Bible — Can We Trust It? JAMES EMERY WHITE RICHARD L

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bible — Can We Trust It? JAMES EMERY WHITE RICHARD L CContentsontents Fall 2008/ Volume 13/ Number 4 54 Pentecostal Ministry in a Relativistic Culture MICHAEL J. BEALS Active churches that are alive in the Spirit provide a vibrant, stable refuge for those longing for a firm and enduring foundation. 62 Overcoming unChristian Branding DAVID KINNAMAN The cold war between Christians and outsiders is likely to deepen unless Christians take a serious look at their reflection. 26 16 One Size Church Does Not Fit All GEORGE O. WOOD 70 Telling the Story for 21st-century Listeners We need not concern ourselves with churches GRAHAM JOHNSTON that do things differently if people are becoming How to make ancient history become undeniably 62 fruitful disciples of Jesus. good news. 20 Defending Christianity in a 80 Speaking the Truth in Love: The Role of Secular Culture Apologetics in Pastoral Ministry INTERVIEW WITH GEORGE P. WOOD RAVI ZACHARIAS If the church does not offer a convincing Why has the response to skeptical arguments, who will? Judeo-Christian worldview 90 Will the Real Jesus Please Stand Up? become the A Comparison of the Person, Teachings, pariah stepchild and Works of the Jesus in the Canonical of worldviews and Noncanonical Gospels while others W.E. NUNNALLY are respected Does evidence support the popular claims that and reverenced? Jesus is merely a good man but not the divine Son of God? 26 Regaining a Christian Worldview in the Church 100 The Bible — Can We Trust It? JAMES EMERY WHITE RICHARD L. DRESSELHAUS Have Christians offered mere feelings and Why we must move past the translation philanthropy rather than hard thinking applied controversy and defend the Bible in an increasingly to the issues of the day? secular society. 40 Following a Unique Christ in a 112 The Secret: Uncovering the Truth Pluralistic Society About an Old Lie PAUL COPAN ROB STARNER How can pastors and Christian leaders encourage What readers of The Secret get is not those entrusted to their care to handle the newly discovered truth, but a repackaged, pluralistic challenges of our day? long-standing lie. ENRICHMENT (ISSN 1082-1791) is published quarterly (January, April, July, October), ©2008 by The General Council of the Assemblies of God, 1445 N. Boonville Ave., Springfi eld, Missouri 65802. Assemblies of God ministers may reproduce nonbyline material from Enrichment in church publications, giving credit to the journal. Except for brief quotations, signed articles may not be reprinted without permission of the authors. Subscription rates: USA –1 year $24; 2 years $42. Outside USA add $30 per year. Subscriptions: All subscription correspondence, including change of address, should be sent to Enrichment, Customer Services, 1445 N. Boonville Ave., Springfi eld, MO 65802, phone 1-800-641-4310. Periodical postage paid at Springfi eld, Missouri, and at additional mailing offi ces. Printed in the USA. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to: Enrichment, 1445 N. Boonville Ave., Springfi eld, MO 65802. enrichment / Fall 2008 1 100 CContentsontentsFall 2008 EXECUTIVE EDITOR Gary R. Allen 140 REAL LIFE PREACHING MANAGING EDITOR Why Our Preaching Doesn’t Matter to Rick Knoth the Church ASSOCIATE EDITOR JONATHAN MARTIN Richard Schoonover ASSISTANT EDITOR Kevin Wilson MANAGING YOUR MINISTRY 142 ADVERTISING/PROMOTIONS Organizational Development and COORDINATOR the Church Steve Lopez Part Four: Change Leadership in the Church OFFICE COORDINATOR JOHN MICHAEL DE MARCO Connie Cross GRAPHICS/DESIGN Design Services ORIGINAL WISDOM 6 e sshortshorts 146 PREPARED UNDER THE George Floyd Taylor (1881–1934) DIRECTION OF THE “Understanding the Spirit’s Work EXECUTIVE PRESBYTERY ej News & Trends 14 and Witness” George O. Wood (general superinten- DOUGLAS JACOBSEN dent), C. Dan Betzer, L. John Bueno, 120 ej Online Warren D. Bullock, Douglas E. Clay, Richard L. Dresselhaus, Douglas E. Fulenwider, L. Alton Garrison, J. Don George, Nam Soo Kim, John E. Maracle, Jesse Miranda, Jr., John EDITORIALS DDEEPAARTMENTSRTMENTS M. Palmer, H. Robert Rhoden, Zollie L. Smith, Jr., Clarence St. John MINISTRY MATTERS Sermon Seeds ADVERTISING 5 150 Proclaiming Truth For information on print or online GARY R. ALLEN Book Reviews advertising, call Steve Lopez at 152 417-862-2781, ext. 4097; go to enrichment journal.ag.org (click on 160 IN CLOSING 154 News & Resources Advertise); or E-mail [email protected]. Proclaiming Truth Today ADVERTISING POLICY RICHARD L. SCHOONOVER 157 Marketplace Enrichment does not endorse any advertiser or product. Claims made With Christ in an advertisement are the sole 158 responsibility of the advertiser. Enrichment reserves the right to CCOLUMNSOLUMNS Advertising Index reject any advertisement that is 159 inconsistent with the journal’s objectives, editorial convictions, and THEOLOGICAL ENRICHMENT Assemblies of God doctrine. 122 Challenges to Does the Bible Teach Eternal Security? Next time in happy, loving E-MAIL: W.E. NUNNALLY marriage [email protected] and family WEB SITE: THE GREATEST CHALLENGES OF PASTORAL CARE relationships www.enrichmentjournal.ag.org 130 Your Marriage and Family are not just Helping People Who Struggle for the people Member of With Addictions who sit in the pew. They also affect the lives of those who stand behind Evangelical LARRY E. HAZELBAKER the pulpit. If your ministry marriage is broken or semi-broken, you Press Association are in great company. Some of the most successful ministers in North America have terrible marriages. Instead of model marriages reflecting Member of MINISTRY AND MEDICAL ETHICS well on Christ, ministry marriages are fighting for survival. Families International 134 Pentecostal Neuroethics: Moral Implications of pictured inside front covers of church directories or displayed as staff in brochures appear happy and healthy. Off of the brochure and back Press Association Meddling with the Mind in the bedroom this is seldom reality. Clergy families are not always as • All Scripture quotations, unless CHRISTINA M.H. POWELL they appear. They are in trouble. otherwise indicated, are taken This issue of Enrichment journal is filled with insightful and from the HOLY BIBLE. NEW INTER- compelling articles and interviews that communicate practical ways Q&A FOR MINISTRY WIVES NATIONAL VERSION®. Copyright© 138 to fireproof your marriage and family relationships. Read stirring I Disagree With My Husband 1973, 1978, 1984 by International articles by Henry Cloud, Don and Jodi Detrick, H.B. London, Gary Oliver, Bible Society. Used by permission GABRIELE RIENAS Dennis Rainey, Dale Wolery, George O. Wood, and others. of Zondervan. All rights reserved. 2 enrichment / Fall 2008 MMinistryinistry MMattersatters / GARY R. ALLEN PProclaimingroclaiming TTruthruth Defi ning Truth Proclaiming Truth The beliefs of our current culture affect how we It is one thing to preach the Word of God to people share the gospel. In the past much of the American who already value biblical truth. Today, however, culture was rooted in Judeo-Christian values. pastors and their congregations meet people These values were the hooks on which people who have little or no knowledge of biblical truth could more easily hang the principles of God’s and values. Their initial exposure to the gospel Word. Today, for the most part, these hooks are is countercultural to their beliefs and lifestyle. gone, and we have few societal moorings with In fact, the gospel is usually offensive to them. which to initially connect a person to our message. Our leverage against their defensive mind and The beliefs that have removed these valuable sinful behavior is the presence and power of hooks include: relativism, compartmentalization, Christ through the Holy Spirit. The Spirit of God pragmatism, and tolerance. draws people to the truth, convicts them of their Relativism states that no absolutes transcend sin, and reveals Jesus as the Answer to their help- culture and time. Relativists believe truth changes lessness and hopelessness. We are to proclaim over time. Truth is not defined by an infallible the Word, but only the Spirit of God can reveal God, but by a person, culture, and community. it to a hardened heart and defiant mind. Compartmentalization results when everyone decides on his own what is right and wrong. People Living the Truth establish their own set of ethics for each compart- Truth for the follower of Christ is more than an ment of their lives. This facilitates living with intellectual assent; it is a lifestyle. Our passion blatant contradictions between one’s persona for the person and presence of Jesus compels us and one’s private life. to live in the truth. Before people will listen to Pragmatism teaches that truth is whatever works our message, they expect to see: for you. Adherents no longer base truth on the timeless principles of God’s Word, but on what Transparency feels right at the time. We are to live so people can see who we really Tolerance is the one value embraced by a world- are. What they see must be what they get. But view that rejects absolute truth. Everyone’s beliefs, even more than seeing into us, they must also values, lifestyle, and perception of truth claims see through us, and see Christ living in us. are equal. There is no hierarchy of truth. Your beliefs and my beliefs are equal; all truth is relative. Authenticity Christianity stakes a claim to absolute truth “Walking the walk and talking the talk” is — from the inerrancy of Scripture to Jesus being essential to being an effective leader. Even when the Way, the Truth, and the Life. Those outside someone does not initially agree with your the Kingdom, however, view the Great Commis- perception of truth, he will observe whether or sion as intolerant because it implies that another not you live what you proclaim. person’s beliefs are inferior to ours.1 The “men of Issachar … understood the times and knew what Israel should do” (1 Chronicles The Cheese Keeps Moving 12:32). God is on your side. He is present to help In the book, Who Moved My Cheese?, by Spencer you discern your environment, reaffirm your Johnson, one of the mice observes, “Change calling, and empower you with His Holy Spirit.
Recommended publications
  • On God's Existence
    Scholars Crossing SOR Faculty Publications and Presentations Summer 2001 On God's Existence W. David Beck Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/sor_fac_pubs Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Comparative Methodologies and Theories Commons, Epistemology Commons, Esthetics Commons, Ethics in Religion Commons, History of Philosophy Commons, History of Religions of Eastern Origins Commons, History of Religions of Western Origin Commons, Other Philosophy Commons, Other Religion Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Beck, W. David, "On God's Existence" (2001). SOR Faculty Publications and Presentations. 167. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/sor_fac_pubs/167 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in SOR Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. W. DAVID BECK 49 compared to the energy involved in the entire act of, say, raising one's hand to vote. When an engineer throws a switch to release the water behind Hoover Dam, the vast amount of potential energy unleashed by the moving water is overwhelmingly greater than that involved in the engineer throwing the switch. It may be the same with libeliarian acts. Perhaps the energy released in the exercise of active power is miniscule compared to the poten­ tial energy released in the body as part of the relevant causal pathway. I just don't lmow. Second, even if one opts for this second option (the release of energy is virtually undetectable), it doesn't follow that the resulting gap would not be detectable, since the effects of a libertarian act could still be quite different in a "gappy" way from what would have followed in the absence of that act.
    [Show full text]
  • Morality and Meaning Without God: Another Failed Attempt
    1 Morality and Meaning Without God: Another Failed Attempt A Review Essay on Atheism, Morality, and Meaning Published in Philosophia Christi New Series 6/2 (2004): 295-304. Posted by permission. PAUL COPAN PHILOSOPHY AND ETHICS PALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY Utilizing new material and old, Michael Martin (professor emeritus at Boston University) has written a stimulating four-part book, Atheism, Morality, and Meaning.1 Martin covers a good deal of territory to make his case for an objective ethic rooted in naturalism and to undercut the theistic/religious basis for objective morality. In the first part of this essay, I set forth the salient features of Martin’s book, and in the second part I offer a response. I. Presenting Martin’s Case Part I seeks to develop and defend a nonreligious foundation of morality. After a brief introduction (chapter 1), Martin tackles objections to morality without religion (chapter 2). He looks at arguments from motivation, derivation, materialism and naturalism. In the first instance, he claims that atheists do have sufficient motivation for being moral or having high moral standards. (To buttress his point, he asks: If the US is so much more religious than Western Europe, why does the US have a higher crime rate?) The argument from derivation is that “theists might argue that objective morality can only be derived from belief in God” (34). In his argument from materialism and naturalism, he rejects that atheists are committed to materialism (he favors a supervenience model of moral properties: “morally wrong” is constituted by physical properties but is not reduced to them [42]): “Religious apologists give no well-articulated argument to support their view that materialism is incompatible with objective morality” (42).
    [Show full text]
  • Amazing Faith Proclaiming Christ's Victory
    Wilfredo De Jesús: Amazing Faith SUMMER 2013 Enriching and equipping Spirit-filled ministers The battle of ideas, concepts, and thoughts 66 Proclaiming Christ’s victory over sinful, personal desires 72 Demonization and the Christian life 86 CHRIST’S VICTORY OVER THE WORLD, THE FLESH, AND THE DEVIL ej.ag.org/summer2013 Ad Ad InsideEnrichment Volume 18 / Number 3 Summer 2013 20 MAnAG i n G tH e MAyH e M o f M i n i stry Features sticks and stones 34 Hand to the plow and … Words can By CarA DAvis Hurt You His message and his humble spirit may be at By Cal leMOn the core of why Pastor Choco finds himself in How we handle and the media’s spotlight. respond to criticism can 16 38 Q&A for Ministry Wives be the worst and Hiring Family Members: High-Maintenance best indicator of our Risk Or reward? Boundaries spirituality. By cAl cARPEnTEr and WARREn D. BULLOcK To negotiate the prickly issue of nepotism By GabriElE riEnAs 22 STAyi n G C o n n e CTE D with wisdom and grace, here are some obser- The overly needy church vations to consider. woman is a difficulty Why You can’t many pastors’ wives face. Overlook social 42 improving Your interest rate: Media As a The irresistible power of a 18 LeAD Lo n G … LeAD str o n G Ministry Tool Great Question Wax On … Wax Off: By JusTin LathrOp By RoberT c. crOsby A Word to Young Social media is the primary Among the essential skills of effective pastors leaders Who Feel form of communication for and leaders is the ability to turn a good ques- They Are Being Held a generation who needs tion into a great one.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert C. Koons
    ROBERT C. KOONS ADDRESSES Department of Philosophy 1, University Station C3500 University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas 78712-3500 (512) 471-5530 [email protected] EDUCATION 1979 B.A., Philosophy, Michigan State University, Summa cum laude 1981 B.A., Philosophy and Theology, Oxford University First Class Honours 1987 Ph.D., Philosophy, UCLA AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION Metaphysics and Epistemology Philosophical Logic Philosophy of Religion PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Sept. 1, 2000 Professor, University of Texas at Austin 1993-2000 Associate Professor, University of Texas at Austin 1987-1993 Assistant Professor, University of Texas at Austin HONORS Visiting Scholar, Nanjing University, April/May 2007 Philosopher-in-Residence, Valparaiso University, Spring 2001 Gustave O. Arlt Award (Council of Graduate Schools) 1992 Carnap Prize (UCLA) 1987 Richard M. Weaver Fellow, 1985-87 Danforth Fellow, l979-85 Dillistone Scholar (Oriel College, Oxford), l980 Marshall Scholar, l979-1981 ROBERT C. KOONS PAGE 2 RESEARCH GRANTS National Science Foundation, Division of Information, Robotics and Intelligent Systems, "The Logic and Representation of Properties and Propositions for Computer Natural Language Processing," with Kamp, Bonevac, Asher, and C. Smith, 1988-1989. National Research Council Travel Grant for Attendance of the Ninth International Congress on Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Uppsala, Sweden, 1991. Faculty Research Assignment, "The Logic of Causation and Teleological Function," Spring 1997. Visiting Scholar, Institute for Advanced
    [Show full text]
  • Inspiration and Interpretation / Seven Sermons Preached Before The
    Table of Contents Inspiration and Interpretation: PREFACE. FOOTNOTES: CONTENTS. PRELIMINARY REMARKS FOOTNOTES: Seven Sermons. SERMON I.[243] FOOTNOTES: SERMON II.[271] FOOTNOTES: SERMON III.[330] FOOTNOTES: SERMON IV.[390] SUPPLEMENT TO SERMON IV FOOTNOTES: SERMON V.[436] FOOTNOTES: SERMON VI.[526] FOOTNOTES: SERMON VII.[589] FOOTNOTES: APPENDIX A. FOOTNOTE: APPENDIX B. APPENDIX C. APPENDIX D. (p. 72.) FOOTNOTES: APPENDIX E. APPENDIX F. FOOTNOTE: APPENDIX G. APPENDIX H. APPENDIX I. APPENDIX J. APPENDIX K. APPENDIX L. Transcriber's notes: The Project Gutenberg EBook of Inspiration and Interpretation, by John Burgon This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org Title: Inspiration and Interpretation Seven Sermons Preached Before the University of Oxford Author: John Burgon Release Date: January 26, 2010 [EBook #31090] Language: English *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK INSPIRATION AND INTERPRETATION *** Produced by Colin Bell, Daniel J. Mount, Dave Morgan and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net Inspiration and Interpretation: SEVEN SERMONS PREACHED BEFORE THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD: WITH PRELIMINARY REMARKS: BEING AN ANSWER TO A VOLUME ENTITLED "Essays and Reviews." BY THE REV. JOHN WILLIAM BURGON, M.A., FELLOW OF ORIEL COLLEGE, AND SELECT PREACHER. I CANNOT HOLD MY PEACE, BECAUSE THOU HAST HEARD, O MY SOUL, THE SOUND OF THE TRUMPET, THE ALARM OF WAR. Oxford & London: J. H. AND JAS. PARKER. 1861. Printed by Messrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Textual Criticism Drawn from De Wells of Infidelity
    Textual Criticism drawn from de Wells of Infidelity Republished November 4, 2009 (updated May 19, 2002; first published April 16, 1999) (David Cloud, Fundamental Baptist Information Service, P.O. Box 610368, Port Huron, MI 48061, 866- 295-4143, [email protected]). >>> http://www.wayoflife.org/database/wellsofinfidelity.html <<< Through diligent and long research into the subject of Bible texts and versions, I have come to the conviction that modern textual criticism is infidelity. Most of the men who developed the theories of textual criticism in an attempt to overthrow that “tyrannous” Received Text (as some of them called it), were rationalists who denied the supernatural inspiration of Holy Scripture. Men like the Baptist A.T. Robertson and Presbyterian B.B. Warfield (left) did not develop textual criticism, but merely rehashed and passed along that which they received from the rationalistic fathers in this field. The vast majority of the men who have written the influential works on textual criticism in the 19th and 20th centuries are rationalists. The Presbyterian leader Robert Dabney, who stood against theological modernism in the 1800s in America, warned that the evangelicals of his day had adop- ted textual criticism “from the mint of infidel rationalism.” The same is true today. The vast majori- ty of the textual critics are Modernists or New Evangelicals at best (Fuller Theological Seminary, etc.) Some Bible-believing fundamentalists have adopted textual criticism, but they did not create it. A wide variety of Bible-believing men from the past two centuries have made the same observation. Let me give some examples.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Only One Religion Be True?
    Contributors Paul Copan (Ph.D., Marquette University) is the Pledger Family Chair of Philosophy and Ethics at Palm Beach Atlantic University in West Palm Beach, Florida. He is the author of several books, including Loving Wisdom: (Chalice, 2007) and “ Christian Philosophy of Religion True for You, but Not for ” (Bethany House, 2007), and he is coauthor of Me Creation out of Nothing: A (Baker Academic, 2004). He has Biblical, Philosophical, and Scientific Exploration coedited a number of books, including (Routledge, The Rationality of Theism 2003), (Routledge, 2012), The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Religion and (Blackwell, 2007). Philosophy of Religion: Classic and Contemporary Issues In addition, he has written many articles in professional philosophical and theological journals. He has served as president of the Evangelical Philosophical Society, and he lives with his wife, Jacqueline, and their six children in West Palm Beach. Paul Rhodes Eddy (Ph.D., Marquette University) is Professor of Biblical and Theological Studies at Bethel University in St. Paul, Minnesota, and Teaching Pastor at Woodland Hills Church in St. Paul. He has authored, coauthored and coedited several books, including John Hick’s Pluralist Philosophy (Ashgate, 2002), of World Religions The Jesus Legend: A Case for the Historical (Baker, 2007), Reliability of the Synoptic Jesus Tradition The Historical Jesus: (InterVarsity, 2009), Five Views Across the Spectrum: Understanding Issues in (Baker, 2009), and (InterVarsity, Evangelical Theology Justification: Five Views 2011). He has also authored a number of articles and essays related to the theology of religions and the historical study of Jesus. Millard J. Erickson (Ph.D., Northwestern University) has taught at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, Western Seminary (Portland and San Jose), and Truett Seminary, Baylor University.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Ethics Needs
    “Ethics Needs God.” Paul Copan In Debating Christian Theism. Edited by J.P. Moreland, Chad V. Meister, and Khaldoun Sweis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Pages 85-100. A MORAL ARGUMENT 7 Ethics Needs God Paul Copan Let me briefly clarify what I do and do not defend in this chapter. My argument will not advance the following points: Objective moral values exist. Both sides here represented assume this.1 Belief in God is required for recognizing moral truths. Properly functioning naturalists, Buddhists, Confucians, and theists know the right thing to do. Atheists/nontheists cannot live decently or be kind to others. Indeed, some may exhibit greater moral virtue than some professing theists. Atheists/nontheists cannot formulate ethical systems that overlap or mesh with theologically oriented ones. Certain Old Testament practices, actions, or regulations are historically and contextually confined and should not be taken as normative and universal. Frequently critiques of theism include inferior moral practices, laws, and actions in the Old Testament—and fall prey to many misunderstandings and misrepresentations. I thoroughly address this topic elsewhere.2 What I am arguing is this: Theism offers a far more likely context than naturalism/nontheism for affirming objective moral values and duties. Naturalism does not lead us to expect the emergence of human rights and universal benevolence—a point equally applicable to other nontheistic worldviews. Many naturalists themselves observe that naturalism’s context simply cannot lead us to human rights/dignity and moral duties. Theism offers a more plausible context than atheism/nontheism for affirming a cluster of features related to human dignity and moral duties.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Yahweh a Moral Monster? the New Atheists and Old Testament Ethics
    PHILOSOPHIA CHRISTI VOL. 10, NO. 1 © 2008 Is Yahweh a Moral Monster? The New Atheists and Old Testament Ethics PAUL COPAN Philosophy and Ethics Palm Beach Atlantic University Palm Beach, Florida The New Atheists and the Old Testament: A Brief Overview Today’s “new atheists” are not at all impressed with the moral creden- tials of the Old Testament (OT) God. Oxonian Richard Dawkins thinks that Yahweh is truly a moral monster: “What makes my jaw drop is that people today should base their lives on such an appalling role model as Yahweh— and even worse, that they should bossily try to force the same evil monster (whether fact or fiction) on the rest of us.” Dawkins deems God’s commanding Abraham to sacrifice Isaac to be “disgraceful” and tantamount to “child abuse and bullying.” Moreover, this God breaks into a “monumental rage whenever his chosen people flirted with a rival god,” resembling “nothing so much as sexual jealousy of the worst kind.” Add to this the killing of the Canaanites—an “ethnic cleansing” in which “bloodthirsty massacres” were carried out with “xenophobic relish.” Joshua’s destruction of Jericho is “morally indistinguishable from Hitler’s invasion of Poland, or Saddam Hussein’s massacres of the Kurds and the Marsh Arabs.” ABSTRACT: The new atheists (Dawkins, Dennett, Harris, Hitchens) level arguments against Old Testament morality as primitive and barbaric, presumably undercutting belief in the biblical God (Yahweh). Yet the Old Testament presents creational moral ideals in Genesis –. Because of Israel’s embeddedness in the ancient Near East’s harsh, morally-problematic social milieu, Old Testament legislation is in places still morally inferior, though offering dramatic, incre- mental improvements upon such conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Why We Hold to the King James Bible) Is Also Contained in a Course Designed for Use in Forums Such As Bible Colleges, Sunday Schools, and Home Schooling
    Copyright 2006 by David W. Cloud Updated November 14, 2008 ISBN 1-58318-104-0 This material cannot be placed on BBS or Internet Web sites Published by Way of Life Literature P.O. Box 610368, Port Huron, MI 48061 866-295-4143 (toll free) [email protected] (e-mail) http://www.wayoflife.org (web site) Canada: Bethel Baptist Church, 4212 Campbell St. N., London, Ont. N6P1A6 519-652-2619 (voice) 519-652-0056 (fax) [email protected] (e-mail) Printed in Canada by Bethel Baptist Print Ministry 2 ADVERTISEMENT FOR ADVANCED BIBLE STUDIES COURSE ON “THE BIBLE VERSION ISSUE” The information in this book (Why We Hold to the King James Bible) is also contained in a course designed for use in forums such as Bible Colleges, Sunday Schools, and Home Schooling. The course is one of the Way of Life Advanced Bible Studies Series and is entitled “The Bible Version Issue.” The material is laid out in outline form to simplify teaching. The Bible Version Issue course includes review questions after each section for the students, plus there is a separate book for teachers containing sectional and final tests with the answers. The review questions and tests are carefully designed to draw the student’s attention to the most important points and to help him remember these points long after the course is finished. The sectional review questions go over all of the important points in the section, while the sectional tests draw from the most important of the review questions and the final test draws from the most important points of the sectional tests.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Byron Stewart Addresses
    ROBERT BYRON STEWART ADDRESSES: Office: 3939 Gentilly Blvd. Home: 4325 Seminary Place New Orleans, LA 70126 New Orleans, LA 70126 (504) 816-8100 X3245 (504) 491-7213 (Cell) [email protected] Current Position New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary, 3939 Gentilly Boulevard, New Orleans, LA 70126 Professor of Philosophy and Theology, March 2011-present Chair: Greer-Heard Chair of Faith and Culture, March 2004-present Director: Greer-Heard Point-Counterpoint Forum in Faith and Culture, March 2004- present Director: Institute for Christian Apologetics (NOBTS), March 2008-present Associate Professor of Philosophy and Theology, June 2005-March 2011 Assistant Professor of Philosophy and Theology, June 2000-June 2005 Instructor in Philosophy and Theology, June 1998-June 2000 (elected to faculty June 1998) New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary Courses Taught: PhD Seminars: The Historical Jesus; The Doctrine of God; Theology of Religions; Contemporary Issues in Theology: Atheism and Relativism; Philosophical Hermeneutics; The Person of Christ; Christology in the Early Church PhD Reading Colloquia: Philosophical Theology, Systematic Theology, Historical Theology, MDIV Courses: Introduction to Philosophy of Religion; Christian Apologetics; Systematic Theology I; Systematic Theology II; Theology of Cults; The Problem of Evil; Philosophical Theology; Epistemology; Contemporary Philosophical Hermeneutics; The Historical Jesus; Theology of C.S. Lewis; Advanced Christian Apologetics: History and Method; Logic; Reformation and Modern Theology: Atheism
    [Show full text]
  • AN ESSAY on DIVINE COMMAND ETHICS a Dissertation by JEREMY
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Texas A&amp;M Repository AN ESSAY ON DIVINE COMMAND ETHICS A Dissertation by JEREMY ALAN EVANS Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2007 Major Subject: Philosophy AN ESSAY ON DIVINE COMMAND ETHICS A Dissertation by JEREMY ALAN EVANS Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Hugh J. McCann Committee Members, Scott Austin James Aune C.E. Harris Head of Department, Robin Smith August 2007 Major Subject: Philosophy iii ABSTRACT An Essay on Divine Command Ethics. (August 2007) Jeremy Alan Evans, B.A., Texas A&M University; M.Div., Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Hugh J. McCann Twentieth-century analytic philosophy ushered in a renewed interest in an ethical theory known as the Divine Command Theory of ethics (DC). Consequent to the work of G.E. Moore, philosophers have been involved in metaethics, or how we may ground ethical terms such as “good” and “right”. The traditional DC response is to argue that God is the source of good, and best serves that role in that He is an “ideal observer” of all states of affairs. The question is how is God’s will relevant to determining the moral status of actions? At this point one may distinguish between what God wills and what God in fact commands.
    [Show full text]