DOCSLIB.ORG

Spawning Herring Surveys in the Bering Sea and Finfish Resource Surveys in Norton Sound and Kotzebue Sound

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Volume 2 Principal Investigators' Reports July-September 1976 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration VOLUME 1. MARINE MAMMALS, MARINE BIRDS VOLUME 2. FISH, PLANKTON, BENTHOS, LITTORAL VOLUME 3, EFFECTS, CHEMISTRY AND MICROBIOLOGY, PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY VOLUME 4, GEOLOGY, ICE, DATA MANAGEMENT Environmental Assessment of the Alaskan Continental Shelf July - Sept 1976 quarterly reports from Principal Investigators participating in a multi-year program of environmental assessment related to petroleum development on the Alaskan Continental Shelf. The program is directed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under the sponsorship of the Bureau of Land Management. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORIES Boulder, Colorado November 1976 VOLUME 2 FISH, PLANKTON, BENTHOS, LITTORAL iii FISH, PLANKTON, BENTHOS, LITTORAL Research Unit Proposer Title Page 5/303 H. M. Feder The Distribution, Abundance, Diver- 1 IMS/U. of Alaska sity and Productivity of Benthic Organisms in the Bering Sea 6 A. G. Carey The Distribution, Abundance, Diver- 6 Oregon State U. sity and Productivity of the Western Beaufort Sea Benthos 7 A. G. Carey Summarization of Existing Litera- 39 Oregon State U. ture and Unpublished Data on the Distribution, Abundance, and Life Histories of Benthic Organisms 19/ Louis H. Barton Spawning Herring Surveys in the Bering 41 19E ADF&G Sea and Finfish Resource Surveys in Norton Sound and Kotzebue Sound 19E James E. Blackburn Pelagic and Demersal Fish Assessment 103 ADF&G in the Lower Cook Inlet Estuary System 24 Rod Kaiser Razor Clam (Siliqua patula, Dixon) 114 ADF&G Distribution and Population Assess- ment Study 27 Loren B. Flagg Kenai Peninsula Study of Littoral 163 ADF&G Zone 58 G. C. Anderson A Description and Numerical 165 Ronald K. Lam Analysis of the Factors Affecting Beatrice Booth the Processes of Production in the Dept. of Ocean. Gulf of Alaska U. of Wash. 64/ W. T. Pereyra Resources of Non-Salmonid Pelagic 173 354 M. 0. Nelson Fish of the Eastern Bering Sea and NMFS/NWFC Gulf of Alaska 78/ S. T. Zimmerman Baseline/Reconnaissance Characterization, 252 79 T. R. Merrell Littoral Biota, Gulf of Alaska and Bering NMFS/Auke Bay Sea Fisheries Lab. v FISH, PLANKTON, BENTHOS, LITTORAL Research Unit Proposer Title Page 156/ T. S. English (a) Plankton of the Gulf of Alaska- 269 164 Dept. of Ocean. Ichthyoplankton U. of Wash. D. M. Damkaer (b) Initial Zooplankton Investiga- 304 PMEL tions in Lower Cook Inlet J. D. Larrance (c) Phytoplankton and Primary Pro- 315 PMEL ductivity in the Northeast Gulf of Alaska R. T. Cooney (d) Zooplankton and Micronekton in the 345 IMS/U. of Alaska Bering-Chukchi/Beaufort Seas Vera Alexander (e) Phytoplankton Studies in the Bering 349 IMS/U. of Alaska Sea 174 L. Ronholt Baseline Studies of Demersal 353 NMFS/NWFC Resources of the Northern Gulf of Alaska Shelf and Slope: An Historical Review 175 W. T. Pereyra Baseline Studies of Fish and Shell- 355 Robert J. Wolotira fish Resources of Norton Sound and NWFS/NMFC the Southeastern Chukchi Sea 233 Terrence N. Bendock Beaufort Sea Estuarine Fishery 360 ADF&G Study 281 H. M. Feder The Distribution, Abundance, Diver- 363 IMS/U. of Alaska sity and Productivity of Benthic Organisms in the Gulf of Alaska 282/ H. M. Feder Summarization of Existing Litera- 415 301 IMS/U. of Alaska ture and Unpublished Data on the Distribution, Abundance and Pro- ductivity of Benthic Organisms of the Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea 284 Ronald Smith Food and Feeding Relationships in 418 IMS/U. of Alaska the Benthic and Demersal Fishes of the Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea 285 J. E. Morrow Preparation of Illustrated Keys to 426 Dept. of Biology Otoliths of Forage Fishes U. of Alaska 318 J. E. Morrow Preparation of Illustrated Keys to 429 Dept. of Biological Otoliths of Forage Fishes Sci. U. of Alaska vi FISH, PLANKTON, BENTHOS, LITTORAL Research Unit Proposer Title Page 348 J. E. Morrow Literature Search on Density 432 Dept. of Biology Distribution of Fishes of the U. of Alaska Beaufort Sea 349 T. S. English Alaska Marine Ichthyoplankton Key 435 Dept. of Ocean. Univ. of Wash. 356 A. C. Broad Reconnaisance Characterization of 437 Western Wash. Littoral Biota, Beaufort and Chukchi State Col. Seas 359 T. S. English Beaufort Sea Plankton Studies 457 Rita A. Horner Dept. of Ocean. U. of Wash. 380 Felix Favorite Ichthyoplankton of the Eastern Bering 483 Kenneth Waldron Sea NMFS/NWFC 485 Colin K. Harris Assessment of Pelagic and Nearshore 487 Allan C. Hartt Fish in Three Bays on Southeast Kodiak U. of Washington Island 486 James E. Blackburn Demersal Fish and Shellfish Assess- 511 ADF&G ment in Selected Estuary Systems of Kodiak Island 502 Howard M. Feder Technical Trawl Survey of the Benthic 521 IMS/U. of Alaska Epifauna of the Chukchi Sea and Norton Sound 517 Howard M. Feder The Distribution, Abundance and Diver- 527 IMS/U. of Alaska sity of the Epifaunal Benthic Organ- isms in Two (Alitak and Ugak) Bays of Kodiak Island, Alaska vii Quarterly Report Contract #03-5-022-56 Research Unit #5/303 Reporting Period 7/1 - 9/30/76 Number of Pages 4 THE DISTRIBUTION, ABUNDANCE, DIVERSITY AND PRODUCTIVITY OF BENTHIC ORGANISMS IN THE BERING SEA Dr. Howard M. Feder Professor of Marine Science Institute of Marine Science University of Alaska Fairbanks, Alaska 99701 October 1, 1976 QUARTERLY REPORT I. Task Objectives A. Qualitative and quantitative census of dominant species within oil lease sites. B. Description of 'seasonal and spatial distribution patterns, with emphasis on assessing patchiness and correleation with micro- habitat. C. Comparison of species distribution with physical, chemical and geological factors. D. Observations of biological interrelationships in benthic biota of the study area. II. Field and Laboratory Activities A. No cruise was scheduled during the last quarter. B. A continuation of the analysis of grab and trawl samples taken in the past year is in progress at the Marine Sorting Center and the bio- logical laboratory of the Institute of Marine Science. All data is being keypunched as it becomes available. Refinement of computer programs developed for the Gulf of Alaska studies is in progress. The methods used in Cluster Analysis are outlined in the Annual Report for the Gulf of Alaska (Feder, et al., 1976, The Distribution, Abundance, Diversity and Productivity of Benthic Organisms in the Bering Sea). GRAB PROGRAM III. Results 1. A selected set of stations from the cruise of the R/V Discoverer in 1975 have been processed by the Marine Sorting Center. This data has been keypunched, and analysis, inclusive of cluster analysis, will take place when 60 selected stations on the MB grid have been completely processed. 2. A series of stations have been given to the Marine Sorting Center for processing in the coming quarter: MB Station Number of replicates 1 5 2 3 3 5 4 3 6 5 8 5 10 5 11 5 12 5 19 5 2 20 5 23 5 24 5 25 2 27 5 28 5 35 5 38 5 39 5 43 5 42 5 59 4 3. Refinement of computer programs used in the Gulf of Alaska benthic investigation has progressed. One set of the Clustering Programs has been modified to accept the increased number of stations involved in the grid in the Bering Sea. 4. All grab programs have been modified to accept the 12-digit species code decided upon by the Marine Sorting Center and NOAA. IV. Preliminary Interpretation of Results No preliminary interpretations are currently available. It is anticipated that an additional 10 stations will be given to the Sorting Center for processing in the coming quarter. It is currently projected that numerical analysis will be initiated by December 1976. Coordination between the Gulf of Alaska and the Bering Sea projects has been initiated to facilitate programming compatability. V. Problems Encountered The nature of the substrate in many of the stations sampled in the Bering Sea is such that considerable time is needed to process each replicate for each station. Thus, the cost per sample in the Bering Sea is considerably higher than originally anticipated. A careful selection of stations to be processed has been made, and these stations are double checked as they are completed to avoid processing of any extra samples. The end result of this unexpected problem is a much slower completion rate of samples in the Bering Sea as compared to the Gulf of Alaska. In addition, a reduced grid of stations will be processed as compared to the extensive coverage originally anticipated. It is anticipated that a continuing problem in the sorting of materials will ensue; thus, it is probable that a full second-year coverage will not be possible. Instead, only a very limited number of selected stations will be processed for comparison over a wide area on the Bering Sea grid. TRAWL PROGRAM III. Results Benthic invertebrates obtained on Leg I 1976 have been processed. Verification of specimens from Legs II and III will follow. 3 IV. Preliminary Interpretation of Results No new interpretations at present. V. Problems Encountered No problems. OCS COORDINATION OFFICE University of Alaska ENVIRONMENTAL DATA SUBMISSION SCHEDULE DATE: September 30, 1976 CONTRACT NUMBER: 03-5-022-56 T/O NUMBER: 15 R.U. NUMBER: 5/303 PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Dr. H. M. Feder Submission dates are estimated only and will be updated, if necessary, each quarter. Data batches refer to data as ident- ified in the data management plan. Cruise/Field Operation Collection Dates Estimated Submission Dates From To Batch 1 2 Discoverer Leg I #808 5/15/75 5/30/75 * None Discoverer Leg II #808 6/2/75 6/19/75 * None Miller Freeman 8/16/75 10/20/75 * Miller Freeman 3/76 6/76 (a) (a) Note: 1 Data Management Plan and Data Format have been approved and are considered contractual.
Recommended publications
  • Pacific Herring

    Pacific Herring

    THE MULTITUDINOUS PACIFIC HERRING by D. N. OUTRAM FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA BIOLOGICAL STATION, NANAIMO, B. C. CIRCULAR NO. 6 3^*u DECEMBER, 1961 COVER PHOTOGRAPH: A mountain of herring covers the storage bin area of the reduction plant at Imperial Cannery, Steveston, B„ C„, awaiting processing into fish meal and oil. Photographs by Mr. C. Morley. THE MULTITUDINOUS PACIFIC HERRING . Vast Shoals of Protein-Rich Herring Rove the Temperate Coastal Waters Along Canada's Western Seabord N V By Donald N, Outram y ^v- _•• HISTORICAL BACKGROUND annually. While this fishery is. Fabulous numbers of herring first in landed weight and second (Fig. l) are found along the sea- to salmon in landed value, it is washed shores of Canada's most wes only worth about one-quarter as much terly province, Their migrations, as the salmon catch. their sudden abundance and their Fluctuations in the world price straggle to survive is an exciting of fish meal and oil cause the market study. Undoubtedly, herring were one value at about ten million dollars to of the first coastal fishes to be vary from year to year, utilized by man. In northern Europe, FISHING FOR HERRING particularly, they have been a source The British Columbia herring of food since before written history. fishery is a highly organized opera Herring and herring roe have been an tion utilizing modern shore plants and article of food or barter of the efficient fishing vessels . The seventy- coastal Indian tribes of British Col to eighty-foot long seine boats are umbia for ma.ny centuries, They were equipped with the very latest electronic not fished, however, on a commercial fish-detecting equipment, enabling the basis until 1877 when 75 tons were fishermen to "see" the shoals before caught.
  • Bristol Bay, Alaska

    Bristol Bay, Alaska

    EPA 910-R-14-001C | January 2014 An Assessment of Potential Mining Impacts on Salmon Ecosystems of Bristol Bay, Alaska Volume 3 – Appendices E-J Region 10, Seattle, WA www.epa.gov/bristolbay EPA 910-R-14-001C January 2014 AN ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL MINING IMPACTS ON SALMON ECOSYSTEMS OF BRISTOL BAY, ALASKA VOLUME 3—APPENDICES E-J U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 Seattle, WA CONTENTS VOLUME 1 An Assessment of Potential Mining Impacts on Salmon Ecosystems of Bristol Bay, Alaska VOLUME 2 APPENDIX A: Fishery Resources of the Bristol Bay Region APPENDIX B: Non-Salmon Freshwater Fishes of the Nushagak and Kvichak River Drainages APPENDIX C: Wildlife Resources of the Nushagak and Kvichak River Watersheds, Alaska APPENDIX D: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Characterization of the Indigenous Cultures of the Nushagak and Kvichak Watersheds, Alaska VOLUME 3 APPENDIX E: Bristol Bay Wild Salmon Ecosystem: Baseline Levels of Economic Activity and Values APPENDIX F: Biological Characterization: Bristol Bay Marine Estuarine Processes, Fish, and Marine Mammal Assemblages APPENDIX G: Foreseeable Environmental Impact of Potential Road and Pipeline Development on Water Quality and Freshwater Fishery Resources of Bristol Bay, Alaska APPENDIX H: Geologic and Environmental Characteristics of Porphyry Copper Deposits with Emphasis on Potential Future Development in the Bristol Bay Watershed, Alaska APPENDIX I: Conventional Water Quality Mitigation Practices for Mine Design, Construction, Operation, and Closure APPENDIX J: Compensatory Mitigation and Large-Scale Hardrock Mining in the Bristol Bay Watershed AN ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL MINING IMPACTS ON SALMON ECOSYSTEMS OF BRISTOL BAY, ALASKA VOLUME 3—APPENDICES E-J Appendix E: Bristol Bay Wild Salmon Ecosystem: Baseline Levels of Economic Activity and Values Bristol Bay Wild Salmon Ecosystem Baseline Levels of Economic Activity and Values John Duffield Chris Neher David Patterson Bioeconomics, Inc.
  • A Review of Indian Ocean Foa Cardinalfishes (Percomorpha: Apogonidae: Apogonichthyini), with a New Species from Chagos Archipelago and the Maldives

    A Review of Indian Ocean Foa Cardinalfishes (Percomorpha: Apogonidae: Apogonichthyini), with a New Species from Chagos Archipelago and the Maldives

    A review of Indian Ocean Foa cardinalfishes (Percomorpha: Apogonidae: Apogonichthyini), with a new species from Chagos Archipelago and the Maldives THOMAS H. FRASER Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-7800, USA & Mote Marine Laboratory, 1600 Ken Thompson Parkway, Sarasota, FL 34236-1096, USA Email: [email protected] Abstract A new species of cardinalfish,Foa winterbottomi, is described from the Chagos Archipelago and Maldive Islands. It is characterized by a relatively uniform dusky head and body, fewer than 10 pores between the mandibular and articular pores, and a single line of free neuromasts along the dentary. The new species is compared to the two regional congeners: Foa madagascariensis, known from tidal estuaries and shallows of East Africa and the islands of the western Indian Ocean, is characterized by discrete, small, intense dark spots on the body, about 35 pores between the mandibular and articular pores, and multiple linear rows of free neuromasts on the dentary; and Foa fo, a widespread species, has indistinct irregular dark bars on the body, about 30 pores between the mandibular and articular pores, and multiple linear rows of free neuromasts on the dentary. The holotype of Apogonichthys zuluensis is re-examined and the species is considered a junior synonym of Foa fo. Key words: taxonomy, systematics, ichthyology, coral-reef fishes, SAIAB, J.L.B. Smith. Citation: Fraser, T.H. (2020) A review of Indian Ocean Foa cardinalfishes (Percomorpha: Apogonidae: Apogonichthyini), with a new species from Chagos Archipelago and the Maldives. Journal of the Ocean Science Foundation, 35, 18‒29. doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3893961 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5595397D-E89A-4B97-B860-39B8048BC371 Date of publication of this version of record: 15 June 2020 18 Journal of the Ocean Science Foundation, 35, 18–29 (2020) Introduction Species of the genus Foa Jordan & Evermann in Jordan & Seale, 1905 are more numerous than presently documented (see Fraser & Randall 2011, Fraser 2014).
  • IMR/PINRO Nr. 2

    IMR/PINRO Nr. 2

    IMR/PINRO J O 2 S I E N I T 2013 R E R E S P O R T $WODVRIWKH%DUHQWV6HDÀVKHV based on the winter survey Institute of Marine Research - IMR Polar Research Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography - PINRO This report should be cited as: Wienerroither R., Johannesen E., Dolgov A., Byrkjedal I., Aglen A., Bjelland O., Drevetnyak K., Eriksen KB., Høines Å., Langhelle G., Langøy H., Murashko P., Prokhorova T., Prozorkevich D., Smirnov O., Wenneck T. 2013. 2013. Atlas of the Barents Sea Fishes based on the winter survey. IMR-PINRO Joint Report Series 2-2013. ISSN 1502-8828. 220 pp. Atlas of the Barents Sea Fishes based on the winter survey Authors: Rupert Wienerroither, Edda Johannesen, Herdis Langøy, Kirsti Børve Eriksen, Thomas de Lange Wenneck, Åge Høines, Otte Bjelland and Asgeir Aglen IMR Andrey Dolgov, Tatiana Prokhorova, Pavel Murashko, Dmitry Prozorkevich, Konstantin Drevetnyak and Oleg Smirnov PINRO Ingvar Byrkjedal and Gunnar Langhelle University Museum of Bergen Foreword This report is intended as a supplement to the “Atlas of the Barents Sea Fishes” (Wienerroither et al. 2011). The data used in the “Atlas of the Barents Sea Fishes” were gathered on the IMR-PINRO ecosystem survey (2004-2009). The maps presented in this supplement are based on data from February-March 2007-2012 that are gathered on the joint IMR PINRO winter survey. Differences between the two surveys and seasons and how these influence the spatial distributions presented in the maps are described in the introduction. The species descriptions are the same as in and the structure of this report is similar to the “Atlas of the Barents Sea Fishes”.
  • Important Northeast Fish Provides Bait & Forage Needs

    Important Northeast Fish Provides Bait & Forage Needs

    Species Profile: Atlantic Herring Atlantic Herring Clupea harengus Important Northeast Fish Provides Bait & Forage Needs Introduction Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) is a member of the clupeid family, which are typically small, schooling marine fishes, such as menhaden, shad, and sardines. This species is also known as sea herring because it spends its entire life cycle in the ASMFC Management Area: ME - NJ ocean (unlike the anadromous river herring). Atlantic herring inhabits the coastal Common Names: Sea herring, sar- waters of the United States from Cape Hatteras, North Carolina through Labra- dine, herring dor, Canada, and also off the coasts of Europe. Herring form the base of the food web as a forage fish for marine mammals, seabirds, and many fish throughout the Interesting Facts: * Atlantic sea herring are often Mid-Atlantic and Northeast. They are an effective and affordable bait source for confused with river herring. Sea lobster, blue crab, and tuna fishermen, and were historically sold by fish canneries herring spend their entire life at as sardines. Whale watching/ecotourism and salt retailers are indirectly dependent sea, while river herring migrate on a steady supply of herring because whales migrate inshore in pursuit of schooling annually to freshwater to spawn. * Atlantic and Pacific herring have herring and fishermen buy salt to preserve their fish. Overseas, frozen and salted been found to produce a burst herring are a valued commodity. of sound, called a Fast Repetitive Tick, at night. Its believed that The Commission’s Atlantic Herring Section manages herring in state waters (0 - 3 this high-pitched click-like sound miles from shore), while the New England Fishery Management Council (Council) is used by herring to signal their location, thereby making it easier regulates the stock in federal waters (3 - 200 miles from shore).
  • Atlantic Herring

    Atlantic Herring

    Species Profile: Atlantic Herring New Stock Assessment Could Lead to Species Snapshot Management Changes Introduction Atlantic Herring Until recently, the Atlantic herring stock had been considered healthy and fully rebuilt from a Clupea harengus collapsed stock in the 1980s. However, the results of the 2018 benchmark stock assessment have raised new concerns about the Atlantic herring resource. While the stock remains not Management Unit: Maine through New Jersey overfished and was not experiencing overfishing in the terminal year (2017) of the assess- ment, the assessment did show very low levels of recruitment over the past five years. These Common Names: Sea herring, sardine, sild, results will likely have management implications for the species as regulators work to prevent common herring, Labrador herring, sperling overfishing from occurring in the coming years. Diminished stock size and, in turn, lowered catch limits will also impact fisheries that rely on Atlantic herring as an important source of Interesting Facts: bait, such as American lobster, blue crab, tuna, and striped bass fisheries. • Atlantic herring and other clupeid fish have exceptional hearing. They can detect sound Life History frequencies up to 40 kilohertz, beyond the Atlantic sea herring is one of 200 species in the clupeid family, which includes menhaden, range of most fish. This allows schooling fish shad, and river herring. It inhabits coastal waters of the U.S. from Cape Hatteras, North Caro- to communicate while avoiding detection by lina through Labrador, Canada, and off the coast of Europe. Herring form the base of the food predatory fish. web as a forage species for many animals, from starfish and whelk to economically import- • While most members of the clupeid family are ant fish such as haddock, cod, and flounder.
  • Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area APPENDICES

    Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area APPENDICES

    FMP for Groundfish of the BSAI Management Area Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area APPENDICES Appendix A History of the Fishery Management Plan ...................................................................... A-1 A.1 Amendments to the FMP ......................................................................................................... A-1 Appendix B Geographical Coordinates of Areas Described in the Fishery Management Plan ..... B-1 B.1 Management Area, Subareas, and Districts ............................................................................. B-1 B.2 Closed Areas ............................................................................................................................ B-2 B.3 PSC Limitation Zones ........................................................................................................... B-18 Appendix C Summary of the American Fisheries Act and Subtitle II ............................................. C-1 C.1 Summary of the American Fisheries Act (AFA) Management Measures ............................... C-1 C.2 Summary of Amendments to AFA in the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2010 ................ C-2 C.3 American Fisheries Act: Subtitle II Bering Sea Pollock Fishery ............................................ C-4 Appendix D Life History Features and Habitat Requirements of Fishery Management Plan SpeciesD-1 D.1 Walleye pollock (Theragra calcogramma) ............................................................................
  • List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017

    List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017

    Washington Natural Heritage Program List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017 The following list of animals known from Washington is complete for resident and transient vertebrates and several groups of invertebrates, including odonates, branchipods, tiger beetles, butterflies, gastropods, freshwater bivalves and bumble bees. Some species from other groups are included, especially where there are conservation concerns. Among these are the Palouse giant earthworm, a few moths and some of our mayflies and grasshoppers. Currently 857 vertebrate and 1,100 invertebrate taxa are included. Conservation status, in the form of range-wide, national and state ranks are assigned to each taxon. Information on species range and distribution, number of individuals, population trends and threats is collected into a ranking form, analyzed, and used to assign ranks. Ranks are updated periodically, as new information is collected. We welcome new information for any species on our list. Common Name Scientific Name Class Global Rank State Rank State Status Federal Status Northwestern Salamander Ambystoma gracile Amphibia G5 S5 Long-toed Salamander Ambystoma macrodactylum Amphibia G5 S5 Tiger Salamander Ambystoma tigrinum Amphibia G5 S3 Ensatina Ensatina eschscholtzii Amphibia G5 S5 Dunn's Salamander Plethodon dunni Amphibia G4 S3 C Larch Mountain Salamander Plethodon larselli Amphibia G3 S3 S Van Dyke's Salamander Plethodon vandykei Amphibia G3 S3 C Western Red-backed Salamander Plethodon vehiculum Amphibia G5 S5 Rough-skinned Newt Taricha granulosa
  • Collapse and Recovery of Marine Fishes

    Collapse and Recovery of Marine Fishes

    letters to nature sulphide complexes, indicating that Cu sulphide clusters are more 7. Al-Farawati, R. & van den Berg, C. M. G. Metal-sulfide complexation in seawater. Mar. Chem. 63, 331–352 (1999). stable than Cu organic complexes. This explains why laboratory 8. Luther III, G. W., Rickard, D. T., Theberge, S. M. & Olroyd, A. Determination of metal (bi)sulfide cultures of oceanic phytoplankton have been observed to increase stability constants of Mn2+,Fe2+,Co2+,Ni2+,Cu2+, and Zn2+ by voltammetric methods. Environ. Sci. the production of total dissolved sulphides when the concentrations Technol. 30, 671–679 (1996). of free Cu and Zn in the culture media were increased22. Although 9. Helz, G. R, Charnock, J. M., Vaughan, D. J. & Garner, C. D. Multinuclearity of aqueous copper and zinc bisulfide complexes—an EXAFS investigation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 57, the data that we report here suggest that metal sulphide formation is 15–25 (1993). a means of detoxifying trace metals for organisms, further toxico- 10. Luther III, G. W., Theberge, S. M. & Rickard, D. T. Evidence for aqueous clusters as intermediates logical studies are needed to quantify the roles both sulphides and during zinc sulfide formation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 19/20, 3159–3169 (1999). ‘natural’ organic ligands play in controlling Cu toxicity in natural 11. Peters, J. W., Lanzilotta, W. N., Lemon, B. J. & Seefeldt, L. C. X-ray crystal structure of the Fe-only hydrogenase (Cpl) from Clostridium pasteurianum to 1.8 angstrom resolution. Science 282, 1853– waters. 1858 (1998). Sulphur complexation may have a dramatic effect on the acute 12.
  • Vii Fishery-At-A-Glance Night Smelt Scientific Name: Spirinchus Starksi Range

    Vii Fishery-At-A-Glance Night Smelt Scientific Name: Spirinchus Starksi Range

    Fishery-at-a-Glance Night Smelt Scientific Name: Spirinchus starksi Range: Night Smelt are distributed coast-wide from southeast Alaska to Point Arguello, Santa Barbara County. Habitat: Night Smelt occur in the surf and in depths from the surface to approximately 400 feet (122 meters). Size (length and weight): Night Smelt measure less than 6 inches total length (140 millimeters) weighing to 11 grams. Males are slightly longer and heavier than females. Life span: Night Smelt are short lived and believed to reach a maximum of 2 to 3 years. Reproduction: Spawning occurs in the surf along open coast coarse sand beaches from January to September. Eggs are fertilized in the wash of the surf, adhere to sand grains, and sink. Hatching occurs in approximately 2 weeks. Prey: Night Smelt feed on small crustaceans—primarily gammarid amphipods and mysid shrimp. Predators: Night Smelt provide forage for a wide range of predators, including Striped Bass, Redtail Surfperch, salmon, Harbor Seals, California Sea Lions, terns, gulls, and cormorants. Fishery: Commercial and recreational fisheries are shore-based. Area fished: Historically, fishing occurred from Moss Landing, Monterey County to the Oregon border. Currently, fishing occurs from San Mateo County to Del Norte County. Fishing season: Fishing occurs during the spawning season—January to September. Fishing gear: Fishermen fish from shore using A-frame dip nets. Market(s): Landed fish are sold for human consumption and aquarium food. Current stock status: No formal stock assessments exist for Night Smelt. Although catch rates have increased on average since the early 2000s, it is undetermined if this increase in the index is due to increased abundance or changes in fishermen behavior.
  • Identification of Larvae of Three Arctic Species of Limanda (Family Pleuronectidae)

    Identification of Larvae of Three Arctic Species of Limanda (Family Pleuronectidae)

    Identification of larvae of three arctic species of Limanda (Family Pleuronectidae) Morgan S. Busby, Deborah M. Blood & Ann C. Matarese Polar Biology ISSN 0722-4060 Polar Biol DOI 10.1007/s00300-017-2153-9 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by 2017. This e- offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self-archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”. 1 23 Author's personal copy Polar Biol DOI 10.1007/s00300-017-2153-9 ORIGINAL PAPER Identification of larvae of three arctic species of Limanda (Family Pleuronectidae) 1 1 1 Morgan S. Busby • Deborah M. Blood • Ann C. Matarese Received: 28 September 2016 / Revised: 26 June 2017 / Accepted: 27 June 2017 Ó Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 Abstract Identification of fish larvae in Arctic marine for L. proboscidea in comparison to the other two species waters is problematic as descriptions of early-life-history provide additional evidence suggesting the genus Limanda stages exist for few species. Our goal in this study is to may be paraphyletic, as has been proposed in other studies.
  • First Records of the Night Smelt, Spirinchus Starksi, in the Salish Sea

    First Records of the Night Smelt, Spirinchus Starksi, in the Salish Sea

    First Records of the Night Smelt, Spirinchus starksi, in the Salish Sea, Washington Author(s): Melanie M Paquin , Anna N Kagley , Kurt L Fresh , and James W Orr Source: Northwestern Naturalist, 95(1):40-43. 2014. Published By: Society for Northwestern Vertebrate Biology DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1898/NWN13-05.1 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1898/NWN13-05.1 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/ page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non- commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. 40 NORTHWESTERN NATURALIST 95(1) NORTHWESTERN NATURALIST 95:40–43 SPRING 2014 FIRST RECORDS OF THE NIGHT SMELT, SPIRINCHUS STARKSI, IN THE SALISH SEA, WASHINGTON MELANIE MPAQUIN,ANNA NKAGLEY,KURT LFRESH, AND JAMES WORR Key words: COI, distribution, genetics, (frozen or preserved in ethanol) from 11 S. starksi Longfin Smelt, Night Smelt, Osmeridae, Spir- and 5 S. thaleichthys were obtained from the inchus starksi, Spirinchus thaleichthys, Washing- Northwest Fisheries Science Center (NWFSC) ton and the University of Washington Fish Collec- tion (UW).