Hot Spot Location Report Complete2
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Geospatial Analysis: Commuters Access to Transportation Options
Advocacy Sustainability Partnerships Fort Washington Office Park Transportation Demand Management Plan Geospatial Analysis: Commuters Access to Transportation Options Prepared by GVF GVF July 2017 Contents Executive Summary and Key Findings ........................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Sources ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 ArcMap Geocoding and Data Analysis .................................................................................................. 6 Travel Times Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 7 Data Collection .......................................................................................................................................... 7 1. Employee Commuter Survey Results ................................................................................................ 7 2. Office Park Companies Outreach Results ......................................................................................... 7 3. Office Park -
No Action Alternative Report
No Action Alternative Report April 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2. NEC FUTURE Background ............................................................................................................................ 2 3. Approach to No Action Alternative.............................................................................................................. 4 3.1 METHODOLOGY FOR SELECTING NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE PROJECTS .................................................................................... 4 3.2 DISINVESTMENT SCENARIO ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 4. No Action Alternative ................................................................................................................................... 6 4.1 TRAIN SERVICE ........................................................................................................................................................................ 6 4.2 NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE RAIL PROJECTS ............................................................................................................................... 9 4.2.1 Funded Projects or Projects with Approved Funding Plans (Category 1) ............................................................. 9 4.2.2 Funded or Unfunded Mandates (Category 2) ....................................................................................................... -
Appendix A: Review of Existing Pedestrian and Bicycle Planning Studies
APPENDIX A: REVIEW OF EXISTING PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PLANNING STUDIES This appendix provides an overview of previous planning efforts undertaken in and around Philadelphia that are relevant to the Plan. These include city initiatives, plans, studies, internal memos, and other relevant documents. This appendix briefly summarizes each previous plan or study, discusses its relevance to pedestrian and bicycle planning in Philadelphia, and lists specific recommendations when applicable. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE PLAN APRIL 2012 CONTENTS WALKING REPORTS AND STUDIES .......................................................................................................................... 1 Walking in Philadelphia ............................................................................................................................................ 1 South of South Walkabilty Plan................................................................................................................................. 1 North Broad Street Pedestrian Crash Study .............................................................................................................. 2 North Broad Street Pedestrian Safety Audit ............................................................................................................. 3 Pedestrian Safety and Mobility: Status and Initiatives ............................................................................................ 3 Neighborhood/Area Plans and Studies ................................................................................................................. -
Torresdale Station to Frankford Transportation Center
A ®SEPT 19ective February 24, 2020 Eff Torresdale Station to Frankford Transportation Center Serving Northeast Philadelphia Customer Service 215-580-7800 TDD/TTY 215-580-7853 www.septa.org Grant A Presidential Plaza 1 Archbishop v Ryan H. S. erree Rd Catalent V Baldi M. S. Grant Plaza Y COUNTY Greg 88 58 velt BlvdWhitman Modena Surre g St Square S. C. Northeast y Rd Grant A 14 d Red LionPark Rd Philadelphia R Roos1e y d v Airport R 58 m Academy e s d t MONTGOMER Krewstown 88 a Plaza h PHILADELPHIA COUNTY c g Plaza i Alton St A n Bustleton Blue Grass Rd W K elsh Rd Jefferson erree Rd d 14 Grant A V R Torresdale n 1 w The Court v Pine Rd o t s Northeast w 50 Morrell e r S. C. Plaza Fox Chase K Primr Morrell Rha NORTHEAST 13 ose dham Park wn St Blue Grass Academy Rd Rd PHILADELPHIA For O S. C. Ashton Rd G x Gardens ra 66 f n o v t Av d Holy Family r d Pennypack R College A 28 Park y 66 v m v velt Blvd 20 Outlook Rd A Algon A v e rd Willits Rd d kfo elsh Rd elsh Soll a an c r 28 W 50 F y A A TORRESDALE Gloria v Roose Nazareth Ashton20 Rd STATION Dei CastorRh A a v DunganN Rda wn St Hospital v A Cottman BurholmeA pfle Holme A e Fitler St Holm Av v James St A v W n 1 Holme elsh Rd Pennypack State Rd o Rhawnhurst t 70 e l Circle Woods 95 77 t 67 Northeast s Father 232 H. -
NEC One-Year Implementation Plan: FY17 Contents
Northeast Corridor One-Year Implementation Plan Fiscal Year 2017 September 2016 Congress established the Northeast Corridor Commission to develop coordinated strategies for improving the Northeast’s core rail network in recognition of the inherent challenges of planning, financing, and implementing major infrastructure improvements that cross multiple jurisdictions. The expectation is that by coming together to take collective responsibility for the NEC, these disparate stakeholders will achieve a level of success that far exceeds the potential reach of any individual organization. The Commission is governed by a board comprised of one member from each of the NEC states (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland) and the District of Columbia; four members from Amtrak; and five members from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). The Commission also includes non-voting representatives from four freight railroads, states with connecting corridors and several commuter operators in the Region. 2| NEC One-Year Implementation Plan: FY17 Contents Introduction 6 Funding Summary 8 Baseline Capital Charge Program 10 1 - Boston South Station 12 16 - Shore to Girard 42 2 - Boston to Providence 14 17 - Girard to Philadelphia 30th Street 44 3 - Providence to Wickford Junction 16 18 - Philadelphia 30th Street - Arsenal 46 4 - Wickford Junction to New London 18 19 - Arsenal to Marcus Hook 48 5 - New London to New Haven 20 20 - Marcus Hook to Bacon 50 6 - New Haven to State Line 22 21 - Bacon to Perryville 52 7 - State Line to New Rochelle 24 22 - Perryville to WAS 54 8 - New Rochelle to Harold Interlocking 26 23 - Washington Union Terminal 56 9 - Harold Interlocking to F Interlocking 28 24 - WAS to CP Virginia 58 10 - F Interlocking to PSNY 30 25 - Springfield to New Haven 60 11 - Penn Terminal 32 27 - Spuyten Duyvil to PSNY* 62 12 - PSNY to Trenton 34 28 - 30th St. -
Northeast Corridor Capital Investment Plan Fiscal Years 2017-2021
Northeast Corridor Capital Investment Plan Fiscal Years 2017-2021 April 2016 Congress established the Northeast Corridor Commission (the Commission) to develop coordinated strategies for improving the Northeast’s core rail network in recognition of the inherent challenges of planning, financing, and implementing major infrastructure improvements that cross multiple jurisdictions. The expectation is that by coming together to take collective responsibility for the NEC, these disparate stakeholders will achieve a level of success that far exceeds the potential reach of any individual organization. The Commission is governed by a board comprised of one member from each of the NEC states (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland) and the District of Columbia; four members from Amtrak; and five members from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). The Commission also includes non-voting representatives from four freight railroads, states with connecting corridors and several commuter operators in the Region. Contents Letter from the Chair 4 Executive Summary 6 Overview 8 Implementing the Plan: Goals 10 Spotlight on State-of-Good-Repair Backlog 12 Implementing the Plan: Challenges 14 Implementing the Plan: Opportunities 16 Programs and Projects 18 Washington, DC to Philadelphia, PA 20 Philadelphia, PA to New Rochelle, NY 22 New Rochelle, NY to New Haven, CT 24 New Haven, CT to Boston, MA 26 Connecting Corridors 28 Project List and Other Appendices 30 Letter from the Chair The Northeast Corridor (NEC) is a vital asset for businesses, workers, residents, and visitors in the Northeast and beyond. Its eight commuter rail operators deliver hundreds of thousands of workers to some of the most productive economic centers in the country each day. -
Trenton Transit Center to Oxford Valley Mall
A ®SEPT 127March 9, 2020 ective Eff Trenton Transit Center to Oxford Valley Mall Serving Morrisville Customer Service 215-580-7800 TDD/TTY 215-580-7853 www.septa.org River Rd d S v NJT To Points North R to 29 206 E State St g A y ny Lafa Fro Clinton St Av le Hill Rd yette St nt St M d rd H Morrisville o oo TRENTON a e d D Br n allenber nw Y a R t e v e ey Yardley Morrisville Rd e Temporary W oad St g W Gre c Vall Shopping lm o R. n o rd a m r xfo o Detour rr Hamilton A o c O re e e h k Center n ry TRENTON St Francis A Pine Gr g R S A n v t v a d P TRANSIT Medical Center L 295 v en Makefield Rd n T s CENTER Chamber o d Ston y Market St wnship Line Rd R o Trenton A lv Oxford Valley Mall y y Hill Rd ve Rd a 206 alle d West n Chambersburg rd V R Big Oak Rd ia Txofo r y MORRISVILLE Clinton St O wn Center D Bu e A ck Dr ll v s St 295 s Town a lvd V M 1 Br B 127 Big Oak Rd oad St ty St n a Pennsbury almer St w Macy’s k o d P 29 t M e e d r l R i o f Plaza Liber d f i d Sesame e d d x 129 d y l i R 32 e l O d e D UA Oxfolrd k M l Place t a o Jefferson R e St a O v Valley w e V d Br W g 206 n i Bucks l oad St d Bridg Chestnut r r Shops at oodbourne Rd D 127 B B own S a o l T t f JCPenney v s o w Park x d k Makefield uc n Trenton A Lalor St O B y a Village H est r River LINE Lincoln i 1 l e l W Plaza Oxf R To Camden Big Oak Rd 1 or d R Woodbourne Square Valle d Woolston Rd 1 Connections at y Rd i OxfordOld Lincoln Valley Mall: Hwy 13 Ne v 14 129 wbold Rd e Lincoln Hwy 14, 127, 128, 1291 P 1 128 d ennsylv r risville R Lincoln Hwy or BUS Arleans M r NEW JERSEY 1 A e Bristol Rd Kings Plaza ania A 295 v w Court at Olds Blvd Lo uck B st o wn Dr Oxford Valley 129 vd N d v l R renton Rd B S. -
Roosevelt Boulevard Section 1 – Appendix 1
Roosevelt Boulevard Section 1 – Appendix 1 Previous Studies Review March 2016 This page intentionally left blank Task 1.C Review of Previous Studies Roosevelt Boulevard Route for Change Program TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...................................................................................................................... i City of Philadelphia Plans 1. Philadelphia 2035 Citywide Vision (2011, Philadelphia City Planning Commission) .............. 1 Study Purpose and Highlights ........................................................................................................ 1 Plan Recommendations ................................................................................................................. 2 Public Involvement Process ...........................................................................................................11 Relevance to Route for Change Program ......................................................................................11 2. Lower Northeast District Plan (2012, Philadelphia City Planning Commission) ................... 15 Study Purpose and Highlights ...................................................................................................... 15 Plan Recommendations ................................................................................................................ 16 Frankford Transportation Center ............................................................................................. 17 Frankford Gateway ................................................................................................................. -
Croydon Transit Revitalization Investment District, Bristol Township
CROYDON TRANSIT REVITALIZATION INVESTMENT DISTRICT Bristol Township, Bucks County PA A Plan for 2010 & Beyond PENN ONI MSOCIATES INC. 2501 BATH ROAD 1 BRISTOL, PA 19007 1 PHONE: 215·785·0500 JUNE 18, 2009 P ~IIINONJ ASSO CIATES IN C. C:ONS ULTt,.,. Iif'lGI""!! I!~ s BRIS0901 June 12, 2009 BRISTOL TOWNSHIP COUNCil Bristol Township Administration Building 2500 Bath Road Bristol, PA 19007 Re: Croydon Transit Revitalization Investment District (TRIO) - Final Planning Study "A Plan for 2010 and Beyond" Attn: Jeffrey Bartlett, Township Managing Director It is with great pleasure that we submit this document for Council's approval and acceptance before forwarding onto the PA Department of Community and Economic Development as satisfaction of the TRID/LUPTAP Grant for this phase of development of the TRID program and Transit-Oriented Development to revitalization the Croydon Section of Bristol Township, in an area in proximity to the SEPTA Croydon Station and its new construction. We believe that it satisfies the Grant conditions; containing: the Market Analysis, Value Capture, establishment of a viable TRID Boundary, and the Draft Agreement to effect the TRIO area and program. In addition, it is in conformance with the original Requ est for Proposals, and has been reviewed by the Key Stakeholders working group, and other key agencies having a say on TRID, including SEPTA, the Bucks TMA, the BCRDA, Bucks County, DVRPC, area legislators, and members of the public through their input at various stages. We (Pennoni Asso ciates Inc., and Economic Development Associates) look forward to an opportunity to assist in subsequent phases of implementation of this cha llenging and worthy undertaking for the citizens/residents of Croydon and the Township in a program that ca n induce additional mass transit SEPTA ridership, and tax revenues from future development and red evelopment as revitalization occurs over time. -
DVRPC Congestion Management Process (CMP)
The symbol in The Delaware Valley Regional Planning our logo is Commission is dedicated to uniting the adapted from the official region’s elected officials, planning DVRPC seal professionals, and the public with a and is designed as a stylized image of common vision of making a great region the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole while even greater. Shaping the way we live, the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware work, and play, DVRPC builds River. The two adjoining crescents represent the Commonwealth of consensus on improving transportation, Pennsylvania and the State of New promoting smart growth, protecting the Jersey. environment, and enhancing the DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding economy. We serve a diverse region of sources including federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s nine counties: Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Montgomery, and Philadelphia in and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Jersey Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, departments of transportation, as well Gloucester, and Mercer in New Jersey. as by DVRPC’s state and local member governments. The authors, however, are DVRPC is the federally designated solely responsible for the findings and Metropolitan Planning Organization for conclusions herein, which may not represent the official views or policies of the Greater Philadelphia Region — the funding agencies. leading the way to a better future. DVRPC fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. DVRPC’s website (www.dvrpc.org) may be translated into multiple languages. -
Progress 2009 Annual Report
SPARKING PROGRESS 2009 ANNUAL REPORT Southeastern SEPTAPennsylvania Transportation Authority Board Members Chairman Vice Chairman Pasquale T. Deon, Sr. James C. Schwartzman, Esquire SEPTA Board SEPTA Officers Philadelphia Governor Appointee General Manager Beverly Coleman Denise J. Smyler, Esquire Joseph M. Casey, CPA Rina Cutler Senate Majority Leader Chief Financial Officer/ Bucks County Appointee Treasurer Pasquale T. Deon, Sr. Honorable Stewart J. Greenleaf, Richard G. Burnfield Honorable Charles H. Martin Esquire General Counsel Chester County Senate Minority Leader Nicholas J. Staffieri, Esquire Joseph E. Brion, Esquire Appointee Kevin L. Johnson, P.E. James C. Schwartzman, Esquire Controller to the Board Stephen A. Jobs, CPA Delaware County House Majority Leader Thomas E. Babcock Appointee Secretary to the Board Daniel J. Kubik Frank G. McCartney Elizabeth M. Grant Montgomery County House Minority Leader Thomas Jay Ellis, Esquire Appointee Michael J. O’Donoghue, Esquire Herman M. Wooden Created by the State Legislature in 1964, the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority was formed to plan, develop and coordinate a regional transportation system for Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery and Philadelphia counties. It has the right to acquire, construct, operate, lease and otherwise function in public transport in these five counties. The SEPTA Transportation Board determines policy for the Authority. Its 15 members represent the five counties served by SEPTA and the governing bodies of the Commonwealth. Copyright SEPTA 2010. Pasquale T. Deon, Sr. James C. Schwartzman, Esquire Denise J. Smyler, Esquire Honorable Stewart J. Frank G. McCartney Herman M. Wooden Greenleaf, Esquire Beverly Coleman Rina Cutler Thomas E. Babcock Joseph E. Brion, Esquire Thomas Jay Ellis, Kevin L. -
SEPTA Cycle-Transit Plan a Strategic Approach April 2015
SEPTA Cycle-Transit Plan A Strategic Approach April 2015 1 SEPTA CYCLE-TRANSIT PLAN A Strategic Approach to Bike and Transit Integration TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLES & FIGURES..............................................................................................................................................................3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................................................4 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................................................6 BIKES AS MAINSTREAM....................................................................................................................................................7 SECTION 1: BIKES TO TRANSIT......................................................................................................................................9 1.1 - Baseline..............................................................................................................................................................9 1.2 - Future Actions.................................................................................................................................................15 SECTION 2: BIKES AT TRANSIT....................................................................................................................................15 2.1 - Baseline...........................................................................................................................................................15