DOCSLIB.ORG

Hot Spot Location Report Complete2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hot Spot Location Report Complete2 Hot Spot Recommendations # of Advanced Watchmen Hot Spot # of Stickers Name of Location MP Curves Gang Watchmen West East CommentsApplied Sub Division Noise under bridge East & Limited Visibility NYD West I-95 Bridge 76 - 75.5 121 Yes West 125 MPH Adams Limited Visibility S curves east & west NYD West West end of Torresdale Curve 75 - 75.5 S' Curve 1 3 3 Yes Traffic noise from I-95 Adams 105 MPH Limited Visibility S curves NYD West East end of Torresdale Curve 74.4 S' Curve 1 5 1 Yes Traffic Noise from I-95 Adams 105 MPH 2 'S' curves I-95 noise NYD West Torresdale Station 74.5 S' Curves 1 3 2 No Traffic noise from I-95 Adams 105 MPH New York Division 1 Hot Spot Recommendations # of Advanced Watchmen Hot Spot # of Stickers Name of Location MP Curves Gang Watchmen West East CommentsApplied Sub Division * When working on 3 & 4 track ** When working on 1 & 2 track From the * 2 Noise from I-95 NYD West Cornwells Heights 72.5 10 Yes East ** 1 Limited Visibility Adams Intertrack Fencing Speed 110 MPH Traffic noise from I-95 Neshaminy Bridge From the Curve from the East NYD West 70.5 - 71 103 Yes & Curve East Limited Visibility Adams Speed 120 MPH Traffic noise from I-95 Curve Neshaminy Bridge In the Limited Visibility NYD West 70 - 70.5 111 Yes & Curve Curve Advance position (east & west), but not Adams amount, will change with gang movement. Speed 120 MPH New York Division 2 Hot Spot Recommendations # of Advanced Watchmen Hot Spot # of Stickers Name of Location MP Curves Gang Watchmen West East CommentsApplied Sub Division Traffic Noise Limited Visibility NYD West Croydon Station & West 69.2 - 69.5 West 1 2 0 Curve from the West Yes Adams Intertrack Fencing Speed 120 MPH Limited Visibility West of Bristol Station. Access East & Location is an S curves NYD West 67.2 112 Yes from Stairs on 4 track West Traffic Noise from Rt. 13 Adams 125 MPH Limited Visibility East & NYD West Bristol Station 66.5 123Curves East & West Yes West Adams 125 MPH New York Division 3 Hot Spot Recommendations # of Advanced Watchmen Hot Spot # of Stickers Name of Location MP Curves Gang Watchmen West East CommentsApplied Sub Division Limited Visibility Curve West Curve West of Grundy (East NYD West 65.6 West 1 5 0 125 MPH Yes bound home board) Adams ***Note: With 4 advanced watchmen the train was at our location in 15 seconds. Limited Visibility Curves East & West East & NYD West Grundy Interlocking - Tower 65.4 133125 MPH Yes West Adams Noise from turnpike traffic overhead Factory noise for east advanced watchman Limited Visibility Curve East of Grundy (West NYD West 64.5 - 65 East 1 0 2 Curve Yes bound home board) Adams 125 MPH Intertrack fencing NYD West Levittown Station 63.2 No 1 0 0 Yes Close Clearance (fence) Adams New York Division 4 Hot Spot Recommendations # of Advanced Watchmen Hot Spot # of Stickers Name of Location MP Curves Gang Watchmen West East CommentsApplied Sub Division Limited Visibility 3 & 4 track curve through a tunnel. Must protect 3 track for eastbound moves. 4 NYD West Morris Interlocking -Tower 58.5 West 1 5 0 advanced along 4 track through tunnel. Yes Adams 1 advanced to protect curve on 1&2 track. Noise from roadway 100 MPH Close Clearance NYD West Delaware River Bridge 57.5 No 1 0 0 Clear into cutouts No Adams Foul time Close Clearance (Walls on both sides) Limited Visibility Fair NYD West 56.7 West 1 1 1 Protect Septa moves as well as moves from No West End Adams 1 track to the High. 110 MPH New York Division 5 Hot Spot Recommendations # of Advanced Watchmen Hot Spot # of Stickers Name of Location MP Curves Gang Watchmen West East CommentsApplied Sub Division Close Clearance NYD West West of platform 56.5 West 1 3 0 Limited Visibility No Adams 110 MPH Foul time needed on 1 or 2 track when working in platform area and a ladder to clear onto platforms. NYD West West End of Platform 56.4 West 1 2 0 No Close Clearance Adams Limited Visibility 110 MPH Foul time needed on 1 or 2 track when working in platform area and a ladder to clear onto platforms. NYD West Middle of Platform 56.3 West 1 3 0 No Close Clearance Adams Limited Visibility 110 MPH New York Division 6 Hot Spot Recommendations # of Advanced Watchmen Hot Spot # of Stickers Name of Location MP Curves Gang Watchmen West East CommentsApplied Sub Division Foul time needed on 1 or 2 track when working in platform area and a ladder to West & clear onto platforms. NYD West East end of platform 56.2 131 No East Close Clearance Adams Limited Visibility 110 MPH Foul time required or a ladder so workers can climb onto the platform. NYD West Hamilton Station 53 No 1 0 0 Yes Close Clearance Adams Intertrack Fencing Foul time required or a ladder so workers can climb onto the platform. NYD West Princeton Station 47 No 1 Yes Close Clearance Adams Intertrack Fencing New York Division 7 Hot Spot Recommendations # of Advanced Watchmen Hot Spot # of Stickers Name of Location MP Curves Gang Watchmen West East CommentsApplied Sub Division ** 1 watchman and 4 advanced watchmen are needed anywhere is this 'S' curve due S' Curve east of Midway NYD West 39 - 41 Yes 1 ** 4 to visibility & speeds. Yes Curves #275 & #276 Adams 130 MPH Limited visibility ** Minimum of 2 watchmen needed Curve East of Adams NYD West 33.8- 34.2 Yes 1 ** 1 Limited Visibility No Curve #274 Adams 135 MPH Limited Clearance NYD West N. Brunswick Elevated section 31 - 31.25 No 1 0 0 Foul time required with SSD No Adams 125 MPH Limited Visibility NYD West New Brunswick Station 31.25 Yes 1 1 0 Yes 125 MPH Adams New York Division 8 Hot Spot Recommendations # of Advanced Watchmen Hot Spot # of Stickers Name of Location MP Curves Gang Watchmen West East CommentsApplied Sub Division West end of bridge Limited Visibility Close Clearance NYD West Raritan River Bridge 31 Yes 1 2 0 No Foul Time Need due to close clearance, with Adams SSD 125 MPH Middle & East end of bridge Limited Visibility NYD West 30.9 - 30.8 Yes 1 3 3 No Curves East & West Adams 125 MPH Foul time required or a ladder so workers can climb onto the platform. NYD West Edison Station 29 No 1 0 0 Yes Close Clearance Adams 125 MPH Limited Visibility On 4 track NYD West Crurve 270 27.66 Yes 1 0 1 110 MPH side Adams New York Division 9 Hot Spot Recommendations # of Advanced Watchmen Hot Spot # of Stickers Name of Location MP Curves Gang Watchmen West East CommentsApplied Sub Division ** 5 advanced watchmen needed (total of 6 watchmen) anywhere is this 'S' curve due to visibility & speeds. Limited Visibility On 4 track NYD West Curves 269 - 268 27 -26.7 Yes 1 ** 5 Triple curve - Curve 268 east, curve 269 in side Adams the middle & curve 270 west Highway noise (Rt. 287) on curve 269 95 MPH Curve West of location NYD West Lincoln 26 West 1 3 0 Limited Visibility No Adams 110 MPH New York Division 10 Hot Spot Recommendations # of Advanced Watchmen Hot Spot # of Stickers Name of Location MP Curves Gang Watchmen West East CommentsApplied Sub Division ** Foul time, or track out of service, needed when working in station limits NYD West Metuchen Station 25.8 East **1 0 **5 Limited Visibility No Adams 'S' curve to the east 110 MPH ** A total of 5 watchmen are needed in this curve. NYD West Curve 267 24.6 to 25.5 S' Curve 1 ** 4 No Limited visibility Adams 110 MPH Limited visibility in both directions East & NYD West Menlo 23.7 125Traffic noise all around No West Adams 110 MPH New York Division 11 Hot Spot Recommendations # of Advanced Watchmen Hot Spot # of Stickers Name of Location MP Curves Gang Watchmen West East CommentsApplied Sub Division Limited visibility in both directions Traffic noise East & NYD West Metropark 23.2 144Close clearance No West Adams 110 MPH Foul time with SSD recommended Limited visibility in both directions East & NYD West Islen 22.8 153Traffic noise No West Adams 110 MPH Limited Visibility Union 20.6 NYD West West 1 4 0 Close Clearance No 19.3 - 20.6 Inman Ave. Adams 110 MPH Vertical Limited Visibility NYD West Union 20 1 1 No curve Adams New York Division 12 Hot Spot Recommendations # of Advanced Watchmen Hot Spot # of Stickers Name of Location MP Curves Gang Watchmen West East CommentsApplied Sub Division ** Foul time is recommended due to; Close Clearance Union - Tunnel traffic NYD West Union Overall & None 1** 0 0 No Lack of proper clearing space Adams Station 110 MPH Cat pole clearing bays are recommended Close Clearance NYD West Linden 17.3 None 1 0 0 No Foul time when working in station limits Adams *Vertical Curve, on west end, limits visibility. Close Clearance NYD West Elmoria 15 East 1 1* 2 No Limited Visibility Adams 60 MPH New York Division 13 Hot Spot Recommendations # of Advanced Watchmen Hot Spot # of Stickers Name of Location MP Curves Gang Watchmen West East CommentsApplied Sub Division * 3 watchmen are needed when working in the curves to protect east & west S curve movements NYD West Curves #252 & 253 14 - 15 East & 1 * 2 No Limited visibility Adams West Traffic and airplane (Newark airport) noise 55 MPH * 3 watchmen are needed when working in the curves to protect east & west movements NYD West Elizabeth Station 14 West 1 * 2 No Limited visibility Adams Traffic and airplane (Newark airport) noise 55 MPH NY East Airport 12 No 1 0 0 Close Clearance No Hunter-MP3 New York Division 14 Hot Spot Recommendations # of Advanced Watchmen Hot Spot # of Stickers Name of Location MP Curves Gang Watchmen West East CommentsApplied Sub Division * Foul time recommended at close clearance locations in conjunction w/ watchmen 8.95 - Close Clearance NY East Viaduct None * 1 0 0 No Hunter EB HB Noise Hunter-MP3 Limited Clearing 70 MPH * Foul time
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geospatial Analysis: Commuters Access to Transportation Options
    Advocacy Sustainability Partnerships Fort Washington Office Park Transportation Demand Management Plan Geospatial Analysis: Commuters Access to Transportation Options Prepared by GVF GVF July 2017 Contents Executive Summary and Key Findings ........................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Sources ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 ArcMap Geocoding and Data Analysis .................................................................................................. 6 Travel Times Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 7 Data Collection .......................................................................................................................................... 7 1. Employee Commuter Survey Results ................................................................................................ 7 2. Office Park Companies Outreach Results ......................................................................................... 7 3. Office Park
    [Show full text]
  • No Action Alternative Report
    No Action Alternative Report April 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2. NEC FUTURE Background ............................................................................................................................ 2 3. Approach to No Action Alternative.............................................................................................................. 4 3.1 METHODOLOGY FOR SELECTING NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE PROJECTS .................................................................................... 4 3.2 DISINVESTMENT SCENARIO ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 4. No Action Alternative ................................................................................................................................... 6 4.1 TRAIN SERVICE ........................................................................................................................................................................ 6 4.2 NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE RAIL PROJECTS ............................................................................................................................... 9 4.2.1 Funded Projects or Projects with Approved Funding Plans (Category 1) ............................................................. 9 4.2.2 Funded or Unfunded Mandates (Category 2) .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Review of Existing Pedestrian and Bicycle Planning Studies
    APPENDIX A: REVIEW OF EXISTING PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PLANNING STUDIES This appendix provides an overview of previous planning efforts undertaken in and around Philadelphia that are relevant to the Plan. These include city initiatives, plans, studies, internal memos, and other relevant documents. This appendix briefly summarizes each previous plan or study, discusses its relevance to pedestrian and bicycle planning in Philadelphia, and lists specific recommendations when applicable. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE PLAN APRIL 2012 CONTENTS WALKING REPORTS AND STUDIES .......................................................................................................................... 1 Walking in Philadelphia ............................................................................................................................................ 1 South of South Walkabilty Plan................................................................................................................................. 1 North Broad Street Pedestrian Crash Study .............................................................................................................. 2 North Broad Street Pedestrian Safety Audit ............................................................................................................. 3 Pedestrian Safety and Mobility: Status and Initiatives ............................................................................................ 3 Neighborhood/Area Plans and Studies .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Torresdale Station to Frankford Transportation Center
    A ®SEPT 19ective February 24, 2020 Eff Torresdale Station to Frankford Transportation Center Serving Northeast Philadelphia Customer Service 215-580-7800 TDD/TTY 215-580-7853 www.septa.org Grant A Presidential Plaza 1 Archbishop v Ryan H. S. erree Rd Catalent V Baldi M. S. Grant Plaza Y COUNTY Greg 88 58 velt BlvdWhitman Modena Surre g St Square S. C. Northeast y Rd Grant A 14 d Red LionPark Rd Philadelphia R Roos1e y d v Airport R 58 m Academy e s d t MONTGOMER Krewstown 88 a Plaza h PHILADELPHIA COUNTY c g Plaza i Alton St A n Bustleton Blue Grass Rd W K elsh Rd Jefferson erree Rd d 14 Grant A V R Torresdale n 1 w The Court v Pine Rd o t s Northeast w 50 Morrell e r S. C. Plaza Fox Chase K Primr Morrell Rha NORTHEAST 13 ose dham Park wn St Blue Grass Academy Rd Rd PHILADELPHIA For O S. C. Ashton Rd G x Gardens ra 66 f n o v t Av d Holy Family r d Pennypack R College A 28 Park y 66 v m v velt Blvd 20 Outlook Rd A Algon A v e rd Willits Rd d kfo elsh Rd elsh Soll a an c r 28 W 50 F y A A TORRESDALE Gloria v Roose Nazareth Ashton20 Rd STATION Dei CastorRh A a v DunganN Rda wn St Hospital v A Cottman BurholmeA pfle Holme A e Fitler St Holm Av v James St A v W n 1 Holme elsh Rd Pennypack State Rd o Rhawnhurst t 70 e l Circle Woods 95 77 t 67 Northeast s Father 232 H.
    [Show full text]
  • NEC One-Year Implementation Plan: FY17 Contents
    Northeast Corridor One-Year Implementation Plan Fiscal Year 2017 September 2016 Congress established the Northeast Corridor Commission to develop coordinated strategies for improving the Northeast’s core rail network in recognition of the inherent challenges of planning, financing, and implementing major infrastructure improvements that cross multiple jurisdictions. The expectation is that by coming together to take collective responsibility for the NEC, these disparate stakeholders will achieve a level of success that far exceeds the potential reach of any individual organization. The Commission is governed by a board comprised of one member from each of the NEC states (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland) and the District of Columbia; four members from Amtrak; and five members from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). The Commission also includes non-voting representatives from four freight railroads, states with connecting corridors and several commuter operators in the Region. 2| NEC One-Year Implementation Plan: FY17 Contents Introduction 6 Funding Summary 8 Baseline Capital Charge Program 10 1 - Boston South Station 12 16 - Shore to Girard 42 2 - Boston to Providence 14 17 - Girard to Philadelphia 30th Street 44 3 - Providence to Wickford Junction 16 18 - Philadelphia 30th Street - Arsenal 46 4 - Wickford Junction to New London 18 19 - Arsenal to Marcus Hook 48 5 - New London to New Haven 20 20 - Marcus Hook to Bacon 50 6 - New Haven to State Line 22 21 - Bacon to Perryville 52 7 - State Line to New Rochelle 24 22 - Perryville to WAS 54 8 - New Rochelle to Harold Interlocking 26 23 - Washington Union Terminal 56 9 - Harold Interlocking to F Interlocking 28 24 - WAS to CP Virginia 58 10 - F Interlocking to PSNY 30 25 - Springfield to New Haven 60 11 - Penn Terminal 32 27 - Spuyten Duyvil to PSNY* 62 12 - PSNY to Trenton 34 28 - 30th St.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Corridor Capital Investment Plan Fiscal Years 2017-2021
    Northeast Corridor Capital Investment Plan Fiscal Years 2017-2021 April 2016 Congress established the Northeast Corridor Commission (the Commission) to develop coordinated strategies for improving the Northeast’s core rail network in recognition of the inherent challenges of planning, financing, and implementing major infrastructure improvements that cross multiple jurisdictions. The expectation is that by coming together to take collective responsibility for the NEC, these disparate stakeholders will achieve a level of success that far exceeds the potential reach of any individual organization. The Commission is governed by a board comprised of one member from each of the NEC states (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland) and the District of Columbia; four members from Amtrak; and five members from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). The Commission also includes non-voting representatives from four freight railroads, states with connecting corridors and several commuter operators in the Region. Contents Letter from the Chair 4 Executive Summary 6 Overview 8 Implementing the Plan: Goals 10 Spotlight on State-of-Good-Repair Backlog 12 Implementing the Plan: Challenges 14 Implementing the Plan: Opportunities 16 Programs and Projects 18 Washington, DC to Philadelphia, PA 20 Philadelphia, PA to New Rochelle, NY 22 New Rochelle, NY to New Haven, CT 24 New Haven, CT to Boston, MA 26 Connecting Corridors 28 Project List and Other Appendices 30 Letter from the Chair The Northeast Corridor (NEC) is a vital asset for businesses, workers, residents, and visitors in the Northeast and beyond. Its eight commuter rail operators deliver hundreds of thousands of workers to some of the most productive economic centers in the country each day.
    [Show full text]
  • Trenton Transit Center to Oxford Valley Mall
    A ®SEPT 127March 9, 2020 ective Eff Trenton Transit Center to Oxford Valley Mall Serving Morrisville Customer Service 215-580-7800 TDD/TTY 215-580-7853 www.septa.org River Rd d S v NJT To Points North R to 29 206 E State St g A y ny Lafa Fro Clinton St Av le Hill Rd yette St nt St M d rd H Morrisville o oo TRENTON a e d D Br n allenber nw Y a R t e v e ey Yardley Morrisville Rd e Temporary W oad St g W Gre c Vall Shopping lm o R. n o rd a m r xfo o Detour rr Hamilton A o c O re e e h k Center n ry TRENTON St Francis A Pine Gr g R S A n v t v a d P TRANSIT Medical Center L 295 v en Makefield Rd n T s CENTER Chamber o d Ston y Market St wnship Line Rd R o Trenton A lv Oxford Valley Mall y y Hill Rd ve Rd a 206 alle d West n Chambersburg rd V R Big Oak Rd ia Txofo r y MORRISVILLE Clinton St O wn Center D Bu e A ck Dr ll v s St 295 s Town a lvd V M 1 Br B 127 Big Oak Rd oad St ty St n a Pennsbury almer St w Macy’s k o d P 29 t M e e d r l R i o f Plaza Liber d f i d Sesame e d d x 129 d y l i R 32 e l O d e D UA Oxfolrd k M l Place t a o Jefferson R e St a O v Valley w e V d Br W g 206 n i Bucks l oad St d Bridg Chestnut r r Shops at oodbourne Rd D 127 B B own S a o l T t f JCPenney v s o w Park x d k Makefield uc n Trenton A Lalor St O B y a Village H est r River LINE Lincoln i 1 l e l W Plaza Oxf R To Camden Big Oak Rd 1 or d R Woodbourne Square Valle d Woolston Rd 1 Connections at y Rd i OxfordOld Lincoln Valley Mall: Hwy 13 Ne v 14 129 wbold Rd e Lincoln Hwy 14, 127, 128, 1291 P 1 128 d ennsylv r risville R Lincoln Hwy or BUS Arleans M r NEW JERSEY 1 A e Bristol Rd Kings Plaza ania A 295 v w Court at Olds Blvd Lo uck B st o wn Dr Oxford Valley 129 vd N d v l R renton Rd B S.
    [Show full text]
  • Roosevelt Boulevard Section 1 – Appendix 1
    Roosevelt Boulevard Section 1 – Appendix 1 Previous Studies Review March 2016 This page intentionally left blank Task 1.C Review of Previous Studies Roosevelt Boulevard Route for Change Program TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...................................................................................................................... i City of Philadelphia Plans 1. Philadelphia 2035 Citywide Vision (2011, Philadelphia City Planning Commission) .............. 1 Study Purpose and Highlights ........................................................................................................ 1 Plan Recommendations ................................................................................................................. 2 Public Involvement Process ...........................................................................................................11 Relevance to Route for Change Program ......................................................................................11 2. Lower Northeast District Plan (2012, Philadelphia City Planning Commission) ................... 15 Study Purpose and Highlights ...................................................................................................... 15 Plan Recommendations ................................................................................................................ 16 Frankford Transportation Center ............................................................................................. 17 Frankford Gateway .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Croydon Transit Revitalization Investment District, Bristol Township
    CROYDON TRANSIT REVITALIZATION INVESTMENT DISTRICT Bristol Township, Bucks County PA A Plan for 2010 & Beyond PENN ONI MSOCIATES INC. 2501 BATH ROAD 1 BRISTOL, PA 19007 1 PHONE: 215·785·0500 JUNE 18, 2009 P ~IIINONJ ASSO CIATES IN C. C:ONS ULTt,.,. Iif'lGI""!! I!~ s BRIS0901 June 12, 2009 BRISTOL TOWNSHIP COUNCil Bristol Township Administration Building 2500 Bath Road Bristol, PA 19007 Re: Croydon Transit Revitalization Investment District (TRIO) - Final Planning Study "A Plan for 2010 and Beyond" Attn: Jeffrey Bartlett, Township Managing Director It is with great pleasure that we submit this document for Council's approval and acceptance before forwarding onto the PA Department of Community and Economic Development as satisfaction of the TRID/LUPTAP Grant for this phase of development of the TRID program and Transit-Oriented Development to revitalization the Croydon Section of Bristol Township, in an area in proximity to the SEPTA Croydon Station and its new construction. We believe that it satisfies the Grant conditions; containing: the Market Analysis, Value Capture, establishment of a viable TRID Boundary, and the Draft Agreement to effect the TRIO area and program. In addition, it is in conformance with the original Requ est for Proposals, and has been reviewed by the Key Stakeholders working group, and other key agencies having a say on TRID, including SEPTA, the Bucks TMA, the BCRDA, Bucks County, DVRPC, area legislators, and members of the public through their input at various stages. We (Pennoni Asso ciates Inc., and Economic Development Associates) look forward to an opportunity to assist in subsequent phases of implementation of this cha llenging and worthy undertaking for the citizens/residents of Croydon and the Township in a program that ca n induce additional mass transit SEPTA ridership, and tax revenues from future development and red evelopment as revitalization occurs over time.
    [Show full text]
  • DVRPC Congestion Management Process (CMP)
    The symbol in The Delaware Valley Regional Planning our logo is Commission is dedicated to uniting the adapted from the official region’s elected officials, planning DVRPC seal professionals, and the public with a and is designed as a stylized image of common vision of making a great region the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole while even greater. Shaping the way we live, the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware work, and play, DVRPC builds River. The two adjoining crescents represent the Commonwealth of consensus on improving transportation, Pennsylvania and the State of New promoting smart growth, protecting the Jersey. environment, and enhancing the DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding economy. We serve a diverse region of sources including federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s nine counties: Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Montgomery, and Philadelphia in and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Jersey Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, departments of transportation, as well Gloucester, and Mercer in New Jersey. as by DVRPC’s state and local member governments. The authors, however, are DVRPC is the federally designated solely responsible for the findings and Metropolitan Planning Organization for conclusions herein, which may not represent the official views or policies of the Greater Philadelphia Region — the funding agencies. leading the way to a better future. DVRPC fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. DVRPC’s website (www.dvrpc.org) may be translated into multiple languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress 2009 Annual Report
    SPARKING PROGRESS 2009 ANNUAL REPORT Southeastern SEPTAPennsylvania Transportation Authority Board Members Chairman Vice Chairman Pasquale T. Deon, Sr. James C. Schwartzman, Esquire SEPTA Board SEPTA Officers Philadelphia Governor Appointee General Manager Beverly Coleman Denise J. Smyler, Esquire Joseph M. Casey, CPA Rina Cutler Senate Majority Leader Chief Financial Officer/ Bucks County Appointee Treasurer Pasquale T. Deon, Sr. Honorable Stewart J. Greenleaf, Richard G. Burnfield Honorable Charles H. Martin Esquire General Counsel Chester County Senate Minority Leader Nicholas J. Staffieri, Esquire Joseph E. Brion, Esquire Appointee Kevin L. Johnson, P.E. James C. Schwartzman, Esquire Controller to the Board Stephen A. Jobs, CPA Delaware County House Majority Leader Thomas E. Babcock Appointee Secretary to the Board Daniel J. Kubik Frank G. McCartney Elizabeth M. Grant Montgomery County House Minority Leader Thomas Jay Ellis, Esquire Appointee Michael J. O’Donoghue, Esquire Herman M. Wooden Created by the State Legislature in 1964, the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority was formed to plan, develop and coordinate a regional transportation system for Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery and Philadelphia counties. It has the right to acquire, construct, operate, lease and otherwise function in public transport in these five counties. The SEPTA Transportation Board determines policy for the Authority. Its 15 members represent the five counties served by SEPTA and the governing bodies of the Commonwealth. Copyright SEPTA 2010. Pasquale T. Deon, Sr. James C. Schwartzman, Esquire Denise J. Smyler, Esquire Honorable Stewart J. Frank G. McCartney Herman M. Wooden Greenleaf, Esquire Beverly Coleman Rina Cutler Thomas E. Babcock Joseph E. Brion, Esquire Thomas Jay Ellis, Kevin L.
    [Show full text]
  • SEPTA Cycle-Transit Plan a Strategic Approach April 2015
    SEPTA Cycle-Transit Plan A Strategic Approach April 2015 1 SEPTA CYCLE-TRANSIT PLAN A Strategic Approach to Bike and Transit Integration TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLES & FIGURES..............................................................................................................................................................3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................................................................4 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................................................6 BIKES AS MAINSTREAM....................................................................................................................................................7 SECTION 1: BIKES TO TRANSIT......................................................................................................................................9 1.1 - Baseline..............................................................................................................................................................9 1.2 - Future Actions.................................................................................................................................................15 SECTION 2: BIKES AT TRANSIT....................................................................................................................................15 2.1 - Baseline...........................................................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]