Evaluating Gene Flow Using Selected Markers: a Case Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evaluating Gene Flow Using Selected Markers: a Case Study Copyright 1998 by the Genetics Society of America Evaluating Gene Flow Using Selected Markers: A Case Study Thomas Lenormand, Thomas Guillemaud, Denis Bourguet1 and Michel Raymond Laboratoire GeÂneÂtique et Environnement, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution (UMR 5554), Universite Montpellier II, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France Manuscript received September 16, 1997 Accepted for publication March 9, 1998 ABSTRACT The extent to which an organism is locally adapted in an environmental pocket depends on the selection intensities inside and outside the pocket, on migration, and on the size of the pocket. When two or more loci are involved in this local adaptation, measuring their frequency gradients and their linkage disequilbria allows one to disentangle the forcesÐmigration and selectionÐacting on the system. We apply this method to the case of a local adaptation to organophosphate insecticides in the mosquito Culex pipiens pipiens in southern France. The study of two different resistance loci allowed us to estimate with support limits gene ¯ow as well as selection pressure on insecticide resistance and the ®tness costs associated with each locus. These estimates permit us to pinpoint the conditions for the maintenance of this pocket of adaptation as well as the effect of the interaction between the two resistance loci. LTHOUGH evolutionary theory attempts mainly to this ®nite variance requires knowledge of population A explain past changes, its predictions can be tested sizes and of the patterns of isolation by distance (Rous- by examining actual evolutionary processes in natural set 1997). populations. To do so we must quantify the determinis- Another approach is to analyze directly the relative tic processes causing genetic evolution, namely, selec- magnitude of gene ¯ow vs. selection through clinal pat- tion and gene ¯ow, and take into account the unpredict- terns that have been extensively studied theoretically for able changes due to stochastic processes such as random various selection models (Felsenstein 1976; Endler drift and mutation. Among these factors only gene ¯ow 1977). In an in®nite environment and at equilibrium, (and stabilizing selection) will oppose genetic differenti- the cline slope is a robust estimate of the relative mag- ation between populations. Its evaluation is therefore nitude of selection vs. migration (Barton and Gale required for the understanding of the evolution of pop- 1993). Different methods can be used to infer the abso- ulations in their ªadaptive landscapeº (for review, see lute value of each term, and in all cases, they require Slatkin 1987). However, methods are lacking to evalu- extra information about the system such as (1) a direct ate gene ¯ow independently of selection, mutation, or measure of dispersal, thus giving an indirect estimate drift. of selection (Endler 1977; Barton and Hewitt 1985); In most cases, it is possible to determine the relative (2) a genotypic parameter such as heterozygote de®- magnitude of gene ¯ow vs. drift, and thus estimate the ciency at one locus or linkage disequilibria when several degree of isolation of populations. This determination loci are involved, the latter being more reliable (Mal- enables the evaluation of the effects of different kinds let and Barton 1989); (3) the variation of the cline of selection, of the geographic scale of a local adaptation through time, for instance, the speed of a wave of ad- (Nagylaki 1975), or whether such populations might vance of an advantageous gene (Fisher 1937) or the be able to cross an ªadaptive valleyº (Lande 1985). rate of modi®cation of the cline shape when selection These methods, in principle, are valid for neutral and or migration is not constant. Despite their potential for independent genes at equilibrium and for a given rate the understanding of the evolution of populations over and mode of mutation. When averaged over many loci, their ªadaptive landscape,º these methods have mainly these methods may be robust to slight departures from been used for the analysis of tension zones (Barton the assumptions (Slatkin and Barton 1989). However, 1982; Szymura and Barton 1986; Mallet et al. 1990; they provide an estimate of the number of ªeffectiveº Sites et al. 1995). The aim of this article is to show that migrants but not of migration variance (s2). Estimating these methods can also be useful for understanding the dynamics of local adaptation. We have investigated the case of local adaptation of Corresponding author: Thomas Lenormand, Laboratoire GeÂneÂtique the mosquito Culex pipiens pipiens to organophosphate et Environnement, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution (UMR 5554), insecticides in the Montpellier area in France. This ad- Universite Montpellier II, CC065 Place E. Bataillon, F-34095 Montpel- lier Cedex 5, France. E-mail: [email protected] aptation is conferred by resistance alleles at two major 1 Present address: Station de Recherche de lutte biologique, INRA La loci. Insecticide selection varies geographically, creating MinieÁre, 78285 Guyancourt Cedex, France. a pocket of adaptation. We have analyzed clinal patterns Genetics 149: 1383±1392 ( July 1998) 1384 T. Lenormand et al. at these two loci to estimate selection intensities and TABLE 1 gene ¯ow. These estimates were used to evaluate the Nomenclature role of interaction between the two loci for the main- tainance of the pocket of adaptation. Finally, we com- Coding rules pared our estimates to direct or indirect estimates of selection intensity and gene ¯ow in other studies. Genotype Genotype Phenotype Class Ester4 Ester4 (44) [4] {E} Ester4 Ester 0 (40) [4] {E} MATERIALS AND METHODS Ester 1 Ester 1 (11) [1] {E} Ester 1 Ester 0 (10) [1] {E} Culex pipiens and its environment: Larval development of 2 2 the mosquito C. p. pipiens takes place mainly in anthropic Ester Ester (22) [2] {E} 2 0 pools where insecticide control occurs. Females are presum- Ester Ester (20) [2] {E} ably fertilized at emergence (Weidhass et al. 1973) and then Ester4 Ester 1 (41) [41] {E} search for their blood meal and a site to lay z150±200 eggs. Ester4 Ester 2 (42) [42] {E} Insecticides are applied during the breeding season, that is, Ester2 Ester 1 (21) [21] {E} approximately from April to October near Montpellier in Ester 0 Ester 0 (00) [0] {O} Chevillon southern France (see et al. 1995 fordetails) andare Ace.1R Ace.1R (RR) [RR] {R} restricted to a 20-km coastal belt. Between 1968 and 1990±91, Ace.1R Ace.1S (RS) [RS] {R} organophosphate (OP) insecticides were exclusively used for Ace.1RS Ace.1S (RSS) [RS] {R} mosquito control and have been replaced since then by the Ace.1RS Ace.1R (RSR) [RS] {R} Bacillus sphaericus toxin. However, in the Montpellier area, OP Ace.1RS Ace.1RS (RSRS) [RS] {R} insecticides are still used at large doses to control other Culic- S S ids and even to control C. p. pipiens in some situations (Anony- Ace.1 Ace.1 (SS) [SS] {S} mous 1990±1995). Additionally, residual doses of OP may be The resistance allele Ester 1 corresponds to overproduced of the order of lethal concentrations for susceptible mosqui- esterase A1, and alleles Ester 2 and Ester4 correspond to overpro- toes in many places of the treated area, possibly due to other S R. Eritja, duced esterases A2-B2 and A4-B4, respectively. Ace.1 codes pest controls ( personal communication). for a sensitive AChE1, Ace.1R for an insensitive AChE1, and Genetics of resistance: Two main loci are responsible for Ace.1RS for both acetylcholinesterases. ªCoding rulesº indicates OP resistance in C. p. pipiens. The ®rst locus, Ace.1, codes for Bourguet the simpli®ed code for each genotype, phenotype, and class an acetylcholinesterase (AChE1), the OP target ( corresponding to the genotype indicated in the ®rst column. et al. 1996a; Malcolm et al. 1998) and has three alleles: Ace.1R S ªPhenotypeº corresponds to the electrophoretic phenotype that codes for an insensitive AChE1; Ace.1 that codes for a (Ester locus) or to the TPP phenotype (Ace.1 locus). ªClassº sensitive AChE1; and Ace.1RS that corresponds to a duplication groups genotypes with at least one resistance allele. {E}/{O} of and codes for both enzymes (Raymond 1986; Ace.1 et al. for the presence/absence of at least one overproduced ester- Bourguet 1996b,c). The second locus corresponds to et al. ase and {R}/{S} for the presence/absence of at least one insen- a ªsuper locus,º that is, two closely linked loci, and Est-3 sitive AChE1. Est-2, coding for esterases A and B, respectively (de Stordeur 1976; Pasteur et al. 1981a,b). Only 2 to 6 kb of DNA separate Est-3 from Est-2 (Rooker et al. 1996; Guillemaud et al. 1997). Resistance alleles at Est-3 and Est-2 induce an overproduction populations, resistance alleles at both loci are associated with of esterase, resulting in gene ampli®cation or gene regulation ®tness costs, in the absence of insecticides, through decreases (Rooker et al. 1996). Due to their close proximity, esterase in fecundity and adult survival and an increase in larval devel- genes are often coampli®ed as a single unit, which explains opmental time. These ®tness costs tend to be higher for insen- the complete association of resistance alleles at both loci sitive acetylcholinesterase than for overproduced esterases (Rooker et al. 1996; Guillemaud et al. 1997). This coampli®- (Chevillon et al. 1997). cation justi®es considering them as a single ªsuper locus,º Data collection: Pupae were sampled on July 5, 1995 in 10 which will hereafter be designated as Ester. In southern France, breeding sites along a 50-km north-south transect (Figure 1) three resistance alleles have been identi®ed at this locus. Ester 1 across the treated and untreated areas studied by Guillemaud corresponds to an increased expression of the esterase A1, et al.
Recommended publications
  • Microevolution and the Genetics of Populations ​ ​ Microevolution Refers to Varieties Within a Given Type
    Chapter 8: Evolution Lesson 8.3: Microevolution and the Genetics of Populations ​ ​ Microevolution refers to varieties within a given type. Change happens within a group, but the descendant is clearly of the same type as the ancestor. This might better be called variation, or adaptation, but the changes are "horizontal" in effect, not "vertical." Such changes might be accomplished by "natural selection," in which a trait ​ ​ ​ ​ within the present variety is selected as the best for a given set of conditions, or accomplished by "artificial selection," such as when dog breeders produce a new breed of dog. Lesson Objectives ● Distinguish what is microevolution and how it affects changes in populations. ● Define gene pool, and explain how to calculate allele frequencies. ● State the Hardy-Weinberg theorem ● Identify the five forces of evolution. Vocabulary ● adaptive radiation ● gene pool ● migration ● allele frequency ● genetic drift ● mutation ● artificial selection ● Hardy-Weinberg theorem ● natural selection ● directional selection ● macroevolution ● population genetics ● disruptive selection ● microevolution ● stabilizing selection ● gene flow Introduction Darwin knew that heritable variations are needed for evolution to occur. However, he knew nothing about Mendel’s laws of genetics. Mendel’s laws were rediscovered in the early 1900s. Only then could scientists fully understand the process of evolution. Microevolution is how individual traits within a population change over time. In order for a population to change, some things must be assumed to be true. In other words, there must be some sort of process happening that causes microevolution. The five ways alleles within a population change over time are natural selection, migration (gene flow), mating, mutations, or genetic drift.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Flow by Pollen Into Small Populations
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 86, pp. 9044-9047, November 1989 Population Biology Gene flow by pollen into small populations: Data from experimental and natural stands of wild radish (Raphanus sativus/spatial isolation/interpopulation mating) NORMAN C. ELLSTRANDt, B. DEVLINt, AND DIANE L. MARSHALL§ Department of Botany and Plant Sciences and Program in Genetics, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521-0124 Communicated by R. W. Allard, August 14, 1989 (received for review August 18, 1988) ABSTRACT Gene flow can have an especially strong im- much from population to population, whether it varies within pact on the evolution of small populations. However, empirical a population over a season, and whether it varies with spatial studies on the actual rates and patterns of gene flow into small isolation from the nearest conspecific. More data are needed populations are few. Thus, we sought to measure gene flow into that focus more closely on a number ofpopulations ofa single small populations of wild radish, Raphanus sativus. We found species. significant differences in gene flow receipt among experimental Therefore, we selected wild radish, Raphanus sativus L. populations and within those populations over a season. A (Brassicaceae), to measure patterns of gene flow by pollen maximum-likelihood estimate revealed that almost all of the into small populations. This species is especially suitable for gene flow into these synthetic populations had its origin in both experimental and descriptive gene flow studies because relatively distant (>650 m), large natural populations rather it is a common outcrossing weed in southern California (8), than the proximal (255400 m), small synthetic populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Saving Our Tree HUMAN GENETICS
    HIGHLIGHTS EVOLUTION IN BRIEF Saving our tree HUMAN GENETICS Identification of a gene responsible for familial For several years, evolutionary biolo- Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome. gists interested in gene flow between species have been investigating and Gollob, M. H. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 344, 1823–1831 (2001) debating a controversial issue: the hor- Wolff–Parkinson–White (WPW) syndrome is an inherited heart izontal exchange of genes between dis- defect associated with arrhythmia, cardiac arrest and sudden death. tantly related species, its extent and Gollob et al. studied two large families with autosomal-dominant possible adaptive significance. WPW syndrome, and used a positional candidate-gene approach to Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is an identify the causative gene, which encodes a regulatory subunit of important evolutionary force in appears in a cluster of bacterial AMP-activated protein kinase. This finding should shed light on prokaryotes, as their life cycles facilitate sequences, then the vertebrate gene the mechanisms that lead to heart arrhythmias. the exchange of genes between even was probably horizontally transferred distantly related species. However, this from bacteria. Conversely, if all GENETIC NETWORKS is trickier in multicellular organisms, eukaryotic sequences cluster together, in which the fixation of horizontally then HGT has probably not occurred Ordering genes in a flagella pathway by analysis of transferred genes can only occur if as this grouping is most parsimo- expression kinetics from living bacteria. they are transmitted through the germ niously explained by vertebrates hav- Kalir, S. et al. Science 292, 2080–2083 (2001) line. It was therefore surprising when ing acquired the sequence by descent the International Human Genome through other eukaryotes.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Flow 1 6 James Mallet
    Gene Flow 1 6 James Mallet Calton Laboratory, Department of Biology, Univetsity College London, 4 Stephenson Way, London NWI 2HE, UK What is Gene Flow? 'Gene flow' means the movement of genes. In some cases, small fragments of DNA may pass from one individual directly into the germline of another, perhaps transduced by a pathogenic virus or other vector, or deliberately via a human transgenic manipulation. However, this kind of gene flow, known as horizontal gene transfer, is rare. Most of the time, gene flow is caused by the movement or dispersal of whole organisms or genomes from one popula- tion to another. After entering a new population, immigrant genomes may become incorporated due to sexual reproduction or hybridization, and will be gradually broken up by recombination. 'Genotype flow' would therefore be a more logical term to indicate that the whole genome is moving at one time. The term 'gene flow' is used probably because of an implicit belief in abundant recombination, and because most theory is still based on simple single locus models: it does not mean that genes are transferred one at a time. The fact that gene flow is usually caused by genotype flow has important consequences for its measurement, as we shall see. Two Meanings of 'Gene Flow' We are often taught that 'dispersal does not necessarily lead to gene flow'. The term 'gene flow' is then being used in the sense of a final state of the population, i.e. successful establishment of moved genes. This disagrees somewhat with a more straightforward interpretation of gene flow as actual EICAR International 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Invasions at the Gene Level VIEWPOINT Rémy J
    Diversity and Distributions, (Diversity Distrib.) (2004) 10, 159–165 Blackwell Publishing, Ltd. BIODIVERSITY Biological invasions at the gene level VIEWPOINT Rémy J. Petit UMR Biodiversité, Gènes et Ecosystèmes, 69 ABSTRACT Route d’Arcachon, 33612 Cestas Cedex, France Despite several recent contributions of population and evolutionary biology to the rapidly developing field of invasion biology, integration is far from perfect. I argue here that invasion and native status are sometimes best discussed at the level of the gene rather than at the level of the species. This, and the need to consider both natural (e.g. postglacial) and human-induced invasions, suggests that a more integrative view of invasion biology is required. Correspondence: Rémy J. Petit, UMR Key words Biodiversité, Gènes et Ecosystèmes, 69 Route d’Arcachon, 33612 Cestas Cedex, France. Alien, genetic assimilation, gene flow, homogenization, hybridization, introgression, E-mail: [email protected] invasibility, invasiveness, native, Quercus, Spartina. the particular genetic system of plants. Although great attention INTRODUCTION has been paid to the formation of new hybrid taxa, introgression Biological invasions are among the most important driving more often results in hybrid swarms or in ‘genetic pollution’, forces of evolution on our human-dominated planet. According which is best examined at the gene level. Under this perspective, to Myers & Knoll (2001), distinctive features of evolution now translocations of individuals and even movement of alleles include a homogenization of biotas, a proliferation of opportunistic within a species’ range (e.g. following selective sweeps) should species, a decline of biodisparity (the manifest morphological equally be recognized as an important (if often cryptic) and physiological variety of biotas), and increased rates of speci- component of biological invasions.
    [Show full text]
  • Divergence, Gene Flow, and Speciation in Eight Lineages of Trans‐Beringian Birds
    Received: 2 May 2019 | Revised: 22 July 2020 | Accepted: 27 July 2020 DOI: 10.1111/mec.15574 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Divergence, gene flow, and speciation in eight lineages of trans-Beringian birds Jessica F. McLaughlin1,2 | Brant C. Faircloth3 | Travis C. Glenn4 | Kevin Winker1 1University of Alaska Museum, Fairbanks, AK, USA Abstract 2Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural Determining how genetic diversity is structured between populations that span the History, Norman, OK, USA divergence continuum from populations to biological species is key to understanding 3Department of Biological Sciences and Museum of Natural Science, Louisiana State the generation and maintenance of biodiversity. We investigated genetic divergence University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA and gene flow in eight lineages of birds with a trans-Beringian distribution, where 4 Department of Environmental Health Asian and North American populations have likely been split and reunited through Science and Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA multiple Pleistocene glacial cycles. Our study transects the speciation process, in- cluding eight pairwise comparisons in three orders (ducks, shorebirds and passer- Correspondence Kevin Winker, University of Alaska Museum, ines) at population, subspecies and species levels. Using ultraconserved elements 907 Yukon Drive, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA. (UCEs), we found that these lineages represent conditions from slightly differentiated Email: [email protected] populations to full biological species. Although allopatric speciation is considered Funding information the predominant mode of divergence in birds, all of our best divergence models in- National Science Foundation, Grant/Award Number: DEB-1242267-1242241-1242260 cluded gene flow, supporting speciation with gene flow as the predominant mode in Beringia.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitochondrial Gene Flow
    Proc. NatI. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 81, pp. 1764-1767, March 1984 Genetics Mitochondrial gene flow (population genetics/interspedfic gene flow/mitochondrial DNA) NAOYUKI TAKAHATA*t AND MONTGOMERY SLATKIN Department of Zoology, NJ-15, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 Communicated by W. T. Edmondson, November 28, 1983 ABSTRACT To account for the transmission of mitochon- drial genotype because of the linkage disequilibrium between drial DNA between Nonspecific species Drosophila pseudoob- them. This could be important for interspecific gene flow scura and D. pprsimilis in sympatry reported by J. R. Powell especially, because it is reasonable to expect some selection [Powell, J. R. (1983) Proc. Nail. Acpd. Sci. USA 80, 492-495], against hybrids. Powell (1) proposes selection against het- a simple model of gene flow and selection in infinite popula- erozygotes as one mechanism for preventing the interchange tions is analyzed. The model assumes two alleles at each of two of nuclear genes among the two Drosophila species. Another loci, one of which is coded by an autosome and the other' by mechanism Powell suggests is assortative mating. If the hy- mitochondrial DNA. Viability selection is'presumed to be un- brids are able to mate with only one of the parental species derdominant-i.e., heterozygous inferiority to the homozy- and the backcrosses tend to mate with the same parental spe- gotes- at an autosomal locus, and neutral or deleterious at a cies, then nuclear and mitochondrial gene flow between spe- mitochondrial locus, with'the combined action being multipli- cies could be lower than expected on the basis of'the number cative.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 23: Population Genetics (Microevolution)  Microevolution Is a Change in Allele Frequencies Or Genotype Frequencies in a Population Over Time
    Chapter 23: Population Genetics (Microevolution) Microevolution is a change in allele frequencies or genotype frequencies in a population over time Genetic equilibrium in populations: the Hardy-Weinberg theorem Microevolution is deviation from Hardy- Weinberg equilibrium Genetic variation must exist for natural selection to occur . • Explain what terms in the Hardy- Weinberg equation give: – allele frequencies (dominant allele, recessive allele, etc.) – each genotype frequency (homozygous dominant, heterozygous, etc.) – each phenotype frequency . Chapter 23: Population Genetics (Microevolution) Microevolution is a change in allele frequencies or genotype frequencies in a population over time Genetic equilibrium in populations: the Hardy-Weinberg theorem Microevolution is deviation from Hardy- Weinberg equilibrium Genetic variation must exist for natural selection to occur . Microevolution is a change in allele frequencies or genotype frequencies in a population over time population – a localized group of individuals capable of interbreeding and producing fertile offspring, and that are more or less isolated from other such groups gene pool – all alleles present in a population at a given time phenotype frequency – proportion of a population with a given phenotype genotype frequency – proportion of a population with a given genotype allele frequency – proportion of a specific allele in a population . Microevolution is a change in allele frequencies or genotype frequencies in a population over time allele frequency – proportion of a specific allele in a population diploid individuals have two alleles for each gene if you know genotype frequencies, it is easy to calculate allele frequencies example: population (1000) = genotypes AA (490) + Aa (420) + aa (90) allele number (2000) = A (490x2 + 420) + a (420 + 90x2) = A (1400) + a (600) freq[A] = 1400/2000 = 0.70 freq[a] = 600/2000 = 0.30 note that the sum of all allele frequencies is 1.0 (sum rule of probability) .
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Flow in Coral Reef Organisms of the Tropical Eastern Pacific 16
    Gene Flow in Coral Reef Organisms of the Tropical Eastern Pacific 16 H.A. Lessios and Iliana B. Baums Abstract Gene flow can provide cohesion between conspecific populations. In order to obtain an indirect measure of gene flow between coral reef species in the eastern tropical Pacific (ETP) and between these populations and those of the rest of the Pacific we compiled available data from sequences of DNA and microsatellites for corals, gastropods, echinoderms and fishes, and calculated FST statistics. The ETP consists of a narrow strip of continental shelf along the coast of the Americas and a deeper water gap between the coast and the outer eastern Pacific Islands; a large expanse of deep ocean separates the ETP and the closest islands in the central Pacific. We have, therefore, compared populations in four major directions: (1) between the eastern and the central Pacific, (2) between the coast and the outer islands, (3) among the outer islands, and (4) along the coast and nearshore islands. The available data are biased in favor of showing high levels of gene flow because they contain an excess of transpacific species, which are a minority among ETP biota. Despite this bias, shallow water populations of the ETP are isolated from the rest of the world’s oceans. Occasional breaching of the expanse of water between the ETP and the Central Pacificby some species is also possible. Gene flow between the outer eastern Pacific islands and the mainland coast is variable, depending on the species examined. Gene flow among populations at the outer eastern Pacific islands is high except for those at Easter Island (Rapa Nui), in which all but one sampled species show large and significant values of FST in comparisons with populations from all other islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Genetic Diversity (Within a Population)
    Primer in Population Genetics Hierarchical Organization of Genetics Diversity Primer in Population Genetics Defining Genetic Diversity within Populations • Polymorphism – number of loci with > 1 allele • Number of alleles at a given locus • Heterozygosity at a given locus • Theta or θ = 4Neμ (for diploid genes) where Ne = effective population size μ = per generation mutation rate Defining Genetic Diversity Among Populations • Genetic diversity among populations occurs if there are differences in allele and genotype frequencies between those populations. • Can be measured using several different metrics, that are all based on allele frequencies in populations. – Fst and analogues – Genetic distance, e.g., Nei’s D – Sequence divergence Estimating Observed Genotype and Allele Frequencies •Suppose we genotyped 100 diploid individuals (n = 200 gene copies)…. Genotypes AA Aa aa Number 58 40 2 Genotype Frequency 0.58 0.40 0.02 # obs. for genotype Allele AA Aa aa Observed Allele Frequencies A 116 40 0 156/200 = 0.78 (p) a 0 40 4 44/200 = 0.22 (q) Estimating Expected Genotype Frequencies Mendelian Inheritance Mom Mom Dad Dad Aa Aa Aa Aa •Offspring inherit one chromosome and thus A A one allele independently A a and randomly from each parent AA Aa •Mom and dad both have genotype Aa, their offspring have Mom Dad Mom Dad Aa Aa three possible Aa Aa genotypes: a A a a AA Aa aa Aa aa Estimating Expected Genotype Frequencies •Much of population genetics involves manipulations of equations that have a base in either probability theory or combination theory. -Rule 1: If you account for all possible events, the probabilities sum to 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Mutation, Migration, Drift, and Selection Are Ongoing Natural Processes That
    Genetic diversity is always changing — both across Migration is the movement of genetic diversity, usually space and through time. Typically, the amount and type within a species. In plants, this occurs through pollen of genetic diversity within a species vary across its dispersal, seed dispersal, and movement of vegetative natural range. Additionally, its genetic diversity changes propagules, such as suckers or rhizomes, in species that over time — at least in the longterm, and sometimes can reproduce asexually. Migration, also called gene even over shorter timeframes such as a few generations flow, occurs both with the advancing front of a population of the species. These natural changes in the genetic when it is colonizing new areas, and when genes of two diversity of a species create a dynamic landscape upon or more populations mix through pollen and seed dispersal. which any influences that we exert are superimposed. The rate of migration is obviously related to the frequency To better understand our impacts, and to decide if of reproduction and the distances over which pollen and management actions are warranted, it is useful to seeds typically disperse. understand the natural dynamics of genetic diversity. Genetic Drift, or random genetic drift, is simply the change in genetic diversity, or, more specifically, the [ mutation, migration, change in frequencies of different alleles, over genera- drift, and selection are ongoing tions because of chance. For example, every pollen grain natural processes that affect contains a different combination of alleles. Which pollen grains — whether carried by wind, insects, or genetic diversity ] some other medium — actually succeed in arriving at a compatible flower and producing a seed — are largely Genetic diversity is affected by several ongoing natural determined by chance events.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptation Despite Gene Flow? Low Recombination Helps
    This document is the accepted manuscript version of the following article: Marques, D. A. (2017). Adaptation despite gene flow? Low recombination helps. Molecular Ecology, 26(17), 4361-4363. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14251 1 Adaptation despite gene flow? – Low recombination helps. 2 3 David A. Marques1,2 4 5 1Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland 6 2Department of Fish Ecology and Evolution, Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and 7 Technology, Kastanienbaum, Switzerland 8 9 Correspondence: David A. Marques; E-Mail: [email protected] 10 11 Keywords: recombination, adaptation, speciation, threespine stickleback, gene flow, speciation continuum 12 13 15,000 years earlier, the Northern half of Europe and North America was buried under a few 14 kilometers of ice. Since then, many organisms have colonized and rapidly adapted to the new, 15 vacant habitats. Some, like the threespine stickleback fish, have done so more successfully than 16 others: from the sea, stickleback have adapted to a multitude of lake and stream habitats with a 17 vast array of complex phenotypes and life histories. Previous studies showed that most of these 18 ‘ecotypes’ differ in multiple divergently selected genes throughout the genome. But how are well- 19 adapted ecotypes of one habitat protected from maladaptive gene flow from ecotypes of another, 20 adjacent habitat? According to a From the Cover meta-analysis in this issue of Molecular Ecology 21 (Samuk et al. 2017), low recombination rate regions in the genome offer such protection. While 22 inversions have often been highlighted as an efficient way to maintain linkage disequilibrium 23 among sets of adaptive variants in the face of gene flow, Samuk et al.
    [Show full text]