DOCSLIB.ORG

Handbook to the Textual Criticism of the New Testament for the Use of Students Who Are Comparatively New to the Subject

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project to make the world’s books discoverable online. It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that’s often difficult to discover. Marks, notations and other marginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book’s long journey from the publisher to a library and finally to you. Usage guidelines Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing this resource, we have taken steps to prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying. We also ask that you: + Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for personal, non-commercial purposes. + Refrain from automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google’s system: If you are conducting research on machine translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help. + Maintain attribution The Google “watermark” you see on each file is essential for informing people about this project and helping them find additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it. + Keep it legal Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other countries. Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we can’t offer guidance on whether any specific use of any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book’s appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liability can be quite severe. About Google Book Search Google’s mission is to organize the world’s information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers discover the world’s books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through the full text of this book on the web at http://books.google.com/ 1 HandbooktothetextualcriticismofNewTestament SirFredericGeorgeKenyon HandbooktothetextualcriticismofNewTestament SirFredericGeorgeKenyon HANDBOOK TO THE TEXTUAL CRITICISM OF THE NEW TESTAMENT MACMILLAN AND CO., Limited LONDON • BOMBAY . CALCUTTA MELBOURNE THE MACMILLAN COMPANY NEW YORK • BOSTON • CH1CAGO DALLAS • SAN FRANC1SCO THE MaCMILLAN CO. OF CANADA. Ltd. TORONTO HANDBOOK TO THE TEXTUAL CRITICISM OF THE NEW TESTAMENT BY Sir FREDERIC G. KENYON, K.C.B., F.B.A. D1RICTOR AND niNCiFAL L1BRAR1AN, BR1T1SH MUSIUM SECOND EDITION WITH SIXTEEN FACSIMILES MACMILLAN AND CO., LIMITED ST. MARTIN'S STREET, LONDON 1912 COPYRIGHT First Edition, Qvo, 1901 Second Edition, Extra Crown %voi 1912 ffieorgio Eftrtung EPISCOPO SOUTHWELLENSI COLLEGII B.V.M. WINTON PROPE WINTON OLIM INFORMATOR! HUNC LIBRUM GRATO ANIMO DEDICAT DISCIPULUS 274979 PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION A NEW edition of this handbook being required, I have endeavoured to bring the information contained in it up to date. The principal alteration made in it is in regard to the numeration of the MSS. The new system proposed by von Soden is described, and likewise the modification of the notation hitherto in use which Gregory, after consultation with a large number of Biblical scholars, has elaborated ; and the latter has been adopted in this edition. A new section is also devoted to von Soden's theory of the textual history of the New Testament. In other respects, though there are many alterations in detail, the book remains substantially as before ; but the opportunity has been taken to issue it at a lower price, which, it is hoped, may make it more accessible to the students to whom it is most likely to be useful. I have to thank many friends for suggestions and corrections, notably Prof. C. R. Gregory and Prof. J. Hope Moulton. F. G. K. August 20, 1912. vii PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION The object of this volume is to provide a serviceable handbook to the textual criticism of the New Testament for the use of students who are comparatively new to the subject. It lays no claim to rival the standard works of Gregory and Scrivener as a storehouse of statistics and bibliographical information, though in certain details it has been possible to supplement them and bring them up to date ; on the other hand, the discussion of textual theories is somewhat fuller than the plans of those works admitted of. It seemed advisable to indicate to the student the present state of the principal controversies with regard to textual theory ; and I have tried to represent all the more important views fully and fairly, whether I agree with them or not. The lists of authorities prefixed to the several chapters are not intended to be exhaustive, but to indicate either those works which I have chiefly con sulted, or those which will be most useful to the student (especially the English student), who wishes to push his inquiries further. Such a work as this is in great measure dependent on the labours of others, iz x CRITICISM OF NEW TESTAMENT to whom my indebtedness is, I hope, fully acknow ledged throughout. I have also to thank Cavaliere F. Carta, Chief Librarian of the National Library at Turin, for his courtesy in enabling me to obtain a photograph of a page of the Codex Bobiensis ; Mr. W. E. Crum for much information with regard to the Coptic Versions ; and especially Mr. C. H. Turner, Fellow of Magdalen College, Oxford, and the Rev. H. E. Salter, vicar of Shirburn, for their kindness in reading the proofs and making many valuable suggestions and corrections. F. G. K. October 21, 1901. CONTENTS CMAF. FAGK I. The Function of Textual Criticism . i II. The Autographs of the New Testament . 19 Catalogue of Papyri . .41 III. The Uncial Manuscripts . .45 i IV. The Minuscule Manuscripts . .124 V. The Ancient Versions . .145 1. The Syriac Versions . .147 (a) The Diatessaron of Tatian . .148 (6) The Old Syriac . 151 (<:) The Peshitto . .158 (rf) The Philoxenian and Harkleian Syriac. 164 (e) The Palestinian Syriac . .167 2. The Armenian Version . .171 3. The Georgian Version . .174 4. The Persian Versions . .175 5. The Coptic Versions . .176 (a) The Bohairic Version . .181 (*) The Sahidic Version . .185 (c) The Middle Egyptian Versions 192 xi xii CRITICISM OF NEW TESTAMENT CHAP. PAGE 6. The Ethiopic Version . .194 7. The Arabic Versions . .195 8. The Latin Versions . .196 (a) The Old Latin 197 (6) The Vulgate . .216 9. The Gothic Version . .240 VI. Patristic Quotations .... 242 VII. Textual Criticism in the Past . 265 VIII. The Textual Problem . .314 1. The o-text . 315 2. The /?-text ..... 327 3. The y-text . -334 4. The 8-text . -338 5. von Soden's Textual Theory 363 INDEX I. Subjects and Persons . 37 1 INDEX II. Passages of which the various Read ings are noticed . .380 PLATES [Most of the facsimiles are reduced in scale, in order to show complete pages ; the scale of reduction is stated in each case on the plate.] PACE PAGE I. Hyperides pro Euxenippo (Papyrus Roll of the First Century, literary hand) . .28 II. Aristotle's 'Adrjvalwv HoXireCa (Papyrus Roll of the First Century, non-literary hand) . 30 III. Codex Sinaiticus, 4th century . .60 IV. Codex Alexandrinus, 5th century . .72 V. Codex Vaticanus, 4th century . .78 VI. Codex Bezae, 6th century . .89 VII. Codex Regius, 8th century . 108 VIII. Codex Nitriensis, 6th century . .113 IX. Codex 81, a.d. 1044 .... 134 X. Codex 700, 1 2th century . .139 XI. The Curetonian Syriac MS., 5th century . 151 XII. The Peshitto Syriac (Brit. Mus. Add. MS. 14459), a.D. 530-540 ..... 161 XIII. The Bohairic Version (Curzon Catena), a.d. 889 . 183 XIV. The Sahidic Version (Brit. Mus. MS. Or. 3518), 5th century (?) . .187 XV. The Codex Bobiensis (k of the Old Latin), 5th century (?) . 203 XVI. The Lindisfarne Gospels (Y of the Vulgate), circ. a.d. 700 ..... 234 xiii CHAPTER I THE FUNCTION OF TEXTUAL CRITICISM The province of Textual Criticism is the ascertainment of the true form of a literary work, as originally composed and written down by its author. The science owes its existence to the conditions under which, until comparatively modern days, literary works have been preserved. If the author's autograph of every book were still in existence, there could be no dispute as to what he had written ; or if printing had been practised from the earliest days of literary com position, we could be sure that every book had been handed down to us in practically unaltered form. For authors of the last four centuries, with few exceptions, we are in the happy condition of being certain that we possess their works, to all intents and purposes, pre cisely as they wrote them.
Recommended publications
  • University of Birmingham the Garland of Howth (Vetus Latina

    University of Birmingham the Garland of Howth (Vetus Latina

    University of Birmingham The Garland of Howth (Vetus Latina 28): A Neglected Old Latin witness in Matthew Houghton, H.A.G. License: Other (please specify with Rights Statement) Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (Harvard): Houghton, HAG 2019, The Garland of Howth (Vetus Latina 28): A Neglected Old Latin witness in Matthew. in G Allen (ed.), The Future of New Testament Textual Scholarship From H. C. Hoskier to the Editio Critica Maior and Beyond. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament, vol. 417, Mohr Siebeck, pp. 247-264. Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: Checked for eligibility: 25/02/2019 Houghton , H. A. G. (2019) The Garland of Howth (Vetus Latina 28): A Neglected Old Latin witness in Matthew. In G. V. Allen (Ed. ), The future of New Testament textual scholarship (pp. 247-264). Tübingen, Germany: Mohr Siebeck. For non commercial use only. General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain.
  • This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G

    This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G

    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: • This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. • A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. • This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. • The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. • When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. SCRIBAL HABITS IN CODEX SINAITICUS, VATICANUS, EPHRAEMI, BEZAE, AND WASHINGTONIANUS IN THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW GREGORY SCOTT PAULSON A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH, NEW COLLEGE IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY EDINBURGH, UK 2013 The thesis has been composed by the candidate and is the candidate’s own work. Gregory Scott Paulson, Ph.D. candidate ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page..................................................................................................... i Declaration................................................................................................... ii Table of Contents........................................................................................
  • Greg Goswell, “Early Readers of the Gospels: the KEPHALAIA and TITLOI of Codex Alexandrinus”

    Greg Goswell, “Early Readers of the Gospels: the KEPHALAIA and TITLOI of Codex Alexandrinus”

    [JGRChJ 6 (2009) 134-74] EARLY READERS OF THE GOSPELS: THE KEPHALAIA AND TITLOI OF CODEX ALEXANDRINUS Greg Goswell Presbyterian Theological College, Melbourne, Australia For the New Testament, the oldest system of capitulation (division into chapters) known to us is that preserved in Codex Vaticanus (B 03) of the fourth century.1 I will use the notation V1, V2 etc. to refer to chapters of Vaticanus. Even a cursory examination of Vaticanus is enough to reveal that the divisions represent an evaluation of what are the sense units of the biblical passages. Each successive chapter in the Gospels is numbered using Greek letters written in red ink to the left of the columns. Capitulation is further indicated by a space of (usually) two letters at the close of the preceding chapter, a short horizontal line (paragraphos) above the first letter of the first whole line of the new chapter marking the close of the preceding paragraph, and sometimes by a letter protruding into the left margin (ekthesis).2 The system of 1. H.K. McArthur, ‘The Earliest Divisions of the Gospels’, in Studia Evangelica, III. 2 (ed. F.L. Cross; Texte und Untersuchungen, 88; Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1964), pp. 266-72. After rejecting three other possible explanations, McAr- thur suggests that the divisions were used for citation purposes, especially in aca- demic circles. For alternate systems of chapter division in Greek versions of the Old Testament, see Robert Devreesse, Introduction à l’étude des manuscrits grecs (Paris: Klincksieck, 1954), pp. 139-41. The major divisions in Vaticanus are called chapters, while those in Alexandrinus, which are the basis of the standard divisions used in Nestle-Aland (Novum Testamentum Graece [27th Edition] = NTG27) are called kephalaia.
  • Vom Apostel Johannes Und Gottes Wort?

    Vom Apostel Johannes Und Gottes Wort?

    Ist das „CJ“ vom Apostel Johannes und Gottes Wort? 1Jh 5,6-8: „Dieser ist der, der durch Wasser und Blut kam, Jesus, der Gesalbte; nicht in dem Wasser allein, sondern in dem Wasser und dem Blut. Und der Geist ist der Bezeugende, weil der Geist die Wahrheit ist, 7 weil drei es sind, die Bezeugende ‹sind›: der Geist und das Wasser und das Blut, und die drei sind auf das eine ‹gerichtet› [o.: und die drei sind vereint].“ So nach dem byzantinischen Text und fast sämtlichen griech. Handschriften (Hss). Der t. r. hat einen längeren Text: „Dieser ist der, der durch Wasser und Blut kam, Jesus, der Gesalbte; nicht in dem Wasser allein, sondern in dem Wasser und dem Blut. Und der Geist ist der Bezeugende, weil der Geist die Wahrheit ist, 7 weil drei es sind, die im Himmel Bezeugende ‹sind›: der Vater, das Wort und der Heilige Geist, und diese drei sind eins; 8 und drei sind es, die auf der Erde Bezeugende ‹sind›: der Geist und das Wasser und das Blut, und die drei sind auf das eine ‹gerichtet› [o.: und die drei sind vereint].“ Den kursiv gedruckten Text nennt man in der Geschichte der Textkritik das Comma Johanneum (CJ; zu Deutsch: „der johanneische Einschub“; gemeint ist der Satz, wie ihn Stephanus 1550 in seiner griechischen Ausgabe des NT hatte). Das CJ wird ab 1550 von allen textus-receptus-Ausgaben bezeugt und erscheint in allen größeren receptus-Bibelübersetzungen. Wohl kein anderer Text des NT war unter Christen (vor allem im englischen Sprachraum) so umstritten. Ist er echt oder eine spätere Hinzufügung?1 Ist das „Comma Johanneum“ vom Apostel Johannes und Gottes Wort? Das CJ findet sich bis ins 14.
  • The Contributions of Textual Criticism to the Interpretation of the New Testament

    The Contributions of Textual Criticism to the Interpretation of the New Testament

    Restoration Quarterly Volume 5 | Number 4 Article 2 10-1-1961 The onC tributions of Textual Criticism to the Interpretation of the New Testament Frank Pack Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.acu.edu/restorationquarterly Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, Christianity Commons, Comparative Methodologies and Theories Commons, History of Christianity Commons, Liturgy and Worship Commons, Missions and World Christianity Commons, Practical Theology Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Pack, Frank (1961) "The onC tributions of Textual Criticism to the Interpretation of the New Testament," Restoration Quarterly: Vol. 5 : No. 4 , Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.acu.edu/restorationquarterly/vol5/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ ACU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Restoration Quarterly by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ ACU. RESTORATION QUARTERLY CONTENTS An Introduction : Th e Task and Method of Ex egesis -Abraham J . Malh erbe ...................................................... .......... 169 Th e Contributions of Textu al Criticism t o th e Inte rpret ation of th e New Testa ment-F ran k Pack ......................................... 179 Th e Lan guage Backgro und of the New Testam ent-J . W. Rober ts 193 Th e Psych ological App roac h to Int er pret ation-Paul Sou thern .... 205 Th e J ewish Background of the New Testament-J ack P. La wis .. 209 Th e Pagan Back gro und of th e New Testam ent - Roy Bowen Wa r d ........................................................................ 216 Patri stic Int er pretat ion of th e Bible-William M.
  • A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament, Vol. II

    A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament, Vol. II

    The Project Gutenberg EBook of A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament, Vol. II. by Frederick Henry Ambrose Scrivener This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at http://www.gutenberg.org/license Title: A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament, Vol. II. Author: Frederick Henry Ambrose Scrivener Release Date: June 28, 2011 [Ebook 36549] Language: English ***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A PLAIN INTRODUCTION TO THE CRITICISM OF THE NEW TESTAMENT, VOL. II.*** A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament For the Use of Biblical Students By The Late Frederick Henry Ambrose Scrivener M.A., D.C.L., LL.D. Prebendary of Exeter, Vicar of Hendon Fourth Edition, Edited by The Rev. Edward Miller, M.A. Formerly Fellow and Tutor of New College, Oxford Vol. II. George Bell & Sons, York Street, Covent Garden London, New York, and Cambridge 1894 Contents Chapter I. Ancient Versions. .3 Chapter II. Syriac Versions. .8 Chapter III. The Latin Versions. 53 Chapter IV. Egyptian Or Coptic Versions. 124 Chapter V. The Other Versions Of The New Testament. 192 Chapter VI. On The Citations From The Greek New Tes- tament Or Its Versions Made By Early Ecclesiastical Writers, Especially By The Christian Fathers. 218 Chapter VII. Printed Editions and Critical Editions. 231 Chapter VIII. Internal Evidence. 314 Chapter IX. History Of The Text.
  • Sidirountios3

    Sidirountios3

    ZEALOT EARLY CHRISTIANITY AND THE EMERGENCE OF ANTI‑ HELLENISM GEORGE SIDIROUNTIOS A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of London (Royal Holloway and Bedford New College) March 2016 1 Candidate’s declaration: I confirm that this PhD thesis is entirely my own work. All sources and quotations have been acknowledged. The main works consulted are listed in the bibliography. Candidate’s signature: 2 To the little Serene, Amaltheia and Attalos 3 CONTENTS Absract p. 5 Acknowledgements p. 6 List of Abbreviations p. 7 Conventions and Limitations p. 25 INTRODUCTION p. 26 1. THE MAIN SOURCES 1.1: Lost sources p. 70 1.2: A Selection of Christian Sources p. 70 1.3: Who wrote which work and when? p. 71 1.4: The Septuagint that contains the Maccabees p. 75 1.5: I and II Maccabees p. 79 1.6: III and IV Maccabees p. 84 1.7: Josephus p. 86 1.8: The first three Gospels (Holy Synopsis) p. 98 1.9: John p. 115 1.10: Acts p. 120 1.11: ʺPaulineʺ Epistles p. 123 1.12: Remarks on Paulʹs historical identity p. 126 2. ISRAELITE NAZOREAN OR ESSENE CHRISTIANS? 2.1: Israelites ‑ Moses p. 136 2.2: Israelite Nazoreans or Christians? p. 140 2.3: Essenes or Christians? p. 148 2.4: Holy Warriors? p. 168 3. ʺBCE CHRISTIANITYʺ AND THE EMERGENCE OF ANTI‑HELLENISM p. 173 3.1: A first approach of the Septuagint and ʺJosephusʺ to the Greeks p. 175 3.2: Anti‑Hellenism in the Septuagint p. 183 3.3: The Maccabees and ʺJosephusʺ from Mattathias to Simon p.
  • Textual Affinities of Papyrus Bodmer Xiv (P75)

    Textual Affinities of Papyrus Bodmer Xiv (P75)

    TEXTUAL AFFINITIES OF PAPYRUS BODMER XIV (P75) by JOHN E. HARTLEY MR. HARTLEY is a graduate of Asbury Theological Seminary, Wilmore, Kentucky, where he studied under Dr. J. Harold Greenlee, a distinguished authority on New Testament textual criticism. We are glad to publish here an article based on his B.O. thesis which he prepared under Dr. Greenlee's direction. Trn. Bodmer Library has published, among other things, the text of a papyrus codex containing the Gospel of Luke and John, with an introduction and facsimiles. 1 This papyrus is designated Papyrus Bodmer XIV for Luke and Papyrus Bodmer XV for John. Professor Kurt Aland of Munster has assigned this codex the official siglum P75. Papyrus Bodmer XIV is the oldest extant copy of Luke; it is dated about 200 A.D.2 The text of Luke 8: 5-28; 10: 8-17: 29, and 22: 37-24: 53 is preserved almost entirely, along with fragments of Luke 3: 18-22; 3: 33-4: 2; 4: 34-5: 10. The purpose of the present article is to summarize the results of a Bachelor of Divinity thesisa in which the te~t of Papyrus Bodmer XIV was examined in order to determine its textual affinities. The first step in analyzing the textual affinities of Bodmer XIV was to collate it against the Textus Receptus. Supporting evidence for the variants against the Textus Receptus was then gathered from the :textual apparatuses of Nestle,4 Souter,5 Merk,6 von 1 For a concise description of the salient features of p75 see Bruce M.
  • Making Sense of the End of Mark Pastor Russ Reaves Immanuel Baptist Church, Greensboro, NC January 27, 2009

    Making Sense of the End of Mark Pastor Russ Reaves Immanuel Baptist Church, Greensboro, NC January 27, 2009

    Making Sense of the End of Mark Pastor Russ Reaves Immanuel Baptist Church, Greensboro, NC January 27, 2009 Anyone who has ever read the Gospel of Mark carefully has likely noticed that most Bibles contain a footnote, a marginal note, or some other device or feature to indicate that there are questions about the authenticity of Mark 16:9-20. Almost every modern English version does in some way. Following are some examples of how this is done: • A bracketed heading before verses 9-20 which states, “The earliest manuscripts and some other ancient witnesses do not have Mark 16:9-20.” 1 • A footnote containing explanations similar to the following: “Some of the earliest manuscripts (or “mss.”) do not contain verses (or “vv.”) 9-20.” 2 • A footnote that reads, “Verses 9 through 20 are not found in the most ancient manuscripts, but may be considered an appendix giving additional facts.” 3 • A heading before verses 9-20 which reads, “An Ancient Appendix” or something similar. 4 • A footnote that offers a more detailed description of the situation, such as the following or similar: “Vv. (verses) 9-20 are bracketed in NU (an abbreviation for the Greek text known as Nestle-Aland Greek New Testament and United Bible Societies Greek New Testament ) as not original. They are lacking in Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus (two Greek manuscripts dating to the fourth century), although nearly all other mss. (manuscripts) of Mark contain them.” 5 • Bracketing around verses 9-20, with an explanatory notation in the footnotes stating, “Mark 16:9-20 [the portion in brackets] is contained only in later manuscripts,” or similar.
  • The Ending of the Gospel of Mark

    The Ending of the Gospel of Mark

    The ending of Mark A Textual Commentary on the Greek Gospels Vol. 2b The various endings of Mk BY WIELAND WILLKER Bremen, online published th 12 edition 2015 © all rights reserved Contents: The manuscript evidence ...................................................................................................... 3 Discussion of the external evidence ................................................................................. 4 Introductory comments in the manuscripts .................................................................... 6 Church fathers evidence ...................................................................................................... 8 Arguable evidence from the fathers .............................................................................. 13 Can a book end with ga.r? .................................................................................................... 17 Excursus: Attempts to reconstruct a lost ending ....................................................... 18 General Discussion .............................................................................................................. 22 Important literature .......................................................................................................... 24 Other various literature ................................................................................................... 25 The short ending ................................................................................................................. 27
  • Early Christian Re-Writing and the History of the Pericope Adulterae

    Early Christian Re-Writing and the History of the Pericope Adulterae

    Early Christian Re-Writing and the History of the Pericope Adulterae JENNIFER WRIGHT KNUST Texts, even sacred texts, are never fixed. Meaning is never stable and inter- pretations shift in concert with the changing concerns of those who present them. These principles are readily demonstrated by a consideration of the complex history of the pericope adulterae—a story about Jesus, an adulteress, and a group of interlocutors found in the Gospel of John. This story is absent from many early gospel manuscripts and is remarkably unstable when it does appear. There are a few second- and third-century citations of the tale, but they do not mention the identity or motives of the interlocutors, nor do they specify the guilt (or innocence) of the woman or the men who accused her. By contrast, fourth- and fifth-century exegetes regularly suggested that the inter- locutors sought to test Jesus, represented the woman as guilty, and claimed that “the Jews” were damned for their sins, readings that were preserved in gospel manuscripts. The pericope adulterae, increasingly invoked to produce Christian hegemony at the expense of “the Jews,” real or imagined, became a story about Jewish sin and Christian difference. This interpretation then influ- ence the transmission of the tale, though traces of earlier readings lingered. Efforts to fix the content and meaning of “sacred text” by ancient Chris- tians and others is always also an attempt at social scripting, as Vincent Wimbush has reminded us. “Sacred texts,” he observes, “are as much determined by society and culture as society and culture are determined Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the Radcliffe Institute (January 2004) and the Society of Biblical Literature (November 2004).
  • Regalitatea Lui Dumnezeu N Viziunea Autorilor Psalmilor

    Regalitatea Lui Dumnezeu N Viziunea Autorilor Psalmilor

    [Plērōma anul IX nr. 1 (2007) 5-34] IUNIA ŞI NIMFA – AVATARURILE UNOR IDENTITĂŢI FEMININE ÎN MANUSCRISELE GRECEŞTI, RESPECTIV TRADUCERILE ROMÂNEŞTI ALE NOULUI TESTAMENT prep. univ. drd. Emanuel Conţac Abstract The process of copying and translating the New Testament across the ages is sometimes bound to be affected by certain cultural predispositions of the scribes. Two passages where such tendencies can be identified are Romans 16:7 and Colossians 4:15, where two feminine names (Junia and Nympha, respectively) are understood as male names. The supposedly male identities are found in numerous manuscripts of the NT and in the vast majority of the Romanian NT translations, as shown by the present study. Introducere Odată cu ascensiunea studiilor feministe şi de gen, problematica identităţii feminine a început să facă obiectul unor cercetări intense în mai toate disciplinele umaniste sau înrudite cu acestea. Evident, nici domeniul studiilor biblice (Biblical Studies) nu a rămas neinfluenţat de noile tendinţe. Gama abordărilor este impresionantă, de la cele radicale, care denunţă vehement teologia tradiţională ca pe o emanaţie a culturii patriarhale şi misogine, propunând transformarea din temelii a establishmentului religios, 6 Emanuel Conţac până la cele care caută mai degrabă o reajustare a discursului teologic contemporan al Bisericii în lumina noilor cercetări, fără a-şi fi propus o revoluţionare a praxisului religios în sine. Dintre chestiunile puse pe tapet în perioada ultimelor decenii se detaşează cea privitoare la statutul femeilor în creştinismul timpuriu. Studii feministe recente afirmă ritos că, în zorii creştinismului, femeile slujeau alături de bărbaţi în funcţia de prezbiter, ba chiar şi de episcop.1 Alţi cercetători merg mai departe, considerând că a existat chiar şi o femeie printre apostoli – Iunia, menţionată în Epistola apostolului Pavel către Romani, 16:7.