DOCSLIB.ORG

Multi-Million Pound Investment for Rail Across the West of England Gets the Green Light

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Multi-Million Pound Investment for Rail Across the West of England Gets the Green Light Multi-million pound investment for rail across the West of England gets the green light June 19, 2019 Better connections and more frequent rail services are coming down the tracks after the West of England Combined Authority (WECA) approved a further £3.5m investment in the MetroWest project. The funding was approved by WECA on 14 June to support the next stage in the project, which aims to deliver additional infrastructure and train operations by the end of 2021 to provide: A half hourly service for Yate local station on the Bristol Parkway to Gloucester line, through the provision of an additional service between Bristol Parkway and Yate An hourly service for a reopened Henbury Line with new stations at Henbury and North Filton. A new station will also be constructed at Ashley Down, on the existing Filton Bank (between Filton Abbey Wood and Stapleton Road). The WECA Committee has also agreed to take forward ambitions for a brand-new rail station serving Charfield and the surrounding towns and villages, with a further investment of £900,000 to develop the full business case. West of England Mayor, Tim Bowles, said: “Rail is a key part of my ambition to improve public transport in the region, giving people more sustainable ways to travel. “This includes improving the Severn Beach line to provide direct services to Bath and Westbury, re- opening Henbury station and more frequent services to Yate. We also have plans to open new train stations in Portishead, Henbury, Portway and Charfield. “Improved and more frequent rail services will give people better access to jobs, link new homes and communities with employment areas and encourage more people to use public transport. This is just part of the picture. Our long-term Investment Strategy proposes £350m for transport over the next 20 years.” The West of England Joint committee has also confirmed a £500,000 allocation to the MetroWest scheme, and in April the Transport Secretary committed an extra £31.9m to complete the funding needed to reopen the railway to Portishead and Pill with two new stations. The Severn Beach line extension to Bath and Westbury is also on track for 2021. Cllr Toby Savage, Leader of South Gloucestershire Council, said: “Ensuring efficient and sustainable transport in South Gloucestershire, such as improved rail access at Yate and Severn Beach, and a new station at Charfield, is key to successfully linking it up with the wider region and I am pleased these important projects have taken a big step forward.” Cllr Don Davies, Leader of North Somerset Council, said: ““We are another step closer to reintroducing passenger rail services between Portishead, Pill and Bristol. This project has a tremendous amount of support from our residents as it will provide vastly improved access to public transport options. The economic benefits are also substantial with an expected additional £264m in the region’s economy in the first ten years.” Mayor of Bristol, Marvin Rees, said: “We welcome this vital investment in rail infrastructure, which will deliver more frequent and reliable services for people in and around Bristol and widen access to the rail network, building on the funding we have invested to help develop these key schemes. These improvements will help to contribute to our commitment to better, more accessible sustainable transport options across the city.” Cllr Dine Romero, Leader of Bath & North East Somerset Council, said: “Improving the line from Severn Beach to Bath and opening up new stations has to be good news for the wider region and I very much welcome investment in public transport as part of a broader approach to addressing the climate emergency.” MetroWest is part of a wider transport strategy to accommodate planned and committed business and residential growth throughout the region, and will support delivery of the Joint Spatial Plan. The MetroWest Programme is being developed in collaboration with the rail industry and will build on and complement the investment being made by Network Rail, such as the already completed Filton Bank 4-tracking and Bristol area re-signalling projects. It is anticipated that the MetroWest scheme could add 1.6m passenger journeys per year once fully operational, and could bring more than an additional 50,000 people within the immediate catchment of the rail network..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix F CAPABILITY MODELLING
    Ref: 139797 Version: 1.1 Date: June 2015 Appendix F CAPABILITY MODELLING Governance of Railway Investment Projects Ref: 139797 Version: 1.1 Date: June 2015 This page left deliberately blank Governance of Railway Investment Projects Group Strategy - Capability Analysis MetroWest Phase 2 Report Rhys Bowen Group Strategy – Capability Analysis MetroWest Phase 2 Report Document Control Scheme Name MetroWest Phase 2 Report Document Ref. No. Document V:\SAP-Project\CA000000 - MetroWest RSV8 TH\004 Report\Phase Two Location Version No. 1.0 Status Final Author Rhys Bowen Version Date 15/12/2014 Security Level Unrestricted Authorisation Control Lee Mowle Signature Date Project Manager –Capability Analysis (Document Owner) Alistair Rice Signature Date Major Schemes Project Manager - South Gloucester council Andrew Holley Signature Date Senior development Manager - Network Rail Group Strategy – Capability Analysis MetroWest Phase 2 Report DOCUMENT CONTROL & ADMINISTRATION Change Record Version Date Author(s) Comments 0.1 12/09/14 Rhys Bowen First Draft 0.2 17/09/14 Rhys Bowen Amended after diagrams added 0.3 18/09/14 Rhys Bowen Amended after review 0.4 23/09/14 Rhys Bowen Amended after review 0.5 26/09/14 Rhys Bowen Draft for external review 0.6 04/11/14 Rhys Bowen Final draft for internal review 0.7 07/11/14 Rhys Bowen Final draft for external review 0.8 28/11/14 Toby Hetherington Minor amendments to final draft. Further minor amendments and report 1.0 15/12/14 Toby Hetherington finalised. Reviewers Version Date Reviewer(s) Review Notes Structure
    [Show full text]
  • M4 Junction 18A Link Study – Combined Modelled and Appraisal Report
    M4 Junction 18a Link Study – Combined Modelled and Appraisal Report Prepared for South Gloucestershire Council and Highways England March 2018 Draft 1 The Square Temple Quay Bristol BS1 6DG Draft Document history M4 Junction 18a Link Study Combined Modelling and Appraisal Report This document has been issued and amended as follows: Version Date Description Created by Verified by Approved by 001 01.03.18 Working Draft JB HS HS Draft Contents Section Page Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1‐1 1.1 Purpose of this Report ............................................................................................... 1‐1 1.2 Scheme Objectives ..................................................................................................... 1‐1 1.3 Scheme Description ................................................................................................... 1‐1 1.4 Previous Studies ......................................................................................................... 1‐3 Local Transport Situation ............................................................................................................ 2‐3 2.1 Existing Local Transport System ................................................................................ 2‐3 2.2 Key Travel Demands .................................................................................................. 2‐5 2.3 Transport Problems and Factors ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CP6 Delivery Plan Update – Wales & Western
    Wales & Mark Langman, managing director, Western Wales & Western In 2019, as part of the Putting Passengers First programme we established Wales & Western, bringing together Wales & Borders route, Western route and Western and Wales Infrastructure Projects. Our aim is to deliver a safe, reliable and punctual railway for the passengers, communities and businesses we serve across Wales, the Thames Valley and the west. The new accountabilities and decision-making authorities we have will help us be more responsive to the needs of our train operators, stakeholders and passengers. The introduction of a new, enhanced timetable in step change in connectivity for passengers in and out of December 2019 realised the benefits of 10 years key cities. investment to modernise and electrify the Great Western Alongside this, we continue our relentless drive to improve Main Line from Paddington to Cardiff, Newbury and performance through a combination of robust renewals Chippenham. In January 2020, this culminated in the plans to improve safety, reliability and reduce delays and completion of electrification to Cardiff, enabling electric through improved rapid incident response, efficient trains to operate in South Wales for the first time. track access planning and better traffic management of Improved infrastructure, electric trains and better signalling the network. enable us to timetable more trains on the Wales Western We are determined to improve passengers’ experience, network and allows Great Western Railway (GWR) to particularly those who need help when travelling. We have offer new high-speed peak services for customers in South tripled the team at London Paddington who are able to Wales, the South West and from Bristol to London.
    [Show full text]
  • North Somerset
    Portishead Branch Line (MetroWest Phase 1) TR040011 Applicant: North Somerset District Council 6.6, Environmental Statement, Volume 2, Chapter 3 Scheme Development and Alternatives Considered The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009, regulation 5(2)(a) Planning Act 2008 Author: CH2M Date: November 2019 Notice © Copyright 2019 CH2M HILL United Kingdom. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of CH2M HILL United Kingdom, a wholly owned subsidiary of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. Where any data supplied by the client or from other sources have been used, it has been assumed that the information is correct. No responsibility can be accepted by Jacobs for inaccuracies in the data supplied by any other party. The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based on the assumption that all relevant information has been supplied by those bodies from whom it was requested. Where field investigations have been carried out, these have been restricted to a level of detail required to achieve the stated objectives of the work. This work has been undertaken in accordance with the quality management system of Jacobs.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrowest Phase 2 Gloucestershire Extension Study
    FINAL REPORT MetroWest Phase 2 Gloucestershire Extension Study Prepared for Gloucestershire County Council South Gloucestershire Council December 2016 1 The Square Temple Quay Bristol BS1 6DG Contents Section Page Document History ........................................................................................................................... v Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... vii Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1‐1 1.1 MetroWest Phase 2 ................................................................................................... 1‐1 1.2 Gloucestershire Rail Study ......................................................................................... 1‐2 1.3 Gloucestershire extension study ............................................................................... 1‐2 1.4 This Report ................................................................................................................. 1‐3 Approach .................................................................................................................................... 2‐1 2.1 Building on the PBC .................................................................................................... 2‐1 2.1.1 Information taken directly from MetroWest Phase 2 PBC ........................... 2‐1 2.1.2 Information augmented and/or adapted from
    [Show full text]
  • Henbury Rail Station Location Consultation
    F I N A L REPORT HENBURY RAIL STATION LOCATION CONSULTATION Prepared for MetroWest Phase 2 May 2016 CH2M Burderop Park Swindon Wilts SN4 0QD Contents Section Page Executive Summary i 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. MetroWest Phase 2 ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Henbury Station Site Options ....................................................................................... 1 1.3 Consultation area .......................................................................................................... 2 2. Communications and publicity ......................................................................................... 3 2.1 Communications management ..................................................................................... 3 2.1.1 Stakeholders .................................................................................................... 3 2.1.2 Press ................................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Consultation methods and materials............................................................................ 3 3 Consultation Responses ................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Questionnaire Responses ............................................................................................. 5
    [Show full text]
  • The Great British Transport Competition 2 Foreword
    THE GREAT BRITISH TRANSPORT COMPETITION 2 FOREWORD The case for scrapping High Speed 2 (HS2) gets stronger by the day. Increasingly, people from across the political spectrum are waking up to the fundamental issues which have plagued this project. Whether it be the spiralling costs, environmental damage, consistent mismanagement or overwhelming unpopularity of the project, the tide is turning against HS2. With the latest evidence suggesting that costs could almost double, taxpayers are demanding more for their money. Even on current estimates, scrapping HS2 would free up at least £50 billion to improve transport links up and down the country. But were this to happen, what should replace it? With this question in mind, we joined the TaxPayers’ Alliance in launching The Great British Transport Competition in September 2018, to find popular alternatives to HS2. We asked all interested parties from across the United Kingdom to submit ideas for transport infrastructure projects. As the judges for this competition - including qualified surveyors, engineers, accountants, politicians and transport industry experts - we have been lucky to receive and assess so many fantastic entries from all around the country. The judging process began in early January and was concluded by early March. After many hours of detailed deliberation and discussion, 28 winning entries were chosen and the sum total of their construction costs came to £45.1 billion. We were incredibly impressed by the high standard and variety of the entries we received. What particularly stood out was that many of the entries required only relatively small sums of money to achieve vast benefits for local communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Western Electrification: Unlocking Future Growth
    Research Spring 2 017 Great Western Electrification: Unlocking future growth 08449 02 03 04 gva.co.uk Setting the scene 235 miles of railway to be electrified Over 100 million passengers a year are Future growth in the West of England predicted to travel on Great Western services will also be delivered through local and by 2019, according to Network Rail, in addition national infrastructure schemes that run to road and bus commuting in the region. in parallel to the electrification of the GWML. Investment in road, bus and rail networks is These include Crossrail, MetroWest, Bus Rapid essential to accommodate these growing Transit schemes and proposed investment numbers of commuters to unlock future in additional motorway junctions along the economic growth in key areas along the M49 and M4. Great Western route, ensuring our Core City Our report focuses on four key locations Region remains the only City outside of in the West of England region: Bath, Bristol, London to positively contribute to GDP. Chippenham and Swindon, all of which The electrification of the Great Western will benefit from electrification by having Main Line (GWML) will deliver a significant a commuting distance of under 90 minutes enhancement to the connectivity and capacity to London and enhanced interurban services. of services in the West of England. The project We will examine how transport connectivity, will bring new high-speed electric trains, a major local infrastructure projects, and investment in redevelopment of Bristol Temple Meads and station upgrades (to accommodate capacity Paddington Stations (to be known as Paddington and commuter flow) will play a critical role Place), and modernisation of signals and in unlocking new economic growth and stations along 235 miles of railway corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • Response to West of England Draft Joint Local Transport Plan 4 (JLTP4) Consultation, March 2019
    Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FOSBR) Response to West of England Draft Joint Local Transport Plan 4 (JLTP4) consultation, March 2019 Contributors: Christina Biggs, Christopher Orlik, John Vasey, Andrew Short, Carol Durrant, Terry Miller, Rob Dixon (proofreader), David Williams (UWE) Contents 1. Summary of the case for rail 2. The presenting issues that require a shift away from the car: 2.1 Road congestion 2.2 Air quality 2.3 Car driving in the West of England according to local authority 2.4 Growth in rail commuting – a regional success story 3. The FOSBR Rail Plan 3.1 Overview 3.2 Improvements to existing rail service 3.3 Unlocking capacity with rail infrastructure proposals 3.4 Specific FOSBR proposals 3.4.1 Welcoming WECA’s rail station reopening proposals 3.4.2 The case for Pilning 3.4.3 The case for the Henbury Loop 3.4.3 The case for Thornbury 3.4.4 The case for Coalpit Heath 3.4.5 Nailsea and Backwell rail-bus service to the Airport Appendices A. An analysis of Census 2011 data compared with ORR figures for 2011/2 and 2017/8 B. JSP response to Emerging Findings January 2019 PDF attachments: Cost-benefit analysis of a Park and Rail at Pilning; Severnside employment 1. The case for rail: a summary Author: John Vasey; edited by Christina Biggs Preamble FOSBR is pleased to support the objectives at Section 3 of JLTP4 to: • Support sustainable and inclusive economic growth • Enable equality and improve accessibility • Address poor air quality and take action against climate change • Contribute to better health, wellbeing, safety and security • Create better places FOSBR argues that rail is the only transport solution currently available that meets all of these objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Portishead Branch Line (Metrowest Phase 1)
    Portishead Branch Line (MetroWest Phase 1) Planning Inspectorate Reference: TR040011 Applicant: North Somerset District Council 9.4 ExA.RR.D1.V2 - Comments on Relevant Representations Author: North Somerset District Council Version: 2 Date: November 2020 DOCUMENT CONTROL DOCUMENT PROPERTIES Author SP, NSDC Title PRINCIPAL TRANSPORT POLICY OFFICER (NORTH SOMERSET DISTRICT COUNCIL, METROWEST PHASE 1 PROJECT TEAM) Document 9.4 ExA.RR.D1.V2 Reference VERSION HISTORY Date Version Status Description/changes 20/09/2020 1 DRAFT SP, NSDC initial draft 02/11/2020 2 FINAL Final 2 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 2 Purpose of the document.......................................................................................................... 2 Structure of the document ........................................................................................................ 2 2. THE APPLICANT’S RESPONSE TO RELEVANT REPRESENTATIONS ............................... 3 Table 1 - The Applicant’s response to Relevant Representations ............................................ 3 Table 2 – The Applicant’s Response to Additional Submissions ...........................................326 Appendix A – Response to Portishead Town Council Appendix B – Response to Pill and Easton-In-Gordano Parish Council Appendix C – Response to Barry Cash Appendix D – Response to Freightliner Appendix E – Response to Bristol Port Company Appendix F – Response to Mrs Freestone
    [Show full text]
  • Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FOSBR) Response to Bristol Transport Strategy Nd 2 November 2018
    Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FOSBR) Response to Bristol Transport Strategy nd 2 November 2018 Summary We welcome the strategy and many of the elements in it but we note that these proposals sideline rail and light rail and are focused largely on road-based schemes including new roads. Only a handful of new rail stations are proposed, ignoring the potential to make the most of the existing network. We recognise and agree with the importance of buses and new routes, particularly orbital and limited stop routes, but with the caveat that these should be on existing roads and not used as an excuse to build unnecessarily costly and over-engineered infrastructure for buses or to be shared with private vehicles as has occurred with much of MetroBus. The draft strategy outcomes do not specifically include carbon reduction, and air quality improvement is included in Outcome 1 as an adjunct to “efficient movement of traffic around the city, with increased resilience of the network”. These omissions suggest that the Council is not focusing adequately on key aims. FOSBR believe that the potential for rail and light rail to help with congestion, carbon reduction, air quality and achieving better health has been underestimated by the draft strategy. Familiar excuses about narrow streets and the location of rail in relation to existing (road) corridors are used to justify decisions about rail and light rail. These do not bear serious examination and seem to be aimed to justify avoiding taking any serious action to reduce car use. These are written off as “extremely radical measures”.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis and Forecasting Interim Report Nov 2013
    Network Rail – Analysis & Forecasting MetroWest Interim Report November 2013 Rob Brewer Network Rail – Analysis & Forecasting MetroWest Interim Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 6 3. MetroWest Proposals ................................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 MetroWest Phase 1 ............................................................................................................................... 7 3.1.1 Re-Opening of the Portishead Line ................................................................................................. 7 3.1.2 Increasing Service Frequencies on Existing Routes ........................................................................ 8 3.2 MetroWest Phase 2 ............................................................................................................................... 8 3.2.1 Re-Introduction of Passenger Services on the Henbury Line ......................................................... 8 3.2.2 Additional Increase of Service Frequencies on Existing Routes ..................................................... 9 4. A summary of work completed .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]