DOCSLIB.ORG

Collective Agreements: Extending Labour Protection

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Collective Agreements: Extending Labour Protection dos = 0,85 cm Edited by Susan Hayter & Jelle Visser Collective Agreements: Extending Labour Protection Collective Agreements: Extending Labour Protection Collective agreements are an important source of labour protection in many countries. They set out wages, limits on working hours and leave provisions. In many instances, they also determine the extent to which workers are able to share in the benefits of improved productivity and firm performance. This volume examines the extension of collective Visser & Jelle Hayter Susan by Edited agreements and its use as a policy tool to expand the coverage of labour protection, and shore up collective bargaining. It traces developments in law and practice across a range of countries. It highlights the ways in which countries with different industrial relations traditions are using this tool to afford protection to migrant workers, posted workers, workers in non-standard forms of employment and workers in small and medium size enterprises. At a time when inequality is on the rise, this volume offers renewed insights on how this tool might be used to advance social justice and inclusive labour markets. Inclusive Labour Markets, Labour Relations and Working Conditions Branch (INWORK) International Labour Office 4, route des Morillons CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland Tel: + 41 22 799 67 54 Agreements:Collective Extending Labour Protection ISBN 978-92-2-131609-1 Fax: + 41 22 799 84 51 [email protected] www.ilo.org/collectivebargaining ILO COLLECTIVE AGREEMENTS: EXTENDING LABOUR PROTECTION Edited by Susan Hayter and Jelle Visser COLLECTIVE AGREEMENTS: EXTENDING LABOUR PROTECTION Edited by Susan Hayter and Jelle Visser International Labour Organization • Geneva Copyright © International Labour Organization 2018 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to ILO Publications (Rights and Licensing), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email: [email protected]. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered with a reproduction rights organization may make copies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the reproduction rights organization in your country. ISBN 978-92-2-131609-1 (print) ISBN 978-92-2-131610-7 (web pdf) ILO Cataloguing in Publication Data The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. The responsibility for opinions expressed in signed articles, studies and other contributions rests solely with their authors, and publication does not constitute an endorsement by the International Labour Office of the opinions expressed in them. Reference to names of firms and commercial products and processes does not imply their endorsement by the International Labour Office, and nya failure to mention a particular firm, commercial product or process is not a sign of disapproval. ILO publications and digital products can be obtained through major booksellers and digital distribution platforms, or ordered directly from [email protected]. For more information, visit our website: www.ilo.org/publns or contact [email protected]. Cover page, artwork by Karim Noureldin, Evo, 2008 (detail), coloured pencil on paper 41.8 x 29.7 cm. http://www.karimnoureldin.net This publication was produced by the Document and Publications Production, Printing and Distribution Branch (PRODOC) of the ILO. Graphic and typographic design, layout and composition, proofreading, printing, electronic publishing and distribution, PROD OC endeavours to use paper sourced from forests managed in an environmentally sustainable and socially responsible manner Code: DT P- SCR-REPRO List of contributors Susan Hayter is a Senior Specialist on Industrial Relations at the International Labour Office in Geneva. She received an MSc in Industrial Relations from the London School of Economics in the United Kingdom. Jelle Visser is a Professor at Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies (AIAS) and the Bremen International Graduate School for the Social Sciences (BIGSSS). Thorsten Schulten is a Senior Researcher at the Institute for Economic and Social Research (WSI) at the Hans Böckler Foundation in Düsseldorf, Germany, where he heads the WSI Collective Agreement Archive. He is also an Honorary Professor at the University of Tübingen. Reinhard Naumann is Associate Researcher at the Centre for Studies in Socioeconomic Change (DINAMIA) (University Institute, Lisbon) and representative of the Friedrich Ebert Foundation in Portugal. Niklas Bruun is a Professor of Law at the Hanken School of Economics, Helsinki. For several years he held a position as a guest professor at the University of Stockholm where he led a research programme ‘Regulating Markets and Labour’ (ReMarkLab). He is also a former member of the Committee on Freedom of Association (ILO). Shane Godfrey is Coordinator of the Labour and Enterprise Policy Research Group at the University of Cape Town. His research focus is the interface between labour regulation and development in Southern Africa. Adalberto Cardoso is a Professor and Researcher at the Institute of Social and Political Studies of the State University of Rio de Janeiro (IESP-UERJ). Cecilia Senén González is a Doctor in Social Studies, Metropolitan Autonomous University, México City, Researcher for the National Council for Scientific nda Technological Research (CONICET), Lecturer in Labour Relations at the Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Buenos Aires (UBA), Argentina. Bárbara Medwid is Magister in Politiques Comparées, Grenoble, France, and Professor of Political Economy at the National University of La Pampa, Argentina. List of contributors v Table of contents List of contributors . v 1. The application and extension of collective agreements: Enhancing the inclusiveness of labour protection . 1 Susan Hayter and Jelle Visser 1. Introduction. 1 2. Origins and normative principles . 4 3. Extension regimes . 6 4. Practices . 16 5. Reinforcing multi-employer bargaining . 20 6. Enhancing inclusion and reducing inequality . 22 7. Conclusion . 26 2. Extension policies compared: How the extension of collective agreements works in the Netherlands, Switzerland, Finland and Norway . 33 Jelle Visser 1. Introduction. 33 2. The legal basis for extension . 34 3. Origins . 36 4. Aims and objectives . 37 5. Procedure and requirements . 39 6. Exemption policies . 44 7. The scope of extension . 45 8. The size of extension . 47 9. The effects of extension . 51 10. Conclusion . 54 Table of contents vii 3. The role of extension in German collective bargaining . 65 Thorsten Schulten 1. Introduction. 65 2. Recent trends in German collective bargaining . 66 2.1. The decline in bargaining coverage . 66 2.2. Differentiation between sectors and groups of workers . 67 2.3. The impact of the decline in collective bargaining on actual wage developments . 69 2.4. Reasons for the decline in collective bargaining . 69 3. The legal basis of the German extension regime . 71 3.1. The Collective Agreement Act . 71 3.2. The Posted Workers Act . 73 4. The use of extension in practice . 74 4.1. Historical development of the use of extension . 74 4.2. Sectoral composition of extended collective agreements . 76 4.3. The content of extended collective agreements . 77 4.4. Extensions on the basis of the Posted Workers Act . 79 5. The 2014 reform of the legal basis for extension . 79 5.1. The debates on the reform of extension . 81 5.2. The new legal provisions for extension . 82 6. Conclusion: Has the reform of extension law contributed to strengthening collective bargaining in Germany? . 84 4. Reregulating the extension of collective agreements in Portugal: A case study Reinhard Naumann 1. Introduction. 93 2. Industrial relations in Portugal . 94 3. Collective bargaining: Shifting power relations, stagnation and reform . 95 4. The crisis: Memorandum demands changes in extension mechanism . 96 5. The extension mechanism before the reform . 97 6. Statistical data regarding the use of the extension mechanism and its effects on bargaining coverage . 98 7. The political and scientific debate on the extension of collective agreements . 102 8. The impact of the change in the extension regime, 2011–12 . 105 viii COLLECTIVE AGREEMENTS: EXTENDING LABOUR PROTECTION 9. The reform of the reform . 109 10. The ongoing debate . 110 11. Conclusion . 111 5. Extension of collective agreements: The Nordic situation . 119 Niklas Bruun 1. Introduction. 119 2. The Finnish model . 122 2.1. Background . 122 2.2. The present system . 122 2.3. Criticism . 123 2.4. The Finnish system and the European Union . 124 2.5. Public procurement and extension . 125 3. Norway and social dumping . 126 4. The different scenes: Denmark and Sweden . 127 4.1. Background . 127 4.2. The Laval judgment of the CJEU and its aftermath . 129 4.3. Extension as a tool for implementing EU directives . 131 4.4. Public procurement and extension . 131 5. Concluding remarks . 134 6. Contested terrain: The extension of multi-employer collective agreements in South Africa . 179 Shane Godfrey 1. Introduction. ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trade Unionism in Sweden
    Discussion papers DP/109/1999 Trade unionism Labour in Sweden and Society Programme Reinhold Fahlbeck P.O. Box 6 CH-1211 Geneva 22 Tel.004122/7998496 Fax. 004122/7998542 E-mail: [email protected] The International Institute for Labour Studies was established in 1960 as an autonomous facility of the International Labour Organization (ILO). Its mandate is to promote policy research and public discussion on emerging issues of concern to the ILO and its constituents labour, business and government. The Labour and Society Programme examines the outlook for labour at the beginning of the new millennium in the light of changes at the workplace and in society at large. Focusing initially on organized labour, the programme seeks to identify approaches and strategies to enhance the profile of labour as a major actor in civil society, and as a contributor to dynamic and equitable growth. Specifically, the programme will review the changing environment of labour and unions; document trade union responses to these changes; highlight promising approaches for trade unions in civil society and the global economy in future; and outline the type of policy and institutional environment required for the growth of free and effective trade unions. This work is undertaken in close collaboration with international and national trade union organizations and international trade secretariats, and will be implemented through networks consisting of trade union practitioners, academics, research institutes and other policymakers. These networks, both international and regional, will also be a means of disseminating research outcomes to a wider audience. The Discussion Paper Series presents the preliminary results of research undertaken by the IILS.
    [Show full text]
  • The Supreme Court and the New Equity
    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 68 | Issue 4 Article 1 5-2015 The uprS eme Court and the New Equity Samuel L. Bray Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Recommended Citation Samuel L. Bray, The uS preme Court and the New Equity, 68 Vanderbilt Law Review 997 (2019) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol68/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW VOLUME 68 MAY 2015 NUMBER 4 ARTICLES The Supreme Court and the New Equity Samuel L. Bray* The line between law and equity has largely faded away. Even in remedies, where the line persists, the conventional scholarly wisdom favors erasing it. Yet something surprisinghas happened. In a series of cases over the last decade and a half, the U.S. Supreme Court has acted directly contrary to this conventional wisdom. These cases range across many areas of substantive law-from commercial contracts and employee benefits to habeas and immigration, from patents and copyright to environmental law and national security. Throughout these disparate areas, the Court has consistently reinforced the line between legal and equitable remedies, and it has treated equitable remedies as having distinctive powers and limitations. This Article describes and begins to evaluate the Court's new equity cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade-Union Policy Between the Wars the Case of Holidays with Pay in Britain*
    STEPHEN G. JONES TRADE-UNION POLICY BETWEEN THE WARS THE CASE OF HOLIDAYS WITH PAY IN BRITAIN* Most standard histories of Britain between the wars refer to the develop- ment of holidays with pay, albeit briefly. It is widely acknowledged that by the end of the 1930's the majority of the British working population benefited from a paid holiday. The crucial initiative, so it is claimed, was the Holidays with Pay Act of 1938, which gave Parliamentary approval to the principle of payment of wages during holidays.1 Clearly the growth of paid holidays is seen as yet another instance of a more affluent Britain, an integral element of the growth of leisure.2 However, there has been very little detailed discussion of the paid-holiday-policy option and the precise reasons for the formulation and implementation of that policy. This neglect is rather surprising given the popular support for this "fringe benefit", which was perceived as providing a certain degree of financial security during the annual break from the rigours of work. It is true that there has been more specialised treatment, but even this is of a general nature, with little reference to the industrial and political struggle for holidays with pay.3 * I would like to thank Dr M. E. Rose, Professor A. E. Musson and members of the Editorial Board for their helpful comments. 1 See C. L. Mowat, Britain Between the Wars 1918-1940 (London, 1955), p. 501; D. H. Aldcroft, The Inter-War Economy: Britain, 1919-1939 (London, 1970), p. 366; N. Branson and M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Identification of Collective Bargaining Issues for the Korea Baseball Organization Jongmi Joo
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2003 The Identification of Collective Bargaining Issues for the Korea Baseball Organization Jongmi Joo Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION THE IDENTIFICATION OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ISSUES FOR THE KOREA BASEBALL ORGANIZATION By JONGMI JOO A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Sport Management, Recreation Management, and Physical Education in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2003 The members of the Committee approved the dissertation of Jongmi Joo defended on August 25, 2003. Annie Clement Professor Directing Dissertation David Pargman Outside Committee Member Alvin Stauber Outside Committee Member Tom Ratliffe Committee Member Approved: Charles Imwold, Chair, Department of Sport Management, Recreation Management, and Physical Education The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii Dedicated to my father, Cheongon Joo, mother, Seonggu Lee, father in law, Dr. Donghee Choi, and mother in law, Yongjae Kim iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation might never be completed without the help of a number of individuals. I would like to thank Dr. Annie Clement, major professor, whose leadership, understanding, guidance, patience, and friendship have been a constant source of encouragement and motivation. I offer my sincere thanks to the other members of my committee, Dr. David Pargman, Dr. Alvin Stauber, and Dr. Tom Ratliffe for their excellent suggestions, which were instrumental in the completion of this study. I feel truly blessed to have had such a wonderful committee members.
    [Show full text]
  • Shop Steward Glossary
    The Shop Steward Glossary Canadian Labour Congress CanadianLabour.CA The Shop Steward Glossary Across-the-board adjustment Change in pay rates made for all employees in a workplace or particular group. Adjudication The equivalent to grievance arbitration; a method under the Public Service Employee Relations Act of providing a settlement of disputes arising out of the terms of any Agreement. Affiliated union A union which is a member of a group of unions. Affirmative action Affirmative action is a comprehensive strategy whose aim is to establish the same percentage of minority group members and women at all levels of the workplaces and unions as there are in the general population. Agency shop A clause in a collective agreement similar to the Rand Formula. Agreement, collective A contract (agreement and contract are interchangeable terms) between one or more unions, acting as bargaining agent, and one or more employee covering wages, hours, working conditions, fringe benefits, rights of workers and union, and procedures to be followed in settling disputes and grievances. Arbitration A method of settling disputes through the intervention of a third party whose decision is final and binding. Such a third party can be either a single arbitrator, or a board consisting of a chairperson and one or more representatives. Arbitration is often used to settle major grievances and for settling contract interpretation disputes. Voluntary arbitration is that agreed to by the parties without statutory compulsion. Compulsory arbitration is that imposed by law. Governments sometimes impose it to avoid a strike or end one. Assessments Special charges levied by unions to meet particular financial needs.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2017 ITUC Global Rights Index the WORLD's WORST
    THE WORLD'S WORST COUNTRIES FOR WORKERS The 2017 ITUC Global Rights Index | 4 The International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) is a confederation of national trade union centres, each of which links trade unions of that particular country. It was established on 1 November 2006, bringing together the organisations which were formerly affiliated to the ICFTU and WCL (both now dissolved) as well as a number of national trade union centres which had no international affiliation at the time. The new Confederation has 340 affiliated organisations in 163 countries and territories on all five continents, with a membership of 181 million, 40 per cent of whom are women. It is also a partner in “Global Unions” together with the Trade Union Advisory Committee to the OECD and the Global Union Federations (GUFs) which link together national unions from a particular trade or industry at international level. The ITUC has specialised offices in a number of countries around the world, and has General Consultative Status with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations. The 2017 ITUC Global Rights Index | 6 Foreword .............................................9 ASIA .................................................. 70 Bangladesh ....................................... 71 Part I ..................................................13 Cambodia .......................................... 71 The 2017 Results ...............................14 China ................................................ 72 The ITUC Global Rights Index ...............19 Fiji
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Workers of the World from the 36Th and Madison Store August Charles Fostrom, and Evan Winterscheidt
    A new model for building Growing workers’ rebellion international solidarity? knows no borders Zapatistas call for grassroots, Bosses, who needs them? nonelectoral movement of Chinese, South Korean & Serbian communities in resistance 4-5 workers seize workplaces 12 Starbucks fires 3 IWWs Industrial for union organizing In its latest effort to crush the growth England. David Bleakney, a national represen- of the Starbucks Workers Union, Starbucks tative of the 55,000-member Canadian Union has fired three IWW members as part of of Postal Workers, has written CEO Howard a stepped-up campaign of intimidation of Schultz, demanding the reinstatement of the union supporters. three fires workers and warning that if he does Charles Fostrom, a worker at New York’s not receive a satisfactory reply by August 17 57th & Lexington Starbucks, was fired July he will write all CUPW locals to inform them Worker 11 was fired for “insubordination” after he of the situation. refused illegal orders to work off the clock. On July 29, Starbucks workers, other Evan Winterscheidt, a two-year veteran at the IWW members, and supporters from Make 14th & 6th Avenue Starbucks, was fired July The Road By Walking, CODA and NMASS 18 after a minor dispute with a coworker. picketed in support of fired workers Joe Agins OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER OF THE IWW organizer Daniel Gross was fired Jr. (fired some months ago for union activity), INDUSTRIAL WORKERS OF THE WORLD from the 36th and Madison store August Charles Fostrom, and Evan Winterscheidt. 5 for urging district manager Allison Marx Organizing continues despite the firings. September 2006 #1686 Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Dialogue and Industrial Relations: Global Trends, Challenges and Opportunities
    BRICS BRIEF SERIES Social Dialogue and Industrial Relations: Global Trends, Challenges and Opportunities GLOBAL TRENDS For the purpose of this note, social dialogue includes the protection of labour rights, improved working all types of negotiation, consultation and exchange of conditions and sustainable enterprise development, information between and among representatives of facilitated wage determination and enhanced social governments, employers and workers on issues of peace and stability. It also proved its value during the common interest relating to economic and social recent economic and financial crisis by helping to policy . Social dialogue is both a means to achieve generate socially acceptable solutions at national and social and economic progress and an end in itself, as regional levels, and by mitigating negative impacts in it gives people a voice and a stake in their societies many countries, especially by maintaining and workplaces. It is central to the functioning of the employment and income levels during the economic ILO and is practiced in the majority of its member downturn. ILO research has shown that collective states, albeit to varying degrees and levels of bargaining plays an important role in reducing efficiency. Around 90 per cent of ILO member states inequality, and has specifically shown the correlation have some kind of tripartite institution in place to between higher levels of collective bargaining enable social dialogue at the national level. coverage and lower levels of inequality. Social dialogue is widely recognised as an important However, a number of challenges are prompting social component of good governance of labour-related dialogue actors around the world to consider how best matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Admiralty and Maritime Litigation in State Court David W
    Louisiana Law Review Volume 55 | Number 4 Maritime Law Symposium March 1995 Admiralty and Maritime Litigation in State Court David W. Robertson Repository Citation David W. Robertson, Admiralty and Maritime Litigation in State Court, 55 La. L. Rev. (1995) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol55/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Admiralty and Maritime Litigation in State Court David W. Robertson' TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ................................... 686 II. General Principles of Jurisdiction ..................... 687 A. The Criteria for Identifying an Admiralty or Maritime C ase . ...................................... 689 1. Admiralty Tort Jurisdiction .................... 690 2. Admiralty Jurisdiction in Contract Cases .......... 694 B. When Is Federal Court Admiralty Jurisdiction Exclusive? . 698 C. What Are the General Limits of State Authority in Concurrent Jurisdiction Cases? . 699 III. When Are State Courts Bound to Follow the Federal Courts: Current General Views of Reverse-Erie Preemption ........ 700 IV. Selected Difficulties from the Procedural Realm .......... 705 A. Forum Non Conveniens ......................... 705 B. Forum Selection Clauses ........................ 709 C. The Plaintiffs Right to Elect Bench or Jury Trial ...... 710 D. Prejudgment Interest ........................... 713 1. The Federal Court Picture in a Nutshell ........... 714 a. Bench Trials ........................... 714 b. Jury Trials in Maritime Cases Not Involving the Jones Act ............................. 715 c. Jury Trials in Jones Act Cases ............... 715 d. Summ ary .............................. 716 2. The State Courts' View that They Must Follow the Federal Courts ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • EEMENT BETWEEN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY and LS UNION O? AMERICA, AFL-CIO EMICAL WORKERS UNION COUNCIL, PCW, AFL - Ao
    $n EEMENT BETWEEN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND LS UNION O? AMERICA, AFL-CIO EMICAL WORKERS UNION COUNCIL, PCW, AFL - ao April 1, 2002 - :cting rates of pay and other mditions of employment i TABLE OF CONTENTS Tme PAGE NUMBER 1. LABOR/MANAGEMENT PEACE PRINCIPLES. 1 2. MANAGEMENT/UNION RIGHTS, RELATIONSHIPS, RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 - Management Rights 4 2.2 - Union Rights 5 2.3 - Nondiscrimination 19 2.4 - Conclusion of Bargaining & Management Rights 19 2.5 - Labor-Management Activities 21 3. BARGAINING UNIT SENIORITY & JOB CLASSIFICATIONS 3-1 - General Seniority Policy 31 3.2 - Scope 32 3.3 - Determination of Seniority 34 3.4 - Seniority in Demotion .35 3.5 - Veteran's Seniority Credit 36 3.6 - Seniority in Shift Assignments 37 3.7 - Seniority in Rehiring 38 3.8 - Classification Policy 40 3.9 - Classification Changes 40 3.10 - Refusal of Duties 41 4. TOTAL COMPENSATION 4.1 - Pay Structure 43 4.2 - Overtime 47 TITLE PAGE NUMBER 4.3 - Premiums 56 4.4 - Benefits 61 4.5 - Special Provisions 89 5. WORK FORCE FLEXIBILITY/WORK SCHEDULES 5.1 - General Statement 96 5.2 - Workday and Workweek 97 5.3 - Modification of Schedules 98 5.4 - Job Site Reporting 100 5.5 - Special Work Schedules 100 5.6 - Work Assignments of Relatives 101 5.7 - Job Assignments During Inclement Weather 102 5.8 - Flexible Work Force : 103 5.9 - Temporary Relief Assignments 104 5.10 - Position Opportunity and Placement104 5.11 - Job Profiles 117 5.12-Certification 117 5.13 - Technical Layoff 117 5.14- New or Modified Regions 118 5.15 - Employee Redeployment - Work Force Balancing 120 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Collective Agreement Between Toronto & York
    COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN TORONTO & YORK REGJON LABOUR COUNCIL AND CANADIAN OFFICE & PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES UNION LOCAL343 JANUARY 1, 2016 TO DECEMBER 31,2018 cope 343 INDEX ARTICLE# TITLE PAGE# 1 Recognition 3 2 Union Security 3 3 Seniority 3 4 Wages 4 5 Hours of Work, Overtime and Mileage Allowance 4/5 6 Paid Holidays 5 7 Vacations 5/6 8 Grievance and Arbitration 6 9 Discharge and Disciplinary Action 6 10 Severance Pay 7 11 Registered Retirement Savings Plan 7 12 Sick Leave 7 13 Leave of Absence - General 8 14 Leave of Absence - Maternal/Paternal 9 15 No Strikes or Lockouts 10 16 Discrimination 10 17 Health and Safety 10 18 Welfare 10/11 19 Retirement Benefits 11 20 Skills Development 12 21 Union Label 12 22 Savings Clause 12 23 Rights and Privileges 12 24 Contracting Out 12 25 Technological Change 12/13 26 Acting Pay 13 27 Negotiating Committee 14 28 Termination 14 AGREEMENT BETWEEN TORONTO & YORK REGION LABOUR COUNCIL (hereinafter referred to as "the Employer") AND CANADIAN OFFICE & PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL 343 (hereinafter referred to as "the Union") ARTICLE 1 - RECOGNITION 1.01 The Employer recognizes the Union as the sole collective bargaining agent for all its clerical employees. ARTICLE 2 - UNION SECURITY 2.01 Any person hereafter employed shall be required to join the Union immediately. All present employees who are members of the Union on the effective date of this Agreement, or who subsequently become members, shall remain members in good standing in the Union during the term of this Agreement. All employees who are not members of the union shall become members of the Union as of the effective date of this Agreement and shall remain members in good standing in the Union of the month following such deduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Labour Terms
    Glossary of Labour Terms Available online at: http://prairies.psac.com/stewards-dictionary ADJUDICATION: Process for settling grievances by a third party when they arise out of the interpretation or application of a collective agreement or arbitral award, or out of disciplinary action resulting in financial loss or penalty (i.e., discharge, suspension ). Normally used for Public Service units covered by the Public Service Staff Relations Act. See Arbitration. AGREEMENT, COLLECTIVE: A contract (‘Collective Agreement’ and ‘Contract’ are used interchangeably) between the union acting as the bargaining agent and the employer, covering wages, hours of work, working conditions, benefits, rights of workers and union, and procedures to be followed in settling disputes and grievances. APPEAL: Procedure for seeking redress from Public Service Commission against: appointments to a job made by closed competition or job appointments made without competition. Applies only to Public Service units covered by the Public Service Employment Act. ARBITRATION: A method of settling negotiating disputes through the intervention of a third party whose decision is final and binding. Such a third party can be either a single arbitrator, or a board consisting of a chairman and one or more representatives. Voluntary Arbitration is that agreed to by the parties without statutory compulsion. Compulsory Arbitration is that imposed by law. Governments sometimes impose it to avoid a strike or to end one. Arbitration (same as adjudication) terminology is used in the Canada Labour Code, Part I, the Northwest Territories Ordinances, and most Provincial Labour Codes and Acts. BARGAINING AGENT: Union designated by a labour relations board or similar government agency e.g.
    [Show full text]