DOCSLIB.ORG

The Following Article by Walter Gropius Appeared in the March 1956 Issue of ARCHITECTURAL RECORD

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Following Article by Walter Gropius Appeared in the March 1956 Issue of ARCHITECTURAL RECORD The following article by Walter Gropius appeared in the March 1956 issue of ARCHITECTURAL RECORD. Simply click on the photo below to retrieve his March 1937 article from our ARCHives. O N APRIL 10 Walter Gropius will receive in London the Royal Gold Medal for 1956 of the Royal Institute of British Architects fol- lowing its award by Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II on the unani- mous recommendation of the Council of that Institute. At the request of ARCHITECURAL RECORD, Professor Gropius has selected from his outstanding work seven especially significant buildings and projects which we are honored to present here together with a stim- ulating statement on the architec- tural state of the nation from a truly pioneer architect and educator. 1911-12 190 ARCHITECTURAL RECORD MARCH 1956 1911–12 Shoe Last Factory, Karl Benscheidt, Alfeld, A. L. Built 1911–12, photographed 1954. Walter Gropius with Adolf Meyer ARCHITECTURAL RECORD MARCH 1956 191 1914 1914 WALTER GROPIUS: 1914 Upper: Office Building at the Werkbund Exhi- bition, Cologne. Lower: Machine Hall opposite the Office Building at the same exhibition. Both buildings by Walter Gropius with Adolf Meyer 1922 Design for the Chicago Tribune Tower 192 ARCHITECTURAL RECORD MARCH 1956 1922 1924-25 1949 WALTER GROPIUS: 194 ARCHITECTURAL RECORD MARCH 1956 1953 1924–25 Bauhaus Building, Dessau 1949 Harvard Graduate Center, Harkness Commons Building. The Architects Collaborative 1953 Office Building, McCormick Estate, Chicago, designed 1953. The Architects Collaborative; Arthur Myh- rum, Associate ARCHITECTURAL RECORD MARCH 1956 195 WALTER GROPIUS A RCHITECTURAL RECORD has asked me and independence of thought and ized knowledge which he has to absorb to state both what troubles me most action. But diversity is, after all, the and integrate. He must comprehend and what pleases me most in the status very source of true democracy! But fac- land, nature, man and his art as one of architecture in the United States. tors of expediency, like high-pressure great entity. In our mechanized soci- In the May issue of 1937 shortly salesmanship and money-making as an ety, we should patiently emphasize after I had entered this, my adopted end in itself, have impaired the indi- that we are still a world of men, that country, for good, ARCHITECTURAL vidual’s capacity to seek and under- man in his natural environment must RECORD published a statement about stand the deeper potentialities of life be the focus of all planning and build- my general intentions as newly- from which the culture of a nation ing. appointed Harvard Professor of develops. Our sense of neighborly If we, the architects and planners, Architecture. I emphasized that “it integration, our love of beauty as a envisage the strategic goal of our pro- should be our highest aim to produce a basic life requirement, are underdevel- fession in its vast complexity, it indeed type of architect who is able, to visual- oped. We need, on the one hand, dis- embraces the civilized life of man in all ize an entity rather than let himself get tinct diversity of minds resulting from its major aspects: the destiny of the absorbed into the narrow channels of intensive individual performance, and, land, the forests, the water, the cities specialization . to make way for the on the other, a common idiom of and the countryside; the knowledge of man of vision.” regional expression springing from the man through biology, sociology and Have we made any progress towards cumulative experience of successive psychology; law, government and eco- this goal? Indeed we have. During the generations who gradually weed out nomics, art, architecture and engineer- last twenty years, a young American the superfluous and the merely arbi- ing. As all are interdependent, we can- generation of talented architects has trary from the essential and typical. not consider them separately in com- come to the fore—among them, I am Such a voluntary selective process, far partments. Their connectedness, proud to say, many of my own former from producing dull uniformity, directed toward a cultural entity, is students whose achievements show should give many individuals a chance undoubtedly of greater importance for definite signs of a growing coherence to contribute their own individual success in planning our environment and kinship of the American architec- variation of a common theme and so than finding ever-so-perfect practical tural idiom. Comparing publications help to evolve again the integrated pat- solutions for limited objectives. If we on European architecture with those tern for living that we lost with the agree on this rank of order, then the on American design, the latter stands advent of the machine age. The two emphasis must be on the “composite out; in its generally more direct, fresh opposites—individual variety, and a mind,” as we may call it, developed and flexible solutions, less inhibited, common denominator expressed by through a process of continuous cross- less tempered by prejudice. In a coun- creating form symbols of human fel- checking and balancing, rather than try that is blessed with abundance, an lowship—need to be reconciled to on the specialized expert who shuns enviable array of technical means each other. The degree of success in responsibility for the whole and offers opportunities for daring experi- shaping and fusing these opposites divides his brain into tight compart- ments, and this challenge has been indicates the depth of culture reached ments. enthusiastically met. and is the very yardstick for judging To rebalance our life and to human- What a contrast to the early days the architectural achievements of a ize the impact of the machine, we must when we struggled with the first letters period. give the creative architect, the artist, of the new architectural alphabet, Our scientific age of specialization, his chance to reassert himself as the hemmed in on all sides by colossal with its glorious achievements for our prototype of “whole man.” As soon as prejudices and barely able to sur- physical life, has simultaneously the longing for “total architecture,” as mount, the technical difficulties that brought about confusion and a general I like to call it, becomes more univer- beset, all attempts at creating new, dissolution of context; it has resulted sal, there will grow a demand for unprecedented forms for living. We in shrinking and fragmentizing life. “experiments in living,” for courageous were lonely fighters with insufficient But there are indications that we are practical attempts to examine the liv- equipment, with uncertain allies, and slowly moving away from overspecial- ing value of our building and planning practical demonstrations of our ideas ization and its perilous atomizing habits by setting up organic model were few and far between. effect on the social coherence of the communities where our new living Now, when a new generation is able community. Many ideas and discover- standards can be tested and demon- to use the architectural language of the ies of our present civilization are whol- strated. As soon as the average twentieth century as a matter of ly concerned with finding again the American, with his innate enthusiasm course, when prejudice has died down relationship between the phenomena and readiness to act, will feel the need and a building program is in progress of the universe, which scientists had so for a more beautiful and more organi- that supersedes any expectation, we far viewed only in isolation from cally coherent environment as an architects find ourselves still at a fair neighboring fields. The scientist has expression of his pride and participa- distance from our desired goal: the contributed new knowledge of the tion in our democracy, then he may transformation of our chaotic, pro- identity of matter and energy. The cause a chain reaction conducive to fusely growing surroundings into a artist, the architect, has learned to solving our great and complicated pattern of organic entity and visual express visibly with inert materials a task, to have both, unity and diversity, bliss. For such a desire has hardly new dimension—time and motion. the two indispensable components of a taken root yet within our American Are we on the way to regaining a com- cultural order. population as a whole; we are still prehensive vision of the oneness of the without their response and encourage- world which we had let disintegrate? ment. We are still in danger of losing In the gigantic task of its reunifica- control over the vehicle of progress tion, the architect and planner will which our time has created. The mis- have to play a big role. He must be use of the machine tends to flatten the well trained not ever to lose a total mind, leveling off individual diversity vision in spite of the wealth of special- 196 ARCHITECTURAL RECORD MARCH 1956.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bauhaus 1 Bauhaus
    Bauhaus 1 Bauhaus Staatliches Bauhaus, commonly known simply as Bauhaus, was a school in Germany that combined crafts and the fine arts, and was famous for the approach to design that it publicized and taught. It operated from 1919 to 1933. At that time the German term Bauhaus, literally "house of construction" stood for "School of Building". The Bauhaus school was founded by Walter Gropius in Weimar. In spite of its name, and the fact that its founder was an architect, the Bauhaus did not have an architecture department during the first years of its existence. Nonetheless it was founded with the idea of creating a The Bauhaus Dessau 'total' work of art in which all arts, including architecture would eventually be brought together. The Bauhaus style became one of the most influential currents in Modernist architecture and modern design.[1] The Bauhaus had a profound influence upon subsequent developments in art, architecture, graphic design, interior design, industrial design, and typography. The school existed in three German cities (Weimar from 1919 to 1925, Dessau from 1925 to 1932 and Berlin from 1932 to 1933), under three different architect-directors: Walter Gropius from 1919 to 1928, 1921/2, Walter Gropius's Expressionist Hannes Meyer from 1928 to 1930 and Ludwig Mies van der Rohe Monument to the March Dead from 1930 until 1933, when the school was closed by its own leadership under pressure from the Nazi regime. The changes of venue and leadership resulted in a constant shifting of focus, technique, instructors, and politics. For instance: the pottery shop was discontinued when the school moved from Weimar to Dessau, even though it had been an important revenue source; when Mies van der Rohe took over the school in 1930, he transformed it into a private school, and would not allow any supporters of Hannes Meyer to attend it.
    [Show full text]
  • Education of Architects: Walter Gropius' Ideas a Century Later
    Volume 21, Number 3, 2019 © WIETE 2019 Global Journal of Engineering Education Education of architects: Walter Gropius’ ideas a century later Grażyna Schneider-Skalska Cracow University of Technology Kraków, Poland ABSTRACT: The education of architects in Poland follows a specific sequence: standards defined by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education concordant with European Union standards; educational outcomes defined by a specific school; module charts formulated by academic teachers. As a result of this sequence a freshly graduating architect becomes equipped with appropriate knowledge, skills and social competencies adapted to contemporary times. At the start of the 20th Century, Walter Gropius formulated a highly specific vision of the role of the architect in society and a model of education associated with this role. He published this in a book, Scope of Total Architecture. The author of this article has confronted the recommendations by Gropius with the reality of educating architects at the Faculty of Architecture at Cracow University of Technology (FA-CUT), Kraków, Poland, and the author’s own observations. Highlighted here is a series of timeless requirements in architects’ education, in addition to observing differences associated with time and changing conditions. Keywords: Architectural education, qualities and attributes, Walter Gropius’ educational ideas INTRODUCTION The curriculum for the education of architects in the European Union is regulated to standards that ensure university graduation diplomas are recognised throughout the EU member states. Architecture schools are required to define educational outcomes in accordance with these standards and to develop curricula and syllabuses for individual modules or programmatic blocks. As a result, a freshly graduated architect is equipped with appropriate knowledge, skills and social competencies, tailored to the needs of contemporary times.
    [Show full text]
  • Shifts in Modernist Architects' Design Thinking
    arts Article Function and Form: Shifts in Modernist Architects’ Design Thinking Atli Magnus Seelow Department of Architecture, Chalmers University of Technology, Sven Hultins Gata 6, 41296 Gothenburg, Sweden; [email protected]; Tel.: +46-72-968-88-85 Academic Editor: Marco Sosa Received: 22 August 2016; Accepted: 3 November 2016; Published: 9 January 2017 Abstract: Since the so-called “type-debate” at the 1914 Werkbund Exhibition in Cologne—on individual versus standardized types—the discussion about turning Function into Form has been an important topic in Architectural Theory. The aim of this article is to trace the historic shifts in the relationship between Function and Form: First, how Functional Thinking was turned into an Art Form; this orginates in the Werkbund concept of artistic refinement of industrial production. Second, how Functional Analysis was applied to design and production processes, focused on certain aspects, such as economic management or floor plan design. Third, how Architectural Function was used as a social or political argument; this is of particular interest during the interwar years. A comparison of theses different aspects of the relationship between Function and Form reveals that it has undergone fundamental shifts—from Art to Science and Politics—that are tied to historic developments. It is interesting to note that this happens in a short period of time in the first half of the 20th Century. Looking at these historic shifts not only sheds new light on the creative process in Modern Architecture, this may also serve as a stepstone towards a new rethinking of Function and Form. Keywords: Modern Architecture; functionalism; form; art; science; politics 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Walter Gropius, “Bauhaus Manifesto and Program” (1919)
    Walter Gropius, “Bauhaus Manifesto and Program” (1919) The ultimate aim of all visual arts is the complete building! To embellish buildings was once the noblest function of the fine arts; they were the indispensable components of great architecture. Today the arts exist in isolation, from which they can be rescued only through the conscious, cooperative effort of all craftsmen. Architects, painters, and sculptors must recognize anew and learn to grasp the composite character of a building both as an entity and in its separate parts. Only then will their work be imbued with the architectonic spirit which it has lost as “salon art.” The old schools of art were unable to produce this unity; how could they, since art cannot be taught. They must be merged once more with the workshop. The mere drawing and painting world of the pattern designer and the applied artist must become a world that builds again. When young people who take a joy in artistic creation once more begin their life's work by learning a trade, then the unproductive “artist” will no longer be condemned to deficient artistry, for their skill will now be preserved for the crafts, in which they will be able to achieve excellence. Architects, sculptors, painters, we all must return to the crafts! For art is not a “profession.” There is no essential difference between the artist and the craftsman. The artist is an exalted craftsman. In rare moments of inspiration, transcending the consciousness of his will, the grace of heaven may cause his work to blossom into art.
    [Show full text]
  • R Ich a Rd N E U Tra , D E Lco U Rt H O U Se , C Ro Ix , Fra N Ce , 1 9 6 7 -1 97 0 , La Te Ra L V Ie W O F Th E H a Ll. © R Ic
    Richard Neutra, Delcourt House, Croix, France, 1967-1970, lateral view of the hall. © Richard Klein, 2018. ESSAYS The Delcourt House: the last house by Richard Neutra BY RICHARD KLEIN The only French building by the architect Richard Neutra (1892-1970), Delcourt house, built in Croix near Roubaix, France, is frequently forgotten in publications on his work, and is generally considered to be of little significance in the largely American career of its designer. At the end of the 1960s, Marcel Delcourt (1923-2016), a young Chief Executive Officer at the head of the mail order companyLes Trois Suisses, was attracted to the American way of life. As the final work of Richard Neutra, the Delcourt residence is a fragile heritage, the result of complex and fruitful exchanges between Europe and the United States of America (USA), between architects and the client, but also between the customized design of most of the features and the use of sophisticated techniques, products that the interior finish industry was able to supply at the end of the 1960s. The edifice now stands as a repository of domestic architecture techniques. The only French building by the architect Richard Neutra, Neutra and Eero Saarinen (1910-1961). In the register the Delcourt house, located in Croix near Roubaix, is of singularities, Helmut Borcherdt and Volker Traub frequently forgotten or relegated in the publications mentioned a relationship to landscape shared between devoted to the work of Richard Neutra. Neutra designed integration or detachment and the influence of lifestyles 64 — 2021/1 several villas in Switzerland and Germany and his only on architectural forms, the expression of a kind of life and French house is also his last achievement.
    [Show full text]
  • An American 'Parthenon': Walter Gropius's Athens US Embassy
    AN AMERICAN ‘PARTHENON’ Walter Gropius’s Athens US Embassy Building between Regionalism, International Style and National Identities Nikos Pegioudis Berlin, Germany Abstract In 1954 the United States, embarked on an embassy-building program that sought to represent its expansive foreign policy by means of a bold embrace of modernist architecture. For this purpose, the Foreign Buildings Office issued a set of new guidelines asking architects to present designs for buildings that would be modern, open to the local traditions of the host country and American at the same time. Walter Gropius’s The Architects Collaborative was among the architectural firms that managed to obtain such a commission for the US embassy in Athens, Greece. The designs were officially presented in 1957 (the building was inaugurated in 1961) and were supposed to achieve a balance between a regionalist sensitivity, a dedication to the principles of Modern architecture and the United States’ national claims. Gropius predictably underlined Parthenon as the source of his inspiration and resorted to an extensive use of ‘classical’ Greek marble which was combined with standard modernist techniques and materials. But how could an International Style stand at the same time as national and open to regionalist loans from the Greek classical and vernacular tradition? This paper examines the Athens embassy building as a watered-down intersection between regionalism and modern architecture, a kind of populist modernism which prefigured or were typical of a crisis of both regionalism and modernism. The regionalist/classical connotations of the building are framed in a postcolonial context which casts a new light on this controversial attempt towards a new type of International Style.
    [Show full text]
  • Brookline Preservation Commission Demolition Application Report
    Brookline Preservation Commission Demolition Application Report Address: 318 Mason Terrace Petitioner: Stowe Carr Building type: house National Register Listing (if Applicable): n/a Historical/Architectural Significance: The house was constructed in 1951, making it an early example of international style architecture on Corey Hill. The architects are listed as Diehl, Makintosh and Mansfield on the building permit for this 45’ x 32’ cedar-sided single family built into the uphill side of Mason Terrace close to the town border with Allston/Brighton. Edward Diehl (1923-2014) was trained as an architect and engineer at Harvard after serv- ing in the US army during World War II. He worked briefly at The Architects’ Collaborative, founded by Walter Gropius and seven of his Harvard Design School students. He also worked with Carl Koch on the design of prefabricated Tech Built homes. In 1952, he established his own firm, Edward L. Diehl Associates, on Plympton Street in Cambridge. The house design was commissioned by the Carr family, who continue to own the property. 318 Mason Terrace July 2014 318 Mason Terrace Diehl designed buildings for the Perkins School for the Blind in Watertown and the Cotting School in Lexington. With Benjamin Thompson he created the plans for the redesign of the Inner Harbor Development in Baltimore and Faneuil Hall Market in Boston. This house appears to be an early example, perhaps a prototype, of modernist-style prefabrica- tion using modular components of standard sized wall panels and window and door panels. Other character-defining elements include the low-pitch roof and the lack of ornamental detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Neutra's Ambiguous Relationship to Luxury
    arts Article Richard Neutra’s Ambiguous Relationship to Luxury Matthias Brunner Institute for the History and Theory of Art and Architecture (ISA), Academy of Architecture, Università della Svizzera italiana, 6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland; [email protected]; Tel.: +41-58-666-5402 Received: 17 October 2018; Accepted: 22 October 2018; Published: 5 November 2018 Abstract: Many architects of the modern movement who, in theory, refused luxury nonetheless responded to the demand for it. Richard J. Neutra was one of them: Although he mostly rejected luxury in his writings, he gained fame for his skills in constructing luxurious residences. This paper explores how he handled such discrepancies. For this purpose, it relates his understanding of luxury to the German debates on the luxury of the interwar period and analyzes two of his most important expensive residences: the Lovell Health House (1927–1929) and the Kaufmann Desert House (1946–1947). It comes to the conclusion that Neutra took an intermediate position between socialist opponents and idealist proponents of luxury. While he acknowledged the importance of objectivity and scientific thinking and agreed to give priority to the improvement of the living conditions of the masses, he was nevertheless much interested in comfort, aesthetics, details, and individualization. Moreover, it draws attention to the fact that Neutra’s houses also reflected his clients’ relationship to luxury. The Kaufmanns asked for a luxurious background for leisure; the Lovells’ wanted a place for a disciplined life that lacked certain essential traits of luxury. Keywords: luxury in architecture; architect and owner; California modern architecture; transatlantic exchange in architecture; Richard J.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 18! ! the Bauhaus:! from Expressionism to the Triumph Of
    5/9/16 Lecture 18! ! Bauhaus Exhibitions 1923, Weimar; 1938, The Bauhaus:! MoMA, NY; 2010, From Expressionism to the MoMA NY Triumph of Neue Sachlichkeit ! "New Objectivity ! The Bauhaus (chronology): ! 1919 Weimar: Gropius director 1919-1922: craft orientation 1921 van Doesburg in Weimar 1923 Itten leaves; Moholy-Nagy joins staff 1925 move to Dessau 1928 Hannes Meyer director 1928-1930: functionalist-collectivist emphasis 1930 Mies van der Rohe director 1932 move to Berlin 1933 Bauhaus closed by Nazis Origins of the Bauhaus Henry van de Velde, Academy of Art, Weimar, 1904-11 Walter Gropius 1883-1969 Herbert Beyer, *Gropius & Meyer, Fagus Shoe book cover for Factory, Alfeld-an-der-Leine, Lyonel Feininger, Program of the Bauhaus exhibition 1911-13 state Bauhaus in Weimar, 1919. 1923 1 5/9/16 Gropius & Meyer, Model Factory Complex, Werkbund Exhibition, Cologne, 1914 * Gropius and Meyer, Sommerfeld House, Berlin, 1920 * Gropius and Meyer, Sommerfeld House, Berlin, 1920 * Gropius and Meyer, Sommerfeld House, Berlin, 1920 * Gropius and Meyer, Sommerfeld House, Berlin, 1920 L: Marcel Breuer and Gunta Stölzl, African Chair, 1921 R: Lothar Schreyer, Oskar Schlemmer Death house for 1888-1943 a woman, 1920 L: Georg Muche, Walter Gropius, Weimar cemetery, 1922 (destroyed) Weaving Workshop, 1921 2 5/9/16 Gropius and Meyer, Chicago Tribune Building competition project, 1922 , Walter Gropius Diagram for the structure of teaching at the Bauhaus, 1922 Mies van der Rohe, Friedrichstrasse Skycraper Project, Berlin, 1921; Glass Skyscraper Project, 1922 Bauhaus designs: Joost Schmidt, Poster for Cradle- Peter Keler, 1922 the Bauhaus Exhibition in Weimar, 1923 Table Lamp, Wilhelm Wagenfeld, known as the Bauhaus lamp Johannes Itten László Moholy-Nagy mid to late 1920s 1888-1967 1895-1946 Kurt Schmidt, Mechanical cabaret, 1924 Directors Office, Bauhaus, Weimar, 1923 Herbert Bayer, Design for a cinema, 1924-25 3 5/9/16 Bauhaus furniture: chair, Marcel Breuer, 1922 Marcel Breuer, table and chairs, ca.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bauhaus and Modern Design Education Lecture 22 : the Bauhaus, Weimar, Germany 1919 Founder Walter Gropius, Bauhaus Philosophy, Abstract Expressionism, Op-Art
    Objectives_template Module 9 : The Bauhaus and Modern Design Education Lecture 22 : The Bauhaus, Weimar, Germany 1919 founder Walter Gropius, Bauhaus philosophy, Abstract Expressionism, Op-Art The Lecture Contains: The Bauhaus and the Modern Design Education ● The Bauhaus, Weimar, Germany 1919 founder Walter Gropius ● Bauhaus philosophy ● Abstract Expressionism ● Op-Art file:///D|/Dr.%20Amit%20Ray/Philosophy_&_History_of_Design/lecture22/22_1.htm [9/26/2013 3:46:05 PM] Objectives_template Module 9 : The Bauhaus and Modern Design Education Lecture 22 : The Bauhaus, Weimar, Germany 1919 founder Walter Gropius, Bauhaus philosophy, Abstract Expressionism, Op-Art The Bauhaus and the Modern Design Education The Bauhaus, Weimar, Germany 1919 founder Walter Gropius The concept and the spirit of designing things exist since the beginning of mankind. Till the Bauhaus institution took initiative around the early 20th century to establish a structured curriculum it remained primarily craft oriented field of design. The new design concept tried to analyze and understand the pure form, color and shapes. Such initiative helped to understand the true characteristics of material by stripping away the decorative aspects in design. The spirit of Bauhaus School generated an awareness synthesizing art, craft and industrial design. The creativity in design created a new breed of artist engineers. Thus, the Bauhaus played a pivotal role in the modern Industrial Design profession. It generated enough curiosity and excitement among artists, architects and technologists. The Bauhaus school was founded by Walter Gropius in Weimar, Germany which operated from 1919 to 1933. The Bauhaus style became one of the most influential forces in the modern architecture and design. The Bauhaus had a significant influence upon later developments in art, architecture, graphic design, interior design, industrial design, and typography.
    [Show full text]
  • Bauhaus Beginnings Reexamines the Founding Principles of This Landmark Institution
    Almost mythic in status, the Bauhaus is seen as one of the most influential schools of art and design of the twentieth century. Established in 1919, the Bauhaus sought to erode distinctions among crafts, the fine arts, and architecture through a program of study centered on practical experience and diverse theories. Until the school’s forced closure by the Nazi regime in 1933, students and masters worked with a variety of traditional and experimental media and continually reconceived the role of art and design in contemporary society. Despite its relatively brief, itinerant existence, the Bauhaus occupies an outsize position in the cultural imaginary. Marking the one hundredth anniversary of the school’s opening, Bauhaus Beginnings reexamines the founding principles of this landmark institution. The exhibition considers the school’s early dedication to spiritual expression and its development of a curriculum based on elements deemed fundamental to all forms of artistic practice. Sponsored by Rosetta Getty Bauhaus Beginnings | June 11 – October 13, 2019 | www.getty.edu/bauhaus/beginnings 1 Founding the Bauhaus The Bauhaus officially opened in Weimar, Germany, on April 1, 1919. Director Walter Gropius’s manifesto announced a bold vision for the newly reformed, state-sponsored school of art and design. In a text laden with spiritual and romantic imagery, Gropius outlined a model of education that bridged the fine and applied arts. He hoped that various forms of artistic practice—especially painting, sculpture, architecture, and design—could produce socially and spiritually gratifying collective works. Lyonel Feininger illustrated Gropius’s future-oriented vision somewhat counterintuitively through a woodcut depicting a Gothic cathedral with flying buttresses, pointed arches, and rays of light emanating from its steeples.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bauhaus-Archiv / Museum Für Gestaltung, Berlin
    Press Kit The Bauhaus‐Archiv / Museum für Gestaltung, Berlin 1. Dates and facts 2. Profile texts 3. Collections and archive 4. The building 5. The new museum building Information provided in December 2018 Press contact: Bauhaus‐Archiv / Museum für Gestaltung Press office and public relations Schillerstr. 9 10625 Berlin (Germany) [email protected] www.bauhaus.de Esned Nezic Therese Teutsch Director of communication Spokesperson for press office and public relations Tel. (+49) 030 – 25 400 245 Tel. (+49) 030 – 25 400 247 page 1 of 8 Fact Sheet Bauhaus-Archiv / Museum für Gestaltung Offices Bauhaus-Archiv /Museum für Gestaltung Schillerstraße 9, 10625 Berlin Tel. +49 30-254002-0, Fax 030-254002-10 Email: [email protected] www.bauhaus.de Project space the temporary bauhaus-archiv / museum für gestaltung Knesebeckstraße 1-2, 10623 Berlin Tel. +49 30-254002-0 Director Dr. Annemarie Jaeggi (since 2003) Staff 24 employees Legal form Gemeinnütziger Verein (charitable organisation/non-profit organisation) Board Chairperson Dr. Markus Klimmer Financing and annual budget Receives funding from the state of Berlin 2017 Budget: c.1.8 m €, consisting of 53 % public funding and 47 % independent income incl. acquisition of third-party funding Areas of responsibility and activity Double function as museum and archive: . Collecting all documents and objects related to the activities and cultural intellectual heritage of the Bauhaus . Researching the history and influence of the Bauhaus . Exhibiting key works from the Bauhaus collection . Providing an exhibition
    [Show full text]