Psychology of Terrorism
Bruce Bongar, et al., Editors
OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS PSYCHOLOGY OF TERRORISM This page intentionally left blank Psychology of Terrorism
EDITED BY
Bruce Bongar Lisa M. Brown Larry E. Beutler James N. Breckenridge Philip G. Zimbardo
1
2007 3
Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education.
Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam
Copyright Ó 2007 by Oxford University Press
Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publicaton Data Psychology of terrorism / edited by Bruce Bongar ...[et al.]. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN–13 978–0–19–517249–2 ISBN 0–19–517249–3 1. Terrorism—Psychological aspects. 2. Disasters—Psychological aspects. 3. Victims of terrorism—Mental health. I. Bongar, Bruce Michael. [DNLM: 1. Terrorism—psychology. 2. Stress, Psychological —therapy. 3. Survivors— psychology. WA 295 P9743 2006] RC569.5.T47P83 2006 363.32019—dc22 2005034001
987654321 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper This book is dedicated to all those who fight terrorism, to all those who strive to prevent terrorism, and to all those whose lives have been irreparably scarred by terrorism. This page intentionally left blank Foreword
How do I answer the preschooler who asks, ‘‘Why emotional focus for Western society. During the does that man want to kill us?’’ during a nightly following years we have had to confront the horror news broadcast. Why do wealthy suburbanites beg of significant civilian casualties, live with uncer- their primary care physicians to write prescriptions tainty and fear compounded by stumbling and in- for Cipro (ciprofloxacin) when no outbreak of an- trusive efforts by government to protect us, all the thrax has ever occurred within hundreds of miles? while attempting to comprehend the willingness How do we provide explanations of dispositional of other people from different cultures to gladly die perceived risk, negativity bias, attributional error, in an effort to kill as many of us as possible. and social amplification to the nightly news re- As behavioral scientists and mental health porter who wants psychological sound bites? Not practitioners, the years since 9/11 have forced us to long ago few of us would have dreamed that we contemplate a range questions long overlooked by would face such questions. many of our colleagues. Should we regard those What happens to people, both as individuals who organize and perpetrate acts of terror as crim- and members of social groups, when we suddenly inals or revolutionaries; antisocial personalities or find ourselves forced to question our fundamental religious ideologues; psychopaths or self-sacrificing assumptions about our basic safety, security, and advocates of radical social change; or all of the well-being? What happens when that challenge above? What treatment strategies will prove most appears suddenly in the form of massive destruc- effective for helping people who experience post tion and loss of life from unanticipated sources traumatic stress, chronic reactive anxiety, burnout, and directions, accompanied by continuing threats and related physical symptoms? Does the develop- from others we do not know and whose motives ment of a complex fluctuating color coded threat we cannot comprehend? Today, we know the an- level system, and announcement that future attacks swer: anxiety, fear, dread, and terror. will almost certainly occur. facilitate or hinder Terrorism in human history dates back at least coping? Do existing treatment models actually work to biblical times, although September 11, 2001, or must we abandon conventional ideas for new brought the full psychological and societal impact intervention paradigms? What can we do to pro- of massively destructive terrorist acts into sharp mote resilience in coping with uncertain risk, viii Foreword chronic threat of future attacks, and inconsistent of historical events, as well as domestic terrorism messages from government authorities? Traditional such as the threats posed by the ‘‘Unabomber,’’ education and training of mental health profes- Oklahoma City Bombing, and postal anthrax sionals and behaviorally scientists has done little to incidents. prepare us for addressing these critical questions. As we prepare ourselves and our students to Bongar and his talented colleagues offer us serve the contemporary needs of society, the con- significant assistance in overcoming the gaps in our tents of this volume provide an incredibly valuable training. They have compiled a broad and deep and vital resource. The work of these contributors array of exceptionally useful information aimed at will enable our profession to more readily step for- helping readers both to understand the psychology ward and engage in research and clinical endeavors of the terrorist and the best scientifically grounded aimed at reducing both terrorist threats and the ac- remedies for the terrorized. These experts from companying psychological consequences. Although academic, medical, military, and clinical settings I rue the need for this excellent resource, I remain cover the full range of theoretical, clinical, social grateful for it. psychological, work site, developmental, and his- Gerald P. Koocher torical contexts. The authors also look well Boston beyond the scope of 9/11, addressing a wide range March 23, 2006 Acknowledgments
I, along with millions of others who watched New York City was always there in his soul). Before the events of September 11, 2001, unfold, felt my trip, I was honored to be invited as a special- the immediate shocking impact of the terrorist ist in clinical emergencies and crises to come to attacks—all the more so as my son frequently Washington, D.C. to discuss disaster mental health traveled on that fateful flight from Boston to San and its role with regard to 9/11 with Dr. Bernadine Francisco and could have easily been on the plane Healy, the head of the American Red Cross. After that terrible day. As a clinical psychologist, I im- spending several days in New York City, and being mediately volunteered my services to the American astonished at the incredible resilience of this re- Red Cross (ARC). While awaiting an assignment to markable city and its people, I was able to meet at go to Manhattan, I completed the required ARC some length with Dr. Healey and her senior aid at Disaster Mental Health Level 1 training to work at a ARC headquarters. In this meeting, I emphasized disaster site. As both a scientist and a practitioner, I the critical role of the American Psychological As- was astonished to learn that scientifically validated sociation, through its Disaster Response Network methods were not being used for training, and the (DRN), and the efforts of Dr. Russell Newman and need to provide responders, victims proximally and senior DRN staff who served as vital resources that remotely affected with the best possible psycholo- stood ready to work closely with the ARC and its gical tools to deal with this horror became evident then head of disaster mental health, Dr. John and provided a challenge for me. Clizbe. While awaiting any available opening for an Most importantly, I had a remarkable evening ARC assignment to go back to New York City, I with the individual whom I consider to be the took it upon myself immediately to go to New York, foremost authority on suicide terror in the world, and without identifying myself in any way, in- Professor Ariel Merari. It was through this meeting formally assessed the situation as best I could. An at the Willard Hotel that I realized how little I and insight soon emerged. These people had attacked other interested mental health professionals really not just the United States of America, but my Dad’s knew about terrorism and what this heinous attack ‘‘home.’’ For my father, Moses Bongar, was a ‘‘true America would entail in the years to come. That New Yorker’’ (and though he traveled far and wide, evening with Ariel changed my life. For Professor x Acknowledgments
Merari shared with me his vast experience and that inevitable psychological trauma that is inherent in of his Israeli colleagues who have waged battle any human-created mass casualty event. against this ghastly sort of event since the founding Thanks to Joan and to her dedicated colleagues of the State of Israel. He quickly convinced me that and staff at OUP for guidance and assistance in America would soon find itself deluged with a preparing this massive missive. It is essential to panoply of so-called terrorism experts—all of acknowledge the magnificent role that OUP’s Jo- whom would be more than willing to provide their seph Zito, Jennifer Rappaport, Mallory Jensen, and learned opinions (often for a substantial fee). Un- Anne Enenbach played in making this book a fortunately, as I had already learned decades ago, reality. one good scientific study is worth a thousand I would be remiss in not acknowledging the ‘‘learned opinions.’’ Thus, Professor Merari inspired critical additional financial support for the con- me to coordinate the first ever American-based ference that was solicited by President Allen Calvin international conference on the psychology of ter- of the Pacific Graduate School of Psychology and, rorism. Science, rather than ‘‘opinion,’’ would be in particular, wish to thank Racky Newman and her the heart and soul of this endeavor. I would also be foundation and Rabbi Stephen Pearce of Temple remiss in not mentioning another remarkable, ac- Emanu-El for support of this event. complished Merari, Professor Dalia Merari, whose This book also owes a great debt to the input sage counsel helped me focus on what would be and wise counsel of Col. Larry James of the United of most interest and value in the applied sphere. States Army; an equal debt is owed to Captain My colleagues at the first North Atlantic Treaty Elizabeth Holmes of the United States Naval Organization conference on the prevention of sui- Academy (and to my colleagues Brad Johnson and cide terror, organized by Professors Ariel Merari Rocky Lall). I would also like to thank and ac- and Scott Atran, and held in Lisbon in 2004 were knowledge Dr. Patrick DeLeon for his sage coun- ever in my mind as we headed for the finish line. In sel. I also wish to thank my colleagues Drs. Paul particular, I wish to acknowledge Dr. Simon Wes- Stockton, Phillip Zimbardo, Larry Beutler, and ley and Professor Atran for their generous efforts to James Breckenridge for their dedicated work in educate me on the nuances and vital dimensions crafting a marvelous course on the psychology of of both basic and applied science after such evil terrorism at the United States Naval Postgraduate events. London and Madrid proved their pre- School (NPS) in Monterey, California. Professors science. At the NATO conference I also learned often dream of having a class of students so dedi- how science and its cutting edge applications can cated, so wise, and most importantly, so motivated be best mobilized through teamwork and discus- to learn that teaching is not a mere pleasure, but sion. At several dinners, I was fortunate enough to a life-changing event. The first class in the NPS be educated in the complexities of how science can Master’s degree program in Homeland Security impact assessment, risk management and inter- humbled all five of us with their amazing range of vention by a wise and wonderful colleague, Major intellect, experience and talents (both individually General Issac Ben-Israel. and collectively). You know who you are and I, for It is crucial to note that neither the initial one, will be forever grateful for the experience of conference in Palo Alto on the psychology of ter- being your student and your professor. rorism nor this book could ever have come to Any book of this magnitude rises or falls on the fruition without the faith and support of a truly perseverance, resiliency and good spirits of one’s remarkable woman, Joan Bossert of Oxford Uni- senior support staff. Laura Pratchett, my graduate versity Press (OUP). For it was Joan and the other student assistant from my PGSP-STANFORD leaders at OUP who, without missing a beat, im- doctor of psychology program, functioned at the mediately recognized that such a conference was level of a junior colleague rather than a beginning not only timely, but represented a sea change in graduate student (here her training in Scotland as a how psychological science and its application solicitor brought a laser beam focus to this old would be the key to understanding the role that professor’s tome). My former graduate students psychology would play in making a difference in Drs. Glenn Sullivan and Eric Crawford also insured how we assess, manage, treat, and prevent the that the conference from which this work sprung Acknowledgments xi was run like a Swiss watch (a Rolex for that matter). have been my hero. The reader may wonder about I also want to acknowledge that Dr. Sullivan will such an odd place to tell his son this—for both carry the torch on my own work on suicide terror father and son are old-fashioned guys who are long after I have sailed off to retirement. I am also easily embarrassed about telling each other how indebted to my personal assistant, Briana Breen, for much they love one another. Parents in all cultures her perseverance, resiliency and consistent good know that the greatest pride is the pride one takes spirits in getting this book completed through in the accomplishments of one’s children. her role as a senior coordinator. Briana tirelessly I am always indebted to my family and thank endured ‘‘herding cats’’—especially yours truly. my Mom, my amazingly gifted and talented sister From a personal standpoint, I also wish to Hallie, her husband James White and my Native acknowledge the incredible support of Professor American nephew and nieces, my wonderfully Larry Beutler, my beloved colleague and writing entrepreneurial brother Andrew, his wife Kim and partner of so many years—Larry was always there the boys, and my intrepid sister Debbie and her and his gimlet editorial eye suffuses many of the children in Israel. chapters herein. Blanche Dubois in the Tennessee I would also like to thank specifically for their Williams masterpiece, A Street Car Named Desire, unflagging support for the National Center on once remarked that ‘‘I have always depended on the Disaster Psychology and Terrorism, our dis- kindness of strangers.’’ More than 20 years ago, tinguished chair of psychiatry, Alan Schatzberg, Professor Phillip Zimbardo, already a legend as Dean Pizzo of Stanford Medical School, the chair of teacher of psychology, most generously recom- our joint doctor of psychology program, Bruce mended to his publisher that a young colleague Arnow, Javaid Sheikh of VAPAHCS, and last but be asked to review a critical chapter or two in his never least our visionary, President Allen Calvin of classic introductory text. That young professor the Pacific Graduate School. I would also like to Bongar (now grown a bit long in the tooth) hopes thank my friends and colleagues Eric Harris and that 20 years from now, if he is lucky, he will have Susan Brooks, Wendy and Sy Packman, Ben Patty the energy, intellectual mastery and drive that Phil and Bennie, Linda Crothers and Dani, my fellow continues to demonstrate to the world. Professors ‘‘Lotus Eaters’’ David Clark, Andrew Slaby, and lucky enough to have many years of mentoring Terry Maltsberger, Art and Barbara Frankel, David doctoral students know that if one is extremely and Marilyn Rigler, Don Bersoff, Kirk Hubbard, lucky, one has a few super stars, destined early on Bruce and Diane Ogilvie, and Kevin Murphy. In to surpass their professor’s own research and sci- addition, since 1978, I have been honored beyond entific accomplishments. It is clear that my col- measure to have as my esteemed friend and col- league and former doctoral student Dr. Lisa Brown league, the current president of the American Psy- is already on such a trajectory and her enormous chological Association, Dean Gerald Koocher. efforts, along with those of my colleagues Larry, Randy Travis, a famous American country- Phil, and Jim are ever present in this work. western balladeer, once sang the lyrics ‘‘your heroes Psychologists who wish to understand the will help you find good in yourself, your friends psychology of terrorism can learn much from our won’t desert you for somebody else.’’ Thank you sibling social sciences, in particular from the dis- RAH, IF, CSF, ACD, WS, SF, CR, WBG, HW, AM cipline of anthropology. My life-long friend, mo- PL, BCO, DR, MHE, DR, LGP, CR, JKG, JR, WSC ther of our son Brandon, and my former wife, the and JPJ, LV, CP, JP, GN, and SW. noted cultural anthropologist Professor Debbora For over twenty five years I have been privileged Battaglia, who for almost 13 years honored me by to be a scientific fellow among a remarkable band of allowing me to accompany her on many of her brothers and sisters, The Explorers Club, who have professional journeys. For most of my adult life, I ‘‘pushed the limits for more than a century’’—thank have not been a deeply religious person, but I you for allowing this ‘‘shrink’’ to learn that ‘‘home continue to thank God every day that our son was is where when you go there, they have to take not on that plane. you in.’’ Most of all, this book is dedicated to my son, While my colleagues Lisa, Larry, Phil, and Brandon Fortune Bongar—for so many years you Jim kindly and generously put their names and xii Acknowledgments considerable skills into this volume, as a bluewater (and most honestly critical audience) I have ever sailor with thousands of miles under my keel, I addressed. I am honored to have had the chance to know that to escape chaos, in the end someone must work with every contributor to this volume and take full responsibility as the ‘‘skipper’’ for all that is hope that each reader will find that the assembled contained herein. I fully accept such responsibility, chapters meet both their professional and personal and I trust that the readers of this book will soon needs. realize that all chapter authors involved in this Finally, to the sunshine of my life: John, Gordo, project strove at every juncture to provide the in- Frank, Las Vegas Larry, M, Jeff, Joel, Sarah, Robyn tended audience with the most accurate, useful and The Wonder Dog, to Donna Olsen Satterfield, my scientifically sound chapters possible. In particular I former internship supervisor who for 30 years has am indebted to Professors Tony Taylor and Douglas been my best friend, and last but never least, first Paton of New Zealand for inviting me to give a among equals, to My Funny Valentine, Cookie (who plenary address on the psychology of terrorism to taught me the real meaning of true love that lasts the New Zealand Psychological Society—the best forever—it was always you from the start). Contents
Foreword 6 Terrorism and the Media 81 Gerald P. Koocher vii Joel N. Shurkin Contributors xv 7 What Is Terrorism? Key Elements and History 87 I The Psychology of Terrorism Scott Gerwehr and Kirk Hubbard 1 The Psychology of Terrorism: Defining 8 Psychological Aspects of Suicide the Need and Describing the Goals 3 Terrorism 101 Bruce Bongar Ariel Merari 2 Psychological Issues in Understanding 9 The Strategy of Terrorism and the Terrorism and the Response to Psychology of Mass-Mediated Terrorism 13 Fear 116 Clark McCauley James N. Breckenridge and Philip G. Zimbardo 3 The Need for Proficient Mental Health Professionals in the Study of Terrorism 32 III Consequences of Terrorism Larry E. Beutler, Gil Reyes, Zeno Franco, and 10 The Role of Religion, Spirituality, and Jennifer Housley Faith-Based Community in Coping 4 War Versus Justice in Response to With Acts of Terrorism 137 Terrorist Attacks: Competing Timothy A. Kelly Frames and Their Implications 56 11 Psychological Consequences of Actual Clark McCauley or Threatened CBRNE Terrorism 153 Glenn R. Sullivan and Bruce Bongar II Terrorism 12 Psychological Weapons of Mass 5 The Staircase to Terrorism: Disruption Through Vicarious Classical A Psychological Exploration 69 Conditioning 164 Fathali M. Moghaddam Dennis D. Embry
xiii xiv Contents
13 Near- and Long-Term Psychological 22 Cultural Considerations: Caring for Effects of Exposure to Terrorist Culturally Diverse Communities Attacks 175 in the Aftermath of Terrorist Susan E. Brandon and Andrew P. Silke Attacks 338 14 The Response of Relief Organizations to David Chiriboga Terrorist Attacks: An Overview 23 The Psychological Consequences of of How the Red Cross and Other Relief Terrorist Alerts 357 Organizations Work in Conjunction Rose McDermott and Philip G. Zimbardo With Other Agencies 194 John A. Clizbe and Susan Hamilton V Prevention and Psychological 15 Understanding How Organizational Problems in Reaction to Acts of Bias Influenced First Responders Terrorism at the World Trade Center 207 24 Defusing the Terrorism of Joseph W. Pfeifer Terror 373 16 Warfare, Terrorism, and A. J. W. Taylor Psychology 216 25 Psychological Resilience in the Face of L. Morgan Banks and Larry C. James Terrorism 400 Lisa D. Butler, Leslie A. Morland, IV Assessment and Treatment Gregory A. Leskin 17 Terrorism Stress Risk Assessment and 26 Promoting Resilience and Recovery in Management 225 First Responders 418 Douglas Paton and John. M. Violanti Richard Gist 18 Evidence-Based Interventions for 27 Integrating Medical, Public Survivors of Terrorism 247 Health, and Mental Health Assets Josef I. Ruzek, Shira Maguen, and Brett T. Litz into a National Response Strategy 434 19 Neurobiological and Behavioral Dori B. Reissman, Stephan G. Reissman, Consequences of Terrorism: and Brian W. Flynn Distinguishing Normal From Pathological Responses, Risk Profiling, 28 Reflections on the Psychology of and Optimizing Resilience 273 Terrorism 452 Rachel Yehuda, Richard Bryant, Joseph Zohar, Laura Pratchett, Lisa M. Brown, and and Charles R. Marmar Bruce Bongar 20 Older Adults and Terrorism 288 Lisa M. Brown, Donna Cohen, and Appendix: Resources in Psychology Joy R. Kohlmaier of Terrorism 459 21 Children and Terrorism: A Family Matteo Bertoni and Brynne Johannsen Psychoeducational Approach 311 Maureen Underwood, John Kalafat, and Glossary 467 Nicci Spinazolla Index 475 Contributors
Editors versity Press Clinical Psychology Series and is the winner of both the Shneidman award for early Bruce Bongar is Calvin Professor of Psychology at career achievement and Dubin award for lifetime the Pacific Graduate School of Psychology and career achievement in the scientific understanding Consulting Professor of Psychiatry and Behavio- of suicide from the American Association of Sui- ral Sciences at Stanford University School of Medi- cidology, and is past president of Section VII, cine. He founded and is the executive director of Clinical Emergencies and Crises, of the Division of the National Center on Disaster Psychology and Clinical Psychology (Division 12) of the American Terrorism. Along with Larry Beutler, the Director Psychological Association. Professor Bongar is a of the Palo Alto Medical Reserve Corps (MRC) of fellow of the American Psychological Association, the Office of the Surgeon General of the United the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine, and the States, Professor Bongar recently volunteered his American Psychological Society. A practicing clin- services and has joined the senior staff of the San ical psychologist and psychotherapist for almost Mateo County Coastside Medical Reserve Corp 30 years, Dr. Bongar is a licensed psychologist, a (MRC). Professor Bongar, along with his close chartered clinical psychologist of the British Psy- colleague Professor Ariel Merari, of Tel Aviv chological Society, and a Diplomate of the American University, will be undertaking an international Board of Professional Psychology. collaborative study to attempt to scientifically un- derstand and prevent acts of suicide terror such as Lisa M. Brown is an Assistant Professor in the those that occurred on 9/11 and the bombings in Department of Aging and Mental Health, Florida London and Madrid—a study that grew out of Mental Health Institute, and the Department of the first NATO conference on the prevention of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, University of suicide terrorism—organized by Merari and Scott South Florida. Brown is interested in how adults Atran. Dr. Bongar is an authority on suicide and cope with adverse personal or societal life events. life threatening behaviors and on clinical and legal Her research on mental health and disasters has standards of care. He founded the Oxford Uni- evolved from her longstanding interest in the
xv xvi Contributors effects of adverse events and pathological condi- fairs section of Division 18 (Public Service). He tions on the mental and physical health of older recently received the Division’s National Out- adults. Brown and her colleague John A. Schinka standing Researcher Award for his work in health have recently completed a longitudinal study that economics, risk adjustment, and other statistical examines the effects of the 2004 and 2005 hurri- modeling approaches to healthcare utilization. The canes on a cohort of elderly Floridians. She is cur- Department of Veterans Affairs Under Secretary for rently evaluating the effectiveness of a mental health Health recognized Dr. Breckenridge in 2005 for intervention that was developed to reduce hurri- his Robert Wood Johnson funded research on cane related distress and put into practice state- national patterns of intensive care and palliative wide after the 2004 hurricane season. Along with care alternatives. Kathryn Hyer, Brown is examining the response and recovery of long-term care facilities during Philip G. Zimbardo is internationally recognized disasters and working to develop policy and best as the ‘‘voice and face of contemporary psychology’’ practices to protect institutionalized adults. through his widely seen PBS-TV series, Discovering Psychology, his media appearances, best-selling Larry E. Beutler is the William McInnes Dis- trade books on shyness, and his classic research, tinguished Professor of Psychology at Pacific the Stanford Prison Experiment. Zimbardo has Graduate School of Psychology (PGSP), and is a been a Stanford University professor since 1968, Consulting Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral having taught previously at Yale, NYU, and Co- Sciences at Stanford University School of Medi- lumbia University. He is now an Emeritus Professor cine. He is also a Visiting Professor of Homeland but is still teaching more new and intense under- Security and Defense at the Naval Post-Graduate graduate courses. He has been given numerous School in Monterey and the former Chair of the awards and honors as an educator, researcher, Ph.D. Program and Director of Clinical Training at writer, and service to the profession. Most recently Pacific Graduate School of Psychology. Beutler has he was awarded the 2005 Havel Foundation Prize published over 20 scholarly books and 350 sci- from the Czech Republic for his lifetime of research entific articles and papers on psychological as- on the human condition. Among his more than 350 sessment, training, and treatment. He is a Past professional publications and 50 books is the old- President of the Society for Clinical Psychology est current textbook in psychology, Psychology and (Division 12, APA), the Division of Psychotherapy Life, going into its 18th edition. His current re- (APA), and the International Society for Psy- search interests are in the domain of experimental chotherapy Research. social psychology with a scattered emphasis on everything and anything interesting to study from James N. Breckenridge is the Associate Director of time perspective to political psychology. Zimbardo the Stanford Center for Interdisciplinary Policy, is currently enmeshed in his major opus, Zimbardo Research, and Education on Terrorism. He retired is past President of the Western Psychological As- recently from his positions as Chief of the Psy- sociation (twice), President of the American Psy- chology Services at the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto chological Association, the elected Chair of the Health Care System. Breckenridge is also Professor Council of Scientific Society Presidents (CSSP) re- of Psychology at the Pacific Graduate School of presenting 63 scientific, math and technical asso- Psychology, and Director of Training of the PGSP- ciations (with 1.5 million members), and is now STANFORD Psy.D. Consortium, and Consulting Chair of the Western Psychological Foundation Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and President of the Philip Zimbardo Foundation at Stanford University School of Medicine. He that collects funds for college scholarships and teaches graduate courses in the psychology of computers for children in his ancestral Sicilian terrorism at the Center for Homeland Defense and village town of Cammarata. Zimbardo is also the Security at the Naval Post-Graduate School, where director of a new terrorism center sponsored jointly he is a Distinguished Senior Fellow. Breckenridge by Stanford and the Naval Postgraduate School, is also a Fellow of the American Psychological The Interdisciplinary Center for Policy, Education, Association and is chair-elect of the Veterans Af- and Research on Terrorism (CIPERT). Contributors xvii
Contributors Zeno Franco Col. L. Morgan Banks, PhD Pacific Graduate School of Psychology, Psychological Applications Directorate, Ft. Bragg, NC Palo Alto, CA Larry E. Beutler, PhD, ABPP Scott Gerwehr Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA Defense Group Inc., Center for Intelligence National Center on the Psychology of Terrorism Research and Analysis, Santa Monica, CA Richard Gist, PhD Bruce Bongar, PhD, ABPP, FAPM Department of Psychology, University of Missouri– Pacific Graduate School of Psychology, Palo Alto, CA Kansas City, Kansas City, MO Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Principal Assistant to the Director, Kansas City Fire Stanford University School of Medicine, Department, Kansas City, MO Stanford, CA and National Center on the Psychology of Terrorism Susan Hamilton, PhD American Red Cross, Washington, DC Susan Brandon, PhD Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Jennifer Housley Haven, CT Pacific Graduate School of Psychology, Palo Alto, CA James N. Breckenridge, PhD Kirk M. Hubbard, PhD Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA Operational Assessment Division, Central In- Lisa M. Brown, PhD telligence Agency, Washington, DC Aging and Mental Health Department, Larry James, PhD Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Department of Psychology, Tripler Army Medical Institute, University of South Florida, Center, Honolulu, HI and Tampa, FL and National Center on the Psychology of Terrorism National Center on the Psychology of Terrorism John Kalafat, PhD Richard Bryant, PhD Graduate School of Applied and Professional Department of Psychology, University of New Psychology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ South Wales, Sydney, Australia Timothy A. Kelly, PhD Lisa D. Butler, PhD Fuller Graduate School of Psychology, Pasadena, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, California Stanford University School of Medicine, Gregory A. Leskin, PhD Stanford, CA National Center for Post-Traumatic Stress Dis- David Chiriboga, PhD order, VA Aging and Mental Health Department, Louis de Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, Joy Kohlmaier, PhD University of South Florida, Tampa, FL Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health John A. Clizbe, PhD Institute, University of South Florida, American Red Cross, Washington, DC Tampa, FL Donna Cohen, PhD Brett T. Litz, PhD Aging and Mental Health Department, Louis de National Center for Post-Traumatic Stress la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, Disorder, Behavioral Science Division, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL Boston, MA Dennis D. Embry, PhD Shira Maguen, PhD PAXIS Institute, Tucson, AZ Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Program, San Brian W. Flynn, EdD, RADM, U.S. Public Francisco Veterans Administration Medical Health Services, Ret. Center, San Francisco, CA Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress, Charles R. Marmar, MD Uniformed Services University of the Health San Francisco Department of Veterans Affairs Sciences, Bethesda, MD Medical Center, San Francisco, CA xviii Contributors
Clark McCauley, PhD Joel Shurkin Psychology Department, Bryn Mawr College, Bryn National Center on the Psychology of Terrorism Mawr, PA Baltimore, MD Rose McDermott, PhD Andrew Silke, PhD Political Science Department, University of Cali- School of Law, University of East London, Strat- fornia, Santa Barbara, CA ford, London, England Ariel Merari, PhD Psychology Department, Tel Aviv University, Tel Nicci Spinazzola, EdS, LMFT, LPC Aviv, Israel and Richard Hall Community Mental Health Center, National Center on the Psychology of Terrorism Somerville, NJ Fathali M. Moghaddam, PhD Glenn R. Sullivan, PhD Psychology Department, Georgetown University, Pacific Graduate School of Psychology, Washington, DC Palo Alto, CA and Leslie Morland, PsyD National Center on the Psychology of Terrorism National Center for Post-Traumatic Stress Dis- order, Veterans Affairs Pacific Island Healthcare A. J. W. Taylor System, Honolulu, HI School of Psychology, Victoria University of Douglas Paton PhD, CPsychol Wellington, Wellington, NZ School of Psychology, University of Tasmania, Maureen Underwood, LCSW Launceston, Tasmania, Australia and Morristown, NJ National Center on the Psychology of Terrorism John M. Violanti, PhD Joseph W. Pfeifer School of Public Health and Health Fire Department of New York, NY Professions, Social and Preventative Medicines, Laura Pratchett, LLB (Hons) State University of New York–Buffalo, Pacific Graduate School of Psychology–Stanford Buffalo, NY PsyD Consortium, Palo Alto, CA Dori Reissman, MD Rachel Yehuda, PhD Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Psychiatry Department, Mount Sinai School of Atlanta, GA Medicine, New York, NY and Traumatic Stress Studies Division, Stephan G. Reissman, PhD, CEM Mount Sinai School of Medicine and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Bronx Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, GA New York, NY Gil Reyes, PhD School of Psychology, Fielding Graduate Philip G. Zimbardo, PhD University, Santa Barbara, CA Psychology Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA Josef I. Ruzek, PhD National Center for Post-Traumatic Stress Dis- Joseph Zohar, MD order, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Psychiatry Department, Chaim Sheba Medical Alto, CA Center, Ramat Gan, Israel I The Psychology of Terrorism This page intentionally left blank 1
The Psychology of Terrorism Defining the Need and Describing the Goals Bruce Bongar
Terrorism is about one thing: Psychology. It is the psychology of fear. Philip G. Zimbardo, personal communication, April 2004
The past decade has witnessed a dramatic trans- or use poison on a large scale. These assassins were formation in the nature and use of terrorism. These an eleventh-century offshoot of a Shia Muslim sect changes have brought into high relief the need for known as the Ismailis, who believed that dying better psychological and social responses to ter- in the process of their assault was an act of self- rorism and man-made disasters. It is important sacrifice and guaranteed them a pathway into to note that a major strategic intent of modern heaven. By contrast, terrorist organizations today terrorists is to create huge numbers of secondary are often much larger, more loosely connected net- psychological casualties by means of large-scale works of full-time and part-time activists, and this physical attacks. The catastrophic acts of Septem- anonymity removes inhibitions to inflict broad, in- ber 11, 2001, and their aftermath have forced discriminate damage (Hoffman, 2001). military, medical, and psychological experts to re- The English word terrorism comes from the evaluate their understanding of mass casualty ter- re´gime de la terreur that prevailed in France from rorism. Given the relative newness of the discipline, 1793 to 1794, when a French revolutionary, we believe there is a great need for a text that covers Maximilian Robespierre, proclaimed that ‘‘Terror aspects of psychology relevant to terrorism. is nothing other than justice, prompt, severe, in- flexible; it is therefore an emanation of virtue; it is not so much a special principle as it is a con- Definitional Issues sequence of the general principle of democracy applied to our country’s most urgent needs.’’ In 48 A.D., a Jewish sect called the Zealots carried McDermott and Zimbardo (this volume) tren- out terrorist campaigns to force an insurrection chantly point out that terrorism is not about war in against the Romans in Judea. These campaigns any traditional sense of destroying the material included the use of assassins—‘‘sicarii,’’ or dagger resources of an enemy nation and taking over that men—who would infiltrate Roman-controlled country; instead, terrorism is fundamentally about cities, stab Jewish collaborators or Roman le- psychology. Terrorist acts are designed strategi- gionnaires with a ‘‘sicae’’(dagger), kidnap members cally to incite terror and fright in civilian popula- of the staff of the Temple Guard to hold for ransom, tions. They further note that terrorists in most
3 4 The Psychology of Terrorism instances are neither crazy nor irrational—though in the early spring of 2004 by the nonpartisan their acts may be evil in the extreme. Many au- Council for Excellence that found that more than thorities have also found that there is neither a three-quarters of Americans expect the United States specific terrorist psychological profile nor a sin- to be the target of a major terrorist attack in the near gular psychopathological condition. future. A clear reality focus for such widespread Crenshaw (2000) has emphasized this defini- anxiety and fear was noted: tional dilemma and pointed out that the concept of terrorism is not well defined, that contradictions One distinct pattern in the litany of terrorist occur, that terrorism is a highly politicized term atrocities is that there has been an increasing used to describe the behavior of oppositional for- interest in well-planned attacks designed to net ces, and that the category of terrorism includes the highest numbers of civilian casualties. diverse practices that range from kidnappings to Charting data from the International Policy In- bombings intended to create mass casualties. Fur- stitute for Counter-Terrorism, Robert Axelrod, a thermore, he notes that there is ongoing political political scientist at the University of Michigan, pressure to define terrorist behavior in terms of observes that a very few terrorist attacks account psychopathology, and he clearly suggests that the for a very large percentage of all casualties. Not lack of extensive, reliable interview data or empiri- only does this trend call for anticipating attacks cal testing has made it difficult to draw dependable with ever broader political, economic, and so- and valid inferences. He concludes that, despite the cial effects, it also seems to point to an eventual political climate, personality factors and psycho- suicide attack using chemical, biological, or pathologies are not specific to terrorists and there nuclear weapons. Although that may take some is little evidence of gender differences; instead, ra- time to plan effectively, long-term planning has ther than individual factors, group dynamics within proven to be Al Qaeda’s hallmark. ‘‘God has close units with shared ideologies and solidarity ordered us to build nuclear weapons.’’ (Atran, play a much larger role. In 2002 Shamir and Shi- 2004, p. 70) kaki published the findings of their study, which This extensive review also underscored a examined the psychological processes applied by common misconception in the U.S. administration terrorists and terrorist organizations to justify their and media spin on the war on terrorism—namely, violence. They maintain that, ‘‘although there is no that terrorists are evil, deluded, or homicidal consensus over what terrorism is, most people seem misfits who thrive in poverty, ignorance, and an- to believe that terrorism is bad and should be era- archy. Atran further stated that dicated’’ (541). such a portrayal lends a sense of hopelessness to any attempt to address root causes because Contemporary Terrorism some individuals will always be desperate or deranged enough to conduct suicide attacks. The primary goal of terrorism is to disrupt society by Nevertheless, as logical as the poverty-breeds- provoking intense fear and shattering all sense of terrorism argument may seem, study after study personal and community safety. The target is an shows that suicide attackers and their suppor- entire nation, not only those who are killed, injured, ters are rarely ignorant or impoverished. Nor are or even directly affected. they crazed, cowardly, apathetic, or asocial. The Hall, Norwood, Ursano, Fullerton, and Levinson, 2002 common misconception underestimates the central role that organizational factors play in In a lengthy review on terrorism in the Washington the appeal of terrorist networks. A better un- Quarterly, Scott Atran (a research scientist at the derstanding of such causes reveals that the National Center for Scientific Research in Paris and challenge is actually manageable: the key is not at the University of Michigan) has pointed out that to profile and target the most despairing or most Americans currently feel no safer from ter- deranged individual but to understand and rorism, that they are more distrustful of many long- undermine the organizational and institutional standing allies, and that they are increasingly appeal of terrorists’ motivations and networks. anxious about the future. He cited a survey released (Atran, 2004, p. 73) The Psychology of Terrorism 5
It is also useful to remember that the attacks bers of the apocalyptic cult Aum Shinrikyo¯ man- on September 11, 2001, were intended to cause far aged to kill only 12 (and not 12,000) people in the more deaths and injuries than they actually did. Tokyo subway because of luck and inexperience, We know from the testimony of the 1993 World not moral or tactical constraint. This same orga- Trade Center bombers that terrorist planners be- nization had previously purchased a sheep farm lieved the buildings would topple when attacked, in western Australia in order to mine uranium not cascade down upon themselves; the original and construct a nuclear bomb (Stern, 1999). Only intent was to spread death and injury among fortuitous intervention by Japanese law enforce- countless inhabitants of Lower Manhattan and not ment forestalled a much larger tragedy. Even after merely among those who worked in the targeted the dismantling of Aum Shinrikyo¯, a myriad of skyscrapers. As British prime minister Tony Blair millennial cults that hope to provoke the apoc- has observed, modern terrorists ‘‘have no moral alypse through terrorism remain in our midst inhibition on the slaughter of the innocent. If (Lifton, 1999). they could have murdered not 7,000 [sic] but 70,000 does anyone doubt they would have done so and rejoiced in it?’’ (Blair, 2001). The al-Qaeda Psychological Impact leadership had met several years previously and explored attacking nuclear power facilities in It is impossible to say anything that is able to give a the United States (but actually had some qualms true idea of it to those who did not see it, other than this, that it was indeed very, very, very dreadful, and about the terrorist act ‘‘getting out of control such as no tongue can express. and decided not to do that for now’’ [Blair, 2001]). Daniel Defoe, Journal of the Plague Year When directly queried by a journalist who inter- viewed them in Pakistan about what ‘‘for now’’ The heinous events of September 11, 2001, have meant, a senior correspondent for Al Jazeera (an forever changed our awareness of the impact of mass Arabic-language television station in Qatar) said, casualty terrorism. Ariel Merari (personal commu- ‘‘for now, means for now!’’ (obviously leaving the nication, January 30, 2003) has stated that the only door open for future planning for such assaults; factors constraining the terrorists who seek to de- Blair, 2001). Credible intelligence sources have also stroy us are practical and technical, not political or discovered that the same group responsible for moral. Among the lessons learned by Merari and 9/11 were at least actively trying to secure mate- others on the front lines is that the strategic intent rials for either a radiological dispersion device of modern terrorists is to create huge numbers of and/or chemical or biological agents that could be secondary psychological casualties by means of large- used to attack U.S. targets (both in the United scale physical attacks. In the 1970s it was often re- States and abroad). peated that terrorists ‘‘want a lot of people watching, In addition, terrorism authorities such as Ariel not a lot of people dead’’; today it is more accurate to Merari of Tel Aviv University have been warning say that terrorists want a lot of people dead—and of the threat of ‘‘megaterrorism’’ since the early even more people crippled by fear and grief. 1990s. The goal of megaterrorists is not to achieve Government and military officials acknowl- political ends but simply to kill enormous num- edge that we are currently unprepared to care for bers of ‘‘enemy’’ civilians. An example of this the large numbers of medical and psychological brand of terrorism is the May 23, 2002, attempt casualties that would result from an attack invol- to detonate the Pi Gilot fuel depot in Tel ving weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and/ Aviv; had the terrorists succeeded, an estimated or bioterrorism. National authorities such as Leon 20,000–40,000 civilians living nearby would have E. Moores, a physician at the Walter Reed Army been killed (Dunn, 2002). Given the practical and Medical Center, have calculated that the number technologicalmeans—chemical,biological,nuclear, of casualties from a WMD attack would be in the or explosive—a single act of megaterrorism thousands but that the long-lasting psychological could easily claim the lives of 100,000 innocent consequences would have a devastating affect on civilians. millions of people. This hyperhomicidal form of terrorism is not Military psychologists have long known that restricted to al-Qaeda operatives. In 1995 mem- fear, stress, and exhaustion cause more casualties 6 The Psychology of Terrorism than do bombs and bullets. The ratios of psycho- treating thousands of victims, rescuers, and their logical to physical casualties can be enormous; for families. Sadly, the effort to deliver quality every one death directly caused by an Iraqi Scud mental health services was largely scattered, dis- missile attack on Israel during the Gulf War, organized, and understaffed and involved mostly there were 272 hospital admissions resulting from well- meaning but inadequately trained mental clinical psychological emergencies. The March 20, health professionals. The insufficient training of 1995, sarin attack in the Tokyo subway killed 12 those who rushed to help was not entirely their people and caused more than 4,000 nonaffected own fault; little training is available in disaster individuals to go to area hospitals, often with psy- mental health services (or in the psychological chogenic symptoms of chemical injury (World response to acts of terrorism), and even less (if Health Organization, 2001). any) training is available in treatment protocols that have scientific, empirical support for their Clearly, the impact on society can be much efficacy. It is important—and chilling—to note greater than initial casualty rates might imply. that some authorities (Rose, Bisson, & Wessely, The long-term psychological impact of the use or 2002; Van Emmerick, Kamphuis, Hulsbosch, & even threat of WMD is difficult to predict. Emmelkamp, in press) have concluded that pop- Changes in daily activity, depression and suicide ular models of disaster mental health response rates, and economic impact can last for years or (e.g., critical incident stress debriefing) are po- even decades, and current disaster experts have tentially harmful to victims of terrorist acts. no models to predict the ultimate need for psy- chological assessment or treatment services. Many experts contend, based on the Israeli ex- Critical Incident Stress Debriefing perience and other similar venues (e.g., Northern Ireland) that the strain on the medical resources Devilly and Cotton (2004) have critically reviewed and psychological strength of a society could the literature on critical incident stress debriefing potentially be crippling. (Moores, 2002) (CISD) and made a powerful conclusion: At present, the psychological science needed to It is surprising, perhaps, that CISD has become provide proper and effective treatment for victims so universally accepted despite the fact that of horrendous events such as September 11 and there is no data from randomized clinical trials for future potential terrorist events (including the demonstrating its efficacy as a clinical use of WMD) simply does not exist. Despite a intervention. ...Indeed, as noted earlier, two wealth of information about psychological assess- recent studies suggest that CISD is either in- ment and intervention following severe individual effective or actually worsens PTSD [posttrau- trauma (e.g., combat, rape), natural disasters, and matic stress disorder] symptoms instead of airplane crashes, for example, there is no wide- preventing the later development of PTSD, as is spread scientific or clinical consensus regarding generally believed. Obviously, much more re- the efficacy of these treatment interventions with search is needed. As we ask ourselves, people who are directly affected by a terrorist at- however, ...how CISD could have attracted so tack. A similar scarcity of scientific data exists many strong adherents in the absence of con- regarding appropriate treatments specifically de- vincing data, the answer may lie in the low signed for people not directly exposed to, but prevalence of PTSD among individuals exposed struggling to cope with, actual or threatened ter- to natural disasters. ...If most people exposed rorist acts. Obviously, such effects are magnified to natural disasters will never develop PTSD, by the 24/7 news cycle and the widespread avail- then most people exposed to natural disasters ability of Internet connectivity. who receive CISD will never develop PTSD. The pertinent question, therefore, is whether in- Treatment of Victims of Terror dividuals most at risk to develop PTSD follow- ing acute traumatization will have more favor- In the aftermath of September 11, an urgent need able outcomes if they receive CISD. Clearly we arose for the services of highly trained psycholo- must move beyond clinical impressions and gists and other mental health professionals in descriptive studies to rigorous randomized trials The Psychology of Terrorism 7
if we hope to learn whether CISD can actually threat of chemical and biological attacks, produced prevent the later development of PTSD among several recommendations for the direction of fu- acutely traumatized individuals.(p. 35) ture research. These organizations identified several ‘‘areas of concern’’ in which immediate progress was In their critical review of CISD, Devilly and necessary. It is important to note that little, if any, Cotton (2004) also extensively emphasized the meaningful work has so far been published in any of work of Litz, Gray, Bryant, and Adler (2002) and these areas (Table 1.1): Rose, Bisson, and Wessely (2002): In 2005 the American Psychological Associa- 1. It appears that there is sufficient evidence to tion’s primary instrument for disseminating profes- recommend that psychological debriefing not sional news (APA Monitor, February, 2005) reported be provided to individuals immediately after on the outcome of a conference that convened in trauma. ...There is consensus, however, that November of 2004, where more than 100 partici- providing comfort, information, support, and pants from federal, state, and local government meeting people’s immediate practical and Homeland Security and Defense entities and from emotional needs play useful roles in one’s major research institutions and universities came immediate coping with a highly stressful event together to discuss the possible development of a (Litz et al., 2002). curriculum in homeland security that would reflect 2. There is no current evidence that psychologi- the contributions of psychology and other behavioral cal debriefing is a useful treatment for the sciences. Suggestions and discussion topics included prevention of posttraumatic stress disorder the following: after traumatic incidents. Compulsory de- briefing of victims of trauma should cease 1. risk assessment, perception, and communica- (Rose et al., 2002). tion 2. human behavior and social dynamics (e.g., Devilly and Cotton carefully examined the reasons motivation, culture, values) in disasters CISD might be harmful and found five major areas 3. human-centered design of the technologies of concern: involved in homeland security 1. the lack of choice 4. decision-making dynamics such as crisis and 2. poor timing stress management 3. retraumatizing the victim of terror 5. the need for psychologists to study the content 4. vicarious traumatization domains of homeland security from a beha- 5. superficiality (Devilly & Cotton, 2004, pp. vioral and social science perspective 39–40) 6. the realization that one’s sense of security is a psychological state Last, even given a more balanced observation drawing on the other side’s more clinical material, Murphy has also proposed that
It seems that what can be definitively and strongly A true understanding of the psychology of ter- said is that the research done so far has not rorism includes: (1) advance knowledge of how convincingly demonstrated that critical incident and why individuals become attracted to stress debriefings are useful in preventing post- terrorist groups and organizations and [the de- traumatic stress disorder or other pathological velopment of] interventions to reduce the like- reactions to trauma. A question that remains lihood that individuals will join such groups, unanswered is whether or not debriefing has (2) advance knowledge about the relationships beneficial effects that to date have not been between terrorists and terrorist groups and or- measured. (Devilly and Cotton, 2004, pp. 39–40) ganizations, and [the] use [of] that knowledge to develop ways of influencing and disrupting the functioning of these groups, (3) [increasing] Additional Research Issues our understanding of the ways individuals and groups react to terrorist events, to the antici- In 1999 the National Research Council and the In- pation of terrorism and to counterterrorism stitute of Medicine, in an attempt to address the strategies, with the goal of limiting the negative 8 The Psychology of Terrorism
Table 1.1. Recommendations of the National Research Council and the Institute of Medicine
Training: Identify resource material on chemical and biological agents, stress reduction after other traumas, and disaster response services; enlist the help of mental health professional societies in developing a training program for their members. The key to success in this attempt will be in offering continuing education credits and certification for mental health providers trained in chemical and biological attack response. (Breckenridge et al. 2003 have secured funding from the Office of the Surgeon General to provide training models, but this is still only one such funded training venue.) Screening and Assessment: Identify suitable psychological screening methods for use by mental health providers and possibly first responders, differentiating adjustment reactions after chemical and biological attacks from more serious psychological illness (e.g., panic disorder, PTSD, psychosis, depression) and organic brain impairment from chemical or biological agents. Conduct research to identify trauma characteristics and behavior patterns that predict whether long-term disability will be necessary. Communication: Develop health education and crisis response materials for the general public, including specific communication on chemical or biological agents. Additional information is needed on risk assessment and threat perception by individuals and groups and on risk communication by public officials, especially the roles of both the mass media and the Internet in the transmission of anxiety (or confidence). Some information is available in EPA studies of pollutants and toxic waste, but little or no systematically collected data exist on fears and anxieties related to the possibility of purposefully introduced disease.
effects of terrorism and negative reactions to This conference, which brought together some of counterterrorism efforts, (4) develop[ing] ef- the foremost national and international authorities fective methods of communicating information on the psychology of terrorism (almost all of whom about terrorism risks to policy makers, first are authors of their respective chapters in this responders and the public in ways that are book) had the following as its goals: consistent with the best underlying behavioral 1. designing a strategy and making re- science (risk perception, communication tech- commendations on how to evaluate and niques, social influence) and [developing mate- deliver scientific, empirical treatment rials] that are informative to and understood by interventions for the victims of terrorism recipients, and (5) build[ing] resilience among and their rescuers the potential targets of terrorism and develop[ing] 2. training current and future mental healthcare methods of limiting the success of terrorists in professionals in the effective use of these spreading fear, anxiety and alarm. (2004, p. 5) treatments Furthermore, Murphy (2004) has pointed out 3. conducting scientific research on the psychol- that the most important weapon for a terrorist is not ogy of terrorism that will assist governmental a gun or a bomb but rather the uncertainty, fear, and community agencies in preventing, pre- and alarm that terrorist attacks and the threat of paring for, and recovering from mass casualty those attacks produce. He emphasizes that an im- assaults portant vulnerability of terrorists is not the techni- 4. organizing and training rapid-response teams cal wizardry of intelligence services but rather that of professional clinicians that will respond fact that terrorists always depend on others—other immediately and effectively in the event of members of their own groups, members of allied future national crises and emergencies groups, the societies in which they live and operate, 5. most importantly, emphasizing the role of family, friends, acquaintances—and are therefore psychological science (and not mere opinion) open to attack via the social networks that sustain in our understanding of the psychological di- them. Murphy concludes that, given the importance mensions of acts of terror of social and psychological factors in understanding and combating terrorism and its effects, the poten- tial importance of the behavioral and social sciences Tactical and Strategic Perspectives in the war on terror is clear. The present book is the direct product of an Psychology can also contribute to our under- international conference held in the fall of 2002. standing of terrorist motivations and recruitment The Psychology of Terrorism 9 techniques, which can provide a basis for in- terrorist bullets are fired at civilians and bombs novative tactical and strategic-level counterterrorism explode. In recent years suicide bombers started programs. A comprehensive understanding of the exploding themselves in populated areas causing psychology of terror will also help to establish death and injury’’ (p. 69). a rational and defensible prioritization of potential Cowen (2005) has reported on the ideas of terrorist targets in the United States and abroad Danny Brom, the director of the Israel Center for based on the extent of the psychological impact the Treatment of Psychotrauma, who stated that created by an attack. In addition, there are pre- ‘‘as to terrorism we are not talking about PTSD; liminary indications that it may be possible to detect we are talking about an attack on the fabric of behavioral patterns and physical characteristics, such society. ...We have to develop resiliency-building as gait and facial expression, of suicide bombers as services.’’ Cowen says that Brom also suggested they approach a target (Merari, personal commu- that the educational system could be an alternative nication, July 2004). These indicators could provide delivery system for mental health services if proper security forces at the intended site of attack with a testing and training are provided and that, at the brief warning and an opportunity for interdiction. end of the day, we will become a stronger society Such research could also have broader prevention as the result of attempts to weaken us. Danieli, benefits and include knowledge of the terrorists’ Brom, and Sills (2005) have also emphasized the psychological makeup and motivations, which importance of fostering a community’s capacity would provide a basis for information operations for resilience, the centrality of traumatic grief, the programs to dissuade them from volunteering for a need for multicultural understanding in services mission or persisting in it. Such tactical programs and treatment, and for proactive community or- based on initial results in Israel have already helped ganization in the face of terrorism. increase the number of suicide candidates who have Pines (2004) has further commented that aborted their mission. ‘‘people who live in a country that was established From a strategic perspective, psychological on the ashes of the holocaust, who confront reg- research can advance the development of programs ularly the death and injury of young soldiers pro- to decrease support for terrorist attacks within tecting its borders, and of civilians under terrorist communities that generate such incidents. More attacks, are more acutely aware of death and con- generally, studies in the psychology of terrorism sequently of the significance of their own life’’ will support efforts by the United States to win (p. 70). She cites the work of Bleich, Gelkopf, and ‘‘the war of ideas’’ and attack adversary recruitment Solomon (2003), who found that Israelis reported efforts at the strategic level. It may also be possible lower levels of PTSD than do Americans living in to utilize technical means to detect potential ter- New York City after the terrorist attack of Sep- rorists, including suicide bombers, before they tember 11. She points out that the lowest levels of strike. Basic and applied research into the psy- PTSD were reported among settlers in the occu- chology of terrorism that examines behavioral pied territories, who feel that living where they do patterns and physical characteristics may well lead is a calling. However, it is not the mere living in to methods that directly support attack prediction Israel but the existential significance attached to and prevention (Atran, 2004). it that keeps them there (Pines, 2004, p. 75).
Brief Perspective on the Israeli Prevention Issues Experience At a 2004 NATO conference on the prevention of Pines (2004) has stated that ‘‘life in Israel is very suicide terrorism (organized by Scott Atran and Ariel stressful. Since its establishment in 1948, Israel has Merari and sponsored by the NATO Office of Sci- gone through five major wars. Even during times ence and Technology), Simon Wessely of the British of peace, soldiers are killed while protecting the Institute of Psychiatry suggested that, when psy- borders, and civilians live with a constant threat chological weapons lose their novelty, they lose their of terrorist activities. People’s bags are checked primary potency. Wessely believes that it is vital that whenever they enter public places and periodically the public receive sound and sensible information 10 The Psychology of Terrorism that is accurate and reassuring. It is also potentially challenges illustrated by the relative lack of success dangerous to (even inadvertently) amplify responses by even such a well-funded and well-trained ter- to biological and chemical weapons (e.g., inves- rorist group (Hoffman, 2001). tigators who are clad in ‘‘space suits’’) (Wessely, Flynn (2004) emphasizes that, although we Hyams, & Bartholomew, 2001). Moreover, he con- currently have ideas about how to treat people’s tends that the public’s general level of fear and anxiety psychopathological responses, we do not yet have may remain high for years, exacerbating preexisting intervention strategies for dealing with nationwide psychiatric disorders (Wessely et al., 2001; Wessely, stress reactions. Flynn further suggests that this personal communication, June 2004). Hall et al. lack of information resulted in a missed opportu- (2002) have described an additional role for psy- nity that could have ‘‘increased social support, chological science and practice in preparing a com- promoted positive coping behavior, and built po- munity for possible terrorist attacks by focusing their sitive cohesion among diverse groups’’ (2004, p. attention on the risks of collective behaviors (e.g., 165). Flynn also says that, in the future, mental panic and mass hysteria) or mass psychogenic illness. health professionals should be aware that our role They maintain that psychologists can play a role in involves an acceptance of the fact that pathologies educating the authorities and the public about the are not the only area of study and that we should risks and containment of panic. expand our scope to understand resiliency me- Pape (2003) has argued that terrorism itself chanisms. is not a form of psychopathology and, in fact, Stein et al. (2004) have examined the re- contends that terrorism—and in particular suicide lationship between psychology and terrorism and terrorism—can be seen as a logical strategic deci- described the latter as essentially a psychological sion by organizations. Pape drew this conclusion attack on a society’s social capital: ‘‘In this way, after examining information from all of the com- terrorism is fundamentally different from other pleted suicide terrorist attacks between 1980 and community-wide traumatic events. ...The natural 2001 and then inferring that we can reasonably course of reactions following a terrorist attack may conclude that suicide terrorism results in the be broader and more prolonged than reactions to achievement of the desired outcomes and that it is other disasters because a goal of terrorism is to therefore a mistake to assume that suicide terror- create such reactions’’ (p. 106). Hoffman (2001) ism is irrational. has stated that the true goal of terrorist attacks is Hall and his colleagues have posited that ter- to ‘‘rend the fabric of trust that bonds society’’ and rorism is the most disturbing kind of disaster be- to elicit ‘‘irrational, emotional,’’ and repressive cause it is caused not by natural, technological, countermeasures. Terrorists seek not only to in- or accidental forces but by deliberate, human flict physical damage to their victims but also to malevolence (Hall et al., 2002). They assert that leverage that damage to accomplish broader poli- the most psychologically taxing factor of terrorism tical goals, ranging from specific policy changes to is living in a heightened state of fear and alert that mass panic and public disaffection from existing an indiscriminate and undetermined threat will government authorities. ‘‘The primary goal of ter- strike without warning in the foreseeable future. rorism is to disrupt society by provoking intense Hoffman (2001) particularly mentions the work of fear and shattering all sense of personal and com- Barbera, Macintyre, and De Atley (2001), who, after munity safety. The target is an entire nation, not the sarin attack in the Tokyo subway, found that only those who are killed, injured, or even directly 73.9% of the 5,000 people seeking treatment were affected’’ (Hall et al., 2002, p. 2). suffering from psychological effects such as shock, It is also crucial not to extrapolate too broadly emotional upset, or a psychosomatic complaint. from the field of disaster mental health to the Hoffman (2001) further speculated on the limita- newly emerging area of the psychology of terror- tions in our current understanding of terrorist be- ism. Flynn has pointed out that ‘‘research is not havior and stated that it is generally assumed that nearly as extensive and complete as it needs to be terrorist groups are more likely to imitate previous and we are far too dependent on extrapolation from successful attacks than to develop innovative new other types of traumatic events’’ (2004, p. 164). ideas. However, no imitations of the Aum Shinrikyo¯ An excellent example of how different warn- attack have been attempted, perhaps because of the ings of terrorism are from the traditional warnings The Psychology of Terrorism 11 of impending natural disasters is presented by Cross, and undergraduate and graduate-level college Zimbardo and Kluger (2003), who underscore the and university students. However, we also believe need for effective psychological science in ex- that there will be an important secondary audience amining the color-coded level of alert—green- that includes police departments, fire departments, blue-yellow-orange-red—employed by the U.S. emergency medical personnel, military personnel, government as an early warning system for the local elected officials responsible for preparing for public. They have noted obvious flaws in the and responding to terrorist threats, and federal, system—especially the fact that the current system state, regional, and local government agencies. creates anxiety without providing instruction on how to remain safe. Instead of being a useful warning device, the color-coded warning system, References they maintain, has ‘‘a profoundly negative impact Asukai, N., & Maekawa, K. (2002). Psychological and on our individual and collective mental health ...a physical health effects of the 1995 sarin attack in ‘pre-traumatic stress syndrome’ and its effect on the Tokyo subway system. In J. M. Havenaar, our day-to-day lives is debilitating’’ (Zimbardo & J. G. Cwikel, & E. J. Bromet (Eds.), Toxic Kluger, 2003, p. 34). Furthermore, that system is turmoil: Psychological and social consequences of counterproductive in that it provides vague in- ecological disasters (pp. 149–162). New York: formation, which serves only to increase fear in the Kluwer Academic/Plenum. public (which, ironically, is the goal of terrorism; Atran, S. (2004, June). Mishandling suicide terrorism. Zimbardo & Kluger, 2003). Washington Quarterly, 27(3), 67–90. ———, and Merari A. (2004, June). NATO Office of Science and Technology Invitational Conference on the Prevention of Suicide Terrorism, Lisbon. Conclusion Blair, T. (2001, October). Part one of the speech by Prime Minister Tony Blair at the Labour Party The emerging field of the psychology of terrorism conference. Guardian Unlimited (UK). Retrieved thus ranges from first response to basic science, from February 4, 2006, from http://politics.guardian.co the epidemiological to the cross-cultural to the case .uk/speeches/story/0,11126,590775,00.html study, and from controlled clinical trials to rigorous Bleich A., Dycian, A., Koslowsky, M., Solomon, Z., & qualitative methodologies. In the following chapters Wiener, M. (1992). Psychiatric implications we address the goals of the various conferences and of missile attacks on a civilian population. groups that have sought to define this newly emer- Journal of the American Medical Association, 268, ging area. Within these chapters we present the 613–615. newest findings on treatment and clinical response Bleich, A., Gelkopf, M., & Solomon, Z. (2003). The psychological impact of ongoing terrorism and protocols. We also explore the theory and history of suicide bombing on Israeli society: A study of a terrorism and examine the larger cultural and social national sample. Journal of the American Medical psychological dimensions of this new field. The Association, 260, 612–620. authors of the subsequent chapters also explore a Cowen, D. (2005, March 16). Interview with Daniel wide range of subjects, such as the role of national, Brom. Canadian Jewish News, 4 state, and local agencies and volunteer groups in Crenshaw, M. (2000). The psychology of terrorism: An responding to terrorist threats, military response, agenda for the 21st century. Political Psychology, psychological consequences of terrorism, special 21(2), 405–420. populations, prevention, training, and research. Danieli, Y., Brom, D., & Sills, J. (2005). The trauma The hope is that this volume can fill the need for of terrorism: Sharing knowledge and shared care, a comprehensive resource for mental health clin- an international handbook. New York: Haworth. Devilly, G. J., & Cotton, P. (2004). Caveat emptor, icians, medical care providers, researchers, educa- caveat venditor, and critical incident stress tors, and others who respond to acts of terrorism. debriefing/management (CISD/M). Australian The primary audience will be mental health and Psychologist, 39, 35–40. primary care providers (specifically, psychologists, Dunn, R. (2002, May 24). Bomb explodes at Israeli fuel psychiatrists, emergency and primary care physi- depot. Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved February cians, crisis intervention counselors, social workers, 4, 2006, from http://www.smh.com.au/articles/ public sector nonprofit agencies such as the Red 2002/05/23/1022038458284.html 12 The Psychology of Terrorism
Flynn, B. W. (2004, Summer). Commentary on ‘‘A na- Pines, A. (2004, June). Why are Israelis less burned tional longitudinal study of the psychological conse- out? European Psychologist, 9(2), 69–77. quences of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks: Rose, S., Bisson, J., & Wessely, S. (2002, April 22). Reactions, impairment, and help-seeking. Can Psychological debriefing for preventing post- we influence the trajectory of psychological con- traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cochrane Library, sequences to terrorism?’’ Psychiatry 67(2), 164–166. 1. Oxford, UK: Update Software (CD-ROM). Giuliani, R., & Von Essen, T. (2003). Foreign Press Shamir, J., & Shikaki, K. (2002). Self-serving percep- Center briefing: New York City after September tions of terrorism among Israelis and Palestinians. 11, 2001. Retrieved February 4, 2006, from Political Psychology, 23(3), 537–557. http://fpc.state.gov/23971.htm Stein, B. D., Elliott, M. N., Jaycox, L. H., Collins, R. L., Hall, M. J., Norwood, A. E., Ursano, R. J., Fullerton, Berry, S. H., Klein, D. J., et al. (2004, Summer). A C. S., & Levinson, C. J. (2002). Psychological and national longitudinal study of the psychological behavioral impacts of bioterrorism. PTSD Research consequences of the September 11, 2001, terrorist Quarterly, National Center for Post-Traumatic Stress attacks: Reactions, impairment, and help-seeking. Disorder, 13(4), 1–7. Psychiatry 67(2), 105–117. Hassett, A. (2002, September). Unforeseen conse- Stern, J. (1999). The ultimate terrorists. Cambridge, MA: quences of terrorism. Archives of Internal Medicine Harvard University Press. (162), 1809–1813. Stewart, J. B. (2002). Heart of a soldier: A story of love, Hoffman, B. (2001). Change and continuity in terror- heroism, and September 11th. New York: Simon & ism. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 24, 417– 428. Schuster. Lifton, R. J. (1999). Destroying the world to save it: Aum Van Emmerick, A. A. P., Kamphuis, J. H., Hulsbosch, Shinrikyo¯, apocalyptic violence, and the new global A. M., & Emmelkamp, P. M. G. (in press). Single- terrorism. New York: Henry Holt. session debriefing following psychotrauma, help or Litz, B., Gray, M., Bryant, R., & Adler, A. (2002). Early harm? A metaanalysis. Lancet. interventions for trauma: Current status and future Wessely, S. (2002). Protean nature of mass sociogenic directions. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice, illness. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 9, 112–134. 300–306. Moores, L. (2002). Threat credibility and weapons of ———, Hyams, K., & Bartholomew, R. (2001). mass destruction. Neurosurgical Focus, 12, 1–3. Psychological implications of chemical and Murphy, K. (2004, December). Mission statement biological weapons. British Medical Journal, 323, for a proposal for the establishment of a center 878–879. for the behavioral and social science of World Health Organization. (2001, October). World counterterrorism. Meeting held at Pennsylvania health report 2001—Mental health: New under- State University. standing, new hope. Geneva: Author. Pape, R. A. (2003). The strategic logic of suicide Zimbardo, P., & Kluger, B. (2003, May/June). Phantom terrorism. American Political Science Review, 97(3), menace: Is Washington terrorizing us more than 1–19. Al Qaeda? Psychology Today, 3, 34–36. 2
Psychological Issues in Understanding Terrorism and the Response to Terrorism Clark McCauley
This chapter begins with a brief effort to put mod- the word terror to refer to political violence goes ern terrorism in context. Thereafter, the chapter is back only to the French Revolution of the 1790s. divided into two main sections. The first deals with Threatened by resistance within France and foreign psychological issues involved in understanding the armies at French borders, the revolutionaries un- perpetrators of terrorism, including their motiva- dertook a Reign of Terror to suppress the enemy tions and strategies. The second deals with the U.S. within. This first violence to be called terrorism had response to terrorism, including issues of fear and the power of the state behind it. Terrorism today is identity shift in reaction to the events of September usually associated with political violence perpe- 11, 2001. I cannot offer a full review of the lite- trated by groups without the power of the state. Few rature related to even one of these issues, and for of these nonstate groups have referred to themselves some of them there is so little relevant literature as terrorists, although prominent exceptions include that I can only point in the general directions that the Russian Narodnaya Volya in the late 1800s and research might take. In using a very broad brush, I the Zionist Stern Gang of the late 1940s. Most apologize in advance to scholars whose knowledge nonstate terrorists see themselves as revolutionaries and contributions are not adequately represented or freedom fighters. here. A little theory can be a dangerous thing, State terrorism was not only first, it also con- especially in the hands of a nonspecialist in the tinues to be more dangerous. Rummel (1996) es- relevant theory. But the events of 9/11 warrant timates that 170 million people were killed by some additional risk taking in connecting psycho- government in the twentieth century, not including logical research to our understanding of the origins 34 million who died in battle. Most of the civilian and effects of terrorism. victims were killed by their own government or, more precisely, by the government controlling the area in which the victims were living. Stalin, Mao, Terrorism as a Category of Violence and Hitler were the biggest killers (42 million, 37 million, 20 million respectively), with Pol Pot’s Violence and the threat of violence to control killing of 2 million Cambodians coming in only people is an idea older than history, but the use of seventh in the pantheon of killers. By comparison,
13 14 The Psychology of Terrorism killing by nonstate groups is miniscule. Rummel Terrorist Motivations estimates that 500,000 were killed in the twentieth century by terrorists, guerillas, and other nonstate People become terrorists in many different ways groups. State terrorism is thus greater by a ratio of and for many different reasons. Here I simplify in about 260 to 1. Worldwide, Myers (2001) counts order to consider three kinds of explanation of the 2,527 deaths from terrorism in the 1990s. Three 9/11 attacks: They are crazy, they are crazed by thousand terrorist victims on September 11 is thus hatred and anger, or they are rational within their a big increment in the killing done by terrorists, but own perspective. My argument is that terrorism that event does not change the scale of the com- is not to be understood as pathology and that parison: State terrorism is by far the greater danger. terrorists emerge out of a normal psychology of Despite the origin of the term terrorism in ref- emotional commitment to cause and comrades. erence to state terror and despite the preeminence of state terror in relation to nonstate terror, terrorism Terrorism as Individual Pathology today is usually understood to mean nonstate ter- rorism. Nonstate terrorism includes both antistate A common suggestion is that there must be some- terror and vigilante terror, but it is usually antistate thing wrong with terrorists. They must be crazy or terrorism that is the focus of attention—violence suicidal or psychopathological. Only someone de- against recognized states by small groups without void of moral feelings could do the cold-blooded the power of a state. Most definitions of antistate killing that a terrorist does. terrorism also include the idea of violence against noncombatants, especially women and children, The Search for Pathology although the suicide bombing of the U.S. Marine Thirty years ago this suggestion was taken very barracks in Beirut in 1984 is often referred to as seriously, but thirty years of research has found terrorism, as is the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon. little evidence that terrorists are suffering from Antistate terrorism cannot be understood out- psychopathology. This research has profited by side the context of state terrorism. Compared with what now amounts to hundreds of interviews with the nineteenth century, the twentieth century saw terrorists. Some are captured and interviewed in massive increases in state power. The modern state prison. Some active terrorists can be found in their reaches deeper into the lives of citizens than ever home neighborhoods, if the interviewer knows before. It collects more in taxes, and its regula- where to look. And some retired terrorists are tions, rewards, and punishments push further into willing to talk about their earlier activities, parti- work, school, and neighborhood. The state culture cularly if these were successful. Itzhak Shamir and is thus ever harder to resist; any cultural group that Menachem Begin, for instance, moved from anti- does not control a state is likely to feel in danger Arab and anti-British terrorism to leadership of the of extinction. But resistance to state culture faces state of Israel. Interviews with terrorists rarely find state power that continues to grow. In the context any disorder listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical of growing state power, those who would contest Manual of Mental Disorders. against the state are likely to feel increasingly More systematic research confirms the interview desperate. results. Particularly thorough were the German stu- Much has been written about how to define dies of the Baader-Meinhof Gang. Although the ter- antistate terrorism, but I generally agree with those rorists had gone underground and their locations who say the difference between a terrorist and a were undisclosed, their identities were known. Ex- freedom fighter lies mostly in the politics of the cellent German records provided a great deal of in- beholder (see McCauley, 1991, and McCauley, formation about each member. Pre- and perinatal 1993, for more on this issue). The psychologi- records, pediatric records, preschool records, lower- cal question is how members of a small group school records, grade-school records, high-school without the power of a state become capable of pol- records, and university records (most had had itical violence that includes violence against non- some university education)—all of these were combatants. In the remainder of this chapter I combed for clues to understanding the trajectory to follow common usage in referring to antistate ter- terrorism. Family, neighbors, and classmates—all rorism simply as ‘‘terrorism.’’ those who had known an individual before the leap Psychological Issues in Understanding Terrorism and the Response to Terrorism 15 to terrorism—were interviewed. A comparison Indeed, terrorism would be a trivial problem if sample of people from the same neighborhoods, only those with some kind of psychopathology matched for gender, age, and socioeconomic sta- were terrorists. Rather, we have to face the fact that tus, was similarly studied. The results of these normal people can be terrorists and that we our- investigations fill several feet of shelf space but are selves are capable of terrorist acts under some easy to summarize. The terrorists did not differ circumstances. This fact is already implied in re- from the comparison group of nonterrorists in any cognizing that military and police forces invol- substantial way; in particular, the terrorists did not ved in state terrorism are all too capable of killing show higher rates of any kind of psychopathology. noncombatants. Few would suggest that the broad range of soldiers and police involved in such Terrorists as Psychopaths killing must all be suffering some kind of psy- Some have suggested that terrorists are antisocial chopathology. personalities or psychopaths. Psychopaths can be in- telligent and very much in contact with reality; their Terrorism as Emotional Expression problem is that they are socially and morally defi- cient. They are law breakers, and they are deceitful, On October 11, 2001, when asked at a press aggressive, and reckless in disregarding the welfare conference why people in the Muslim world of others. They do not feel remorse for hurting hate the United States, President Bush expressed others. Just as some people cannot see color, psy- amazement and replied, ‘‘That’s because they don’t chopaths cannot feel empathy or affection for others. know us.’’ President Bush is not the only one to Explaining terrorism as the work of psycho- accept the idea that the 9/11 attacks were an ex- paths brings a new difficulty, however. The 9/11 pression of hatred. ‘‘Why do they hate us?’’ has attackers were willing to give their lives in the been the headline of numerous stories and edi- attack. So far as I am aware, no one has ever torials in newspapers and magazines. Despite the suggested that a psychopath’s moral blindness can headlines, there has been little analysis of what take the form of self-sacrifice. In addition, psy- hatred means or where it comes from. chopaths are notably impulsive and irresponsible. The mutual commitment and trust that is evident Hatred and Anger within each of the four groups of attackers and in The surprising fact is that, although a few psy- the cooperation among the groups is radically in- choanalysts have discussed hatred, very little psy- consistent with the psychopathic personality. chological research has focused on hate or hatred. It is possible that a terrorist group might re- Gordon Allport (1954) briefly mentioned hatred in cruit a psychopath for a particular mission if the writing The Nature of Prejudice, and Marilyn Brewer assignment requires inflicting pain or death with- (2001) has asked, ‘‘When does in-group love be- out the distraction of sympathy for the victims, but come out-group hate?’’ However, empirical research the undertaking would have to be a one-person on hatred, particularly research that distinguishes job, something that requires little or no coordina- it from anger, is notably absent. In contrast, there tion and trust. And it would have to offer a rea- is a large and well-developed literature on the sonable chance of success without suicide. emotion of anger. Does hatred mean anything more than strong anger? An example suggests that The Case Against Pathology hatred may be different. A parent can be angry Of course, there are occasional lone bombers with a misbehaving child, angry to the point of or lone gunmen who kill for political causes, and striking the child. Nevertheless, even caught up such people may indeed suffer from some form of in that violence, the parent would not hate the psychopathology. A loner like Theodore Kaczyn- child. ski, the ‘‘Unabomber,’’ who sent out letter bombs A few differences between anger and hatred in occasional forays from his wilderness cabin, show up in the way these words are used in ev- may suffer from psychopathology. However, ter- eryday speech. Anger is hot, whereas hatred can be rorists who operate in groups, especially those that cold. Anger is a response to a particular incident or can organize successful attacks, are very unlikely offense; hatred expresses a longer-term relation of to suffer from serious psychopathology. antipathy. We sometimes talk about hatred when 16 The Psychology of Terrorism we mean only strong dislike, as in ‘‘I hate broc- interest is the evolutionary key to anger. If each coli,’’ but even this usage suggests the sense of a person acted rationally on self-interest, the strong general and unwavering dislike, a dislike without could do anything they wanted to the weak. Both exceptions, and perhaps even the wish that broc- would realize that the weak cannot win, and the coli would be erased from every menu. weaker would always defer to the stronger. How- In The Deadly Ethnic Riot, Donald Horowitz ever, anger can lead the weaker to attack the stron- (2001) offers a distinction between anger and ha- ger despite the objective balance of forces. The tred that is consistent with the language just con- stronger will win, but will suffer some costs along sidered. Horowitz quotes Aristotle as follows: ‘‘The the way, and the possibility of these costs restrains angry man wants the object of his anger to suffer in the stronger and improves the bargaining position return; hatred wishes its object not to exist’’ (p. of the weaker. 543). This distinction begs for a parallel distinction This perspective suggests an evolutionary ad- in offenders or offenses, one that can predict when vantage for people for whom anger can conquer an offense will lead to anger and when to hatred. fear. The result should be a gradual increase in One possibility (see also Brewer, 2001) is that an the proportion of those who are capable of anger. offense that includes long-term threat is more Everyday experience suggests that, under certain likely to elicit the desire to eliminate the offender. circumstances, most people are capable of anger. The emotional reaction to threat is fear. Thus hatred What are those circumstances, that is, what are the may be a compound of anger and fear, or, as elicitors of anger? Sternberg (2003) suggests, a variable blend of There are basically two theories of anger (Sa- disgust, anger-fear, and contempt. bini, 1995, pp. 411–428). The first, which comes Another perspective is offered by Royzman, to us from Aristotle, says that anger is the emo- McCauley and Rozin (2004), who suggest that hate tional reaction to insult—an offense in which is not an emotion or a blend of emotions but rather someone is not accorded due respect or status. The an extreme form of negative identification. Nega- second, which emerged from experimental re- tive identification means feeling bad about the search with animals, says that anger is the emo- successes of others; negative identification means tional reaction to pain, especially the pain of frus- feeling good about the successes of others. Thus tration. Frustration is understood as the failure to the hater feels joy or pride when the target of hate receive an expected reward. These theories ob- is losing, hurting, or weakening, but feels anger, viously have a great deal in common. Respect that fear, or humiliation when the target of hate is is expected but not forthcoming creates a painful winning, gaining, or strengthening. Similarly love frustration. For our purposes, the two theories is an extreme form of positive identification, and differ chiefly in their emphasis on material welfare. the lover can feel either positive or negative emo- Insult is subjective, a social judgment, whereas at tions depending on what is happening to the loved least some interpretations of frustration include one. As extremes of the human capacity for iden- objective poverty and powerlessness as sources of tification, hate and love are the occasions of ex- frustration that can lead to anger. This interpreta- periencing many different emotions depending on tion of frustration-aggression theory was popular the situation of the one loved or hated. at the 2002 World Economic Forum, where many Whether or not hate is an emotion, hate has luminaries cited material deprivation as the cause some relation to anger and research on anger may be (or at least an important cause) of violence aimed able to help us understand the behavior of terrorists. at the West (A. Friedman, 2002).
The Psychology of Anger Individual Frustration and Insult Explanation of terrorism as the work of people The immediate difficulty of seeing the 9/11 terror- blinded by anger is at least generally consistent ists as crazed with anger is the fact, much cited by with what is known about the emotion of anger. In journalists and pundits, that they were not ob- particular, there is reason to believe that anger gets viously suffering from frustration or insult. Mo- in the way of judgment. In Passions within Reason, hammed Atta came from a middle-class family Robert Frank (1988) argues that blindness to self- in Egypt, studied architecture in Cairo, traveled Psychological Issues in Understanding Terrorism and the Response to Terrorism 17 to Hamburg, Germany, for further studies in archi- pathy for African Americans predicts support for tecture, and had a part-time job doing architectural busing and other desegregation policies. Unless drawings for a German firm. His German thesis, on self-interest is exceptionally large and clear cut, the ancient architecture of Aleppo, was well re- voters’ opinions are not self-centered but group ceived. According to Thomas Friedman’s (2002) centered. inquiries, several of the other 9/11 pilot leaders Similarly, Kinder recounts evidence that poli- came from comparable middle-class backgrounds tical action, including protest and confrontation, with similar threads of personal success. is motivated more by identification with group The origins of the 9/11 terrorist leaders are thus interest than self-interest. ‘‘Thus participation of strikingly different from those of the Palestinian black college students in the civil rights movement suicide terrorists that Ariel Merari studied in Israel in the American South in the 1960s was predicted for decades (Lelyveld, 2001). The Palestinians were better by their anger over society’s treatment of young, male, poor, and uneducated. Their motiva- black Americans in general than by any discontent tions were manifold but sometimes included the they felt about their own lives. ...Thus white several thousand dollars awarded to the family of a working-class participants in the Boston antibus- Palestinian martyr. The amount is small by Western ing movement were motivated especially by their standards but enough to lift a Palestinian family out resentments about the gains of blacks and profes- of abject poverty, including support for parents and sionals, and less by their own personal troubles’’ aged relatives and a dowry for the martyr’s sisters. (Kinder, 1998, p. 831). It is easy to characterize these suicide terrorists as Group identification makes sense of sacrifice frustrated by poverty and hopelessness, with frus- by people who are not personally frustrated or tration leading to anger against Israel as the per- insulted. The mistake is to imagine that self- ceived source of their problems. sacrifice must come from personal problems, ra- More recent studies, however, consistently ther than identification with group problems. This conclude that terrorists and suicide terrorists are error rests in ignorance of the fact that many not generally poor or uneducated. Rather they twentieth century terrorists have been people from have education and prospects at least average, of- comfortable circumstances, people with options. ten higher than average, in relation to the group The Baader-Meinhof Gang in Germany, the Red they come from (Atran, 2003; Krueger & Mal- Brigade in Italy, the Weather Underground in the eckova, 2002; Pape, 2005). It seems that the United States—these and many other post–World middle-class origins of the 9/11 leadership are not War II terrorist groups consisted mostly of people unusual and that personal frustration associated with middle-class origins and middle-class skills with poverty, poor education, and unemployment honed by at least some university education is not a useful explanation of terrorism. (McCauley & Segal, 1987). Explaining self-sacrifice If not angry about personal frustrations and as a result of personal problems is no more per- insults, terrorists may yet be angry about frustra- suasive for terrorists than for Mother Theresa or tions and insults their group has suffered. U.S. Medal of Honor winners. The power of group identification is thus the Group Frustration and Insult foundation of intergroup conflict, especially for In the Handbook of Social Psychology, Kinder (1998) large groups, where self-interest is probably max- summarizes the accumulated evidence that poli- imized by free riding, that is, by letting other group tical opinions are only weakly predicted by narrow members pay the costs of advancing group welfare self-interest and more strongly predicted by group that the individual will profit from. Here I am interest. The poor do not support welfare policies briefly asserting what I elsewhere argue for in more more than others, young males are not less in fa- detail (McCauley, 2001). vor of war than others, and parents of school-age The explanation of terrorists’ sacrifice as a fit children are not more opposed than others to of anger overcoming self-interest can now be re- busing for desegregation. Rather it is group interest formulated in terms of anger over group insult and that is the useful predictor. Sympathy for the group frustration. The potential origins of such poor predicts favoring increased welfare. Sym- anger are not difficult to discern. 18 The Psychology of Terrorism
are seen as responsible for terrorist attacks against Insult and Frustration as Seen by Muslims the United States. In an International Herald Tri- (and Others) bune-Pew poll of 275 ‘‘opinion makers’’ in 24 From Morocco to Pakistan lies a belt of Muslim countries, respondents were asked how many or- states in which governments have police and dinary people think that U.S. policies and actions military power but little public support. The gulf in the world were a major cause of the 9/11 attack between rich and poor is deep and wide in these (Knowlton, 2001). In the United States only 18% countries, and government is associated with of respondents said that many people think this; in Western-leaning elites for whom government, not 23 other countries an average of 58% said most or private enterprise, is the source of wealth. Political many people hold this opinion. In Islamic coun- threat to the state is not tolerated; imprisonment, tries 76% said most or many think this, and even torture, and death are the tools of the state against in Western European countries 36% said most or political opposition. As the Catholic Church in many people agree. Americans do not have to ac- Poland under Communism came to be the prin- cept the judgments of other countries, but we will cipal refuge of political opposition, so funda- have to deal with them. mentalist Muslim mosques are the principal refuge of political opposition to government in these Anger or Love? states. If group identification can lead to anger as a result In this conflict between Muslim governments of frustrations and insults suffered by the group, it and Muslim peoples, the United States and other remains to be determined whether there is any Western countries have supported the govern- evidence of such emotions in the 9/11 terrorists. ments. When the Algerian government was about Our best guide to the motives of those who carried to lose an election to the Islamic Salvation Front in out those attacks is the document found in the 1992, the government annulled the election, and luggage of several of the attackers. Four of the five Europeans and Americans were glad to accept pages of this document have been released by the lesser of two evils. Western countries have sup- the FBI, and Makiya and Mneimneh (2002) have ported authoritarian governments of Egypt, Jor- translated and interpreted them. I am indebted to dan, and Pakistan with credits and military Hassan Mneimneh for his assistance in under- assistance. U.S. support for Israel against the Pa- standing this document. lestinians is only one part of this pattern of sup- The four pages are surprising for what they do porting power against people. not contain. There is neither a list of group frus- Al-Qaeda is an association of exiles and re- trations and insults nor a litany of injustice to fugees from the political violence going on in justify violence. ‘‘The sense throughout is that the Muslim countries. Long before declaring jihad would-be martyr is engaged in his action solely to against the United States, Osama bin Laden was please God. There is no mention of any communal attacking the house of Saud for letting U.S. troops purpose behind his behavior. In all of the four remain in the holy land of Mecca and Medina after pages available to us there is not a word or an the Gulf War. Fifteen of the 9/11 terrorists ori- implication about any wrongs that are to be re- ginally came from Saudi Arabia, although most of dressed through martyrdom, whether in Palestine them seem to have been recruited from the Muslim or Iraq or in ‘the land of Muhammad,’ the phrase diaspora in Europe. The United States has become bin Laden used in the al-Jazeera video that was a target because it is seen as supporting the gov- shown after September 11’’ (Makiya and Mneim- ernments that created the diaspora. The United neh, 2002, p. 21). Indeed, the text approvingly States has, in effect, stumbled into a family feud. If cites a story from the Hadith, the collection of this scenario seems strained, consider the parallel sayings and actions attributed to the Prophet and between Muslims declaring jihad on this country his companions, about Ali ibn Abi Talib, cousin and for supporting state terrorism in Muslim countries, son-in-law of the Prophet, who is spat upon by an and the United States declaring war on any country infidel in combat. The Muslim holds his sword that supports terrorism against it. until he can master the impulse for vengeance—an It is important to recognize that it is not only individual and human motive—and strikes only Arab and Muslim countries in which U.S. policies when he can strike for the sake of God. Psychological Issues in Understanding Terrorism and the Response to Terrorism 19
Rather than anger or hatred, the dominant life and death and links the individual to some message of the text is a focus on the eternal. There form of immortality. are many references to the Koran, and the voca- bulary departs from seventh-century Arabic only The Psychology of Cause for a few references to modern concepts such as Most people believe in something more important airport and plane (and these modern words are than life. We have to because, unlike other ani- reduced to one-letter abbreviations). To feel con- mals, we know that we are going to die. We need nection with God and the work of God and to something that makes sense of our life and our experience the peace of submission to God’s will— death, something that makes our death different these are the imperatives and the promises of from that of a squirrel lying by the side of the road. the text. Invocations and prayers are to be offered The closer and more immediate death is, the more at every stage of the journey: the last night, the we need the group values that give meaning to life journey to the airport, boarding the plane, takeoff, and death. These include the values of family, re- seizing control of the plane, and welcoming death. ligion, ethnicity, and nationality—the values of our The reader is reminded that fear is an act of wor- culture. Dozens of experiments have shown that ship due only to God. If killing is necessary, the thinking about death—especially their own—leads language of the text makes the killing a ritual people to embrace the values of their culture more slaughter with vocabulary that refers to animal strongly (Pyszcznski, Greenberg, & Solomon, sacrifice, including the sacrifice of Isaac that 1997). Abraham was prepared to offer. These values do not have to be explicitly re- Judging from this text, the psychology of the ligious. Many of the terrorist groups since World 9/11 terrorists is not one of anger or hatred or War II have been radical-socialist groups with vengeance. The terrorists are not righting human purely secular roots: the Red Brigade in Italy, the wrongs but acting with God and for God against Baader-Meinhof Gang in Germany, the Shining evil. In the most general terms, this is a psychology Path in Peru, the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka. Animal of attachment to the good rather than a psychology rights and environmental issues can be causes that of hatred for evil. Research with U.S. soldiers in justify terrorism. For much of the twentieth cen- World War II found something similar; hatred of tury, atheistic communism was such a cause. Thus the enemy was a minor motive in combat perfor- there is no special relation between religion and mance, whereas attachment to buddies and not violence; religion is only one kind of cause in wanting to let them down was a major motive which people can find an answer to mortality. (Stouffer et al., 1949). This resonance with the What is essential is that the cause should have psychology of combat—one that is usually treated the promise of a long and glorious future. History as normal psychology—again suggests the possi- is important in supporting this promise. A cause bility that terrorism and terrorists may be more invented yesterday cannot easily be seen to have a normal than we usually recognize. glorious and indefinite future. Moreover, the his- tory must be a group history. No one ever seems to Terrorism as Normal Psychology have had the idea that she or he alone will achieve some kind of immortality. Immortality comes as The trajectory by which normal people become part of a group: family group, cultural group, re- capable of doing terrible things is usually gradual, ligious group, or ideological group. A good parti- perhaps imperceptible to the individual. This is cipant in the group, one who lives up to its norms among other things a moral trajectory, such as and contributes to the group, will to that extent Sprinzak (1991) and Horowitz (2001) have de- live on after death as part of the group. The mean- scribed. In too-simple terms, terrorists kill for the ing of the individual’s life is the future of the cause, same reasons that groups have killed other groups embodied in the group that goes on into the future for centuries. They kill for cause and comrades, after the individual is dead. that is, with a combination of ideology and in- tense small-group dynamics. The cause that is The Psychology of Comrades worth killing for and dying for is not abstract but The group’s values are focused to a personal in- personal—a view of the world that makes sense of tensity in the small group of like-minded people 20 The Psychology of Terrorism who perpetrate terrorist violence. Most people middle-class background and education. For belong to many groups—family, coworkers, neigh- educated men, the power of ideas may substitute borhood, religion, country—and each of these has to some degree for the everyday reinforcement of a some influence on individual beliefs and behavior. like-minded group. Indeed, the terrorist document Different groups have different values, and the referred to earlier is a kind of manual for using competition of values reduces the power of any control of attention to control behavior, and this one group over its members. However, members of kind of manual should work better for individuals an underground terrorist cell have put this group familiar with the attractions of ideas. Probably both first in their lives, dropping or reducing every possibilities—a social world reduced to one group other connection. The power of this one group is despite physical dispersal and a group of in- now enormous and extends to every kind of per- dividuals for whom the ideology of cause is un- sonal and moral judgment. This is the power that usually important and powerful—contributed to can make violence against the enemy not just ac- the cohesion of the 9/11 perpetrators. ceptable but necessary. Every army aims to do what the terrorist group The Psychology of Cult Recruiting does: link a larger group cause with the small-group Studies of recruiting for the Unification Church (UC) dynamics that can deliver individuals to sacrifice. provide some insight into differences in vulerability Every army cuts trainees off from their previous to the call of cause and comrades (McCauley & lives so that the combat unit can become their fa- Segal, 1987). Galanter (1980) surveyed participants mily, their fellow soldiers become their brothers, in UC recruiting workshops in Southern California and their fear of letting down their comrades be- and found that the best predictor of who becomes a comes greater than their fear of dying. The power of member was the answer to a question about how an isolating group over its members is not limited to close the person feels to people outside the Uni- justifying violence. Many nonviolent groups also fication Church. Those with outside attachments gain power by separating individuals from groups were more likely to leave, whereas those without that might offer competing values. Those that use outside connections were more likely to join. This is this tactic include religious cults, drug treatment the power of comrades. centers, and residential schools and colleges. In Barker (1984) surveyed participants in Uni- brief, the psychology behind terrorist violence is fication Church recruiting workshops in London normal psychology; it is abnormal only in the in- and found that the best predictor of who becomes tensity of the group dynamics that link cause with a member was the answer to a question about comrades. goals. Those who said they were looking for ‘‘some- Some commentators have noted that the 9/11 thing but I don’t know what’’ were more likely to terrorists, at least the pilot leaders, spent long join. This is the power of cause, a group cause that periods of time dispersed in the United States. can give meaning to one’s life. Terrorist groups, How could the intense group dynamics typical of like cult groups, cut the individual off from other underground groups be maintained in dispersal? contacts and are particularly attractive to those There are two possible answers. The first is that without close connections and the meaning that physical dispersal is not the same as developing comes with group anchoring. Only those who have new group connections. It seems that the dis- never had the experience of feeling cut off from persed terrorists lived without close connections to family, friends, and work will see this kind of others outside the terrorist group. They did not vulnerability as a type of pathology. The rest of us take interesting jobs, become close to coworkers, will feel fortunate that we did not at this point in or develop romantic relationships. Although living our lives encounter someone recruiting for a cult apart, they remained connected to and anchored or terrorist group. in only one group—their terrorist group. The second possibility is that group dynamics The Psychology of Crisis can be less important to the extent that the cause— The psychology of cause and comrades is multi- its ideology—is more important. As noted pre- plied by a sense of crisis. Many observers have viously, the pilot leaders of the 9/11 terrorists were noted an apocalyptic quality in the worldview not poor or untalented; they were men with a of terrorists. Terrorists see the world precariously Psychological Issues in Understanding Terrorism and the Response to Terrorism 21 balanced between good and evil, at a point where slowly toward an apocalyptic view of the world action can bring about the triumph of the good. and a correspondingly extreme behavioral com- The ‘‘end times’’ or the millennium or the triumph mitment. Sprinzak (1991) has distinguished three of the working class is near or can be made near by stages in this trajectory: a crisis of confidence, in right action. Action—extreme action—is required which a group protests and demonstrates against immediately for the triumph of the good and the the prevailing political system with a criticism that defeat of evil. This ‘‘ten minutes to midnight’’ yet accepts the system’s values; a conflict of legiti- feeling is part of what makes it possible for normal macy, in which the group loses confidence in re- people to risk their lives in violence. form and advances a competing ideological and Consider the passengers of the hijacked flight cultural system while moving to angry protest and that crashed in western Pennsylvania. The pas- small-scale violence; and a crisis of legitimacy, in sengers found out from their cell phones that hi- which the group embraces terrorist violence against jacked planes had crashed into the World Trade the government and everyone who supports it. Center. They had every reason to believe that their Whether as someone joining an extreme group or plane was on its way to a similar end. Unarmed, as a member of a group that becomes more ex- they decided to attack the hijackers and sacrificed treme over time, the individual becomes more their lives in bringing the plane down before it extreme in a series of steps so small as to be nearly could impact its intended target, which was pro- invisible. The result is a terrorist who may look bably the Pentagon or the White House. When it is back at the transition to terrorism with no sense of ten minutes to midnight, there is little to lose and ever having made an explicit choice. everything to gain. Psychology offers several models of this kind The sense of crisis is usually associated with an of slippery slope (see McCauley & Segal, 1987, for overwhelming threat. In the case of the 9/11 ter- more detail). One is Milgram’s obedience experi- rorists it seems to be fear that fundamentalist ment, in which 60% of subjects are willing to Muslim culture is in danger of being overwhelmed deliver the maximum shock level (‘‘450 volts XXX by Western culture. The military and economic Danger Strong Shock’’) to a supposed fellow sub- power of the West and the relative feebleness of ject in a supposed learning experiment. In one once-great Muslim nations in the modern era are variation of the experiment, Milgram had the ex- submerging Muslims in a tidal wave of individ- perimenter called away on a pretext, and another ualism and irreligion. It is attachment to a view supposed subject came up with the idea of raising of what Muslims should be—and fear for their the shock one level with each mistake from the future—that are the emotional foundations of the ‘‘learner.’’ In this variation, 20% went on to deliver terrorists. They do not begin from hatred of the maximum shock. The 20% yielding cannot be at- West but from love of their own group and cul- tributed to the authority of the experimenter and ture, which they believe is in danger of extinction is most naturally understood as the power of self- from the power of the West. justification acting on the small increments in Similarly, the United States, mobilized by shock level. Each shock delivered becomes a rea- President Bush for a war against terrorism, does son for giving the next higher shock because the not begin from hatred of al-Qaeda but from love of small increments mean that the subject has to see country. Mobilization includes a rhetoric of crisis something at least a little wrong with the last shock and of impending threat from an evil enemy or, if there is something wrong with the next one. A more recently, an ‘‘axis of evil.’’ America’s anger clear choice between good and evil would be a toward al-Qaeda, and perhaps more broadly to- shock generator with only two levels, 15 volts and ward Arabs and Muslims, is not an independent 450 volts, but the 20% who go all the way never emotion but a product of patriotism combined see a clear choice between good and evil. with a crisis of threat. Another model of the terrorist trajectory is more explicitly social psychological. Group ex- The Psychology of the Slippery Slope tremity shift, which is the tendency for group The sense of crisis does not spring full blown upon opinion to become more extreme in the direction a person. It is the end of a long trajectory to ter- initially favored by most people, is currently un- rorism, a trajectory in which the person moves derstood in terms of two mechanisms: relevant 22 The Psychology of Terrorism arguments and social comparison (Brown, 1986, want to create fear and uncertainty far beyond the pp. 200–244). Relevant arguments theory explains victims and those close to them. They want their the shift as a result of individuals hearing new enemy to spend time and money on security. In arguments in discussion that are biased in the in- effect, the terrorists aim to lay an enormous bur- itially favored direction. Social comparison theory den on every aspect of the enemy’s society, one explains the shift as a competition for status in that transfers resources from productive purposes which no one wants to fall behind in supporting to antiproductive security measures. The costs of the group-favored direction. In the trajectory to increased security are likely to be particularly high terrorism, initial beliefs and commitments favor for a country like the United States, where an open action against injustice, and group discussion society is the foundation of economic success and and in-group status competition move the group a high-tech military. toward more extreme views and more extreme The United States is already paying enormous violence. taxes of this kind. Billions more dollars are going to The slippery slope is not something that hap- the FBI, the CIA, the Pentagon, the National Security pens only in psychology experiments and foreign Agency, and a new bureaucracy for the Depart- countries. Since 9/11, there have already been ment of Homeland Security. Billions are going to suggestions from reputable people that U.S. se- bail out the airlines, to increase the number and curity forces may need to use torture to get in- quality of airport security personnel, and to pay the formation from suspected terrorists. This is the National Guard stationed at airports. The costs to edge of a slope that leads down and away from the business activity are perhaps even greater. Long rule of law and the presumption of innocence. lines at airport security points and fear of air travel have cut both business and holiday travel. Hotel Terrorism as Strategy bookings are down, urban restaurant business is down; in short, all kinds of tourist businesses are Psychologists recognize two kinds of aggression: down. Long lines of trucks at the Canadian and emotional and instrumental. Emotional aggression Mexican borders are slowed for more intensive is associated with anger and does not calculate searches, and the delays necessarily contribute to the long-term consequences. The reward of emotional cost of goods transported. The Coast Guard and the aggression is hurting someone who has hurt you. Immigration and Naturalization Service now focus Instrumental aggression is more calculating—it in- on terrorism and have decreased their attention to volves the use of aggression as a means to other the drug trade. I suspect that the expenses of in- ends. The balance between these two in the be- creased security and the war on terrorism will far havior of individual terrorists is usually not clear outrun the costs of the losses at the World Trade and might usefully be studied more explicitly in Center and the reparations to the survivors of those the future. The balance may be important in de- who died there. termining how to respond to terrorism: emotional aggression should be less sensitive to objective rewards and punishments, and instrumental ag- Political Damage to the Enemy gression more sensitive. In the longer term, the damage terrorism does to Of course, the balance may be very different in civil society may be greater than any dollar costs those who perpetrate the violence than in those (see McCauley, this volume). The response to who plan it. The planners are probably more in- terrorism inevitably builds the power of the state strumental because they are usually thinking about at the expense of the civil society. The adage that what they want to accomplish. They aim to inflict ‘‘war is the health of the state’’ is evident to anyone long-term harm to their enemy and to gain lasting who tracks the growth of the federal government advantage for themselves. in the United States. The Civil War, World War I, World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, Material Damage to the Enemy the Gulf War, and now the war against terrorism— Terrorism inflicts immediate damage in destroying in every war the power of government grows in lives and property, but terrorists hope that the direction and extent never recovered when the long-standing costs will be much greater. They conflict is over. Psychological Issues in Understanding Terrorism and the Response to Terrorism 23
Polls taken in the years preceding the terrorist ‘‘bomb factory’’ was in fact producing only medical attack on September 11 indicate that about half of supplies. adult Americans saw the federal government as a A violent response to terrorism that is not well threat to the rights and freedoms of ordinary citi- aimed is a success for the terrorists. The Taliban zens. No doubt fewer would say so in the after- did their best to play up U.S. bombing mistakes in math of those attacks, a shift consistent with the Afghanistan but were largely disappointed. It ap- adage that ‘‘war is the health of the state.’’ If more pears that civilian casualties of U.S attacks in Af- security could ensure the safety of a nation, how- ghanistan number somewhere between 1,000 and ever, the Soviet Union would still be with us. It is 3,700, depending on who is estimating (Bearak, possible that bin Laden had the Soviet Union in 2002). Although Afghan civilian losses may thus mind in an interview broadcast by CNN. ‘‘Osama approach the 3,000 U.S. victims of 9/11, it is clear bin Laden told a reporter with the Al Jazeera net- that U.S. accuracy has been outstanding by the work in October that ‘freedom and human rights standards of modern warfare. Al-Qaeda could still in America are doomed’ and that the U.S. govern- hope to profit by perceptions of a crusade against ment would lead its people and the West ‘into an Muslims if the United States extended the war unbearable hell and a choking life’ ’’ (Kurtz, 2002). on terrorism to Iraq, Iran, or Somalia. In 2006, as this chapter goes to press, the U.S. presence in Mobilizing the In-Group Iraq seems to have done all that Al-Qaeda could Terrorists particularly hope to elicit a violent re- hope for. sponse that will assist them in mobilizing their own people. A terrorist group is the apex of a pyramid of supporters and sympathizers. The base U.S. Reaction to 9/11: Some Issues of the pyramid is composed of all those who sym- of Mass Psychology pathize with the terrorists’ cause even though they may disagree with the violent means they use. In In this section I consider several psychological is- Northern Ireland, for instance, the base of the sues raised by the U.S. reaction to the terrorist at- pyramid is all those who agree with ‘‘Brits out.’’ In tacks of September 11, 2001. Has the United States the Islamic world, the base of the pyramid is all been terrorized? What kinds of identity shifts may those who agree that the United States has been have occurred after 9/11? hurting and humiliating Muslims for fifty years. The pyramid is essential to the terrorists for cover Fear After 9/11 and for recruits. They hope that a clumsy and overgeneralized strike against them will hit some There is little doubt that the events of 9/11, soon of those in the pyramid below them. The blow will followed by another plane crash at Rockaway enlarge their base of sympathy, turn the sympa- Beach, made Americans less willing to fly. In early thetic but unmobilized to action and sacrifice, and 2002, air travel and hotel bookings were still sig- strengthen their own status as leaders at the apex. nificantly below the levels recorded in the months Al-Qaeda had reason to be hopeful that U.S. before the attacks. Beyond the fear of flying, Amer- strength could help them. In 1986, for instance, icans evidently became generally more anxious the United States attempted to reply to Libyan- and insecure. At least some law firms specializing supported terrorism by bombing Libya’s leader, in the preparation of wills and trusts saw a big Khaddafi. The bombs missed Khaddafi’s residence increase in business after 9/11. Gun sales were up but hit a nearby apartment building and killed in some places after that date, suggesting a search numerous women and children. This mistake was for increased security broader than the threat of downplayed in the United States but was a public terrorism. Owning a gun may not be of much help relations success for anti-U.S. groups across North against terrorists, but, at least for some people, a Africa. In 1998, the United States attempted to gun can be a symbol and reassurance of control reply to al-Qaeda’s attacks on U.S. embassies in and personal safety. Pet sales were also reported up Africa by sending cruise missiles against terror- in some places after the September attacks. Again, ist camps in Afghanistan and against a supposed a pet is not likely to be of much help against ter- bomb factory in Khartoum. It appears now that the rorists, but, at least for some, a pet may be 24 The Psychology of Terrorism an antidote to uncertainty and fear. A pet offers by a cognitive appraisal that flying is safe, and the both an experience of control and the reassurance images of planes crashing interfere with this ap- of unconditional positive regard (Beck & Katcher, praisal. This interpretation is similar to the ‘‘safety 1996). frame’’ explanation of how people can enjoy the It is tempting to interpret a big decrease in air fear arousal associated with riding a roller coaster travel as evidence of a substantial increase in fear, or watching a horror film (McCauley, 1998b). but it may be that even a small increase in fear can If the safety frame is disturbed, the fear con- produce a large decrease in the willingness to fly. trols behavior, and, in the case of air travel, people When the stakes are high, a small change in risk are less willing to fly. One implication of this in- perception can trigger a large decrease in one’s in- terpretation is that, for at least some people, gov- clination to bet. Indeed, decreased willingness to ernment warnings of additional terrorist attacks fly need not imply any increase in fear. Some may in the near future would make no difference in already have been afraid of flying and found 9/11 the level of trepidation experienced—vivid crash not a stimulus to increased fear but a justification images may release the latent fear no matter what for acting on fears had previously been ridiculed the objective likelihood of additional crashes. and suppressed. Thus it may be only a minority Acting on the uneasiness experienced is a se- who felt an increased fear of flying after 9/11. parate issue. Warnings of future terrorist attacks Myers (2001) has offered four research gen- may affect the norms of acting on a fear of flying, eralizations about perceived risk that can help that is, the warnings may reduce social pressure to explain the increased fear of flying after 9/11. We carry on business as usual and lessen ridicule for are biologically prepared to fear heights, we par- those who are afraid of flying. Fear of flying is an ticularly fear what we cannot control, we fear im- attitude, and social norms undoubtedly have much mediate more than long-term and cumulative dan- to do with determining when attitudes are ex- gers, and we exaggerate dangers represented in pressed in behavior (Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980). vivid and memorable images. All of these influ- Indeed, the impact of government warnings ences can help explain the fear of flying, but only and increased airport security are very much in the last one can explain the reason that fear of need of investigation. President Bush was in the flying increased after 9/11. Fear of heights pre- position of trying to tell Americans that they ceded 9/11. On entering a plane, every passenger should resume flying and that new airport security gives up control, and the immediate risk of measures made flying safe again, even as security climbing on a plane is little affected by four or five agencies issued multiple warnings of new terrorist crashes in a brief period of time. attacks. These warnings had the peculiar quality Myers notes, however, that the risks of air of being completely unspecific about the nature travel are largely concentrated in the minutes of of the threat or what to do about it. The possible takeoff and landing. This is a framing issue: Do air downside of such warnings is suggested by re- travelers see their risk in terms of deaths per pas- search indicating that threat appeals are likely to senger mile—which makes air travel much safer be repressed or ignored if they do not include than driving—or do they see the risk as deaths per specific and effective action to avoid the threats minute of takeoff and landing? With the latter (Sabini, 1995, pp. 565–566). Even the additional perspective, air travel may be objectively riskier airport security measures may be of dubious value. than driving. It is true that many Americans seemed reassured Still, Myers may be correct in focusing on the to see army personnel with weapons stationed in importance of television images of planes slicing airports, although the objective security value of into the World Trade Center, but the importance troops with no training in security screening is by of these images may have more to do with control no means obvious. But if there is any value to the of fear and norms about expressing it than with the framing interpretation of increased anxiety, then actual level of fear. Myers reports a 1989 Gallup adding military security at airports may actually poll concerning commercial aviation that indicates increase travelers’ apprehension. Vivid images of that, even before 9/11, 44% of those willing to fly armed troops at airports may actually undermine were willing to admit they felt apprehensive about rather than augment the safety frame that controls flying. It is possible that this anxiety is controlled the fear of flying. Psychological Issues in Understanding Terrorism and the Response to Terrorism 25
Differences in security procedures from one sent to one corporation on one day and to a dif- airport to another can also exacerbate fear. A jour- ferent corporation the next day, even as another nalist from Pittsburgh called me not long after new counselor experienced the reverse transfer. The security procedures were introduced at U.S. air- importance of becoming familiar with a particular ports. His newspaper had received a letter to the corporate culture and setting, the personal con- editor written by a visitor from Florida, a letter ex- nection between individual counselor and the coriating the Pittsburgh airport for inadequate se- managers that control that setting, and the trust curity. The writer had been frightened because she developed between counselors and people needing was asked for identification only once on her way to assistance and referral in that setting—these were boarding her return flight from Pittsburgh, whereas, given little attention in the organization of coun- in boarding the Florida flight to Pittsburgh, she had seling assistance. It appears that the experience of been stopped for identification five times. the counselors working with WTC survivors has Fear of flying is not the only apprehension to not yet been integrated with the experience of emerge from 9/11. Survivors of the attacks on the those working with survivors of the Oklahoma World Trade Center (WTC), those who fled for City bombing (Pfefferbaum, Flynn, Brandt, & their lives that morning, may still be fearful of Lensgraf, 1999). There is a long way to go before working in a high-rise building and afraid even of we are able to develop anything like a consensus all of the parts of Lower Manhattan that were as- on ‘‘best practice’’ for assisting survivors of such sociated with commuting to and from the WTC. attacks. Many corporate employees who escaped the WTC In sum, fear after 9/11 includes a range of fear returned to work in new office buildings in reactions, including fear of flying by those with northern New Jersey. In these new settings, some no personal connection to the WTC, more general may have been retraumatized by frequent fire and anxieties associated with death from uncontrollable evacuation drills that associated their new offices and unpredictable terrorist attacks, and specific and stairwells with the uncertainties and fears workplace fearfulness among those who escaped of the same environment at the WTC. For these the WTC attacks. These reactions offer theoretical people, the horror of the WTC may have been a challenges that can be of interest to those interested kind of one-trial traumatic conditioning experi- in understanding the relation between risk appraisal ment, with follow-up training in associating their and fear (Lazarus, 1991), as well as to those who new work place with the old one. Their experience are interested in the commercial implications of and their fears deserve research attention. public fears. A small step in this direction was a December 2001 conference at the University of Pennsyl- Cohesion After 9/11: Patriotism vania’s Solomon Asch Center for the Study of Ethnopolitical Conflict. The conference brought After 9/11, all over the United States, vehicles and together eight trauma counselors from around the homes were decorated with the U.S. flag. Walls, United States who had been brought in to assist fences, billboards, and emails were emblazoned WTC corporate employees returning to work in with ‘‘God bless America.’’ Clearly, the immediate new office spaces. Several potentially important response to the attacks was a sudden upsurge in issues emerged at the conference. Perhaps most patriotic expression. The distribution of this phe- important is that the counselors were selected nomenon across the country could be a matter of and directed by corporate employee assistance pro- some interest. Was the new patriotism greater in grams with more experience in physical health New York City than elsewhere? Did it decline in than mental health problems. Thus the counselors concentric circles of distance from New York? Was were all contracted to use critical incident stress it greater among blue-collar than white-collar fa- debriefing techniques with everyone they assisted; milies? Was it greater for some ethnic groups than at least officially, no room was left for a counselor for others? Was it stronger in cities, possibly per- to exercise independent judgment about what ceived as more threatened by future terrorist at- approach might best suit a particular situation. tacks, than in suburbs and small towns? Similarly, because the counselors were seen as The attacks of 9/11 represent a natural ex- interchangeable resources, a counselor might be periment relevant to two prominent approaches to 26 The Psychology of Terrorism conceptualizing and measuring patriotism. In the Cohesion After 9/11: Relations in Public first approach, Kosterman and Feshbach (1989) distinguish between patriotism and nationalism. News reports immediately after 9/11 suggested a Patriotism is love of country and generally consid- new interpersonal tone in New York City. Along ered a good thing; nationalism is a feeling of with shock and fear came a new tone in public national superiority that is regarded as a source of interactions of strangers, a tone of increased po- intergroup hostility and conflict. Schatz, Staub, and liteness, helpfulness, and personal warmth. Several Lavine (1999) offer a distinction between critical reports suggested a notable drop in crime, espe- and uncritical patriotism. Critical patriotism refers cially violent crime, in the days that followed 9/11. to love of country expressed as willingness to cri- It would be interesting to know whether these ticize its policies and its leaders when these go reports can be substantiated with more objective wrong; uncritical patriotism refers to love of measures of social behavior in public places country coupled with a rejection of criticism—‘‘my (McCauley, Coleman, & DeFusco, 1978). Did the country right or wrong.’’ Critical patriotism is ac- pace of life in NYC slow after the attacks? That is, did counted the good thing, and uncritical patriotism people on the streets walk more slowly? Did eye the danger. contact between strangers increase? Did commercial Thus both approaches distinguish between transactions (e.g., with bus drivers, postal clerks, good and bad forms of patriotism, and both offer supermarket cashiers) include more personal ex- separate measures of these forms. That is, there is a changes? Did interpersonal distance in interactions scale of patriotism and a scale of nationalism, and between strangers decrease? This research will be there is a scale of critical patriotism and a scale of hampered by the absence of relevant measures from uncritical patriotism. In both approaches, there is NYC in the months before 9/11, but measures taken some evidence that the two scales are relatively now could lay the foundation for assessing change independent. Some people score high on patri- if the U.S. suffers future terrorist attacks. otism, for instance, but low on nationalism. Simi- larly, some people score high on critical patriotism Cohesion After 9/11: Minority and also score high on uncritical patriotism (an Identity Shifts inconsistency that seems to bother those taking the scale less than it bothers theorists). A few reports have suggested that minority groups What happened to these different aspects of experienced major changes of group identity after patriotism among Americans after 9/11? Since in- 9/11. Group identity is composed of two parts: creased cohesion is known to increase conformity private and public identity. Private identity is the and pressure on deviates, one might expect that way in which the individuals think of themselves patriotism, uncritical patriotism, and nationalism in relation to groups they belong to. Public identity increased, whereas critical patriotism decreased. is how people believe others perceive them. Another possibility is that scores on these measures were unchanged after 9/11 but that identification Public Identity Shift for Muslims and Arabs with the country increased in relation to other di- The attacks of 9/11 produced an immediate effect rections of group identification. That is, Americans on the public identity of Arabs, Muslims, and rating the importance of each of a number of those, like Sikhs, who can be mistaken by Amer- groups—country, ethnic group, religious group, icans for Arab or Muslim. Actual violence against family, school—might rate country higher in rela- members of these groups seems mercifully to have tion to other groups. been rare, with 39 hate crimes reported to the New It seems likely that both kinds of patriotism York City Police Department in the week ending increased, both scores on the patriotism scales and September 22 but only one a week by the end ratings of the relative importance of country. If so, of December (Fries, 2001). Much more frequent additional questions arise. Did nationalism and has been the experience of dirty looks, muttered uncritical patriotism increase more or less than the suggestions to ‘‘go home,’’ physical distancing, and ‘‘good’’ forms of patriotism? Was the pattern of discrimination at work and school (Sengupta, change different according to geography, educa- 2001). Many Arab Americans and Muslims say tion, or ethnicity? they have been afraid to report this kind of bias. Psychological Issues in Understanding Terrorism and the Response to Terrorism 27
Americans’ reactions to Muslims and Arabs bias but also about their perception of what most after 9/11 pose a striking theoretical challenge. of the members of their group experienced. As How is it that the actions of 19 Arab Muslims elaborated earlier, the motivation for violence may can affect Americans’ perceptions of the Arabs and have more to do with group experience than per- Muslims that they personally encounter? The ease sonal problems. with which the 19 were generalized to an im- pression of millions should amaze us; ‘‘the law of Public Identity Shift for African Americans small numbers’’ (Tversky & Kahneman, 1971), in The attacks of 9/11 may also have produced an which small, unrepresentative samples are accepted effect on the public identity of African Americans. as representative of large populations, has not been Their sharing in the costs and threats of terrorist observed in research on stereotypes. Indeed, the attack may have strengthened their public status difficulty of changing stereotypes has often been as Americans. Several African Americans have advanced as one of their principal dangers. suggested that the distancing and unease they of- Of course, not every American accepted the ten feel from whites they interact with was idea that all Arabs are terrorists, but even those who markedly diminished after 9/11. The extent and dis- intellectually avoided this generalization sometimes tribution of this feeling of increased acceptance by found themselves fighting a new unease and sus- white Americans could be investigated in inter- picion toward people who looked Arabic. Whether views with African Americans. Again, the distinc- on the street or boarding a plane, Americans seem tion between personal experience and perception to have had difficulty controlling their emotional of group experience may be important in esti- response to this newly salient category. It seems mating the political impact of 9/11 on African unlikely that an attack by 19 Congolese terrorists Americans. would have the same impact on perceptions of Finally, an issue of great practical importance African Americans. Why not? is that of understanding the public identity of One possible explanation of the speed and Muslim African Americans as a minority within a power of the group generalization of the 9/11 minority. This group is likely to have faced con- terrorists is that humans are biologically prepared flicting changes after 9/11, with increased accep- to essentialize cultural differences of members of tance as African Americans on the one hand and unfamiliar groups. Gil-White (2001) has suggested decreased acceptance as Muslims on the other. The that there was an evolutionary advantage for in- distinctive attire of African American Muslims, dividuals who recognized and generalized cultural particularly that of the women of this community, differences so as to avoid the extra costs of inter- makes them readily identifiable in public settings. acting with those whose norms do not mesh with With the attire goes a community lifestyle that also local norms. This perspective suggests that we may sets this minority apart from other African Amer- have a kind of default schema for group perception icans. Thus, public reactions to Muslim African that makes it easy to essentialize the characteristics Americans should be very salient in their experi- of a few individuals encountered from a new group. ence, and researchers with entre´e to their com- To essentialize means to see the unusual character- munity could investigate this experience. Again, istics of the new individuals as the product of an the distinction between the personal experiences unchangeable group nature or essence. Previous of individual respondents and perceived group familiarity with the group, a preexisting essence for experience may be important. the members, could interfere with this default; One way to learn about shifts in the public consequently, African terrorists would not easily identities of minorities is to study changes in the lead to a generalization about African Americans. mutual stereotyping of majority and minority. Ste- It would be useful to know more about the reotypes are today generally understood as percep- experience of Muslims and Arabs in the United tions of probabilistic differences between groups, States after 9/11, not least because those who ex- differences that may include personality traits, perience bias may become more likely to sym- abilities, occupations, physique, clothing, and pre- pathize with terrorism directed against the United ferences (McCauley, Jussim, & Lee, 1995). Thus, States. Interviews and polls might inquire not only researchers might ask both minority and majority about the respondents’ personal experiences of group members about whether and how 9/11 28 The Psychology of Terrorism changed their perceptions of the differences be- Here I want to focus on shifts in the private tween majority and minority. identities of minorities. As with public identity Perhaps even more important for under- shifts, the three minority groups of special interest standing the public identity of minorities would be are Muslim Arabs living in the United States, research that asks about metastereotypes. Metaste- African Americans, and Muslim African Amer- reotypes are perceptions of what ‘‘most people’’ icans. For each group, research can focus on believe about group differences. Although little changes since 9/11 in their feelings toward the studied, metastereotypes may be more extreme than United States and feelings toward their minority personal stereotypes; there is some evidence that group. What is the relation between changes in individuals believe that most people see more these two private identities? It is by no means marked differences between in-groups and out- obvious that more attachment to one identity groups than they do (Rettew, Billman, & Davis, means less attachment to others, but in terms of 1993). The public identity of the minority might behavior there may be something of a conservation thus be measured as the average minority in- principle at work. Time and energy are limited, dividual’s perception of what ‘‘most people’’ in and more behavior controlled by one identity may the majority group see as the differences between mean less behavior controlled by others. We have minority and majority. Related metastereotypes much yet to learn about the relation between more might also be of interest: the average minority in- particularistic identities, including ethnic and re- dividual’s perception of what most minority mem- ligious identities, and overarching national iden- bers believe about majority-minority differences, tity. the average majority member’s perception of what most majority members believe about these dif- Group Dynamics Theory and Political ferences, and the average majority member’s per- Identity ception of what most minority members believe about these differences. Public reaction to terrorist attacks is strikingly The attacks of 9/11 and their aftermath offer consistent with results found in research with a natural experiment in conflicting pressures on small face-to-face groups. In the group dynamics public identity. Research on the public identities literature that began with Festinger’s (1950) the- of minorities could enliven theoretical develop- ory of informal social influence, cohesion is at- ment even as the research contributes to gauging tachment to the group that comes from two kinds the potential for terrorist recruitment in groups— of interdependence. The obvious sort of inter- Muslim Arabs in the United States, Muslim African dependence arises from common goals of material Americans—that security services are likely to interest, status, and congeniality. The hidden in- see as being at risk for terrorist sympathies. In terdependence arises from the need for certainty particular, public identity shifts for Muslim African that can be obtained only from the consensus of Americans will be better understood by compar- others. Agreement with those around us is the ison with whatever shifts may obtain for African only source of certainty about questions of value, Americans who are not Muslim. including questions about good and evil and what is worth living for, working for, and dying Private Identity Shifts for. Private identity concerns the beliefs and feelings It seems possible that identification with large, of an individual about a group that person is part faceless groups is analogous to cohesion in small of. The most obvious shifts in private identity are face-to-face groups (McCauley, 2001). A scaled-up those already discussed as shifts in patriotism. Pa- theory of cohesion leads immediately to the im- triotism is a particular kind of group identification, plication that group identification is not one single that is, identification with country or nation, and thing but a number of related things. Research has increases in patriotism are a kind of private identity shown that different sources of cohesion lead to shift. This obvious connection between national different types of behavior. Cohesion based on identification and patriotism has only recently be- congeniality, for instance, leads to groupthink, come a focus of empirical research (Citrin, Wong, whereas cohesion based on group status or mate- & Duff, 2001; Sidanius & Petrocik, 2001). rial interest does not (McCauley, 1998a). Psychological Issues in Understanding Terrorism and the Response to Terrorism 29
Similarly, various sources of ethnic identifica- identification—heightened cohesion—in the group tion may lead to different behaviors. Individuals attacked. The nonobvious quality of this idea is who care about their ethnic group for status or conveyed by the many unsuccessful attempts to material interest may be less likely to sacrifice for use air power to demoralize an enemy by bombing the group than members who care about their its civilian population (Pape, 1996). group for its social reality value—for the moral In sum, I have argued that both origins and culture that makes sense of the world and the in- effects of terrorist acts are anchored in group dy- dividual’s place in it. Research on the effects of namics. Along the way I have tried to suggest how 9/11 on group identities might try to link various the response to terrorism can be more dangerous measures of group identification with different be- than the terrorists. haviors after 9/11: giving blood or money, com- munity volunteer work, will revisions, changed References travel plans, and more time spent with one’s fa- mily. The distinctions between patriotism and Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes nationalism and between critical and uncritical and predicting behavior. New York: Prentice Hall. patriotism are steps in this direction. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cam- Research on group dynamics has shown that bridge, MA: Addison Wesley. shared threat is a particularly potent source of Atran, S. (2003, March 7). Genesis of Suicide Ter- group cohesion; similarly, the threat represented rorism. Science, 299, 1534–1539. by the 9/11 attacks seems to have heightened feel- Barbera, J., Macintyre, A. G., & De Atley, C. A. (2001, ings of patriotism and national identification in the October). Ambulances to nowhere: America’s United States (Moskalenko, McCauley, & Rozin, critical shortfall in medical preparedness for catastrophic terrorism. BCSIA Discussion Paper 2006). Research also shows that high cohesion 2001-15, ESDP Discussion Paper ESDP-2001-07, leads to an acceptance of group norms, respect for John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard group leaders, and pressure on deviates (Duckitt, University. 1989). Similarly, the U.S. response to the 9/11 Barker, E. (1984). The making of a Moonie: Choice or attacks seems to have included a new respect for brainwashing? London: Basil Blackwell. group norms (less crime, more politeness), new Bearak, B. (2002, February 11). Afghan toll of civilians respect for group leaders (President Bush, Mayor is lost in the fog of war. International Herald Giuliani), and a new willingness to sanction de- Tribune, pp. 1, 8. viates (hostility toward those who sympathize with Beck, A., & Katcher, A. (1996). Between pets and Arabs and Muslims; Knowlton, 2002). people: The importance of animal companion- ship. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press. Brewer, M. (2001). Ingroup identification and inter- Conclusion group conflict: When does ingroup love become outgroup hate? In R. D. Ashmore, L. Jussim, & D. In the first part of this chapter, group dynamics Wilder (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup conflict, and theory was the perspective brought to bear in un- conflict reduction (pp. 17–41). New York: Oxford derstanding the power of cause and comrades in University Press. moving normal people to terrorism. In particular Brown, R. (1986). Social psychology, the second edition. I suggested that the power of a group to elicit sa- New York: Free Press. crifice depends upon its terror-management value, Citrin, J., Wong, C., & Duff, B. (2001). The meaning which is another way of talking about the social of American national identity: Patterns of ethnic reality value of the group. conflict and consensus. In R. D. Ashmore, L. Jussim, & D. Wilder (Eds.), Social identity, Group dynamics research and the psychology intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction (pp. of cohesion also provide a useful starting point for 71–100). New York: Oxford University Press. theorizing the origins and consequences of group Duckitt, J. (1989). Authoritarianism and group identi- identification, including many aspects of public fication: A new view of an old construct. Political reaction to terrorism. Terrorism is a threat to all Psychology, 10, 63–84. who identify with the group targeted, and at least Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. the initial result of an attack is always increased Psychological Review, 57, 271–282. 30 The Psychology of Terrorism
Frank, R. L. (1988). Passions within reason: The strategic Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, role of the emotions. New York: Norton. 142–162. Friedman, A. (2002, February 5). Forum focuses on ———. (1998b). When screen violence is not ‘‘wrath’’ born of poverty. International Herald attractive. In J. Goldstein (Ed.), Why we watch: The Tribune, p. 11. attractions of violent entertainment (pp. 144–162). Friedman, T. (2002, January 28). The pain behind New York: Oxford University Press. Al Qaeda’s Europe connection. International Herald ———. (2001). The psychology of group identification Tribune, p. 6. and the power of ethnic nationalism. In D. Chirot Fries, J. H. (2001, December 22). A nation challenged: & M. Seligman (Eds.), Ethnopolitical warfare: Relations; complaints of anti-Arab bias crimes dip, Causes, consequences, and possible solutions but concerns linger. New York Times, p. B8. (pp. 343–362). Washington, DC: APA Books. Galanter, M. (1980). Psychological induction into the ———. (2003). Making sense of terrorism after 9/11. large group: Findings from a modern religious sect. In R. S. Moser & C.E. Frantz (Eds.), Shocking American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 1574–1579. violence II: Violent disaster, war and terrorism Gil-White, F. (2001). Are ethnic groups biological affecting our youth (pp. 10–32). Springfield, IL: ‘‘species’’ to the human brain? Current Anthropol- Charles C. Thomas. ogy, 42, 515–554. ———, Coleman, G., & DeFusco, P. (1978). Com- Horowitz, D. L. (2001). The deadly ethnic riot. Berkeley: muters’ eye contact with strangers in city and University of California Press. suburban train stations: Evidence of short-term Kinder, D. (1998). Opinion and action in the realm of adaptation to interpersonal overload in the city. politics. In D. T. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior, (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, Vol. 2 (4th 2, 215–255. ed., pp. 778–867). New York: McGraw-Hill. ———, Jussim, L. J., & Lee, Y.-T. (1995). Stereotype Knowlton, B. (2001, December 20). How the world accuracy: Toward appreciating group differences. sees the U.S. and Sept. 11. International Herald In Y.-T. Lee, L. J. Jussim, & C. R. McCauley (Eds.), Tribune, pp. 1, 6. Stereotype accuracy: Toward appreciating group ———. (2002, February 12). On U.S. campuses, differences (pp. 293–312). Washington, DC: APA intolerance grows. International Herald Tribune, Books. pp. 1, 4. ———, & Segal, M. (1987). Social psychology of Kosterman, R., & Feshbach, S. (1989). Towards a terrorist groups. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Review of measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. personality and social psychology, Vol. 9 (pp. Political Psychology, 10, 257–274. 231–256). Beverly Hills: Sage. Krueger, A. B., & Maleckova, J. (2002). Education, Moskalenko, S., McCauley, C., & Rozin, P. (2006). poverty, political violence, and terrorism: Is there Group identification under conditions of threat: a causal connection? Working Paper 9074. Cam- College students’ attachment to country, family, bridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Re- ethnicity, religion and university before and after search. Retrieved on March 8, 2006, from http:// September 11, 2001. Political Psychology, 27(1), papers.nber.org/papers/w9074.pdf. 77–98. Kurtz, H. (2002, February 2–3). America is ‘‘doomed,’’ Myers, D. G. (2001). Do we fear the right things? bin Laden says on tape. International Herald American Psychological Society Observer, 14(10), Tribune, p. 5. 3, 31. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Cognition and motivation in Pape, R. A. (1996). Bombing to win: Air power and emotion. American Psychologist, 46, 352–367. coercion in war. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Lelyveld, J. (2001, October 28). All suicide bombers Press. are not alike. New York Times Magazine, pp. 48–53, ———. (2005). Dying to win: The strategic logic of 62, 78–79. suicide terrorism. New York: Random House. Makiya, K., & Mneimneh, H. (2002, January 17). Pfefferbaum, B., Flynn, B. W., Brandt, E. N., & Manual for a ‘‘raid.’’ New York Review of Books, 49, Lensgraf, S. J. (1999). Organizing the mental pp. 18–21. health response to human-caused community McCauley, C. (1991). Terrorism research and public disasters with reference to the Oklahoma City policy: An overview. In C. McCauley (Ed.), bombing. Psychiatric Annals, 29(2), 109–113. Terrorism research and public policy (pp. 126–144). Pyszcznski, T., Greenberg, J., & Solomon, S. (1997). London: Frank Cass. Why do we need what we need? A terror ———. (1998a). Group dynamics in Janis’s theory of management perspective on the roots of human groupthink: Backward and forward. Organizational social motivation. Psychological Inquiry, 8, 1–20. Psychological Issues in Understanding Terrorism and the Response to Terrorism 31
Rettew, D. C., Billman, D., & Davis, R. A. (1993). Sidanius, J., & Petrocik, J. R. (2001). Communal and Inaccurate perceptions of the amount others national identity in a multiethnic state: A com- stereotype: Estimates about stereotypes of ones’ parison of three perspectives. In R. D. Ashmore, own group and other groups. Basic and Applied L. Jussim, & D. Wilder (Eds.), Social identity, Social Psychology, 14, 121–142. intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction (pp. Royzman, E., McCauley, C., & Rozin, P. (2004). From 101–129). New York: Oxford University Press. Plato to Putnam: Four ways of thinking about hate. Sprinzak, E. (1991). The process of delegitimization: In R. Sternberg (Ed.), The psychology of hate (pp. Towards a linkage theory of political terrorism. In 3–35). Washington, DC: APA Books. C. McCauley (Ed.), Terrorism research and public Rummel, R. J. (1996). Death by government. New policy (pp. 50–68). London: Frank Cass. Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. Sternberg, R. J. (2003). A duplex theory of hate: Sabini, J. (1995). Social psychology (2d ed.). New York: Development and application to terrorism, mas- Norton. sacres, and genocide. Review of General Psychology, Schatz, R. T., Staub, E., & Lavine, H. (1999). On the 7(3), 299–328. varieties of national attachment: Blind versus Stouffer, S. A., et al. (1949). The American soldier: Vol. constructive patriotism. Political Psychology, 20, 4. Combat and its aftermath. Princeton, NJ: 151–174. Princeton University Press. Sengupta, S. (2001, October 10). A nation challenged: Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the Relations; Sept. 11 attack narrows the racial divide. law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 2, New York Times, p. B1. 105–110. 3
The Need for Proficient Mental Health Professionals in the Study of Terrorism Larry E. Beutler Gil Reyes Zeno Franco Jennifer Housley
The disciplines of psychology that are devoted to the press). In contrast, the most reliable figures re- understanding of terrorism and the treatment of presenting PTSD in the general population, fol- victims of terrorism are new and generally rely lowing the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001, on extrapolation of knowledge from related fields. places the incidence rate at about 4%, which in- However, while this strategy is effective in begin- dicates virtually no effect from 9/11. The incidence ning the process of illuminating this poorly re- rates of PTSD-like symptoms are higher in areas searched domain, it is also problematic. Not only that were directly affected by the terrorist attacks. have many of the conventional treatments used with In the New York City area, the estimated rates victims and responders proven to be less effective hover at about 11% and are noticeably lower than conventionally thought when applied to trauma in Washington, DC (Schlenger, Caddell, Ebert, generally (Litz, Bryant, & Adler, 2002), but serious Jordan, Rourke, et al., 2002). These latter results questions have also been raised about whether suggest that the prevalence rates approximate treatments that work for those exposed to civil, those reported by the NVVRS studies only in the natural, or even military-related disasters will work immediate aftermath of 9/11 and among those di- equally well with someone who has been exposed rectly affected. Even here, the rates of PTSD symp- to the systematic and planned acts of terrorists. toms decline quickly over time, returning to For example, incidence rates of symptoms that normative levels within 6 months to a year (Galea are suggestive of posttraumatic stress disorder et al., 2003; Resnick, Acierno, Holmes, Dammeyer, (PTSD) seem to be quite situation specific and & Kilpatrick, 2000). vary from one type of trauma to another. The most Because of such disparities between terrorist- widely cited figure representing PTSD in military initiated trauma and other forms of civilian and populations derives from the National Vietnam military trauma, many questions have been raised Veterans Readjustment Study (NVVRS), which in the field of trauma response about whether determined the likelihood of PTSD among those established treatments for civilian PTSD are who served during the Vietnam years to be about appropriate for terrorist-initiated traumas. These 30%, regardless of whether they were exposed concerns also stimulate questions about who might to combat (Marlowe, 2001; Wessely & Jones, in then provide the treatment. Is it sufficient for one
32 The Need for Proficient Mental Health Professionals in the Study of Terrorism 33 to have been trained in the use of widely practiced fearful of an almost omnipresent danger in the treatments for civil and military PTSD? An affir- environment. The fear generated by terrorist at- mative answer to this question fails to consider tacks extends into the most basic reaches of the both the fundamental differences present in the human mind, activating systems that have been nature of response to terrorism as a particular fundamental to our survival but long unused, and traumatic event and the associated differences that this may cause reactions that undermine one’s terroristic events may portend in the required emotional and mental well-being. treatment regimens. One of the difficulties of developing the ability This chapter explores what is currently known to predict and manage victims’ responses to ter- about how terrorism impacts victims in unique and rorism is the unavailability of systematic, empirical probably more profound ways than other forms research on the events that immediately follow a of catastrophic disaster, builds a theoretical fra- terrorist attack (Neria, Suh, & Marshall, 2004). By mework that explores the way in which terrorism nature these attacks are infrequent and unexpected specifically impacts traumatization and recovery, events and do not provide researchers with an and considers the effective treatment of victims of opportunity to systematically observe the response and first responders to terrorist attacks. From these of victims and create well-designed studies to ex- starting points, we then identify the particular skills amine effective treatment. Instead, behavioral sci- that constitute expertise in this arena, an approach entists who are interested in the aftereffects of this that contrasts with the more common procedure of form of violence have two basic options. They can evaluating one’s expertise on the basis of training, respond with a hurriedly constructed inquiry im- experience, and knowledge. The objective of these mediately following a mass-casualty event. Alter- considerations is to question the nature of expertise natively, they can search for analogous events that and training that might be advantageous for those have a higher base rate of occurrence and greater who treat the victims of terrorist attacks. The com- predictability and thus offer greater experimental prehensive view of terrorism and related trauma control. In order to bridge this gap between the presented here form a foundation for the creation available information and the knowledge that is of expertise that may be central for mental health needed to illuminate this developing area in psy- professionals working in this field. Such a foun- chology, we present findings drawn from both the dation of knowledge should begin to guide both relatively small body of literature dealing specifi- clinical practice and research. cally with the psychological sequelae of terrorist attacks, as well as a broader range of findings from other events that have been carefully selected to be Terrorism Versus Disasters: as analogous to terrorism as possible. Differential Psychological Response Psychological Responses to Terrorism The intentionality of an act of terrorism serves as a signal contributor, differentiating the responses A few large-scale studies examining the fear and of victims of a natural disaster from those of victims psychological symptoms associated with the dis- of a terrorist attack. The implication of intentional tress caused by the 9/11 attacks have been pub- malevolence, which can neither be effectively pre- lished. Additionally, findings from incidents that dicted nor prevented, and the concomitant feelings share the fundamental elements of terrorism, in- of uncertainty, distrust, and loss of control that cluding malevolent intent, unpredictability, the follow are fundamentally different from the ex- threat of future attack, and the possibility of envi- perience of fear associated with a naturally occur- ronmental contamination, provide insight into this ring disaster—even if the disaster is serious and unique area of study. Analogous events run the large scale. Whereas one can prepare for an earth- gamut from very serious incidents involving nu- quake or a hurricane, the nature of a terrorist act is merous casualties and mass panic (e.g., the cesium likely uncertain and defies effective preparation. 137 release and panic in Goiania, Brazil, in 1987), The most insidious forms of terrorism, such as in-garrison military incidents (e.g., the attack on the use of biological weapons, may be impossible Pearl Harbor), and individual or small-group to detect even after an attack occurs, leaving one events (e.g., domestic and gang violence) to the 34 The Psychology of Terrorism absurd (e.g., the panic caused by the ‘‘War of the malicious intent allows even those who are directly Worlds’’ broadcast in 1938). These comparable impacted to gradually delimit the event and to incidents allow us to examine the ways in which understand it as an unpleasant, though funda- the fear produced by terrorism differs from ‘‘fated’’ mentally ‘‘normal,’’ part of life. events such as natural disaster. Conversely, the causal attributions drawn from To understand psychological distress and the a terrorist event are much less orderly. Almost symptoms associated with trauma, we must first by definition, these acts are designed to invoke understand the fundamental psychological pro- a pervasive fear of an unknown, unpredictable, cesses that underlie fear and threat assessment. yet intentional threat. Where a naturally occurring Exposure to any disaster, whether generated by disaster is almost always bound by time or geo- humans or occurring naturally, can be expected to graphic location, terrorism is not similarly de- deeply impact the cognition, affect, and physical limited. Paul Slovic (2002), an expert in the field functioning of those who are in the path of the of risk perception, notes that the most feared forms catastrophe. However, we suggest that the inten- of terrorism, such as chemical or biological attack, tional nature of terrorism essentially alters these are ‘‘emergencies [that] contaminate in ways that perceptions. We argue that these differences are never seem to end’’ (p. 425). To the victims, the seen in the development of causal attributions that event has no apparent closure. are employed to explain the event, in the heuristics Further, whereas natural disasters are generally that may bias perception of it, and in risk assess- understood as the work of ‘‘fate’’ or an ‘‘act of God,’’ ments that assist us in estimating ongoing and the only causal attributions that can be drawn from future threats. terrorist activity is the malevolent intent of a human It appears that terrorist attacks differ systemat- agent, and often this agent is unknown to the vic- ically across each of these domains when compared tims. Thus, the exact message and rationale for the to natural disasters or accidental traumatization. assault are usually unclear to the immediate vic- Moreover, preexisting vulnerabilities, as well as tims, and the intended message is generally not peritrauma and posttrauma risk factors, are central meant for them specifically. Rather, the objective of to predicting which people will recover normally the assailants is to incite fear in the general popu- from a terrorist event and which will experience lation in order to draw the attention of political interrupted or delayed recovery. These elements leaders (Pfefferbaum, Pfefferbaum, North, & Neas, are developed in the following sections, and later 2002). The immediate causal attributions are based in the chapter they are integrated into a model that on the limited knowledge that the event is delib- describes threat assessment and its relationship to erately caused and malevolent in nature. Thus, a psychological trauma. victim’s abilities to understand, anticipate, plan for, and delimit the event are seriously impaired. Causal Attributions Without the availability of clear event con- The sense of causal understanding found after tingencies, victims are faced with several key ques- many natural disasters is often absent in the wake tions for which no clear answers are immediately of a terrorist attack. The dynamics of a hurricane, available, such as (1) Who was the intended target? tornado, accidental plane crash, or earthquake re- (2) Do I fit the target profile? (3) What is the like- present events that are easily understood by lihood of another attack? And, if so, (4) What fur- the public. Furthermore, clear causal attributions ther attack methods may be employed? Without about the event can be drawn, and expectations the ability to explain the event and without clear about the location, progression, and duration of answers to questions used to evaluate immediate the event are generally known or can be reasonably personal danger, a victim or witness to a terrorist estimated (Slovic, 2002). Based on experience of or event is left with little sense of personal control prior education about the disaster, first responders or agency. The result may be a profound sense of and potential victims can typically consider an im- helplessness and defeat. pending event with a sense of what to expect and the actions they can perform to mitigate the si- Heuristics tuation. In the worst-case scenario, an evacuation Because of the salience of the event and the un- plan can be devised. Importantly, the lack of predictability of terrorism, both direct victims and The Need for Proficient Mental Health Professionals in the Study of Terrorism 35 those secondarily exposed are likely to respond model of fear in these situations suggest that two disproportionately to event-related stimuli, placing factors may be central to understanding how them at greater risk for increased fear, anxiety, and people assign affective values to terrorist incidents. possible psychological difficulty. The analysis of The first factor can be described as dread risk, risk, formally referred to as risk assessment by re- a continuum beginning with low-dread events, searchers in this field, is a function that humans which are seen as controllable, not catastrophic, have instinctively performed long before recorded decreasing in risk over time, and generating little history (Slovic, 2002). Natural selection produced risk for future generations (Slovic & Weber, 2002). a refined system that enabled people to incorporate Conversely, high-dread events are viewed as hav- information of many types, analyze it based on ing a high mortality rate, being globally cata- past experiences, and produce an affective reaction strophic and inescapable, and increasing in risk capable of governing our behavior. This form of over time. risk assessment, called experiential risk assessment, A second factor is unknown risk, which begins is considered to be ‘‘intuitive, automatic, and fast’’ at the low-risk level with well-understood, ob- (Slovic, 2002, p. 425). Research on fear-related servable, non-novel events (Slovic & Weber, 2002). stimuli has demonstrated that people precon- If an event is high on the unknown risk dimen- sciously attend to threatening information (Ohman, sion, it is characterized by having delayed or per- Flykt, & Esteves, 2001). Operating largely outside sisting effect and being a novel threat that is poorly of consciousness and relying primarily on recalled understood (Slovic & Weber, 2002). Using this visual information and associative thoughts, experi- model, Slovic and Weber provide a two-dimensional ential risk assessment produces simple emotions— chart with unknown risk on the Y axis and dread a ‘‘gut feeling’’ about a given event (Slovic, 2002, risk on the X axis. Earlier research by Slovic allows p. 425). a wide variety of different threatening events to This form of reasoning is a powerful and be placed in this two-dimensional space, in which generally useful behavioral motivator. However, events that fall in quadrant I are viewed as the the emotionally charged images, feelings, physical most threatening. Examples of things found at the consequences, and media attention that are typical extreme end in quadrant I include DNA technol- outcomes of terrorist events may create an over- ogy, radioactive waste, nuclear reactor accidents, whelming fear and anxiety in both the direct vic- and nuclear fallout (earlier work by Slovic as cited tims and those secondarily exposed through the in Slovic & Weber, 2002). media (Pfefferbaum et al., 2002). Because experi- Because we are most concerned with the psy- ential risk assessment is rapid and largely auto- chological consequences of these events and the matic, it relies on the availability heuristic and is role of mental health response in combating se- vulnerable to the base rate fallacy, giving more quelae such as PTSD, depression, and drug abuse weight to recent, easily imagined, and highly following a mass-casualty event, it may be help- arousing events and overestimating their future ful to translate the model proposed by Slovic and likelihood (Chapman & Harris, 2002; Slovic & Weber (2002) into terminology that is typically Weber, 2002). Although these systems may in- used by disaster psychologists and first responders. itially play a vital role in a person’s survival, the Doing so helps us determine what constitutes an salience of the stimuli related to terrorism also ‘‘expert’’ who can provide discriminating help to plays into a fundamental signal-processing bias in the victims of mass terrorism. human risk assessment that may short-circuit the In addition to the factors already proposed by system, resulting in the elicited fears and anxieties Slovic, we also suggest an additional factor that has continuing beyond the point of utility and poten- not been carefully explored—the role of perceived tially putting the victim at risk for PTSD or other malevolent intent—to round out this matrix and serious psychological difficulties. to lend further assistance to the professional who attempts to establish priorities for effective inter- Risk Assessment vention. In analyzing the psychological risk in- Currently, very few models exist that specifically volved in a terrorist attack, psychologists, social describe the factors involved in risk perception as workers, other mental health professionals, and applied to terrorism. Initial efforts to provide a first responders may be assisted by evaluating the 36 The Psychology of Terrorism following dimensions: (1) the scale of the attack The resulting panic no longer ensures survival and (dread risk); (2) proximity to the attack (dread instead actually places the organism at risk for self- risk); (3) perceived personal threat (dread risk); injury and accident by virtue of the disorganized, (4) the type of weapon used (unknown risk); (5) goal-directed behavior that accompanies this hy- duration of threat (unknown risk); and (6) the peraroused state. Hyperarousal caused by a terrorist nature of the malevolent intent (adapted from attack may dispose the majority of the exposed Slovic & Weber, 2002). In general, as the value of population to an initial adaptive fear response. each of these dimensions increase, the risk of However, a smaller number of people may begin psychological harm also rises. showing symptoms of acute stress disorder (ASD), and a subset of this group may progress to PTSD. Terrorism and Traumatization In fact, research performed after the Oklahoma City bombing demonstrated that feeling nervous or Throughout this chapter we address concerns re- afraid immediately following the bombing was the lated to different two populations: the general best single affective predictor of later PTSD onset public exposed to a major terrorist event and the (Tucker, Pfefferbaum, Nixon, & Dickson, 2000). first responders, including firefighters, police offi- A powerful example of how we respond to risk cers, emergency medical technicians, military per- assessments that seem particularly threatening and sonnel, and other relief workers. Although some of how these assessments play into maladaptive hy- the considerations for each distinct population perarousal can be drawn from the Israeli experi- overlap, we approach them as having fundamental ence during the Gulf War. Two retrospective differences in training, expectations, and support studies of the rates of physical and psychological systems that cause them to differ in initial re- illness during 18 discreet attacks involving 39 sponse, later assessment of trauma symptoms, and missile explosions in Israel (Bleisch, Dycian, Ko- final recovery. Some of the key concepts that de- slowsky, Solomon, & Wiener, 1992) have shown scribe the process of traumatization may serve as that 27% of hospital admissions were due to un- an underpinning for understanding what first re- necessary atropine (a chemical warfare antidote) sponders experience. However, when undertaking injections, presumably due to stress reaction or to treat first responders, clinicians should incor- mishandling of the atropine injectors. Addition- porate the information that is specific to this po- ally, a substantial increase in acute anterior wall pulation in the assessment, planning, and delivery myocardial infarction and sudden out-of-hospital of treatment. deaths (as compared to five control periods) was also noted (Meisel et al., 1991). Hospital staff de- General Public termined that about 43% of hospital admissions One of the keys in understanding the variations during this time were for psychological rather than in anxiety created by external events is the un- physical symptoms (Bleisch et al., 1992). Inter- derstanding of the adaptive and evolutionary sig- estingly, the rates of heart attack and sudden death nificance of these responses. Wakefield (1992) attenuated rapidly after the initial attacks, sug- emphasizes the role of evolutionary events as a gesting that most people had adjusted to the new central theme in behavior. This perspective asserts threat fairly rapidly (Meisel et al., 1991). that every behavior has evolutionary significance. The SCUD missile attacks in Israel were in- That is, it increases the probability of the survival itially feared to contain chemical weapons, but only of the species. In the case of anxiety, arousal likely conventional warheads were actually used (Bleisch serves to motivate and activate an organism to et al., 1992). Even though the media overly dra- prepare itself for danger and thus reduces the matized the likelihood of mass exposure to che- chances of premature death. Various levels of mical or biological agents in Israel, it is critical arousal promote vigilance and reflect the levels of that disaster mental health providers and first re- danger expected by the organism. sponders view the use and even the threat of However, at some point, when the danger is nonconventional weapons as a special situation unpredictable and uncontrollable, as in the case of that may elicit a particularly strong fear response in terrorism, the result may be a level of arousal that the public (Slovic & Weber, 2002), generate a great is no longer adaptive but rather is dysfunctional. many psychological casualties, produce a high rate The Need for Proficient Mental Health Professionals in the Study of Terrorism 37 of false positive reports of exposure (Pastel, 2001), generate fear and stimulate flight in the event of and rapidly overwhelm public health resources. The unexplained illness or death. risk of evoking a particular type of fear-generated In addition to the fear and anxiety produced response, known as outbreaks of multiple un- by a mass-casualty event, by creating an event that explained symptoms (OMUS), tends to increase is unbounded by time (and potentially unbounded when unconventional weapons are introduced into by geography), terrorism also removes factors that the threat matrix (Pastel, 2001). are assumed to be central to healthy mental func- The concept of OMUS reflects a modern in- tioning, such as a sense of predictability, agency, terpretation of the more traditional descriptions and control. Research on Holocaust survivors has of ‘‘mass psychogenic illness’’ and ‘‘mass hysteria’’ demonstrated that victims made considerably fewer (Pastel, 2001, p. 44). In general, OMUS occur in attributions of internal control and many more response to an unobservable environmental con- external control attributions as compared to simi- tagion, real or imagined, and are denoted by a lar control participants (Suedfeld, 2003). In more host of somatic symptoms with no apparent phy- recent disasters, including the Chernobyl reactor sical cause (Pastel, 2001). Unlike classic mass accident and the Loma Prieta earthquake, even panic, OMUS occur relatively frequently (Small, those who were not directly victimized experi- Propper, Randolph, & Eth, 1991) and can be very enced a degradation of the optimistic bias that costly to both the government and private sectors. many researchers believe to be important in The effects of OMUS are often reinforced by maintaining mental health (Weinstein, Lyon, Roth- mass media, rumor, and highly visible response man, & Cuite, 2000). Similarly, people who were interventions and subsequent investigation. Ex- close to large-scale tornado damage but were amples of OMUS include those that surfaced at not directly impacted show significantly lower Three Mile Island and during the Alar-poisoning usage of self-protecting biases, many more intrusive panic (Pastel, 2001). In each of these cases, broad- thoughts about future tornados, a lowered per- cast and/or print media played a central role in ception of control over the damage caused by these inciting fear. events, increased feelings of personal vulnerability, While most cases of OMUS yield compara- and more feelings of anxiousness and depression tively harmless results, the picture becomes much in response to related stimuli (Weinstein et al., more complex in the event of a bona fide terrorism 2000). act or an accident involving a chemical, biological, So far we have primarily considered the af- radiological, or nuclear (CBRN) device. For ex- fective and cognitive components of trauma in ample, the radiological poisoning of 249 people in response to terrorism. While closely related to the Goiania, Brazil, in 1987 from contact with scrap perception of anxiety, the physical aspects of a metal that was contaminated with cesium 137 terrorist attack—including both physical exposure resulted in more than 5,000 unexposed people and immediate somatic response—must also be (of the 125,800 screened) demonstrating physical considered by practitioners who seek to assist symptoms (Pastel, 2001). The symptoms these victims effectively in the aftermath of such an event. 5,000 unexposed people exhibited were very Clear evidence was found demonstrating that similar to those of the much smaller number physical injury was one of the most predictive of people who were sickened by actual radiation factors in later onset of PTSD following the Okla- poisoning. This phenomenon made it difficult to homa City bombing (Tucker et al., 2000). The differentiate between the two groups. In the case of immediate physical response of those directly ex- a possible CBRN incident, the previously used posed, such as increased heart rate and trembling, terms for OMUS (e.g., mass hysteria) seem parti- has also been shown to be substantially correla- cularly inappropriate since the syndrome may be ted with PTSD and subclinical PTSD symptoms viewed as a powerful self-protective mechanism (Tucker et al., 2000). that encourages flight from an area containing Although we generally assume that proximity an unknown pathogen. It is plausible that OMUS to and the magnitude of an event are related and their concomitant social components, such as to the likelihood of later psychological difficulty ‘‘psychological contamination’’ (Pastel, 2001), may (Weinstein et al., 2000), PTSD symptoms follow- have an evolutionary component that served to ing large-scale events are evidently not correlated 38 The Psychology of Terrorism with proximity to the worst levels of destruction or probably should, be included in what we refer to exposure to greater loss of life (Goenjian et al., as victims of terrorist attacks. To a large extent, 2001). In a study of PTSD symptoms and de- they cannot be distinguished from the immediately pression in adolescent victims following Hurricane targeted bystanders who are the usual victims. Mitch in Nicaragua, investigators found that the Next to the immediate victims of an attack, first majority of victims’ subjective exposure ratings responders are the first to see its aftermath and are ‘‘did not follow a dose-of-exposure pattern’’ those who are called upon immediately to manage (Goenjian et al., 2001, p. 792). Moreover, no sig- the situation and treat those affected. However, nificant correlation was found between those in just because they may not be directly affected by the most badly damaged city where the greatest the initial terrorist action, they are still susceptible loss of life had occurred and victims in a to the aftermath and thus suffer many of the same nearby city that was not as severely impacted illnesses and symptoms that the victims they are (Goenjian et al., 2001). The authors of this study treating may develop. suggest that a ceiling effect may occur when the The first responder population is broad. Gen- severity of the event is sufficiently great, with the erally speaking, they are the professionals and vo- result that physical proximity becomes a less im- lunteers who arrive first on the scene following portant factor in the development of mental health a terrorist attack or are on the front line in caring for problems. victims. Some obvious examples include police of- While the precise mechanisms through which ficers, firefighters, and ambulance personnel. Oth- human intent to cause harm operates on risk ers include emergency room staff, hazmat teams, perception and fear have not been fully explicated, military personnel, utility crews, and volunteers. the events of 9/11 and other intentional tragedies Both victims and first responders share certain clearly differ from both natural disaster and un- characteristics within the context of terrorist events. intended mass-casualty events. Paul Slovic states First responders, like the general population, are that ‘‘a startling feature of the September 11 attacks subject to the unpredictability of the event and and the subsequent anthrax exposures and deaths the difficulty in simulating an exact replica during is the degree to which a handful of determined training exercises and, of course, can experience individuals, in a very short time, so greatly dis- strong emotional reactions. Each population uti- rupted the world’s most powerful nation’’ (2002, lizes an array of coping strategies to deal with the p. 425). trauma they witness. Treatments for psychological Any major disaster, whether caused by nature, conditions resulting from exposure to trauma over- unintentional human error, or intentional mal- lap between the general population and the first evolence, is likely to result in profound physical responders. Additionally, just as there are different injury, immediate fear, and potential long-term cultures present among the general population, psychological difficulties. However, we argue that different cultures are present among first respon- the combination of the perception of human in- ders. These features contribute to how a terrorist tentionality, the lack of ability to generate a co- event is appraised, what coping style is used, and herent set of expectations, the persistence of an how frequently treatment is sought if psychological unknown threat, and the ubiquity of the threat all harm is identified. serve to differentiate terrorism from other mass- Moreover, each first responder population has casualty events. These differences fundamentally a ‘‘culture’’ that is unique to their profession and alter human perceptions of the event, increasing that is shaped both by the services they provide their salience and heightening their arousal com- and by their level of investment in these services. ponents. In view of this, we suggest that the fear These factors contribute to the type of psycholo- generated by terrorism may be more persistent and gical impacts that result from emergency scenes. more potent in generating psychological sequelae For example, although firefighters and police of- than other forms of disaster. ficers both respond to emergency scenes, there are fundamental differences in their roles. A fire- First Responders fighter’s role is acute in nature and medically Thus far we have addressed victims and their oriented; they have little opportunity for ongoing treatment. However, first responders can, and contact with victims following an emergency. The Need for Proficient Mental Health Professionals in the Study of Terrorism 39
In contrast, because the role that police officers heavily on cognition and memory and, as such, play extends beyond the emergency scene, they may be deeply impacted by preexisting risk factors may have more contact with victims in postcrisis that cue trauma-related recollections. In the fol- situations. Thus firefighters have a culture that lowing sections, we consider both preexisting and centers around the acute care of victims, whereas posttrauma risk factors that influence the devel- that of police officers centers around continual opment of psychological effects following a terrorist exposure. attack. Key differences between populations of victims and first responders must be considered by the Risk Factors: General Public knowledgeable professional who intervenes. First Several vulnerability factors have been associated responders have responsibilities in disaster situa- with higher rates of PTSD-like symptoms in ret- tions, whereas victims may not. For example, first rospective studies and include prior exposure, par- responders must identify and address the effects of ticularly early in life, to violence or other major disasters on the general population and may utilize traumatic events, gender (females are at greater coping strategies that are unique to their trades risk for chronic PTSD), age (younger victims are both in type and intensity. The health and safety of generally at greater risk), intelligence, concurrent others depend on the health and skill of the first mood disorder, neuroticism, and a low level of responders. This charge carries with it emotions social support (Litz, Gray, Bryant, & Adler, 2002; such as the fear of failure, which in turn can affect McNally, Bryant, & Ehlers, 2003). Several attempts the way in which first responders deal with trauma have been made to demonstrate that these vul- situations. nerability factors cause higher levels of PTSD symp- Addressing each population based on its un- toms through prospective studies, and the results ique culture can assist us in identifying barriers have largely supported the initial retrospective to predicting susceptibility to mental health diffi- findings (McNally et al., 2003). These results culties, determining which method of prevention have largely been derived from pre- and post- might be most useful, choosing an effective ap- deployment testing of troops and have demon- proach to mental health education and training, strated that those with more serious PTSD and learning which type of intervention may be symptoms scored lower on IQ tests (and that IQ called for. does not change after deployment), were more likely to have personality traits of hypochondriasis, psychopathic deviate, paranoia, and femininity The Effects of Exposure to Terrorism based on Minnesota Multiphasic Personality In- ventory (MMPI) scores, and exhibited more nega- In this section we build upon the topics presented tivism toward their deployment (McNally et al., in the prior two portions of the chapter to round 2003). Litz et al. (2002, p. 114) state that ‘‘It has out a model that helps explain the fundamental become axiomatic that prior exposure to poten- psychological differences between intentional acts tially traumatizing events (PTEs) is a risk factor of terrorism and natural disasters and how they set for chronic PTSD stemming from a subsequent the stage for either normal or interrupted recovery. PTE.’’ Prior exposure is represented in affect laden A more comprehensive perspective on the psy- memories that are activated by a current event chological sequelae of terrorism and their treat- or trauma, and then serve to exacerbate and sen- ment will enable us to begin constructing effective sitize the individual to that event. These incipient, mental health measures and allocate limited re- internal cues from memory may be important sources in an emergency more efficiently, as well as features that reduce the capacity for adapting and manage the incredibly high cost of response to and resilience. recovery from terrorism. We argue that the basic For example, in determining which factors psychological and physical responses to terrorism, precipitate PTSD and explain why some people such as the affective components of fear, are later develop it and others, similarly exposed, do not, processed through an increasingly complex matrix Dalgleish (2004) concludes that PTSD is a joint involving causal attributions, heuristics, and risk function of at least three separate aspects of cog- assessment. These more complex activities rely nitive representation. These include the presence 40 The Psychology of Terrorism of associative networks in which prior stressors ac- type, timing, and the destructive agent used. These tivate remembered and rehearsed cognitive path- can affect the stress level of first responders in ways; verbal or prepositional representations; and different ways. For example, because they are con- schemas or preexisting beliefs about oneself and sidered more preventable, human-induced events others. Memories and associational pathways alone precipitate stronger feelings of anger and blame are insufficient to account for the variations in re- than natural disasters. Paton (1996) states that sponse. Also needed is a language system through events that occur during nighttime hours are per- which these events are processed and the activation ceived as more threatening than those that occur of self-related schemas that lend themselves to feel- during the day. ings of helplessness and hopelessness. Another factor related to timing is the degree In addition to the risk factors that may be present of uncertainty associated with a threat. The events prior to a traumatic event, several factors have been of 9/11 can serve as an example since it was un- identified that may serve as peri- and posttraumatic clear whether additional attacks were forthcoming. markers for future psychological difficulty: A related stressor has to do with whether there was warning before the disaster. In addition, Paton 1. People with many or very severe ASD symp- states that ‘‘invisible’’ threats, such as chemical or toms that appear 1–2 weeks following a trau- radiation hazards, may elicit more reaction than matic event. Particular attention should be visible threats such as flooding. Finally, the greater given to these people if these symptoms are the number of threats associated with the disas- comorbid with high rates of rumination. This ter, the greater the reaction felt by emergency appears to be one of the best, simplest, and workers. The 9/11 catastrophe illustrates how one most straightforward screening methods cur- incident can yield multiple threats. Fires, the col- rently available. lapse of buildings, death, suffering, and health 2. People who experience high levels of physical hazards were just a few of the many threats that symptoms, such as a rapid heart rate, after both victims and first responders faced during that having been removed from the trauma stimu- incident. lus. These types of measures may be particu- A second grouping of the stressors identified larly useful for Emergency Medical by Paton (1996) involves the perceptions of the Technicians (EMTs) and physicians. events by the first responders and the way in 3. People who experience ASD or PTSD symp- which their ability to do their jobs is affected. toms in conjunction with signs of clinical de- Having insufficient opportunity for effective ac- pression are at higher risk for developing tion, knowing the victims and/or their families, chronic PTSD. receiving additional job-related responsibilities, 4. People who display a high level of active and having to meet increased emotional, physical, avoidance or precautionary symptoms and time demands can all trigger additional stress 5. People who make maladaptive attributions for first responders. Lack of adequate resources about their symptoms can negatively affect their ability to perform 6. People with serious physical injuries as their jobs and can thus also result in stress. In result of the trauma event addition, unrealistic expectations can make re- 7. People with low levels of social support? covery from trauma more difficult (McCammon, (list adapted from Litz et al., 2002; McNally et al., Durham, Jackson, & Williams, 1988). Another 2003). complicating factor is the degree and duration of emotion suppression following an emergency si- tuation (McCammon et al., 1988). Risk Factors: First Responders The third group of stressors relays the im- Again, the risk factors for the general public serve portance of the organizational structure in which as a foundation for understanding the vulner- the first responders are working. Changes to this abilities of first responders. However, a number of structure can result in additional stress. For ex- specific psychological risk factors should be con- ample, interagency coordination difficulties, con- sidered for members of special response teams, flicts, or failure can have adverse effects on the including characteristics of the event itself, such as emotional and functional capabilities of emergency The Need for Proficient Mental Health Professionals in the Study of Terrorism 41 workers, and feelings of inadequacy and help- presented earlier and to explain the model, we lessness can ensue. Emotions such as these can suggest the following hypothetical timeline: hamper workers’ ability to perform their job suc- First, immediately following a terrorist attack, cessfully and efficiently. There are many roles that affected individuals must assess the objective need fulfilling in disaster situations, and constantly threats in the environment, including perso- having to change roles, such as going from saving nal physical injury, exposure, physical someone’s life to speaking with the media, can put symptoms of shock, observing injury to oth- extra strain on first responders as well. ers, witnessing death, and fearing for the Although there may be little one can do to survival of one’s family members. affect the time, type, or nature of a future terrorist Second, both during and after a mass-casualty attack or other unforeseen disaster situation, some event, these objective threats may generate the of these stressors can likely be reduced through immediate affective responses of fear and training and preparedness work. For example, anxiety. As people move from the experience establishing firm roles and responsibilities, pro- of the traumatic event into recovery, they viding sufficient resources, ensuring adequate le- begin to process the event more deeply. vels of staffing for shift rotations, and requiring During this assessment phase, risk factors for additional preparatory training may all contribute PTSD, such as exposure to prior trauma, be- to supporting a first responder in the line of duty come increasingly salient and may deeply and assisting in reducing the degree of stress felt in impact the cognitions and memories related such a situation. to the event. Similarly, resiliency factors may be important at this stage in shielding the A Proposed Model of Threat Assessment individuals from what otherwise might lead to and Trauma problematic thought and memory patterns Based on the more detailed understanding of fear revolving around the event. It is also at this and threat assessment developed in the preceding assessment stage that causal attributions and sections, we suggest a model of terrorist response heuristics may be applied, both of which rely that addresses six major factors grouped into three heavily on cognitive and memory processes. time categories: Thus, mediators such as risk and resiliency factors, along with cognition and memory, are 1. Peritrauma and immediate posttrauma phase central to a victim’s subjective (or secondary) Factor 1. initial (objective) threat assessment threat assessment. Terrorist attacks may be Factor 2. immediate physical response particularly powerful in influencing the Factor 3. immediate affective response secondary appraisal of fear-related stimuli 2. Assessment phase (posttrauma) because they elicit thoughts that revolve Factor 4. mediators (prior traumatization, around threat persistence (unboundedness), other risk factors, training, etc.) (these im- malevolence, and fear of the unknown (CBRN pact factor 5) devices, etc.). Factor 5. cognition and memory (these im- Finally, in the resolution phase, a victim’s fear pact factor 6) and psychological symptoms either begin or Factor 6. subjective threat assessment abate as their subjective threat assessment 3. Resolution phase (continuing) wanes. However, if the subjective threat as- Either the individual continues to feel sessment does not decrease, the individual threatened and experiences ongoing symp- may be at risk for developing ASD or PTSD. toms, or the threat is downgraded and the symptoms begin to abate. Normal Versus Interrupted Recovery By being familiar with these factors, a practi- Practitioners should remain aware that, even in tioner can begin to categorize the experiences a normal recovery, many psychological and physical victim has had and construct a comprehensive symptoms associated with the traumatic event treatment plan in case the person’s natural re- may be present and can persist for some time (Litz covery process fails. To synthesize the information et al., 2002). However, if one’s response to the 42 The Psychology of Terrorism trauma is normal and the individual has the usual researchers and theorists in the field of trauma sources of support and resilience, recovery may psychology. be relatively rapid, and the victim may return to baseline in days or weeks. Alternatively, the as- Specific Disorders Associated With sessments, modulators, and risk factors may dis- Mass-Casualty Terrorist Events pose a person to be traumatized to such a degree that resilience is impaired, and the normal re- The following descriptions of psychological dis- storation of mental health may be delayed or in- orders that may occur after exposure to a mass- terrupted. casualty event are drawn from the DSM-IV-TR, Furthermore, research on disaster victims has except where noted, and we have used the language not always shown congruent symptoms across all employed there in order to ensure congruity be- event types (Brewin, Andrews, Rose, & Kirk, 1999; tween these paraphrased descriptions and the actual Goenjian et al., 2001; Morgan, Grillon, Lubin, & diagnostic criteria for the disorders. The descrip- Southwick, 1997), and differences in correlations tions are intended for informational purposes only. between the age of the adults and distress in vic- We refer the reader to the DSM-IV-TR for more tims and first responders have also proven difficult details, specific symptoms, and formal diagnostic to pin down. Some studies have found that older procedures. rescue workers and victims tend to be more re- silient in the face of disaster, while others have PTSD found that older victims are most at risk, and still others have demonstrated that those in their According to the DSM-IV-TR, posttraumatic stress middle years are most likely to be affected (Tucker disorder may occur following exposure to an ex- et al., 2000). Similarly, we can expect that different tremely traumatic stressor when a person has di- types of terrorist attacks will result in nuances rectly witnessed situations that result in actual or in healthy and pathological recovery. threatened mortality or physical injury and the The types of psychological trauma and other individual’s response to this situation includes a after effects that are associated with major mass- strong affective component of intense fear, help- casualty events include PTSD, ASD, major de- lessness, and/or horror. One or more cardinal symp- pressive disorder (MDD), burnout, anxiety, sleep toms of reexperiencing, three or more symptoms disorders, and drug and alcohol abuse. In some of avoidance and/or numbing, and two or more rare instances the practitioner should also be pre- symptoms of increased arousal are needed to meet pared to handle OMUS (Bleisch et al., 1992; Pastel, the full clinical criteria. The symptoms must be 2001; Tucker et al., 2000). We briefly describe the present for at least 1 month and are considered clinical diagnostic criteria for each of these dis- to be acute if the symptoms last for less than orders (or theoretical formulations for trauma- 3 months; they are considered chronic if they related syndromes not listed in the Diagnostic and persist for more than 3 months. Children may Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV- present slightly differently, especially with regard TR)) as well as how they manifest in postdisaster to reexperiencing, with repetitive play that is situations. thematically related to the trauma event and night- However, the majority of what remains of this mares with no specific content. Trauma reenactment chapter focuses on treating acute stress disorder in younger children may be common. and preventing chronic PTSD since these two as- sociated conditions encapsulate the central pro- ASD blems associated with the trauma exposure with Acute stress disorder is largely similar to PTSD which mental health practitioners must deal and but is shorter in duration and focuses more on are the general focus of the literature on the psy- the dissociative symptoms than PTSD does (Bre- chology of catastrophic events. We also highlight win et al., 1999). The DSM-IV-TR suggests that these disorders because their treatment among ASD ‘‘is the development of characteristic anxiety, victims of mass-casualty events is poorly under- dissociative, and other symptoms that occur within stood and because the efficacy of the treatments one month after exposure to an extreme stressor.’’ that have been used to date are hotly debated by Symptoms must last at least 2 days before diagnosis The Need for Proficient Mental Health Professionals in the Study of Terrorism 43 can be made. As with PTSD, the victim must both large-scale disaster may increase the risk for an witness an event that threatened or resulted in onset of PTSD. However, the clinical diagnosis of serious physical harm to the victim or others and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) requires that present an intense affective response including the symptoms be present most of the time during a fear, helplessness, or horror. Three or more dis- 6-month period. Those who suffer from GAD find sociative symptoms must be present, one or more it difficult to control their worry and exhibit at reexperiencing symptoms must occur, and notable least three of the following symptoms: restlessness, avoidance, anxiety, or arousal symptoms are re- fatigue, impaired concentration, irritability, muscle quired for this diagnosis tension, sleep disturbance (either in falling asleep, staying asleep, or sleeping restfully). In children, Depression only one of these symptoms is necessary to meet A major depressive episode is diagnosed following clinical diagnostic criteria. a period of 2 or more weeks in which an individual reports a depressed mood or anhedonia toward Sleep Disorders most normal activities. Depression is generally A diagnosis of primary insomnia is indicated associated with a set of vegetative symptoms, such when an individual has difficulty falling or stay- as sleeping difficulties and lethargy. Thoughts about ing asleep or experiences nonrestorative sleep for personal worthlessness and suicide often occur. a period of 1 month or more. Primary insomnia Especially in mass-casualty situations, symptoms causes serious distress in important life functions related to bereavement should be separated from and is not due to biologically based sleep pro- a potential diagnosis, and treatment should speci- blems such as apnea or circadian rhythm upset. In fically address bereavement concerns if the indi- trauma-exposed people, nightmare disorder may vidual has lost close relatives or friends. Depression also occur. This is typified by repeated awakenings has frequently been reported among those who from sleep with detailed recall or extended and were subjected to the terrors of 9/11 (Galea et al., extremely frightening dreams, usually involving 2002). threats to personal survival, security, or self- esteem. The nightmares must cause significant Burnout difficulty in some aspect of life functioning to meet Although not a DSM-IV-TR category, burnout can clinical criteria and must not occur during the nonetheless result from high-stress occupational course of another disorder, such as PTSD. situations and can detrimentally affect job perfor- mance. It is helpful to consider burnout as both a Drug Abuse and Dependence process and a result. A person who experiences Because of the wide variety of drugs that may be burnout may progress through different stages, abused or for which dependence may develop, and the symptoms are similar to those of stress, we concentrate here on the general criteria for anxiety, and depressive disorders. Eventually, after substance abuse and dependence. Clinicians who experiencing prolonged levels of high stress and suspect specific forms of drug use in trauma- anxiety, an individual may socially withdraw and exposed clients should refer to the DSM-IV-TR for become apathetic and possibly resentful. Follow- further information. Due to the ubiquity of and ease ing this stage, the person may become depressed in obtaining alcohol, clinicians should be particu- and exhibit many of the classic signs of depression. larly alert for signs of alcohol abuse in trauma vic- In addition to anxiety and depression, substance tims. The criteria for substance abuse include a abuse is also associated with burnout. Burnout maladaptive pattern of substance use that leads to is preventable and can often be identified by the one or more of the following domains: failure to individual once provided with education about the fulfill major obligations at work, school, or home; condition. recurrent use of the substance when its ingestion puts the individual at risk for physical harm; legal Anxiety difficulties related to the use of the substance; and Subclinical anxiety symptoms may be quite com- continued use of the substance despite social or mon after a mass-casualty event. Evidence suggests relational problems associated with intoxication. that feeling afraid or anxious immediately after a These criteria must be met within the space of a 44 The Psychology of Terrorism
12-month period. As with depression, drug abuse individual and community intervention framework is particularly likely to increase following terror known as critical incident stress management attacks, judging from the results of follow-ups on (CISM) (Litz & Gray, 2004). The CISD system has 9/11 victims (Vlahov et al., 2002). been used as the sole treatment intervention for numerous police and fire departments throughout OMUS the country for the better part of the last two dec- Outbreaks of multiple unexplained symptoms are ades (Litz & Gray, 2004). not part of the DSM-IV-TR taxonomy of psycho- With the increasing popularity of CISD, the logical disorders. Instead, this is a phenomenon absence of alternative treatments, and the pur- that has been periodically observed in response ported benefits of the intervention, many govern- to specific environmental factors. OMUS has been ment agencies, not-for-profit relief organizations, referred to as ‘‘mass anxiety’’ or ‘‘mass hysteria’’ in and private corporations felt compelled to offer earlier formulations; however, because the phe- it following traumatic incidents and often made nomenon is probably an evolutionary response to attendance compulsory for victims. Thus, CISD a potential unknown, invisible pathogen, it should evolved from an intervention specific to emergency not be viewed as an inherently dysfunctional re- responders to one that became the standard of care sponse (Pastel, 2001). OMUS may generate real for nearly all victims of disasters, even though it somatic symptoms, including vomiting, diarrhea, was not originally designed for use with the gen- rashes, and breathing difficulty, which are difficult eral public. Mitchell argues that it is not appro- to distinguish from symptoms of actual exposure priate for civilian casualties who have been directly to a CBRN device (Pastel, 2001). The phenomenon impacted by a disaster (those with serious injury or is also denoted as ‘‘psychological contamination’’ who have experienced the death of a relative), and or the ‘‘social transmission’’ of symptoms (Jones, there is little empirical evidence to support its use Craig, Hoy, & Gunter, 2000; Small et al., 1991). in this more general context (Litz & Gray, 2004). Typically, OMUS occur in environments where As originally formulated, CISD was intended a potential pathogen causes one person to feel to be a single-session group intervention. Within ill; then a number of other people report similar the treatment group, a mental health professional symptoms without being similarly exposed (Small trained in CISD leads a discussion that follows a et al., 1991). The phenomenon is viewed as a seven-step progression: (1) introduction; (2) fact social and psychological response to potential phase (in which the event is re-created through the environmental contamination, often in the absence participants’ stories); (3) thought phase (in which of actual threat or personal exposure, resulting in the participants describe their thoughts during somatic symptoms that quickly spread through the the crisis); (4) reaction phase (in which the par- affected population and are usually transient but ticipants may experience catharsis); (5) symptom may recur with exposure to the location of the phase (in which each participant’s current symp- initial illness (Small et al., 1991). toms are discussed); (6) teaching phase (in which symptoms are normalized through psychoeduca- tion); and (7) reentry phase (event closure; re- Current Intervention Approaches ferrals are given as necessary) (Everly & Mitchell, and Myths of Treatment 1999). The CISD model suggests that the inter- vention should take place as soon as possible fol- The most frequently used model for reducing lowing a traumatic event, typically within 24–72 trauma in an attempt to prevent PTSD and other hours. serious psychological consequences is critical in- The treatment model focuses primarily on cident stress debriefing (CISD) (Litz & Gray, 2004). talking through the trauma and reliving the emo- This model was developed by Jeffery Mitchell in tional experiences of the event in a protected en- the early 1980s and was originally designed to vironment (Litz & Gray, 2004). When conducted provide comprehensive stress management ap- with police officers, firefighters, or other first re- proaches for use with first responders (Mitchell, sponders, the CISD groups are usually formed 1983). The system later evolved into a broader with prestanding units who experienced the same The Need for Proficient Mental Health Professionals in the Study of Terrorism 45 event. The theoretical framework of CISM suggests responders, and the originator of the CISD inter- that the sharing of the experience assists in the vention has suggested that it may not be appro- normalization of symptoms and provides a frame- priate for the general public. Finally, alternative work for reliving the event through the multiple approaches have not been extensively developed perspectives of the participants. and empirically examined as comparisons to the CISD model. Myth: Talking It Through Prevents As a result of this increased interest, three Traumatization major meta-analyses of the CISD treatment system were undertaken and have recently been published Until recently, common wisdom within the trauma (Litz & Gray, 2004). These reviews examine the treatment community held that ventilating the relatively few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) victim’s emotions immediately following the event probing the efficacy of CISD that are available. We was requisite in preventing the later onset of PTSD. consider two of these meta-analyses in detail. The However, there is increasing empirical evidence to first was conducted by Rose, Bisson, & Wessely in suggest that early treatment for trauma may inter- 1998 as part of a Cochrane Review. This study was fere with the mind’s natural healing processes (Gist subsequently updated in 2001 and served as the & Lubin, 1999; Litz et al., 2002; McNally et al., first major review of RCTs of the efficacy of the 2003; Rose, Bisson, & Wessley, 2001). In fact, CISD treatment system. there is some suggestion that interventions that Using established search criteria, the authors focus heavily on the emotional reliving of the event of the Cochrane Review identified 11 studies that in the days immediately following the tragedy may involved the use of single-session psychological actually put people who might otherwise recover debriefing with participants who had recently been normally at increased risk for PTSD (Rose et al., exposed to a trauma. All of the interventions used 2001). After a traumatic event, an individual ty- a variation of emotional recounting of the event. pically experiences dissociative symptoms, such as The authors of the review also noted that the emotional numbing, detachment, reduced aware- quality of most of the studies was poor (Rose et al., ness, derealization, and depersonalization. These 2001). The Cochrane Review poses some com- symptoms may actually be normal, healthy reac- pelling and disturbing questions about the use of tions to highly stressful events (McNally et al., CISD and related treatment systems. 2003). Dissociation may in fact serve as a tem- These meta-analyses found no quantitative porary buffer, allowing an individual to process support for the contention that single-session stressful information without attending to the debriefing leads to a reduction in PTSD risk. The events in consciousness. However, the CISD model report also entertains the possibility that this type encourages mental health professionals to pierce of early intervention may instead hinder recovery this protective veil and reintroduce the power- and increase the risk of chronic PTSD. Two of the ful emotional reaction to the trauma as soon as long-term follow-up studies included in the review possible. found that those receiving a single treatment fol- The CISD intervention model has recently lowing a traumatic event had worse prognoses for come under increased scrutiny for several reasons. mental health difficulty as compared to the con- Litz & Gray (2004) list a number of concerns with trols. Further, Rose and his colleagues found that the CISD approach. First, at a theoretical level, the debriefing did not reduce other psychological dif- debriefing seems to not consider the natural course ficulties associated with exposure to trauma, in- of psychological healing that takes place for most cluding depression and anxiety (Rose et al., 2001). people following trauma. Second, most of the stu- The authors of the review suggest that single- dies examining the CISD model have been au- session psychological debriefing treatments may thored by the group that developed it and have not suffer from the following problems that reduce been replicated in other settings. Third, the ma- this intervention’s efficacy: (1) The interventions jority of the studies of CISD suffer from critical may be too short; (2) the follow-up may be too methodological flaws. Fourth, the CISD model was short to show results; (3) the treatment timing originally developed for the treatment of first may be incorrect; and (4) the idea of debriefing 46 The Psychology of Terrorism may have been incorporated into contemporary conclusions of advocates of CISD/CISM, there is culture, rendering formalized intervention un- no sufficiently rigorous empirical support for the necessary. Each of these possibilities warrants fur- use of CISD/CISM in the secondary prevention of ther investigation. chronic PTSD. Controlled studies reveal it to be The review by Rose et al. (2003) hypothesizes therapeutically inert when applied to individuals’’ reasons for the observed negative or null outcomes (Litz & Gray, 2004, p. 101). In light of these with single-treatment interventions. The first is the findings, a conference convened by the National suggestion that those who experience shame or Institute of Mental Health concluded that CISD guilt reactions in response to a traumatic event should not be used as an intervention with trauma may be at risk when only a single, emotion-laden victims, a view seconded by the British National treatment is provided and further exploration Health Service (Litz & Gray, 2004). In response, of these emotions is not offered. Second, psy- dramatic shifts in the world of trauma intervention chological debriefing may attach an unnecessary have begun to occur as several major insurance stigma to the normal recovery symptoms observed agencies have discouraged large organizations from in trauma victims. Rose and colleagues note that hiring CISD counselors to provide this interven- ‘‘Debriefing, by increasing awareness of psycholo- tion because it is increasingly viewed as prior art, gical distress, may paradoxically induce distress in no longer the standard of care, and a lawsuit risk people who would otherwise not have developed (Yandrick, 2004). it’’ (Rose et al., 2003, p. 9). Finally, the authors of this review argue that psychological debriefing Myth: Most People Are at Risk may be problematic because it subscribes to the dubious notion that all victims experience the One of the common misconceptions about ter- traumatic event and progress through recovery in a rorism and trauma is the expectation that a large fairly uniform manner. These hypotheses should proportion of the affected population will develop serve as the basis for future research examining full-blown PTSD symptoms in the months fol- both the efficacy and the possible dangers of lowing the event (McNally et al., 2003). In fact, the single-session, emotion-driven treatment systems general public and even direct victims appear to for trauma. be surprisingly resilient. In the wake of what was A second set of meta-analyses performed by arguably the most significant act of terrorism in Litz and his colleagues (2002) sought to confirm peacetime, the events of September 11, 2001, and expand upon the findings of the Cochrane surprisingly few people used the psychological and Review. These analyses examined the results of other support services offered by the 9,000 pro- six RCTs involving psychological debriefing. The fessional and paraprofessional counselors who inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis differ were rushed to New York following the tragedy somewhat from those found in the review by Rose (McNally et al., 2003). The Project Liberty pro- et al. (2001). However, the same pattern of results gram, a federally funded initiative designed to emerged. The findings confirmed that psycholo- provide counseling to affected New Yorkers, esti- gical debriefing provided no more relief of symp- mated that 25% of the city’s inhabitants would toms than could be expected with natural recovery need counseling and prepared to meet the need for over time. A small difference in effect size indicated psychological services for a staggering 2.5 million that psychological debriefing may result in greater victims, yet just slightly more than half a million levels of PTSD symptoms following treatment. city residents used these services (McNally et al., However, Litz and colleagues caution against in- 2003). terpreting these findings or those of the study by In fact, in summarizing PTSD prevalence data Rose et al. (2001) as providing definitive evidence gathered by several researchers following the 9/11 of negative side effects with the use of this treat- attacks, McNally and colleagues (2003) stated that, ment approach (Litz et al., 2002). while predictions of significant distress surged, the As a result of the mounting evidence showing actual rates of PTSD symptoms ranged from just that CISD may not be as effective as hoped, one of 7.5% to 20% in the general public who had been the leading researchers in the field of acute stress near Ground Zero at the time of the attacks. Four treatment has concluded that, ‘‘Contrary to the months later, a similar study with participants The Need for Proficient Mental Health Professionals in the Study of Terrorism 47 living near the World Trade Center site found that individuals. These interventions differentiate be- the proportion of the population experiencing tween immediate response, which occurs in the PTSD-like symptoms dropped to 1.7% (McNally hours following a terrorist event, and the more et al., 2003). One national study of PTSD preva- long-term treatment of people who have residual lence following 9/11 found slightly higher num- symptoms. Together they compose the content of bers, with 17% of the sample meeting criteria 8 the knowledge that mental health practitioners weeks after the attacks and falling to 5.8% after 6 should apparently have as they anticipate providing months (Litz & Gray, 2004). Similarly, estimates care to survivors. of PTSD rates in Israeli civilians (ostensibly due to ongoing terrorist activity) found that between Do’s and Don’ts in the Immediate 2.7% and 9.4% of respondents met the criteria for Aftermath of Terror PTSD (depending on the stringency of the inclu- sion criteria). Only 5.3% felt they needed to seek Mental health professionals must be trained to professional treatment for stress related to terrorist respond to disasters such as terrorist attacks with a activity, while more than 60% of the participants broader range of skills than that required in the reported feeling that their lives were threatened office practice of psychotherapy. Various initiatives (Bleisch, Gelkopf, & Solomon, 2003). have been set in motion to provide them with the Several studies following the 9/11 tragedy tools they need to treat these victims. found similar results, and a number of researchers Various recommendations have been made for in the field have suggested that, even though many how best to intervene with those at psychological people may initially exhibit stress symptoms, this is risk following terrorist events. CISD is no longer a a fundamentally normal process, and most people treatment intervention one should use lightly or recover from the trauma without the high rate of simply because one has been instructed to do so. chronic psychological illness that was initially pre- Newer approaches derived from empirically based dicted (Litz et al., 2002; McNally et al., 2003). treatments are becoming available for the emer- Furthermore, while a high proportion of people gency mental health responder. In the remainder who were representatively sampled across the na- of this chapter, we present a brief overview of tion endorsed items indicating that they had ex- current recommendations. However, additional perienced stress-related symptoms following the research-based information is forthcoming and events of 9/11, there is little evidence to suggest practitioners should view this effort as an initial that the majority of those who were exposed effort to build the ground work for future work. through the media were at risk for developing PTSD Mental healthcare workers should actively seek out (Pfefferbaum et al., 2002). Moreover, those with new information as it becomes available because severe symptoms immediately after a major trau- of the fledgling nature of this field. For example, matic event are no more likely to develop chronic the area of psychological first aid (PFA) appears to PTSD than those who experience lesser symptoms be gaining strength as an alternative to CISD, and (McNally et al., 2003). These findings, as well as the research findings in this area should inform prac- progression of recovery they suggest, should be tice as they become available. central to our understanding of the human re- Emerging treatments focus on the unique as- sponse to intentional mass-casualty events. pects of victims of terrorism. Thus, treatment con- ceptualizations are becoming more specific and refined. For example, despite the developing belief What Mental Health Professionals among researchers in this field that early psycho- Need to Know About Intervention logical intervention may be contraindicated, this does not imply that no support should be offered Based on mounting evidence that single-session to individuals immediately following a trauma psychological debriefing treatments provide no event. To the contrary, social support has been benefit and may even hinder the recovery process, repeatedly shown to help prevent chronic PTSD, researchers and clinicians have become increas- and, perhaps more importantly, negative social ingly interested in developing and using alterna- contacts immediately following a critical incident tive treatment systems with disaster-traumatized appear to increase the risk of PTSD (McNally et al., 48 The Psychology of Terrorism
2003). Further, feelings of nihilism and despair assumed to be 1–2 weeks (Litz & Gray, 2004), that are associated with chronic PTSD are best the practitioner should begin considering more addressed by assisting the client to build (or re- aggressive intervention. build) a strong social support network through reengagement in social activities (Miller, 2002). Minimum Intervention Guidelines for Responding to Victims and Psychological First Aid Rescuers During Crises
Borrowing from a model developed to treat re- It is imperative that the ways in which we help crisis fugees, it appears that the most important first step victims reflect the best scientific knowledge avail- in psychological treatment is to reestablish a sense able. However, because of the nature of science, of safety and to provide basic services such as food, what we know and what we can recommend are shelter, and contact with loved ones. Miller (2002) always changing. Because of the way that scientific states that, immediately after a trauma event, ‘‘Phy- information accumulates, we are likely to find out sical care is psychological care.’’ This approach, more quickly when something does not work than termed ‘‘psychological first aid,’’ is not envisioned as when it does. Thus, we have learned many things a treatment program (Litz et al., 2002). Psycholo- from scientific research that we initially believed gical first aid differs from psychological debriefing should have been helpful, yet some have turned out models in that its primary focus is the provision of to be ineffective and even harmful (Gist & Woodall, physical comfort and psychoeducation to normalize 2000; Litz et al., 2002; Rose, Bisson, & Wessely, symptoms; in short, it puts in place a referral system 2001; Rose, Brewin, et al., 1999; Rose, Wessely, & for people who feel the need for more assistance. Bisson, 1998). At the same time, we are finding that Also contrary to the CISD model, Litz and his col- many of the commonsense procedures and fun- leagues (2002) state that ‘‘This position recogni- damental ways of providing assistance are surpri- zes that most people do not suffer from PTSD [or singly helpful to people in crisis. more accurately ASD] in the immediate days after Despite the extensive instruction that is fre- an event; rather the majority of people will have quently offered and the treatments that are accepted transient stress reactions that will remit with time’’ as if their use represents factual and scientifically (p. 128). derived knowledge, actual scientifically generated Through the use of psychological first aid, the and supported knowledge about what best to do in practitioner is also able to strengthen preexisting the immediate wake of trauma is quite limited. social networks that may encourage more natu- There are, however, some general guidelines that ral debriefing (e.g., with family members or co- can be derived from research studies. We have workers), approaches that have been found to often compiled these into a straightforward list of basic be more effective and better received than overt, do’s and don’ts for the clinician who is seeking practitioner-led debriefing (Gist & Lubin, 1999). to assist victims and rescuers in the first hours Finally, this approach also allows the psychologist, and days following a major community crisis. These social worker, or other mental health professional recommendations represent the best knowledge to passively monitor the progression of recovery that is available at the present time. and to enable them to flag those who are at high risk for PTSD, monitor them, and step in as needed. Things to Do While psychological first aid provides an ap- The following points offer some guidance as to propriate framework for general intervention, specific actions and approaches a clinical practi- Bryant & Harvey (2000, p. 84) note that ‘‘There is tioner can engage in to provide effective support now convergent evidence that approximately 80% following a terrorist attack or similar mass-casualty of individuals who are diagnosed with ASD sub- event: sequently suffer chronic PTSD.’’ In light of this finding, effective, early interventions are needed 1. Remember that effective first response comes for the subset of victims who fail to recover natu- not from your role as a healer but rather from rally. If a reduction in symptoms is not apparent your role as one who provides comfort, direct after an appropriate period of time, which is support, and useful information. You are most The Need for Proficient Mental Health Professionals in the Study of Terrorism 49
effective as a source of accurate information, should be carefully structured to promote ex- immediate guidance, and direct assistance with pectations of resilience and recovery rather the needs and demands of the present. If than providing laundry lists of pitfalls and victims have lost their home, it is far more symptoms. important to reduce the immediate feelings of 8. Direct victims and rescuers to community re- stress by providing shelter than it is to listen sources that offer comfort and assistance. empathically to the feelings of helplessness Connect victims with sources of aid that will that loss entails. In the face of loss and threat, provide direct and continuing support (e.g., it is also more effective to provide immediate family, community, faith-based resources). calming and instrumental care than to en- 9. Rescuers are critically affected by the tendency courage early ventilation and catharsis. to identify with victims and to the effects of 2. Get your hands ‘‘dirty’’—get into the field—in exhaustion—help them to establish and order to make sure that physical and medical maintain boundaries, pace their efforts and needs are addressed. It is very helpful in later expectations, and control emotions during contacts to have met people first in these set- protracted encounters. tings and to have initially provided immediate 10. Work with a companion whenever possible, and pragmatic forms of help before attempting and let the coworker help you maintain per- to offer more personal levels of support. spective and objectivity. 3. Provide information and guidance at very practical levels. Arm yourself with as much Things to Avoid information as you can garner and commu- The following points offer some guidance as to nicate it clearly and systematically to those you specific actions and approaches a clinician should encounter. Relate your information clearly, avoid following a terrorist attack or similar mass- using only fully authoritative sources (do not casualty event: be a vehicle for rumors and misinformation). 4. Establish a working relationship with the cli- 1. Emotion-focused debriefing in the immediate ent. Make sure that your role is understood aftermath of trauma—by its many labels, in- and that the client has given permission for cluding psychological debriefing (PD), CISD, you to assist. Make known your identity, cre- and multiple stressor debriefing (MSD)—has dentials, relationships to other organizations not been shown to be effective in preventing (e.g., Red Cross, employer of rescue person- later difficulties and may even cause problems nel) very clearly, and establish the objectives to become entrenched or more severe over for the encounter. Do not proceed unless the time. ‘‘Debriefing,’’ as used here, includes any individual is willing to accept your help. approach that involves (a) revisiting and re- 5. Ensure that physical and safety needs (e.g., constructing the details and feelings associated medical, shelter, food) are provided before with the traumatic event and any of the fol- addressing the emotional impacts of the lowing additional procedures: (b) encourage- trauma. Keep the initial focus on meeting ment to explore and deepen one’s basic needs and preserving stamina. reexperiencing of the emotion-laden events; 6. Provide a clearly defined objective and end (c) normalization of reactions, especially ele- point for the contact and relationship. Tell ments of negative feelings; and (d) education people what to expect. Most of the time, you regarding the signs and symptoms of PTSD. will need to provide one or more direct re- While doing these things often seem to be a ferrals for subsequent assistance. Ensure that good idea, the evidence is strong and accu- the options your provide reflect a wide range mulating that these are aspects of help giving of possibilities. that should be avoided during the initial stages 7. Emphasize the client’s strengths rather than of trauma reaction. weaknesses or deficits. Provide reassurance 2. Some examples of other treatments that are (‘‘this will pass’’; ‘‘you will get through this’’) frequently used but whose effects have not yet and maintain a sense of calm. If handouts or been demonstrated scientifically to be helpful written information are used, these materials include reexposure therapy, eye movement 50 The Psychology of Terrorism
desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR), are very resilient and do not need long-term as- thought field therapy (TFT), acupuncture, and sistance. However, during the first days and weeks various patent remedies. Cognitive therapy following a crisis it is difficult to reliably distin- (CT) has been found to be effective in high- guish those who will have prolonged difficulty and risk populations and in those whose problems those who will not. A clinician should not attempt persist beyond the initial reaction, but even to make formal mental health assessments until 2 this approach should be avoided during the or more weeks have passed. Nonetheless, a brief, immediate aftermath period. Any continuing initial screening, as long as it does not interfere ‘‘treatment’’ should be used only if indicated by with providing immediate physical and medical as- careful evaluation. sistance, along with support, encouragement, and 3. Avoid being the primary focus for the provi- comfort, might help identify those who should be sion of assistance and emotional or social recontacted after a few weeks and considered for support. Healthy resolution may ultimately more prolonged treatment. depend on fostering a sense of self-efficacy and mastery of the threat and challenge. The Initial Screening greatest risk to helpers and clinicians may be Screening of risk factors can be accomplished with ‘‘overhelping,’’ or what some have called ‘‘the four basic, relatively unobtrusive queries: tyranny of urgency.’’ This is the tendency to go too far in helping people do what they need to 1. Have the individuals experienced other intense do for themselves or even doing for them what exposures or instances of trauma (has anything can best be done by their own families and like this happened before)? reference groups. 2. Is there any history of prior mental health 4. The vast majority of those who are exposed to treatment or of circumstances for which the even severe trauma will not experience PTSD individuals or others thought treatment should and will recover through their own resources have been sought? and in their own time. Thus, it is important to 3. Do the individuals have at least one other respect the natural recovery process and to person with whom they can talk and share avoid presuming that someone needs profes- their problems? Has doing so seemed pro- sional mental health assistance. Be ‘‘invisibly ductive and helpful in the past? supportive.’’ People recover at different rates 4. Were the individuals exposed (in their judg- and by different means. Let victims set their ment) to particularly gruesome or disturbing own pace, talk about things that are important aspects of this event? to them, and seek their own space. Some people need a period of withdrawal; beyond Follow-Up Evaluation this, it is important that victims feel empow- Persons experiencing lingering difficulties after the ered to take some steps on their own in order initial impact has passed (generally 2–6 weeks) to gain a sense of personal agency. Do not should be evaluated for further mental health as- push them to discuss—before they are ready— sistance within the context of an established pro- or to do something that they are reluctant fessional relationship. These services are generally to do. best provided by agencies and professionals within 5. Do not be too formal. Don’t carry or wear the the local community, where enduring therapeutic badges of distance, such as a clipboard or a relationships can be developed. white coat, which might mark you as a ‘‘re- Where further treatment is indicated, empiri- moved,’’ clinical observer. Respect the client’s cally supported, conservative approaches such as privacy and keep the relationship open. CT spread across four or five sessions should be among the primary considerations. Therapists Follow-Up Treatment attempting longer-term interventions should seek specific training and supervision in these ap- In the weeks following a traumatic incident, most proaches and especially in their application to trau- people will recover in response to psychological matic exposure. Case management that includes first aid and the minimalist treatment. Most people social work and systems advocacy should also be The Need for Proficient Mental Health Professionals in the Study of Terrorism 51 considered as a critical adjunct to ensure that con- multiple times over several weeks, allowing a tinuing or emergent instrumental needs continue to supported processing of the event (Litz & Gray, be supportively addressed. If more intensive follow- 2004). Under the watchful eye of a trained prac- up is indicated by the persistence of debilitating titioner, serious issues that may be left unidentified anxiety after a few weeks, there are several treat- and unresolved in a single session may be detected ments that have been found to be useful for re- and addressed. Initial controlled trials have de- storing normal functioning. monstrated that when CBT and PE techniques are used with ASD patients, the intervention drama- Prolonged Exposure tically reduces PTSD rates at follow-up, with only 15% of the participants continuing to meet criteria, While the CISD model relies on a single-exposure compared to 67% in a supportive counseling con- intervention, more rigorously constructed short- trol condition (Bryant & Harvey, 2000). While term interventions involving imaginal exposure CBT combined with PE is perhaps the best ap- over a number of sessions have demonstrated sig- proach currently known, care should be taken nificant reductions in PTSD symptoms (Bryant & if the patient is acutely traumatized, suicidal, ex- Harvey, 2000). These findings were identified in periencing concomitant mental health problems, studies of traumatic reactions to sexual and non- or under stress because of continued exposure. sexual assault, and lowered rates of PTSD were The powerful effects of exposure therapy may over- found during a 3-month follow-up after cessation whelm these clients, leading them to drop out of of treatment. However, although this intervention therapy (Bryant & Harvey, 2000). approach appears to be effective in reducing symptoms for some people, initial studies indicate Other Treatment Considerations that these results occur in only about half of the victims who are treated (Bryant & Harvey, 2000). The field of trauma treatment has received in- Based on preliminary findings, in vivo exposure creasing attention from a wide variety of re- may also be an effective treatment for PTSD pre- searchers and theorists in psychology and related vention; however, little systematic research has fields since the events of September 11, 2001. been undertaken in this area (Bryant & Harvey, While much of the research currently under way 2000). Prolonged exposure (PE) techniques are will explore the efficacy of various components of typified by recalling the traumatic event for a per- psychological debriefing, CBT, and other ‘‘talk iod of not less than 50 minutes. The approach aims therapies,’’ pharmacological interventions are also to completely activate the fear-related memories being examined. Some research has pointed to of the event long enough to cause habituation to continued physical arousal symptoms following the the stimulus (Bryant & Harvey, 2000). removal of victims to safety as an indicator of risk for PTSD onset. Based on this model, some have suggested that pharmacological interventions that Cognitive Behavioral Therapy suppress the sympathetic nervous system response, Based on the limited literature currently available, such as propranolol (a beta-blocker), may be ef- elements of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and fective in disrupting the immediate fear response PE appear to be the most appropriate tools in and, in turn, serve to lower the risk of PTSD. While the reduction of initial stress symptoms and ASD this is just one emerging treatment model, it illus- symptoms and in the prevention of chronic PTSD trates that practitioners need to remain vigilant as (Litz et al., 2002). The key features of CBT and PE new research informs a changing standard of care. treatment that may assist a trauma victim typically include elements from PE and include imaginal ex- posure to trauma-related memories, graduated in Special Considerations vivo exposure to avoided situations, cognitive re- for First Responders structuring, and homework tasks to support the therapeutic process (Bryant & Harvey, 2000; Litz A common perception of emergency personnel et al., 2002). One of the critical components of this is that they are somehow stronger people, both approach is that the intervention is carried out emotionally and physically, than most and that this 52 The Psychology of Terrorism strength allows them to do their jobs and remain environmental factors and emotional reactions. unaffected by the tragedy and trauma they witness. For example, prebriefings on what to expect were Their attraction to their professions seems to sug- associated with adaptive capabilities in FEMA gest a solid personality that responds quickly and workers and assisted in mitigating the stress of appropriately in emergency situations. However, understanding what they were about to go through even if these perceptions are rooted in fact, emer- in responding to an emergency (Garcı´a, 2003). gency response workers are still subjected to re- This implies that briefing first responders on what peated stress. Exposure to mass-casualty incidents, to expect at an emergency scene could assist by repeated exposure to stressful situations, and al- desensitizing them and therefore reduce the stress ways being on alert for the next call can contribute associated with responding to an emergency scene. to potential psychological injury over the course of a Additional training might include educating re- career or in the aftermath of a disaster. These ad- sponse workers about the mental health resources verse effects can come in various forms and include available through their employer and in their emotional, cognitive, and somatic effects. However, community. there are certain identified resilience mechanisms While those who do not work in the field of and coping strategies that can assist in buffering trauma or death and dying may find the humor against such adverse effects. of emergency personnel morbid and distasteful, it Efforts to assist first responders have empha- serves a valuable purpose in relieving stress and sized intervention techniques, but attention should helping them transition from one call to the next. also be focused on preparatory strategies to pro- Studies on the use of humor by emergency person- mote adaptation and minimize impact prior to a nel have shown that, among experienced para- mass-casualty event (Paton, 1996). Emergency re- medics, humor was ranked higher than other coping sponse workers are often involved in repeated mechanisms, including talking with friends and fa- training for various aspects of their jobs. Two of mily, socializing, going out, and exercising (Rosen- the goals of training are practice and preparation— berg, 1991). Pretrained subjects in Rosenberg’s practice in using problem-solving abilities in novel study stated that humor relieved tension and served situations and preparation for doing one’s job and as a tool by which they could cognitively and emo- for knowing what to expect while doing it. tionally refocus themselves to regain perspective and Training is often considered in the functional even transcend a situation. Experienced paramedics perspective of engaging in and practicing job-related said that humor provides a mental break and assists duties. But performing these responsibilities some- them in returning to a normal state of mind. In times extends beyond one’s capacity to accomplish addition, those paramedics who used humor less functional tasks, such as starting an intravenous (IV) showed higher levels of stress. Subjects of this study injection. A professional must be mentally able to also communicated that humor has limits and that follow through with those tasks in a disaster situa- overreliance on it to the exclusion of other coping tion and maintain a state of psychological health mechanisms is counterproductive. over the long term in order to ensure an extended In a study on leisure coping used by police and career in the emergency response field. emergency response workers, it was found that Predisaster psychology training could benefit leisure coping and both short- and long-term stress emergency response workers, for example, by coping are positively related (Iwasaki, Mannell, helping them determine what psychological stres- Smale, & Butcher, 2002). This relationship extends sors they are susceptible to and learn how to beyond the benefits of general coping. Coping with recognize when victims, their coworkers, or they short-term stress includes stress reduction, and themselves are experiencing adverse psychological coping with long-term stress includes benefits as- effects. Such instruction can also help them learn sociated with both physical and mental health. to communicate effectively with others and to Leisure activities also seem to benefit emergency practice coping mechanisms to deal with such response workers through mood regulation, tem- stress. Also, training provided to desensitize porary escape from job-related stress, companion- emergency response personnel to situations they ship with friends and family, and the fostering might encounter could provide benefits through of feelings of empowerment, perceived control, and increasing their familiarity with the associated a positive attitude toward life. The Need for Proficient Mental Health Professionals in the Study of Terrorism 53
Firefighters and police officers, as well as other Bleisch, A., Dycian, A., Koslowsky, M., Solomon, Z., emergency response professionals, experience a & Wiener, M. (1992). Psychiatric implications of strong bond both within individual departments missile attacks on a civilian population. Journal and across the country. When the news that fire- of the American Medical Association, 268(5), fighters in New York City had perished during the 613–615. Bleisch, A., Gelkopf, M., & Solomon, Z. (2003). 9/11 crisis reached firefighters on the West Coast, Exposure to terrorism, stress-related mental health the emotions felt for their ‘‘fallen brothers’’ were symptoms, and coping behaviors among a na- profound. Many tears were shed among this group tionally representative sample in Israel. Journal of of tough workers, and those who were not sent the American Medical Association, 290(5), 612. to Ground Zero confronted feelings of helpless- Brewin, C., Andrews, B., Rose, S., & Kirk, M. (1999). ness, grief, and despair. Departments around the Acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress country implemented ‘‘boot collections’’ (using fire disorder in victims of violent crimes. American boots to hold the donations) at public places to Journal of Psychiatry, 156(3), 360–366. send money to the families of their ‘‘brothers.’’ Bryant, R., & Harvey, A. (2000). Acute stress disorder: A Departments held moments of silence for the fire- handbook of theory, assessment, and treatment. Wash- fighters who had lost their lives. The bond felt ington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. Chapman, C., & Harris, A. (2002). A skeptical look at between professionals in their respective fields is September 11th: How we can defeat terrorism by arguably a strong one, and it may assist emergency reacting to it more rationally. Skeptical Inquirer, response professionals in coping with trauma in 26(5), 29–34. that they rarely experience it alone. Dalgleish, T. (2004). Cognitive approaches to post- McCammon and colleagues (1988) questioned traumatic stress disorder: The evolution of multi- emergency response workers about the frequency representational theorizing. Psychological Bulletin, with which they used particular coping mechan- 130, 228–260. isms in response to two disaster situations. In the Everly, G., & Mitchell, J. (1999). Critical incident stress case of an explosion at an apartment building, management (CISM): A new era and standard of care behaviors they deemed helpful included remind- in crisis intervention (2d ed.). Ellicott City, MD: ing themselves that things could be worse, looking Chevron. Galea, S., Ahern, J., Resnick, H., Kilpatrick, D., at the situation realistically, being more helpful to Bucuvalas, M., Gold, J., et al. (2002). Psychological others, thinking about the meaning of life following sequelae of the September 11 terrorist attacks in the event, and talking to others about the incident. New York City. New England Journal of Medicine, 346, 982–987. Acknowledgments. This research was performed Galea, S., Vlahov, D., Resnick, H., Ahern, J., Susser, E., while the third author (Zeno Franco) was on appoint- Gold, J., et al. (2003). Trends of probable post- ment as a U.S. Department of Homeland Security traumatic stress disorder in New York City after (DHS) fellow under the DHS Scholarship and Fellow- the September 11 terrorist attacks. American ship Program, a program administered by the Oak Journal of Epidemiology, 158, 514–524. Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) for Garcı´a, E. (2003). Supporting the Federal Emergency DHS through an interagency agreement with the U.S. Management Agency rescuers: A variation of Department of Energy (DOE). Oak Ridge Associated critical incident stress management. Military Med- Universities ORISE is managed by DOE contract icine, 168(2), 87–91. Gist, R., & Lubin, B. (Eds.). (1999). Response to disaster: number DE-AC05–000R22750. Psychosocial, community, and ecological approaches. All of the opinions expressed in this chapter are Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis. the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect the policies Gist, R., & Woodall, S. (2000). There are no simple and views of DHS, DOE, or ORISE. solutions to complex problems. In J. M. Violanti & P. Douglas (Eds.), Posttraumatic stress intervention: Challenges, issues, and perspectives (pp. 81–95). References Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas. Goenjian, A., Molina, L., Steinberg, A., Fairbanks, American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic L., Alvarez, M., Goenjian, H., et al. (2001). and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV- Posttraumatic stress and depressive reactions TR (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. among Nicaraguan adolescents after Hurricane 54 The Psychology of Terrorism
Mitch. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158(5), Pastel, R. (2001). Collective behaviors: Mass panic and 788–794. outbreaks of multiple unexplained symptoms. Iwasaki, Y., Mannell, R. C., Smale, B. J., & Butcher, J. Military Medicine, 166(12), 44–46. (2002). A short-term longitudinal analysis of Paton, D. (1996). Training disaster workers: Promoting leisure coping used by police and emergency well-being and operational effectiveness. Disaster response service workers. Journal of Leisure Re- Prevention and Management, 5(5), 11–18. search, 34(3), 331–339. Pfefferbaum, B., Pfefferbaum, R., North, C., & Neas, B. Jones, T., Craig, A., Hoy, D., & Gunter, E. (2000). (2002). Does television viewing satisfy criteria for Mass psychogenic illness attributed to toxic exposure in posttraumatic stress disorder. Psy- exposure at a high school. New England Journal of chiatry, 65(4), 306–309. Medicine, 342(2), 96–101. Resnick, H., Acierno, R., Holmes, M., Dammeyer, M., Litz, B., & Gray, M. (2004). Early intervention for trauma & Kilpatrick, D. (2000). Emergency evaluation in adults. In B. Litz (Ed.), Early intervention for and intervention with female victims of rape and trauma and traumatic loss. New York: Guilford Press. other violence. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, ———, Bryant, R., & Adler, A. (2002). Early 1317–1333. intervention for trauma: Current status and future Rose, S., Bisson, J., & Wessely, S. (2001). Psychological directions. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, debriefing for preventing post traumatic stress 9(2), 112–134. disorder (PTSD) (Cochrane Review). Cochrane Marlowe, D. H. (2001). Psychological and psychosocial Library, 3. Oxford University Press: Update Software. consequences of combat and deployment. Santa Rose, S., Brewin, C. R., Andrews, B., & Kirk, M. Monica: RAND. (1999). A randomized controlled trial of individual McCammon, S. L., Durham, T. W., Jackson, E. J., & psychological debriefing for victims of violent Williams, J. E. (1988). Emergency workers’ crime. Psychological Medicine, 29, 793–799. cognitive appraisal and coping with traumatic Rose, S., Wessely, S., & Bisson, J. (1998). Brief events. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 1(3), 353–372. psychological interventions (‘‘debriefing’’) for McNally, R., Bryant, R., & Ehlers, A. (2003). Does early trauma-related symptoms and prevention of post- psychological intervention promote recovery from traumatic stress disorder (Cochrane Review). posttraumatic stress? Psychological Science in the Cochrane Library, 2. Oxford University Press: Public Interest, 4(2), 45–79. Update Software. Meisel, S., Kutz, I., Dayan, K., Pauzner, H., Chetboun, Rosenberg, L. (1991). A qualitative investigation of the I., Abrel, Y., et al. (1991). Effect of Iraqi missile use of humor by emergency personnel as a strategy war on incidence of acute myocardial infarction for coping with stress. Journal of Emergency and sudden death in Israeli civilians. Lancet, Nursing, 17(4), 197–202. 338(8788), 660–661. Schlenger, W. E., Caddell, J. M., Ebert, L., Jordan, B. K., Miller, L. (2002). Psychological interventions for Rourke, K. M., Wilson, D., et al. (2002). terroristic trauma: Symptoms, syndromes, and Psychological reactions to terrorist attacks: Find- treatment Strategies. Psychotherapy: Theory/ ings from the National Study of Americans’ Research/Practice/Training, 39(4), 283–296. Reactions to September 11. Journal of American Mitchell, J. (1983). When disaster strikes ...the critical Medical Association, 288, 581–588. incident stress debriefing process. Journal of Slovic, P. (2002). Terrorism as hazard: A new species of Emergency Medical Services, 8, 36–39. trouble. Risk Analysis, 22(3), 425–426. Morgan, C., Grillon, C., Lubin, H., & Southwick, S. ———, & Weber, E. (2002, April). Perceptions of risk (1997). Startle reflex abnormalities in women with posed by extreme events. Paper presented at the sexual assault–related posttraumatic stress disorder. Risk Management Strategies in an Uncertain American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(8), 1076–1080. World, April 12–13, Palisades, New York. Neria, Y., Suh, E. J., & Marshall, R. D. (2004). The Small, G., Propper, M., Randolph, E., & Eth, S. (1991). professional response to the aftermath of September Mass hysteria among student performers: Social 11, 2001, in New York City: Lessons learned from relationship as a symptom predictor. American treating victims of the World Trade Center attacks. Journal of Psychiatry, 148(9), 1200–1205. In B. Litz (Ed.), Early intervention for trauma and Suedfeld, P. (2003). Specific and general attributional traumatic loss (pp. 201–215). New York: Guilford. patterns of Holocaust survivors. Canadian Journal Ohman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001). Emotion of Behavioural Science, 35(2), 133–141. drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass. Tucker, P., Pfefferbaum, B., Nixon, S., & Dickson, W. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(3), (2000). Predictors of post-traumatic stress symp- 466–478. toms in Oklahoma City: Exposure, social support, The Need for Proficient Mental Health Professionals in the Study of Terrorism 55
peri-traumatic responses. Journal of Behavioral Health Weinstein, N., Lyon, J., Rothman, A., & Cuite, C. Services and Research, 27(4), 406–416. (2000). Changes in perceived vulnerability fol- Vlahov, D., Galea, S., Resnick, H., Ahern, J., Boscarino, lowing natural disaster. Journal of Social and Clinical J. A., Bucuvalas, M., Gold, J., & Kilpatrick, D. Psychology, 19(3), 372–395. (2002). Increased use of cigarettes, alcohol, and Wessely, S., & Jones, E. (in press). Psychiatry and the marijuana among Manhattan residents after the ‘‘lessons of Vietnam’’: What were they, are they still September 11th terrorist attacks. American Journal relevant? War and Society. of Epidemiology, 155, 988–996. Yandrick, R. M. (2004). Traumatic event debriefings Wakefield, J. C. (1992). The concept of mental disorder: getting second thoughts. Crisis Management Inter- On the boundary between biological facts and social national. Retrieved April, 2004, from http://www values. American Psychologist, 47, 373–388. .cmiatl.com/news_article59.html 4
War Versus Justice in Response to Terrorist Attacks Competing Frames and Their Implications Clark McCauley
Often lost in discussion of the September 11, 2001, terrorism. ‘‘On September the 11th, enemies of attacks on the World Trade Center (WTC) is the freedom committed an act of war against our coun- fact that a very similar attack, with similar moti- try. ...Our war on terror begins with al Qaeda, but vation and related perpetrators, occurred eight it does not end there. It will not end until every years earlier. On February 16, 1993, a truck bomb terrorist group of global reach has been found, in the basement parking garage of the WTC killed stopped and defeated’’ (Bush, 2001). six, injured hundreds, and damaged property to Within the rhetoric of war, however, there has the extent of half a billion dollars. The bomb was been frequent recourse to the rhetoric of criminal designed to topple one of the towers into the other justice. ‘‘Whether we bring our enemies to justice or and to bring both towers down. The man behind justice to our enemies, justice will be done. ...We this plan, Ramzi Yousef, noted regretfully that if he will come together to give law enforcement the had had a little more funding his design would additional tools it needs to track down terror here have succeeded and killed tens of thousands (Kirk, at home’’ (Bush, 2001; White House Press Office, 2002). The U.S. response to this attack was police 2003). work and prosecution. After trials and convictions, The rhetoric of justice and the rhetoric of war six Arab men are in U.S. prisons, and a seventh may appear complementary, as in the often- person is still being sought. debated qualifications of ‘‘just war.’’ But closer On September 11, 2001, a second attack on inspection indicates that these two kinds of rhetoric the World Trade Center brought down the Twin instantiate two very different frames for under- Towers and caused nearly 3,000 deaths. The 9/11 standing the nature of the terrorist threat and the perpetrators were similar in origins and moti- appropriate response to it. In this chapter I explore vation to the 1993 perpetrators; indeed one of the inconsistent and even contradictory implica- the planners of the 9/11 attacks, Khalid Shaikh tions of these frames, and I suggest that more em- Mohammed, is Ramzi Yousef’s uncle. Despite the phasis on the criminal justice frame offers some similarity of the attacks, the U.S. response was important advantages for what all of us agree will strikingly different. Rather than criminal justice be an extended U.S. effort to secure itself from proceedings, the U.S. response was a war on terrorist attacks.
56 War Versus Justice in Response to Terrorist Attacks 57
Framing and Human Judgment certainty to risk when comparing gains but pre- ferred risk to certainty when comparing losses. The power of framing effects has been demon- These results opened a gold rush of studies to strated in two decades of research in psychology learn more about when and how different frames and economics. Perhaps the most famous demon- can affect human judgment in ways that are, stration is Tversky and Kahneman’s (1981) ‘‘Asian statistically at least, mysterious or even irrational disease problem.’’ Several hundred people were (Shafir & Le Boeuf, 2002). One indication of the randomly divided into two groups, so that the two significance of this research is that Kahneman’s groups would on average be very similar. Each work on framing effects was cited in the award group was given a different problem. of his Nobel Prize in economics in 2002. The de- monstrated power of framing effects is the foun- Problem 1. Imagine that the United States is dation for the argument of this chapter, namely, preparing for an outbreak of an unusual Asian that war and justice may have importantly different disease, which is expected to kill 600 people. implications for how the United States responds to Two alternative programs to combat the disease terrorist threats. have been proposed. Assume that the exact scientific estimates of the consequences of the programs are as follows: A Framing Analysis of the Difference Program A: If Program A is adopted, 200 Between 1993 and 2001 people will be saved. Program B: If Program B is adopted, there is One way to think about the results of the Asian a one-third probability that 600 people will be disease problem is that most people prefer a sure saved and a two-thirds probability that no one gain to a chance of larger gain (‘‘risk averse for will be saved. gain’’) but prefer a chance of losing nothing to a Which of the two programs would you favor? certainty of losing something (‘‘risk seeking for Tversky and Kahneman (1981) found that loss’’). This understanding can be applied to the 72% of the group reading Problem 1 favored Pro- problem of terrorism if we assume that, after 9/11, gram A. The prospect of saving 200 lives with terrorism was expected to kill 600 American civi- certainty was more attractive than the probability lians the following year. As with most applica- of a one-in-three chance of saving 600 lives. tions of formal models, this analysis excludes many complications, including the loss of lives—both Problem 2. The second group read the same foreign civilians and U.S. military—associated with story of the threat of Asian disease but with the war on terrorism. In defense of this exclusion, it different program options. might be argued that U.S. leaders and U.S. citizens Program C: If Program C is adopted, 400 do not weigh these lives as heavily as civilian deaths people will die. in the United States. Program D: If Program D is adopted, there If we translate 600 lives threatened by Asian is a one-third probability that nobody will die disease into 600 lives threatened by terrorism, the and a two-thirds probability that 600 people effect of framing as gain versus framing as loss will be will die. as follows. Two antiterrorism programs are available: Which of the two programs would you favor? criminal justice and war. Presented in terms of saving Surprisingly, 78% of the group reading Pro- lives, criminal justice promises for certain to save blem 2 favored Program D. The prospect of 400 200 lives from terrorism, whereas war has a chance people lost for certain was worse than the prob- of saving all 600 lives. Presented in terms of lives ability of a two-in-three chance of losing 600. The lost, criminal justice gives up 400 lives for certain, surprise value of the difference in the results for whereas war offers a chance of losing no lives to the two problems is that they offer exactly the terrorism. If we focus on saving lives and if we are same alternatives, except that Problem 1 is framed risk averse for gains, we will prefer criminal justice to as gain (people will be saved) and Problem 2 is war as the response to terrorism. However, if we framed as loss (people will die). The results in- focus on lives lost and if we are risk seeking for loss, dicate that the participants in this study preferred we will prefer war to criminal justice. 58 The Psychology of Terrorism
One might argue about how the probabilities September 13, 1993. The trial lasted 6 months, should change as we move from the Asian disease with the presentation of 204 witnesses and threat to the terrorist threat, but the point survives more than 1,000 pieces of evidence. On March 4, that framing the response to terrorism in terms 1994, the jury convicted the four defendants— of saving lives is likely to favor criminal justice, Mohammed Salameh, Nidal Ayyad, Mahmud whereas framing it in terms of lives lost is likely Abouhalima, and Ahmad Ajaj—on all 38 counts to favor war. It is not difficult to see how, im- against them. On May 25, 1994, a judge sentenced mediately after 9/11, with 3,000 deaths fresh and each defendant to 240 years in prison and a personalized in the televised suffering of relatives $250,000 fine. and friends of the dead, the predominant framing On February 7, 1995, authorities in Pakistan was in terms of lives already lost and lives to be arrested Ramzi Yousef, who was then extradited lost in future terrorist attacks. This framing in turn to the United States. On November 12, 1997, favored war as the response to the 9/11 attacks. Yousef was found guilty of masterminding the In contrast, the six deaths caused by the 1993 1993 bombing, and on January 8, 1998, he was attack on the WTC did not rise out of the everyday sentenced to life in prison without parole. In a death toll of car accidents and homicides. As at- related case, Sheikh Omar Abdul Rahman, a blind tention to the 1993 deaths was small, the framing cleric who preached at mosques in Brooklyn and of the response to terrorism was less about lives Jersey City, was sentenced to life imprisonment on lost and more about saving lives by bringing the October 1, 1995, for conspiracy to bomb New terrorists to justice. York City landmarks (not specifically for the 1993 Thus research on framing can help explain WTC bombing, however). why criminal justice was the predominant frame In contrast, the beginning of a war is typically for the U.S. response to the terrorist attack on the a declaration from one government to another that WTC in 1993, but war was the predominant frame a state of war exists between them. The casus belli for the response to a 9/11 terrorist attack similar to does not usually require investigation or discovery; the one in 1993 in all but the death toll. Never- an attack or ultimatum is typically the clear occa- theless, the rhetoric of bringing enemies to justice sion of war. In the case of al-Qaeda, the declaration remains available in public discourse in the United of war against the United States is usually identi- States, mixed with and sometimes submerged fied with a May 26, 1998, news conference in in the rhetoric of the war on terrorism (Bush, which Osama bin Laden appeared with the two 2005), and it is useful to draw out the divergent sons of Sheik Omar Abdul Rahman, the spiritual implications of these two frames. Whereas Roth leader of those convicted of the 1993 attack on (2004) brought a human-rights framework to this the World Trade Center. Within 11 weeks of the comparison, I focus on the psychological im- declaration, al-Qaeda attacked U.S. embassies in plications of war and criminal justice in response Kenya and Tanzania with bombs that killed 224 to terrorism. people, including 12 Americans. The U.S. response was not a declaration of war against al-Qaeda but a campaign to kill al-Qaeda Justice Versus War: In the Beginning members and to destroy their bases, notably by cruise missile attacks on al-Qaeda bases in Afgha- The beginning of a criminal justice response to nistan. It was only after the 9/11 attacks that Pres. terrorism is the specification of a violation of George W. Bush declared war on terrorism, not the criminal code. Charges are brought against just on al-Qaeda but on all terrorists with inter- defendants, if necessary against criminals unknown national reach. The logic of the extension was that until investigation uncovers the identity of the per- any terrorist group with international reach was petrators. Once identified, the criminal defendants an ally or a potential ally of al-Qaeda. are brought to trial, and a jury determines their guilt The expansive definition of enemies in the war or innocence. on terrorism points to a notable difference between In the case of the 1993 attack on the WTC, war and criminal justice. The beginning of a crim- four suspects were apprehended within a month of inal justice response to war is precise and limited the blast. They went on trial in a federal court on in requiring the specification of criminal code War Versus Justice in Response to Terrorist Attacks 59 violations and of particular individuals accused of theless, the rhetoric of war calls on the ideal case in these violations. Even conspiracy charges have to which the enemy is a state and its people. be substantiated by evidence of some material link When enemy combatants represent a national between the conspirator and a criminal act, planned or ethnic group, that whole group is seen as the or accomplished. In contrast, a declaration of war enemy or at least as having a tendency and po- designates a group enemy—typically a nation—and tential to serve the enemy. After the United States often more than one nation joins the list of enemies declared war on Japan, Japanese civilians could be as alliances come into play. The war on terrorism is rounded up without trial and put in detention larger than a war on al-Qaeda, and the expansion camps for years. Similar if lesser actions were taken of enemies is typical after a declaration of war. against Italian Americans after the United States In sum, those who were sought for the 1993 declared war on Italy in World War II. In England, WTC attack were individuals; those who were World War I made it expedient for the royal family sought for the 2001 WTC attack were an ill- to give up its identity as the House of Hanover defined group of Arabs and Muslims—al-Qaeda— to become the House of Windsor. and terrorist groups everywhere. There is a parallel in the war on terrorism. After identification of the 9/11 attackers as Muslim Arabs, a wave of hostility and even occasional Criminals Versus Combatants violence was visited on many in the United States who were identified (in some cases incorrectly— This difference in specificity leads immediately to Sikhs, for instance) as Arab or Muslim (Arab Amer- another difference: the labeling of the enemy. The ican Institute, 2002; Kaplan, 2006). This hostility targets of criminal justice are criminals, that is, contributed to the war on terrorism insofar as it lawbreakers, norm breakers, individuals who are helped support the roundup and imprisonment, not generally seen as typical of the group they come without charges, hearing, or habeas corpus, of from. The United States has criminal gangs, in- nearly a thousand Arab and Muslim noncitizens cluding those that are predominantly Italian, pre- living in the United States (Parker & Fellner, dominantly Colombian, predominantly Russian, 2004). In another way, however, this group-level and predominantly Chinese. It is true that some attribution of suspicion and responsibility was prejudicial association between such gangs and counterproductive: It hindered U.S. security forces their larger ethnic group is often made in public seeking information and assistance against terror- images and occasionally found even in political ists from Arab and Muslim citizens of the United discourse, but in general the association is weak. States. Americans do not generally feel hostility toward Thus the difference between criminal and or discriminate against Italians because there is a combatant is clear in this respect: Criminals are Cosa Nostra. atypical and soldiers are representative. Criminals In contrast, war is typically declared on a state act in their own interest; soldiers act for their na- that is seen to represent a people or a nation. The tion. It is an irony of the war on terrorism that war last war formally voted by the U.S. Congress was implies combatant status for the terrorists and re- against Germany and Japan. When it is not easy to sponsibility for terrorist acts to those the terrorists specify a nation-representing state, even violence claim to represent. Understood as criminals, ter- that looks like war does not get a formal declaration rorists represent only themselves, and those they of war. The U.S. military presence in Korea was claim to represent can be asked to help apprehend formally a ‘‘police action’’ under UN auspices, the them. Vietnam War was properly the ‘‘Vietnam Conflict’’ insofar as the U.S. Congress never declared war, and the U.S. intervention in Panama in 1989 was to Small Versus Large Enemy safeguard 35,000 American citizens there from a drug-trafficking tyrant, Gen. Manuel Noriega. The Along with the difference between criminal and war-making power of the U.S. president as com- combatant comes an implication about the size mander in chief no longer requires a formal of the enemy. In war, an enemy state usually declaration of war from the U.S. Congress. Never- represents millions of citizens and commands 60 The Psychology of Terrorism significant armed forces. Thus a declaration of war patriotism that is experienced as the exhilarating is a declaration against a very large enemy. The warmth of unity, common values, common pur- argument for war against terrorism is that even a pose, and common sacrifice (LeVine & Campbell, small number of terrorists can use modern tech- 1972, pp. 31–32). nology (fully fueled aircraft in the case of the 9/11 In contrast, the criminal justice system has to attacks) to inflict horrendous damage. Without compete with many other public interests and denying this argument, it is important to note that priorities. Even if the public perceives that crime is the war on terrorism can give an exaggerated im- a major and escalating problem, criminal justice pression of the size of the terrorist enemy. does not automatically take first place in the allo- Even if we think of al-Qaeda as more a fran- cation of public resources. Political leaders often chise than a state or corporation, it probably does compete on the basis of what they promise to do not amount to more than 5,000 people worldwide. about crime and criminals and what resources Perhaps 18,000 went through the al-Qaeda train- the criminal justice system should have. However, ing camps in Afghanistan before these were de- they seldom claim, at least in the United States, stroyed, and perhaps one-quarter of these are that crime is the only problem. It is almost always still alive, connected, and committed to violence linked to problems of education, jobs, housing, (Robb, 2004). A network of 5,000 would be large and welfare policy, and these issues compete with for a criminal conspiracy (such as the Cosa Nostra the criminal justice system for resources in re- in the United States perhaps), but tiny by the sponding to crime. standards of wartime enemies. Declaring war on It is difficult in a democracy to maintain a state terrorism conduces to seeing terrorism as larger of war indefinitely. Other priorities begin to re- than it actually is. This bias plays well for the assert themselves; the mobilizing advantage of war terrorists, raising their self-esteem and their status sooner or later begins to fade. This has been the among those who sympathize with the cause they fate, in the United States, of the ‘‘war on poverty’’ claim to advance. and the ‘‘war on drugs.’’ Thus the war on terrorism is ill adapted to a long-term strategy against ter- rorism. Unfortunately, there is every reason to Competing Priorities Versus Survival believe that terrorism is a long-term problem. It is not a group or a cause but a strategy, one that has A declaration of war is a declaration of mortal threat, been around for millennia (e.g., the Jewish sicarii an announcement of the utmost danger that calls for of the first century AD). No one is predicting how the utmost sacrifice. A criminal justice procedure is long the war on terrorism will take, only that it business as usual. Violent criminals are indeed a will last as long as it takes. threat to society but not one that calls for national mobilization. One implication of declaring war on terrorism is that the threat to the United States is Police Work Versus Combat: Expertise a danger to national interest that can go as far as endangering the survival of the nation. War on terrorism asserts a military response to This difference is important because engaging terrorism. This has implications with regard to the a mortal threat brings a massive shift in priorities. expertise deployed. Military forces are trained A declaration of war implies that, until it is won, to fight an enemy military: Find them, fix them, the war has top priority. All other values and destroy them. From the evidence of Napoleon’s priorities are put on the back burner until the war campaigns, von Clausewitz developed his famous is over. The public agenda is fighting the war, and treatise, On War: ‘‘To sum up: of all the possible any cost is acceptable in the context of asking aims in war, the destruction of the enemy’s armed young people to pay the ultimate price. The war forces always appears as the highest’’ (von Clause- gets first and unlimited call on resources of money, witz, 1989, p. 99). This perspective encouraged a time, and talent; political preferences are formed clear distinction between combatants, men in uni- around policies and personalities in terms of their form, and noncombatant civilians—a distinction perceived value for prosecuting the war. The pre- that has been eroding since the French Revolution dictable result of external threat is an increase in (McCauley, 2005). War Versus Justice in Response to Terrorist Attacks 61
Here the focus is on military expertise. Modern the criminal justice framing of response to terror- armed forces are composed of highly specialized ism points to untapped potential in understanding components with a ratio of tail to tooth that is terrorism with data and theory from criminology perhaps ten to one, that is, ten people in logistics (LaFree & Dugan, 2004). and coordination for each one at risk in combat. Land, sea, and air forces depend on complex in- formation systems to focus intricate and powerful Police Work Versus Combat: Values weapon systems against the enemy. These systems are essential in fighting another modern army but Procedurally, the criminal justice system has to deal relatively ill suited for fighting terrorists who explicitly with the values of privacy and civil rights. emerge from and disappear back into civilian pop- Police and district attorneys can always imagine ulations. The difficulties of even the best-trained how their work would be forwarded and public army in fighting terrorism and insurgency are evi- safety improved by changes in procedure or law dent in the U.S. experience in Afghanistan and Iraq. that would give them greater access to citizens’ fi- In both places, overwhelming military power has nancial, health, telephone, and travel records or not yet been able to find and destroy the enemy. greater leeway in interrogation and use of the re- Fighting terrorism effectively is more like police sults of interrogations. Defense attorneys can al- work than military combat. Effective police work ways imagine how clients’ rights can be enlarged or requires understanding a local culture, knowing the protected against the procedures sought by police details of social and physical geography in a local and district attorneys. Judges are required to ima- area, developing local relationships, and cultivating gine both sides. Perhaps the most important aspect local sources of information. This kind of expertise of the criminal justice system is that it brings people is very different from integrated arms and large- from the same training—law school—to an in- scale logistics. It is no disgrace to a modern army stitutionalized competition of public interest in to recognize that it is ill prepared for police work security with private interest in individual rights. or the kind of economic and community develop- Indeed, many lawyers have the opportunity to ment work that can support effective police work. work both sides of this competition during their At a minimum, effective police work requires professional careers—as prosecuting attorney at speaking the local language, but learning foreign one time and as defense attorney at another time. languages is not typically a high priority in military In contrast, the military has no professional training. experience of balancing competing values. The Beyond the local level, the story is similar. Inter- military hierarchy is consistent and unidimensional. national cooperation is crucial for fighting interna- Winning is the only value. MacArthur’s Message tional terrorists. Putting together patterns of indi- From the Far East, memorized by every West Point vidual behavior and networks of contacts requires cadet, is paradigmatic: ‘‘From the Far East I send sharing intelligence across borders—something at you one single thought, one sole idea—written in least as difficult as sharing between the FBI and the red on every beachhead from Australia to Tokyo— CIA within the United States. International police There is no substitute for victory!’’ In the U.S. mili- cooperation is a better model of this kind of sharing tary, it is a kind of cross-cultural experience to work than international military cooperation; police and with another branch of the armed services: army security services are more likely than the military to officers working with air force or navy officers, for have useful information about individual terrorists instance. There is no parallel to the competition of and terrorist groups. perspectives that exists for attorneys; there is no It is worth noting briefly that, along with the career path for officers to serve first in fighting U.S. difference in expertise of those fighting crime and enemies and then to serve the enemy fighting the those fighting war, there is also a difference in United States. the expertise of those studying crime and those The criminal case against the perpetrators of the studying war. Researchers who focus on crime are 1993 WTC bombing brought prosecuting and de- generally based in sociology and criminology, fense attorneys to a contest in which both sides whereas researchers who study war are more often came from the same professional preparation, and from political science and psychology. In particular, the contest included a negotiation of individual 62 The Psychology of Terrorism rights versus the public’s right to security. The war and increased action for the cause the terrorists against terrorism has no such balancing act; the claim to represent. A terrorist group is only the apex officers who plan and command and the soldiers of a pyramid in which the base is all who agree with who follow are little practiced in representing the the terrorist aims even if they do not agree with the perspective or rights of the enemy. This, in brief, attacks on civilians that are the hallmark of ter- is the story of the violations of human rights of rorism (McCauley, 2002). For the Irish Republican prisoners at Abu Ghraib and likely of prisoners at Army, for instance, the base of the pyramid has Guantanamo as well. Police are required to practice been all those who agree with ‘‘Brits out.’’ As- every day the rights of suspects; soldiers are not cending in the pyramid, numbers decrease but similarly practiced in the rights of prisoners. commitment, risk taking, and support for killing Nor are soldiers drilled in the rights of non- civilians increase. combatants. The distancing phrase for civilian ca- The terrorists cannot survive without the cover, sualties of military campaigns is ‘‘collateral damage.’’ information, money, and new recruits that come The U.S. military in Afghanistan was, by modern from the pyramid. Anything that cuts off the standards, unusually successful in avoiding civilian terrorists from the pyramid is a mortal threat; casualties. Yet approximately 3,000 civilians were anything that increases mobilization of the base of killed in the U.S. campaign that defeated and dis- the pyramid behind terrorist leadership is a suc- persed the Taliban and its al-Qaeda allies in Af- cess. Here is where the strategy of jujitsu politics ghanistan (Herald, 2002). It is not only fire power enters the contest between terrorists and the state. that kills civilians. Increased mortality associated The best scholars (Crenshaw, 2002) and the most with the U.S.-led embargo of Iraq between 1990 thoughtful terrorists (Marighella, 1970) recognize and 1998 is estimated to have included at least that a crucial terrorist goal is to provoke a state 100,000 deaths among Iraqi children under 5 years response that will mobilize the uncommitted of age (Garfield, 1999). Modern war would be im- among those who sympathize with the terrorists’ possible if killing noncombatants were strictly goals. As jujitsu is the art of using the opponent’s proscribed and prosecuted. strength against him, so jujitsu politics is the art In short, war brings a unidimensional scale of of provoking the enemy to a response that will value in which nothing can compete with the value mobilize support against them. of winning, whereas criminal justice brings an For terrorists, the promise of a military re- institutionalized and well-practiced competition sponse is that military values do not give much of values. In time of war, talk about money cost attention to collateral damage. In Bombing to Win, or opportunity cost or human-rights cost is un- Robert Pape (1996) reviews twentieth-century patriotic; in the criminal justice system, these costs military thinking about using aerial bombing to can be counted in the balance of competing values destroy the morale of enemy civilians. Sometimes and priorities. this thinking goes as far as explicitly aiming for the mass killing of civilians; sometimes it goes only so far as recognizing the impossibility of avoiding Judicial Error Versus killing them. Such thinking has not disappeared, as Collateral Damage mentioned earlier in relation to the civilian casual- ties in Afghanistan. Such casualties continue as Terrorism is the warfare of the weak, the strategy of the U.S. occupation of Afghanistan continues. Si- those who cannot win by conventional means and milarly, the U.S. occupation of and war on terror- who see their cause as sinking toward extinction ism in Iraq cannot avoid civilian casualties. The (McCauley, 2002). Terrorists have many goals: increase in hostility toward the United States in polls publicity for their cause, a recovered sense of power in Islamic countries provides the foundation for and agency against the power that is crushing them, increased support and more recruits for al-Qaeda. and revenge and justice against those who have In contrast, the criminal justice response to done terrible things to their friends and their cause. the 1993 bombing brought five of six indicted Less commonly recognized is the terrorist goal that perpetrators to trial but provided no warrant for is essential for the survival of a terrorist group: punishing their friends and neighbors. The crim- mobilization of sympathizers to increased support inal justice system also makes mistakes, but these War Versus Justice in Response to Terrorist Attacks 63 are more likely to lead to imprisoning the wrong strengths and weaknesses of these two frames for people than to killing the wrong people. A crimi- the U.S. response to a continuing terrorist threat. nal justice response to terrorism offers terrorists War has a clear beginning and a clear and not- a much smaller opening for jujitsu politics. too-distant end; criminal justice is a never-ending effort to control and ameliorate a problem that will not go away. War targets a unified enemy group— Justice Versus War: In the End a people or a nation; criminal justice targets in- dividual perpetrators of criminal acts. War recog- As war has an official and explicit beginning, so it nizes the enemy as large and dangerous; criminal should have an official and explicit end. There justice makes the enemy small and tawdry. War is unconditional surrender (World War II) or ne- puts every other public interest and value on the gotiated surrender (World War I) or at least a truce back burner; criminal justice has to compete for agreement to mark the end of war. Even wars that resources year after year in the national scale of are described as police actions or humanitarian in- priorities. War puts the military in charge of re- terventions have an end. The Korean War stalemate sponse; criminal justice puts lawyers and police in ended in a truce, and the Vietnam War ended with a charge. peace treaty, the withdrawal of U.S. troops, and the The differences between legal and military sub- fig leaf of an international control commission to cultures bring other important differences. Military ensure the peace. It is worth noting that the Vietnam professionals are focused on winning as the single War was the longest the United States has fought, scale of value; police, prosecutors, defense attor- enduring from 1964 to 1973. neys, and judges are experienced in balancing the In contrast, the criminal justice system faces a public’s right to security against individual and problem without end. No one expects that crime civil rights. Military mistakes often get people kil- will be exhausted or beaten or that it will surrender. led, including enemy civilians; criminal justice No one expects that crime will sign a peace treaty or mistakes put the wrong people behind bars but even a truce. There has never been a society with- seldom put innocents into coffins. Military mis- out rules or one without sanctions for violation of takes mobilize terrorist sympathizers behind ter- those rules. What it lacks in mobilizing power the rorist leadership; criminal justice mistakes are criminal justice system makes up in staying po- smaller and can be redressed with retrial and wer. Police, prosecuting attorneys, defense attor- compensation. The collateral damages from mili- neys, judges, and prisons together constitute a tary strikes and military occupation of foreign criminal justice system that is expected to go on lands are a rich contribution to jujitsu politics; indefinitely into the future, along with the criminal criminal justice operations and mistakes offer less acts that they respond to. opportunity for advancing the terrorist cause. The criminal justice response to the 1993 at- Despite its limitations, war offers unique ad- tack on the WTC continues today. One of the vantages over criminal justice as a response to ter- suspects, Abdul Rahman Yasin, was interviewed rorism. War produces the warmth and direction of shortly after the bombing, provided useful infor- national unity behind national leaders. War brings mation, was released, took flight to Iraq, and has resources against terrorism that are difficult to not been seen since. He is still a wanted man, as justify or funnel through the criminal justice sys- the criminal justice response to the 1993 attack tem. War brings at least the perception that ev- grinds on. The war on terrorism that began after erything possible is being done to prevent future 9/11 also continues. It remains to be seen how terrorist attacks. In general, war has the status of a long this war can be maintained before competing heroic response to a mortal threat; criminal justice interests and values undermine its vigor. is government business as usual. War can reach directly and quickly to foreign bases and foreign support for terrorism that cannot be reached—or Conclusion only slowly reached—with the forces of criminal justice. It is time to summarize the implications of war and Unfortunately, no one today predicts that the justice with a view toward evaluating the relative war on terrorism will end anytime soon. The 64 The Psychology of Terrorism command and control capacity of al-Qaeda has Motassadeq was sentenced to seven years in prison been degraded as the leadership has been killed, as a member of a terrorist organization. And in captured, or driven into deep hiding places. The Spain, twenty-four Muslim men suspected of being current and continuing dangers of terrorist attack members of Al Qaeda went on trial in April 2005, are more a matter of local franchise operations in a three of them accused of providing support for the corporation that has lost its headquarters. Under 9/11 attacks. Prison terms were handed down in these conditions, some of the advantages of the September 2005, though charges related to 9/11 war on terrorism have begun to fade. The attention were not sustained. Zacarias Moussaoui, the only and priority given to the war on terrorism cannot person facing trial in the United States in connec- last indefinitely, military occupations in foreign tion with the 9/11 attacks, pleaded guilty to parti- lands cannot be maintained indefinitely, blank cipating in an al-Qaeda conspiracy. The penalty checks of support to foreign governments for at- phase of his trial is going on as this chapter goes to tacks on their own ‘‘terrorists’’ cannot be honored press in March 2006. indefinitely, and the government’s reach into the It appears, then, that the criminal justice sys- lives of U.S. citizens cannot deepen indefinitely. In tems of Western countries are capable of engaging sum, war is not an effective response to a chronic al-Qaeda’s terrorists. Criminal justice may be slower problem. than the war on terrorism, but it may be surer in This is a lesson that the United States has had reaching terrorist perpetrators. multiple opportunities to learn. Previous efforts For many, however, the crucial argument to harness the rhetoric and unity of war against against a criminal justice response to terrorism is chronic problems have been notably unsuccessful. that criminal justice failed miserably on 9/11. Pre- The U.S. war on poverty never came to victory or mise: Bringing the 1993 perpetrators to trial, con- even truce, and the gap between rich and poor viction, and incarceration did not save the United may even be growing. The U.S. war on drugs went States from the attacks of 9/11. Conclusion: The so far in military stylistics as to appoint a com- war on terrorism is the stronger medicine re- mander in chief or czar, but drug trafficking and quired. The answer to this argument is straightfor- drug abuse are not vanquished and perhaps not ward. Criminal justice has not failed when crime is even weakened. not eliminated; it fails only when crimes are not Against a chronic threat of terrorist attack, the solved and criminals are not put away. No one ar- U.S. response might usefully give increased sal- gues that the war on terrorism has failed because ience to the criminal justice frame. Criminal justice terrorist alerts continue. To a modern democratic does not glorify the terrorists and their cause. Cri- state, terrorist threat is not a mortal peril, not like a minal justice does not stereotype an ethnic or re- severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic ligious group as the enemy and avoids losing the but more like a recurring flu. Criminal justice can cooperation of the communities the terrorists claim be the treatment of choice for a chronic terrorist to represent. Criminal justice does not undermine threat. the balance of public security and civil rights in the United States and thus preserves a civil society Acknowledgments. I thank Gary LaFree for his care- worth defending from terrorism (Hirshon, 2002). ful reading of this chapter and suggestions for im- Perhaps most important, criminal justice does not proving it. I am grateful also for research opportunities lead to the collateral damages and foreign occu- provided by Bryn Mawr College and the Solomon Asch pations that are the lifeblood of terrorist mobili- Center for Study of Ethnopolitical Conflict at the zation against the United States. University of Pennsylvania. Preparation of this chapter Some movement in this direction may be vi- was supported by the United States Department of sible. In Germany, Mounir el Motassadeq was con- Homeland Security through the National Consortium victed in 2003 of involvement in the 9/11 plot, but for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism his verdict was overturned when an appeals court (START), grant number N00140510629. However, the ruled that his trial was unfair because the United opinions expressed in this chapter are those of the States refused to produce testimony from terrorism author and do not necessarily reflect views of the U.S. suspects in U.S. custody. In August 2005, el Department of Homeland Security. War Versus Justice in Response to Terrorist Attacks 65
References LeVine, R. A., & Campbell, D. T. (1972). Ethnocen- trism: Theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes, and group Arab American Institute. (2002). Healing the nation: The behavior. New York: Wiley. Arab American experience after September 11: A Marighella, C. (1970). Minimanual of the urban first anniversary report by the Arab American guerrilla. In C. Marighella, For the liberation of Institute. Retrieved September 15, 2004, from http:// Brazil (pp. 61–97; J. Butt & R. Sheed, Trans.). www.aaiusa.org/PDF/healing_the_nation.pdf Havana: Tricontinental. Bush, G. W. (2001). Address to a joint session of McCauley, C. (2002). Psychological issues in under- the American Congress and the American peo- standing terrorism and the response to terrorism. ple. Retrieved September 15, 2004, from http:// In C. Stout (Ed.), The psychology of terrorism: Vol. www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/09/ 3. Theoretical understandings and perspectives (pp. 20010920–8.html 3–30). Westport, CT: Praeger. ———. (2005). President thanks U.S. troops at ———. (2005). Terrorism and the state: The logic Wiesbaden Army Airfield Base. Retrieved April 2, of killing civilians. In James J. F. Forest (Ed.), 2005, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/ The making of a terrorist: Recruitment, training releases/2005/02/20050223–8.html and root causes, Volume three root causes (pp. Crenshaw, M. (2002). The causes of terrorism. In C. 238–253). Westport, CN: Praeger Security Besteman (Ed.), Violence: A reader (pp. 99–118). International. New York: New York University Press. Pape, R. A. (1996). Bombing to win: Air power and Garfield, R. (1999, July). Morbidity and mortality among coercion in war. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Iraqi children from 1990 through 1998: Assessing Press. the impact of the Gulf War and economic sanctions. Parker, A., & Fellner, J. (2004). Above the law: Retrieved September 15, 2004, from http://www Executive power after 9/11 in the United States. .casi.org.uk/info/garfield/dr-garfield.html Retrieved September 15, 2004, from the Human Herald, M. W. (2002). A dossier on civilian victims of Rights Watch website: http://hrw.org/wr2k4/ United States’ aerial bombing of Afghanistan: A 8.htm comprehensive accounting [revised]. Retrieved Robb, J. (2004, May). Journal: An estimate of al- September 15, 2004, from http://www.cursor.org/ Qaeda’s current strength. Retrieved September 15, stories/civilian_deaths.htm 2004, from http://globalguerrillas.typepad.com/ Hirshon, R. E. (2002, February 15). Military tribunals globalguerrillas/2004/05/journal_an_esti.html Wall Street Journal letter to the editor. Retrieved Roth, K. (2004, January–February). The law of war in April 20, 2005, from http://www.abanet.org/ the war on terror. Foreign Affairs, 83, 2–7. leadership/wallstreet_letter.htm Shafir, E., and Le Boeuf, R. A. (2002). Rationality. Kaplan, J. (2006). Islamophobia in America?: Septem- Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 491–517. ber 11 and Islamophobic hate crime. Terrorism and Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981, January). The Political Violence, 18, 1–33. framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Kirk, M. (2002, October 3). The man who knew. Science, 211(30), 453–458. Transcript of Public Broadcasting System Frontline von Clausewitz, C. (1989). On war (M. Howard & program #2103. Retrieved September 15, 2004, P. Paret, Eds. and Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton from http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/ University Press. shows/knew/etc/script.html White House Press Office. (2003, May 16). President LaFree, G., & Dugan, L. (2004). How does studying Bush vows to bring terrorists to justice: Remarks terrorism compare to studying crime? In M. by the president upon departure for Camp David, Deflem (Ed.), Terrorism and counter-terrorism: the South Lawn. Retrieved September 15, 2004, Criminological perspectives (pp. 53–75). Oxford, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/ UK: Elsevier Science. 2003/05/20030516–15.html This page intentionally left blank II Terrorism This page intentionally left blank 5
The Staircase to Terrorism A Psychological Exploration Fathali M. Moghaddam
Despite notorious disagreements about the defini- specific psychological experiences—terror and help- tion of terrorism (Cooper, 2001) and claims that lessness (Moghaddam & Marsella, 2004); second, ‘‘one person’s terrorist is another person’s freedom terrorism often has harmful psychological conse- fighter,’’ there is general agreement that terrorism quences (Danieli, Engdahl, & Schlenger, 2004; has become a monstrous problem in many parts of Wessells, 2004); and third, subjectively inter- the world and that every effort must be made to end preted values and beliefs often serve as the most it. For the purposes of this discussion, terrorism important basis for terrorist action (Bernholz, is defined as politically motivated violence that is 2004). Psychologists are contributing in important perpetrated by individuals, groups, or state-sponsored ways to a better understanding of terrorism, as well agents and intended to bring about feelings of terror as more effective coping with its individual and and helplessness in a population in order to influence communal health consequences (Crenshaw, 2000; decision making and to change behavior. Terrorism is Danieli, Brom, & Waizer, in press; Galea, Ahern, depicted in this discussion as a problem, especially Resnick, Kilpatrick, Bucuvalas, et al., 2002; Hor- because many major international terrorist groups gan & Taylor, 2003; Moghaddam & Marsella, work to weaken rather than to strengthen democ- 2004; North, Nixon, Shariat, Mallonee, McMillen, racy and because terrorism distracts people and et al., 1999; North, Tivis, McMillen, Pfefferbaum, resources from paths blazed by growing grassroots Spitznagel, et al., 2002; North & Pfefferbaum, pro-peace, pro-democracy movements in different 2002; Pyszczynski, Solomon, & Greenberg, 2003; parts of the world. Contemporary terrorism is par- Robbins, 2002; Schlenger, Caddell, Ebert, Jordan, ticularly dangerous because terrorists might gain Rourke, et al., 2002; Schuster, Stein, Jaycox, Col- access to weapons of mass destruction (Gurr & lins, Marshall, et al., 2001; Silke, 2003; Silver, Cole, 2002). Terrorism is often strongly influenced Holman, McIntosh, Poulin, Gil-Rivas, 2002; Ste- by ideology, but it can also be carried out for ma- phenson, 2001; Stout, 2002). However, there is an terial gain (to benefit one’s family, for example). urgent need for greater attention to the social and Psychologists have a vitally important respon- psychological processes that lead to terrorist acts. sibility in combating terrorism because, first, the A better understanding of terrorism is essential actions of terrorists are intended to bring about for the development of more effective policies to
69 70 Terrorism combat this global problem. Critical assessments Two points need to be clarified at the outset of the available evidence suggest that there is little about the staircase metaphor. First, the metaphor validity in explanations of terrorism that assume is intended to provide a general framework within a high level of psychopathology among terrorists which to organize current psychological knowl- (Ruby, 2002) or that terrorists come from eco- edge and to help direct future research and policy; nomically deprived backgrounds or have little it is not intended as a formal model to be tested education (Atran, 2003). Clearly, explanations in- against alternatives. Metaphors have proven highly tended to reduce the causes of terrorism to dis- useful in psychological science (e.g., in concep- positional, intrapersonal factors are too simplistic, tualizing intelligence; see Sternberg, 1990) and can despite the serious efforts made to profile terrorists play a constructive role in better understanding the (e.g., Fields, Elbedour, & Hein, 2002), as are roots of terrorism. Second, the staircase metaphor explanations that are founded only on the mate- is intended to apply only to behavior encompassed rial conditions in which terrorism takes place, des- by terrorism as defined earlier in this discussion; it pite attempts to identify demographic and socio is not intended to apply to other types of minority economic factors associated with terrorism (e.g., influence tactics. Ehrlich & Liu, 2002). The present discussion is intended as a modest contribution toward a Ground Floor: Psychological Interpretation more dynamic, comprehensive account of the so- of Material Conditions cial and psychological processes leading to terror- ism. A central proposition is that terrorism can best A puzzle arises when the economic and educa- be understood through a focus on the psychological tional backgrounds of terrorists are considered: interpretation of material conditions and the op- Poverty and lack of education become problematic tions seen to be available to overcome perceived as explanations for terrorist acts. In the West Bank injustices, particularly injustices in the procedures and Gaza, support for armed attacks against Israeli through which decisions are made (Tyler & Huo, targets tends to be greater among Palestinians with 2002). more years of education (Krueger & Maleckova, 2002). A British army document discussing the Provisional Irish Republican Army (PIRA) in 1978, The Stairway to the Terrorist Act at a time when armed attacks by the PIRA had reached a peak, stated that ‘‘there is a stratum of Toward a more in-depth understanding of terror- intelligent, astute and experienced terrorists who ism, it is useful to envisage a narrowing stairway provide the backbone of the organization. ...Our leading to a terrorist act at the top of a building. The evidence of the calibre of rank and file terrorists stairway leads to higher and higher floors, and does not support the view that they are mindless whether people remain on a particular floor de- hooligans drawn from the unemployed and un- pends on the doors and spaces that they imagine employable’’ (in Coogan, 2002, p. 468). Similarly, open to them on that floor. The fundamentally poverty and lack of education were not found to be important feature of the situation is not only the characteristic of captured terrorists associated with actual number of floors, stairs, rooms, and so on but al-Qaeda in Southeast Asia (Singapore Ministry of more importantly, in some contexts, how people Home Affairs, 2003) or of Osama bin Laden or the perceive the building and the doors they think are al-Qaeda members who perpetrated the tragedy of open to them. As people climb the stairway, they 9/11 (Bodansky, 2001). Clearly, absolute material see fewer and fewer choices, until the only possible conditions do not account for terrorism; otherwise, outcome is the destruction of others, or oneself, or acts of terrorism would be committed more by the both. This kind of ‘‘decision tree’’ conceptualization poorest people living in the poorest regions, and of behavior has proved to be a powerful tool in this is not the case. psychology. For example, Latane´ and Darley Psychological research points to the funda- (1970) conceptualized helping behavior as the mental importance of perceived deprivation. The outcome of five choice points that lead an in- seminal research of Stouffer and others on military dividual to either help or not help others in an personnel during World War II demonstrated that emergency. there is not necessarily an isomorphic relationship The Staircase to Terrorism 71 between material conditions and subjective ex- Revolution (Arjomand, 1988) and other collective perience: Members of the U.S. Army Air Corps uprisings in modern times, it is perceived and re- expressed less satisfaction with military life com- lative injustices rather than absolute deprivation pared to some other units, despite the higher rate that coincide with collective nonnormative action of promotions in that branch of the military (Miller, 2000). Perceptions of injustice may arise (Stouffer, Suchman, De Vinney, Star, & Williams, for a variety of reasons, including economic and 1949). Similarly puzzling was the fact that African political conditions and threats to personal or col- American soldiers stationed in the North often lective identity (Tajfel & Turner, 1986; Taylor, expressed less satisfaction than those stationed 2003). Perceived threat to identity is of central in the South. The concept of relative deprivation importance in the case of religious fundamenta- was introduced to explained such trends: The lists because of the unique ability of religion to higher rate of promotions in the air corps raised serve identity needs (Seul, 1999) and the feeling expectations and created more dissatisfaction for that increasing globalization, secularization, and those who were not promoted, and African Amer- Westernization are undermining traditional non- icans in the North had higher expectations about Western ways of life. Identity threat is also of deep equal treatment. Half a century of psychological concern to broader segments of non-Western po- research underlines the importance of subjective pulations, particularly the youth, who often grap- perceptions of feelings of deprivation (Collins, ple with the ‘‘good copy problem’’ (Moghaddam & 1996). Solliday, 1991), the feeling that the very best they Particularly relevant to terrorism is Runciman’s can achieve is to become a ‘‘good copy’’ of the (1966) distinction between egoistical deprivation, Western model of women and men propagated by in which individuals feel deprived because of their the international media—a ‘‘good copy’’ that can position within a group, and fraternal deprivation, never become as good as the original. which involves feelings of deprivation that arise Minority groups have different resources avail- because of the position of an individual’s group in able for meeting the challenge of the good copy comparison with other groups. Research evidence problem (for example, the development of alter- suggests that fraternal deprivation is under certain native media and educational systems, political conditions a better predictor of feelings of dis- opposition groups, or cultural institutions that content among minorities than is egoistical depri- allow for the evolution of alternative identities). vation (Dion, 1986; Guimond & Dube´-Simard, However, in most Islamic societies of the Near and 1983), and in some cases such feelings translate Middle East, local dictators have shut down all of to collective action (Martin, Brickman, & Murray, these possibilities, and the only remaining avenue 1984). Gurr’s (1970) theoretical formulation and for the development of alternative identities is the subsequent research (e.g., Crosby, 1982) suggest mosque. It is only in the mosque that alternative that fraternal deprivation is more likely to arise political and cultural voices, as well as religious when group members feel their path to a desired ones, can find an outlet, and it is only in the goal—one that their group deserves and others mosque that the young can meet the challenge of possess—has been blocked. For example, in the the good copy problem. case of terrorism, especially important could be a Radical elements have also been attracted to the perceived right to independence and the retention mosque, using the monopoly of the mosque to gain of indigenous cultures for a society, a perception privileged access to the young. Not surprisingly, that other societies have achieved this goal, and the source of the greatest number of terrorist at- a feeling that, under present conditions, the path tacks against the West are the two countries where to this goal has been obstructed (by Americans, the mosque has a monopoly and where national for example). Of course, such perceptions may be identity is most directly positioned as Islamic: influenced by deep prejudices (Moghaddam, Saudi Arabia, the home of Islam’s holiest sites, and 1998, ch. 10). Pakistan, which gained independence from India in The literature on collective mobilization also 1947 on the basis of its ‘‘Islamic character.’’ Thus, underlines the importance of subjective percep- in these societies particularly, the only institution tions (Taylor & Moghaddam, 1994). From the available for voicing dissatisfaction and trying to French Revolution (Schama, 1989) to the Iranian overcome the good copy problem is the mosque. 72 Terrorism
At the ‘‘foundational’’ ground floor, then, what formulations such as Brockner & Wiesenfeld, 1996). matters most is perceptions of fairness. Someone However, the equity tradition also underlines the may be living in extremely poor, crowded condi- vital role of psychological interpretations of justice tions in Bombay and not feel unjustly treated de- and the need for policy makers to understand local spite the opulent living conditions of others in the cultural practices and ideas—‘‘the native’s point of city; however, another person may be living in view’’—in justice. When local cultural interpreta- relatively comfortable conditions in Riyadh but feel tions lead to a view that the in-group is being very unjustly treated. A number of those who feel treated fairly, there is greater likelihood of support unjustly treated become motivated to search fur- for central authorities. ther for options to address their grievances. The availability of avenues for participating in decision making is a key factor in perceived jus- First Floor: Perceived Options tice and support for authorities (Tyler, 1994). In- to Fight Unfair Treatment dependent of the outcomes of judicial processes (distributive justice) and the explanations that People climb to the first floor and try different authorities provide for their decisions and the doors in search of solutions to what they perceive as considerations they show to the recipients of de- unjust treatment. Two psychological factors shape cisions (interactional justice), the research of Tyler their behavior on the first floor in major ways: first, (Tyler, 2001; Tyler & Huo, 2002) demonstrates perceived possibilities for personal mobility to im- that the major factor in perceived legitimacy and prove their situation (Taylor & Moghaddam, 1994) willingness to abide by government regulations and, second, perceptions of procedural justice is how fair people perceive the decision-making (Tyler, 1994). process to be (procedural justice). Although much A first key question is, are there doors that of the research on procedural justice has been could be opened by talented persons motivated to conducted in Western societies, there is solid evi- make progress up the societal hierarchy? Plato (The dence in support of basic universals in perceived Republic, book three, 415b–d) warned of the in- rights and duties (Doise, 2002; Moghaddam & evitable collapse of a society that does not allow Riley, in press) and strong reasons to believe that for the rise of talented people to the top of the so- procedural justice also plays a central role in many cial hierarchy and correspondingly the downward and perhaps all major non-Western societies. mobility of those who lack talent but are the off- A primary influence on procedural justice is spring of those in power. This idea received ela- participation in decision making (Tyler & Huo, boration in elite theory (Pareto, 1935) and is 2002). Opportunities for voice and participation in central to modern psychological theories of inter- decision making are lacking in many parts of the group relations (Taylor & Moghaddam, 1994). world, as evidenced by UN ‘‘human development’’ Evidence suggests that the survival of even ap- reports (e.g., ‘‘The spread of democratization ap- parently rigid hierarchical systems, such as the cast pears to have stalled, with many countries failing system of India, is aided by some level of social to consolidate and deepen the first steps toward mobility, albeit informal (Scrinivas, 1968). A democracy and several slipping back into author- variety of research evidence suggests that when itarianism. Some 73 countries—with 42% of the paths to individual mobility are seen to be open, world’s people—still do not hold free and fair there is far less tendency to attempt nonnormative elections, and 106 governments still restrict civil actions (e.g., Tyler, 1990; Wright, Taylor, & Mo- and political freedoms’’; United Nations Develop- ghaddam, 1990). ment Programme, 2002, p. 13). It is clear that low This is probably because of a strong human income is no obstacle to democracy and that a tendency to want to believe that the world is just region with an enormous deficit in democracy is and that one’s personal efforts will be rewarded the Middle East and North Africa. The democratic fairly (Lerner, 1980). Research on equity theory movements that have influenced the lives of hun- endorses the view that people strive for justice and dreds of millions of people in Latin America and feel distressed when they experience injustice (see parts of Africa and Asia have yet to have a serious the classic work of Adams, 1965, and Walster, impact on Islamic societies of the Middle East Walster & Berscheid, 1978, as well as more recent and North Africa. There is general agreement that The Staircase to Terrorism 73 options for voice, mobility, and participatory de- Carlson, & Miller, 2000; Miller, Pederson, Ear- mocracy are particularly lacking in Saudi Arabia, lywine, & Pollock, 2003). According to Freud, the the country of origin for many of the most influ- role of displaced aggression must be understood ential terrorist networks currently active on the in the larger context of intergroup processes. world stage (Schwartz, 2002). Freud’s account of displaced aggression in This is not, of course, a justification for at- intergroup relations gives particular importance to tempting the wholesale transplantation of Western- three factors, the first of which is the role of lea- style democracy to non-Western societies, but there ders. In Freud’s group psychology, leaders play is a need to support contextualized democracy, asocio- an important role in redirecting negative emotions political order that allows participation in decision within the group onto others outside the group. making and social mobility through the utilization He argued that it is always possible to ‘‘bind to- of local, culturally appropriate symbols and strate- gether a considerable number of people in love as gies. Contextualized democracy needs to proceed long as there are other people left over to receive with attention to the details of the cultural context the manifestations of their aggressiveness’’ (1930, in non-Western societies (see Moghaddam, 2002, p. 114). Second, Freud gives importance to the particularly Chapters 2 and 3), such as that of Shi’a targets of displacement. Such targets are not ran- Islam (Moghaddam, 2004). Contextualized democ- domly selected; rather, according to Freud, they racy should be given the highest priority in coun- are dissimilar outsiders. Third, Freud points to the tries such as Saudi Arabia, where a combination of in-group cohesion that results from out-group repression and corruption (see, for example, Abur- threat. By highlighting threats from dissimilar out- ish, 1995) leaves minimal options for any kind siders, leaders increase in-group cohesion and of public expression of dissatisfaction and partici- strengthen their own support base. pation in meaningful decision making. Psychologi- Related to Freud’s analysis, a strategy widely cal theories (Taylor & Moghaddam, 1994) suggest adopted by leaders for dealing with dissatisfactions that a range of possible interpretations will arise among populations in some part of the world is among people in this situation, including displace- anti-Americanism (e.g., see Atran, 2003, p. 1538). ment of aggression; those who vehemently blame For example, Rushdie (2002) has argued that anti- others (e.g., ‘‘America—the Great Satan’’) for their Americanism is serving to deflect criticism away perceived problems climb the stairs to the second from governments in the Middle East: floor. As always, anti-US radicalism feeds off the widespread anger over the plight of the Second Floor: Displacement of Aggression Palestinians. ...However ...anti-Americanism has become too useful a smokescreen for Mus- Terrorism involves acts of violence against civilians lim nations’ many defects—their corruption, and others who are only indirectly involved in the their incompetence, their oppression of their power struggle among the terrorists, governmental own citizens, their economic, scientific and authorities, and others. Attacks on civilians often cultural stagnation. involve displaced aggression. Of course, displaced aggression can be verbal and indirect. Most of the In such contexts, those who develop a readi- people who climb up to the second floor do not ness to physically displace aggression and actively undertake physical aggression; rather, they limit seek out opportunities to do so eventually climb themselves to verbal attacks. However, some of the stairs to the third floor in search of ways to take them go beyond verbal displacement of aggression, action. often through the influence of their leaders. Such displacement of aggression was discussed Third Floor: Moral Engagement extensively by Freud (1921, 1930) and has a un- iquely important role in his account of intergroup Terrorist organizations arise as a parallel or sha- relations (see Taylor & Moghaddam, 1994, ch. 2). dow world, with a parallel morality that justifies The explanatory power and contemporary re- ‘‘the struggle’’ to achieve the ‘‘ideal’’ society by levance of displaced aggression are underlined by any means possible. From the perspective of the ongoing research (Marcus-Newhall, Pederson, mainstream, terrorists are ‘‘morally disengaged,’’ 74 Terrorism particularly because of their willingness to commit Fourth Floor: Categorical Thinking and acts of violence against civilians. However, from the Perceived Legitimacy of the the perspective of the morality that exists within Terrorist Organization terrorist organizations, terrorists are ‘‘morally en- gaged,’’ and it is the government and its agents After a person has climbed to the fourth floor and who are ‘‘morally disengaged.’’ The terrorist orga- entered the secret world of the terrorist organiza- nization becomes effective by mobilizing sufficient tion, there is little or no opportunity to leave alive. resources (McCarthy & Zald, 1977) to persuade In most cases new recruits in the first category, who recruits to become disengaged from morality as will be relatively long-term members, become part defined by governmental authorities (and often by of small cells, typically of four or five persons each, the majority in society) and morally engaged in the with access to information only about the other way morality is constructed by the terrorist orga- members in their own cell. In the second category, nization (for a related discussion, see Bandura, the foot soldiers who are recruited to carry out 2004). In the context of the Islamic world, terrorist violent attacks and to become suicide bombers, the organizations have fed on interpretations of Islam entire operation of recruitment, training, and im- that laud what outsiders see as acts of terrorism plementation of the terrorist act may take no more but terrorists depict as martyrdom (Davis, 2003; than 24 hours. Within those 24 hours, the re- Gold, 2003; Rashid, 2002). While the struggle for cruited member is typically given a great deal of control over the ‘‘correct’’ interpretation of Islam is positive attention and treated as a kind of celebrity, for the most part public (Donnan, 2002), the ter- particularly by the recruiter (who stays by his side rorist organizations that have evolved according constantly) and by a charismatic cell leader. to an ideology of martyrdom are secretive. The cell structure of terrorist organizations Recruits are persuaded to become committed may have first been widely adopted among guerilla to the morality of the terrorist organization through forces fighting dictatorships in Latin America in a number of tactics, the most important of which the mid-twentieth century and is designed to limit are isolation, affiliation, secrecy, and fear. Studies infiltration and discovery by antiterrorist agents. By of terrorist organizations and their networks the late 1960s and early 1970s, the cell structure (e.g., Alexander & Swetman, 2002; Coogan, 2002; was being copied by most terrorist organizations, Kaplan & Marshall, 1996; Rapoport, 2002; Sage- including those operating in Western societies man, 2004) reveal that, even when terrorists con- (e.g., Coogan, 2002, p. 466). Often it is informal tinue to live their ‘‘normal’’ lives as members of friendship networks and a need to belong that binds communities, their goal is to develop their parallel people to such cells (Sageman, 2004). Immersion lives in complete isolation and secrecy. Recruits in secret small-group activities leads to changes are trained to keep their parallel lives a secret even in perceptions among recruits: a legitimization of from their wives, parents, closest friends, and all the terrorist organization and its goals, a belief others around them. The illegal nature of their that the ends justify the means, and a strengthening organization, perceived harsh governmental mea- of the categorical ‘‘us versus them’’ view of the sures against them, and perceived lack of open- world. ness in society all contribute to their continued Social categorization is a powerful psycholo- isolation and the sense of affiliation with other gical process (McGarty, 1999) that can lead to in-group members. In essence, terrorist organiza- in-group favoritism and out-group discrimination tions become effective by positioning themselves even when the basis of categorization is trivial in at two levels: at the macrolevel, as the only option a real-world context (Taylor & Moghaddam, 1994, toward reforming society (they point to alleged Chapter 4). A categorical ‘‘us versus them’’ view government repression and dictatorship as proof of the world is one of the hallmarks of terrorist of their assertion), and at the microlevel, as a organizations and the people attracted to them ‘‘home’’ or in-group for disaffected individuals (Pearlstein, 1991; Taylor, 1988). Western psy- (mostly young, single males), some of whom are chological literature has identified right-wing recruited to carry out the most dangerous missions authoritarians as having a categorical viewpoint through programs that often have a very fast (Altemeyer, 1988a, 1988b), but in the world turnaround. context, religious fundamentalism may be more The Staircase to Terrorism 75 directly related to an ‘‘us versus them’’ viewpoint kill enemy soldiers (Grossman, 1995) and raise the among both Easterners (Alexander, 2002) and question as to how terrorist organizations train Westerners (Booth & Dunne, 2002). Just as Isla- their members to carry out the act that kills in- mic fundamentalists have labeled the United States nocent civilians. The answer is found in two psy- the ‘‘Great Satan,’’ leading evangelist Christians in chological processes that are central to intergroup the United States have backed the view that ‘‘Islam dynamics (Brown & Gaertner, 2001). The first was founded by ...a demon-possessed pedophile’’ involves social categorization (of civilians as part of (Cooperman, 2002). This ‘‘us versus them’’ think- the out-group), and the second involves psycho- ing from the West has played into the hands of logical distance (through exaggerating differences fundamentalists abroad, particularly Saudi Wah- between the in-group and the out-group). habism (Gold, 2003) and the radical form of Shi’i First, the categorization of civilians as part of the Islam, as represented by Hizballah in Iran and out-group matches the pattern of secrecy practiced Lebanon, for example (Shapira, 2000). Of course, by terrorist organizations; recruits to terrorist orga- a categorical ‘‘us versus them’’ viewpoint is not nizations are trained to treat everyone, including ci- sufficient to lead to terrorism; another important vilians, outside their tightly knit group as the enemy element is a belief in the terrorist organization as (Sageman, 2004). Newspaper headlines such as a just means to an ideal end. ‘‘terrorist blast kills three innocent bystanders’’ have Commitment to the terrorist cause strengthens little meaning from the perspective of terrorist or- as the new recruit is socialized into the traditions, ganizations because of the particular way in which methods, and goals of the organization. More than they have categorized the world into ‘‘us’’ and ‘‘them’’ a century of research on social influence (Mo- and because of their perception that anyone who is ghaddam, 1998, Chapters 6 and 7) suggests that not actively resisting the government is a legitimate conformity and obedience are very high in the cells target of violence. Besides, by attacking civilian tar- of terrorist organizations, where the cell leader re- gets, social order might be disrupted, and the ter- presents a strong authority figure and noncon- rorist act could serve as a spark to get people to formity, disobedience, and disloyalty receive the ‘‘recognize the truth’’ and revolt against authorities harshest punishments. The recruits at this stage (this was even assumed by the Oklahoma City face two uncompromising forces: From within the bombers; see Linenthal, 2001). Thus, from the point organization, they are pressured to conform and to of view of terrorist organizations, acts of violence obey in ways that will lead to violent acts against against civilians are justified because civilians are part civilians (and often against themselves); from out- of the enemy, and only when civilians actively op- side the organization, especially in regions such as pose the targeted ‘‘evil forces’’ will they no longer the Middle East and North Africa, they face gov- be the enemy. The perception of civilians as part ernments that do not allow even minimal voice and of the enemy helps explain how terrorists sidestep democratic participation in addressing perceived what Lorenz (1966) termed ‘‘inhibitory mechan- injustices. These dictatorial governments are seen isms.’’ as puppets of world powers, particularly the United Lorenz (1966) has argued that inhibitory me- States—a perception endorsed by a variety of in- chanisms serve to limit intraspecies killing. For ternational critics (Scranton, 2002). example, when two wolves fight, it usually be- During their stay on the fourth floor, then, comes clear fairly soon that one of them is stron- individuals find their options have narrowed ger, with the result that the weaker wolf signals considerably. They are now part of a tightly con- defeat by moving back and showing signs of sub- trolled group that they cannot exit from alive. mission. The aggression of the winner is inhibited by the signals of submission; thus the winner does Fifth Floor: The Terrorist Act and not continue to attack and attempt to seriously Sidestepping Inhibitory Mechanisms injure or kill the loser. Inhibitory mechanisms also evolved to influence human behavior; crime Terrorism involves acts of violence against civi- statistics (Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2002) lians, often resulting in numerous deaths. The ex- show that most killings of humans by humans take periences of professional military units demonstrate place through the use of guns and other weapons the intensive programs required to train soldiers to that allow killing from a distance and enable the 76 Terrorism sidestepping of inhibitory mechanisms potentially the aim of achieving a situation in which the triggered through eye contact, pleading, crying, and general population rightly feels that it lives in a just other means (also see discussion of weapons and society. This long-term policy should go hand in homicide in Smith & Zahn, 1999). Lorenz (1966) hand with short-term strategies to deal with the argued that among humans, inhibitory mecha- small number of individuals who have already nisms have been bypassed through modern weap- climbed to the top of the stairway and are active in ons, which allow an attacker to destroy a target from terrorist organizations. However, there needs to be a long distance away. a shift away from an almost complete preoccu- The case of terrorist attacks suggests that in- pation with secretive counterterrorism units and hibitory mechanisms can also be effectively cir- measures, away from a total concern with hunting cumvent by psychological distance, perhaps similar for the ‘‘bad apples,’’ and away from a naive re- to the distancing that takes place between a rapist liance on improved technology and superior mili- and the victim, particularly through the rapist’s tary might as the way to defeat terrorism. Such adoption of cultural myths about rape (see Burt, a policy shift may appear risky, but in practice 1980, and readings in Searles & Berger, 1995). it provides the best long-term safeguard against Terrorists often operate in tight physical proximity terrorism. to their human targets, particularly in the case of suicide bombers, so they could potentially be in- 2. Procedural Justice Toward fluenced by the kinds of pleading and other signals Contextualized Democracy that typically trigger inhibitory mechanisms. However, two key factors serve to sidestep these Psychological research clearly highlights the im- mechanisms during terrorist attacks. First, by portant role that procedural justice can play in categorizing the target, albeit civilians, as ‘‘the bringing about contextualized democracy. Local enemy’’ and exaggerating differences between in- cultural practices and symbolic systems need to be group and out-group, terrorists psychologically incorporated and used to enable more legal op- distance themselves from the other humans they portunities for voice and mobility, as well as to intend to destroy. Second, the victims seldom be- influence perceptions of these opportunities. Such come aware of the impending danger before the policies must include women and other minorities attack actually occurs, so they do not have an in the decision-making process. It is particularly in opportunity to behave in ways that might trigger this regard that support is needed for democratic inhibitory mechanisms. processes even when they contradict local tradi- tions, such as a tradition of allowing only a very limited role for women in the public sphere (as is Some Policy Implications still the case in much of the Middle East and North Africa). In this regard, special attention must be In this final section I highlight four important given to the relationship between educational ave- policy implications arising from the stairway me- nues and opportunities for voice and mobility. taphor. 3. Educating Against Categorical 1. Prevention Must Come First ‘‘Us Versus Them’’ Thinking
The stairway metaphor has an overarching policy In order to help bring about greater voice and implication that is familiar to psychologists who mobility in societies such as those in the Middle are researching and practicing in mental health: East and North Africa, it is important to appro- Prevention is the long-term solution to terrorism. priately frame the fight against terrorism and par- This is in line with a model of mental health that is ticularly the way in which we categorize the social integral to a larger public health care system and world. As people climb up the stairway, their ca- that provides broad-based services. tegorization of the world into ‘‘us versus them,’’ Policies to combat terrorism should con- ‘‘the forces of good versus the forces of evil,’’ and centrate on changing conditions for people si- so on becomes more prominent and rigid. The tuated at the foundation level of the stairway, with challenge is to prevent such an inflexible style of The Staircase to Terrorism 77 categorization from becoming the norm at the by political needs rather than by scientific under- foundation level, where most of the people are standing. The focus of policies for the most part has situated. A starting point for implementing this been on people who have climbed all the way up policy is to avoid—and indeed to combat—a ca- the stairway and are already committed to carry- tegorization of the world into ‘‘us versus them’’ and ing out terrorist acts. Policies aimed at these in- ‘‘good versus evil.’’ Such categorization only en- dividuals do not address the foundational problem dorses the views of fundamentalists and increases at the bottom of the stairway, involving the vast the probability of more people climbing up the majority of people. Basic issues at the foundational stairway to commit terrorist acts. This requires a level need to be addressed by guiding principles, major policy shift in a number of countries. In the including how the majority perceive fairness, open- United States, despite assurances by some mem- ness, and voice opportunities in their societies and bers of the Bush administration that ‘‘there is no how they are influenced by leaders to see the source war against Islam,’’ the rhetoric of ‘‘you are either of their problems as external and to displace ag- with us or against us’’ has played into the hands gression onto out-group targets. As part of a policy of fundamentalists. shift, a categorization of the world into ‘‘us versus them’’ needs to be avoided. 4. Interobjectivity and Justice Acknowledgments. I am grateful to anonymous re- To strengthen a shared worldview on justice, viewers for comments made on an earlier draft of this rights, and duties, we must implement policies chapter. to influence interobjectivity, the understandings shared within and between cultures (Moghaddam, References 2003). These policies can build on a foundation of probable psychological universals in justice but Aburish, S. K. (1995). The rise, corruption, and coming must also take into consideration the perceptions fall of the House of Saud. New York: St. Martin’s among many non-Western people that their in- Press. digenous identities are threatened as a result of Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequality in social exchange. In increasing globalization and Western influence. L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social These types of policies with global implications psychology: Vol. 2 (pp. 267–299). New York: Aca- require working through—and being supportive demic Press. of—international organizations such as the United Alexander, Y. (2002). Palestinian religious terrorism: Nations. Hamas and Islamic Jihad. Ardsley, NY: Trans- national Publishers. ———, & Swetman, M. (2002). Usama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda: Profile of a terrorist network. Ardsley, Concluding Comment NY: Transnational Publishers. Altemeyer, B. (1988a). Enemies of freedom: Under- Ultimately, terrorism is a moral problem with standing right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: psychological underpinnings; the challenge is to Jossey-Bass. prevent disaffected youth and others from becom- ———, B. (1988b, March/April). The good soldier, ing engaged in the morality of terrorist organiza- marching in step: A psychological explanation of tions. A lesson from the history of terrorism in the state terror. Sciences, 30–38. Middle East and other parts of the world is that Arjomand, S. A. (1988). The turban for the crown: The this moral problem does not have a technological Islamic revolution in Iran. New York: Oxford solution and is therefore at odds with the con- University Press. Atran, S. (2003). Genesis of suicide terrorism. Science, temporary tendency to try to find technological 299, 1534–1539. solutions to moral dilemmas (Moghaddam, 1997). Bandura, A. (2004). The role of selective moral More sophisticated technology and increased force disengagement in terrorism and counterterrorism. will not end terrorism in the long term. Despite the In F. M. Moghaddam & A. J. Marsella (Eds.), often-repeated declaration that the ‘‘war on terror Understanding terrorism: Psychosocial roots, causes, will be a long one,’’ policies for ending terrorism and consequences (pp. 121–150). Washington, DC: have been more short-term strategies, often driven American Psychological Association. 78 Terrorism
Bernholz, P. (2004). Supreme values as the basis for Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2002). Uniform crime terror. European Journal of Political Economy, 20, reports for the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. 317–333. Government Printing Office. Bodansky, Y. (2001). Bin Laden: The man who declared Fields, R. M., Elbedour, S., & Hein, F. A. (2002). The war on America. New York: Random House. Palestinian suicide bomber. In C. E. Stout (Ed.), Booth, K., & Dunne, T. (Eds.). (2002). Worlds in The psychology of terrorism: Vol. 2 (pp. 193–223). collision: Terror and the future of global order. New Westport, CT: Praeger. York: Palgrave Macmillan. Freud, S. (1921). Group psychology and the analysis Brockner, J. M., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An of the ego. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.), The integrative framework for explaining reactions to standard edition of the complete psychological decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and works: Vol. 18 (pp. 69–143). London: procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 189–208. Hogarth. Brown, R., & Gaertner, S. L. (Eds.). (2001). Blackwell ———. (1930). Civilization and its discontents. handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition Oxford: Blackwell. of the complete psychological works: Vol. 21 Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for (pp. 59–145). London: Hogarth. rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, Galea, S., Ahern, J., Resnick, H., Kilpatrick, D., 217–230. Bucuvalas, M., Gold, J., et al. (2002). Psychological Collins, R. L. (1996). For better or worse: The impact sequelae of the September 11 terrorist attacks in of upward social comparison on self-evaluations. New York City. New England Journal of Medicine, Psychological Bulletin, 116, 457–475. 346, 982–987. Coogan, T. P. (2002). The IRA. New York: Palgrave. Gold, D. (2003). Hatred’s kingdom: How Saudi Arabia Cooper, H. H. A. (2001). The problem of definition supports the new global terrorism. Washington, DC: revisited. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, Regnery. 881–893. Grossman, D. (1995). On killing: The psychological cost of Cooperman, A. (2002, June 20). Anti-Muslim remarks learning to kill in war and society. New York: Little, stir tempest. Washington Post, A3. Brown. Crenshaw, M. (2000). The psychology of terrorism: An Guimond, S., Dube´-Simard, L. (1983). Relative agenda for the 21st century. Political Psychology, deprivation theory and the Quebec nationalist 21(2), 405–420. movement: The cognition-emotion distinction Crosby, F. (1982). Relative deprivation and working and the person-group deprivation issue. women. New York: Oxford University Press. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, Danieli, Y., Brom, D., & Waizer, J. (Eds.). (in press). 526–535. The trauma of terror: Sharing knowledge and sharing Gurr, N., & Cole, B. (2002). The new face of terrorism: care. New York: Haworth Press. Threats from weapons of mass destruction. New York: Danieli, Y., Engdahl, B., & Schlenger, W. E. (2004). I. B. Tauris. The psychosocial aftermath of terrorism. In F. M. Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton: Princeton Moghaddam & A. J. Marsella (Eds.), Understanding University Press. terrorism: Psychosocial roots, consequences, and Horgan, J., & Taylor, M. (2003). The psychology of interventions (pp. 223–246). Washington, DC: terrorism. New York: Frank Cass. American Psychological Association. Kaplan, D. E., & Marshall, A. (1996). The cult at the end Davis, J. (2003). Martyrs: Innocence, vengeance, and of the world: The terrifying story of the Aum doomsday despair in the Middle East. New York: Palgrove cult, from the subways of Tokyo to the nuclear arsenals Macmillan. of Russia. New York: Crown. Dion, K. L. (1986). Responses to perceived discrimina- Krueger, A., & Maleckova, J. (2002, July). Education, tion and relative deprivation. In J. M. Olson, C. P. poverty, political violence, and terrorism: Is there a Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation causal connection? NBER Working Paper no. and social comparison: The Ontario symposium: Vol. 4 W9074, National Bureau of Economic Research, (pp. 159–180). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Cambridge, MA. Retrieved January 7, 2006, from Doise, W. (2002). Human rights as social representations. http://papers.nber.org/papers/W9074 London: Routledge. Latane´, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive Donnan, H. (Ed.). (2002). Interpreting Islam. London: bystander: Why doesn’t he help? Englewood Cliffs, Sage. NJ: Prentice Hall. Ehrlich, P. R., & Liu, J. (2002). Some roots of terrorism. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A Population and Environment, 24, 183–191. fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum. The Staircase to Terrorism 79
Linenthal, E. T. (2001). The unfinished bombing: North, C. S., Nixon, S. J., Shariat, S., Mallonee, S., Oklahoma City in American memory. New York: McMillen, J. C., Spitznagel, et al. (1999). Psy- Oxford University Press. chiatric disorders among survivors of the Lorenz, K. (1966). On aggression (M. Wilson, Trans.). Oklahoma City bombing. Journal of the American New York: Harcourt, Brace, World. Medical Association, 282, 755–762. Marcus-Newhall, A., Pederson, W. C., Carlson, M., & North, C. S., & Pfefferbaum, B. (2002). Research on Miller, N. (2000). Displaced aggression is alive and the mental health effects of terrorism. Journal of the well: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality American Medical Association, 288, 633–636. and Social Psychology, 78, 670–689. North, C. S., Tivis, L., McMillen, J. C., Pfefferbaum, B., Martin, J., Brickman, P., & Murray, A. (1984). Moral Spitznagel, E. L., Cox, J., et al. (2002). Psychiatric outrage and pragmatism: Explanations for collec- disorders in rescue workers after the Oklahoma tive action. Journal of Experimental Social Psychol- City bombing. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, ogy, 20, 484–496. 857–859. McCarthy, T. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource Pareto, V. (1935) The mind and society: A treatise in mobilization and social movements: A partial general sociology. 4 vols. New York: Dover. theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212– Pearlstein, R. M. (1991). The mind of the political 1241. terrorist. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources. McGarty, C. (1999). Categorization in social psychology. Plato. (1987). The republic (D. Lee, Trans.). Harmonds- Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. worth, UK: Penguin. Miller, D. L. (2000). Introduction to collective behavior Pyszcznski, T., Solomon, S., & Greenberg, J. (2003). In and collective action (2nd ed). Prospect Heights, IL: the wake of 9/11: The psychology of terror. Wash- Waveland. ington, DC: American Psychological Association. Miller, N., Pederson, W. C., Earlywine, M., & Pollock, Rapoport, D. C. (Ed.). (2002). Inside terrorist organi- V. E. (2003). A theoretical model of triggered zations (2d ed.). London: Frank Cass. displaced aggression. Personality and Social Psy- Rashid, A. (2002). Jihad: The rise of militant Islam in chology Review, 7, 75–97. Central Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press. Moghaddam, F. M. (1997). The specialized society: The Robbins, S. (2002). The rush to counsel: Lessons of plight of the individual in an age of individualism. caution in the aftermath of disaster. Families in Westport, CT: Praeger. Society: Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 83, ———. (1998). Social psychology: Exploring universals 113–116. in social behavior. New York: Freeman. Ruby, C. L. (2002). Are terrorists mentally deranged? ———. (2002). The individual and society: A cultural Analysis of Social Issues and Public Policy, 2, 15–26. integration. New York: Worth. Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social ———. (2003). Interobjectivity and culture. Culture justice: A study of attitudes to social inequality in and Society, 9, 221–232. twentieth-century England. Berkeley: University of ———. (2004). Cultural continuities beneath the California Press. conflict between radical Islam and pro-Eastern Rushdie, S. (2002). Anti-Americanism has taken the forces: The case of Iran. In Y. T. Lee, C. McCauley, world by storm. Guardian. Retrieved January 7, F. M. Moghaddam, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The 2006, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/afghanistan/ psychology of ethnic and cultural conflict (pp. 115– comment/story/0,11447,645579,00.html 132). Westport, CT: Praeger. Sageman, M. (2004). Understanding terror networks. ———, & Marsella, A. J. (Eds.). (2004). Understanding Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. terrorism: Psychosocial roots, consequences, and Schama, S. (1989). Citizens: A chronicle of the French interventions (pp. 223–246). Washington, DC: revolution. New York: Vintage. American Psychological Association. Schlenger, W. E., Caddell, J. M., Ebert, L., Jordan, B. K., Moghaddam, F. M., & Riley, C. J. (in press). Toward a Rourke, K. M., Wilson, D., et al. (2002). cultural theory of rights and duties in human Psychological reactions to terrorist attacks: Find- development. In N. Finkel & F. M. Moghaddam ings from the national study of Americans’ (Eds.), The psychology of rights and duties: Empirical reactions to September 11. Journal of the American contributions and normative commentaries. Wash- Medical Association, 288, 581–588. ington, DC: American Psychological Association. Schuster, M. A., Stein, B. D., Jaycox, L. H., Collins, R. Moghaddam, F. M., & Solliday, E. A. (1991). ‘‘Balanced L., Marshall, G. N., Elliott, M., et al. (2001). New multiculturalism’’ and the challenge of peaceful England Journal of Medicine, 345, 1507–1512. coexistence in pluralistic societies. Psychology and Schwartz, S. (2002). The two faces of Islam: The house of Developing Societies, 3, 51–72. Saud from tradition to terror. New York: Doubleday. 80 Terrorism
Scranton, P. (Ed.). (2002). Beyond September 11: An Stout, C. E. (Ed.). (2002). The psychology of terrorism. 4 anthology of dissent. London: Pluto Press. vols. Westport, CT: Praeger. Scrinivas, M. N. (1968). Mobility in the caste system. In Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity M. Singer & B. S. Cohen (Eds.), Structure and theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & G. change in Indian society (pp. 189–200). Chicago: Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. Aldine. 2–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall. Searles, P., & Berger, R. J. (Eds.). (1995). Rape and Taylor, D. M. (2003). The quest for identity. Westport, society: Readings on the problem of sexual assault. CT: Praeger. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. ———, & Moghaddam, F. M. (1994). Theories of Seul, J. R. (1999). ‘‘Ours is the way of God’’: Religion, intergroup relations: International social psychological identity, and intergroup conflict. Journal of Peace perspectives. Westport, CT: Praeger. Research, 36, 553–569. Taylor, M. (1988). The terrorist. London: Brassey’s Shapira, S. (2000). Hizballah between Iran and Lebanon. Defence Publishers. Tel Aviv: Kakibbutz Hameuchad. Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Silke, A. (Ed.). (2003). Terrorism, victims, and society: Haven: Yale University Press. Psychological perspectives on terrorism and its con- ———. (1994). Governing amid diversity: The effect sequences. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. of fair decision-making procedures on the legiti- Silver, R. C., Holman, E. A., McIntosh, D. N., Poulin, macy of government. Law and Society Review, 28, M., & Gil-Rivas, V. (2002). Nationwide long- 809–831. itudinal study of psychological responses to ———. (2001). Trust and law abidingness: A September 11. Journal of the American Medical proactive model of social regulation. Boston Uni- Association, 288, 1235–1244. versity Law Review, 81, 361–406. Singapore Ministry of Home Affairs. (2003, January 9). ———, & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law. New White paper: The Jemaah Islamiyah arrests and York: Russell Sage Foundation. the threat of terrorism. Retrieved April 19, 2006, United Nations Development Programme. (2002). from http://www2.mha.gov.sg/mha/detailed.jsp? Human development report 2002: Deepening democ- artid¼667&type¼4&root¼0&parent¼0&cat¼ racy in a fragmented world. New York: Oxford 0&mode¼arc. University Press. Smith, M. D., & Zahn, M. A. (Eds.). (1999). Studying Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). and preventing homicide: Issues and challenges. Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Bacon. Stephenson, J. (2001). Medical, mental health com- Wessells, M. G. (2004). Terrorism and the mental munities mobilize to cope with terror’s psycholo- health and well-being of refugees and displaced gical aftermath. Journal of the American Medical people. In F. M. Moghaddam & A. J. Marsella Association, 286, 1823–1825. (Eds.), Understanding terrorism: Psychosocial roots, Sternberg, R. J. (1990). Metaphors of mind: Conceptions consequences, and interventions. Washington, DC: of the nature of intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge American Psychological Association. University Press. Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., De Vinney, L. C., Star, (1990). Responding to membership in a dis- S. A., & Williams, R. M. (1949). The American advantaged group: From acceptance to collective soldier: Adjustment during army life: Vol. 1. Prince- protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, ton: Princeton University Press. 58, 994–1003. 6
Terrorism and the Media Joel N. Shurkin
The media find themselves in a dysfunctional po- The attack was planned on exactly that sition relative to terrorism. On the one hand, they premise—that the media would cover the story must report terrorist attacks as they happen. On the with the immediacy it deserved. That’s probably other, they are part of the reason these incidents why the attack was in two parts. The first plane occur in the first place. For members of the media, hitting the first building got everyone’s attention. the situation raises interesting, difficult, and com- When the second plane struck, the cameras were plex professional and ethical problems. The fact is on, and billions of people watched it live in their that the media are crucial in determining the ge- homes. While later replays of the event were neral community’s reaction to terrorism. Fortu- edited somewhat, those watching live saw bodies nately, the media seem to understand that. fall from the towers, people who had jumped or When the World Trade Centers were attacked been pushed, tumbling in space against the beau- on September 11, 2001, the common refrain among tiful autumn sky. No one knew how many people journalists was that nothing like this had hap- were still in the building when they so gracefully pened before and that the usual journalistic pro- and awfully collapsed. The sight could not have cedures and rules were inadequate. Undoubtedly, been more horrible. That, of course, was exactly like most Americans, they were stunned. The story what the terrorists wanted, but the television had astounding scope. A quick visit to an almanac networks could not turn off the cameras, photo- would show that on any business day as many graphers could not avert their lenses, and reporters as 20,000 people could be in the two buildings at could not turn away. Whatever else anyone can say one time. The number of casualties was beyond of the attacks, they were brilliantly conceived with imagination or more than the heart could bear, the media in mind. as the mayor of New York said. It was the first This dichotomy made the attacks perhaps the attack on U.S. soil since Pearl Harbor, but this most difficult reporting assignments in modern time it was not on a Hawaiian island but in Man- journalistic history. That the media did as well as hattan, the media center of the country—if not they did is a tribute to them—and a lesson. the Western world—and it was seen live—on Most of the media believed that what hap- television. pened that day had no precedent. In fact, it did
81 82 Terrorism have. Although the nuclear accident at Three Mile ‘‘freedom fighter’’? Israelis view Palestinian bom- Island was not terrorism, many of the same issues bers as terrorists, while Palestinians point out that were raised then. And if journalists thought it Menachem Begin, a former prime minister of Israel would be a while before they were confronted with and something of a national hero, used a similar the same issue, they were mistaken. technique against the British to win Israel’s in- dependence. The difference is who won and who got to write the history.1 Handmaiden to Terrorism
Without the media, there would likely be no Three Mile Island and the Precedent modern terrorism. Palestinian terrorists know that of Reporting the Threat of Disaster the Israeli and the world press will cover every bombing, particularly of civilian targets. If it did From a journalistic point of view, there was pre- not, there would be no political point in blowing cedent for 9/11, a huge story that could have been up a bus. Historically, the terrorists do not fancy made worse by the media if they had acted irre- themselves murders but martyrs for a cause, al- sponsibly. The precedent was set 33 years earlier at though with the rise of the new religious fanaticism Three Mile Island, a nuclear power plant in Penn- that may well be changing (Council on Foreign sylvania. No terrorism was involved, merely human Relations, 2004). In a free society that almost incompetence, but the media were placed in the guarantees that publicity, the dominant image re- awesome position of having to report a complex quires publicity and the media. story with insufficient information and having to Studies agree that a symbiotic relationship ex- get it right. ists between the terrorists and the media. In its most I was science editor of the Philadelphia Inquirer cynical form, the image is of terrorists using the at the time and faced the problem head on. The media as a conduit for their message and the media confusion we confronted easily matches the con- using the terrorists for dramatic stories (Lockyer, fusion reporters faced on 9/11—confusion that 2003). Terrorism has been called political ‘‘theater,’’ had been deliberately created. And, if we got the and that’s how terrorists view it. A nineteenth- story wrong, there might be unwarranted panic century anarchist called it ‘‘propaganda by deed’’ or people would be placed in danger that could (Council on Foreign Relations, 2004). If terrorism have been avoided. can be defined as violence that is designed to deliver Three Mile Island sits on an actual island in the a message, the media are the messenger. Experts are middle of the Susquehanna River, south of Harris- divided on whether the publicity always helps the burg, Pennsylvania. It was operated by a medium- terrorists’ cause, with some pointing out that their sized utility, Metropolitan Edison, which in retro- message plays differently to different audiences. spect was probably too small for the responsibility As the Palestinians have discovered, in public opi- of running a nuclear power plant. On March 28, nion the method overshadows the message after a 1979, because of operator error, the plant began a while. partial meltdown. It goes without saying that virtually all editors The Associated Press relayed the first word of and reporters would rather not have these stories the incident after the company reported a minor to cover, and all of them understand they are being radioactive release from the plant. Throughout used. They are aware that the language they em- the morning, news from the company continued to ploy in these stories is crucial—politicizing lan- portray the event as minor, but after a few hours it guage was not an idea invented by George Orwell. was clear that something unusual was happening. Words have meanings beyond those found in the The media, including the Inquirer, were un- dictionary. Janny de Graaf (Schmid and de Graaf, prepared for the event. Like many science reporters, 1982) has argued that, when journalists interview I had avoided writing about nuclear energy be- subjects, they are more inclined to use the subject’s cause, after a subconscious cost-benefit analysis, wording, whether it comes from a terrorist cell I had concluded that the aggravation created by or a government. For instance, when is a ‘‘terrorist’’ proponents and opponents of nuclear energy— a ‘‘guerilla’’? Who is a ‘‘murderer’’ and who a on the phone and in the mail—outweighed the Terrorism and the Media 83 benefits of doing the stories.2 Hence, although I blem that was facing the media at Three Mile had written about how these plants worked and Island. knew something of the technology, I was about to Richard Thornburg, then governor of Penn- be blindsided by a story well beyond my expertise. sylvania, called the president of the United States When I reported for work that morning and and demanded that someone produce informa- asked one of the editors whether he needed any tion that he could use—and, by extension, that help, I was told the political reporters at the state the press could use. The NRC sent a man named capital could handle the story. I was skeptical but Harold Denton to Middletown to act as a con- went back to my seat and waited. Within a few duit between the public and the government. hours, the reporters in Harrisburg were screaming The information—such as it was—finally began for help. They had no idea what was happening at to flow.4 the plant and were getting no information from the Still, reporters faced serious questions. The company. I was sent to Middletown, Pennsylvania, extent of the danger from the radiation was con- the community nearest to the plant. When I got troversial in the extreme in the scientific com- there, I found that every other newspaper was munity, one of the reasons the stories were so going through a similar process, with editors as- contentious. Some reputable scientists held that suming the story was a simple one, requiring no any radiation at all imposed a danger of cancer on expertise and only later shipping out their science the public; others said that only a certain level was writers. dangerous. As a competent reporter, you could The most serious problem was a lack of reli- predict the answers you would get by knowing able and creditable information. At first, Metro- whom to call. So, whom do you call? politan Edison simply refused to be of any help, at Several days into the accident, a bubble of least in part because the officials there had no clue hydrogen built up in the reactor and threatened to what was happening within the containment ves- explode—a calamity in the making, one that could sels of the reactors. Then the lawyers apparently indeed have endangered most of central Pennsyl- took over, and the company’s small information vania. No one could predict what would then machinery simply shut it down. The Inquirer even happen. What do you say? If you report that the tape-recorded a conversation that took place be- reactor is likely to explode, you will set off a panic. tween the company and the employees of a public And what if it didn’t explode? If you say everything relations firm, Hill and Knowlton, which had been is under control or the danger is minimal and it brought in to help them with the emergency, as then blows up, a lot of people who could have fled they conspired to prevent information from leak- would be in the path of the radiation. ing. They produced a press kit that contained no- The general, unspoken consensus was that we thing useful and set up a telephone number that had to play it straight and with moderation, giving was specifically designed to be eternally busy. the information we had clearly and calmly and with Even the federal government played along. as much context as possible, and let people decide The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) set up for themselves what to do. I called experts on ra- a trailer outside the press center, and the infor- diation I knew to be moderates who would give mation officer set up a system so he would not have me unruffled, measured responses. This in itself to give out information. Not only was the press was a problem. Readers, who apparently expected excluded from information, but so was the state experts to have answers, began flooding the news- government, which had the final responsibility for paper editors with complaints about our less-than- the public’s safety. specific information. They wanted experts who told In one of history’s great ironies, 13 days before them whether something was dangerous; they did the incident at Three Mile Island, Hollywood not want stories that straddled the fence. In 35 had released a film starring Jane Fonda, The China years of journalism, it was the most profound Syndrome, in which a reactor goes wild and threat- professional decision I ever had to make. We ac- ens everything around it.3 The movie was play- tually sat, discussed the matter, and decided how ing in Middletown at the time. In the film, a cha- to write the stories (Sandman & Paden, 1979a, racter says the meltdown could wipe out most of 1979b). That almost never actually happens in the central Pennsylvania. And that is exactly the pro- field. Reporters usually act on instinct. 84 Terrorism
I suspect that similar discussions occurred in Once the disease was identified, all of the in- newsrooms all over the country on 9/11 and for formation was shut down. NBC’s Robert Bazell the same reasons. Because information was scarce said, ‘‘all the government agencies including NIH and unreliable, it was difficult for everyone to com- and CDC were told not to talk. They were trying to prehend exactly what was happening, only that it develop a model where all the information came was gigantic and the potential enormous. What from a central source (Thomas, 2003). Meanwhile, other buildings were being attacked and by whom? of course, no information was getting out. Rick Word came quickly of the attack at the Pentagon, Weiss of the Washington Post was less kind. He but rumors of another at the State Department described the policy as ‘‘One department, one voice. proved untrue even after they were reported in But that one voice is busy right now, so please the major media. How many planes were still in leave a message’’ (quoted in Thomas, 2003). The the sky carrying terrorists? The FAA had reports process was similar to that adopted by the NRC of dozens; in fact, there was only one. Was the and Metropolitan Edison: Pretend you are giving United States under a general attack, or were out information when in fact you are doing noth- New York and Washington the only targets? ing of the sort. Should people panic? Were they safe? With bil- Information was the first casualty. Confusion lions of viewers—including a vast proportion of reigned. The Bush administration urged Americans the American public—watching, reporters had to to go about their business; meanwhile, the FBI was think before they wrote in ways they had not often predicting new attacks. done before. Journalists had ‘‘no precedent, no strategy to deal with rapid-fire breaking news of infection by killer germs, no ready-made pool of experts’’ Anthrax and the Media as the Target (Ricchiardi, 2001,). Part of the problem was a lack of personnel, with one public relations person It happened again quickly. This time the media initially assigned to answer questions. That person were the target, and it was terrorism. Again ob- recorded more than 135 messages a day, and there structions were placed between reporters and the likely were still more calls that were simply not information they needed. As with Three Mile Is- logged. Between October 4 and October 18, the land, this new development became a primer for media office reported 2,229 calls. Many more (an the government on how not to handle terrorism average of 230 calls a day) went unreported. By (Ricchiardi, 2001). October 14, five more public information officers Within weeks of 9/11, a terrorist struck again. (PIOs) had been brought in to handle the load. To this day, no one knows who the perpetrator Getting one of the PIOs on the phone did was, but the first victim was Robert Stevens, 63, a not solve reporters’ problems, however. They photo editor at a supermarket tabloid published by were usually referred elsewhere and then to CDC in American Media in Florida. The official response Atlanta—an unproductive circle. Meanwhile, as the only fueled the panic, especially after Stevens died. attacks spread by mail to other news media, in- Part of the difficulty was that the weapon of choice cluding the office of NBC’s Tom Brokaw, and as the was anthrax, a disease so obscure that virtually U.S. Postal Service gradually shut down, coverage no one knew much about it. exploded. Some of the cable news channels went ‘‘all That most of the targets were in the media was anthrax all the time’’ (Thomas, 2003). At this junc- a cunning ploy. As Ricchiardi wrote, ‘‘If you want ture, another plague erupted, just as it had on 9/11, to scare the wits out of America, scare journalists and many instant experts appeared, many (if not first.’’ The attacks were brought by the U.S. mail most) of whom had no idea what they were talking right into newsrooms. about. One channel produced an ‘‘expert’’ who re- ‘‘If you were a terrorist with only a small peatedly referred to the anthrax ‘‘virus,’’ when a ba- amount of anthrax, you want to send it to the cillus in spore form is actually what causes anthrax. people who would get you on the evening news— By October 15 it was obvious to everyone that people at the news tabloid, a news anchor, a po- the public needed more information—and needed litician,’’ said Kyle Olson, a terrorism expert it accurately and quickly. CDC brought in another (quoted in Ricchardi, 2001). 10 PIOs. By October 18 it was able to produce an Terrorism and the Media 85 extensive, multipurpose press release confirming nalists and reporters help society solve its problems, that a postal worker in New Jersey had contracted and half felt the media get in the way. the disease. Information went up on the Web and The study also found that the public could not in Spanish. Real information began to replace bad; get enough of the news. Gresham’s Law of Journalism had been reversed. Another effect of 9/11 was that the media, in The next time we might not be so lucky. An- some regard, sobered up. Before the attack, with thrax is a disease that is relatively hard to spread. news coverage sliding inexorably toward trivia, ce- Had it been variola, the smallpox virus, we would lebrity news, and junk medicine at the cost of re- not have had several weeks to get our act in order. porting serious news—particularly international The anthrax attack killed 5 of the 11 people who news—one result was a reversal of that trend, at became infected. More than 2,000 hoaxes and false least for a while. reports emptied government buildings and shut Rosenstiel reported that, right after the attack, down post offices. Most of the terrorism experts ‘‘the war on terrorism has caused a colossal shift feared that the worst could come at any moment. in the news people see on network television’’ ‘‘I think the press has been prudently cautious (Rosenstiel, 2001). The networks were producing in reporting the story and therefore helped the more traditional hard news than they had in dec- country understand that there is no need to be ades. The news agenda on the networks was more panic-stricken about this,’’ said Robert Giles, cura- reminiscent of the 1970s than the 1990s, but that tor of the Nieman Foundation, when the scare was expansion was limited. The new interest was in the over (quoted in Ricchiardi, 2001). war on terrorism, not in the broad world beyond that subject. Even Rosenstiel admitted, however, that the sobering up might be just a temporary re- How Did the Media Do? action. A year later, Althaus reported that everything was unfortunately back to normal (Althaus, 2002). In these difficult episodes, the American media did surprisingly well. Even the most free swinging sobered up. The main problem they had was not Notes of their making; rather, it was bureaucracies— government and industrial—that were keeping in- 1. Part of the problem may be the lack of neutral formation they needed from them. Of course, in the words to describe these acts. The Israeli govern- case of 9/11, reporters were confronting a situation ment and many Zionists have been in a decades- that was so gigantic that useful information was long battle with the British Broadcasting Company impossible to ascertain. over the terminology the BBC uses to describe events in the Middle East (Honest Reporting, 2004) Thirty A study by the Pew Research Center for the years ago in New York I had a similar battle as news People and the Press, made after 9/11, showed that editor for Reuters, when the London office removed the press’s image was improved by the coverage it the word ‘‘terrorist’’ from every story about airplane provided of the attacks (Pew Research Center for hijackers, claiming it was politically charged and the People and the Press, 2001). However, there was inappropriate for customers in the area. some unhappiness with a number of the practices 2. That there are stories like that is one of the the press had engaged in, and the somewhat mel- great secrets of journalism. Abortion is another ex- low attitude of the public has probably wafted ample. All that printing stories does is excite the away (Pew Research Center for the People and the readers and viewers who care passionately one way Press, 2002). According to the 2001 study, the or the other. They do not change anyone’s mind. Pew Center reported that, after the attack, 47% of Hence, many reporters do the stories only when they have to. respondents thought news organizations were po- 3. The ‘‘China syndrome’’ is an engineering litically biased, compared with 59% in early Sep- construct in which a nuclear reactor melts tember. Additionally, more people thought the down through the floor of the containment vessel media tried not to be biased (26% after the attack and keeps going. It would, in theory, eventually versus 35% in early September). More than half still hit groundwater and explode. But, taken to the thought the media had tried to cover up their mis- extreme, it would then keep going—all the takes, however. More than a third believed jour- way to China. 86 Terrorism
4. Thornburg eventually recommended that preg- news media’s image. Retrieved April 19, 2006, nant women leave the area. from http://people-press.org/dataarchive/. ———. (2002, August 4). News media’s improved image proves short lived. Retrieved April 19, 2004, References from http://people-press.org/reports/display .php3?ReportID¼159. Althaus, S. (2002, September). American news con- Ricchiardi, S. (2001, December). The anthrax enigma. sumption during times of national crisis. PS: American Journalism Review, 23(10), 18–23. Political Science and Politics, 35(3), 517–521. Rosenstiel, T. (2001, November). Before and after: Council on Foreign Relations. (2004). Islam in a How the war on terrorism has changed the news changing world. Retrieved April 19, 2006, from agenda, network television, June to October 2001. http://www.cfr.org/publication/7533/islam_in_a_ Retrieved January 8, 2006, from http://www changing _world.html. .journalism.org/resources/research/reports/ Honest Reporting. (2004, January 14). BBC’s selective agenda/default.asp. sensitivity. Retrieved April 19, 2006, from http:// Sandman, P., & Paden, M. (1979a, July–August). At Three www.honestreporting.com/articles/45884734/ Mile Island. Columbia Journalism Review, 43–58. critiques/BBCs_Selective_Sensitivity.asp. ———. (1979b, July–August). The ‘‘Inquirer’’ goes for Lockyer, A. (2003, August 18). The relationship broke. Columbia Journalism Review (sidebar), 48–49. between media and terrorism. Canberra: Austra- Schmid, A. P., & de Graaf, J. (1982). Violence as lian National University. Retrieved April 19, communication: Insurgent terrorism and the Western 2006, from http://rspas.anu.edu.au/papers/sdsc/ news media. London: Sage. viewpoint/paper_030818.pdf. Thomas, P. (2003, Spring). The anthrax attacks: A Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. journalist assesses what went wrong in coverage (2001, November 28). Terror coverage boosts of this story. Nieman Reports, 11–14. 7
What Is Terrorism? Key Elements and History Scott Gerwehr Kirk Hubbard
Laqueur (1987) defines terrorism as the illegiti- rorism can therefore be seen as a form of social mate or extranormal use of violence against non- influence, employing acts of extranormal violence combatants to achieve political ends. Although there (instead of leaflets or loudspeakers, for example) to are innumerable definitions of terrorism, they all influence a target population’s emotions, motives, bear some resemblance to Laqueur’s definition, and objective reasoning, perceptions, and ultimately, particularly this notion that the ends cannot be behavior. Social influence is normally instantia- reached directly by the means. Indeed, a key dif- ted in tools and techniques such as rumor, social ference between military activities (e.g., guerrilla or proof, radio and television broadcasts, posters, and special operations) and acts of terror is that ter- graffiti. However, violence itself can be a dramatic rorism takes place ‘‘on a stage’’ with an audience in medium for changing attitudes and perceptions. mind (Rubin & Friedland, 1986; Jenkins, 1975). Nothing in the definition of social influence pro- Unlike most guerrilla attacks or special operations, hibits the consideration of extranormal violence as an act of terrorism is usually of little military value a tool of attitude and behavioral change. Thus a but instead ‘‘sends a message’’ to the target audi- well-timed bit of sabotage that disables a banking ence, for example, in drawing attention to a his- system may bolster an effort to worsen an already torical grievance or discrediting hated authorities shaky economic situation. Similarly, direct action (Schmid, Jongman, & Stohl, 1988). Even the most that prevents police or fire-fighting personnel from horrific of recent terrorist acts—Kenya and Tan- responding to an explosion may help discredit zania in 1998, Washington and New York in 2001, those two agencies. In sum, virtually any form of Madrid in March 2004—are insignificant in mili- violence may be pressed into the service of social tary terms. They are, however, powerful and vivid influence so long as the goal is to manipulate a messages from terrorist groups writ in blood and target audience’s perceptions, cognitions, and ac- carnage.1 tions. Terrorism fits the description. Hoffman Delivering such a message in a shocking, (1998) states: sensational fashion is meant to catalyze political change, and it is inarguable that dramatic politi- Terrorism is specifically designed to have far- cal change has been spawned by these acts. Ter- reaching psychological effects beyond the
87 88 Terrorism
immediate victim(s) or object of the terrorist The communications from A to B are purpo- attack. It is meant to instill fear within, and sive: They are meant to galvanize specific thereby intimidate, a wider ‘‘target audience’’ changes in attitudes and behaviors. That said, that might include a rival ethnic or religious they may operate directly or indirectly (i.e., group, an entire country, a national government propagated in some fashion through a third or political party, or public opinion in party or mediated through another cognitive general. ...Through the publicity generated by process). their violence, terrorists seek to obtain the The communications from A to B are discrete leverage, influence and power they otherwise and finite and can be characterized by a lack to effect political change on either a local or channel or medium of communication. an international scale. Although widespread understanding and ap- Sudden, shocking acts of extranormal violence preciation of the importance of social influence are the medium for producing these psychologi- campaigns spans the historical record, their scien- cal effects, and this is a potent means of commu- tific study dates from the pioneering work of Carl nicating. There is ample historical precedent to Hovland and his colleagues during and after World support this assertion (Bell, 1978; Downes-Le War II (the famous ‘‘Yale model’’ of persuasion, Guin & Hoffman, 1993). For example, the Reagan based on learning theory). Since that time much administration felt compelled to facilitate the re- excellent work has been done, and we draw on it lease of more than 700 Shiite prisoners from Israeli in examining the particulars of historical terrorism. prisons in exchange for the 39 Americans aboard The Yale model of social influence can serve at least TWA 847, which was hijacked in 1985. Why? as a broad-strokes description of the structure of a After more than 2 weeks of intense coverage by the large-scale persuasion attempt (for how an audience news media, there was widespread support among internalizes and processes it, we incorporate more the American public for a nonviolent quid pro quo recent scientific work, such as Petty and Cacioppo’s ending. This domestic pressure (a deliberate and Elaboration Likelihood Model). As the following explicit goal of the hijackers) proved irresistible to discussion points out, many terrorist campaigns can the Reagan administration. be usefully thought of in these terms, and specific There are many such historical examples of acts of terrorism can be thought of as the individual terrorism producing political change through so- communications in the course of a social influence cial influence, and these examples will inelucta- campaign. A noteworthy qualifier to this character- bly lead to future imitators. The presence of so ization is the fact that these communications have many potential targets, civilians, and news media decidedly different intentions and are meant to is a powerful attractant to would-be terrorists, reach multiple populations. and they are virtually guaranteed a wide audience There are two broad dimensions of the Yale both domestically and internationally for their model: the process of persuasion and the variables message. of persuasion. As the Yale model suggests (Hov- land, Janis, & Kelley, 1953; many subsequent re- ports), a look at the process of any social influence Social Influence Campaigns attempt will reveal six stages (exposure, attention, comprehension, acceptance, retention, and trans- Four hostile newspapers are more to be feared than lation) that must be navigated to successfully per- a thousand bayonets. suade a target audience. When examining the out- General Burnod, Military Maxims of Napoleon comes of the persuasion attempt, there will be four types of independent variable (source, message, For our purposes, we may state that a social target, and channel). influence campaign is generally characterized by the following features: A Process View of Social Influence One individual, group, or government (A) communicates with another person, group, or Exposure. The first stage required to translate government (B) on multiple occasions. influence into desired action is exposure. In What Is Terrorism? 89
general, exposure requires that the message which in turn leads to quick and decisive re- reach the audience; for example, an elaborate jection of the message. This stage is perhaps radio campaign is useless if the target audience the single most important obstacle in the way does not listen to the station that broadcasts of terrorism as a vector of social influence. the communication. To achieve the intended Retention. Even an influential message must psychological objectives, a communicator must have a durable effect on the target audiences; transmit the persuasive message through the ‘‘durable’’ here means that the audience re- correct channel to the appropriate audience members the persuasive message long enough (by appropriate, we mean the audience that for the desired behavior to emerge at a propi- can directly or indirectly produce the desired tious time (Hovland, Lumsdaine, & Sheffield, response). 1949). Notably, the retention requirements of Attention. Even if the message is transmitted an influence campaign depend on its objec- through the correct channels, the appropriate tives. A few minutes may be long enough to audience still might not notice it. Attention can galvanize the surrender of a hostage taker sometimes be difficult to achieve. The world is holed up in a barricaded house, but a few years a noisy place: New messages compete with may be needed to reduce monetary support to contradictory information and sheer back- a government or a popular social movement. ground noise, which can drown out an In the context of terrorism, a clear example of otherwise persuasive communication.2 The success in navigating the retention stage is the message should be crafted to pierce this sur- train bombings in Madrid in March 2004. This rounding noise and suit the channel through act of terror took place 3 days before a national which it is transmitted (Klapper, 1960). election and utterly eclipsed all other issues in Comprehension. An influence campaign must the race for the following 3 days. The shocking ensure that the intended audience understands and horrific acts, which the public interpreted the persuasive communication. This requires as a punishment for Spanish support of the the communicator to craft and deliver the U.S. invasion of Iraq, indisputably affected the message in a culturally appropriate manner, outcome of the election. employing syntax, images, words, concepts, Translation. Translation entails cognitive and intentions that are tailored to the audi- change leading to behavioral change or the ence. Notably, a message that is linguistically translation of perception into action. For or idiomatically ill suited will likely fail and translation to occur, an unobstructed path may even be counterproductive (Eagly, 1974). must exist for a changed attitude to result in This stage poses a significant hurdle for ter- altered behavior (see, for example, Darley & rorism in terms of social influence. Batson, 1973). The target audience may truly Acceptance. The target audience must not only experience a change in attitude, yet be re- comprehend the message but also accept it. strained by repressive societies and/or author- Indeed, a well-crafted message can be trans- itarian leaders. The literature on social mitted, noticed, and comprehended but still psychology indicates that circumstances trigger instant rejection by audiences if it is not strongly influence actual decision making.4 articulated to gain their acceptance (Chaiken, Thus, influence attempts have a greater possi- 1987; Chaiken, Liberman, & Eagly, 1989; bility of success if they are conducted in an Petty and Cacioppo, 1986). One example of environment that facilitates the translation of how this rejection might occur involves the changes in attitude into changed behavior. inappropriate use of schemas.3 A widely dis- seminated message advertising a bounty on a This sequence represents a view of the process wanted fugitive might seem entirely reasonable of a social influence campaign. Another view of to the sender, but to a target audience the very social influence comes from Smith, Lasswell, and notion of a bounty (i.e., the ‘‘bounty’’ schema) Casey (1946), who state that the outcomes of any may invoke all manner of negative—even persuasion attempt are dependent upon the char- taboo—associations relating to hospitality acteristics of four types of independent variable: norms, kinship ties, and group affiliation, source, recipient, message, and medium. There is 90 Terrorism significant interplay between these categories and Terrorism as Social Influence the particulars of the process described earlier. Source. The apparent origin of a message can Kill one, warn a thousand. Chinese proverb matter significantly in how it is received by an audience. Relevant data about the originator of It is not possible to adequately treat all histori- the communication include factors such as cal terrorism within a single section of a single chap- credibility (Kelman & Hovland, 1953; Husek, ter. Moreover, the very word terrorism was coined 1965), authority (McGuire, 1969; Bochner & by Edmund Burke to describe state terror: the Insko, 1966), likeability and attractiveness government’s ‘‘reign of terror’’ in revolutionary (Chaiken, 1979), similarity to the recipient France (1793–1794). In fact, Robespierre opined (Byrne, 1971; Goethals & Nelson, 1973), that ‘‘Terror is nothing other than justice, prompt, trustworthiness (Andreoli & Worchel, 1978), severe, inflexible; it is therefore an emanation of and perceived profit motive (Hovland & Man- virtue.’’ These views clearly differ quite markedly dell, 1952). from how the word is commonly used today Recipient. Several characteristics of a target (to denote a criminal atrocity perpetrated against audience can weigh heavily in how the mes- noncombatants for political and/or ideological sage is perceived and processed. These vari- ends). In this chapter we do not embrace either ables include motivation (Petty, Harkins, & view of terrorism. Instead we examine terrorism as Williams, 1980), issue involvement (Petty & a persuasive instrument of marginal, revolutionary, Cacioppo, 1979), and culture (Eagly & War- or nonstate groups seeking significant political ren, 1976). change (not perpetuating the status quo). We Message. As many of these sequential steps sample the space of historical terrorism for illus- imply, the content and nature of a message will trations of the violence-as-social-influence theme, figure prominently in its ultimate effect. The and we argue that this perspective on terrorism is relevant qualities of a message can include applicable and fruitful in helping us to understand salience and vividness (Taylor & Fiske, the rise and fall of terrorist campaigns in all times 1975), emotional content (e.g., fear; see Janis and places. & Feshbach, 1953; Leventhal, 1970), the Terrorist acts by definition include some key number of arguments (Calder, Insko, & aspects of persuasive communication, as we have Yandell, 1974; Norman, 1976), and already outlined: others. Transmission and propagation. The nature of the Medium. The medium plays an important role international news media virtually guarantees in delivering and mediating the effects of the that target audiences will be exposed to the actual message. Some media are particularly terrorists’ message (step 1 of the Yale model). effective vectors of persuasive communica- The proliferation of and competition among tions, while others lend themselves less to this news outlets has created a 24-hour news cycle function. Among the characteristics that matter in order to satisfy the public’s appetite for in the choice of medium are style (e.g., audio sensational news and competitive advantage versus video; see Chaiken & Eagly, 1976), (i.e., items not possessed by competitors). This setting (e.g., one on one versus group; see means that, day or night, virtually anywhere in Burnstein & Vinokur, 1977), and nonverbal the world, there will be a near-instantaneous accompaniment (Harper, Weins, & Matarazzo, transmission of news of terrorist acts to mil- 1978). lions of viewers, listeners, and readers—with a In the following sections we highlight social subsequent multiplication as coverage con- influence variables in historical cases of terrorism tinues or is rebroadcast. to help us understand when and how terrorism is Vividness. By their shocking nature, terrorist effective. Our argument is that the requirements acts capitalize on the salience effect (Nisbett & for effective social influence are virtually identical Ross, 1980), ensuring that target audiences pay to those for successful terrorism (in the sense of attention to the message (step 2 of the Yale achieving the stated political aims). model). What Is Terrorism? 91