DOCSLIB.ORG

Academics Against Israel and the Jews

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ACADEMICS AGAINST ISRAEL AND THE JEWS AAca_02.indbca_02.indb 1 003/11/20073/11/2007 114:47:114:47:11 Books by the Same Author Revaluing Italy, with Lorenzo Necci (Italian), 1992 Environment and Confusion: An Introduction to a Messy Subject, 1993 Israel’s New Future: Interviews, 1994 The State as a Business: Do-It-Yourself Political Forecasting (Italian), 1994 Judaism, Environmentalism and the Environment, 1998 The Environment in the Jewish Tradition: A Sustainable World (Hebrew), 2002 Europe’s Crumbling Myths: The Post-Holocaust Origins of Today’s Anti-Semitism, 2003 American Jewry’s Challenge: Conversations Confronting the 21st Century, 2004 Israel and Europe: An Expanding Abyss? 2005 European-Israeli Relations: Between Confusion and Change? 2006 Books Edited The New Clothes of European Anti-Semitism, with Shmuel Trigano (French), 2004 Monograph The Autumn 2005 Riots in France: Their Possible Impact on Israel and the Jews, 2006 AAca_02.indbca_02.indb 2 003/11/20073/11/2007 114:47:154:47:15 ACADEMICS AGAINST ISRAEL AND THE JEWS Edited by Manfred Gerstenfeld Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs AAca_02.indbca_02.indb 3 003/11/20073/11/2007 114:47:154:47:15 Copyright © 2007 by Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs (JCPA) and Manfred Gerstenfeld All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying or recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system—except for brief quotations in critical articles or reviews—without written permission from the JCPA, 13 Tel Hai Street, Jerusalem, 92107, Israel. Tel: +972 2 561 9281, Fax: + 972 2 561 9112. E-mail: [email protected], www.jcpa.org ISBN: 965-218-057-2 Set in New Times New Roman at Marek Lasman, Jerusalem Printed at Ahva—Coop. Printing Press Ltd Cover design by Rami & Jacky AAca_02.indbca_02.indb 4 003/11/20073/11/2007 114:47:154:47:15 Dedicated to all those who fight against the demonizers and defamers of Israel and Jews on campuses worldwide AAca_02.indbca_02.indb 5 003/11/20073/11/2007 114:47:154:47:15 AAca_02.indbca_02.indb 6 003/11/20073/11/2007 114:47:154:47:15 Table of Contents Acknowledgments 9 Introduction 11 Natan Sharansky: Foreword 13 Manfred Gerstenfeld: Academics against Israel and the Jews 17 ESSAYS Rebecca Leibowitz: Defeating Anti-Israeli and Anti-Semitic Activity on Campus: A Case Study: Rutgers University 83 Noah Liben: The Columbia University Report on Its Middle Eastern Department’s Problems: A Paradigm for Obscuring Structural Flaws 95 Martin Kramer: Columbia University: The Future of Middle Eastern Studies at Stake 103 Jonathan Jaffit: Fighting Sheikh Zayed’s Funding of Islamic Studies at Harvard Divinity School 108 Leila Beckwith: Anti-Zionism/Anti-Semitism at the University of California-Irvine 115 Leila Beckwith, Tammi Rossman-Benjamin, and Ilan Benjamin: Faculty Efforts to Combat Anti-Semitism and Anti-Israeli Bias at the University of California-Santa Cruz 122 Edward S. Beck: Scholars for Peace in the Middle East (SPME): Fighting Anti-Israelism and Anti-Semitism on the University Campuses Worldwide 134 Roz Rothstein: StandWithUs: A Grassroots Advocacy Organization Also on Campus 147 Alain Goldschläger: The Canadian Campus Scene 154 AAca_02.indbca_02.indb 7 003/11/20073/11/2007 114:47:154:47:15 Corinne Berzon: Anti-Israeli Activity at Concordia University 2000-2003 163 Aryeh Green: European Universities and the New Anti-Semitism: Issues, Examples, Prescriptions 174 Ruth Contreras: On the Situation in Austrian Universities 184 Ronnie Fraser: The Academic Boycott of Israel: Why Britain? 198 Manfred Gerstenfeld: The UCU May 2007 Boycott Resolution and Its Aftermath 214 Gavin Gross: Anti-Israeli Activity at the School of Oriental and African Studies: How Jewish Students Started to Fight Back 224 Manfred Gerstenfeld: Utrecht University: The Myth of Jewish Cannibalism, Censorship, and Fear of Muslim Intimidation 236 Itamar Marcus and Barbara Crook: Anti-Semitism among Palestinian Authority Academics 242 Ted Lapkin: Academic Anti-Zionism in Australia 250 List of Contributors 259 Index 263 AAca_02.indbca_02.indb 8 003/11/20073/11/2007 114:47:154:47:15 Acknowledgments Several donors who wish to remain anonymous have supported parts of this project over the past few years. I express my gratitude to them for helping generously in this way. I would like to thank the following people at JCPA: Dore Gold and Chaya Herskovic, president and director-general, respectively, for their supportive attitude since the project’s beginning; Edna Weinstock-Gabay, who was responsible for the production of this book; Elizabeth Mayman, who has guided several student interns in the research for their articles; Tamas Berzi, for his observations on the book’s content as well as his technical assistance; and, last but not least, Ashley Perry for all his help. I learned much from Anne Herzberg’s legal comments. Many thanks are due as well to David Hornik for his copyediting. I would like to thank all the student interns who, over the past five years, have collected material for this book. Naming only some of them would do injustice to many others. Manfred Gerstenfeld 9 AAca_02.indbca_02.indb 1 003/11/20073/11/2007 114:47:154:47:15 AAca_02.indbca_02.indb 2 003/11/20073/11/2007 114:47:154:47:15 Introduction In the new century, many attempts to discriminate against Israel, its academic institutions, and its scholars have been made in several Western countries. These include issues such as boycotting Israeli universities and academics as well as calling for the divestment of Israeli securities. The campaigns frequently use anti- Semitic motifs and sometimes also involve violent anti-Semitic acts. Although the phenomena on campus are heterogeneous, the assailants come mainly from two specific segments of the academic world: the extreme Left and Muslims. The Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs has been following the developments in the academic world since the first call for a boycott over five years ago. Various lecturers visiting the JCPA have provided us with knowledge and perspective. We are also extremely grateful to many others who have shared with us their insights on campus developments. Students from all over the world interning at the JCPA have been an additional source of information as we discussed their personal experiences with them. It is difficult to obtain a grip on dispersed, multifaceted phenomena. They involve many countries, each with its own peculiarities as far as academia’s functioning and organization are concerned. The process of defaming and demonizing Israel has many aspects as do the reactions to it by faculty, students, as well as nonacademic bodies and individuals. The introductory overview essay lays the broad infrastructure for understanding the complexities of the issue in question. This book also contains eighteen essays dealing with its key facets on four continents. The authors of the essays highlight the great variety of the problem’s characteristics in a number of countries. Some are academic teachers; others are present or former student leaders; yet others are monitors of academia from the outside. This not only leads to varying perspectives but also to very diverse writing styles and approaches. Some articles cover specific periods. Many thanks are due to all the authors for having made the effort to analyze so many aspects of the campaign against Israel and Jews at universities. The attacks on Israel and Jews in academia are part of a large and dynamic process. Many of the problems described in these essays will not disappear. One purpose of this book is thus to lay the groundwork for ongoing monitoring of the demonization and defamation of Israel and Jews in the academic world, as well as the efforts to fight these trends. Because part of the information for this text comes from the Internet, much of it may no longer be available in a few years. This book, therefore, fulfills another function as well: it documents for future reference many details of the initial years of this process and the attitudes of important proponents. While not being comprehensive, it aims to capture the mood of this period. 11 AAca_02.indbca_02.indb 1 003/11/20073/11/2007 114:47:154:47:15 AAca_02.indbca_02.indb 2 003/11/20073/11/2007 114:47:154:47:15 Natan Sharansky Foreword Anti-Semites succeeded in murdering six million Jews only after significant parts of the supposedly enlightened world accepted as a matter of fact that Jews were dangerous and inferior beings. Genocide became legitimate when this attitude permeated universities, the intelligentsia, and other elites. Against this historical background the inroads of the anti-Israeli campaign into the Western academic world are extremely worrying. The infrastructure for future crimes or even genocide is being laid by ideologists at universities of the free world. To demonstrate how academic freedom is regularly abused on campuses I have developed the “three Ds” test, which stands for Demonization, the application of Double standards against Israel, and its Delegitimization. After I became minister for Jerusalem and Diaspora affairs in 2003, I invented this test of the “three Ds” to distinguish new anti-Semitism from legitimate criticism of Israel. It is anti-Semitism and demonization when comparisons are being made between Israelis and Nazis, or between Palestinian refugee camps and Auschwitz. It is equally anti-Semitic when Israel is singled out by the United Nations for human rights abuses while the behavior of major abusers such as China, Iran, Cuba, and Syria is ignored. Similarly it is anti-Semitism when only Israel’s fundamental right to exist—alone among all the people of the world—is questioned.1 Examples from Personal Experience In light of these observations, when I was minister I visited many dozens of university campuses abroad to gain firsthand knowledge of the defamation of Israel and the discrimination against those who support it in the academic world as well as to encourage the resistance of activists.
Recommended publications
  • University of Cincinnati

    University of Cincinnati

    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date: August 6th, 2007 I, __________________Julia K. Baker,__________ _____ hereby submit this work as part of the requirements for the degree of: Doctorate of Philosophy in: German Studies It is entitled: The Return of the Child Exile: Re-enactment of Childhood Trauma in Jewish Life-Writing and Documentary Film This work and its defense approved by: Chair: Dr. Katharina Gerstenberger Dr. Sara Friedrichsmeyer Dr. Todd Herzog The Return of the Child Exile: Re-enactment of Childhood Trauma in Jewish Life-Writing and Documentary Film A Dissertation submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies University of Cincinnati In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of DOCTORATE OF PHILOSOPHY (Ph.D.) In the Department of German Studies Of the College of Arts and Sciences 2007 by Julia K. Baker M.A., Bowling Green State University, 2000 M.A., Karl Franzens University, Graz, Austria, 1998 Committee Chair: Katharina Gerstenberger ABSTRACT “The Return of the Child Exile: Re-enactment of Childhood Trauma in Jewish Life- Writing and Documentary Film” is a study of the literary responses of writers who were Jewish children in hiding and exile during World War II and of documentary films on the topic of refugee children and children in exile. The goal of this dissertation is to investigate the relationships between trauma, memory, fantasy and narrative in a close reading/viewing of different forms of Jewish life-writing and documentary film by means of a scientifically informed approach to childhood trauma. Chapter 1 discusses the reception of Binjamin Wilkomirski’s Fragments (1994), which was hailed as a paradigmatic traumatic narrative written by a child survivor before it was discovered to be a fictional text based on the author’s invented Jewish life-story.
  • Dear Prime Minister, We Note with Concern the Increasingly Violent

    Dear Prime Minister, We Note with Concern the Increasingly Violent

    Dear Prime Minister, We note with concern the increasingly violent rhetoric directed towards Julian Assange of WikiLeaks. “We should treat Mr Assange the same way as other high-value terrorist targets: Kill him,” writes conservative columnist Jeffrey T Kuhner in the Washington Times. William Kristol, former chief of staff to vice president Dan Quayle, asks, “Why can’t we use our various assets to harass, snatch or neutralize Julian Assange and his collaborators, wherever they are?” “Why isn’t Julian Assange dead?” writes the prominent US pundit Jonah Goldberg. “The CIA should have already killed Julian Assange,” says John Hawkins on the Right Wing News site. Sarah Palin, a likely presidential candidate, compares Assange to an Al Qaeda leader; Rick Santorum, former Pennsylvania senator and potential presidential contender, accuses Assange of “terrorism”. And so on and so forth. Such calls cannot be dismissed as bluster. Over the last decade, we have seen the normalisation of extrajudicial measures once unthinkable, from ‘extraordinary rendition’ (kidnapping) to ‘enhanced interrogation’ (torture). In that context, we now have grave concerns for Mr Assange’s wellbeing. Irrespective of the political controversies surrounding WikiLeaks, Mr Assange remains entitled to conduct his affairs in safety, and to receive procedural fairness in any legal proceedings against him. As is well known, Mr Assange is an Australian citizen. We therefore call upon you to condemn, on behalf of the Australian Government, calls for physical harm to be inflicted upon Mr Assange, and to state publicly that you will ensure Mr Assange receives the rights and protections to which he is entitled, irrespective of whether the unlawful threats against him come from individuals or states.
  • ISRAELI-ARAB CONFLICT Primer to Understanding the Centuries-Old Struggle

    ISRAELI-ARAB CONFLICT Primer to Understanding the Centuries-Old Struggle

    ISRAELI-ARAB CONFLICT Primer to understanding the centuries-old struggle “When people criticize Zionists, they mean Jews. You’re talking anti-Semitism.” Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. HonestReporting Defending Israel From Media Bias ANTI-SEMITISM IS THE DISSEMINATION OF FALSEHOODS ABOUT JEWS AND ISRAEL www.honestreporting.com 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 1 History Part 2 Jerusalem Part 3 Delegitimization Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Part 4 Hamas, Gaza, and the Gaza War Part 5 Why Media Matters 2 www.honestreporting.com ISRAELI-ARAB CONFLICT Primer to understanding the centuries-old struggle The Middle East nation we now know as the State of Israel has existed throughout history under a va riety of names: Palestine, Judah, Israel, and others. Today it is surrounded by Arab states that have purged most Jews from their borders. Israel is governed differently. It follows modern principles of a western liberal democracy and it pro vides freedom of religion. Until the recent discovery of large offshore natural gas deposits, Israel had few natural resources (including oil), but it has an entrepreneurial spirit that has helped it become a center of research and development in areas such as agriculture, computer science and medical tech nologies. All Israeli citizens have benefited from the country’s success. Yet anti-Israel attitudes have become popular in some circles. The reason ing is often related to the false belief that Israel “stole” Palestinian Arab lands and mistreated the Arab refugees. But the lands mandated by the United Nations as the State of Israel had actually been inhabited by Jews for thousands of years.

  • Anti-Zionism and Antisemitism Cosmopolitan Reflections

    Anti-Zionism and Antisemitism Cosmopolitan Reflections David Hirsh Department of Sociology, Goldsmiths, University of London, New Cross, London SE14 6NW, UK The Working Papers Series is intended to initiate discussion, debate and discourse on a wide variety of issues as it pertains to the analysis of antisemitism, and to further the study of this subject matter. Please feel free to submit papers to the ISGAP working paper series. Contact the ISGAP Coordinator or the Editor of the Working Paper Series, Charles Asher Small. Working Paper Hirsh 2007 ISSN: 1940-610X © Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy ISGAP 165 East 56th Street, Second floor New York, NY 10022 United States Office Telephone: 212-230-1840 www.isgap.org ABSTRACT This paper aims to disentangle the difficult relationship between anti-Zionism and antisemitism. On one side, antisemitism appears as a pressing contemporary problem, intimately connected to an intensification of hostility to Israel. Opposing accounts downplay the fact of antisemitism and tend to treat the charge as an instrumental attempt to de-legitimize criticism of Israel. I address the central relationship both conceptually and through a number of empirical case studies which lie in the disputed territory between criticism and demonization. The paper focuses on current debates in the British public sphere and in particular on the campaign to boycott Israeli academia. Sociologically the paper seeks to develop a cosmopolitan framework to confront the methodological nationalism of both Zionism and anti-Zionism. It does not assume that exaggerated hostility to Israel is caused by underlying antisemitism but it explores the possibility that antisemitism may be an effect even of some antiracist forms of anti- Zionism.
  • INFORMATION to USERS the Most Advanced Technology Has Been Used to Photo­ Graph and Reproduce This Manuscript from the Microfilm Master

    INFORMATION to USERS the Most Advanced Technology Has Been Used to Photo­ Graph and Reproduce This Manuscript from the Microfilm Master

    INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photo­ graph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are re­ produced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. These are also available as one exposure on a standard 35mm slide or as a 17" x 23" black and white photographic print for an additional charge. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 Nortfi Z eeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Order Number 9001986 The mission of women’s colleges in an era of cultural revolution, 1890-1930 Leone, Janice Marie, Ph.D.
  • What's Wrong with the Study of China/Countries

    What's Wrong with the Study of China/Countries

    Asian Studies II (XVIII), 1 (2014), pp. 151–185 What’s Wrong with the Study of China/Countries Hans KUIJPER* Abstract In this paper 1 the thesis is submitted that there is something fundamentally amiss in Western Sinology (Zhōngguóxué, as distinct from Hànxué, which is a kind of old- fashioned philology): ‘China experts’ either pretend to be knowledgeable about everything related to China, in which case they cannot be taken seriously, or–– eventually––admit not to be scientific all-rounders with respect to the country, in which case they cannot be called ‘China experts’. The author expects no tenured professor of Chinese Studies/History to share this view. Having exposed the weakness, indeed the scandal of old-style Sinology, he also points out the way junior Sinologists should go. The fork in that road is two-pronged: translating or collaborating. Keywords: Sinology, area/country studies, complexity, scientific collaboration, e-research Izvleček V tem članku avtor predstavi tezo, da je nekaj bistveno narobe v zahodni sinologiji (Zhōngguóxué, za razliko od Hànxué, ki je nekakšna staromodna filologija): »Kitajski strokovnjaki« se bodisi pretvarjajo, da so dobro obveščeni o vsem v zvezi s Kitajsko, in v tem primeru jih ni mogoče jemati resno, ali pa na koncu priznajo, da niso vsestransko znanstveni o državi, in jih v tem primeru ne moremo imenovati »Kitajske strokovnjake«. Avtor pričakuje, da nihče od univerzitetnih profesorjev kitajskih študij ali kitajske zgodovine ne deli tega stališča z njim. Z izpostavljenostjo šibkosti, kar je škandal za sinologijo starega sloga, opozarja tudi na pot, po kateri naj bi šli mladi sinologi. Na tej poti sta dve smeri, in sicer prevajanje ali sodelovanje.
  • The Public Eye, Summer 2010

    The Public Eye, Summer 2010

    Right-Wing Co-Opts Civil Rights Movement History, p. 3 TheA PUBLICATION OF POLITICAL R PublicEyeESEARCH ASSOCIATES Summer 2010 • Volume XXV, No.2 Basta Dobbs! Last year, a coalition of Latino/a groups suc - cessfully fought to remove anti-immigrant pundit Lou Dobbs from CNN. Political Research Associates Executive DirectorTarso Luís Ramos spoke to Presente.org co-founder Roberto Lovato to find out how they did it. Tarso Luís Ramos: Tell me about your organization, Presente.org. Roberto Lovato: Presente.org, founded in MaY 2009, is the preeminent online Latino adVocacY organiZation. It’s kind of like a MoVeOn.org for Latinos: its goal is to build Latino poWer through online and offline organiZing. Presente started With a campaign to persuade GoVernor EdWard Rendell of PennsYlVania to take a stand against the Verdict in the case of Luis RamíreZ, an undocumented immigrant t t e Who Was killed in Shenandoah, PennsYl - k n u l Vania, and Whose assailants Were acquitted P k c a J bY an all-White jurY. We also ran a campaign / o t o to support the nomination of Sonia h P P SotomaYor to the Supreme Court—We A Students rally at a State Board of Education meeting, Austin, Texas, March 10, 2010 produced an “I Stand With SotomaYor” logo and poster that people could displaY at Work or in their neighborhoods and post on their Facebook pages—and a feW addi - From Schoolhouse to Statehouse tional, smaller campaigns, but reallY the Curriculum from a Christian Nationalist Worldview Basta Dobbs! continues on page 12 By Rachel Tabachnick TheTexas Curriculum IN THIS ISSUE Controversy objectiVe is present—a Christian land goV - 1 Editorial .
  • NEW TITLES in BIOETHICS Annual Cumulation Volume 20, 1994

    NEW TITLES in BIOETHICS Annual Cumulation Volume 20, 1994

    NATIONAL REFERENCE CENTER FOR BIOETHICS LITERATURE THE JOSEPH AND ROSE KENNEDY INSTITUTE OF ETHICS GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY, WASHINGTON, DC 20057 NEW TITLES IN BIOETHICS Annual Cumulation Volume 20, 1994 (Includes Syllabus Exchange Catalog) Lucinda Fitch Huttlinger, Editor Gregory P. Cammett, Managing Editor ISSN 0361-6347 A NOTE TO OUR READERS . Funding for the purchase of the materials cited in NEW TITLES IN BIOETHICS was severely reduced in September 1994. We are grateful for your donations, as well as your recom­ mendations to your publishers to forward review copies to the Editor. In addition to being listed here, all English-language titles accepted for the collection will be considered for inclusion in the BIOETHICSLINE database, produced at the Kennedy Institute of Ethics under contract with the National Library of Medicine. Your efforts to support this publication and the dissemination of bioethics information in general are sincerely appreciated. NEW TITLES IN BIOETHICS is published four times Inquiries regarding NEW TITLES IN BIOETHICS per year (quarterly) by the National Reference Center should be addressed to: for Bioethics Literature, Kennedy Institute of Ethics. Gregory Cammett, Managing Editor Annual Cumulations are published in the following year (regarding subscriptions and claims) as separate publications. NEW TITLES IN BIOETHICS is a listing by subject of recent additions OR to the National Reference Center's collection. (The subject classification scheme is reproduced in full with Lucinda Fitch Huttlinger, Editor each issue; it can also be found at the end of the (regarding review copies, gifts, and exchanges) cumulated edition.) With the exception of syllabi listed NEW TITLES IN BIOETHICS as part of our Syllabus Exchange program, and docu­ National Reference Center for Bioethics ments in the section New Publications from the Ken­ Literature nedy Institute of Ethics, materials listed herein are not Kennedy Institute of Ethics available from the National Reference Center.
  • Final 15/02/2008

    Final 15/02/2008

    CONSEIL COUNCIL DE L’EUROPE OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST SECTION CASE OF PFEIFER v. AUSTRIA (Application no. 12556/03) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 15 November 2007 FINAL 15/02/2008 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. PFEIFER v. AUSTRIA JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Pfeifer v. Austria, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Mr L. LOUCAIDES, President, Mrs N. VAJIĆ, Mr A. KOVLER, Mr K. HAJIYEV, Mr D. SPIELMANN, Mr S.E. JEBENS, judges, Mr H. SCHÄFFER, ad hoc judge, and Mr S. NIELSEN, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 18 October 2007, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in an application (no. 12556/03) against the Republic of Austria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Austrian national, Mr Karl Pfeifer (“the applicant”), on 7 April 2003. 2. The applicant was represented by Lansky, Ganzger and Partners, lawyers practising in Vienna. The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador F. Trauttmansdorff, Head of the International Law Department at the Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 3. The applicant alleged that the Austrian courts had failed to protect his reputation against defamatory allegations made in a magazine. 4. The application was allocated to the First Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court).
  • STUDENT ASSOCIATIONS and ALUMNI RELATIONS Section 20

    STUDENT ASSOCIATIONS and ALUMNI RELATIONS Section 20

    Student Associations and Alumni Relations 20.1 UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS 20.2 GRADUATE STUDENTS 20.3 ALUMNI RELATIONS Section 20 101 STUDENT ASSOCIATIONS AND ALUMNI RELATIONS Section 20 20.1 UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS The Concordia Student Union (CSU) represents all undergraduate students, both full‑time and part‑time. Besides organizing many events and activities, the CSU ensures student representation on University decision‑making bodies, both those that legislate on academic and administrative matters and those concerned with the cultural and social life of the community. There are student members of the Board of Governors, Senate, the Faculty Councils, and the Concordia Council on Student Life, which is directly concerned with all issues pertaining to student life including the provision of student services. The CSU also offers services for its members such as a Housing and Job Bank, and Advocacy and Legal Information Services. There is a CSU office on each campus. The Sir George Williams office is in Room H 711 of the Henry F. Hall Building. The Loyola office is in the CC Building, Room 426. CSU’s telephone number is 514‑848‑2424, ext. 7474; email: [email protected]; website: csu. qc.ca. Powers and responsibilities are divided between three bodies: the Executive, the Council of Representatives, and the Judicial Board. The Executive is headed by an elected president. The Council of Representatives consists of students elected from the undergraduate student population with seats reserved for the four Faculties and Independent students. The Judicial Board is an appointed body charged with assuring the constitutionality of any new legislation or resolution of conflicts.
  • JULIAN ASSANGE: When Google Met Wikileaks

    JULIAN ASSANGE: When Google Met Wikileaks

    JULIAN ASSANGE JULIAN +OR Books Email Images Behind Google’s image as the over-friendly giant of global tech when.google.met.wikileaks.org Nobody wants to acknowledge that Google has grown big and bad. But it has. Schmidt’s tenure as CEO saw Google integrate with the shadiest of US power structures as it expanded into a geographically invasive megacorporation... Google is watching you when.google.met.wikileaks.org As Google enlarges its industrial surveillance cone to cover the majority of the world’s / WikiLeaks population... Google was accepting NSA money to the tune of... WHEN GOOGLE MET WIKILEAKS GOOGLE WHEN When Google Met WikiLeaks Google spends more on Washington lobbying than leading military contractors when.google.met.wikileaks.org WikiLeaks Search I’m Feeling Evil Google entered the lobbying rankings above military aerospace giant Lockheed Martin, with a total of $18.2 million spent in 2012. Boeing and Northrop Grumman also came below the tech… Transcript of secret meeting between Julian Assange and Google’s Eric Schmidt... wikileaks.org/Transcript-Meeting-Assange-Schmidt.html Assange: We wouldn’t mind a leak from Google, which would be, I think, probably all the Patriot Act requests... Schmidt: Which would be [whispers] illegal... Assange: Tell your general counsel to argue... Eric Schmidt and the State Department-Google nexus when.google.met.wikileaks.org It was at this point that I realized that Eric Schmidt might not have been an emissary of Google alone... the delegation was one part Google, three parts US foreign-policy establishment... We called the State Department front desk and told them that Julian Assange wanted to have a conversation with Hillary Clinton...
  • British Imperialism in Books from the “Third Reich”

    British Imperialism in Books from the “Third Reich”

    Empire and National Character: British Imperialism in Books from the “Third Reich” Victoria Jane Stiles, MA, MA Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2015 Abstract This thesis examines the variety of representations and rhetorical deployments of the theme of British Imperialism within books published in the “Third Reich”. The thesis considers these books not only as vehicles for particular ideas and arguments but also as consumer objects and therefore as the product of a series of compromises between the needs of a host of actors, both official and commercial. It further traces the origins of the component parts of these texts via the history of reuse of images and extracts and by identifying earlier examples of particular tropes of “Englishness” and the British Empire. British imperial history was a rich source of material for National Socialist writers and educators to draw on and lent itself to a wide variety of arguments. Britain could be, in turns, a symbol of “Nordic” strength, a civilisation in decline, a natural ally and protector of Germany, or a weak, corrupt, outdated entity, controlled by Germany’s supposed enemies. Drawing on a long tradition of comparing European colonial records, the British Empire was also used as a benchmark for Germany’s former imperial achievements, particularly in moral arguments regarding the treatment of indigenous populations. Through its focus on books, which were less ephemeral than media such as newspaper and magazine articles, radio broadcasts or newsreels, the thesis demonstrates how newer writings sought to recontextualise older material in the light of changing circumstances.