DOCSLIB.ORG

CBG Disaggregation Annual Suijijort @$31/$51* @ Models' Own Default Inputs @ FCC "Common" Inputs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CBG Disaggregation Annual Suijijort @$31/$51* @ Models' Own Default Inputs @ FCC CBG Disaggregation Annual SUIJIJort @$31/$51* @ Models' Own Default Inputs @ FCC "Common" Inputs HA15.0a @ BCPM 3.1 @ BCPM HA15.0a @ BCPM 3.1 @ BCPM HAl Default Input BCPM Default Relative to FCC Common FCC Common Relative to State Study Area Values** Input Values HAl Input Values Input Values HAl VT New England Tel-VT $19,829,582 $57,713,841 291% $ 27,911,383 24,829,014 89% WA GTE Northwest Inc - Washington $13,558,020 $55,341,292 408% $ 14,785,430 26,023,743 176% WA Pacific Northwest Bell-Washington $32,613,930 $105,403,642 323% $ 34,340,028 46,203,827 135% WA Telephone Utilities Of WA Inc $28,687,697 $82,203,800 287% $ 33,992,927 44,105,939 130% WI GTE North Inc-WI $36,617,671 $157,105,870 429% $ 53,418,843 76,074,367 142% WI Wisconsin Bell $17,204,673 $64,229,071 373% $ 20,723,109 25,470,320 123% WV C And P Tel Co Of W VA $68,799,486 $169,186,364 246% $ 83,053,812 76,933,339 93% WY Mountain Bell-Wyoming $34,184,430 $96,228,775 281% $ 36,206,946 47,038,477 130% Sum $3,491,436,915 $10,009,263,007 287% $4,103,441,290 $4,485,465,272 109% * In these comparisons, it is assumed that all residence lines are supported at $51/month and all business lines are supported at $51/month. ** The true HAl default is to provide support only for primary residence lines and single line business lines, and not all lines as reported here. ..t1171ClR AT&T and Mel Analysis Page 4 ofB CBG Disaggregation Annual @ Base Selection of @ Base Plus Areas Reduced to Match @ Base Plus Areas and RIA Reduced to Suppor(@$31/$51_* BCPM Inputs BCPM Inputs Match BCPM Inputs BCPM BCPM Resulting Dollar BCPM HA15.0a @ Relative to HA15.0a @ Resulting Dollar Relative to HA15.0a @ Change from Relative to BCPM Default HAl Emu BCPM Default Change from HAl Emu BCPM Default Base Plus Area HAl Emu State study Area Input Values of BCPM Input Values Base of BCPM Input Values Reduction of BCPM AK Anchorage Tel Util $ 3,168,385 56% $ 2,203,771 $ (964,614) 81% $ 2,033,584 $ (170,187) 87% AL Contel Of The South Dba GTE South $ 57,640,616 94% $ 34,956,452 $ (22,684,164) 155% $ 33,424,995 $ (1,531,458) 162% AL GTE And Contel Of Alabama $ 47,418,241 95% $ 26,746,925 $ (20,671,316) 169% $ 25,448,610 $ (1,298,315) 178% AL South Central Bell-AL $ 250,261,891 87% $ 133,069,453 $ (117,192,438) 164% $ 126,872,020 $ (6,197,434) 171% AR Southwestern Bell-Arkansas $ 120,534,837 123% $ 68,430,054 $ (52,104,783) 216% $ 64,865,428 $ (3,564,626) 228% AZ Mountain Bell-Arizona $ 92,873,996 169% $ 72,478,072 $ (20,395,923) 217% $ 69,089,221 $ (3,388,852) 228% CA Contel Of California - California $ 67,466,457 144% $ 54,490,462 $ (12,975,994) 178% $ 51,520,077 $ (2,970,386) 188% CA GTE Of California $ 43,739,932 152% $ 30,731,403 $ (13,008,529) 216% $ 28,973,662 $ (1,757,740) 229% CA Pacific Bell $ 245,177,442 136% $ 173,562,766 $ (71,614,677) 192% $ 164,178,002 $ (9,384,764) 203% CA Roseville Telephone Company $ 836,142 32% $ 333,167 $ (502,976) 79% $ 303,480 $ (29,687) 87% CO Mountain Bell-Colorado $ 172,537,304 110% $ 135,442,700 $ (37,094,604) 140% $ 129,637,123 $ (5,805,576) 147% CT Southern New England Tel $ 58,801,273 84% $ 29,669,779 $ (29,131,494) 167% $ 28,167,307 $ (1,502,472) 176% DC C And P Telephone Company Of DC $ 13,737 117% $ 1,444 $ (12,293) 1108% $ 72 $ (1,373) 22336% DE Diamond State Tel Co $ 20,316,827 96% $ 11,796,052 $ (8,520,775) 166% $ 11,260,205 $ (535,847) 173% FL Central Tel Co Of Florida $ 37,071,001 107% $ 23,177,351 $ (13,893,650) 171% $ 22,051,549 $ (1,125,801) 180% FL GTE Floridainc $ 37,816,944 82% $ 18,644,840 $ (19,172,104) 166% $ 17,509,046 $ (1,135,794) 177% FL Southern Bell-FL $ 109,546,275 98% $ 61,148,047 $ (48,398,228) 176% $ 58,210,534 $ (2,937,512) 185% FL United Tel Co Of Florida $ 80,723,147 112% $ 47,968,597 $ (32,754,550) 189% $ 45,555,367 $ (2,413,230) 199% GA Alltel Georgia Communications Corp $ 74,263,194 90% $ 45,808,184 $ (28,455,010) 146% $ 43,800,940 $ (2,007,244) 153% GA Southern Bell-GA $ 223,047,789 92% $ 115,626,755 $ (107,421,034) 178% $ 110,550,232 $ (5,076,522) 186% HI GTE Hawaiian Telephone Co Inc $ 30,724,207 72% $ 20,013,465 $ (10,710,742) 111% $ 18,828,241 $ (1,185,224) 118% IA GTE And Contel Of Iowa $ 58,601,994 118% $ 38,553,307 $ (20,048,687) 180% $ 36,273,207 $ (2,280,100) 191% IA Northwestern Bell-IA $ 91,506,231 104% $ 52,624,895 $ (38,881,336) 180% $ 49,547,240 $ (3,077,655) 191% 10 GTE Northwest Inc - Idaho $ 34,233,518 140% $ 26,150,890 $ (8,082,628) 183% $ 25,102,830 $ (1,048,060) 191% 10 Mountain Belt-Idaho $ 65,743,356 115% $ 49,176,719 $ (16,566,638) 154% $ 47,178,535 $ (1,998,184) 160% IL Central Tel Co Of IL $ 9,528,049 107% $ 5,724,026 $ (3,804,023) 179% $ 5,361,379 $ (362,648) 191% IL Contel Of Illinois Inc Dba GTE - Illinois $ 73,917,995 105% $ 46,436,907 $ (27,481,088) 168% $ 43,876,537 $ (2,560,369) 178% IL GTE Of Illinois $ 159,966,933 100% $ 99,300,334 $ (60,666,598) 161% $ 93,763,361 $ (5,536,973) 171% IL Illinois Belt Tef Co $ 75,505,922 103% $ 39,487,882 $ (36,018,041) 198% $ 37,229,830 $ (2,258,052) 210% IN Contel Of Indiana Inc Dba GTE - IN $ 60,390,565 91% $ 35,502,488 $ (24,888,077) 155% $ 33,790,184 $ (1,712,304) 163% IN GTE Of Indiana $ 78,574,919 91% $ 42,926,555 $ (35,648,365) 167% $ 40,825,553 $ (2,101,002) 175% IN Indiana Bell Tel Co $ 89,667,220 101% $ 47,503,815 $ (42,163,405) 191% $ 45,070,254 $ (2,433,561 ) 201% IN United Tel Co Of Indiana Inc $ 61,918,918 92% $ 37,220,505 $ (24,698,413) 153% $ 35,447,888 $ (1,772,617) 161% KS Southwestern Bell-Kansas $ 110,775,357 147% $ 81,812,216 $ (28,963,141) 199% $ 77,468,573 $ (4,343,643) 211% KY Cincinnati Bell-KY $ 19,250,283 61% $ 10,793,350 $ (8,456,933) 109% $ 10,262,287 $ (531,064) 114% ATJl.T ..nrl Mr.1 Analvsis Page 5 of8 CBG Disaggregation Annual @ Base Selection of @ Base Plus Areas Reduced to Match @ Base Plus Areas and RIA Reduced to SUIJIJort @$31/$51* BCPM Inputs BCPM Inputs Match BCPM Inputs BCPM BCPM Resulting Dollar BCPM HA15.0a @ Relative to HA15.0a @ Resulting Dollar Relative to HA15.0a @ Change from Relative to BCPM Default HAl Emu BCPM Default Change from HAl Emu BCPM Default Base Plus Area HAl Emu State Study Area Input Values of BCPM Input Values Base of BCPM Input Values Reduction of BCPM KY GTE South Inc - Kentucky $ 66,221,033 100% $ 35,057,848 $ (31,163,185) 189% $ 33,397,498 $ (1,660,350) 199% KY South Central Bell-KY $ 162,944,724 99% $ 89,954,718 $ (72,990,007) 179% $ 85,505,630 $ (4,449,088) 188% LA South Central Bell-LA $ 205,866,556 100% $ 117,966,824 $ (87,899,731) 175% $ 112,205,811 $ (5,761,013) 184% MA New England Tel-MA $ 74,131,020 81% $ 39,440,952 $ (34,690,068) 152% $ 36,764,160 $ (2,676,792) 163% MD C And P Tel Co Of MD $ 99,299,524 82% $ 56,917,103 $ (42,382,421 ) 142% $ 54,292,011 $ (2,625,091 ) 149% ME New England Tef-Maine $ 101,273,321 107% $ 58,628,464 $ (42,644,£57) 184% $ 55,566,928 $ (3,061,536) 194% MI GTE North Inc-MI $ 146,136,886 101% $ 87,780,154 $ (58,356,733) 168% $ 83,787,794 $ (3,992,360) 176% MI Michigan Bell Tel Co $ 182,057,422 111% $ 102,853,771 $ (79,203,652) 197% $ 97,817,360 $ (5,036,411 ) 207% MN Contel Of Minnesota Inc Dba GTE MN $ 70,104,184 119% $ 47,403,730 $ (22,700,453) 176% $ 44,885,957 $ (2,517,774) 186% MN Frontier Comm Of Minnesota Inc $ 28,641,359 91% $ 17,855,160 $ (10,786,199) 146% $ 16,823,819 $ (1,031,341 ) 155% MN Northwestern Bell-Minnesota $ 146,737,303 87% $ 85,314,978 $ (61,422,325) 149% $ 80,806,068 $ (4,508,909) 157% MN United Telephone Co Of Minn $ 34,093,429 94% $ 19,741,282 $ (14,352,147) 162% $ 18,708,193 $ (1,033,089) 171% MO Contel Missouri DBA GTE Missouri $ 112,053,071 109% $ 66,525,668 $ (45,527,403) 183% $ 63,025,066 $ (3,500,602) 194% MO GTE North Inc - Missouri $ 31,925,297 100% $ 18,855,851 $ (13,069,446) 169% $ 17,935,101 $ (920,749) 178% MO Southwestern Bell-Missouri $ 160,346,835 100% $ 85,341,384 $ (75,005,451) 188% $ 81,049,079 $ (4,292,305) 198% MO United Telephone Co Of Missouri $ 64,628,024 101% $ 37,592,681 $ (27,035,343) 174% $ 35,561,522 $ (2,031,159) 184% MS South Central Bell-Mississippi $ 313,151,071 96% $ 175,020,089 $ (138,130,982) 172% $ 166,758,049 $ (8,262,039) 180% MT Mountain Bell-Montana $ 72,799,525 142% $ 63,231,016 $ (9,568,509) 164% $ 60,596,526 $ (2,634,490) 171 % NC Alltel Carolina Inc-north $ 33,738,219 71% $ 19,996,366 $ (13,741,853) 119% $ 19,230,607 $ (765,759) 124% NC Carolina Tel And Tel Co $ 198,706,346 80% $ 113,327,592 $ (85,378,754) 141% $ 108,343,460 $ (4,984,132) 148% NC Central Tel Co-NC $ 41,904,315 78% $ 23,410,811 $ (18,493,504) 140% $ 22,537,390 $ (873,421 ) 145% NC Contel Of North Carolina Dba GTE NC $ 41,230,730 92% $ 25,480,240 $ (15,750,490) 149% $ 24,503,702 $ (976,538) 155% NC GTE South Inc - North Carolina $ 9,379,584 76% $ 4,525,636 $ (4,853,948) 158% $ 4,312,115 $ (213,522) 166% NC North State Tel Co-NC $ 6,491,596 62% $ 3,145,353 $ (3,346,243) 128% $ 2,978,378 $ (166,975) 135% NC Southern Bell-NC $ 134,595,093 83% $ 68,593,684 $ (66,001,409) 163% $ 65,718,411 $ (2,875,273) 170% NO Northwestern Bell-North Dakota $ 34,455,401 150% $ 25,538,007 $ (8,917,394) 202% $ 24,167,828 $ (1,370,179) 213% NE Lincoln Tel And Tele Co $ 58,023,904 116% $ 40,411,223 $ (17,612,681) 167% $ 38,165,960 $ (2,245,263) 176% NE Northwestern Bell-Nebraska $ 77,120,548 100% $ 56,190,964 $ (20,929,584) 137% $ 53,103,970 $ (3,086,995) 145% NH New England Tel-NH $ 66,259,162 86% $ 35,326,953 $ (30,932,210) 162% $ 33,350,793 $ (1,976,160) 172% NJ New Jersey Bell $ 43,099,249 70% $ 22,244,227 $ (20,855,023) 135% $ 20,874,331 $ (1,369,896) 144% NJ United Tel Co Of NJ Inc $ 13,002,790 71% $ 7,587,720 $ (5,415,070) 121% $ 7,191,613
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Qwest Corporation TARIFF FCC NO. 2[1]
    Qwest Corporation TARIFF F.C.C. NO. 2[1] SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION ORIGINAL TITLE PAGE REGULATIONS, RATES AND CHARGES Applying to the Special Construction of Facilities in connection with the provision of Interstate Services within the operating territory of Qwest Corporation in the State(s) of Arizona (AZ) Colorado (CO) Idaho (ID) Iowa (IA) Minnesota (MN) Montana (MT) Nebraska (NE) New Mexico (NM) North Dakota (ND) Oregon (OR) South Dakota (SD) Utah (UT) Washington (WA) Wyoming (WY) as provided herein d/b/a Qwest Original Tariff effective July 26, 2000. [1] This entire Tariff is issued under the authority of Special Permission No. 00-064. (Filed under Transmittal No. 1.) Issued: July 25, 2000 Effective: July 26, 2000 By: Director - Federal Regulatory Suite 5100 1801 California Street Denver, Colorado 80202 Qwest Corporation TARIFF F.C.C. NO. 2 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION 105TH REVISED PAGE 0-1 CANCELS 104TH REVISED PAGE 0-1 CHECK SHEET Title Page and Pages 0-1 to 0-7; 1-1; 2-1 to 2-14; 3-1 to 3-11; 4-1; 5-1 to 5-22; 6-1 to 6- 110 inclusive of this Tariff are effective as of July 26, 2000. NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF REVISION REVISION REVISION EXCEPT AS EXCEPT AS EXCEPT AS PAGE INDICATED PAGE INDICATED PAGE INDICATED Title Original 3-2 Original 5-21 Original 0-1 105th * 3-3 Original 5-22 Original 0-1.1 84th * 3-4 Original 6-1 Original 0-1.2 60th * 3-5 Original 6-2 Original 0-1.3 31st * 3-6 Original 6-3 Original 0-1.4 12th * 3-7 Original 6-4 Original 0-1.5 7th * 3-8 Original 6-5 Original 0-1.6 3rd * 3-9 Original 6-6 Original 0-2 Original 3-10 Original
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Exchange / Seattle Public Library Queen Anne Warehouse 1529 4Th Avenue West, Seattle Landmark
    Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Exchange / Seattle Public Library Queen Anne Warehouse 1529 4th Avenue West, Seattle Landmark Nomination BOLA Architecture + Planning Seattle December 21, 2015 Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Exchange / Seattle Public Library Queen Anne Warehouse Landmark Nomination 1529 4th Avenue W, Seattle December 21, 2015 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 Background Research Seattle’s Landmark Designation Process Preservation Incentives Design Reviews of Proposed Changes to a Landmark 2. Property Data 4 3. Historic Context Statement 5 Historic Overview of Queen Anne Hill The Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Company in Seattle The Building’s Construction History The Original Designers The Role of Women as Switchboard Operators 4. Architectural Description 12 Neighborhood Context The Site The Structure and Exterior Facades Interior Layout and Features Changes to the Original Building 5. Bibliography and Resources 18 6. Photographs and Images 23 Figure Index Images Select Drawings Cover: Views looking southwest at the building: Museum of Communications, 1923; King County Tax Assessor’s Property Record Card, 1936; Contemporary, BOLA, July 2015. BOLA Architecture + Planning 159 Western Avenue West, Suite 486 Seattle, Washington 98119 206.447.4749 Name (common, present, or historic): The Pacific Telegraph and Telephone Garfield Exchange / Seattle Public Library Queen Anne Warehouse Year built: 1921-1922, 1929 (remodeled in 1950 and 1961); 1977 (Renovation) Street and number: 1529 4th Avenue West, Seattle WA 98119 Assessor's file no.: 423290-3170
    [Show full text]
  • Curtis L. Kennedy Attorney at Law
    CURTIS L. KENNEDY ATTORNEY AT LAW 8405 E. PRINCETON AVE. DENVER, CO 80237-1741 [email protected] TELEPHONE (303) 770-0440 ALSO ADMITTED IN: ___________________ UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT STATE OF ARIZONA FAX (303) 843-0360 STATE OF OKLAHOMA STATE OF TEXAS WASHINGTON, D.C. August 20, 2004 List of Retiree Telephone Concession Reimbursement Documents: 1 Date (Approximate): Originator Title and Description: Revised 12-1-61 Mountain States Telephone & Interdepartmental Manual No. 122 –Telephone Service Furnished to Revised 7-1-63 Telegraph Company Active and Pensioned Employees for Personal Use (21 pages) January 1974 Benefits Department - Telephone Service After Retirement. “Effective with your Mountain Bell retirement. charges for your residence telephone service will be paid by this Company. during your lifetime. After retirement, if you take up residence in an area not served by Mountain Bell, this concession still applies. .” (1 page) 1 Note: Documents indicated with * are supplemental either in whole or in part to those appearing on the July 19, 2004, index. -1- September 1976 Corporate Personnel - Benefits Pensioners’ Concession Telephone Service. “When your pension is Mountain Bell effective, charges for your residence telephone service will be paid by this Company. This means that, except for a few special types of service, you will receive free local service and be allowed a reasonable but limited amount of toll service over Bell System or connecting company lines within the continental United States during your lifetime. .also applies if your telephone service is provided by a company other than Mountain Bell. .If you take up residence in an area not served by Mountain Bell, this concession still applies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Telecom Meltdown for a Listing of Recent Titles in the Artech House Telecommunications Library, Turn to the Back of This Book
    The Great Telecom Meltdown For a listing of recent titles in the Artech House Telecommunications Library, turn to the back of this book. The Great Telecom Meltdown Fred R. Goldstein a r techhouse. com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record for this book is available from the U.S. Library of Congress. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Goldstein, Fred R. The great telecom meltdown.—(Artech House telecommunications Library) 1. Telecommunication—History 2. Telecommunciation—Technological innovations— History 3. Telecommunication—Finance—History I. Title 384’.09 ISBN 1-58053-939-4 Cover design by Leslie Genser © 2005 ARTECH HOUSE, INC. 685 Canton Street Norwood, MA 02062 All rights reserved. Printed and bound in the United States of America. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. All terms mentioned in this book that are known to be trademarks or service marks have been appropriately capitalized. Artech House cannot attest to the accuracy of this information. Use of a term in this book should not be regarded as affecting the validity of any trademark or service mark. International Standard Book Number: 1-58053-939-4 10987654321 Contents ix Hybrid Fiber-Coax (HFC) Gave Cable Providers an Advantage on “Triple Play” 122 RBOCs Took the Threat Seriously 123 Hybrid Fiber-Coax Is Developed 123 Cable Modems
    [Show full text]
  • The American Telephone and Telegraph Company Divestiture: Background, Provisions, and Restructuring
    Report No. 84-58 E I -. <I?....*- ".YII. -n, -- THE AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY DIVESTITURE: BACKGROUND, PROVISIONS, AND RESTRUCTURING b Y Angele A. Gilroy Specialist in Industrial Organization Economics Division COLLECTION WKI HEKN !CNTUCKY LIBRARY April 11, 1984 11 i :::A L.'~~-l.ii.e makes jucn research available. without parti- ::;I.. in lr:m\ !orrns inc!uding studies. reports. cornpila- ;,)I!., I!:<?\[>. :md l:a~kqroi~ndhrietings. Cpon request. CRS .. ., :i ~ !>!r::z:rrir.e.;in ann1~-zingle+slative proposals and -tl:..b. :!nd in s>w;sinq the possible effects of these proposals . < :!I irie.The Ser~ice'ssenior specialists and ii,:c( r :iil.,;ii ?is are also at-aiiable for personal consultations ;xi-ir :.t>.;!?ecri\-elieid.; t~f'expertise. ABSTRACT On January 1, 1984, The American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T) di- vested itself of a major portion of its organizational structure and functions. Under the post-divestiture environment the once fully-integrated Bell System is now reorganized into the "new" AT&T and seven Ladependent regional 5olding ?om- panies -- American Information Technologies Corp., 3ell Atlantic Corp., 3ell- South Corp., NYNEX Corp., Pacific Telesis Group., Southwestern Bell Corp., and U.S. West, Inc. The following analysis provides an overview of the pre- and post-divestiture organizational structure and details the evolution of the anti- trust action which resulted in this divestiture. CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................ iii INTRODUCTION ............................................................ 1 1 . BELL SYSTEM CORPORATE REORGANIZATION .............................. 3 A . Predivestiture Bell System Corporate Structure ................ 3 B . Divested Operating Company Structure .......................... 5 C . Post-Divestiture AThT Organizational Structure ................ 7 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission DA 05-719 Before the Federal
    Federal Communications Commission DA 05-719 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) 1993 Annual Access Tariff Filings ) CC Docket No. 93-193 ) 1994 Annual Access Tariff Filings ) CC Docket No. 94-65 ) ORDER Adopted: March 17, 2005 Released: March 17, 2005 Responses from Verizon and BellSouth Due: April 18, 2005 By the Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this order, we review the refund plans submitted by various price cap local exchange carriers (LECs) in response to the Commission’s order concluding the investigation of the 1993 and 1994 access tariffs of price cap LECs that implemented a sharing or lower formula adjustment in 1992 or 1993.1 We approve the refund filing of Qwest Corporation (Qwest), which results in no refund liability. We also approve the refund plans of SBC Communications Inc. (SBC), and the Sprint Incumbent Local Exchange Companies (the Sprint LECs), with the modifications we specify in this order. We disapprove the refund plans submitted by Verizon and BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (BellSouth). We direct Verizon and BellSouth to recalculate their refund liability using the proper methodology discussed below, and to resubmit their refund plans for our approval. II. BACKGROUND 2. Under price cap regulation, the maximum price a LEC can charge for its interstate access services is determined by the Price Cap Index (PCI), a complex formula that is adjusted annually by a measure of inflation minus a productivity factor, or “X” factor.2 The original price cap plan included certain “back stop” adjustments to the PCI. Specifically, the Commission required price cap LECs to share a portion of their earnings above a certain level with their interstate access customers by lowering their PCIs and rates in the following year.3 The Commission’s rules also permit price cap LECs that earn 1 1993 Annual Access Tariff Filings, CC Docket No.
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Prior Testimony
    RECORD OF EXPERT TESTIMONY ECONOMICS AND TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2010 California Public Utilities Commission, O1 Communications, Inc. (U 6065 C) v. Verizon California., a California Corporation (U 1002 C), C.08-02-013 and Verizon California., a California Corporation (U 1002 C) v. O1 Communications, Inc. (U 6065 C) C. 09-06-025, on behalf of O1 Communications, Inc., Reply Testimony filed February 3, 2010. Witness: Lee L. Selwyn 2009 Illinois Commerce Commission, Frontier Communications Corporation, Verizon Communications, Inc., et al, Joint Application for Approval of a Reorganization, Docket No. 09-0268, on behalf of the People of the State of Illinois, Citizens Utility Board, Direct Testimony filed October 20, 2009, Rebuttal Testimony filed December 14, 2009. Witness: Lee L. Selwyn Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, James Thomas, on behalf of themselves, the general public, and all those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Global Vision Products, Inc., Antony Imbriolo, Derrike Cope, David L. Gordon, Powertel Technologies, Inc., Craig Dix, Henry Edelson and Robert Debenedictis, Defendants, Case No. RG03-091195, on behalf of the Law Offices of Scott A. Bursor, Oral testimony and cross examination on November 9, 2009. Witness: Colin B. Weir United States District Court, District of New Jersey, Judy Larson, Barry Hall, Joe Milliron, Tessie Robb, and Willie Davis, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. AT&T Mobility LLC f/k/a Cingular Wireless LLC and Sprint Nextel Corporation and Sprint Spectrum L.P. d/b/a Sprint Nextel and Nextel Finance Company, Civ. Act. No. 07-5325 (JLL), on behalf of PinilisHalpern, LLP and Law Offices of Scott A.
    [Show full text]
  • S:\CA\2016\URF Review\LLS Direct 03-15-16
    Before the CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Order Instituting Investigation into the State of Competition Among Telecommunications Providers in California, and to Consider and Investigation 15-11-007 Resolve Questions raised in the Limited Rehearing of Decision 08-09-042. Direct Testimony of LEE L. SELWYN on behalf of the Office of Ratepayer Advocates of the California Public Utilities Commission March 15, 2016 DIRECT TESTIMONY OF LEE L. SELWYN TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 Qualifications, background and experience 1 Assignment 4 A NEW TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY FRAMEWORK 6 Introduction and Background 6 Assessing the extent and effectiveness of competition – the Structure-Conduct- Performance (“S-C-P”) paradigm 9 Structure analysis 15 Conduct analysis 16 Performance analysis 18 Applying the S-C-P paradigm to current telecommunications market conditions in California 18 Analysis principles relating to Structure 19 Analysis principles relating to Conduct 20 Analysis principles relating to Performance 22 Structure 22 (1) Multiple providers should each be capable of achieving minimum efficient scale in order for the market to be considered as capable of supporting effective competition. 22 i ECONOMICS AND TECHNOLOGY, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) (2) Market share, concentration, and market power of infrastructure-based markets must be assessed only with respect to the specific geographic areas being served by each incumbent. 31 (3) The number and the relative size and strength of competing firms must be sufficient to engender actual price competition. 35 (4) The relative positions of dominant firms may change over time without necessarily resulting in a material change in the level of market concentration. 44 (5) Putatively competing services may not offer fully equivalent functionality in all respects.
    [Show full text]
  • HB 3065 Carrier of Last Resort Public Process PUC White Paper
    HB 3065 Carrier of Last Resort Public Process PUC White Paper House Bill 3065 (2019) requires the Oregon Public Utility Commission (PUC) to investigate the continuing relevance of the carrier of last resort (COLR) obligations provided for under ORS 759.500 to 759.570. The primary purpose of this white paper is to provide background information to enable the general public to participate and make informed contributions to this public process required by HB 3065.1 A secondary purpose is to provide a common knowledgebase to inform stakeholder discussions at workshops relating to HB 3065. COLR obligations, which derive from long-standing laws and policy, affect people, providers, and policy across Oregon. The legislature directed the PUC to focus its investigation on whether developing industry trends, technologies, and policy drivers in the telecommunications sector impact the existing regulatory system administered by the PUC to ensure adequate and reasonable access for residential customers to telecommunications service in all areas of this state. To inform initial participation in this process, this white paper offers background information on policy developments and providers that have shaped the existing regulatory system and telecommunications sector. As part of the HB 3065 process, the PUC is required to investigate changes that could accommodate developing industry trends and support new policy objectives without compromising residential customers’ access to reliable and safe service at just and reasonable prices in an adequate and
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2018, Vol
    www.telcomhistory.org (303) 296‐1221 Spring 2018, Vol. 23, no.1 Jody Georgeson, editor Director’s Message Spring is a time of growth and celebration. We at the Telecommunications History Group passionately believe our history is more relevant today than ever, and we are committed to continuing branding, marketing, and fundraising projects to increase visibility and share programs and services more widely than we have in the past. New marketing collateral and a newly designed website are on the 2018 agenda. 2017 brought the passing of Robert Timothy and Howard Doerr, along with several others like Herb Warrick and Don Ostrand in recent years. As time passes and our telecom community loses more of the individuals who were near and dear to us, we want to ensure that we are recognizing their contributions to our industry and to THG. Women’s History Month is an excellent opportunity to showcase the stories of women and their impact in the telecommunications industry. Don’t miss the wonderful articles in this edition. This year marks the 30th anniversary of the first tour in our Connections Museum in Seattle. Plans are currently underway for an open house celebration so be sure to watch for further information as the details are finalized. It is largely personal donations and volunteer hours that keep us afloat and support our operations. We are grateful for contributions, connections, ideas, and time from individuals like you with an interest in maintaining a history that holds special meaning for you and all of us. Warm regards, Lisa Berquist THG Executive Director Board of Directors THG's Board provides voluntary service in the form of oversight and management of the organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission Record 7 FCC Red No
    DA 92-818 Federal Communications Commission Record 7 FCC Red No. 13 SOUTHERN BELL File No. E-91-23 Before the TELEPHONE AND Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 TELEGRAPH COMPANY, SOUTH CENTRAL BELL File No. E-91-24 In the Matter of TELEPHONE COMPANY, SOUTHWESTERN BELL File No. E-91-25 CABLE & WIRELESS TELEPHONE COMPANY, COMMUNICATIONS, INC., CINCINNATI BELL File No. E-91-26 Complainant, TELEPHONE COMPANY, and GTE SOUTHWEST, INC., File No. E-91-27 v. Defendants. NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE File No. E-90-428 AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, ORDER BELL TELEPHONE File No. E-90-429 Adopted: June 17, 1992; Released: June 24, 1992 COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA, By the Deputy Chief, Enforcement Division, Common CHESAPEAKE AND POTOMAC File No. E-90-430 Carrier Bureau: TELEPHONE COMPANY, CHESAPEAKE AND POTOMAC File No. E-90-431 TELEPHONE COMPANY I. INTRODUCTION OF MARYLAND, 1. In this Order we address discovery issues and establish a schedule for further discovery and the submission of CHESAPEAKE AND POTOMAC File No. E-90-432 briefs and reply briefs by the parties to the above-cap­ TELEPHONE COMPANY tioned proceedings to determine whether and to what ex­ OF VIRGINIA, tent the complainant, Cable & Wireless Communications, CHESAPEAKE AND POTOMAC File No. E-90-433 Inc. (Cable & Wireless), may be entitled to recover dam­ TELEPHONE COMPANY ages as a result of defendants' alleged violations of the Commission's rate of return prescription for the period OF WEST VIRGINIA, January 1, 1987 through December 31, 1988. DIAMOND STATE File No. E-90-434 TELEPHONE COMPANY, NEW JERSEY BELL File No.
    [Show full text]
  • Suggested Plan for the Implementation of a Noise Reduction Program in the Spokane District of the Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1966 Suggested plan for the implementation of a noise reduction program in the Spokane district of the Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company Charles Merlin Crockett The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Crockett, Charles Merlin, "Suggested plan for the implementation of a noise reduction program in the Spokane district of the Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company" (1966). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 3778. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/3778 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A SUGGESTED PLAN FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A NOISE REDUCTION PROGRAM IN THE SPOKANE DISTRICT OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY By CHARLES MERLIN CROCKETT BaSo Washington State University, 1962 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1966 Approved byg Chairman, Board of iSxaminers / Dean •aduate School MAY %U 1966 Date UMI Number: EP34557 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]