DOCSLIB.ORG

1999 PUF Detailed Schedule of Investments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1999 PUF Detailed Schedule of Investments PERMANENT UNIVERSITY FUND DETAIL SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES Year Ended August 31, 1999 Deloitte & Touche LLP Telephone (713) 982-2000 Suite 2300 Facsimile: (713) 982-2001 333 Clay Street Houston, Texas 77002-4196 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT To the Board of Directors The University of Texas Investment Management Company Austin, Texas We have audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the financial statements of the Permanent University Fund (PUF) for the year ended August 31, 1999, and have issued our report thereon dated October 29, 1999. We have also audited the accompanying schedules of debt securities (Schedule A), preferred stocks and convertible debentures (Schedule B), equity securities (Schedule C), cash and cash equivalents (Schedule D), Equity Index Fund B Lendable (Schedule E) and Mid Cap Index Fund B Lendable (Schedule F) as of August 31, 1999. These schedules are the responsibility of the PUF’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these schedules based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the schedules referred to above are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the schedules. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of August 31, 1999, by correspondence with the custodian. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall schedule presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, such schedules present fairly, in all material respects, the PUF’s par value, shares, cost and value of investments as shown in the accompanying Schedules A through F as of August 31, 1999, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. October 29, 1999 PERMANENT UNIVERSITY FUND SCHEDULE A DEBT SECURITIES August 31, 1999 PAR VALUE VALUE COST SECURITY ($) ($) U.S. GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS (DIRECT AND GUARANTEED) DIRECT OBLIGATIONS SYNTHETIC O-T-R TREASURY RECEIPT 94-3 6% CUSTODY RECEIPT DUE 8/15/11....................................................... 10,000,000 9,157,800 9,656,708 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0% STRIPS (CPNS) DUE 11/15/11............................................................. 23,000,000 10,499,500 8,109,071 0% STRIPS (CPNS) DUE 5/15/10............................................................... 10,000,000 5,053,000 4,166,665 5.875% NOTES DUE 11/15/99..................................................................... 2,000,000 2,002,820 1,998,844 6.25% NOTES DUE 2/15/03......................................................................... 5,000,000 5,046,850 5,018,477 6.25% BONDS DUE 8/15/23........................................................................ 18,000,000 17,665,380 18,156,889 6.75% BONDS DUE 8/15/26........................................................................ 10,000,000 10,464,100 10,975,677 6.875% BONDS DUE 8/15/25...................................................................... 94,000,000 99,610,860 104,895,749 7.125% BONDS DUE 2/15/23...................................................................... 12,000,000 12,991,920 13,667,439 7.25% BONDS DUE 5/15/16........................................................................ 8,000,000 8,620,000 7,930,849 7.25% BONDS DUE 8/15/22........................................................................ 30,000,000 32,887,500 30,205,207 7.5% BONDS DUE 11/15/16........................................................................ 18,000,000 19,859,040 17,563,565 7.5% NOTES DUE 11/15/01......................................................................... 8,800,000 9,106,592 8,847,935 7.75% NOTES DUE 2/15/01......................................................................... 13,000,000 13,365,560 12,954,358 7.875% BONDS DUE 2/15/21...................................................................... 49,200,000 57,064,128 63,304,587 8% NOTES DUE 5/15/01.............................................................................. 12,000,000 12,429,360 11,974,793 8.125% BONDS DUE 8/15/19...................................................................... 36,500,000 43,098,470 41,621,914 8.25% BONDS DUE 5/15/05........................................................................ 5,000,000 5,078,100 4,968,491 8.5% NOTES DUE 11/15/00......................................................................... 2,100,000 2,168,901 2,098,968 8.5% NOTES DUE 2/15/00........................................................................... 2,000,000 2,027,820 1,999,477 8.75% NOTES DUE 8/15/00......................................................................... 9,000,000 9,261,540 8,991,266 8.875% BONDS DUE 2/15/19...................................................................... 5,000,000 6,297,650 5,732,487 9.125% BONDS DUE 5/15/09...................................................................... 1,500,000 1,669,920 1,486,395 9.125% BONDS DUE 5/15/18...................................................................... 8,000,000 10,251,280 9,359,553 10.75% BONDS DUE 2/15/03...................................................................... 7,000,000 8,010,590 6,925,606 11.125% BONDS DUE 8/15/03.................................................................... 5,000,000 5,871,100 4,983,881 15.75% BONDS DUE 11/15/01.................................................................... 14,000,000 16,832,760 13,972,522 TOTAL DIRECT OBLIGATIONS 436,392,541 431,567,373 GUARANTEED OBLIGATIONS FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION 9% C B O DUE 11/3/99................................................................................. 5,000,000 5,029,750 5,000,000 FONDS D EQUIPMENT A.I.D. MOROCCO 7.29% NOTES DUE 5/1/23........................................................................... 9,000,000 9,131,220 8,892,310 GOVERNMENT BACKED TRUST 9.625% CERTIFS CL T-3 DUE 5/15/02....................................................... 3,650,964 3,774,002 3,649,110 TOTAL GUARANTEED OBLIGATIONS 17,934,972 17,541,420 GUARANTEED OBLIGATIONS - MORTGAGE BACKED GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION 7% PASS THRU 1212 DUE 6/20/23............................................................ 2,576,094 2,489,975 2,570,393 7% PASS THRU 2084 DUE 9/15/02............................................................ 61,224 60,697 61,058 8% PASS THRU 194952 DUE 1/15/02........................................................ 26,388 26,663 26,385 8% PASS THRU 182539 DUE 1/15/02........................................................ 64,003 64,670 63,997 2 PERMANENT UNIVERSITY FUND SCHEDULE A DEBT SECURITIES (CONTINUED) August 31, 1999 PAR VALUE VALUE COST SECURITY ($) ($) 8% PASS THRU 183691 DUE 1/15/02........................................................ 46,418 46,902 46,413 8% PASS THRU 189914 DUE 1/15/02........................................................ 96,526 97,531 96,515 8% PASS THRU 206065 DUE 1/15/02........................................................ 71,839 72,587 71,831 8% PASS THRU 201307 DUE 3/15/02........................................................ 333,319 336,793 333,095 8% PASS THRU 16676 DUE 4/15/07.......................................................... 710,290 722,635 708,241 8.25% PASS THRU 9806 DUE 5/15/06....................................................... 18,230 18,691 18,224 8.25% PASS THRU 10770 DUE 5/15/06..................................................... 61,043 62,368 60,350 8.25% PASS THRU 8790 DUE 4/15/06....................................................... 25,744 26,396 25,737 8.25% PASS THRU 9675 DUE 4/15/06....................................................... 48,620 49,851 48,592 8.25% PASS THRU 9813 DUE 4/15/06....................................................... 22,656 23,148 22,643 8.25% PASS THRU 10215 DUE 6/15/06..................................................... 46,940 48,128 46,927 8.25% PASS THRU 9323 DUE 6/15/06....................................................... 90,842 93,142 90,617 8.25% PASS THRU 10834 DUE 6/15/06..................................................... 26,546 27,219 26,530 9% PASS THRU 152730 DUE 6/15/01........................................................ 123,715 125,673 123,635 9% PASS THRU 139698 DUE 8/15/01........................................................ 279,050 283,468 278,291 9.5% PASS THRU 290652 DUE 8/15/20..................................................... 263,043 280,172 261,604 10% PASS THRU 151185 DUE 3/15/16...................................................... 287,072 312,521 282,638 10% PASS THRU 233778 DUE 2/15/18...................................................... 269,080 293,970 267,667 10% PASS THRU 252468 DUE 6/15/19...................................................... 196,535 214,715 195,209 10% PASS THRU 291147 DUE 5/15/20...................................................... 196,289 214,445 196,289 10.5% PASS THRU 224630 DUE 10/15/17................................................. 243,494 268,452 234,293 11% PASS THRU 35288 DUE 3/15/10........................................................ 121,436 133,712 120,454 11.5% PASS THRU 131670 DUE 5/15/15................................................... 31,875 35,840 31,722 12% PASS THRU 49551 DUE 7/15/11........................................................ 87,312 98,402 74,638 12.5% PASS THRU
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Relationship Between Institutional Common Ownership, Marketing, and Firm Performance
    What if Your Owners Also Own Other Firms in Your Industry? The Relationship between Institutional Common Ownership, Marketing, and Firm Performance John Healey 1 Ofer Mintz 2 May 2021 Forthcoming in International Journal of Research in Marketing (IJRM) 1 John Healey ([email protected]) is Assistant Professor of Marketing, A.B. Freeman School of Business, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA. 2 Ofer Mintz ([email protected]) is Senior Lecturer and Associate Head (External Engagement) of the Marketing Department at the UTS Business School, and Research Associate at the UTS Australia-China Relations Institute, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia. Both authors contributed equally to the paper and are listed alphabetically. They are grateful for detailed feedback provided by Peter Danaher and Gerard Hoberg, and participants at the University of Adelaide, and at the 2017 UTS Marketing Discipline Group Research Camp, 2018 Winter American Marketing Association, 2018 Theory and Practice in Marketing, 2018 Marketing Science, and 2019 Marketing Meets Wall Street conferences. Further, they thank Yang Wang for her help with database programming. What if Your Owners Also Own Other Firms in Your Industry? The Relationship between Institutional Common Ownership, Marketing, and Firm Performance Abstract The growth in institutional holdings of public firms has led to increased interest in the concept of common ownership, in which the same investor owns stakes in multiple firms within the same industry. Economic theory suggests that common ownership could affect firm performance, but little empirical research has examined the nature of this effect or how a firm’s extant marketing potentially relates to this effect.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Marginable OTC Stocks
    List of Marginable OTC Stocks @ENTERTAINMENT, INC. ABACAN RESOURCE CORPORATION ACE CASH EXPRESS, INC. $.01 par common No par common $.01 par common 1ST BANCORP (Indiana) ABACUS DIRECT CORPORATION ACE*COMM CORPORATION $1.00 par common $.001 par common $.01 par common 1ST BERGEN BANCORP ABAXIS, INC. ACETO CORPORATION No par common No par common $.01 par common 1ST SOURCE CORPORATION ABC BANCORP (Georgia) ACMAT CORPORATION $1.00 par common $1.00 par common Class A, no par common Fixed rate cumulative trust preferred securities of 1st Source Capital ABC DISPENSING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ACORN PRODUCTS, INC. Floating rate cumulative trust preferred $.01 par common $.001 par common securities of 1st Source ABC RAIL PRODUCTS CORPORATION ACRES GAMING INCORPORATED 3-D GEOPHYSICAL, INC. $.01 par common $.01 par common $.01 par common ABER RESOURCES LTD. ACRODYNE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 3-D SYSTEMS CORPORATION No par common $.01 par common $.001 par common ABIGAIL ADAMS NATIONAL BANCORP, INC. †ACSYS, INC. 3COM CORPORATION $.01 par common No par common No par common ABINGTON BANCORP, INC. (Massachusetts) ACT MANUFACTURING, INC. 3D LABS INC. LIMITED $.10 par common $.01 par common $.01 par common ABIOMED, INC. ACT NETWORKS, INC. 3DFX INTERACTIVE, INC. $.01 par common $.01 par common No par common ABLE TELCOM HOLDING CORPORATION ACT TELECONFERENCING, INC. 3DO COMPANY, THE $.001 par common No par common $.01 par common ABR INFORMATION SERVICES INC. ACTEL CORPORATION 3DX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. $.01 par common $.001 par common $.01 par common ABRAMS INDUSTRIES, INC. ACTION PERFORMANCE COMPANIES, INC. 4 KIDS ENTERTAINMENT, INC. $1.00 par common $.01 par common $.01 par common 4FRONT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Qwest Corporation TARIFF FCC NO. 2[1]
    Qwest Corporation TARIFF F.C.C. NO. 2[1] SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION ORIGINAL TITLE PAGE REGULATIONS, RATES AND CHARGES Applying to the Special Construction of Facilities in connection with the provision of Interstate Services within the operating territory of Qwest Corporation in the State(s) of Arizona (AZ) Colorado (CO) Idaho (ID) Iowa (IA) Minnesota (MN) Montana (MT) Nebraska (NE) New Mexico (NM) North Dakota (ND) Oregon (OR) South Dakota (SD) Utah (UT) Washington (WA) Wyoming (WY) as provided herein d/b/a Qwest Original Tariff effective July 26, 2000. [1] This entire Tariff is issued under the authority of Special Permission No. 00-064. (Filed under Transmittal No. 1.) Issued: July 25, 2000 Effective: July 26, 2000 By: Director - Federal Regulatory Suite 5100 1801 California Street Denver, Colorado 80202 Qwest Corporation TARIFF F.C.C. NO. 2 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION 105TH REVISED PAGE 0-1 CANCELS 104TH REVISED PAGE 0-1 CHECK SHEET Title Page and Pages 0-1 to 0-7; 1-1; 2-1 to 2-14; 3-1 to 3-11; 4-1; 5-1 to 5-22; 6-1 to 6- 110 inclusive of this Tariff are effective as of July 26, 2000. NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF REVISION REVISION REVISION EXCEPT AS EXCEPT AS EXCEPT AS PAGE INDICATED PAGE INDICATED PAGE INDICATED Title Original 3-2 Original 5-21 Original 0-1 105th * 3-3 Original 5-22 Original 0-1.1 84th * 3-4 Original 6-1 Original 0-1.2 60th * 3-5 Original 6-2 Original 0-1.3 31st * 3-6 Original 6-3 Original 0-1.4 12th * 3-7 Original 6-4 Original 0-1.5 7th * 3-8 Original 6-5 Original 0-1.6 3rd * 3-9 Original 6-6 Original 0-2 Original 3-10 Original
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Exchange / Seattle Public Library Queen Anne Warehouse 1529 4Th Avenue West, Seattle Landmark
    Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Exchange / Seattle Public Library Queen Anne Warehouse 1529 4th Avenue West, Seattle Landmark Nomination BOLA Architecture + Planning Seattle December 21, 2015 Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Exchange / Seattle Public Library Queen Anne Warehouse Landmark Nomination 1529 4th Avenue W, Seattle December 21, 2015 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 Background Research Seattle’s Landmark Designation Process Preservation Incentives Design Reviews of Proposed Changes to a Landmark 2. Property Data 4 3. Historic Context Statement 5 Historic Overview of Queen Anne Hill The Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Company in Seattle The Building’s Construction History The Original Designers The Role of Women as Switchboard Operators 4. Architectural Description 12 Neighborhood Context The Site The Structure and Exterior Facades Interior Layout and Features Changes to the Original Building 5. Bibliography and Resources 18 6. Photographs and Images 23 Figure Index Images Select Drawings Cover: Views looking southwest at the building: Museum of Communications, 1923; King County Tax Assessor’s Property Record Card, 1936; Contemporary, BOLA, July 2015. BOLA Architecture + Planning 159 Western Avenue West, Suite 486 Seattle, Washington 98119 206.447.4749 Name (common, present, or historic): The Pacific Telegraph and Telephone Garfield Exchange / Seattle Public Library Queen Anne Warehouse Year built: 1921-1922, 1929 (remodeled in 1950 and 1961); 1977 (Renovation) Street and number: 1529 4th Avenue West, Seattle WA 98119 Assessor's file no.: 423290-3170
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Technologies Multi/Parallel Processing
    Emerging Technologies Multi/Parallel Processing Mary C. Kulas New Computing Structures Strategic Relations Group December 1987 For Internal Use Only Copyright @ 1987 by Digital Equipment Corporation. Printed in U.S.A. The information contained herein is confidential and proprietary. It is the property of Digital Equipment Corporation and shall not be reproduced or' copied in whole or in part without written permission. This is an unpublished work protected under the Federal copyright laws. The following are trademarks of Digital Equipment Corporation, Maynard, MA 01754. DECpage LN03 This report was produced by Educational Services with DECpage and the LN03 laser printer. Contents Acknowledgments. 1 Abstract. .. 3 Executive Summary. .. 5 I. Analysis . .. 7 A. The Players . .. 9 1. Number and Status . .. 9 2. Funding. .. 10 3. Strategic Alliances. .. 11 4. Sales. .. 13 a. Revenue/Units Installed . .. 13 h. European Sales. .. 14 B. The Product. .. 15 1. CPUs. .. 15 2. Chip . .. 15 3. Bus. .. 15 4. Vector Processing . .. 16 5. Operating System . .. 16 6. Languages. .. 17 7. Third-Party Applications . .. 18 8. Pricing. .. 18 C. ~BM and Other Major Computer Companies. .. 19 D. Why Success? Why Failure? . .. 21 E. Future Directions. .. 25 II. Company/Product Profiles. .. 27 A. Multi/Parallel Processors . .. 29 1. Alliant . .. 31 2. Astronautics. .. 35 3. Concurrent . .. 37 4. Cydrome. .. 41 5. Eastman Kodak. .. 45 6. Elxsi . .. 47 Contents iii 7. Encore ............... 51 8. Flexible . ... 55 9. Floating Point Systems - M64line ................... 59 10. International Parallel ........................... 61 11. Loral .................................... 63 12. Masscomp ................................. 65 13. Meiko .................................... 67 14. Multiflow. ~ ................................ 69 15. Sequent................................... 71 B. Massively Parallel . 75 1. Ametek.................................... 77 2. Bolt Beranek & Newman Advanced Computers ...........
    [Show full text]
  • Curtis L. Kennedy Attorney at Law
    CURTIS L. KENNEDY ATTORNEY AT LAW 8405 E. PRINCETON AVE. DENVER, CO 80237-1741 [email protected] TELEPHONE (303) 770-0440 ALSO ADMITTED IN: ___________________ UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT STATE OF ARIZONA FAX (303) 843-0360 STATE OF OKLAHOMA STATE OF TEXAS WASHINGTON, D.C. August 20, 2004 List of Retiree Telephone Concession Reimbursement Documents: 1 Date (Approximate): Originator Title and Description: Revised 12-1-61 Mountain States Telephone & Interdepartmental Manual No. 122 –Telephone Service Furnished to Revised 7-1-63 Telegraph Company Active and Pensioned Employees for Personal Use (21 pages) January 1974 Benefits Department - Telephone Service After Retirement. “Effective with your Mountain Bell retirement. charges for your residence telephone service will be paid by this Company. during your lifetime. After retirement, if you take up residence in an area not served by Mountain Bell, this concession still applies. .” (1 page) 1 Note: Documents indicated with * are supplemental either in whole or in part to those appearing on the July 19, 2004, index. -1- September 1976 Corporate Personnel - Benefits Pensioners’ Concession Telephone Service. “When your pension is Mountain Bell effective, charges for your residence telephone service will be paid by this Company. This means that, except for a few special types of service, you will receive free local service and be allowed a reasonable but limited amount of toll service over Bell System or connecting company lines within the continental United States during your lifetime. .also applies if your telephone service is provided by a company other than Mountain Bell. .If you take up residence in an area not served by Mountain Bell, this concession still applies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Telecom Meltdown for a Listing of Recent Titles in the Artech House Telecommunications Library, Turn to the Back of This Book
    The Great Telecom Meltdown For a listing of recent titles in the Artech House Telecommunications Library, turn to the back of this book. The Great Telecom Meltdown Fred R. Goldstein a r techhouse. com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record for this book is available from the U.S. Library of Congress. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Goldstein, Fred R. The great telecom meltdown.—(Artech House telecommunications Library) 1. Telecommunication—History 2. Telecommunciation—Technological innovations— History 3. Telecommunication—Finance—History I. Title 384’.09 ISBN 1-58053-939-4 Cover design by Leslie Genser © 2005 ARTECH HOUSE, INC. 685 Canton Street Norwood, MA 02062 All rights reserved. Printed and bound in the United States of America. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. All terms mentioned in this book that are known to be trademarks or service marks have been appropriately capitalized. Artech House cannot attest to the accuracy of this information. Use of a term in this book should not be regarded as affecting the validity of any trademark or service mark. International Standard Book Number: 1-58053-939-4 10987654321 Contents ix Hybrid Fiber-Coax (HFC) Gave Cable Providers an Advantage on “Triple Play” 122 RBOCs Took the Threat Seriously 123 Hybrid Fiber-Coax Is Developed 123 Cable Modems
    [Show full text]
  • Scalable Shared-Memory Multiprocessor Architectures
    NEW DIRECTIONS I Scalable Shared-Memory Multiprocessor Architectures New coherence schemes scale beyond single-bus-based, shared-memory architectures. This report describes three research efforts: one multiple-bus-based and two directory-based schemes. Introduction Shreekant Thakkar, Sequent Computer Systems Michel Dubois, University of Southern California Anthony T. Laundrie and Gurindar S. Sohi, University of Wisconsin-Madison There are two forms of shared-memory the bus as a broadcast medium to maintain interconnection. The following “coher- multiprocessor architectures: bus-based coherency; all the processors “snoop” on ence properties” form the basis for most of systems such as Sequent’s Symmetry, the bus to maintain coherent information in these schemes: Encore’s Multimax, SGI’s Iris, and Star- the caches. The protocols require the data Sharing readers. Identical copies of a dent’s Titan; and switching network-based in other caches to be invalidated or updated block of data may be present in several systems such as BBN’s Butterfly, IBM’s on a write by a processor if multiple copies caches. These caches are called readers. RP3, and New York University’s Ultra. of the modified data exist. The bus pro- Exclusive owners. Only one cache at a Because of the efficiency and ease of the vides free broadcast capability, but this - time may have permission to write to a shared-memory programming model, feature also limits its bandwidth. block of data. This cache is called the these machines are more popular for paral- New coherence schemes that scale be- owner. lel programming than distributed multi- yond single-bus-based, shared-memory processors such as NCube or Intel’s iPSC.
    [Show full text]
  • Lacrosse Footwear, Inc
    LACROSSE FOOTWEAR, INC. NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS To Be Held April 27, 2009 To: The Shareholders of LaCrosse Footwear, Inc.: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the annual meeting of shareholders of LaCrosse Footwear, Inc. will be held on Monday, April 27, 2009, at 3:00 P.M., Eastern Time, at LaCrosse Footwear, Inc.’s Distribution Center, 5352 Performance Way, Whitestown, Indiana, 46075 for the following purposes: 1. To elect three directors to hold office until the 2012 annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified; 2. To consider and act upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. The close of business on February 27, 2009, has been fixed as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. A proxy for the meeting and a proxy statement are enclosed herewith. By Order of the Board of Directors LACROSSE FOOTWEAR, INC. David P. Carlson Secretary Portland, Oregon March 27, 2009 Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to Be Held on April 27, 2009. Pursuant to new rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials both by sending you this full set of proxy materials, including a notice of annual meeting, and 2008 Annual Report to Shareholders, and by notifying you of the availability of our proxy materials on the Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • EOS: a Project to Investigate the Design and Construction of Real-Time Distributed Embedded Operating Systems
    c EOS: A Project to Investigate the Design and Construction of Real-Time Distributed Embedded Operating Systems. * (hASA-CR-18G971) EOS: A PbCJECZ 10 187-26577 INVESTIGATE TEE CESIGI AND CCES!I&CCIXOti OF GEBL-1IIBE DISZEIEOTEO EWBEECIC CEERATIN6 SPSTEI!!S Bid-Year lieport, 1QE7 (Illinois Unclas Gniv.) 246 p Avail: AlIS BC All/!!P A01 63/62 00362E8 Principal Investigator: R. H. Campbell. Research Assistants: Ray B. Essick, Gary Johnston, Kevin Kenny, p Vince Russo. i Software Systems Research Group University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Department of Computer Science 1304 West Springfield Avenue Urbana, Illinois 61801-2987 (217) 333-0215 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction. ........................................................................................................................... 1 2. Choices .................................................................................................................................... 1 3. CLASP .................................................................................................................................... 2 4. Path Pascal Release ................................................................................................................. 4 5. The Choices Interface Compiler ................................................................................................ 4 8. Summary ................................................................................................................................. 5 ABSTRACT: Project EOS is studying the problems
    [Show full text]
  • The American Telephone and Telegraph Company Divestiture: Background, Provisions, and Restructuring
    Report No. 84-58 E I -. <I?....*- ".YII. -n, -- THE AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY DIVESTITURE: BACKGROUND, PROVISIONS, AND RESTRUCTURING b Y Angele A. Gilroy Specialist in Industrial Organization Economics Division COLLECTION WKI HEKN !CNTUCKY LIBRARY April 11, 1984 11 i :::A L.'~~-l.ii.e makes jucn research available. without parti- ::;I.. in lr:m\ !orrns inc!uding studies. reports. cornpila- ;,)I!., I!:<?\[>. :md l:a~kqroi~ndhrietings. Cpon request. CRS .. ., :i ~ !>!r::z:rrir.e.;in ann1~-zingle+slative proposals and -tl:..b. :!nd in s>w;sinq the possible effects of these proposals . < :!I irie.The Ser~ice'ssenior specialists and ii,:c( r :iil.,;ii ?is are also at-aiiable for personal consultations ;xi-ir :.t>.;!?ecri\-elieid.; t~f'expertise. ABSTRACT On January 1, 1984, The American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T) di- vested itself of a major portion of its organizational structure and functions. Under the post-divestiture environment the once fully-integrated Bell System is now reorganized into the "new" AT&T and seven Ladependent regional 5olding ?om- panies -- American Information Technologies Corp., 3ell Atlantic Corp., 3ell- South Corp., NYNEX Corp., Pacific Telesis Group., Southwestern Bell Corp., and U.S. West, Inc. The following analysis provides an overview of the pre- and post-divestiture organizational structure and details the evolution of the anti- trust action which resulted in this divestiture. CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................ iii INTRODUCTION ............................................................ 1 1 . BELL SYSTEM CORPORATE REORGANIZATION .............................. 3 A . Predivestiture Bell System Corporate Structure ................ 3 B . Divested Operating Company Structure .......................... 5 C . Post-Divestiture AThT Organizational Structure ................ 7 11.
    [Show full text]
  • CBG Disaggregation Annual Suijijort @$31/$51* @ Models' Own Default Inputs @ FCC "Common" Inputs
    CBG Disaggregation Annual SUIJIJort @$31/$51* @ Models' Own Default Inputs @ FCC "Common" Inputs HA15.0a @ BCPM 3.1 @ BCPM HA15.0a @ BCPM 3.1 @ BCPM HAl Default Input BCPM Default Relative to FCC Common FCC Common Relative to State Study Area Values** Input Values HAl Input Values Input Values HAl VT New England Tel-VT $19,829,582 $57,713,841 291% $ 27,911,383 24,829,014 89% WA GTE Northwest Inc - Washington $13,558,020 $55,341,292 408% $ 14,785,430 26,023,743 176% WA Pacific Northwest Bell-Washington $32,613,930 $105,403,642 323% $ 34,340,028 46,203,827 135% WA Telephone Utilities Of WA Inc $28,687,697 $82,203,800 287% $ 33,992,927 44,105,939 130% WI GTE North Inc-WI $36,617,671 $157,105,870 429% $ 53,418,843 76,074,367 142% WI Wisconsin Bell $17,204,673 $64,229,071 373% $ 20,723,109 25,470,320 123% WV C And P Tel Co Of W VA $68,799,486 $169,186,364 246% $ 83,053,812 76,933,339 93% WY Mountain Bell-Wyoming $34,184,430 $96,228,775 281% $ 36,206,946 47,038,477 130% Sum $3,491,436,915 $10,009,263,007 287% $4,103,441,290 $4,485,465,272 109% * In these comparisons, it is assumed that all residence lines are supported at $51/month and all business lines are supported at $51/month. ** The true HAl default is to provide support only for primary residence lines and single line business lines, and not all lines as reported here.
    [Show full text]