Notice of Meeting and Agenda Planning Committee 10.00 Am, Monday, 15 June 2015
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Notice of meeting and agenda Planning Committee 10.00 am, Monday, 15 June 2015 Dean of Guild Court Room, City Chambers, High Street, Edinburgh This is a public meeting and members of the public are welcome to attend. Contacts E-mail: [email protected]/ [email protected] Tel: 0131 529 4261/529 4105 1. Order of business 1.1 Including any notices of motion and any other items of business submitted as urgent for consideration at the meeting. 2. Declaration of interests 2.1 Members should declare any financial and non-financial interests they have in the items of business for consideration, identifying the relevant agenda item and the nature of their interest. 3. Deputations 3.1 If any 4. Minutes 4.1 Planning Committee of 14 May 2015 – submitted for approval as a correct record. 5. Development Plan 5.1 Strategic Development Plan Main Issues Report 2 – report by the Acting Director of Services for Communities (circulated) 5.2 Midlothian Local Development Plan Proposed Plan: Period for Representations – report by the Acting Director of Services for Communities (circulated) 6. Planning Policy 6.1 Planning Performance Framework 2014 -15: Planning and Building Standards Service Plan – report by the Acting Director of Services for Communities (circulated) 6.2 Corporate Performance Framework – Performance for October 2014 – March 2015 – report by the Acting Director of Services for Communities (circulated) 7. Planning Process 7.1 High Hedges - Review of Fees – report by the Acting Director of Services for Communities (circulated) 7.2 New Procedure for Dealing with Legacy Planning Applications– report by the Acting Director of Services for Communities (circulated) 7.3 Development Management Sub – Committee: Review of Procedures – report by the Acting Director of Services for Communities (circulated) 7.4 Customer Engagement Strategy – Draft for Consultation – report by the Acting Director of Services for Communities (circulated) 8. Conservation 8.1 Leith Conservation Area – Review of Conservation Area Character Appraisal – report by the Acting Director of Services for Communities (circulated) Planning Committee – 15 June 2015 Page 2 of 4 8.2 Facilitating Reuse of At Risk Historic Buildings – report by the Acting Director of Services for Communities (circulated) 9. Motions 9.1 None Carol Campbell Head of Legal, Risk and Compliance Committee Members Councillors Perry (Convener), Dixon (Vice-Convener), Bagshaw, Balfour, Blacklock, Brock, Cairns, Child, Heslop, Howat, Keil, McVey, Milligan, Mowat, and Robson. Information about the Planning Committee The Planning Committee consists of 15 Councillors and is appointed by the City of Edinburgh Council. The Planning Committee usually meets every eight weeks. It considers planning policy and projects and other matters but excluding planning applications (which are dealt with by the Development Management Sub-Committee). The Planning Committee usually meets in the Dean of Guild Court Room in the City Chambers on the High Street in Edinburgh. There is a seated public gallery and the meeting is open to all members of the public. Further information If you have any questions about the agenda or meeting arrangements, please contact Stephen Broughton or Carol Richardson, Committee Services, City of Edinburgh Council, City Chambers, High Street, Edinburgh EH1 1YJ, Tel 0131 529 4261or 529 4105, e-mail [email protected]/[email protected]. A copy of the agenda and papers for this meeting will be available for inspection prior to the meeting at the main reception office, City Chambers, High Street, Edinburgh. The agenda, minutes and public reports for this meeting and all the main Council committees can be viewed online by going to www.edinburgh.gov.uk/cpol. Webcasting of Council meetings Please note: this meeting may be filmed for live or subsequent broadcast via the Council’s internet site – at the start of the meeting the clerk will confirm if all or part of the meeting is being filmed. Planning Committee – 15 June 2015 Page 3 of 4 You should be aware that the Council is a Data Controller under the Data Protection Act. Data collected during this webcast will be retained in accordance with the Council’s published policy. Generally, the public seating areas will not be filmed. However, by entering the Council Chamber and using the public seating area, you are consenting to being filmed and to the possible use of those images and sound recordings for webcasting or training purposes. If you have any queries regarding this, please contact Committee Services on 0131 529 4106 or [email protected] Planning Committee – 15 June 2015 Page 4 of 4 Minutes Item No 4.1 Planning Committee 10.00 am Thursday 14 May 2015 Present Councillors Perry (Convener), Dixon (Vice-Convener), Bagshaw, Blacklock, Brock, Cairns, Child, Dixon, Heslop, Howat, McVey, Milligan, Mowat, Robson, Rose, and Ross. Also Present Councillors Austin-Hart, Paterson, Walker, and Work (Item 1). 1. Order of Business Due to the significance of the Local Development Plan, the Convener, seconded by Councillor Dixon, proposed suspension of Standing Order 30.1, in order to hear local members’ views on the proposals. Decision To unanimously resolve that Standing Order 30.1 be suspended for the duration of the meeting in order that local members may be heard. 2. Local Development Plan: Submission to Examination – Ward Members and Deputations a) Local Ward Members The following ward councillors were heard:- 1) Almond Ward – Councillors Paterson and Work Councillor Paterson was heard on her concerns that the plan had not undergone significant revision since Committee had considered it in 2014. At that time, she stated that concerns on infrastructure and loss of green space in her ward had not been satisfactorily addressed. She highlighted the level of concern in her ward and requested a moratorium on the Scotstoun element of the Plan. Councillor Work advised that he agreed with the statement made by Councillor Paterson and indicated he remained concerned about infrastructure pressures and expressed a preference for the use of brownfield over greenfield sites for housing. 2) Liberton/Gilmerton Ward – Councillor Austin Hart Councillor Austin Hart raised various issues with the LDP, including concerns that GP services in her area were already over-subscribed, and that no monies had yet been identified to meet the need for additional school capacity. She indicated that housing development applications which had already received approval, and yet were not included in the Plan, and their inclusion could alter the number of homes required to be built in the east of the city 3) Portobello/Craigmillar Ward – Councillor Walker Councillor Walker expressed concern about transport links for the new housing developments planned for his ward, stressing the landlocked nature of the land identified would require high expenditure to implement new routes. He also felt that existing infrastructure would not cope with the increased housing density, and that the historic character of Craigmillar and the surrounding area would be damaged. (b) Deputations (i) Cramond and Barnton Community Council The Clerk advised that Cramond and Barnton Community Council had withdrawn their request for a deputation. (ii) Cammo Residents Association Committee agreed to hear a deputation from Sally Chalmers on behalf of Cammo Residents Association. The deputation made the following points:- • Whilst there was an obvious need for additional housing in Edinburgh, the Cammo site was not appropriate because of educational and infrastructure pressures. • The area already suffered severe traffic congestion at peak times of the day, which the higher housing density outlined in the Plan would inevitably exacerbate. More traffic would also lead to higher levels of pollution. • Schools in the area were already at capacity. • The views of local people did not seem to have been taken into account during the consultation, and other brownfield sites around the city which seemed to present more obvious options for development had been overlooked. (iii) Moredun 4 Multis Residents Association The Committee agreed to hear a deputation from Neil Hansen on behalf of Moredun 4 Multis Residents Association. The deputation made the following points:- Planning Committee – 14 May 2015 • The housing planned for the area would wipe out the only significant green space in area, a great loss to the community in general, and particularly the children who play there. • Existing issues of noise and other anti-social behavior could be worsened by increased development. • Parking was already difficult in Moredun. Hospital staff used the area for parking and this would be exacerbated when the new Sick Kids opened. • Dentists and G.Ps in the area were already over-subscribed. • There had been a 20-fold increase in the level of objection from the area since LDP Phase 1. (iv) Friends of Granton Castle Walled Garden The Committee agreed to hear a deputation from Kirsty Sutherland, Linda Garcia and David Leslie representing the Friends of Granton Castle Walled Garden. The deputation made the following points:- • Since their last deputation, Historic Scotland had decided to upgrade the listed status of the garden. • Given the site’s historical horticultural significance, it should not be considered suitable for development and the Committee was asked to amend the text of the Plan to clarify that the garden should be a protected open space. (v) Craigmillar First The Committee agreed to hear a deputation from Paul Nolan from Craigmiller First, on behalf of his organisation, Craigmillar Labour and Niddrie Independent Parent Support. The deputation made the following points:- • The area had already lost 8 parks and green spaces, totaling approximately 11 hectares. • More consideration should be given to protecting the historic environment. • Traffic was already heavy in Newcraighall, and the proposals would worsen the situation, as well as having a detrimental impact on the character of the village. • Going forward with the Plan in its current form would erode the remaining green belt between Edinburgh and East Lothian.