DOCSLIB.ORG

Before the Board of Optometry Department of Consumer Affairs State of California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Before the Board of Optometry Department of Consumer Affairs State of California BEFORE THE BOARD OF OPTOMETRY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Amended Accusation Case No. 1002502512 Against: OAH No. 2017070083 Gary Bruce Myers 1012 Main St Ste 105 Ramona, CA 92065 Optometrist License No. 7998 Respondent DECISION The attached Proposed Decision is hereby adopted by the California State Board of Optometry, Department of Consumer Affairs, as its Decision in this matter. This Decision shall become effective December 22, 2017 . It is so ORDERED November 22, 2017 . _________________________________ Cyd Brandvein, President California State Board of Optometry 1 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California 2 ANTOINETTE B. CINCOTTA Supervising Deputy Attorney General 3 NICOLE R. TRAMA Deputy Attorney General 4 State Bar No. 263607 600 West Broadway, Suite 1800 5 San Diego, CA 92101 P.O. Box 85266 6 San Diego, CA 92186-5266 Telephone: (619) 738-9441 7 Facsimile: (619) 645-2061 Attorneys for Complainant 8 BEFORE THE 9 CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF OPTOMETRY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 10 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 11 In the Matter of the Accusation Against: Case No. 1002502512 12 GARY BRUCE MYERS 13 398 D Street Ramona, CA 92065 A C C U S A T I O N 14 Optometrist License No. OPT 7998 15 Respondent. 16 17 Complainant alleges: 18 PARTIES 19 1. Jessica Sieferman (Complainant) brings this Accusation solely in her official capacity 20 as the Executive Officer of the California State Board of Optometry (Board), Department of 21 Consumer Affairs. 22 2. On or about February 3, 1984, the Board issued Optometrist License Number OPT 23 7998 to Gary Bruce Myers (Respondent). The Optometrist License expired on December 31, 24 2014, and has not been renewed. 25 JURISDICTION 26 3. This Accusation is brought before the Board under the authority of the following 27 laws. All section references are to the Business and Professions Code unless otherwise indicated. 28 /// 1 ( GARY BRUCE MYERS) ACCUSATION 1 4. Section 118, subdivision (b), of the Code provides that the suspension, expiration, 2 surrender, or cancellation of a license shall not deprive the Board of jurisdiction to proceed with a 3 disciplinary action during the period within which the license may be renewed, restored, reissued 4 or reinstated. 5 5. Section 3090 of the Code states: 6 Except as otherwise provided by law, the board may take action against all persons guilty of violating this chapter or any of the regulations adopted by the 7 board. The board shall enforce and administer this article as to licenseholders, and 8 the board shall have all the powers granted in this chapter for these purposes, including, but not limited to, investigating complaints from the public, other 9 licensees, health care facilities, other licensing agencies, or any other source suggesting that an optometrist may be guilty of violating this chapter or any of the 10 regulations adopted by the board. 11 STATUTORY PROVISIONS 12 6. Section 820 of the Code states: 13 Whenever it appears that any person holding a license, certificate or permit 14 under this division or under any initiative act referred to in this division may be unable to practice his or her profession safely because the licentiate's ability to 15 practice is impaired due to mental illness, or physical illness affecting competency, the licensing agency may order the licentiate to be examined by one or more 16 physicians and surgeons or psychologists designated by the agency. The report of 17 the examiners shall be made available to the licentiate and may be received as direct evidence in proceedings conducted pursuant to Section 822. 18 19 7. Section 822 of the Code states: 20 If a licensing agency determines that its licentiate’s ability to practice his or her profession safely is impaired because the licentiate is mentally ill, or 21 physically ill affecting competency, the licensing agency may take action by any one of the following methods: 22 23 (a) Revoking the licentiate’s certificate or license. 24 (b) Suspending the licentiate’s right to practice. 25 (c) Placing the licentiate on probation. 26 (d) Taking such other action in relation to the licentiate as the licensing agency in its discretion deems proper. 27 28 2 ( GARY BRUCE MYERS) ACCUSATION The licensing section shall not reinstate a revoked or suspended certificate or 1 license until it has received competent evidence of the absence or control of the 2 condition which caused its action and until it is satisfied that with due regard for the public health and safety the person’s right to practice his or her profession may 3 be safely reinstated. 4 8. Section 3110 of the Code states: 5 The board may take action against any licensee who is charged with unprofessional conduct, and may deny an application for a license if the applicant 6 has committed unprofessional conduct. In addition to other provisions of this 7 article, unprofessional conduct includes, but is not limited to, the following: 8 (a) Violating or attempting to violate, directly or indirectly assisting in or abetting the violation of, or conspiring to violate any provision of this chapter or 9 any of the rules and regulations adopted by the board pursuant to this chapter. 10 . 11 (l) Administering to himself or herself any controlled substance or using any 12 of the dangerous drugs specified in Section 4022, or using alcoholic beverages to the extent, or in a manner, as to be dangerous or injurious to the person applying 13 for a license or holding a license under this chapter, or to any other person, or to the public, or, to the extent that the use impairs the ability of the person applying 14 for or holding a license to conduct with safety to the public the practice authorized by the license, or the conviction of a misdemeanor or felony involving the use, 15 consumption, or self administration of any of the substances referred to in this 16 subdivision, or any combination thereof. 17 COST RECOVERY 18 19 9. Section 125.3 of the Code provides, in pertinent part, that the Board may request the 20 administrative law judge to direct a licentiate found to have committed a violation or violations of 21 the licensing act to pay a sum not to exceed the reasonable costs of the investigation and 22 enforcement of the case. 23 FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 24 10. Following the receipt of two consumer complaints alleging that Respondent practiced 25 optometry while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, the Board initiated an investigation 26 which revealed the following: 27 11. On January 29, 2016, Respondent was interviewed by an investigator. Respondent 28 admitted that since 2010, he has had a series of medical problems and has not practiced 3 ( GARY BRUCE MYERS) ACCUSATION 1 optometry since 2014, and is on disability. Respondent stated that he only took Tramadol as 2 prescribed by his doctor. He admitted that his hands shake as a side effect of not taking his 3 medication. Respondent stated that due to his health problems, he believed he will need a few 4 years to recover from his medical issues before he is able to return to practicing as an optometrist. 5 12. Respondent’s medical records showed a long history of alcohol abuse. Specifically, 6 in March 2013, Respondent informed his physician that he consumed six or more alcoholic drinks 7 daily or almost daily, and that he had a history of addiction to narcotics. This pattern of drinking 8 continued throughout the remainder of 2013, despite Respondent beginning a hydrocodone- 9 acetaminophen regime in July 2013. 10 13. Throughout 2014, Respondent continued to drink heavily and take narcotic pain 11 medication. On several occasions in 2014, Respondent presented to his physician’s office while 12 under the influence and “obviously intoxicated.” On each of those visits, Respondent’s physician 13 found that Respondent’s “judgement and insight” were “impaired” or “questionable.” 14 Respondent admitted to his physician that he used oxycodone and abused alcohol for pain 15 control. 16 14. Respondent was also admitted to the emergency room several times in 2014. On 17 October 25, 2014, Respondent presented to the emergency room and appeared “intoxicated.” On 18 November 9, 2014, Respondent was hospitalized and had elevated alcohol levels and was going 19 through mild withdrawal signs and symptoms. In late 2014, Respondent was using more pain 20 narcotics than what he was prescribed and frequently mixed his narcotics with alcohol, causing 21 him to feel dizzy. On December 17, 2014, Respondent was admitted to the emergency room after 22 consuming a half of pint of vodka and sustaining a laceration to his ear. On December 20, 2014, 23 Respondent presented to the emergency room and tested positive for alcohol, benzodiazepine and 24 opiates. He admitted to “heavy drinking, including episodes of binge drinking.” 25 15. In 2015, Respondent entered into at least three different residential treatment 26 programs. Despite that, Respondent resumed drinking alcohol, and in December 2015, 27 Respondent presented to the emergency room, testing positive for alcohol. He admitted to 28 “drinking several beers.” 4 ( GARY BRUCE MYERS) ACCUSATION 1 16. On April 1, 2016, Respondent presented to the emergency room with multiple 2 complaints. Respondent requested pain medicine, but was not given any because he was 3 planning on driving himself home. In response, Respondent reported that he had pain medication 4 in his car, that he would take those medication as soon as he was discharged and that he “always” 5 drove while using pain medication. On April 2, 2016, Respondent’s physician reported that 6 Respondent was drinking one 24 ounce beer each night and taking tramadol and hydrocodone for 7 his chronic pain.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Postgraduate Education in Europe Harmonising with a Dissonance?
    Sakari Ahola & Osmo Kivinen Postgraduate Education in Europe Harmonising with a dissonance? This presentation deals with the emerging European postgraduate policies and their larger EU-dimensions which have motivated the establishing of a co-operative network (PG-NET) of eight European countries. The focus is on the harmonisation of the European higher education scene, especially from the Finnish point of view. The ongoing Bologna process can be seen as an expression of the will to create a common higher education market in Europe in order to promote the free mobility of students and the labour force. In this respect the speculation taken furthest is that already in the near future the effort to maintain the distinction between universities and polytechnics will be given up. In this way Europe will probably follow in the footsteps of the US, and gradually move towards a three-phase model of higher education with abroad access and initial three-year programmes leading to the bachelor’s degree that provides advanced training but that are not closely linked with the world of academic research. In the next phase a smaller part will advance through selective procedures to the master’s level on which studies are also more closely connected with scientific work. Only at the post-master’s level leading to a doctorate will the humboldtian ideal of the integrated nexus of teaching, research and learning be attained. It is argued in the paper that this kind of a two (or three) tier structure would be suitable especially from the perspective of the European Graduate School model and beneficial also to the functioning of the Finnish higher education system with its special problem points.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Educational Terms 2Nd Edition Now with Farsi
    INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION RESEARCH FOUNDATION ® Index of Educational Terms 2nd Edition now with Farsi 1969-2019 Celebrating 50 years of service Index of Educational Terms We are pleased to present this 2nd edition of the Index of Educational Terms, as part of IERF’s 50th anniversary celebration. This handy resource can trace its beginnings to the 1979 publication of The Glossary of Foreign Educational Terms. Developed by Theodore Sharp, IERF’s co-founder, The Glossary focused on a selection of languages from Europe and Latin America. The Index of Educational Terms, compiled by IERF evaluators, provides glossaries from 11 major languages around the world, including Arabic, Chinese and Russian. This new edition, which now also includes Farsi, is intended as a handy tool for admissions officers, credentials analysts and registrars, the Index of Educational Terms focuses on the most commonly used terms found on international academic records. We are grateful for the enthusiastic feedback we have received over the years, since its first release in 2012. I would like to give special thanks to the following individuals for their hard work and for making this possible: Editors: Emily Tse Alice Tang Contributors: Liana Amelova Andrej Molchan Andrea Ben Zion Maryam Rawson Daniel Borhanian Irene Romo Joshua Everett Amy Santiago Matthew Fisher Traci Wells Victoria Haydenko Alvin Yin I-Hsing Lin Nina Zhao Finally, I would also like to express my appreciation to our colleagues, Ujjaini Sahasrabudhe and Herman de Leeuw, for their kind support and feedback.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum for Licentiate Degree in Engineering 2020- 2022
    1 Curriculum for Licentiate Degree in Engineering 2020- 2022 March 16, 2020 2 Contents In accordance with the Aalto University General Regulations on Teaching and Studying, the curriculum is a confirmed overall description of the learning outcomes of a licentiate programme, the goals and contents of its study modules and the courses offered as well as the organisation of teaching within a given period of time as indicated in the Aalto University General Regulations on Teaching and Studying (Section 2). When the curriculum is being designed, at least the following details must be specified for each course: name, scope in credits, timing, learning outcomes, implementation method, language of instruction, assessment methods, grading scale, prerequisites (if any), the unit responsible for and the teacher-in-charge of the course. Contents ................................................................................................................................................. 2 1. Basic information about the degree ............................................................................................. 3 1.1. Name of the degree ................................................................................................................ 3 1.2. Language of the degree .......................................................................................................... 3 1.3. Research fields ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.4. Scope of
    [Show full text]
  • Master's/Licentiate Thesis Handbook
    Master's and Licentiate Thesis Handbook 2020-2021 Edition Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 WRITING YOUR THESIS ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 STYLE ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 THE WRITING CENTER ................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC AND RESEARCH COMPUTING RESOURCES ...................................................................................................... 4 USING AN INDEPENDENT TYPIST AND COPY EDITOR ............................................................................................................................................ 4 THE COPYRIGHT ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 ECCLESIASTICAL IMPRIMATUR .......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Classifying Educational Programmes
    Classifying Educational Programmes Manual for ISCED-97 Implementation in OECD Countries 1999 Edition ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Foreword As the structure of educational systems varies widely between countries, a framework to collect and report data on educational programmes with a similar level of educational content is a clear prerequisite for the production of internationally comparable education statistics and indicators. In 1997, a revised International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED-97) was adopted by the UNESCO General Conference. This multi-dimensional framework has the potential to greatly improve the comparability of education statistics – as data collected under this framework will allow for the comparison of educational programmes with similar levels of educational content – and to better reflect complex educational pathways in the OECD indicators. The purpose of Classifying Educational Programmes: Manual for ISCED-97 Implementation in OECD Countries is to give clear guidance to OECD countries on how to implement the ISCED-97 framework in international data collections. First, this manual summarises the rationale for the revised ISCED framework, as well as the defining characteristics of the ISCED-97 levels and cross-classification categories for OECD countries, emphasising the criteria that define the boundaries between educational levels. The methodology for applying ISCED-97 in the national context that is described in this manual has been developed and agreed upon by the OECD/INES Technical Group, a working group on education statistics and indicators representing 29 OECD countries. The OECD Secretariat has also worked closely with both EUROSTAT and UNESCO to ensure that ISCED-97 will be implemented in a uniform manner across all countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Licentiate in Sacred Theology
    LICENTIATE IN SACRED THEOLOGY 2 Licentiate in Sacred Theology These guidelines are intended to assist students in understanding the features of the Licentiate in Sacred Theology (STL) program at the Boston College School of Theology and Ministry (STM). As a guide to the policies and expectations for the STL, this information will be helpful to prospective applicants, as well as to matriculated students making progress toward completing the degree. Regarding interpretation of these policies, the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and the STL Program Director are the proper arbiters. 1. What is the STL? The STL is an advanced ecclesiastical degree that the STM offers by virtue of its status as an ecclesiastical faculty; it does so in accordance with the provisions of Sapientia Christiana. The STL is a “second cycle” degree: it follows the first level Bachelor of Sacred Theology degree (STB), the B.D., or the M.Div and is a prerequisite for the “third cycle”, the Doctor of Sacred Theology. The STL enables students to deepen their theological background in order to equip themselves for service in official capacities within dioceses and religious communities. The degree prepares students to teach theology in major seminaries, diocesan schools, and other institutions of higher learning. Through the thesis component, the degree also helps students to expand their skills in the methods of theological research and writing; these skills are crucial for doctoral work. 2. What is the focus of this degree? The Licentiate focuses on the traditional theological disciplines as represented under the following areas: 1) Biblical Studies; 2) Systematic, Historical, and Liturgical Theology; 3) Moral Theology; and 4) Church History.
    [Show full text]
  • ACADEMIC RANKS and CAREER of the Pro Deo State University
    PRO DEO STATE UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF THE RECTOR MAGNIFICUS RECTORIAL ACT 28/04/2010 To implement the decision of renewing the all structure of our University, in accordance with the most and internationally accepted standards, in order to better correspond to the needs and to the reality of the University in the present times; In the sequence of the approval by the Pedagogical Council, Scientific Council and Curator's Board, successively, in virtue of the powers conferred upon us as Rector Magnificus and as President of the Curator's Board, by the present Act we approve the following rules : 1- From the present day on, the following will be the ACADEMIC RANKS and CAREER of the Pro Deo State University: Level A - FULL PROFESSOR - For this rank a Ph.D is required, as well as an outstanding curriculum and experience in teaching to conduct B.A., Licentiate, Masters and Ph.D Courses and Thesis. A Full Professor should have at least 4 scientific articles published in peer reviewed journals (listed in the ISI web of science) and have at least the same number of citations, or be the author or co- author of at least 2 books in his branch of Science. A Full Professor should preferably have international recognition, such as being member of the board of scientific journals and/or scientific associations, chairman at international congresses etc.. Level B - ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR - ( Equivalent to Chair Professor ) For this rank a Ph.D is required to conduct B.A., Licentiate, Masters and Ph.D Courses and Thesis. An Associate Professor should have at least 2 scientific articles published in peer reviewed journals (listed in the ISI web of science) and should have at least the same number of citations, or shall be the author or co-author of at least 1 book in his branch of Science, besides being member of scientific associations.
    [Show full text]
  • Licentiate and Doctor Degree Application Personal Details Fill out the Address and Contact Information Thoroughly
    Licentiate and Doctor Degree Application Personal details Fill out the aDDress and contact information thoroughly. Use clear block letters anD no abbreviations. Unclear or missing information can cause the Degree certificate to be sent to the wrong aDDress or make it Difficult to get in contact with you if we have any questions about your application. SweDish national iDentity number/University registration number Given name anD surname c/o Postal aDDress Postal code City/Town Country Phone number Email I Do not speak SweDish anD woulD like to be contacteD in English if necessary Degree of licentiate Mark the Degree you apply for. Ekonomie licentiat (Licentiate of Philosophy) MeDicine licentiat (Degree of Licentiat) Farmacie licentiat (Degree of Licentiate) ODontologie licentiat (Degree of Licentiate) Filosofie licentiat (Licentiate of Philosophy) Teknologie licentiat (Licentiate of Technology) Juris licentiat (Licentiate of Laws) Teologie licentiat (Licentiate of Theology) Konstnärlig licentiat (Licentiate of Philosophy in Fine Arts) Degree of doctor Mark the Degree you apply for. Ekonomie Doktor (Doctor of Philosophy) MeDicine Doktor (Doctor of Philosophy) Farmacie Doktor (Doctor of Philosophy) ODontologie Doktor (Doctor of Philosophy) Filosofie Doktor (Doctor of Philosophy) Teknologie Doktor (Doctor of Technology) Juris Doktor (Doctor of Laws) Teologie Doktor (Doctor of Theology) Konstnärlig Doktor (Doctor of Philosophy in Fine Arts) Section of Degrees, phone number: +4631-786 1050, email: [email protected] SenD your application to: University of Gotheburg, Section of Degrees, Box 100, SE-405 30 Gothenburg, SWEDEN Field of study Signature I have maDe sure that all courses that I want to incluDe in the Degree are finisheD anD registereD in the stuDy registration programme, LaDok.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 University of Lapland Faculty of Law Postgraduate Degrees The
    1 University of Lapland Faculty of Law Postgraduate degrees The postgraduate degrees in Law are Licentiate in Laws (LL.Lic.) and Doctor of Law (LL.D). According to the Decree on Law Degrees, the aim of postgraduate studies is to enable students to: 1) achieve a deep understanding of their field of research and its social significance, to acquire the skills necessary to apply scientific research methods independently and critically, and to generate new scientific knowledge; 2) achieve a sound understanding of the development of their chosen field, its basic research problems, and its research methods; and 3) gain such knowledge of the general theory of science and of other disciplines relating to their field of research that will enable them to follow the related developments. The licentiate and doctorate are separate degrees, although their requirements overlap to some extent. The degree of Doctor of Laws is intended for those pursuing the career of a researcher or a legal expert. The projected time required to complete the degree as a full time student is four years (240 credits). The aim of the Licentiate in Laws degree is to provide practicing lawyers with valuable, supplementary professional education. It is also possible to take the licentiate’s degree as an intermediate step when studying for a doctorate. In this case, it is advisable to choose a topic for the licentiate thesis that falls within the field of the doctoral thesis; otherwise completion of the doctorate might be delayed. The recommended time required to complete the licentiate’s degree is two years (120 cr.).
    [Show full text]
  • Final UST Credential Policy Approved Acadcouncil
    CREDENTIALING POLICY Policy Number: AD.01.02 SCOPE All Faculty: Tenured, Tenure Track, Visiting, Instructor, Adjunct and Artist in Residence and Program Administrators (those persons assigned the responsibility for the review, development and implementation of programs of study leading to degrees, minors and certificates.) PURPOSE SACSCOC Comprehensive Standard 3.7.1 requires that the institution employ competent faculty members qualified to accomplish the mission and goals of the institution. The University of St. Thomas must also demonstrate that our faculty (all tenured and tenure-track faculty as well as non-tenure track faculty and adjuncts) have the credentials to teach in the discipline to which they are assigned. This policy ensures that all faculty teaching in an academic setting at the University of St. Thomas have the necessary preparation, training, experience to teach our students, meet or exceed the minimum standards of SACSCOC in a manner consistent with the mission of the University of St. Thomas and the mission of the academic unit. The academic deans will determine for each faculty member if the field of study of their highest degree matches the field(s) of the courses each faculty member is teaching during the academic year. If there is a direct match, then no further justification is needed. If there is not a direct match, then a justification for a faculty member teaching a course outside his or her highest degree field of study needs to be provided and additional documentation must be obtained that show that the faculty member is qualified to teach each learning objective of the course(s) he or she is teaching.
    [Show full text]
  • Documentation Requirements – by Country
    Documentation Requirements – by Country Afghanistan • Final high school transcript • Transcripts • Bachelor/Licence • Master Degree with transcripts (if applicable) • A syllabus or course description for all accounting, business and communication courses at the post-secondary level. Albania • Final high school transcript • Transcripts • Diplome with titull • A syllabus or course description for all accounting, business and communication courses at the post-secondary level. Algeria • Final high school transcript • Transcripts • Licentiate • A syllabus or course description for all accounting, business and communication courses at the post-secondary level. Andorra • Final high school transcript • Transcripts • Diplomatura en….. (Bachelor Degree) • A syllabus or course description for all accounting, business and communication courses at the post-secondary level. Angola • Final high school transcript • Transcripts • Bacharelato • Licenciado (if applicable) • A syllabus or course description for all accounting, business and communication courses at the post-secondary level. Anguilla • Final high school transcript • Transcripts • Bachelor Degree • A syllabus or course description for all accounting, business and communication courses at the post-secondary level. Antigua & Barbuda • Final high school transcript • Transcripts • Bachelor Degree • A syllabus or course description for all accounting, business and communication courses at the post-secondary level. Argentina • Final high school transcript • Transcripts • Bachiller Superior/Bachelor
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at Teacher Education of the Communication Professors in the UFRR
    e-ISSN nº 2447-4266 Vol. 6, n. 1, January-March. 2020 Learning of teaching: A look at teacher education of the Communication professors in the UFRR Aprendizagem da docência: Um olhar para a formação docente dos professores do campo da Comunicação na UFRR 1a2en n 6 Aprendizaje docente: Una mirada a la formación docente de docentes en el campo de la Comunicación en v la UFRR 20 4266.20 Leila Adriana Baptaglin ABSTRACT: - Doctor in Education (UFSM). Research professor in the This research aims to discuss teacher Licentiate Course in Visual Arts, the Postgraduate education implemented in the construction Program in Communication, the Postgraduate of the learning of teaching of the professors Program in Education, both at UFRR, and in the Inter- in the Bachelor’s Course in Social institutional Doctorate in Education in the Amazon. Communication/Journalism (CCOS) and the [email protected]. Postgraduate Program in Communication 0000-0002-8137-0913 (PPGCOM) in the Federal University of Roraima (UFRR). For this, we analyzed the Vilso Junior Santi resumés in the Lattes platform and an Doctor in Social Communication (PUC-RS). Research inquiry via email to the teachers asking them professor in the Course of Social about the activities they performed during Communication/Journalism and in the Postgraduate http://dx.doi.org/10.20873/uft.2447 their education process, related to the Program in Communication at UFRR. learning of teaching. This set of documents [email protected]. DOI: was studied through the Content Analysis, in 0000-0003-0970-6459 which three categories were defined: Initial academic education; Postgraduate studies; Mailing address: Universidade Federal de Roraima, 20 and Educational trajectories.
    [Show full text]