DOCSLIB.ORG

1998-1999 (The Band’S 29Th Year) Was a Highly Successful One

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1998-1999 (The Band’S 29Th Year) Was a Highly Successful One Centenary Annual Report 1998 - 1999 30 November 1999 The Hon D Llewellyn MHA Minister for Police and Public Safety Parliament House, HOBART Dear Minister In accordance with Section 33AB of the Tasmanian State Service Act 1984 and Section 27 of the Financial Management and Audit Act 1990, I have pleasure in submitting the Annual Report and Financial Statements for the Department of Police and Public Safety for the financial year 1998-99. Yours sincerely Richard McCreadie, Secretary, Department of Police and Public Safety 1 Centenary Annual Report 1998 - 1999 2 Centenary Annual Report 1998 - 1999 Contents SECRETARY’S FOREWORD ..............................................................................................................................7 VISION ..........................................................................................................................................................9 MISSION .......................................................................................................................................................9 CORPORATE MANAGEMENT GROUP................................................................................................10 BUSINESS STATEMENT .................................................................................................................................11 OUTCOMES ..............................................................................................................................................11 OUTPUT GROUPS .....................................................................................................................................11 STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS ............................................................................................................................11 CORPORATE PRIORITIES.............................................................................................................................11 VALUES ...................................................................................................................................................12 GUIDING PRINCIPLES................................................................................................................................12 ORGANISATIONAL PROFILE ..........................................................................................................................13 TASMANIA POLICE ....................................................................................................................................13 STATE EMERGENCY SERVICE......................................................................................................................18 CENTENARY OF TASMANIA POLICE ..............................................................................................................21 POLICE COMMISSIONERS.............................................................................................................................23 OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................................................31 POLICING A ‘SAFE HAVEN’ CENTRE............................................................................................................31 ABORIGINAL STRATEGIC PLAN....................................................................................................................31 BUSINESS PROJECTS..................................................................................................................................32 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT ...................................................................................................................33 RESOURCE DISTRIBUTION METHODOLOGY PROJECT.....................................................................................33 YEAR 2000 PREPARATIONS........................................................................................................................34 INTEGRATED CRIME MANAGEMENT STRATEGY (ICMS) PROJECT ..................................................................34 CRIME PREVENTION AND COMMUNITY SAFETY COUNCIL (CPCSC)..............................................................34 CRIMTRAC ...............................................................................................................................................35 ILLICIT DRUG STRATEGIES.........................................................................................................................35 AUSTRALIAN ROAD RULES .........................................................................................................................36 STATE EMERGENCY SERVICE INITIATIVES ....................................................................................................37 DEGREE IN POLICE STUDIES......................................................................................................................37 NATIONAL COMMITMENTS...........................................................................................................................39 CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS OF POLICE OF AUSTRALASIA AND THE SOUTH WEST PACIFIC REGION .........39 AUSTRALASIAN CRIME CONFERENCE ..........................................................................................................39 MINISTERIAL COUNCIL ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE (AUSTRALASIAN POLICE MINISTERS’ Council - APMC) ...................................................................................................................................40 SENIOR OFFICERS’ GROUP TO THE APMC (SOG) ......................................................................................40 NATIONAL DRUG STRATEGY (NDS)...........................................................................................................40 3 Centenary Annual Report 1998 - 1999 NATIONAL COMMON POLICE SERVICES.......................................................................................................41 Other National Policing Activities....................................................................................................44 State Emergency Service ..................................................................................................................45 Report on Government Service Provision ........................................................................................46 OUTPUT GROUP 1 POLICING SUPPORT TO THE COMMUNITY......................................................................47 Crime Prevention Programs .............................................................................................................47 Protective Security ...........................................................................................................................51 Search and Rescue...........................................................................................................................51 Pipe Band.........................................................................................................................................53 Community Surveys .........................................................................................................................53 OUTPUT GROUP 2 CRIME DETECTION AND INVESTIGATION........................................................................55 Investigation of Crime ......................................................................................................................55 OUTPUT GROUP 3 TRAFFIC LAW ENFORCEMENT AND ROAD SAFETY..........................................................59 Accident Reduction and Road Safety...............................................................................................59 OUTPUT GROUP 4 PROTECTION OF PRIMARY INDUSTRY AND FISHERIES RESOURCES ................................63 Poppy Security .................................................................................................................................63 Fisheries Security .............................................................................................................................64 OUTPUT GROUP 5 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ..........................................................................................67 Emergency Management Planning, Training and Public Education. ..............................................67 Volunteer Training and Support ......................................................................................................68 Response and Recovery Coordination for Significant Emergencies.................................................68 OUTPUT GROUP 6 SUPPORT TO JUDICIAL SERVICES ..................................................................................71 Prosecution and Conferencing .........................................................................................................71 Coronial............................................................................................................................................71 Bail/Warrant Processing...................................................................................................................72 OUTPUT GROUP 7 MINISTERIAL SUPPORT AND INFORMATION SERVICES ...................................................73 Ministerial Support and Policy Advice.............................................................................................73 Information Services ........................................................................................................................73
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Police Award
    TASMANIAN INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION Industrial Relations Act 1984 s.23 application for award or variation of an award Police Association of Tasmania (T.2516 of 1990) (T.3119 of 1991) and Commissioner of Police (T4214 of 1993) POLICE AWARD PRESIDENT F. D. WESTWOOD 20 SEPTEMBER 1993 Award variation - restructuring and rates of pay - Structural Efficiency Principle - special case applications REASONS FOR DECISION Application T2516, lodged by the Police Association of Tasmania on 29 June 1990, was for an increase in "all salaries and skill/work related allowances" of 3 per cent as the second structural efficiency adjustment. On 3 July 1990 that application was referred to the Full Bench which was hearing a range of public sector matters in accordance with the Structural Efficiency Principle of the 1989 Wage Fixing Principles. The Association agreed to abide by Exhibit W2 in the conglomeration of public sector matters1 which established a series of conditions to be followed in concluding the structural efficiency exercise. With effect from the first full pay period to commence on or after 18 July 1990 the Police Award was varied to reflect the three percent second structural efficiency increase. On 7 August 1990, following an application from the Tasmanian Trades and Labour Council in Matter TA.70 of 1990, Anomalies Conference No. 23, the Police Award was granted the status of an "arguable special case" to enable the Association to pursue a work value claim in excess of the six per cent available by way of the Structural Efficiency Principle. Subsequently, on 7 June 1991, the Association, after industrial action by its members seeking to convince the employer that parity with rates of pay for police in other States should be conceded, made the necessary application2 relevant to its arguable special case claim.
    [Show full text]
  • St Johns Burial Ground New Town, Hobart Tasmania, Rosemary Davidson
    TASMANIAN FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY INC. PO Box 191 Launceston Tasmania 7250 State Secretary: [email protected] Journal Editor: [email protected] Home Page: http://www.tasfhs.org Patron: Dr Alison Alexander Fellows: Dr Neil Chick and Mr David Harris Executive: President Anita Swan (03) 6326 5778 Vice President Maurice Appleyard (03) 6248 4229 Vice President Peter Cocker (03) 6435 4103 State Secretary Muriel Bissett (03) 6344 4034 State Treasurer Betty Bissett (03) 6344 4034 Committee: Kerrie Blyth John Gillham Jim Rouse Judy Cocker Libby Gillham Margaret Strempel Sandra Duck Leo Prior Robert Tanner By-laws Officer (vacant) Assistant By-laws Officer Maurice Appleyard (03) 6248 4229 Webmaster Robert Tanner (03) 6231 0794 Journal Editors Anita Swan (03) 6326 5778 Betty Bissett (03) 6344 4034 LWFHA Coordinator Anita Swan (03) 6394 8456 Members’ Interests Compiler Jim Rouse (03) 6239 6529 Membership Registrar Muriel Bissett (03) 6344 4034 Publications Convenor Bev Richardson (03) 6225 3292 Public Officer Colleen Read (03) 6244 4527 State Sales Officer Betty Bissett (03) 6344 4034 Branches of the Society Burnie: PO Box 748 Burnie Tasmania 7320 [email protected] Devonport: PO Box 267 Latrobe Tasmania 7307 [email protected] Hobart: PO Box 326 Rosny Park Tasmania 7018 [email protected] Huon: PO Box 117 Huonville Tasmania 7109 [email protected] Launceston: PO Box 1290 Launceston Tasmania 7250 [email protected] Volume 30 Number 1 June 2009 ISSN 0159 0677 Contents From the editor ............................................................................................................... 2 President’s Message ....................................................................................................... 3 Branch Reports .............................................................................................................. 4 13th AFFHO Congress Auckland January 2009, Dianne Snowden ............................... 7 The Road to Sandy Bay Leads to Hell on Sundays, Sally Rackham ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Tasmanian Chapter of the ASPG
    Report of the Tasmanian Chapter of the ASPG Membership The Tasmanian Chapter’s current members are: 1. Hon. Elise Archer MP, Attorney-General; 2. Mr Todd Buttsworth, Second Clerk-Assistant, House of Assembly; 3. Mr Shane Donnelly, Clerk of the House of Assembly; 4. Ms Anita Dow MP, Member of the House of Assembly; 5. Hon. Craig Farrell MLC, Member of the Legislative Council; 6. Hon. Ruth Forrest MLC, Member of the Legislative Council; 7. Hon. Michael Gaffney MLC, Member of the Legislative Council; 8. Dr Richard Herr, University of Tasmania; 9. Ms Stephanie Hesford, Clerk-Assistant & Sergeant-at-Arms, House of Assembly; 10. Hon. Sue Hickey MP, Speaker of the House of Assembly; 11. Hon. Leonie Hiscutt MLC, Member of the Legislative Council; 12. Mr David O’Byrne MP, Member of the House of Assembly; 13. Ms Michelle O’Byrne MP, Deputy Leader of the Opposition; 14. Mr David Pearce, Clerk of the Legislative Council; 15. Hon. Jeremy Rockliff MP, Deputy Premier; 16. Ms Laura Ross, Deputy Clerk, House of Assembly; 17. Ms Alison Standen MP, Member of the House of Assembly; 18. Ms Catherine Vickers, Deputy Clerk, Legislative Council; 19. Mr Stuart Wright, Clerk-Assistant & Usher of the Black Rod, Legislative Council. Chapter activities The Tasmanian Chapter hosted the 2017 Annual Conference from 27 to 29 September 2017. No other activities were undertaken by the Tasmanian Chapter. Corporate membership votes at AGM These votes will be exercised by: Scott Hennessy, House of Assembly Finance During the period 1 July to date the Chapter received $540.00 in membership fees.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmania: Majority Or Minority Government? *
    AUSTRALASIAN PARLIAMENTARY REVIEW Tasmania: Majority or Minority Government? * Michael Lester and Dain Bolwell PhD Candidate, Institute for the Study of Social Change, Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Tasmania Associate, Institute for the Study of Social Change, Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Tasmania * Double-blind reviewed article. INTRODUCTION While the outcome of the March 2018 Tasmanian State Election was predictable,1 the controversies that dogged the campaign were not. Yet it was the aftermath of the election that was most astonishing—not only to the public but also to members of Cabinet. Tasmania is different. Its parliamentary institutions are unusual and its electoral system is distinctive. So were the issues on which the March 2018 state election was fought. In the lead up to the election both major parties campaigned to govern alone or not at all—neither in minority nor in coalition with the Greens. As well as this apparently overarching concern, there were three other major issues prominent during the campaign—an acute housing shortage, the thousands of poker machines in pubs and clubs, and the surprise matter of gun control. Health, education, law and order, the economy and who would best manage the budget were, as usual, also policy battle grounds; however, the minority government fear campaign, a television blitz on the benefits of poker machines and considerable 1 N. Miragliotta, ‘As Tasmania Looks Likely to Have Minority Government, The Greens Must Decide How to Play Their Hand’, The Conversation, 26 February 2018. Accessed at: https://theconversation.com/as-tasmania-looks- likely-to-have-minority-government-the-greens-must-decide-how-to-play-their-hand-91985.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Youth Crime out of Control' : Is It Reality of Media Hype?
    "Youth Crime out of Control": Is it reality or media hype? A Tasmanian perspective on the print media's portrayal of Youth Crime and Ashley Youth Detention Centre. By Peter John Barr Bachelor of Applied Science (Psychology) A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the degree of Masters of Criminology and Corrections School of Sociology and Social Work University of Tasmania November 2011 STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY OF ACCESS This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Peter Barr DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution. To the best of my knowledge and belief, the thesis contains no material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made in the text of the thesis. Peter Barr I Abstract As an employee at Ashley Youth Detention Centre (AYDC) I have been a keen follower of the Tasmanian media's portrayal of crime generally and youthful offending and AYDC specifically, for 17 years. During that time I have literally read hundreds of Tasmanian media stories relating to youth crime or AYDC and from that had developed the anecdotal view that the Tasmanian print media's reporting of crime, youth crime and AYDC is generally biased. In order to test that hypothesis I reviewed every Tasmanian newsprint article written on youth crime and AYDC during the period July 2007 to June 2009. In all there were 267 articles from the three Tasmanian newspapers.
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday 8 June 2016 - Estimates Committee a (Hidding)
    UNCORRECTED PROOF ISSUE Wednesday 8 June 2016 - Estimates Committee A (Hidding) LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ESTIMATES COMMITTEE A Wednesday 8 June 2016 MEMBERS Mr Farrell Ms Forrest Mr Gaffney Mr Hall (Chair) Mrs Hiscutt Mr Mulder IN ATTENDANCE Hon. Rene Hidding MP, Minister for Infrastructure, Minister for Police, Fire and Emergency Management Department of Police and Emergency Management Darren Hine, Secretary DPEM and Commissioner of Police Scott Tilyard, Deputy Commissioner of Police Chris Arnol, Chief Officer, TFS Gavin Freeman, Deputy Chief Officer, TFS Glenn Frame, Assistant Commissioner of Police Richard Cowling, Assistant Commissioner of Police Donna Adams, Deputy Secretary, Business and Executive Services, DPFEM Nicholas Wilson, Acting Director, State Emergency Service Scott Wilson-Haffenden, Director, Information Services and Communications Technology Marijke Harris, Assistant Manager, Finance and Payroll Services, Business and Executive Services Tasmania Fire Service Chris Arnol, Chief Officer Gavin Freeman, Deputy Chief Officer Sandra Whight, Manager, Fuel Reduction Unit Estimates A 1 Wednesday 8 June 2016 - Hidding UNCORRECTED PROOF ISSUE Department of State Growth Kim Evans, Secretary Gary Swain, Deputy Secretary Policy and Strategy Allan Garcia, CEO Infrastructure Tasmania Penny Nicholls, General Manager Road User Services Shane Gregory, General Manager State Road Services Glen Dean, Finance Director Lia Morris, Chief Executive of Marine and Safety Tasmania Ministerial Office Richard Wilson, Chief of Staff Randolph Wierenga, Senior Adviser Carol Jones, Adviser The committee met at 9 a.m. CHAIR (Mr Hall) - Welcome all. Mr HIDDING - Chair, you might notice our acting director of SES is not present today. Can we take it that we give him a leave pass. He is busy fighting floods.
    [Show full text]
  • 9A Commissioner of Police
    Submission to the Joint Select Committee of the Legislative Council and House of Assembly on ethical conduct, standards and integrity of the elected Parliamentary representatives and servants of the State August 2008 Commissioner of Police J Johnston CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 2 2.0 The Operational Independence of the 4 Commissioner of Police 3.0 The Capacity of Tasmania Police to 10 Conduct Independent Investigations 4.0 Other Existing Mechanisms 16 5.0 Ethics Commission – Recommended Model 26 6.0 Summary of recommendations 33 7.0 Conclusion 35 Attachment A – Draft Guidelines Concerning the Release of 36 Information Concerning Political Investigations Attachment B – Outline of Complaint Process for Alleged 39 Misconduct in Recommended Model Attachment C – Summary of Features of Other Anti-Corruption 41 Bodies Bibliography 47 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION There is no single institution which can provide a panacea to the problem of corruption or misconduct. Instead, a diversity of agencies, laws, practices and ethical codes are required to effectively tackle misconduct and promote integrity (Brown, 2005). The existing mechanisms available in Tasmania to respond to misconduct and promote integrity include: Parliament; The Ombudsman; The State Service Commissioner; The Auditor-General; The Director of Public Prosecutions; Tasmania Police; Commissions of Inquiry; and Legislation – including the Freedom of Information Act 1991, the Public Interest Disclosures Act 2002, and relevant provisions of the State Service Act 2000 and the Local Government Act 1993. Mechanisms such as codes of conduct help to promote integrity, while mechanisms such as freedom of information legislation and the oversight provided by parliamentary committees and the Auditor-General promote transparency.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2012: Justice and Community Safety
    ACT Justice and Community Safety Directorate, ACT Government Solicitor and ACT Magistrates Court ADMINISTRATION OF APPLICATIONS FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE UNDER THEVICTIMS OF CRIME (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) ACT 1983 May 2012 Report by the Acting ACT Ombudsman, Alison Larkins, under the Ombudsman Act 1989 REPORT NO. 01|2012 Reports by the Ombudsman Under the Ombudsman Act 1989 (ACT), the Australian Capital Territory Ombudsman investigates the administrative actions of Australian Capital Territory Government agencies and officers. An investigation can be conducted as a result of a complaint or on the initiative (or own motion) of the Ombudsman. The Ombudsman also has specific responsibilities under the Ombudsman Act 1976 (Cth) for matters regarding the Australian Federal Police, the Freedom of Information Act 1989 (ACT) and is authorised to deal with whistleblower complaints under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1994 (ACT). Most complaints to the Ombudsman are resolved without the need for a formal finding or report. The above Acts provide (in similar terms) that the Ombudsman can culminate an investigation by preparing a report containing the opinions and recommendations of the Ombudsman. A report can be prepared if the Ombudsman is of the opinion that the administrative action under investigation was unlawful, unreasonable, unjust, oppressive, improperly discriminatory, or otherwise wrong or unsupported by the facts; was not properly explained by an agency; or was based on a law that was unreasonable, unjust, oppressive or improperly discriminatory. A report by the Ombudsman is forwarded to the agency concerned and the responsible minister. If the recommendations in the report are not accepted, the Ombudsman can choose to furnish the report to the ACT Chief Minister or the ACT Legislative Assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • Archives Office of Tasmania GOVERNOR's OFFICE
    Archives Office of Tasmania GUIDE TO THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF TASMANIA SECTION TWO GOVERNOR’S OFFICE by P.R. Eldershaw HOBART ARCHIVES OFFICE OF TASMANIA 1958 (Reprinted 2000) © STATE of TASMANIA, ARCHIVES OFFICE OF TASMANIA Other Guides in this series Section One, Colonial Secretary’s Office Section Three, Convict Department Section Four, Records Relating to Free Immigration CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................................I THE GOVERNOR'S OFFICE ............................................................................................................................. I NOTE ON TRANSFERS............................................................................................................................ XXXIX PART 1 – DESPATCHES, 1818-1932 ............................................................................................................ 1 A. - DESPATCHES RECEIVED.......................................................................................................................... 4 B. - DESPATCHES SENT ................................................................................................................................ 13 PART 2 - CORRESPONDENCE RECORDS, 1820-1932.......................................................................... 19 A. - CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED.............................................................................................................. 21 B. CORRESPONDENCE
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Council Tuesday 29 June 2021
    PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL REPORT OF DEBATES Tuesday 29 June 2021 REVISED EDITION Contents TABLED PAPERS ............................................................................................................................................... 1 GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE A - SPECIAL REPORT .................................................................. 1 LEAVE OF ABSENCE ........................................................................................................................................ 1 MEMBER FOR DERWENT - MR FARRELL ............................................................................................................. 1 SPECIAL INTEREST MATTERS ..................................................................................................................... 1 HELEN AND JOHN CONWAY - RICHMOND FOOTBALL CLUB ............................................................................... 1 ZAFIRA FINE FOODS AND FRIENDS OF ZAFIRA .................................................................................................... 3 SCOTCH OAKBURN MIDDLE SCHOOL - CIVICS AND CITIZENSHIP UNIT .............................................................. 5 ANTHONY FRANCIS (TONY) COLMAN - TRIBUTE ................................................................................................ 7 DELORAINE COMMUNITY BANK ......................................................................................................................... 9 RALDA (TOPSY) FREIBOTH - TRIBUTE .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Imagereal Capture
    To Suspend or Not to Suspend: A Qual tative Analysis of Sentencing Decisions in he Supreme Court ofTasmania LORANA BARTELS * Abstract Suspended sentences are a controversial sentencing option currently available in all Australian jurisdictions. This article presents a ualitative analysis of all partly and wholly suspended sentences impo ed in the Tasmanian Supreme Court over a two-year period. The imp rtance of reasons for sentence is discussed and the relevance of a range of factors to the decision to suspend a sentence is considered. In part'cular, the discussion considers factors relating to the offender, for exa pIe, prior record and youth; factors relating to the offence, especia ly where offences are committed in company; the response to the charg s, such as cooperation with the authorities; and the effect of the of ence and sanction, including hardship to the offender and others. In addi ion, cases which suggest an improper reasoning process was applied in xercising the discretion to suspend are reviewed. Introduction Suspended sentences are a controversial sentencing option currently available in all Australian jurisdictions. 1 This article examines he factors cited by judges in imposing a suspended sentence, in order to better understand how such sentences are used and promote cons stency in sentencing. The test for imposing a suspended sentence was set ut by the High Court in Dinsdale v The Queen. 2 Kirby J, with whom Gu ow·and * Criminology Research Council Research Fellow, Australian Institute of BA LLB LLM (UNSW); PhD (UTas). The research reported in this article is based on a chapter ofmy PhD, Sword or Feather? The Use and Utility ofSuspended Sentences in Tasmania.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Assembly Tuesday 21 August 2018
    Tuesday 21 August 2018 The Speaker, Ms Hickey, took the Chair at 10 a.m., acknowledged the Traditional People and said Prayers. QUESTIONS Minister for Health - Actions Ms WHITE question to MINISTER for HEALTH, Mr FERGUSON [10.02 a.m.] The Hodgman Government has lurched from crisis to crisis over the past five weeks and you have been at the centre of it all. First you went missing when Tasmanian families desperately needed leadership and information about meningococcal disease. On your watch the health and hospital system has experienced continuous escalations at level four at the Royal Hobart Hospital and code blacks at the Launceston General Hospital. Patients at the Royal are being treated in corridors and on Liverpool Street, with ambulances queued waiting to get into the emergency department. You have forced nursing staff onto the street in protest at the LGH; nursing staff that you have failed to visit for nearly 50 days. You have been forced into a humiliating back down over your secret pre-election changes to gun laws and you have been forced to admit that you discussed the private, very personal medical details of Angela Williamson - specifically how she was forced to travel to Victoria to access a termination - with her employer, leading to her dismissal from Cricket Tasmania. Minister, you have proven to be a liability. Your credibility is in tatters. Your dishonesty has never been more exposed and your disgraceful conduct means that Tasmanians can have no trust in you. Why don’t you do the honourable thing and resign? ANSWER Madam Speaker, what a pathetic start to question time from the Leader of the Opposition who has no policies, tells Tasmanians lies, misleads the parliament - Ms WHITE - Point of order, Madam Speaker.
    [Show full text]