DOCSLIB.ORG

This Work Has Been Submitted to NECTAR, the Northampton

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
This Work Has Been Submitted to NECTAR, the Northampton This work has been submitted to NECTAR, the Northampton Electronic Collection of Theses and Research. http://nectar.northampton.ac.uk/3551/ Creator: Sneddon, S. Title: Nuclear unclear: an investigation of British nuclear power policy, 1945-2005 Research supervisor: Dr Suzanne McDonald-Walker School: School of Social Sciences Date of completion: 2010 Institution: The University of Northampton Example citation: Sneddon, S. (2010) Nuclear unclear: an investigation of British nuclear power policy, 1945-2005. Doctoral thesis. The University of Northampton. Nuclear Unclear: An investigation of British Nuclear Power Policy 1945-2005 Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy At the University of Northampton 2010 Simon Thomas Sneddon © Simon Thomas Sneddon 2010. This thesis is copyright material and no quotation from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. Nuclear Unclear Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................... I ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................... III CHAPTER 1: BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION ............................................................. 1 1.1: PRAGMATISM ........................................................................................................... 4 1.2: THE USE OF SCIENCE .................................................................................................. 6 1.3: TECHNOCRATIC DECISION MAKING ................................................................................. 11 1.4: THE 2001 FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE OUTBREAK ............................................................... 12 1.5: METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................ 13 1.6: INTRODUCTION TO THE THESIS ...................................................................................... 16 1.7: CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................... 19 CHAPTER 2: 1944-48: THE INTRODUCTION OF NUCLEAR POWER ................................... 21 2.1: INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 21 2.2: BACKGROUND AND DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................... 21 2.3: THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK .............................................................................................. 23 2.4: THE ATOMIC ENERGY ACT 1946 .................................................................................... 32 2.5: THE RADIOACTIVE SUBSTANCES ACT 1948 ....................................................................... 39 2.6: SECRECY AND ACCESS TO INFORMATION ........................................................................... 41 2.7: CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................... 44 CHAPTER 3: 1973-78: MORTAL WOUNDING OF NUCLEAR POWER? ................................. 47 3.1: INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 47 3.2: DEVELOPMENTS BETWEEN 1948 AND 1972 ....................................................................... 48 3.3: THE ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY (WEAPONS GROUP) ACT 1973 .................................................. 72 3.4: THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY (FINANCE) ACT 1977 AND THE NUCLEAR SAFEGUARDS AND ELECTRICITY (FINANCE) ACT 1978 ................................................................................................ 73 3.5: THE PARKER INQUIRY ................................................................................................. 79 3.6: CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................... 84 CHAPTER 4: 1992-95: THE DECLINE OF PUBLIC FUNDING .............................................. 87 4.1: INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 87 4.2: DEVELOPMENTS BETWEEN 1978 AND 1992 ....................................................................... 88 4.3: THE RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS (ROAD TRANSPORT) ACT 1991 AND THE RADIOACTIVE SUBSTANCES ACT 1993 ................................................................................................................. 108 4.4: THE ATOMIC ENERGY AUTHORITY ACT 1995 .................................................................... 111 4.5: CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................ 113 CHAPTER 5: NOVEMBER 2005 – MAY 2008: THE REBIRTH OF NUCLEAR POWER? .......... 117 5.1: INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 117 5.2: DEVELOPMENTS BETWEEN 1995 AND 2005 ..................................................................... 118 5.3: THE CBI SPEECH, NOVEMBER 2005 ............................................................................. 134 5.4: THE 2007 GREENPEACE CASE..................................................................................... 139 5.5: CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................ 145 CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................... 148 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................... 154 JOURNALS ..................................................................................................................... 154 BOOKS ......................................................................................................................... 158 HANSARD ...................................................................................................................... 163 NEWSPAPERS .................................................................................................................. 166 GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS ................................................................................................ 168 INDUSTRY PUBLICATIONS .................................................................................................... 175 OTHER PUBLICATIONS ........................................................................................................ 176 CASES ......................................................................................................................... 180 STATUTE ....................................................................................................................... 181 APPENDIX I: A GLOSSARY OF POSSIBLY UNCOMMON TERMS & ABBREVIATIONS ......... 185 APPENDIX II: NUCLEAR LEGISLATION 1946- ............................................................... 191 Nuclear Unclear UK ACTS ...................................................................................................................... 191 APPENDIX III: CURRENT TYPES OF NUCLEAR REACTOR ............................................... 193 APPENDIX IV BREAKDOWN OF THE NUCLEAR CONSORTIA 1954-80 ............................. 195 PHASE 1 ....................................................................................................................... 195 PHASE 2 ....................................................................................................................... 195 PHASE 3 ....................................................................................................................... 196 PHASE 4 ....................................................................................................................... 196 APPENDIX V INITIAL MEMBERS OF THE UKAEA ........................................................... 197 APPENDIX VI: THE NUCLEAR CHAIN REACTION ........................................................... 199 APPENDIX VII: KEY NUCLEAR SITES IN THE UK ........................................................... 201 APPENDIX VIII: PROJECT PLOWSHARE ....................................................................... 203 Nuclear Unclear Acknowledgements Thanks for help, inspiration and guidance to Dr John Frost, Dr John Proops, Dr Suzanne McDonald Walker, Professor Andrew Pilkington and Dr Caoimhin MacMaolain A big thank you to my family for their support over the past years. Particular thanks to Katie, without whom I’m not sure I would have put my nose back to the grindstone. Post hoc ergo propter hoc. Nuclear Unclear Nuclear Unclear Abstract This thesis traces the development of policy and the regulatory framework for the commercial nuclear power industry in the United Kingdom between 1945 and 2005. It is argued that throughout the whole period politicians have legitimised their decisions in terms of a scientific discourse that represents the scientific community as unified and the decisions as thus self-evident. This is illustrated by looking at the key elements of legislation relating to nuclear power in four distinct periods: 1944-8, the introduction of nuclear power; 1973-8, the mortal wounding of nuclear power; 1992-5, the decline of public funding; and 2005-8, the rebirth of nuclear power. In each of the periods identified the key policy developments and legislative initiatives were based on pragmatic considerations. A distinction is made between two types of pragmatic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Developing an Intergovernmental Nuclear Regulatory Organization
    Developing an Intergovernmental Nuclear Regulatory Organization: Lessons Learned from the International Civil Aviation Organization, the International Maritime Organization, and the International Telecommunication Union Clarence Eugene Carpenter, Jr. Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering, May 1988 Seattle University, Seattle, WA Master of Science in Technical Management, May 1997 The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD Master of Arts in International Science and Technology Policy, May 2009 The George Washington University, Washington, DC A Dissertation submitted to The Faculty of The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 10, 2020 Dissertation directed by Kathryn Newcomer Professor of Public Policy and Public Administration The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University certifies that Clarence Eugene Carpenter, Jr. has passed the Final Examination for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy as of November 26, 2019. This is the final and approved form of the dissertation. Developing an Intergovernmental Nuclear Regulatory Organization: Lessons Learned from the International Civil Aviation Organization, the International Maritime Organization, and the International Telecommunication Union Clarence Eugene Carpenter, Jr. Dissertation Research Committee: Kathryn Newcomer, Professor of Public Policy and Public Administration, Dissertation Director Philippe Bardet, Assistant Professor,
    [Show full text]
  • Haessly, Katie (2010) British Conservative Women Mps
    British Conservative Women MPs and ‘Women’s Issues’ 1950-1979 Katie Haessly, BA MA Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2010 1 Abstract In the period 1950-1979, there were significant changes in legislation relating to women’s issues, specifically employment, marital and guardianship and abortion rights. This thesis explores the impact of Conservative female MPs on these changes as well as the changing roles of women within the party. In addition there is a discussion of the relationships between Conservative women and their colleagues which provides insights into the changes in gender roles which were occurring at this time. Following the introduction the next four chapters focus on the women themselves and the changes in the above mentioned women’s issues during the mid-twentieth century and the impact Conservative women MPs had on them. The changing Conservative attitudes are considered in the context of the wider changes in women’s roles in society in the period. Chapter six explores the relationship between women and men of the Conservative Parliamentary Party, as well as men’s impact on the selected women’s issues. These relationships were crucial to enhancing women’s roles within the party, as it is widely recognised that women would not have been able to attain high positions or affect the issues as they did without help from male colleagues. Finally, the female Labour MPs in the alteration of women’s issues is discussed in Chapter seven. Labour women’s relationships both with their party and with Conservative women are also examined.
    [Show full text]
  • Grappling with the Bomb: Britain's Pacific H-Bomb Tests
    Timeline and glossary Nuclear timeline, 1945–1963 16 July 1945 Alamogordo, United States conducts first-ever nuclear New Mexico, USA test, codenamed ‘Trinity .’ 6 August 1945 Hiroshima, Japan US aircraft Enola Gay drops the atomic weapon ‘Little Boy’ on Hiroshima, killing 80,000 people immediately and an estimated 100,000 people within six months . 9 August 1945 Nagasaki, Japan US aircraft Bockscar drops the atomic weapon ‘Fat Man’ on Nagasaki, killing 70,000 people immediately and tens of thousands in following months . 30 June 1946 Bikini Atoll, Marshall Under Operation Crossroads, United Islands States conducts the first of two atomic tests at Bikini Atoll in the Marshall Islands. ‘Able’ and ‘Baker’ are the first of 67 atmospheric tests in the Marshall Islands between 1946–1958 . 6 August 1948 Hiroshima, Japan Hiroshima’s first Peace Festival. 29 August 1949 Semipalatinsk, USSR conducts first atomic test Kazakhstan RDS-1 in Operation Pervaya molniya (Fast lightning), dubbed ‘Joe-1’ by United States . 1950–1954 Korean peninsula United States, Britain and Australia, under a United Nations mandate, join military operations in Korea following clashes between forces from the south and north of Korea. The Democratic People’s Republic is backed by the newly created People’s Republic of China . 3 October 1952 Monte Bello Islands, Under Operation Hurricane, United Western Australia Kingdom begins its nuclear testing program in Australia with a 25 kiloton atomic test . xi GRAPPLING WITH THE BOMB 1 November 1952 Bikini Atoll, Marshall United States conducts its first Islands hydrogen bomb test, codenamed ‘Mike’ (10 .4 megatons) as part of Operation Ivy .
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Military Nuclear Strategy And
    The Development of Military Nuclear Strategy and Anglo-American Relations, 1939 – 1958 Submitted by: Geoffrey Charles Mallett Skinner to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History, July 2018 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. (Signature) ……………………………………………………………………………… 1 Abstract There was no special governmental partnership between Britain and America during the Second World War in atomic affairs. A recalibration is required that updates and amends the existing historiography in this respect. The wartime atomic relations of those countries were cooperative at the level of science and resources, but rarely that of the state. As soon as it became apparent that fission weaponry would be the main basis of future military power, America decided to gain exclusive control over the weapon. Britain could not replicate American resources and no assistance was offered to it by its conventional ally. America then created its own, closed, nuclear system and well before the 1946 Atomic Energy Act, the event which is typically seen by historians as the explanation of the fracturing of wartime atomic relations. Immediately after 1945 there was insufficient systemic force to create change in the consistent American policy of atomic monopoly. As fusion bombs introduced a new magnitude of risk, and as the nuclear world expanded and deepened, the systemic pressures grew.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Banfield Collection
    The Michael Banfield Collection Friday 13 and Saturday 14 June 2014 Iden Grange, Staplehurst, Kent THE MICHAEL BANFIELD COLLECTION Friday 13 and Saturday 14 June 2014 Iden Grange, Staplehurst, Kent, TN12 0ET Viewing Please note that bids should be ENquIries Customer SErvices submitted no later than 16:00 on Monday to Saturday 08:00 - 18:00 Thursday 12 June 09:00 - 17:30 Motor Cars Thursday 12 June. Thereafter bids +44 (0) 20 7447 7447 Friday 13 June from 09:00 +44 (0) 20 7468 5801 should be sent directly to the Saturday 14 June from 09:00 +44 (0) 20 7468 5802 fax Please call the Enquiries line Bonhams office at the sale venue. [email protected] when out of hours. +44 (0) 20 7468 5802 fax Sale times Automobilia Please see page 2 for bidder We regret that we are unable to Friday 13 June +44 (0) 8700 273 619 information including after-sale Automobilia Part 1 - 12 midday accept telephone bids for lots with collection and shipment a low estimate below £500. [email protected] Saturday 14 June Absentee bids will be accepted. Automobilia Part 2 - 10:30 Please see back of catalogue New bidders must also provide Motor Cars 15:00 (approx) for important notice to bidders proof of identity when submitting bids. Failure to do so may result Sale Number Illustrations in your bids not being processed. 22201 Front cover: Lot 1242 Back cover: Lot 1248 Live online bidding is CataloguE available for this sale £25.00 + p&p Please email [email protected] Entry by catalogue only admits with “Live bidding” in the subject two persons to the sale and view line 48 hours before the auction to register for this service Bids +44 (0) 20 7447 7448 +44 (0) 20 7447 7401 fax To bid via the internet please visit www.bonhams.com Bonhams 1793 Limited Bonhams 1793 Ltd Directors Bonhams UK Ltd Directors Registered No.
    [Show full text]
  • Harold Wilson Obituary
    Make a contribution News Opinion Sport Culture Lifestyle UK World Business Football UK politics Environment Education Society Science Tech More Harold Wilson obituary Leading Labour beyond pipe dreams Geoffrey Goodman Thu 25 May 1995 09.59 EDT 18 Lord Wilson of Rievaulx, as he came improbably to be called - will not go down in the history books as one of Britain's greatest prime ministers. But, increasingly, he will be seen as a far bigger political figure than contemporary sceptics have allowed far more representative of that uniquely ambivalent mood of Britain in the 1960s and a far more rounded and caring, if unfulfilled, person. It is my view that he was a remarkable prime minister and, indeed, a quite remarkable man. Cynics had a field day ridiculing him at the time of his decline. Perhaps that was inevitable given his irresistible tendency to behave like the master of the Big Trick in the circus ring of politics - for whom there is nothing so humiliating as to have it demonstrated, often by fellow tricksters, that the Big Trick hasn't worked. James Harold Wilson happened to be prime minister leading a left wing party at a time when the mores of post-war political and economic change in Britain (and elsewhere) were just beginning to be perceived. Arguably it was the period of the greatest social and industrial change this century, even if the people - let alone the Wilson governments - were never fully aware of the nature of that change. Social relationships across the entire class spectrum were being transformed.
    [Show full text]
  • April 4-6 Contents
    MEDIA GUIDE #TheWorldIsWatching APRIL 4-6 CONTENTS CHAIRMAN’S WELCOME 3 2018 WINNING OWNER 50 ORDER OF RUNNING 4 SUCCESSFUL OWNERS 53 RANDOX HEALTH GRAND NATIONAL FESTIVAL 5 OVERSEAS INTEREST 62 SPONSOR’S WELCOME 8 GRAND NATIONAL TIMELINE 64 WELFARE & SAFETY 10 RACE CONDITIONS 73 UNIQUE RACE & GLOBAL PHENOMENON 13 TRAINERS & JOCKEYS 75 RANDOX HEALTH GRAND NATIONAL ANNIVERSARIES 15 PAST RESULTS 77 ROLL OF HONOUR 16 COURSE MAP 96 WARTIME WINNERS 20 RACE REPORTS 2018-2015 21 2018 WINNING JOCKEY 29 AINTREE JOCKEY RECORDS 32 RACECOURSE RETIRED JOCKEYS 35 THIS IS AN INTERACTIVE PDF MEDIA GUIDE, CLICK ON THE LINKS TO GO TO THE RELEVANT WEB AND SOCIAL MEDIA PAGES, AND ON THE GREATEST GRAND NATIONAL TRAINERS 37 CHAPTER HEADINGS TO TAKE YOU INTO THE GUIDE. IRISH-TRAINED WINNERS 40 THEJOCKEYCLUB.CO.UK/AINTREE TRAINER FACTS 42 t @AINTREERACES f @AINTREE 2018 WINNING TRAINER 43 I @AINTREERACECOURSE TRAINER RECORDS 45 CREATED BY RACENEWS.CO.UK AND TWOBIRD.CO.UK 3 CONTENTS As April approaches, the team at Aintree quicken the build-up towards the three-day Randox Health Grand National Festival. Our first port of call ahead of the 2019 Randox welfare. We are proud to be at the forefront of Health Grand National was a media visit in the racing industry in all these areas. December, the week of the Becher Chase over 2019 will also be the third year of our the Grand National fences, to the yard of the broadcasting agreement with ITV. We have been fantastically successful Gordon Elliott to see delighted with their output and viewing figures, last year’s winner Tiger Roll being put through not only in the UK and Ireland, but throughout his paces.
    [Show full text]
  • SEVEN HUNDRED and ELEVENTH MEETING Minutes of the Meeting of the Trustees Held at the National Portrait Gallery on Thursday 20 February 2003
    SEVEN HUNDRED AND ELEVENTH MEETING Minutes of the Meeting of the Trustees held at the National Portrait Gallery on Thursday 20 February 2003 Present: Sir David Scholey (Chairman) Professor David Cannadine Ms Flora Fraser Professor Ludmilla Jordanova Mr Tom Phillips Ms Sara Selwood Miss Alexandra Shulman Sir John Weston Baroness Willoughby In attendance: Mr Sandy Nairne Mr Jacob Simon 1. Apologies for Absence Apologies were received from the Rt Hon. Robin Cook, Ms Amelia Fawcett, Sir Max Hastings, Professor Phillip King, Dr Christopher Ondaatje and Professor the Earl Russell. 2. Trustees The Chairman thanked Flora Fraser for her service as Vice Chairman. • THE TRUSTEES agreed to the appointment of David Cannadine as her successor as Vice Chairman. 3. Minutes of the Last Meeting The minutes of the meeting held on 21 November 2002 were approved. 4. Matters Arising The Director reported that the Management Statement/Financial Memorandum, the framework agreement between the Gallery and the DCMS, had now been signed, subject to a letter being appended to the document, with the agreement of the DCMS, clarifying the fact that the document could not be taken to override the Gallery's status as an exempt charity.Trustees would be sent a copy of the agreement and appended letter. 5. Director's Report The Director reported that it is proposed to bring the drawing of Lucian Freud, currently in David Hockney's exhibition at Annely Juda, to the May meeting of Trustees. The innovationof circulating a selection of press cuttings to Trustees was generally welcomed. There was a discussion of our expectations of the Americans and the JuliaMargaret Cameron exhibitions and the Trustees complimented Hazel Sutherland on her achievement in obtaining such extensive coverage for Cameron.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Development of British Satellite Broadcasting Policy, 1977-1992
    THE HISTORY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF BRITISH SATELLITE BROADCASTING POLICY, 1977-1992 Windsor John Holden —......., Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of PhD University of Leeds, Institute of Communications Studies July, 1998 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others ABSTRACT This thesis traces the development of British satellite broadcasting policy, from the early proposals drawn up by the Home Office following the UK's allocation of five direct broadcast by satellite (DBS) frequencies at the 1977 World Administrative Radio Conference (WARC), through the successive, abortive DBS initiatives of the BBC and the "Club of 21", to the short-lived service provided by British Satellite Broadcasting (BSB). It also details at length the history of Sky Television, an organisation that operated beyond the parameters of existing legislation, which successfully competed (and merged) with BSB, and which shaped the way in which policy was developed. It contends that throughout the 1980s satellite broadcasting policy ceased to drive and became driven, and that the failure of policy-making in this time can be ascribed to conflict on ideological, governmental and organisational levels. Finally, it considers the impact that satellite broadcasting has had upon the British broadcasting structure as a whole. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract i Contents ii Acknowledgements 1 INTRODUCTION 3 British broadcasting policy - a brief history
    [Show full text]
  • Download Publication
    ARTS COUNCIL CONTENTS C hairina;,'~ Introduction 4 The Arts Council of Great Britain, as a 5 publicly accountable body, publishes an Sui kA• 1r. -C;eneral's Preface 8 Annual Report to provide Parliament and Departmental Report s 14 the general public with an overview of th e Scotland year's work and to record ail grants an d Wales 15 guarantees offered in support of the arts . Council 16 Membership of Council and Staff 17 A description of the highlights of th e Advisory Panels and Committee s 18 Council's work and discussion of its policie s Staff 23 appear in the newspaper Arts in Action Annual Accounts 25 which is published in conjunction with thi s Funds, Exhibitions, SchewsandAuvrd~ Report and can be obtained, free of charge , from the Arts Council Shop, 8 Long Acre , London WC2 and arts outlets throughou t the country . The objects for which the Arts Council of Great Britain is established are : I To develop and improve the knowledge , understanding and practice of the arts ; 2 To increase the accessibility of the arts to the public throughout Great Britain ; 3 To co-operate with governmen t departments, local authorities and othe r bodies to achieve these objects. CHAIRMAN'S INTRODUCTION and performing artists and of helping t o wherever possible both Mth local build up the audiences which must be th e authorities and with private sponsors. real support for the arts . It is the actua l event, the coming together of artist an d The Arts Council is very conscious that th e audience, which matters .
    [Show full text]
  • James Perry and the Morning Chronicle 179O—I821
    I JAMES PERRY AND THE MORNING CHRONICLE- 179O—I821 By l yon Asquith Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of London 1973 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract 3 Preface 5 1. 1790-1794 6 2. 1795-1 805 75 3. 1806-1812 (i) ThB Ministry of the Talents 184 (ii) Reform, Radicalism and the War 1808-12 210 (iii) The Whigs arid the Morning Chronicle 269 4. Perry's Advertising Policy 314 Appendix A: Costs of Production 363 Appendix B: Advertising Profits 365 Appendix C: Government Advertisements 367 5. 1813-1821 368 Conclusion 459 Bibliography 467 3 A BSTRACT This thesis is a study of the career of James Perry, editor and proprietor of the Morning Chronicle, from 1790-1821. Based on an examination of the correspondence of whig and radical polit- icians, and of the files of the morning Chronicle, it illustrates the impact which Perry made on the world of politics and journalism. The main questions discussed are how Perry responded, as a Foxite journalist, to the chief political issues of the day; the extent to which the whigs attempted to influence his editorial policy and the degree to which he reconciled his independence with obedience to their wishes4 the difficulties he encountered as the spokesman of an often divided party; his considerable involvement, which was remarkable for a journalist, in party activity and in the social life of whig politicians; and his success as a newspaper proprietor concerned not only with political propaganda, but with conducting a paper which was distinguished for the quality of its miscellaneous features and for its profitability as a business enterprise.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Loses out to Lara As Britain's Youth Fails to Spot the Cabinet
    Labour Loses out to Lara as Britain's Youth Fails to Spot the Cabinet August 1, 2000 It 's Pokemon vs. the Politicians! 1 August 2000, London: Video games characters are more recognisable to Britain's youth than the country's most powerful politicians, including Tony Blair. That is the shock result of a new survey of 16-21 year olds released today by Amazon.co.uk, Britain's leading online retailer, which commissioned the research as part of the launch of its new PC and Video Games store. When asked to identify photographs, 96% correctly named Super Mario and 93% the Pokemon character Pikachu, whereas the Prime Minister was correctly identified by only 91%. Lara Croft, pin-up heroine of the Tomb Raider games, was identified by 80% of respondents. However, Tony Blair has a far higher profile than his cabinet colleagues. Less than one in four (24%) of 16-21 year olds recognised Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown, Home Secretary Jack Straw was correctly identified by just 33%, and Foreign Secretary Robin Cook by 42%. Other members of the cabinet fared even less well - Mo Mowlam was correctly identified by only 37% of respondents and Peter Mandelson by a meagre 18%, despite their recent high media profile. Donkey Kong, the gorilla hero of video games since the 1980s, was the least recognisable video games character at 67%, but still polled 25% higher than any cabinet member except for the Prime Minister himself. When asked how important a role the politicians and video games characters played in their lives, despite the politicians polling higher than the video games characters, nearly one in three (29%) said that Tony Blair was either not very important or not all important to their lives.
    [Show full text]