Conflict and Displacements Belet Xaawo, Gedo Region Tension Is Still

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conflict and Displacements Belet Xaawo, Gedo Region Tension Is Still Issue # 9 25 February - 04 March 2011 Key Overall Developments Conflict and Displacements Belet Xaawo, Gedo region Tension is still high in the town of Belet Xaawo, Gedo region, as sporadic shelling continues from the Ethiopian town of Suftu. Field reports indicate that military build-up is still high on the Somali/Kenya border as well as on the outskirts of Belet Xaawo town, where the pro-Transitional Federal Government (TFG) forces are based. The current fighting is taking longer than expected and this will severely impact on the livelihoods of the IDPs who are camping in various locations outside Belet Xaawo town including Mandera in Kenya, Suftu in Ethiopia, Doolow and other parts of Gedo region in Somalia. At least 80 per cent (approximately 34,000 people) of the population of Belet Xaawo town has been displaced. Some 11,000 of them have reportedly crossed over into the Kenyan town of Mandera, while the remaining people have either moved to Ethiopia or to other parts of Gedo region including Baardheere and Luuq. According to field reports, pro-government forces have occupied the only main source of water supply located outside Belet Xaawo – restricting the movement of commercial water trucks that used to supply the town. The few people who stayed in Belet Xaawo during the recent fighting are now also leaving after experiencing severe shortages of water and food – but also due to the sporadic shelling that has been ongoing almost on a daily basis. Displaced persons registered in Mandera are, starting today, being transferred to a camp 15km from the town by the Kenya Red Cross. It remains to be seen how many of the 11,000 people registered will take up residence at the new site. The fighting has also affected schools in Belet Xaawo, where the majority of children used to attend classes in the Kenyan town of Mandera. Many of these school children have reportedly moved with their families to safety in other parts of Gedo region and hence are not attending school as a result of the conflict. Mogadishu In Mogadishu, according to ambulance services and hospital sources, some 62 civilians have been killed and 232 others were wounded in the last two weeks. UNHCR says some 4,400 displacements have occurred in and around Mogadishu due to the fighting since 23 February. After a few days of quiet in Mogadishu, fighting has resumed between the TFG/the African Mission to Somalia and Al Shabaab with confrontations concentrated in Hodan and Hawl Wadaag districts. The recent fighting in Belet Xaawo and Mogadishu has hindered humanitarian deliveries in both locations and the surrounding areas. No response is taking place in Belet Xaawo at the moment as the security situation still remains tense. Response is taking place in Mogadishu. Drought updates/Response The drought situation in Puntland continues to deteriorate as water shortages are reported in many parts of the region. In addition to ongoing activities, water response by NGO VSF-G is expected to start this week with CHF funding supporting the provision of water in north Mudug. On 27 February, in Shilcon, Bari region, a national NGO, started the selection of beneficiaries in 63 locations in Qardho, Iskushuban and Kandala districts who will benefit from a water voucher project that is funded through the CHF. The project is expected to cover approximately 30,600 drought-affected pastoralists in the region. Movement of drought-affected people into Mogadishu still continues, but at a lower rate due to the recent upsurge in armed confrontations between the TFG/AMISOM and Al Shabaab. This week, Concern Worldwide has distributed assorted food items to 235 IDP households in Hamar Weyne UNOCHA Somalia, Ngecha Rd. (off Lower Kabete Rd). P.O Box 28832, 00200, Nairobi, Kenya. Tel: +254 20 4002400, Website: http://ochaonline.un.org/Somalia OCHA - Coordination Saves Lives and Hamar Jajab districts in Mogadishu. Each household received 20ks of Rice, 20kgs of wheat flour, 10kgs of sugar, 11kgs of pulse and 6 litres of vegetable oil. Routine nutrition interventions supported by UNICEF and WFP are also ongoing in various parts of Mogadishu. The Norwegian Refugee Council has erected 486 tents for the newly displaced people, built 100 latrines and distributed a total of 5,000 non-food items in the past two weeks. A national NGO JCC started water trucking and the rehabilitation of four water pans in Bu’aale, Sakoow and Salagle districts supported by the CHF. UNICEF is installing 21 water sources in Sool and Sanaag (11 in Sool and 10 in Sanaag). In Ceel Afweyn and Ceerigaabo, a national NGO, ADO, is conducting water trucking in 44 locations. The project is funded by the CHF. On 25 February, HAVIYOKO in partnership with OXFAM GB, started water trucking to 11 sites targeting 600 beneficiaries in Sool region and 39 other sites in Togdheer region. The NGO AFREC, in partnership with UNICEF, is involved in the rehabilitation of 30 shallow wells, the treatment of household water for 1,000 families and the construction of 220 household latrines in Afmadow and Jilib as well as the chlorination of 158 wells throughout Middle and Lower Jubba regions. Despite access constraints in Gedo, Bay and Bakool regions, international and national NGOs are delivering nutrition assistance supported by UNICEF. Other Response Food Assistance During the week under review, WFP delivered a total of 1,470 metric tons of mixed food commodities to 168,600 beneficiaries through emergency school feeding, institutional feeding and general food distribution. Out of the total beneficiaries reached, 152,700 were from the Central Regions and 15,900 from Somaliland. Following the WFP-led rapid needs assessment in Mogadishu where IDPs are concentrated or have moved to drought and escalation of fighting, WFP has initiated an immediate three phased response:1) an immediate distribution of High Energy Biscuits (HEB) to IDPs in the assessed area; 2) a follow-up once-off General Food Distribution response to allow time for (3) opening of additional wet-feeding sites to allow for greater support to the newly displaced. WFP is scaling up its Targeted Supplementary Feeding Programme (TSFP) to meet the additional needs of incoming IDPs as well as seasonal deterioration of overall nutrition. In central regions, WFP collaborates with eight NGOs to support an estimated 18,200 malnourished children and pregnant & lactating women through TSFP for the treatment of moderate malnutrition. The families of those receiving treatment will also benefit from a household ration addressing household food insecurity. As such, the total number of beneficiaries through this intervention will be 109,200. WFP is finalizing one additional agreement to target 1,350 malnourished children and women in 18 sites. Health WHO distributed trauma equipment sufficient to treat 200 people, and one operating theatre kit to the Ministry of Health in Mogadishu to respond to increased number of weapon-related casualties. Contact: Contact: For further information both in English, contacts Rita Maingi on +254 734 800 120 – [email protected] and in Somali, contact: Abdi Yussuf Noor on +254 734 210 103 – [email protected] UNOCHA Somalia, Ngecha Rd. (off Lower Kabete Rd). P.O Box 28832, 00200, Nairobi, Kenya. Tel: +254 20 4002400, Website: http://ochaonline.un.org/Somalia OCHA - Coordination Saves Lives .
Recommended publications
  • Gedo Intercluster Initial Investigation – September
    INTER -AGENCY DROUGHT ASSESSMENT IN LOWER JUBA REGION OF SOMALIA JANUARY 2017 INTER-AGENCY DROUGHT ASSESSMENT IN LOWER JUBA REGION – JANUARY 2017 Table of contents Executive summary -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Key findings --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Recommendations --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Acronyms, abbreviations and definitions of Somalia terminologies --------------------------- 6 Acknowledgement ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 Introduction /context of the inter-agency assessment -------------------------------------------- 8 Methodology ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 9 Assessment findings -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 Impact of drought ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 10 Findings by cluster ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 Food Security and Livelihoods --------------------------------------------------------------- 10 Education ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 12 Nutrition -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 Water, Sanitation
    [Show full text]
  • MIND the GAP Commercialization, Livelihoods and Wealth Disparity in Pastoralist Areas of Ethiopia
    MIND THE GAP Commercialization, Livelihoods and Wealth Disparity in Pastoralist Areas of Ethiopia Yacob Aklilu and Andy Catley December 2010 Contents Summary ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Objectives .............................................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Structure of the report .......................................................................................................................... 5 2. Livestock exports from pastoral areas of Ethiopia: recent trends and issues ......................................... 6 2.1 The growing trade: economic gains outweigh ethnicity and trust........................................................ 7 2.2 The cross‐border trade from Somali Region and Borana ...................................................................... 8 2.3 Trends in formal exports from Ethiopia .............................................................................................. 12 2.4 A boom in prices and the growth of bush markets ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gedo Region – Situation Analysis
    Gedo Region – Situation Analysis Context Gedo Region, the second largest region in Somalia, lies on the Somalia borders with Ethiopia and Kenya, and shares borders with four Somali regions of Bay, Bakool and Middle Jubba and Lower Jubba. It has an estimated total population of 328,3781, with a 75/25 rural/urban divide.The region is home to 76,510 IDPs2. UNHCR estimates that 16,380 IDPs arrived in Luuq, 30,000 in Doloow, and approximately 18,000 in Belet Xaawo. Gedo has six administrative districts: Garbaharey, Baardheere (the capital), Ceel Waaq in the south and Belet Xaawo, Doloow, and Luuq in the north. Two major rivers run through the region, the Dawa and the Juba. The Dawa River runs along the border of Ethiopia into Somalia’s Gedo region. The Jubba River starts from Doloow, just north of Luuq district, and flows to Buur Dhuubo and Baardheere. The economy mostly depends on rearing livestock and farming, but also has strong inter-regional and international cross-border trade with Kenya and Ethiopia, to some extent. In the northern zone the pastoralists rear sheep, goats, camels and cows. The agro-pastoral zone extends from east to west below Guban. The riverine zone extends from east to west below West Golis and is mainly a farming area where crops such as sorghum are produced. The security and access situation in north Gedo, in particular to Luuq, has relatively improved for the United Nations and International NGOs. The area is controlled by the Somali National Army forces backed by Ethiopian forces. South Gedo is more insecure due to continued clashes and greater access for Al-Shabaab (AS) in the rural areas of Garbaharey, Buur Dhuubo and Baardheere.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping of Key Natural Resources in the Cross-Border Areas of Kenya, Somalia & Ethiopia
    Mapping of Key Natural Resources in the Cross-Border Areas of Kenya, Somalia & Ethiopia Building Opportunities for Resilience in the Horn of Africa Prepared by BORESHA Consortium Partners: Mapping of Key Natural Resources in the Cross-Border Areas of Kenya, Somalia & Ethiopia Building Opportunities for Resilience in the Horn of Africa Final Report Submitted to CARE Somalia 21st November 2018 2 Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Acronyms ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 Executive Summary.....................................................................................................................................10 Section 1 Context .......................................................................................................................................17 1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................17 About BORESHA .................................................................................................................................17 Background to Assignment ................................................................................................................17 Structure of this report ........................................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • From the Bottom
    Conflict Early Warning Early Response Unit From the bottom up: Southern Regions - Perspectives through conflict analysis and key political actors’ mapping of Gedo, Middle Juba, Lower Juba, and Lower Shabelle - SEPTEMBER 2013 With support from Conflict Dynamics International Conflict Early Warning Early Response Unit From the bottom up: Southern Regions - Perspectives through conflict analysis and key political actors’ mapping of Gedo, Middle Juba, Lower Juba, and Lower Shabelle Version 2 Re-Released Deceber 2013 with research finished June 2013 With support from Conflict Dynamics International Support to the project was made possible through generous contributions from the Government of Norway Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Government of Switzerland Federal Department of Foreign Affairs. The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the official position of Conflict Dynamics International or of the Governments of Norway or Switzerland. CONTENTS Abbreviations 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT 8 Conflict Early Warning Early Response Unit (CEWERU) 8 Objectives 8 Conflict Dynamics International (CDI) 8 From the Country Coordinator 9 I. OVERVIEW 10 Social Conflict 10 Cultural Conflict 10 Political Conflict 10 II. INTRODUCTION 11 Key Findings 11 Opportunities 12 III. GEDO 14 Conflict Map: Gedo 14 Clan Chart: Gedo 15 Introduction: Gedo 16 Key Findings: Gedo 16 History of Conflict: Gedo 16 Cross-Border Clan Conflicts 18 Key Political Actors: Gedo 19 Political Actor Mapping: Gedo 20 Clan Analysis: Gedo 21 Capacity of Current Government Administration: Gedo 21 Conflict Mapping and Analysis: Gedo 23 Conflict Profile: Gedo 23 Conflict Timeline: Gedo 25 Peace Initiative: Gedo 26 IV. MIDDLE JUBA 27 Conflict Map: Middle Juba 27 Clan Chart: Middle Juba 28 Introduction: Middle Juba 29 Key Findings: Middle Juba 29 History of Conflict : Middle Juba 29 Key Political Actors: Middle Juba 29 Political Actor Mapping: Middle Juba 30 Capacity of Current Government Administration: Middle Juba 31 Conflict Mapping and Analysis: Middle Juba 31 Conflict Profile: Middle Juba 31 V.
    [Show full text]
  • External Interventions in Somalia's Civil War. Security Promotion And
    External intervention in Somalia’s civil war Mikael Eriksson (Editor) Eriksson Mikael war civil Somalia’s intervention in External The present study examines external intervention in Somalia’s civil war. The focus is on Ethiopia’s, Kenya’s and Uganda’s military engagement in Somalia. The study also analyses the political and military interests of the intervening parties and how their respective interventions might affect each country’s security posture and outlook. The aim of the study is to contribute to a more refined under- standing of Somalia’s conflict and its implications for the security landscape in the Horn of Africa. The study contains both theoretical chapters and three empirically grounded cases studies. The main finding of the report is that Somalia’s neighbours are gradually entering into a more tense political relationship with the government of Somalia. This development is character- ized by a tension between Somalia’s quest for sovereignty and neighbouring states’ visions of a decentralized Somali state- system capable of maintaining security across the country. External Intervention in Somalia’s civil war Security promotion and national interests? Mikael Eriksson (Editor) FOI-R--3718--SE ISSN1650-1942 www.foi.se November 2013 FOI-R--3718--SE Mikael Eriksson (Editor) External Intervention in Somalia’s civil war Security promotion and national interests? Cover: Scanpix (Photo: TT, CORBIS) 1 FOI-R--3718--SE Titel Extern intervention i Somalias inbördeskrig: Främjande av säkerhet och nationella intressen? Title External intervention in Somalia’s civil war: security promotion and national Interests? Rapportnr/Report no FOI-R--3718--SE Månad/Month November Utgivningsår/Year 2013 Antal sidor/Pages 137 ISSN 1650-1942 Kund/Customer Försvarsdepartementet/Ministry of Defence Projektnr/Project no A11306 Godkänd av/Approved by Maria Lignell Jakobsson Ansvarig avdelning Försvarsanalys/Defence Analysis Detta verk är skyddat enligt lagen (1960:729) om upphovsrätt till litterära och konstnärliga verk.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding US Policy in Somalia Current Challenges and Future Options Contents
    Research Paper Paul D. Williams Africa Programme | July 2020 Understanding US Policy in Somalia Current Challenges and Future Options Contents Summary 2 1 Introduction 3 2 What Is the US Mission in Somalia? 7 3 How Is the US Implementing Its Mission in Somalia? 10 4 Is US Policy Working in Somalia? 15 5 What Future for US Engagement in Somalia? 21 About the Author 24 Acknowledgments 24 1 | Chatham House Understanding US Policy in Somalia Summary • The US has real but limited national security interests in stabilizing Somalia. Since 2006, Washington’s principal focus with regard to Somalia has been on reducing the threat posed by al-Shabaab, an Al-Qaeda-affiliated Islamist insurgent group seeking to overthrow the federal government. • Successive US administrations have used military and political means to achieve this objective. Militarily, the US has provided training, equipment and funds to an African Union operation, lent bilateral support to Somalia’s neighbours, helped build elements of the reconstituted Somali National Army (SNA), and conducted military operations, most frequently in the form of airstrikes. Politically, Washington has tried to enable the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) to provide its own security, while implementing diplomatic, humanitarian and development efforts in parallel. • Most US resources have gone into its military efforts, but these have delivered only operational and tactical successes without altering the strategic terrain. The war against al-Shabaab has become a war of attrition. Effectively at a stalemate since at least 2016, neither side is likely to achieve a decisive military victory. • Instead of intensifying airstrikes or simply disengaging, the US will need to put its diplomatic weight into securing two linked negotiated settlements in Somalia.
    [Show full text]
  • Part H Background to the Somali War 1 Introduction
    PART H BACKGROUND TO THE SOMALI WAR 1 INTRODUCTION TO SOMALIA 1.1 The Somali People Somalia1 covers almost 640,000 square kilometres in the north-eastern tip of the Horn of Africa. In the main this is a semi-desert region, with a vegetation cover and water resources that dictate a pastoral nomadic existence for the majority of the population. The exception is the area between the two southern rivers, the Shabelle and Juba, and in valleys of the northern escarpments, where higher rainfall and richer soils provide land suitable for agriculture. r The Somali-speaking people form one of the largest ethnic groups in Africa, living dispersed throughout the Horn, from the Awash Valley, through the Ethiopian Ogaden, and into northern Kenya as far as the Tana river. A Cushitic-speaking family or 'nation' of people, Somalis belong to the Hamitic group of peoples, which includes the Afar, Oromo, Saho and Beja peoples of the Horn. The Somali are distinguished by a shared common ancestry, a single language, an Islamic (sunni) heritage and a way of life that is overwhelmingly pastoral. The Somali are divided into six 'clan families' — Dir, Issaq, Darod, Hawiye, Digil, and Rahanweyne — which are further divided, according to agnatic descent, into subsidiary clans or lineage groups (see diagram 1) (Lewis, 1961). The Somali kinship system and the flexible and shifting alliances of clan kinship groups are fundament- ally entrenched in the social, political, and economic culture of the Somali people. Until the colonial period the Somali 'nation' did not form a single political unit; any concept of political identity was based on clan affiliation.
    [Show full text]
  • S 2019 858 E.Pdf
    United Nations S/2019/858* Security Council Distr.: General 1 November 2019 Original: English Letter dated 1 November 2019 from the Chair of the Security Council Committee pursuant to resolution 751 (1992) concerning Somalia addressed to the President of the Security Council On behalf of the Security Council Committee pursuant to resolution 751 (1992) concerning Somalia, and in accordance with paragraph 54 of Security Council resolution 2444 (2018), I have the honour to transmit herewith the final report of the Panel of Experts on Somalia. In this connection, the Committee would appreciate it if the present letter and the report were brought to the attention of the members of the Security Council and issued as a document of the Council. (Signed) Marc Pecsteen de Buytswerve Chair Security Council Committee pursuant to resolution 751 (1992) concerning Somalia * Reissued for technical reasons on 14 November 2019. 19-16960* (E) 141119 *1916960* S/2019/858 Letter dated 27 September 2019 from the Panel of Experts on Somalia addressed to the Chair of the Security Council Committee pursuant to resolution 751 (1992) concerning Somalia In accordance with paragraph 54 of Security Council resolution 2444 (2018), we have the honour to transmit herewith the final report of the Panel of Experts on Somalia. (Signed) Jay Bahadur Coordinator Panel of Experts on Somalia (Signed) Mohamed Abdelsalam Babiker Humanitarian expert (Signed) Nazanine Moshiri Armed groups expert (Signed) Brian O’Sullivan Armed groups/natural resources expert (Signed) Matthew Rosbottom Finance expert (Signed) Richard Zabot Arms expert 2/161 19-16960 S/2019/858 Summary During the first reporting period of the Panel of Experts on Somalia, the use by Al-Shabaab of improvised explosive devices reached its greatest extent in Somali history, with a year-on-year increase of approximately one third.
    [Show full text]
  • PROTECTION of CIVILIANS REPORT Building the Foundation for Peace, Security and Human Rights in Somalia
    UNSOM UNITED NATIONS ASSISTANCE MISSION IN SOMALIA PROTECTION OF CIVILIANS REPORT Building the Foundation for Peace, Security and Human Rights in Somalia 1 JANUARY 2017 – 31 DECEMBER 2019 Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................1 Methodology ...................................................................................................................................7 Civilian Casualties Attributed to non-State Actors ....................................................................9 A. Al Shabaab .............................................................................................................................9 B. Ahlu Sunna Wal Jama ..........................................................................................................16 C. Clan Militia ..........................................................................................................................17 D. The Islamic State Affiliated Group ......................................................................................17 Civilian Casualties Attributed to State Actors and other Actors ............................................18 A. Somali National Army ...................................................................................................18 B. Somali Police Force .......................................................................................................21 C. The National Intelligence Security Agency
    [Show full text]
  • Livestock Trade in the Kenyan, Somali and Ethiopian Borderlands Page 2
    briefing paper page 1 Livestock Trade in the Kenyan, Somali and Ethiopian Borderlands Hussein A. Mahmoud Africa Programme | September 2010 | AFP BP 2010/02 Summary points The Kenya–Somalia–Ethiopia borderlands constitute a dynamic livestock trading zone that supports the livelihoods of thousands of people. Despite the political turbulence of the last 20 years, the export of animals to feed the growing Kenyan market for meat has expanded and flourished. The trade networks have proved resilient and resourceful in adapting to a host of political challenges, including changing ‘regimes’ in Southern Somalia since state collapse. The overall result has been a shift in direction of the livestock export trade away from the Middle East and towards East Africa, thus building closer economic ties in the region. The livestock trade is more than a commercial operation and has social and political benefits. The cross-border clan relationships that always underpinned the trade are increasingly giving way to multiple clan business enterprises. These involve extensive networks of people and help to build trust and integration among them. The nature of the cross-border trade poses challenges to national and local-level authorities, both in terms of development and revenue collection and for border security management. The key challenge is to find ways to attain safe and secure borders that will also contribute to sustaining and enhancing this valuable trade and its benefits. www.chathamhouse.org.uk Livestock Trade in the Kenyan, Somali and Ethiopian Borderlands page 2 The livestock trade in the Southern Horn of Africa herders, traders, middlemen, transporters and local has flourished despite the ongoing war in the south of authorities in all three countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Mandera County
    Situation Brief: Mandera County Report by: Irene Tulel, CEWARN Country Coordinator - Kenya Rukiya Abdulrahman – CEWARN Asst. Country Coordinator Date: 17 October 2011 Background The Somali East cluster areas of Kenya and Somalia have a long history of conflict that has in the past caused heavy loss of life and property and that over time has led to worsening of relationships among the parties concerned. Conflict in the region is dynamic and changes fast and it is multi-faceted and multi-level and involves many actors. The security situation along the border areas have also been complicated by the regional and international dynamics of the conflicts contexts. This situation requires broader and concerted effort linking the formal government process in Kenya with the traditional and administrative institution in Somalia to manage any spillover effect of the violent conflict in Kenya and Somalia. Such efforts need to prioritize support for security forces and traditional response units in the transformation of violence in Somalia and at the border. Mandera town has always been a peaceful cross-border town until the formation and upscale in the activities of the Al-shabab militia. Fighting between the militia and the TFG Somalia forces have led to insecurity in the once peaceful town, to the extent that one can’t walk at night due to the risk involved. Curfews have been imposed in the town for more than two and a half years in order to ensure the safety of the Kenyan people. This new cross-border conflict dynamic along the Kenya/Somalia border has had a negative impact on Mandera’s peace and stability.
    [Show full text]