DOCSLIB.ORG

Documents Presented at the Symposium on Stock Enhancement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Documents presented EIFAC TECHNICAL at the symposium PAPER on stock enhancement DOCUMENT in the management TECHNIQUE of freshwater fisheries DE LA CECPI 42/Suppl./2 Documents présentés au symposium sur l'amélioration des stocks dans le cadre de l'aménagement des pêcheries d'eau douce Volume 2: Introductions and Transplantations Introductions et transplantations Held in Budapest, 31 May – 2 June 1982 in conjunction with the Twelfth Session of EIFAC Tenu à Budapest du 31 mai au 2 juin 1982 à l'occasion de la douzième session de la CECPI FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 1984 ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L'ALIMENTATION ET L'AGRICULTURE Rome, 1984 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Les appellations employées dans cette publication et la présentation des données qui y figurent n'impliquent de la part de l'Organisation des Nations Unies pour l'alimentation et l'agriculture aucune prise de position quant au statut juridique des pays, territoires, villes ou zones, ou de leurs autorités, ni quant au tracé de leurs frontières ou limites. M-43 ISBN 92-5-002102-X All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, Publications Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Via delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy. Tous droits réservés. Aucune partie de cette publication ne peut être reproduite, mise en mémoire dans un système de recherche bibliographique ni transmise sous quelque forme ou par quelque procédé que ce soit: électronique, mécanique, par photocopie ou autre, sans autorisation préalable. Adresser une demande motivée au Directeur de la Division des publications. Organisation des Nations Unies pour l'alimentation et l'agriculture, Via delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome (Italie), en indiquant les passages ou illustrations en cause. PREPARATION OF THIS DOCUMENT This collection of papers represents the Proceedings of the Symposium on Stock Enhancement in the Management of Freshwater Fisheries, held in conjunction with the Twelfth Session of EIFAC (Budapest, Hungary, 31 May – 2 June 1982). The Proceedings are in two volumes, which are supplementary to the Report of the Symposium issued in 1982 as EIFAC Technical Paper No. 42. PREPARATION DE CE DOCUMENT Cette ensemble de documents represents les actes du Symposium sur l'amélioration des stocks dans le cadre de l'aménagement des pêcheries d'eau douce, tenu à Budapest (Hongrie) du 31 mai au 2 juin 1982 à l'occasion de la douzième session de la CECPI. Les actes sont presentés en deux volumes complémentaires au Rapport du Symposium émis par la CECPI en 1982 sous forme de document technique № 42. Distribution For biblïographic purposes this document should be cited as follows/La référence bibliographique Authors/Auteurs de ce document doit être donnée ainsi: Participants in the Symposium/ Participants au Symposium European Inland Fisheries Advisory Commission EIFAC Mailing List/Liste de distribution 1984 Commission européenne consul tative de la CECPI pour les pêches dans les eaux FAO Fisheries Departement/Départment intérieures, 1984 Documents des pêches de la FAO presented at the Symposium on stock FAO Regional Fishery enhancement in the management of Officers/Fonctionnaires régionaux des freshwater fisheries. Documents pêches de la FAO presentés au Symposium sur l'amélioration des stocks dans le cadre de l'aménagement des pêcheries d'eau douce. Vol.2. Introductions and transplantations Introductions et transplantations. Held in Budapest, Hungary, 31 May – 2 June 1982 in conjunction with the Twelfth session of EIFAC. Tenu à Budapest, Hongrie du 31 mai au 2 juin 1982 à l'occasion de la douzième session de la CECPI. EIFAC Tech.Pap./Doc.Tech.CECPI, (42)Suppl.Vol.2:283–554 ABSTRACT Volume Two of these Proceedings groups together the 26 papers presented at the Symposium on Stock Enhancement in the Management of Freshwater Fisheries, which dealt with the advantages and disadvantages of introduction of new species into European waters. RESUME Le volume deux de ces actes regroupe 26 documents presentés au Symposium sur l'amélioration des stocks dans le cadre de l'aménagement des pêcheries d'eau douce, qui traitait des avantages et desavantages de l'introductions et transplantations avec des espèces autochtones des eaux européennes. CONTENTS TABLE DES MATIERES Page INTRODUCTION THE IMPACT OF A TRANSPLANTED FORAGE FISH, THE ALEWIFE (Alosa pseudoharengus) ON A RESERVOIR FISHERY IN SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES C.C. Kohler 283 REVIEW OF EXPERIMENTS WITH INTRODUCTION AND ACCLIMATIZATION OF THE HUCHEN, Hucho hucho (LINNAEUS, 1758) (SALMONIDAE) J. Holcik 290 INTRODUCTION OF CARP (Cyprinus carpio (L.)) IN FINLAND P. Ahlfors, P. Kummu and K. Westman 299 HEAVY SILVER CARP (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix (Val.)) STOCKING IN LAKES AND ITS INFLUENCE ON INDIGENOUS FISH STOCKS D. Barthelmes 313 INTRODUCTION OF GRASS CARP (Ctenopharyngodon idella (Val.) INTO DENMARK P.M. Markmann 325 THE INTRODUCTION, SPREAD AND INFLUENCE OF THE BARBEL (Barbus barbus) IN THE RIVER SEVERN, GREAT BRITAIN A.S. Churchward, P. Hickley and E. North 335 A CENTURY OF PIKEPERCH IN DENMARK J. Dahl 344 THE IMPACT OF ZANDER (Stizostedion lucioperca (L.)) IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND THE FUTURE MANAGEMENT OF AFFECTED FISHERIES IN THE ANGLIAN REGION R.S.J. Linfield 353 INTRODUCTION AND THE PRESENT STATUS OF BROOK TROUT (Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill) IN NORWAY M. Grande 363 RESULTS OF LAKE TROUT STOCKINGS IN FINLAND 1957–81 A. Mutenia, O. Simola and O. Tuunainen 381 RESULT OF THE INTRODUCTION OF LAKE TROUT (LAKE CHARR, Salvelinus namaycush) INTO SWEDISH LAKES A.P. Gonczi and N.-A. Nilsson 392 INTRODUCTION OF THE NORTH AMERICAN CRAYFISH (Pacifastacus Ieniusculus (DANA)) INTO SWEDEN M. Furst 400 PRESENCE EN FRANCE D'ESPECES EXOTIQUES D'ECREVISSES PROVENANT D'INTRODUCTIONS RECENTES P.J. Laurent, D. Vigneux et E. Vigneux 405 THE RESTORATION OF THE CRAYFISH (Astacus astacus) IN RIVER SIIKAJOKI, FINLAND M. Pursiainen and K. Westman 412 INTRODUCTION OF THE AMERICAN CRAYFISH (Pacifastacus leniusculus) IN FINLAND; IMPACT ON THE NATIVE CRAYFISH (Astacus astacus) K. Westman and M. Pursiainen 422 INTRODUCTION ET ACCLIMATATION DE POISSONS D'EAU DOUCE EN FRANCE; HISTORIQUE ET BILAN J. Allardi 427 A REVIEW OF FISH AND CRAYFISH INTRODUCTIONS MADE IN FINLAND K. Westman and P. Tuunainen 436 THE EFFECTS OF FRESHWATER FISH INTRODUCTIONS INTO IRELAND P. Fitzmaurice 449 INTRODUCTION DE NOUVELLES ESPECES DE POISSONS DANS LES PECHERIES D'EAU DOUCE DE LA ROUMANIE N. Bacalbasa-Dobrovici 458 THE EXOTIC ICHTHYOFAUNA OF THE CONTIGUOUS UNITED STATES WITH PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS ON INTERANATIONAL TRANSPLANTS W.R. Courtenay, Jr. and J.N. Taylor 466 SOME CONSIDERATIONS ON THE ROLE OF INTRODUCED SPECIES OF FISH IN THE MANAGEMENT OF INLAND FISHERIES J. Holcik 488 THE NICHE CONCEPT AND THE INTRODUCTION OF EXOTICS N.-A. Nilsson 496 REDUCING THE RISK OF FISH INTRODUCTIONS: A RATIONAL APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF INTEGRATED COLDWATER COMMUNITIES R.A. Ryder and S.R. Kerr 510 PARASITE RANGE EXTENSION BY INTRODUCTION OF FISH TO HUNGARY K. Molnar 534 IMPLEMENTATION OF A REVIEW AND DECISION MODEL FOR EVALUATING PROPOSED INTRODUCTIONS OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS IN EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA C.C. Kohler and J.G. Stanley 541 EXOTIC FISH SPECIES ACCLIMATIZED IN HUNGARIAN NATURAL WATERS J. Toth and P. Biro 550 INTRODUCTION Following the recommendations of the International Consultation on Fishery Resources Allocation (Vichy, France, 1980) and its own discussions during its Eleventh Session (Stavanger, Norway, May 1980), EIFAC felt that subsequent sessions should examine closely the current situation for managing stocks of fish in European inland waters. Because the whole topic of management is too large for coverage during any one symposium, it was recommended by the Commission that the subject be covered in two symposia - one on biotic aspects of management to be held in conjunction with the Twelfth Session of EIFAC and one on abiotic aspects to be held with the Thirteenth Session of EIFAC. There has been a long-standing concern with the effects of introductions of exotic species into European rivers and lakes. Furthermore, whilst stocking with native or introduced species is common management practice, there is very little evidence for or against its biological or economic effectiveness. Therefore, the first Symposium on management addressed the twin problems of introductions and stockings in an effort to define guidelines for both practices in European waters. The Symposium considered these two specific aspects of stock manipulation in seven sessions as follows: Session 1 Stocking with non-salmonids Session 2 Stocking with brown trout Session 3 Stocking with salmon Session 4 Introductions and transplantations - case histories and experience with some species Session 5 Introductions - country reviews and Lake Kinneret case Session 6 Introductions - ecological and practical aspects Session
Recommended publications
  • INNOVATION NETWORK »MORGENSTADT: CITY INSIGHTS« City Report

    INNOVATION NETWORK »MORGENSTADT: CITY INSIGHTS« City Report

    City report City of the Future INNOVATION NETWORK »MORGENSTADT: CITY INSIGHTS« »MORGENSTADT: »MORGENSTADT: CITY INSIGHTS« City Report ® INNOVATION NETWORK INNOVATION Project Management City Team Leader Fraunhofer Institute for Dr. Marius Mohr Industrial Engineering IAO Fraunhofer Institute for Nobelstrasse 12 Interfacial Engineering and 70569 Stuttgart Biotechnology IGB Germany Authors Contact Andrea Rößner, Fraunhofer Institute for lndustrial Engineering IAO Alanus von Radecki Arnulf Dinkel, Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE Phone +49 711 970-2169 Daniel Hiller, Fraunhofer Institute for High-Speed Dynamics Ernst-Mach-Institut EMI Dominik Noeren, Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE COPENHAGEN [email protected] 2013 Hans Erhorn, Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics IBP Heike Erhorn-Kluttig, Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics IBP Dr. Marius Mohr, Fraunhofer Institute for lnterfacial Engineering and Biotechnology IGB OPENHAGEN © Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft, München 2013 Sylvia Wahren, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA C MORGENSTADT: CITY INSIGHTS (M:CI) Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering IAO Fraunhofer Institute for Factory Operation and Climate change, energy and resource scarcity, a growing Copenhagen has repeatedly been recognized as one Nobelstrasse 12 Automation IFF world population and aging societies are some of the of the cities with the best quality of life. Green growth 70569 Stuttgart Mailbox 14 53 large challenges of the future. In particular, these challen- and quality of life are the two main elements in Germany 39004 Magdeburg ges must be solved within cities, which today are already Copenhagen’s vision for the future. Copenhagen shall home to more than 50% of the world’s population. An be a leading green lab for sustainable urban solutions.
  • Growing Smart Cities in Denmark

    Growing Smart Cities in Denmark

    GROWING SMART CITIES IN DENMARK DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY FOR URBAN IMPROVEMENT AND NATIONAL PROSPERITY RESEARCH AND EDITORIAL ABOUT TEAM About Invest in Denmark Léan Doody As part of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark, Invest Associate Director – Arup in Denmark is a customized one-stop service for foreign [email protected] companies looking to set up a business in Denmark. Nicola Walt www.investindk.com Principal Consultant – Arup [email protected] About Arup Ina Dimireva Consultant – Arup Arup is an independent consultancy providing professional [email protected] services in management, planning, design and engineering. As a global firm Arup draws on the skills and expertise of Anders Nørskov Director – CEDI nearly 11,000 consultants. Arup’s dedication to exploring [email protected] innovative strategies and looking beyond the constraints of individual specialisms allows the firm to deliver holistic, multi-disciplinary solutions for clients. STEERING COMMITTEE www.arup.com This research was commissioned by: About CEDI CEDI is a consulting company with expertise in public sector digitization in Denmark. CEDI provides strategic consulting Financing partners and steering committee: to the government and the IT industry based on solid insight into the subjects of digitization and technology, extensive knowledge on the administrative and decision-making pro- cesses of government agencies, and a deep understanding of the political agenda. www.cedi.dk Additional participants in the steering committee meetings were the Central Denmark Region, Local Government Den- mark (LGDK) and the municipalities of Aarhus and Vejle. Layout Mads Toft Jensen +45 25143599 [email protected] www.spokespeople.dk ©2016 Arup, CEDI.
  • Edna Assay Development

    Edna Assay Development

    Environmental DNA assays available for species detection via qPCR analysis at the U.S.D.A Forest Service National Genomics Center for Wildlife and Fish Conservation (NGC). Asterisks indicate the assay was designed at the NGC. This list was last updated in June 2021 and is subject to change. Please contact [email protected] with questions. Family Species Common name Ready for use? Mustelidae Martes americana, Martes caurina American and Pacific marten* Y Castoridae Castor canadensis American beaver Y Ranidae Lithobates catesbeianus American bullfrog Y Cinclidae Cinclus mexicanus American dipper* N Anguillidae Anguilla rostrata American eel Y Soricidae Sorex palustris American water shrew* N Salmonidae Oncorhynchus clarkii ssp Any cutthroat trout* N Petromyzontidae Lampetra spp. Any Lampetra* Y Salmonidae Salmonidae Any salmonid* Y Cottidae Cottidae Any sculpin* Y Salmonidae Thymallus arcticus Arctic grayling* Y Cyrenidae Corbicula fluminea Asian clam* N Salmonidae Salmo salar Atlantic Salmon Y Lymnaeidae Radix auricularia Big-eared radix* N Cyprinidae Mylopharyngodon piceus Black carp N Ictaluridae Ameiurus melas Black Bullhead* N Catostomidae Cycleptus elongatus Blue Sucker* N Cichlidae Oreochromis aureus Blue tilapia* N Catostomidae Catostomus discobolus Bluehead sucker* N Catostomidae Catostomus virescens Bluehead sucker* Y Felidae Lynx rufus Bobcat* Y Hylidae Pseudocris maculata Boreal chorus frog N Hydrocharitaceae Egeria densa Brazilian elodea N Salmonidae Salvelinus fontinalis Brook trout* Y Colubridae Boiga irregularis Brown tree snake*
  • Spawning and Early Life History of Mountain Whitefish in The

    Spawning and Early Life History of Mountain Whitefish in The

    SPAWNING AND EARLY LIFE HISTORY OF MOUNTAIN WHITEFISH IN THE MADISON RIVER, MONTANA by Jan Katherine Boyer A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Fish and Wildlife Management MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana January 2016 © COPYRIGHT by Jan Katherine Boyer 2016 All Rights Reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I thank my advisor, Dr. Christopher Guy, for challenging me and providing advice throughout every stage of this project. I also thank my committee members, Dr. Molly Webb and Dr. Tom McMahon, for guidance and suggestions which greatly improved this research. My field technicians Jordan Rowe, Greg Hill, and Patrick Luckenbill worked hard through fair weather and snowstorms to help me collect the data presented here. I also thank Travis Horton, Pat Clancey, Travis Lohrenz, Tim Weiss, Kevin Hughes, Rick Smaniatto, and Nick Pederson of Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks for field assistance and advice. Mariah Talbott, Leif Halvorson, and Eli Cureton of the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service assisted with field and lab work. Richard Lessner and Dave Brickner at the Madison River Foundation helped to secure funding for this project and conduct outreach in the Madison Valley. The Channels Ranch, Valley Garden Ranch, Sun West Ranch, and Galloup’s Slide Inn provided crucial land and river access. I also thank my fellow graduate students both for advice on project and class work and for being excellent people to spend time with. Ann Marie Reinhold, Mariah Mayfield, David Ritter, and Peter Brown were especially helpful during the early stages of this project.
  • Fisheries Management Plan for Black Hills Streams 2015 – 2019

    Fisheries Management Plan for Black Hills Streams 2015 – 2019

    Fisheries Management Plan for Black Hills Streams 2015 – 2019 South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks Wildlife Division Gene Galinat Greg Simpson Bill Miller Jake Davis Michelle Bucholz John Carreiro Dylan Jones Stan Michals Fisheries Management Plan for Black Hills Streams, 2015-2019 Table of Contents I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 3 II. Resource Descriptions ........................................................................................................... 4 Black Hills Fish Management Area ...................................................................................... 4 III. Management of Black Hills Fish Management Area Stream Fisheries ...................... 7 Classification of Trout Streams ............................................................................................. 7 Regulations .............................................................................................................................. 7 Stocking .................................................................................................................................... 8 Fish Surveys ............................................................................................................................ 8 Angler Surveys ........................................................................................................................ 9 Habitat and Angler Access ...................................................................................................
  • The Vermont Management Plan for Brook, Brown and Rainbow Trout Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department January 2018

    The Vermont Management Plan for Brook, Brown and Rainbow Trout Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department January 2018

    The Vermont Management Plan for Brook, Brown and Rainbow Trout Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department January 2018 Prepared by: Rich Kirn, Fisheries Program Manager Reviewed by: Brian Chipman, Will Eldridge, Jud Kratzer, Bret Ladago, Chet MacKenzie, Adam Miller, Pete McHugh, Lee Simard, Monty Walker, Lael Will ACKNOWLEDGMENT: This project was made possible by fishing license sales and matching Dingell- Johnson/Wallop-Breaux funds available through the Federal Sportfish Restoration Act. Table of Contents I. Introduction ......................................................................................... 1 II. Life History and Ecology ................................................................... 2 III. Management History ......................................................................... 7 IV. Status of Existing Fisheries ............................................................. 13 V. Management of Trout Habitat .......................................................... 17 VI. Management of Wild Trout............................................................. 34 VII. Management of Cultured Trout ..................................................... 37 VIII. Management of Angler Harvest ................................................... 66 IX. Trout Management Plan Goals, Objectives and Strategies .............. 82 X. Summary of Laws and Regulations .................................................. 87 XI. Literature Cited ............................................................................... 92 I. Introduction
  • Huchen (Hucho Hucho) ERSS

    Huchen (Hucho Hucho) ERSS

    Huchen (Hucho hucho) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, April 2011 Revised, January 2019, February 2019 Web Version, 4/30/2019 Photo: Liquid Art. Licensed under CC-SA 4.0 International. Available: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Danube_Salmon_-_Huchen_(Hucho_hucho).jpg. (January 2019). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2019): “Europe: Danube drainage [Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Switzerland, and Ukraine].” “Population has declined [in Slovenia] due to pollution and river regulation. Conservation measures include artificial propagation and stocking [Povz 1996]. Status of threat: Regionally extinct [Bianco and Ketmaier 2016].” 1 “Considered locally extinct (extirpated) in 1990 [in Switzerland] [Vilcinskas 1993].” “Extinct in the wild in 2000 [in Czech Republic] [Lusk and Hanel 2000]. This species is a native species in the basin of the Black Sea (the rivers Morava and Dyje). At present, its local and time- limited occurrence depends on the stocking material from artificial culture. Conditions that will facilitate the formation of a permanent population under natural conditions are not available [Lusk et al. 2004]. […] Status of threat: extinct in the wild [Lusk et al. 2011].” From Freyhof and Kottelat (2008): “The species is severely fragmented within the Danube drainage, where most populations exclusively depend on stocking and natural reproduction is very limited due to habitat alterations and flow regime changes.” From Grabowska et al. (2010): “The exceptional case is huchen (or Danubian salmon), Hucho hucho. The huchen’s native range in Poland was restricted to two small rivers (Czarna Orawa and Czadeczka) of the Danube River basin, […]” Status in the United States Froese and Pauly (2019) report an introduction to the United States between 1870 and 1874 that did not result in an established population.
  • ECOLOGY of NORTH AMERICAN FRESHWATER FISHES

    ECOLOGY of NORTH AMERICAN FRESHWATER FISHES

    ECOLOGY of NORTH AMERICAN FRESHWATER FISHES Tables STEPHEN T. ROSS University of California Press Berkeley Los Angeles London © 2013 by The Regents of the University of California ISBN 978-0-520-24945-5 uucp-ross-book-color.indbcp-ross-book-color.indb 1 44/5/13/5/13 88:34:34 AAMM uucp-ross-book-color.indbcp-ross-book-color.indb 2 44/5/13/5/13 88:34:34 AAMM TABLE 1.1 Families Composing 95% of North American Freshwater Fish Species Ranked by the Number of Native Species Number Cumulative Family of species percent Cyprinidae 297 28 Percidae 186 45 Catostomidae 71 51 Poeciliidae 69 58 Ictaluridae 46 62 Goodeidae 45 66 Atherinopsidae 39 70 Salmonidae 38 74 Cyprinodontidae 35 77 Fundulidae 34 80 Centrarchidae 31 83 Cottidae 30 86 Petromyzontidae 21 88 Cichlidae 16 89 Clupeidae 10 90 Eleotridae 10 91 Acipenseridae 8 92 Osmeridae 6 92 Elassomatidae 6 93 Gobiidae 6 93 Amblyopsidae 6 94 Pimelodidae 6 94 Gasterosteidae 5 95 source: Compiled primarily from Mayden (1992), Nelson et al. (2004), and Miller and Norris (2005). uucp-ross-book-color.indbcp-ross-book-color.indb 3 44/5/13/5/13 88:34:34 AAMM TABLE 3.1 Biogeographic Relationships of Species from a Sample of Fishes from the Ouachita River, Arkansas, at the Confl uence with the Little Missouri River (Ross, pers. observ.) Origin/ Pre- Pleistocene Taxa distribution Source Highland Stoneroller, Campostoma spadiceum 2 Mayden 1987a; Blum et al. 2008; Cashner et al. 2010 Blacktail Shiner, Cyprinella venusta 3 Mayden 1987a Steelcolor Shiner, Cyprinella whipplei 1 Mayden 1987a Redfi n Shiner, Lythrurus umbratilis 4 Mayden 1987a Bigeye Shiner, Notropis boops 1 Wiley and Mayden 1985; Mayden 1987a Bullhead Minnow, Pimephales vigilax 4 Mayden 1987a Mountain Madtom, Noturus eleutherus 2a Mayden 1985, 1987a Creole Darter, Etheostoma collettei 2a Mayden 1985 Orangebelly Darter, Etheostoma radiosum 2a Page 1983; Mayden 1985, 1987a Speckled Darter, Etheostoma stigmaeum 3 Page 1983; Simon 1997 Redspot Darter, Etheostoma artesiae 3 Mayden 1985; Piller et al.
  • Part IV: Scoring Criteria for the Index of Biotic Integrity to Monitor

    Part IV: Scoring Criteria for the Index of Biotic Integrity to Monitor

    Part IV: Scoring Criteria for the Index of Biotic Integrity to Monitor Fish Communities in Wadeable Streams in the Coosa and Tennessee Drainage Basins of the Ridge and Valley Ecoregion of Georgia Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division Fisheries Management Section 2020 Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………… ……... Pg. 1 Map of Ridge and Valley Ecoregion………………………………..……............... Pg. 3 Table 1. State Listed Fish in the Ridge and Valley Ecoregion……………………. Pg. 4 Table 2. IBI Metrics and Scoring Criteria………………………………………….Pg. 5 References………………………………………………….. ………………………Pg. 7 Appendix 1…………………………………………………………………. ………Pg. 8 Coosa Basin Group (ACT) MSR Graphs..………………………………….Pg. 9 Tennessee Basin Group (TEN) MSR Graphs……………………………….Pg. 17 Ridge and Valley Ecoregion Fish List………………………………………Pg. 25 i Introduction The Ridge and Valley ecoregion is one of the six Level III ecoregions found in Georgia (Part 1, Figure 1). It is drained by two major river basins, the Coosa and the Tennessee, in the northwestern corner of Georgia. The Ridge and Valley ecoregion covers nearly 3,000 square miles (United States Census Bureau 2000) and includes all or portions of 10 counties (Figure 1), bordering the Piedmont ecoregion to the south and the Blue Ridge ecoregion to the east. A small portion of the Southwestern Appalachians ecoregion is located in the upper northwestern corner of the Ridge and Valley ecoregion. The biotic index developed by the GAWRD is based on Level III ecoregion delineations (Griffith et al. 2001). The metrics and scoring criteria adapted to the Ridge and Valley ecoregion were developed from biomonitoring samples collected in the two major river basins that drain the Ridge and Valley ecoregion, the Coosa (ACT) and the Tennessee (TEN).
  • Anthropogenic Hybridization Between Endangered Migratory And

    Anthropogenic Hybridization Between Endangered Migratory And

    Evolutionary Applications Evolutionary Applications ISSN 1752-4571 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Anthropogenic hybridization between endangered migratory and commercially harvested stationary whitefish taxa (Coregonus spp.) Jan Dierking,1 Luke Phelps,1,2 Kim Præbel,3 Gesine Ramm,1,4 Enno Prigge,1 Jost Borcherding,5 Matthias Brunke6 and Christophe Eizaguirre1,* 1 Research Division Marine Ecology, Research Unit Evolutionary Ecology of Marine Fishes, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany 2 Department of Evolutionary Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plon,€ Germany 3 Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, Faculty of Biosciences Fisheries and Economics, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway 4 Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark 5 General Ecology & Limnology, Ecological Research Station Grietherbusch, Zoological Institute of the University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany 6 Landesamt fur€ Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und landliche€ Raume€ (LLUR), Flintbek, Germany * Present address: School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK Keywords Abstract admixture, anadromous fish, conservation, evolutionarily significant unit, gill raker, Natural hybridization plays a key role in the process of speciation. However, introgression, stocking anthropogenic (human induced) hybridization of historically isolated taxa raises conservation issues. Due to weak barriers to gene flow and the presence of endan- Correspondence gered taxa, the whitefish species complex is an
  • Putnam County Conservation Element Data & Analysis

    Putnam County Conservation Element Data & Analysis

    Putnam County COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSERVATION ELEMENT EAR-based Amendments Putnam County 2509 Crill Avenue, Suite 300 Palatka, FL 32178 Putnam County Conservation Element Data & Analysis Putnam County Conservation Element Table of Contents Section Page I. Introduction 4 II. Inventory of Natural Resources 5 A. Surface Water Resources 5 1. Lakes and Prairies 5 2. Rivers and Creeks 8 3. Water Quality 10 4. Surface Water Improvement and Management Act (SWIM) 15 5. Analysis of Surface Water Resources 16 B. Groundwater Resources 17 1. Aquifers 17 2. Recharge Areas 18 3. Cones of Influence 18 4. Contaminated Well Sites 18 5. Alternate Sources of Water Supply 19 6. Water Needs and Sources 21 7. Analysis of Groundwater Resources 22 C. Wetlands 23 1. General Description of Wetlands 23 2. Impacts to Wetlands 25 3. Analysis of Wetlands 26 D. Floodplains 26 1. National Flood Insurance Program 26 2. Drainage Basins 26 3. Flooding 29 4. Analysis of Floodplains 30 E. Fisheries, Wildlife, Marine Habitats, and Vegetative Communities 30 1. Fisheries 30 2. Vegetative Communities 30 3. Environmentally Sensitive Lands 35 4. Wildlife Species 55 5. Marine Habitat 57 6. Analysis of Environmentally Sensitive Lands 58 F. Air Resources 58 1. Particulate Matter (PM) 58 2. Sulfur Dioxide 59 3. Nitrogen Oxides 60 4. Total Reduced Sulfur Compounds 60 5. Other Pollutants 61 6. Analysis of Air Resources 61 EAR-based Amendments 10/26/10 E-1 Putnam County Conservation Element Data & Analysis G. Areas Known to Experience Soil Erosion 62 1. Potential for Erosion 62 2. Analysis of Soil Erosion 64 H.
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S

    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S

    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................