DOCSLIB.ORG

Rookery at Perico Seagrass Advance Mitigation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rookery at Perico Seagrass Advance Mitigation ROOKERY AT PERICO SEAGRASS ADVANCE MITIGATION Mitigation Establishment Criteria Report May 17, 2013 ROOKERY AT PERICO SEAGRASS ADVANCE MITIGATION Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ I 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1.1 2.0 COMPENSATORY MITIGATION (DIRECT IMPACTS) ................................................. 2.2 2.1 MANGROVE FOREST DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION ............................................... 2.2 2.2 MONITORING METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................... 2.2 2.3 SUCCESS CRITERIA ......................................................................................................... 2.4 2.4 LONG-TERM MAINTENANCE ........................................................................................... 2.5 3.0 HABITAT CREATION MITIGATION CREDITS .............................................................. 3.5 3.1 SEAGRASS HABITAT CREATION .................................................................................... 3.5 3.1.1 Design Details ...................................................................................................... 3.5 3.1.2 Implementation Options ....................................................................................... 3.7 3.1.3 Mitigation Credit Assessment (UMAM) ................................................................ 3.9 3.1.4 Monitoring Details .............................................................................................. 3.13 3.1.5 Mitigation Credit Determination .......................................................................... 3.17 3.1.6 Long-Term Protection ........................................................................................ 3.19 3.2 MANGROVE HABITAT CREATION ................................................................................. 3.19 3.2.1 Design Details .................................................................................................... 3.19 3.2.2 Mitigation Credit Assessment (UMAM) .............................................................. 3.20 3.2.3 Monitoring Details .............................................................................................. 3.22 3.2.4 Mitigation Credit Determination .......................................................................... 3.24 3.2.5 Mangrove Creation Areas Long-Term Protection .............................................. 3.25 4.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................... 4.25 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A FIGURES ...................................................................................................... A.0 A.1 Seagrass Donor Area Exhibit ........................................................................................ A.1 APPENDIX B ATTACHMENTS .......................................................................................... B.0 B.1 Perico Preserve Habitat Restoration Modeling Study Prepared by Coastal Planning and Engineering, Inc. December 2012 ................................................................................. B.1 B.2 Uniform Wetland Mitigation Assessment Worksheet - Parts I and II ............................. B.2 rh \\us1227-f01\workgroup\2155\active\215510428\env\05_rpt-deliv\deliverables\swfwmd\submittal_finaal\rpt_mitigation_credits_20130516_final.docx i ROOKERY AT PERICO SEAGRASS ADVANCE MITIGATION Executive Summary This document has been prepared to provide supporting information for the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) relative to the establishment and release of mitigation credits for the project known as Rookery at Perico Seagrass Advance Mitigation. This document was prepared as a separate document to focus on the establishment of mitigation credits, a key component of the project. The purpose of this document is to provide a framework for the generation, monitoring, success determination, and release of mitigation credits that is applicable for both the SWFWMD and USACE. rh \\us1227-f01\workgroup\2155\active\215510428\env\05_rpt-deliv\deliverables\swfwmd\submittal_final\rpt_mitigation_credits_20130516_final.docx I ROOKERY AT PERICO SEAGRASS ADVANCE MITIGATION Introduction May 17, 2013 1.0 Introduction This document has been prepared to outline the process by which the regulatory permits may authorize the generation and release of mitigation credits for the Rookery at Perico Seagrass Advance Mitigation project. For SWFWMD, this will entail the establishment of a regional offsite mitigation area (ROMA). This document will be provided to both the SWFWMD and USACE to be incorporated into the permit conditions for the applicable permits to be issued. The Applicant acknowledges that this is a unique project and that this document may generate feedback from both the review and resource agencies. The Applicant desires to work with the agencies to establish a mitigation credit generation and release criteria that satisfies the regulatory requirements and provides a predictable mitigation credit quantity for the Applicant. In addition to habitat creation and restoration activities proposed for the purpose of generating mitigation credits, this document will also discuss the details associated with the design, monitoring, and success of the compensatory mitigation for project construction related impacts (i.e. mangrove forest excavation) discussed within the “Support Narrative” that accompanied both the USACE Individual Permit application and the SWFWMD Individual ERP application. Please reference Attachment B of the “Support Narrative and Documentation for SWFWMD ERP Application” or “Support Narrative and Documentation for USACE Application – Revised May 2013” for the Construction Plans or Project Plans, respectively, referenced herein. The following aspects and criteria will be discussed in this document: Compensatory mitigation – Mangrove forest creation Design and implementation Monitoring methodology Success criteria Long-term maintenance Habitat creation mitigation credits – Seagrass and mangrove Habitat creation design Implementation options Conceptual mitigation credit assessment Monitoring methodology rh \\us1227-f01\workgroup\2155\active\215510428\env\05_rpt-deliv\deliverables\swfwmd\submittal_final\rpt_mitigation_credits_20130516_final.docx 1.1 ROOKERY AT PERICO SEAGRASS ADVANCE MITIGATION Compensatory Mitigation (direct impacts) May 17, 2013 Mitigation credit determination/quantification Mitigation credit release schedule/details Long-term maintenance 2.0 Compensatory Mitigation (direct impacts) The proposed project requires 0.41 acre of impact to the mangrove forest adjacent to Perico Bayou for two flushing channel cuts, as described in the “Rookery at Perico Seagrass Advance Mitigation – Support Narrative and Documentation for SWFWMD ERP Application” and “Rookery at Perico Seagrass Advance Mitigation – Support Narrative and Documentation for USACE Application”. The calculated Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM) functional loss associated with the impacts is 0.12. The Applicant proposes to mitigate for this impact through onsite mangrove forest creation. 2.1 MANGROVE FOREST DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION The Applicant proposes to provide compensatory mitigation for the mangrove impacts through the establishment of a “Mangrove Mitigation Zone” along the fringe of the “Seagrass Creation Area” as shown on the Construction Plans. The 0.5 acre mangrove creation area will be constructed as a 20-foot wide and 1,089-foot long linear fringe ranging from one (1) foot below mean high water (0.33’ NAVD) to one (1) foot above mean high water. It is anticipated that the portion above mean high water will develop into a black mangrove dominated forest and a red mangrove forest will develop below mean high water. It is likely that a transition area containing both species will develop near mean high water. Following the finish grading activities for the basin, vegetation will be installed along the upper elevations to minimize the potential for erosion within and into the Mangrove Mitigation Zone. As shown on the planting specifications in the Construction Plans, 439 red mangrove propagules will be planted on five-foot centers and 110 3-gallon red mangroves will be planted on ten-foot centers below mean high water and 108 two-inch (minimum) liner black mangroves will be planted on ten-foot centers. 2.2 MONITORING METHODOLOGY The following monitoring methodology has been designed to sufficiently monitor the Mangrove Mitigation Zone to determine whether the mitigation activities are progressing towards and eventually meeting the success criteria required by the regulatory permits. A mitigation construction completion/baseline report will be prepared and submitted to SWFWMD/USACE for approval within 30 days of the completion of planting activities. Once rh \\us1227-f01\workgroup\2155\active\215510428\env\05_rpt-deliv\deliverables\swfwmd\submittal_final\rpt_mitigation_credits_20130516_final.docx 2.2 ROOKERY AT PERICO SEAGRASS ADVANCE MITIGATION Compensatory Mitigation (direct impacts) May 17, 2013 approval is received from SWFWMD/USACE, the monitoring and maintenance period for the Mangrove Mitigation Zone will commence. Monitoring events will be conducted
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Year 2 Data Summary Report: Nekton of Sarasota Bay and a Comparison of Nekton Community Structure in Adjacent Southwest Florida Estuaries
    Year 2 Data Summary Report: Nekton of Sarasota Bay and a Comparison of Nekton Community Structure in Adjacent Southwest Florida Estuaries T.C. MacDonald; E. Weather; R.F. Jones; R.H. McMichael, Jr. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute 100 Eighth Avenue Southeast St. Petersburg, Florida 33701-5095 Prepared for Sarasota Bay Estuary Program 111 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200W Sarasota, Florida 34236 June 4, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................ iii LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................................... v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................ vii SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................... ix INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 METHODS .................................................................................................................................................... 2 Study Area ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Corridor Management Plan 5-Year Update
    Corridor Management Plan 5-Year Update Submitted to: Florida Department of Transportation District One Scenic Highways Coordinator 1840 61st St. Sarasota, Florida 34243 941.359.7311 Submitted by: The Palma Sola Scenic Highway Corridor Management Entity Seth Kohn, Chairperson Molly McCartney, Vice Chairperson ‘c/o City of Bradenton 1411 9th Street West Bradenton, FL 34205 941.708.6300 Prepared by: Keep Manatee Beautiful, Inc. P.O. Box 14426 Bradenton, Florida 34280 941.795-8272 July 2009 Palma Sola Scenic Highway Corridor Management Plan 5-Year Update TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................... 1 Corridor Management Entity Member List.......................................................................... 2 Bylaws .................................................................................. 3 Agreements .......................................................................... 9 Corridor Conditions ....................................................................... 11 Corridor Vision .............................................................................. 16 Goals, Objectives and Strategies.................................................. 17 Protection Techniques .................................................................. 22 The Corridor Story.......................................................................... 22 Community Participation Program ................................................ 23 Local Support ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Currently the Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems
    CRITICALLY ERODED BEACHES IN FLORIDA Updated, June 2009 BUREAU OF BEACHES AND COASTAL SYSTEMS DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION STATE OF FLORIDA Foreword This report provides an inventory of Florida's erosion problem areas fronting on the Atlantic Ocean, Straits of Florida, Gulf of Mexico, and the roughly seventy coastal barrier tidal inlets. The erosion problem areas are classified as either critical or noncritical and county maps and tables are provided to depict the areas designated critically and noncritically eroded. This report is periodically updated to include additions and deletions. A county index is provided on page 13, which includes the date of the last revision. All information is provided for planning purposes only and the user is cautioned to obtain the most recent erosion areas listing available. This report is also available on the following web site: http://www.dep.state.fl.us/beaches/uublications/tech-rut.htm APPROVED BY Michael R. Barnett, P.E., Bureau Chief Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems June, 2009 Introduction In 1986, pursuant to Sections 161.101 and 161.161, Florida Statutes, the Department of Natural Resources, Division of Beaches and Shores (now the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems) was charged with the responsibility to identify those beaches of the state which are critically eroding and to develop and maintain a comprehensive long-term management plan for their restoration. In 1989, a first list of erosion areas was developed based upon an abbreviated definition of critical erosion. That list included 217.6 miles of critical erosion and another 114.8 miles of noncritical erosion statewide.
    [Show full text]
  • Of 6 62-302.532 Estuary-Specific Numeric Interpretations of The
    FAC 62-302.532 Estuary-Specific Numeric Interpretations of the Narrative Nutrient Criterion Effective Date: 12/20/2012 62-302.532 Estuary-Specific Numeric Interpretations of the Narrative Nutrient Criterion. (1) Estuary-specific numeric interpretations of the narrative nutrient criterion in paragraph 62-302.530(47)(b), F.A.C., are in the table below. The concentration-based estuary interpretations are open water, area-wide averages. The interpretations expressed as load per million cubic meters of freshwater inflow are the total load of that nutrient to the estuary divided by the total volume of freshwater inflow to that estuary. Page 1 of 6 FAC 62-302.532 Estuary-Specific Numeric Interpretations of the Narrative Nutrient Criterion Effective Date: 12/20/2012 Estuary Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen Chlorophyll a (a) Clearwater Harbor/St. Joseph Sound Annual geometric mean values not to be exceeded more than once in a three year period. Nutrient and nutrient response values do not apply to tidally influenced areas that fluctuate between predominantly marine and predominantly fresh waters during typical climatic and hydrologic conditions. 1. St.Joseph Sound 0.05 mg/L 0.66 mg/L 3.1 µg/L 2. Clearwater North 0.05 mg/L 0.61 mg/L 5.4 µg/L 3. Clearwater South 0.06 mg/L 0.58 mg/L 7.6 µg/L (b) Tampa Bay Annual totals for nutrients and annual arithmetic means for chlorophyll a, not to be exceeded more than once in a three year period. Nutrient and nutrient response values do not apply to tidally influenced areas that fluctuate between predominantly marine and predominantly fresh waters during typical climatic and hydrologic conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Seagrass Integrated Mapping and Monitoring for the State of Florida Mapping and Monitoring Report No. 1
    Yarbro and Carlson, Editors SIMM Report #1 Seagrass Integrated Mapping and Monitoring for the State of Florida Mapping and Monitoring Report No. 1 Edited by Laura A. Yarbro and Paul R. Carlson Jr. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute St. Petersburg, Florida March 2011 Yarbro and Carlson, Editors SIMM Report #1 Yarbro and Carlson, Editors SIMM Report #1 Table of Contents Authors, Contributors, and SIMM Team Members .................................................................. 3 Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................... 4 Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 7 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 31 How this report was put together ........................................................................................... 36 Chapter Reports ...................................................................................................................... 41 Perdido Bay ........................................................................................................................... 41 Pensacola Bay .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Seagrass Targets for the Sarasota Bay Estuary Program
    SEAGRASS TARGETS FOR THE SARASOTA BAY ESTUARY PROGRAM Prepared for: Sarasota Bay Estuary Program 111 South Orange Avenue Suite 200W Sarasota, FL 34236 Prepared by: Anthony Janicki, Michael Dema, and Ravic Nijbroek 1155 Eden Isle Drive NE St. Petersburg, FL 33704 December 2008 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The objective of this project is to provide technically-defensible quantitative restoration and protection targets for seagrasses in the Sarasota Bay ecosystem. Establishment of seagrass targets provides a necessary basis for management decisions regarding water quality and other issues that can influence the distribution and persistence of this resource. The primary goal of this project is to maintain and/or restore seagrass coverage to its historic extent. Restoration targets were defined through an analysis of historic and recent aerial surveys of the study area. Historic photos of the area were taken in 1950; as many alterations have occurred to the shoreline in the study area, as well as channelization of the Intracoastal Waterway (ICW), the following analyses have accounted for these changes as non-restorable areas. Additionally, trends in seagrass coverage throughout the SBEP based on recent surveys have been identified. The methodology employed for this project is GIS-based. Historic aerial photos were used to establish a baseline extent of seagrass in the study area circa 1950. Recent trends in and persistence of seagrass throughout the SBEP were determined through analysis of GIS shapefiles based on aerial surveys executed by the SWFWMD since 1988. Due to anthropogenic modifications in the estuary such as shoreline build-out and the dredging of the Intracoastal Waterway (ICW), certain areas have been altered to the extent that they have no reasonable potential for restoration; these so-called non-restorable areas have been identified and removed from the analyses contained in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Geography of Southwest Florida Waterways Vol. 1
    10 HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY The Boating Geography of Southwest Florida Before Coastal Development One must go back in time to 1890 to regain a sense of Each of these bays historically was separated from the the pre-development state of the waterway we refer to as others through a series of natural barriers. Boat traffic the Sarasota Bay system. At that time, this 54-mile reach between Big and Little Sarasota Bays was impeded by “The of the coast, from lower Tampa Bay to Gasparilla Sound, Mangroves,” a cluster of islands at the mouth of Phillippi enclosed three separate inland bays of varying navigabil- Creek. The only means of traverse was a crooked, narrow ity (Map 1): channel barely 50 feet wide and 0.3 mile long that was 1. Big Sarasota Bay, on the north, is 21 miles long and mostly obstructed by mangroves. The channel was non- stretches from Palma Sola (Sarasota) Pass at the mouth of navigable at low water. No inside waterway passage ex- lower Tampa Bay to Phillippi Creek (south of Sarasota); isted between Little Sarasota and Lemon Bays. A five- 2. Little Sarasota Bay, in the middle, is 12 miles long mile land barrier existed from Roberts Bay just below and ranges from Phillippi Creek to Roberts Bay (present- Casey’s Pass to Alligator Creek, which was the head of day Venice); navigation of northern Lemon Bay. 3. Lemon Bay, to the south, is a 16-mile-long Settlers along this coast were forced to sail the outside embayment from Alligator Creek to the Bocilla Pass area passages between Big Sarasota Bay, Little Sarasota Bay and Lower Tampa Bay south of Grove City.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperative Gulf of Mexico Estuarine Inventory and Study, Florida / J
    <-\^ C5 5.13 ; N^FS -3L'f NOAA TR NMFS CIRC-368 NOAA Technical Report NMFS CIRC-368 M,otc ^ °v U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration \ :r National Marine Fisheries Service Cooperative Gulf of Mexico Estuarine Inventory and Study, Florida: Phase I, Area Description J. KNEELAND McNULTY, WILLIAM N. LINDALL, JR., AND JAMES E. SYKES SEATTLE, WA November 1972 NOAA TECHNICAL REPORTS National Marine Fisheries Service, Circulars The major responsibilities of the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) are to monitor and assess the abundance and geographic distribution of fishery resources, to understand and predict fluctuations in the quan- tity and distribution of these resources, and to establish levels for optimum use of the resources. NMFS is also charged with the development and implementation of policies for managing national fishing grounds, develop- ment and enforcement of domestic fisheries regulations, surveillance of foreign fishing off United States coastal waters, and the development and enforcement of international fishery agreements and policies. NMFS also assists the fishi. g industry through marketing service and economic analysis programs, and mortgage insurance and vessel construction subsidies. It collects, analyses, and publishes statistics on various phases of the industry. The NOAA Technical Report NMFS CIRC series continues a series that has been in existence since 1941. The Circulars are technical publications of general interest intended to aid conservation and management. Publica- tions that review in considerable detail and at a high technical level certain broad areas of research appear in this series. Technical papers originating in economics studies and from management investigations appear in the Circular series.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Power Squadrons®
    United States Power Squadrons® ® Anna Maria Island Sail & Power Squadron The Bearing America’s Boating Club® for the Bradenton Area Commander Janet Razze, AP June 2019 On behalf of your Executive EVENTS CALENDAR Bridge, we wish everyone a very safe and wonderful summer. We 3 JUN - Teen ABC Course Begins * do not publish our newsletter in 6 JUN - Members’ Meeting @ Marina Jack 5:30 July and August, but I will send out our “Letter from The Helm” 13 JUN - Brunch Bunch 9:30am - Judy’s Host: Pat Laney (941) 795-2964 to keep you updated on our summer activities. It is with my pleasure that I inform everyone that we 15 JUN - C&R @ Old Salty Dog 11:30am received recognition at the Spring District 22 Hosts: Joanne & Larry Wilhelm (941) 383-3485 Conference. Our newsletter, The Bearing received the 19 JUN - Clubhouse Work Party 9:00am Distinctive Communicator Award in recognition of Distinctive Performance for USPS Publications in 2018 27 JUN - Executive Committee Meeting 6:30pm (congratulations Larry Wilhelm!); received the (if necessary) Distinctive Communicator Award in recognition of * Call 941-792-0394 to register Distinctive Performance for USPS Websites in 2018 (congratulations Ken Guscott!); USPS Educational Fund your snorkel gear ready. You do not need fins. The Certificate of Merit for the 32nd time in appreciation of full face masks work best. the Extraordinary Contribution for furtherance of I have an answer to a question brought up at our last education in the fields of navigation and small boat C&R. There was a discussion about Sea Tow and if handling (congratulations Gary Razze for getting this they towed boats for their clients from the dock to a accomplished!); District 22 Squadrons Hospitality marina to be serviced.
    [Show full text]
  • Oyster Integrated Mapping and Monitoring Program Report for the State of Florida
    Oyster Integrated Mapping and Monitoring Program report for the State of Florida Item Type monograph Publisher Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Fish and Wildlife Research Institute Download date 09/10/2021 18:01:24 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/41152 ISSN 1930-1448 Oyster Integrated Mapping and Monitoring Program Report for the State of Florida KARA R. RADABAUGH, STEPHEN P. GEIGER, RYAN P. MOYER, EDITORS Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute Technical Report No. 22 • 2019 MyFWC.com Oyster Integrated Mapping and Monitoring Program Report for the State of Florida KARA R. RADABAUGH, STEPHEN P. GEIGER, RYAN P. MOYER, EDITORS Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute 100 Eighth Avenue Southeast St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 MyFWC.com Technical Report 22 • 2019 Ron DeSantis Governor of Florida Eric Sutton Executive Director Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission The Fish and Wildlife Research Institute is a division of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, which “[manages] fish and wildlife resources for their long-term well-being and the benefit of people.” The Institute conducts applied research pertinent to managing fishery resources and species of special concern in Florida. Pro- grams focus on obtaining the data and information that managers of fish, wildlife, and ecosystems need to sustain Florida’s natural resources. Topics include managing recreationally and commercially important fish and wildlife species; preserving, managing, and restoring terrestrial, freshwater, and marine habitats; collecting information related to population status, habitat requirements, life history, and recovery needs of upland and aquatic species; synthesizing ecological, habitat, and socioeconomic information; and developing educational and outreach programs for classroom educators, civic organizations, and the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Sarasota Bay Surface Water and Improvement Management (SWIM)
    Southwest Florida Water Management District Sarasota Bay Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) Plan December 2002 SWIM SECTION RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 7601 U.S. HIGHWAY 301 NORTH TAMPA, FLORIDA 33637 (813) 985-7481 Sarasota Bay Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) Plan Update December 2002 Southwest Florida Water Management District SWIM Section Resource Management Department 7601 U.S. Highway 301 North Tampa, Florida 33637 (813) 985-7481 The Southwest Florida Water Management District (District) does not discriminate upon the basis of any individual's disability status. This nondiscrimination policy involves every aspect of the District's functions, including one's access to, participation, employment, or treatment in its programs or activities. Anyone requiring reasonable accommodation as provided for in the Americans With Disabilities Act should contact the District at 813-985-7481, or 1-800-423-1476 (Florida), extension 2201 ; TDD ONLY 1-800-231-6103 (Florida); FAX 81 3-987-6747 / SunCom FAX 577-6747. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................... i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................. 3 The SWIM Act ........................................................................................3 Sarasota Bay SWIM Plan Evolution.............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download/464727198/74E1a913bc); We Hope to Hold the In-Person Symposium Within the Next Year, As the Celebration Continues
    2 Celebrating 50 years of conservation, research, education, and action October 3rd, 2020, marked the 50th anniversary of the world’s longest-running study of a wild dolphin population, conducted by the Sarasota Dolphin Research Program. On that day in 1970, Blair Irvine attached the first tags to Sarasota Bay bottlenose dolphins, taking the first step that led to demonstrating the local dolphin residency that has been key to all of the research that has followed in Sarasota Bay. Much more on the history of the program appears in the pages of this special issue of Nicks’n’Notches. While we had planned to hold an in-person symposium in Sarasota in October to reflect on decades of scientific findings and celebrate with the friends and colleagues who have made this work possible, the pandemic forced us to take a different path. With the recorded or live help of 25 of our colleagues and collaborators from around the world, we instead held a virtual celebration to mark the official date (recording available at: https://vimeo.com/frontpageprod/download/464727198/74e1a913bc); we hope to hold the in-person symposium within the next year, as the celebration continues. We are also editing a special topics issue of the journal Frontiers in Marine Science entitled: “The Dolphins of Sarasota Bay: Lessons from 50 Years of Research and Conservation,” expected to consist of 25 peer-reviewed papers by colleagues, staff, and students, to be published in 2021. As we celebrate the accomplishments and amazingly productive (and fun) collaborations we developed during our first 50 years, we also look toward the future.
    [Show full text]