Coastal Habitat Integrated Mapping and Monitoring Program Report for the State of Florida

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Coastal Habitat Integrated Mapping and Monitoring Program Report for the State of Florida ISSN 1930-1448 Coastal Habitat Integrated Mapping and Monitoring Program Report for the State of Florida KARA R. RADABAUGH, CHRISTINA E. POWELL, AND RYAN P. MOYER, EDITORS Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute Technical Report No. 21 • 2017 MyFWC.com Coastal Habitat Integrated Mapping and Monitoring Program Report for the State of Florida KARA R. RADABAUGH, CHRISTINA E. POWELL, AND RYAN P. MOYER, EDITORS Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute 100 Eighth Avenue Southeast St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 MyFWC.com Technical Report 21 • 2017 Rick Scott Governor of Florida Nick Wiley, Executive Director Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission The Fish and Wildlife Research Institute is a division of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, which “[manages] fish and wildlife resources for their long-term well-being and the benefit of people.” The Institute conducts applied research pertinent to managing fishery resources and species of special concern in Florida. Pro- grams focus on obtaining the data and information that managers of fish, wildlife, and ecosystems need to sustain Florida’s natural resources. Topics include managing recreationally and commercially important fish and wildlife species; preserving, managing, and restoring terrestrial, freshwater, and marine habitats; collecting information related to population status, habitat requirements, life history, and recovery needs of upland and aquatic species; synthesizing ecological, habitat, and socioeconomic information; and developing educational and outreach pro- grams for classroom educators, civic organizations, and the public. The Institute publishes three series: Memoirs of the Hourglass Cruises, Florida Marine Research Publications, and FWRI Technical Reports. FWRI Technical Reports contain information relevant to immediate needs in resource management. Gil McRae, FWRI Director Bland Crowder, Editor and Production This publication is available online and may be downloaded at http://myfwc.com/research/publications/scientific/ technical-reports/. Copies may also be obtained from: Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute 100 Eighth Avenue SE St. Petersburg, FL 33701-5095 Attn: Librarian We suggest that this document be cited as follows: Radabaugh, Kara R., Christina E. Powell, and Ryan P. Moyer (eds.). 2017. Coastal Habitat Integrated Mapping and Monitoring Program Report for the State of Florida. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Fish and Wildlife Research Institute Technical Report No. 21. Cover and text papers used in this publication meet the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials Z39.48–1992(R2009). Cover photograph: Spartina alterniflora and Laguncularia racemosa in St. Petersburg, Florida. Photograph by Ryan P. Moyer Coastal Habitat Integrated Mapping and Monitoring Program Report for the State of Florida KARA R. RADABAUGH, CHRISTINA E. POWELL, AND RYAN P. MOYER, EDITORS Contents Acknowledgments ...........................................................................................................v Coastal Habitat Integrated Mapping and Monitoring Program (CHIMMP) ...................vi Contributors and Their Affiliations .................................................................................vi Executive Summary ........................................................................................................vii Chapter 1: Introduction ...................................................................................................1 Coastal wetland ecosystems of Florida ..................................................................................................1 Ecological and economic value of salt marsh and mangrove ecosystems ........................................4 Common threats to Florida’s coastal wetlands ....................................................................................5 Classification of coastal wetlands by remote-sensing techniques ......................................................7 Land cover classification schemes .........................................................................................................9 Land cover mapping data in Florida ....................................................................................................13 Monitoring in coastal wetlands ............................................................................................................17 Long-term monitoring of Florida coastal wetlands: examples of two methodologies ...................20 THE GUANA TOLOMATO MATANZAS NATIONAL ESTUARINE RESEARCH RESERVE .................................20 CRITICAL COASTAL HABITAT ASSESSMENT MONITORING IN TAMPA BAY ................................................23 Monitoring resources ............................................................................................................................26 Region-specific chapters .......................................................................................................................27 Works cited .............................................................................................................................................27 iv Radabaugh, Powell, and Moyer, editors Chapter 2: Northwest Florida ........................................................................................34 Chapter 3: Big Bend and Springs Coast .........................................................................46 Chapter 4: Tampa Bay ....................................................................................................58 Chapter 5: Sarasota Bay .................................................................................................71 Chapter 6: Charlotte Harbor and Estero Bay .................................................................78 Chapter 7: Collier County ..............................................................................................88 Chapter 8: Everglades ....................................................................................................98 Chapter 9: Florida Keys ............................................................................................... 109 Chapter 10: Biscayne Bay ........................................................................................... 116 Chapter 11: Palm Beach and Broward Counties ........................................................ 123 Chapter 12: Indian River Lagoon ................................................................................ 134 Chapter 13: Northeast Florida .................................................................................... 144 Chapter 14: Conclusions and Recommendations ...................................................... 155 Appendix A, Acronym List ........................................................................................... 158 Appendix B, Species list .............................................................................................. 160 Coastal Habitat Integrated Mapping and Monitoring Program Report: Florida v Scores of fiddler crabs (Uca spp.) in a Spartina alterniflora salt marsh in New Smyrna Beach, Florida. Photograph by Ryan P. Moyer. Acknowledgments This report was funded by a grant from Florida’s State wetland acreages for this report. Amber Whittle and Shan- Wildlife Grants Program in order to support the study of non Whaley completed the technical review of the docu- high-priority coastal habitats in accordance with the State ment. Bland Crowder completed scientific review, copy Wildlife Action Plan. The Coastal Habitat Integrated Map- review, and layout. Several FWC coastal wetlands interns ping and Monitoring Program (CHIMMP) was based on and technicians assisted with CHIMMP vegetation mon- the framework established by the Seagrass Integrated Map- itoring or editing (Amanda Chappel, Ioana Bociu, Allie ping and Monitoring (SIMM) program and reports gener- Wilcox, Barbara Clark, Danielle Pavlik, Joshua Michael, ated by Laura Yarbro, Paul Carlson Jr., and numerous oth- Dana Parkinson, Stuart Penoff, Victoria Manzella, Josh- er contributors from across Florida. The CHIMMP editors ua Breithaupt, Emma Dontis, Taylor Nielsen, and Reba wish to thank Amber Whittle, Kathleen OKeife, Andrea Campbell). Alden, and Caroline Gorga for their support and guidance This report is a collaboration among many authors throughout the course of CHIMMP . We also wish to thank from governmental and independent agencies. The views, the dozens of scientists and managers from across Florida statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations who contributed directly to the writing of this report and expressed herein are those of the authors and do not nec- to the many others who provided comments and contribu- essarily reflect the views of the State of Florida, the Na- tions during the CHIMMP workshops. Christi Santi, a GIS tional Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the U.S. specialist with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Geological Survey, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, or Commission (FWC), created regional maps and calculated any of their subagencies. vi Radabaugh, Powell, and Moyer, editors Coastal Habitat Integrated Mapping and Monitoring Program (CHIMMP) The Coastal Habitat Integrated Mapping and Moni- together coastal wetland scientists and managers
Recommended publications
  • Pensacola Bay Bridge
    Florida Department of Transportation RICK SCOTT 1074 Highway 90 ANANTH PRASAD, P.E. GOVERNOR Chipley, Florida 32428 SECRETARY July 18, 2011 Ms. Lauren P. Milligan Florida State Clearinghouse Department of Environmental Protection 3900 Commonwealth Blvd., Mail Station 47 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 RE: Advance Notification Pensacola Bay Bridge Replacement PD&E Study ETDM #: 13248 From: 17th Avenue in Pensacola to Baybridge Drive in Gulf Breeze Federal Aid Project Number: 4221 078 P Financial Project ID Number: 409334-1-22-02 Escambia and Santa Rosa Counties, Florida Dear Ms. Milligan: We are sending this Advance Notification (AN) Package to your office for distribution to State agencies that conduct Federal consistency reviews (consistency reviewers) in accordance with the Coastal Zone Management Act and Presidential Executive Order 12372. We are also distributing the AN Package to local and Federal agencies. Although we will request specific comments during the permitting process, we are asking that permitting and permit reviewing agencies (consistency reviewers) review the attached information and provide us with their comments. This is a Federal-aid action and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), in consultation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), will determine what type of environmental documentation will be necessary. The determination will be based upon in-house environmental evaluations and comments from other agencies. Please provide a consistency review for this project in accordance with the State’s Coastal Zone Management Program. www.dot.state.fl.us In addition, please review the project’s consistency, to the maximum extent feasible, with the approved Comprehensive Plan of the local government to comply with Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Year 2 Data Summary Report: Nekton of Sarasota Bay and a Comparison of Nekton Community Structure in Adjacent Southwest Florida Estuaries
    Year 2 Data Summary Report: Nekton of Sarasota Bay and a Comparison of Nekton Community Structure in Adjacent Southwest Florida Estuaries T.C. MacDonald; E. Weather; R.F. Jones; R.H. McMichael, Jr. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute 100 Eighth Avenue Southeast St. Petersburg, Florida 33701-5095 Prepared for Sarasota Bay Estuary Program 111 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200W Sarasota, Florida 34236 June 4, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................ iii LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................................... v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................ vii SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................... ix INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 METHODS .................................................................................................................................................... 2 Study Area ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Current Status of Oyster Reefs in Florida Waters: Knowledge and Gaps
    Current Status of Oyster Reefs in Florida Waters: Knowledge and Gaps Dr. William S. Arnold Florida FWC Fish and Wildlife Research Lab 100 Eighth Avenue SE St. Petersburg, FL 33701 727-896-8626 [email protected] Outline • History-statewide distribution • Present distribution – Mapped populations and gaps – Methodological variation • Ecological status • Application Need to Know Ecological value of oyster reefs will be clearly defined in subsequent talks Within “my backyard”, at least some idea of need to protect and preserve, as exemplified by the many reef restoration projects However, statewide understanding of status and trends is poorly developed Culturally important- archaeological evidence suggests centuries of usage Long History of Commercial Exploitation US Landings (Lbs of Meats x 1000) 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Statewide: Economically important: over $2.8 million in landings value for Florida fishery in 2003 Most of that value is from Franklin County (Apalachicola Bay), where 3000 landings have been 2500 2000 relatively stable since 1985 1500 1000 In other areas of state, 500 0 oysters landings are on 3000 decline due to loss of 2500 Franklin County 2000 access, degraded water 1500 quality, and loss of oyster 1000 populations 500 0 3000 Panhandle other 2500 2000 1500 1000 Pounds500 of Meats (x 1000) 0 3000 Peninsular West Coast 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Peninsular East Coast 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 Year 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 MAPPING Tampa Bay Oyster Maps More reef coverage than anticipated, but many of the reefs are moderately to severely degraded Kathleen O’Keife will discuss Tampa Bay oyster mapping methods in the next talk Caloosahatchee River and Estero Bay Aerial imagery used to map reefs, verified by ground-truthing Southeast Florida oyster maps • Used RTK-GPS equipment to map in both the horizontal and the vertical.
    [Show full text]
  • WALTON COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE: CHAPTER 4 | Resource Protection Standards Revised September 10, 2019 Page 2 of 55
    Revised September 10, 2019 Page 1 of 55 CHAPTER IV. RESOURCE PROTECTION STANDARDS 4.00.00. OVERALL PURPOSE AND INTENT The purpose of this chapter is to protect, conserve and enhance Walton County's natural and historical features. It is the intent of the County to enhance resource protection by utilizing development management techniques to control potential negative impacts from development and redevelopment on the resources addressed herein. Specifically, it is the intent of the County to limit the specific impacts and cumulative impacts of development or redevelopment upon historic sites, wetlands, coastal dune lakes, coastal dune lines, water quality, water quantity, wildlife habitats, living marine resources, or other natural resources through the use of site design techniques, such as clustering, elevation on pilings, setbacks, and buffering. The intent of this policy is to avoid such impact and to permit mitigation of impacts only as a last resort. 4.00.01. Permits Required. A. Local Development Order. Unless exempt under Section 1.15.00, a development order is required for all development or redevelopment of real property within the County. As a part of the application process defined in Chapter 1 of this Code, a landowner or developer must apply the provisions of this chapter before any other design work is done for any proposed land development. Application of the provisions of this chapter will divide a proposed development site into zones or areas that may be developed with minimal regulation, zones that may be developed under more stringent regulation and zones that must generally be left free of development activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Experience Ocean, Lakes Abd Everglades in the Palm Beaches
    YEAR 2017 Experience Ocean, Lakes and Everglades in The Palm Beaches, Florida Discover the best way to experience Florida’s great outdoors, unique wildlife and natural beauty in The Palm Beaches. Situated between 47 miles of Atlantic Ocean and the shores of Lake Okeechobee, the largest lake in the southeastern United States, The Palm Beaches is the gateway to the Everglades and home to treasured animal sanctuaries, untouched nature preserves and a diverse range of soft adventure activities. TAKE A HIKE (OR PICTURE) Beauty is just a short hike away. The terrain is mostly flat, but tropical trees and plants abound with exotic wonder. Trek alongside wetlands in the Everglades or through wide-open wet prairie, no matter the trail, hikers will find sunshine serenity. DuPuis Management Area – Canal Point, FL The DuPuis Management Area is a 21,875-acre multi-use natural area located in the northwestern part of The Palm Beaches. The park land is interspersed with numerous ponds, wet prairies, cypress domes, pine flatwoods and remnant Everglades marsh. The area provides miles of hiking and horseback trails, an equestrian center, graded vehicle roads, backpack and group campsites as well as seasonal hunting. DuPuis is far from urban areas, and its dark night sky lends itself to excellent stargazing. Harold A. Campbell Public Use Area This site covers 17,000 acres on the southern border of The Palm Beaches, making it the largest constructed wetland in the world. Its public use area provides access to vast wetland habitat where bicyclists, hikers and birdwatchers can see a variety of wildlife native to Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • DISSERTAÇÃO Caroline Leal Rodrigues Soares.Pdf
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE PERNAMBUCO CENTRO DE BIOCIÊNCIAS PROGRAMA DE PÓS GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS CAROLINE LEAL RODRIGUES SOARES AVALIAÇÃO DA ATIVIDADE CICATRIZANTE IN VITRO E IN VIVO DO EXTRATO HIDROALCOÓLICO DE LAGUNCULARIA RACEMOSA (L) C.F. GAERTN Recife 2018 CAROLINE LEAL RODRIGUES SOARES AVALIAÇÃO DA ATIVIDADE CICATRIZANTE IN VITRO E IN VIVO DO EXTRATO HIDROALCOÓLICO DE LAGUNCULARIA RACEMOSA (L) C.F. GAERTN Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós- Graduação em Ciências Biológicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, como parte dos requisitos parciais para obtenção do título de mestre em Ciências Biológicas. Área de concentração: Biologia Química para a Saúde Orientadora: Profª. Drª. Teresinha Gonçalves da Silva Recife 2018 Dados Internacionais de Catalogação na Publicação (CIP) de acordo com ISBD Soares, Caroline Leal Rodrigues Avaliação da atividade cicatrizante in vitro e in vivo do extrato hidroalcoólico de Laguncularia racemosa (L) C.F. Gaertn / Caroline Leal Rodrigues Soares - 2018. 85 folhas: il., fig., tab. Orientadora: Teresinha Gonçalves da Silva Dissertação (Mestrado) – Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Centro de Biociências. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas. Recife, 2018. Inclui referências e anexo 1. Plantas medicinais 2. Laguncularia racemosa 3. Cicatrização I. Silva, Teresinha Gonçalves da (orient.) II. Título 615.321 CDD (22.ed.) UFPE/CB-2018-452 Elaborado por Claudina Karla Queiroz Ribeiro CRB4/1752 CAROLINE LEAL RODRIGUES SOARES AVALIAÇÃO DA ATIVIDADE CICATRIZANTE IN VITRO E IN VIVO DO EXTRATO HIDROALCOÓLICO DE LAGUNCULARIA RACEMOSA (L) C.F. GAERTN Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós- Graduação em Ciências Biológicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, como parte dos requisitos parciais para obtenção do título de mestre em Ciências Biológicas.
    [Show full text]
  • Corridor Management Plan 5-Year Update
    Corridor Management Plan 5-Year Update Submitted to: Florida Department of Transportation District One Scenic Highways Coordinator 1840 61st St. Sarasota, Florida 34243 941.359.7311 Submitted by: The Palma Sola Scenic Highway Corridor Management Entity Seth Kohn, Chairperson Molly McCartney, Vice Chairperson ‘c/o City of Bradenton 1411 9th Street West Bradenton, FL 34205 941.708.6300 Prepared by: Keep Manatee Beautiful, Inc. P.O. Box 14426 Bradenton, Florida 34280 941.795-8272 July 2009 Palma Sola Scenic Highway Corridor Management Plan 5-Year Update TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................... 1 Corridor Management Entity Member List.......................................................................... 2 Bylaws .................................................................................. 3 Agreements .......................................................................... 9 Corridor Conditions ....................................................................... 11 Corridor Vision .............................................................................. 16 Goals, Objectives and Strategies.................................................. 17 Protection Techniques .................................................................. 22 The Corridor Story.......................................................................... 22 Community Participation Program ................................................ 23 Local Support ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mosquito Lagoon Environmental Resources Inventory
    NASA Technical Memorandum 107548 Mosquito Lagoon Environmental Resources Inventory J. A. Provancha, C. R. Hall and D. M. Oddy, The Bionetics Corporation, Kennedy Space Center, Florida 32899 March 1992 National Aeronautics and Space Administration TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................... _................................................................................... viii INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................................... 1 CLIMATE ................................................. ....................................................................................... 2 LAND USE ..................................................................................................................................... 6 VEGETATION .............................................................................................................................. 11 GEOHYDROLOGY ..................................................................................................................... 13 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    FLORIDA Coastal and Estuarine Land Conservation Plan SEPTEMBER 2008 (Originally submitted October 2006) Prepared by: Florida Coastal Management Program In cooperation with: Florida Department of Environmental Protection Division of State Lands Office of Coastal and Aquatic Managed Areas Florida Natural Areas Inventory ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many state partners and individuals assisted the Florida Coastal Management Program in developing the Florida Coastal and Estuarine Land Conservation Plan. The Florida Coastal Management Program would like to extend special thanks to the following for their assistance and support in developing this plan: From the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Division of State Lands O. Greg Brock, Donna Jones Ruffner and Ellen Stere From the Florida Natural Areas Inventory Gary Knight and Ann F. Johnson The Florida Coastal Management Program 3900 Commonwealth Blvd. MS #47 Tallahassee, FL 32399 Coastal Program URL: http://www.dep.state.fl.us/mainpage/programs/cmp.htm Development of this plan was supported with funding from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management under Section 306 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972. Florida Coastal and Estuarine Land Conservation Plan Overview of conservation lands in the State of Florida ii Florida Coastal and Estuarine Land Conservation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 a. Background
    [Show full text]
  • Collier Miami-Dade Palm Beach Hendry Broward Glades St
    Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission F L O R ID A 'S T U R N P IK E er iv R ee m Lakewood Park m !( si is O K L D INDRIO ROAD INDRIO RD D H I N COUNTY BCHS Y X I L A I E O W L H H O W G Y R I D H UCIE BLVD ST L / S FT PRCE ILT SRA N [h G Fort Pierce Inlet E 4 F N [h I 8 F AVE "Q" [h [h A K A V R PELICAN YACHT CLUB D E . FORT PIERCE CITY MARINA [h NGE AVE . OKEECHOBEE RA D O KISSIMMEE RIVER PUA NE 224 ST / CR 68 D R !( A D Fort Pierce E RD. OS O H PIC R V R T I L A N N A M T E W S H N T A E 3 O 9 K C A R-6 A 8 O / 1 N K 0 N C 6 W C W R 6 - HICKORY HAMMOCK WMA - K O R S 1 R L S 6 R N A E 0 E Lake T B P U Y H D A K D R is R /NW 160TH E si 68 ST. O m R H C A me MIDWAY RD. e D Ri Jernigans Pond Palm Lake FMA ver HUTCHINSON ISL . O VE S A t C . T I IA EASY S N E N L I u D A N.E. 120 ST G c I N R i A I e D South N U R V R S R iv I 9 I V 8 FLOR e V ESTA DR r E ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Interrelationships Among Hydrological, Biodiversity and Land Use Features of the Pantanal and Everglades
    Interrelationships among hydrological, biodiversity and Land Use Features of the Pantanal and Everglades Biogeochemical Segmentation and Derivation of Numeric Nutrient Criteria for Coastal Everglades waters. FIU Henry Briceño. Joseph N. Boyer NPS Joffre Castro 100 years of hydrology intervention …urban development 1953 1999 Naples Bay impacted by drainage, channelization, and urban development FDEP 2010 SEGMENTATION METHOD Six basins, 350 stations POR 1991 (1995)-1998. NH4, NO2, TOC, TP, TN, NO3, TON, SRP, DO, Turbidity, Salinity, CHLa, Temperature Factor Analysis (PC extraction) Scores Mean, SD, Median, MAD Hierarchical Clustering NUMERIC NUTRIENT CRITERIA The USEPA recommends three types of approaches for setting numeric nutrient criteria: - reference condition approach - stressor-response analysis - mechanistic modeling. A Station’s Never to Exceed (NTE) Limit. This limit is the highest possible level that a station concentration can reach at any time A Segment’s Annual Geometric Mean (AGM) Limit. This limit is the highest possible level a segment’s average concentration of annual geometric means can reach in year A Segment’s 1-in-3 Years (1in3) Limit. This limit is the level that a segment average concentration of annual geometric means should be less than or equal to, at least, twice in three consecutive years. 1in3 AGM NTE 90% 80% 95% AGM : Annual Geometric Mean Not to be exceeded 1in3 : Annual Geometric Mean Not to exceed more than once in 3 yrs Biscayne Bay, Annual Geometric Means 0.7 AGMAGM Limit : Not to be exceeded 0.6 (Annual Geometric Mean not to be exceeded) 1in31in3 Limit : Not to exceed more 0.5 (Annualthan Geometric once Mean in not 3 to beyears exceeded more than once in 3 yrs) 0.4 0.3 Total Nitrogen, mg/LNitrogen, Total 0.2 Potentially Enriched 0.1 SCO NCO SNB NCI NNB CS SCM SCI MBS THRESHOLD ANALYSIS Regime Shift Detection methods (Rodionov 2004) Cumulative deviations from mean method CTZ CHLa Zcusum Threshold 20 0 -20 Cusum .
    [Show full text]
  • Pensacola Bay System EPA Report
    EPA/600/R-16/169 | August 2016 | www.epa.gov/research Environmental Quality of the Pensacola Bay System: Retrospective Review for Future Resource Management and Rehabilitation Office of Research and Development 1 EPA/600/R-16/169 August 2016 Environmental Quality of the Pensacola Bay System: Retrospective Review for Future Resource Management and Rehabilitation by Michael A. Lewis Gulf Ecology Division National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory Gulf Breeze, FL 32561 J. Taylor Kirschenfeld Water Quality and Land Management Division Escambia County Pensacola, FL 32503 Traci Goodhart West Florida Regional Planning Council Pensacola, FL 32514 National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gulf Breeze, FL. 32561 i Notice The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through its Office of Research and Development (ORD) funded and collaborated in the research described herein with representatives from Escambia County’s Water Quality and Land Management Division and the West Florida Regional Planning Council. It has been subjected to the Agency’s peer and administrative review and has been approved for publication as an EPA document. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. This is a contribution to the EPA ORD Sustainable and Healthy Communities Research Program. The appropriate citation for this report is: Lewis, Michael, J. Taylor Kirschenfeld, and Traci Goodheart. Environmental Quality of the Pensacola Bay System: Retrospective Review for Future Resource Management and Rehabilitation. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Gulf Breeze, FL, EPA/600/R-16/169, 2016. ii Foreword This report supports EPA’s Sustainable and Healthy Communities Research Program.
    [Show full text]