DOCSLIB.ORG

Download/464727198/74E1a913bc); We Hope to Hold the In-Person Symposium Within the Next Year, As the Celebration Continues

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download/464727198/74E1a913bc); We Hope to Hold the In-Person Symposium Within the Next Year, As the Celebration Continues 2 Celebrating 50 years of conservation, research, education, and action October 3rd, 2020, marked the 50th anniversary of the world’s longest-running study of a wild dolphin population, conducted by the Sarasota Dolphin Research Program. On that day in 1970, Blair Irvine attached the first tags to Sarasota Bay bottlenose dolphins, taking the first step that led to demonstrating the local dolphin residency that has been key to all of the research that has followed in Sarasota Bay. Much more on the history of the program appears in the pages of this special issue of Nicks’n’Notches. While we had planned to hold an in-person symposium in Sarasota in October to reflect on decades of scientific findings and celebrate with the friends and colleagues who have made this work possible, the pandemic forced us to take a different path. With the recorded or live help of 25 of our colleagues and collaborators from around the world, we instead held a virtual celebration to mark the official date (recording available at: https://vimeo.com/frontpageprod/download/464727198/74e1a913bc); we hope to hold the in-person symposium within the next year, as the celebration continues. We are also editing a special topics issue of the journal Frontiers in Marine Science entitled: “The Dolphins of Sarasota Bay: Lessons from 50 Years of Research and Conservation,” expected to consist of 25 peer-reviewed papers by colleagues, staff, and students, to be published in 2021. As we celebrate the accomplishments and amazingly productive (and fun) collaborations we developed during our first 50 years, we also look toward the future. We look forward to continuing our existing research and education partnerships, and implementing new ones with institutions such as New College of Florida. We look forward to further developing and refining some of our new field techniques, and expanding our ecological studies of Sarasota Bay, as you’ll read about in the following pages. Most of all, we look forward to the opportunity to continue to learn about the dolphins of Sarasota Bay, who we have gotten to know so well over the past half-century, and applying what we learn to their benefit, and to help with dolphin conservation elsewhere around the world. We are extremely grateful to the Chicago Zoological Society for their support of the program for the past 31 years, and for their commitment to our future endeavors. And thanks to all of you for caring about the dolphins of Sarasota Bay, Director, Chicago Zoological Society’s Sarasota Dolphin Research Program In This Issue Our Approach Toward Helping Dolphins ....................... 4 Ecology, Population Structure and Dynamics ............. 37 Year in Review .................................................................. 5 Tools and Techniques .................................................... 42 Conservation Research and Action ................................ 9 Education, Outreach, and Training ............................... 46 Behavior, Social Structure, and Communication ......... 14 Products ......................................................................... 53 Health and Physiology .................................................... 16 Program Operations ...................................................... 56 Dolphin Rescues, Releases, and Follow-up Monitoring 22 Opportunities For You to Help ...................................... 58 The Half-Century in Review ........................................... 24 3 Our approach toward helping dolphins Our desire with each research or conservation project in Florida or elsewhere is to contribute to a better understanding of the structure and dynamics of populations of small cetaceans (dolphins, whales, and porpoises), as well as the natural and anthropogenic factors (factors of human origin) that impact them. We use an interdisciplinary and collaborative approach in conducting studies of bottlenose dolphins within a unique long-term natural laboratory. The primary goals of our program include: (1) collecting biological, behavioral, ecological, and health data of importance to the conservation of small cetaceans, especially bottlenose dolphins, (2) providing requisite information for bottlenose dolphin conservation to wildlife management agencies, (3) disseminating the information generated by our program to scientific and general audiences in order to aid dolphin conservation efforts, (4) using our model program to develop and refine hypotheses regarding bottlenose dolphins in other parts of the species’ range as well as other species of small cetaceans, (5) using the established natural laboratory to develop and test new research tools and methodologies of potential benefit to conservation efforts, (6) training cetacean conservation workers and students from around the world in the use of these techniques, (7) applying our unique expertise to dolphin rescue operations and post-release follow-up monitoring, and (8) applying the information we gather from free-ranging dolphins to improve the quality of care for dolphins in zoological park settings. The collaborative work done toward achieving these goals is conducted under the umbrella of the “Sarasota Dolphin Research Program.” This name links the efforts of several organizations and individuals that work together to insure the continuity of the long-term dolphin research in Sarasota Bay. The SDRP has been operated by the Chicago Zoological Society (CZS) since 1989. Dolphin Biology Research Institute, a Sarasota-based 501{c}3 non-profit corporation established in 1982, provides logistical support with its fleet of small research vessels, vehicles, computers, cameras, field equipment, etc. Since 1992, the program has been based at Mote Marine Laboratory, with office, lab, storage and dock space within the resident Sarasota Bay dolphins’ home range. The SDRP maintains academic connections including providing graduate student opportunities primarily through the University of Florida, the University of California at Santa Cruz, and Duke University, and undergraduate opportunities through a number of schools, including New College of Florida. All of our dolphin research in the United States is conducted under NOAA Fisheries Service Scientific Research Permit No. 20455 and Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approvals through the appropriate institutions. Contact us: The Chicago Zoological Society’s Sarasota Dolphin Research Program 708 Tropical Circle, Sarasota, FL 34242 USA Tel: (941) 374-0449 [email protected], www.sarasotadolphin.org 4 The Year in Review Some of our accomplishments, by the numbers SMM past-president Randy Wells served as both a scientific Randall Wells, Chicago Zoological Society’s Sarasota program committee member and chair of a plenary session Dolphin Research Program on Conservation Interventions. Staff Scientist Reny Tyson- Moore co-coordinated a workshop with Kim Urian from Duke The “natural laboratory” situation of Sarasota Bay University (former SDRP lab manager and grad student) facilitates cutting-edge work done by a diverse group of focused on applying automated systems for dorsal fin specialists who complement the expertise and interests of matching. While most professional meetings such as these the SDRP. Over the years, staff, students, and collaborators have been suspended or moved online during the global have produced more than 325 peer-reviewed publications, pandemic, we very much hope that it will be safe to bring 4 books, and more than 100 technical reports, and we have people together again for the next biennial conference, made more than 660 presentations to scientific audiences, scheduled for December 2021 in Palm Beach, Florida. students, stakeholder groups, and the general public. Perhaps the most meaningful component of our legacy, though, involves training the next generation of conservation leaders. To date, 41 master’s and 50 doctoral students have benefited from SDRP data collection opportunities, data, samples, or guidance. In addition, about 400 undergraduate interns have received multi-month training by the SDRP. Foreign participants in our training programs include 70 of the interns, along with 30 post-graduate scientists and 108 health assessment project participants, from 45 countries. A number of the alumni from our training programs have moved into key positions in wildlife management, at NOAA and the Marine Mammal Commission, and elsewhere around the world. The accomplishments of the program over the decades reflect the efforts of many: staff, students, volunteers, and collaborators, and the long-term support of several key individuals and Former CZS-SDRP students and interns reunited during the WMMC in organizations. Barcelona in December 2019. Sarasota Dolphin Research Program participation in the World Marine Mammal Sarasota Dolphin Research Program project Conference summary Katie McHugh, Chicago Zoological Society’s Sarasota Randall Wells, Chicago Zoological Society’s Sarasota Dolphin Research Program Dolphin Research Program In December 2019, the Chicago Zoological Society’s The events of the past year have influenced the activities Sarasota Dolphin Research Program (CZS-SDRP) staff of our research program. While we have been awarded and students, along with our colleagues from around funding for a number of research, education, or conservation the world, had a major presence at the World Marine projects, the pandemic has forced us to postpone or cancel Mammal Conference (WMMC) in Barcelona, Spain – a several of the larger projects, including
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Year 2 Data Summary Report: Nekton of Sarasota Bay and a Comparison of Nekton Community Structure in Adjacent Southwest Florida Estuaries
    Year 2 Data Summary Report: Nekton of Sarasota Bay and a Comparison of Nekton Community Structure in Adjacent Southwest Florida Estuaries T.C. MacDonald; E. Weather; R.F. Jones; R.H. McMichael, Jr. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute 100 Eighth Avenue Southeast St. Petersburg, Florida 33701-5095 Prepared for Sarasota Bay Estuary Program 111 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200W Sarasota, Florida 34236 June 4, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................ iii LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................................... v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................ vii SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................... ix INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 METHODS .................................................................................................................................................... 2 Study Area ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Corridor Management Plan 5-Year Update
    Corridor Management Plan 5-Year Update Submitted to: Florida Department of Transportation District One Scenic Highways Coordinator 1840 61st St. Sarasota, Florida 34243 941.359.7311 Submitted by: The Palma Sola Scenic Highway Corridor Management Entity Seth Kohn, Chairperson Molly McCartney, Vice Chairperson ‘c/o City of Bradenton 1411 9th Street West Bradenton, FL 34205 941.708.6300 Prepared by: Keep Manatee Beautiful, Inc. P.O. Box 14426 Bradenton, Florida 34280 941.795-8272 July 2009 Palma Sola Scenic Highway Corridor Management Plan 5-Year Update TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................... 1 Corridor Management Entity Member List.......................................................................... 2 Bylaws .................................................................................. 3 Agreements .......................................................................... 9 Corridor Conditions ....................................................................... 11 Corridor Vision .............................................................................. 16 Goals, Objectives and Strategies.................................................. 17 Protection Techniques .................................................................. 22 The Corridor Story.......................................................................... 22 Community Participation Program ................................................ 23 Local Support ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rob Patten: Creating a Legacy for Coastal Island Sanctuaries
    SUMMER 2011 2011 Audubon Assembly: Take Action for Florida’s Special Places October 14-15 Connect to Florida’s Special Places Guarding the Everglades Treasure 2011 Florida Audubon Society John Elting, Chairman, Leadership Florida Audubon Society Eric Draper Executive Director, Audubon of Florida President, Florida Audubon Our April board of directors meeting was a pivotal point for Florida Audubon Society (FAS). It was at that moment in time, surrounded by a chorus of birds at the Chinsegut Nature Center near Board of Directors FAS-owned Ahhochee Hill, that I think we all realized how far we had come this fiscal year. Our John W. Elting, Chairman Executive Director Eric Draper, our committed board and tireless staff had a lot to celebrate. Joe Ambrozy, Vice Chairman Sheri Ford Lewin, Board Secretary Even during tough economic times, we were ending the year in a positive financial position, Doug Santoni, Treasurer something other environmental groups are struggling with this year. We have achieved 100 per- Sandy Batchelor, Esq. cent board giving, both financially and in terms of gifts of time and talent. Our marketing efforts, Jim Brady particularly the expanded focus on social media, have resulted in a strong online community that Henry Dean, Esq. helped protect Florida’s state parks on three different occasions this year. Improved outreach and John Flanigan, Esq. regional events are building engagement in Audubon throughout Florida. The board’s science Charles Geanangel committee is taking our applied science work to new levels including accelerated involvement John Hood of citizen scientists. Lastly, we are beginning to work at the local, state and national level as One Reid Hughes Audubon.
    [Show full text]
  • Currently the Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems
    CRITICALLY ERODED BEACHES IN FLORIDA Updated, June 2009 BUREAU OF BEACHES AND COASTAL SYSTEMS DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION STATE OF FLORIDA Foreword This report provides an inventory of Florida's erosion problem areas fronting on the Atlantic Ocean, Straits of Florida, Gulf of Mexico, and the roughly seventy coastal barrier tidal inlets. The erosion problem areas are classified as either critical or noncritical and county maps and tables are provided to depict the areas designated critically and noncritically eroded. This report is periodically updated to include additions and deletions. A county index is provided on page 13, which includes the date of the last revision. All information is provided for planning purposes only and the user is cautioned to obtain the most recent erosion areas listing available. This report is also available on the following web site: http://www.dep.state.fl.us/beaches/uublications/tech-rut.htm APPROVED BY Michael R. Barnett, P.E., Bureau Chief Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems June, 2009 Introduction In 1986, pursuant to Sections 161.101 and 161.161, Florida Statutes, the Department of Natural Resources, Division of Beaches and Shores (now the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems) was charged with the responsibility to identify those beaches of the state which are critically eroding and to develop and maintain a comprehensive long-term management plan for their restoration. In 1989, a first list of erosion areas was developed based upon an abbreviated definition of critical erosion. That list included 217.6 miles of critical erosion and another 114.8 miles of noncritical erosion statewide.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 COLA
    Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 COL Application Part 2 — FSAR SUBSECTION 2.4.1: HYDROLOGIC DESCRIPTION TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.4 HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING ..................................................................2.4.1-1 2.4.1 HYDROLOGIC DESCRIPTION ............................................................2.4.1-1 2.4.1.1 Site and Facilities .....................................................................2.4.1-1 2.4.1.2 Hydrosphere .............................................................................2.4.1-3 2.4.1.3 References .............................................................................2.4.1-12 2.4.1-i Revision 6 Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 COL Application Part 2 — FSAR SUBSECTION 2.4.1 LIST OF TABLES Number Title 2.4.1-201 East Miami-Dade County Drainage Subbasin Areas and Outfall Structures 2.4.1-202 Summary of Data Records for Gage Stations at S-197, S-20, S-21A, and S-21 Flow Control Structures 2.4.1-203 Monthly Mean Flows at the Canal C-111 Structure S-197 2.4.1-204 Monthly Mean Water Level at the Canal C-111 Structure S-197 (Headwater) 2.4.1-205 Monthly Mean Flows in the Canal L-31E at Structure S-20 2.4.1-206 Monthly Mean Water Levels in the Canal L-31E at Structure S-20 (Headwaters) 2.4.1-207 Monthly Mean Flows in the Princeton Canal at Structure S-21A 2.4.1-208 Monthly Mean Water Levels in the Princeton Canal at Structure S-21A (Headwaters) 2.4.1-209 Monthly Mean Flows in the Black Creek Canal at Structure S-21 2.4.1-210 Monthly Mean Water Levels in the Black Creek Canal at Structure S-21 2.4.1-211 NOAA
    [Show full text]
  • 2006-SBEP-Stateofthebay.Pdf
    he Sarasota Bay Estuary Program would like to thank the Tmany citizens, technical advisors, elected officials and government agency staff who have participated in the process of protecting and revitalizing Sarasota Bay. The work of our small team of five can realize comprehensive achievements when our efforts are supported by partner funds, agency staff and an active and committed Board of Directors. We offer special thanks to the partners to the 2004 Interlocal Agreement, which established the Program as a special district in Florida: Sarasota County, Manatee County, City of Sarasota, City of Bradenton, Town of Longboat Key, Florida Department of Environmental Protection and Southwest Florida Water Management District. Sarasota Bay Estuary Program • State of the Bay 006 4 Preface Sarasota Bay: Our Greatest Natural Asset 6 Setting the Stage Sarasota Bay: Our Economic and Ecological Treasure 8 Executive Summary Sarasota Bay Shows Significant Improvements 10 Water Quality Nitrogen Wastewater Pollution Air Pollution Stormwater Pollution Bacteria Contamination Tributary Action Plans Red Tide 14 Hydrology Preserving Balance in the Ecosystem and Maintaining Natural Flow 16 Bay Habitat Wetlands Wetland Restoration Monitoring Wetland Restoration Projects Seagrasses Hard Bottom Habitat Oysters Artificial Reefs Monitoring Reefs 24 Public Involvement in Restoring the Bay Community Recreation, Stewardship and Citizen Action Outreach—How the Community is Involved Sarasota County Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance Manatee County Rebate Program Southwest
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared for County of Sarasota Coastal
    FINAL REPORT LITTLE SARASOTA BAY CIRCULATION STUDY Prepared for County of Sarasota Coastal Zone Management Division Environmental Services Department 9250-110-RT Contract No. C82-66 Prepared by Stergios A. Dendrou Charles I. Moore Raymond Walton CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE 7630 Little River Turnpike Annandale, Virginia 22003 August 1983 Suggested reference Camp Dresser & McKee and Mote Marine Laboratory. 1983. Little Sarasota Bay circulation study. Sarasota County. Contract no C82-66. Mote Marine Laboratory Technical Report no 57. 175 p. Available from: Mote Marine Laboratory Library. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. LIST OF FIGURES . iii LIST OF TABLES . ix I INTRODUCTION ........................................... I-1 DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA .......................... I-1 SCOPE OF WORK .......................................... I-3 REPORT OUTLINE ......................................... I-4 II RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS . II-1 III LITTLE SARASOTA BAY MODEL .............................. III-1 DYNAMIC ESTUARY MODEL .................................. III-1 MODEL THEORY ........................................... III-1 Basic Hydrodynamic Equations ...................... III-4 Numerical Solution-Stability ...................... III-5 Boundary Conditions ............................... III-6 LITTLE SARASOTA BAY GRID NETWORK ....................... III-7 Geometric Input Data .............................. III-7 IV PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS ................................... IV-1 TIDES AND TIDAL PHASING ................................ IV-1 WIND
    [Show full text]
  • Of 6 62-302.532 Estuary-Specific Numeric Interpretations of The
    FAC 62-302.532 Estuary-Specific Numeric Interpretations of the Narrative Nutrient Criterion Effective Date: 12/20/2012 62-302.532 Estuary-Specific Numeric Interpretations of the Narrative Nutrient Criterion. (1) Estuary-specific numeric interpretations of the narrative nutrient criterion in paragraph 62-302.530(47)(b), F.A.C., are in the table below. The concentration-based estuary interpretations are open water, area-wide averages. The interpretations expressed as load per million cubic meters of freshwater inflow are the total load of that nutrient to the estuary divided by the total volume of freshwater inflow to that estuary. Page 1 of 6 FAC 62-302.532 Estuary-Specific Numeric Interpretations of the Narrative Nutrient Criterion Effective Date: 12/20/2012 Estuary Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen Chlorophyll a (a) Clearwater Harbor/St. Joseph Sound Annual geometric mean values not to be exceeded more than once in a three year period. Nutrient and nutrient response values do not apply to tidally influenced areas that fluctuate between predominantly marine and predominantly fresh waters during typical climatic and hydrologic conditions. 1. St.Joseph Sound 0.05 mg/L 0.66 mg/L 3.1 µg/L 2. Clearwater North 0.05 mg/L 0.61 mg/L 5.4 µg/L 3. Clearwater South 0.06 mg/L 0.58 mg/L 7.6 µg/L (b) Tampa Bay Annual totals for nutrients and annual arithmetic means for chlorophyll a, not to be exceeded more than once in a three year period. Nutrient and nutrient response values do not apply to tidally influenced areas that fluctuate between predominantly marine and predominantly fresh waters during typical climatic and hydrologic conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Rookery at Perico Seagrass Advance Mitigation
    ROOKERY AT PERICO SEAGRASS ADVANCE MITIGATION Mitigation Establishment Criteria Report May 17, 2013 ROOKERY AT PERICO SEAGRASS ADVANCE MITIGATION Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ I 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1.1 2.0 COMPENSATORY MITIGATION (DIRECT IMPACTS) ................................................. 2.2 2.1 MANGROVE FOREST DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION ............................................... 2.2 2.2 MONITORING METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................... 2.2 2.3 SUCCESS CRITERIA ......................................................................................................... 2.4 2.4 LONG-TERM MAINTENANCE ........................................................................................... 2.5 3.0 HABITAT CREATION MITIGATION CREDITS .............................................................. 3.5 3.1 SEAGRASS HABITAT CREATION .................................................................................... 3.5 3.1.1 Design Details ...................................................................................................... 3.5 3.1.2 Implementation Options ....................................................................................... 3.7 3.1.3 Mitigation Credit Assessment (UMAM) ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Seagrass Integrated Mapping and Monitoring for the State of Florida Mapping and Monitoring Report No. 1
    Yarbro and Carlson, Editors SIMM Report #1 Seagrass Integrated Mapping and Monitoring for the State of Florida Mapping and Monitoring Report No. 1 Edited by Laura A. Yarbro and Paul R. Carlson Jr. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute St. Petersburg, Florida March 2011 Yarbro and Carlson, Editors SIMM Report #1 Yarbro and Carlson, Editors SIMM Report #1 Table of Contents Authors, Contributors, and SIMM Team Members .................................................................. 3 Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................... 4 Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 7 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 31 How this report was put together ........................................................................................... 36 Chapter Reports ...................................................................................................................... 41 Perdido Bay ........................................................................................................................... 41 Pensacola Bay .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Community-Based Watershed Plan
    Perdido Bay Community-Based Watershed Plan The Nature Conservancy in Florida December 2014 Photo © Beth Maynor Young The Nature Conservancy would like to thank all of the stakeholders from local, state and federal governments, non-governmental organizations, community groups, businesses, and citizens who devoted their time, resources and support for this watershed planning process. Your desire and commitment to come together in the spirit of building a watershed community that will achieve more together than individually has created a solid foundation and legacy of collaboration and conservation for the Gulf. In particular, we would like to recognize the National Resource Conservation Service for their support in creating the GIS-based project maps and the leadership demonstrated by the counties in the Panhandle and Springs Coast regions to invest in a process that reaches across political and organizational boundaries and focuses on improving and protecting the watersheds today and for future generations. Copyright © 2015. The Nature Conservancy in Florida Table of Contents Executive Summary 2 Introduction 4 Planning Process 5 Identifying Priority Issues, Root Causes, Major Actions 7 Project Identification and Performance Measurement 9 Current Status and Recommended Next Steps 13 TNC Recommendations 14 Path Forward 14 Appendices 1 A—Deepwater Horizon Related Funding Opportunities 16 B—Stakeholder Participants 19 C—Stakeholder Meeting Notes 24 D—Watershed Overview and General Issues 58 E—Stakeholder-Identified Priority Issues, Root Causes, Major Actions and Project Types 65 F—Project Table 71 The Nature Conservancy Executive Summary The Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill has focused attention on opportunities to restore and enhance Gulf Coast ecosystems and communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Seagrass Targets for the Sarasota Bay Estuary Program
    SEAGRASS TARGETS FOR THE SARASOTA BAY ESTUARY PROGRAM Prepared for: Sarasota Bay Estuary Program 111 South Orange Avenue Suite 200W Sarasota, FL 34236 Prepared by: Anthony Janicki, Michael Dema, and Ravic Nijbroek 1155 Eden Isle Drive NE St. Petersburg, FL 33704 December 2008 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The objective of this project is to provide technically-defensible quantitative restoration and protection targets for seagrasses in the Sarasota Bay ecosystem. Establishment of seagrass targets provides a necessary basis for management decisions regarding water quality and other issues that can influence the distribution and persistence of this resource. The primary goal of this project is to maintain and/or restore seagrass coverage to its historic extent. Restoration targets were defined through an analysis of historic and recent aerial surveys of the study area. Historic photos of the area were taken in 1950; as many alterations have occurred to the shoreline in the study area, as well as channelization of the Intracoastal Waterway (ICW), the following analyses have accounted for these changes as non-restorable areas. Additionally, trends in seagrass coverage throughout the SBEP based on recent surveys have been identified. The methodology employed for this project is GIS-based. Historic aerial photos were used to establish a baseline extent of seagrass in the study area circa 1950. Recent trends in and persistence of seagrass throughout the SBEP were determined through analysis of GIS shapefiles based on aerial surveys executed by the SWFWMD since 1988. Due to anthropogenic modifications in the estuary such as shoreline build-out and the dredging of the Intracoastal Waterway (ICW), certain areas have been altered to the extent that they have no reasonable potential for restoration; these so-called non-restorable areas have been identified and removed from the analyses contained in this report.
    [Show full text]