Sunburst: the Rise of Japanese Naval Air Power, 1909–1941 Robert Cressman

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sunburst: the Rise of Japanese Naval Air Power, 1909–1941 Robert Cressman Naval War College Review Volume 56 Article 18 Number 2 Spring 2003 Sunburst: The Rise of Japanese Naval Air Power, 1909–1941 Robert Cressman Mark R. Peattie Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Cressman, Robert and Peattie, Mark R. (2003) "Sunburst: The Rise of Japanese Naval Air Power, 1909–1941," Naval War College Review: Vol. 56 : No. 2 , Article 18. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol56/iss2/18 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cressman and Peattie: Sunburst: The Rise of Japanese Naval Air Power, 1909–1941 BOOK REVIEWS 157 essay, Jeffrey Record points out that those many historians have also been in a hall who emphasize the failures of civilian of mirrors, preoccupied with the Amer- policy makers in Washington ignore both ican side of the struggle. It is the great the achievements of Vietnamese revolu- strength of this volume that, at least in tionaries and “the defective professional part, it suggests the insights that can be U.S. military performance in Vietnam gained by moving beyond the American within the political limitations imposed perspective. on the use of force.” If politicians were CHARLES E. NEU stabbing the military in the back, “the Brown University military also was shooting itself in the foot.” He concludes that it is unlikely that the United States could have done more than increase the price of an en- emy victory. John Prados analyzes the Peattie, Mark R. Sunburst: The Rise of Japanese uses of intelligence by both sides, em- Naval Air Power, 1909–1941. Annapolis, Md.: Na- phasizing the difficulties of the Ameri- val Institute Press, 2002. 392pp. $36.95 cans and South Vietnamese in This work compellingly describes how collecting accurate information, and Japanese naval aviation, both land and the extent of North Vietnamese and carrier based—like that of its principal Vietcong penetration of the Saigon adversary in the Pacific War, the United government and army. Gilbert chal- States—grew to maturity through trial lenges the views of Harry Summers, and error. Its maturation period ex- Jr., and William E. Colby, both of tended from the earliest days of pow- whom, he believes, fail to understand ered flight through the bloody crucible that America in Vietnam was betrayed of war with China. The story of U.S. na- “by its own collective limited vision of val aviation during this time is a famil- the nature of the war and the require- iar one, but that of the Japanese is less ments of victory.” Andrew Rotter ex- so, due to the formidable barrier posed amines the respective economic by language. As more scholars equip cultures of America and North Vietnam themselves with the tools necessary to that shaped each side’s response to the mine riches from the sources and publi- war, while Marilyn Young explores the cations of a former enemy, however, impact of the American peace movement, the other side of the story is becoming suggesting that whatever its effect on the known. One such diligent student of length of the conflict, widespread protests Japanese naval history is Mark R. “increased the price to the government of Peattie, familiar as the coauthor (with continued prosecution of the war.” David C. Evans) of the highly praised In a thoughtful reflection on these es- Kaigun: Tactics and Technology in the says, Lloyd Gardner writes that “the re- Imperial Japanese Navy, 1887–1941 ality of Vietnam was as elusive to (Naval Institute Press, 1997). Holder of American policymakers as the enemy a doctorate in modern Japanese history forces were to the men they sent to this from Princeton University and author, hall of mirrors. They saw only their coauthor, or editor of seven other own reflections, multiplied over and works, Peattie brings unique qualifica- over.” Like policy makers at the time, tions to the daunting task. Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 2003 1 158 NAVAL WAR COLLEGENaval War REVIEW College Review, Vol. 56 [2003], No. 2, Art. 18 Sunburst’s meat lies in seven chapters concludes that the “catastrophic col- that discuss the early development of lapse” of Japanese naval air power lay in Japanese naval aviation (1909–21), Jap- the Imperial Navy’s failure “to antici- anese naval aircraft and the tactics de- pate the kind of air combat it would be veloped for their employment (1920– obliged to wage,” its failure “to make 36), the design and construction of Jap- the right kinds of decisions” to cope anese aircraft carriers and formulation with the realities of a “new kind of air of doctrine for their employment war,” and, importantly, “the inability of (1920–41), the Japanese aircraft indus- Japanese industry and technology to try and the design and construction of support Japanese naval aviation against aircraft (1937–41), and Japanese naval the emerging numerical and qualitative aviation, both land and carrier based superiority of American air power.” In during the undeclared war with China that connection, this reviewer was par- (1937–41). Paralleling the wartime ex- ticularly pleased with how Peattie dis- perience is a chapter on the develop- poses of the most common of persistent ment of Japanese naval air power in Midway myths, that the battle resulted projecting the empire’s power as it pre- in the catastrophic loss of aircrew. pared for the Pacific conflict. The final While heavy, the loss of pilots and ob- chapter, “Descending the Flame,” be- servers by no means equaled the loss of gins with the attack on Pearl Harbor the “trained maintenance personnel,” and with the destruction, at sea and un- invaluable to maintain modern naval der way, of the British battleship HMS aircraft, who went down with their Prince of Wales and battle cruiser HMS ships. “Similarly,” he contends, “the Repulse. It ends with the battle of the loss of skilled ground crews, often Philippine Sea in June 1944, after which abandoned to their fates when the navy “the Japanese Navy never again launched evacuated remaining aircrews from is- a significant effort to contest the hege- lands under siege, substantially weak- mony of the skies over the Pacific.” ened the land-based air groups.” Augmenting the text are nine appendi- “In the end,” Peattie concludes, “the ces: biographical sketches of those men- Japanese naval air service was outpro- tioned in the text; a glossary of naval duced, outorganized, outmanned, and aviation terms; the generic organization outfought.” Yet in the ashes of defeat, of Japanese naval aviation; naval aviation however, “the precision, skill, and . ships (carriers, seaplane carriers, and the technical mastery” with which the Japa- like); naval air bases and air groups; prin- nese crafted the Zero fighter “gave wings cipal naval aircraft; aircraft designation to the phoenix of postwar Japanese tech- systems; principal engines; and a descrip- nology.” Students of the Pacific War will tion of the “turning-in” maneuver. A find Sunburst (based on an impressive common thread found in the graphics array of Japanese sources, including the that appears throughout the text is the official war history volumes and a variety superb work of Jon Parschall, who ren- of book or article-length studies) invalu- ders tactical maneuvers, ordnance, air- able for its insights on an important craft, and ships with equal facility. subject. Sunburst, which Peattie affectionately ROBERT CRESSMAN dedicates to his former coauthor, Naval Historical Center https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol56/iss2/18 2.
Recommended publications
  • The Rise of Naval Aviation in Modern Japan
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE A Battle against Tradition: The Rise of Naval Aviation in Modern Japan Jens Sagen Foreword The maritime victory off Tsushima in May 1905 during the Russo-Japanese War was a milestone in modern naval history. The victory marked the beginning of a new era for the Imperial Japanese Navy. It also manifested a theory among officers all over the World of large vessels and giant guns as being the most important factors in naval warfare, a view which permeated international naval thinking at the turn of the century. The means applied and the results achieved in this decisive naval engagement paved the way for this theory focusing on large ships and giant guns in Japan, and eventually formed the foundation of the doctrinal core of the Imperial Navy and subsequently ruled out any alternatives as means of securing victory at sea. This paper seeks to answer the question of whether or not the development of the Imperial Japanese Naval Air Wing, which began less than five years after the Japanese defeat of Russia, was crippled by a doctrine based on experience gained in the golden days of ships of the battle line. First, the paper will examine the emergence of a conventional Japanese naval battle doctrine, and subsequently answer the question of why the Imperial Navy became a surface-oriented force, and how it planned to engage an enemy and emerge victorious. Second, looking at what factors promoted this conventional doctrine, the paper will pose an answer to the question of why the surface doctrine remained prominent and virtually unchallenged, and, subsequently, how deeply this doctrine permeated officers of the naval air wing.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Collection
    A, AIR & SPA ID SE CE MU REP SEU INT M AIRCRAFT COLLECTION From the Avenger torpedo bomber, a stalwart from Intrepid’s World War II service, to the A-12, the spy plane from the Cold War, this collection reflects some of the GREATEST ACHIEVEMENTS IN MILITARY AVIATION. Photo: Liam Marshall TABLE OF CONTENTS Bombers / Attack Fighters Multirole Helicopters Reconnaissance / Surveillance Trainers OV-101 Enterprise Concorde Aircraft Restoration Hangar Photo: Liam Marshall BOMBERS/ATTACK The basic mission of the aircraft carrier is to project the U.S. Navy’s military strength far beyond our shores. These warships are primarily deployed to deter aggression and protect American strategic interests. Should deterrence fail, the carrier’s bombers and attack aircraft engage in vital operations to support other forces. The collection includes the 1940-designed Grumman TBM Avenger of World War II. Also on display is the Douglas A-1 Skyraider, a true workhorse of the 1950s and ‘60s, as well as the Douglas A-4 Skyhawk and Grumman A-6 Intruder, stalwarts of the Vietnam War. Photo: Collection of the Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum GRUMMAN / EASTERNGRUMMAN AIRCRAFT AVENGER TBM-3E GRUMMAN/EASTERN AIRCRAFT TBM-3E AVENGER TORPEDO BOMBER First flown in 1941 and introduced operationally in June 1942, the Avenger became the U.S. Navy’s standard torpedo bomber throughout World War II, with more than 9,836 constructed. Originally built as the TBF by Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corporation, they were affectionately nicknamed “Turkeys” for their somewhat ungainly appearance. Bomber Torpedo In 1943 Grumman was tasked to build the F6F Hellcat fighter for the Navy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Naval Aviation
    MIT Security Studies Program TheThe FutureFuture ofof NavalNaval AviationAviation The Future of Naval Aviation Owen R. Cote Jr. Associate Director M.I.T. Security Studies Program This report is a product of the M.I.T. Security Studies Program. It is the sixth in a series authored by Owen Cote and devoted to the subject of the U.S. Navy in the future security environment. This series of reports is dedicated to the late Vice Admiral Levering Smith, U.S.N., the technical director of the Navy’s fleet ballistic missile program during the development of Polaris, and from 1965 to 1977, its director. The author would like to thank Admiral John Nathman, Vice Admiral Mark Fitzgerald, Rear Admiral Thomas Kilcline, and Malcolm Taylor for their support for this project, and Jeanne Abboud and Harlene Miller for their help in producing this report. It, along with other MIT/SSP reports, is available at http://web.mit.edu/ssp/ Contents Executive Summary | 7 The Future Security Environment | 15 Sea Shield Past, Present, and Future | 35 The Revolution in Sea Strike | 55 Conclusion | 75 Notes | 78 When concentrated, multiple carriers are now able to produce effects ashore that would formerly have required many more wings of tactical aircraft operating from local bases in the region, while at the same time protecting the sea base and extending that shield ashore. Executive Summary ODAY, ALONGSIDE ITS ALL IMPORTANT OPERATIONS in direct support of the Global War on Terror, naval aviation also continues its now 60 year commitment to shap- Ting the maritime and littoral environment through persistent forward presence.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Innovation and Carrier Aviation—
    2017PGS 4/13/98 10:26 PM Page 97 Crashed VE–7 on USS Langley, 1925. Military Innovation and Carrier Aviation— Naval Historical Center An Analysis USS Langley leading task group in the Philippines, 1944. Naval Historical Center Autumn/Winter 1997–98 / JFQ 97 2017PGS 4/13/98 10:26 PM Page 98 ■ CARRIER AVIATION By JAN M. VAN TOL interesting things at sea. While proponents of air- craft as independent strike weapons were a mi- he first part of this article, which ap- nority, aviators were already well accepted by the peared in the last issue of JFQ, charted commanding officers of ships. Flying was not re- the historical development of British garded as a bad tour, though it is noteworthy that and American carrier aviation, with most aviators continued to do traditional ship- T board tours. particular emphasis on the complex interplay of technological, operational, and organi- zational factors. The second part treats legislation requiring commanding officers of key questions on how this revolution succeeded in the U.S. Navy and was carriers to be aviators created career paths rather less successful in the Royal Navy and what that implies for military innovation. Risk was further reduced by establishing an Among questions considered are: institutional home for champions and a venue ■ How quickly did those who grasped the vision for experimenting with new capabilities and con- move from a vague to a clearly-defined vision? How cepts of operation. This led to a viable career path quickly did change take place? that kept officers employed when their few years ■ Which mattered more to making progress, indi- of flying ended.
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan Navy Profile
    DL8AAM's Utility-DXing “Network Profile Sheet” اسلمی جمہوریۂ پاکستان Pakistan Ministry of Defence Pakistan Navy From: http://www.amarok-online.de/kurzwelle/logs/logs2.html From: QIP Based on own investigations & UDXF-reports: 2010 ( z ), 2011 ( a ) edited by Thomas M Rösner, DL8AAM – 26. Jan. 2011 DL8AAM's Utility-DXing “Network Profile Sheet” a) ALE & PSK 02487.0 kHz (USB) 03590.0 z 04348.0 08143.0 a 10962.0 a 12876.0 a 13580.0 „Pakistani Navy uses R&S XK2000 Series radios on selected vessels - the waveform used is the R&S proprietary 2400 Bd serial tone waveform.“ (Leif Dehio on UDXF, June 2010) KW a ARL „Karachi Wireless“ NRS z APQ Pakistan Naval Radio Islamabad AHSAN c Pakistan Naval Station Ahsan, Ormara Hammer Head COMSCHOOL1 a „PN Communication School“ at Naval Station Bahadur NATHIAGALI Pakistan Naval Station Nathia Gali, Karachi BABUR a Frigate PNS Babur (F-182) BADR a Frigate PNS Badr (F-184) HURMAT Submarine PNS Hurmat (S-136) KHAIBAR a Frigate PNS Khaibar (F-183) LARKANA a Missile Boat PNS Larkana MOAWIN a Auxiliary PNS Moawin (A-20) MUJAHID Minehunter PNS Mujahid (M-164) MUNSIF Minehunter PNS Munsif (M-166) NASR Auxiliary PNS Nasr (A-47) SHAHJAHAN a Frigate PNS Shah Jahan (F-185) SHANSHER1 Frigate PNS Shamsheer (F-252) SHUJAAT Missile Boat PNS Shujaat (P-1024) TARIQ a Frigate PNS Tariq (F-181) TIPPUSULTAN AROU Frigate PNS Tippu Sultan (F-186) TSULTAN AROU Frigate PNS Tippu Sultan (F-186) B) PACTOR ??? ARL2 „Karachi Wireless“ Naval Radio 08283.7 kHz USB/cf ARL4 „Karachi Wireless“ Naval Radio 08283.7 ARL4: PAK Ny Station Karachi 1840 Pactor-II/100Bd transm.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Navy Indices to the Naval Aviation Confidential Bulletin, 1946-1954
    Description of document: Department of the Navy Indices to the Naval Aviation Confidential Bulletin, 1946-1954 Requested date: 2019 Release date: 3029 Posted date: 05-July-2021 Source of document: United States Navy The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is a First Amendment free speech web site and is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. OP-.O~B~ i ' • J OP-09B91C ' I 1 Naval A'U'Utlon eontident1al Bulletin \, ~ 1. Bel.ow 11ated grouping ·is subm1~t-e.d tor , y·ol.lr :1.nf'OrJDatiOn. Date cla&s 1t icatl l..46 Jan 19'46~ 1 -~ 4 A~r 1946 = 4 JUl 1946 .
    [Show full text]
  • Military Innovation and Carrier Aviation–
    1516PGS 10/15/97 7:56 AM Page 77 Military Innovation and Carrier Aviation– The Relevant History By JAN M. VAN TOL U.S. Navy USS Lexington. ajor differences between the United The early 1920s found the United States with States and Great Britain in both the huge capital ship construction underway and ap- development and employment of proaching Britain in Mahanian splendor. A M aircraft carriers and carrier aviation decade later, the battleship remained dominant in the interwar years suggest how innovation was while the battle force was far smaller than antici- highly successful in the American case and much pated. Two carriers entered service and promised less so in the British. The only country with carri- to alter naval warfare, and six months after Amer- ers at the end of World War I was Britain. It had ica entered World War II carriers decisively used carrier-based aircraft to carry out the sort of changed the nature of the Pacific War. The most missions that characterized mature operations important development leading to this capability during World War II. Royal Navy leaders sup- took place in an era of disarmament and severe ported aviation in the fleet. Yet by 1939 Britain budgetary constraints. was outclassed by America and Japan because of Revolutions in military affairs are driven by its obsolete carrier aircraft. How was such a rever- the interplay of technological, operational, and sal possible? organizational factors. This article describes the historical evolution of British and American car- rier aviation, with emphasis on those factors. An article in the next issue of JFQ will analyze how Commander Jan M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pakistan Navy: a Transformation from ‘Fledgling Force’ to ‘Fighting Machine’ Abhijit Singh*
    Abhijit Singh FocusThe Pakistan Navy: A Transformation from ‘Fledgling Force’ to ‘Fighting Machine’ Abhijit Singh* The Pakistan navy (PN) is poised on the brink of a transformation. Neglected for long by Pakistan’s political masters and a dominant Pakistan army, the PN was unable to assert its salience and witnessed slow growth. But in the one decade since the September 2001 attacks and the US led ‘war on terror’, it has undergone a striking metamorphosis. As Pakistan realises the importance of having a robust maritime force and commits greater resources for its development, the tactics of the PN and its broader strategy in the northern Arabian Sea too have undergone a shift. An enhanced international profile and greater credibility for its role in regional maritime order is gradually resulting in the PN becoming a more confident and assertive player, and a major stakeholder in the regional maritime security regime. In December 2010, the Pakistan chief of naval staff, Admiral Noman1 Bashir, speaking onnot the attract sidelines much ofattention the Defence at the Services time, but Asia in the (DSA) months exhibition, that have commented followed, it that has the Pakistan navy was on the cusp of a dramatic transformation . The remark did proven to be a realistic and accurate forecast of the PN’s future development. PNS Alamgir, As USSpart McInerney of a new comprehensive - strategy, the PN, in recent months, has been on a veritable acquisition spree. In May 2011, it took2 possession of the ex- an Oliver HazardPNS Perry Saif (OHP) class3. Constructionfrigate acquired of the from fourth the US, as part of a deal for transfer of eight such ships4 .
    [Show full text]
  • Nmrn Fleet Air Arm Museum Service Narrative
    NMRN FLEET AIR ARM MUSEUM SERVICE NARRATIVE REVIEWED BY THE COLLECTIONS RESEARCH AND LEARNING COMMITTEE OF THE TRUSTEES / 29 NOVEMBER 2017 NMRN FAAM SERVICE NARRATIVE Fleet Air Arm Museum ~ Service Narrative THE FLEET AIR ARM MUSEUM tells the story of NARRATIVE demands of the 21st century, maintaining its ability to project air power from the sea in defence of the UK’s national British naval aviation from its earliest incarnations In 1909, the Royal Navy (RN) ordered its first airship, the interests and also, when called upon, in support of our allies. to the present day – its triumphs and failures, its Mayfly. Two years later, four officers of the RN, one a Royal Marine, became the first Navy pilots using aircraft borrowed ingenuity and innovation, its impact and from a civilian, Frank McClean. They and those who quickly Purpose 1 The Royal Navy’s new, state-of-the-art aircraft carrier, HMS Queen Elizabeth, 2017. importance. followed them were the pioneers tasked with developing the We tell the story of the origins of naval aviation, its cutting-edge and embryonic concept of operating aircraft at 2 Mechanics, Riggers, Pilot and Observer, around 1916. sea. From that time on, British naval aviation has continued development over time and its purpose today. We trace its to demonstrate and enhance those qualities and capabilities evolution from the Royal Naval Air Service (RNAS) and its 3 Landing Royal Marines in Sierra Leone, Operation that make it unique – the innovation, self-reliance and original ‘Eyes in the Sky’ role to the multi-role operations of Silkman, 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Navy Fleet Problems and the Development of Carrier
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Texas A&M Repository UNITED STATES NAVY FLEET PROBLEMS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF CARRIER AVIATION, 1929-1933 A Thesis by RYAN DAVID WADLE Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS August 2005 Major Subject: History UNITED STATES NAVY FLEET PROBLEMS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF CARRIER AVIATION, 1929-1933 A Thesis by RYAN DAVID WADLE Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, James Bradford Committee Members, R.J.Q. Adams James Olson Head of Department, Walter Buenger August 2005 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT United States Navy Fleet Problems and the Development of Carrier Aviation, 1929-1933. (August 2005) Ryan David Wadle, B. A., Iowa State University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. James Bradford The U.S. Navy first took official notice of aviation in 1910, but its development of carrier aviation lagged behind Great Britain’s until the 1920s. The first American aircraft carrier, the Langley, commissioned in 1919, provided the Navy with a valuable platform to explore the potential uses of carrier aviation, but was usually limited to scouting and fleet air defense in the U.S. Navy’s annual interwar exercises called fleet problems. This began to change in 1929 with the introduction of the carriers Lexington and Saratoga in Fleet Problem IX.
    [Show full text]
  • A Theory of Naval Airpower Robert C
    Naval War College Review Volume 67 Article 6 Number 3 Summer 2014 A Theory of Naval Airpower Robert C. Rubel Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Rubel, Robert C. (2014) "A Theory of Naval Airpower," Naval War College Review: Vol. 67 : No. 3 , Article 6. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol67/iss3/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Rubel: A Theory of Naval Airpower A TheorY of NAVAL AIRPOWER Robert C. Rubel he U�s� Navy has never been comfortable with theory or doctrine at what is now known as the operational level of war� The Navy has always pos- Tsessed robust ship- and formation-level doctrine—tactics—and of course has embraced the high-level sea-power theories of both Alfred Thayer Mahan and Julian Corbett� The gap in the middle either has not been needed—as has been essentially the case for most of the Navy’s history except for World War II—or has been filled by adaptive practice in the form of specific campaign or opera- tions plans� For the Navy, the old framework of strategy and tactics has sufficed since 1945� However, an emergent set of circumstances in the form of Chinese naval development, as well as a new generation Professor Rubel is Dean of Naval Warfare Studies of weapons and sensors, is driving the Navy at the Naval War College.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Naval Studies Group, Australian Centre for the Study of Armed
    Naval Studies Group, Australian Centre for the Study of Armed Conflict and Society, UNSW Canberra The Royal Australian Navy and its frigates Navies are sophisticated, complex and adaptable systems and frigates are one part of that system. The role frigates play depends on the purpose the navy is being employed to achieve; a purpose which is ultimately a national purpose. The frigate’s role can therefore have both national strategic and operational and tactical elements. From a national perspective, the future frigates will be required to perform the three enduring functions of a warship: warfighting, constabulary and diplomatic. Through these functions, they will be part of the Navy’s contribution to Australia’s demonstration of its national will and ability to play a role in the security and stability of our region and areas of strategic interest. By demonstrating significant capability they will assist to shape Australia’s strategic environment as the Australian Government directs. For example, deployments of single ships and task groups to East Asia shows that Australia can send capable fighting ships to the area, underscoring the Australian Government’s support for the security and stability of the region. This paper explains what a frigate is, describes their history in Australian service and sets out the likely roles for the vessels to be delivered under the $30 billion future frigate program. What is a frigate? While frigates have a long history as a type of warship, the term fell into disuse in the second half of the 19th century. The modern use dates from the Second World War, when it described a convoy escort vessel, primarily intended for oceanic anti-submarine warfare.
    [Show full text]