Nomenclatural Notes on Anthicidae and Pyrochroidae (Coleoptera). 2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nomenclatural Notes on Anthicidae and Pyrochroidae (Coleoptera). 2 Latvijas entomologs 2007, 44: 31-44. 31 Nomenclatural Notes on Anthicidae and Pyrochroidae (Coleoptera). 2. DMITRY TELNOV Rgas rajons, Stopiu novads, Dzidrias, Drza iela 10, LV-2130 Latvia; e-mail: [email protected] TELNOV D., 2007. NOMENCLATURAL NOTES ON ANTHICIDAE AND PYROCHROIDAE (COLEOPTERA). 2. - Latvijas entomologs 44: 31-44. Abstract: Taxonomic studies of the beetles of the families Anthicidae by early authors were often not accurate. In the second work of the series, additional nomenclatural problems are solved, namely 26 new combinations, 23 new synonymies, two revised statuses, 3 new statuses for subspecific names, and 4 lectotype designations. Three unavailable names of Anthicidae are listed. New data on distribution of insufficiently known palaearctic species of Pedilus (Pyrochroidae: Pedilinae) are given. Key words: Coleoptera, Anthicidae, Pyrochroidae, Pedilus, nomenclature, new synonymy, new combinations, lectotype designation, faunal information. Introduction HNHM – Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest (Hungary); MNHN – Muséum National d’Histoire naturelle, Paris This is the second publication in the (France); current series that aims to find solutions to the NHMW – Naturhistorisches Museum Wien (Austria); numerous taxonomic problems within NMNZ – Museum of New Zealand, Wellington, (New Anthicidae (see also Telnov 2006). The main Zealand); part of this publication is devoted to the material MPUZ – Museum of Zoology Moscow Pedagogical University (Russia); of Anthicidae inadequately or erroneously NKME – Naturkundemuseum Erfurt (Germany); described by Maurice Pic, and now housed in ZISP – Zoological Institute Russian Academy of the Muséum National d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. Sciences, St.-Petersburg (Russia); Twenty six new combinations, 23 new CDT – collection Dmitry Telnov, Rga (Latvia); synonyms, two revised statuses, 3 new statuses CNK - collection Nikolay O. Kabakov, St.-Petersburg (Russia). for subspecific names, and 4 lectotype designations in Anthicidae (Anthicinae, Nomenclatural Part Lemodinae) are made. Three unavailable names of Anthicidae are listed. Recent information on 1. New Combinations, New Synonymy, distribution of Palaearctic species of Pedilus Species Homonyms, Replacement Names (Pyrochroidae: Pedilinae) is given. Family Anthicidae Anthicomorphus aeneipennis (PIC) comb. nov. Materials and methods Original placement: Anthicus æneipennis PIC, 1915: 5. All label text is reproduced exactly, with Based on study of the HOLOTYPUS, MNHN: no corrections or additions; labels (if more than Kompong Kedey Cambodge mars á mai 1914 one for the same specimen) are separated by [handwritten] / TYPE [printed, label red] / slash. Author’s comments are placed in square aeneipennis Pic type [handwritten]. brackets. Genera and species are arranged alphabetically in the nomenclatural part. Anthicus quadrispilus (MARSEUL) stat. rev. Original placement: Anthicus quadrispilus Acronyms of the type material stores: Marseul, 1879: 104. MNHB – Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt- Erroneously placed into Omonadus MULSANT, Universität, Zoologisches Museum, Berlin (Germany); REY by Uhmann (1990: 402). Based on study of 32 Nomenclatural Notes on Anthicidae and Pyrochroidae (Coleoptera). 2 the HOLOTYPUS, MNHN. Note: this species considered to be closely Anthicus subopaciceps (PIC) stat. rev. related with H. pilumnus (KREKICH- Original placement: Anthicus subopaciceps PIC, STRASSOLDO, 1930: 261). 1913b: 157. Erroneously placed into Sapintus CASEY, 1895 Macrotomoderus pallidipes (PIC) by Uhmann (1993: 401). Based on study of the Original placement: Tomoderus pallidipes PIC, HOLOTYPUS, NHMW: S.O. Borneo Grabowsky. 1913d: 131. [printed, label yellowish] / TYPE [printed, label Based on study of the HOLOTYPUS, NHMW: red] / subopaciceps Pic det. [handwritten] / P.F.Sijthoff, Preanger. Java [printed, black subopaciceps Pic [handwritten]. border] / TYPE [printed, label red] / pallidipes Pic det. [handwritten] / pallidipes Pic Clavicollis phungi (PIC) comb. nov. [handwritten, label tan, black border]. Original placement: Anthicus Phungi PIC, 1926: 25. Nitorus peguensis (PIC) comb. nov. Based on study of the HOLOTYPUS , MNHN: Original placement: Leptaleus Hoa Binh Tonkin [handwritten] / Anthicus (Pseudoleptaleus) peguensis PIC, 1913c: 138. Phungi Pic [handwritten]. This species was omitted by Telnov (2007), it should be placed into genus Nitorus TELNOV, Clavicollis truncatellus (LAFERTÉ-SÉNECTÈRE) 2007 according to the new sense of comb. nov. Pseudoleptaleus PIC, 1900 (Telnov, 2007). Original placement: Anthicus Truncatellus LAFERTÉ-SÉNECTÈRE, 1849: 135. Omonadus maturus (PIC) comb. nov. Based on study of the HOLOTYPUS, MNHN: … Original placement: Anthicus maturus PIC, [unreadable handwritten text] truncatell Ind 1895a: 94. [handwritten, label red]. = Anthicus maturus race mediocris PIC, 1895a: 94 syn. nov. Cordicollis helferi (PIC) comb. nov. Based on original description of “race Original placement: Anthicus helferi Pic, 1913b: mediocris” and study of the HOLOTYPUS of 157. nominate form, MNHN: [small blue circular Based on study of the HOLOTYPUS , NHMW: label with no text] / type [handwritten] / TYPE MUSEUM PRAG HINTER-JNDIEN [sic!] [printed, label red] / A maturus Pic n sp Tenasserim ? [printed] / [printed] / Coll. [handwritten]. Helfer. [printed] / T Y P E [printed, label red] / Helferi Pic det. [handwritten] / Helferi Pic Omonadus sinuatolineatus (PIC) comb. nov. [handwritten]. Original placement: Anthicus sinuatolineatus PIC, 1922: 20. Cyclodinus capilliger (MARSEUL) comb. nov. = Anthicus sinuatolineatus v. nov. Original placement: Anthicus capilliger mediocrucifer PIC, 1928: 19 syn. nov. MARSEUL, 1879: 128. Based on original description of var. Based on study of the HOLOTYPUS, MNHN: mediocrucifer and study of the HOLOTYPUS of Arabie Jeddah [handwritten]. nominate form, MNHN: Hoa-Binh Tonkin [printed] / Type [handwritten] / TYPE [printed, Hirticollis sparsepunctatus (PIC) comb. nov. label red] / Muséum Paris Coll. M. Pic [printed, Original placement: Anthicus sparsepunctatus label border black] / sinuatolineatus n sp PIC, 1906: 58. [handwritten]. Based on study of the LECTO- and PARALECTOTYPUS, MNHN [see chapter “2. Sapintus biluteomaculatus (PIC) comb. nov. Type Designations” below]: Manilla Original placement: Anthicus biluteomaculatus [handwritten] / Type [handwritten] / TYPE PIC, 1926: 16. [printed, label red] / sparsepunctatus Pic Based on study of the HOLOTYPUS , MNHN. [handwritten]. Latvijas entomologs 2007, 44: 31-44. 33 Sapintus binhensis (PIC) comb. nov. Sapintus lituratus (PIC) comb. nov., stat. nov. Original placement: Anthicus binhensis PIC, Original placement: Anthicus diversipes Pic v. 1922: 20. nov. lituratus 1913b: 158. Based on study of the HOLOTYPUS, MNHN: Based on study of the HOLOTYPUS , NHMW: Hoa-Binh Tonkin [printed] / Type [handwritten] Bengalen Nietner [handwritten, label yellowish] / TYPE [printed, label red] / binhensis n sp / 47496 [printed] / diversipes v. lituratus Pic det. [handwritten]. [handwritten] / coll. Heberdey [printed] / = Anthicus tripartiticornis [sic!] v. nov. diversipes lituratus Pic. [handwritten]. subunicoloricornis PIC, 1938: 15 syn. nov. Note: new status for nominate form of A. Based on study of the LECTO- and diversipes PIC see above. PARALECTOTYPUS, MNHN [see chapter “2. Type Designations” below]: Hoa Binh Sapintus longehirsutus (PIC) comb. nov. [handwritten] / v. subunicoloricornis mihi Original placement: Anthicus longehirsutus PIC, [handwritten]. 1922: 20. Note: new combination for nominate form of A. Based on study of the HOLOTYPUS , MNHN: triparticornis PIC see below. Hoa-Binh Tonkin [printed] / Type [handwritten] / TYPE [printed, label red] / longehirsutus n sp Sapintus botanicus (PIC) comb. nov., stat. nov. [handwritten]. Original placement: Anthicus pilipennis v. botanicus PIC, 1952: 8. Sapintus meritorius (PIC) comb. nov. Based on study of the HOLOTYPUS, MNHN: Original placement: Anthicus meritorius PIC, SAIGON [printed] 27. I. 49 [handwritten] J. 1914a: 76. BARBIER [printed] / v. botanicus mihi Based on study of the HOLOTYPUS, MNHN: [handwritten]. Kompong Kedey Cambodge mars á mai 1914 Note: new combination for nominate form of A. [handwritten] / ex Vitalis [handwritten] / type pilipennis PIC see below. [handwritten] / TYPE [printed, label red] / meritorius Pic [handwritten]. Sapintus difformipes (PIC) comb. nov. Original placement: Anthicus difformipes PIC, Sapintus nigricolor (PIC) comb. nov. 1900: 759. Original placement: Anthicus nigricolor PIC, Based on study of the HOLOTYPUS , MNHN: 1901b: 801. Palembang Sumatra. [printed, black border] / Based on study of comparative material (1, ex Donckier [handwritten] / type [handwritten] / det. M.Pic, compared with the HOLOTYPUS), TYPE [printed, label red] / difformipes Pic MNHN: MALAY PENIN. West Coast, [handwritten]. Langkawi Is. [printed] 18-4- [handwritten] = Anthicus brunneo-notatus PIC, 1900: 1928. [printed] under bark of … [unreadable 759 syn. nov. handwritten text] in sea. [handwritten] / A. HOLOTYPUS , MNHN: Palembang Sumatra . nigricolor Pic var [handwritten]. [printed, black border] / ex Donckier [handwritten] / type [handwritten] / TYPE Sapintus pendleburyi (PIC) comb. nov. [printed, label red] / brunneonotatus Pic Original placement: Anthicus Pendleburyi PIC, [handwritten]. 1943: 8. = Anthicus diversipes diversipes PIC, Based on study of the HOLOTYPUS, MNHN: 1900: 759 syn. nov. MALAY PENIN: [printed] PAHANG, F.M.S. HOLOTYPUS , MNHN: Palembang Sumatra. N. Sembilan Fort Dicksan Dec: 26’ 31’ [printed, black
Recommended publications
  • Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E
    Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E. Carlton Louisiana State Arthropod Museum Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist) Suborder Adephaga Suborder Polyphaga, cont. •Carabidae Superfamily Scarabaeoidea •Dytiscidae •Lucanidae •Gyrinidae •Passalidae Suborder Polyphaga •Scarabaeidae Superfamily Staphylinoidea Superfamily Buprestoidea •Ptiliidae •Buprestidae •Silphidae Superfamily Byrroidea •Staphylinidae •Heteroceridae Superfamily Hydrophiloidea •Dryopidae •Hydrophilidae •Elmidae •Histeridae Superfamily Elateroidea •Elateridae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Cantharoidea Superfamily Cucujoidea •Lycidae •Nitidulidae •Cantharidae •Silvanidae •Lampyridae •Cucujidae Superfamily Bostrichoidea •Erotylidae •Dermestidae •Coccinellidae Bostrichidae Superfamily Tenebrionoidea •Anobiidae •Tenebrionidae Superfamily Cleroidea •Mordellidae •Cleridae •Meloidae •Anthicidae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Chrysomeloidea •Chrysomelidae •Cerambycidae Superfamily Curculionoidea •Brentidae •Curculionidae Total: 35 families of 131 in the U.S. Suborder Adephaga Family Carabidae “Ground and Tiger Beetles” Terrestrial predators or herbivores (few). 2600 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Dytiscidae “Predacious diving beetles” Adults and larvae aquatic predators. 500 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Gyrindae “Whirligig beetles” Aquatic, on water
    [Show full text]
  • Nomina Insecta Nearctica Aderidae Agyrtidae
    43 NOMINA INSECTA NEARCTICA Vanonus congener Casey 1905 Syn. ADERIDAE Vanonus sagax Casey 1895 (Vanonus) Vanonus floridanus Casey 1895 Syn. Vanonus uniformis Werner 1990 (Vanonus) Aderus Westwood 1830 Vanonus valgus Werner 1990 (Vanonus) Phomalus Casey 1895 Syn. Vanonus vigilans Casey 1895 (Vanonus) Vanonus wickhami Casey 1895 (Vanonus) Aderus brunnipennis LeConte 1875 (Xylophilus) Tanilotes lacustris Casey 1895 Syn. Aderus populneus Panzer 1796 (Notoxus) Aderus saginatus Casey 1895 (Phomalus) Ariotus Casey 1895 AGYRTIDAE Scanylus Casey 1895 Syn. Ariotus luteolus Casey 1895 (Scanylus) Agyrtes Froelich 1799 Ariotus pruinosus Casey 1895 (Scanylus) Agyrtecanus Reitter 1901 Syn. Ariotus caseyi Pic 1896 Syn. Lendomus Casey 1924 Syn. Ariotus quercicola Schwarz 1878 (Xylophilus) Ariotus subtropicus Casey 1895 (Ariotus) Agyrtes longulus LeConte 1859 (Necrophilus) Lendomus politus Casey 1924 Syn. Axylophilus Casey 1895 Agyrtes similis Fall 1937 (Agyrtes) Axylophilus constrictus Fall 1901 (Xylophilus) Apteroloma Hatch 1927 Axylophilus nucleus Fall 1901 (Xylophilus) Axylophilus yuccae Casey 1895 (Axylophilus) Apteroloma arizonica Van Dyke 1928 (Pteroloma) Apteroloma caraboides Fall 1907 (Pteroloma) Cnopus Champion 1893 Apteroloma tahoeca Fall 1927 (Pteroloma) Apteroloma tenuicornis LeConte 1859 (Necrophilus) Cnopus impressus LeConte 1875 (Xylophilus) Ipelates Reitter 1885 Emelinus Casey 1895 Pelates Horn 1880 Homo. Sphaeroloma Portevin 1905 Syn. Emelinus butleri Werner 1956 (Emelinus) Pelatines Cockerell 1906 Syn. Emelinus huachucanus Werner 1956 (Emelinus) Brachyloma Portevin 1914 Syn. Emelinus melsheimeri LeConte 1855 (Xylophilus) Necrophilodes Champion 1923 Syn. Emelinus ashmeadi Casey 1895 Syn. Necrophiloides Hatch 1927 Missp. Ganascus Casey 1895 Ipelates latus Mannerheim 1852 (Necrophilus) Sandytes Casey 1895 Syn. Lyrosoma Mannerheim 1853 Ganascus ptinoides Schwarz 1878 (Xylophilus) Ganascus ventricosus LeConte 1875 (Xylophilus) Lyrosoma opacum Mannerheim 1853 (Lyrosoma) Ganascus opimus Casey 1895 Syn.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution
    INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 20, No. 3-4, September-December, 2006 165 The beetle fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and distribution Stewart B. Peck Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada stewart_peck@carleton. ca Abstract. The beetle fauna of the island of Dominica is summarized. It is presently known to contain 269 genera, and 361 species (in 42 families), of which 347 are named at a species level. Of these, 62 species are endemic to the island. The other naturally occurring species number 262, and another 23 species are of such wide distribution that they have probably been accidentally introduced and distributed, at least in part, by human activities. Undoubtedly, the actual numbers of species on Dominica are many times higher than now reported. This highlights the poor level of knowledge of the beetles of Dominica and the Lesser Antilles in general. Of the species known to occur elsewhere, the largest numbers are shared with neighboring Guadeloupe (201), and then with South America (126), Puerto Rico (113), Cuba (107), and Mexico-Central America (108). The Antillean island chain probably represents the main avenue of natural overwater dispersal via intermediate stepping-stone islands. The distributional patterns of the species shared with Dominica and elsewhere in the Caribbean suggest stages in a dynamic taxon cycle of species origin, range expansion, distribution contraction, and re-speciation. Introduction windward (eastern) side (with an average of 250 mm of rain annually). Rainfall is heavy and varies season- The islands of the West Indies are increasingly ally, with the dry season from mid-January to mid- recognized as a hotspot for species biodiversity June and the rainy season from mid-June to mid- (Myers et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 230 Florida Entomologist 79(2) June, 1996 ANTHICIDAE (COLEOPTERA
    230 Florida Entomologist 79(2) June, 1996 ANTHICIDAE (COLEOPTERA) OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DARREN A. POLLOCK1 AND MICHAEL A. IVIE Department of Entomology Montana State University Bozeman, MT 59717 1Current address: Section of Invertebrate Zoology, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 4400 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15213. ABSTRACT Eight species in two subfamilies of Anthicidae are known from the Virgin Islands: Neoeurygenius portoricensis Abdullah (Eurygeniinae); Anthicus antilleorum Werner, A. crinitus LaFerté-Sénectère, A. floralis (Linneaus), A. tobias Marseul, Vacusus vici- nus (LaFerté-Sénectère), Sapintus teapensis (Champion), and Acanthinus trifasciatus (Fabricius) (Anthicinae).In addition to a key to these species, each is diagnosed and il- lustrated, and the Virgin Islands distribution given. The biogeographical composition of the fauna is discussed. A key to the subfamilies and tribes of West Indian anthicids is provided. RESUMEN Existen ocho especies en tres subfamilias de Anthicidae en las Islas Vírgenes: Neoeurygenius portoricencis Abdullah (Eurygeniinae); Anthicus antilleorum Werner, A. crinitus LaFerté-Sénectère A. floralis (Linnaeus), A. tobias Marseul, Vacusus vici- nus (LaFerté-Sénectère), Sapintus teapensis (Champion), y Acanthinus trifasciatus (Fabricius) (Anthicinae). Además de las claves para la identificación de estas especies, cada una es diagnósticada e ilustrada. Se incluye la distribución de las especies en las Islas Vírgenes. Se discute la composición biogeográfica de la fauna. Se ofrece una clave para las subfamilias y tribus de los Anthicidae de las Antillas. The Virgin Islands are located at the eastern extreme of the Greater Antilles. The northern islands lie on the submerged Puerto Rican Bank, while St. Croix and its sat- ellite islands are separated by a deep trench from the northern islands (Heatwole & MacKenzie 1966).
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity
    The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State
    [Show full text]
  • Ant-Like Flower Beetles (Coleoptera: Anthicidae) of the Uk, Ireland and Channel Isles
    BR. J. ENT. NAT. HIST., 23: 2010 99 ANT-LIKE FLOWER BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: ANTHICIDAE) OF THE UK, IRELAND AND CHANNEL ISLES DMITRY TELNOV Stopinu novads, Darza iela 10, LV-2130, Dzidrinas, Latvia; E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The Anthicidae or ant-like flower beetles of the UK, Ireland and Channel Isles are reviewed. A species list, identification key, short diagnoses and illustrations of all taxa are given. Brief information on known ecological preferences of species is given. Key words: identification, distribution, key, United Kingdom, Ireland, fauna, ecology. INTRODUCTION Anthicidae are a cosmopolitan family of small to medium-sized, fast-moving beetles of the superfamily Tenebrionoidea. Anthicidae are represented in the World fauna by approximately 100 genera, and about 3500 species (Chandler, 2010). Only a few species are known from the fossil record. The last revision of the British Anthicidae was published by F. D. Buck (1954) in the well-known series Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects. Since then, there have been numerous nomenclatural changes within Anthicidae, and some additional species (introduced) have been recorded from the UK, making Buck’s key out of date. During 2004 and 2005 a total of 3356 specimens of Anthicidae from the UK and Ireland were examined by the author, mainly from the collections of The Natural History Museum (London), Oxford University Museum of Natural History and National Museum of Ireland. Additional data for more than 2100 specimens were received from other British museums and private collections between 2005 and 2007. A new key and short diagnoses for the genera are presented, as well as data on habitats and general distribution of species.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Cleopomiarus Distinctus Boheman, 1845 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) and Stricticollis Tobias Marseul, 1879 (Coleoptera, Anthicidae) from Norway
    © Norwegian Journal of Entomology. 14 December 2018 New records of Cleopomiarus distinctus Boheman, 1845 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) and Stricticollis tobias Marseul, 1879 (Coleoptera, Anthicidae) from Norway MARI STEINERT, MARKUS A. K. SYDENHAM, KATRINE ELDEGARD & STEIN R. MOE Steinert, M., Sydenham, M.A.K., Eldegard, K. & Moe, S.R. 2018. New records of Cleopomiarus distinctus Boheman, 1845 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) and Stricticollis tobias Marseul, 1879 (Coleoptera, Anthicidae) from Norway. Norwegian Journal of Entomology 65, 175–182. Two new beetle species for Norway were recorded from field surveys in power-line clearings located in predominantly forested areas in Southeastern Norway; Cleopomiarus distinctus Boheman, 1845 (Curculionidae), and Stricticollis tobias Marseul, 1879 (Anthicidae). A total of 81 specimens of the weevil C. distinctus, were found across four sites in Buskerud over the course of three years (2013–2015). C. distinctus has never been recorded in Scandinavia previously. Three specimens of the ant-like flower beetle S. tobias, were found at two sites in Hedmark in 2015. S. tobias has a wide distribution in other Nordic countries and has been recognized as a “doorstep-species” to Norway from Sweden. The biology of the two species are presented and the potential distribution of the species are discussed. Key words: Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Cleoponmiarus distinctus, Anthicidae, Stricticollis tobias, Southeastern Norway, New records, Power-line clearings. Mari Steinert *, Markus A. K. Sydenham, Katrine Eldegard & Stein R. Moe. Faculty of environmental sciences and natural resource management, The Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1432-Ås, Norway. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected], katrine.eldegard@nmbu. no, [email protected] * Corresponding author.
    [Show full text]
  • A Key to the Anthicidae of Hawaii, with One New Species (Coleoptera) L
    310 Proceedings, Hawaiian Entomological Society A Key to the Anthicidae of Hawaii, with One New Species (Coleoptera) l Floyd G. Werner DEPARTMENT OF ENTOMOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA, TUCSON, ARIZONA Eight species of Anthicidae have been collected in the Hawaiian Islands, but only one of these on islands other than Oahu. Three species are cosmopolitan, two North American, and two Micronesian. The eighth, described as new, is of unknown origin and most likely belongs to the Oriental or East Indian faunas which are badly in need of revisionary work. It was compared with specimens in the British Museum in 1960, and E. T. Smith, of Melbourne, compared it with the Australian fauna. I describe it as new in hope that someone will recognize it as a member of the fauna he is studying, just as Anthicus mundulus Sharp, described from Honolulu, eventually proved a member of the fauna of coastal California. Most of the specimens reported here are from the collection of the Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association, kindly sent for study by J. W. Beardsley. The specimens have been returned to this collection unless another source is indicated. Key to Species 1. Each elytron with a distinct pale spot or band behind the middle. 2 Elytra uniformly colored or paler across the base, without a spot or band behind the middle 5 2. Pubescence on elytra dense and double, of decumbent setae directed backward and more numerous fine, short setae beneath them, directed obliquely laterally, in addition to scattered suberect tactile setae. Each elytron with a pale spot behind the base and another behind the middle, the basal spots sometimes con nected across the suture.
    [Show full text]
  • Brachygluta Final
    PROC. ENTOMOL. SOC. WASH 108(4), 2006, pp. 761-764 BRACHYGLUTA ABDOMINALIS (AUBÉ) (COLEOPTERA: STAPHYLINIDAE) NEWLY RECORDED IN CANADA, WITH NOTES ON OTHER BEACH-DRIFT BEETLES CHRISTOPHER G. MAJKA AND JEFFREY OGDEN (CGM) Nova Scotia Museum of Natural History, 1747 Summer Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 3A6 (email: [email protected]); (JO) Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources, PO Box 130, Shubenacadie, Nova Scotia Canada B0N 2H0 (email: [email protected]) Abstract. – Brachygluta abdominalis (Aubé) is reported for the first time in Canada from collections in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. Leptacinus intermedius Donisthorpe, Atheta novaescotiae Klimaszewski and Majka, Hypocaccus fraternus (Say), and Sapintus pusillus (LaFerté-Sénectère) are newly reported from New Brunswick. Beach-drift Coleoptera are discussed, as is the potential vulnerability of this community within an environment that has been much diminished and disturbed by anthropogenic activities. Key words: Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Pselaphinae, Brachygluta abdominalis, salt marsh, sand dune, littoral environment, Bay of Fundy Since 2002, one of us (CGM) has been (Chandler 1997). It has not hitherto been investigating the beetle fauna of salt-marsh, recorded from Canada. sand-dune, beach-drift, and other shore- Members of the genus Brachygluta line environments at Mary’s Point in the are found under leaf litter or stones, or in Shepody National Wildlife Area, Albert mosses and grass clumps along streams, County, New Brunswick, Canada (45º 43’ N, ponds, or marshes (Chandler 2001). 64º 39’ W) located along the upper reaches Brachygluta abdominalis has been collected of Chignecto Bay. This survey yielded the from grass and deciduous leaf litters at first Canadian record of the pselaphine margins of salt marshes, under beach staphylinid, Brachygluta abdominalis drift, and at ultraviolet light (Chandler (Aubé, 1833).
    [Show full text]
  • From Tethyan-Influenced Cretaceous Ambers
    Geoscience Frontiers 7 (2016) 695e706 HOSTED BY Contents lists available at ScienceDirect China University of Geosciences (Beijing) Geoscience Frontiers journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/gsf Research paper Evolutionary and paleobiological implications of Coleoptera (Insecta) from Tethyan-influenced Cretaceous ambers David Peris a,*, Enrico Ruzzier b, Vincent Perrichot c, Xavier Delclòs a a Departament de Dinàmica de la Terra i de l’Oceà and Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Facultat de Geologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Martí i Franques s/n, 08071 Barcelona, Spain b Department of Life Science, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Rd, SW7 5BD London, UK c UMR CNRS 6118 Géosciences & OSUR, Université de Rennes 1, 35042 Rennes cedex, France article info abstract Article history: The intense study of coleopteran inclusions from Spanish (Albian in age) and French (AlbianeSantonian Received 23 September 2015 in age) Cretaceous ambers, both of Laurasian origin, has revealed that the majority of samples belong to Received in revised form the Polyphaga suborder and, in contrast to the case of the compression fossils, only one family of 25 December 2015 Archostemata, one of Adephaga, and no Myxophaga suborders are represented. A total of 30 families Accepted 30 December 2015 from Spain and 16 families from France have been identified (with almost twice bioinclusions identified Available online 16 January 2016 in Spain than in France); 13 of these families have their most ancient representatives within these ambers. A similar study had previously only been performed on Lebanese ambers (Barremian in age and Keywords: Beetle Gondwanan in origin), recording 36 coleopteran families. Few lists of taxa were available for Myanmar Fossil (Burmese) amber (early Cenomanian in age and Laurasian in origin).
    [Show full text]
  • Field Records and Observations of Insects Associated with Cantharidin
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 17 Number 4 - Winter 1984 Number 4 - Winter Article 2 1984 December 1984 Field Records and Observations of Insects Associated With Cantharidin Daniel K. Young University of Wisconsin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Young, Daniel K. 1984. "Field Records and Observations of Insects Associated With Cantharidin," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 17 (4) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol17/iss4/2 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Young: Field Records and Observations of Insects Associated With Canthar 1984 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 195 FIELD RECORDS AND OBSERVATIONS OF INSECTS ASSOCIATED WITH CANTHARIDIN Daniel K. Young! ABSTRACT This paper reports on insect species not previously associated with cantharidin, the terpeooid defense mechanism of blister beetles (MeJoidae). Species from the following tau were obserYed and collected: Miridae (Hemiptera); Endomychidae, Pyrochroidae, .-\nthiLidae I Coleoptera); Ceratopogonidae, Sciaridae (Diptera); and Braconidae (Hymen­ optera;. In addition to listing the associations, a discussion of cantharidin orientation is presented along with preliminary hypotheses to explain these intriguing examples of coevolution . .-\ recent re,'jew (Young 1984) attempted to draw together all published associations between insect5 and cantharidin or the me10id beetles which are known to produce the compound. In this paper, a large number of insect-cantharidin records are reported for specie:; 1lL"'i previously associated with cantharidin.
    [Show full text]
  • University Morifilms International 300N.Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 8305402
    INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. For blurred pages, a good image of the page can be found in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted, a target note will appear listing the pages in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photographed, a definite method of “sectioning” the material has been followed. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand comer of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again-beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete.
    [Show full text]