The Odes of John Keats: a Critical Assessment Ghadah
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THE ODES OF JOHN KEATS: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT GHADAH BAKR MARIE To The Unforgettable Memory of my dear father and Mother Thanks to: Many thanks to all the professors with whom I had correspondence through writing the book and I am pleased to mention some of them-Professor Kenneth Muir, Professor Stuart M. Sperry, Professor Ronald A. Sharp, and Professor David A. Kent. They have provided me with a number of books and articles, in addition to their own views on different aspects of Keats's odes. Also, I like to thank my family for the continuous encouragement I received. An endless gratitude I owe to my dear sister, Dr. Hanan Bakr, for her kind help in providing me with up-to-date books on Keats, in addition to her dear advice. A great help was also received from my dear brother, Dr. Siddeeq Bakr. Contents Chapter Page Interlocution 1-7 Chapter One: The Irregular English Ode 8-27 and Keats: A Historical Survey Chapter Two: The Early Odes 28-46 Chapter Three: The Major Odes: 47-68 A Unified Sequence! Chapter Four: Sensation and Thought in 69-89 the Major Odes Chapter Five: Imagery Structure of the 90-128 Major Odes Chapter Six: Thematic Structure of the 129-141 Major Odes Conclusion 142-144 Bibliography of Works Cited 145-159 Introduction This book aims at a discussion of the major odes of John Keats – "Ode to Psyche", "Ode to a Nightingale", "Ode on a Grecian Urn", "Ode on Melancholy", "Ode on Indolence" and "To Autumn". Points of view of many critics on these odes are surveyed. The thesis contains an introduction, six chapters, and a conclusion. The introduction contains a hypothesis of this book, its aim, the data and method used. Other works on the same field are also mentioned. Chapter One is a historical introduction to the "Ode" as a genre. It presents two contradictory opinions concerning Keats's handling of the "Ode". The first opinion is that Keats's odes are but a developed stage of his experiments with the "sonnet" form. The second opinion presents the notion that Keats used the "Ode" as a literary genre as used by the English poets, principally by Thomas Gray, who influenced Keats at the beginning of his literary career. 1 Chapter Two tackles the controversy around some of Keats's poems – "Ode to Apollo", the four lyric interludes of Endymion: "To Pan", "To Neptune", "To Sorrow", and "To Diana"; "Lines on Seeing a Lock of Milton's Hair"; and "Ode to May". These poems are regarded by some critics as early odes. They have features of the irregular English ode. Other critics, however, reject some or all of these poems as early odes. Chapter Three discusses the debate on Keats's critics of whether the major odes form a unified sequence or not. Some critics believe they form a sequential pattern; others assert that they form a unity; a third group of critics read and assess the odes as individual poems. Chapter Four discusses another critical issue, that of sensation and thought in John Keats, and their role in shaping the major odes. Many points of view on both sides are stated here. Essentially, sensation proved its predominance, in spite of the fact that there is development from sensation to thought in his poetry. Chapter Five is about Keats's skillful use of imaging in the major odes-especially sensory imagery which established Keats's fame as a great Romantic poet of sensation. 2 Chapter Six explores the structure of each ode as complementary to theme. Each of the major odes has specific type of structure. In all these odes structure has a firm relation with theme. The conclusion recalls the main issues in the book and shows Keats as a great poet of sensation whose fame is of permanent value. Also, it sums up my points of view on each issue. Keats's Odes have attracted, and still attract, the attention of critics since their first publication. A large amount of critical analyses of the odes has accumulated, for they are regarded the peak of Keats's poetic life. Although written when Keats was barely twenty-five, they proved his poetic genius. His literary life span is only about five years and it is during the period from April to September 1819 that he wrote the odes. Their intrinsic literary value and their relation to Keats's poetic achievement are great. Hence, critics have investigated these odes extensively. Accordingly, each study of the odes tackles certain aspects, and thus many points of view are given. This book is another attempt to re-evaluate the odes. This study aims at presenting the main aspects of the major odes. It, first of all, discusses the issue whether 3 Keats's odes are the result of his experiments in both the sonnet-sequence and the narrative pomes, or whether they fit in the traditional pattern of the irregular English ode. It, then, tackles the question whether these odes do or do not form a unified sequence. The study also states the sensation – thought argument on Keats's odes. The functions of imagery and structure in these poems are salso discussed here. The six major odes of Keats form the main data of this study. In one chapter reference is made to some of the poems which are regarded as "early odes". Allusions are made to Milton's "Nativity Ode", Collins' and Gray's Pindaric Odes, References to Keats's letters are also made in relation to his odes. Some critics associate the odes with Keats's personal life; others study the odes in relation to other poems of the poet – especially the narrative ones and those written just before the odes. Another approach is to read the odes in relation to one another and to Keats's letters. Also, there are studies which emphasize the psychological state of the poet, that is, his mood when writing the odes. Other studies conduct a critical analysis of the odes as independent works of art. This study stands close to this last method. 4 Many books and articles are devoted to the study of Keats's odes. Among the books, Robert Giting's John Keats: The Living Year (London: Heincman, 1954) is a biographical study of the odes. Jack Stillinger's edition of Twentieth Century Interpolations of Keats's Odes (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1968) contains critical interpretations of the odes as personal view points of Keats's modern critics. In his The Odes of John Keats and their Earliest Known Manuscripts (London: Heincman, 1970) Robret Gittings gives an account of all the drafts of the odes Keats first wrote. G. S. Fraser's edition of John Keats, Odes: A Casebook (London: Macmillan, 1970) cantinas sound and significant articles on the odes. Helen Vendler's recent book, The Odes of John Keats (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard, 1983) argues that Keats's odes can be read as a sequence. She tries to enforce her claim partly by using "image-transformation device in the odes. In addition to these books there is a large number of articles an single odes. Here are some of the most significant ones: on the "Ode to Psyche", L. M. Jones's "The 'Ode to Psyche': An Allegorical Introduction to Keats's Great Odes" in the Keats-Shelley Memorial, No. 9 (1958) celebrates the ode as a starting-pint towards a better 5 way of writing the other odes. Another article is L. Waldoff's "The Theme of Mutability in the 'Ode to Psyche'" in PMLA, 92. No. 3 (May 1977) which tackles the "change" theme as the moving agent in the poem. On the Nightingale Ode, the most famous article is that of Rich arch Harter Fogle, "Keats's 'Ode to a Nightingale'" in PMLA, 68, No. 1 (March 1953) which gives a full account of the ode: another is that of Y. J. Lams, "Ruth, Milton, and Keats's 'Ode to a Nightingale'" in MLQ, 34. No. 4 (December 1973), which, shows Milton's influence on Keats in this ode. "Ode on a Grecian Urn" occupies, among the other ode, the major part of criticism. Among the standard articles on the ode are those of J. D. Wigod, "Keats's Ideal in the Ode on a Grecian Urn'" in PMLA, 72, No. 1 (March 1957). This article discusses one of Keats' themes – that of the actual against the ideal, in relation to the ode. Another article as by J. O'Rourke, "Persona and Voice in the 'Ode on a Grecian Urn'" in Studies in Romanticism, 26, No. 1 (Spring 1987). O'Rourke handles "Silence" as developed in the ode. The last ode, "To Autumn", also has a large number of critical articles devoted to it. Among these are Michael Lillgate's "Keats: 'To Autumn'" in Notes on Literature, No. 5 (1960) in which he traces the development of the ode in terms of thematic 6 growth: Patrick Swinden in "John Keats: 'To Autumn'", Critical Quarterly, 20, No. 4 (Winter 1978) ascribes the poem's optimistic mood to the fact that Keats never mentions the dead leaves usually seen in autumn. Other materials on the odes are found in books dealing with Keats's poetry in general. Such books are by famous critics on Keats – such as K. Muir, W. J. Bate H. W. Garrod, P. Gittings, I. Jack, E. Wasserman, B. Blackstone. J. Ricks, S. M. Spery, Sperry, M., R. Ridley, and E. Mayhead. 7 The ode is a classical genre, with its roots in English poetry that go back to the Renaissance.