650.3 R425 1999 c.l
Arkansas Oklahoma Louisiana Texas
REPORT OF TEE
COMPACT COMMISSION
Arkansas Louisiana Texas RED RIVER COMPACT COMMISSION
November 28, 2005
The President United States of America
The Honorable Mike Huckabee, Governor State of Arkansas
The Honorable Kathleen Blanco, Governor State of Louisiana
The Honorable Brad Henry, Governor State of Oklahoma
The Honorable Rick Perry, Governor State of Texas
Dear Mr. President and Governors:
The Red River Compact is an interstate agreement entered into by the States of Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas with the consent of Congress dealing with the water resources of the Red River Basin.
Pursuant to Section 10.02 paragraphs (d) and (e) of the Red River Compact and as directed by the Red River Compact Commission (RRCC), the interstate body overseeing the Compact, the Compact at its nineteenth annual meeting submitted the report of the RRCC, together with an account of all funds received and expended in the conduct of its work for FY 1999 and a budget covering the anticipated expenses of the Commission for Fiscal Year 2000.
The State of Oklahoma hosted the nineteenth annual meeting on May 4,1999, at Beavers Bend Lakeview Lodge, at Broken Bow, Oklahoma.
Sincerely, mhn Id Gordon W. Fasset Chairman/Federal Commissioner
ARKANSAS LOUISIANA OKLAHOMA TEXAS TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
Red River Compact Commission 1999 Officers 1
and Committee Members
Proxy - Red River Compact Commission 5
Red River Compact Commission Budget - July 1,1999 - June 30,2001 7
FY 99 Interim Financial Report 8
FY 98 Year End Financial Report 10
Red River Compact Commission Statement of Cash Receipts 13
and Disbursements - July 1,1997-June 30,1998
Red River Compact Commission Nineteenth Annual Meeting Agenda 17
Minutes of the Red River Compact Commission Nineteenth Annual Meeting. 19
State of Arkansas Commissioner's Report 33
State of Oklahoma Commissioners' Report 47
State of Texas Update 51
State of Louisiana Activity Report 55
Report of the Legal Committee 59
Engineering Advisory Committee Report 67
USGS List of Corps of Engineers Stations to be Discontinued 69
1999 Calendar Year Report to the Red River Commission 71
Bureau of Reclamation
USGS Summary Sheets 75
Red River Compact Preamble and Articles 119
Rules for Internal Organization 151 Rules and Regulations to Compute and Enforce Compact Compliance
A. Reach II, Subbasin 5 157
B. Reach I, Subbasin 1 163
C. Reach 111, Subbasin 3 (as amended 4/25/89) 169 RED RIVER COMPACT COMMISSION MEMBERS Federal Commissioner Major General Phillip R. Anderson Mississippi Valley Division U.S. Army Corps of Engineers P.O. 80 Vickbsurg, MS 39181-0080 (601) 634-5768 Arkansas Commissioners Don Mitchell 8004 Stateline Plaza Texarkana, Arkansas 71854 (870} 773-1061 J- Randy Young/ P.E., Executive Director Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission 101 East Capitol, Suite 350 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3823 (501) 682-3986 (501) 682-3991 (FAX) Louisiana Commissloners Arthur R. Theis,- P.E. 9433 West Tampa Driver Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70815 Business: (504) 927-5588 Residence;(504) 927-0414 Frank M. Denton, Secretary Department of Transportation and Development P. O. Box 94245, Capitol Station Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70804-9245 (504) 379-1200 Curtis Patterson (representative for Mr. Denton) (504) 379-1294 (504) 379-1394 (FAX) Oklahoma Commissioners Ken Fergeson Box 598 Altus, Oklahoma 73522 (580) 477-1100 (405) 477-1634 (FAX) Duane Smith, Executive Director Oklahoma Water Resources Board 3800 N. Classen Blvd. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73118 (405) 530-8800 (405) 530-8900 (FAX) Texas Commissioners Lowell Cable 858 Gilmer Sulphur Springs, Texas 75482 (903) 858-3148 (903) 439-1050 (FAX) Jeffrey Saitas, Executive Director Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission P. 0. Box 13087, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711-3087 (512) 239-3900 (512} 239-3939 (FAX)
Pagel RED RIVER COMPACT COMMISSION OFFICERS and COMMITTEE CHAIRMEN 1999 CHAIRMAN/FEDERAL COMMISSIONER Major General Phillip R. Anderson Mississippi Valley Division U.S. Army Corps of Engineers P.O. 80 Vickbsurg, MS 39181-0080 (601) 634-5768 VICE CHAIRMAN/LOUISIANA COMMISSIONER Duane A. Smith, Executive Director Oklahoma Water Resources Board 3800 N. Classen Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73118 (405) 530-8800 fax: (405) 530-8900 SECRETARY Mary Schooley, Executive Secretary Oklahoma Water Resources Board 3800 N. Classen Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73118 (405) 530-8800 fax: (405) 530-8900 TREASURER Pris Houchens, Executive Assistant Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission 101 East Capitol, Suite 350 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3823 (501) 682-3986 (501) 682-3991 (FAX) BUDGET COMMITTEE - CHAIRMAN Michael E* Mathis, Chief, Planning & Management Division Oklahoma Water Resources Board 3800 N. Classen Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73118 (405) 530-8800 fax: (405) 530-8900 ENGINEERING COMMITTEE - CHAIRMAN Michael E. Mathis, Chief, Planning & Management Division Oklahoma Water Resources Board 3 800 N. Classen Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73118 (405) 530-8800 fax: (405) 530-8900 ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE - CHAIRMAN Derek Smithee, Chief, Water Quality Division Oklahoma Water Resources Board 3800 N. Classen Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73118 (405) 530-8800 (fax: (405) 530-8900
Page 2 pm PTWP COMPACT COMMISSION COMMITTEE MEMBERS 1999 BUDGET COMMITTEE Michael E. Mathis, Chief Planning & Management Division Oklahoma Water Resources Board 3800 N. Classen Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73118 (405) 538-8800 fax: (405) 530-8900 Frank M« Denton, Secretary Department of Transportation and Development P. 0. Box 94245, Capitol Station Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70804-9245 Curtis Patterson (representative for Mr. Denton) (504) 379-1294 (504) 379-1394 (FAX) Lowell Cable 858 Gilmer Sulphur Springs, Texas 75482 (903) 853-3148 (903) 439-1050 (FAX) Earl T- Smith, Jr., P.E., Chief Water Resources Management Division Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission 101 East Capitol, Suite 350 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3823 (501) 682-3979 (501) 682-3991 (FAX) E-mail: [email protected] ENGINEERING COMMITTEE Michael E- Mathis, Chief Planning & Management Division Oklahoma Water Resources Board 3800 N. Classen Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73118 (405) 538-8800 fax: (405) 530-8900 Earl T. Smith, Jr., P.E., Chief Water Resources Management Division Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission 101 East Capitol, Suite 350 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3823 (501) 682-3979 (501) 682-3991 (FAX) E-mail: earl.smithfcaswcc.state.ar.us Zahir wBo" Bolonrchi, P.E., Chief Water Resources Section Department of Transportation and Development P. 0. Box 94245, Capitol Station Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70804-9245 (504) 379-1434 (504) 379-1523 (FAX) E-mail: [email protected] Herman R. Settemeyer, Engineer Advisor Red River Compact Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission MC-157 P. 0. Box 13087 Austin, Texas 78711-3087 (512) 239-4707 (512) 239-4750 (FAX) E-mail: [email protected] Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE Julia Mobley, Chief Executive Officer Commercial National Bank P. 0. Box 1998 Texarkana, Arkansas 75504 (501) 773-4561 (501) 772-6914 (FAX) State of Louisiana has not designated a representative Derek Smithee, Chief, Water Quality Division Oklahoma Water Resources Board 3800 N. Classen Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73118 (405) 530-8800 (fax: (405) 530-8900
Ken Petersen Office of Water Resource Management Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission P. 0. Box 13087, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711-3087 (512) 463-2012 (512) 320-0052 (FAX) LEGAL COMMITTEE A- Mark Bennett, III, General Counsel Water Resources Management Division Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission 101 East Capitol, Suite 350 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3823 (501) 682-3965 (501) 682-3991 (FAX) Gary Ethridge, Senior Attorney Department of Transportation and Development P. O. Box 94245, Capitol Station Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70804-9245 (504) 379-1043 (504) 379-1857 (FAX) Dean Couch, General Counsel Oklahoma Water Resources Board 3800 N. Classen Blvd. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73118 (405) 530-8800 (405) 530-8900 (FAX) Tom Bohl, Assistant Attorney General Natural Resources Division P. O. Box 12548, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711-3087 (512) 463-2012 (512) 320-0052 (FAX)
Page 4 RED RIVER COMPACT COMMISSION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that I have designated and do hereby
authorize ESMOND J. PREAU, JR., Chief, Public Works and Water
Resources Development Division, to serve as my proxy for the Red
River Compact Commission meetings, and any committee meetings held
in connection with the Red River Compact Commission, with full
authority to act on my behalf as a voting member of the Commission.
SIGNED at Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 2# day of April,
1999.
KAM K. MOVASSAGHX, Ph.D. P.E. SECRETARY
Page 5 Page 6 RED RIVER COMPACT COMMISSION FY2000 - 2001 Budget (July 1,1999 thru June 30, 2001)
5/4/99
FY2000 FY2Q01 1. Personnel Services, Office Expenses,
Rent, Travel (Mtg. Expenses) $500 $500
2. Audit $250 $250
3. Treasurer's Bond $125 $125
4. Postage, Stationery & Office Supplies $100 $100
5. Printing & Reports $1,225 $1225
6. Contingency $0 $0 TOTAL $2,200 $2,200
STATE ASSESSMENTS:
In accordance with Article IX, Section 9.04.C, of the Compact, the amount of such budget shall be bome equally by the signatory states in an equal amount. Therefore, the FY2000 assessment is $550 per state and the FY2001 assessment is $550 per state.
Page 7 FY 99 Interim Financial 7/1/98 Through 4/22/99 4/22/99 Pagel Red River CC
Date Num Description Memo Category Clr Amount —
INCOME/EXPENSE
INCOME •—-
i Assessment s..m..
8/13/98 DEP Arkansas FY 99 Assessment 550.00 8/17/98 DEP Louisiana FY 99 Assessment 550.00 9/30/98 DEP State of Oklahoma FY 99 Assessment 550.00 .—' 11/17... DEP State of Texas FY 99 Assessment 550.OO •, ,
TOTAL Assessment 2,200.00 w
Div Income-Dividend Income —^
w^ 7/29/98 DEP First Commercial Bank July Interest Div Income 25.35 8/27/98 DEP First Commercial Bank August Interest Div Income 23.16 , , 10/29... DEP First Commercial Bank September Interest Div Income 26.40 -.... 10/29... DEP First Commercial Bank October Interest Div Income 22.32 •—• 11/5/98 DEP First Commercial Bank November Interest (pa... Div Income 5.11 11/25... DEP Regions Bank November Interest Div Income 14.83
12/25... DEP Regions Bank December Interest Div Income 21.40 •*—' 1/27/99 DEP Regions Bank January 1999 Interest Div Income 26.81 —- 2/24/99 DEP Regions Bank February Interest Div Income 21.31 .—„ 3/23/99 DEP Regions Bank March Interest Div Income 19.19 , -
TOTAL Div Income-Dividend Income 205.88 _
TOTAL INCOME 2,405.88 ^
EXPENSES Annual Audit
9/28/98 1016> Johnson, Bunch & Asso... 7/1/97 - 6/30/98 Annual Audit -225.00 . ,
TOTAL Annual Audit .-225.00 —'
Printing-Report ^ •—' 8/13/98 10W\ Louisiana DOTD 1996 Report Printing-Report -634.20 8/13/98 1015 Louisiana DOTD 1997 Report Printing-Report -739.20 —'
TOTAL Printing-Report -1,373.40
TOTAL EXPENSES -1,598.40 . -
TOTAL INCOME/EXPENSE 807.48 ....
Page 8 Register Report - FY 99 7/1/98 Through 4/22/99 4/22/99 Page1 ! Red River CC
Date Num Description Memo Category Or Amount
1BALANC E 6/30/98 11,683.72
7/29/98 DEP First Commercial Bank July Interest Div Income 25.35 8/13/98 DEP Arkansas FY 99 Assessment 550.00 8/13/98 1014 Louisiana DOTD 1996 Report Printing-Report -634.20 8/13/98 1015 Louisiana DOTD 1997 Report Printing-Report -739.20 8/17/98 DEP Louisiana FY 99 Assessment 550.00 8/27/98 DEP First Commercial Bank August Interest Div Income 23.16 9/28/98 1016 Johnson, Bunch &Ass... 7/1/97 - 6/30/98 Annual Audit -225.00 9/30/98 DEP State of Oklahoma FY 99 Assessment 550.00 10/29... DEP First Commercial Bank September Interest Div Income 26.40 10/29... DEP First Commercial Bank October Interest Div Income 22.32 11/5/98 DEP First Commercial Bank November Interest (pa... Div Income 5.11 11/17... DEP State of Texas FY 99 Assessment 550.00 11/25... DEP Regions Bank November Interest Div Income 14.83 12/25... DEP Regions Bank December Interest Div Income 21.40 1/27/99 DEP Regions Bank January 1999 Interest Div Income 26.81 2/24/99 DEP Regions Bank February Interest Div Income 21.31 3/23/99 DEP Regions Bank March Interest Div Income 19.19
TOTAL 7/1/98 - 4/22/99 807.48
BALANCE 4/22/99 12,491.20
TOTAL INFLOWS 2,405.88 TOTAL OUTFLOWS -1,598.40
NET TOTAL 807.48
Page 9 FY 98 Year End Financial Report 7/1/97 Through 6/30/98 4/22/99 Pagel Red River CC
Date Num Description Memo Category CJr Amount
INCOME/EXPENSE INCOME Assessment
1/30/98 DEP States of AR, LA, OK, &... FY 97 Assessment 2,200.00
TOTAL Assessment 2,200.00
Div Income-Dividend Income
7/30/97 DEP First Commercial Bank July Interest Div Income 18.84 8/30/97 DEP First Commercial Bank August Interest Div Income 17.66 9/29/97 DEP First Commercial Bank September Interest Div Income 19.52 10/29... DEP First Commercial Bank October Interest Div Income 18.34 11/26... DEP First Commercial Bank November Interest Div Income 17.76 12/29... DEP Rrst Commercial Bank December Interest Div Income 19.63 1/29/98 DEP First Commercial Bank January Interest Div Income 19.05 2/26/98 DEP Rrst Commercial Bank February Interest Div Income 21.89 3/27/98 DEP First Commercial Bank March Interest Div Income 24.89 4/28/98 DEP Rrst Commercial Bank April Interest Div Income 23.94 5/20/98 DEP Rrst Commercial Bank May Interest Div Income 23.37 6/26/98 DEP Rrst Commercial Bank June Interest Div Income 22.24
TOTAL Div Income-Dividend Income 247.13
TOTAL INCOME 2,447.13
EXPENSES Annual Audit
4/20/98 1012 Bob Johnson 7/1/96-6/30/97 Annual Audit -225.00
TOTAL Annual Audit -225.00
Mtg. Expenses
5/7/98 1013 Clarion Resort on the L... Mtg. Expenses -297.28
TOTAL Mtg. Expenses -297.28
Treas. Bond
3/31/98 1011 Meadors & Adams, Inc. 4/2S/98 - 4/25/99 Treas. Bond -100.00
TOTAL Treas. Bond -100.00
TOTAL EXPENSES -622.28
TOTAL INCOME/EXPENSE 1,824.85
Page 10 Register Report - FY 98 7/1/97 Through 6/30/98 4/22/99 PageF l Red River CC
Date Num Description Memo Category Ctr Amount
BALANCE 6/30/97 9,858.87
7/30/97 DEP First Commercial Bank July Interest Div Income 18.84 8/30/97 DEP First Commercial Bank August Interest Div Income 17.66 9/29/97 DEP Rrst Commercial Bank September Interest Div Income 19.52 10/29... DEP Rrst Commercial Bank October Interest Div Income 18.34 11/26... DEP First Commercial Bank November Interest Div Income 17.76 12/29... DEP Rrst Commercial Bank December Interest Div Income 19.63 1/29/98 DEP First Commercial Bank January Interest Div Income 19.05 1/30/98 DEP StatesofAR,LA,OK,... FY 97 Assessment 2,200.00 2/26/98 DEP Rrst Commercial Bank February Interest Div Income 21.89 3/27/98 DEP First Commercial Bank March Interest Div Income 24.89 3/31/98 1011 Meadors fit Adams, Inc. 4/25/98 - 4/25/99 Treas. Bond -100.00 4/20/98 1012 Bob Johnson 7/1/96-6/30/97 Annual Audit -225.00 4/28/98 DEP Rrst Commercial Bank April Interest Div Income 23.94 5/7/98 1013 Clarion Resort on the... Mtg. Expenses -297.28 5/20/98 DEP Rrst Commercial Bank May Interest Div Income 23.37 6/26/98 DEP First Commercial Bank June Interest Div Income 22.24
TOTAL 7/1/97 - 6/30/98 1,824.85
BALANCE 6/30/98 11,683.72
TOTAL INFLOWS 2,447.13 TOTAL OUTFLOWS -622.28
NET TOTAL 1,824.85
Page 11 Page 12 Red River Compact Commission
Statement of Cash Receipts and Disbursements
July 1.1997 through •June 3Q, 1995
Page 13 Johnson, Bunch, & Associates Certified Public Accountants 1200 N.James SuiteA Jacksonville, AR 72076 Phone (501)982-9461 Fax (501) 985-1275
Red River Compact Commission Fort Smith, Arkansas
We have audited the accompanying statement of cash receipts and disbursements of the Red River Compact Commission for the period July 1, 1997 through June 30, 1998. The financial statement is the responsibility of the commission's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement based on our audit.
We conducted an audit in accordance wrth generally accepted auditing standards for cash basis statements. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that out audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
The commission's policy is to prepare its financial statements on the basis of cash receipts and disbursements; consequently, certain revenue and related assets are recognized when received rather than when earned, and certain expenses are recognized when paid rather than when the obligation is incurred. Accordingly, the accompanying financial statement is not intended to present results of operations in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
In our opinion, the financial statement referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the recorded cash transactions of the Red River Compact Commission for the period ended June 30, 1998, on the basis of accounting described in the preceding paragraph.
Johnson, Bunch & Associates Certified Public Accountants September 3, 1998
Page 14 Red River Compact Commission Statements of Cash Receipts and Disbursements For the Period July 1, 1997 through June 30, 1998
Cash balance. First Commercial Bank, July 1, 1997 $ 9,859
Cash receipts Member assessments 2,200 Interest 247
Total cash receipts 2,447
Cash disbursements Accounting 225 Public official bond 100 Meeting 297
Total cash disbursements 622
Cash balance. First Commercial Bank, June 30, 1998 $ 11,684
Page 15 Page 16 RED RIVER COMPACT COMMISSION 19TH ANNUAL MEETING BEAVERS BEND LAKEVIEW LODGE, BROKEN, BOW, OKLAHOMA MAY 4,1999 8:30 A.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
I). WELCOME
HI. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
IV. APPROVAL OFTHE MINUTES OF THE APRIL 28,1998 MEETING
V. REPORT OFTHE CHAIRMAN
VS. REPORT OF THE TREASURER
VSI. REPORT OFTHE COMMISSIONERS A. ARKANSAS B. OKLAHOMA C. TEXAS D. LOUISIANA
VIII. REPORT OF COMMITTEES A BUDGET B. LEGAL ADVISORY C. ENGINEERING ADVISORY D. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY
IX. FEDERAL AGENCY REPORTS A BUREAU OF RECLAMATION B. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS C. NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION COMMISSION D. U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
X. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
XL NEW BUSINESS A. ANNUAL REPORT B. ASSIGNMENTS TO COMMITTEES C. ELECTION OF OFFICERS D. APPOINTMENT TO COMMITTEES F. 20TH ANNUAL MEETING
XII. OTHER BUSINESS
XIII. PUBLIC COMMENT
XIV. ADJOURNMENT
Page 17 Page 18 02FE3-8 Pfj 2'57 Minutes of the
RED RIVER COMPACT COMMISSION Nineteenth Annual Meeting
Beavers Bend Lake view Lodge Broken Bow, Oklahoma May 4,1999
L CALL TO ORDER AND II. WELCOME
The Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Red River Compact Commission was called to order at 8:30 a.m., May 4,1999, at the Beavers Bend Lakeview Lodge at Broken Bow, Oklahoma. Representing the Host State of Oklahoma, and in the absence of a Federal Commissioner and Chairman, Acting Chairman Ken Fergeson welcomed members of the Commission, staff and guests. Commissioner Fergeson stated that he preferred to conduct the meeting in a more relaxed atmosphere, and rather than roll call, he recognized there was a quorum of members present Commissioner Fergeson then asked each person in attendance to make a self- introduction.
Those present at the meeting were:
Red River Compact Commissioners Ken Fergeson, Oklahoma Duane Smith, Oklahoma Don Neal, representing Ken Petersen, Texas Lowell Cable, Texas Don Mitchell, Arkansas J. Randy Young, Arkansas Arthur Theis, Louisiana Edmond Preau, representing Curtis Patterson for Karri K. Movassaghi, Louisiana (letter of designation presented, Attachment "1") Col. Robert Crear, representing Federal Chairman Philip Anderson
Representatives. Federal Agencies and Guests from Oklahoma Bob Blazs, U.S. Geological Survey Shirley Shadix, Bureau of Reclamation, Great Plains Region, Oklahoma-Texas Area Office Donna Kirby, Lugert-Altus Irrigation District Daryl & Margaret Royal, Lugert-Altus Irrigation District
Page 19 Wendell Pollen, Lugert-Altus Irrigation District Jim Barnett, Lugert-Altus Irrigation District Robert Robbins, Lugert-Altus Irrigation District Kent McCloud, Lugert-Altus Irrigation District Wendell Thomasson, Oklahoma Water Resources Board Dean Couch, Oklahoma Water Resources Board Mike Mathis, Oklahoma Water Resources Board Kent Wilkins, Oklahoma Water Resources Board Terri Sparks, Oklahoma Water Resources Board Mary Schooley, Oklahoma Water Resources Board Brian Vance, Oklahoma Water Resources Board Don & Judi Barrett, Idabel
Representatives, Federal Agencies and Guests from Arkansas Mark Bennett, Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission Pat Smith, Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission Ken Brazil, Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission Shane Barks, U.S. Geological Survey
Representatives. Federal Agencies and Guests from Texas Herman Settemeyer, Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission Jane Atwood, Office of the Attorney General of Texas Paul Elliott Charles Armstrong, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Carl Hutcherson, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service
Representatives. Federal Agencies and Guests from Louisiana Sharon J. Balfour, Department of Transportation and Development Gary Ethridge, Department of Transportation and Development
Representatives. Federal Agencies from Mississippi Roger Cockrolt, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Commissioner Fergeson stated that Oklahoma suffered another tragedy with the devastating tornadoes across the state on the previous night. He asked for a moment of silence to remember the people of Oklahoma City and Kansas.
Commissioner Fergeson proceeded with the agenda, noting the tour scheduled for the afternoon.
III. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
Commissioner Fergeson stated the agenda had been previously mailed, and he asked if there were any additions to the agenda. {Attachment "2") Commissioner Duane Smith, Oklahoma, said there are a number of people representing the Altus-Lugert Irrigation District and at some point on the agenda he would like to add a place for them to be heard by the Commission. He moved approval of the agenda, with the amendment of adding the Altus-Lugert Irrigation District after the Committee reports and before the Federal Agency reports. Commissioner Randy Young, Arkansas, seconded. The motion was unanimously approved.
Page 20 IV. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE APRIL 28,1998 MEETING
Commissioner Fergeson stated the draft minutes of the April 28,1998 meeting had been previously distributed. He asked if there were any additions or deletions to the minutes. Commissioner Young moved to approve the minutes of the Red River Compact Commission 18th Annual Meeting, and Commissioner Smith seconded. The motion was approved unanimously. (Attachment "3")
V. REPORT OF THE CHAIRMAN
There was no report by the Chairman.
VI. REPORT OFTHE TREASURER
Commissioner Fergeson asked for the report of the Treasurer. Commissioner Young said that Ms. Pris Houchens, long-time Treasurer for the Commission, has taken a new position at the Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission and will no longer be involved in compact meetings. Ms. Pat Smith, Executive Assistant to Mr. Young, presented the Treasurer's Report. Ms. Smith noted the year-end financial report that she had distributed prior to the meeting. The report covers July 1, 1997 to June 30,1998. The member assessments for the four states totaled $2,200, and dividend income totaled $247.13, making the total cash receipts of $2,447.13. Ms. Smith stated an audit was conducted, which report was distributed. The meeting expense for the 1998 meeting totaled $297.28, and other expenses for public bond and accounting made the total cash disbursements of $622.28, for a net total of $1824.35. The cash balance for the Compact account at the First Commercial Bank is $11,683.72. Ms. Smith noted the Interim Financial Report for the period of July 1,1998 through April 22,1999. She said the assessments for the four states are current at $2,200; dividend income totaled $205.88 for total outflows of $2,405.88. The annual audit cost $225.00; printing of the 1996 and 1997 Compact reports cost a total of $1,373.40, for total outflows of $1,598.40. She said the 1998 report has yet to be printed, but estimated total cost will be $700. Ms. Smith concluded the report stating the total income/expense was $807.48 and the balance as of 4/22/99 is $12,491.20. (See Attachment "4") Commissioner Young moved the Treasurer's Report be accepted, and Commissioner Theis seconded. The motion was approved unanimously.
VII. REPORT OF THE COMMISSIONERS
A. Arkansas - Commissioner Randy Young presented the Report of the Arkansas Commissioners. He distributed a written report and noted the areas of interest. The Red River Commission and the Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission have agreed to sponsor the Southwest Arkansas project that will investigate the feasibility of extending navigation from Shreveport, Louisiana to Index, Arkansas. Legislation impacting the Compact area passed during the 1999 session included the creation of the Ouchita River Commission and Ouachita River Trust Fund; establishing the "Sparta Aquifer Critical Ground Water Counties
Page 21 Remediation Act allowing creation of a county-wide board to provide water to substitute for Sparta Aquifer water; and general interest legislation allowing irrigation, drainage, watershed, regional water distribution and conservation districts to participate in watershed or basin studies. Commissioner Young updated the Commission regarding the status of the Memorandum of Agreement between the ASWCC and federal and state agencies for the state's mitigation banking program. He noted irrigation projects in the critical groundwater areas in Eastern Arkansas, and he reviewed the Nonpoint Source Pollution Program. Commissioner Young concluded his report stating the ASWCC had completed the state's Unified Watershed Assessment and identified seven watersheds as Category 1 waters in Arkansas. (Attachment "5")
B. Oklahoma - Commissioner Duane Smith presented the state's report on behalf of the Oklahoma Commissioners. He distributed a written report, and highlighted areas of interest. The Oklahoma Water Resources Board (OWRB) administers a $3 million program for Weather Modification for statewide hail suppression and rainfall enhancement. The program is funded through legislative appropriation and voluntary assessment of insurance companies. The OWRB also administers an extensive financial assistance program that awards loans and grants for the construction and improvement of water and sewer facilities. Since the beginning of the program, the Board has loaned over $600 million dollars, and in the Red River Compact Area, $107 million in loan program funds, almost $10.4 million in emergency grants and almost $4.6 million in Rural Economic Action Program (REAP) grants. Commissioner Smith noted items pending in the current Legislative Session including funding for the state's Beneficial Use Monitoring Program, implementation of regulation of poultry and swine industry created by the 1998 Legislation Session, and activities surrounding the resolution of the Sardis Lake lawsuit and creation of a regional water supply. (Attachment "6")
C. Texas - Mr. Don Neal, representing Jeff Saitas presented the Texas Commissioner's report. He distributed a written report and noted items of interest. Senate Bill 1, a comprehensive water bill enacted by the Texas Legislature in 1997, made sweeping changes related to the development and management of water resources in the state. The Texas Water Development Board and four state agencies were challenged to work cooperatively to formulate sixteen planning regions. Once each region has developed a water development plan, regulatory agencies cannot approve projects unless included in the plan. The legislation also required water rights holders to develop water conservation plans, and wholesale and retail public water suppliers are required to develop drought contingency plans. The TWDB was instructed to develop water availability models for surface water in all river basins in Texas with the exception of the Rio Grande. Interbasin transfer was affected by SB1, and the TWDB modified rules to accommodate that change; data coordination was enhanced, and the agency also implemented other associated rules changes. Mr. Neal also noted three significant items before the current Texas Legislature: Red River Boundary Compact, a measure mandating the permitting of a reservoir in the Brazos basin, and providing for the modeling of the Rio Grande. Mr. Neal also mentioned the Texas Weather Modification Program. (Attachment "7")
D. Louisiana - Mr. Ed Preau, representing Curtis Patterson, said the Louisiana Department of Transportation has once again been reorganized. He said Mr. Patterson is now the Assistant Secretary of the Office of Public Works and Intermodal Transportation, which is an appointed position. He explained there is a new Secretary, Dr. Kam K. Movassaght. Mr. Preau distributed a written report and highlighted items of interest. In response to declining water levels in the Sparta Aquifer, the Louisiana Legislature is currently considering a bill authorizing the creation of multi-parish groundwater conservation districts throughout the state, composed of major water users who would police themselves in conserving groundwater. He reported the
Page 22 Red River Navigation project is approximately 90% complete, approximately $103 million has been spent on port development, and the latest tonnage figures for 1998 were in excess of 627,000 tons shipped from public ports. He also noted the Mississippi River Levee project, involving a lawsuit over land rights. (Attachment "8").
VIII. REPORT OF COMMITTEES
A. Budget Committee, - Mr. Mike Mathis, chair of the Committee, reviewed the proposed budget with the Commissioners. He said the Committee recommended the two-year budget be approved as there were no changes. He noted there might be a need to increase the treasurer's bond. The FY2000 assessment for each state is set at $550. There were no other issues. Commissioner Duane Smith moved to approve the FY2000-2001 Budget, and Commissioner J. Randy Young seconded. The Budget Committee report was unanimously accepted. (Attachment "9")
B. Legal Committee - Mr. Dean Couch, chair of the Committee, stated he had a handwritten report that had not been reviewed by the Committee members, and he asked for a short break to confer with the members. Commissioner Fergeson called for a five-minute break. Following the break, Mr. Couch presented the committee report saying the legal committee met on the afternoon of May 3, and he introduced the members. He said the members reviewed a draft committee report and made some changes and modifications and the revised report was distributed to the Commissioners. There were two issues assigned to the committee: (1) draft proposed revisions to the Commission's rules concerning the election of a chairman, and (2) continue the assignment of developing an institutional history involving the allocation of water in the north quarter of the Red River system. Mr. Couch stated the first issue stemmed from a long-standing situation that the Commission faces virtually every year. The Commission is to have appointed to it a non-voting chairman representing the federat government. To address the problem (of no confirmed appointment of a chairman), there was proposed to be an Acting Chairman, and in essence created the position of a Vice Chairman — one of two commissioners of the host state — under rules for internal organization acts as chairman. The Commission asked the committee to look at the provision in the rules of the Compact that indicates that the failure of the President to appoint a federal commissioner will not prevent the operation or effect of the Compact and the eight representatives of the eight signatory states will elect a chairman for the Commission. The Legal Committee reviewed the provision and for next year suggested that through rule change, if the Commission so desired, another option other than the Vice Chairman acting as Chair would be that in the absence of a Presidentially-appointed chairman, the Commission elect a chair. The proposed rule as drafted within the Legai Committee report distributed, is to amend rule 2.2 and 2.3 (specified on page 2 of the report) with underlined language to be added, that would on essence allow the election of a chair. The language allows that if the appointed person attends the meeting, he/she would chair the meeting. The election of a chair would only be for the instances when the President has not appointed a chair, or where an appointment is made but has not been confirmed by the U.S. Senate, and the appointee is reluctant to attend. Mr. Couch said the Commission's current rules provide that unless waived there is a requirement that proposed rules be circulated at least thirty days prior to a meeting, and this proposal had not been developed and circulated to meet that provision. He said that if the Commission chose to adopt the proposal today, there would need to be a separate waiver included in the motion to adopt.
Page 23 Commissioner Fergeson asked the Committee's recommendation on who would be elected as Chair. Mr. Couch responded that in essence the Commission has always wanted and enjoyed the connection it has with the Corps of Engineers with its authorities and involvement in projects that cross all four state lines. The Commander of the Lower Mississippi Valley Division is typically chosen and recommended for Presidential appointment, and in fact the Commission rule indicates that when there is a permanent change of commander, "the Vice Chairman shall immediately request the President to appointment the new Commander"/ The internal rule triggers the request but there have been delays in completing the process. Mr. Couch said the Legal Committee did not make a recommendation for an elected chair pro temp. Commissioner Young said it was his recollection there had always been reluctance on the part of the LMVD Commander to come to the meeting until all "i's dotted and ts crossed." He asked that if under the proposed rule the Commission elected the Commander as the Chairman Pro Temp would that solve the concern of his not coming. Col. Robert Crear, representing Major General Phillip Anderson, stated the Commander did not attend today's meeting because of a conflict in another Commission meeting. He said that in his capacity, he fulfills all responsibilities of the job, even without confirmation. Commissioner Theis said a problem arose several years ago in the designation of the Federal Chairman because the Justice Department ruled that a Commissioned Officer in the Corps of Engineers would be subject to losing his pension if he took the job as Federal Chairman of the Compact. There was argument then about what it actually meant and whether some benefits would be at risk. Since that time, there has been little trouble getting approval, but it does take some time, and the Commission has had the rotating vice chairman from each state serve in the absence of the approval of the Federal Chairman-designee. He said he did not have any problem with the proposal, whether he be called Vice Chairman acting as the Chairman, or President Pro Temp in the absence of the regular chairman. Commissioner Fergeson said the only reason to have an elected chairman from within the Commission would be to have a chairman that would actually be knowledgeable. Commissioner Theis responded the advantage of having the Federal Chair from LMVD is to enlist the Corps of Engineers' support in program activities, information, and helpful in deciding engineering issues and federal construction within the basin, even though the Federal Chairman is not a voting member. That also allowed the other Commissioners to be on equal footing. Chairman Fergeson asked if there was a motion to waive notification and adopt the proposal. Commissioner Theis asked if adopting the proposal would be an election of a President Pro Temp that would serve in the absence of a Federal Chairman in lieu of the vice-chairman arrangement. Mr. Couch clarified the current rule about the vice chairman for the Host State next year acting as chair for the meeting is not proposed for deletion, but the proposal would add another option for an elected chairman that may or may not be a Commission member. Commissioner Smith stated for clarification, that if the Federal Chairman attends he is the Chair. If the Federal Chairman doesn't attend, the Commission has the option of electing someone else. If the Commission does not elect someone else, then the vice-chairman would serve as chair. Mr. Couch said the rules specifies a vice chair shall be elected at the annual meeting from the Commissioners of the Host State for the next year. There would be an election of the vice-chairman, and the proposal also creates the possibility to elect someone else not from the Host State. Commissioner Smith asked if the rule could state, "from the Host State" and then the Commissioners from the Host State would decide who would serve as chair. Commissioner Young stated he believed that is what is current, and adding that language would be an unnecessary complication. Commissioner Fergeson said it was his
Page 24 recollection the Commission has asked the Legal Committee to propose a way where the Federal Chairman would feel comfortable about attending. Commissioner Theis responded that there is no problem to ask the Federal Chairman to attend and to Chair the meeting, but he would be reluctant to add language that would allow the Commission to appoint a President Pro Temp from outside the four states. Following additional discussion among members of the Legal Committee, Commissioners and others, no action was taken by the Commission on the recommendation by the Legal Committee on Assignment #1.
Mr. Couch said the second assignment to the Legal Committee was the continued development of an official history involving the allocation of water on the North Fork of the Red River system. This matter has been presented in various forms over the years to the Commission, beginning with the internal rules to compute the apportionment rule for the Compact, which is divided into four reaches and subbasins. The Engineering Committee began drafting those in the early 1980s so there is some way to actually check the use of the waters for compact compliance. In drafting those rules, the engineers representing Oklahoma and Texas became stuck on a particular rule on the North Fork of the Red River and Sweetwater Creek and reported draft rules to the Commission. The Commission could not resolve the issue, and it has been bouncing back and forth between the committees and the Commission. Last year, there was information from the Lugert-Altus Irrigation District gathered by personnel involving negotiations of the Compact and there was a briefing about the issues that were being discussed and circulated to the Commissioners as a reminder. Mr, Couch said two major issues presented in the briefing paper appears as "Exhibit A" in the Legal Committee report. The two issues are: (1) How does the 60/40 allocation for Reach 1, Subbasin 1 apply to the North Fork Red River and Sweetwater Creek; and (2) Do the allocation provisions of the Compact control over water rights of the Lugert-Altus Irrigation District and others which existed prior to the effective date of the Compact? Mr. Couch said that after much discussion at the Legal Committee meeting, there are no further suggestions to this Commission which would be productive to resolve the issue. Ms. Atwood added that in discussions of what the Legal Committee might recommend, they found they were coming in full circle from earlier legal briefings prepared. She said it looked as if there would not be any agreement, and so a recommendation is not beneficial.
Commissioner Art Theis moved to accept the Legal Committee report, and Commissioner Duane Smith seconded. The report was unanimously accepted. (Attachment #10)
C. Engineering Committee - Mr. Mike Mathis, Chair of the Engineering Committee presented the Committee's written report. He said there were two assignments; the first to continue to track the status of the U.S.G.S. stream gaging program, specifically regarding potential impacts as a result of the Corps of Engineers' budget cuts. He explained that so far the cuts have been in the Tulsa District impacting the State of Oklahoma that has been working with the Tulsa District. The Tulsa District has pledged to review the cuts to lessen the severity of the impact. Oklahoma is looking at other options to increase state funding to cover the shortfall, as well as looking a private contractors as a potential option. The report contains a copy of the U.S.G.S. webpage depicting the status of the COE participation in Oklahoma. The Little Rock District is taking notice, and the Committee recommended continued monitoring of the situation. Mr. Mathis said the Committee discussed the second assignment concerning website development for the compact. He said it was decided that an Internet provider would need to be identified, as well as finding someone who could physically develop a website, at a fairly
Page 25 substantial capital investment He said the Oklahoma Water Resources Board has developed a website, and it possible to incorporate a webpage for the compact at the Board's site, at a low cost to the Commission. The Committee envisioned that the OWRB could establish links within the compact webpage to other compact states. The Committee recommended requesting the State of Oklahoma to develop some example web pages for consideration by the Engineering Committee and the Commission at its next annual meeting. Commissioner Art Theis moved to accept Oklahoma's offer to develop a webpage, and Commissioner J. Randy Young seconded. The motion was unanimously approved. Col. Robert Crear commented about budget cuts throughout the country. Commissioner Theis stated he did not believe the Compact should get into the stream gaging business. Chairman Fergeson asked for a motion to approve the Engineering Report and accept its recommendations, and Commissioner Theis so moved, Commissioner J. Randy Young seconded. There was no objection, and the report was unanimously adopted. (Attachment u11")
D. Environmental Advisory Committee There was no report by the Committee.
AMENDED AGENDA ITEM FOR DISCUSSION BY LUGERT-ALTUS IRRIGATION DISTRICT.
Commissioner Fergeson asked Ms. Donna Kirby, Manager of the Lugert-Altus Irrigation District, to address the Commission. Ms. Kirby addressed the members, and thanked them for amending the agenda. She said she had mailed the prepared history of Reach I, Subbasin I and had mailed it to each of the Commissioners, representatives of each states, the Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation. In the packet, she explained, is information taken from the minutes of the all the compact meetings, summarized in her own words. Ms. Kirby stated she had compiled all the information from the meetings and Legal and Engineering Committees into two boxes and ring binders and is available for copying. She said she did not mail the attachments as they are quite thick; one copy has been provided to each state, and copies are available at the meeting. Ms. Kirby stated that Mr. Jim Barnett, attorney representing the District, will address the Commission. Mr. Barnett said that the Lugert-Altus Irrigation District (LAID) has been very concerned about the failure of the Commission to adopt rules and regulations pertaining to the North Fork and Sweetwater Creek. His said the District believed it is time to move forward as this is a very important issue to the District. Mr. Barnett explained his extensive background with this Commission, and during his time with the Legal Committee, he drafted the "Supplemental Interpretive Comments" and at that time the Committee's goal was to try to explain the nuances and "fuzzy wording" of the Compact. He said today he is asking the Commissioners to address two issues: (1) 60/40 allocation (as mentioned earlier), and (2) address the issue of federal withdrawal—does the compact adversely affect pre-existing federal interest? Mr. Barnett said he recommended the Commission adopt the approach already adopted on the other five main streams in Reach I, Subbasin I. He said there is no rational or legal basis for distinguishing between the five streams for which rules have been promulgated, and the two under discussion today, using the previous Engineering Committee work as a pattern. Mr. Barnett argued that the Compact lists the streams individually so that the 60/40 split is applied to each and every one of the streams, and not on an aggregate basis. He quoted from the Compact language, and supported his argument with discussion of legal briefings on the 60/40 rule. He said the Red River Authority of Texas had made application to the Texas Water Commission for a reservoir and the Commission's ALJ ruled against it because of the 60/40 split; however, he
Page 26 said his client's concern is that the application will come back as soon as next year, in the year 2000 the protections that are set out in the Compact in a later section go away and that is the real reason the 60/40 split needs to be resolved today and not postponed for another year. Mr. Barnett said he believed those in the Sweetwater Creek area that might be wishing to build a reservoir, and his clients, are entitled to know what the rule of law is going to be on how much water will be developed on Sweetwater Creek in order to maintain irrigation. Secondly, Mr. Barnett said he believed (the Supplemental Interpretive Comments) is a straightforward reading of the compact. Section 2.07 of the compact says that, "...nothing in this Compact shall be deemed to impair or effect the powers, rights or obligations of the United States, or those claiming under its authority in, over, and to water of the Red River Basin = He said it could not have been clearer that the compact would not impact any federal rights to water and those claiming pursuant to those federal rights to water in the Red River Basin. Mr. Barnett asked the Commission to recognize today by virtue of a rule the fact that any federal withdrawal of water, pursuant to law, prior to the compact being adopted, are protected. He suggested the Commission adopt the rule prior to any application for development on Sweetwater Creek because the purpose of the compact is to avoid litigation, and the interstate compact is the preferable means for resolving disputes. He said that the equitable apportionment of the waters between states is the desired resolution of interstate water disputes. Commissioner Fergeson asked if an alternative would be to extend the expiration date of the prohibitions. Mr. Barnett stated he did not believe the Commission could do that through the rules because it is in the Compact itself, and would require renegotiation of the Compact Commissioner Smith asked if other interstate compacts contain 60/40 splits on subbasin flow per stream. Mr. Barnett answered there is one subbasin where Arkansas has multiple tributaries across state lines into Louisiana some of which are named and some which not named, and to his knowledge rules have not be developed for that particular subbasin. Commissioner Young asked why regulations were not developed on these two streams when they were developed on the other five. Mr. Barnett said his recollection is that it was understood the stream was more controversial and even though there was development downstream in Oklahoma, agreement could not be reached on those streams at that time, and the assignment was made to the Committee to continue work on it Ms. Atwood interjected that Texas agreed to move forward, but that the accommodation would not have a legal effect. Mr. Barnett stated that he has worked with people interested in developing the Mangum project on the Salt Fork, expecting to develop 40 percent of the flow, and are counting on Texas not to put a dam on the stateline and take 100 percent of the flow. He said that under the theory that someone could espouse that all the streams could somehow be aggregated, that would make the Mangum project infeasible. Commissioner Smith asked if Texas= position is that it could take 100 percent of the flow on Sweetwater Creek and allow the 60/40 split on all of the water that comes to Oklahoma from the North Fork of the Red, essentially drying up Sweetwater Creek. Ms. Atwood answered Texas= position is that it is allowed to take 60 percent of the aggregate flow of the two streams together. Commissioner Smith stated, then, the amount of water in calculating the 60/40 split entirely comes from the North Fork, and none of it would come from Sweetwater Creek. Ms. Atwood stated she did not know the numbers of the flows on the streams to know if one or the other would dry up. Commissioner Smith asked if it was Texas= position from a philosophical standpoint, rather than a hydrological standpoint, that it could take all of the water from Sweetwater Creek and Ok!ahoma=s portion would come entirely from the North Fork? Ms. Atwood said she did not believe it could be stated that way, but that it is their position that Texas Is entitled to 60 percent of the two streams. Commissioner Smith said that in regard to any downstream state, the apportionment of water where one stream is dried up is unfair.
Page 27 Commissioner Smith then moved that rules to compute and enforce the compact compliance for Reach I Subbasin I be written for the North Fork of the Red and Sweetwater Creek on an individual basis exactly iike the other five named streams in the Subbasin, and have the Engineering and Legal Committees jointly prepare and circulate the proposed rules thirty days prior to the next meeting of the Commission. Commissioner Young seconded. Mr. Don Neal stated his concern the item was not on the agenda, that the District came to the meeting in an adversarial position, that no one had notice the matter would be voted on. He said the presentation is clearly from local interest, and Texas has no local interest present. He felt an item was inserted into the agenda at the last minute and there could have been notice and time to prepare. Commissioner Smith answered the issue has been in front of the Commission for a number of years. The Commission has heard from the Legal Committee it has no additional recommendation and that the Commission must decide. He said he believed it is appropriate for the Commission to decide, and the motion is simply to give direction to the Legal and Engineering Committee to write rules to be presented to the Commission for a vote at the next meeting. He said the vote would be for direction to the Committees. Mr. Neal answered a fundamental issue of due process is an equal opportunity to be heard. He said there had been plenty of time for the item to have been on the agenda if it were the intent of the State of Oklahoma and the District to decide this at this meeting. Because the Commission has been talking about it for years is not the same as setting it on the agenda for a vote. He said he was concerned about the precedence of how it was being done. Commissioner Theis said the item added to the agenda was not to vote on the division of waters of the Subbasin, but to add that the Lugert- Altus Water District could present the report. He said he did not have a problem with directing the Engineering Committee, and to bring it back to the Commission at the next meeting and for Texas to have a response and for Oklahoma to have a response. He said that is has always been said that if and when Oklahoma and Texas could arrive at a conclusion, then it could be voted on, but the Commission has always been reluctant that it would decide what Texas and Oklahoma could have and it has been a sticky issue. He commended the District for its development of the facts of the past 30 years saying there is enough information, it is just a matter of whether Texas and Oklahoma are ever going to come to a conclusion and decide what they want to do. He said it is awkward for Louisiana and Arkansas and that they ought to resolve the problem themselves. Commissioner Smith stated that while he is not an attorney, he did not see that there are any due process problems. The Commission would simply be giving direction to the Committees to draft something and then have an opportunity to vote at the next meeting. He added that he believed the two states should work out disagreements, but here there is a fundamental difference in that through the application of this type of language in the compact, any downstream state can be impacted and that warrants some consideration by the other states to enter the fray for a fair determination. Ms. Atwood stated this is a very complicated legal issue. To draft rules with only one decision is making the decision that is the way it is going to be. The only fair position would be to draft both positions. She added there has only been one characterization of the history presented, that Texas had not seen the document and is not confident that all the documents have been included. She said it is an issue that has not been settled since "day one= of the negotiations of the compact; there is no conflict and no theory of the compact is being violated and in that sense it is premature. She recommended that all the Commissioners be provided ail the legal briefings that have been prepared over the years before directing that draft rules be prepared. She said the motion brings up many legal issues and to pass rules that would impair Texas= water rightso r Oklahoma's water rights, will require a unanimous vote of the Commission. She said that [motion] could be extended and legal briefings could be done to even have the Committees draft rules that would require an unanimous vote.
Page 28 Mr. Neal stated that it seemed the Commission is setting a precedence of forcing a controversial issue without putting it on the agenda. Commissioner Fergeson said the motion is to ask two committees to draft rules. Mr. Neal said the rules are to favor one side. He asked if the Commission wanted to operate by adding controversial issues to the agenda and let one side line up their presenters, and then take a vote? Chairman Fergeson said that is not what the Commission is doing, that every year the Lugert-Altus Irrigation District has made a report and this is the first time he has heard the Legal Committee say there are the two positions and there is no place to go, and the motion to instruct the Legal and Engineering Committees to come up with a set of rules in a year from now is not underhanded. Ms. Atwood said she took the motion to say the Oklahoma position is to be taken. Commissioner Theis said that it seemed to be Texas= argument the motion favors one side, and he did not construe that is what the motion would do. He asked if it could be added to the motion that it be on the agenda that both sides make a presentation. Commissioner Smith said that circulating the rule thirty-days prior to the meeting would give notice of the proposal. Mr. Barnett stated it is unfair to assume this issue has been sprung on anyone as the Committees have reported every year on this issue. He said the Committees work for the Commission and will bring to it what the Commission decides. He said that because it will not be voted on until the next meeting, there will be ample opportunity for everyone to make comment. Commissioner Fergeson asked that the motion be re-read. Commissioner Smith said he moved that rules to compute and enforce compact compliance for Reach I, Subbasin I be written for the North Fork Red River and for Sweetwater Creek on an individual basis like the other five named interstate streams in the Subbasin. That those rules be circulated thirty days prior to the next meeting for consideration by the Commission. Commissioner Theis said that [the motion] states only one direction, that it has to be on an interstream basis. Commissioner Fergeson asked if he wanted an amendment to the motion. Commissioner Theis answered that there be a recommendation from the Engineering and Legal Committees to come up with two ways and the Commission wilt decide which way it wants to go. Otherwise, the motion says to draft it as the other five streams and it wilt be voted up or down, and if there is an alternative, then the vote would be one way or the other. Commissioner Fergeson asked Commissioner Smith if he would be willing to accept an amendment to the motion to instruct the Engineering and Legal Committees to offer at least two alternatives. Commissioner Smith said that he would accept the amendment. Commissioner Young agreed to amend his second to the motion. Commissioner Smith stated the amended motion that rules to compute and enforce compact compliance for Reach 1, Subbasin I be written for the North Fork of the Red River and Sweetwater Creek with alternative positions for the State of Oklahoma and the State of Texas. Commissioner Young seconded. Mr. Gary Ethridge interjected that if the assignment is made to make two different proposals, it is his understanding that if the water rights of any state will be effected, there is to be a unanimous vote. And how could there be a unanimous vote if one proposal favors one side and the other favors another side; we are in a loop, unless a way can be figured to not favor either state. Mr. Dean Couch, General Counsel for the Oklahoma Water Resources Board, stated that the 6-2 vote problem has been around for a number of years, and that he was unaware of any water rights of Texas on Sweetwater Creek or the North Fork of the Red that would be impaired by rules to compute and enforce compact compliance taking the Oklahoma view. He has not heard how the application to construct a reservoir for 65,000 acre-feet on Sweetwater Creek would impact water rights from a rule which is one way or the other. Oklahoma has made its presentation on some aspects, but he is unaware of where either way it goes Texas water rights are impacted.
Page 29 Mr. Ethridge stated there is difficulty in the Legal Committee even agreeing on how to get the proposal to the Commission to look at it. Texas feels Oklahoma=s position is going to adversely affect it, and he questioned what was to be accomplished. He said the issue of whether it is a 6-vote or an 8-vote needed to be decided first Mr. Robert Robbins, vice chairman of the Lugert-Altus Irrigation District, stated he had been on the District Board since 1984, that Ms. Kirby has attended the meetings.and the attorneys have worked on it. He said that all along Texas has not admitted there is problem, that there is no pending application. He said there hasn=t been a pending application because of the ARule 2000." He said he could be changed to a dry land farmer overnight and that would be disastrous. He said the farmers need to know where they are, to know whether there will be water or there won=t and he pleaded with the Commission to make a decision. Commissioner Fergeson said there has been a motion and a second, an amendment to the motion and second. He asked for the vote. He noted 6 ayes, 2 nays, with Texas casting the nay votes. Commissioner Fergeson asked if in direction to the Committees did a Asix vote= suffice. Mr. Couch responded it is his presumption that a six vote would suffice, and that he did not know what would be clearer in direction from the Commission to its Committees. Commissioner Young encouraged the Chairman to rule. Commissioner Fergeson so directed the Committees, and that Texas as host state would chair the Committee.
Mr. Barnett then asked the Commission to address the second issue, that of federal withdrawal. Commissioner Smith asked if the motion just passed would address that Mr. Barnett said it did not, and the federal withdrawal issue is more important than the 60/40. He said the District felt it is entitled to have the Compact say that it means what it says, and it will be applied to the W.C. Austin irrigation project. He said the federal government built the project with federal money prior to the Compact and were not a party to it. He asked the Commission to state it does not plan to let anyone adversely affect it. Commissioner Smith said that in response to the request, he was prepared with a second motion. He moved that rules to compute and enforce Compact compliance specify that nothing in the rules affect federal withdrawals, including the withdrawal of the Bureau of Reclamation for the W.C. Austin project, pursuant to the Compact provision, Section 2.07. He clarified that as rules are drafted, the motion is to protect federal projects that are downstream, and in this particular case, W.C. Austin. Commissioner Don Mitchell, Arkansas, seconded. Ms. Atwood argued that the issue had already been settled by a Supreme Court precedence in the 1930s. The compact overrides any previous rights associated with the compact and the federal government ratified the compact. Commissioner Fergeson asked 'rf the motion was a direction to the Committee or asking for a vote by the Commission that the federal exemptions of the Compact include the W.C. Austin project. Commissioner Young asked that the motion be re-read; Commissioner Smith re-stated the motion. The motion is that any rules in place would protect the W.CAustin project that was in place before the Compact was entered into. Commissioner Theis questioned why the project needed to be named. He said he preferred that projects not be named as a separate entity, and that the rules only refer to federal rights so that in the future rules do not have to be amended to include specific entities. Commissioner Fergeson called for a vote on the motion. The motion failed on a vote of 5-3.
Page 30 IX. FEDERAL/STATE ACTIVITY REPORTS
Representatives of the federal agencies presented reports to the Commissioners. Copies of the written reports are available as attached to the Minutes (Attachment #11). The Commissioners heard reports by Shirley Shadix, US Bureau of Reclamation; Col. Robert Crear, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Mississippi Valley Division—Vicksburg District- presented a computerized update on activities in the Red River Basin; Carl Hutcherson, Natural Resources Conservation Commission; Bob Blasz, Oklahoma District - U.S. Geological Survey, and Shane Barks, Arkansas District - U.S. Geological Survey. Following the presentation by the Oklahoma U.S. Geological Survey about the elimination of streamflow gages due to the Corps of Engineers1 budget reductions. Commissioner Theis said that if the COE eliminates gages that measure low flow, that is in direct opposition to the Compact which is directly related to low flows and the gaging program will be detrimental to the Compact needs. There was discussion that the Compact should draft a resolution urging the Corps of Engineers, the federal government (Congress) and NRCS, USGS and other agencies involved in the gaging program to maintain those gages with basic data that deals with the Compact. Commissioner Theis said that he would draft the resolution and circulate to signature states. The Commissioners agreed that a resolution should be prepared and circulated as a draft for comments. Commissioner Young suggested the resolution be sent to the Congressional Delegation of each member state and the President
X. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
There was no unfinished business.
NEW BUSINESS
A. Annual Report - The annual report for 1998 has been compiled and will be printed by the State of Arkansas. The publication of the 1999 annual report will be assigned to the Engineering Committee.
B. Assignments to Committees
Commissioner Fergeson stated the assignments as earlier voted upon by the Commission under Committee reports: Engineering Committee: Continue to monitor Corps of Engineers gaging stations, development of website through Oklahoma Water Resources Board webpage, and publication of 1999 annual report. Engineering and Legal Committee: Draft rules to compute and enforce Compact compliance for Reach I Subbasin I for the North Fork Red River and Sweetwater Creek.
C. Election of Officers
Commissioner Smith moved that the State of Texas be elected Vice-Chair and Host State for the 2000 Annual Meeting. Commissioner Art Theis seconded.
Page 31 D. Appointment to Committees
Commissioner Fergeson stated that appointment to the committees is historical, and the Host State will chair each committee.
E. 20th Annual Meeting
Commissioner Fergeson stated the State of Texas will host the 20th Annual meeting at a date and time to be determined.
XII. OTHER BUSINESS
There was no other business.
XIII. PUBLIC COMMENT
There was no public comment
XIV. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Commissioner Fergeson adjourned the meeting at 12:15 p.m. on May 4, 1999.
Respectfully submitted,
'dkMJU$L(A&>(lUi J}ti»iAA $. 7JZ0 Mary Lane schooley f\ Date Secretary
Page 32 RED RIVER COMPACT COMMISSION STATE OF ARKANSAS COMMISSIONER'S REPORT BROKEN BOW, OKLAHOMA MAY 1999
NAVIGATION
(Within the Compact Area)
The Red River Commission and the Arkansas Soil & Water Conservation Commission (ASWCC) have agreed to sponsor the Southwest Arkansas project which will investigate the feasibility of extending navigation from Shreveport, Louisiana to Index, Arkansas.
The Corps of Engineers reauthorized the White River Navigation Project and are in the process of conducting a Feasibility Study to look into developing a nine-foot channel on the White River.
The Commission has been requested by the Arkansas Waterways Commission to complete the allocation plan for the White River. A Subcommittee of the ASWCC will work with the ASWCC staff to develop final allocation recommendations.
1999 LEGISLATIVE SESSION
The Arkansas General Assembly met in its 82nd Biennial Regular Session from January 11, 1999, until April 30,1999. Significant legislation concerning water was considered and passed.
Specific legislation impacting the Compact area includes:
• Act 1532 would create the Ouachita River Commission and Ouachita River Trust Fund similar to the existing Red River Commission of Arkansas. The Commission's purpose is to accomplish an increase in river use without any bend cuts or bend widenings. • Act 1090 entitled 'The Sparta Aquifer Critical Ground Water Counties Remediation Act" allows the creation of countywide boards to provide water to substitute for Sparta aquifer water The Act provides that the boards may assess a fee up to 36-cents per 1,000 gallons for Sparta aquifer water withdrawn. The Act as written will allow formation of boards only with five south central Arkansas counties declared critical ground water areas.
Page 33 General interest legislation includes Act 52 that would allow irrigation, drainage, watershed, regional water distribution and conservation districts to participate in watershed or basin studies.
Bills considered, but not passed, would have given the ASWCC additional authority for aquifers traditionally used as drinking water supplies and assessed a 4-cent per 1,000 gallon fee on most Sparta water users statewide. Funding was made for the Red River Trust Fund, the White River Trust Fund and the Ouachita River Trust Fund. Administrative funds were provided for the White River and Bayou Meto Irrigation Districts.
Resolutions in support of additional federal funding for Natural Resources Conservation Service and expressing appreciation to members of the Arkansas Congressional Delegation for their efforts in support of resolving Arkansas' ground water problems were passed.
ENVIRONMENTAL
Bayou Meto Restoration * The state of Arkansas has received a $1 million settlement over Bayou Meto Super Fund site's litigation. The state plans to cost share with federal dolEars to restore riparian buffer zones along Bayou Meto. The total potential restoration funds will equal $5 million. The Arkansas General Assembly established a committee made up of representatives of state agencies and other interest groups to manage these funds.
Mitigation Banking Program • The Memorandum of Agreement has been executed between the ASWCC and federal and state agencies which outlines the procedures by which the state sponsored mitigation banking program will operate. ASWCC staff is currently soliciting for lands to serve as potential mitigation banking sites. The state mitigation banking program will make credits available to satisfy mitigation requirements for 404 permits. Potential users will include government, public, and private entities.
Page 34 IRRIGATION PROJECTS
(Within the Compact Area)
Walnut Bayou Feasibility Study • The 82nd Arkansas General Assembly has appropriated $100,000 to fund the Walnut Bayou Irrigation Feasibility Study. Southeast Arkansas Project • The Boeuf-Tensas Irrigation District has secured funding for the first year of this feasibility study. The project proposes to utilize Arkansas River to augment existing irrigation supply in Bayou Bartholomew watershed.
(Outside the Compact Area)
Grand Prairie Demonstration Project • The White River Irrigation District currently is working to secure local funding for the required non-federal portion of the construction phase of their project. Congress appropriated $8 million to begin construction on the main canal and control weirs. Dutch engineers are working closely with local engineering firms on real-time operation and transport models.
Bayou Meto Project • The Corps of Engineers and NRCS are currently working on the design phase of this project. This project proposes to divert Arkansas River water to irrigate 431,000 acres in Lonoke, Prairie, Arkansas, and Jefferson Counties.
NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION PROGRAM
A review of the program includes:
Management Program • Arkansas has completed an update to its Management Program that addresses the nine key elements as described in the Clean Water Action Plan.
Bayou Bartholomew • ASWCC, Cooperative Extension Service, and Lincoln and Jefferson County . Conservation Districts are cooperating with the Bayou Bartholomew Alliance to deliver technical assistance and sediment management training to agricultural producers in the bayou. The goal of the project is to restore the beneficial use of aquatic life to the upper third of the bayou by reducing the sediment and turbidity load to the streams.
Page 35 Water Qualify Technician Program
• ASWCC has continued funding the water quality technician program that has resulted in a total of 25 state-funded water quality technicians. The primary function of these technicians is to prepare nutrient management plans for poultry farmers. As of December 1,1998, just over 3,100 nutrient management plans had been completed constituting roughly half of the farms in Arkansas.
Livestock Producer Water Quality Management Training
• During 1998, the Conservation Partners conducted training programs for over 4,500 poultry producers. These programs included explanation of the water quality issues associated with poultry production, especially the phosphorus problem, what BMPs are available to the farms and how to interpret their nutrient management plan. The local poultry integrators hosted the training sessions. Also, during 1998, all producers of liquid animal waste continued to receive training as required by the liquid animal waste regulations.
Illinois River
• The trend toward reduced phosphorus loading in the Illinois River continued during 1998. ASWCC implemented two new projects in the basin, one project works with livestock producers in the Cincinnati Creek area to implement practices to reduce phosphorus runoff and protect critical areas. The other project is an Urban Education/Awareness project in the Mud Creek watershed in Fayetteville. EQIP continues to make the Illinois River a priority. In 1999, the ASWCC will implement a new watershed project in the Ballard Creek watershed of the Illinois River and in the City of Rogers.
Unified Watershed Assessment
• Arkansas completed its unified watershed assessment during the summer of 1998. Seven watersheds are identified as top priority Category I waters in Arkansas. These seven waters are the Upper White River, Lower Little River, Illinois River, Strawberry River, Bayou Bartholomew, Little Red River, and the Cadron Creek. ASWCC and Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (formerly ADPC&E) are starting to prepare the Watershed Restoration Action Strategy for the Upper White this spring. Initial steps have been taken toward organizing a citizens watershed action group in the watershed. This group will be responsible for developing the locally led conservation effort as is encouraged by the Clean Water Action Plan.
Page 36 CRITICAL GROUNDWATER AREAS
The ASWCC has designated two critical groundwater areas in Arkansas. Last year, ASWCC declared a critical groundwater area for the Sparta and alluvial aquifers in Arkansas, Jefferson, Prairie, and portions of Lonoke, Pulaski, and White Counties. In south Arkansas, ASWCC has previously declared a critical groundwater area for the Sparta aquifer in Union, Columbia, Ouachita, Bradley, and Caihoun Counties.
Page 37 a MtiQLCMerett EXPLANATION A FLOW AND WATER-QUALITY STATIONS BOUNDARY OF RED RIVER BASIN
Page 38 DISCHARGE, IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND
O O O
Oo H o < a m o 50 m > z o
-n < m m
>
> H
> 3D
> -<
C z 11 c_ —t. CO CO c -asj CcoO
-^ flln CcoO > a>*< K <0 CsD c 01 ta=i 3 n CO m m *< TJ
Page 39 RED RIVER BASIN
XL UJ
OS UJ Q_ CO
S
(9 INDEX CAMDEN MCGEHEE
UJ CD O 1998 at o
A a o
o 2 i A
A Red River at Index. Aik. El Ouachita River at Camden, Ark. O Bayou Bartholomew near McGehee, Ark.
1 1 1 1 1 1 OCT. NOV. DEC. JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUN. JUL AUG. SEP.
Page 40 RED RIVER BASIN
1 . 1996-1999
• - • ~T
—T— -
• 0.1 - - —'— DC __ • UJ CL • CO - S o
0.01 :—; INDEX CAMDEN MCGEHEE
CO
01 1998 - O X A - CL CO O O O X o 0. O m -J o A o 0.1 O A A A - A -
- IB -
_ m -
- 0 m n
^^ DdlRhwitlndBtA'*. jjftj CunfifeRWwuCaRiOan.Mi.
| 1 1 ] 1 0.01- —. ,—— i 1— 1— —t 1— 1 OCT. NOV. DEC. JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUN. JUL. AUG. SEP.
Page 41 RED RIVER BASIN
1000
100 :
DC UJ H tt-J W 0. CO £
INDEX CAMDEN MCGEHEE UJ O Q: o X 1998 o A Q A A UJ O 100 CO CO O Q O O
10
O
Q Q A R*dFtheraElnd»(.AfK. R%j OuaeWMRhiaral CaindMt. Aifc O Bayou Bwmdetnaw TMM UcG«M«. Atk.
OCT. NOV. DEC. JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUN. JUL. AUG. SEP.
Page 42 DISSOLVED CHLORIDE, IN MILLIGRAMS PER LITER o o o O o o T i J r O
JO o m o
m<
->1 o > D > z m D m
CO • > o 73
•• Z 0) > CO 9 I • CO o
o J I I 1 1 1_L o
Page 43 RED RIVER BASIN 10000 r
1000 V
0£ UJ 1- tr 100 V UJ CL CO E
INDEX CAMDEN MCGEHEE
Z Ul - £ 1998 - Q UJ A CO - Q UJ Q 1000 A Z Z UJ Q_ CO - - A A CO A A 100 m O z O O O : O 0 m G IS m -
A Rod River at Index, Arte. 10 1 Hi OuoeMtaRwwal Camden, Ant O Bayou Bartholomew near McG«hm, Ark.
s • T— 1— J T I 1 i 1 —• i OCT. NOV. DEC. JAN. FEB MAR. APR. MAY JUN. JUL. AUG. SEP.
Page 44 RED RIVER AT INDEX, ARKANSAS or
o 10000 : s a: w CL CO o 3 1000
UJ 1 100
UJ zQ UJ Q. 10 (0 D 1/1/20 1/1/30 1/1/40 1/1/50 1/1/60 1/1/70 1/1/80 1/1/90 1/1/00 (0 Page 46 OKLAHOMA COMMISSIONERS' REPORT Red River Compact Commission
Annual Meeting Lakev'tew Lodge Beavers Bend Resort State Park Broken Bow, Oklahoma May 4, 1999
1998 CLIMATE & STREAMFLOW The Oklahoma Climatological Survey reports that state-averaged precipitation for water year 1998 was 107 percent of normal (33.71 inches). The South Central climate division was the driest (82 percent of normal) while the North Central and West Central regions were the wettest (136 percent). The statewide excess was primarily due to the very wet winter of 1997-98 which offset severely below-normal precipitation received during the last six months of the water year (April through September) - the direct opposite of the normai distribution of rainfall, in addition, the April- September average statewide temperature was 76.7 degrees F, which places 1998 in a tie with 1954 for the hottest such period ever recorded in Oklahoma.
Beginning in April 1998, much of Oklahoma suffered from devastating drought conditions. Hardest hit was the southwest region which received only 29 percent of normal precipitation between April 1 and September 30. The south central and west central regions of the state also received less than 50 percent of their average rainfall over that period. The state's agricultural industry suffered damages well in excess of $2 billion and 66 of Oklahoma's 77 counties were declared disaster areas by the federal government.
Streamflows, as measured by the USGS for water year 1998, were above normal at the six gaging stations located on the Red River - Burkburnett, Gainesville, Denison, Arthur City and DeKalb, Texas, and Terral, Oklahoma.
WEATHER MODIFICATION The Oklahoma Weather Modification Program, directed by the OWRB since the program's inception in 1996, concluded 1998 operations on October 17. The operational cloud seeding program includes the dual purposes of rainfall enhancement and hail suppression. The field program typically runs from March through October each year from bases established in Oklahoma City and Woodward. The program, funded by three consecutive legislative appropriations, conducted more than 700 total operations during the 1998 project season.
The Oklahoma Climatological Survey continues its independent evaluation of the program's effectiveness in augmenting rainfall and suppressing hail damage throughout the state. The ongoing evaluation has concluded that program results are consistent with results from similar programs in other states. More specifically, radar response images indicate precipitation and increased cloud development downwind of project operations.
To date, the State Legislature has not allocated funds for continuation of the program in 1999. However, the Legislature is currently studying various methods to fund the effort, including a cooperative state/private insurance-funded program of approximately $3 million/year. In addition, the OWRB is working with the State of Texas to obtain necessary licenses which would allow the Oklahoma weather modification contractor to conduct activities, when required, across the state line.
Page 47 WATER RESOURCES REPORTS/STUDIES • The OWRB and U.S. Geological Survey continue a cooperative study of the High Plains Aquifer in northwest Oklahoma. A digital groundwater flow model will estimate the amount of water in storage while samples collected from water wells wiSI establish baseline water quality of the aquifer. • Current OWRB Clean Lakes Section (Water Quality Division) activities include work on the following projects: • At the direction of the Oklahoma Legislature, initiation of studies to monitor and determine the impact of concentrated animal feeding operations on Oklahoma City's water supply reservoirs and the North Canadian River. •* Completion of two years of monitoring and storm sampling at Lake Arcadia, east of Edmond. • Completion of data collection on a Lake Hefner diagnostic-feasibility study and recommendations for solving sediment and nutrient problems. • Early this year, the OWRB's Technical Section (Planning and Management Division) completed a hydrologic investigation of the Arkansas River Basin in Oklahoma. The report describes water available for appropriation in the Basin's stream systems and subsystems, provides data on major reservoirs and lakes, and provides related Basin information to assist in various appropriation and water planning activities.
WATER RESOURCES FINANCING The Oklahoma Water Resources Board administers the State Financial Assistance Program (FAP), backed by the Statewide Water Development Revolving Fund, which awards loans and grants for the construction and improvement of water and sewer facilities. Loans are offered by the Board from proceeds of revenue bonds to eligible communities for sewer and water improvements and refinancing. As of April 13,1999, the Board has approved 204 bond loans totaling almost $289 million. The emergency grant program, funded by interest earnings on the Revolving Fund, has approved 432 grants for more than $24.7 million. These grants have stimulated nearly $130 million in water/wastewater projects in Oklahoma.
The Board also provides loans through the Clean Water (CWSRF) and Drinking Water Construction Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Programs for various wastewater and water treatment/distribution projects, respectively, which are often required to bring borrowers into compliance with EPA requirements. The CWSRF Loan Program, which provides funds for the construction of new wastewater facilities or the replacement or rehabilitation of existing facilities, has approved 78 loans for more than $290 million. The DWSRF, a cooperative program recently developed by the OWRB and Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality, was created to assist municipalities and rural water districts in constructing drinking water treatment and distribution system improvements required to comply with the federal Safe Drinking Water Act. The program has approved 3 loans for more than $9.7 million.
tn 1996, the legislature passed a bill creating the Rural Economic Action Plan (REAP) grant program, which is operated by the Board in a manner very similar to its emergency grant program. REAP gives priority to communities with populations less than 1,500 and rural water districts with less than 300 household taps. As of April, the Board has approved 151 REAP grants totaling more than $11.6 million.
For the Oklahoma portion of the Red River Compact area, the OWRB has approved more than $107 million from the three loan programs combined, almost $10.4 in emergency grants and almost $4.6 in REAP grants.
Page 48 THE 1998 OKLAHOMA LEGISLATIVE SESSION The State Legislature devoted much of its efforts during the 1998 Legislative Session to addressing various impacts of the growing swine industry as well as the effects of poultry operations on streams and lakes in eastern Oklahoma. * A statewide moratorium on the administrative processing of water use permit applications for certain kinds of swine animal feeding operations was enacted March 9,1998. Following passage of stricter legislative regulations for swine production, the moratorium was lifted in August. * The State Legislature appropriated $1 million to establish a statewide stream and groundwater monitoring program based on beneficial uses established under Oklahoma's Water Quality Standards. Under this initiative, entitled the Beneficial Use Monitoring Program (BUMP), described in detail below, the OWRB will coordinate the water monitoring activities of all state environmental agencies. • The OWRB also received a $3.5 million appropriation to match the State Drinking Water Revolving Fund capitalization grant from EPA. A separate appropriation of $3.5 million was also appropriated to the OWRB for a non-point source loan program. The loans may be made to eligible public entities to address non-point source pollution problems.
OKLAHOMA BENEFICIAL USE MONITORING PROGRAM The Beneficial Use Monitoring Program (BUMP) was created in 1998 by the Oklahoma State Legislature to establish a state monitoring program which objectively evaluates Oklahoma waters in determining their individual beneficial use support. The primary objective of BUMP, enabled through a $1 million appropriation to the OWRB, is to determine the effectiveness of point and non-point source controls in maintaining beneficial uses established in state Water Quality Standards. More specifically, the program seeks to identify waters supporting (or not supporting) designated beneficial uses, locate threatened waters, and determine water quality trends.
BUMP consists of five monitoring components, including 32 permanent sites in the Red River Compact area (see attached map): • Fixed Station Stream Monitoring, consisting of approximately 70 sites (chosen according to hydrologic units) sampled 10 times/year for selected physical and water quality parameters; • Rotating Station Stream Monitoring, approximately 60 sites located in priority areas sampled monthly, consistent with fixed station parameters; * Fixed Station Load Monitoring, which seeks to determine flow data at as many sites as possible (including USGS, Mesonet sites) to assist in determinations of wastewater load calculations; • Fixed Station Lakes Monitoring, involving quarterly sampling (possibly including biological assessments and bathymetric mapping) of approximately 40 state reservoirs; and • Fixed Station Groundwater Monitoring, which will initially compile existing groundwater data and determine if monitoring is sufficient to determine use support, then sampling programs will be established in appropriate areas.
SARDtSLAKE The OWRB, on behalf of the state of Oklahoma, continues to investigate options and measures to establish a regional water supply which would serve citizens in the Sardis Lake area of southeast Oklahoma. At the same time, the OWRB, State Dept. of Wildlife, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and local citizens are cooperating to institute a lake level protection plan that would both set aside up to 20,000 ac-ft of water for future local uses as well as limit lake fluctuations to preserve the lake's fishery which provides substantial economic/recreational benefits to the area. Once the lake level plan is in place, involved parties will consider proposals to market the Sardis water supply to potential out-of-basin users, including the Oklahoma City Water Utilities Trust.
Page 49 Red River Basin Permanent Monitoring Sites Beneficial Use Monitoring Program
°« Xu o Permanent Sites A/ Major Rivers and Streams f^pt Red River Basin I ~ I Counties 2?
100 100 200 Miles RED RIVER COMPACT COMMISSION TEXAS UPDATE May 4,1999
Senate Bill 1
Senate Bill 1 (SB1) enacted by the 75th Texas Legislature in 1997, made sweeping changes related to the development and management of water resources of the state. SB1 challenged four agencies in particular to work cooperatively to implement its provisions: the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB), Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD), the Texas Agricultural Extension Service and the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC). The TNRCC works with these agencies to facilitate statewide water planning, water rights admiiustration, provision of public drinking water, water conservation, drought contingency planning and response, water quality management, and fish and wildlife management. The TNRCC's implementation of SB1 centers around rulemaking (involving enforcement, water rights, groundwater management, and water rates), water availability modeling, and water resource data coordination.
WATER AVAILABILITY MODELING ( WAM)
Overview; Article 7 of SB 1 requires the TNRCC to obtain or develop water availability models for six river basins by December 31,1999 and for the remaining 16 basins by December 31,2001. New water availability models (WAM) are being developed for (1) water rights permitting; and (2) regional and state (TWDB) planning. Within 90 days of completing a water availability model for a river basin, the TNRCC will answer the 3 specific questions set out in SB1: (1) What is the projected amount of water available to each water right holder during various low streamflow conditions?; (2) What is the amount of water that might be available if cancellation procedures were initiated?; and (3) What is the impact of reuse on existing water rights, instream uses, and freshwater inflows to bays?
Model: With the help of several engineering contractors, the TNRCC selected Texas A&M University's Water Rights Application Program (WRAP) model for water rights accounting, and the University of Texas* PrePro, a Graphical User Interface (GUI) to connect WRAP and the various database components. The contractors' recommendations also identified modifications essential for WRAP and PrePro to satisfy the evaluative criteria developed by both WAM stakeholders and the WAM Management Team.
Basin Modeling Status: The Sulphur River Basin model draft report has been completed by the contractor for that basin, R. J. Brandes Co., with the final report due in late April. Brown and Root is modeling the Neches River Basin, with the final water availability report for the Neches to be
TNRCC Implementation of Senate BUI 1 Page 1 Status Update April 5,1999 Page 51 produced in May. The Guadalupe, San Antonio, and Nueces River Basins are being modeled by HDR Engineering, with completion of the final water availability report for these three basins due in July. The Trinity, San Jacinto, Trinity- San Jacinto, and Neches- Trinity River Basins are being modeled by Espey, Padden, Consultants, Inc. The San Jacinto River Basin model will be completed by the end of 1999, in accordance with SB1 guidelines.
Additionally, the TNRCC has contracted with both Texas A&M University and the University of Texas to perform work essential to WAM. Texas A&M, as the creator of WRAP, has been selected to make modifications to the WRAP model. The University of Texas has been selected to provide geospatial data and watershed properties necessary for modeling. Both universities are working closely with the TNRCC and the basin contractors.
To complete the models for the 22 river basins by December 31,2001, the TNRCC has asked in its 2000 and 2001 LAR requests for $6.27 million. This appropriation was amended from an original request of $3.14 million to the current request of $6.27 million. The original $3.14 million estimate was based on initial estimates before any of the initial river basin models were contracted. Subsequently, the TNRCC requested Parsons ES to perform a detailed cost estimate of the funding required to complete the modeling tasks of Article 7, SB 1. The total cost estimate by Parsons ES was $5.26 million. This cost estimate does not include money for specific groundwater modeling efforts, costs to update or maintain the models, program management activities, or capital costs by the TNRCC to purchase computer equipment to run the models.
Database Development Development of new water availability models for river basins in Texas will require extensive TNRCC database development as well. The initial task for this project involved an inventory of the various databases associated with water rights administration. Scoping, analysis and design of the new database has commenced and should conclude in August 1999.
INTERAGENCY DATA COORDINATION
The firstste p in implementing the water resource data coordination goals enunciated in Article 7 of SB 1 was the development of a Memorandum of Agreement (MO A), signed by the TWDB, TPWD, and TNRCC. The TWDB serves as the lead agency in this monumental undertaking. The MOA explains how the agencies will coordinate the collection, quality assurance, and compilation of data to ensure accuracy, currency, and ready availability to citizens and water planners throughout the state.
A Data Steering Team (DST) and Water Information Integration Committee (WIIC), were created pursuant to the MOA, comprised of representatives fromth e TWDB, TPWD, and TNRCC to oversee the following data coordination efforts: (1) develop the requirements for water resource information
TNRCC Implementation of Senate BUI 1 Page 2 Status Update April 5, J 999
Page 52 (water supply numbers, water demand, population, etc.) for distribution to regional planning groups to support the development of regional water plans beginning next summer; (2) determine methods for verifying and reconciling water use data between the TNRCC and TWDB; and (3) create a long- range plan for interagency coordination on water resource data collection and dissemination. The agencies are on schedule in developing the plans for coordination and for gathering the available information for the Regional Water Planning Groups, with most of the information now available through the TWDB's Internet website.
REGIONAL WATER PLANNING GROUPS (RWPG)
SB1 required the TWDB to designate regional water planning areas and initial coordinating bodies for each RWPG. In February 1998, the TWDB adopted state and regional water planning rules, designated 16 regional water planning areas and named the initial coordinating body members of each area's regional water planning group (RWPG). Each RWPG is responsible for developing a regional water plan for its area in preparation for and response to drought conditions. All sixteen RWPG's have hired technical consultants to assist with an inventory of their regions' water resources and water use characteristics, including water drawn fromsource s within and outside each region.
Each RWPG must submit a regional water plan to the TWDB by September 1, 2000. TWDB-approved regional water plans will be incorporated into the next comprehensive State Water Plan, which is due September 1, 2001. After September 1, 2001, the TNRCC may not, without waiver, issue a water right for municipal purposes unless the water right permit addresses a water supply need in a manner that is consistent with an approved regional water plan or the State Water Plan. TNRCC rules for the development of drought contingency plans require those plans to be coordinated with the RWPG. In short, the regional water planning groups are essential to successful implementation of SB 1.
TNRCC RULEMAKING UPDATE
To implement the water resource management provisions of SB 1, the TNRCC initiated the following four rulemaking projects.
Enforcement Provisions: These rules modify Chapter 303 and 304 of Title 30 of the Texas Administrative Code (30 TAC) and will provide for the enforcement process and appeal remedies for field citations issued by a Watermaster. Also, administrative penalties for any violation of chapter 11 became part of the enforcement penalty policies. These rules were adopted at the Commission's Agenda of December 2,1998.
TNRCC Implementation of Senate Hill 1 Page 3 Status Update April 5,1999 Page 53 Water Rights and Groundwater Management: New and amended rules in Chapters 288, 293, 294,295, and 297 implement water rights and groundwater district creation and oversight provisions of Senate Bill 1. These rules provide definition and clarification for terms, procedures, and provisions related to:
• water conservation plans; • drought contingency plans; • water right applications and fees; • multi-use water rights; • reuse; • interbasin transfers; • emergency transfers; • cancellation; • aquifer storage and retrieval; • effects of hydrologic connection between surface and groundwater; • standards for evaluation of water right amendments; and • use of bed banks to transport water.
The rules also provide procedures for the designation of priority groundwater management areas, creation of groundwater conservation districts, and actions the commission may take in assuring district compliance with the requirements of the Texas Water Code, Chapter 36. An ad hoc advisory committee comprised of affected stakeholders was created to assist TNRCC staff in the development of necessary rules. The rules were adopted by the Commission at the January 27,1999 commission agenda.
Water Rates: These rules implement requirements for business plans and financial assurance for Certificates of Convenience and Necessity (CCN) applications and public water system development, and they modify reporting requirements for wholesale rates and regulatory assessments. This rulemaking project includes legislative implementation of SB 1 as well as HB 1406andSB 623. These rules were adopted January 13,1999.
Rate Flexibility: These rules modify 30 Tex. Admin.. Code Chapter 291, and will allow water and sewer rate flexibilityb y allowing rates to be based on factors other than rate of return. These rules also were adopted January 13, 1999.
TNRCC Implementation of Senate BUI I pa%e 4 Status Update April 5, 1999 Page 54 STATE OF LOUISIANA RED RIVER COMPACT COMMISSION LOUISIANA ACTIVITY REPORT Beavers Bend Resort Park, Oklahoma May 4-5,1999
********
RED RIVER WATERWAY PROJECT
The project is 90% complete and moving to completion with navigation features and recreational development. The Red River Waterway Commission is negotiating a Project Cooperation Agreement with the Corps to develop recreation in pools 3,4, and 5 . Actively marketing the river and ports and seeing excellent development especially at Caddo-Bossier, Natchitoches and Alexandriaports. The Corps is pursing mitigation by buying land at Loggy Bayou and Bodcau. The Commission is in communication with the Coast Guard concerning the placement of buoys and land based markers to enhance navigation aspects for industry.
Approximately $98 million in public funds (Federal, state and local) have been invested in port development on the Red River to date. Private investment at the ports adds another $ 15 million. The tonnage on the Red River Waterway is ahead of the Corps projected figuresfo r this time of development. The latest tonnage figures for 1998 were in excess of 627,000 tons shipped from public ports. Total tonnage from public and private terminals exceeded 3 million tons for 1998.
2. GROUNDWATER DATA BANK
DOTD's water well registration data file is now on the Internet, Please check it out at: www.dotd.s1^e.Ia.us/wells/mtro.html. DOTD is continuing the updating of its computerized Groundwater Data Bank and related software. The data retrieval system has been expanded to provide hard-copy printouts as well as diskettes containing various fields and in formats easily readable by users. The Data Bank presently contains data formore than 120,000 wells. The roster of DOTD licensed drillers is also on the Internet at the above listed address.
3. DOTTMJSGS COOPERATIVE WATER RESOURCES PROGRAM
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) under a cooperative water resources program with DOTD operates and maintains a surface water network consisting of 16 daily discharge stations, 16 daily stage stations, 21 crest gages and 14 flood profile stations. The groundwater network includes 98 water level stations and 46 chloride stations. Water levels are measured quarterly, while chloride levels are measured semiannually. The data collected
Page 55 from these stations are included in the water resources annual report which is published by USGS and is available to the public. For current surface water conditions and flood tracking information, check Louisiana's hydro watch at wwwdlabrg.er.usgs.gov/public/hydrowatch.htmi or go to DOTD's water well data file address and click on USGS.
4. SPARTA AQUIFER
Louisiana and Arkansas are experiencing water level declines in the Sparta Aquifer particularly in the major pumping centers of north central Louisiana and south central Arkansas. The fear is that pumping is outdistancing recharge of the aquifer effectively mining the aquifer. DOTD has been meeting with Arkansas, the USGS, major water users, and other interested parties to study the situation and determine a course of action. USGS in cooperation with DOTD, Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission and Arkansas Geological Commission, has prepared and published 1996-1997 water level report (WRI Report #97-4282) of the Sparta Aquifer for south central Arkansas and north central Louisiana. Currently there is a bill in the Louisiana Legislature, Senate Bill 912, which authorizes creation of multi-parish groundwater conservation districts throughout the state. District would be composed of major water users who would police themselves in conserving groundwater. It is expected to be passed by the Legislature this session.
5. DOTD REORGANIZATION
The 1998 Legislative Special Session enacted legislation reorganizing DOTD. Five new appointed positions have been added. We are now in the Office of Public Works and Intermodal Transportation and Mr. Curtis Patterson has been appointed Assistant Secretary. Our group is the Public Works and Water Resources Development Division, headed by Mr. Edmond Preau. The Water Resources Design Unit is now back under our control.
6. DOTD NEW LEADERSHIP
Dr. Kam Movassaghi was named the secretary of the Department in December, 1998. He was previously the Head of the Civil Engineering Department at the University of Southwestern Louisiana in Lafayette.
7. MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES (Lawsuit
The EarthJustice Legal Defense Fund, Inc., filed suit on October 2, 1996, challenging the adequacy of the 1976 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the ongoing Mississippi River mainline levee enlargement andberm construction feature of the Mississippi River and Tributaries Project The lawsuit sought deferral of al new construction on the main-stem Mississippi River levees until the 1976 EIS was supplemented to address environmental
Page 56 concerns. On April 4, 1997, the Corps announced the initiation of the supplemental EIS (SEIS) preparation. A Consent Decree was signed with the plaintiffs on June 17, 1998, to facilitate continued construction of certain project features during the preparation of the SEIS.
The SEIS has been completed. On October 5, 1998, Major General Phillip R. Anderson signed the Record of Decision finding that the recommended plan (Avoid and Minimize) was necessary to provide floodprotection , was the environmentally preferable plan, was in the public interest, and was in compliance with all Federal, state, and local requirements. The Avoid and Minimize plan substantially reduced the need to use forested wetlands for borrow by utilizing a variety of innovative engineering methods. Compensatory mitigation for impacts that could not be avoided, plus environmental enhancement design of borrow pits in the batture, will result in a net gain of 6,727 acres of aquatic habitat and 4,070 acres of high-quality bottomland hardwoods. Thus there has been complete compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act.
However, on December 4,1998, plaintiffs filed a challenge to the SEIS and alleged breach of the Consent Decree. The plaintiffs asserted that the SEIS was inadequate for five reasons. The Government filed its opposition motion to plaintiffs' challenge on April I, 1999. Plaintiffs' response.is due April 30,1999. The Government's reply is then due on May 15, 1999. Oral arguments are scheduled for May 26,1999. So far, the plaintiffs have not sought any injunctive relief.
At issue, basically, is the location of borrow pits. The plaintiffs want the pits on the protected side of the levee, preferably on expensive cleared farm land, rather than the traditional location on the relatively cheap, unprotected batture. In March, the Association of Levee Boards of Louisiana representing the non-Federal sponsors responsible for rights- of-way for borrow pits, filed a motion to enter an Amicus Curiae Brief.
Page 57 Page 58 REPORT OF THE LEGAL COMMITTEE at the 19th Annual Meeting of the RED RIVER COMPACT COMMISSION May 4, 1999 Lake View Lodge at Broken Bow Reservoir Broken Bow, Oklahoma
Assignments
At its 18th Annual Meeting in Hot Springs, Arkansas, the Commission made the following assignments to the Legal Committee:
1. Draft proposed revisions to the Commission's Rules for the internal Organization of the Red River Compact Commission relating to the election of a Chairman.
2. Continue the assignment of developing an institutional history involving allocation of water In the North Fork Red River system.
Responses
In response to these assignments, the Legal Committee respectfully submits the following report with recommendations:
Assignment 1. Last year in reporting on an assignment concerning the federal commissioner situation, the Legal Committee suggested that the Commission amend its Rules for Internal Organization to address the federal chair vacancy. Regarding the federal chair, the Compact itself (Section 9.01) provides as follows:
There is hereby created an interstate administrative agency to be known as the 'Red River Compact Commission', hereinafter called the 'Commission.' The Commission shall be composed of two representatives from each Signatory State who shall be designated or appointed in accordance with the laws of each state, and one Commissioner representing the United States, who shall be appointed by the President. The Federal Commissioner shall be the Chairman of the Commission but shall not have the right to vote. The failure of the President to appoint a Federal Commissioner will not prevent the operation or effect of this Compact, and the eight representatives from the Signatory States will elect a Chairman for the Commission."
Article I! of the current Rules for Internal Organization addresses the Officers of the Commission. Regarding the Chair and Vice-Chair of the Commission, the current rules provide:
2.2 "The Commissioner representing the United States shall be the Chairman of the Commission. The Chairman or designated representative of the Chairman shall preside at meetings of the Commission. His duties shall be those usually imposed upon such officers and as may be assigned by these rules or by the Commission from time to time."
Page 59 Red River Compact Commission 1999 Legal Committee Report Page 2
2.3 "The Vice-Chairman shall be elected at the annual meeting from the Commissioners of the host state for the upcoming year as reflected by the minutes, and shall hold office for a term of one year, beginning on July 1 following the election, or until a successor is elected. The Vice-Chairman shall serve as Chairman in the event the President of the United States fails to appoint a Federal Commissioner, or the absence of the Federal Commissioner or the designated representative of the Federal Commissioner."
As can be seen, rule 2.2 contemplates that the Federal Commissioner can have a "designated representative". The Legal Committee construes this provision to mean that the Federal Commissioner (provided the President has appointed a Federal Commissioner) could send a "proxy" to the Commission meeting to be the non-voting chair to conduct the meeting. However, if the President has not made an appointment there can be no "designated representative" of the Federal Commissioner.
The internal rules provide for a Chairman by default if the President fails to appoint a Federal Commissioner, or if the Federal Commissioner or the designated representative is absent. The Vice-Chairman (one of the two Commissioners from the host state) is the default Chairman by this internal rule. Being an internal rule, it appears to the Legal Committee that it can certainly be amended if the Commission intends to put a different practice into place. The following proposed amendment provides flexibility to the Commission, leaving the practice of having the Vice-Chair from the host state serve as Chair, and adding a provision about electing another person to act as Chair.
2.2 "The Commissioner representing the United States shall be the Chairman of the Commission. The Chairman or designated representative of the Chairman shall preside at meeting of the Commission. His duties shall be those usually imposed upon such officers and as may be assigned by these rules or by the Commission from time to time. If the Federal Commissioner position is vacant, the etoht representatives from the Signatory States will elect a Chairman Pro Tempore for the Commission. In such case. the eight representatives may elect a Chairman Pro Tempore from among the eight representatives of the Signatory States pursuant to these rules or from other persons who are not members of the Commission. The Chairman Pro Tempore shall serve only until the appointment of a Federal Commissioner becomes effective or until a successor Chairman Pro Tempore is elected."
2.3 "The Vice-Chairman shall be elected at the annual meeting from the Commissioners of the host state for the upcoming year as reflected by the minutes, and shall hold office for a term of one year, beginning on July 1 following the election, or until a successor is elected. Unless a Chairman Pro Tempore has been elected by the
Page 60 Red River Compact Commission 1999 Legal Committee Report Page 3
Commission pursuant to Section 2.2 of these rules. The the Vice- Chairman shall serve as Chairman in the event the President of the United States fails to appoint a Federal Commissioner, or the absence of the Federal Commissioner or the designated representative of the Federal Commissioner."
If the Commissioners wish to amend its Rules for Internal Organization at this annual meeting, the Commission will need to waive the 30-day notice requirement set forth in rule 6.1.
Assignment 2 - The matter relating to the Reach 1, Subbasin 1 apportionment rules and the North Fork Red River and Sweetwater Creek has been subject of much discussion over the years by the Commission, as well as the Legal Committee and Engineering Committee- The latest assignment from the Commission was to continue work on developing an institutional history relating to the Reach 1, Subbasin 1 apportionment provisions.
By separate cover dated April 1,1999, Donna Kirby, Manager of the Lugert-Altus Irrigation District distributed a Historic Review document relating to Reach 1, Subbasin 1 of the Compact. The Historic Review document summarizes the minutes of the 60 meetings of the Negotiating Committee beginning in March 1956 through May 1978, as well as many pertinent drafts which were discussed by the Negotiating Committee. The Historic Review document also summarizes all the annual meetings of the Commission beginning with the organizational meeting in February 1981. Legal Committee and Engineering Committee meetings are also summarized.
From a review of this Historic Review document, there does not appear to be a crystal clear statement in those documents to guide the Commission on the two major issues that have been presented:
1. How does the 60/40 allocation for Reach 1, Subbasin 1 apply to the North Fork Red River and Sweetwater Creek?
2. Do the allocation provisions of the Compact control over water rights of the Lugert-Altus Irrigation District and others which existed prior to the effective date of the Compact?
The Legal Committee notes that it provided a briefing on these Reach 1, Subbasin 1 issues to the Commission last year. A copy of that briefing paper, marked Exhibit A, is attached hereto.
The Legal Committee has no further suggestions which would be productive to resolve this issue.
Page 61 Page 62 EXHIBIT A
RED RIVER COMPACT COMMISSION LEGAL COMMITTEE April 28, 1998
BRIEFING TO COMMISSIONERS ON REACH I, SUBBASIN 1 ISSUES
Issues relating to the Reach I, Subbasin 1 provision of the Compact have been pending before the Commission for over 10 years. The Legal Committee deemed it appropriate to provide a brief background and overview of the issues to the Commission, particularly in light of appointment of new Commissioners.
The Compact is an agreement among the four states and federal government containing several points of understanding about the waters of the Red River. One of the major points of understanding relates to apportionment of water. Where watersheds of rivers or lakes are found in two or more states, the apportionment provisions generally provide percentages of flow to the states affected. The Reach I, Subbasin 1 provision apportions water between Texas and Oklahoma.
Reach I, Subbasin 1 apportionment provisions state:
"Reach I of the Red River is divided into topographic subbasins, with the water therein allocated as follows:
"SECTION 4.01. Subbasin 1 - Interstate streams - Texas.
(a) This includes the Texas portion of Buck Creek, Sand (Lebos) Creek, Salt Fork Red River, Elm Creek, North Fork Red River, Sweetwater Creek, and Washita River, together with all their tributaries in Texas which lie west of the 100th Meridian.
(b) The annual flow wthin this subbasin is hereby apportioned sixty (60) percent to Texas and forty percent to Oklahoma."
"SECTION 4.05. Special Provisions.
(a) ...
(b) Texas shall not accept for filing, or grant a permit, for the construction- of a dam to impound water solely for irrigation, flood control, soil conservation, mining and recovery of minerals, hydroelectric power, navigation, recreation and pleasure, or for any other purposes other than for domestic, municipal, and industrial water supply, on the mainstem of the North Fork Red River or any of its tributaries within Texas above Lugert-Altus Reservoir until the date that imported water, sufficient to meet the municipal and irrigation needs of Western Oklahoma is provided, or until January 1,2000, which ever occurs first/
As can be seen, there are seven named interstate streams within Subbasin 1. After flowing into Oklahoma, Sweetwater Creek joins the North Fork upstream from
Page 63 Lugert-Altus Reservoir. Representatives of the States of Texas and Oklahoma have divergent views on the meaning and intent of the Reach I provisions. These divergent views have fostered peripheral issues. The primary issue can be succinctly stated as follows:
Does the 60/40 apportionment apply to each of the named interstate streams individually (Oklahoma view), or does it apply subbasin-wide (Texas view)?
This issue first arose in a 1983 proceeding before the Texas Department of Water Resources (now Texas Natural Resources and Conservation Commission) when the Oklahoma Water Resources Board (OWRB) along with others protested a water right application by the Red River Authority of Texas to construct a 65,000 acre-feet reservoir on Sweetwater Creek in Texas. The application was later dismissed before any final ruling on the issue. Texas currently has no plans for a reservoir on Sweetwater Creek, according to the August 1997 Texas water plan entitled "Water for Texas/
The primary issue was presented again at the Commission's annual meeting in 1987 when the Engineering Committee presented draft rules to implement the Reach I, Subbasin 1 apportionment provisions. The Commission approved most of the proposals as "interim rules" which implemented the 60/40 split individuaUy for five of the seven, named streams. The Texas Member of the Engineering Committee presented a draft rule that would calculate the 60/40 spht based on the combined annual flows of the North Fork Red River and Sweetwater Creek. The Texas view would allow a Texas entity to impound up to 100% of the flow of Sweetwater Creek then make up the flow from the North Fork, as long as the combined flow into Oklahoma from the two streams calculated together equaled at least 40%. The Oklahoma Member presented a draft rule that would calculate the 60/40 split of the annual flow of the North Fork and Sweetwater Creek individually. The Commission referred the matter to the Legal Committee to work with the Engineering Committee to propose a resolution to the divergent points of view. Also notable in the 1987 annual meeting is the fact that neither Louisiana Commissioner was present, therefore, the "interim rules* that were adopted were adopted with a six to zero vote. The North Fork/Sweetwater Creek issue has been discussed at Commission annual meetings virtually every year since the 1987 meeting.
A peripheral issue arose at the Commission's 1988 annual meeting when the validity of Commission's 1987 action in approving the "interim rules* was discussed. Under Section 9.03, the Compact provides that any action concerned with Compact administration or requiring compliance with specific terms of this Compact shall require six concurring votes, but action of the Commission which affects existing water rights requires eight concurring votes. The adoption of Commission rules to implement apportionment could be construed as Compact administration. That action could also be said to affect existing water rights. It remains unresolved as to the meaning of "existing water rights."
A second peripheral issue relates to the water rights of the Lugert-Altus Irrigation District. Oklahoma has taken the view that Sections 2.07 and 2.14 protect the 1939 water right of the District separate from the interpretation of the Reach I,
Page 64 Subbasin 1 apportionment provision. On the other hand, Texas has taken the position that the Compact apportionment provision controls pursuant to case law on the effects interstate water compacts have on water rights, and that the only special provision recognized for Lugert-Altus is found in Section 4.05(b).
Page 65 Page 66 RED RIVER COMPACT COMMISSION
Engineering Advisory Committee Report Broken Bow, Oklahoma May 4, 1999
ASSIGNMENTS TO THE COMMITTEE:
1. Status of Critical USGS Stream Gages 2. Website Development
ASSIGNMENT NO. 1
The Committee was given the assignment to continue to monitor the Corps of Engineers' proposed cutbacks in the USGS stream gaging program as ft affects the Compact. Oklahoma has taken the lead in following this issue as the impact of the Corps' action has been limited to the State of Oklahoma thus far (see attached USGS website information sheet). The Oklahoma Water Resources Board met with the Tufsa District COE on April 1,1999 and requested that the COE take another look at their proposed cutbacks to see if they could be scaled back. Based on that meeting, the Tulsa COE is revisiting their cutback plan at this time. Additionally, the OWRB is in the process of preparing a Request For Proposals (RFP) for the Oklahoma stream gaging network as an alternative to the USGS Cooperative Program.
ASSIGNMENT NO. 2
The Committee was given the assignment to explore the development of a website for the Compact, Developing a commercial website would involve contracting for an internet service provider for site development along with monthly service fee for the site itself. The State of Oklahoma could possibly assist in this development through the OWRB website. OWRB staff could possibly develop appropriate web pages and host the site through the OWRB website. The Committee recommends requesting that the State of Oklahoma (OWRB) develop some example web pages for consideration by the Engineering Committee and the Commission at its next annual meeting.
Page 67 Page 68 USGS Oklahoma District - Corps of Engineers Page 1 of 2
Water Resources of Oklahoma Last of Corps of Engineers Stations to be Discontinued Beginning October 1,1999, due to changing priorities, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will no longer fund the USGS to monitor daily flow at the following sites. The Corps will only maintain the sites during periods of high water for flood discharge measurements only. Without funding the USGS will discontinue these sites.
This means accurate measurements of other flow conditions will no longer be made and accurate discharge data will no longer be available online through the internet. This eliminates any future use of these sites for updating estimates of low flow, such as the 7Q2, and other streamflow statistics. There will be insufficient data to calculate annual flow or other yields. The impact of drought on these streams will be undocumented and the availability of flow for all uses unrecorded. The Corps is not planning to maintain a database of flow conditions.
For more information, call Kathy Peter, District Chief, at 405.S 10.4417 or Bob Blazs, Chief, Hydrologic Records and Data Collection, at 405.810.4419. Drainage Period of Number Area Sta.No Station Name Record (WY> of Years (mi/2) 07148400 Salt Fork Arkansas River near Alva 1,009 1937-54,77-99 41 07151000 Salt Fork Arkansas River near Tonkawa 4,528 1936-99 34 07158000 Cimarron River near Waynoka 13,334 1938-99 32 07159100 Cimarron River near Dover 15,713 1974-99 26 07159750 Cottonwood Creek near Seward 320 1973-82,90-99 20 07161450 Cimarron River near Ripley 17r979 1988-99 12 07174400 Caney River near Bartlesville 1,392 1986-99 14 07175500 Caney River near Ramona 1,955 1945-99 55 07176500 Bird Creek at Avant 364 1945-99 55 07195500 Illinois River near Watts 635 1955-99 35 07197000 Baron Fork at Eldon 307 1949-99 51 07199500 Illinois River near Gore (temperature) 1,626 1948,54-63,93-99 IS 07230500 Little River nr Tecumseh 456 1944-99 56. 07231500 Canadian River at Calvin 27,952 1939-42,44-99 60 07234000 Beaver River at Beaver 7,955 1938-99 62 07237500 North Canadian River at Woodward 11,589 1906,39-99 62 07238000 North Canadian River near Seiling 12,261 1946-99 54 07239000 North Canadian River near Canton 12,484 1938-93 56 07239300 North Canadian River near Watonga 12,736 . 1984-99 16 07242000 North Canadian River near Wetumka 14,290 1938-99 62 07242380 Deep Fork at Warwick 532 1984-99 16 07243500 Deep Fork near Beggs 2,018 1938-99 62
Page 69 http://wwwok.cr.usgs.gov/public/corps99.htrnl 4/26/99 USUS Oklahoma District - Corps of Engineers Page 2 of 2
07247500 Fourche Maline near Red Oak 122 1939-99 61 07301481 North Fork Red River near Sayre 2,159 1978-87 20 07303400 Elm Fork near Carl 416 1960-79,95-99 25 07305000 North Fork Red River near Headrick 4,244 1905-08-38-99 66 07307010 Otter Creek near Snyder (not published) 217 1985-99 15 07316000 Red River near Gainesville, TX 30,782 1936-99 64 07325000 Washita River near Clinton 1,977 1936-99 64 07325500 Washita River near Carnegie 3,129 1938-99 62 07329700 Wildhorse Creek near Hoover 604 1970-93 24 07334000 Muddy Boggy Creek near Farris 1,087 1938-99 62. 07335500 Red River at Arthur City, TX 44,531 1906-11,36-99 70 07338500 Little River below Lukfata Creek near Idabel 1,226 1947-99 53 07338750 Mountain Fork at Smithville 320 1992-99 8 Broken Bow Lake Rereg Dam 4 07338920 767 1996-99 4 (temperatures) 07339000 Mountain Fork near Eagletown 787 1924-26,30-99 73 1948,55,61-63,93- 07339000 Mountain Fork near Eagletown (temperature) 787 12 99
Page 70 http://wwwok.cr.usgs.gov/public/corps99.html 4/26/99
RED RIVER COMMISSION
ARKANSAS LOUISIANA TEXAS OKLAHOMA Don Mitchell Frank M. Denton Lowell Cable DuaneA. Smith FEDERAL COMMISSIONER Major General PhUUp R. Anderson
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
GREAT PLAINS REGION
Oklahoma-Texas Area Office
May 1999
Page 71 Page 72 REPORT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
TO THE RED RIVER COMPACT COMMISSION
MAY 1999 ********** BUREAU OF RECLAMATION (RECLAMATION) Great Plains Region, Oklahoma/Kansas and Texas Offices OKLAHOMA-TEXAS AREA OFFICE
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT & DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Oklahoma Water Supply Study, Oklahoma
The objective of this joint Oklahoma City Water Utilities Trust (OCWUT)/Reclamation project was to make small commuiuties and rural water districts in central and south central Oklahoma aware of the availability of dependable, affordable, good quality water supply from Oklahoma City's water in the McGee Creek Project. The documentation and data gathering phases were completed ahead of schedule. However, our reports writer has so far been unable to obtain from the City some of the data for our final report. A final report will be written with the data we have before the end of this year.
Lugert-Altus Water Resource Management Option?
This project began in 1997. Oklahoma Water Resources Board is the partner in this study. The study was envisioned as a multi-year study to place gauges, weirs and other measurement devices and methods within the North Fork Red River and Salt Ford Red River watersheds below Altus Dam to quantify the amount of water available for appropriation. A determination could then be made of the amount of water the district discharges to the river systems during normal operations. This discharge has considerable impact on the amount of water available for appropriations by applicants outside the District. Current operations are based on rough estimates, inefficient to quantify distribution efficiency and losses. Accurate, quantitative measurement and accounting of water downstream of Lugert-Altus is essential for water use determination and availability beyond current operations.
WATER CONSERVATION PROJECTS AND DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLANNING
Reclamation's Water Conservation Field Services Program (WCFSP) seeks to develop projects that accomplish one or more of the following goals:
Page 73 (1) conservation planning assistance, to include technical and managerial direction; (2) demonstration and investigation of innovative water conservation technologies; (3) implementation of effective water conservation measures; and (4) water conservation information/education.
In Texas, Reclamation Drought contingency planning is a part of the water conservation program, a workshop entitled "Planning for the Next Drought" several times a year at various locales around the country and interested entities are encouraged to attend. There is no fee for this program, was granted to for assistance in drafting the drought portion of their water management plan.
WATER REUSE
Water Reuse, under Title XVI of Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 (H.R. 429), is being planned by the Oklahoma-Texas Area office in the Rio Grande basin and the Canadian River basin. We are not aware of any interest to participate in the program as far as the Red River basin is concerned.
Page 74 US. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SUMMARY SHEET OKLAHOMA DISTRICT TEXAS DISTRICT
ANNUAL RED RIVER COMPACT COMMISSION MEETING Beavers Bend Resort Park, OK May 4,1999
RED RIVER BASIN
PEAK DISCHARGE (CFS) AVERAGE DISCHARGE (CFS) MAXIMUM WY98 PERIOD OF RECORD WY98
07308500 174,000 59,800 1,283 2,062 RED IUVERNRBTDRKBURNETT, TX 6-06-95 3-17-98 39YRS
07315500 236,000 99,400 2,571 3,306 RED RIVER NRTERRAL, OK 6-07-95 3-18-98 61YRS
07316000 265,000 98,800 3,343 4,267 RED RIVER NR GAINESVILLE, IX 5-31-87 3-lSM>8 62YRS
07331600 201,000 57,400 4,919* 8,308 RED RIVER AT DENISON, TX 5-21-35 3-25-98 46YRS+
07335500 - 400,000 56,500 9,478* 12,570 RED RIVER AT ARTHUR COT, TX 5-28-08 1-06-98 54YRS++
0?33682#* 279,000 79,100 14,810 16,130 REJJ RIVER NRDE &tfJ3^IX? * AVERAGE DISCHARGE SINCE DENISON DAM IN OPERATION + HAS 67 TOTAL YEARS OF RECORD ++ HAS 68 TOTAL YEARS OF RECORD Page 75 62 BED RIVER BASIH 07315500 RED RIVER SEAR 1BBBAD, OK 10CATI0H.—Iat 33°S2'43», long S^SS'OS-, Jefferson Conner, Hydrologie Unit 11130201, as left: book *fc downstream side of bridge atoctmcnt en. U.S. Highway 81, 0.5 mi downstream from Chicago, Itoct Island, and Railroad Co. bridge, 1.2 mi south. of Terra!, 3.6 mi downstream from little Wichita River, end at jn*l» 672. DKAIMAGE AREA-—28,723 ad3 of which 5,936 nri2 probably is nonecptxibtttaoq. PERKD OF RECORD.--Apr 1338 to current year. Monthly discharge only for acoe periods, published ia HSP 1311. REVISED RECORDS.--WSP 1211: Drainage area. GAGE.—Water-stage recorder. Datum of gaga is 770.31 ft above sea, level. Prior to Jam 12, 1339, nonrecording gage at seas sita and datum. Satellite telemeter at station.' REMARKS.--Records good except those for estimated daily discharges, which are fair. Since ir.atnlla.ticn of gage ia Apr 1938, at least 10% of contributing drainage area has been regulated by upstream reservoirs. There are zaany small diversions upstream from station for irrigation, oil field operations, and for Municipal uses. EXTREMES OUTSIDE PERIOD OP RECCED.—Flood of Kay 19, 1935, reached a stage of 27.2 ft, although floods ia 1891 and ca May 1, 1908, are reported to have reached about the same stage. DISCHARGE, CUBIC FEET PER SECC99D, WATER TSAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1S98 QATLY MEAN -VAIBE3 DAI OCT BOV DEC JW- FEB BAR APR MAY JOB ODD ADC SEP 1 2550 1360 U60 4170 . 3470 6050 6100 3010 1170 e570 188 e231 2 2200 1300 1100 3780 7970 5650 5720 2780 . 1210 eSSO 177 •266 3 1920 1220 1120 . 3410 8940 5250 5400 2830 947 e570 193 . B332 4 17B0 1140 1200 3320 7820 4940 5490 2710 342 e590 218 •290 5 1670 1050 1290 8050 6190 4720 5450 2460 755 e750 218 e241 6 1470 991 1350 9150 5940 4610 5350 2160 711 ell30 348 •212 7 1410 975 1560 9180 5660 4630 . 5070 1930 695 el300 302 el92 8 1250 963 1630 8820 5290 5640 5110 1820 670 •1200 239 el83 9 2580 945 1600 7880 4850 8550 5500 1680 712 elOlO 231 180 10 3150 943 1620 6760 4520 8870 5190 1690 • 1010 710 286 • 169 11 2010 947 1550 5770 4270 7800 4570 1640 1S50 500 • 340 164 12 2730 971 1470. 4950 3990 6800 4330 1430 1920 457 305 156 13 2160 1130 1280 4510 3S50 6450 4250 1360 2560 419 291 165 14 2590 1240 1250 4340 4150 6000 3980 1320 2220 376 265 175 15 4150 1290 . 1290 4250 4490 6180 3490 1290 1340 362 274 166 IS 3490 1280 1180 4480 4500 24100 3130 1360 908 370 274 • 177 17 2780 1260 1080 4600 4400 76800 2950 1540 768 334 295 180 18 2780 1170 1040 4530 5810 84000 2840 1480 730 316 301 ' 182 19 2400 1090 1010 4430 8750 48900 2680 1290 712 303 267- 183 20 1920 1130' 1140 4340 14700 27900 2650 1340 761 285 a231 191 21 1740 1150 2490 4280 12100 17400 2640 1460 633 279 el52 187 22 1610 1120 4130 4310 8820 11800 2570 1550 614 27S • •158 241 23 2110 1200 5060" 4300 7800 9310 2410 1370 570 261 •136 276- 24 1800 1240 £540 3990 7970 9660 2280 1320 S23 246 el08 263 25 1570 1240 7890 3550 7590 9380 2200 1250 521 230 el23 255 26 2040 1310 8090 3560 - - 7370 8410 2290 1180 510 224 •171 232 27 2000 1330 6150 3410 7260 7700 4210 1130 519 214 s241 213 26 1720 1370 49S0 3160 6610 - 7860 7520 1040 536 208 S263 195 29 1540 1320 45S0 2900 ... 7590 4740 997 531 215 e259 182 30 1420 1230 4630 2650 6780 3590 978 589 220 e252 165 31 1380 ... 4450 2640 ... 6260 ... 1000 ... 203 •231 •"*. T0TAD 65920 34906 84860 149470 135160 456000 123700 50395 27747 14687 7477 6244 MEAH 2126 1164 2737 4822 6614 14710 4123 1626 925 474 241 ' 208 MAX 4150 1370 8090 9180 14700 84000 7520 3010 25S0 1300 348 332 MXK 1250 943 1010 2640 3470 4610 2200 978 510 203 108 156 AC-FT 130800 69240 168300 296500 367300 904500 245400 99960 55040 29130 14830 12380 STATISTICS OF MOBiaUr MEAB DATA FOR HATER IEARS 1938 • 1996S, BY MATER TEAR (W?) MEAN 3047 1517 1150 956 1373 2030 2665 6675 6351 1670 1356 2069 MAX 23900 9713 11810 5306 9320 14710 18080 43580 , 37460- '8077 14730 9653 (W7) 1987 1987 1932.- 1992 1987 1998 1990 1357 1941 1950 1395 1386 ten 108 102 91.2 76.5 136 66.1 142 134 517 158 155 109 (KT) 1953 1940 1339 1940 1953 • 1940 1971 1371 1966 1964; 1370 1956 e Estimated Pag© 76 BED RIVER BASIH 07315500 BED RIVER BEAR TEHRAD, OK—Contla»«d SUMMARY STATISTICS FDR 1997 CAXESDAR TEAR FOE 1998* MATER TEAS WATER YEARS 1938 - 1998z ANNQAD TOTAL 1501760 1206586 AMBQADMEAK 4114 - 3306 2571 HIGHEST AHHOAL MEAK 8925 1987 LOWEST AKHOAL KEAHt 523 1953 HK3DS3T DAILY MEAS 44200 Apr 28 84000 Mar 18 215000 Ata 7 1335 ICHEST DAILY HEAR 551 Sep 19 108 Aug 24 46 Mar 20 1940 AHHOAL SEVEH-DAY MIMtKOM 603 Sep 13 160 Aug 20 •47 Mar 18 1940 IMSTATOAHECCg PEAK FUK 99400 Mar 18 236000 JuB 7 1995 INSTANTANEOOS PEAK STAGE 22.32 Maris 33.60 Oct 22 1983 ANBDAL EDHOEF CAC-FT3 2979000 2393000 1862000 10 PERCENT EXCEEDS 9640 7300 5700 50 PERCENT EXCEEDS 1840 1460 607 30 IERCEHT EXCEEDS 894 222 177 z Period of regulated atrsamflov. 100,000r M A M 1597 1998 MATER TEAR Page 77 RED RIVER BASIS 07308500 RED RIVER KERB BOKKSUKSKiT, TX lOCATION.--lat 34°06'36", long S8°31'53", Cotton County, Okie., Hydrologic Dhit 11130102, on downstream guardrail of downstreau bridge en U.S. Highways 277 and 281, 2.S mi northeast of Surkbttrnatt. and at mile 933. DRAINAGE AREA.--20.570 ad2, of which 5,936 mi3 probably is noncontrSfrqting. WATER-DISCHARGE RECORDS PERIOD OF RECORD.--Jul 1924 to Aug 1925 (monthly discharge only), Dec 1959 to current year. GAGE.--Water-stage recorder. Datum of gage is 952.57 ft above sea level. Oul 11, 1924, to Aue< 31, 1925, aenrecording gage at site 1,000 ft downstream at aase datum. Dec 16, 1959, to Oan U, 1960, aonreoording gage at present site and datum. REMARKS.- -Records »"**• except fcbeaa for estimated daily discharges, which are poor. Bo known regulation. There are many smell diversions upstream from station for irrigation, but total amounts are unknown. EXTREMES OOTSTDE PERIOD OF RECORD.--Flood of Jun 3, 1957, reached a stage of 13.54 ft, from floodaarJcs. According to local residents, higher stages occurred in 1891 and Jua 1941. PEAR DISCHARGES FOR CORREKP YEAR.--Peak discharges greater than base discharge of 9,000 ft3/S* Discharge Gage height Discharge Gago height Date Tima (ft> Date Time (ft3/s) (ft) Dec 25 1700 13,900 6.70 Feb 20 1030 21,900 7.75 Jan 4 1930 12,400 6.52 Mar 17 unknown 59,800 10.80 DISCHARGE, CTOIC FEET PER SBCCttP, KSTHH TEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1998 DAUST MEAN VADDES DAY OCT JSXW DEC 0MT FEB MAR APR MAY 'JOS JOT, ADC SEP 1 eJ250 431 447 2730 3700 2130 3440 1490 712 1S5 87 221 2 eB50 411 482 2390 «45S0 2060 3020 1450 524 169 as 145 3 597 393 536 2420 eSlSO 2010 3180 1370 438 173 83 in 4 467 371 547 5710 •4600 1950 2980 13S0 380 174 100 94 5 386 355 796 7380 •3890 1890 2620 1330 347 .247 124 37 S 332 357 832 3500 3S10 244Q 2500 1330 344 399 133 83 7 297 376 802 2680 3290 3190 2860 1350 344 388 143 74 8 310 383 812 2550 .3070 3210 2850 1580 399 216 171 5S 9 307 375 800 3200 3070 3320 •2760 1530 395 214 170 S7 10 286 385 7S3 2590 3180 4600 2650 1300 392 191 121 51 11 307 431 561 2370 3080 3590 •2500 1250 537 154 112 45 12 472 588 461 2140 3070 2910 •2350 1220 589 137 109 41 13 791 S53 543 2040 3530 2620 •2070 1120 457 140 104 - 42 14 1730 690 493 1990 3920 2820 1310 1200 . 2*1 13S 141 44 15 1790 682 417 1360 3S20 5040 1940 1350 342 135 13S 51 IS 223Q 598 390 2070 3320 31100 1850 1430 317 149 163 SO 17 1770 529 390 2010 4020 e5300Q 1780 1370 299 142 140 78 18 1030 556 • 522'' 1880 7720 40900 1690 1070 286 144 125 73 19 718 614 783 Q17S0 IOOOO 33700 1680 1050 284 151 118 113 20 553 610 868 el650 19900 24400 173Q 1220 31S 15S 130 155 21 532 679 1220 •1560 . - 11800 •17200 1580 1170 270 151 112 114 22 516 730 1480 •1480 5860 •13400 1410 984 243 134 Id 93 23 S46 7S2 3230 •1410 5110. 9940 1330 •830 239 129 107 89 24 659 852 4590 •1310 4260 8050 1340 •780 235 125 110 71 25 786 855 12100 e!240 3720 S840 1300 o70Q 231 HI 110 51 26 737 80S 11300 1180 3330 5810 1830 62S 215 39 103 58 27 716 762 S570 1160 2860 S860 2180 620 189 99 105 53 28 661 69S 4700 1180 24SQ S510 1810 633 178 92 106 48 29 577 609 4410 1290 ... 4050 1570 70S 172 37 1C4 43 30 512 485 3680 1720 ... 3980 1430 845 159 90 107 39 31 465 3510 2440 ... 39S0 ... 1020 ... 84 317 -.. TOTAL 23186 17067 69025 71090 139620 • 311470 64140 35332 10223 4989 3944 2363 MEAN 748 569 2227 2293 4936 10050 2138 1140 341 161 127 73.0 MAX 2230 12100 7330 19900 53000 3440 1S80 " 712 399 317 221 MIM 286 as355s 390 116Q 2450 1890 1300 620 169 84 87 39 AC-FT 45990 33850 136900. 141000 276900 617800 127200 70080 20280 9900 7820. 4700 STATISTICS OF MONTHLY MEAN DATA FOR MATER TZARS 1960 • 1998, BY MATER TSAR (MY) MEAH 1S81 692 595 517 734 965 1150 2381 3505 874 318 1426 MAX 1490O 4960 4435 2293 4986 10050 13040 12470 24780 S947 • 10540 6381 (WY) 1937 1987 1992 1998 1398 1998 1997 1977 1995 1975 1995 1396 2EN 21.9 .96 2.99 5.53 8.37 7-97 .15 11.4 148 .058 1.29 32.2 (MY) 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1970. 1971 1971 1970 1370 1964 1983 - e Estimated Pace 78 RED RIVER BASIN 07308500 RED RIVER SEAR SOSEBORDETT, TX--Continued SUMMARY STATISTICS FOR 1397 CALENDAR YEAR FEE 1998 MATER TEAR MATER TEARS I960 - 1998 AKHnAL TOTAL 1272713 7524SS ANNUAL MEAN 3487 . 2062 1283 HIGHEST AWCTUJ MEAN 4424 1987 LOWEST ANMQAL MEAN 179 1964 HIGHEST DAILY MEAN 62800 Apr 27 53000 Mar 17 144000 Oun 6 199S LOKE9T DAILY MEAN 196 Ctea 14 39 Sep 30' .00 Jul 19 1964 ANSOAL SEgEK-DAY MDGMDM 305 On! 31 47 Sep 9 .00 Jul 19 1964 INSTAHTANEOCS PEAK FLCW ' 59800 Mar 17 174000 Jun 6 199S TNS1AMTAMEOPS PEAK STAGE 10.80 •Mar 17 15.90 Oct 21 1383 INSTANTANEOUS LOW FLCW .00 Jul 19 1964 ANNUAL RDEOFF {AC-FT} 2524000 1492000 929400 10 PERCENT EXCEEDS 7700 3960 2540 50 PEHCEMT EXCEEDS 855 716 310 50 PERCEHT EXCEEDS 377 104 53 N M A M 1397 1998 MATER YEAR Page 79 RED RIVER BASIN 07308500 RED RIVER HEAR BUHKBUKBim1, TX--Contiauad NATER-OIALITY RECORDS FERiro OF RECORD.- -Chemical analyses: May 1968 to current year. Biochemical analysest Oct 1974 to Aug 1994. Pesticide analysesi Oct 1973 to Sep 1982, Oct 1996 to Sep 1997. PERIOD OF DAILY RECORD.— SPECIFIC COHPPCTAHCEi Jul 1968 to Sep-1981, Oct 1994 to current year. KATER TEMPERATORE: Jul 1968 to Sop 1981, Oct 1994 to to current year. INSTRUMENTATION. - -From Dec 1968 to Sop 1979, specific conductance was continuously recorded at this station. From Oct 1394. to current year, specific t-r«-atnr*KTvti end water eenqperatura ware continuously recorded at this station. REMARKS.--Mean monthly and annual concentrations end loads for selected *^>«**-«T censticuenta have bees computed using the daily (or continuous) records of specific conductance and regression relationships between each chemical constituent and specific conductance. Regression, aquations developed for this station may be obtained from the Geological Survey District Office upon request. EXTREMES FOR PERIOD OF r»TrY RECORD..-- SPECIFIC COKDDCTANCE; Maximum, 17,400 ndcrosiemens, Jul 30, 1972] W*W4»»M», 462 aaveroslsrasns, Feb 24, 1997. HATER TEMPERATUREi Maximum, 36.CC, Jul 3, 1996r minimum, 0.0°C, en many days during winter swaths.. EXTREMES TOR CURRENT YEAR.— SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEi M^TI"1™! 8,070 nicrosiemens, May 19) minimum, 1,450 mieroslemans, Jul 7. WATER TEMraHATCRE: wmrin.^ 36.5%, Jul 14, 18 j mlnimm, 0.5°C, Dec 13. HATER-CjOAXiXTir DATA, WATER YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1993 DIS PH QXTCZN, HARD CHARGE, svs- RASER DIS HARD NESS MACNE- HOT. CIFIC HBQEZ SOLVED NESS wmcsRB CALCIUM .3XUH, COB EC CCB- JXELD TEMJER'- Q3C2CE2I, (PER TOTAL DX330D7 DIS DIS FEET DQCT- (STAND AT0RE DIS CENT (MC/L FLD. AS SOLVED SOLVED DATE TIME PER ANCB ARD HATER SOLVED SATOK- AS CAC03 (MG/X. (HG/L SECCH) (OS/CM) UNITS) (DEC C) (MC/L) ATTON) CACC3) (MG/W AS au AS MG> (000613 (00095) (00400) (00010) (00300) (003013 (00900) (00904} (00915) (00925) NOT 10... 1135 380 6110 8.1 7.3 9-8 85 1400 1200 370 112 25... 1015 860 5610 8.2 9^,9 10.1 S3 1200 1000 310 101 JAN IS... 1210 1960 5210 8.4 3.5 14.1 111 1200 1000 310 106 FEB 17... 1225 3930 5460 8.3 9.5 13.0 121 1100 910 280 100 MAR 18... 1430 39900 2470 7.8 12.0 10.3 100 470 400 130 •' 37 APR 30... 1040 1350 5250 8.2 16.0 10.0 107 1200 1100 300 114 MAY 20... UD5 1310 7110 8.1 23.5 8.5 106 1300 1200 340 115 28... 1020 604 5570 8.3 24.5 7.3 92 1300 1200 310. 117 JON 30.-- 1055 175 6650 8.1 27.5 5.7 76 1400 1400 340 144 JCL 28... 1240 90 6680 8-2 30.0 5.8 81 1400 1300 330 141 AOG 12... 1025 111 5460 8.0 26.0 7.4 96 1200 UOO 270 118 25... 1350 110 5870 8.3 -33.0 7.1 104 1200 1100 280 122 ALXA- SOLIDS, RESIDUE NTTRO- SCDXQM POTAS LINTTf CHLO FLUO SHIGA, SUM OF T&ttlr CEN, SODIUM, AD SIUM, MAT DIS SULFATE RIDE, RIDE, . DIS COBTT- AT 105 NITRATE DIS SORP DIS FIX END DIS DIS DIS SOLVED TGBHTS, DEC. C, DIS SOLVED TION SOLVED FIELD SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED QC/L DIS SUS SOLVED DATE 0C/L RATIO (MS/L CAC03 QdC/L (MC/L [MS/L AS SOLVED PENDED (MC/L AS MA} ' AS K) CMG/L* AS 904) AS CL) AS F) SI02) (MO/L) (HG/L) A3 H) (00930) (00931} (00935) (39036; (00945) (00940) (00950) (00955) (70301) (00530) (00618) EOV 10... 827 10 7.7 170 1100 1400 .47 8.5 3950 10 1.25 25... 739 9 6.3 180 uoo 1200 .45 11 3560 67 1.09 JAN IS... 713- 9 6.8 - 210 930 1100 .49 15 3310 192 1.40 FEB 17... 724 10 7.1 190 890 1200 .45 9.1 3280 198 _. MAR IB... 338 7 6.9 72 370 550 .28 8.4 1480 2320 .457 APE 30... 59 S 9 6.9 130 -1100 1100 .43 5.4 3390 98 .646 MAY 20... 994 12 8.9 100 1200 1500 .48 8.4 4320 312 .439 28... 740 9 8.1 71 1200 . 1200 .42 6.8 3550 46 .161 JON 30... 928 11 9.3 83 1300 1300 .51 11 4100 28 JUL .. 28... 937 11 $.$ 91 1300 1500 .49 13 4190 23 .- ADC 12... 742 9 9.1 81 1100 1200 .40 10 3440 29 .. 25... 808 10 8.7 72 1100 1300 .48 13 3640 33 -- Page 80 RED RIVER BASIN 07308500 RED RIVER NEAR BUREBUBNETT, TX--ContaxHWd RATER-aOALITY DATA, ftATER YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1998 NITRO NITRO NXTRO- NTTRO- PBDS- PBDS- GEN, GEN, CEN, NXT2D- GEN.AM- PH0S- H3DEOS PRATE, NXTRTTS BD2+K03 AMMDKXA N1TMO* GE3T, MBDIA +• PHOS FBDRUS ORTBD, ORTBO, DIS DIS DIS GEN, ORGANIC ORQUZLC PHORUS DIS DIS DIS ARSENIC SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED TOTAL DATS CMG/L (MG/L (MG/L QC/L (MC/L CMG/L (HG/L (MG/L (MG/L (MG/L (OG/L A3 N> A3 N) AS N) A3 N) ASH) ASH) ASP) AS P) AS P) A3 P04) AS AS) 100613)- (00631) (00506) (00600) (00605) (00625) (00665) (00666) (00671) (00660) (01002) NOV 10... .032 1.29 .103 1.8 - .46 .56 .053 <.010 .021 .06 2 25... .011 1.10 <.020 1.7 .63 .050 <.010 .026 .08 3 JAN .-- 15... .013 • 1.42 .024 2.1 -.63 .72 -111 .032 .035 .11 3 FEB . 17... <.010 1.13 •e.020 2.1 .98 .150 .035 .043 .13 3 MAR .- 18... .023 .480 '.143 4.1 3.5 3.7 1.49 .014 .022 .07 9 APR 30... .010 .656 .026. 1.6 .91 .94 .039 <.010 .015 .05 CHRO BARIUM, CADMIUM MIUM. CHRO COPPER, IRON, ARSENIC TOTAL BARIUM, RATER GADMXQM TOTAL MIUM, TOTAL COPPER, TOTAL IRON, DIS RECOT- DIS UNFLTRD DI3- RECOV DIS RECOV DIS RECOV DIS SOLVED gpawje SOLVED TOTAL SOLVED ERABLE SOLVED ERABLE SOLVED ERABLE SOLVED DATE (OC/L (DC/L (OG/L (TC/L MANGA LEAD, NESE, MAHGA- MERCURY NICKEL, SELE- SILVER, TOTAL LEAD, TOTAL NESE, TOTAL MERCURY TOTAL NICKEL, SELE HXOM, TOTAL RECOV DIS RECOV DIS RECOV DIS BECOV- DIS NIUM, DIS HBCCV- ERABLE SOLVED ERABLE SOLVED ERABLE SOLVED SHABLE SOLVED TOTAL SOLVED ERABL5 DATE (OG/L (DO/L (DO/L 1DG/L (UQ/L (UC/L (OG/L (OC/L (UQ/L (UG/L (UG/L A3 PB) AS PB) cAS MM) A3 MB) AS BC) AS BB) AS HI) AS MI) AS BE) AS SB) AS AG} (01051) (01049) (01055) (01056) (71900) (71830) (01067) (01065) (01147) (01145) (01077) NOV - 10... <1 <40 24 8.5 <.10 . <-l <100 <40 5" 6 ANNUAL RED RIVER COMPACT COMMISSION MEETING Beavers Bend Resort Park, OK May 4,1999 RED RIVER BASm PEAK DISCHARGE (CFS) AVERAGE DISCHARGE (CFS) MAXIMUM WY98 PERIOD OF RECORD WY98 07308500 174,000 59,800 1,283 2,062 RED RIVER NR BtHE^URNETT, TX 6-0645 3-17-98 39YRS 07315500 . 236,000 99,400 2,571 3,306 RED RIVER NR TERRAL, OK 6-07-95 3-1SV98 61YRS 07316000 265,000 98,800 3,343 4,267 RED RIVERNRGAINESVttT.E, IX 5-31-87 3-19^98 62YRS 07331600 201,000 57,400 4,919* 8,308 RED RIVER AT DENISON, TX 5-21-35 3-25-98 46YRS+ 07335500 - 400,000 56,500 9,478* 12,570 RED RIVER AT ARTHUR OTV, TX 5-28-08 1-06-98 54YRS++ 279,000 79,100 14,810 16,130 * jgg^Sx^iw&iG i#w$m (DI§C m 5-06-90 1-07-98 31YRS * AVERAGE DISCHARGE SINCE DEMSON DAM IN OPERATION + HAS 67 TOTAL YEARS OF RECORD ++ HAS 68 TOTAL YEARS OF RECORD Page 83 62 RED RIVER BASIN 07315500 RED RIVER SEAR TERGAL, CSC LOCATIOM.—Lat 33*52'43", long 97°SS,03*. Jefferson County, Hydrologic Unit 11130201, DAY OCT BOV DEC 3AH- FE3 MAR APR HAY JOB JUL ADG .SEP 1 2550 1360 1160 4170 . 3470 6050 6100 3010 1170 a570 138 •231 2 2200 1300 1100 3780 7970 5650 S720 2780 . 1210 •560 177 •266 3 1320 1220 1120 . 3410 8940 5250 5400 2830 947 •570 193 . «332 4 1780 1140 1200 3320 7620 4940 5490 2710 842 •590 218 •290 5 1670 1050 3290 8050 6190 4720 5450 2460 765 •750 218 •241 6 1470 991 1350 9150 5940 4610 5350- 2160 711 •1130 348 •212 7 1410 975 1560 9160 5660 4630 . 5070 1930 695 •1300 302 8192 8 1250 963 1630 8820 5290 5640 5110 1820 670 •1200 289 •183 9 2580 946 1600 7880 4650 8550 5500 1680 712 •1010 281 180 10 3150 943 1620 6760 4520 8870 5190 1690 • 1010 710 286 - 169 11 2010 347 1550 5770 4270 7000 4570 1640 1S50 500 ' 340 ' 164 12 2730 971 1470. 4950 3990 6800 4330 1430 1920 457 305 156 13 2150 1130 1280 4510 3950 6460 4250 1360 2560 419 291 165 14 2590 1240 1250 4340 4150 5000 3980 1320 2220 376 265 175 15 4150 1290 . 1290 4250 4490 6180 3490 1290 1340 362 274 166 16 3490 1280 1180 4480 4500 24100 3130 1360 908 370 274 • 177 17 2780 1260 1080 4600 4400 76800 2950 1540 758 334 295 ISO 18 2780 1170 1040 4S30 5610 84000 2840 1460 730 316 301 ' 182 19 2400 1090 1010 4430 8750 48900 2680 1290 712 303 267- 183 20 1920 1130 1140 4340 14700 27900 2650 1340 761 285 •231 191 21 1740 1150 2490 4260 12100 17400 2640 1460 633 279 •192 187 22 1610 1120 4130 4310 6820 11800 2570 1550 614 275 • •158 241 23 2110 1200 S06Q' 4300 7800 9310 2410 1370 570 261 •136 276- 24 1800 1240 6540 3990 7970 9660 2280 1320 S23 246 •108 , 263 25 1570 1240 7690 3550 7590 9360 2200 1250 S21 230 •123 255 26 2040 1310 803Q 3560 - - 7370 8410 2290 1180 510 224 •171 232 27 2000 1330 6150 3410 7260 7700 4210 1330 519 214 •241 213 26 1720 1370 4950 3160 6610 - 7B60 7520 1040 536 208 •263 195 29 1540 1320 4560 2900 ... 7590 4740 997 531 215 •259 182 30 1420 1230 4630 2650 ... 6780 3590 978 589 220 •252 165 31 1380 ... 4450 2640 6260 ... 1000 203 •231 TOTftL 65920 34906 84660 149470 135180 456000 123700 50395 27747 14687 7477 6244 HEM 2126 1164 2737 4822 6614 14710 4123 1626 925 474 241 - 208 MAX 4150 1370 8090 9180 14700 84000 7520 3010 2560 1300 348 332 HIS 1250 943 1010 2640 3470 4610 2200 978 510 203 108 156 AC-FT 130800 69240 168300 296500 367300 904500 245400 99960 55040 29130 14830 12380 STATISTICS OF JCHISLT MEWS DATA FDR WATER YEARS 1938 - 1998C, BY WATER YEAR (HY) ' MEM! 3047 1517 1150 956 1373 2030 2665 6675 6351 1670 1356 2069 MAX 23900 9713 11810 5306 9320 14710 18080 43580 . 37460- 8077 14730 9653 CWY> 1967 1967 1992.- 1992 1987 1998 1990 1957 1941 • 1950 1995 1986 MHJ 108 102 91.2 76.5 136 66.1 142 134 517 158 155 109 (WT) 1953 1940 1939 1940 1953 • 1940 1971 1371 1966 1964' 1370 1956 • Estimated Page 84 RED RIVER BASH! 07315500 RED RIVER BEAR TERRAL, CK—Continued SQMOKY STATISTICS TOR 1997 CALEHDAR YEAR FOEC 1998 WATER YEAR WATER YEARS 1938 - 1998z ANNUAL TOTAL 1S01760 1206586 AHBOALHEAN 4114 - 3306 2571 RICHEST ARHDAL MEAN 8925 1987 IOHEST AKtHUAL KERH 523 1953 HIGHEST DAILY HEAK 44200 Apr 28 84000 Mar 18 215000 Jua 7 1995 IOHEST DAILY HESS 551 Sep 19 108 Aug 24 46 Mar Z0 1940 AHHHAL SEVEH-DAY MDGHJM 603 Sep 13 160 Aug 20 • 47 War 18 1940 IHSTAHKUSECCS PEAK FIJCW 99400 Bar 18 236000 Jun 7 1995 IHSTANEftHEOOS PEAK STAGE 22.32 Her 18 33.60 Oct 22 1983 AHBOAL RUNOFF (AC-FT) 2979000 2333000 1862000 10 PERCEBT EXCEEDS 9640 7300 5700 50 PERCEST EXCEEDS 1840 1460 607 90 PEKCEST EXCEEDS 894 222 177 z Period of regulated streamflov. Page 85 RED RIVER BASIS 07308500 RED RIVER HEAR BCRKBUBMETT, TX LOCATIOfr. —Lat 34°06'36", long 98°31'53a, Cotton County, Okla.-, Bydrologic Unit 11130102, on downstream guardrail of downstxusa bridge on U-S. Highways 277 and 281, 2.5 ml northeast of Burkburcatt. and at mil* 933. DRAINAGE AREA.-20,570 mi3, of which 5,936 mi3 probably is noncontribBtiag. KATER-DISCEARGE RECORDS PERIOD OF RECORD---Jul 1924 to Aug 1925 (monthly discharge only), Dae 1959 to current year. CAGE.--Hater-stage recordar. Datum of gage is 952.57 ft above sea level. Oul 11, 1S24, to Aug 31, 1925, nenracerding gaga at site 1,000 ft downstream at smca datum. Dec 16, 19S9, to OSan U, I960, nenrecording gage at present sit« and datum. REMARKS.- -Records fair except those for estimated daily discharges. Which era poor. Bo known regulation. There are many small diversions upstream from station for ixzigatiaa, but total amounts ass unknown. EXTREMES OOTSTDB PSCCO OF RECCED.--Flood of Jttn 3, 1957, reached a stage of 13-54 ft, from floodmarfcs. According to local ' residents, higher stages occurred is 1891 and Oun 1941. PEAK DISCHARGES COR CURRBCT YEAR.—Peak discharges greater than base discharge of 9,000 ft3/s» Discharge Gage height Discharge Gaga height Date Time (ft) Data Time (ft) Doc 25 1700 13,900 6.70 Feb 20 1030 21,900 7.75 Jan 4 1930 12,400 6.S2 Bar 17 unknown 59,800 10.80 DISCBARGE, CUBIC FEET PER SECOH3, WATER YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPIEZffiSR 1998 DAILY MEAN VAIDES DAY OCT NOV DSC CSS FEB MAR APR MAY JOS JVlt AUG 5EP 1 •1250 431 447 2730 3700 2130 3440 1490 712 165 87 221 2 e850 411 482 2390 •4560 2060 3020 1450 524 169 88 145 3 597 393 536 2420 •5180 2010 3180 1370 438 173 88 111 4 467 371 547 5710 •4600 1950 2980 13S0 330 174 100 94 5 386 355 796 7380 •3890 1890 2620 1330 347 247 124 87 6 332 357 832 3500 3510 2440 2500 1330 344 399 133 83 7 297 376 802 2680 3290 3190 2860 1350 344 388 143 74 S 310 383 812 2550 .3070 3210 2850 1S80 399 216 171 65 9 307 375 800 3200 3070 3320 •2760 1530 395 214 17Q 57 10 286 385 7S3 2690 3180 46QQ 2650 1300 392 191 121 51 11 307 431 S61 2370 3080 3590 •2500 125Q 537 154 112 45 12 472 588 461 2140 3070 2910 •2350 1220 589 137 109 41 13 791 6SS 543 2040 3530 2620 •2070 1120 457 140 104 - 42 14 1730 690 493 1990 3920 2820 1910 1200 . 381' 135 141 44 15 1790 S82 417 1960 3620 5040 1940 1350 342 135 19S SI IS 2230 598 390 2070 3320 31100 1850 1430 317 149 163 60 17 1770 529 390 2010 4020 •53000 1780 1370 299 142 140 78 18 1030 556 • S22 ' 1880 7720 40900 1690 1070 286 144 125 73 19 718 614 783 •1760 10000 33700 1680 1050 284 151 118 113 20 559 610 868 •1650 19900 24400 1730 1220 31S 155 130 1S5 21 532 679 1220 •1560 . - 11800 •17200 1580 1170 270 151 112 114 22 516 730 1480 •1480 5860 •13400 1410 984 243 134 101 93 23 546 7S2 3230 •1410 5110. 9940 1330 •830 239 129 107 89 24 6S9 852 4590 •1310 4260 8050 1340 8780 235 125 110 71 25 786 855 12100 •1240 3720 6840 1300 •700 231 111 110 61 26 737 805 11300 1180 3330 5810 1830 625 215 99 103 SB 27 716 762 S570 1160 2860 5960 2180 620 189 99 105 53 29 661 695 4700 1180 2450 S510 1810 633 178 92 106 48 29 577 609 4410 1290 4050 1570 70S 172 97 104 43 30 512 485 3 680 1720 ... 3980 1430 845 169 90 107 39 31 455 ... 3510 2440 — 3950 ... 1020 84 317 TOTAL 23186 17057 6902S 71090 139620 • 311470 64140 35332 10223 4989 3944 2369 MEAN 748 569 2227 2293 4986 10050 2138 1140 341 161 127 79.0 MAX 2230 855 12100 7330 19900 53000 3440 1580 • 712 399 317 221 HEN 286 3SS 390 1X60 2450 1890 1300 620 169 84 87 33 AC-FT 4S990 33850 136900. 141000 276900 617800 127200 70080 20280 9900 7820. 4700 STATISTICS OF M0OTHLY MEAH DATA FOR WATER YEARS I960 •• 1998, BY HATER YEAR (HI) MEAD 1581 692 595 S17 734 965 1150 2381 350S 874 918 1426 HAX 14900 4960 4435 2293 4936 10050 13040 12470 24780 5947 10540 6381 CWY) 1937 1987 1992 1998 1998 1998 1997 1977 1995 1975 1995 199S HZK 21.9 .96 2.98 5.53 8.37 7.97 .15 11.4 148 .058 1.29 32.2 wo 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1971 1970 1970 1964 1983 e Estimated Page 86 S£D RIVER SASI2T 07303500 RED RIVER BEAR BUSKBORNETT, TX--Continued SUMMARY STATISTICS FOR 1597 CALENDAR YEAR FOR 1998 HATER YEAR KATES YEARS I960 - 1998 AKGEIAL TOTAL 1272713 752455 ANNQAL MEAN 3487 2062 1283 HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN 4024 1SB7 LCME3T ANNUAL MEAN- 178 1964 HIGHEST DAILY MEAN 62800 Apr 27 53000 Mar 17 144000 JUn 6 1995 LOK&ST DAILY MEAN 196 Jan. 14 39 Sep 30' .00 Jul 19 1964 ANSOAL SSVBJ-DAY MMEHDM 305 Jul 31 47 Sap 9 .00 Jul 19 1964 INSTANTANEOUS PEAK FLOW ' 59800 Mar 17 174000 Jun 6 1955 INSTANTANEOUS PEAK STAGE 10.80 Mar 17 15.90 Oct 21 1983 TK3TAKTJHSCCS LOW FLOH .00 Jul 19 1964 ANBOAL ROBPFF (AC-FT) 2524000 1492000 929400 10 EEKCEOT EXCEEDS 7700 3960 2540 50 ESHCEHT SPEEDS 855 716 310 90 EEKCEWT EZCEEBS 377 104 53 100,000 50,000 20,000 h a 10 000 o. & 5 000 at r> a 2 000 u z 1 ,000 M^ 500 aTO 200 z 100 H SO 20 10 N M A H 1997 1998 HATER YEAR Page 87 RED RIVER. BASIN 07308500 RED RIVER NEAR BURKBOHHETT, TX--ContJnuad WAIER-QCALITY RECORDS PERIOD OF RECORD.--Chemical analyses: Hay 1968 to current year. Biochemical analysesi Oct 1974 to Aug 1994. Pesticide analyses! Oct 1973 to Sep 1982, Oct 1996 to Sep 1997. PERIOD OF DAILY RECORD.-- SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE i Jul 1968 to Sep-1981, Oct 1994 to current year. KATER TEKPERATORE: Jul 1968 to Sop 1981, Oct 1994 to to current ywr. INSTRUMENTATION---From Dec 1968 to Sop 1979, specific conductance was continuously recorded at this station. From Oct 1994. to current year, specific conductance and water tesqperatuxa ware continuously recorded at thi» station. REMARKS.--Maan monthly and *Tnv"l concentrations and loads for selected rf*r^--M constltuanta bav* been computed using th* daily (or continuous) records o£ specific conductance and regression relationships between each cbaaical constituent and specific conductance. Regression equations developed for this station may be obtained from the Geological Survey District Office upon request. EXTREMES FOR PERIOD OF DAILY RECORD.-- SPECIFIC CONOOCTMCEi *fa-iri-fn»m 17,400 nicrosiemens, 3ttl 30, 1972} "*"<"". 462 mcrosiraaano. Fab 24, 1997. HATER TEMPERAIMREi Hmdmum, 36.0%, Jul 3, 19961 nrf-Fi™™, 0.0%, on many days during winter months. EXTREMES FOR CURRENT YEAR.— SPECIFIC CCSCDCrANZS) H""^*""", 8,070 mlerosismens, May 19j minimum, 1,450 microsiamans, Jul 7. WATER TEMPERATOHE; »«»•-; m.^ 36.5%, Jul 14, lBj mimsEOB, 0JC, Dec 13. KATSR-QUALITY IWT& , WATER YEAR OCHCBE B 199 7 TO SEPTEMBER 19!> 8 DIS PR CKXGBN, EAKD- CBARGE, SPE HATER DXS- HARD- SB9Q MOOSE* DOT. CIFIC fflBnU! sactfzo BESS NCnCARB CALCKZf . SICH, GUBXC CON- FIELD TEMPER- OESGEa, (PER TOTAL DISSOLV DIS DIS FEET Ducrr- (STAND ATORE DIS CENT ac/L ELD. AS SOLVED SOLVED DATE TIME PER ANCE ARD WATER SOLVED SATDR- AS CACOO (MSA (MC/L SECOSD (OS/CM) UNITS) ALKA- SOLIDS, NTTRO- SODIUM POTAS L3STTT CHLO FLU0-- SILICA, BOM OF TOTAL CES, 1 SCXMUM, AD- SIUM, TOO DIS SULFATE RIDE, RXDE, . DIS GQSTI- AT 105 NITRATE DIS SORP- DIS FIX END DIS DIS DIS SOLVED TOEtire, DEC. C, DIS SOLVED TICN SOLVED FIELD SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED QC/L DIS SUS SOLVED DATE oas/L RATIO (HC/L CAC03 OCA. (M2/L [HG/L . AS SOLVED PENDED (MG/L AS K&> ' AS K) 04E/L) AS SC4) AS CL) AS F) SICS) NOV 10... 827 10 7.7 170 1100 1400 .47 8.5 3950 10 1.25 25... 739 9 6.8 180 1100 1200 .45 11 3560 67 1.09 JAN 15... 713- 9 6.8 " 210 930 1100 .49 IS 3310 192 1-40 FEB 17... 724 10 7.1 190 890 1200 .45 9.1 3280 198 -- MAR 18... 338 7 6.9 72 370 550 .28 8.4 1430 2320 .457 APS 30... 696 9 6.9 130 -1100 1100 .43 5.4 3390 98 .646 HAY 20... 994 • 12 8.9 100 1200 1500 .48 8.4 4320 312 .439 28... 740 9 B.1 71 1200 . 1200 .42 6.8 3550 46 .161 JUN 30... 928 U 9.3 83 1300 1300 .51 11 4100 28 -- JUL 28... 937 11 9.$ 91 1300 1500 .49 13 4190 23 -- . AUG 12... 742 s' 9.1 81 1100 1200 .40 10 3440 29 .. 25... 808 10 8.7 72 1100 1300 .48 13 3640 33 -- Page 88 RED RIVER BASIN MATER-QOALITY DATA, WATER YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1998 NITRO NITRO NXTRO- STTRO- PBDS- PflDS- GEN, GEN, GES, NITRD- G£ff,AM~ PBDS- P33RDS PHATE, NITRITE H32+M33 AMMCKXA NITRO- GEN, MONDl +• PBCS- PBORUS CRIHD, ORTBQ, DIS DIS DIS GEN, ORGANIC ORGANIC PKORUS DIS DIS DIS ARSENIC SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED TOTAL DATE OE/L (MG/L (MG/L (HC/L (MS/L (MS/L (M3/L OC/L CC/L QC/L (UC/L A3 N> AS m A3N) A3 H) A3 S) AS B) AS P) AS P) AS P) AS P04) AS AS) (00613)- (00631) (0060B) (00600) (00605) (00625) (O0665) (00666) (00671) (00660) (01002) HOT 10... .032 1.29 .103 1.8 - .46 .56 .053 <.010 .021 .06 2 25... .011 1.10 <.O20 1.7 .-- .63 .050 <.010 .026 .08 3 JAN IS... .013 1.42 .024 2.1 .63 .72 -111 .032 .035 .11 3 FEB . 17... <.010 1.13 <.O20 2.1 .98 .150 .035 .043 .13 3 BAR .- 18... .023 .480 '.143 4.1 3.5 3.7 1.49 .014 .022 -07 9 APR 30... .010 .656 .026. 1.6 .91 .94 .089 <.0l0 .015 .05 <5 MAY 20... .027 .466 <-02O 2.0 * .. 1.5 .200 .010 .019 .06 3 28... .020 .181 .022 1.3 1.1 1.1 .111 .069 <.010 3 JUN -- 30... <-010 <.050 .040 — 1.0 1.1 <-010 <.D10 •C.010 •4 JUL . 28... <-010 .109 .046 .97 .81 .86 .041 .011 .011 .03 5 AUG 12... .010 <.050 .059 .. .85 .91 .031 <.01O .015 .05 5 25... <.01O •c.OSO <.020 1.0 .044 <-010 <-O10 5 CBRO- BARIUM, CAmUDM XXUM. CHRO COPPER, IRON, ARSENIC TOTAL BARIUM, HATER CADMIUM TOTAL MIUM, TOTAL COPPER, TOTAL IRON, DIS RECOV DIS UNPLTBD DIS RECOV DIS RECCV- DIS RECCff- DIS SOLVED ERABLE SOLVED TOTAL SOLVED ERABLE SOLVED ERBBLE SOLVED ERABLE SOLVED DATE (UG/L (OG/L (OC/L (UG/L (UG/L (UG/L (UG/L (DG/L (UG/L (DG/L (UG/L AS AS) AS BA) A3 BA) AS CD) AS CD) AS CR) AS CS) AS GDI AS CD) A3 BE) AS FE) {01000} (01007) (01005) (01027) (01025) (01034) (01030) (01042) (01040) (01045) (01046) S3? 10--. 2 <100 SS <1 <4.0 <1 <1.0 <1 <40 310 <22 25... 2 <100 87 <1 <5.0 2 «1.0 2 <50 580 MANGA LEAD, NESE, KABGA- MERCURY NICKEL, S&£~ SILVER, TOTAL LEAD, TOTAL SESS, TOXAL MERCURY TOTAL NTCKgL, SELE- NCTK, TOTAL BECCV- DIS RECOV-' DIS RECOV DIS BECCV- DIS muK, DIS RECOV ERABLS SOLVED ERABIE SOLVED ERABLE SOLVED BRABLE SOLVED TOTAL SOLVED ERABLE DATE fOG/L (DG/L (DG/L (OG/L (UG/D (UG/L (UC/L (UG/L (DD/L (OG/L (DG/L A3 PB> AS FBI tAS MB) A3 USD AS BC1 AS 32) AS sn AS HI) AS BE) A3 SB) A3 AG} (01051) (01049) (01055) {01056} (71900J (71890) (01067) (01065) (01147) (01145) (01077) NOV - 10... <1 <40 24 8.S <-10 . <.l <10O <40 5" 6 07308500 RED RIVER NEAR BURABURME1T, TZ--Coatinied TOTER-GUALrrY DATA, HATES TEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1998 znc, CSLOR- SILVER, TOTAL Z33E, DANE, EBDRIN HEPTA- DIS RECOV DIS- TBCS- DX- HATER HEFTA- CfTLOR - TOX- SOLVED ERABLE SOLVED ALDBIK, HICAL ELDRTN GBFLTRD CHLOR, EPOXIDE LDBANE APBENE, DATE (UG/L (OG/L (UG/L TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL EEC TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL AS AG) A3 ZM) AS ZN) (UG/L) (UG/L) (DG/L) (DG/L) (UG/L) (DG/L) (UC/L) (DG/L) (01075) {01092} (01090) (39330) (39350) (39380) (39390) (39410) (39420) (39340) (39400) NOV 10... <1.0 MONTHLY AND ANNUAL MEANS AKO LQADfl FOR OCTOBER 1397 TO SEPTEMBER 1998 SPECIFIC CONDUCT DIS DIS DIS DIS BIO- DIS ANCE SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED HARDNESS DISCHARGE PATCRO- SOLIDS SOLIDS CHLORIDE CHLORIDE SULFATE SULFATE (CA,MS) MJflH YEAR (CFS-DAYS) (MG/L) (TONS) (BC/L) (TONS) (MS/L) (TONS} (M=/L) OCT- 1997 23186 5360 3370 211300 1200 74490 950 59780 1100 HOV. 1997 17057 5640 3550 163700 1300 58250 990 45760 1100 DEC. 1997 69025 4070 2570 47B600 870 162600 760 142100 880 JAN. 1998 71090 4580 2890 554900 990 190900 840 162200 970 FEB. 1998 139620 4620 2910 1097500 1000 37S900 B60 322400 990 MAR. 1998 311470 3060 1930 1624100 630 525700 610 510300 700 APR. 1998 64140 4830 •3050 527400 uoo 182500 880 153000 1000 MAY 1998 35332 5730 3610 344500 1300 123200 1000 95590 1200 JUNE 1998" 10223 5240 3300 91130 1200 32120 930 25300 1100 JULY 1998 4989 5740 3620 48720 1300 17460 1000 13480 1200 AUG. 199 B 3944 5790 3640 3BB10 1300 13890 1000 10760 1200 S EST 1398 2369 5370 3380 21650 1200 7700 950 6060 1100 TOTAL 752455.00 •»» *» 5202400 •** 1764600 *. 1547200 — HTD-AVG. 2060 4060 2560 ** B70 *. 760 »* 880 Page 90 RED RIVER BASIN 0730S500 RED RIVER NEAR BURKSORNETT, TX--Continued SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (HICROSIEHEN3/CH AT 25 DSG.C), HATER YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 199S DAY MAX MTU MEAN MAX MTN MEAN MAX MB? MEAN MAX MTM MEAN OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY 1 — •3950 5950 5890 5930 eS920 4510 4070 4280 2 ... ._. •4400 5980 5300 5930 6130 5890 5970 4880 4500 4650 3 ...... 04860 6010 5940 5980 6210 5910 600Q 5100 4880 4960 4 5130 4920 5020 6000 5890 5950 6330 6200 6250 5280 2900 4730 5 5240 5130 5200 5930 5730 5810 6390 5940 6250 2900 2350 2450 6 5130 4340 4560 5830 5670 5750 6010 5590 5790 3650 2660 3330 7 5280 4150 4640 5770 5640 5710 5590 5370 5470 3770 3580 3660 B 5410 4800 5240 ...... •5640 5520 S390 5420 4710 3770 4100 9 5440 46B0 5230 ...... •5310 5710 5520 5610 5060 4710 4860 10 5580 5430 5490 ...... •5930' 5700 5640 5670 5010 4200 4490 11 5610 5430 5540 6060 5S20 6010 5930 5600 5710 4570 4060 4330 12 5540 5010 5330 5970 5600 5360 6320 .5930 6180 4610 3060 4390 13 5700 ' 5040 5270 5600 5210 5300 6530 5960 6160 4800 4500 4700 14 5830 ' 5420 5590 5370 5090 5230 6600 6270 6400 4930 4790 4850 15 5420 5040 5150 5600 5320 5440 6700 6450 -6610 5160 4920 4960' 16 G230 5190 5710 5890 5600 S770 6700 4350 6490 ... •5230 17 5150 5020 5460 6390 5390 6210 6660 6410 6550 ...... •5330 18 5020 4800 4870 S320 5200 5430 6690 6560 6620 ... .-- e5380 19 5070 4830 4950 - 6020 5060 5760 G630 6120 6500 ... — •5420 20 5250 S070 5170 6180 6020 6130 6120 5040 5640 ... •5460 21 5360 5220 5280 6180 5860 6060 5040 4330 4660 ... •5510 22 5550 5350 • 5450 5860 5480 5700 4740 4330 4450 _.- ... •S600 23 5600 5350 5480 5480 52B0 5360 5430 4740 4920 ...... •5640 24 5390 5200 5310 5590 5390 5470 6470 5430 6160 ...... •5680 25 6030 5310 5500 --- ... •5200 — •2650 ... e5720 26 6320 6010 6160 -.. ... •5260 .-- ... •3110 ___ e5770 27 6450 6320 6390 ...... •5360 __. ... •3350 5630 5530 5580 28 6460 S340 6390 ...... •5420 ...... •3510 5670 5600 5S30 29 6610 6220 6470 ...... •5540 ...... •3810 5700 5650 56S0 30 6220 6070 6120 ...... •5700 ... __. •3920 5770 5690 S730 31 6130 5900 6010 ... — •4060 6150 1B00 4570 MONTH 5360 5690 5350 4920 DAY MAX UTN MEAN MAX ma MEAN MAX KIN MEAN MAX MIS MEAN FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL KAY 1 4480 4200 4350 4380 4310 4340 4420 4210 4320 5220 4850 5050 2 4330 4060 4220' 4340 4300 4320 4460 4170 4390 5310 4910 5090 3 4150 3420 3640 4340 4300 4320 4490 1540 4200' 5720 5240 5660 4 3510 3400 3460 4300 4220 4270 4310 4180 4230 6000 5660 5810 5 3680 3460 3560 4250 4210 4230 4490 4290 4340 6020 5900 5960 6 4090 3570 3750 4360 4100 4190 4690 4490 4590 S970 5B20 5900 7 4040 3810 3930 4610 3900- 4200 4740 4470 4650 5860 5680 5730 8 4200 3990 4100 ;-- ..- •4000 4300 4540 4680 5770 5450 5670 9 -.. ... •4300 ... .-- •3300 5060 4790 4920 6130 3590 5210 10 ...... o4700 ... •3600 4960 4770 4840 5470 3570 4280 11 5220 5010" 5110 ..- ___ •4000 --. --. •4820 S320 5350 5530 12 5180 5090 5140 ...... •4300 ... .._ •5000 6000 5690 5330 13 5090 4770 4930 — ... •4580 ...... •5150 6350 6000 6120 14 4900 4720 4810 5480 4480 4820 ...... •5320 6360 6260 6320 15 5070 4760 4840 5510 4510 5200 5420 5260 5350 6940 6130 6310 16 5090 4970 5020 4510 1980 2980 5570 - 5160 5470 7120 6300 6820 17 5330 4930 5150 .-- ... •1800 5700 5530 5650 6300 5630 5830 18 5330 4670 5190 ...... •2500 • 5730 5550 5640 5640 5090 5530 19 5350 4920 5300 2980 2820 2890 5630 5530 5580 B070 5450 7130 20 5360 3860 4970= 3170 2910 3040 5620 5480 5570 B030 5750 6370 21 5090 4230 4900 3260 3120 3200 5630 5450 5590 ...... •6030 22 4450 4100 4380 3400 3240 3330 5620 5490 5560 --- ... •5190 23 4530 4450 4490 3540 3380 3460 5880 5610 5760 •*-- ... ,•5240 24 4470 4410 4430 3620 3430 3520 6050 5880 5950 ...... •5280 25 4410 4350 4400 3720 3490 3610 59B0 56B0 5840 ... •5320 26 4350 4290 4320 3800 3600 3720 5630 4S30 5350 ...... •5370 27 4360 4260 4280 3900 3740 3820 5240 1960 3B90 - 5510 5060 5310 28 4400 4360 .4380 4030 3840 3940 4670 2070 2680 5590 5370 S490 29 ...... 4100 3940 4040 5420 2130 3620 5660 5300 5460 30 --- ...... 4200 4080 4140 5370 5030 5200 6350 5430 5730 31 ...... 4310 4140 4220 — ... — 6410 5380 5SS0 MONTH 4500 3820 4940 5710 Page 91 BED RIVER RAS2N 07308500 RED RIVER REAR BDRKBORNETT, TX- -ConH.Tittad SPECIFIC COPOCPBES (MICROSIEMERS/CM AT 25 DEG.C), HATER YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1998 DAY MAX MOT MEAN MAX MTK MEAN MAX MIN MEAN MAX MOT MEAN JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER 1 603 0 5700 S890 6700 6S10 5670 6610 S250 6500 3920 3320 3450 2 S710 4930 5230 6780 6600 6S60 6730 6500 6590 3890 3480 3640 3 5040 4890 4960 6850 5660 6750 S550 6070 •6520 4780 3890 4300 4 sno 4940 5080 6660 5540 ' 6600 6590 6030 6260 5290 4780 5060 5 ... e5140 6550 4620 5820 6250 5910 6110 5610 5290 5430 6 " ...... eS190 5910 4410 SS60 5970 5720 5680 5620 5600 5660 7 , 5460 4810 5240 4430 14S0 3700 5950 5670 5830 5870 5710 5800 8 5330 4160 48B0 ...... S4580 S910 5440 5760 6030 5840 5920 9 ...... •3680 ... — •5090 5530 4910 5250 6170 5490 6030 10 --'- ... •3700 ... — eSl20 ' 5580 4910 5220 6460 5210 6070 11 ... e3800 — eS930 5570 5170 5330 7120 5950 6570 12 ... •3300 — ... e5980 60SO S340 5710 6990 6770 6920 13 ... •4200 ... •'•.. •6000 6120 6010 6060 6990 5780 6700 14 .;. •5700 ... •6020 6140 6040 6090 7040 6820 6920 15 -•* ... •5900 6240 5020 6130 6230 ssoo 5890 7100 6740 6950 IS ...... e6200 6340 6240 5260 S730 5340 5520 7140 6B70 7070 17 eSlBO 6260 6020 6160 5690 5350 5450 7030 6440 6690 18 ... •6000 6100 5950 6020 5930 5690 5810 6490 5850 6060 19 ...... •5800 • 6090 5850 5980 6040 5BB0 5950 6400 5690 5980 20 ...... •SO00 6130 S920 6020 5930 542Q 5730 6740 4420 5870 21 ...... •6050 6010 5490 5820 5760 5400 5600 4420 3830 4020 22 ... •6080 5980 5820 seao 5930 5700 S800 4330 3930 4090 23 ... •6100 5910. 5710 5790 6070. 5540 5900 4410 4200 4300 24 ... a6050 6090 58Q0 5980 5910 S750 5830 5220 4250 4720 25 — — •6010 6040 S700 5930 .5890 5710 5600 6300 5220 5740 26 ...... e6040 6130 4730 5450 5800 5630 5740 6780 6300 6520 27 6150 5820 S970 . 6580 5270 6230 5920 5720 5780 6B50 6740 6790 28 6380 6150 6240 5700 4600 6480 6030 5680 5970 6910 6760 6830 29 5610 6380 6460 6520 4640 6060 59S0 5820 5880 6790 6570 6680 30 6690 5570 6630 6390 6000 • 6190 5950 5650 seoo 6850 6610 6SO0 31 ...... 6500 6060 6250 6200 3920 5430 MONTH ...... 5460 — — 5910 6730 3920 5840 7140 3320 5790 • Estimated TEMPERATURE, MATER fl>EC. C), HATER YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1998 DAY MAX HTM MEAN. MAX HEK HBAK MAX MEN MEAN MAX MEAN OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEH3ER. JAHGARY 1 27.1 22.8 24.8 17.5 14.5 15.9 10.5 9.7 10.1 B.7 4.3 5.4 2 15.3- " 12J. 13.5 9.9 9.4 9.6 13.7 8.4 10.9 3 ...... 14.5 9.3 12.0 9.5 6.3 83 14.9 12.4 13.6 4 26,4 20...9. 23.3 16.8 10.7- 13.6 9.2 4.5 6.7 14.5 103 12.4 5 25.3 20. S 23.2 17.3 13.0 15.0 7.4 3.9 S.7 10.2 9.4 9.B 6 25.3 21.8 23.4 15.1 10.5 12.7 6.6 4.3 S3 9.9 B.l 9-5 7 24.0 21.6 22.7 14.4 9.3 U.7 6.7 5.1 5.3 e.i 4.7 6.1 B 26.0 21.7 23.5 14-7 9.4 11.9 8.4 S.4 5.7 5.5 3.5 4.6 9 -26.2 22.6 24.2 12.0 8.9 10.6 9.9 7.5 7.0 3.3 5.3 10 25.6 23.0 24.2 9.4 7.0 8.0 6.8 4.s.o1 5.2 5.9 4.4 4.8 u 24.0 22.3 23.0 9.7 5.3 7.5 4.1 2.6 3.2 S.l " 43 4.6 12 22.4 18.8 21.5 9.3 6.B B.l 4.6 1.9 3.0 8.9 5.1 6.5 13 20.0 15.8 17.9 8.9 7.1 6.3 5,4 -5 2-3 • 6.6 43 5.1 14 20.2 15.6 17.8 8.6 4.6 7-0 7.0 1.8 43 4.6 3.9 4.2 15 20.9 15.1 18.3 e.9 3.3 5.0 6.6 3.0 5.6 . 6.4 2.3 4.3 16 21.5 16.9 18.9" 8-0 2.7 5.2 9.1 4.5 6.6 8.1 4.5 6.1 17 19.0 16.1 17.1 7.0 3.5 5.2 9.3 4.4 6.$ 9.5 5.8 7.S 18 19.9 14. B 17.0 9.B 3.8 6.6 9.7 4.9 73 10.4 6.S 8.4 19 20.8 15.2 17.7 11.1 5.9 S.4 10.8 5.B 83 8.9 6.3 . 7.S 20 17.7 IS-6 16.5 12.1 7.4 9.7 B.B S.O 6.6 10.0 6.9 B.2 21 16.9 14.5 15.5 • 12.3 8.2 10.2 S.l 4.5 4.B 83 73 7.9 22 15.9- 12.5 14.2 13.4 9.1 11.0 5.2 3.9 4.5 7.2 6.0 6.7 23 16.7 13.5 15.0 13.4 3.B 11.0 •4.9 4.5 4.6 6.9 5.7 6.0 24 20.4 15-2 17.4 13.9 9.1 11.4 5.2 3.6 4.S 6.9 5.1 S.S 25 18.3 10.4 15.8 14-8 8.7 12.2 5.2 4.2 4.3 8.4 6.6 7.2 26- 10.4 6.2 . 8.3 14.6 11.7 12.9 .5.3 3.5 4.3 32.0 8.0 9.6 27 12.7 6.5 9.4 14.7 11.2 12.9 S3 2.7 3.9 10.9 6.8 B.B 28 14.9 9.1 ' 11.7 17.1 13.6 15.0 4.8 3.0 3.9 9.6 8.0 8.8 29 17.3 10.9 14.0 14.0 9.B 11-2 5.3 2.0 3.7 • 11.6 8.4 . 9-7 30 19.7 14.4 16.7 11.0 8.1 9.6 7.0 3.6 53 12.9 8.6 10.7' 31 20.0 14.1 16.9 ...... 6.9 4.2 5.6 12.5 11.1 11- s MONTH 17.5 2.7 10.4 10.8 .5 S.S 14.9 2.3 7.7 Page 92 RED RIVER BASIN 07308S00 BED RIVER HEAR BURKBURNEIT, TX--Continued TEMPERATURE, HATER (DEC. C), HATER YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1998 DAY MAX HOT MEAN MAX HZM SON MAX HZS MEAN MAX MOT MEAN FEBRUARY MAHCH APRIL MAY 1 13.4 103 11.7 10.6 9.7 10.0 ... — 25.7 17.0 21.2 2 13.3 9.5 113 9.7 8.9 9.3 ... _.. ... 27.1 19.3 22.7 3- 11.1 8.5 9.1 9.4 3.6 9.0 --- ... ._. 26.1 1B.9 22.3 4 8.5 6.0 7.4 9.8 9.0 9.4 173 U.S 143 25.8 .193 22.4 5 6.8 4.4 5.6 10.0 9.3 9.9 13.4 12.7 153 28.8 20.3 24.0 6 6.6 2.9 4.7 9.8 3.0 93 18.8 14-7 16.7 29.7 22.6 2S.4 7 8.3 43 6.1 9.0 8.0_ 8.8 19.0 143 16.4 29.3 213 25.2 8 10.4 6.1 8.0 ...... 18.7 14.5 16.4 26.0 19.8 23.0 9 12.3 7.2 10.1 — __. ... 293 13.9 16.4 23.1 18-7 20.3 10 113 8.9 10.3 --- ...... 20.a 14.7 17.5 27.4' 17.8 22.3 11 11.8 7.0 9.4 ...... — 1-. ... 27.7 193 233 12 10.0 73 8.7 ...... 293 19.0 23.9 13 10.7 7.4 8.9 ...... -- ... 28.8 213 24.8 Id 11.4 8.3 9.7 123 73 9.6 ...... 283 223 25.3 15 11.2 9.9 103 13.1 11.4 123 243 18.6 213 26.5 22.4 24.4 16 .93 3.4 9.1 ...... -• 20.3 15.1 17.5 27.4 20.6 23.7 17 10.5 73 9.0 ...... -.. 18.1 13.8 16.0 28.0 22.0 24.5 18 10.9 83 9.6 ...... -.- 213 13.4 17.1 29.3 223 25.5 19 11.5 9.2 10.3 - ... .._ ... . 22.6 15.4 18.9 29.7 22.6 25.3 20 12.4 9.4 10.9 — ...... 19.1 13.4 16.0 2B.6 22.7 25.4 21 11.7 10.0 10.5 -...... 19.5 11.4 15.5 ...... 22 10.3 9.8 10.0 ... .-- ... 22.7- 14.4 18.3 ...... ---.- 23 12.9 10.3 10.4 ...... 23.4 153 19.4 23.8 21.7 22.6 24 10.8 103 10.6 ...... 22.3 15.5 19.1 28.6 20.9 24.4 25 11.5 10.8 U.1 — ... 24.5 16.5 20:1 23.0 22.8 25.2 26 11.7 U.S 11.6 ... — 203 15.6 IB.6 29.0 22.6 25.8 27 11.7 11.6 11.7 ...... 19.3 13.8 16.7 29.4 24.0 26.6 28 11.7 10.6 11.3 ...... 16.1 13.0 14.0 31.6 23.7 27.4 25 ...... -.- ... 17.6 rt.4 14.6 31.2 25.4 28.0 30 ... ..- . --. — ._. ... 23-1 13.3 17.9 28.5 243 26.6 31 — — — — ... — . 29.9 23.4 26.4 MONTH 13-4 2.9 9.6 HAY MAX MOT MEAN MAX HTM MEAN MAX MEN MEAN MAX ML? MEAN JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER 1 30.9 24.9 27.7 353 27.0 30.8 34.5 25.1 293 33.0 25.1 28.7 2 29.4 23.4 263' 34.5 26.7 30.1 34.0 23.4 28.7 33.1 24.5 28.8 3 30.9 23.1 26.7 33.5 25.4 29.1 34.7 23.3 28.6 32.2 25.0 28.5 27.9 23.8 26.1 31.7 25.7 23.4 32.4 23.7 27.7 32.5 24.0 27.9 5a 23.8 18.1 20.8 28.7 25.0 26.6 293 25.4 27.4 33.0 24.1 28.0 6 26.7 173 21.6 34.4 26.1 30.0 32.1 24.0 28.0 33.6 23.8 27.8 7 24.5 19.1- 21.6 35-9 28.6 - 31.9 34.6 25.0 29.1 34.4 23.4 23.3 8 27.7 1S.7 233 33.9 26.7 30.1 32.0 243 27.6 33.7 24.2 23.5 9 34.8 27.9 31.0 32.6 24.4 28.2 31.5 23.8 263 10 ...... 35.2 27.0 30.9 323 23.5 26 3 29.3 19.8 24.3 11 ... 34.7 263 303 29.7 24.2 26.5 28.0 21.9 24.6 12 ...... 35.5 26.9 30.6 . 33.2 24.7 28.3 25.5 21.6 23.1 13 ...... 363 27.6 31.0 34.0 24.4 23.6 27.7 21.7 23.9 14 ...... -.. 363 27.1 31.4 31.7 25.5 28.6 32.4 22.3 26.8 IS --- ... 38.3 27.4 313 35.0 25.5 29.6 30.7 23.3 26.4 16 29.4 23.5 26.3 34.8 25.7 29.9 33.5 25.4 29.1 28.9 23.1 25.3 17 30.1 22.3 263 35.7 25.9 303 33.6 2S.1 28.3 31.4 23.4 26.3 18 32.2 243 27.6 36.5 27.2 313 32.1 24.7 273 31.6 23.5 27.1 19 32.3 24.5 23.1 " 34.9 26.3 30.6 31.9 2S.5 283 31.0 23.6 27.0 20 323 25.1 28.3* 35.1 263 303 323 2S.1 28.7 30.8 23.0 26.4 21 30.7 25.0 27.6 343 25.8 29.5 32.3 25.4 28.8 30.7 233 26.4 23 32.4 23.4 273 353 25.4 29.7 32.4 25.1 28.5 25.4 20.6 23.4 23 32.0 23.9 273 35.8 25.1 293 33.7 24.9 28.8 27.9 193 22.9 24 31.2 233 26.7 35.4 25.4 30.0 33 3 25.1 28.9 313 22.5 26.2 25 31.2 23.4 26.8 34.6 26.0 30.0 35.5 2S.8 293 30.4 223 2S.4 26 32.0 23.4 27.3 34.7 24.7- 293 34.6 26.3 29.9 30.0 21.7 25.2 27 33.9 24.8 28.7 34.7 243 . 283 ' 32.8 253 28.8 32.5 23.1 27.1 23 34.2 25.7 29.5 34.5 24.8 29.0 31.5 24.7 27.4 35.1 24.6 23.8 29 3S.0 25.9 29.9 33.5 24.1 233 33.4 233 27.8 33.6 24.0 28.1 30 353 25.5 29.9 33.5 233 23.0 333 23.5 23.1 32.0 23.0 27.1 31 ...... --. 34.1 23.3 23.5 323 25.1 283 ...... MONTH 36.5 233 293 35.5 233 28.4 35.1 19.8 26.5 Page 93 RED RXVBR BASIN 07316000 RED RIVER NEAR GAINESVILLE, TX , B LOCATION.—Let 33°43'40", long 97°09 3S , in SK V4 sac.36, T.9 3., R.l E-, lev* County, OK, Biydrologic Quit 11130201, on downstream right hank at end of bridge on Interstate 35, 0.2 mi downstream from Gulf, Colorado, and Santa F« Railway Co. bridge, 5.0 ml downstream from Fish Creek, 4.5 mi southwest of Thackerville, OK, 7.0 mi north of Gainesville, and at mile 791.5. HATER-DISCHARGE RECORDS DRAINAGE AREA. —30,782 nda of which 5,936 mi2 probably is inoncontraiuting. PERIOD OF* RECORD.--Kay 1936 to currant yaar. Monthly diachaxgs only for soma periods, published in WSP 1311. REVISED RECORDS.--HSP 1211: Drainage area. GAGE.--Hater-stage recorder. Datum of gage is 627.91 ft above sea level. Prior to Jan. 17, 1939, and Feb. 13, 1965 to Nov. 14, 1966, nonmcording gaga at same site and datum. REMARKS.--Records poor- Flow slightly regulated by Lake Roup (station 07312000 in Texas), since 1943 by Lake Altus (station. 07302500 la Oklahoma), since 1946 by Lake Rlckapoo (station 07314000 in Texas), since 1967 by Lake Arrowhead (station 07314800 in Texas) and Boss Lake (station 07315950 in Texas). 0.3. Amy Corps of Engineers' satellite talamatar at station. PEAK DISCBARGES FOR CURRENT YEAR.--Peak discharges greater than base discbarge of 24,000 ftJ/«- Discharge Gage height Discharge Gaga height Date Taffla (ft) Date Time (ft3/o) (ft) Max 19 1030 102,000 29.62 No other peak gxoater than base discharge. DISCHARGE, CUBIC FEET PER SECOND, HATER YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1998 DAILY MEAM VALUES DAY OCT NOV DSC 3KS FEB MAR APR MAY JUM JUL AUG SEP 1 3250 •1450 •1430 4780 3550 7340 9090 7070 •1250 570 •410 •308 2 • •2390 •1400 1440 4270 3410 6810 8450 4340 el300 c550- •415 •305 3 •2080 el370 1440 3320 7S40 6170 7910 3260 •1290 •490 •420 29S 4 •1940 1340 1400 3610 14400 -5600 7410 3000 1280 e4S5 410 e2S5 5 el830 •1300 1340 4380 12600 4990 7130 2940 1240 •470 •400 359 6 •1630 •1250 1250 11800 8500 4630 7030 2760 1080 e490 •390- 395 7 •1560 •1200 1340 15500 7640 5100 6730 2480 989 eSOO e330 339 8 el400 ellSO 1460 19100 7050 6240 6330 2240 •970 •S30 •470 302 9 •2700 •1100 1580 16900 6510 7140 e6000 2110 955 .•520 •560 276 10 •2800 •1080 1570 14000 5960 9910 •6200 2010 1020 •aoo •450 258 11 •3180 •1100 1S30 12100 5240 11S00 •5800 1970 e!050 •890 371 250 12 e2900 •1200 1550 9430 4360 10200 •5200 I860 O1300 •730 361 •229 13 •2330 &1280 1490 6920 4S10 . 8160 •4900 1810 el350 •610 398 •224 14 •2860 •1310 1410 60S0 4190 7050 •4700 1670 elSOO 570 424 •216 15 02900 •1370 1290 •5600 . 4140 6650 4510 1630 •1800 •550 408 210 16 •3000 •1360 1240 - 5410 4370 16400 4010 1500 «1200 •500 334 253 17 •3380 01350 1240 5290 4730 54300 3480 "1580 elOOO •480 359 308 18 •3150 1330 1190 5430 4810 38900 3210 1540 •950 •460 354 •290 19 •2650 •1300 1120 S350 5020 98800 3000 1610 •900 •440 360 •274 20 •2160 •1280 1170 5160 12400 65400 2890 1560 elSOO o420 383 •247 21 1980 •1300 1630 4980 18600 33800 •2750 1470 •1600 e400 376' e233 23 •1760 •1280 2670 6160 13900 24400 •2700 1520 •1800 •390 346 224 23 •2310 •1350 4750 7770 11600 17500 . •2600 1590 •1300 380 328 329 24 •1940 •1380 6S80 6840 9510 •14800 •2500 1600 •900 •380 320 331 25 •1710 •1400 10300 5450 8550 14500 •2400 1550 eS50 •385 324 288 26 •2230 •1450 13500 •5300 8230 14200 •2350 1540 •630 e380 324 •319 27 •2100 el470 12500 •6000 7310 13600 •2500 •170O 0620 •285 314 310 28 •1800 •1500 9010 5530 7590 12300 •4500 •1800 •610 e390 314 301 29 •1700 •1450 6960 4310 ... 11100 10000 •1600 •S90 •395 •317 290 30 •1600 •1430 SGS0 3940 ... 10100 9720 el400 •5B0 •400 •315 268 31 •1500 5050 3750 9640 ... •1300 ... •405 •312 TOTAL 70720 39530 106410 224990 217520 507230 156000 66130 33204 15345 11697 8526 MEAN 2281 1318 3433 7258 7769 19590 5200 2133 1107 495 377 234 MAX 3380 1500 13500 19100 18800 98800 10000 7070 1300 890 560 395 MOT 1400 1080 1120 : 3610 3410 . 4630 2350 1300 580 - 380 312 210 AC-FT 1«0300 78410 211100 446300 431500 1204000 309400 131200 65860 30440 23200 16910 STATISTICS OF MONTHLY MEAN DATA FOR HATER YEARS 1937 •- 1998, BY HATER YEAR (HY) MEAN 3832 1990 1640 1296 1878 2899 3593 8167 3414 2184 1641 2552 MAX 31080 14020 14990 7258 9984 19590 27400 47780 43510 9857 20730 12880 tHY) 1942 1942 "1992 1998 1987 . 1998 1990 19S7 1941 ' 1950 1995 1986 MOT 119 137 12S 82.4 151 90.5 153 204 640 166 163 108 (WY) 1953 1955 1940 1940 1953 1940 1971 1971 1966 1964 1570 1956 a Estimated Page 94 RED RIVER BASIN 07316000 RED RIVER NEAR GAINESVILLE, TX—Continued SUMORY STATISTICS FOR 1997 CALENDAR YEAR FOR 1998 HATER YEAR HATER XEARS 1937 - 1998 ANNUAL TOTAL 1962368 1557302 ANNUAL MEAN 5376 4267 3343 BTCHEOT AIWUAL MEAN 11890 1987 IOHEST AEOTAL MEAN 651 1953 HIGHEST DAILY ISAM 58500 Apr 29 98800 Mar 19 232000 Hay 31 1987 LOWEST DAILY MEAN 791 Jan 17 210 Sep 15 48 Jan 18 1940 JSBS&L SEVEN-DAY MOTIMOM 839 sap 18 234 Sap 10 48 Jan IB 1940 INSTANTANEOUS PEAS FLOW . 102000 Mar 19 265000 May 31 1987 INSTANTANEOUS PEAK STAGE 29.62 Mar 19 40.08 May 31 1987 ANNUAL RDNCFF (AC-FT) 3892000 3089000 2422000 10 EERCQJT EXCEEDS 130Q0 9560 7400 50 PERCEMT EXCEEDS 2060 1600 869 90 PERCENT EXCEEDS 1060 336 217 100,000r 50,000 200 i- l J L 100 J L M J F A M J J A S 1997 1998 HATER YEAR Page 95 RED RIVER BASIK 07316000 RED BXVER NEAR GAINESVILLE, TX—Continued HATSR-QUALTTY RECORDS PERIOD OF RECORD.--October 1994 to current year. PERIOD OF DAILY RECORD.— SPECIFIC CCMDUCTAHCB; October 1994 to currant year. HATER TEMTHULTORE: October 1994 to cnrrent year. INSTRUMENTATION. - -Water-quality monitor since October 1994. REMARKS. --Samples were collected asntbly, and specific conductance, pH, water temperature, alkalinity and dissolved oxygen were deter- mined in the field. EXTREMES FOR PERIOD OF DAILY RECORD.•- SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE: f^'Wj 7,800 microsiemens July 15, 16 1997; miaiimsn, 402 microsiemens Nov. 14, 1994. HATER TEHEEKATURE: WnH"•"•'. 36 3*C July 15, 1998; ^"^" , O.Ot several days in winter months. EXTREMES FOR CURRENT YEAR.-- SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEi Maximum, 6,130 microsieaoaos May 25» minimal,, 739 mierosiemens Mar. 18. HATER TEMEOTATUREJ Maximum, 36.5°C Jttly 15; mimimim, 2.0"C Dec. 13. MISCELLANEOUS HATER-O0ALIT7 DATA, HATER YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1998 SAMPLE BARO DIS- PH LOC METRIC AGENCY AGENCY CHARGE, SPE HATER ATION, . EHES- COL- ANA INST. CIFIC HH3LE CROSS TEMPER- SURE LECTOTG LYZING CUBIC CCS- OXYGEN, VI H?f JV SECTION ATDKE (MK SMOTE SAMPLE FEET GAGE DCCT- DIS (STAND DATE TIME (FT FM HATER OF (CODE (CODE PER BEXGHT ASCE SOLVED ARD It BANK) [DBG O BO) NUMBER) NUMBER) SECOND (FEET) (MG/L) UNITS) (00009) <[00010 } (00025) (00027) (00023) i[00061 ) {00065} (us/a(O0O95o) (00300} 'E00400 ) SEP 22... 1153 9O.0 27.5 752 1028 1028 224 7.55 4520 7.7 7.6 22... 1156 80.0 27.5 752 1028 1023 224 7.SS 4330 7.5 7.6 22... 1159 70.0 27.5 752 1028 1028 224 7.SS 4510 7.6 7.6 22... 1202 60-0 27.5 752 1023 1023 224 7.55 4510 73 7.6 22... 1205 50-0 27.5 752 • 1023 1028 224 7.55 4510 73 7.6 22-.- 1208 40.0 27.5 752 1028 1028 224 7.55 4510 7.5 7.6 22... 1211 30.0 27.5 752 1023 1028 224 7.55 4510 7.4 7.6 22... 1214 20.0 27.5 752 1028 1028 224 7.55 4510 7.5 7-S 22--. 1217 10.0 273 752 1028 1028 224 7.55 4S10 7.5 7.6 22... 1220 50.0 27.0 752 1028 1028 224 7.55 4520 7.6 7.6 22... ill* 40.0 27.0 752 1023 1028 224 7.SS - 4510 7.5 -7.6 22... 1226 30.0 27.0 752 102S 1028 224 7.SS 4510 73 7.5 22-.- 1229 20.0 27.0 752 1028 1028 224 7.55 4510 73 7.6 22... 1232 10.0 27.5 752 1028 1028 224 7.55 4510 7.4 . 7.6 WATEa-QOAiaTY DATA, HATER YEAR OCTOBER 1957 TO SEPTEMBER 1998 DIS PH BARO OXYGEN', AGBCY AGENC7 CHARGE, SPE HATER METRIC DIS HARD- COL- ANA- 1K>T. CIFIC HEDLE PRES SOLVED NESS LECTI3S LYZQJG CUBIC . - CON FIELI]i TEMPER-- TEMPER SURE OXYGEN, (PER TOTAL SAMPLE SAMPLE FEET DUCT (STAHEI - ATDRE ATUKE (M« DIS CENT OC/L DATE TIME (CODE (CODE PER ANCE ARD AIR WATER OF SOLVED SATUR* AS NUMBER) NUMBER!) SECOND' (US/CM) UNITS) (DEC C)i (DEC C) EG) WE/L) ATICd) CAC03) (00027} (00028;) (00061) (00095) (00400) (00020]1 (00010) (00025) (00300) (00301) (00900) OCT 21. .. - 1430 1028 80020 1980 S070 8.6 13.0 17.5 758 123 129 920 NOV 04- .- 1430 1028 80020 1340 4920 6.S 22.0 14.0 750 12.2 123 860 DEC 10- 0830 1028 80020 1570 5000 8.5 S.S 7.0" 750 113 98 980 JAR 14. -• 1200 1028 8O02O 6070 2290 83 4.0 5.5 754 U.S 93 490 FEB 11. .- 1SQ0 1023 ' 80020 5120 2430 83 18.0 10.5 755 12.0 109 590 MAR 19. .. 1530 1023 80020, 100000 1090 7.9 6.0 12.0 749 3.7 . 82 220 APR 16. .. 1615 - 1028 80020 3950 3220 8.4 22.0 21.5 748 113 131 720 MAY 21. * * 1315 1028 80020 1440 4930 8.0 31.0 26.5 750 7.1 91 1100 JUN 10. • • 1400 1028 80020 1020 4260 3.3 26.0 26.5 748 83 107 920 JUL 14. .. 1930 1Q28 80020 570 3660 8.1 39.5 35.5 745 9.6 144 640 AUG 19. .. 1200 1028 80020 362 4400 3.4 33.0 30.0 754 3.4 114 870 SEP 03. .. 0845 1023 80020 295 5030 3.1 24.S 27.0. 745 53 69 950 * Page "96 RED RIVER BASIN 07316000 RED RIVER NEAR GAINESVILLE, TX—Continued HATER-QUALITY DATA, HATER YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1998 BARO BICAR CAR- ALKA- NESS HAG8E- SODIUM . POTAS BONATE BGNATS LmiTV CHLO H3NCAKB CALCIUM SIDM, SODIUM, AD SIUM, WATER HATER HAT DIS SULFATE RIDE, BISSOEV DIS DIS DIS SORP DIS DIS IT DIS IT TOT IT DIS DIB- FLD. A3 SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED TION SOLVED F33EID FIELD FIELD SOLVED SQCVED DATE CAC03 OC/L OC/L (MS/L SODIUM RATIO CMS/L MG/L AS MS/LAS iC/L AS CM3/L (MS/L (M3/L) AS CA) AS WSJ AS NA) PERCENT AS K3 8C03 C03 CACC3 AS S04) AS CL) (00904) (00915) (00925) (00930) (00932) (00931) (0093S) (0O4S3) (00452) (39085) (00945) (00940) OCT' 21... 830 240 79 746 64 11 8.1 105 4 93 740 1200 NOV 04... 770 210 78 664 62 10 8.2 93 S 34 790 1100 DEC 10... 820 250 86 660 59 9 2.1 201 *0 165 820 1100 JAN 14... 350 130 42 285 56 6 63 172 0 141 350 430 FEB 11... 420 . ISO 52 285 51 5 S.8 203 0 166 430 . 420 MAR 19... 130 60 17 124 54 4 5-1 105" 0 86 140 190 APR 16... 590 180 S6 390 54 6 1.2 251 -0 124 590 620 MAY 21... 970 260 104 637 56 S 33 149 0 122 950 1000 JOBT 10... 780 230 85 548 SS 8 6-7 166 0 136 740 860 JUL 14... 580 140 68 469 60 .8 37 65 0 S3 550 810 AUG 19... 770 200 87 599 60 9 9-6 HO 7 102 730 970 SEP 03... ' 340 220 97 695 61 10 9.8 140 0 IIS 810 1100 SOLIDS, RESIDUE NITRO NH5D- NTTRO- ttLTtaj- NITRO NITRO FLDO- SILICA, SOM OF SOLIDS, SOLIDS, TOTAL GEN, GEN, GEN, GEN, GEN, GEN, RIDE, DIS CONSTI- DIS DIS AT 105 NirRATS NnSATE NITRITE NITRITE ND2+N03 AMMDNXA DIS SOLVED TUENTS, SOLVED SOLVED DEG. C, DIS DIS DIS DIS DIS DIS SOLVED oas/L DIS {TCBB (SCKB SUS SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED DATE (MS/L A3 SOLVED PER PER PENDS) flNG/L (MC/L (MS/L (MC/L (MG/L (MC/L AS n SI02) 0M3/W AC-PTJ DAY) (MC/L) AS N) AS N03) AS N) AS N02) A3 N} A3 N) (0095O) (00955) (70301) (70303) (70302) (00530} (00618) (71SS1) (00613) (718S6) (00631) (00608) OCT 21... 36 43 3040 4.13 16200 • 106 <310 <.OS0 <315 NOV ------04... .34 4.7 2930 3-99 10600 39 -031 .10 <.05O <320 DEC -. -- 10... 37 73 3030 ' 4.12 12900 85 -- .. <.010 .. 1.05 <320 axa~ 14... -34 9.8 1330 1.81 21800 360 364 3.8 .016 .05 380 .027 FEB 11... .37 8.8 1450 1.98 - . 20100 232 397 4.0 .013 .04 .910 3S9 MAR 19... .20 7.3 591 30 160000 - 1140 <„010 3S1 .098 APR ------16... .37 3.5 1920 2.61 20500 231 <-010 <.050 . .033 MAY ------21... 39 4.6 3090 431 12000 40 .010 -03 <.050 .068 JUN '- -- 10... .30 7.8 2560 3.49 7060 34 <.01Q .102 -023 JCfL ------14... .43 2.4 2120 238 3260 49 .. _. .011 .04 <.oso .051 AUG 19... , .50 9.9 2670 3.63 2610 ------.010 .03 <.050 .084 SEP , 03... .53 10 3030 4.12 2410 48 « -- .011 .04 <.050 .075 *pH of filtered sample <8.3; tbarafore no carbonate value. Page 97 RED RIVER BASIN 07316000 RED HTVER NEAR GAINESVILLE, 'EX--Cent z uniec[ HATER-CUAIJTY DATA, HATER YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1358 N2TRO- KTTRCl - PBOS- PB3S- CEN, MPTSCi - GEN,AK- FHOS- ' FHQRU3 PHATS, BARIUM, AMMSSXA GEN, MONIA + NXTRO- PEDS- FH3RUS ORTBO ORTBD, ARSENIC TOTAL BARIUM. DIS- ORGANIC ORGANIC SEN, PHORUS DIS DIS- DIS• ARSENIC DIS! - KSCCV- DI3- SOLVED TOTAL TOTAL> TOTAL TOTAL SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED TOTAL SOLVED ERABLE SOLVED DATE (MS/L (MG/L (MS/L (MS/L (MG/L (MG/L (M3/L (MS/L CDC/L COG/L (UC/L (UG/L AS JK4) AS m A3 N) AS N) AS P) AS P) AS PJ A3 P04) AS AS} A3 AS) A3 BA) AS BA) (71346) (00S05) (00625) (00600} (00665) (00666)i (00671]) (00660) (01002) (01000) (01007) (01005) OCT 21... .. -- 1-4 -- .133 <310 <310 .. 2 2 200 214 NOV * 04... -- ..- 37 .. .062 <-010 <-010 .. 2 2 CHRO MANGA CADMIUM ' MIUM, CHRO- COPPER, IRON, LEAD, NESE, HATER CADMIUM TOTAL MTCM, TOTAL COPPER, TOTAL IRON, TOTAL LEAD, TOTAL UNPI/TKD DIS RECOV DIS RECOV DIS KECOV- DIS RECOV DIS RECOV TOTAL SOLVED ERABLE SOLVED ERABLE SOLVED EBABIE SOLVED ERABLE SOLVES ERABLE DATE (UG/L (DG/L (DG/L (UC/L (UC/L (UG/L CDG/L (UG/L (UC/L Page 98 RED BTVMt^ QASid 07316000 RED RTVER NEAR GAINESVILLE, TX- -Continued HATER-QUALITY DATA, HATER YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1998 MANGA MERCURY KICKSL, SELE SILVER, ZINC, NESE, TOTAL MERCURY TOTAL NK3EL, SELE NIUM, TOTAL SHIVER, TOTAL ZINC, DIS RECOV DIS RECOV DIS NIUM. DIS RECOV DIS RECOV DIS SOLVED ERABLE SOLVED ERABLE SOLVED TOTAL SOLVED ERABLE SOLVED ERABLE SOLVED DATE (UG/L CUG/L (UC/L (UC/L (UG/L (UG/L (UG/L (UG/L CDS/L (DG/L CDC/L AS HN) AS BO) AS HE) AS HI) AS HI) AS SE) AS SE) AS AC) AS AC) AS 2H) AS ZH) (01056) (71900) (71890) (01067) (01065) (01147) (01145) (01077) (01075) (01092) (01090) OCT . 21... <4-0 <30 <:i <100 <40 3 2 <1 AGENCY AGENCY COL- ABA- AROCLOR AROCLOR ARCCL0R ARCCLOR AROCLOR ARCCLOR ARCCLOR LECTXBC LYZTJSG 1016 1221 1232 1242 1248 1254 1260 SAMPLE SAMPLE _PCB _PCB PCB PCS PCB _PC3 PCS DATE TIME (CODE (CODE TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL NUMBER) NUMBER) (UC/L) ' (UC/L) (DG/L) (UG/L) (UC/L) (UC/L) (DS/L) (00027) (0002B) 134671) (39483) (39492} (39496) (39500) (39504) (39S08) FEB • 11... 1600 1028 30020 , <-100 CHLOR- C3LCR- CBLOR- DANE DAKE DANE, CT? " TRANS ENDRD5 2NDRIB ESPTA* TECH HATER HATER DI- HATER ALDE HEPEA- CHLOR AIDRIB, NICAL HEQLE HHULE ELDRHJ UNFLTRD HYDE CHLOR, EPOXIDE LINDANE DATE TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL- TOTAL TOTAL REC TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL (DQ/L) (DG/L) CUC/L) (UG/L) (UC/L) (UG/L) (UG/L) (DC/L) (UC/L) (DG/L) (39330) (39350) (39062) (39 065) £39330) (39390) (34366) (39410) (39420) (39340) FEB 11... <.040 <-100 <.100 <300 <.020 <-060 <300 -C.030 -c.SOO <.O30 JUN 10... <.O40 <-100 <.100 <.1Q0 <-020 <.060 <300 <.030 •C.8O0 <-030 BETA . DELTA ENDO- SUMMf- HEXA- BEXA- I HSDO- EN0O- TCX- CRLGR- CHLOR- ALPHA P,P' P,P- P,P' HATER SULFAN SULFAN APHENE, IDE IDE BBC DDT, DDD, DDE, HHOLE II SULEATE DATE TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL REC TOTAL TOTAL (TC/L) (UG/L) (UG/L) CUG/L) (UG/L) (DC/L) (DG/L)' (UG/L) (UG/L) (DC/L) (39400) (39333) (34259) 139337) (39300) (39310) (39320) (34361) (34356) (34351) FEB 11... <2-00 <-030 <.090 <.030 <.100 <-100 <.O40 <-10O <.O40 <300 JUN 10... <2.00 <-030 <-090 <-030 <-100 <.ioo' <.040 <-100 <-040 <.600 Page 99 RED RIVER BASIN 07316000 RED RIVER NEAR GAINESVILLS, TX- -Continued SPECIFIC CONPOCTABCS OalCROSIEHENB/CM AT 25 DEG.C) , HATER YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1993 DAY MAX MIN MEAN ' MAX MEN "MEAN MAX MEN MEAN MAX KIN MEAN OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY 1 2320 1970 2140 S040 4720 4900 4350 4270 4310 3660 34S0 3600 2 2720 2320 2500 S230 5010 5140 4310 4100 4210 3460 33S0 3390 3 2990 2720 2870 S230 5180 S190 4160 4030- 4110 3500 3350 3420 4 3260 2990 3120 5130 4760 4980 4060 4000 4020 3500 3140 3370 5 3550 3260 3410 4820 47S0 4790 4420 4010 4060 3140 2430 2620 6 3850 3550 3710 4780 4730 4740 4890 4420 4750 3290 1930 2S90 7 4090 3850 3950 4780 4710 4730- 4990 4790 4920 1930 93S 1240 8 4130 4000 4060 4940 4710 4820 4940 4790 4360 1010 914 970 9 4300 4090 4200 S070 4940 5C10 5010 4840 4930 986 844 894 10 4450 4300 4370 5140 5040 . 5090 5250 4350 5070 977 339 937 11 4450 3630 4090 S190 S130 S170 5190 4940 5060 1310 977 1140 12 3680 2140 2470 •5090 4940 4780 • 4860 1790 1310 1500 13 2650 2360 2450 ... 485..0. 4990 4860 4770 4810 2250 1790 210O 14 40B0 2650 3390 498sub0 4860 4910 5130 4850 4980 2380' 2240 2310 15 4060 3180 3470 4830 4720 4870 5180 5100 5150 2550 2370 2470 16 4190 . 3200 3610 5090 4840 4930 5120 4970 S030 2790 2550 2680 17 4180 2450 2930 5220 5060 5170 5320 49S0 5080' 2930 2790 2870 18 3140 2490 2750 5130 4910 5070 5470 5300 5410 2950 2670 2850 19 3900 3140 3580 - 4910 4810 4B40 5610 5310 5460 2680 2660 2670 20 4580 3900 4220 4BS0, 4800 4830 -— •52B0 2720 2670 2690 21 5070 4580 4920 4890 4300 4770 4380 4110 4470 2700 2410 2650 22 4980 4270 4610 4S20 4290 4380 4140 3420 3830 2420 2110 2300 23 4280 3750 3990 4940 4510 4740 3420 2270 2690 2170 I860 2020 24 3780 3690- 3730 S230 4940 5030 2270 2000 2110 2080 1890 1950 25 3330 3700 3770 5540 5230 5330 2130 1340 1610 2440 1940 2260 26 4010 3830 3910- 56BO 5540 S61C 3060 1620 2360 2250 1690 2080 27 4200 4010 4130 S670 5300 S530 3140 2820 29S0 2310 2080 2230 28 4420 3980 4140 5300 4860 S090 2840 2610 2730 2300 2080 2170 29 4450 3480 3930 4860 4640 4760 2610 2510 2540 2630 2140 2410 30 4060 3480 3720 4640 4360 4510 3140 2590 2850 2890 2630 2750 31 4720 4080 4420 ... 3S90 3140 3390 3070 2890 3010 MONTH 5070 1970 3630 4970 4130 3660 344 2330 BAY MAX KEN MEAN MAX MIN MEAN MAX MEN MEAN MAX MIN MEAN FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY 1 3360 306Q 3200 4160 3950 4050 2580 2460 2S00 1490 1280 1360 2 3590 3360 3510' 4160 - 4100 4150 2830 2580 2710 2240 1430 1B40 3 4480 2450 3710 4100 4020 4050 2850 2810 2840 2760 2240 2520 4 2450 1560 1790 4030 3990 4020 2820 2780 2800 2970 2750 2390 5 2520 1900 2290 4120 39S0 4010 2820 2780 2800 3120 2970 3070 6 2000 1700 1790 4150 4120 4130 2880 2310 2350 3OB0 2950 3020 7 1790 1700 1740 4140 1290- 2920 2850 2690 2770 3000 2930 2960 B 2050 1790 1910 2800 2500 2620 2740 2690 2720 3250 2990 3140 9 2270 2050 2170 2800 2590 2710 2950 2720. 2B20 3600 3150 3350 10 2360 2270 2330 2730 2530 2610 3070 29S0 3000 3810 3600 3690 11 2490 23 SO 2420 2710 2170 2340 3090 2870 2980 3870 3 BOO 3850 12 2710 2480 2600 3100 2160 2540 2950 2870 2910 4050 3350 3920 13 2950 2710 27B0 ' 3320 3100 3260 3240 2940 3120 4420 40SO 4290 14 3380 2950 3160 3340 3060 • 3190 • 3330 3240 3280 4410 4250 4340 15 3640 3380 35S0 3070 2500 2920 3340 3230 3320 4300 4070 4140 16 3750 3640 3690 2540 332 1590 3290 3180 3230 4170 4050 4100 17 3750 3590 3640 1530 S2S 1100 3380 3170 3220 4350 4140 4240 IB 3610 3500 3580 925 739 BOO 3640 3380 3540 4500 4320 4410 19 3610 3370 34S0 1250 341 1040 37S0 3630 3700 4730 4490 4S90 20 3630 3190 3360- 1370 1250 1320 3780 3660 3750 4770 46 60 4730 21 3210 2600 2910 1540 1370 1440 3800 3720 3760 5130 4750 S070 22 2600 2150 2280 1740 1540 1650 3830 3790 3810 5170 4720 5010 23 2230 2170 2210 1770 1720 1740 3320 3780 3800 4720 4600 4650 24 2230 2160 2190 2000 1770 1880 3820 3790 3800 5600 4650 4390 25 2900 2230 2560 2210 1990 2110 3840 3750 3310, 6130 5450 5920 26 3320 2900 3170 2290 2210 2240 3350 3310 3740 5530 4610 4940 27 3350 3280 3300 2330 2290 2310 3630 3420 3500 4620 4110 4360 23 3950 33S0 3660 2370 2270 2300 3710 3390 3SS0 4110 3740 3920 29 .-- ...... 2540 2370 2480 3680 1380 2050 3320 3720 3750 30 ...... 2590 2480 2540 1450 12B0 13B0 ...... •3710 31 ...... — 2560 2480 2510 — ...... C3730 PWTH 4480 1560 2320 4180 739 2S30 38S0 1280 3140 ...... 3880- Page 100 RED RIVER BASIN 07316000 RED RIVER NEAR GAINESVILLE, TX--Continued SPECEFXC CCBDQCTANCE CMECROSIEMEKS/CM AT 25 DEG.C), HATER YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1998 OAT MAX MIN MEAN MAX MIN MEAN MAX MIN HEAR MAX MIN MEAN JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER 1 ...... •3770 4390 4230 4320 4260 4060 4160 4990 4920 4950 2 ...... •3800 4540 4390 4460 4300 4140 4230 5050 4940 5000 3 -.- •3840 4620 4530 4560 4460 4240 4350 5230 5040 5130 4 ...... •3870 4680 4600 4630 4530 3720 4330 5130 5020 5070 5 --- ... •4000 4680 4550 4620 4540 4320 4460 5160 5000 5070 6 ...... •4030 4590 4530 4560 1640 4520 4560 5320 S1S0 5230 7 ...... •4070 4650 4580 4600 4880 4620 475Q 5330 5220 5280 8 ... •4100 4680 4600 4650 5190 4870 5050 5710 5270 5480 9 ...... •4130 4660 4390 4S70 5220 5000 5100 5760 5310 5620 10 ...... •4150 4390 3790 4140 5410 5130 5260 5310 4580 4960 11 4120 3140 3610 3790 3220 3600 5510 5380 5460- 4580 4120 4350 12 3740 3220 3470 3220 2770 2930 ...... •5280 ... --. •4000 13 3520 3310 3380 3520 3110 333Q ...... •4510 ... •3870 14 3680 3500 3600 3670 3510 3610 ...... •4320 ...... •3730 15 3500 2850 3060 3600 3440 3530 — --'- 04550 ... -r. . •3590 16 .3330 2550 2810 . 3380 3450 3640 ... •4580 3710 3330 3570 17 2910 2780 2S30 4100 3370 4020 ...... •4430 3560 3130 3400 IS 2950 2850 2920 4360 4100 4240 ... _-. •4430 4110 3250 3680 19 3180 2350 3070 * 4430 435Q 4390 ...... •4400 . 4200 40B0 4150 20 3160 2150 2390 4480 4400- 4460 ' 4650 4470 4540 4420 4170 4270 21 2410 1630 1930 4620 4450 4S10 4670 4420 4560 4520 4360 4440 22 1650 1430 1530 4700 4570 4630 4650 4440 4580 4580 3960 4450 23 1660 1440 1530 4620 4460 4S20 4960 4650 4780 4530 4170 43S0 24 2420 1470 1850 4770 4570 4670 5120 4960 5050 4170 3380 4000 '25 3700 2420 3120 . 4330 473Q 4790 5000 . 4820 4930 4080 3790 3940 26 4110 3700 3940 4920 4780 4B60 4920 4700 4B00 4740 3870 4310 37 4230 4100 4160 4810 4500 4710 4960 4690 4850 5140 4740 5030 28 4310 4060 4220 4530 4250 4420 5010 4250 4850 53S0 5140 5190 29 4160 4060 4130 4320 4070 4230 5020 4880 4550 5450 5350 5400 30 4290 4160 4240 4260 4030 4140 5030 4820" 5020 5370 4960 5190 31 — — 4210 4020 4120 5080 4860 4980 ' ...... MONTH ...... 3390 4920 2770 4270 — ... 4710 ...... 4560 • Estimated _ TEMPERATCEE, MATER (DEC. C), HATER YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1998 DAY MAX MIN MEAN MAX MIN MEAN MAX MIN MEAN MAX MIN MEAN OCTOBER a OVEMBER DEcEHBE E JANQAKX 1 263 243 253 183 17.0 18.0 113 11-0 11.5 73 5.0 S.S 2 273 24 3 253 17.0 • - 15.0 16.0 11-0 11.0 113 11.0 7.0 9.0 3 26.5 24.0 2S3 153 13.0 143 11.0 9.0 103 13.5 11-0 12.5 4 26.0 23.0 243 15.0 123 - 14.0 103 8.0 93 . 143 13.5 14.0 5 253 223 24.0 17.0 14.5 153 83 7.0 8.0 133 12.5 13.0 6. 25.5 23 3 243 153 12.5 14.0 8.0 6.0 73 123 10.5 11.5 7 25.0 243 243 14.0 11.0 123 7.5 63 7.0 10.5 8.0 9.0 8 24.5 23.0 24.0 143 11.5 13-0 83 6.5 73 3.0 63 7-0 9 26.0 23.0 243 133 123 13.0 10.0 7.5 83 6 3 5.5 6.0 10 26.0 243 253 123 9.0 10.5 8.5 6.5 73 5 3 5.0 5.5 11 253 233 24.5 113 83 9.5 6-5 5.0 53 53 53 5.0 12 233 21.5 23.0 103 8.0 9.5 S.O 33 43 6.5 53 6.0 13 21.5 193 203 103 83 9.S 4.5 2.0 3.5 6.5 53 6.0 14 20.5 173 19.0 9 3 7.5 9.0 6.0 3.0 43 53 5.0 •5.5 15 21.0 173 19.0 93 7.0 8.0 7.0 33 53 6.0 43 5.0 16 20-5 173 19.0 ; 9.0 6.0 73 8.5 5.5 63 6.5 4.5 S.5 17 20-5 183 193 73 6.0 7.0 83 S.O 7.0 7-0 5.0 6.0 18 -193 17 3 183 93 6.0 7.5 9.0 6.0 73 83 S3 7.0 19 20.0 17.0 133 103 73 9.0 11.0 7.5 9.0 8.5 6.5 7.5 20 213 18.0 193 113 9.0 10-0. 10.0 73 9.0 83 7.0 83 21 19.5 163 18.0 123 93 11.0 83 73 8.0 93 83 8.5 22 163 15.0 16.0 13.0 ' 10.5 11.5 7.0 6.0 $.5 8.0 63 7.Q 23 15.5 14.5 15.0 133 10.0 11.5 6.5 6.0' 63 6.5 5.0 5-5 24 18.5 15.0 163 13.0 103 113 6.0 5.5 53 6.0 4.0 S.O 25 19.5 16.5 183 143 U.S 13.0 6.0 53 53 6.0 5.0 5.5 -26 16.5 11.5 13.0 163 14.0 15.0 6.0 5.0 53 73 6.0 7.0 27 133- 10.0 113 16.5 14.0 15.5 5.5 43 53 9.0 63 7.5 23 14.0 11.0 123 163 15.0 16.0 5.0 • 4.0 43 10.0 B.Q 9.0 23 15-5 12.5 14.0 153 123 14.0 5.0 3.5 43 11.0 8.5 9.5 30 18.5 1S.0 17.0 123 11.5 12.0 6.0 4.0 5-0 113 . S3 10.0 31 20.5 173 18.5 ...... 6.0 43 53 113 10.0 10.5 M3NTH 27.0 10.0 20.0 183 6.0 11.9 113 2.0. 63 143 4.0 7.7 Page 101 RED RIVER BASIN 07316000 RED RIVER NEAR CAISESVILTZ, TX--Contanned TEMPERATURE, HATER, (DEC. C), HATER YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1998 DAY MAX MEN MEAN MAX MIN MEAN MAX MEN MEANT MAX MEN MEAN FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY 1 L2.0 10.5 113 12,0 103 U.O 183 16.5 173 20.5 17.5 la.s 2 12.0 9.5 11.0 113 93 103 183 17.0 173 23.0 19.0 21.0 3 U-0 93 10 3 U-0 9.0 10.0 18.0 16.0 173 24.5 21.0 22-5 4 10.5 93 10.0 133 93 U-0 17.0 15.5 16.0 25.0 213 23.0 5 9.5 73 83 13.0 U.S 12.5 173 15.0 16.0 253 22.0 23.5 6 8.0 63 7.0 11.5 10.0 103 183 16.0 17.0 27.5 23.5 25.0 7 8.0 63 7.0 10-S 9.5- 103 19.0 17.0 183 283 24.0 25.0 8 S.S 6.5 73 103 7.0 8.5 193 17-S 18.0 27.5 24.5 26.0 9 103 73 83 .73 53 63 19.0 17.0 183 26.0 23.5 24.5 10 10.0 9.5 10.0 7.0 53 S.O 193 16-5 18.0 263 21.5 24.0 11 ' 103 33 93 . 7-5 53 s.s 203 17.5 183 27 3 23.0 25.0 12 10.0 9.0 93 73 5.5 63 20.0 17.5 183 273 23.0 25.0 13 10.0 93 9.5 7.5 •7.0 73 21.5 18.0 193. 27.0 24.0 25.5 14 10-0 33 9.5 9.0 73 S.O 223 19.5 " 21.0 273 243 26.0 15 11.0 10.0 10-5 U-5 9.0 10.0 23.0 20.5 22.0 273 2S.0 26.0 16 10.5 10-0 10.0 123 U.S 12.0 223 20.0 21.0 28 3 23.5 26.0 17 10.5 93 10.0 12-5 12.0 123 20.5 18,5 19 3 273 253 26.0 18 11.5 93 10.0 123 U.S 123 20.0 17.0 183 283 24.0 25.0 19 11.5 10.5 11.0 • 12-5 Xl.5 12.0 203 17.0 18-5 283 243 26.5 20 12.0 103 11.0 U-5 103 10.5 193 17.5 183 293 25.0 263 21 11.5 103 11.0 103 93 103 19.0 16.0 17 3 23.0 25.0 27.0 22 11.5 103 113 113 10.0 103 193 16.5 18.0 27.0 25.0 26.0 23 12.0 10 3 11.0 13-5 11.0 12.0 21.0 . 16.5 18.5 26 3 24.0 25.5 24 13.5 11-5 12.5 15.5 13.0 143 213 13.0 20.0 28 3 243 26.0 25 15.5 13.0 143 17.0 15.0 16.0 213 183 20.0 27.0 24.5 25.0 26 153 143 153 18.6 16.5 17.5 21.0 20.0 203 273 24.5 26.0 27 14.5 13 3 14.0 183 17.0 173 20.0 19-0 193 263 24.5 25.5 28 13.5 12.0 12 3 19.0 16.5 173 . 20.0 173 18.5 293 23.5 26.5 29 ...... 19.5 18.0 183 17.5 16.0 16.5 31.5 263 29.0 30 -.. — 193 18.5 19.0 183 15.5 17.0 ...... 31 — — 18.5 173 183 ... — — MONTH 15.5 6.0 103 193 S.O U.7 23-0 15.0 18-5 DAY MIN MEAN MAX MOT MEAN MAX MIN MEAN MAX yrm MEAN JUKE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER 1 — — 34-5 293 313 34.0 27.5 30-5 32.5 26.5 29.5 2 ... — 34.5 293 32 3 343 27.0 303 33.5 26.5 30.0 3 — — 343 293 313 333 28.5 31.0 33.5 27.0 30.0 4 ... — — 313 28.5 303 303 25.0 28.0 33.0 27-0 30.0 5 --- ... . --- 303 273 293 31.0 263 283 323 273 293 6 333 273 303 33.0 27.0 30.0 323 263 29.0 7 ... — 343 28.5- 31.5 34.0 27.0 30.0 33.0 26.5 29.5 8 ... 34.5 293 32.0 33.0 27.0 293 33 3 27-0 30.0 9 ... — 34.5 29-5 32.0 333 27.5 30.5 313 263 2S.0 10 ... — 35. 0 293 323 32.5 " 27-5 30-0 303 23.5 25.5 11 28-5 243 26.0 343 29.5 32.0 30-0 2S.0 29.0 27.0 24.5 25.5 12 31.0 253 273 3S.0 29-5 32.0 34.0 27.5 303 ...... 13 32. S 283 30.0 35.5 30.0 32.5 34.0 28.0 303 ...... — 14 323 28.0 30.0 353 30.0 33.0 32.0 29.0 303 — ... — 15 31.0 233 29 3 363 293 33.0 34.5 27-0 303 — — — IS 30-0 263 283 353 30-0 32.5 34.0 28.5 31.0 27.5 25-0 26.0 17 29.5 263 27.5 333 293 313 343 2B.5 313 303 24.5 27.0 18 30.5 253 28.0 353 23.5 313 •33.0 28-0 303 323 2S.5 29.0 19 32.0 253 28.5 34.0 29.0 313 333 29.0- 313 313 263 29.0 20 31.0 27 3 29.8- 34.0 293 313 343 28.5 31.5 323 26 3 29.0 21 30.5 27.0 293 33.5 23.5 31.0 34.0 28.S 31.0 323 27.0 29.0 22 31.S 27.0 29.5 333 2S.5 31.0 32.S 28.5 303 30.0 26.5 23.0 23 313 283 303 343 23.0 313 323 27.5 30.0 29.5 25.0 27.5 24 32.0 273 293 34.0 283 31.0 333 28.5 303 303 26.0 28.0 25 32-0 27.5 293 333 383 31.0 33.5 28.5 31.0 31-0 26.0 29.0 2S 33.0 273 30.0 34.0 233 303 333 28.5 313 29.5 253 273 27 34.0 28-0 303 34.0 28.0 31.0 33.5 28.5 303 313 26.0 23.5 28 34.5 283 31.5 34.0 233 31.0 32.5 28.0 293 32.5 273 29.5 29 33 3 28 .5 313 333 28.0 303 34.0 27.5 303 32.5 26.5 293 30 33.5 283 31.0 33.0 37.5 30.0 333 27.5 303 313 26.5 29.0 31 ...... 333 273 30.0 333 28.0 303 ...... MONTH 363 27.0 31.3 343 25.0 30.3 Page 102 RED RIVER BASIN 07335500 RED RIVER AT ARTHUR CITY, TX LOCATION. —Lat 33°52'30", long 9S*JO*06», in Nff V4 secll, T.8 S., R.17 E., Choctaw County, OK, Hydrologic Halt U140101, on right downstrama, bank: of bridge on U.S. Highway 271 at Arthur City, 10.6 mi downstream from Muddy Boggy River, 26-0 mi upstream, from Kiamichi River, and at Rile 633.1. DRATKACE AREA. "44,531 mi2, of which 5,936 oi2 probably is noncentributing. PERIOD OF RECORD.--January to September 1905 (gage heights and discharge measurements only), October 1905 to Decern* ber 19U, July 1936 to current year. Monthly discharge only for some periods, published in HSP 13U. Gage-height records collected e seme alto since 1891 are contained in reports of the National Heather Service. REVISED RECORDS. —WSP 1241: Drainage area. H5P 1311; 1906-11. GAGE.—Hater-stage recorder. Datum of gage is 380.07 ft above sea level. Prom 1905-11 nasrecordiog gaga at St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. bridge 200 £t upstream at some datum, July 1, 1936, to Mar. 24, 1940, nonrecordino; gage at present 8 •iH0d datum. REMARKS.--Records fair. Flow regulated since October 1943 by Lake Texona (station 07331500), 92.3 mi upstream from sta- fcicn. U.S. Aray Corps of Engineers' satollite telemeter at station. DISCHARGE, CUBIC FEET PER SECOND, KATES YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER, 1998 DAILY MEAN VALUES DAY OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR HAY JUN JUL AUG SEP 1 2570 3670 1770 20400 24500 25200 46400 10300 2740 837 4400 2690 2 4270 3630 elSOO 21100 21600 22000 47000 S9S0 1620 1970 4410 1710 3 5300 3590 1890 . 20800 20600 20000 47900 9660 2700 3330 3750 2560 4 S730 2250 4220 20900 20100 19400 49800 9420 4230 4120 3150 2750 5 5750 1890 5910 47300 19700 16300 48800 9230 4460 4250' 3680 2750 6 3610 3450 5540 51700 2O400 9320 48000 9090 4640 3040 4380 2890 7 2820 359C 5540 41700 20300 7130 44100- 9020 4510 1360 4470 24S0 3 2570 3640 6080 44000 20100 11600 33800 6870 2680 1800 3770 1440 9 2440 3690 5100 47500 19900 22000 23600 8730 1480 3970 &2800 1200 10 2910 2700 5510 45300 19600 19400 21800 8600 1440 4200 &2100 2340 U 3040 alAOO 6710 44100 16400 15300 20800 B440 2590 4150 1590 2700 12 2790 2430 6340 43900 15600 22800 17700 8340 3230 £3500 2250 2860 13 2320 3540 6020 43200 15400 26300 171O0 ' 8210 e3120 3000 4410 29B0 14 1100 3690 3800 42500 15300 24100 16900 8070 O30B0 1400 4740 2800 15 1500 3690 1990 41800 15200 23500 15200 B010 2960 1890 4730 17B0 16 3950 3620 a!400 41900 15200 38200 17700 7550 1830 4000 4670 16SC 17 3960 2980 2710 41200 15600 50300 17500 3390 1590 4300 3340 2690 18 3870 2750 5030 39200 16300 43500 15400 2320 2420 4440 1680 2950 19 3880 3270 5290 3S500 16400 43600 14300 1890 2600 4290 2200 2950 20 3580 3470 5860 38600 16700 46900 14000 4070 2540 3060 4350 2940 21 2190 3480 23200 3B400 .. 16700 47500 14000 5430 2460 1420 4600 2750 22 1660 3470 34900 40600 16800 50100 14100 5300 2120 1B40 4610 1630 23 3410 3490 26800 ' 42500 20100 52100 13400 "5210 U60 3970 4640 1260 24 3780 1870 27300 41300 19100 53100 13900 52 DO 1050 4220 3330 2460 25 4050 alSOO 32000 4O700 20000 51600 13600 2810 2260 4260 1670 2620 26 4030 2220 24800 38700 .. 30500 50400 113 00 1760 2500 4290 2170 1590 27 3840 3330 20600 39500 35600 45900 10900 2850 2460 4720 4370 2480 28 3580 3610 • 19400 37900 30300 ,. 44600 11200 2670 2390 4700 4620 2680 29 3640 2340 17S00 34000 ... 45500 10900 3010 2080 4440 4670 1590 30 3640 1830 13600 31600 ... 4SS00 10600 4360 1080 4370 4690 1200 31 3680 — 15700 29800 — 46400 ... 4320 4360 3860 ... TOTAL 105960 90080 344510 1190600 5S4000 1040050 702200 196030 76070 105547 114100 69340 MEAN 3418 3003 11110 38410 19790 33550 23410 6325 2536 3405 36B1 2311 MAX 5800 3690 34900 51700 - 35600 53100 49800 10300 4640 4720 4740 2980 MIN UOO 1400 1400 20400 15200 7130 10600 1760 1050 837 1590 1200 AC-FT 210200 178700 633300 2362000 1099000 2063000 1393000 388900 -150900 209400 226300 137500 STATISTICS OF MQSTBLY MEAN DATA FDR WATER YEARS 1945 - 1993, BY HATER TEAR (WY) MEAN 7052 7534 7434 7034 3536 10930 U750 17320 18420 7861 4961 49 OS MAX 40240 37170 32340 39930 24200 38610 55500 103900 33320 27700 34840 19010 CWE) 1982 1975 1992 . 1992 1946 1S87 1990 1990 1957 1989 1950 1950 MTU 263 242 894" 1126. 1138 1118 1344 2837 2074 1586 1103 859 WY) 19S7 1957 1957 1964 1959 1967 -1956 1980 19S6 1956 1972 1988 e Estimated Page 103 RED RIVER BASIN SUMMARY STATISTICS 1997 CALENDAR YEAR FOR 1998 HATER YEAR WATER YEARS 1945 - 1998 ANNUAL TOTAL 4207765 4588537 ANNUAL MEAN 11530 • 12570 •9478 HIGHEST ANHUALMEAM 23290 1990 LOWEST ANNUAL MEAN 2754 1964 HIGHEST DAILY MEAN 43900 Feb 21 53100 Mar 24 269000 May 4 1990 LOWEST DAILY MEAN 800 Sep 24 837 Jul 1 134 ^Dec 11 1955 ANNUAL SEVEN-DAY M2HM0M Sep 20 1900 JUn 26 134 Dec U 1956 INSTANTANEOUS PEAK FLOW uao 56500 • Jan, 6 "275000 Hay 4 1990 INSTANTANEOUS PEAK STAGE 1634 Jan 6 *34.21 May 4 1990 ANNUAL RUNOFF (AC-FT) 3346000 9101000 6867000 10 PERCENT EXCEEDS ' 27500 41200 24800 50 PERCENT EXCEEDS 6710 4440 4320 90 PERCENT EXCEEDS 2060 1860 1370 "Prior to regulation, water years 1906-11, 1937-43, 9,266 ft3/». fcAlso occurred Dec. U, 1956. SKmciimim discharge for period of record, 400,000 ftJ/s, Hay 28, 1908. ^MwTrrwnmt gaga height for period o£ record, 43.2 ft. May 28, 1908. 100,000r K M A M 1997 1998 WATER YEAR - Page 104 BED RIVER BASUr 07336820 RED RIVER NEAR DB KALB, TX LOCATION- —Lat 33°40l59a, long 94°41'39», Bowie county, Bydrologie Doit U140106, on right bant at downstream side of bridge en U.S. Highway 259, 4.8 mi upotrsam frost North Mill Creek, 13 mi north-of De Xalb, and at mile 556.9. DRAINACE AREA.--47,348 mi3, of which 5,936 mi3 probably is noneontrihutixig. WATER-DISCHARGE RECORDS PERIOD OF RECORD.--Dec 1967 to Sop 1998 (discontinued) . GAGE.--Hater-stage, recorder and crest-stage gage. Datum of gage is 302.92 ft above eea level. Satellite talmeter at station. REMARKS.--No estimated daily discharges. Records good. Since installation of gaga in Dee 1967, at least 104 of contributing drainage area has been regulated by Late Texoma (station 07331500) located approximately 169 mi upstream,, and low flows may be affected by releases for the generation of electric power. Storage and/or releasee from Lake Hugo en the Kl^grf n>ij River, a tributary to the Red River about 45 mi upstream, may also affect flows. EXTREMES OUTSIDE PERIOD OF RECORD.--Maximum discharge since 1957, 205,000 ft3/o JUn 1957 (gage height, 32.2 ft), from rating curve extended above 186,500 ft3/s. The greatest flood since 1936 occurred in Fab 1938, stage unknown. DISCBARGE, CUBIC FEET PER SECOND, WATER YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1998 DAILY MEAN VALUES DAY OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP 1 3400 4160 4120 31500 42900 38000 56200 9510 4440 2280 4560 4490 2 3590 4120 4090 34800 37400 30800 56100 9170 4140 1670 4560 3570 3 3690 4060 6980 34200 32300 26900 55900 8790 2560 1700 4610 2420 4 . 5220 4140 3880 ' 33600 28800 24400 5610O 8400 1920 2430 4570 1780 5 6180 4610 9520 45000 27700 21500 56900 8190 3350 3710 3870 2240 6 6260 3960 10500 72100 2230O 17400 56100 8000 4520 4590 3320 2390 7 5970 5090 9220 76200 13900 10000 S500Q 7920 4780 4650 3930 2400 8 4650 S670 10700 88700 19600 7040 50100 7870 4900 3230 4490 2490 9 4690 4790 14300 70600 19000 10100 39600 7820 4470 2000 4620 2040 10 5580 4710 14900 71000 20800 22600. 26700 7830 2670 2600 4720 1360 H 4540 4650 12400 66700 32700 25S0O 22800 7810 1870 4140 4620 1230 12 4510 3790 9640 67400 26800 22300 21000 7770 2060' 4540 3130 1980 13 4980 3350 7490 65200 22800 26000 1780O 7740 2930 4680 1970 2590 14 4890 4640 6120 65500 19300 28300 16300 7790 3800 4620 2780 3220 15 3770 5470 5120 64300 16300 25600 15700 7770 4210 3170 4350 4240 16 2340 6400 3460 62100 15200 27900 14400 7840 4320 1950 4790 5530 17 3230 6400 2670 61700 15400 50500 15700 7780 3100 2530 4820 4490 18 4500 6100 2410 605OO 18000 59300 16700 5120 2130 4100 4670 3720 19 4530 553 0 3640 58300 19600 SSOO0 14600 2900 2110 4620 3U0 7980 20 4470 5400 4570 57200 19800 63100 13500 2180 2650 4740 1860 6430 21 4480 5480 9120 57300 19500 65800 13000 2310 2820 4550 2560 5920 22 4150 4370 31900 56500 19300 67300 12200 4700 2780 3100 4100 5820 23 3190 4080 39000 - 56700 19000 71300 12800 5240 2710 1880 4460 5340 24 35B0 4020 36800 5S800 21200 72100 12000 "5170 2220 2470 4540 4170 25 4520 3820 36100 53100 23100 63100 12400 5150 1630 3990 4510 . 2540 26 4690 2910 35800 52400 26600 64800 U500 4440 - 1670 4370 3040 2390 27 4700 2470 31200 52400 ~ 40000 61300 11500 2600 2480 4450 1790 2440 23 4630 3300 29300 53400 43900 549O0 10400 2440 2770 .4550 2460 1790 29 4400 4480 27900 5U00 ... * 52100 10400 3530 2740 4960 4040 2230 30 4220 S010 28800 47400 __. 52800 10100 2670 2670 4930 4420 2290 31 4200 ... 29300 45200 54600 ... 3570 ... 4660 4530 ... TOTAL 138250 136980 485950 1747900 689200 1280440 794S0O 190020 91420 121910 119300 102020 MEAN 4460 4S66 15680 56380 24610 41300 26430 6130 3047 3610 3865 3401 MAX 6260 6400 39O00 76200 439O0 72100 56900 9510 4900 4960 4S20 79S0 2840 2470 2410 31500 15200 7040 10100- 2180 1630 1670 1790 1230 vmAC-F T 274200 271700 963900 3467000 1367000 2540000 1576000 376900 181300 222000 237600 202400 STATISTICS OF MONTHLY MEAN DATA FOR HATER YEARS 1968 - 19983, BY MATER YEAR (WY) MEAN 9U4 14670 14350 12810 14820 20770 19130 24990 2S860 9S62 5BU 6064 MAX 39930 53170 45440 56380 31000 48590' 62330 125500 67360 3S03O 21150 24010 (WY) 1982 197S 1972 1998 1969 1987 1990 1990 1987 1982 1995 1974 MIN 1783 2105 1608; 1699 2876 2492 3005 4707 2909 2598 1418 1368 {WY) 1979 1980 1978 1981 1976 1980 1981 1972 1988 1972 1972 1988 Page 105 RED RIVER BASIN 07336820 RED RIVER NEAR OE EALB, TE--Continued SUMMARY STATISTICS FOR 1997 CALENDAR YEAR FOR 1998 WATER YEAR WATER YEARS 1968 - 19992 ANNUAL TOTAL 5607180 5SS33S0 ANNUAL MEAN 15360 - 16130 14310 HIGHEST ABNCEAL MEAN 30100 19S0 LOWEST ANNUAL MEAN 4690 1980 HIGHEST DAILY MEAN 67700 Feb 22 76200 Jan 7 278000 May 7 1990 1CKEST DAILY MEAN 2400 Sep 26 1230 Sep 11 254 NOV 29 1979 ANtKIAL SEVEN-DAY MINIMOM 2750 Sep 21 1980 Sep 6 529 , Aug 31 1972 INSTANTANEOUS EEAK FLOW 79100 Jan 7 279000 May 6 1990 INSTANTANEOUS PEAK STAGE 25.00 Jan 7 34-42 May 6 1990 AKNQAS ROKOFF (AC-FT) 11120000 11680000 10730000 iu pmsiari' EXCEEDS 34200 54900 40900 SO PERCENT EXCEEDS 9460 5120 7130 90 PERCENT EXCEEDS 3820 2470 2220 z Period of regulated streamflow. 100,000 1,000 M M A M 1997 199 8 WATER YEAR Page 106 RED RIVER BASIS 07336820 RED RIVER &3AR DE KALB, TX—Continued 8ATER-QOALIT7 RECORDS PERIOD OF RECORD.--Chemical and biochemical analyses: Jan 1968 to Sep 1998(discontinued) . Pesticide analyses: Oct 1970 to Jul 1931. Sediment analyses t Nov 1979 to Sep 1999 (discontinued) . PERIOD OP DAILY RECORD.-- SPECIFIC C02B>UCTA»CEt Jan 1968 to Sep 1991. WATER TEMPERATURE* Jan 1968 to Sep 1991. EXTREMES FOR PERIOD OF DAILY RECORD.-- SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE: Mmriw™ daily, 2,140 micros! , Jul 13, 1930; «riw WATER-QUALITY DATA, WATER YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1998 DIS PH OXYGEN, OXYGEN CHARGE, SPE WATER DIS DEMAND, HARD INST. CIFIC WHOLE COLOR SOLVED BIO NESS CUBIC CON-- FIELD TEMPER (PLAT- TOR" CXYGEaV (PER CHEM TOTAL FEET DUCT- (STAND ATURE mcK- STO DIS CENT ICAL, OC/L DATE TIME PER ANCB ARD WATER CCBALT UT SOLVED SATUR 5 DAY AS SECC5D (US/CM) UNITS) (DBG C) UNITS] (NTU) {MC/L} ATION) (MS/L) CAC03) (00061) (00095) £00400) (00010} (O00SO) (00076) (00300) {00301} {00310} {00900} DEC 16... • 0944 3290 1040 7.7 73 _. .. U.S 98 2.3 370 FEB 25... 1140 23600 1060 8.0 93 -- .. 10.8 97 1.6 270 HAY 06... 1235 8000 1290 8.4 2S3 21 23 8.4 104 13 340 JUL 09... 1150 2000 1320 7.7 33.0 .. -- 73 110 3.2 340 AUG 06... 0915 3300 1480 S3 28.5 — -- 6.6 86 2.1 . 380 HARD ALKA NESS MAGNE SCDIUK POTAS LINITY CBLO- FLUC- SILICA, BOHZARB CALCIUM SIUM, SODIUM, AD- SIUM, WAT DIS SULFATE EQDE, RlDEy- DIS DISSOLV DIS DIS DIS 30RP- DIS FIX sm DIS DIS DIS SOLVED FLD. AS SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED TXUS SOLVED FIELD SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED OC/L DATE CAC03. (MG/L (MG/L (MC/L RATIO OC/L CAC03 (MS/L OC/L (MS/L AS (MC/L) AS CA) ASMS) AS KA)' AS K) (MC/L) AS SD4) AS CL) AS P) SID2) (00904)• (00915) (00925) (00930) (00931) (00935) (39036) (00945) (00940) (00950) (00955) DEC 16... 270 97 31 130 3 53 98 260 190 .28 8.7 FEB 2S... 170 71 - 23 98 3 33 100 190 140 .22 7-2 HAY 06... 190 88 29 119 3 43 150 220 180 38 7.2 JUL 09... 210 84 31 .128 3 4.6 130 230 190 .29 36 AUG 06... 240 32 36 147 . 3' S.l 140 260 210 34 6.2 SOLIDS, RESIDUE SiLTNO- NITRO NITRO NITRO ZSTTRO- PB3S- BUM OF TOTAL RESIDUE RESIDUE GJ2J, GEN, GEN, GEN, GSN.AU- PBDS- iSSJBUS cossn- AT 105 VOLA FIXED NITK1TE HD2+KC3 AMMONIA ORGANIC MOSIA + IEORDS GBXEO, TUEKTS, DBG. C, TILE, N3N DIS DIS DIS DIS ORGANIC DIS DIS- DIS SUS sus- FH/IER- SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED DIS. SOLVED SGLVHJ DATE SOLVED PENDED PE3CED ABLS QC/L (MG/L {M3/L (MG/L (MC/L (MS/L (MG/L oc/L} (MC/L) (MG/L) 4KC/L) AS N) AS N) A3 N) AS N) AS N) AS P) AS P) {70301} (00530) (00535) (00540) {00613) (00631) (00608) (00607) (00623} (00666} (00671) DEC 16... 731 .. — -- <.0l0 <350 .021 36 38 333 338 FEB 25... 593 .. _. .. <31C .285 .040 .24 .28 .016 .022 MAY 06... 730 46 8 38 <31C .253 .032 .24 38 <310 <310 JUL 09... 750 .- -- -- <.010 <350 .036 35 .29 332 ,019 AUG 06... 840 -- — — <.01Q <.050 333 .26 .30 <310 <310 Page 107 RED RIVER BASIN 07336820 RED RIVER NEAR DE KALB, TX--Continued WATER-QCALTTr DATA, WATER YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1998 PHOS PHATE, BERYL CHB0- QRTHD, CARSQS, ARSENIC BARIUM, LIUM, CADMIUM MCT4, COBALT, COPPER, HtK, LEAD, DIS ORGANIC DIS DIS DIS DIS DIS DIS- DI3- Dia- DIS SOLVED TOTAL SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED DATE QJE/L QC/L (UG/L (UG/L (UG/L (UC/L (UG/L (UC/L {UG/L (UG/L (UG/L AS P04) AS C) AS AS) AS BA) AS BE) AS CD) AS CR) AS CO) AS CD) AS FE) AS PB) (00660) (00680) (01000) (OlOOS) (01010) (01025} (01030) (01035) (01040) (010461 (01049) DEC 16... .12 FEB 25... .07 98 <1.0 MANGA MOLYB SELE BTRON- VANA LITHIUM NESE, MERC0RY DENUM. NICKEL, NIUM, SILVER, TXUK, DIUM, ZJNC, DIS DIS DIS DIS DIS DIS DIS DIS DIS DIS SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED SOLVE SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED' SOLVED SOLVED DATE (UG/L 1DG/L (UG/L (UG/L (DG/L (DG/L {UG/L (UG/L (DG/L (DG/L AS LI) AS MS) AS HC) AS MO)' AS NX) AS SE) AS AG) AS SR) AS V] AS ZN) (01130) (01056) (71B90) (01060) (01065) (0U45) (01075) (010B0) (01085) CO1090) DEC 16.-- FEB -- .. -. -- -- .. -- -- . 25--- IS 10 <.l Page 108 RED RIVER BASIN 07331600 RED RIVER AT DSKISQN DAK NEAR DENISON, TX LOCATION.--Lat 33°49'OS", long 96"33r47", Grayson County, Hydrologic Unit 11140101, on right bant 1,800 ft dounatream from Denison Dam powerhouse, 0.4 mi upstream from Shawnee Creek (spiUway flow return), 4.5 mi north of Denison, and at mile 7253. WATER-DISCHARGE RECORDS DRAINAGE AREA.--39,720 mia, of which 5,936 mia is probably nonccatributing. At site used prior to October 1961 drainage area was 39,777 mi*, of which 5,936 mia probably was nancontributizig. PERIOD OF RECORD.--October 1923 to September 1989; December 1996 to current year. Monthly discharge only for some periods, published in W3P 1311. Prior to October 1934, published as "near Denison, TX", and October 1934 to September 1961, published as "near Colbert, CK". Gage-height records coUected at various sitae in this vicinity 1892-93, 1906-28, 1931-49 are contained in reports of the Rational weather service. REVISED RECORDS.--WSP 807: 1935 (M). WSP 12Us Drainage area. WSP 1241 ( 1924-29, 19132-33, 1934 00, 1935. GAGE. - -Water-stage recorder. Datum of gage is 495.00 ft above national Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929. Oct. 9, 1923, to Sept. 24, 1934, ncnrocording gage, and July 29, 1942, to Sept. 30, 1961, water-stage recorder, at county road bridge 2.5 mi downstream. Prior to Oct. 1, 1931, at datum U.85 ft higher,- Oct. 1, 1931, to Sept 24, 1934, at datum 12.07 ft higher; and JUly 29, 1942, to Sept. 30, 1961, at datum 2.36 ft higher? Sept. 25, 1934, to July 28, 1942, water-stage recorder at railway bridge 1.9 ml downstream at datum 12.36 ft higher. July 29, 1942 to Sept. 30, 1989, at same site and datum 5.00 ft higher. REMARKS.--Records fair. Flow regulated since October 1943 by Late Texoma (station 07331500). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers satellite telemeter at station. EXTREMES OUTSIDE PERIOD OF RECORD.--Flood of May 26, 1908, reached a stage of 453 ft (at site and datum used July 29, 1942, to Sept. 30, 1961) ; from record of National Weather Service. DISCHARGE, CUBIC FEET PER 3EC0H), WATER YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1998 DAILY MEAN VALUES DAY OCT HDV DEC JAN FEB MAR APS MAY JON JUL AUG SEP 1 5630 2580 1070 12700 13700 16100 40600 8610 3970 4120 3160 2320 2 5610 '. 188 1640 12700 13700 14600 45200 8630 4320 4310 2410 2310 3 5600 2410 2690 12700 13700 14600 43600 8590 4280 4250 4230 2310 4 2430 2510 2930 13200 14600 5660 48500 8620 4320 564 4420 2410 5 2390 2480 2960 5220 15900 U2 48100 8640 4230 ,130 4530 295 6 1690 2390 2290 1890 15600 95 39100 8600 471 3830 4400 141 7 1980 2320 235 5360 15900 1070 23400 8600 154 4230 4440 2080 8 2050 192 3210 9870 15900 535 16300 8650 2080 4230 558 2330 9 2020 117 3250 14800 13700 253 16700 8570 2350 4290 125 2360 10 2040 1980 3290 17400- 11500 6130 15200 8S70 2350 4300 4030 2360 11 200 1990 3280 17400 11700 16700 13300 8650 2380 547 4430 2400 13 137 1970 280 20800 11700 13100 13300 3600 2290 125 4450 413 13 1940 2010 110 26300 11300 16500 13700 8660 387 4060 4470 147 14 3970 1970 106 29000 11300 14400 13300 8670 128 4280 4450 2250 15 3160 1360 3050 31400 11800 14500 14800 864 2Q10 4530 561 2550 16 3190 1350 3110 32400 U800 12300 . 13100 178 2260 4390 124 2560 17 3170 1970 3210 32500 11800 11600 12400 173 2550 4300 3990 2S60 18 2660 1970 3200 32400 11800 20600 12400 5260 2230 558 4440 2560 19 206 1970 3220 32500 . - 11800 28400 122C0 5650 2220 128 4470 460 20 2580 1990 3390 32600 naco 32700 12400 5410 396 3920 4440 127* 21 2690 1990 522 32500 11900 33600 11300 5300 143 4310 4450 2270 22 2690 117 3410 32700 11900 46600 12300 5340 2220 4310 563 2620 23 2720 104 3730 32700 14000 ©46400 12300 619 2430 4310 131 349 24 2690 1970 3670 32700 16000 e47200 1O900 173 2440 4300 4030 2270 25 2640 1740 3520 26800 16100 51900 8820 3550 2250 4920 4450 2580 26 2630 I960 3520 21800 16000 43700 8800 485 2270 4710 4470 470 27 2680 US 3520 14800 16000 40000 S7S0 3570 342 4310 4460 132 23' 2700 115 3470 12600 16000 4UO0 3630 3860 142 4330 4460 2090 29 2710 102 5840 11200 ... 41000 8670 3840 1910 4350 2690 2920 30 2710 100 10700 15000 -.- 41000 3660 484 2200 4590 342 2310 31 2580 ... 12700 13700 40600 ... 152 5440 2120 TOTAL 82093 44033 101123 639640 380100 723055 570730 165568 61723 110972 100294 52954 MEAN 2643 1468 3262 . 20630 13580 23320 19020 5341 2057 3580 3235 1765 MAX 5630 2580 12700 32700 16100 51900 48600 8670 4320 5440 4530 2920 MUST 137 100 106 1B90 11500 95 8630 152 128 125 124 127 AC-FT 162800 87340 200600 1269000 753900 1434000 U32000 328400 - 122400 220100 198900 105000 STATISTICS OF MDNTBLY MEAN DATA FOR WATER YEARS 1945 - 1998, BY WATER YEAR (WY) MEAN 5085 3670 3390 3622 3523 4512 4305 7713 U710 5467 3513 2695 MAX 27860 18830 13320 20630 13800 24760 20400 34710 66960 21820 25570 10330 1987 1975 1397 1998 1587 1987 1945 1957 1957 1982 1950 1950 MZEtwof 66.7 79.6 559 271 678 614 789 712 1449 1580 953 325 (WY) 1957 1957 1981 1945 1945 1976 1978 1959 1956 1956 1972 1984 a Estimated Page 109 RED RIVER BASIN 07331600 RED RIVER AT DENISON DAM NEAR DEKXSCM, TX--Continued SUMMARY STATISTICS FOR 1997 CALENDAR YEAR FOR 1998 WATER YEAR WATER YEARS 1945 • 1998 ANNUAL TOTAL 2914774 3032285 ANNUAL MEAN 7986 8308 *4919 HIGHEST AIKUAL MEAN 16030 1987 LOWEST ANHUAL MEAN 1510 1964 HIGHEST DAILY MEAN 30300 May 12 51900 Mar 25 96200 Jtan 5 1957 ZCMEST DAUCrMEAN 100 2tov 30 95 Mar 5 27 Jtav 14 1982 A8S0AL SEVEN-DAY MTNDBDM 729 Nov 26 729 Nbv 26 Oct 23 1944 INSTANTANEOUS PEAR FLOW 57400 Mar 25 b102000 Jun 5 1957 INSTANTANEOUS PEAK STAGE 20.48 Mar 25 =26.26 Jtaa 5 1957 ANNUAL RUNOFF (AC-FT) S781000 6015000 3564000 10 PERCENT EXCEEDS 18400 19100 10700 SO PERCENT EXCEEDS 4060 90 EEBCSNT EXCEEDS 5350 2830 345 269 198 "Prior to regulation, water years 1924-43, S,684 fti's. "Maximum discharge for period of record, 201,000 fit*/» May 21, 1935. 100,000 T ] 1 1 1 T 50,000 1 § 20300 n jg 10,000 o. 5 5,000 tou U § 2,000 8 5 1,000 J I I L J I I L w J 7 M- A M J J 1997 1998 WATER YEAR Page 110 RED RIVER BASIN 07331500 RED RIVES' AT DEOS0N QAM NEAR DENISON, TX--Continued WATER-CDALTTY RECORDS PERIOD OF RECORD.--May 1944 to August 1939; October 1996 to current year. PERIOD OF DAILY RECORD.•- SM&JJJJLC COHDULTiaBCB; May 1944 to September 1989; February 1997 to current year- KATER TEMPERATURES October 1945 to September 1939; February 1997 to current year. mSTRUMEW&TIOM.--Watar~quolity monitor February 1997 to current year. REMARKS.--Samples were collected monthly, and specific conductance. pH, water temperature, alkalinity and dissolved oxygen wars determined in the field. EXTREMES FOR PERIOD OF DAILY RECORD.— SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE:'Maximum, daily, 3,520 microsiemens Aug. 14, 1944; yriTHmmw daily, 656 microsiemens Oct. 16, 1945. WATER TEMPERATURE) Maximum daily, 31.0% July 17, 1969; ndajjinim daily, 3-Q°C Feb. 2-4, 7, 1966. EXTREMES FOR CURRENT YEAR.-- SFECXFXC CONDUCTANCE: Maximum, 2,190 microsiemena May 15; minimum, 1,310 mierosiemens July 25. WATER TEMPERATURE: Maximum, 26.5°C Aug. 28, 29, Sept. 1, 2, 3, 1, 8; «riw MISCELLANEOUS WATER-CDALTTY DATA, WATER YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1998 SAMPLE BARO DIS- PH LOC METRIC AGENCY AGENCY CHARGE, SPE WATER ATION, PRES COL- Am- BSST- CIFIC WH3LE CROSS TEMPER- SURE LECTBX5 LYZHC CUBIC . COS- OXYGEN. if F^'i.n SECTION ATURE (M* SAMPLE SAMPLE FEET GAGS DUCT- DIS (STAND DATE TTMe (FT FM WATER OF (CODE (CODE PER HEIGHT ANCB SOLVED ARD L BAKE) (DEC C) 8G) NUMBER) NUMBER) SECOKD (FEET) (US/CM) (MG/L) UNITS) (00009) (00010) (00025) (00027) (00026) (00061) (00065) (00095) (00300) (00400) SEP 22... 0945 270 22.5 755 102 B 1028 209 5.2B 1SB0 .6 7.0 22... 0948 250 22.4 755 1028 1028 209 5.28 1680 3.5 7.0 22... 0951 230 22.4 755 1028 102B 209 5.28 1580 .1 73 22... 0954 210 22.3 755 1028 1028 209 5.28 1630 .2 7.0 22... 0957 190 22.4 755 1028 1023 209 5.28 1680 3 7.0 22... 1000 170 22.4 755 1028 1028 209 5.28 1680 .6 7.0 22... 1003 150 22.3 75S 1023 1028 209 5.28 1630 .6 73 22... 1006 130 22.8 755 1028 1023 209 5.28 1690 .7 7.1 22... 1009 110 24.4 7S5 1028 1028 209 5.28 1690 4.B 7.1 22... 1012 903 24.7 7S5 1023 1028 251 5.28 1690 4.6 7.2 22... 1015 70.0 24.6 7S5 1028 1023 209 5.28 1690 5.4 7.2 22... 1018 50.0 24-6 755 102B 1028 209 5.28 1690 S-S 7.1 WATER-QUALITY DATA, WATER YEAR OCTOBER 1SS7 TO SEPTEMBER 1998 DIS- PH BARO QXSGEN, AGENCY AGENCY' CHARGE, SPE WATER , METRIC DIS HARD- COL AMA- INST. CIFIC WHOLE PRES SOLVEDi HESS LECTING LYZUC CUBIC CON- FIELDi TEMPER-• TEMPER SURE OXYGEN, (PER- TOTAL SAMPLE SAMPLE FEET DUCT- (STANDi - ATURE ATURE KM DIS CENT (MG/L DATE TIME (CODE (CODE PER - • JUKE ARQ AXR WATER OF SOLVED SATUR AS NUMBER) NUMBER) SECG3D| (US/CM) UNITS) (DEC CJI (DEC C) EC) CMG/L) ATION) CACC3) (00027) (00028) (00061) (00095)- (00400) (00020]i (00010) (00025) (00300) (00301) (00900) OCT 22-.. 1830 102B 80020 7420 1990 83 17.7 22.1 758 63 79 490 NOV 04... 1730 1028 30020 5940 1S50 3-2 22.0 173 754 3.8 94 490 DEC 09... 1500 1028 30020 445 1990 3-4 19.1 12.2- 744 10.4 100 513 JAN 14... 1500 1028 80020 29400 1950 S3 3.8 8.0 754 11.2 96 510 FEB 11... 1130 1023 30020 11700 1800 83 14.1 73 755 12.4 106 450 -JOB 19... 1100 1028 80020 26300 1790 6.4 6.8 93 751 123 107 440 APR 17... 1500 1028 80020 - 15700 1400 33 16.2 16.5 758 8.9 92 360 MAY 21... 0730 1028 80020 291 1940 7.7 26.5 18.0 750 5.4 58 460 JUN 11... 1215 1028 80020 225 1860 8.0 24.7 20.0 751 8.4 94 460 JUL 14... 1600 1028 80020 5100 1630 S3 40.2 24.0 750 3 3 36 420 ADC 19... 0745 1028 80020 241 1690 73 313 21.7 753 7.0 81 440 'SEP 02... 1800- 1028 80020 5790 1740 7.8 37.1 263 750 43 61 440 Page 111 RED RIVER BASIS 07331600 RED RIVER AT DENISON DAM NEAR DENISON, TX- -Continued . WATER-QUALITY DATA, HATER YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1998 HARD BICAS- CAR ALKA NESS MAGNE SODIUM POTAS B0SA3E BONATE LINITY CHLO NONCARB CALCIUM SIUM, SODIUM, AD SIUM, WATER WATER WAT DIS SULEATZ RIDE. DISSOLV DIS DIS DIS SORP DIS DIS IT DIS IT TOT IT DIS DIS FLD. AS SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED TION SOLVED FIELD FIXED PTET.n SOLVED SOLVED DATE CAC03 (MG/L (MG/L (MG/L SODIUM RATIO IMG/L MG/L AS MG/L AS HG/L AS (MG/L (MG/L (MG/L) AS CA) AS HC) AS NA) PERCENT AS K) HC03 ' C03 CAC03 AS S04) AS CL) (00904) (00915) (00925) (00930) (00932) (00931) (00935) (00453) (00452) (39086) (00945) (00940) OCT 22... 370 120 46 206 47 4 63 143 0 U7 390 330 NOV 04... 380 120 46 202 47 4 63 143 0 117 390 310 DEC 09... . 410 130 49 205 46 4 6.0 UO 5 • 98 410 320 JAN " 14... 380 • 120 43 203 46 4 63 149 0 122 400 310 FEB 11... 320 110 42 180 46 4 S.O "' 255 0 127 350 280 MAR 19.-. 290 41 188 48 4 53 177 4 151 330 290 APR uo 17... 230 93 31 136 45 3 4-5 151 0 124 240 210 MAY 21... 320 120 41 201 48" 4 • 5.4 172 . 0 141 330 320 JUN U... 320 120 40 . 194 48 4 4.4 172 141 320 310 • JUL o- 14... 230 100 33 155 44 3 4.7 170 0 130 290 240 AUG 19... 290 110 40 173 46 4 S.B 1B1 0 148 300 270 SEP 02... 30O 110 42 177 47 1 4.8 170 0 139 310 270 SOLIDS, RESIDUE HTTBO- NITRO KTTBO- HTTftO- HZTRO- NITRO FLUO SILICA, SUM OF SOLIDS, SOLIDS, TOTAL GES, GEN, GEN, GEN, GEN, GEN, RIDE, DIS CONSTI DIS DLS- AT 10S NITRATE NITRATE NITRITE EZZTRITS N02+TO3 AMMONIA DIS SOLVED TUENTS, SOLVED SOLVO DEC. C, DIS DIS DIS DIS DIS DIS SOLVED (MG/L DIS (TOGS (TONS SUS SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED SOLVED DATE (MG/L AS SOLVED PER PER PENDS} {MC/L (MG/L (MG/L {MG/L (MG/L (MG/L AS F) SIC2) QC/L) AC-FT) DAY} QC/L) AS Si AS ND3) AS N) AS N32) AS N) AS N) (00950) (00955) (70301) (70303) (70302) (00530) (00618) (71851) (00613) (71856) (00631) (00608) OCT 22... 33 9.2 1.61 23700 . 6 <-0l0 -167 <315 2DV uso ------04... 3S 83 1160 138 18500 1 .132 .58 .042 .14 -174 <320 DEC 09-.. -3S 93 UOO 1.61 1420 4 <.,010 .180 <-020 JAN' .. . .- -• 11... .33 9.3 U70 139 . 92300 12 .222 .98' 317 36 .239 <320 FEB 11... .34 8.4 1050 1.43 • • 33200 3 .295 13 -Oil .04 .306 .087 MAR 19... .28 7.9 1070 1.45 75300- 12 <-0l0 .362 .063 APR -- .- .. 17... .27 73 797 1.08 33300 4 351 1.6 .021 -07 .372 .125 HAY 21... .27 6.2* 1110 1.51 871 4 .447 23 .017 36 .464 .060 JON 11... .24 7-6 1070 1.46 653 7 .400 1.8 .023 33 .423 .090 JUL 14... .32 7.7 929 1.26 12800 . 7 .139 .62 .024 .08 .163 .178 AUG 19... .33 10 999 136 650 4 .011 34 <3S0 .611. SEP -- -- 02... 32 8.5 1000 137 15700 4 -- -- .013 34 <.0S0 .418 Page 112 RED RIVER BASIN - 07331600 RED RIVES AT DENISON DAK NEAR DENISON, TX- -Continued WATER-QUALITY DATA, WATER YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SZFXXHBER 1998 MTJSO- X3TTRC - F8DS- PEDS GEN, NITRG GEBT,AH- PHOS- 3HQRUS PHATE, BARIUM, AMU0HIA GEN, MONIA *• NTTRO- PBDS- PEOSBS ORTHO, ORTBD, ARSENIC TOTAL BABX0M, DIS- ORGANIC ORGANIC GEN, PHDRDS DIS- DIS DIS ARSENIC DIS RECOV- DIS- SOLVED TOTAL TCTAL TOTAL TOTAL SOLVED SOLVEE SOLVED TOTAL SOLVED ERABLS SOLVED DATE (MG/L (MG/L CMG/L (MC/L (M3/L 03G/L (MC/L (MC/L (UG/L (DG/L (UG/L (DG/L AS VB&) AS K) AS K) AS N) AS P) AS P) AS P) AS P04) AS AS) AS AS) AS BA) A3 BA) (71346) (00605) (0062S) (00600) (0066S) (00666) (00671) (00660) (01002) (01000) (01007) (01005) OCT 22... 35 .52 • .045 <-010 316 • .05 2 2 200 151 NOV -- 04... 34 31 317 <-010 .018 .06 2 2 CBRO- MANGA- ' CADMIUM MIUM, CHRO- COPPER, IRON, LEAD, NESE, WATER CADMIUM TOTAL MIUM, TOTAL COPPER, TOTAL IRON, TOTAL LEAD, TOTAL OKFLTRD DIS-' RECOV DIS- RECOV- DIS- RECOV DIS RECOV DIS RECOV TOTAL SOLVED KRAffTCiiPi SOLVED ERABLE SOLVED ERABLE SOLVED ERABLE SOLVED ERABLE DATE (UC/L (UC/L (DG/L (UC/L (U=/L (UG/L (UC/L (DG/L (OC/L (DG/L (0=/L AS CD) AS CD) AS CR] AS CR) AS CO) AS CU) A3 FE) AS FE) AS PB) A3 PS) AS MM) (01027) (01025) (01034 (01030) (01042) (01040) (01045) (01046) (01051) (01049) (01055) OCT 22. <1 .0 <1 <13 <1 <10 100 <3 0 17 37 NOV < - 04. <1 <1 3 <1 <1.0 1 Page 113 RED RIVER BASIN 07331600 RED RIVER AT DENISON DAK NEAR DEHISCE, TX--Continued WATER-QUALITY DATA, WATER YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1998 MANGA- MERCURY NICKEL, 3ELE- SILVER, ZBC, NESS, TOTAL MERCURY TOTAL NICKEL, SELE" HXUM, TOTAL SILVER, TOTAL ZEE, DIS- RECOV- DIS- RECOV- DIS- NIOM, DIS- ' flECOV- DIS- RECOV- DIS SOLVED ERABLE - SOLVED ERABLE SOLVED TOTAL SOLVED ERABLE SOLVED ERABLE SOLVED DATE (UG/L (UG/L (UG/L (UC/L (OG/L (DG/L (UG/L (DG/L (UG/L (UG/L (UC/L ASMN) ABBS] ASHG) ASNI} AS HI} ASSE) A3 SE) AS AG) AS AG) AS ZW) AS SEN) C010S6) . (71900) (71890) (01067) (01065) (01147) (0114S) (01077)" (0107S) (01092) (01090) OCT 22... 2.7 <.10 <.l <100 <10 <1 . <1 <1 <1.0 <10 <3.0 rov 04... 3.5 <.10 <-l <100 <10 • Jlt'wTVKTT AGEEC1T COL- ANA- AROCLOR AROCLOR AROCLOR AROCLOR ARCCLOR AROCLOR ARCCLOR LECTIBG LYZHSG 1016 122I 1232 1242 1248 1254 1260 SAMPLE SAMPLE PCB PCB - PCB PCB PCB PCB PCB , DATE TIME (CODE (CODE TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL NUMBER} NUMBER) (UG/L) (UG/L) (UC/L) IUG/L) (UC/L) (UG/L) {DG/L} (00027) (00038) (34671) (39433) (39492) (39496) (39S00) (39504) (39508) FEB 1130 1028 80020 <.100 <1.00 «.100 <-100 <-100 <.100 <.10O JUNu.. . U-. . 1215 1028 80020 <-100 <1.00 •c-100 <-100 <-100 <-100 <-100 CBEOR- CHLOR- CBLOR- DANS DAHE DANE, CIS TRANS EBDRIN EHDRIN HEPH- TECH WATER - WATER DI- WATER ALDE BEPTA- CELOR ALDRIN, NICAL WHOLE WHOLE ETDRIN UNFLTRD HYDE CHLOR, EPOXIDE LINDANE DATE TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL- TOTAL TOTAL REC TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL (UC/L) (UG/L) (UC/L) (UG/L) (UG/L) (DC/L) (UC/L) (OC/L) (UC/L> (UG/L) (39330) (39350) C39062) (39065) (39380) (39390) (34366) (39410) (39420) (39340) FEB 11... <.D40 <-100 <.100 <.100 <-020 •c.OSQ <300 <-030 <300 <330 JUN 11... <-040 <.100 <.100 <-100 <.020 «360 <300 <-030 <.800 <.03Q BETA DELTA 2KDO" BENZENE BENZENE SOLFAK- HEXA- HEXA- I ENDO- EINDO- TCX- CSLOR- CBLOR- ALPHA P,P* P,P' P,P» WATER SULFAH SULFAN APKENE, IDE LDE BBC DDT, DDD, DDE, wffnrjP II SULFATE DATE TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL- TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL REC TOTAL TOTAL {UG/L) (U=/L) (DC/L) (UC/L) (UC/L) (UG/L) CUG/L) (UG/L) (DG/L) (DG/L) (39400) (39333) (34259) (39337) (39300) (39310) (39320) (34361) (34356) (34351) FEB 11... <2.00 <-030 <.090 <.030 <.100 <,100 <-040 <.100 <.04Q <300 JUN U... <2.00 <330 <-090 <-030 <.100 <-100 <-040 <.1D0 <.040 <300 Pag© 114 RED RTVESL BASIN 07331600 RED RIVER AT DENISON DAM NEAR DSKISCH, TX--Continued SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE OfftCROSIEMENS/CM AT 25 DEC.C}, WATER YEAR C^'IHBK 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1998 DAY MAX MIN MEAN MAX SIN MEAN MAX MIN MEAN MAX MIN HEAH CCTOBER I CWEHBER DECEMBER JANUARY 1 ... _-. ©1920 1950 1930 1940 2070 1970 2000 2050 2030 2040 2 ...... elSSO 1980 1930 1950 2080 ' 2010 2030 2040 2030 2040 3 ... -.. C19S0 " 2000 1960 1930 2070 1960 1990 2050 2040 2040 4 ...... elSSO 1930 1950 • I960 1980 1950 1970 2050 2010 2040 5 elSSO , 1930 1970 1980 19 BO 1950 1970 2050 1990 2030 6 ...... 81950 1980 1970 I960 1990 1960- 1980- 2040 1980 2000 7 --- ... O1960 1990 1970 1980 . 1980 1830 1950 2020 1980 2010 8 --- elSGO 1990 1970 1980 1980 1920 1970 2030 2010 2020 9 ...... el960 1980 1770 1910 2010 I960 1980 2030 2020 2030 10 ...... •I960 1960 1910 19 SO 2010 1980 1990 2030 2020 2020 11 el960 1960 1920 1950 2000 1970 1990 2030 2020 2020 12 ...... el960 1950 1770 1920 ' 200O 1960 1970 2020 2010 2020 13 ' ... _-. el970 1950 1810 1920 1990 1970 1980 2020 2010 2020 14 ...... O1960 1930 1900 1920 2000 1980 1990 2020 1380 1970 15 ... ..- &1990 1940 1790 1910 2010 1990 2000 1930 1340 1870 16 2010- " 1980 2000 1940 1920 1930 2010 2000 2000 2000 1920 1960 17 2060 1980 2020 1940 1920 1930 2010 1990 2000 1960 1920 1940 18 2060 2010 2030 I960 1940 1950 2010 2000 2010 1970 1920 1940 19 2030 2000 2010 . 1970 1950 I960 2010 1990 2010 1940 1930 1930 20 2020 1980 2000 1970 1950 1960 2010 1950 2000. 1950 1910 1930 21 2010 1940 1990 1970 1950 I960 2000 1870 1930 1910 1900 1910 22 2020 1980 2000 1970 1940 1960 2010- 1990 2000 1900 1340 1B70 23 2020 2010 2010 1970 1940 1960 2030 1990 2010 1860 1840 1S50 24 2020 2000 . 2020 1970 1960 i960 2020 1970 2010 1350 1830 1350 25 2030 2010 2020 2050 1960 2010 2020 2000' 2020 1370 1830 1870 26 2030 1970 2000 2070 2010 2030 2020 1930 2020 1850 1840 1BS0 27 2010 1990 2000 2060 2010 2030 2020 2000 2020 1850 1340 1850 28 2020 2000 2010 2070 1930 2030 2030 2000 2020 1B80 1840 I860 29 2000 1980 1990 2050 2Q00 2030 2040 2020 2030 1880 1370 1870 30 1990 I960 1970 2110 1970 2030 . 2040 2030 2030 1B70 1B70 1570 31 1960 1930 1940 -*- ... 20S0 203O 2030 1B80 1860 1870 MONTR 1980 2110 1770 1970 2080 1830 2000 2050 1330 1950 DAY MAX MIN MEAN MAX MEN MEAN MAX SCDS MEAN MAX MIN MEAN FEBRUARY MAftCH APRIL MAY 1 1B90 1870 1570 1730 1780 1790 ...... eisao 1540 1500 1510 2 1890 1860 1S70 1790 1770 17B0 -.. ... ©1570 1560 1500 1520 - 3 1870 1660 1870 1770 1750 1760 -.. ©1S6Q 1550 1510 1520 4 1880 1850 1370 el7S0 ...... el54Q 1570 1520 1540 5 1870 1850 I860 el740 -._ e!520 1600 1430 1500 6 el840 el750 ...... el490 1640 1530 1590 7 el620 el750 ...... el470 1620 14B0 1530 8 1810 1810 1810 O1770 ..- ... ©146Q 1670 1550 1590 9 1830 1810 1B20 ©1790 ...... el44Q 1770 14S0 1550 10 1820 1790 1310 e!780 e!430 1780 1520 1590 11 1820 1800 1810 elSOO ...... el440 1760 1580 1640 12 1810 1800 1810 el790 ... _-. ©1430 1840 1660 1710 13 1810 1800 1810 el780 ...... " el410 - 1870 1500 1700 14 1810 1300 1810 elSOO ol420 1920 1650 1710 15 1810 13O0 1B10 el820 ...... el410 2190 1690 2020 15 1810 1800 1800 e!830 ... el400 2180 2140 2160 17 1310 1800 1800 e!840 • ...... «1400 2160 2U0 2140 18 1810 1790 1800 el820 1430 1400 1410 2160 1670 1930 19 1B0O 1790 1800 elSOO 1440 1400 1420 2030 1660 1780 20 1800 1790 1800, e!7S0 1440 1400 1410 2060 1620 1780 21 1600 1780 ' 1790 «17G0 1410 1390 1400 2080 1640 1770 22 1800 1790 1790 el740 1420 1400 1410 2060 1660 1800 23 1790 1780 1790 el720 1430 1410 1410 2130 1740 2000 24 1790 1770 1790 el700 1460 1410 1440 2130 2070 2110 25 1790 1780 1790 e!630 1540 1460 1510 2100 1570 1890 26 1B20 1790 1800 O1630 1550 1450 1480 2070 1670 1960 27 1800 1790 1790 C1660 1490 1430 1460 2060 •1570 1870 28 1790 1780 1790 O1650 • 1510 1460 1470 2010 1630 1730 29 e!630 1510 1460 1480 2020 1610 1730 30 elSlO 1530 1460 1490 2050 1690 1950 31 el600 — — 2050 2040 2050 MONTH 1320 1750 1450 2190 1430 1770 e Estimated Page 115 RED RIVER BASIN 07331600 RED RIVER AT DENISON DAM NEAR DENISON, TX- -Continued SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE (MICROSIEMENS/CM AT 2S DEG.C), WATER YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1998 DAY MAX MOT MEAN MAX MEN MEAN MAX KIN MEAN MAX MIN MEAN JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER 1 2050 1710 1910 1750 1570 1650 1690 1630 1660 1710 1690 1700 2 1980 1600 1780 1780 1580 1660 1710 1640 1670 1750 1690 1710 3 2000 1610 1770 17B0 15B0 1670 1710 1660 1680 1770 1710 1740 4 2000 1530 1760 1780 1640 1730 1720 1680 1690 1760 1730 1740 5 1930 1550 1700 1770 1760 1770 1740 1630 1700 1740 1720 1730 6 1970 1660 1880 1770 1610 1700 1740 1690 1710 1740 1720 1730 7 1990 1970 1970 175Q 1600 1660. 1750 1690 1710 1760 1T20 1740 8 1990 1690 1870' 1760 1610 1660 1760 1700 1740 1760 1720 1740 9 1950 1670 1330 1740 1600 1660 1760 1750 1750 1770 1710 1740 10 1930 1670 1810 1750 1610 1670 1770 1730 1750 1770 1720 1740 U 1880 1670 1770 1750 1650 1720 1770 1730 1750 1770 1710 1740 12 1890 1630 1730 1750 1730 1740 1790 1670 1740 1760 1710 1730 13 1900 1690 1340 1740 1610 1630 1750 1680 1710 1720 1700 1710 14 1890 1860 1880 1730 1510 1660 1730 1670 1690 1750 1710 1730 15 1870 1570 1780 1740 1610 1660 1720 1670 1700 1750 1730 1740 16 • 1840 1590 1720 1720 1620 1660 1730 1710 1720 1750 1740 1730 17 1810 1590 1690 1730 1630 1570 1730 1690 1710 1760 1740 1750 18 1B10- 1610 1720 1740 1650 1710 1720 1670 • 1690 17S0 1730 1740 19 1790 1530 1700 . 1740 1720 1730 1730 1690 1710 " 1750 1720 1750 20 1780 1630 1740 1730 • 1620 1660 1730 1710 1720 1740 1720 1730 21 1730 " 1750 1770 1720 1540 1570 1750 1710 1730 1760 1720 1740 22 1770 1550 1700 1720 1640 1670 1760 1720 1740 1760 1720 1740 23 1740 1530 1660 1720 1650 1680 1750 1720 1740 1760 1720 1740 24 1750 1560 1660 1730 1320 1540 1750 1720 1740 1750 1720 1740 25 17S0 1530 1670 13B0 1310 • 1340 1760 1730 1740 •1760 1730 1740 26 176Q 1570 1670 1390 1320 1360 1750 1730 1740 1750 1730 1740 27 1760 1630 1720 1600 1390 1490 1740 1730 1740 1740 1730 1730 28 1760 1720 1750 1640 1600 1620 1750 1690 1730 1760 1720 1740 29 1760 1550 1700 1670 1610 1530 1720 1670- 1700 1760 1720 1750 30 1760 1560 1670 1680 1620 1640 1700 1680 1700 1760 1730 17S0 31 ... — 1690 1630 1650 1710 1680 1700 MONTH 2050 1530 1760 1780 1310 16S0 1790 1630- 1720 1770 1690 1740 TEMPERATURE, WATER (DEC. C) , WATZR YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1998 DAY MAX MIN MEAN MAX MIN MEAN MAX MIN MEAN MAX MIN MEAN OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY 1 25.0 24.0 243 20.0 133 193 13.0 12.5 13.0 83 83 B.5 2 24-5 233- 243 19-5 153 173 133 12.5 13 3 83 3.5 8.5 3 24.5 23.S 24.0 13.5- - 14.5 17.0 13.0 12.0 123 83 8.5 8.5 4 24.5 23.5 243 19.0 163 173 13 3 11.0 123 9.0 3.5 8.5 5 24.5 23 3 243 19.5 17.0 . 18.0 133 11.0 123 9.5 93 9.0 6 243 23 3 24 3 183 16.0 17.0 123 11.0 12.0 10-0 9.0 9.5 7 24.0 233 23 3 IB.5 16.0 17.0 123 10.0 U.O 9 3 .9.0 9.0 8 24.5 23.0 23 3 18-5 15.5 163 12.0 10.5 U.S 93 83 8.5 9 24.5 23.0 233 16.0 U.S 153 13.0 113 12.0 8.5 83 8.5 10 24.0 23.0 233 16.5 14.5 16 3 11.5 103 U.O 8.5 83 8.5 11 23.5 233 23 3 17.0 14.0 153 113 10.5 U.D 83 8.5 8.5 12 23.0 22.0 22.5 16.0 14.5 15.5 103 93 103 8-5 83 8.5 13 23.5 19 3 213 16.0 14-5 153 U.5 83 93 83 8.0 3.0 14 23.5 21.5 223 • 153 13.0 153 12.0 83 103 83 7.5 8.0 IS 23.S 21.5 22 3 153 12.0 14.0 U-5 83 10.0 8.0 73 7.5 16 23.5 213 223 15.5 u-.o 143 U.S 93 103 83 8.0 - 83 17 23.0 21.0 22.0- 143 12.5 143 11.5 93 10.5 8.0 8-0 8.0 18 ' 24.0 21.0 22 3 153 13.0 14.0 113 9.5 10.5 8.0 8.0 3,0 19 24.5 21.0 223 153 13.0 14.0 113 103 10.5 33 83 83 20 24.5 21.0 22-5 14.0 13.0 14.0 103 103 103 83 8.0 8.0 21 223 213 22.0 14.5 133 143 103 9.0 $.5 8.0 73 73 22 233 21.0 223 15.0 12.5 133 103 83 9,S 73 73 7.5 23 22.0 17.0 203 15.0 U.S 133 103 93 93 73 73 7.5 24 23.0 20.5 21.5 143 12.0 13.5 10-0 93 S.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 25 22.0 19.0 21.0 143 12.5 13.5 103 9.0 9.5 73 7.5 7.5 26 - 203 IS.5 193 14.5 13.0 143 9.5 9.0- 93 73 73 7.5 27 20.5 18.0 193 143 13.0 143 103 8.0 9.0 73 73 73 28 20.0 17.5 19.0 143 123 14.0 9.0 83 9.0 73 73 73 29 20.0 18.0 19.0 143 123 123 33 73 83 73 73 73 30 20.0 18.5 193 123 U.S U.O -33 8.5 83 73 7.5 73 31 21.0 183 19-0 ...... 33 8.5 33 7.5 73 7.5 MONTH 25.0 16.5 22.1 203 U-5 15.0 13.5 73 10.4 10-0 73 8.1 Page 116 RED RIVER BASIN 07331600 RED RIVER AT DENISON LAM.NEAR DEHISOM, TX"-Continued TEMPERATURE, WATER (DEO. C), HATER YEAR OCTOBER 1997 TO SEPTEMBER 1338 DAY MAX MIN MEAN MAX MIN MEAN MAX MIN MEAN MAX MIN MEAN FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL HAY 1 63 73 73 $.5 9.0 9.5 ... 173 15.5 173 2 83 73 B.O 93 9.0 93 ...... 17.0 16.0 17.0 3 3.5 83 83 93 9.0 93 -__ .-- ..- 13 3 163 173 4 83 8.0 83 U.O 9.0 103 ...... 17-5 16.0 17.0 5 6.0 8.0 S3 U.S . 103 103 --- 17.0 163 173 6 ... 10.5 83 9-5 ...... 17.5 173 173 7 --...... 103 7.0 9.5 ...... 183 17.0 18.0 8 7.S 7.5 73 10.0 73 83 ...... 18.0 17.0 173 9 8.0 73 73* li.^ 6.5 83 ... — - ... 193 173 183 10 . 8.0 73 33 103 7.0 83 19.0 17 .5 13.5 11 6.0 73 8.0 9.5 9.0 93 ...... 13.5 17.0 183 12 3.0 73 83 9-0 9.0 93 ... .__ ... 18.0 17.5 18.0 13 8.0 83 8 3 9.0 -9.0 93 ...... 183 173 18.0 14 8.0 83 8.0 93 93 93 ...... 13.5 1B.0 18.0 15 83 3.0 8 3 9.0 9.0 93 -.- ... • 203 18.0 19.0 16 83 83 83 93 9.0 S.O ...... 213 17.0 19.0 17 8.0 83 83 93 93 93 ...... 20.0 17.5 18.5 18 83 8.0 83 93 9.0 9.5 173 163 16.5 19 3 173 18.5 19 8.0 3.0 83 - 93 93- 9.5 173 15.5 16.5 193 17.5 18.5 20 9.0 83 83 93 9.0 9.5 173 15.5 16.5 193 13.0 18.5 21 83 83 83 93 9.5 93 17.5 163 17.0 19.0 18.0 18.5 22 8.5 83 3.0 93 8.0 9.5 17.5 16.5 17.0 193 18.0 18.5 23 8.5 S.O 8.5 — "". -._ 173 . 16.S 17.0 20.0 18-0 18.5 24 3.5 - 83 83 --. " ... 17.0 16.0 16.5 20.5 17.5 19.0 25 8.5 83 S.O ...... — 153 15.5 16.5 203 18.0 19.0 26 93 83 9.0 — ...... 17.0 163 163 20.5 18.0 19.5 27 10.0 9-0 93 ...... -__ 17.5 16.0 17.0 13.5 13.0 13.5 28 9.5 9.5 93 ...... --_ 17.5 15.5 17.0 21.0 1S3 19.0 29 ...... _ 17.0 15.5 . 17.0 21.0 13.0 19.0 30 ...... -...... 173 15.5 17.0 213 13.0 19.5 31 ...... --- ...... 213 13.0 19.5 M3NTH 21.5 15.5 183 DAY MAX MIN MEAN MAX MIN MEAN MAX MIN MEAN MAX MIN MEAN JUKE JDLY AUGUST SEPTEMBER 1 20.5 16.0 19 3 24.0 193 213 25-0 213 23.5 26.5 213 233 2 20.5 18.0 19.0" 23.5 20.0 21.5 ' 25.0 21.0' 23.0 25.5 213 23.5 3 20.5 18.5 19 3 233 19.5 213 253 21.0 23.0 263 U-5 24.0 4 21.5 18.5 19.5 22.5 20.0 213 253 21-0 233 263 21.0 23.5 5 23.0 183 203 223 19.0 20 3 25.5 21.0 23.5 .24.5 21.5 22.5 6 223 163 20.0 233 19.0 213 25.5 21.0 23 3 24.5 20.5 22.0 7 21.0 17.0 19.0 233 203 - 22.0 25.5 213 233 26.5 203 233 8 20.5 183 . 193 243 20.0 223 243 213 23.0 263 213 243 9 22.5 13.5 203 23.5 20.0 223 243 203 22.0 263 21.0 233 10 21.0 193 203 23.5 203 22.0 253 203 223 26.0 20.5 233 11 21.5 19.0 19.5 . 233 203 213 25.5 21.5 23 3 25.0 213 23.0 12 22.5 18.5 203 243 193 21.5 26-0 213 24.0 24.5 213 223 13 22.5 19 3 203 24.0 19.5 223 26.0 21.5 243 223 21.5 213 14 223 183 20.0 24-0 203 223 25.5 21.5 24.0 243 213 22.5 15 22.5 " 183 203 24.0 203 223 25.0 21.5 23.5 243 22.5 24.0 16 22.0 18.5 20.0 24.5 203- 22.5 25.0 20.5 22.5 24.5 22.5 233 17 22.0 183 20.0 243 203 22.5 26.0 20.5 23.0 253 223 24.0 18 213 19.0 20.0 24.0 20.5 22.0 263 213 243 253 223 23.5 19 23.0 193 203 233 19.5 213 26.0 21.5 243 25.0 22.0 23.5 20 23.0 19.0 20.5= 243 19.5 223 25 3 21. 5_ 24.0 243 21.0 22.5 21 223 193 20.5 243 203 223 26.0 21.5 24.0 .253 21.0 23.0 22 22.5 193 203 243 20 .5 22.5 25.5 213 23 3 25.0 223 24.0 23 22.5 19.0 203 243 20.5 22.5 24.0 203 223 253 22-5 23.5 24 22.5 19 3 203 243 20.5 223 253 20.5 233 253 213 23.0 25 22.5 193 20.5 243 20.5 233 263 21.5 243 2S3 22.0 233 26 233 19.5 213 243 203 233 26.0 223 24.5 243 223 23.0 27 23.5 193 21.0 25.0 20.S 233 263 21.5 24.0 263 213 23.0 28 23.5 19.0 213 , 243 20.5 233 263 22.0 24.5 263 213 233 29 23.0 193 21.0 243 20.5 233 263 21.5 24.5 263 22.0 24.0 30 23.0 19 3 21.5 243 20.5 233 25.0 21.5 23.0 26.0 22.0 24.0 31 253 20.5 233 26.0 20.5 233 ... — MONTH 23-5 173 20.2 25.0 19.0 22.1 26.5 203 23.5 263 203 23.2 Page 117 Page 118 RED RIVER COMPACT ARKANSAS - LOUISIANA - OKLAHOMA - TEXAS MAY 12,1978 Page 119 Page 120 PREAMBLE The states of Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas, pursuant to the acts of their respective Governors or legislatures, or both, being moved by considerations of interstate comity, have resolved to compact with respect to the water of the Red River and its tributaries. By Act of Congress, Public Law No. 346 {84th Congress, First Session), the consent of the United States has been granted for said states to negotiate and enter into a compact providing for an equitable apportionment of such water; and pursuant to that Act the President has designated the representative of the United States. Further, the consent of Congress has been given for two or more states to negotiate and enter into agreements relating to water pollution control by the provisions of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (P. L. 92-500, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.). T3ie Signatory States acting through their duly authorized Compact Commissioners, after several years of negotiations, have agreed to an equitable apportionment of the water of the Red River and its tributaries and do hereby submit and recommend that this compact be adopted by the respective legislatures and approved by Congress as hereinafter set forth: Page 121 Page 122 ARTICLE I PURPOSES SECTION 1.01. The principal purposes of this Compact are: (a) To promote interstate comity and remove causes of controversy between each of the affected states by governing the use , control and distribution of the interstate water of the Red River and its tributaries; (b) To provide an equitable apportionment among the Signatory States of the water of the Red River and its tributaries. (cj To promote an active program for the control and alleviation of natural deterioration and pollution of the water of the Red River Basin and to provide for enforcement of the laws related thereto; (d) To provide the means for an active program for the conservation of water, protection of lives and property from floods, improvement of water quality, development of navigation and regulation of flows in the Red River basin; and (e) To provide a basis for state or joint state planning and action by ascertaining and identifying each state's share in the interstate water of the Red River Basin and the apportionment thereof. Page 123 ARTICLE II GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION 2.01. Each Signatory State may use the water allocated to it by this Compact in any manner deemed beneficial by that state. Each state may freely administer water rights and uses in accordance with the laws of that state, but such uses shall be subject to the availability of water in accordance with the apportionments made by this Compact. Section 2.02 - The use of water by the United States in connection with any individual Federal project shall be in accordance with the Act of Congress authorizing the project and the water shall be charged to the state or states receiving the benefit therefrom. Section 2.03. Any Signatory State using the channel of Red River or its tributaries to convey stored water shall be subject to an appropriate reduction in the amount which may be withdrawn at the point of removal to account for transmission losses. SECTION 2.04. The failure of any state to use any portion of the water allocated to it shall not constitute relinquishment or forfeiture of the right to such use. SECTION 2.05. Each Signatory State shall have the right to: (a) Construct conservation storage capacity for the impoundment of water allocated by this Compact; (b) Replace within the same area any storage capacity recognized or authorized by this Compact made unusable by any cause, including losses due to sediment storage; (c> Construct reservoir storage capacity for the purposes of flood and sediment control as well as storage of water whi ch is ei ther imported or is to be exported i f such storage does not adversely affect the delivery of water apportioned to any other Signatory State; and (d) Use the bed and banks of the Red River and its tributaries to convey stored water imported or exported water, and water apportioned according to this Compact. SECTION 2.06. Signatory States may cooperate to obtain construction of facilities of joint benefit to such states. SECTION 2.07. Nothing in this Compact shall be deemed to impair or affect the powers, rights, or obligations of the United States, or those claiming under its authority, in, over and to water of the Red River Basin. Page 124 SECTION '2.08. Nothing in this Compact shall be construed to include within the water apportioned by this Compact any water consumed in each state by livestock or for domestic purposes; provided, however, the storage of such water is in accordance with the laws of the respective states but any such impoundment shall not exceed 200 acre- feet, or such smaller quantity as may be provided for by the laws of each state. SECTION 2.09. In the event any state shall import water into the Red River Basin from any other river basin, the Signatory State making the importation shall have the use of such imported water. SECTION 2.10. Nothing in this Compact shall be deemed to: (a) Interfere with or impair the right or power of any Signatory State to regulate within its boundaries the appropriation, use, and control of water, or quality of water, not inconsistent with its obligations under this Compact. (b) Repeal or prevent the enactment of any legislation or the enforcement of any requirement by any Signatory State imposing any additional conditions or restrictions to further lessen or prevent the pollution or natural deterioration of water within its jurisdiction; provided nothing contained in this paragraph shall alter any provision of this Compact dealing with the apportionment of water or the rights thereto; or (c) Waive any state's immunity under the Eleventh Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, or as constituting the consent of any state to be sued by its own citizens. SECTION 2.11. Accounting for apportionment purposes on interstate streams shall not be mandatory under the terms of the Compact until one or more affected states deem the accounting necessary. SECTION 2.12. For the purposes of apportionment of the water among the Signatory States, the Red River is hereby divided into the following major subdivisions: {a) Reach I - the Red River and tributaries from the New Mexico-Texas State boundary to Denison Dam; (b) Reach II - the Red River from Denison Dam to the point where it crosses the Arkansas-Louisiana state boundary and all tributaries which contribute to the flow of the River within this reach; Page 125 (c) Reach III - the tributaries west of the Red River, which cross the Texas-Louisiana state boundary, the Arkansas- Louisiana state boundary, and those, which cross both the Texas-Arkansas state boundary and the Arkansas-Louisiana state boundary- (d) Reach IV - the tributaries east of the Red River in Arkansas which cross the Arkansas -Louisiana state boundary; and SECTION 2.13. If any part or application of this Compact shall be declared invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, all other severable provisions and applications of this Compact shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 2.14. Subject to he availability of water in accordance with this Compact, nothing in this Compact shall be held or construed to alter, impair, or increase, validate, or prejudice any existing water right or right of water use that is legally recognized on the effective date of this Compact by either statutes or courts of the Signatory State within which it is located. Page 126 ARTICLE III DEFINITIONS SECTION 3.01. In this Compact: (a) The States of Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas are referred to as "Arkansas," ^Louisiana," "Oklahoma,* and "Texas," respectively, or individually as "State" or "Signatory State, * or collectively as 'States" or ""Signatory States." {b) The term "Red River* means the stream below the crossing of the Texas-Oklahoma state boundary at longitude 100 degrees west. (c) The term "Red River Basin" means all of the natural drainage area of the Red River and its tributaries east of the New Mexico-Texas state boundary and above its junction with Atchafalaya and Old Rivers. (d) The term "water of the Red River Basin" means the water originating in any part of the Red River Basin and flowing to or in the Red River or any of its tributaries. (e) The term "tributary" means any stream which contributes to the flow of the Red River. (f) The term "interstate tributary" means a tributary of the Red River, the drainage area of which includes portions of two or more Signatory States. (g) The term "intrastate tributary" means a tributary of the Red River, the drainage area of which is entirely within a single Signatory State. (h) The term "Commission" means the agency created by Article IX of this Compact for the administration thereof. (i) The term "pollution", means the alteration of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of water by the acts or instrumentalities of man which create or are likely to result in a material and adverse effect upon human beings, domestic or wild animals, fish and other aquatic life, or adversely affect any other lawful use of such water; provided, that for the purposes of this Compact, "pollution" shall not mean or include "natural deterioration." Page 127 {j) The term "natural deterioration" means the material reduction in the quality of water resulting from the leaching of solubles from the soils and rocks through or over which the water flows naturally. (k) The term "designated water" means water released from storage, paid for by non-Federal interests, for delivery to a specific point of use or diversion. (1) The term "undesignated water" means all water released from storage other than "designated water." (m) The term "conservation storage capacity" means that portion of the active capacity of reservoirs available for the storage of water for subsequent beneficial use, and it excludes any portion of the capacity of reservoirs allocated solely to flood control and sediment control, or either of them. (n) The term "runoff" means both the portion of precipitation, which runs off the surface of a drainage area and that portion of the precipitation that enters the streams after passing through the portions of the earth. Page 128 ARTICLE IV APPORTIONMENT OF WATER - REACH I OKLAHOMA - TEXAS Subdivision of Reach I and apportionment of water therein. Reach I of the Red River is divided into topographical subbasins, with the water therein allocated as follows. SECTION 4.01. Subbasin 1 - Interstate streams - Texas. (a) This includes the Texas portion of Buck Creek, Sand (Lebos) Creek, Salt Fork Red River, Elm Creek, North Fork Red River, Sweetwater Creek, and Washita River, together with all their tributaries in Texas which lie west of the 100th Meridian. (b) The annual flow within this subbasin is hereby apportioned sixty {60) percent to Texas and forty <40} percent to Oklahoma. SECTION 4.02. Subbasin 2 - Intrastate and Interstate streams - Oklahoma. (a) This subbasin is composed of all tributaries of the Red River in Oklahoma and portions thereof upstream to the Texas-Oklahoma state boundary at longitude 100 degrees west, beginning from, Denison Dam and upstream to and including Buck Creek. (b) The State of Oklahoma shall have free and unrestricted use of the water of this subbasin. SECTION 4.03. Subbasin 3 - Intrastate streams - Texas. (a) This includes the tributaries of the Red River in Texas, beginning from Denison Dam and upstream to and including Prairie Dog Town Fork Red River. (b) The State of Texas shall have free and unrestricted use of the water in this subbasin. SECTION 4.04. Subbasin 4 - Mainstem of the Red River and Lake Texoma. (a) This subbasin includes all of Lake Texoma and the Red River beginning at Denison Dam and continuing upstream to the Texas-Oklahoma state boundary at longitude 100 degrees west. Page 129 (b) The storage of Lake Texoma and flow from the mainstem of the Red River into Lake Texoma is apportioned as follows: (1) Oklahoma 200,000 acre-feet and Texas 200,000 acre- feet, which quantities shall include existing allocations and uses; and (2) Additional quantities in a ratio of fifty (50) percent to Oklahoma and fifty (50) percent to Texas. SECTION 4.05. Special Provisions. (a) Texas and Oklahoma may construct, jointly or in cooperation with the United States, storage or other facilities for the conservation and use of water; provided that any facilities constructed on the Red River boundary between the two states shall not be inconsistent with the Federal legislation authorizing Denison Dam and Reservoir project. (b) Texas shall not accept for filing, or grant a permit, for the construction of a dam to impound water solely for irrigation, flood control, soil conservation, mining and recovery of minerals, hydroelectric power, navigation, recreation and pleasure, or for any other purpose other than for domestic, municipal, and industrial water supply, on the mainstem of the North Fork Red River or any of its tributaries within Texas above Lugert-Altus Reservoir until the date that imported water, sufficient to meet the municipal and irrigation needs of Western Oklahoma is provided, or until January 1, 2000, which ever occurs first. Page 130 ARTICLE V APPORTIONMENT OF WATER - REACH II ARKANSAS OKLAHOMA TEXAS AND LOUISIANA Subdivision of Reach II and allocation of water therein. Reach II of the Red River is divided into topographic subbasins, and the water therein is allocated as follows: SECTION 5.01. Subbasin 1 - Intrastate streams - Oklahoma. (a) This subbasin includes those streams and their tributaries above existing, authorized or proposed last downstream major damsites, wholly in Oklahoma and flowing into Red River below Denison Dam and above the Oklahoma-Arkansas state boundary. These streams and their tributaries with existing, authorized or proposed last downstream major damsites are as follows: Location Stream Site Ac-Ft Latitude Longitude Island-Bayou Albany 85,200 33°51.5'N 96°11.4'W Blue River Durant 147,000 33°55.5'N 96°04.2'W Boggy River Boswell 1,243,800 34°01-6'N 95°45.0'W Kiamichi River Hugo 240,700 34©01.O'N 95°22.6'W (b) Oklahoma is apportioned the water of this subbasin and shall have unrestricted use thereof. SECTION 5.02. Subbasin 2 - Intrastate streams - Texas. (a) This subbasin includes those streams and their tributaries above existing authorized or proposed last downstream major damsites, wholly in Texas and flowing into Red River below Denison Dam and above the Texas-Arkansas state boundary. Page 131 Location Stream Site Ac-Ft Latitude Longitude Shawnee Creek Randall Lake 5,400 33°48.1'N 96°34.8'W Brushy Creek Valley Lake 15,000 33°38.7'N 96°21.5'W Bois d'Arc Creek New Bonham Reservoir 130,600 33°42.9'N 95°58.2'W Coffee Mill Creek Coffee Mill Lake 8,000 33°44.1'N 95°58.0'W Sandy Creek Lake Crockett 3,900 33°44.5'N 95°55-5'W Sanders Creek Pat Mayse 124,500 33°51.2'N 95°32.9'W Pine Creek Lake Crook 11,011 33°43.7'N 95°34.0'W Big Pine Creek Big Pine Lake 138,600 33°52.0'N 95°11.7'W Pecan Bayou Pecan Bayou 625,000 33°41.1'N 94°58.7'W Mud Creek Liberty Hill 97,700 33°33.0'N 94°29.3'W Mud Creek KVW Ranch Lakes (3) 3,440 33034.8'N 94°27.3'W (b) Texas is apportioned the water of this sUbbasin and shall have unrestricted use thereof. SECTION 5.03. Subbasin 3 - Interstate streams - Oklahoma and Arkansas (a) This subbasin includes Little River and its tributaries above Millwood Dam. (b) The States of Oklahoma and Arkansas shall have free and unrestricted use of the water of this subbasin within their respective states, subject, however, to the limitation that Oklahoma shal 1 al low a quantity of water equal to 40 percent of the total runoff originating below the following existing, authorized or proposed last downstream major damsites in Oklahoma to flow into Arkansas- Location Stream Site Ac-Ft Latitude Longitude Little River Pine Creek 70,500 34°06.8'N 95°04-9'W Glover Creek Lukfata 258,600 34°08.5'N 94°55.4'W Mountain Fork River Broken Bow 470,100 34°08.9'N 94°41.2'W (c) Accounting will be on an annual basis unless otherwise deemed necessary by the State of Arkansas and Oklahoma. Page 132 SECTION 5.04. Subbasin 4 - Interstate streams - Texas and Arkansas. Ia) This subbasin shall consist of those streams and their tributaries above existing authorized or proposed last downstream maj or damsites, originating in Texas and crossing the Texas-Arkansas state boundary before flowing into the Red River in Arkansas. These streams and their tributaries with existing, authorized or proposed last downstream major damsites are as follows: Location Stream Site Ac-Ft Latitude Longitude McKinney Bayou Trib. Bringle Lake 3,052 33°30.6'N 94°06.2'W Barkman Creek Barkman Reservoir 15,900 33°29.7'N 94°10.3'W Mountain Fork River Texarkana 386,900 33°18.3'N 94°09.6'W (b) The State of Texas shall have the free and unrestricted use of the water ofthis subbasin. SECTIQN 5.05. Subbasin 5 - Mainstem of the Red River and tributaries. (a) This subbasin includes that portion of the Red River, together with its tributaries, from Denison Dam down to the Arkansas-Louisiana state boundary, excluding all tributaries included in the other four subbasins of Reach II. (b) Water within this subbasin is allocated as follows: (1) The Signatory States shall have equal rights to the use of runoff originating in subbasin 5 and undesignated water flowing into subbasin 5, so long as the flow of the Red River at the Arkansas- Louisiana state boundary is 3,000 cubic fee per second or more, provided no state is entitled to more than 25 percent of the water in excess of 3,000 feet per second. (2) Whenever the flow of the Red River at the Arkansas- Louisiana state boundary is less than 3,000 cubic feet per second, but more than 1,000 cubic feet per second, the States of Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Texas shall allow to flow into the Red River for delivery to the State of Louisiana a quantity of water equal to 40 percent of the total weekly runoff originating in subbasin 5 and 40 percent of undesignated water flowing into subbasin 5; provided, however, that this Page 133 requirement shall not be interpreted to require any state to release stored water- (3) Whenever the flow of the Red River at the Arkansas - Louisiana state boundary falls below 1,000 cubic feet per second, the States of Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Texas shall allow a quantity of water equal to all the weekly runof f originating in subbasin 5 and al 1 undesignated water flowing into subbasin 5 within their respective states to flow into the Red River as required to maintain a 1,000 cubic. foot per second flow at the Arkansas-Louisiana state boundary. (c) Whenever the flow at Index, Arkansas, is less than 526 c.f.s. the states of Oklahoma and Texas shall each allow a quantity of water equal to 40 percent of the total weekly runoff originating in subbasin 5 within their respective states to flow into the Red River; provided however, this provision shall be invoked only at the request of Arkansas, only after Arkansas has ceased all diversion from the Red River itself in Arkansas above Index, and only if the provisions of Sub-sections 5.05 (b) (2) and (3) have not caused a limitation of diversions in subbasin 5. (d) No state guarantees to maintain a minimum low flow to a downstream state. SECTION 5.06. Special Provisions (a) Reservoirs within the limits of Reach II, subbasin 5, with a conservation storage capacity of 1,000 acre feet or less in existence or authorized on the date of the Compact pursuant to the rights and privileges granted by a Signatory State authorizing such reservoirs, shall be exempt from the provisions of Section 5.05; provided, if any right to store water in, or use water from, an existing exempt reservoir expires or is cancelled after the effective date of the Compact the exemption for such rights provided by this section shall be lost. (b) A Signatory State may authorize a change in the purpose or place of use of water from a reservoir exempted by subparagraph (a) of this section without losing that exemption, if the quantity of authorized use and storage is not increased. (cj Additionally, exemptions from the provisions of Section 5.05 shall not apply to direct diversions from Red River to off-channel reservoirs or lands- Page 134 ARTICLE VI APPORTIONMENT OF WATER - REACH III ARKANSAS, LOUISIANA, AND TEXAS Subdivision o£ Reach III and allocation of water therein. Reach III of the Red River is divided into topographic subbasins, and the water therein allocated, as follows: SECTION 6.01. Subbasin 1 - Interstate streams - Arkansas and Texas. (a) Thi3 subbasin includes the Texas portion of those streams cros s ing the Arkans as - Texas s tat e boundary one or mo re times and flowing through Arkansas into Cypress Creek- Twelve Mile Bayou watershed in Louisiana. (b) Texas is apportioned sixty (60) percent of the runoff of this subbasin and shall have unrestricted use thereof; Arkansas is entitled to forty (40) percent of the runoff of this subbasin. SECTION 6.02. Subbasin 2 - Interstate streams - Arkansas and Louisiana. (a) This subbasin includes the Arkansas portion of those streams flowing from Subbasin 1 into Arkansas, as well as other streams in Arkansas, which cross the Arkansas- Louisiana state boundary one or more times and flow into Cypress Creek-Twelve Mile Bayou watershed in Louisiana. (b) Arkansas is apportioned sixty (60) percent of the runoff of this subbasin said shall have unrestricted use thereof; Louisiana is entitled to forty (40) percent of the runoff of this subbasin. SECTION 6.03. Subbasin 3 - Interstate streams - Texas and Louisiana. (a) This subbasin includes the Texas portion of all tributaries crossing the Texas-Louisiana state boundary one or more times and flowing into Caddo Lake, cypress Creek-Twelve Mile Bayou or Cross Lake, as well as the Louisiana portion of such tributaries. (b) Texas and Louisiana within their respective boundaries shall each have the unrestricted use of the water of this subbasin subject to the following allocation: (1) Texas shall have the unrestricted right to all water above Marshall, Lake O' the Pines, and Black Cypress damsites; however, Texas shall not cause runoff to be Page 135 depleted to a quantity less than that which would have occurred with the full operation of Franklin County, Titus County, Ellison Creek, Johnson Creek, Lake O' the Pines, Marshall, and Black Cypress Reservoirs constructed, and those other impoundments and diversions existing on the effective date of this Compact. Any depletions of runoff in excess of the depletions described above shall be charged against Texas' apportionment of the water in Caddo Reservoir. (2) Texas and Louisiana shall each have the unrestricted right to use fifty (50} percent of the conservation storage capacity in the present Caddo Lake for the impoundment of water for state use, subject to the provision that supplies for existing uses of water from Caddo Lake, on date of Compact, are not reduced. (3) Texas and Louisiana shall each have the unrestricted right to fifty (50) percent of the conservation storage capacity of any future enlargement of Caddo Lake, provided, the two states may negotiate for the release of each state's share of the storage space on terms mutually agreed upon by the two states after the effective date of this Compact. (4) Inflow to Caddo Lake from its drainage area downstream from Marshall, Lake O' the Pines, and Black Cypress damsites and downstream from other last downstream dams in existence on the date of the signing • of the Compact document by the Compact Commissioners, will be allowed to continue flowing into Caddo Lake except that any manmade depletions to this inflow by Texas will be subtracted from the Texas share of the water in Caddo Lake. (c) In regard to the water of interstate streams which do not contribute to the inflow to Cross Lake or Caddo Lake, Texas shall have the unrestricted right to divert and use this water on the basis of a division of runoff above the state boundary of sixty (60) percent to Texas and forty (40) percent to Louisiana. (d) Texas and Louisiana will not construct improvements on the Cross Lake watershed in either state that will affect the yield of Cross Lake; provided, however, this subsection shall be subject to the provisions of Section 2.08. Page 136 SECTION 6.04. Subbasin 4 - Intrastate streams - Louisiana. (a) This subbasin includes that area of Louisiana in Reach III not included within any other subbasin. (b) Louisiana shall have free and unrestricted use of the water of this subbasin. Page 137 ARTICLE VII APPORTIONMENT OF WATER - REACH IV ARKANSAS AND LOUISIANA Subdivision of Reach TV and allocation of water therein. Reach TV of the Red River is divided into topographic subbasins, and the water therein allocated as follows: SECTION 7.01. Subbasin 1 - Intrastate streams - Arkansas- (a) This subbasin includes those streams and their tributaries above last downstream major damsites originating in Arkansas and crossing the Arkansas- Louisiana state boundary before flowing into the Red River in Louisiana. Those major last downstream damsites are as follows: Location Stream Site Ac-Ft Latitude Longitude Ouachita River Lake Catherine 19,000 34°26.6'N 93°01.6'W Caddo River DeGray Lake 1,377,000 34°13.2*N 93°06.6'W Little Missouri River Lake Greeson 600,000 34°08.9'N 93°42.9'W Alum Fork, Saline " Lake Winona 63,264 34°47.8'N 92°51.0'W (b) Arkansas is apportioned the waters of this subbasin and shall have unrestricted use thereof. SECTION 7.02. Subbasin 2 - Interstate Streams - Arkansas and Louisiana. (a) This subbasin shall consist of Reach IV less subbasin 1 as defined in Section 7.01 (a) above. (b) The State of Arkansas shall have free and unrestricted use of the water of this reach subject to the limitation that Arkansas shall allow a quantity of water equal to forty (40) percent of the weekly runoff originating below or flowing from the last downstream major dam site to flow into Louisiana. Where there are no designated last downstream damsites, Arkansas shall allow a quantity of water equal to forty (40) percent of the total weekly runoff originating above the state boundary to flow into Louisiana. Use of water in this subbasin is subject to low flow provisions of subparagraph 7.02(b). Page 138 SECTION 7.03. Special Provisions (a) Arkansas may use the beds and banks of segments of Reach IV for the purpose of conveying its share of water to designated downstream divisions. (b) The State of Arkansas does not guarantee to maintain a minimum low flow for Louisiana in Reach IV. However, on the following streams when the use of water in Arkansas reduces the flow at the Arkansas- Louisiana state boundary to the following amounts: (1) Ouachita - 780 cfs (2) Bayou Bartholomew - 80 cfs (3) Boeuf River - 40 cfs (4) Bayou Macon - 40 cfs The State of Arkansas pledges to take affirmative steps to regulate the diversions of runoff originating or flowing into Reach IV in such a manner as to permit an equitable apportionment of the runoff as set out herein to flow into the State of Louisiana. In its control and regulation of the water of Reach IV and adjudication or order rendered by the State of Arkansas or any of its instrumentalities or agencies affecting the terms of this Compact shall not be effective against the State of Louisiana nor any of its citizens or inhabitants until approved by the Commission. Page 139 ARTICLE VIII APPORTIONMENT OF WATER - REACH V Section 8.01. Reach V of the Red River consists of the mainstem Red River and all its tributaries lying wholly within the State of Louisiana. The State of Louisiana shall have free and unrestricted use of the water of this subbasin. Page 140 ARTICLE IX ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMPACT SECTION 9.01. There is hereby created an interstate administrative agency to be known as the "Red River Compact Commission," hereinafter called the "Commission." The Commission shall be composed of two representatives from each Signatory State who shall be designated or appointed in accordance with the laws of each state, and one Commissioner representing the United States, who shall be appointed by the President. The Federal Commissioner shall be the Chairman of the Commission but shall not have the right to vote. The failure of the President to appoint a Federal Commissioner will not prevent the operation or effect of this Compact, and the eight representatives from the Signatory States will elect a Chairman for the Commission. SECTION 9.02. The Commission shall meet and organize within 60 days after the effective date of this Compact. Thereafter, meetings shall be held at such times and places, as the Commission shall decide. SECTION 9.03. Each of the two Commissioners from each state shall have one vote; provided, however, that if only one representative from a state attends he is authorized to vote on behalf of the absent Commissioner from that state. .Representatives from three states shall constitute a quorum. Any action concerned with administration of this Compact or any action requiring compliance with specific terms of this Compact shall require six concurring votes. If a proposed action of the Commission affects existing water rights in a state, and that action is not expressly provided for in this Compact, eight concurring votes shall be required. SECTION 9.04. (a) The salaries and personal expenses of each state's representative shall be paid by the government that it represents, and the salaries and personal expenses of the Federal Commissioner will be paid for by the United States. (b) The Commission's expenses for any additional stream flow gauging s tat i ons shal 1 be equi tably apport i oned among the states involved in the reach in which the stream flow gauging stations are located. (c) All other expenses incurred by the Commission shall be borne equally by the Signatory States and shall be paid by the Commission out of the "Red River Compact Commission Fund." Such Fund shall be initiated and maintained by equal payments of each state into the fund. Disbursement shall be made from the fund in such manner as may be authorized by the Commission. Such fund shall not be subject to audit and - accounting procedures of the state; however, all receipts and disbursements of the fund in such Page 141 manner as may be authorized by the Commission. Such fund shall not be subject to audit and accounting procedures of the state; however, all receipts and disbursements of the fund by the Commission shall be audited by a qualified independent public accountant at regular intervals, and the report of such audits shall be included in and become a part of the annual report of the Commission. Each state shall have the right to make its own audit of the accounts of the Commission at any reasonable time. Page 142 ARTICLE X POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE COMMISSION SECTION 10.01. The Commission shall have the power to: (a) Adopt rules and regulations governing its operation and enforcement of the terms of the Compact. (b) Establish and maintain an office for the conduct of its affairs and, if desirable, from time to time, change its location; (c) Employ or contract with such engineering, legal clerical and other personnel as it may determine necessary for the exercise of its functions under this Compact without regard to the Civil Service Laws of any Signatory State; provided that such employees shall be paid by and be responsible to the Commission and shall not be considered employees of any Signatory State; (d) Acquire, use and dispose of such real and personal property as it may consider necessary; (e) Enter into contracts with appropriate State or federal agencies for the collection, correlation and presentation of factual data, for the maintenance of records and for the preparation of reports; (f) Secure from the head of any department or agency of the Federal or State government such information as it may need or deem to be useful for carrying out its functions and as may be available to or procurable by the department or agency to which the request is addressed; provided such information is not privileged and the department or agency is not precluded by law from releasing same. (g) Make findings, recommendations or reports in connection with carrying out the purposes of this Compact, including, but not limited to, a finding that a Signatory State is or is not in violation of any of the provisions of this Compact. The Commission is authorized to make such investigations and- studies, and to hold such hearings as it may deem necessary for said purposes. It is authorized to make and file official certified copies of any of its findings, recommendations or reports with such officers or agencies of any Signatory State, or the United States, as may have any interest in or jurisdiction over the subject matter. The making of findings, recommendations, or reports by the Commission shall not be a condition precedent to the instituting or maintaining of any action or proceeding of any kind by a Signatory State in any court or tribunal, or before any agency or officer, for the Page 143 protection of any right under this Compact or for the enforcement of any of its provisions; and (h) Print or otherwise reproduce and distribute its proceedings and reports. SECTION 10.02. The Commission shall: (a) Cause to be established, maintained and operated such stream, reservoir and other gauging stations as are necessary for the proper administration of the Compact. (b) Cause to be col lected, analyzed and reported such information on stream flows, water quality, water storage and such other data as are necessary for the proper administration of the Compact: (c) Perform all other functions required of it by the Compact and do all things necessary, proper and convenient in the performance of its duties thereunder; (d) Prepare and submit to the governor of each of the Signatory States a budget covering the anticipated expenses of the Commission for the following fiscal biennium; (e) Prepare and submit an annual report to the governor of each Signatory State and to the President of the United States covering the activities of the Commission for the preceding fiscal year, together with an accounting of all funds received and expended by it in the conduct of its work; (f) Make available to the governor or to any official agency of a Signatory State or to any authorized representative of the United States, upon request, any information within its possession; (g) Not incur any obligation in excess of the unencumbered balance 'of its funds, nor pledge the credit of any of the Signatory States; and (h) Make available to a Signatory State or the United States in any action arising under this Compact, without subpoena, the testimony of any officer or employee of the Commission having knowledge of any relevant facts. Page 144 ARTICLE II POLLUTION SECTION 11.01. The Signatory states recognize that the increase in population and the growth of industrial, agricultural, mining and other activities combined with natural pollution sources may lead to a diminution of the quality of water in the Red River Basin which may render the water harmful or injurious to the health and welfare of the people and impair the usefulness or public enjoyment of the water for beneficial purposes, thereby resulting in the adverse social, economic, and environmental impacts. SECTION 11.02. Although affirming the primary duty and responsibility of each Signatory State to take appropriate action under its own laws to prevent, diminish, and regulate all pollution sources within its boundaries which adversely affect the water of the Red River Basin, the states recognize that the control and abatement of the natural ly-occurr ing sal ini ty sources as wel 1, under certain circumstances, the maintenance and enhancement of the quality of water in the Red River Basin may require the cooperative action of all states. SECTION 11.03, The Signatory States agree to cooperate with agencies of the United States to devise and effectuate means of alleviating the natural deterioration of the water of the Red River Basin. SECTION 11.04. The Commission shall have the power to cooperate with the United States, the Signatory States and other entities in programs for abating and controlling pollution and natural deterioration of the water of the Red River basin, and to recommend reasonable water quality objectives to the states. SECTION 11.05. Each Signatory State agrees to maintain current records of waste discharges into the Red River Basin and the type and quality of such discharges, which records shall be furnished to the Commission upon request. SECTION 11.06. Upon receipt of a complaint from the governor of a Signatory State that the interstate water of the Red River Basin in which it has an interest are being materially and adversely affected by pollution and that the state in which the pollution originates has failed after reasonable notice to take appropriate abatement measures, the Commission shall make such findings as are appropriate and thereafter provide such findings to the governor of the state in which such pollution originates and request appropriate corrective action. The Commission, however, shall not take any action with respect to pollution, which adversely affects only the state in which such pollution originates- SECTION 11.07. In addition to its other powers set forth under this Article, the Commission shall have the authority, upon receipt of six concurring votes, to utilize applicable Federal statutes to Page 145 institute legal action in its own name against the person or entity responsible for interstate pollution problems; provided, however, sixty (60) days before initiating legal action the Commission shall notify the Governor of the state in which the pollution source is located to allow that state an opportunity to initiate action in its own name. SECTION 11.08. Without prejudice to any other remedy available to the Commission, or any Signatory State, any state which is materially and adversely affected by the pollution of the water of the Red River Basin by pollution originating in another Signatory State may institute a suit against any Signatory state or political or governmental subdivision thereof, or against any officer, agency, department, bureau, district or instrumentality of or in any Signatory State contributing to such pollution in accordance with applicable Federal statutes. Nothing herein shall be construed as depriving any persons of any rights of action relating to pollution which such person would have if this Compact had not been made. Page 146 ARTICLE XII TERMINATION AND AMENDMENT OF COMPACT SECTION 12.01. This Compact may be terminated at any time by appropriate action of the legislatures of all of the four Signatory States. In the event of such termination, all rights established under it shall continue unimpaired. SECTION 12.02. This Compact may be amended at any time by appropriate action of the legislatures of all Signatory States that are affected by such amendment. The consent of- the United States Congress must be obtained before any such amendment is effective. Page 147 ARTICLE XIII RATIFICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE OF COMPACT SECTION 13.01. Notice of ratification of this compact by the legislature of each Signatory State shall be given by the governor thereof to the governors of each of the other Signatory States and to the President of the United States. The President is hereby requested to give notice to the governors of each of the Signatory States of the consent to this Compact by the Congress of the United States. SECTION 13. 02. This Compact shall become effective, binding and obligatory when, and only when: (a) It has been duly ratified by each of the Signatory States; and (b) It has been consented to by an Act- of the Congress of the United States, which Act provides that: Any other statute of the United States to the contrary notwithstanding, in any case or controversy: which involves the construction or application of this Compact; in which one or more of the Signatory States to this Compact is a plaintiff or plaintiffs; and which is within the judicial power of the United States as set forth in the Constitution of the United States; and without any requirement, limitation or regard as to the sum or value of the matter in controversy, or of the place of residence or citizenship of, or of the nature, character or legal status of, any of the other proper parties plaintiff or defendant in such case or controversy: The consent of Congress is given to name and join the United States as a party defendant or otherwise in any such case or controversy in the Supreme Court of the United States if the United States is an indispensable party thereto. Page 148 SECTION 13.03. The United States District Courts shall have original jurisdiction (concurrent with that of the Supreme Court of the United States, and concurrent with that of any other Federal or state court, in matters in which the Supreme Court, or other court has original jurisdiction) of any case or controversy involving the application or construction of this Compact; that said jurisdiction shall include, but not be limited to, suits between Signatory States; and that the venue of such case or controversy may. be brought in any judicial district in which the acts complained of (or any portion thereof) occur. Page 149 Page 150 RULES FOR THE INTERNAL ORGANIZATION of the RED RIVER COMPACT COMMISSION (As Amended April 25,1984, April 30, 1991, May 4,1993, and March 24,1994) ARTICLE I THE COMMISSION 1.1 The Commission is the "Red River Compact Commission," which is referred to in Article X of the Red River Compact. \2 The credentials of each Commissioner shall be filed with both the Chairman and the Secretary of the Commission. When the credentials of a new Commissioner are received, the Secretary shall promptly notify each of the other Commissioners of the name and address of the new Commissioner. 1.3 Each Commissioner shall advise in writing the office of the Commission as to his address at which all official notices and other communications of the Commission shall be sent to Mm. Any change of address shall be promptly communicated in writing to the office of the Commission. 1.4 Persons designated to substitute for duly appointed Commissioners at meetings of the Compact Commission shall present the Commission with credentials of authority by letter, or other form of appointment acceptable to the Commission, which states the scope or. limitations of the appointment, together with a copy of the state or federal law or Attorney General's opinion which authorizes the appointment. ARTICLE II OFFICERS 2.1 The officers of the Commission shall be a Chairman, a Vice-Chairman, Secretary and a Treasurer. 2.2 The Commissioner representing the United States shall be the Chairman of the Commission. The Chairman or the designated representative of the Chairman, shall preside at meetings of the Commission. His duties shall be those usually imposed upon such officers and as may be assigned by these rules or by the Commission from time to time. 23 The Vice-Chairman shall be elected at the annual meeting from the Commissioners of the host state for the coming year as reflected by the minutes, and shall hold office for a term of one year, beginning on July 1 following the election, or until a successor is elected. The Vice-Chairman shall serve as Chairman in the event the President of the United States fails to appoint a Federal Commissioner, or in the absence of the Federal Commissioner or the designated representative of the Federal Commissioner. 2.4 The Secretary shall be selected at the annual meeting by the Commission from the state designated to host the next annual meeting as reflected in the minutes. The Secretary shall serve for the term of one year, beginning on July 1 following the selection, and perform the duties as the Commission shall direct. In case of a vacancy in the office of the Secretary, the Commission shall select a new Secretary as expeditiously as possible. Page 151 2.5 The Treasurer shall be selected by the Commission for a term of one year, beginning on July 1 following the selection. The Treasurer shall furnish a fidelity bond, the cost of which shall be paid by the Commission. The Treasurer shall receive, hold and disburse all funds which come into the his hands of the Treasurer. 2.6 The Secretary and Treasurer may Be members of the Commission, and their offices may be combined by the Commission. Any one person may hold both offices. 2.7 Whenever there is a permanent change in the Commander of the Lower Mississippi Valley Division, Department of the Army Corps of Engineers, or its counterpart in any future reorganization of the Corps, the Vice-Chairman shall immediately request the President to appoint the new Commander as the U.S. Commissioner to the Compact Commission. ARTICLE III PRINCIPAL OFFICE 3.1 The principal office of the Commission shall be either the office of the Chairman or the Secretary, as the Commission shall direct 3.2 Official books and records of the Commission shall be kept at the principal office. ARTICLE IV MEETINGS 4.1 The annual meeting of the Commission shall be held on the last Tuesday of April of each year. 4.2 Special meetings of the Commission may be called by the Chairman at any time. Upon the written request of each of the Commissioners of two states setting forth, the matters to be considered at such meeting, the chairman shall call a special meeting. 4.3 Reasonable notice of all special meetings of the Commission shall be sent by the Chairman, to all members of the Commission by ordinary mail at least ten days in advance of each meeting and notice shall state the purpose thereof. 4.4 Emergency meetings of the Commission may be called by the Chairman at any time upon the concurrence of at least two. states and such meetings, may be conducted by long-distance telephone conference call or other electronic means. Any such long-distance telephone conference call or other electronic communication shall be recorded and made available for public inspection in accordance with the laws of the respective signatory states. Each of the signatory states shall be represented by at least one Commissioner during such an emergency conference and concur in the action. An emergency is defined as a situation involving an eminent threat of injury to persons or damage to property or eminent ftoancial loss when the time requirements for public notice and travel to a special meeting would make such procedure and travel impractical and increase the likelihood of injury or damage or eminent financial loss. Page 152 4.5 Notice to the public shall be given of all Commission meetings. Except as otherwise provided, the Chairman shall furnish notice of all meetings to the Commissioners of each signatory state, whose responsibility it shall be to give said notice to the public in accordance with the laws of their respective states. In the event of an emergency meeting held by telephone or other electronic communication, no advance notice is required. All meetings of the Commission shall be held at the principal office unless another place shall be agreed upon by the Commissioners. 4.6 Minutes of the Commission shall be preserved in suitable manner. Minutes, until approved, shall not be official and shall be furnished only to members of the Commission, its employees and committees. 4.7 Commissioners from three of the signatory states shall constitute a quorum. However, if an emergency meeting is conducted as provided for in rule 4.4, or if a proposed action of the Commission affects existing water rights in a state, and that actions is not expressly provided for in the Compact, ei£ht concurring votes shall be required. Any other actions concerned with the administration of the Compact or requiring compliance with specific terms of the Compact shall require six concurring votes. 4.8 At each regular or annual meeting of the Commission, the order of business, unless agreed otherwise, shall be as follows: Call to order, Approval of Agenda; Approval of the minutes; Report of Chairman; Report of Secretary; Report of the Treasurer, Report of the Commissioners; Report of Committees; Unfinished business; New business; - Adjournment; 4.9 All meetings of the Commission, except executive sessions and except as otherwise provided, shall be open to the public. Executive sessions shall be open only to members of the Commission and such advisers as may be designated by each member and employees as permitted by the Commission; provided, however, that the Commission may call witnesses before it when in such sessions. The Commission may hold executive sessions only for the purposes of discussing; (1) The employment, appointment, promotion, demotion, disciplining or resignation of a Commission employee or employees, members, advisers, or committee members. (2) Pending or contemplated litigation, settlement offers, and matters where the duty of the Commission's counsel to his client, pursuant to the Code of Professional Responsibility, clearly conflicts with the public's right to know, (3) The report, development, or course of action regarding security, personnel, plans, or devices. Page 153 No executive session may be held except on a vote, taken in public by a majority of a quorum of the members present. At least one Commissioner from each of the signatory states must agree to the holding of an executive session. Any motion or other decision considered or arrived at in executive session shall be voidable unless, following the executive session, the Commission reconvenes in public session and presents and votes on such motion or other decision. 4.10 In the absence of a Chairman and Vice-Chairman, all of the Commissioners from any two (2) states may call an emergency or a special meeting of the Compact Commission. ARTICLE V COMMITTEES 5.1 There may be the following standing committees: (a) Budget Committee; (b) Engineering Committee; (c) Environmental and Natural Resources Committee; (d) Legal Committee. 5.2 The committees shall have the following duties: (1) The Budget Committee shall prepare the annual budget and shall advise the Commission on all fiscal matters that may be referred to it. (2) The Engineering Committee shall advise the Commission all engineering matters mat may be referred to it. (3) The Environmental and Natural Resources Committee shall advise the Commission on all environmental and natural resource matters that may be referred to it. (4) The Legal Committee shall advise the Commission on all legal matters that may be referred to it 5.3 Commissioners may be members of committees. The number of members of each committee shall be determined from time to time by the Commission. The Commissioners of each state shall designate the member or members on each committee representing the State, and each State shall have one vote. 5.4 The Chairman may appoint a non-voting member of each committee. 5^ The Chairman of each committee shall be designated by the Commission from members of the committee; however, in the event a Chairman is unable to perform his duties, the committee shall appoint an Interim Chairman. 5.6 The Commission may from time to time create special committees and assign it tasks. The Commission may also determine the composition of the special committees. 5.7 Formal committee reports shall be made in writing and filed with the Commission. Page 154 ARTICLE VI RULES AND REGULATIONS 6.1 So far as is consistent with the Compact, the Commission may adopt rules and regulations and amend them from time to time. Rules and regulations to be adopted shall be presented by resolution and approved by a quorum as set out in Rule 4.7. Copies of proposed resolutions for rule adoption shall be presented in writing to each of the Commissioners at least thirty days before the meeting upon which they are to be voted. However, at its meeting, by unanimous vote, the Commission may waive this notice requirement. 6.2 Rules and regulations of the Commission may be compiled and copies may be prepared for distribution to the public under such terms and conditions as the Commission may prescribe. ARTICLE VII FISCAL -7.1 All funds of the Commission shall be deposited in a depository or depositories designated by the Commission under the name of the "Red River Compact Commission Fund". 7.2 Disbursement of funds in the hands of the Treasurer, for items included in the approved budget, shall be made by check signed by him and the Vice-Chairman or by such person as may be designated by the Commission. Disbursement of rands for non-budgeted items shall be made by check signed by the Treasurer and Vice-Chairman upon voucher approved by at least six of the Commissioners, four of whom shall be from different signatory states. 7.3 At the annual meeting of each year, the Commission shall adopt a budget covering an estimate of its expenses for the following two fiscal years. 7.4 The payment of expenses of the Commission and of its employees shall not be subject to the audit and accounting procedures of the states. 7.5 All receipts and disbursements of the Commission shall be audited periodically as determined by the Commission by a qualified independent public accountant to be selected by the Commission and the report of the audit shall be included in and become a part of the annual report of the Commission. 7.6 The fiscal year of Commission shall begin July 1, of each year and end June 30 of the next succeeding year. ARTICLE VIII ANNUAL REPORT 8.1 The Commission shall make an annual report and transmit it on or before the last day of May to the governors of the signatory states to the Red River Compact and to the President of the United States. Page 155 8.2 The annual report shall contain: (1) Minutes of all regular, special or emergency meetings held during the year; (2) All findings of facts made by the Commission during the preceding year; (3) Recommendations for actions by the signatory states; (4) Statements as to any cooperative studies made during the preceding year; (5) All data which the Commission deems pertinent; (6) The budget for current and future years; (7) The most recent audit report or current financial statement of the Red River Compact Fund; (8) Name, address and phone number of each Commissioner and each member of all standing committees; (9) Such other pertinent matters as the Commission may require. Page 156 RED RIVER COMPACT INTERIM RULES AND REGULATIONS To Compute and Enforce Compact Compliance REACH U, SUBBASIN 5 (Adopted 4/30/87) 1. These rules and regulations to be used to compute and enforce Compact compliance within Subbasin 5 of Reach II, Red River Compact, are adopted subject to the following conditions and assumptions. a. It is fully understood that these rules and regulations should be modified as new or improved gaging stations are constructed, whenever experience or detailed studies demonstrate the need for modification, and if the Commission should modify its interpretation of Compact provisions relating to this Subbasin. to. Definitions: (1) "Diversion" as used in these rules and regulations, is the net loss to a water source from use by a diverter, and is computed as the diversion from the water source minus the part of the diversion which is returned to the water source. Normally, return flows must be measured to be considered; however, the EAC may consider and recommend exceptions. As used herein, "diversion" is equivalent to "net diversion" from a water source and to "depletion" or "consumptive use" of a water source. 2. Management of Compact Compliance Computations. a. Management Using State Centers: (1) State EAC representatives will establish State Computation Control Centers (a) State representatives will gather data, exchange data and meet via conference call to check on computation results, if necessary. (b) EAC will determine compliance with Compact b. Management Period for Weekly Flow and Diversions: (1) Next week's State diversions will be allocated based on last week's compliance computations. (2) It is each State's responsibility to limit its total State diversion allocation among its State diverters. (3) The weekly period for use and flow data will start and end at 8:00 ajn. on Tuesday of each week. (4) Data collection and dissemination will be completed on Tuesday of each week. (5) Computation of Compliance will be completed on Wednesday of each week. (6) Each State can request an update at any time. c Management Improvement Studies: The EAC will monitor the effect on accounting management of the following factors and will report thereon to the Commission whenever procedure changes appears desirable. (1) Errors caused by travel time. (2) Future restrictions computed from past week's data, (3) Failure to consider channel loss. (4) Failure to consider ungaged return flows. (5) Failure to consider flow trends. (6) Addition of needed B Aev v ' Page 157 3. Enforcement of Compact Compliance Requirements. Each State will be responsible for insuring that the sum of the diversions by State users does not exceed the total State diversion authorized by the Red River Compact. In this regard, each State will be responsible for establishing clear legal authority within its State for enforcing the restrictions imposed by the Red River Compact 4. Data Reporting Procedures. a. Streamflow Gaging Station Records: The EAC will make arrangements with the Corps of Engineers, the U.S, Geological Survey and with States as required to collect daily and/or weekly data, as needed, and forward to the State Computation and Control Centers. b. Diversion Records: Each State will be responsible to collect daily and/or weekly data, as needed, and forward to the State Computation and Control Centers. c. Archived Records: Records will be archived by Commission Chairman. 5. General Compliance Requirements of Section 5.05, Red River Compact. a. Section 5.05 (b)(1): (1) Compact prescribes: "The Signatory States shall have equal rights to the use of the runoff originating in subbasin 5 and undesignated water flowing into subbasin 5, so long as the flow of the Red River at the Arkansas-Louisiana state boundary is 3,000 cubic feet per second or more, provided no state is entitled to more than 25 percent of the water in excess of 3,000 cubic feet per second." (2) In computing the Subbasin 5 water allocation, when the flow of the Red River at the Arkansas-Louisiana State Boundary is 3,000 cfs or more and the total runoff and undesignated flow of Subbasin 5 is greater than or equal to 7,500 cfs but less than or equal to 12,000 cfs, Louisiana's allocation shall be 3,000 cfs and each of the three upstream states will equally share the runoff and undesignated flow in excess of 3,000 cfs. . (3) When the total runoff and undesignated flow of Subbasin 5 is 12,000 cfs or more, each of the signatory states shall be entitled to 25% of the total runoff and undesignated flow. (4) State compliance with Section 5.05 (b)(1) does not need to be determined except when specifically requested by a Compact State. b. Section 5.05 (b)(2): (1) The Compact states: "Whenever the flow of the Red River at the Arkansas-Louisiana state boundary is less than 3,000 cubic feet per second, but more than 1,000 cubic feet per second, the States of Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Texas shall allow to flow into the Red River for delivery to the State of Louisiana a quantity of water equal to 40 percent of the total weekly runoff originating in subbasin 5 and 40 percent of undesignated water flowing into subbasin 5; provided, however, that this requirement shall not be interpreted to require any state to release stored water." Page 158 (2) In computing the Subbasin 5 water allocation to Louisiana when flow "of Red River at the Arkansas-Louisiana State boundary is less than 3,000 cfs but more than 1,000 cfs, the Subbasin 5 runoff for each of the three upstream States and the undesignated water flowing into Subbasin 5 from each upstream State totaled, and the three upstream States should allow to pass to Louisiana 40 percent of the total, or 1,000 cfs, whichever is greater. (3) When the Subbasin 5 runoff plus undesignated water totals at least 2,500 cfs and not more than 7,500 cfs, each of the three upstream States are allocated 60 percent of its runoff plus undesignated inflow and the other 40 percent is to be allowed to flow into the Red River for delivery to Louisiana. (4) When the Subbasin 5 runoff plus undesignated water totals at least 1,000 cfs but less than 2,500 cfs, the allocation to Louisiana is 1,000 cfs because of Compact Section 5.05 (b)(3). The total Subbasin 5 runoff plus undesignated water is compared to the Louisiana allocation of 1,000 cfs and a percentage is established. Each of the three upstream States will be entitled to divert and use a quantity computed ' using (100 percent minus the established percentage) times (the total of runoff from its Subbasin 5 areas plus undesignated water flowing into its Subbasin 5 areas). (5) This Compact compliance determination should be made whenever the flow of the Red River at the Arkansas-Louisiana State boundary fells below 3,000 cfs and is more than 1,000 cfs. c. Section 5.05 (b)(3): (1) The Compact states: "Whenever the flow of the Red River at the Arkansas-Louisiana state boundary falls below 1,000 cubic feet per second, the States of Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Texas shall allow a quantity of water equal to all the weekly runoff originating in Subbasin 5 and all undesignated water flowing into Subbasin 5 within their respective states to flow into the Red River as required to maintain a 1,000 cubic foot per second flow at the Arkansas-Louisiana state boundary." (2) In computing the Subbasin 5 allocation when the flow of the Red River at the Arkansas-Louisiana State boundary falls below 1,000 cfs, and when the Subbasin 5 runoff and undesignated water flowingint o Subbasin 5 total 1,000 cfs or less, all flow must be passed to Louisiana. (3) When the Subbasin 5 runoff and undesignated water flowing into Subbasin 5 total more than 1,000 cfs but less than 2,500 cfs, Louisiana is allocated 1,000 cfs. TOs 1,000 cfs Louisiana entitlement is compared to the total runoff plus undesignated water and a percentage is established. Each of the three upstream States will be entitled to divert and use a quantity computed using (100 percent minus the established percentage) times (its total State runoff and undesignated water inflow). (4) See rules for Compact Section 5.05 (b)(2) when the Subbasin 5 runoff and undesignated water flowing into Subbasin 5 total 2,500 cfs or more up to 7,500 cfs. (5) This Compact compliance determination should be made whenever the flow of the Red River at the Arkansas-Louisiana State boundary falls below 1,000 cfs. Page 159 d. Section 5.05 (c): (1) The Compact states: "Whenever the flow at Index, Arkansas, is less than 526 cfs., the states of Oklahoma and Texas shall each allow a quantity of water equal to 40 percent of the total weekly runoff originating in Subbasin 5 within their respective states to flow into the Red River; provided however, this provision shall be invoked only at the request of Arkansas, only after Arkansas has ceased all diversions from the Red River itself in Arkansas above Index, and only if the provisions of Sub-sections 5.05 (b)(2) and (3) have not caused a limitation of diversions in subbasin 5." (2) In computing the Subbasin 5 allocation when flow of Red River at Index Arkansas is less than 256 cfs, the States of Oklahoma and Texas are to pass 40 percent of weekly runoff from respective Subbasin 5 areas. (3) This Compact compliance determination will be made only when requested by Arkansas, only after Arkansas has ceased all diversions from the Red River, and only if the provisions of subsections 5.05 (b)(2) and (3) have not caused a limitation of diversions in Subbasin 5. 6. Procedures (Disregarding Designated Flows) to Compute State Runoff, Runoff plus Undesignated Inflows, and Flow of Red River at Arkansas-Louisiana State Boundary. a. Oklahoma. (1) Runoff plus Undesignated Inflows of Denison Dam to DeKalb Gage: (a) Kiamichi River near Hugo, OK, Gage flow, plus Muddy Boggy Creek near Unger, OK, Gage flow plus Blue River near Blue, OK Gage flow, plus (b) Fifty percent of (DeKalb Gage flow, plus Texas and Oklahoma diversions, minus gaged flows at Kiamichi River near Hugo, Ok, Muddy Boggy Creek near Unger, OK, Blue River near Blue, OK, and Sanders Creek near Chicota, Texas, streamflow Gages). (2) Runoff plus Undesignated Inflows, DeKalb Gage to Oklahoma-Arkansas State line: Fifteen and one-half (15.5) percent of (Index Gage flow, minus DeKalb Gage flow, plus Oklahoma, Texas and Arkansas diversions downstream from DeKalb Gage). (3) Runoff only, Denison Dam to Oklahoma-Arkansas State line. (a) Fifty percent of (DeKalb Gage flow, minus Red River at Denison Dam Gage flow, plus Texas and Oklahoma diversions upstream from DeKalb Gage, minus Blue River near Blue, OK, Gage flow, minus Muddy Boggy Creek near Unger-Okla. Gage flow, minus Kiamichi River near Hugo-Okla. Gage flow minus Gage flow), plus (b) Fifteen and one-half (15.5) percent of (Index Gage flow, minus DeKalb Gage flow, plus Oklahoma, Texas and Arkansas diversions between DeKalb and Index Gages). b. Texas. (1) Runoff plus Undesignated Inflows, DeKalb Gage to Index Gage: (a) Sanders Creek near Chicota Gage flow, plus (b) Fifty percent of: (DeKalb Gage flow, plus Texas and Oklahoma diversions, minus gaged flows at Kiamichi River near Hugo, OK, Muddy Boggy Creek near Unger, OK, Blue River near Blue, OK, and Sanders Creek near Chicota, TX, streamflow Gages). Page 160 (2) Runoff plus Undesignated Inflows, DeKalb Gage to Index Gage: Fifty (50) percent of (Index Gage flow, minus DeKalb Gage flow,plu s Oklahoma, Texas and Arkansas diversions downstream from DeKalb Gage). (3) Runoff plus Undesignated Inflows, Sulphur River Gage: One hundred percent of (Sulphur River near Texarkana Gage flow) minus (Texas diversions from river below gage) plus (Texas diversions below Texarkana Dam). (4) Runoff Only, Denison Dam to Index Gage: Fifty percent of (Index Gage flow, minus Red River at Denison Dam Gage flow, plus Oklahoma and Texas and Arkansas diversions upstream fromth e Index Gage, minus Blue River near Blue, OK, Gage flow, minus Muddy Boggy Creek near Unger-Okla. Gage flow, minus Kiamichi River near Hugo-Okla. flow, minus Sanders Creek near Chicota-Texas Gage flow). c. Arkansas Runoff plus Undesignated Inflows. (1) Oklahoma-Arkansas State Line to Index Gage: Thirty-four and one-half (34.5) percent of (Index Gage flow, minus DeKalb Gage flow, plus Oklahoma and Texas and Arkansas diversions between DeKalb and Index Gages). (2) Index Gage to Hosston Gage: (a) Hosston Gage flow, plus Louisiana diversions above Hosston Gage, minus Index Gage flow, minus (Sulphur River near Texarkana Gage flow less Texas diversions from river below gage), plus Arkansas diversions downstream from Index Gage. d. Louisiana Streamflow at Arkansas-Louisiana State Boundary. (1) Red River flow at Arkansas-Louisiana State boundary equals (Gage flow) plus (Louisiana diversions from Red River downstream from the State boundary and upstream from gage). (2) Data needed to make interim Louisiana calculations (a) For Red River flows up to 5,000 cfs - Hosston Gage flow, plus Louisiana diversions from Red River upstream from Hosston Gage. (b) For Red River flows of 5,000 cfs or larger - Shreveport Gage flow, plus Louisiana diversions from Red River upstream from Shreveport Gage, minus Twelvemile Bayou near Dixie-La Gage flow, plus Louisiana diversions from Twelvemile Bayou below Twelvemile Bayou near Dixie-La Gage. (3) Effect of Flow Trends, Scheduled Change of Reservoir Releases, and Other Events Certain to Significantly Change Flow at Arkansas-Louisiana State Boundary During Coming Week. In addition to the Arkansas-Louisiana State boundary flow estimated based on subparagraph (2) (a) or (b) above, the EAC will also advise the Commission of probable significant changes in State boundary flow which should result from flow trends, scheduled change of reservoir releases, and other such known events. Page 161 7. Procedures (Using Designated Flow Data) to Compute State Runoff plus Undesignated Inflows and Flow of Red River at Arkansas-Louisiana State boundary. Procedures outlined in paragraph 6 above will be followed except that designated inflows, designated outflows and diversion of designated flows will be accounted for whenever appropriate. Page 162 RED RIVER COMPACT RULES AND REGULATIONS To Compute and Enforce Compact Compliance REACH I, SUBBASIN 1 (Adopted 4/30/87) 1. General. These rules and regulations to be used to compute and enforce Compact compliance within Subbasin I of Reach 1, Red River Compact, are adopted subject to the following conditions and assumptions. a. It is fully understood that these rules and regulations should be modified as new or improved gaging stations are constructed, whenever experience or detailed studies demonstrate the need for modification, and if the Commission should modify its interpretation of Compact provisions relating to this Subbasin. 2. Management of Compact Compliance Computations. a. Management Using State Centers: (1) Texas and Oklahoma representatives will establish State Computation and Control Centers. (a) State representatives will gather data, exchange data and meet prior to the annual Commission meeting to check on computation results, (b) The EAC will determine compliance with Compact. b. Management Period for Compact Compliance Computations: (1) Computation will be on the calendar year basis. (2) Water data for a calendar year should be exchanged prior to March 15 of the following year. (3) Compact Compliance Computation for a calendar year should be completed by April 15 of the following year. 3. Enforcement of Compact Compliance Requirements. Texas will be responsible for insuring that the sum of Texas uses does not exceed the total Texas water use authorized by the Red River Compact, and Texas will be responsible for establishing clear legal authority within Texas for enforcing the restrictions imposed by the Red River Compact. 4. Data Reporting Procedures. a. Streamflow Gaging Station Records: The EAC will make arrangements with federal and State agencies, as required, to collect calendar year data as needed, and forward to the Texas and Oklahoma Computation Control Centers. b. Archived Records: Records will be archived by the Commission Chairman. 5. General Compliance Requirements of Section 4.01 Red River Compact, a. SECTION 4.01. Subbasin 1 - Interstate Streams - Texas: (1) The Compact prescribes: "(a) This includes the Texas portion of Buck Creek, Sand (Lebos) Creek, Salt Fork Red River, Elm Creek, North Fork Red River, Sweetwater Creek and Washita River, together with all their tributaries in Texas which lie west of the 100th Meridian." The annual flow within this subbasin is hereby apportioned sixty (60) percent to Texas and forty (40) percent to Oklahoma." Page 163 SECTION 4.01 is modified in part by SECTION 4.05. Special Provisions, as follows: "(b) Texas shall not accept for filing, or grant a permit, for the construction of a dam to impound water solely for irrigation, flood control, soil conservation, mining and recovery of minerals, hydroelectric power, navigation, recreation and pleasure, or for any other purpose other than for domestic, municipal, and industrial water supply, on the mainstem of the North Fork Red River or any of its tributaries within Texas about Lugert-Altus Reservoir until the date that imported water, sufficient to meet the municipal and irrigation needs of Western Oklahoma is provided, or until January 1,2000, which ever occurs first." (2) Pertinent extracts from the Supplemental Interpretive Comments of Legal Advisory Committee, as approved by the Red River Compact Commission on the 19th day of September 1978, are as follows: Pages 9 and 10 "***** The flow of interstate tributaries is generally divided 60 percent to the upstream State and 40 percent to the downstream State. Because flows in Reach I are primarily from flood flows, an annual basis of accounting was adopted" ***** "Section 4.05(b) reflects the compromise of a long-standing dispute between Oklahoma and Texas over the water of the North Fork of the Red River and Sweetwater Creek. ****** "Under the Compromise Texas will limit development on. North Fork and Sweetwater Creek to projects justified on the basis of municipal, industrial, and domestic needs until the year 2000. However, if sufficient imported water becomes available in Western Oklahoma before 2000, Texas will be free to pursue full development of its 60% of these interstate tributaries. * * * *" (2) Until January 1,2000 (assuming that imported water is not provided prior to that date in sufficient amounts to meet municipal and irrigation needs of Western Oklahoma) special restrictions apply to Texas water use in its North Fork Red River watershed upstream from the Lugert-Altus Reservoir. Therefore, some of the Compact compliance rules for the North Fork Red River watershed upstream from the Lugert-Altus Reservoir (para 5.f.(3) &, (4) and g.(3) & (4) below) expire on January 1, 2000, if still in effect at that time. b. Buck Creek Watershed in Texas: Buck Creek watershed covers about 300 square miles in Texas. There are no existing gaging stations on Buck Creek in Texas or in Oklahoma. Since neither the Texas nor Oklahoma use of flow from Buck Creek is significant at this time, it is not required to make an annual accounting of the flow in Buck Creek. It also appears that establishing gaging stations and channel loss values so that future annual accountings could be made is not economically justified at this time. Annual accounting procedures for this watershed should be developed to provide a 60:40 apportionment whenever requested by either Oklahoma or Texas. Page 164 c Sand (Lebos) Creek Watershed in Texas: Sand Creek watershed covers about 65 square miles in Texas. There are no gaging stations on Sand Creek in Texas or in Oklahoma. Since neither Texas nor Oklahoma makes significant use of flow from Sand Creek, it is not necessary to make an annual accounting of the flow in Sand Creek, and it does not seem to be economically justified at this time to establish gaging stations and determine channel loss values so that future annual accountings could be made. Annual accounting procedures for this watershed should be developed to provide a 60:40 apportionment whenever requested by either Oklahoma or Texas. d. . Salt Fork Red River Watershed in Texas: Salt Fork Red River watershed in Texas covers about 1,380 square miles, of which 209 are non-contributing. The USGS streamflow gage number 07300000, Salt Fork Red River near Wellington, Texas, is about 16 miles upstream from the Oklahoma-Texas State line and measures flow from a 1,222 sq. mi. drainage area, of which 209 is probably non-contributing. The average annual discharge (1953-1966) was 52,600 AF/yr, and the average annual discharge since Greenbelt Reservoir was completed (1967-1977) has been 33,250 AF/yr. The USGS streamflow gage 07300500, Salt Fork Red River at Mangum, Oklahoma, is about 29 miles downstream from the Oklahoma-Texas State line and measures flow from a 1,566 sq. mile drainage area, of which 209 is probably non-contributing. The average annual discharge (1937-1977) has been 62,450 AF/yr. (1) The actual annual delivery at the Oklahoma State line is computed as follows: (a) The annual flow at the Wellington gage, (lb) . Minus channel losses to Wellington gage flows between gage and State line (until this specific channel loss value is available, the Compact compliance calculations will be made ignoring this channel loss adjustment), (c) Plus Texas1 flow between Wellington gage and the State line. (This flow will be computed based on intervening drainage area between Wellington and Mangum gages adjusted for both Texas and Oklahoma man-made depletions.), and (d) Minus Texas' man-made depletions downstream from the Wellington gage. (2) The scheduled annual delivery at the Oklahoma State line is 40 percent of the natural flow at State line without diversions or impoundments, and would be computed as 40 percent of the following: (a) Hie actual annual delivery (para 5.d.(l) above), (b) Plus all man-made depletions in Texas, and (c) Minus the increased channel losses in Texas which would have incurred had Texas depletions not occurred (until this specific channel loss value is available, the. Compact compliance calculations will be made ignoring this channel loss adjustment). (3) Compact compliance is achieved as long as actual delivery exceeds scheduled delivery. Page 165 e. Elm Creek Watershed in Texas: Elm Creek watershed covers about 360 square miles in Texas which includes the North Elm Creek tributary. There is no streamflow gage on Elm Creek in Texas. The USGS gage number 07303400, Elm Fork of North Fork Red River near Carl, Oklahoma, is about 6 miles downstream from the Oklahoma-Texas State line, and was used to measure flow from a 416 square mile drainage area but discharge measurements at this site were discontinued in 1980. The average annual discharge (20 years) was 30,280 AF/yr. No Compact compliance accounts can be made until the Gage near Carl has been reestablished. (1) The actual annual delivery at State line is computed as follows: (a) Flow at the State line. (This flow will be computed based on the drainage area and on the flow measured at Carl gage, adjusted for both Texas and Oklahoma depletions;), and (b) Minus Texas' man-made depletions. (2) The scheduled annual delivery at State line is 40 percent of the natural flow at State line without diversions or impoundments and would be computed as 40 percent of the following: (a) The actual annual delivery (para 5.e.(i) above), ' (b) Plus man-made depletions in Texas, and (c) Minus the increased channel losses in Texas which would have been incurred if Texas had not depleted the flow (until this specific channel loss value is available, the Compact compliance calculations will be made ignoring this channel, loss adjustment). (3) Compact compliance is achieved as long as the actual delivery exceeds the scheduled delivery. f. Washita River Watershed in Texas: There is no streamflow gage on the Washita River in Texas. The USGS streamflow gage number 07316500, Washita River near Cheyenne, Oklahoma, is over 21 miles downstream from the Oklahoma-Texas State line, and measures flow from a 794 square mile drainage area, of which about 441 square miles are in Texas. The average annual discharge at the Cheyenne gage (44 years) has been 20,720 AF/yr. (1) The actual annual delivery at Oklahoma State line is computed as follows: (a) The annual flow at the Cheyenne gage, (b) Plus channel losses to the State line flow between the State line and the gage (until this specific channel loss value is available, the Compact compliance calculations will be made ignoring this channel loss adjustment), (c) Minus Oklahoma's flow between the State line and Cheyenne gage. (This flow will be computed based on the drainage area upstream from the Cheyenne gage, adjusted for both Texas and Oklahoma man-made depletions.), and (d) Minus Texas' man-made depletions. Page 166 (2) The annual scheduled delivery at State line is 40 percent of the natural flow at State line without diversions or impoundments, and would be computed as 40 percent of the following: (a) The actual annual delivery at State line (para 5.h.(l) above), (b) Plus man-made depletions in Texas, and (c) Minus the increased channel losses which would have occurred if Texas had not made any diversions (until this specific channel loss value is available, the Compact compliance calculations will be made ignoring this channel loss adjustment). (3) Compact compliance is achieved as long as the actual delivery exceeds the scheduled delivery. Page 167 Page 168 RED RIVER COMPACT RULES AND REGULATIONS To Compute and Enforce Compact Compliance REACH HI, SUBBASIN 3 (as amended 4/25/89) 1. These rules and regulations to be used to compute and enforce Compact compliance within Subbasin 3 of Reach III, Red River Compact, are adopted subject to the following conditions and assumptions. a. It is fully understood that these rules and regulations should be modified whenever experience or detailed studies demonstrate the need for modification, and if the Commission should modify its interpretation of Compact provisions relating to this Subbasin. b. Definitions: (1) "Diversion", as used in these rules and regulations, is the net loss to a water source from use by a diverter, and is computed as the diversion from the water source minus the part of the diversion which is returned to the water source. Normally, return flows must be measured to be considered; however, the Engineering Committee may consider and recommend exceptions. As used herein, "diversion" is equivalent to "net diversion" from a water source and to "depletion" or "consumptive use" of a water source. (2) "Drawdown", as used in these rules and regulations, means that period commencing on the first day water ceases spilling over the existing Caddo Lake spillway (or the raised spillway, if Caddo Lake is enlarged), and continuing so long as the Caddo Lake surface elevation continues to fall, until the day when appreciable inflow reaches Caddo Lake, causing the Caddo Lake surface elevation to rise leading to a spill from Caddo Lake. 2. Management of Compact Compliance Computations. a. Management Using State Centers: (1) State Engineering Committee representatives will establish State Computation Control Centers. (a) State representatives will gather data, exchange data and meet via conference call to check on computation results, if necessary. (b) The Engineering Committee will compute compliance with Compact b. Management Period for Compact Compliance Computations: (1) Next week's State diversions will be allocated based on last week's compliance computations. (2) It is each State's responsibility to limit its total State diversion allocation among its State diverters. (3) The weekly period for use and flow data will start and end at 8:00 a.m. on Tuesday of each week. (4) Data collection and dissemination will be completed on Tuesday of each week. (5) Computation of Compliance will be completed on Wednesday of each week. (6) Each State can request an update at any time. Page 169 c. Management Improvements Studies: The Engineering Committee will monitor the effect on accounting^ management of the following factors and will report thereon to the Commission whenever procedure changes appear . desirable. (1) Errors caused by travel time. (2) Future restrictions computed from past week's data. (3) Failure to consider channel loss. (4) Failure to consider ungaged return flows. (5) Failure to consider flow trends. (6) Addition of needed gages. 3. Enforcement of Compact Compliance Requirements. Each State will be responsible for insuring that the sum of the diversions by State users does not exceed the total State diversion authorized by the Red River Compact Commission. In this regard, each State will be responsible for establishing clear legal authority within its State for enforcing the restrictions imposed by the Red River Compact 4. Data Reporting Procedures. a. Streamflow Gaging Station Records: The Engineering Committee will make arrangements with Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Geological Survey, and with States as required to collect daily and/or weekly data, as needed, and forward to the State Computation and Control Centers. b. Diversion Records: Each State will be responsible to collect weekly data, as needed, and forward to the State Computation and Control Centers. c Archived Records: Records will be archived by the Commission Chairman. 5. General Compliance Requirements of Section 6.03 Red River Compact. a. Section 6.03 (b)(1): (1) The Compact states: "Texas shall have the unrestricted'right to all water above Marshall, Lake O' the Pines, and Black Cypress damsites; however, Texas shall not cause runoff to be depleted to a quantity less than that which would have occurred with the full operation of Franklin County, Titus County, Ellison Creek, Johnson Creek, Lake O' the Pines, Marshall, and Black Cypress Reservoirs constructed, and those other impoundments and diversions existing on the effective date of this Compact. Any depletions of runoff in excess of the depletions described above shall be charged against Texas1 apportionment of the water in Caddo Reservoir." (2) Texas may use the bed and banks of the streams or tributaries available within this Subbasin to convey its developed water downstream from the aforesaid dam sites to specified authorized users. Such water would retain its identity and would not be subject to the Caddo Lake drawdown provisions of Section 5.b. of these rules until passing the designated point of diversion. Appropriate transportation losses will be approved by the Red River Compact Commission. (3) Until both Marshall Reservoir (with an estimated capacity of 782,300 acre-feet and yield of 325,000 acre-feet annually) and Black Cypress Reservoir (with estimated capacity of 824,400 acre-feet and yield and 220,000 acre-feed annually) have been constructed, it will be virtually impossible for Texas to deplete runoff in excess of that authorized. In the future, whenever potential Texas depletions above Marshall, Lake O* the Pines, and Black Cypress damsites become a concern to Louisiana, procedures to compute Texas depletion of runoff in excess Page 170 of that authorized by Section 6.03 (b)(1) of the Compact should be developed by the Engineering Committee and presented for Commission consideration. b. Section 6.03 (b)(2): (1) The Compact states: "Texas and Louisiana shall each have the unrestricted right to use fifty (50) percent of the conservation storage capacity in the present Caddo Lake for the impoundment of water for state use, subject to the provision that supplies for existing uses of water from Caddo Lake, on date of Compact, are not reduced" (2) Whenever water is spilling over the existing spillway at 168.5 feet above mean sea level, each state may withdraw or divert water from Caddo Lake without restriction. (3) Whenever Caddo Lake is not spilling over the existing spillway at 168.5 feet above mean sea level, the total consumptive use by each state shall not exceed 8,400 acre-feet during the drawdown period, provided that neither state shall divert more than 3,600 acre-feet during any one month or 4,800 acre-feet during any two consecutive months. c. Section 6.03 (b)(3): (1) The Compact states: "Texas and Louisiana shall each have the unrestricted right to fifty (50) percent of the. conservation storage capacity of any future enlargement of Caddo Lake, provided the two states may negotiate for the release of each state's share of the storage space on terms mutually agreed upon by the two states after the effective date of this Compact" (2) . This Compact provision requires no separate computation procedures but other rules may be changed if enlargement of Caddo Lake occurs. If enlargement of Caddo Lake is authorized in the future, the Engineering Committee should review and modify as necessary Rule 5 (b) and Rule 6. Page 171 e. Section 6.03 (c): (1) The Compact states: "In regard to the water of interstate streams which do not contribute to the inflow to Cross Lake or Caddo Lake, Texas shall have the unrestricted right to Divert and use this water on the basis of a division of runoff above the state boundary of sixty (60) percent to Texas and forty (40) percent to Louisiana." (2) The Engineering Committee will review known Texas diversion data for the previous year and report to the Commission any Texas non-compliance with Compact Section 6.03 (c). f. Section 6.03(d): (1) The Compact states: "Texas and Louisiana will not construct improvements on the Cross Lake watershed in either state that will affect the yield of Cross Lake; provided, however, this subsection shall be subject to the provisions of Section 2.08." (2) The Engineering Committee will renew any known improvements on the Cross Lake watershed and report to the Commission any non-compliance with Compact Section 6.03 (d). 6. Caddo Lake Content Accounting Procedure During Drawdown Periods. a. Whenever water is spilled from Caddo Lake, both state's accounts are full and no accounting is necessary. Accounting shall start the first day of no-spill following each period of spilling and shall continue until the first day of spill in the next period of spilling. The accounting procedure for computing the quantity of water in Caddo Lake during periods of drawdown belonging to the States of Louisiana and Texas shall be as follows: (1) At the beginning of the drawdown, the Caddo Lake contents belong 50 percent to each state. Otherwise, begin with water ownership on Caddo Lake as shown in the most recent previous report. (2) Each State shall be credited with one-half of the inflow to Caddo Lake since the previous report. (3) Each State's account shall be reduced by its share of Caddo Lake evaporation losses during the period since the previous report (4) Each State's account shall be reduced by its diversions from Caddo Lake since the previous report (5) A State's account shall not exceed 50 percent of the capacity of Caddo Lake. If these accounting procedures result in a greater State content than 50 percent of the total capacity of Caddo Lake, the excess computed quantity shall be "spilled" into the other State's account as needed to bring the other State's account up, but in no case shall either State's account exceed 50 percent of the total capacity of Caddo Lake. b. Using a stage-area-capacity relationship concurred in by both States, the content of Caddo Lake at the end of each accounting period shall be determined and inflow for that period shall be computed as follows: (1) From the present content, as determined above, subtract the content determined at the end of the previous period. (2) Add to the figure resulting from Step (I) the total Texas and Louisiana diversions since the end of the previous period. (3) Add to the figure resulting from Step (2) the computed gross evaporation smcelhe end of the previous period as determined in c. (2) below. This results in total inflow. Page 172 c. Evaporation will be computed as follows: (1) The Weather Bureau's pan evaporation data shall be used to compute gross lake evaporation using a standard conversion coefficient agreed to by the engineer advisors of each State. (2) The average lake surface area for the accounting period shall be determined from the stage-area-capacity relationship concurred in by both States and multiplied by the gross lake evaporation as determined in Step (1) to determine the volume of evaporation for the period. 7. Availability of Diversion Records. Arrangements shall be made for all Texas and Louisiana diverters, during "drawdown" of Caddo Lake, to maintain daily diversion records open for inspection, and to provide weekly use data as required by Rule 2 b. (3). Page 173 Page 174