New Voices In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Voices In new voices in michael j. zak lecture series Foreword by Richard Fontaine and Loren DeJonge Schulman Emma Ashford, Hal Brands, Jasen J. Castillo, Kate Kizer, Rebecca Friedman Lissner, Jeremy Shapiro, and Joshua R. Itzkowitz Shifrinson About the Authors EMMA ASHFORD is a Research Fellow in REBECCA FRIEDMAN LISSNER is an defense and foreign policy at the Cato Assistant Professor in the Strategic and Institute, with expertise in international Operational Research Department at the U.S. security and the politics of energy. She is Naval War College. She has held research currently writing a book on the politics and fellowships at the University of Pennsylvania’s foreign policies of petrostates, including Perry World House, the Council on Foreign Russia, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Venezuela. Relations, and Yale University’s International Her recent research includes work on the Security Studies program. Dr. Lissner also has efcacy of U.S. sanctions on Russia, the future of U.S. Middle served as a special advisor to the Deputy Secretary at the U.S. East policy, U.S.-Saudi relations, and the increasing role of Department of Energy. Dr. Lissner’s research interests focus on Asian states in the politics and economics of the Persian Gulf. international security and American foreign policy, and she is Ashford is the co-host of Power Problems, a biweekly podcast working on a book project that examines lessons learned from that explores key questions in international security with guests U.S. military interventions. She received an AB in social studies from across the political spectrum. She holds a PhD in foreign from Harvard University and an MA and PhD in government from afairs from the University of Virginia and an MA from American Georgetown University. The views expressed here are exclusively University’s School of International Service. her own. HAL BRANDS is the Henry A. Kissinger JEREMY SHAPIRO is the research director of Distinguished Professor of Global Afairs the European Council on Foreign Relations. at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced His areas of focus include U.S foreign International Studies and a Senior Fellow policy and transatlantic relations. Shapiro at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary was previously a fellow with the Project on Assessments. He served as Special Assistant International Order and Strategy and the to the Secretary of Defense for Strategic Center on the United States and Europe Planning from 2016 to 2016, and has been at Brookings, where he edited the Foreign a Council on Foreign Relations International Afairs Fellow. Policy program’s blog Order from Chaos. Prior to Brookings, he He has also consulted with a range of government ofces and was a member of the U.S. State Department’s policy planning agencies in the intelligence and national security communities staf, where he advised the secretary of state on U.S. policy in and served as lead writer for the Commission on the National North Africa and the Levant. He was also the senior advisor to Defense Strategy for the United States. Brands received his BA Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Afairs from Stanford University and his PhD from Yale University. He Philip Gordon, providing strategic guidance on a wide variety previously worked at Duke University’s Sanford School of Public of U.S.-European foreign policy issues. Shapiro graduated from Policy and the Institute for Defense Analyses. Harvard University with a bachelor’s degree in computer science and received his master’s degree in international relations and international economics from the Johns Hopkins School JASEN J. CASTILLO is an Associate of Advanced International Studies. He is a PhD candidate in Professor and Evelyn and Ed F. Kruse political science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. ‘49 Faculty Fellow in the Bush School of Government and Public Service at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the Bush JOSHUA R. ITZKOWITZ SHIFRINSON is an School, Castillo worked in the Department Assistant Professor of International Relations, of Defense’s Policy Planning Ofce. Before Boston University. His teaching and research working in the Ofce of the Secretary of interests focus on the intersection of Defense, he was an analyst at the RAND Corporation, where international security and diplomatic history, his research focused on military strategy, nuclear deterrence, particularly the rise and fall of great powers and WMD terrorism. Prior to RAND, he was a consultant for and the origins of grand strategy. He has the Institute for Defense Analyses. Castillo earned his PhD in special expertise in great power politics since political science from the University of Chicago. His research 1945 and U.S. engagement in Europe and Asia. His next major interests include U.S. defense policy, military history, and nuclear project examines American foreign policy in the 1990s and early deterrence. Currently, he is working on a book project exploring 2000s to explain how great powers try to stop challengers from the military requirements of deterrence and U.S. nuclear emerging. Shifrinson earned a BA from Brandeis University weapons policy. and a PhD from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The recipient of fellowships from the Dickey Center, the Institute for Security and Conflict Studies, and the Belfer Center, Shifrinson KATE KIZER is the Policy Director at Win was an Assistant Professor Government at Texas A&M University Without War. She has nearly a decade prior to joining Pardee. At Boston University, he teaches classes of experience working on human rights, on international relations theory, U.S. grand strategy, alliance democratization, and U.S. foreign policy in politics, and security studies. the Middle East. Kizer previously served as the Director of Policy and Advocacy at the Yemen Peace Project and as U.S. Advocacy Ofcer for Americans for Democracy and Human Rights in Bahrain. She has held leadership roles in the private sector and on political campaigns. Kizer received a BA in Middle Eastern & North African Studies from UCLA and an MA in democracy and governance from Georgetown University. About the Michael J. Zak Grand Strategy Lecture In March 2018, the Center for a New American Security (CNAS) launched the Michael J. Zak Grand Strategy Lecture Series, a new annual event developed to feature original thinking on American grand strategy. For the 2019 event, CNAS commissioned seven essays on American grand strategy unbound by the intellectual and strategic strictures of the past. In New Voices in Grand Strategy, CNAS brings together strategists, academics, and policymakers to ofer a vision for a grand strategy that defines national power and purpose on the world stage. 01 Foreword Richard Fontaine and Loren DeJonge Schulman 03 Power and Pragmatism: Reforming American Foreign Policy for the 21st Century Emma Ashford 13 Grand Strategy for a New Twilight Struggle Hal Brands 23 Passing the Torch: Criteria for Implementing a Grand Strategy of Ofshore Balancing Jasen J. Castillo 37 A U.S. Grand Strategy for a Values-Driven Foreign Policy Kate Kizer 49 Military Intervention and the Future of American Grand Strategy Rebecca Friedman Lissner 61 Does America Need a Foreign Policy? Jeremy Shapiro 71 Requiem for a Dream: American Grand Strategy, 1991–2018 Joshua R. Itzkowitz Shifrinson POWER AND PRAGMATISM: REFORMING AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY FOR THE 21ST CENTURY Foreword Richard Fontaine and Loren DeJonge Schulman 1 @CNASDC n June 2008, the Center for a New American Security published a compendium of essays to grapple with the central questions of American grand strategy.1 The volume compiled I the views of leading senior strategists from across the political spectrum and from both academia and the policy community. Four years later, CNAS embarked on a similar venture, presenting the views of four more expert thinkers.2 Today, the debate over America’s proper role in the world is perhaps wider than at any time in decades. The 2016 presidential election illuminated deep divides in the American public about the scope of the country’s interests, the nature of existing threats, the financial and military burdens the United States should shoulder, the degree to which values as well as interests should motivate national action, and the methods for attaining national objec- tives, however defined. The debate among national security experts on such matters should be just as wide and searching. With the very vision for U.S. global leadership up for grabs, CNAS now seeks to broaden the existing debate by bringing new voices to the conversation. We have commissioned a series of essays on American grand strategy from a new generation of thinkers, strategists, academics, and policymakers. As will immediately become apparent, their contributions are not bound by the intellectual and strategic strictures of the past. Our goal was to question the assumptions and decisions that have guided U.S. foreign policy in the post–Cold War era, to assess how ongoing changes in the world should reshape U.S. grand strategy, and ulti- mately to propose recommendations and alternatives for the way forward. The essays in this volume are fresh, rigorously analytical, and provocative – deliberately so. They also elucidate and deepen the range of grand-strategic options, identifying diferent and distinct approaches. These seven distinct, thoughtful contributions from rising leaders in the field serve as starting points for policymakers seeking to define America’s role in a changing world. We hope that they will also serve as a resource for all those wishing to thoughtfully consider the right grand strategy for the United States today. 1. “Finding Our Way: Debating American Grand Strategy,” edited by Michele A. Flournoy and Shawn Brimley, Center for a New American Security, June 2008, https://s3.amazonaws. com/files.cnas.org/documents/FlournoyBrimley_Finding-Our-Way_June08.pdf?m- time=20160906082323. 2. “America’s Path: Grand Strategy for the Next Administration,” edited by Richard Fontaine and Kristin Lord, Center for a New American Security, May 2012, https://www.cnas.org/publica- tions/reports/americas-path-grand-strategy-for-the-next-administration.
Recommended publications
  • The Civilian Impact of Drone Strikes
    THE CIVILIAN IMPACT OF DRONES: UNEXAMINED COSTS, UNANSWERED QUESTIONS Acknowledgements This report is the product of a collaboration between the Human Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School and the Center for Civilians in Conflict. At the Columbia Human Rights Clinic, research and authorship includes: Naureen Shah, Acting Director of the Human Rights Clinic and Associate Director of the Counterterrorism and Human Rights Project, Human Rights Institute at Columbia Law School, Rashmi Chopra, J.D. ‘13, Janine Morna, J.D. ‘12, Chantal Grut, L.L.M. ‘12, Emily Howie, L.L.M. ‘12, Daniel Mule, J.D. ‘13, Zoe Hutchinson, L.L.M. ‘12, Max Abbott, J.D. ‘12. Sarah Holewinski, Executive Director of Center for Civilians in Conflict, led staff from the Center in conceptualization of the report, and additional research and writing, including with Golzar Kheiltash, Erin Osterhaus and Lara Berlin. The report was designed by Marla Keenan of Center for Civilians in Conflict. Liz Lucas of Center for Civilians in Conflict led media outreach with Greta Moseson, pro- gram coordinator at the Human Rights Institute at Columbia Law School. The Columbia Human Rights Clinic and the Columbia Human Rights Institute are grateful to the Open Society Foundations and Bullitt Foundation for their financial support of the Institute’s Counterterrorism and Human Rights Project, and to Columbia Law School for its ongoing support. Copyright © 2012 Center for Civilians in Conflict (formerly CIVIC) and Human Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America. Copies of this report are available for download at: www.civiliansinconflict.org Cover: Shakeel Khan lost his home and members of his family to a drone missile in 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • The 'New Middle East,' Revised Edition
    9/29/2014 Diplomatist BILATERAL NEWS: India and Brazil sign 3 agreements during Prime Minister's visit to Brazil CONTENTS PRINT VERSION SPECIAL REPORTS SUPPLEMENTS OUR PATRONS MEDIA SCRAPBOOK Home / September 2014 The ‘New Middle East,’ Revised Edition GLOBAL CENTRE STAGE In July 2014, President Obama sent the White House’s Coordinator for the Middle East, Philip Gordon, to address the ‘Israel Conference on Peace’ in Tel-Aviv. ‘How’ Gordon asked ‘will [Israel] have peace if it is unwilling to delineate a border, end the occupation and allow for Palestinian sovereignty, security, and dignity?’ This is a good question, but Dr Emmanuel Navon asks how Israel will achieve peace if it is willing to delineate a border, end the occupation and allow for Palestinian sovereignty, security, and dignity, especially when experience, logic and deduction suggest that the West Bank would turn into a larger and more lethal version of the Gaza Strip after the Israeli withdrawal During the last war between Israel and Hamas (which officially ended with a ceasefire on August 27, 2014), US Secretary of State John Kerry inadvertently created a common ground among rivals: Israel, the Palestinian Authority, Egypt and Jordan all agreed in July 2014 that Kerry had ruined the chances of a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas. Collaborating with Turkey DEFINITION and Qatar to reach a ceasefire was tantamount to calling the neighbourhood’s pyromaniac instead of the fire department to extinguish the fire. Qatar bankrolls Hamas and Turkey advocates on its behalf. While in Paris in July, Kerry was all smiles Diplomat + with Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu whose boss, Recep Erdogan, recently accused Israel of genocide and compared Netanyahu to Hitler.
    [Show full text]
  • O'hanlon Gordon Indyk
    Getting Serious About Iraq 1 Getting Serious About Iraq ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ Philip H. Gordon, Martin Indyk and Michael E. O’Hanlon In his 29 January 2002 State of the Union address, US President George W. Bush put the world on notice that the United States would ‘not stand aside as the world’s most dangerous regimes develop the world’s most dangerous weapons’.1 Such statements, repeated since then in various forms by the president and some of his top advisers, have rightly been interpreted as a sign of the administration’s determination to overthrow Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein.2 Since the January declaration, however, attempts by the administration to put together a precise plan for Saddam’s overthrow have revealed what experience from previous administrations should have made obvious from the outset: overthrowing Saddam is easier said than done. Bush’s desire to get rid of the Iraqi dictator has so far been frustrated by the inherent difficulties of overthrowing an entrenched regime as well as a series of practical hurdles that conviction alone cannot overcome. The latter include the difficulties of organising the Iraqi opposition, resistance from Arab and European allies, joint chiefs’ concerns about the problems of over-stretched armed forces and intelligence assets and the complications caused by an upsurge in Israeli– Palestinian violence. Certainly, the United States has good reasons to want to get rid of Saddam Hussein. Saddam is a menace who has ordered the invasion of several of his neighbours, killed thousands of Kurds and Iranians with poison gas, turned his own country into a brutal police state and demonstrated an insatiable appetite for weapons of mass destruction.
    [Show full text]
  • To Play the King Ebook
    TO PLAY THE KING PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Michael Dobbs | 356 pages | 03 Jun 2014 | Sourcebooks Landmark | 9781492606642 | English | Naperville, United States To Play the King PDF Book Mycroft eventually decides to come out to the King's press corps, at the same time announcing his resignation. The King, however, refuses to be blackmailed. External Reviews. Male Secretary 1 episode, David Neville A very good one, perhaps the best from the entire book Read more Choir 1 episode, The Best Horror Movies on Netflix. Trailers and Videos. David Mycroft 4 episodes, Editor 1 episode, Add episode. Where is my magnificent bastard? BBC Official 1 episode, The Lady 4 episodes, Both the PM and HRH have their own ideas as to how the United Kingdom ought to forge ahead, neither seeing the other one's position as viable. Ending reminded me of "Omen" and it's sequel. Yeah, you read it completely right that this book is the highest ever rating I have given to any Fiction book and yet I would say that this book deserved it at its best. Average rating 3. In the USA he attended the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University in Medford, Massachusetts, which he funded by a job as feature writer for the Boston Globe, where he worked as an editorial assistant and political feature writer from to Waitress 1 episode, Declan Skeete Francis Urquhart 4 episodes, Michael Kitchen Prostitute 1 episode, Everything in this book series so beautifully weaved that it stands apart from the rest. Second, there is a failing in the treatment of the woman Francis was having an affair with.
    [Show full text]
  • America's Anxious Allies: Trip Report from Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Israel by Meghan O'sullivan, Philip Gordon, Dennis Ross, James Jeffrey
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 2696 America's Anxious Allies: Trip Report from Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Israel by Meghan O'Sullivan, Philip Gordon, Dennis Ross, James Jeffrey Sep 28, 2016 Also available in Arabic ABOUT THE AUTHORS Meghan O'Sullivan Meghan O'Sullivan is the Jeane Kirkpatrick Professor of the Practice of International Affairs at Harvard University's Kennedy School. Philip Gordon Philip Gordon is a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and a former White House coordinator for the Middle East, North Africa, and the Gulf region. Dennis Ross Dennis Ross, a former special assistant to President Barack Obama, is the counselor and William Davidson Distinguished Fellow at The Washington Institute. James Jeffrey Ambassador is a former U.S. special representative for Syria engagement and former U.S. ambassador to Turkey and Iraq; from 2013-2018 he was the Philip Solondz Distinguished Fellow at The Washington Institute. He currently chairs the Wilson Center’s Middle East Program. Brief Analysis A bipartisan team of distinguished former officials share their insights from a recent tour of key regional capitals. On September 26, The Washington Institute held a Policy Forum with Meghan O'Sullivan, Philip Gordon, Dennis Ross, and James Jeffrey, who recently returned from a bipartisan tour of Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Israel. O'Sullivan is the Jeane Kirkpatrick Professor at Harvard's Kennedy School and former special assistant to the president for Iraq and Afghanistan. Gordon is a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and former White House coordinator for the Middle East, North Africa, and the Gulf region.
    [Show full text]
  • Seeking Stability at Sustainable Cost: Principles for a New U.S
    Seeking Stability at Sustainable Cost: Principles for a New U.S. Strategy in the Middle East Report of the Task Force on Managing Disorder in the Middle East April 2017 Aaron Lobel Task Force Co-Chairs Founder and President, America Abroad Media Ambassador Eric Edelman Former U.S. Ambassador to Turkey Mary Beth Long Former Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Jake Sullivan Affairs Former Director of Policy Planning, U.S. State Department Former National Security Advisor to the Vice President Alan Makovsky Former Senior Professional Staff Member, House Foreign Affairs Committee Task Force Members Ray Takeyh Ambassador Morton Abramowitz Former Senior Advisor on Iran, U.S. State Department Former U.S. Ambassador to Turkey General Charles Wald (ret., USAF) Henri Barkey Former Deputy Commander, U.S. European Command Director, Middle East Program, Woodrow Wilson International Center Former Commander, U.S. Central Command Air Forces Hal Brands Amberin Zaman Henry A. Kissinger Distinguished Professor of Global Affairs at the Columnist, Al-Monitor; Woodrow Wilson Center Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies Svante Cornell Staff Director, Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program Blaise Misztal Director of National Security Ambassador Ryan Crocker Former U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon Nicholas Danforth Senior Policy Analyst Ambassador Robert Ford Former Ambassador to Syria Jessica Michek Policy Analyst John Hannah Former Assistant for National Security Affairs to the Vice President Ambassador James Jeffrey Former Ambassador to Turkey and Iraq DISCLAIMER The findings and recommendations expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of the Bipartisan Policy Center’s founders or its board of directors.
    [Show full text]
  • No Exceptions: the Decision to Open All Military Positions to Women Table of Contents
    BELFER CENTER REPORT No Exceptions The Decision to Open All Military Positions to Women Ash Carter SPECIAL REPORT DECEMBER 2018 Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School 79 JFK Street Cambridge, MA 02138 www.belfercenter.org Statements and views expressed in this report are solely those of the author and do not imply endorsement by Harvard University, the Harvard Kennedy School, or the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. Layout by Andrew Facini Cover photo: KFOR Multinational Battle Group-East Soldiers fire the M9 pistol from the firing line during the weapons qualification event for the German Armed Forces Proficiency Badge at Camp Bondsteel, Kosovo, Dec. 12, 2017. (U.S. Army Photo / Staff Sgt. Nicholas Farina) Copyright 2018, President and Fellows of Harvard College Printed in the United States of America BELFER CENTER REPORT No Exceptions The Decision to Open All Military Positions to Women Ash Carter SPECIAL REPORT DECEMBER 2018 About the Author Ash Carter is a former United States Secretary of Defense and the current Director of the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Har- vard Kennedy School, where he leads the Technology and Public Purpose project. He is also an Innovation Fellow and corporation member at MIT. For over 35 years, Secretary Carter has leveraged his experience in national security, technology, and innovation to defend the United States and make a better world. He has done so under presidents of both political parties as well as in the private sector. As Secretary of Defense from 2015 to 2017, he pushed the Pentagon to “think outside its five-sided box.” He changed the trajectory of the mili- tary campaign to deliver ISIS a lasting defeat, designed and executed the strategic pivot to the Asia-Pacific, established a new playbook for the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The US Perspective on NATO Under Trump: Lessons of the Past and Prospects for the Future
    The US perspective on NATO under Trump: lessons of the past and prospects for the future JOYCE P. KAUFMAN Setting the stage With a new and unpredictable administration taking the reins of power in Wash- ington, the United States’ future relationship with its European allies is unclear. The European allies are understandably concerned about what the change in the presidency will mean for the US relationship with NATO and the security guar- antees that have been in place for almost 70 years. These concerns are not without foundation, given some of the statements Trump made about NATO during the presidential campaign—and his description of NATO on 15 January 2017, just days before his inauguration, as ‘obsolete’. That comment, made in a joint interview with The Times of London and the German newspaper Bild, further exacerbated tensions between the United States and its closest European allies, although Trump did claim that the alliance is ‘very important to me’.1 The claim that it is obsolete rested on Trump’s incorrect assumption that the alliance has not been engaged in the fight against terrorism, a position belied by NATO’s support of the US conflict in Afghanistan. Among the most striking observations about Trump’s statements on NATO is that they are contradicted by comments made in confirmation hear- ings before the Senate by General James N. Mattis (retired), recently confirmed as Secretary of Defense, who described the alliance as ‘essential for Americans’ secu- rity’, and by Rex Tillerson, now the Secretary of State.2 It is important to note that the concerns about the future relationships between the United States and its NATO allies are not confined to European governments and policy analysts.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Cards" Lindsey E
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2015 The orW ld According to Frank Underwood: Politics and Power in "House of Cards" Lindsey E. Davidson Claremont McKenna College Recommended Citation Davidson, Lindsey E., "The orldW According to Frank Underwood: Politics and Power in "House of Cards"" (2015). CMC Senior Theses. Paper 1052. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/1052 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE The World According to Frank Underwood: Politics and Power in House of Cards SUBMITTED TO PROFESSOR JOHN J. PITNEY JR. AND DEAN NICHOLAS WARNER BY Lindsey E. Davidson for SENIOR THESIS Fall 2014 December 1st, 2014 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS House of Cards as a dramatized portrayal of the American legislative process was a fascinating study for my senior thesis. As a dual major of Government and Film Studies, it was a perfect blend of content, subject matter, and Hollywood mixed together. I would like to thank Professor John Pitney for suggesting this research topic and turning me onto what is now one of my favorite shows. This thesis would not have become a reality without your advice and guidance. I would also like to thank Executive Story Editor Melissa James Gibson and Co- Executive Producer John Mankiewicz of House of Cards for agreeing to be interviewed for this thesis. What a rare opportunity for me it was to gain insight and vision into this show and its portrayal of politics in Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Obama's Chief of Staff Will Be the Most Important Appointment of His
    Ben W. Heineman Jr. - Ben Heineman Jr. has held top positions in government, law and business. He is the author of High Performance with High Integrity (Harvard Business Press, 2008). Obama’s Chief of Staff Will Be the Most Important Appointment of His Term By: Ben W. Heineman Jr. January 14, 2013 For many practical purposes, it is the White House operations boss -- and not the vice president -- who serves as the nation's deputy president. President Obama will soon make what could be the most important appointment of his second term: his chief of staff. His choice will not have to be confirmed by the Senate or testify on Capitol Hill, and is not given nearly as much attention as controversial or high-visibility nominations to the Cabinet or to critical agencies, as is clearly the case right now with Defense (Chuck Hagel) and the CIA (John Brennan) -- or even Jack Lew, the current chief of staff and Obama's nominee for Treasury secretary. This is so because chiefs of staff often (though not always) try to operate out of the glare of the media spotlight, and are often summarily described in the media as the West Wing "gatekeeper." But given the fragmented nature of the federal government, the right chief of staff must effectively function as deputy president. Watching what the White House chief of staff actually does is critical to an understanding of how the president leads. In the vast executive branch, only the chief of staff and the vice president have the same broad view of the total policy and political world as the president himself.
    [Show full text]
  • Connolly .Indd
    Matt Connolly Solidification and Flux on the “Gay White Way”: Gay Porn Theaters in Post-Stonewall New York City Abstract This paper traces the exhibition strategies of two gay porn theaters in New York City from 1969-1973: the 55th Street Playhouse and the Eros I. It draws upon contemporaneous advertising and trade press to reconstruct these histories, and does so in the pursuit of two interconnected goals. First, by analyzing two venues whose exhibition protocols shifted over the course of this time period, this paper seeks a more nuanced understanding of how gay porn theaters established, maintained, and augmented their market identities. Second, it attempts to use these shifts to consider more broadly what role exhibition practices played in the shaping of gay men’s experiences within the porn theater itself – a key site of spectatorial, erotic, and social engagement. The 1970s saw the proliferation of theaters in major my conclusions in some ways, but that will also urban centers specializing in the exhibition of gay provide the opportunity to investigate exhibition pornography.1 Buoyed by both seismic shifts in spaces within a city that is central to histories of both LGBT visibility in the wake of the 1969 Stonewall LGBT culture and pornographic exhibition.3 I will riots and larger trends in industry, law, and culture track two Manhattan theaters across this time period that increasingly brought pornography of all stripes to observe what films they screened and how they into the mainstream, these theaters provided a public advertised their releases: the 55th Street Playhouse venue for audiences of primarily gay men to view gay and the Eros I.
    [Show full text]
  • President Obama's Second Term
    Number 57 February 2013 President Obama’s Second Term: Staffing Challenges and Opportunities Kathryn Dunn Tenpas, PhD* * With expert research assistance from Emma Barnes E X E C U T I V E SUMMARY ecent departures of White House Chief of Staff Jack Lew and Senior Adviser David Plouffe have drawn attention to a frequently overlooked R aspect of the American presidency – the men and women who work most closely with the president in the Executive Office of the President. Though Cabinet secretaries wield significant influence within the administration, no one can deny the influence of White House advisers, many of whom consult with the Kathryn Dunn Tenpas is a president on a broader range of issues and, most likely, more frequently than nonresident senior fellow with Cabinet members due to their closer proximity. Little is known, however, about Governance Studies and a fellow and secretary of the the frequency with which these individuals come and go. This report documents Governance Institute. She is staff turnover rates amongst the president’s “A” team (the top tier of staff in the the director of the University of Pennsylvania’s Washington Executive Office of the President as designated by the National Journal) and Semester Program and an compares the Obama team to those of Presidents Reagan, Clinton and Bush. By adjunct professor in Penn’s the end of the first term, 71% of President Obama’s “A” team had left their Political Science Department. original positions—a rate comparable to his predecessors. As President Obama begins his second term, less than one third of his original team will be occupying their initial positions.
    [Show full text]