DOCSLIB.ORG

The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research New Testament Tools, Studies and Documents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research New Testament Tools, Studies and Documents The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research New Testament Tools, Studies and Documents New Testament Tools, Studies, and Documents (NTTSD) combines two series, New Testament Tools and Studies (NTTS) and Studies and Documents (SD). The former was founded by Bruce M. Metzger in 1965 and edited by him until 1993, when Bart D. Ehrman joined him as co-editor. The latter series was founded by Kirsopp and Silva Lake in 1935, edited by them until the death of Kirsopp Lake in 1946, then briey by Silva Lake and Carsten Høeg (1955), followed by Jacob Geerlings (until 1969), by Irving Alan Sparks (until 1993), and nally by Eldon Jay Epp (until 2007). The new series will promote the publication of primary sources, reference tools, and critical studies that advance the understanding of the New Testament and other early Christian writings and writers into the fourth century. Emphases of the two predecessor series will be retained, including the textual history and transmission of the New Testament and related literature, relevant manuscripts in various languages, methodologies for research in early Christianity. The series will also publish a broader range of studies pertinent to early Christianity and its writings. Editors Bart D. Ehrman, Ph.D., James A. Gray Distinguished Professor of Religious Studies University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Eldon J. Epp, Ph.D., Harkness Professor of Biblical Literature Emeritus and Dean of Humanities and Social Sciences Emeritus, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio VOLUME 42 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/ntts The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research Essays on the Status Quaestionis Second Edition Edited by Bart D. Ehrman Michael W. Holmes LEIDEN • BOSTON 2013 The rst edition of this title was published as: The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis. SD, 46. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The text of the New Testament in contemporary research : essays on the status quaestionis / edited by Bart D. Ehrman, Michael W. Holmes. – 2nd ed. p. cm. – (New Testament tools, studies, and documents, 0077-8842 ; v. 42) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-90-04-23604-2 (alk. paper) – ISBN 978-90-04-23655-4 (e-book) 1. Bible. N.T.–Criticism, Textual. 2. Bible. N.T.–Criticism, Textual–History–20th century. 3. Bible. N.T.–Manuscripts, Greek. 4. Bible. N.T.–Versions. I. Ehrman, Bart D. II. Holmes, Michael W. (Michael William), 1950- BS2325.T48 2013 225.4'86–dc23 2012030790 This publication has been typeset in the multilingual “Brill” typeface. With over 5,100 characters covering Latin, IPA, Greek, and Cyrillic, this typeface is especially suitable for use in the humanities. For more information, please see www.brill.com/brill-typeface. ISSN 0077-8842 ISBN 978-90-04-23604-2 (hardback) ISBN 978-90-04-23655-4 (e-book) Copyright 2013 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Global Oriental, Hotei Publishing, IDC Publishers and Martinus Nijhof Publishers. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Koninklijke Brill NV provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. Fees are subject to change. This book is printed on acid-free paper. CONTENTS Preface.................................................................. ix List of Contributors . xi 1. The Papyrus Manuscripts of the New Testament . 1 Eldon Jay Epp 2. The Majuscule Manuscripts of the New Testament . 41 David C. Parker 3. The Greek Minuscules of the New Testament . 69 Barbara Aland and Klaus Wachtel 4. The Greek Lectionaries of the New Testament . 93 Carroll Osburn 5. The Diatessaron of Tatian . 115 Ulrich B. Schmid 6. The Syriac Versions of the New Testament . 143 Peter J. Williams 7. The Latin Version of the New Testament . 167 Philip Burton 8. The Coptic Versions of the New Testament . 201 Christian Askeland 9. The Ethiopic Version of the New Testament . 231 Rochus Zuurmond Revised by Curt Niccum 10. The Armenian Version of the New Testament. 253 S. Peter Cowe 11. The Georgian Version of the New Testament. 293 Jef W. Childers 12. The Gothic Version of the New Testament . 329 Carla Falluomini 13. The Use of the Greek Fathers for New Testament Textual Criticism. 351 Gordon D. Fee Revised by Roderic L. Mullen vi contents 14. The Use of the Latin Fathers for New Testament Textual Criticism. 375 H.A.G. Houghton 15. The Use of the Syriac Fathers for New Testament Textual Criticism. 407 Sebastian Brock 16. Additional Greek Witnesses to the New Testament (Ostraca, Amulets, Inscriptions, and Other Sources) . 429 Peter M. Head 17. Scribal Tendencies in the Transmission of the Text of the New Testament . 461 James R. Royse 18. The Social History of Early Christian Scribes . 479 Kim Haines-Eitzen 19. Analyzing and Categorizing New Testament Greek Manuscripts . 497 Thomas C. Geer Jr. Revised by Jean-François Racine 20. Textual Clusters: Their Past and Future in New Testament Textual Criticism . 519 Eldon Jay Epp 21. Criteria for Evaluating Readings in New Testament Textual Criticism. 579 Tommy Wasserman 22. Conjectural Emendation and the Text of the New Testament. 613 Jan Krans 23. From “Original Text” to “Initial Text”: The Traditional Goal of New Testament Textual Criticism in Contemporary Discussion . 637 Michael W. Holmes 24. Modern Critical Editions and Apparatuses of the Greek New Testament . 689 Juan Hernández Jr. 25. The Majority Text Theory: History, Methods, and Critique. 711 Daniel B. Wallace contents vii 26. Thoroughgoing Eclecticism in New Testament Textual Criticism . 745 J. Keith Elliott 27. Reasoned Eclecticism in New Testament Textual Criticism . 771 Michael W. Holmes 28. The Text as Window: New Testament Manuscripts and the Social History of Early Christianity . 803 Bart D. Ehrman Index of Bible Manuscripts, Modern Editions, and Apparatuses . 831 Index of Ancient Names . 843 Index of Modern Names . 846 Index of Subjects . 860 PREFACE When The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis was published in 1995, we hoped that it would meet the need for a book that would ofer an accessible and authoritative survey of the status quaestionis on the wide range of topics encompassed by the discipline of New Testament textual criticism. If the reviews and innumerable citations of it are any indication, the volume has done so rather successfully, for students and experts alike. With the passage of time and in view of the dynamism of the discipline, it is no surprise that essays that once represented the “state of the question” have a dated feel. So we ofer here a second edition, hoping once again to provide informed discussions of the current state of knowledge with respect to a wide range of important text-critical topics: Greek manuscripts (with separate articles on the papyri, the majuscules, the minuscules, and the lec- tionaries), the early versions (Diatessaron, Syriac, Latin, Coptic, Ethiopic, Armenian, and Georgian), patristic citations (Greek, Latin, and Syriac), studies of scribal habits, approaches to manuscript classi cation, critical editions and apparatuses, methods for evaluating variant readings (Major- ity Text theory, thoroughgoing eclecticism, and reasoned eclecticism), and the use of textual data as a source for early Christian social history.1 In some cases the original author has updated the essay, in some cases a new author has revised an existing essay,2 and in other cases a new author has con- tributed a replacement essay. In addition, seven new chapters have been incorporated. The coverage of early versions is expanded by the inclusion of a chapter on the Gothic version, while the range of textual witnesses is extended with a chapter on “other witnesses” (ostraca, inscriptions, etc.). The treatment of scribal 1 The chapter on the use of computers for textual criticism has been dropped from the second edition, in view of the impossibility of any print resource keeping up with the rapid pace of development and change in this eld, a task better suited to electronic resources. Good websites to consult on this aspect of textual criticism include those sponsored by the Institute for Textual Scholarship and Electronic Editing (http://www.itsee.bham.ac.uk/), the Virtual Manuscript Room (http://vmr.bham.ac.uk/), and the Institut für neutestamentliche Textforschung (http://egora.uni-muenster.de/intf/). 2 The contributions of the original authors of the revised chapters—Gordon D. Fee, Thomas C. Geer, Jr., and Rochus Zuurmond—are gratefully acknowledged. x preface tendencies is supplemented by a chapter on the social history of scribes, while other new chapters survey the discussion of text types, assess the various criteria for evaluating variant readings, explore the use and place of conjectures with regard to the New Testament text, and analyze the debate about whether the “original text” can or should be the (or a) goal of the discipline (a point on which not even the editors agree). Each chapter, new or old, includes an up-to-date bibliography of the relevant (sub-) eld. Dr. Metzger, whom the rst edition honored on the occasion of his eight- ieth birthday, passed away in 2007, and among the contributors we note the passing of J. Neville Birdsall and William Petersen. All are remembered here with gratitude and appreciation. Even as we bid farewell to some contributors, we welcome the opportu- nity to bring on board several new contributors, among whom (by editorial design) are many younger colleagues who represent the “next generation” of New Testament textual critics.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: • This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. • A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. • This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. • The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. • When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. SCRIBAL HABITS IN CODEX SINAITICUS, VATICANUS, EPHRAEMI, BEZAE, AND WASHINGTONIANUS IN THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW GREGORY SCOTT PAULSON A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH, NEW COLLEGE IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY EDINBURGH, UK 2013 The thesis has been composed by the candidate and is the candidate’s own work. Gregory Scott Paulson, Ph.D. candidate ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page..................................................................................................... i Declaration................................................................................................... ii Table of Contents........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Oxyrhynchus Papyri Part X
    LIBRARY Brigham Young University FROM k 6lnci^+ Call _^^^'^'Acc. No PA No.. \}0\ /^ THE OXYRHYNCHUS PAPYRI PART X GEENFELL AND HUNT 33(S EGYPT EXPLORATION FUND GRAECO-ROMAN BRANCH THE OXYRHYNCHUS PAPYRI PART X EDITED WITH TRANSLATIONS AND NOTES BY BERNARD P. GRENFELL, D.Litt. HON. LITT.D. DUBLIN; HON. PH.D. KOENIGSBERG; HON. lUR.D. GRAZ FELLOW OF queen's COLLEGE, OXFORD; FELLOW OF THE BRITISH ACADEMY CORRESPONDING MEMBER OP THE ROYAL BAVARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES AND ARTHUR S. HUNT, D.Litt. HON. PH.D. KOENIGSBERG ; HON. LITT.D. DUBLIN ; HON. lUK.D. GRAZ; HON. LL.D. ATHENS AND GLASGOW PROFESSOR OF PAPYROLOGY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD, AND FELLOW OF QUEEN'S COLLEGE FELLOW OF THE BRITISH ACADEMY ; CORRESPONDING MEMBER OF THE ROYAL BAVARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES MEMBER OF THE ROYAL DANISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES AND LETTERS WITH SIX PLATES LONDON SOLD AT The Offices of the EGYPT EXPLORATION FUND, 37 Great Russell St., W.C. AND 527 Tremont Temple, Boston, Mass., U.S.A. KEGAN PAUL, TRENCH, TRUBNER & CO., 68-74 Carter Lane, E.C. BERNARD QUARITCH, ii Grafton St., New Bond St., W. ASHER & CO., 14 Bedford St., Covent Garden, W.C, and 56 Unter den Linden, Berlin C. F. CLAY, Fetter Lane, E.C, and 100 Princes Street, Edinburgh ; and HUMPHREY MILFORD Amen Corner, E.C, and 29-35 West 32ND Street, New York, U.S.A. 1914 All risihts reserved YOUN'G UNlVERSiTC LIBRARi' PROVO. UTAH OXFORD HORACE HART PRINTER TO THE UNIVERSITY PREFACE Of the new literary pieces here published, 1231 and 1233-5 pro- ceed from the second of the large literary finds of 1906, with some small additions from the work of the next season.
    [Show full text]
  • TLG ®1 Unicode Proposal (Draft 8/13/02)
    ®1 TLG Unicode Proposal (draft 8/13/02) Short Table of Contents Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................8 The TLG® Project........................................................................................................................................8 Notes on the proposal ..................................................................................................................................9 I. Additional Greek Letters............................................................................................................................14 Introduction and Overview........................................................................................................................14 a. Additional Greek Letters: New Characters............................................................................................15 II. Ancient Greek Editorial Characters and Punctuation................................................................................18 Introduction and Overview........................................................................................................................18 a. Ancient Greek Editorial Characters and Punctuation: New Characters.................................................22 b. Ancient Greek Editorial Characters and Punctuation: Additional Definition of Preexisting Characters........54 III. Ancient Greek Numerical Characters......................................................................................................66
    [Show full text]
  • Oxyrhynchus Papyrus 2069 and 1 Enoch 487 Quential As This Claim Is for Our Understanding of the Shape of the Enochic Corpus in the Fourth Century
    ]BL 129, no. 3 {2010): 485-505 OxyrhynchusPapyrus2069 and the Compositional History of 1 Enoch RANDALL D. CHESNUTT [email protected] Pepperdine University, Malibu, CA 90263 Among the ancient Greek papyri preserved in the Sacl<lerLibrary at Oxford University is a small cluster offragments that has not received due attention for its bearing on the compositional history of 1 Enoch. Recovered from an Oxyrhynchus rubbish dump and published by Arthur S. Hunt in 1927, the five fragments, all inscribed recto and verso, were designated P.Oxy.2069 and dated to the late fourth century c.E. 1 Based on the opening of heaven and the descent of an angel or other emissary envisioned in frg. 1, the largest of the five, Hunt labeled the manuscript an "apocalyptic fragment" but ventured no further identification. In support of this general characterization he cited apparent references to the day of judgment and seventh heaven in frg. 3r and two allusions in frg. 3v to the Red Sea-a scene of destruction perhaps intended as a type of the judgment More than four decades elapsed before a direct connection between the "apoc­ alyptic fragment" and any known apocalyptic work was perceived. As late as 1970 the two reference works by Albert-Marie Denis on Jewish pseudepigrapha extant in Greek could do no better than classifyP.Oxy.2069 among "fragmenta anonyma"2 or "fragments erratiques" under the general heading "les fragments grecs de pseudepigraphes anonyms:'3 Finally,in 1971 J6zefT. Milik recognized in these frag­ ments the Greek counterpart of lines known in Ethiopic from I Enoch 77- 78 and 1 Hunt, The OxyrhynchusPapyri, Part XVII (London: Egypt Exploration Fund, 1927), 6-8.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the New Testament Manuscripts and Their Texts
    AN INTRODUCTION TO THE NEW TESTAMENT MANUSCRIPTS AND THEIR TEXTS This is the first major English-language introduction to the earliest manuscripts of the New Testament to appear for over forty years. An essential handbook for scholars and students, it provides a thorough grounding in the study and editing of the New Testament text combined with an emphasis on dramatic current developments in the field. Covering ancient sources in Greek, Syriac, Latin and Coptic, it * describes the manuscripts and other ancient textual evidence, and the tools needed to study them * deals with textual criticism and textual editing, describing modern approaches and techniques, with guidance on the use of editions * introduces the witnesses and textual study of each of the main sections of the New Testament, discussing typical variants and their significance. A companion website with full-colour images provides generous amounts of illustrative material, bringing the subject alive for the reader. d. c. parker is Edward Cadbury Professor of Theology in the Department of Theology and Religion and a Director of the Institute for Textual Scholarship and Electronic Editing, University of Birmingham. His publications include The Living Text of the Gospels (1997) and Codex Bezae: an Early Christian Manuscript and its Text (1992). AN INTRODUCTION TO THE NEW TESTAMENT MANUSCRIPTS AND THEIR TEXTS D. C. PARKER University of Birmingham CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521895538 © D.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovered at Oxyrhynchus
    FRAC:~IENTS FROM A PAPYRUS ROLL OF LATE THIRD CENTURY, CONTAINING ST. 10111' xv. 25-xv1. 2 ANO XVI. 21-31. Discovered at Oxyrhynchu s (Oxyrh. Pap. x. 1228), and gifted by the Egypt Exploration Society to Glasgow Univer:-tity Library HERE Y THERE AMONG THE PAPYRI BY GEORGE MILLIGAN D.D. (ABERDEEN), D.C.L. (DURHAM) PROFESSOR OP' DIVINITY AND BIBLICAL CRITICISM IN THB UNIVBRSITY OF GLASGOW WITH A FRONTISPIECE LONDON HODDER AND STOUGHTON LIMITED MCMXXIII PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN J. H. M. ..... ., ,.. ' Tep a"f«7r1'/Ttp ,ea, uvvep"f'!' µou evx,apt<r771pwJ1 Here and There among the Papyri Foreword THIS small book is addressed in the first instance to that wide and ever-increasing public who are keenly interested in the study of the New Testament, and are anxious to know more of the bearing of the papyrus discoveries, of which they hear so much, on its language and literature. Every effort has, therefore, been made to avoid unnecessary technicalities, and no Greek words or phrases have been used without their English equi­ valents. At the same time, even though it involves some repetition of matter I have published elsewhere, I have tried to give at least an indication of the principal points in the whole field of inquiry. For the sake of those who wish to pursue the subject further, full references are given in the Notes to the sources from which the documents made use of are drawn, and also to some of the most vii vm Here and There among the Papyri accessible literature dealing with the questions at issue.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Books Became the Bible: the Evidence for Canon Formation
    How the Books Became the Bible The Evidence for Canon Formation from Work-Combinations in Manuscripts* Michael Dormandy, University of Cambridge Abstract: This paper contributes to a developing conversation about the New Testa- ment canon. I consider the way manuscripts combine different works and investigate to what extent, even before canon lists became widespread, manuscripts combined only those works that were later affirmed as canonical. My method is to establish the works contained in all Greek New Testament manuscripts, dating from before the end of the fourth century. There are a number of cases where only a fragment survives, containing a small part of one work, but where there are also page numbers that enable us to esti- mate what else might have been present. My results demonstrate that the works that are now considered canonical were rarely combined with works now considered noncanon- ical. However, they also demonstrate that single-work manuscripts were widespread. 1. Introduction The origins of the New Testament canon continue to be a subject of controversy. In this paper, I aim to examine what light can be shed on this question by considering how literary works are combined in manuscripts. The scholarly debate on the canon is complex, but nevertheless it is possible to identify at least two types of view: the “open canon” and the “closed canon.” Two ideas characterize the open canon view, though not all scholars who hold one necessarily hold the other. Firstly, the open canon view, as represented by Jens Schröter and Geoffrey Mark Hahneman, holds that the canon did not become established until the fourth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Commentaries, Catenae and Biblical Tradition Houghton, Hugh
    University of Birmingham Commentaries, Catenae and Biblical Tradition Houghton, Hugh License: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC BY) Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (Harvard): Houghton, H 2016, Commentaries, Catenae and Biblical Tradition. Texts and Studies (Third Series), vol. 13, Gorgias Press, Piscataway NJ. <http://gorgiaspress.com/bookshop/download/Commentaries,%20Catenae%20and%20Biblical%20Tradition.pdf > Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: Eligibility for repository: Checked on 10/5/2016 General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.
    [Show full text]
  • THE TEXT and TRANSMISSION of 2 THESSALONIANS by GRANT G
    THE TEXT AND TRANSMISSION OF 2 THESSALONIANS by GRANT G. EDWARDS A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Theology and Religion School of Philosophy, Theology, and Religion College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham December 2019 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The text and transmission of 2 Thessalonians has not received serious scholarly attention in more than a century. This ancient Christian letter survives in Greek in more than 600 manuscripts, but prior editions have not been based on a comprehensive and systematic selection of the extant evidence. This thesis examines the Greek manuscript tradition of 2 Thessalonians using the Teststellen method to identify the manuscripts most important for the early history of the text. Based on these manuscripts, a critical text and apparatus is presented in Chapter 2. Chapter 3 offers a textual commentary which details the rationale for the selected readings and discusses the most relevant textual variants. In Chapter 4, the genealogical relationships between the manuscripts are analyzed to ascertain what can be detected about the textual transmission of 2 Thessalonians.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oxyrhynchus Papyri
    1. I D l\ ^^ IX I lam Young University /r/^ ^^^'"' Ace. No. WAR-U^^958 THE OXYRHYNCHUS PAPYRI PART IX HUNT 3315 EGYPT EXPLORATION FUND GRAECO-ROMAN BRANCH THE OXYRHYNCHUS PAPYRI PART IX EDITED WITH TRANSLATIONS AND NOTES BY ARTHUR S. HUNT, D.Litt. LL.D. ATHENS HON. PH.D. KOKNIGSBERG ; HON. LITT.D. DUBLIN ; HON. lUR.D. GRAZ ; HON. LECTURER IN PAPYROLOGY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD, AND FELLOW OF QUEEN'S COLLEGE CORRESPONDING MEMBER OF THE ROYAL BAVARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES MEMBER OF THE ROYAL DANISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES AND LETTERS WITH SIX PLATES LONDON SOLD AT The Offices of the EGYPT EXPLORATION FUND, 37 Great Russell St., W.C. AND 527 Tremont Temple, Boston, Mass., U.S.A. KEGAN PAUL, TRENCH, TRUBNER & CO., 68-74 Carter Lane, E.C. BERNARD QUARITCH, 11 Grafton St., New Bond St., W. ASHER & CO., 14 Bedford St., Covent Garden, W.C, and 56 Unter den Linden, Berlin and HENRY FROWDE, Amen Corner, E.C., and 39-35 West 3aND Street, New York, U.S.A. 1913 All rights reserved . OXFORD HORACE HART, PRINTER TO THE UNIVERSITY PREFACE For the rather late appearance of this vokime the nature of its contents will perhaps in some degree be accepted as an excuse. It includes two texts of more than usual importance and interest, the new fragments of Sophocles and the Life of Etiripidcs by Satyrus. In the reconstruction and elucidation of these I have again been most fortunate in obtaining the invaluable aid of Professor U. von Wilamowitz-M Ollendorff. I am also under considerable obligations, more particularly with regard to the Sophoclean fragments, to Professor Gilbert Murray.
    [Show full text]
  • OLDEST SYNOPTIC GOSPELS PAPYRI the Earliest Copies of Manuscripts of the Greek New Testament
    OLDEST SYNOPTIC GOSPELS PAPYRI The earliest copies of manuscripts of the Greek New Testament (the language the New Testament was written in originally) are found on fragments of pa­ pyrus (pI. papyri, often abbreviated p), a type of paper made from reeds that grow along the Nile River in Egypt. Much, but not all, of the Greek New Tes­ tament survives in the papyri. All of the Greek New Testament survives in the later codices (sg. codex), which are ancient books usually made of vellum, or leather, pages. The oldest Greek papyri containing the text of the Synoptic Gospels are listed below along with the Gospel passage(s) or fragments they contain. Papyrus 67 (PBarcelona 1) A.D. 125-150 Matthew 3:9,15; 5:20-22,25-28 Papyrus 103 (POxy. 4403) A.D. 175-200 Matthew 13:55-57; 14:3-5 Papyrus 104 (POxy. 4404) A.D. 175-200 Matthew 21:34-37,43, 45 (7) Papyrus 77 (POxy. 2683 + 4405) A.D. 175-200 Matthew 23:30-39 Papyrus 64 (PMagdalen 17) A.D. 125-150 Matthew 26:7-8, 10,14-15,22-23,31-33 Papyrus 4 (PParis 1120) A.D. 125-150 Luke 1:58-59; 1:62-2:1; 2:6-7; 3:8-4:2; 4:29-32,34-35; 5:3-8 Papyrus 75 Qohn Bodmer) c. A.D. 175 Luke 3:18-22; 3:33-4:2; 4:34-5:10; 5:37-6:4; 6:10-7:32; 7:35-39,41-43; 7:46-9:2; 9:4-17:15; 17:19-18:18; 22:4-24:53 OLDEST GREEK CODICES Coincident with the emergence of Christianity was the development of the co­ dex, the forerunner of the modern book, with bound pages printed on both sides.
    [Show full text]
  • P.Oxy. II 209/P10)
    JBL 129, no. 3 (2010): 575–596 A New Testament Papyrus and Its Documentary Context: An Early Christian Writing Exercise from the Archive of Leonides (P.Oxy. II 209/p10) annemarie luijendijk [email protected] Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 In this article I present a NT papyrus (P. Ox y. II 209/p10) as part of a known archive. Although scholars have been familiar with this papyrus and its NT text, they have not known its larger social context. The identification of this piece as part of an archive allows a glimpse into the life and social milieu of its owner: a lit- erate man from the ancient Egyptian city of Oxyrhynchus, a flax merchant and a member of a guild, with connections to a church reader. As such, it is the first and only ancient instance where we know the owner of a Greek NT papyrus. I. The Papyrus and Its Texts P. Ox y. II 209 preserves Rom 1:1–7, the proemium of the apostle Paul’s Letter to the Romans. With its Pauline pericope, this papyrus is a constant witness to the text of the NT. It ranks as Papyrus 10 (p10) of the NT papyri and thus belongs I am grateful to Roger S. Bagnall for his help in identifying this archive and for his other valuable suggestions in developing this project. I thank Laura S. Nasrallah, the members of the Papyrological Seminar in New York City, and the anonymous reviewer for this journal for their helpful comments and input. I presented different parts of this paper at the 25th International Congress of Papyrology (Ann Arbor, July 2007) and at the conference “Lire les papyrus du Nou- veau Testament avec les autres papyrus d’Égypte” (Lausanne, Switzerland, October 2009) and thank the audiences for their feedback.
    [Show full text]