DOCSLIB.ORG

Impact Cratering

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Impact Cratering Impact Cratering MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM David A. Hardy Impact cratering overview: What we will learn about impact craters today: • Causes of impacts - meteorites! • Impact craters in our solar system • Formation of craters • Different parts of a crater • How do craters can change over time • Craters as dating tools MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM • Meteorites on Mars Leonid Meteor Shower Spain November 2002 MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM Juan CarlosCasado Meteor or “shooting star” is the visible path made by a object from space as it travels through a planet’s atmosphere. MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM Sophie DesRosiers, Planétarium de Montréal Meteor or meteorite? QuickTime™ and a YUV420 codec decompressor are needed to see this picture. S. Eichmiller StarChild, NASA Meteorite breaking up as it travels through the atmosphere Peekskill Meteorite October 9, 1992 Peekskill, New York MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM Bill Menke Meteorites are objects from space (meteoroids) that reach a planet’s surface. Iron meteorite Boy hit by a meteorite Arizona Uganda, Africa R.A. Langheinrich Meteorites Collection Dutch Meteor Society MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM Rudolf Reiser Largest meteorite discovered on Earth Namibia, Africa What are meteoroids? Pieces of other Space planets dust Meteoroids NASA/JPL Comets Cécile Engrandare particles of rock, metal and/or ice in space. MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM NASA/JPL Asteroids Rudolf Reiser Most meteoroids are materials left over from the formation of our solar system 4.5 billion years ago! MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM Don Dixon Where do most asteroids come from? Asteroid Belt Ida MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM NASA/JPL Where do most comets come from? Halley’s comet Max-Planck-Institut fur Aeronomie MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM NASA/JPL What happens when a large meteoroid hits a planet? MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM Andrew C. Stewart MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM Why are they important? Meteor Crater, Arizona How do craters form? Impact craters are formed! USGS THEMIS Image, Mars NASA/JPL/ASU Earth’s Moon MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM NASA/JPL Mercury MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM NASA/JPL Mars MOLA topographic map MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM NASA/JPL Mimas, moon of Saturn Herschel Crater Evidence of giant impacts! MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM NASA/JPL Are there impact craters on Earth? MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM Sophie DesRosiers, Planétarium de Montréal Lonar Impact Crater India Impact Craters on Earth Manicouagan Impact Crater Quebec, Canada Google Earth Wolf Creek Impact Crater N Western Australia, Australia MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM Ronald W. Hayes, USGS David McKinnon Best preserved impact crater on Earth! Holsinger meteorite (1400 lbs) Meteor Crater Winslow, Arizona Impact 50,000 years ago MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM Geoscience Research Institute Martin Hellman Sophie DesRosiers, Planétarium de Montréal Chicxulub impact crater Yucatán Peninsula Impact 65 million years ago Gravitational anomaly map MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM NASA / LPI / V.L. Sharpton MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM Lunar and Planetary Institute How do impact craters form? Cinder Lakes Flagstaff, Arizona MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM Meteorites impact on Mars! Crater Formation: Meteoroid Planet surface Planet surface 1. Meteoroid traveling 10-15 kilometers/second strikes the surface of a planet Ejecta 2. Shock waves compress the rocky surface and the Shock waves Contact - Compression meteoroid is vaporized MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM Sophie DesRosiers, Planétarium de Montréal Crater Formation: Ejecta Planet surface 3. Intense shock waves travel through the ground, breaking up and melting surrounding Shock waves rock Molten rock Crater Vapor Ejecta curtain Excavation 4. Crater is formed as shock waves and ejecta expand Shock waves outward MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM Sophie DesRosiers, Planétarium de Montréal Crater Formation: Ejecta 5. Shock waves die out and ejecta settles forming a Fractured rock blanket around the crater rim Fractured rock Ejecta blanket Uplifted Breccia rim Modification 6. Crater is fully formed and is modified by gravity, erosion and sedimentation over Fractured rock geologic time. MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM Sophie DesRosiers, Planétarium de Montréal Impact crater morphology: THEMIS Visible Image impact crater on Mars Central Peak (cp): visible in mostly large craters, the floor of the crater can rebound or get uplifted during the impact Wall (w): the steepest part, where loose debris can fall to the floor Floor (f): the bottom of the crater which can collect debris from the sides of the crater U S Rim (r): where rock is folded above original A / L P surface J SA/ A N Satellite View Ejecta (ej): material from inside the crater that gets thrown out during impact surface ej r w cp crust f MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM Side View of a Crater Where do we find craters on Mars? Hellas Planitia Mars Largest crater in solar system! MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM MOLA map 2,100 kilometer diameter NASA/JPL Craters unique to Mars: Rampart (“splosh”) craters Tooting Crater, Mars Lobate ejecta MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM Victoria Crater, Mars NASA/JPL NASA/JPL Endurance Crater, Mars Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity’s Landing site August 2004 MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM NASA/JPL NASA/JPL Craters are windows into a planet’s geologic past Craters expose rock layers for scientists to study THEMIS images NASA/JPL/ASU NASA/JPL/ASU HiRISE mosaic NASA's Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity examined the rim of Victoria Crater; note the layers of impact breccia (fragments thrown out MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM of crater during impact). NASA/JPL NASA/JPL-Caltech/Cornell/U.S. Geological Survey How are impact craters modified on Earth and Mars? Impact crater, Mars • Eroded (wind, water, tectonism, and volcanism) • Covered or filled in (water, vegetation, sediments, landslides, lava, and ejecta) Victoria Crater, Mars NASA/JPL Lonar Crater, India MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM Tiku Ravat MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM THEMIS 1N, 70E Wind streaks Martian craters: Modification by wind THEMIS 44N, 38.3E NASA/JPL/ASU Sand dunes (dark areas) ASU NASA/JPL/ THEMIS 19N, 284.9E Yardangs (ridges) NASA/JPL/ASU MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM THEMIS 43.6N, 296.4E Channels and deposition of sediments Martian craters: Modification by water sediments NASA/JPL/ASU THEMIS 16N, 329.6E Streamlined Islands NASA/JPL/ASU THEMIS 36.3N, 292.8E Gullies NASA/JPL/ASU MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM THEMIS 12.6N, 83.8E 12.6N, THEMIS Martian craters: Modification by Modification craters: Martian gravity Slumps (slumping and landslides) and (slumping NASA/JPL/ASU THEMIS 0N, 313.4E 0N, THEMIS rim crater Landslides NASA/JPL/ASU MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM THEMIS 0N, 0E THEMIS 0N, 1. Cross-cutting relationships feature cutisolderthan whatcutit.” Using cratersasdatingtools NASA/JPL/ASU THEMIS 29.7N, 1.7E THEMIS 29.7N, -“The -“The NASA/JPL/ASU 288E THEMIS -54N, 3 2 1 NASA/JPL/ASU Using craters as dating tools 2. Cratering rate - the more 70N craters there are on a surface, the older the surface. Which is surface is older? 0N U S A / L JP / A S A THEMIS 14.1N, 287.9E N U S A / L P J / MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM A S THEMIS 36.8N, 42.7E A N 70S 0E NASA/JPL MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM3. Crater modification modified a crater, the older it is. THEMIS 69.1N, 273.6E Using craters as dating tools NASA/JPL/ASU - generally, the more craters Which appear older? THEMIS 44N, 38.3E NASA/JPL/ASU Determining the age of a crater Well defined crater with little to no modification Preserved Partially modified crater, but floor, central peak, rim, walls, and ejecta are still visible Modified Mostly eroded or covered crater; MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM features difficult to see Destroyed NASA/JPL/ASU Are there meteorites on Mars? MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM NASA/JPL NASA/JPL Iron meteorite found on Mars! By Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity in January 2005 “Heat Shield Rock” NASA/JPL Impact craters help us understand: • The geologic history and age of a planet’s surface • How geologic processes work on different worlds, and • The importance of impacts in planetary formation and evolution MARS EDUCATION PROGRAM.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Curiosity's Candidate Field Site in Gale Crater, Mars
    Curiosity’s Candidate Field Site in Gale Crater, Mars K. S. Edgett – 27 September 2010 Simulated view from Curiosity rover in landing ellipse looking toward the field area in Gale; made using MRO CTX stereopair images; no vertical exaggeration. The mound is ~15 km away 4th MSL Landing Site Workshop, 27–29 September 2010 in this view. Note that one would see Gale’s SW wall in the distant background if this were Edgett, 1 actually taken by the Mastcams on Mars. Gale Presents Perhaps the Thickest and Most Diverse Exposed Stratigraphic Section on Mars • Gale’s Mound appears to present the thickest and most diverse exposed stratigraphic section on Mars that we can hope access in this decade. • Mound has ~5 km of stratified rock. (That’s 3 miles!) • There is no evidence that volcanism ever occurred in Gale. • Mound materials were deposited as sediment. • Diverse materials are present. • Diverse events are recorded. – Episodes of sedimentation and lithification and diagenesis. – Episodes of erosion, transport, and re-deposition of mound materials. 4th MSL Landing Site Workshop, 27–29 September 2010 Edgett, 2 Gale is at ~5°S on the “north-south dichotomy boundary” in the Aeolis and Nepenthes Mensae Region base map made by MSSS for National Geographic (February 2001); from MOC wide angle images and MOLA topography 4th MSL Landing Site Workshop, 27–29 September 2010 Edgett, 3 Proposed MSL Field Site In Gale Crater Landing ellipse - very low elevation (–4.5 km) - shown here as 25 x 20 km - alluvium from crater walls - drive to mound Anderson & Bell
    [Show full text]
  • Turbulence and Aeolian Morphodynamics in Craters on Mars: Application to Gale Crater, Landing Site of the Curiosity Rover
    16TH EUROPEAN TURBULENCE CONFERENCE, 21-24 AUGUST, 2017, STOCKHOLM,SWEDEN TURBULENCE AND AEOLIAN MORPHODYNAMICS IN CRATERS ON MARS: APPLICATION TO GALE CRATER, LANDING SITE OF THE CURIOSITY ROVER William Anderson1, Gary Kocurek2 & Kenzie Day2 1Mechanical Engineering Dept., Univ. Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, USA 2Dept. Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, Univ. Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA Mars is a dry planet with a thin atmosphere. Aeolian processes – wind-driven mobilization of sediment and dust – are the dominant mode of landscape variability on the dessicated landscapes of Mars. Craters are common topographic features on the surface of Mars, and many craters on Mars contain a prominent central mound (NASA’s Curiosity rover was landed in Gale crater, shown in Figure 1a [1], while Figures 1b and 1c show Henry and Korolev crater, respectively). These mounds are composed of sedimentary fill and, therefore, they contain rich information on the evolution of climatic conditions on Mars embodied in the stratigraphic “layering” of sediments. Many other craters no longer house a mound, but contain sediment and dust from which dune fields and other features form (see, for example, Victoria Crater, Figure 1d). Using density-normalized large-eddy simulations, we have modeled turbulent flows over crater-like topographies that feature a central mound. Resultant datasets suggest a deflationary mechanism wherein vortices shed from the upwind crater rim are realigned to conform to the crater profile via stretching and tilting. This was accomplished using three- dimensional datasets (momentum and vorticity) retrieved from LES. As a result, helical vortices occupy the inner region of the crater and, therefore, are primarily responsible for aeolian morphodynamics in the crater (radial katabatic flows are also important to aeolian processes within the crater [2]).
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration of Victoria Crater by the Mars Rover Opportunity
    Exploration of Victoria Crater by the Mars Rover Opportunity The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Squyres, Steven W., Andrew H. Knoll, Raymond E. Arvidson, James W. Ashley, James F. III Bell, Wendy M. Calvin, Philip R. Christensen, et al. 2009. Exploration of Victoria Crater by the Mars rover Opportunity. Science 324(5930): 1058-1061. Published Version doi:10.1126/science.1170355 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:3934552 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP Exploration of Victoria Crater by the Rover Opportunity S.W. Squyres1, A.H. Knoll2, R.E. Arvidson3, J.W. Ashley4, J.F. Bell III1, W.M. Calvin5, P.R. Christensen4, B.C. Clark6, B.A. Cohen7, P.A. de Souza Jr.8, L. Edgar9, W.H. Farrand10, I. Fleischer11, R. Gellert12, M.P. Golombek13, J. Grant14, J. Grotzinger9, A. Hayes9, K.E. Herkenhoff15, J.R. Johnson15, B. Jolliff3, G. Klingelhöfer11, A. Knudson4, R. Li16, T.J. McCoy17, S.M. McLennan18, D.W. Ming19, D.W. Mittlefehldt19, R.V. Morris19, J.W. Rice Jr.4, C. Schröder11, R.J. Sullivan1, A. Yen13, R.A. Yingst20 1 Dept. of Astronomy, Space Sciences Bldg., Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA 2 Botanical Museum, Harvard University, Cambridge MA 02138, USA 3 Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter and Opportunity Observations Of
    PUBLICATIONS Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets RESEARCH ARTICLE Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter and Opportunity 10.1002/2014JE004686 observations of the Burns formation: Crater Key Point: hopping at Meridiani Planum • Hydrated Mg and Ca sulfate Burns formation minerals mapped with MRO R. E. Arvidson1, J. F. Bell III2, J. G. Catalano1, B. C. Clark3, V. K. Fox1, R. Gellert4, J. P. Grotzinger5, and MER data E. A. Guinness1, K. E. Herkenhoff6, A. H. Knoll7, M. G. A. Lapotre5, S. M. McLennan8, D. W. Ming9, R. V. Morris9, S. L. Murchie10, K. E. Powell1, M. D. Smith11, S. W. Squyres12, M. J. Wolff3, and J. J. Wray13 1 2 Correspondence to: Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Washington University in Saint Louis, Missouri, USA, School of Earth and Space R. E. Arvidson, Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA, 3Space Science Institute, Boulder, Colorado, USA, 4Department of [email protected] Physics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, 5Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA, 6U.S. Geological Survey, Astrogeology Science Center, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA, 7 8 Citation: Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, Department Arvidson, R. E., et al. (2015), Mars of Geosciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA, 9NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, USA, Reconnaissance Orbiter and Opportunity 10Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Laurel, Maryland, USA, 11NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, observations of the Burns formation: Greenbelt, Maryland, USA, 12Department of Astronomy, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA, 13School of Earth and Crater hopping at Meridiani Planum, J.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Model of the Crustal Magnetic Field of Mars Using MGS and MAVEN
    RESEARCH ARTICLE A New Model of the Crustal Magnetic Field of Mars Using 10.1029/2018JE005854 MGS and MAVEN Key Points: 1 1 2 3 • MGS and MAVEN magnetic field Benoit Langlais , Erwan Thébault , Aymeric Houliez , Michael E. Purucker , 4 measurements are combined into a and Robert J. Lillis high-resolution magnetic field model • The new model extends up to SH 1Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géodynamique, Université de Nantes, Université d'Angers, CNRS, UMR 6112, Nantes, degree 134, corresponding to 160-km France, 2Observatoire Royal de Belgique, Uccle, Belgium, 3Planetary Magnetospheres Laboratory, NASA Goddard horizontal resolution at the Martian Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA, 4Space Science Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA surface • It enables local studies, where geologic and magnetic features can be compared Abstract While devoid of an active magnetic dynamo field today, Mars possesses a remanent magnetic field that may reach several thousand nanoteslas locally. The exact origin and the events that have shaped the crustal magnetization remain largely enigmatic. Three magnetic field data sets from two spacecraft Supporting Information: • Supporting Information S1 collected over 13 cumulative years have sampled the Martian magnetic field over a range of altitudes •TableS1 from 90 up to 6,000 km: (a) Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) magnetometer (1997–2006), (b) MGS Electron Reflectometer (1999–2006), and (c) Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) magnetometer Correspondence to: (2014 to today). In this paper we combine these complementary data sets for the first time to build a new B. Langlais, model of the Martian internal magnetic field. This new model improves upon previous ones in several [email protected] aspects: comprehensive data coverage, refined data selection scheme, modified modeling scheme, discrete-to-continuous transformation of the model, and increased model resolution.
    [Show full text]
  • March 21–25, 2016
    FORTY-SEVENTH LUNAR AND PLANETARY SCIENCE CONFERENCE PROGRAM OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS MARCH 21–25, 2016 The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel and Convention Center The Woodlands, Texas INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT Universities Space Research Association Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute Eileen Stansbery, NASA Johnson Space Center PROGRAM COMMITTEE CHAIRS David Draper, NASA Johnson Space Center Walter Kiefer, Lunar and Planetary Institute PROGRAM COMMITTEE P. Doug Archer, NASA Johnson Space Center Nicolas LeCorvec, Lunar and Planetary Institute Katherine Bermingham, University of Maryland Yo Matsubara, Smithsonian Institute Janice Bishop, SETI and NASA Ames Research Center Francis McCubbin, NASA Johnson Space Center Jeremy Boyce, University of California, Los Angeles Andrew Needham, Carnegie Institution of Washington Lisa Danielson, NASA Johnson Space Center Lan-Anh Nguyen, NASA Johnson Space Center Deepak Dhingra, University of Idaho Paul Niles, NASA Johnson Space Center Stephen Elardo, Carnegie Institution of Washington Dorothy Oehler, NASA Johnson Space Center Marc Fries, NASA Johnson Space Center D. Alex Patthoff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Cyrena Goodrich, Lunar and Planetary Institute Elizabeth Rampe, Aerodyne Industries, Jacobs JETS at John Gruener, NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center Justin Hagerty, U.S. Geological Survey Carol Raymond, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Lindsay Hays, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Paul Schenk,
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Melt Emplacement on Mercury
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 7-24-2018 2:00 PM Impact Melt Emplacement on Mercury Jeffrey Daniels The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Neish, Catherine D. The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Geology A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Master of Science © Jeffrey Daniels 2018 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Geology Commons, Physical Processes Commons, and the The Sun and the Solar System Commons Recommended Citation Daniels, Jeffrey, "Impact Melt Emplacement on Mercury" (2018). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 5657. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/5657 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract Impact cratering is an abrupt, spectacular process that occurs on any world with a solid surface. On Earth, these craters are easily eroded or destroyed through endogenic processes. The Moon and Mercury, however, lack a significant atmosphere, meaning craters on these worlds remain intact longer, geologically. In this thesis, remote-sensing techniques were used to investigate impact melt emplacement about Mercury’s fresh, complex craters. For complex lunar craters, impact melt is preferentially ejected from the lowest rim elevation, implying topographic control. On Venus, impact melt is preferentially ejected downrange from the impact site, implying impactor-direction control. Mercury, despite its heavily-cratered surface, trends more like Venus than like the Moon.
    [Show full text]
  • LAYERED SULFATE-BEARING TERRAINS on MARS: INSIGHTS from GALE CRATER and MERIDIANI PLANUM. K.E. Powell1,2, R.E. Arvidson3, and C.S
    Ninth International Conference on Mars 2019 (LPI Contrib. No. 2089) 6316.pdf LAYERED SULFATE-BEARING TERRAINS ON MARS: INSIGHTS FROM GALE CRATER AND MERIDIANI PLANUM. K.E. Powell1,2, R.E. Arvidson3, and C.S. Edwards1, 1Department of Physics & Astrono- my, Northern Arizona University, 2School of Earth & Space Exploration, Arizona State University, 3Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis. Introduction: Sulfate species have been detected ronment, with episodes of diagenesis and weathering in late Noachian and Hesperian terrains on Mars lying to form a crystalline hematite lag deposit [4, 5]. The stratigraphically above clay minerals, which has been lag deposit masks the CRISM spectral signature of interpreted as documenting a shift from wetter to more sulfate in most locations. Sulfate minerals including arid environments on the surface. Sulfate detections kieserite and gypsum have been detected in impact are associated with layered deposits in numerous loca- crater walls and windswept regions [6]. The Oppor- tions including Gale Crater, Meridiani Planum, Vallis tunity rover explored southern Meridiani Planum Marineris, and Terra Sirenum, and Aram Chaos [1]. through a campaign of crater-hopping, using craters as These sulfates and clays been identified using their a natural drill to expose strata [6]. The deepest expo- diagnostic absorption features in visible and near- sures explored by Opportunity directly are ~10 meters infrared reflectance (VNIR) data acquired from Mars thick at Victoria Crater. Opportunity results indicate orbit. Additionally, two rover missions have explored that the top layers of Burns formation contain up to sites with massive sulfate deposits. The first, the MER 40% sulfate and included Mg, Ca, and Fe species.
    [Show full text]
  • MIAMI UNIVERSITY the Graduate School Certificate for Approving The
    MIAMI UNIVERSITY The Graduate School Certificate for Approving the Dissertation We hereby approve the Dissertation of Qiuyuan Huang Candidate for the Degree: Doctor of Philosophy _______________________________________ Hailiang Dong, Director ________________________________________ Yildirim Dilek, Reader ________________________________________ Jonathan Levy, Reader ______________________________________ Chuanlun Zhang, External examiner ______________________________________ Annette Bollmann, Graduate School Representative ABSTRACT GEOMICROBIAL INVESTIGATIONS ON EXTREME ENVIRONMENTS: LINKING GEOCHEMISTRY TO MICROBIAL ECOLOGY IN TERRESTRIAL HOT SPRINGS AND SALINE LAKES by Qiuyuan Huang Terrestrial hot springs and saline lakes represent two extreme environments for microbial life and constitute an important part of global ecosystems that affect the biogeochemical cycling of life-essential elements. Despite the advances in our understanding of microbial ecology in the past decade, important questions remain regarding the link between microbial diversity and geochemical factors under these extreme conditions. This dissertation first investigates a series of hot springs with wide ranges of temperature (26-92oC) and pH (3.72-8.2) from the Tibetan Plateau in China and the Philippines. Within each region, microbial diversity and geochemical conditions were studied using an integrated approach with 16S rRNA molecular phylogeny and a suite of geochemical analyses. In Tibetan springs, the microbial community was dominated by archaeal phylum Thaumarchaeota
    [Show full text]
  • Water on the Moon, III. Volatiles & Activity
    Water on The Moon, III. Volatiles & Activity Arlin Crotts (Columbia University) For centuries some scientists have argued that there is activity on the Moon (or water, as recounted in Parts I & II), while others have thought the Moon is simply a dead, inactive world. [1] The question comes in several forms: is there a detectable atmosphere? Does the surface of the Moon change? What causes interior seismic activity? From a more modern viewpoint, we now know that as much carbon monoxide as water was excavated during the LCROSS impact, as detailed in Part I, and a comparable amount of other volatiles were found. At one time the Moon outgassed prodigious amounts of water and hydrogen in volcanic fire fountains, but released similar amounts of volatile sulfur (or SO2), and presumably large amounts of carbon dioxide or monoxide, if theory is to be believed. So water on the Moon is associated with other gases. Astronomers have agreed for centuries that there is no firm evidence for “weather” on the Moon visible from Earth, and little evidence of thick atmosphere. [2] How would one detect the Moon’s atmosphere from Earth? An obvious means is atmospheric refraction. As you watch the Sun set, its image is displaced by Earth’s atmospheric refraction at the horizon from the position it would have if there were no atmosphere, by roughly 0.6 degree (a bit more than the Sun’s angular diameter). On the Moon, any atmosphere would cause an analogous effect for a star passing behind the Moon during an occultation (multiplied by two since the light travels both into and out of the lunar atmosphere).
    [Show full text]
  • GRAIL Reveals Secrets of the Lunar Interior
    GRAIL Reveals Secrets of the Lunar Interior — Dr. Patrick J. McGovern, Lunar and Planetary Institute A mini-flotilla of spacecraft sent to the Moon in the past few years by several nations has revealed much about the characteristics of the lunar surface via techniques such as imaging, spectroscopy, and laser ranging. While the achievements of these missions have been impressive, only GRAIL has seen deeply enough to reveal inner secrets that the Moon holds. LRecent Lunar Missions Country Name Launch Date Status ESA Small Missions for Advanced September 27, 2003 Ended with lunar surface impact on Research in Technology-1 (SMART-1) September 3, 2006 USA Acceleration, Reconnection, February 27, 2007 Extension of the THEMIS mission; ended Turbulence and Electrodynamics of in 2012 the Moon’s Interaction with the Sun (ARTEMIS) Japan SELENE (Kaguya) September 14, 2007 Ended with lunar surface impact on June 10, 2009 PChina Chang’e-1 October 24, 2007 Taken out of orbit on March 1, 2009 India Chandrayaan-1 October 22, 2008 Two-year mission; ended after 315 days due to malfunction and loss of contact USA Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) June 18, 2009 Completed one-year primary mission; now in five-year extended mission USA Lunar Crater Observation and June 18, 2009 Ended with lunar surface impact on Sensing Satellite (LCROSS) October 9, 2009 China Chang’e-2 October 1, 2010 Primary mission lasted for six months; extended mission completed flyby of asteroid 4179 Toutatis in December 2012 USA Gravity Recovery and Interior September 10, 2011 Ended with lunar surface impact on I Laboratory (GRAIL) December 17, 2012 To probe deeper, NASA launched the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) mission: twin spacecraft (named “Ebb” and “Flow” by elementary school students from Montana) flying in formation over the lunar surface, tracking each other to within a sensitivity of 50 nanometers per second, or one- twenty-thousandth of the velocity that a snail moves [1], according to GRAIL Principal Investigator Maria Zuber of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    [Show full text]
  • The Curtis L. Ivey Science Center DEDICATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2004
    NON-PROFIT Office of Advancement ORGANIZATION ALUMNI MAGAZINE COLBY-SAWYER Colby-Sawyer College U.S. POSTAGE 541 Main Street PAID New London, NH 03257 LEWISTON, ME PERMIT 82 C LBY-SAWYER CHANGE SERVICE REQUESTED ALUMNI MAGAZINE I NSIDE: FALL/WINTER 2004 The Curtis L. Ivey Science Center DEDICATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2004 F ALL/WINTER 2004 Annual Report Issue EDITOR BOARD OF TRUSTEES David R. Morcom Anne Winton Black ’73, ’75 CLASS NOTES EDITORS Chair Tracey Austin Ye ar of Gaye LaCasce Philip H. Jordan Jr. Vice-Chair CONTRIBUTING WRITERS Tracey Austin Robin L. Mead ’72 the Arts Jeremiah Chila ’04 Executive Secretary Cathy DeShano Ye ar of Nicole Eaton ’06 William S. Berger Donald A. Hasseltine Pamela Stanley Bright ’61 Adam S. Kamras Alice W. Brown Gaye LaCasce Lo-Yi Chan his month marks the launch of the Year of the Arts, a David R. Morcom Timothy C. Coughlin P’00 Tmultifaceted initiative that will bring arts faculty members to meet Kimberly Swick Slover Peter D. Danforth P’83, ’84, GP’02 the Arts Leslie Wright Dow ’57 with groups of alumni and friends around the country. We will host VICE PRESIDENT FOR ADVANCEMENT Stephen W. Ensign gatherings in art museums and galleries in a variety of cities, and Donald A. Hasseltine Eleanor Morrison Goldthwait ’51 are looking forward to engaging hundreds of alumni and friends in Suzanne Simons Hammond ’66 conversations about art, which will be led by our faculty experts. DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT Patricia Driggs Kelsey We also look forward to sharing information about Colby-Sawyer’s Beth Cahill Joyce Juskalian Kolligian ’55 robust arts curriculum.
    [Show full text]