High Altitude Balloon with Stabilized Camera System

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

High Altitude Balloon with Stabilized Camera System High Altitude Balloon with Stabilized Camera System Lee Wasilenko APSC 479 Engineering Physics University of British Columbia January 10, 2011 2 Executive Summary This report describes the design and testing of a camera stabilization system intended for use with on a high altitude balloon. The objective is to be able to control and stabilize a camera with enough precision to obtain clear photos of the stars and other celestial bodies. This report describes several possible mechanical designs but no clearly superior mechanical design emerged during the time allotted to the project. Tests were performed to determine an acceptable level of relative displacement between the camera and its subject. This was determined to be <0.5deg overall and can also be characterized as a rate <0.05/E(t) where E(t) is the shutter speed of the camera. The team constructed and tested a simple stabilization system with a gyroscopic rate sensor, an Arduino microcontroller, and a servo. The system behaviour was determined by PI code written by the team. The team found that this system was not sufficient to provide the stringent level of control required for a stable image. The displacement measured by the team was 5.7deg, which is 10 times higher than that required. Further optimization and design research must be performed before the stability requirements can be met. 3 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 3 List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................ 5 1. Background and Motivation ................................................................................................................. 6 2 Project Objectives ................................................................................................................................. 9 2.1 Specific Objectives for APSC 479................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Objectives for future HAB Launch ............................................................................................... 10 2.3 Scope and Limitations ................................................................................................................. 11 2.4 Organization ................................................................................................................................ 11 3.0 HAB Launch Research ..................................................................................................................... 12 3.1 Balloon Selection......................................................................................................................... 12 3.2 HAB Flight Trajectory Prediction ................................................................................................. 12 3.3 Communications and Recovery .................................................................................................. 15 3.4 Camera Selection ........................................................................................................................ 15 3.5 Star and Region of Space Recognition ........................................................................................ 16 4.0 Camera Stabilization ....................................................................................................................... 17 4.1 Stability Theory and Requirements............................................................................................. 17 4.2 Mechanical Design ...................................................................................................................... 24 4.3 Control Algorithm ....................................................................................................................... 29 4.4 Description of Experimental Testing ........................................................................................... 30 4.5 Results ......................................................................................................................................... 32 4.6 Discussion of Results ................................................................................................................... 32 5.0 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................... 34 6.0 Project Deliverables and Financial Summary .................................................................................. 35 6.1 Deliverables ................................................................................................................................. 35 6.2 Financial Summary ...................................................................................................................... 35 6.3 Ongoing Commitments ............................................................................................................... 35 7.0 Recommendations .......................................................................................................................... 37 References .................................................................................................................................................. 38 4 List of Figures Figure 1: Payload Axis Definition. Positive Z-axis points in the direction of latex balloon ........................... 7 Figure 2: Curvature of the Earth from 33km. Photo credit: David Stillman (4) ............................................ 9 Figure 3: CU Spaceflight Trajectory Prediction ........................................................................................... 13 Figure 4: University of Wyoming Balloon Trajectory Prediction ................................................................ 14 Figure 5: 1.5deg of camera displacement, large view ................................................................................ 19 Figure 6: 1.5deg of camera displacement, close up view ........................................................................... 19 Figure 7: 1.0deg of camera displacement, large view ................................................................................ 20 Figure 8: 1.0deg of camera displacement, close up view ........................................................................... 20 Figure 9: 0.5deg of camera displacement, large view ................................................................................ 21 Figure 10: 0.5deg of camera displacement, close up view ......................................................................... 21 Figure 11: Shaky camera, large view ........................................................................................................... 22 Figure 12: Shaky camera, close up view ..................................................................................................... 22 Figure 13: Shaky camera with VR off, large view ........................................................................................ 23 Figure 14: Shaky camera with VR off, close up view .................................................................................. 23 Figure 15: First draft stabilization design .................................................................................................... 25 Figure 16: Second iteration design ............................................................................................................. 26 Figure 17: Full and close up view of iteration three mechanical design. Mockup courtesy of Bernhard Zender, UBC Engineering Physics Project Lab ............................................................................................. 27 Figure 18: Alternate design with gyroscopic stabilizer. Mockup courtesy of Bernhard Zender, UBC Engineering Physics Project Lab .................................................................................................................. 27 Figure 19: Stabilizer design using gyroscopic stabilizer and inherent stiffness. Mockup courtesy of Bernhard Zender, UBC Engineering Physics Project Lab ............................................................................. 28 Figure 20: Control program flow diagram .................................................................................................. 30 Figure 21: Components of experimental performance tests...................................................................... 31 5 1. Background and Motivation The low cost and ready availability of a plethora of electronic components and semi-conductor devices has made it possible for the amateur, hobbyist and student to construct devices and perform experiments which in the past would have been prohibitively expensive and complex. Two endeavours which are benefitting from the semi-conductor revolution are the fields of amateur photography and high altitude balloon (HAB) projects. Photography has benefitted from the development of the CMOS and CCD technologies which make it possible to capture high quality images, view the result instantaneously, edit as desired, and store the image in a variety of digital formats. At the cutting edge the current state of the art in digital photography rivals that of film photography with much less expense and greater ease in editing. At the low and mid-range, digital cameras are inexpensive, light weight, easy to operate, and have a very
Recommended publications
  • World Scientists' Warning of a Climate Emergency
    Supplemental File S1 for the article “World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency” published in BioScience by William J. Ripple, Christopher Wolf, Thomas M. Newsome, Phoebe Barnard, and William R. Moomaw. Contents: List of countries with scientist signatories (page 1); List of scientist signatories (pages 1-319). List of 153 countries with scientist signatories: Albania; Algeria; American Samoa; Andorra; Argentina; Australia; Austria; Bahamas (the); Bangladesh; Barbados; Belarus; Belgium; Belize; Benin; Bolivia (Plurinational State of); Botswana; Brazil; Brunei Darussalam; Bulgaria; Burkina Faso; Cambodia; Cameroon; Canada; Cayman Islands (the); Chad; Chile; China; Colombia; Congo (the Democratic Republic of the); Congo (the); Costa Rica; Côte d’Ivoire; Croatia; Cuba; Curaçao; Cyprus; Czech Republic (the); Denmark; Dominican Republic (the); Ecuador; Egypt; El Salvador; Estonia; Ethiopia; Faroe Islands (the); Fiji; Finland; France; French Guiana; French Polynesia; Georgia; Germany; Ghana; Greece; Guam; Guatemala; Guyana; Honduras; Hong Kong; Hungary; Iceland; India; Indonesia; Iran (Islamic Republic of); Iraq; Ireland; Israel; Italy; Jamaica; Japan; Jersey; Kazakhstan; Kenya; Kiribati; Korea (the Republic of); Lao People’s Democratic Republic (the); Latvia; Lebanon; Lesotho; Liberia; Liechtenstein; Lithuania; Luxembourg; Macedonia, Republic of (the former Yugoslavia); Madagascar; Malawi; Malaysia; Mali; Malta; Martinique; Mauritius; Mexico; Micronesia (Federated States of); Moldova (the Republic of); Morocco; Mozambique; Namibia; Nepal;
    [Show full text]
  • 2020–21 Commencement Program
    Commencement UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO BOULDER MAY 6, 2021 One Hundred Forty-Fifth Year of the University NORLIN CHARGE TO THE GRADUATES The first commencement at the University of Colorado was held for six graduates on June 8, 1882, in the chapel of Old Main. It was not until 40 years later, on September 4, 1922, that the first summer commencement was held. Since the first commencement in 1882, the University of Colorado Boulder has awarded more than 350,000 degrees. The traditional Norlin Charge to the graduates was first read by President George Norlin to the June 1935 graduating class. You are now certified to the world at large as alumni of the university. She is your kindly mother and you her cherished sons and daughters. This exercise denotes not your severance from her, but your union with her. Commencement does not mean, as many wrongly think, the breaking of ties and the beginning of life apart. Rather it marks your initiation in the fullest sense into the fellowship of the university, as bearers of her torch, as centers of her influence, as promoters of her spirit. The university is not the campus, not the buildings on campus, not the faculties, not the students of any one time—not one of these or all of them. The university consists of all who come into and go forth from her halls, who are touched by her influence, and who carry on her spirit. Wherever you go, the university goes with you. Wherever you are at work, there is the university at work.
    [Show full text]
  • It's Not Easy Being Green
    ••• ISION, RTICLES, EVIEWS, TORIES, NFORMATION, HOUGHTS AND WHAT OU WANT TO READ ••• e WEEK Independent Student LENT Newspaper est. 1947 Friday 17th February 2012 Issue No 754 | varsity.co.uk 10 Features: Former president of Virgin Galactic, 15 Books: Aliens, monsters and the 20 Fashion: Cold walks on frosty beaches provide 23 Sport: Will Whitehorn, on the future of space travel head of the CUSFS magazine the perfect mid term escape Hockey “A delusion is not a psychotic phenomena but a It’s not easy being green DARREN ZU response to one; a constructive attempt to give meaning to one’s experience.” 5 Science interview: Darian Leader, psychoanalyst and It’s wise to energise: students at the ‘Rally for Renewables’ on Parker’s Piece campaign for the reduction of the university’s carbon footprint author publicity was overwhelmingly positive, Cambridge have already submitted a by John Wallis WARMING FACTS NEWS CORRESPONDENT it was extremely diffi cult to convince policy proposal to the University’s Perfume Genius, students to make time for the event Environmental Strategy Committee, MUSIC 2008/9 Cambridge students participated on itself. She stated: “the fact that we got which is currently under consideration. In , the University’s emissions Shearwater were 7 7, 6 6 0 tonnes CO equivalent, Friday in what was possibly biggest upwards of 70 or 80 people out during e University is due to fi nalise its next 2 and this has been growing every year action on climate change the city has a working day on a freezing Febraury energy contract in September 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pioneering Department Evolution from Rural Engineering to Biological and Environmental Engineering at Cornell University, 1907-2007
    A Pioneering Department Evolution from Rural Engineering to Biological and Environmental Engineering at Cornell University, 1907-2007 By Ronald B. Furry Edited by John Marcham The Internet-First University Press Ithaca, NY Liberty Hyde Bailey, director of the College of Agriculture, breaks ground in 1905 for new buildings for the college east of Cornell University’s original quadrangle. A Pioneering Department Evolution from Rural Engineering to Biological and Environmental Engineering at Cornell University, 1907-2007 By Ronald B. Furry Edited by John Marcham The Internet-First University Press Ithaca, NY 2007 A Pioneering Department by Ronald B. Furry Cover: Bas relief faces of Ceres and Pomona, the goddesses of grains and fruits, on the exterior of Riley-Robb Hall The Internet-First University Press, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853. http://ecommons.library.cornell.edu/handle/1813/62 ©2007 Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering This book and other related historical materials are available online at: http://ecommons.library.cornell.edu/handle/1813/323 To order printed copies of this book, please e-mail [email protected] Printed in the United States of America ii A Pioneering Department by Ronald B. Furry Contents Acknowledgements............................................................iv Dedication ..........................................................................v Whence We Came ..............................................................1 The Start of Agricultural Engineering ..............................3
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of the NAVY (DON) 21.1 Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Proposal Submission Instructions
    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY (DON) 21.1 Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Proposal Submission Instructions IMPORTANT • The following instructions apply to SBIR topics only: o N211-001 through N211-100 • The information provided in the DON Proposal Submission Instruction document takes precedence over the DoD Instructions posted for this Broad Agency Announcement (BAA). • DON Phase I Technical Volume (Volume 2) page limit is not to exceed 10 pages. • Proposers that are more than 50% owned by multiple venture capital operating companies (VCOC), hedge funds (HF), private equity firms (PEF) or any combination of these are eligible to submit proposals in response to DON topics advertised in this BAA. Information on Majority Ownership in Part and certification requirements at time of submission for these proposers are detailed in the section titled ADDITIONAL NOTES. • A Phase I proposal template specific to DON topics will be available to assist small businesses to generate a Phase I Technical Volume (Volume 2). The template will be located on https://www.navysbir.com/links_forms.htm. • The DON provides notice that Basic Ordering Agreements (BOAs) may be used for Phase I awards, and BOAs or Other Transaction Agreements (OTAs) may be used for Phase II awards. • The Supporting Documents Volume (Volume 5) is available for the SBIR 21.1 BAA cycle. The Supporting Documents Volume is provided for small businesses to submit additional documentation to support the Technical Volume (Volume 2) and the Cost Volume (Volume 3). Volume 5 is available for use when submitting Phase I and Phase II proposals. DON will not be using any of the information in Volume 5 during the evaluation.
    [Show full text]
  • CUWS Termly Newsletter: Michaelmas 2009 G6UW from the Editor General Matters Welcome to a Rather Belated Michaelmas News- Letter
    NEWS CUWS Termly Newsletter: Michaelmas 2009 G6UW From the Editor General Matters Welcome to a rather belated Michaelmas news- letter. I would first like to welcome our two new International Visitors committee members, Jordan Skittrall M0SKI as CUWS receives visits from quite a number of Chairman and Oliver Snowdon M0ZES as Junior foreign amateurs visiting the UK – everybody Treasurer. I’m also grateful to you all for putting from high-powered telecommunications regu- up with me as Chairman for the past two years lators to famous football stars. We are always and Secretary before that! keen to welcome them at the Maypole and take them out to the shack to help ease the pain of Every newsletter since 2007 has been longer being away from their own stations! than its predecessor, and this edition, covering the Society’s activities over the past four terms, First, news of two visitors who should really is no exception. As you peruse these pages, you have appeared in the last newsletter. On 12 June will find articles on DXpeditions spanning three 2008, Satya Gupta VU2SNN, the Chief Regula- continents, reports on no fewer than seven con- tory Advisor at BT Global Services SAARC, was in tests and news of 26 licence exam passes – and Cambridge for a conference and joined us at the that’s just the tip of the iceberg! Maypole for a drink. I must highlight in particular the three excellent talks scheduled for later this term, the Morse classes which will continue for all who are inter- ested, and the CRG Radio Loan Scheme – these all involve a significant contribution of time or money by those involved, and I really would en- courage you to make the most of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Fission Power and Propulsion
    !ONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS Knoxville, TN 2020, April 6th – 9th Track 2: Nuclear Fission Power and Propulsion Technical Track Chair: Paolo Venneri Author Title Abou‐Jaoude, Abdalla PARAMETRIC EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE NUCLEAR PROPULSION CORES USING CURVED FUEL Angh, Caen DEVELOPMENT OF ZIRCONIUM CARBIDE FOR INERT MATRIX FUELS Cendro, Samantha simulation and experimental validation of aN inductively HeATED Solid‐core nuclear thermal rocket Chaiken, Max HEAT PIPE DEVELOPMENT FOR SPACE FISSION DEMONSTRATION MISSIONS Colgan, Nathan A HEAT EXCHANGER FOR HTGR WASTE HEAT REJECTION TO MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE INTERFACE AND SUBSURFACE CERAMIC BEHAVIOR IN MOLYBDENUM CERMETS FOR NUCLEAR Duffin, Taylor THERMAL PROPULSION PRE‐IRRADIATION CHARACTERIZATION OF INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE FOR NUCLEAR THERMAL Floyd, Dan ROCKETS: TEST PLAN IRRADIATION TESTING OF MOLYBDENUM AND TUNGSTEN BASED CERMETS FOR USE IN NUCLEAR Gaffin, Neal THERMAL PROPULSION Hashkins, Justin Toward an in‐depth material model for Nuclear thermal propulsion fuel elements Hirschhorn, Jacob DEVELOPMENT OF A MULTISCALE MODEL FOR FUEL LOSS FROM NUCLEAR THERMAL PROPULSION Design of the In‐pile experiment Set (INSET) apparatus to support Nuclear Thermal Propulsion fuel and Howard, Richard component testing. Howe, Steve SPRINTR: ADVANTAGES OF FLAT PLATE VERSUS PRISMATIC NTR FUELS Activation analysis of subscale experimental testbed: towards simulating nuclear thermal propulsion Hutchins, Emily prototypic conditions for material testing Joyner, Russell LEU NTP ENGINE SYSTEM FOR FLIGHT DEMONSTRATOR FOR A
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Response to Changing Fortune: Sean O'keefe As NASA
    O ctobe R 2 0 0 5 Executive Response to Changing Fortune: Sean O’Keefe as NASA Administrator NASA/KSC W. Henry Lambright Professor of Public Administration and Political Science, and Director, Science and Technology Policy Program The Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs Syracuse University Transformation of Organizations Series Space Shuttle Discovery takeoff, July 26, 2005 TRansFORMATIon OF ORGanIZATIons SERIES Executive Response to Changing Fortune: Sean O’Keefe as NASA Administrator W. Henry Lambright Professor of Public Administration and Political Science, and Director, Science and Technology Policy Program The Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs Syracuse University October 2005 T ABL E O F C O N TE N T S Foreword ..............................................................................................5 Executive Summary ..............................................................................6 The Executive Challenge: Responding to Changing Fortune .................9 The Executive as Consolidator and Incremental Innovator: O’Keefe in 2002 .................................................................................13 Introduction .................................................................................13 O’Keefe: Background ...................................................................13 The International Space Station (ISS) ............................................14 Appointment to NASA .................................................................15 A Year of Quiet Change
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Issue 8 | Summer 2009 Department of Engineering
    NeWsletter Issue 8 | Summer 2009 Department of Engineering In this issue 2 Student numbers up 2 Engineers develop their entrepreneurial skills 3 Dr Julian Allwood awarded EPSRC Leadership Fellowship 3 Control your TV simply by waving your arm 4 Students win the Award for Innovation in Systems Engineering at Autonomous Underwater Vehicle competition 4 Project Pebble 5 New international nanomaterials research programme launched 5 New reasearch collaboration for health announced 6 A paper about pile jacking has netted Engineering PhD student Andrew Jackson more than £2000 6 Oliver racing towards a bright future after gaining first motor sport blue 7 Happold Brilliant Award 8 Teds in space – one small step for bears, a giant leap for Cambridge outreach Picture entitled ‘Moth’ by Dr Ingrid Graz, won second prize in last year’s Photography competition 9 Design of a timber framed multi-storey and has been used extensively in the University 800th Anniversary celebrations car park 9 Yak Yak Best Engineering Research in UK 10 The future is 3D liquid crystals 11 PowerSi Technologies wins prizes The Department of Engineering has come top of the rankings for 11 Strictly Come Cambridge General Engineering according to the national Research Assessment 12 Enhancing CAPE-abilities in photonics and electronics Exercise. 13 New home for Institute for Manufacturing The results Were published in December transferring research skills to industrY and, 14 The Chancellor, His Royal Highness Prince 2008 and shoW a superb outcome placing for some of them, becoming the neXt Philip visits the Department of Engineering Cambridge far ahead of other institutions generation of engineering academics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gates Cambridge YEARBOOK 2012 Class of 2012
    ThE GaTES CaMBridGE YEARBOOK 2012 Class of 2012 PATRONS aBoUT THE SCHOLARSHIPS The Gates Cambridge scholarship programme aims to build a global network of future leaders committed to improving the lives of others. In 2012, Bill and Melinda Gates Gates Cambridge Scholarships are one of the most prestigious international generously agreed to become scholarships in the world. The programme was established in October 2000 Honorary Patrons of the Gates by a donation of US$210m from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Cambridge Trust. The Trust is to the University of Cambridge; this is the largest ever single donation to a delighted to reinforce a direct link UK university. between the Gates Cambridge Scholarships and the Gates family Scholarships are awarded to outstanding applicants from countries outside the and the Foundation. UK to pursue a full-time postgraduate degree in any subject available at the University of Cambridge. Scholars are selected on the basis of their outstanding intellectual ability, leadership potential, commitment to improving the lives of others, and a good fit between their qualifications and aspirations and the postgraduate programme at Cambridge for which they are applying. The Gates Cambridge Trust administers all aspects of the programme, including supporting the important work of the Scholars’ Council and Alumni Association. The first class of Scholars came in to residence in October 2001; since then the Trust has awarded 1,164 Scholarships to citizens of 95 countries. During the 2012/13 academic year there will be over 200 Scholars from more than 45 countries studying and researching a wide range of subjects in Cambridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal the Journal of the Foundation for Science and Technology
    fst journal The Journal of the Foundation for Science and Technology Volume 21, Number 1, May 2013 George Freeman: Feeding, fuelling and healing the world Scientific advice to Government Sir John Beddington: Addressing the challenges of the 21st century Dame Sally Davies: The issue of health Sir Mark Walport: The role of the Government Chief Scientific Advisor Industrial strategy Sir John Parker: Embracing a new industrial future Professor Alan Hughes: Systems thinking and industrial strategy David Willetts: How can Government promote growth through innovation? Mid-sized businesses Tera Allas: Unleashing the potential of mid-sized businesses Professor Luke Georghiou: Strengthening links between business and universities Richard Burslem: Engaging business potential and research expertise Africa Professor Christopher Whitty: The greatest scientific challenge of our generation? France Mme Geneviève Fioraso: The scientific agenda T H E F O U N D A T I O N F O R S C I E N C E A N D fs t TE C H N O L O G Y THE FOUNDATION The Foundation for Science and Technology FOR SCIENCE AND 10 Carlton House Terrace TECHNOLOGY London fst SW1Y 5AH THE FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Telephone Registered Charity No: 274727. A Company Limited by Guarantee No: 1327814 020 7321 2220 PRESIDENT Fax The Rt Hon the Lord Jenkin of Roding FRSE 020 7321 2221 VICE PRESIDENT Email The Earl of Shannon [email protected] COUNCIL CHAIRMAN Editor The Earl of Selborne GBE FRS Sir John Enderby CBE FRS President, The Royal Society Sir Paul Nurse PRS FMedSci HonFREng
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Commencement Program for the University of Colorado Boulder
    Commencement UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO BOULDER MAY 6, 2021 One Hundred Forty-Fifth Year of the University NORLIN CHARGE TO THE GRADUATES The first commencement at the University of Colorado was held for six graduates on June 8, 1882, in the chapel of Old Main. It was not until 40 years later, on September 4, 1922, that the first summer commencement was held. Since the first commencement in 1882, the University of Colorado Boulder has awarded more than 350,000 degrees. The traditional Norlin Charge to the graduates was first read by President George Norlin to the June 1935 graduating class. You are now certified to the world at large as alumni of the university. She is your kindly mother and you her cherished sons and daughters. This exercise denotes not your severance from her, but your union with her. Commencement does not mean, as many wrongly think, the breaking of ties and the beginning of life apart. Rather it marks your initiation in the fullest sense into the fellowship of the university, as bearers of her torch, as centers of her influence, as promoters of her spirit. The university is not the campus, not the buildings on campus, not the faculties, not the students of any one time—not one of these or all of them. The university consists of all who come into and go forth from her halls, who are touched by her influence, and who carry on her spirit. Wherever you go, the university goes with you. Wherever you are at work, there is the university at work.
    [Show full text]