Behavioral Models of the Praying Mantis As a Basis for Robotic
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
										Recommended publications
									
								- 
												  Cryptic Female Mantids Signal Quality Through BrightnessFunctional Ecology 2015, 29, 531–539 doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12363 Sexual signals for the colour-blind: cryptic female mantids signal quality through brightness Katherine L. Barry*, Thomas E. White, Darshana N. Rathnayake, Scott A. Fabricant and Marie E. Herberstein Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia Summary 1. Cryptic coloration may evolve in response to selective pressure imposed by predators, yet effective intraspecific communication may require some level of detectability. This creates a tension between the benefits of sexually selected visual traits and the predatory costs imposed by greater conspicuousness, and little is known about how this tension may be ameliorated in highly cryptic species. 2. We explore these competing demands in the false garden mantid Pseudomantis albofimbriata, a colour-blind and seemingly cryptic insect. We use reflectance spectrometry and receptor-noise modelling to characterize the conspicuousness of mantid body regions in the visual systems of mates (mantids), as well as potential predators (birds) and prey (bees). We then use condition manipulation and conspecific choice tests to further explore the colour traits of interest. 3. Based on visual modelling, we find that male mantids are inconspicuous to conspecifics, prey and predators – that is, they are chromatically and achromatically cryptic. In contrast, female mantids are chromatically cryptic to all potential receivers, but their abdomens are achromatically conspicuous. Our food manipulation experiment shows that females in good condition (and therefore with more eggs) have brighter abdomens than females in poor condition. Choice assays show male mantids are consistently attracted to females bearing brighter abdomens. 4. Our results reveal brightness-mediated sexual signalling in a colour-blind and classically cryptic insect.
- 
												  A Guide to Arthropods Bandelier National MonumentA Guide to Arthropods Bandelier National Monument Top left: Melanoplus akinus Top right: Vanessa cardui Bottom left: Elodes sp. Bottom right: Wolf Spider (Family Lycosidae) by David Lightfoot Compiled by Theresa Murphy Nov 2012 In collaboration with Collin Haffey, Craig Allen, David Lightfoot, Sandra Brantley and Kay Beeley WHAT ARE ARTHROPODS? And why are they important? What’s the difference between Arthropods and Insects? Most of this guide is comprised of insects. These are animals that have three body segments- head, thorax, and abdomen, three pairs of legs, and usually have wings, although there are several wingless forms of insects. Insects are of the Class Insecta and they make up the largest class of the phylum called Arthropoda (arthropods). However, the phylum Arthopoda includes other groups as well including Crustacea (crabs, lobsters, shrimps, barnacles, etc.), Myriapoda (millipedes, centipedes, etc.) and Arachnida (scorpions, king crabs, spiders, mites, ticks, etc.). Arthropods including insects and all other animals in this phylum are characterized as animals with a tough outer exoskeleton or body-shell and flexible jointed limbs that allow the animal to move. Although this guide is comprised mostly of insects, some members of the Myriapoda and Arachnida can also be found here. Remember they are all arthropods but only some of them are true ‘insects’. Entomologist - A scientist who focuses on the study of insects! What’s bugging entomologists? Although we tend to call all insects ‘bugs’ according to entomology a ‘true bug’ must be of the Order Hemiptera. So what exactly makes an insect a bug? Insects in the order Hemiptera have sucking, beak-like mouthparts, which are tucked under their “chin” when Metallic Green Bee (Agapostemon sp.) not in use.
- 
												  Mantis Study Group Newsletter, 10 (November 1998)ISSN 1364-3193 Mantis Study Group Newsletter 10 November 1998 Newsletter Editor Membership Secretary Phil Bragg Paul Taylor 8 The Lane 24 Forge Road Awsworth Shustoke Nottingham Coleshill NG162QP Birmingham B46 2AD Editorial I apologise for the late publication of this newsletter. This is due largely to moving house - the last newsletter was not really affected since it was more or less done before I moved - and starting a new job, and a large number of exhibitions to attend at weekends have caused a backlog of correspondence. Thanks to those of you that have sent in contributions for the newsletter, and apologies to the two people whose articles are still waiting to be typed up, they will appear in the next issue. On the subject of typing up articles, it is helpful if you can submit your articles on disk. However, if you send articles on disk please send them in WordPerfect 5.1 if possible (Users of Word can save files in Wordperfect 5.1 by using the "save as" option under the "File" menu). If this is not possible please send a copy in ASCII (DOS-text). Please note that I cannot read Word files and with my current job I only have access to a machine which can convert the files about once every ten weeks, and that cannot read versions as recent as Word 97. Membership renewals - Paul Taylor. Members will find attached to this Newsletter membership renewal forms for 1999. Members will be pleased to note that there is no increase in membership fees for this coming year.
- 
												  Living Resources Report Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Results - Open Bay HabitatCenter for Coastal Studies CCBNEP Living Resources Report Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Results - Open Bay Habitat B. Living Resources - Habitats Detailed community profiles of estuarine habitats within the CCBNEP study area are not available. Therefore, in the following sections, the organisms, community structure, and ecosystem processes and functions of the major estuarine habitats (Open Bay, Oyster Reef, Hard Substrate, Seagrass Meadow, Coastal Marsh, Tidal Flat, Barrier Island, and Gulf Beach) within the CCBNEP study area are presented. The following major subjects will be addressed for each habitat: (1) Physical setting and processes; (2) Producers and Decomposers; (3) Consumers; (4) Community structure and zonation; and (5) Ecosystem processes. HABITAT 1: OPEN BAY Table Of Contents Page 1.1. Physical Setting & Processes ............................................................................ 45 1.1.1 Distribution within Project Area ......................................................... 45 1.1.2 Historical Development ....................................................................... 45 1.1.3 Physiography ...................................................................................... 45 1.1.4 Geology and Soils ................................................................................ 46 1.1.5 Hydrology and Chemistry ................................................................... 47 1.1.5.1 Tides .................................................................................... 47 1.1.5.2 Freshwater
- 
												  South Carolina Our Amazing CoastSouth Carolina Our Amazing Coast SO0TB CARO LINA REGIONS o ..-- -·--C..,..~.1.ulrt..l• t -·- N O o.u. (South Carolina Map, South Carolina Aquarium’s Standards-based Curriculum, http://scaquarium.org) Teacher Resources and Lesson Plans Grades 3-5 Revised for South Carolina Teachers By Carmelina Livingston, M.Ed. Adapted from GA Amazing Coast by Becci Curry *Lesson plans are generated to use the resources of Georgia’s Amazing Coast and the COASTeam Aquatic Curriculum. Lessons are aligned to the SOUTH CAROLINA SCIENCE CURRICULUM STANDARDS and are written in the “Learning Focused” format. South Carolina Our Amazing Coast Table of Contents Grade 3 Curriculum…………………………………………………………….................1 – 27 Grade 4 Curriculum……………………………………………………………………...28 – 64 Grade 5 Curriculum……………………………………………………………………...65 – 91 SC Background………………...…………………………………………….…………92 – 111 Fast Facts of SC………………...……………………………………………………..112 – 122 Web Resources………………...……………………….……………………………...123 - 124 South Carolina: Our Amazing Coast Grade 3 Big Idea – Habitats & Adaptations 3rd Grade Enduring understanding: Students will understand that there is a relationship between habitats and the organisms within those habitats in South Carolina. South Carolina Science Academic Standards Scientific Inquiry 3-1.1 Classify objects by two of their properties (attributes). 3-1.4 Predict the outcome of a simple investigation and compare the result with the prediction. Life Science: Habitats and Adaptations 3-2.3 Recall the characteristics of an organism’s habitat that allow the organism to survive there. 3-2.4 Explain how changes in the habitats of plants and animals affect their survival. Earth Science: Earth’s Materials and Changes 3-3.5 Illustrate Earth’s saltwater and freshwater features (including oceans, seas, rivers, lakes, ponds, streams, and glaciers).
- 
												  Carolina Mantis)UWI The Online Guide to the Animals of Trinidad and Tobago Ecology Stagmomantis carolina (Carolina Mantis) Order: Mantodea (Mantids) Class: Insecta (Insects) Phylum: Arthropoda (Arthropods) Fig. 1. Carolina mantis, Stagmomantis carolina. [http://www.alexanderwild.com/Insects/Insect-Orders/Magnificent-Mantids/i-5Zgzcxw/2/L/Stag momantis7-L.jpg, downloaded 29 March 2015] TRAITS. Medium to large sized mantid averaging 50-65mm in length at adulthood (Harris and Moran, 2000). Large, front-facing eyes (Fig. 1), which are adapted to vision in daylight and allow for the estimation of distance of stationary objects (Kral, 2012). Long and slender legs and antennae with a highly developed pair of large, serrated, spiny forelegs which are held in a “praying” position for the capture of prey (Teyssier, 1997). The head and prothorax are connected with a flexible membrane allowing for almost full rotation of the head (Rau and Rau, 1913). Long thorax which combined with the head length is almost as long as the abdomen. Males have slender long abdomens with wings that are fully functional whereas females’ UWI The Online Guide to the Animals of Trinidad and Tobago Ecology abdomen is shorter and very broad with non-functional wings (Fig. 2). Wings are short especially in females where they do not cover the abdomen (Schulz, 2012). Colour: varies within the range of mottled brown to yellow-green with bright green legs and wing covers (Blatchley, 1920). DISTRIBUTION. Widespread throughout warm, temperate and tropical regions within southern, northern and Central America. They are the most abundant native mantids in North America (Things Biological, 2012).
- 
												  Antemninae, Mantidae): a New Lineage of Mantises Exhibiting an Ontogenetic Change in Cryptic Strategy Rodrigues, H., Rivera, J., Reid, N., & Svenson, GAn elusive Neotropical giant, Hondurantemna chespiritoi gen. n. & sp. n. (Antemninae, Mantidae): a new lineage of mantises exhibiting an ontogenetic change in cryptic strategy Rodrigues, H., Rivera, J., Reid, N., & Svenson, G. (2017). An elusive Neotropical giant, Hondurantemna chespiritoi gen. n. & sp. n. (Antemninae, Mantidae): a new lineage of mantises exhibiting an ontogenetic change in cryptic strategy. ZooKeys, 680, 73-104. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.680.11162 Published in: ZooKeys Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyright Henrique M. Rodrigues et al. This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the author and source are cited. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:06.
- 
												  Sexual Conflict in a Sexually Cannibalistic Praying MantidAnimal Behaviour 99 (2015) 9e14 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Animal Behaviour journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/anbehav Sexual conflict in a sexually cannibalistic praying mantid: males prefer low-risk over high-risk females * Romina C. Scardamaglia a, , Sandro Fosacheca a, Lorena Pompilio a, b a Departamento de Ecología, Genetica y Evolucion & IEGEBA-CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina b Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina article info Sexually cannibalistic species such as praying mantids are an ideal model in which to study sexual fl Article history: con ict since the interests of both sexes under a cannibalistic scenario are clearly opposed. Females gain Received 16 April 2014 direct material benefits of feeding on a male, which can in turn boost female reproductive output. Males, Initial acceptance 2 June 2014 on the other hand, pay a high cost when cannibalized since they lose all chance of future reproduction. Final acceptance 23 September 2014 Here, we tested the hypothesis that males behave so as to reduce the risk of being cannibalized in the Published online praying mantid Parastagmatoptera tessellata. Twenty-six males were tested in a choice experiment where MS. number: A14-00315R two options were presented simultaneously: one aggressive female (signalling high risk of cannibalism) and one nonaggressive female (low risk of cannibalism). We predicted that males would prefer Keywords: nonaggressive over aggressive females. We found evidence that males are sensitive to the predatory mate choice strike of a female towards a conspecific male, showing a strong preference for nonaggressive females Parastagmatoptera tessellata based on the time that males spent near each type of female.
- 
												  An Elusive Neotropical Giant, Hondurantemna Chespiritoi Gen. NAn elusive Neotropical giant, Hondurantemna chespiritoi gen. n. & sp. n. (Antemninae, Mantidae): a new lineage of mantises exhibiting an ontogenetic change in cryptic strategy Rodrigues, H., Rivera, J., Reid, N., & Svenson, G. (2017). An elusive Neotropical giant, Hondurantemna chespiritoi gen. n. & sp. n. (Antemninae, Mantidae): a new lineage of mantises exhibiting an ontogenetic change in cryptic strategy. ZooKeys, 680, 73-104. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.680.11162 Published in: ZooKeys Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyright Henrique M. Rodrigues et al. This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the author and source are cited. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected].
- 
												  Bird Predation by Praying Mantises: a Global PerspectiveThe Wilson Journal of Ornithology 129(2):331–344, 2017 BIRD PREDATION BY PRAYING MANTISES: A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE MARTIN NYFFELER,1 MICHAEL R. MAXWELL,2 AND J. V. REMSEN, JR.3 ABSTRACT.—We review 147 incidents of the capture of small birds by mantids (order Mantodea, family Mantidae). This has been documented in 13 different countries, on all continents except Antarctica. We found records of predation on birds by 12 mantid species (in the genera Coptopteryx, Hierodula, Mantis, Miomantis, Polyspilota, Sphodromantis, Stagmatoptera, Stagmomantis, and Tenodera). Small birds in the orders Apodiformes and Passeriformes, representing 24 identified species from 14 families (Acanthizidae, Acrocephalidae, Certhiidae, Estrildidae, Maluridae, Meliphagidae, Muscicapidae, Nectariniidae, Parulidae, Phylloscopidae, Scotocercidae, Trochilidae, Tyrannidae, and Vireonidae), were found as prey. Most reports (.70% of observed incidents) are from the USA, where mantids have often been seen capturing hummingbirds attracted to food sources in gardens, i.e., hummingbird feeders or hummingbird-pollinated plants. The Ruby-throated Hummingbird (Archilochus colubris) was the species most frequently reported to be captured by mantids. Captures were reported also from Canada, Central America, and South America. In Africa, Asia, Australia, and Europe, we found 29 records of small passerine birds captured by mantids. Of the birds captured, 78% were killed and eaten by the mantids, 2% succeeded in escaping on their own, and 18% were freed by humans. In North America, native and non-native mantids were engaged in bird predation. Our compilation suggests that praying mantises frequently prey on hummingbirds in gardens in North America; therefore, we suggest caution in use of large-sized mantids, particularly non-native mantids, in gardens for insect pest control.
- 
												  Mantids of Colorado Fact Sheet NoMantids of Colorado Fact Sheet No. 5.510 Insect Series|Home and Garden by W. Cranshaw* Mantids are some of the most distinctive Quick Facts and well-recognized of all the insect groups. All mantids are predators that feed on various • Mantids are large, distinctive insects, including some pest species. Seven insects that feed on other species of mantids are found in Colorado insects, including some pests. (Table 1), five of which are native to the state. Mantids are very distinctive insects. All • All mantids survive winter in have front legs which are large and well- the egg stage, within a large designed for grasping prey. The segment of egg case (ootheca). the body containing these legs (prothorax) • There are seven kinds is very elongated as is the overall body form. of mantids that occur in Mantids also have the ability to easily turn Colorado, five that are native their heads in order to see in all directions and have widely spaced eyes that give them to the state and two that are excellent binocular vision. introduced species. • The most commonly General Life History encountered mantid in much of the state is the European Mantids survive winter as eggs. The eggs are laid in a case, known as an ootheca, and mantid, which may be brown each contains several dozen to over a 100 or green. eggs. A foamy material covers the oothecal as • Egg cases of the Chinese it is being produced and this then hardens to mantid are commonly sold protect and insulate the eggs. These egg cases through nurseries and garden are attached to solid surfaces such as rocks, catalogs.
- 
												  Checklist of Species Within the CCBNEP Study Area: References, Habitats, Distribution, and AbundanceCurrent Status and Historical Trends of the Estuarine Living Resources within the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Study Area Volume 4 of 4 Checklist of Species Within the CCBNEP Study Area: References, Habitats, Distribution, and Abundance Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program CCBNEP-06D • January 1996 This project has been funded in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement #CE-9963-01-2 to the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. The contents of this document do not necessarily represent the views of the United States Environmental Protection Agency or the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, nor do the contents of this document necessarily constitute the views or policy of the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Management Conference or its members. The information presented is intended to provide background information, including the professional opinion of the authors, for the Management Conference deliberations while drafting official policy in the Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP). The mention of trade names or commercial products does not in any way constitute an endorsement or recommendation for use. Volume 4 Checklist of Species within Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Study Area: References, Habitats, Distribution, and Abundance John W. Tunnell, Jr. and Sandra A. Alvarado, Editors Center for Coastal Studies Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi 6300 Ocean Dr. Corpus Christi, Texas 78412 Current Status and Historical Trends of Estuarine Living Resources of the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program Study Area January 1996 Policy Committee Commissioner John Baker Ms. Jane Saginaw Policy Committee Chair Policy Committee Vice-Chair Texas Natural Resource Regional Administrator, EPA Region 6 Conservation Commission Mr.