SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda April 28, 2008; 10:30 AM SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info 1 Call to Order 9
2 Approval of Agenda 9
3 Committee Reports and Recommendations
3.1 Electoral Area Directors Committee Recommendations of April n/a 9 14, 2007:
1. Village of Pemberton Referral re: Menzel - Perry Proposal for Subdivision in the ALR (KAP73119, DL 202, LLD) THAT AAC comments and the SLRD staff report regarding the nine-lot subdivision proposal for KAP73119, DL 202, LLD submitted to the Village of Pemberton by Mr. Bob Menzel on November 19, 2007 be forwarded to the Village of Pemberton.
2. Bylaw 820: Lillooet Lake Estates Land Use Contract Site Plan Amendment – Revision and Scheduling of a Second Public Hearing (see also Bylaw 820 - item 4.1.1) THAT the map attached to BL 820 be amended to include approximate location of Catalina Creek setbacks;
AND THAT the Public hearing date and time for Bylaw 820 be determined at the April Board meeting.
3. Application for Permit Amendment under the Provisions of the Environmental Management Act
THAT the SLRD support Lizzie Bay Logging’s burn permit amendment for a term of 3 years.
4. Community Tourism Programme - Phase II
1. THAT Area D’s Community Tourism Phase II funds be directed to Britannia Beach Mining Museum’s Copper and Fire Festival; SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 2 - April 28, 2008
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info 2. THAT Staff forward Community Tourism Phase II application information to the Bridge River Valley Economic Development Society; Seton Chamber of Commerce; Ts’kW’aylaxw and Seton Lake bands;
3. AND THAT the District of Lillooet be asked to confirm intention to partner with the SLRD on Phase I funds.
5. Letter of Support for the Seton Lake Band re: Economic Development Proposal THAT a letter of support to be sent to Cliff Casper regarding the Seton Lake Band’s feasibility study proposal to Western Economic Development.
6. Delegation: Tracey Saxby from Greener Footprints THAT Staff investigate and report on plastic bag reduction options for the SLRD.
3.2 Pemberton Valley/Area C Economic Development Commission n/a 9 Recommendations of April 7, 2008:
1. Letter for A. Ross, Economic Development Consultant THAT Staff draft a letter for A. Ross confirming that she is working for a government body so that she is qualified for government rates at hotels.
2. Temporary Structures Bylaw THAT Village of Pemberton and SLRD Staff be requested to draft a Bylaw to allow for temporary structures for the 2010 Olympics and other events leading up to the 2010 Olympics.
3. Development of an Economic Development Website THAT a Pemberton / Area C Economic Development website be developed, subject to funding.
4. Freedom of Information and Privacy Issues THAT A. Ross and P. Edgington, with legal advice, work together to draft policy around confidentiality issues regarding economic development role.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 2 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 3 - April 28, 2008
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info 3.3 Committee of the Whole Recommendations of March 31, 2008: n/a 9
Hydro Grant in Lieu Allocations
THAT the following policy for Allocation of Dams and Reservoir grants be recommended to the board for approval: x The allocation of Dams and Reservoir grants be on a percentage of overall grant formula basis; x The following percentage allocations be made: o 40% - General Government o 30% - Land Use Planning o 5% - Feasibility Study Reserve (to maximum fund level of $150,000, with any resulting excess being allocated to General Government) o 1% to General Select Funds o 5% to the following standing commitments: Lillooet Recreation Centre - $8,500 Seton Portage Fire Service - $5,000 Pemberton Area Transit - $14,500 Squamish Public Library - $10,000 o 19% to Electoral Area Select Funds (to be divided equally among the 4 Electoral Area) x Unused Electoral Area Select Fund allocations will be transferred to General Select Funds at each fiscal year end; x Prior years’ (2007 and earlier) accumulations of Electoral Area Select Funds will be retained to the extent that they have been allocated for specific identifiable projects; x Where allocations of prior and future years Electoral Area Select Funds have been made for specific identifiable projects which relate to an established service, the allocation will be transferred to an appropriate reserve fund for that service; x Electoral Area Select Fund Allocations for specific identifiable projects (other than those which have been transferred to a specific service reserve fund) which remain unexpended as at December 31, 2012 will be transferred to General Select Funds; x Electoral Area Directors will identify their allocations of prior years (2007 and earlier) accumulations of Electoral Area Select Funds for specific identifiable projects no later than the June 2008 Regular Board meeting; x Electoral Area Grants By-law No. 774-2003 will be
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 3 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 4 - April 28, 2008
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info amended to remove the provision which delegates the authority to Electoral Area Directors to provide grants not exceeding $1,000.00 [This to become a function of the Electoral Area Directors Committee]; x A monthly “Grant Approvals Report” setting out Electoral Area Select Fund usage will be placed on the agenda of each regular board meeting.
4 Bylaws
4.1 Unweighted Corporate Vote
4.1.1 Bylaw 820 - Lillooet Lake Estates Land Use Contract Site Plan 10 9 Amendment – Revision and Scheduling of a Second Public Hearing (April 2008 EAD Committee Recommendation – See EAD Agenda for report)
1. THAT second and third readings of Bylaw No. 820, cited as Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Bylaw No. 88-1976, Land Use Contract Amendment Bylaw No. 820-2003 be rescinded.
2. THAT Bylaw No. 820 be amended to apply only to lands managed by the Lillooet Lake Estates Committee.
3. THAT Bylaw No. 820, cited as Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Bylaw No. 88-1976, Land Use Contract Amendment Bylaw No. 820-2003 be read a second time as amended.
4. THAT the Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District delegate the holding of a public hearing for the consideration of Bylaw 820 to Area “C” Director Susan Gimse, with Pemberton Director Jordan Sturdy as alternate delegate pursuant to section 891 of the Local Government Act;
5. THAT the public hearing for the consideration of Bylaw 820 be held at 7:00 p.m. on --- in the Board Room at the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Office, Pemberton, BC.
4.1.2 Bylaw 1059 - A Bylaw to Establish a Community Building 12 9 Service for the Community of Porteau Cove
THAT Bylaw 1059 – 2008 cited as Porteau Cove Community
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 4 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 5 - April 28, 2008
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info Building Service Establishment Bylaw 1059 – 2008 be introduced, and read a first, second, and third time.
4.2 Weighted Corporate Vote
5 Staff Reports and Other Business
5.1 Unweighted Corporate Vote
5.1.1 Director of Planning - Referral - Village of Pemberton Official 19 9 Community Plan Amendment Bylaw 609 and Zoning Amendment Bylaw 610 - Office use in the Industrial zone
THAT the Village of Pemberton be advised of the following SLRD comments with respect to “Official Community Plan Amendment Bylaw No. 609, 2008 and Zoning Bylaw Amendment Bylaw No. 610, 2008:
1. In order to maintain the industrial land supply for industrial uses and to continue to work toward maintaining a vibrant village centre, the SLRD recommends that:
a. the Village of Pemberton not proceed with OCP Amendment Bylaw 609; and b. business and professional offices and civic uses be deleted from the list of permitted uses proposed in Zoning Amendment Bylaw 610.
2. If the Village of Pemberton proceeds with Bylaws 609 and 610, the SLRD recommends that: a. Bylaw 609 be amended to insert the words “on a site specific zoning basis ” after the words “business offices will be accommodated”; b. section 2 of Bylaw 610 be amended to replace the use “business and professional office subject to the requirements of 311.9 with “business office use; and c. the term “business office use” be defined as per the District of Squamish zoning bylaw definition.
5.1.2 Director of Planning - Mount Meager Geohazard 34 9 (Deferred from March 31, 2008 In-Camera Meeting)
1. That, in order to provide a greater level of assurance regarding
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 5 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 6 - April 28, 2008
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info the methodology and conclusions in the “Hazard and risk from large landslides from Mount Meager volcano, British Columbia, Canada” paper published in the online journal Georisk, the Provincial Government be requested to provide funding for: a. an independent peer review of the paper; and b. a study of the feasibility and cost of installing and operating a warning system as described in the Georisk paper. 2. That Staff be instructed to undertake a preliminary analysis of the implications of: a. amending the OCP and zoning to prohibit development in the area identified as subject to geohazard; b. developing a policy regarding geotechnical reports to address the question of the Mount Meager geohazard.
5.1.3 Strategy Planner – Application for a Temporary Use Permit; 56 9 Canadian Snowmobile Adventures Ltd.; Callaghan Valley; Electoral Area D
THAT Temporary Use Permit No. 11 be approved and issued to Canadian Snowmobile Adventures Ltd. for a period of one year.
5.1.4 Manager of Administrative Services - BC Transit Annual 80 9 Operating Agreement
THAT the Chair and Chief Administrative Officer be authorized to sign the 2007/08 Pemberton Annual Operating Agreement Amendment #1, 6-month extension, Amended Schedule B and Amended Schedule C, effective October 1, 2007, in order to prevent a disruption of service;
AND THAT the amendment be referred to the other beneficiaries of the service (Village of Pemberton and Mt. Currie) to advise them of the increase.
5.1.5 Manager of Administrative Services - Corridor Trails Update 9 Report
To be circulated as Late Item
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 6 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 7 - April 28, 2008
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info 5.1.6 Planning Department Activity Report March-April 2008 87 9
THAT the Planning Department March-April 2008 Activity report be received.
5.1.7 Utilities Department Monthly Report 91 9
THAT the Utilities Department March 2008 monthly report be received.
5.1.8 Recreation Department Monthly Report 93 9
THAT the Recreation Department April 2008 monthly report be received.
5.1.9 Max Power Inc. Bridge River Valley IPP Applications 9 Deferred from March 2008 Regular Board meeting.
5.2 Weighted Corporate Vote – All Directors
6 Correspondence Requesting Action
6.1 Pemberton & District Public Library – Release of Funds 95 9
6.2 Lower Mainland Treaty Advisory Committee – Draft Discussion 96 9 Paper
[CAO Comments:
1. Whether there is concern over cooperative management agreements 2. Whether there is support for LMTAC developing a “First Principle” policy statement on cooperative management.]
6.3 Pemberton Visitor Information Centre - Funding Request 153 9
Deferred from April 2008 EAD Committee meeting.
6.4 Girl Guides – Funding Request 157 9
Deferred from April 2008 EAD Committee meeting.
7 Confirmation and Receipt of Minutes
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 7 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 8 - April 28, 2008
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info
7.1 Regular Board Meeting Minutes – March 31, 2008 160 9 For confirmation as circulated or as corrected.
7.2 Special Meeting Minutes – April 14, 2008 175 9 For confirmation as circulated or as corrected.
7.3 Committee of the Whole Meeting Minutes – April 14, 2008 177 9 For confirmation as circulated or as corrected.
7.4 Committee of the Whole Meeting Minutes – March 31, 2008 181 9 For confirmation as circulated or as corrected.
7.5 Electoral Area Directors Committee Meeting – April 14, 2008 184 9 Receipt for information.
7.6 Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee Meeting - April 190 9 7, 2008 Receipt for information.
7.7 Pemberton/Area C Economic Development Commission Meeting 194 9 Minutes – April 7, 2008 Receipt for information.
7.8 Pemberton/Lillooet Treaty Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes – 197 9 March 31, 2008 Receipt for Information
8 Business Arising from the Minutes
9 Consent Items – Correspondence for Information
9.1 BC Ferry Authority - Appointment to BC Ferry Authority Board of 199 9 Directors
9.2 Okanagan-Similkameen Regional District – Regional and Municipal 201 9 Fiscal Imbalance
9.3 Environmental Assessment Office – Ryan River Hydro Project 203 9
10 Delegations and Petitions
10.1 Paul Martiquet, Vancouver Coastal Health - Non-smoking bylaws 9
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 8 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 9 - April 28, 2008
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info 10.2 Bob Fawcett, Whistler Dog Sledding 9
11 Decision on Late Business (only if required) 9
THAT the late items be considered at this meeting. (requires 2/3 majority vote)
12 Late Business
13 Directors’ Reports (matters of information, not requiring action)
14 Termination
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 9 of 204 SQUAMISH-LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT BYLAW NO. 820-2003
A bylaw of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District to amend Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Bylaw No. 88-1976, Lillooet Lake Estates Land Use Contract.
The Board of Directors of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows:
1. This by-law may be cited for all purposes as the “Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Bylaw No. 88-1976, Land Use Contract Amendment Bylaw No. 820-2003".
2. The Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Bylaw 820-2003, is amended as follows:
(a) That the Official Site Plan, Schedule B, Bylaw No. 88-1976, is amended by reconfiguring the lot line alignments as shown within the areas outlined by heavy black dashed lines on the Plan of Heather-Jean Development, Lot 4901, Lillooet Land District, August 24, 1990, which is attached as Appendix 1 and forms part of this bylaw.
READ A FIRST TIME this 26th day of May , 2003. READ A SECOND TIME AS AMENDED this day of , 2008.
A PUBLIC HEARING WAS HELD, PURSUANT TO SECTION 890 OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT, ON THE day of , 2008.
READ A THIRD TIME this day of , 2008.
APPROVED BY THE MINISTER OF COMMUNITY SERVICES this day of , 2008
ADOPTED this day of , 2008.
Russ Oakley Paul Edgington Chair Secretary
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 10 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 11 of 204 To: RegionalBoard From: AllisonMacdonald ManagerofAdministrativeServices REPORT Date: April10,2008 Re: Bylaw1059Ͳ2008 PorteauCoveCommunityBuilding Recommendation: THATBylawNo.1059Ͳ2008,citedasPorteauCoveCommunityBuildingServiceEstablishment BylawNo.1059Ͳ2008,beintroducedandreadafirst,secondandthirdtime. Administrator’sComments:Concurwithrecommendation.PRE. Purpose: TointroduceaserviceestablishmentbylawforacommunitybuildingserviceinPorteauCove. Implications: General: Thebuildingwillbeconstructedbythedevelopers,andtheSLRDwilltakeoverits management.Thebuildingwillbeacommunitybuildingsimilarinsizeandusetothe SpruceGroveFieldHouse.Forthisreason,staffusedtheSpruceGrovebudgetasa roughestimateofexpenditures,withadjustmentsforCPIandamaintenancecontract. Organizational: WillrequireUtilitiesandEnvironmentalServicesstafftimetomanagethisassetonce theserviceisestablished. Financial/Legal: AserviceestablishmentbylawmustbeadoptedfortheSLRDtotakeontheservice.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 1 Page 12 of 204 Therequiredrequisitionisanticipatedtobe$20,000peryear,andthemaximum requisitionhasbeensetat$30,000/year. Priortoadoption,thebylawrequiresMinistryapproval,approvaloftheAreaDirector andasignedpetitionfromamajorityofthepropertyowners. BoardPolicy: PorteauCoveOCPAmendmentBylaw946,citedasElectoralAreaDOfficialCommunity PlanBylawNo.495,AmendmentBylawNo.946,2005,outlinesthefollowingpoliciesfor communityamenities: Community Amenities and Services Policies 5.3.1 Acommunityusebuildingforrecreationandsocialactivities isrequiredtomeetthelongͲtermneedsoftheestimated 3,000to3,500residentsofthePorteauCovecommunity.The facilityshouldbecentrallylocatedintheVillagecentreas indicatedconceptuallyonAppendix1.Provisionofthis facility will be considered as a key community amenity to implementtheresidentialdensitybonusdescribedinsection 5.3.3. 5.3.2 (referstofirehallandothercommunityfacilities–not includedinthisreport) 5.3.3 Confirmationofthefacilityrequirements,phasingoffacility developmentandsecuringofsitesthroughdevelopment agreementsshallbecompletedpriortoadoptionofzoning bylawsforthePorteauCovecommunity StrategicPlan: ThePorteaudevelopment,asoutlinedintheOCPBylaw946,isbeingguidedbySmart GrowthPrinciplesandthedraftRegionalGrowthStrategy,andthiscommunitybuilding isakeycomponentofthoseprinciples. TheDraftRegionalGrowthStrategy,includesaspartofGoal#1: PromotingMoreCompleteCommunitiesͲProvidingfora mixoflandusesincommunitydevelopment,particularly atPorteauCove,FurryCreekandBritanniaBeach,to enhancethepotentialformoreintegrated,complete communities.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 2 Page 13 of 204 Background: SupportingDocuments:DraftBylaw1059,Budgetestimate Keyissues/concepts:ServiceEstablishmentforaportionofAreaD Desiredoutcomes:3rdreadingofbylaw,inordertoforwardtoMinistryofCommunity Servicesforapproval. AllisonMacdonald ManagerofAdministrativeServices
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 3 Page 14 of 204 SQUAMISH-LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT
BYLAW NO. 1059-2008
A bylaw to establish a Community Building Service for the community of Porteau Cove
WHEREAS a regional district may, by bylaw, establish and operate a service under the provisions of Part 24 of the Local Government Act;
AND WHEREAS the Board of the Regional District has received a sufficient petition under s. 797.4 of the Local Government Act to establish such a Service in a portion of Regional District Electoral Area “D” known as Porteau Cove;
AND WHEREAS the Board considers it desirable to provide for the service of the Community Building service within Porteau Cove of Electoral Area “D”;
NOW THEREFORE, the Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows:
Service Being Established
1. The Board hereby establishes a service for the purpose of providing a Community Building service, and shall be known as the “Porteau Cove Community Building service”.
2. The Board may enter into contracts to provide Community Building within the service area.
Service Area Boundaries
3. The boundaries of the Service Area are shown on Schedule A, attached to and forming part of this bylaw.
Participating Area
4. The participants in the service established under Section 1 shall be a portion of Electoral Area D.
Cost Recovery
5. As provided for in Section 803 of the Local Government Act, the annual cost of providing the service shall be recovered by:
a) property values taxes imposed in accordance with Division 4.3 of Part 24, Local Government Act;
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 15 of 204 b) parcel taxes imposed in accordance with Division 4.3 of Part 24 of the Local Government Act; c) fees and charges imposed under section 363 of the Local Government Act; d) revenues raised by other means authorised under the Local Government Act or another act; e) revenues received by way of agreement, enterprise, gift, grant or otherwise.
Requisition Limits
6. The maximum amount that may be requisitioned annually for the service shall be $30,000.
Citation
7. This bylaw may be cited as “Porteau Cove Community Building Service Establishment Bylaw No. 1059-2008”.
READ A FIRST TIME this day of ,2008.
READ A SECOND TIME this day of ,2008.
READ A THIRD TIME this this day of ,2008.
APPROVED BY THE INSPECTOR OF MUNICIPALITIES this day of ,2008.
Assent of the Electoral Area D Director obtained this day of ,2008.
ADOPTED this day of ,2008.
Chair Secretary
I hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and correct copy of Bylaw No. 1059, cited as “Porteau Cove Community Building Service Establishment Bylaw No. 1059-2008”, as read a time.
Secretary
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 16 of 204 Porteau Cove Community Building Service Establishment Bylaw No. 1059-2008
Schedule A
Sea to-Sky Highway
Chair
Secretary
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 17 of 204 BudgetEstimateͲPorteauCoveCommunityBuilding
SpruceGroveFieldHouse2007 PorteauCoveCommunityBuilding2009
1422 SGFHͲBuilding 3510 SundrySales&ServicesͲ$ 2,700 50180 Travel$ 300 1422 SGFHͲBuilding 3900 InternalRecoveriesͲ$ 820 50505 FlatRateOverheadfromGen.Govt.$ 500 1422 SGFHͲBuilding 4010 Payroll$ 3,515 50210 Telephone$ 871 1422 SGFHͲBuilding 4019 PayrollBenefits$ 5 50580 ContractedServices$ 2,000 1422 SGFHͲBuilding 5000 Supplies$ 834 50610 MiscellaneousOperatingCost$ 1,000 1422 SGFHͲBuilding 6105 Telephone$ 846 50650 OperatingSuppliesͲOther$ 1,464 1422 SGFHͲBuilding 6415 BuildingMaintenance$ 27 50670 Service/SiteMaintenance$ 1,367 1422 SGFHͲBuilding 6425 NonBuildingPropertyMtce.$ 1,300 50690 UtilitiesͲHydro$ 6,141 1422 SGFHͲBuilding 6500 ContractServices$ 1,940 53000 TransfertoReserve(Provision)$ 1,900 1422 SGFHͲBuilding 6700 PowerͲHydro$ 5,962 53200 TimeAllocationfromOtherServices$ 4,000 1422 SGFHͲBuilding 8005 StoresPurchases$ 587 1422 SGFHͲBuilding Total $11,496.00 Total$ 19,542.68
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 18 of 204 T Regional Board
Steven Olmstead, Director of Planning and Development
April 10, 2008 REPORT R Referral - Village of Pemberton Official Community Plan Amendment Bylaw 609 and Zoning Amendment Bylaw 610 - Office use in the Industrial zone
Recommendation:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT the Village of Pemberton be advised of the following SLRD comments with respect to “Official Community Plan Amendment Bylaw No. 609, 2008 and Zoning Bylaw Amendment Bylaw No. 610, 2008:
1. In order to maintain the industrial land supply for industrial uses and to continue to work toward maintaining a vibrant village centre, the SLRD recommends that: a. the Village of Pemberton not proceed with OCP Amendment Bylaw 609; and b. business and professional offices and civic uses be deleted from the list of permitted uses proposed in Zoning Amendment Bylaw 610.
2. If the Village of Pemberton proceeds with Bylaws 609 and 610, the SLRD recommends that: a. Bylaw 609 be amended to insert the words “on a site specific zoning basis ” after the words “business offices will be accommodated”; b. section 2 of Bylaw 610 be amended to replace the use “business and professional office subject to the requirements of 311.9 with “business office use; and c. the term “business office use” be defined as per the District of Squamish zoning bylaw definition.
Administrator’s Recommendation:
Voting Rules Who Votes: All; Count: Directors; Decision: Majority
Purpose:
To provide SLRD comments on a Village of Pemberton OCP and zoning amendment referral regarding broadening the scope of permitted uses at the VoP Industrial 1 zone to include
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 19 of 204 - 2 - business and professional offices, additional industrial uses, specified commercial services and indoor recreation.
Background:
The Village of Pemberton is considering bylaw amendments to broaden the scope of uses permitted at the Pemberton Industrial Park (and any other land that zoned Industrial 1 (M-1) under the Village zoning bylaw). To achieve this a policy statement allowing for business offices to be accommodated at the Industrial Park in order to “provide for a mix of business activity”. The OCP amendment notes that professional offices that cater to the day to day needs of the public are better suited to a village centre location and the zoning amendment bylaw has a section prohibiting medical, dental, real estate, legal and accounting offices from locating in the M-1 zone. A copy of the referral package, including Village of Pemberton Official Community Plan Amendment Bylaw No. 609, 2008 and Zoning Bylaw Amendment Bylaw No. 610, 2008, is attached.
Planning Department Comments
The Planning Department has the following comments and concerns about the proposed bylaws:
1. The Pemberton subregional planning study concluded that over the longer term there are constraints to industrial land supply in the Pemberton area. Broadening the mix of businesses in the industrial park to include office uses may result over a period of time in pressure to remove industrial uses that are incompatible with office uses similar to what to a large degree happened at Function Junction in the Resort Municipality of Whistler (recall the extensive discussion on this matter in conjunction with the Durfeld log home rezoning at Rutherford Creek a few years ago). 2. It was suggested in the request for the zoning amendment that amending the VoP industrial zoning would bring it more into alignment with other Sea to Sky communities. SLRD Planning staff believe that Whistler’s planning and zoning approach to industrial and community oriented commercial use is quite unique due to its status as a resort municipality and is an inappropriate model for other communities in the Sea to Sky Corridor. Planning for Whistler’s ongoing success as a resort involves different objectives and priorities than planning for most other types of community. More specifically, maintaining the highest quality visitor experience in the Village might legitimately be considered a more important objective overall than maintaining a vibrant, convenient central area that focuses on meeting the needs of local residents. 3. SLRD staff would recommend using District of Squamish (DoS) zoning as a more comparable model for industrial zoning in the Sea to Sky Corridor than Whistler (RMOW) zoning. Squamish uses a site specific zoning approach for office use in its industrial zones and to date one parcel has been zoned for office use. This gives the municipality greater control over maintaining an industrial focus to industrial zoned lands. Additionally, DoS uses a definition of business office use as follows that might be applicable to the Pemberton situation: “BUSINESS OFFICE USE” means the use of a building for the purpose of conducting a business in an office environment, where such a business does not rely upon a continuous flow of customers visiting the premises and does
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 20 of 204 - 3 - not engage in any retail sales, and may include such businesses as architectural, data processing, drafting, engineering, legal, surveying or, real estate appraisal offices, and specifically excludes medical and dental offices, travel agencies, insurance offices and real estate offices. We believe that incorporating this definition into Bylaw 610 would provide a better basis for ensuring that offices more appropriately located in the village centre do not locate in the industrial park. 4. The Village of Pemberton has recently expressed concern in its comments to the SLRD regarding commercial policy for Mt. Currie in the revised Electoral Area C OCP that the Village “does not want significant commercial activity taking place outside the Village’s existing town centre and gateway.” The Planning Department believes that the Industrial Park is in a similar situation to Mt. Currie and that the same consideration is warranted - promoting a mix of (non-industrial) business at the industrial park will contribute to erosion of the vitality of the village centre.
Respectfully submitted,
Steven Olmstead Director of Planning and Development
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 21 of 204 th P Bo 100 April 04 ,2008 00 Pros ect Street Pemberton British Columbia To: Squamish Lillooet Regional District-Paul Edgington CANA A Pemberton and Area Chamber of Commerce-Paul Selina 0N 2 0 Ministry of Transportation ± Ms. Shauna Hemming Pemberton Business Park Focus Group-Bernice Paterson P. 0 89.15 . 0 89 .5 08 RE: Official Community Plan & Zoning Amendments OCP-Industrial Park-Bylaw No. 609, 2008 Email Zoning-Industrial M-1 zone-Bylaw No. 610, 2008 admin emberton.ca
st ebsite At the Village of Pemberton Council meeting No. 1201 held April 01 , 2008 Council gave first www. emberton.ca reading to the above noted Bylaws and is referring to you the proposed amendments pursuant to Section 879 of the Local Government Act.
Please review the attached material and provide your comments on these amendments to the Village of Pemberton by April 30th, 2008. Should you have any questions, please do not KHVLWDWH WR FRQWDFW WKH 9LOODJH¶V Consultant, Mr. Michael Rosen, at 604-925-0977 or [email protected] .
Yours Truly,
Sheena Fraser Manager of Administrative Services
cc: Lori Pilon- Chief Administrative Officer Michael Rosen - Planning Consultant Richard Diamond, Planning Technician Suzanne Bélanger-Development Services Assistant
Attachment: 1) Bylaw No. 609 & 610-Referral Package
F:\Development Services\Industrial Park\2008\OCP-Zoning Amendments\Referral Letter-External-April 2008.doc
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 22 of 204 THE VILLAGE OF PEMBERTON
BYLAW NO. 609, 2008
Being a bylaw to amend the Village of Pemberton Official Community Plan Designation Bylaw No. 435, 1999
WHEREAS the Council may amend its Official Community Plan from time to time;
AND WHEREAS the Council of the Village of Pemberton deems it desirable to provide a wider array of uses within the Pemberton Industrial Park;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Village of Pemberton in open meeting assembled ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as “Official Community Plan Amendment Bylaw No. 609, 2008.”
2. Schedule 1 of Official Community Plan Designation Bylaw No. 435, 1999 is amended by adding the following policy to Section 3.1.5 (Industry):
“Policy 26a
To provide for a mix of business activity within the Pemberton Industrial Park, business offices will be accommodated, recognizing that professional offices that cater to the day to day needs of the general public such as medical and dental, real estate, accountants, and legal offices are better suited to locate within the Village’s Town Centre.”
READ A FIRST TIME this 1st day of April, 2008.
READ A SECOND TIME this day of 2008
PUBLIC HEARING HELD this day of 2008.
READ A THIRD TIME this day of 2008.
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED this day of , 2008.
______Mayor Administrator
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 23 of 204 THE VILLAGE OF PEMBERTON
BYLAW NO. 610, 2008
Being a bylaw to amend the Village of Pemberton Zoning Bylaw No. 466, 2001
WHEREAS the Council may amend its Official Community Plan from time to time;
AND WHEREAS the Council of the Village of Pemberton deems it desirable to permit a wider array of uses within the Pemberton Industrial Park;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Village of Pemberton in open meeting assembled ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as “Zoning Bylaw Amendment Bylaw No. 610, 2008.”
2. Section 311.1 (Industrial M-1 Zone: Permitted Uses) is amended by adding the following to the list of Permitted Uses:
Business and Professional Office subject to the requirements of 311.9 Civic Catering Establishment Indoor Recreation subject to the requirements of 311.11 Wholesale Bakery Industrial Laundromat and Dry Cleaning Laboratory Pet Grooming Photography Studio Publishing or Printing Radio, Television, or Recording Studio School, Craft or Vocational Veterinary Clinic
3. Section 311 (Industrial M-1 Zone) is amended by adding the following sections:
“311.9 Business and Professional Offices Medical, dental, real estate, accounting, and legal offices shall not be permitted within the M-1 zone.
311.10 Indoor Recreation Indoor recreation use shall be limited to uses that require either a minimum two-storey interior space or a minimum of 186 square meters of gross floor area.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 24 of 204 311.11 Temporary Commercial and Industrial Use Permits
a) Pursuant to Section 921 of the Local Government Act, the entire M-1 zone shall be designated a Temporary Industrial and Commercial Permit Area as a mechanism to accommodate temporary commercial and industrial uses associated with the administration and operation of the 2010 Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games.
b) Temporary Industrial and Commercial Permits shall be issued in accordance with the requirements specified in Section 921 of the Local Government Act.”
4. Section 508 (Off Street Parking Requirements) is amended by adding the following parking standards:
Wholesale Bakery 1 space per 93 square meters Catering Establishment 1 space per 93 square meters Laboratory 1 space per 50 square meters Radio, Television, or Recording Studio 1 space per 50 square meters School, Craft or Vocational 5 spaces per classroom Indoor Recreation 1 space per 20 square meters Accessory Retail 1 space per 28 square meters
READ A FIRST TIME this 1st day of April, 2008.
READ A SECOND TIME this day of 2008
PUBLIC HEARING HELD this day of 2008.
READ A THIRD TIME this day of 2008.
APPROVED BY THE MINISTER OF TRANSPORTATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 52 of the Transportation Act this day of 2008.
RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED this day of , 2008.
______Mayor Clerk
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 25 of 204 Report to Council
Date: March 26, 2008 From: Michael Rosen, Planning Consultant Richard Diamond, Planning Technician
Subject: Amendments to the Official Community Plan and Zoning Bylaw Pemberton Industrial Park
RECOMMENDATIONS
1) THAT Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw 609, 2008 be read a first time;
2) THAT Zoning Bylaw Amending Bylaw 610, 2008 be read a first time; and
3) THAT pursuant to Section 879 of the Local Government Act, Village Council refer the proposed bylaw amendments to the Advisory Land Use Committee, the Advisory Design Review Committee, the Squamish Lillooet Regional District, the Ministry of Transportation, the Pemberton and Area Chamber of Commerce, and the Business Park Focus Group for comment; said referral organizations to be requested to submit their respective comments to the Village within 30 days of first reading.
BACKGROUND AND COMMENTS At Committee of the Whole Meeting held on 19 February 2008, upon consideration of the staff report dated 19 February 2008 and a presentation from the Business Park Focus Group, the Committee instructed staff to prepare an amendment to the Zoning Bylaw to accommodate a wider array of uses within the Pemberton Industrial Park’s M-1 zone, in particular those identified in a letter from Ms. Lisa Ames of Whistler Real Estate dated 10 December 2007.
Attached to this report are proposed amendments to both the Official Community Plan and Zoning Bylaw as per the Committee’s instructions. To assist Council in reviewing the two bylaws, the following is some background context and a brief summary of each of the amending bylaws: a) Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw 609, 2008 As noted in the aforementioned staff report, Policy 26 of the Official Community Plan states that new industrial development within the Village will be directed to be located either in the Pemberton Industrial Park or at the Airport. There is no reference within the policy to accommodate office activity as a principal use.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 26 of 204 Industrial Park – OCP and Zoning Bylaw Amendments Page 2
Policies 10 – 16 in the OCP address commercial development within the Village. None of the commercial policies in the OCP speak to accommodating office type development within the Industrial Park.
Therefore in order for Council to pursue an amendment to the Zoning Bylaw to accommodate a wider array of uses within the Industrial Park, a change to the Official Community Plan should be initiated to ensure that Council is enacting bylaws that are consistent with its long term vision.
The proposed OCP amending bylaw is quite straight forward. A new policy (Policy 26a) would be inserted that would accommodate business offices within the Industrial Park with the recognition that professional offices that cater to the day to day needs of the general public such as medical and dental, real estate, accountants, and legal offices would be better suited to locate within the Village’s Town Centre.
This policy would apply to the entire Industrial Park and does not envision zoning different areas of the Industrial Park for different uses. As such no change to the Land Use Map would be required.
Staff would like to remind Council that the recently completed Sub Regional Land Use Planning Study by Stantec Consulting examined the available industrial lands and future demands for Pemberton and Area C. The report indicated that in the twenty year time horizon, there will be a shortfall of industrial land in the area. While the report identified alternative locations for industrial development to meet this shortfall, it noted “efforts should be made to limit commercial development in the Industrial Park that could go elsewhere.” b) Zoning Bylaw Amendment Bylaw 610, 2008 The entire Industrial Park is currently zoned M-1. As is stated within the Bylaw, the intent of this zone is to accommodate industrial development within the Village of Pemberton. The following is a list of the existing permitted uses within the M-1 zone:
x Industrial (see definition below) x Automobile –oriented commercial (see definition below) x Industrial fuel facility x Waste transfer station x Motor vehicle repair shop x Trade contractor facilities x Artisan quarters (see definition below) x Dog kennel x Storage and equipment yard x Mini storage x Restaurant (gross floor area shall not exceed 93 m2) x Building Supply Outlet x Nursery x Equipment Rental and Repair Outlet
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 27 of 204 Industrial Park – OCP and Zoning Bylaw Amendments Page 3
x Accessory single residential dwelling (limit of four per lot, minimum floor area of 75 m2, where located within the same building as the principle use, be provided with a separate entrance). x Accessory retail (gross floor area use shall not exceed 10% of the Gross floor area of the principal industrial use) x Accessory uses
Definitions for the following Permitted Uses are included within Division 100 of the Zoning Bylaw:
x Industrial means a use providing for the processing, fabricating, assembly, storage, transporting, distributing, wholesaling, testing, servicing, repairing, wrecking or salvaging of goods, materials or things.
x Automobile – oriented commercial means a use providing for the retail sale of automobiles, trucks, boats, recreational vehicles and related parts and accessories and includes facilities to service, wash or repair; excludes gasoline serve stations.
x Artisan quarters mean the use of a building by an artist or a group of artists who create and produce artistic goods.
x Building Supply Outlet means a building that is used for the supply and sale of building materials, fixtures, hardware, equipment and other similar goods related to construction and home improvement, and may have an outdoor storage area.
x Equipment and Rental Repair Outlet means a use providing for the rental and repair of tools, appliances, recreational craft, furniture, light construction equipment or similar items to the general public, and may include the retail sales of such equipment and tools provided that the retail activity is ancillary to the rental and repair aspects of the business.
There are three components of the proposed amending bylaw, briefly described as follows: a) Clause 2 of the Amending Bylaw adds to the list of permitted uses within the M-1 zone. The expanded list of uses has been derived from the list of uses requested by Ms. Lisa Ames in her letter to the Village dated 10 December 2007. They include: Business and Professional Office Civic (accommodates an ambulance station) Catering Establishment Indoor Recreation Wholesale Bakery Industrial Laundromat and Dry Cleaning
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 28 of 204 Industrial Park – OCP and Zoning Bylaw Amendments Page 4
Laboratory Pet Grooming Photography Studio Publishing or Printing Radio, Television, or Recording Studio School, Craft or Vocational Veterinary Clinic
There are some uses within Ms. Ames’ letter that were not included within the new list only because they are currently considered as permitted uses (in italics), notably: appliance repair shop – Equipment Rental and Repair, car wash – Automobile - Oriented Commercial, craft workshop – Artisan Quarters, freight, transport or handling – Industrial, messenger or courier service – Industrial, and warehousing – Industrial.
Regarding office uses, the approach that has been taken was to add “business and professional office” as a generic use as opposed to identifying the specific types of offices as identified in Ms, Ames’ letter. This will avoid the situation of a particular office use not being specifically identified in the list and therefore not being in compliance with the Bylaw. “Business and professional offices” is defined as:
“means the use of a building for the purpose of carrying out business and professional activities in an office environment”
It should be noted that another component of the amending bylaw would be to insert Section 311.9 within the M-1 zone. This regulation would not permit medical, dental, real estate, accounting, and legal offices within the M-1 zone. This is consistent with the aforementioned OCP policy statement. These types of offices are considered important for the functioning of a vibrant pedestrian oriented town center.
Please note that “personal service establishments” as a use has not been added as a permitted use within the M-1 zone as requested by Ms. Ames, as a number of the types of activities would be better suited for the town center. Personal service establishment is currently defined in the Zoning Bylaw as follows:
“means the use of a building where personal services are provided and goods accessory to the provision of such services may be sold, and includes a barber shop, beauty salon, shoe repair shop, dry cleaning, Laundromat, electrical appliance repair, upholstery, watch repair, photographer, tailor or dressmaker, and other similar services”
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 29 of 204 Industrial Park – OCP and Zoning Bylaw Amendments Page 5
That being said, the M-1 zone would accommodate within the list of existing permitted uses a “shoe repair shop” – Industrial, “electrical appliance repair” - Equipment Rental and Repair Outlet, “upholstery” – Industrial, and “watch repair” – Industrial, “tailor and dressmaker” – Industrial.
Regarding the “indoor recreation” use, Section 3.11.10 has been added that would limit such uses to activities that require either a minimum two- storey interior space or a minimum of 186 square meters of gross floor area, a climbing wall being an obvious example.
b) Clause 3 of the Amending Bylaw (Section 311.11) also creates the opportunity for Council to issue a Temporary Commercial and Industrial Permit (Permit) within the M-1 zoned area pursuant to the enabling legislation within the Local Government Act. The Act enables a Permit to be issued for a temporary use for a maximum of two years with a potential renewal for another two years. The Bylaw has been drafted such that the issuance of such a Permit would be limited to industrial and commercial Olympic related activities, including temporary tourist accommodation. It should be noted that Council is the authority in issuing such Permits, not staff. The process also requires notification of neighbouring properties as part of Council’s consideration of a Permit application. A similar type clause has been inserted into the industrial zones within the Resort Municipality of Whistler’s Zoning Bylaw.
c) Clause 4 of the Amending Bylaw establishes parking requirements for specific uses that are not currently identified in the Village’s Zoning Bylaw. The standards are intended to replicate the parking standards for other similar uses within the Bylaw. Please note that a parking requirement for an “accessory retail” use has been added to the list of new parking standards that would be applied to that portion of a building that would be used for accessory retail purposes. The M-1 zone currently allows 10% of the floor area of an industrial use to be used for accessory retail purposes.
OPTIONS FOR COUNCIL The following options are provided for Council’s consideration: Option 1: Give first reading to the two amending bylaws and commence the referral process;
Option 2: Request staff to revise the bylaws prior to proceeding with bylaw enactment process; or
Option 3: Request staff to initiate a referral process prior to proceeding with bylaw enactment process.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 30 of 204 Industrial Park – OCP and Zoning Bylaw Amendments Page 6
CONCLUSION Based upon previous discussions with Council, it is apparent that Council is interested in proceeding with the Industrial Park bylaw amendment package. Option 1 would enable the bylaw process to get underway and provide an opportunity for referral agencies to provide comment on the bylaws.
Attachments: 1) Letter from L. Ames – December 10, 2007
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 31 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 32 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 33 of 204 To: Regional Board
From: Steven Olmstead, Director of Planning and Development
Date: April 15, 2008 REPORT Re: Mount Meager geohazard
Recommendation:
1. That, in order to provide a greater level of assurance regarding the methodology and conclusions in the “Hazard and risk from large landslides from Mount Meager volcano, British Columbia, Canada” paper published in the online journal Georisk, the Provincial Government be requested to provide funding for: a. an independent peer review of the paper; and b. a study of the feasibility and cost of installing and operating a warning system as described in the Georisk paper.
2. That staff be instructed to undertake a preliminary analysis of the implications of: a. amending the OCP and zoning to prohibit development in the area identified as subject to geohazard; b. developing a policy regarding geotechnical reports to address the question of the Mount Meager geohazard.
Administrator’s Recommendation:
Voting Rules Who Votes: All; Count: Directors; Decision: Majority
Purpose: To follow up on the Cordilleran Geoscience letter of March 5, 2008 regarding potential landslide hazard at Mount Meager.
Background and Planning Department comments:
At the regular March, 2008 Regional Board meeting, the Board received information regarding a recently published paper in the journal Georisk entitled “Hazard and risk from large landslides from Mount Meager volcano, British Columbia, Canada”. The article and a cover letter from Pierre Friele of Cordilleran Geoscience were forwarded to the regional district’s solicitor upon receipt. Copies of these documents are attached to this report.
The solicitor advised that notice should be published under s. 25 of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. Section 25 of that act states in part that: “the head of a public body must, without delay, disclose to the public, to an affected group of people or to an applicant, information (a) about a risk of significant harm to the environment or to the health or safety of the public or a group of people….” Notices were published in the local newspapers in accordance with the solicitor’s advice.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 34 of 204 - 2 - In addition to the immediate need to notify the public, there are a number of policy considerations and possible courses of action the Regional Board should address: 1. Should the OCP be amended to prohibit future development in the area potentially affected by the hazard? 2. Provide guidance to the Building Inspector with respect to whether or not to require a Community Charter s. 56 geotechnical report in conjunction with building permit applications in the area subject to hazard, 3. Consider obtaining an independent peer review of the Georisk paper 4. Investigate the feasibility and cost of a warning system. These matters are potentially extremely consequential and therefore the Planning Department recommends that staff be instructed to seek provincial government assistance in the appropriate approach to responding to the issues raised; to investigate possible options and to report back to the Board.
Respectfully submitted,
Steven Olmstead Director of Planning and Development
Attachments: Georisk paper and covering letter from Cordilleran Geoscience
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 35 of 204 March 5, 2008
Steven Olmstead, Director of Planning and Development [email protected] P.O. Box 219, 1350 Aster Street Pemberton, BC V0N 2L0
Mr Olmstead,
Research in the last several years has demonstrated that large volcanic debris flows from Mount Meager have affected the Lillooet River valley at least as far downstream as Pemberton Meadows (Friele et al 2005), and computer modeling indicates such events could reach Lillooet Lake (Simpson et al 2006). The risk to residents posed by this hazard has recently been assessed and presented in the peer-reviewed journal “Georisk” (Friele et al 2008). Although the recurrence interval of the hazard is low (2000 years), the severity of the hazard is very high (complete destruction over hundreds of square kilometers), and therefore the associated risk of loss-of-life in the Pemberton Valley is high. In the absence of tolerable risk thresholds at the Provincial or local government level, we compared the existing landslide risk faced by residents of Pemberton Valley with risk acceptance standards developed in Hong Kong, Australia and under interim use by the District of North Vancouver. According to those standards, existing risk faced by people living in the Lillooet River valley upstream of Lillooet Lake, is considered unacceptable. As registered professional geoscientists we consider it to be our duty to inform you of the outcome of our research and attach a copy of our paper to this letter. You may wish to include the findings from our work in your future development permitting, or perhaps entertain the notion of a debris flow warning system and associated emergency preparedness. If you wish to learn more about our research, we would be pleased to meet you in Vancouver or Pemberton. We could also give a presentation to you at a council meeting, though we would expect to be reimbursed for this service.
Regards,
Pierre Friele, P. Geo, Cordilleran Geoscience Dr. Matthias Jakob, P.Geo, BGC Consulting Dr. John Clague, P.Geo., Department of Earth Sciences, SFU
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 1 Page 36 of 204 Cited papers Friele, P. A., Jakob, M., and Clague J.J. 2008. Hazard and risk from large landslides from Mount Meager volcano, British Columbia, Canada. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 2(1): 48-64. Simpson, K., Stasiuk, M., Clague, J.J., and Friele, P.A. 2006. Evidence for catastrophic volcanic debris flows in Pemberton Valley, British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences. 43: 679-689. Friele, P.A., Clague, J.J., Simpson, K., and Stasiuk, M., 2005. Impact of a Quaternary volcano on Holocene sedimentation in Lillooet River valley, British Columbia. Sedimentary Geology, 176: 305–322.
CC.
Village of Pemberton Email: [email protected]
Gerry Grunau, Manager Professional Services Email: [email protected] Indian and Northern Affairs, Canada
Neil Peters, P.Eng. Inspector of Dikes. Email: [email protected]
Joan McIntyre, MLA Email: [email protected]
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 2 Page 37 of 204 This article was downloaded by:[Friele, Pierre] On: 22 February 2008 Access Details: [subscription number 790796569] Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t744347545 Hazard and risk from large landslides from Mount Meager volcano, British Columbia, Canada Pierre Friele a; Matthias Jakob b; John Clague c a Cordilleran Geoscience, Squamish, BC, Canada b BGC Engineering Inc., Vancouver, BC, Canada c Centre for Natural Hazard Research, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
Online Publication Date: 01 March 2008 To cite this Article: Friele, Pierre, Jakob, Matthias and Clague, John (2008) 'Hazard and risk from large landslides from Mount Meager volcano, British Columbia, Canada', Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 2:1, 48 - 64 To link to this article: DOI: 10.1080/17499510801958711 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17499510801958711
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article maybe used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 38 of 204 Downloaded By: [Friele, Pierre] At: 20:18 22 February 2008 http://www.informaworld.com 10.1080/17499510801958711 DOI: online # 1749-9526 print/ISSN 1749-9518 ISSN 48 2008, March 1, No. 2, Vol. Georisk Crepnigato.Eal [email protected] Email: author. *Corresponding Columbia’ Pro- British for in Development Assessments Residential ‘Guide- Landslide posed Legislated released for Columbia lines British of Geoscientists protocols international and management. is risk Canadian for and for reproducible, basis and the transparent, systematic, assessment’, acceptable. risk is risk ‘quantitative termed estimated approach, the This find or of stakeholders whether determining not consequence (3) and and occurrence, probability hazards, landslide landslide the of quantifying inventory (2) an developing (1) by 2005). Graff world de the and around in (Evans and disasters 1997) several (Evans Columbia to British led has quantify landslides adequately neither and long-runout recognise mitiga- to is failure or The planning tion. consequently, into is incorporated In best, nor and, at 1997). quantified or, understood recognised Scott rarely far is and poorly risk damage the (Vallance managed. cases, cause sources such and can their assessed, however, from identified, landslides, be sufficient Some with is can that, processes sources study, these landslides specific from from of property and originates destructive life to most Risk landsliding. the processes. of hydrologic hazardous One of and variety geomorphic a high-risk to and subject is Canada Western Canada Columbia, British a volcano, Meager Mount from landslides large from risk and Hazard odlea esine qaih C Canada; BC, Squamish, Geoscience, Cordilleran 08Tyo Francis & Taylor 2008 h soito fPoesoa nier and Engineers Professional of Association The quantified be can landslides with associated Risk ersflw volcanism flow; debris Keywords: reso antd,rs oeac hehlsdvlpdi ogKn,Asrla nln,adi one in and safety. England, public Australia, for responsible Kong, by governments Hong local exceeds, for risk in challenge calculated a developed triggered The poses non-eruption thresholds Meager. finding flows from Mount This tolerance valley debris at Canada. River risk volcanic in activity Lillooet jurisdiction some landslide magnitude, in floods, Holocene of residents Unlike on to orders process. based risk permitting flows the flows debris the quantify debris volcanic in permits rare We building large, considered warning. but and not hazards, without subdivision flood of occur are flow of Approval 65 mitigation Meager years. Pemberton, with and five Mount Notably, assessment that past growth. valley, requires from the areas urban areas in inundated River adjacent rapid size flows and experiencing in debris Pemberton Lillooet now doubled in These are has in and metres. Meager, years several Mount downstream 100 of from past km depths kilometres the flow southwest in of and in settled volcano second become tens Quaternary have per a metres several Meager, many Mount reached of from velocities flows have debris Columbia, volcanic large British years, 8000 past the During utrayvlao on egr adld aadadrs;qatttv ikassessment; risk quantitative risk; and hazard landslide Meager; Mount volcano; Quaternary ireFriele Pierre eerh io rsrUiest,Bray C Canada BC, Burnaby, University, Fraser Simon Research, Á 64 SLRD RegularMeeting Agenda,April28,2008 a ,Mtha Jakob Matthias *, b G niern n. acue,B,Canada; BC, Vancouver, Inc., Engineering BGC Page 39 of204 ao 19)cnutdrsac ntemechanics the on unstable research most conducted the and (1996) (1994) Jordan is Jakob geothermal Later, 1990) Canada. Meager in (1978, since massif Mount mountain Read it 1970s. that on the argued out research in of carried began body exploration been large the has of that because study this for could volcano hikers, the users, considered. to be close hotsprings snowmobilers workers, and skiers, resource the although to valley, is River risk focus Lillooet Our in risk. residents existing to standards the risk assessing international for use metric acceptable a we as for reason, guidelines this or For risk. standards cur- no is which has area District, rently study Regional 1). our Squamish-Lillooet (Figure of the River Vancouver jurisdiction Lillooet of administrative north upper The km the 150 in watershed, volca- (MMVC) Meager volcanic complex Mount large the nic by at of posed originating sum- flows risk valley debris and we River hazards Specifically, the Lillooet marise Columbia. the from British risk in southwest acceptable guide- hazards and these we existing landslide on compare paper, to based this lines, In methods, measured. appropriate profes- be apply future will and propose practice present sional guidelines which against The risk standards landslide methodology. standardise to order assessment in 2006, March in b ecoeteMutMae ocnccomplex volcanic Meager Mount the chose We n onClague John and c c etefrNtrlHazard Natural for Centre Downloaded By: [Friele, Pierre] At: 20:18 22 February 2008 fLloe aly h rvoslc fsc a such research of extensive lack the previous with sharply The contrasts valley. residents study to from Lillooet risk flows the debris of assess large quantitatively previously on to use data MMVC we new paper, im- this and the In published study. around provided in our and study for people in petus Stewart’s of growth to since occurrence Accelerated Pemberton the risk event’. with an a deal such to pose strategies that properly preparing to hazards essential is ‘It describe stated 72) p. (2002, Stewart con- al have (Friele et strati- valley supposition Subsurface this Lillooet firmed 2004). in Clague investigations graphic and Friele Stewart 1991, down- 2002, from Slaymaker flows and km (Jordan debris 65 Meager Lillooet volcanic Mount Pemberton, to susceptible of that are village stream, suggested the and have valley (2004). researchers Clague and Several Friele and (2002), Stasiuk by Stewart documented (1996), were 2005) Jakob 8, 9; 7, Large and (classes flows. landslides debris non-eruptive 2005) and Jakob small syn-eruptive 6; and mostly 5, 4, of 3, (classes upper relations of watersheds frequency-magnitude the the including in and rocks, massif volcanic Meager Quaternary Mount the of Creek. from distribution Meager derived the and deposits showing River Landslide Columbia Lillooet (B) British complex. southwestern volcanic of Meager Mount Map (A) 1. Figure nrcgiino hsrs tMutMeager, Mount at risk this of recognition In 2006). . tal et SLRD RegularMeeting Agenda,April28,2008 05 Simpson 2005, . tal et Page 40 of204 Georisk . h on egrvlai ope osssof consists complex km volcanic 20 about Meager Mount The Setting Columbia. British manage- in risk of policies valley discussion ment a Associates the with conclude Leidal in We Wood 2001). risk Kerr and 1985, hazards (Nesbitt-Porter flood on performed oae nteforo ilotvle,32 valley, Lillooet are Meager. of Mount settlement floor from downstream rural the on associated located and village Pemberton The of and of 1994). outbursts (Hickson floods lakes by and landslide-dammed produced damming, flows river hyperconcentrated debris and associated hazards avalanches rock flows, volcanic large principal collapse, edifice The are Alberta. western as growth in (Clague trees charred position ago, on years ages 2360 radiocarbon on about based occurred and eruption snow last by The covered and are ice. streams slopes upper by its dissected and deeply glaciers, 1994). been (Hickson has volcanic belt massif largest volcanic The the Garibaldi is the it in Pliocene; centre the to back dating 3 fdctcadryltceutv rocks eruptive rhyolitic and dacitic of tal et 95.I pedaha a east far as ash spread It 1995). . Á 5km 75 49 Downloaded By: [Friele, Pierre] At: 20:18 22 February 2008 50 eoi r xoe na2- ihra u 0 m 800 cut road high 20-m a in exposed are deposit ennso ag ( large a of Remnants valley Creek Meager in Deposits to used then to are risk (Moon 2 al. plot Table (F-M) less frequency-magnitude in a significantly data generate in The pose safety. considered be thus public may are events and syn-eruptive non-eruptive predicted because 2) only analysis risk (Table 1), the landslides known (Table all compiled triggered Clague Although are and details). Friele events Meager additional (see the for discussed from (2006) briefly derived are landslides massif large on Data characterisation Hazard okaaacedbi lwPlnP.70 4.5 7900 Pk. Pylon flow avalanche/debris Rock Prehistoric yolsi lwSnrpie20 4.4 2400 Syneruptive 10 flow 5250 Pyroclastic Ck. Capricorn flow avalanche/debris Rock ersfo arcr k 981.2 10 2 1998 2 1986 1984 1.2 10 Ck. Capricorn 10 1972 3 Ck. Affliction Meager Mt 1975 10 1 1947 10 Ck. Capricorn 10 Ck. Devastation 10 1931 flow Debris 210 8 Ck. 150 Devastation avalanche 10 Rock 630 Ck. Capricorn flow Ck. Debris Devastation 10 370 870 avalanche Rock 800 Ck. flow Capricorn 1860 Debris Ck. avalanche Angel Rock Ck. Good 1920 avalanche No 2240 Rock Ck. Job Ck. Good flow No Debris AD) Ck. (age Job Historic Ck. Job flow Ck. Debris Angel flow Ck. Debris Job flow Debris flow Debris flow Debris flow Debris flow Debris flow Debris flow Debris 6250 eruption Ck., Job flow avalanche/debris Rock flow hyperconcentrated flow/ avalanche/debris Rock Ck. Job flow avalanche/debris Rock 3 2 1 Age Source Meager. Mount at hazards Event landslide volcanic of Compilation 1. Table ersfo eatto k 101.2 4.4 2170 Ck. Devastation 2400 post-eruptive to Syn- flow Debris avalanche Rock flow hyperconcentrated flow/ flood/debris avalanche/outburst Rock h 20y Pdpstfo oei ettvl orltdwt h nae okaaacei pe ilotvalley. Lillooet upper in burial. avalanche and rock erosion undated of the because with minima correlated likely tentatively are is landslides core prehistoric from of deposit Volumes BP yr 6250 The in age Radiocarbon 05 o MMVC. for 2005) 14 erB.Tectdae r hs htms lsl osri h g fteevent. the of age the constrain closely most that those are ages cited The BP. year C 10 6 Á 10 yo k40 2 4400 precursor Pk Pylon y-rpie20 2 2400 Syn-eruptive 7 m 3 okavalanche rock ) SLRD RegularMeeting Agenda,April28,2008 .Friele P. Page 41 of204 B 6010 2600 et 0 er 10 years 100 1 2 B)Volume (BP) tal. et 10 atreetwssmlrt 1.2 The a area. to same similar the was event in latter Creek Meager dammed likely ftelnsie(..teyugs aiu g) is age), maximum youngest the 5250 (i.e. time the landslide the ages, to the closest radiocarbon of presumably 1). and two (Figure which, of yielded Creek younger has Capricorn of deposit mouth The the of south osse frc vlnh n ersfo phases. flow debris and avalanche rock of consisted ersfo,dtda 150 at dated flow, debris nteHlcn,oc bu 90yasao(4.5 ago years 7900 about once 10 Holocene, the in produ- 2000), lake. Jakob long and 1-km Capri- (Bovis a of cing 1998 mouth in the Creek at corn Creek Meager dammed that 8 8 h ot ln fPlnPa olpe twice collapsed Peak Pylon of flank south The m m 9 3 3 n eodtm bu 40yasao(2 ago years 4400 about time second a and ) 70 Fil n lge20) ahlandslide Each 2004). Clague and (Friele ) 10 10 6 5 8 6 8 5 5 5 6 3 14 Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á Á 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 (m rB GC55) uhyounger much A (GSC-5454). BP yr C 7 7 8 8 6 7 6 5 7 6 6 6 8 9 8 7 9 6 5 5 5 6 6 6 5 7 3 Reference ) tal et hspaper This (1991) McCuaig and McNeely (1994) Jordan (1991) McCuaig and McNeely (1991) McCuaig and McNeely paper This (1991) McCuaig and McNeely Stasiuk Stasiuk Stasiuk Friele Friele (2005) (2004); Clague and Friele (1991) McCuaig and McNeely Friele (2004) Clague and Friele oi n ao (2000) Jakob and Bovis (1987) Evans (1994) Jordan (2001) Evans (1977); Mokievsky-Zubot (1994) Jordan (1978) Read (1983) Croft (1994) Jordan Decker (1932); Carter (1991) McCuaig and McNeely (1991) McCuaig and McNeely (1991) McCuaig and McNeely (2006) . tal et al et tal et al et al et 9 20) Simpson (2005); . (2005) . 60 19) twr (2002) Stewart (1996); . (2002) Stewart (1996); . (2002) Stewart (1996); . 14 rB (GSC-5464), BP yr C 10 6 tal et m 3 (1977); . ersflow debris tal et . Downloaded By: [Friele, Pierre] At: 20:18 22 February 2008 10 10 re Fgr ) ae o2170 to dated 1), (Figure Creek ae ntedpstsaeletn ( extent areal deposit’s the on Based vn 01.Toohrlredbi lw have in 3 Creek flows a Devastation (1) debris century: of twentieth watershed large the the other in Two occurred 2001). 1977, (Mokievsky-Zubok Evans 1975 in Creek Devastation aiu g f370 youngest a of with age ages, maximum 1) radiocarbon (Figure three Creek yielded Good has No at deposit avalanche rock ciescug n lca debuttressing. glacial and sackung, active 10 m 1 10 Meager. Mount at (m avalanches Volume rock and flows debris non-eruptive for analysis Magnitude-frequency 2. Table 10 netmtdaeaetikeso 0m tlkl a a had 10 likely it of m, 10 volume of thickness average estimated an aebe aicro ae t1920 at dated radiocarbon been have ersu o10mtik(iue2 sepsdi a in exposed is 2) (Figure thick m 100 to avalanche up rock debris volcanic stratified, weakly to Massive avalanche rock Pre-eruption been not have deposits published. landslide descriptions previously detailed non-eruptive but (2002), of 1). Stewart Stasiuk (Table and by (1996) documented described are been deposits pre- also Syn-eruptive one has although unit upper instability, eruption slope in eruption subsequent fill 2360-year-old the and near-surface to related and is valley surface Lillooet the valley of River Much Lillooet upper in deposits Proximal of valley the 1978). to (Read confined Creek was Devastation that 1947 in avalanche vrisadbi lwdpsto iia ieta has which that 800 of youngest size is the similar ages, of radiocarbon three deposit yielded flow debris a overlies 97 odn19) n 2 a (2) and 1994); Creek Meager Jordan Decker 1932, of 1977, (Carter length River Lillooet full entered the and travelled that 1931 32,rcrsa vn iia nsz oa1.2 a to size in similar event an records 4302), GC33)ad210 and (GSC-3733) aig fe Fell after Ratings 3 8 7 6 5 10 6 Á Á Á Á ersfo htkle orpol ttemuhof mouth the at people four killed that flow debris adld eoi ttemuho Devastation of mouth the at deposit landslide A w orypeevdlnsiedpst ( deposits landslide preserved poorly Two 10 10 10 10 m 9 9 9 8 7 6 3 utdwsra fAglCek(iue1) (Figure Creek Angel of downstream just ) 70 3 vn gs(D P o feet eod(years) Record events of No. BP) (AD, ages Event ) 14 rB (GSC-4264). BP yr C 6 5,20 3,80 90 2240 1920, 800, 630, 210, 150, 60 40 20 90480 :00Possible 1:2000 Likely 8000 1:1100 total 1:77; Historic 2170 77; total 2 historic; 1 4 7900 6250, 4400, 2600, 2170 1975; 1860, 5150 870, 370, 1998; 1931, 1986; 1984, 1972, 1947, Á tal et 10 7 20) aig r ae ncnieaino paetana rqec,dsrbto fssetberc ye and types rock susceptible of distribution frequency, annual apparent of consideration on based are Ratings (2005). . m 9 3 9 50 h okaaacedebris avalanche rock The . 50 14 ÁÁ rB GC31) A (GSC-3811). BP yr C 14 rB (GSC-3509). BP yr C 9 10 60 6 B m 10 14 SLRD RegularMeeting Agenda,April28,2008 100 9 3 rB (GSC- BP yr C 5 .5km 0.75 Á ersfo in flow debris 50 10 , 6 itrc 1ttl7;24 itrc11;ttl120Certain 1:200 total 1:19; Historic 2240 77; total 11 historic; 4 itrc oa 7 10Hsoi :8 oa :6 Certain 1:860 total 1:38; Historic 5150 77; total 6 historic; 2 14 m CyrBP 3 2 )and tal et tal et rock 10 Page 42 of204 10 5 Á Georisk 7 . . h okaaacehdavlm f3.5 of volume a had avalanche rock the 059 n 2210 and 209559) m uieu ersfo ae t2460 at dated flow Falls: debris Keyhole pumiceous from a downstream km 8 about exposed years. 100 reser- least at the for that persisted suggest voir ages These (Beta-209551). BP eoee rmtefrs eso h et yielded 2350 delta fragments the of Wood of ages beds 1). forest radiocarbon (Figure the tuff from recovered ash-flow the impounded reservoir the by into built was Falls, Keyhole eetmt t rgnletn ohv en1 been have to extent original its estimate we odi autiesn . musra fthe of 2360 upstream of age km an gave 2.2 Creek Salal sand of mouth lacustrine in Wood hsi utb le hnte26 a rBP yr cal 3.5 about 2360 of the area avalanche total than rock a the have older of deposit remnants be Erosional must eruption. it is deposit, the avalanche overlies thus rock tephra River The Bridge Creek. but undated, Job in of rocks headwaters within volcanic Job units the from the maroon derivation indicate and of deposit Grey margins the 1). west (Figure and fan north Creek the at bluff river lo ntevle eo.Tettlvlm of volume total 4.4 is The about eruption be to below. the estimated during valley produced material the pyroclastic outburst that an in lake causing flood a tuff dam, the impounded valley ash-flow overtopped and Lillooet The eventually River in 1). Lillooet thick (Figure blocked metres Falls of Keyhole tens below many tuff of ash-flow to or welded a up one metres left by that many followed flows pyroclastic was the more with blast buried The volcano blast tephra. pumiceous the initial The near 1). landscape (Figure near located Peak is eruption Plinth 2360-year-old the of vent The deposits Syn-eruptive 1 GC50) n yolsi lwo iia age similar of flow pyroclastic (2490 a and (GSC-5403); 2 suiga vrg hcns f35 of thickness average an Assuming . w ag adldsaercre ydeposits by recorded are landslides large Two et ttemuho aa re,usra of upstream Creek, Salal of mouth the at delta A 10 9 12,000 9 m 80 3 . 14 rB,GC53) twr (2002) Stewart GSC-5433). BP, yr C B :200Ntcredible Not 1:12,000 9 40 frequency Annual 14 rB (Beta-209558). BP yr C 9 10 60 8 m 14 3 rB (Beta- BP yr C Seat2002). (Stewart 9 60 10 9 likelihood 6 14 60 Future Á m CyrBP 0 m, 100 10 14 2 and , Cyr 8 10 51 to 1 7 Downloaded By: [Friele, Pierre] At: 20:18 22 February 2008 52 1980 hs vnst e2 be by to transported events material these and of deposit volume avalanche total rock the pre-eruption estimated undated, an showing 1), 630 (Figure about Creek unit Job flow of mouth debris the a opposite Section 2. Figure erti eto a ile aiu limiting maximum a yielded has section this near ptemedo ehl al Fgr ) n of 1820 bracketed One of is 1). ages 3) (Figure (Figure by units Falls upward-coarsening the Keyhole the at of canyon end the blocked upstream with that associated are landslides a deposits successive units backwater over be deposited upward-coarsening to were interpreted The which period. of sandy 600-year to eight silt units, upward-coarsening, 11 gravel least at it, above c.4.4 (ca. ttenrhatmri fteJbCekfan Creek Job unit flow the debris 2240 volcanic at of basal a dated margin exposes 1) northeast (Figure the at the complex eruption. following a valley Peak the creeks of Plinth in Mosaic remnants accumulated long that are and fill km deposits valley Salal 6 The between 1). about wide (Figure area km an 1.5 over debris and occur and fluvial, deposits lacustrine, flow by underlain Terraces deposits Post-eruptive lava small landslide. this A after eruption. vent the the from of erupted phase and flow younger main stratigraphic is the it but than that dated, demonstrate relations directly avalanche geomorphic rock been km The 4 not 2002). about has (Stewart travelled valley and the wall, up down m valley 300 opposing ran valley, the Lillooet crossed it as fragmented 0mhg akaogLloe ie Fgr 3) (Figure River Lillooet along bank high 20-m A 9 50 10 14 rB Bt-078.Lnsiedebris Landslide (Beta-200718). BP yr C 7 m 9 3 elfo h ln fPit Peak, Plinth of flank the from fell ) 9 60 40 14 10 14 rB Bt-077 and, (Beta-200717) BP yr C 8 rB Bt-079 and (Beta-200719) BP yr C m 14 3 er old. years C ae,alrerc mass rock large a Later, . SLRD RegularMeeting Agenda,April28,2008 .Friele P. Page 43 of204 tal. et oneto hc s630 is which 1). (Figure the of the ages, fan at radiocarbon youngest three Creek ha yielded 50 Job have about deposits the The of of area margin an northwest cover 2) (Figure flow n hndbi lwui tKyoeFlsoverlies Falls Keyhole 1990 at at dated unit gravel flow pumiceous debris thin a and ftedpstt e8 be to volume deposit the the estimated of (1994) Jordan (GSC-3215). BP odwti h ersadfo h vryn peat 870 occurred overlying flow the debris from the and that indicate debris from the obtained within ages wood radiocarbon Ten peat. is by 1) capped Figure 4 in by 4 (site underlain Creek Salal of upstream bottom land- by blocked frequently upper slides. been the has period River post-eruptive Lillooet the in Thus, 200715). eois eetmt httedbi lwhda had flow debris remnant the the 1 about that of of thickness estimate volume and we flow. extent debris deposits, the the of time on Valley the of Based before Lillooet or clasts upper at dammed that rip-up was indicating metre-size silt, contain lacustrine They 209553). aicro g f1860 of age radiocarbon rligi ilotvle 32 valley Lillooet in valley Drilling River Lillooet in deposits Distal ersfo nt n tlattresignificant of three part least upper the (Friele at fill in volcanic valley the and units three flow units revealed hyperconcentrated flow has Meager debris Mount from enn eoiso nte ag ocncdebris volcanic large another of deposits Remnant ag c.20h)traeo h ilotvalley Lillooet the on terrace ha) 210 (ca. large A Á fdbi lwsdmnsunit sediments flow debris of m 5 tal et 10 Á 10 6 9 05 Simpson 2005, . m 50 3 10 9 . 14 6 40 Á 9 rB (GSC-5278), BP yr C m 5k downstream km 65 3 40 14 . rB (Beta- BP yr C 14 rB (Beta- BP yr C tal et 9 50 2006). . 14 Cyr Downloaded By: [Friele, Pierre] At: 20:18 22 February 2008 h etbd r nlsdi boxes. on in ages enclosed are Radiocarbon beds units. peat graded the the separate (arrows) thsyeddtordoabnae,teyugrof 6250 younger Meager. the is Mount ages, from radiocarbon km which two 32 yielded hole least drill has at a It is at deposits thick flow m debris 8 three the of oldest The flows Debris 2200 about a of yielded that age diamicton flow radiocarbon debris sediment Creek basal graded Job a normally the overlying eight units of of end sequence a downstream exposing the fan at Section 3. Figure stnaieycreae ihte6250 the with been correlated valley Lillooet has tentatively upper the is in age deposit However, avalanche volcano. this rock the large, of near identified deposit positively landslide proximal ile aicro g f2570 deposit of the age on directly radiocarbon diamicton, lying a bed thick yielded peat 4-m thin 1.5 to A full 2- valley. the across a extends is which It Meager. 32 Mount holes drill in found been 2004). the Clague and the with (Friele into Meager Creek Peak Meager Mount Pylon of from of valley the collapse km in flank 32 unit 4400-year-old at flow hole debris middle drill the correlated 1). (2005) (Table hole drill the in deposit flow debris h oneto h he ersfo nt has units flow debris three the of youngest The Friele rates, aggradation average on Based 9 30 14 rB O-65) No (OS-36556). BP yr C Á 0k ontemfrom downstream km 50 14 rB.Pa beds Peat BP. yr C Á mwdho the of width km 2 9 SLRD RegularMeeting Agenda,April28,2008 40 14 year-old C 14 CyrBP tal et Page 44 of204 Georisk . 4550 eoiso eimsz adldsaeesl eroded easily are landslides contrast, medium-size In of estimated. deposits Evans reasonably and be and scars also (Guthrie may landscape whose 2007), the landslides, in persist large Similarly, deposits of flows. debris frequency small the magni- for of frequency over estimates and damage good tude yield tree Records may or centuries observations several analyses. historic incomplete, on based generally frequency-magnitude are (Moon limiting however, risk data, landslide Geologic quanti- assess to required tatively is model frequency-magnitude A model Frequency-magnitude about (Desloges of Lake Lillooet be in 1994). present to Gilbert is and estimated old, years and 900 strong upper reflector a by in marked acoustic sediment, flow lacustrine of debris layer thick 870-year-old (Friele valley the Lillooet to tentatively We it volcano. the assign from downstream km 47 eo ehl al ecie yStasiuk flow by debris described ensuing syn- Falls (1996). the and Keyhole of flood deposits below distal outburst down- the eruptive km likely 65 (Friele are sediments volcano sediments the deltaic from in stream present is pumiceous overlies wash Similar turn Meager. 42 in Mount cores from drill which downstream in bed, unit flow peat debris thin uppermost the a caps thick at m flow 2004). Clague avalanche/debris and (Friele of Peak rock 1985) Pylon Scott 4400-year-old and (Pierson the faces runout flow debris h imco aea g f2690 of age an gave from recovered diamicton fragment the wood a and (Beta-166059), abnae f3230 Mount of ages from carbon was downstream thick km (Friele m 42 Meager 6 cores to two in up found unit flow hyperconcentrated A flows Hyperconcentrated Creek. Salal of upstream km 3.3 site a at (GSC-6696) yn etta aea g f2650 of age an under- gave yet diamicton that not include peat has may lying flow it but debris identified, the explosions been of deposit minor proximal likely or The although activity and as magmatic (Simpson years, by hundred to eruption few related Meager a Mount as debris the much the that preceded suggest ages flow two The (Beta-166057). B hc,i rsn ncr olce tasite a at collected core in present is thick, m 1 hr yecnetae lwui,wihis which unit, flow hyperconcentrated third A 3 to up unit flow hyperconcentrated pumiceous A 9 90 14 tal et rB GC64) h ntmyb the be may unit The (GSC-6645). BP yr C 06,i sntsrcl syn-eruptive. strictly not is it 2006), . tal et 9 05.I sbaktdb radio- by bracketed is It 2005). . 70 tal et 14 rB Bt-601 and (Beta-166051) BP yr C 05.A anomalously An 2005). . tal et 9 9 05.These 2005). . 50 60 tal et 14 14 CyrBP CyrBP 2005). . Á 7km 47 tal et 53 . Downloaded By: [Friele, Pierre] At: 20:18 22 February 2008 54 Jra 94 ao 96.Fu 10 Four 1996). Jakob 1994; (Jordan i.Aprn netit iis(lc as o class for bars) (black limits uncertainty 4 mas- for Apparent Meager at diagram sif. landslides volcanic frequency-magnitude triggered non-eruption Composite 4. Figure flows debris indicates area on study m bounds the in the assessment fans of Detailed of 4). landslides estimate (Figure order frequencies first actual non-eruptive the a as of prehistoric, 2) frequencies (Table apparent and the use historic we assessment, risk judgment. expert involve frequency-mag- inevitably must of are plots use nitude events and past under- formulation of commonly incomplete, is records frequency As their estimated. and buried, or ete ra.Cas1 ersfosaeexcluded, are flows debris 10 Class distal, areas. reach 9 events and settled size 8 these class only to because limited F-M landslides, is the assessment judge for risk bounds we Considering Our uncertainty model. likely what 4). most represents the be (Figure band to grey reasonable the that is censoring, suggesting model categories, our intermediate-size bars uncertainty the smallest the the of within lies connecting categories line largest best-fit and A years. 4 10,000 that period. assume 8000-year an We in documented been have events ob h otlkl netit onsfrteF-M Canada. the in region for prone massif bounds landslide Meager most that uncertainty the indicates is yield likely annual judge total most The we model. what the represents be band grey consideration to the In censoring, bound). data (lower of data geologic and bound) Á 3 ersflw r eie rmtehsoi eod(upper record historic the from derived are flows debris 8 ihteeise nmn n o h ups of purpose the for and mind in issues these With nvlm aertr nevl f1 of intervals return have volume in Á vnsmyhv curdin occurred have may events 6 8 SLRD RegularMeeting Agenda,April28,2008 Á 10 9 m Á 3 0years 10 cas9) (class B .Friele P. Page 45 of204 10 5 tal. et h rqec flnsie nteregion. the in landslides increase of will frequency 2100 the by Columbia British southwestern m winter of intensity and 3 that amount a argue and the precipitation (2007) in Lambert (Whitfield and increases century intense Jakob this 2003). more 2002, during with later winters rainfall wetter warmer, region this suggest for scenarios change climate Furthermore, faot7 km 76 about of 00m 3000 a ensuidi eala on egrb Holm by Meager Mount alpine al at et detail phenomenon of in The retreat studied 1994). been and has Clague thinning and the (Evans to during glaciers gla- due increased in century failure terrain past slope mountainous catastrophic cierised for potential The instability Potential most the New Canada. is in massif of Meager mountain Mount landslide-prone Alps to that assessment Southern comparable Read’s is the (Hovius It in California Zealand in 1987). rates higher basins Madej times denudation forested 1982, three for and (Kelsey average 2004) (Martin the Evans than Columbia and British hyper-maritime Guthrie for of approximately average is the areas rate than higher This times massif. 50 the of area entire iectgre,tettlana rdcino debris of m production 231,000 annual is total the categories, rate size process landslide volcanic (Moon the provides 4 Figure considered Meager. not Mount are at volume possible this of landslides because 3 ,w a xettefiuert nteftr ilbe will future the in rate failure the expect can we ), cata- to precursor a is deformation detachment. deep- of strophic that of type implying history movement, this previous slope a gravitational with all seated and slope areas trimlines rock in glacial catastrophic glacial occurred above nine just by occurred of failures that out debuttressed failures, Eight slopes then erosion. and oversteepened catastrophic deformation, were recent slope glacial gravitational between near avalanches observed rock rock and trimlines active slides, contain features, rock fall, and movement slope oversteepening show deep-seated volcanics erosional Quaternary weak significant trimlines. the in Age and Ice carved Little type Valleys retreat below scour rock glacial glacial of to extent to according response appreciably varies landslide bedrock The o ml n nemdaesz adlds( landslides intermediate-size and small For nerto fteae eo h etftln in line best-fit the below area the of Integration 20,p 0) h concluded: who 201), p. (2004, . 3 tal et a ... 1 3 05 o MC umdars all across Summed MMVC. for 2005) . km a infcn pta soito a also was association spatial Significant 2 1 hstedndto aei about is rate denudation the thus , tal et h ocnccmlxhsa area an has complex volcanic The . 2 ,or3mma 8 iei entmeauein temperature mean in rise C 97.Oraayi confirms analysis Our 1997). . 1 vrgdoe the over averaged tal et 2002, . tal et B 10 7 . Downloaded By: [Friele, Pierre] At: 20:18 22 February 2008 oso ie h aibe sdi uniaierisk quantitative in used of variables assessment are: The Fell an analysis life. to follows of analysis valley our loss restrict Lillooet We of (2005). residents risk landslide characterise to to use we methodology The Methodology assessment risk shallow Quantitative of sign a 5), adjustments. crustal associated (Figure and activity massif magmatic beneath earthquakes Meager risk small This the frequent past. the by in reinforced that to is similar remain to likely is E V P P P past. recent the of 10 that than larger than, landslides greater However, or to, similar cu,temxmmvlm ftelnsiewould 10 landslide of order the the of of volume be maximum the occur, 98 stntmstesz fte17 okavalanche rock 1975 the of size the (1.2 (Read times area ten source is potential 1978) The 2002). Kooj Lambert der and (van measurements interferometric SAR 1 of on by flows. rates settlement underlain and shows area is rocks This that pyroclastic Creek altered Devastation basin, the hydrothermally on of Creek kilometres square side particular Job several east of Of the area Meager. an Mount of is concern Pylon of Creek, slope flank and east the Devastation edifice Devastator including the of The future and of side of Peak, flanks east the sites at the including elsewhere likely are and most basins collapse these The in MMVC. unstable edifice exist generate Job of still to masses and relief collapse sufficient Large Devastation with rock 1). Angel, volcanic (Figure the basins in Creek rocks hydrothermally are altered MMVC at collapses volcanoes edifice major at rocks collapse edifice altered past. (Finn for the potential hydrothermally of the those and create by reduced lithified been Poorly events has one such future for the and potential in 2002), the whether (Siebert question debris might unstable of volumes ieyfrlse,prilclass nsmay the summary, In (10 collapses. large for partial potential lesser, for likely T:S S:H LOL lmn fcnen nti ae,tenme of number risk. the at paper, potentially location; this lives that in at concern; hazard of function the element a of is intensity risk which the at hazard, of element the the by should affected life be of loss of likelihood Meager Lake; Mount Lillooet area, between and hazard valley the Lillooet occupies as risk defined at element percentage the the time i.e. of impact; of probability temporal the reach risk; will at individual; event element an the for that life probability of spatial loss of probability annual 10 tal et 7 m 01 ibr 02.Tesucso the of sources The 2002). Siebert 2001, . 3 ,tu fctsrpi alr eeto were failure catastrophic if thus ), 8 7 m Á 10 3 oue f10 of Volumes . 8 m 3 adldsa MMVC at landslides ) 7 Á SLRD RegularMeeting Agenda,April28,2008 m mya based cm/year 2 3 eoehuge remove 6 Á 10 8 m tal et 3 Page 46 of204 are Georisk . ilotvle Tbe3 iue6,tu h risk the 8 class thus For only. 6), classes event Figure events, these to 3; refers (Table analysis valley Lillooet pta rbblt fipc (P impact of probability Spatial 0.0006. and 0.0004 respectively, correspond- are, the values events, ing 9 class for respectively; 0.005, as: niae hta10 a that indicates ersfos(lse 8 (classes flows nominal Jakob debris a from (Simpson is taken ing (Friele class 3), evidence Field whereas (Table (2005). event, category an ‘event magnitude of distinguish the to refers we volume magnitude class’; discussion, ‘event from magnitude’ following the In oso iet nidvda ( of individual risk an to Annual life threshold. of risk homemaker. loss tolerable or socially or some farmer to accepted compared a generally is Pemberton, rural risk a of Individual as in much or, for invalid such home an be area to could the close person or This at to time. closest the is living who related someone hazard typically the is to risk, at customarily most groups. individuals person for or to individuals for Risk quantified be can Risk fLloe aly u easm htteei a is there ( that impact assume of we chance but remote areas valley, settled impact Lillooet directly of to unlikely is flow debris eut niaeta nteaeaecs h 10 the case average LA- the the in that using indicate estimated results Iverson were by developed 6) model HARZ Figure 3; (Simpson (Table volume of different distances of travel flows and debris areas inundation of Modeling rbblt ftehzr (P hazard the of Probability Parameterisation scenario. hazard separate each a hazard, forms same which the from of accumu- of paper, this classes risk in magnitude the as different or, example, hazards for different from risks, lated partial of sum an On consideration. ( and atclrhzr rsieo aad gis the Fell against to according hazards defined, an of is a on fatalities from suite of deaths number or expected more or hazard one of particular of number plotting frequency large by annual estimated a is the of risk Group death 2006). simultaneous (Ale than people life the of of loss is individual it of tolerant more is Society E n hi unrblt ( vulnerability their and ) N stepouto h ubro lmnsa risk at elements of number the of product the is P H(min) P LOL F tal et and P P 06 hwta nytelargest the only that show 2006) . 8 H H m P H(max) 3 F/N P P ersfo ol utreach just would flow debris Á S S )rahstldaesof areas settled reach 9) : : H H lt h oa iki the is risk total the plot, P H V tal et r ae s001and 0.001 as taken are P ) LOL tal et P P otehzr under hazard the to ) S:H T S:H T : : S 20) as: (2005), . S a eformulated be can ) 05 n model- and 2005) . ; ) F/N tal et .1.Modeling 0.01). V : lt where plot, 19) The (1998). . tal et 2006) . 7 m ( ( 55 2 1 F 3 ) ) Downloaded By: [Friele, Pierre] At: 20:18 22 February 2008 56 eprlpoaiiyo mat(P impact of probability Temporal 4). (Table flows debris 9 class for 1.0 to 0.1 and ils hl hlrncmuediyt colin school to daily Thus, commute or home Pemberton. children the in while time their fields, spend majority residents the adult agricultural; the is of area This area. impacted n oksho oal,ad5%cmuediyout daily commute live 50% 50% and locally, Lacking assume work/school workers, and we Whistler. statistics, to sector occupational daily service detailed commute whom and farmers, of by residents, some occupied nation flows areas debris first 9 reaching Class farther, 0.8. is travel individual average the for low as ( represent impact we Centre). of Geoscience Pacific which probability Canada, Resources Meadows, (Natural 2005 and Pemberton 1970 between Meager Mount at activity Seismic 5. Figure P lwwudrahLloe ae( Lake Lillooet reach would flow ntecs fcas8dbi lw,tetemporal the flows, debris 8 class of ( probability case the In ihtecide tsho ih or e day, per children, hours two eight risk. school and at at adults most children two person the of the with family for 0.9 a of Assuming value a assigned S:H agsfo .1t . o ls ersflows debris 8 class for 0.1 to 0.01 from ranges P T:S shg o h naie ato the of part inhabited the for high is ) P T:S P o ls ersfosis flows debris 8 class for S:H .) 10 A 0.1). T:S P SLRD RegularMeeting Agenda,April28,2008 S:H ) 9 .) Thus, 1.0). m 3 debris .Friele P. P Page 47 of204 T:S tal. et hra e oe ofr ote20ya flood 200-year the 1 is to which conform floodplain, level, the the homes in on new directly homes whereas built Older typically were volcano. valley Meager Mount from ftevle n r bet1 or e day. per hours 12 absent are and valley the of iedbi hes2 sheets debris wide impact withstand lead to could that death. building to damage a structural of incurring without ability impact, of the intensity the and of building, poorly location a are the within example uncertainty, that individuals for parameters of variable, highly by degree or affected known large is it a because has estimate Any flood. vulnerability debris like- impacted or of be the flow site debris or as a building by vulnerability directly a should define death of we lihood study, this For Vulnerability 0.9 0.7 is be value to average assumed the 0.5, is 4). is valley (Table commuters the for in and staying those rligi ilotvle a ouetdvalley- documented has valley Lillooet in Drilling Á bv h lopan ls 8 class A floodplain. the above m 2 Á hc,32 thick, m 8 Á 5k downstream km 55 P T:S for Downloaded By: [Friele, Pierre] At: 20:18 22 February 2008 eiiglwraduprbounds, upper and by estimate lower vulnerability events. defining the 9 into class built for is certain more Uncertainty is in death ground Some but higher valley, debris. reaching the climbing or by in trees flow standing debris buried large homes 8 into class be of a their survive or might occupants outside people drown debris; caught likely watery people would with and fill buildings or collapse flow. the be by uprooted would transported trees of forces and thousands impact of hundreds The by valley. increased the in buildings 3 of velocities on t ees(Major on Helens to deposits snowmelt-generated St. avalanche up Mount for rock kilometres liquefied inferred velocities, and of flows been higher debris tens have Much many m/s, m/s source. 12 4 their to from up of velocities and old both impact homes. probably new would flow debris 9 or ihaseii rvt f1.2 of gravity flow specific debris a or hyperconcentrated 3 with and A area Pemberton. Meadows at Pemberton 10 upper of velocities the have in can paper this in concern loigfrsm osblt fsurvival, of possibility some for Allowing 10 nnae ssalrta utdfrtersetv ievlaosi ao 20)det h aea osritadteLloe aea the at Lake Lillooet the and event. constraint single lateral a the in to inundated due be (2005) can Jakob that in area volcanoes maximum size the respective define the which for quoted mouth, than smaller is inundated lwcasVlm (m Volume valley. class River flow Lillooet along flow debris Debris volcanic large of Consequences 3. Table 2 1 fe ao 20) oeta h nnainae sdrvdeprclyfo Iverson Simpson from after empirically results derived Modeling is area inundation the that Note (2005). Jakob After 910 710610 810 ne h cnro ulnd ulig would buildings outlined, scenarios the Under yecnetae lw rmvlaoshave volcanoes from flows Hyperconcentrated Á 5ms ol eto otresidential most destroy would m/s, 15 8 7 6 5 Á Á Á Á 10 10 10 10 10 9 9 8 7 6 3 ) discharge 3 3 3 3 3 tal et tal et 10 10 10 10 10 20) ae nIverson on based (2006), . Peak 05.Teeet of events The 2005). . 7 6 5 4 3 Á Á Á Á Á 3 3 3 3 3 1 Á (m .,taeln at travelling 2.3, 10 10 10 10 10 SLRD RegularMeeting Agenda,April28,2008 V 3 /s) 8 7 6 5 4 min and 3 3 3 2 Inundation area Á V 10 Á 5m/s 15 10 10 10 min 6m/s V 9 Á 8 7 6 1 max Page 48 of204 Á Á Á 3 3 (m 3 3 3 tal et is Georisk . 2 10 10 oeta consequences Potential ) 10 10 10 (1998). . 10 10 9 8 7 eeomn n 10 and development h ag fana adld ikt nindividual 5 an is to valley risk Lillooet landslide in annual residing of risk range at The most individuals to Risk evaluation Risk aindniyo 2 persons/km 125 popu- of (average density respectively lation residents, and 1000 and Pemberton 3800 55 2006). Currie, Mount communication, personal iklvlt e10 be tolerable to this level defined have risk Australia, England in and Governments Kong, 4). Hong (Table year per deaths o e eeomn (Fell development new for ino bu 0 epe(vrg ouaindensity population popula- (average persons/km people 5 a 200 has about and of tion agricultural primarily is Pem- volcano, 32 densities. population Meadows, into different berton divided with be can zones valley two Lillooet of area settled The value risk at Element sue ob . o ls ersfo n . for 0.9 and flow. flow debris debris 8 9 class class a a for 0.5 be to assumed 05.FrLloe aly niiulrs su o5.4 to up is risk individual valley, Lillooet For 2005). ontemfo h volcano. the 32 from deposits flow downstream debris three of deposits documents ilotRvrvle,taeln 20 travelling entire valley, the River inundate Lillooet would flows debris indicates Modeling atadcmlt etuto vrhnrd fkm of hundreds over destruction complete and Vast km 100 to up valleys downstream. large km inundate 15 Could River surges Lillooet muddy reached caused flow and debris Devastation confluence. 1931 km river The 5 Meager-Lillooet to the up from travel downstream flows debris for flows. indicates potential hyperconcentrated Modeling the and km with floods of rivers outburst tens large destructive several dam to and up size, fans in or valleys. valleys Lillooet obliterate are upper Could events and indicates Meager km Modeling to of rivers. tens confined dam several and to size up fans in or valleys obliterate Could okonevents. known No ersfosmyrahusra iiso settlement. of limits upstream reach may indicates flows Modeling debris flows. outburst hyperconcentrated destructive and for potential floods the with rivers large dam rmMutMae oLloe Lake. Lillooet to Meager Mount from 2 Sums-ilotRgoa District, Regional (Squamish-Lillooet ) tal et 19) tLloe ie aly h area the valley, River Lillooet At (1998). . Á 5k ontem aeabout have downstream, km 75 4 Á V nulpoaiiyfrexisting for probability annual 5k ontemfo the from downstream km 55 5 max nulpoaiiyo death of probability annual sasge au f1.0. of value a assigned is tal et Á 5k downstream km 75 2 05 Leroi 2005, . 10 ). 2 1 il evidence Field 6 o5.0 to 2 nsz,and size, in 2 Á 0km 50 tal et 10 2 . 2 57 2 2 2 4 . Downloaded By: [Friele, Pierre] At: 20:18 22 February 2008 58 aadaewti h ag htsceycntolerate; can reduced; society that be range the within possible, are hazard acceptable’ wherever ‘broadly should, hazard etbeb oit n eur iiain a o as low ‘as practical’ mitigation; require reasonably and society by ceptable 07.TeFNpo ssbiie nofu zones: four into subdivided is plot ‘unacceptable’ F-N The 2007). cetnei utai,teUie igo,and (Fell Kingdom, Canada gaining United in are the recently that 7). Australia, (Figure criteria in graph evaluation F-N acceptance shows the on 7 pairs debris Figure f-N each for as quantified class was flow 4) (Table risk Societal groups to Risk levels. acceptable than estimated higher have times 36 we ade- to values without up risk are thus, the and mitigation, higher, quate one magnitude is risk of acceptable reduc- order the development, risk reasonably new additional For as tion. low encouraging ‘as while of apply, practical’, principle The not law. the common does encodes Anglo-Saxon latter practical’ to reasonably contrary is as which Netherlands low principle the ‘as the than however, of in Netherlands, higher the times individuals In 2005). 54 (Ale for to jurisdic- up risk is the acceptable and for above, levels cited acceptable tions than higher times 10 The (Iverson Simpson al software of et LAHARZ (after with flows out carried areas from was debris Modeling modelled source flows volcanic different debris of four from averaged distances sizes, different Travel 6. Figure h et.Dsacsdmraenihoho boundaries: neighborhood demarcate 32 Distances delta. the eiet.Pplto siae rvddb Squamish- by provided District. Regional estimates Lillooet Population residents. with 65 fringe and immediate residents; and 3800 Pemberton of municipality km, Á 5k,PmetnMaoswt 0 eiet;55 residents; 200 with Meadows Pemberton km, 55 98 n sbsdo lyrc,vlai ersflows. debris volcanic clay-rich, on based is and 1998) . 9 m 3 vn ece ilotLk L) emntn at terminating (LL), Lake Lillooet reaches event Á ik r eeal osdrdunac- considered generally are risks Á 5k,odMutCri ih1000 with Currie Mount old km, 75 Á Á h nrmna ik rma from risks incremental the nrmna ik rma from risks incremental tal et 05 Porter 2005; . SLRD RegularMeeting Agenda,April28,2008 tal et 2006). . tal et .Friele P. Page 49 of204 Á 65 . tal. et rcie uha a aey(NOD,flood (ANCOLD), installations safety hazardous of dam geoscience construction establi- and and as hazards, engineering been such of have fields practice, other risk for acceptable shed of Definitions standards acceptance risk Global was and zone runout the (Porter damaged of partially edge house only a the their at because is located injury and was exception severe couple a escaped An where baby Vancouver, their fatal. North in generally flow debris is by British impact flows of in direct that flows debris Experience shown debris has structures. of however, effects Columbia, on the sizes for due data different estimate to of variable scarcity difficult to most the Vulnerability perhaps time. is with other change all and factors homes only demographic of querying occupancy would because by temporary improvement Temporal be the improved estimates. although be households, runout could of probabilities limits and/or models confidence different dating apply More could quantifiable. which readily analyses on results, not to detailed is modeling that deposits, error on ability some reliance and have flow an on spatial and debris on control, of map depend accuracy accurately and probabilities precision and temporal hazard The increase Discovery only risk. census. would good is events a it additional developed and of a 2007), have Evans we and persist likely (Guthrie deposits large, landscape and the are scars in their these and as events reasonable, formative appears flows debris 4). to (Table are risk groups minimum for and parameter, they individuals of each both for estimation herein values maximum judgemental and and in by quantified assessments, captured precisely risk be can landslide uncertainties all Not uncertainties General Discussion be can risk re- level. where ‘acceptable’ by the areas to encouraged to reduced be Simi- development plot. should stricting F-N avoidance as low the risk ‘as of the larly, region measures to risk practical’ reduce Mitigation reasonably to aim is standards. therefore valley should based international Lillooet flows debris in 9 and on groups 8 class to both The for risk 7. be unacceptable Figure that on class point shows each a than plot for rather zone risk a as the plotted that require consequence required. is consideration careful but low is life of loss region’ scrutiny ‘intense and netit ntehzr ee o ls n 9 and 8 class for level hazard the in Uncertainty and hazards both in uncertainties study, this In Á h oeta o large for potential the tal et 2007). . Downloaded By: [Friele, Pierre] At: 20:18 22 February 2008
Table 4. Individual and group risk matrices for residents of Lillooet River valley. See text for details.
Individual most at risk
3 Volume (m )PH(Min) PH (max) PS:H (min) PS:H (max) PT:S Vmin Vmax ERL(min) RL(max) Factor* (min) Factor (max) 107 to 108 0.001 0.005 0.01 0.1 0.9 0.5 1 1 0.000005 0.0005 0.05 4.5 108 to 109 0.0004 0.0006 0.1 1 0.9 0.9 1 1 0.000032 0.0005 0.32 5.4
Group risk F PH PS:H PT:S N V E
3 Volume (m )PH (min) PH (max) PS:H (min) PS:H (max) PT:S F (min) F (max) Vmin Vmax Emin Emax N(min) N(max) 107 to 108 0.001 0.005 0.01 0.1 0.8 0.000008 0.000400 0.5 1 20 200 10 200 108 to 109 0.0004 0.0006 0.1 1 0.7 0.000028 0.000420 0.9 1 200 5000 180 5000
SLRD RegularMeeting Agenda,April28,2008 min max
F, N 100 0.000041 0.00127 F, N 101 0.000036 0.000820 F, N 102 0.000028 0.000420
4 Page 50 of204 ‘‘Factor’’ is the ratio of the minimum and maximum risk to the risk acceptance criterion of 10 for existing development. If the number exceeds 1.0, the risk is deemed unacceptable. Accordingly,
only the upper range indicates that risk to individuals for class 8 and 9 debris flows is unacceptable. Georisk eeoe ol,lreybcuers tolerance risk because largely world, developed warranted. thresh- appears environ- risk hazards natural the of for and application olds safety and human establishment to societal ment, risk decreasing of With rare. tolerance residen- are to developments applications tial and natu- hazards, for occurring thresholds rally risk countries few acceptable a established only have However, profit. clients to a their earning for risk while coverage calculate insurance adequate routinely provide (Kendall underwriters plants power Insurance nuclear as such 7. Figure HEciei) h attrelnssprt h unaccep- the zone. Britain separate ALARP the lines and from three zone last table Denmark, The criteria). criteria), (HSE (VROM text. the in Netherlands discussed as calculations, incor- F/N risk uncertainties the the are into reflecting results porated circles The massif. shaded practical’. Meager reasonably as Mount as plotted the low from ‘as flows is debris ALARP 9 and 8 class ikacpac hehlsdfe hogotthe throughout differ thresholds acceptance Risk hehl ie r hw o ogKn,the Kong, Hong for shown are lines threshold F/N ltfrscea iki ilotvle for valley Lillooet in risk societal for plot tal et 1977). . 59 Downloaded By: [Friele, Pierre] At: 20:18 22 February 2008 60 ikb e ta nulpoaiiyo 10 of probability annual an at set individual be for BGC thresholds risk by the recommendation that British (2006) a in Engineering case, management that risk In hazard landslide Columbia. in both precedent a includes con- 3). (Table which a consequences on and risk, 2) based (Table been of Deve- not 1993). sideration have Cave decisions 1973; lopment recognised (Berger only with frequency considering by hazard areas made been in have hazards geologic decisions the land-use In- or specifically. stead, general District in Regional Columbia yet Squamish-Lillooet British not for have defined landslides been for criteria Columbia risk British in Quantitative policies risk and hazard Landslide 2005). (Ale situations idatlrbers ii o oso ieo 10 of life of loss for limit risk only tolerable a fied acceptable be Safety and would (Heath 1989). standard Executive flows British the for debris to risk according The 8 of flows. residents debris 9 by class class faced western from Hong risk valley the and Lillooet all by Australia exceeded as are in well Kong, as thresholds countries, Environment of European orders However, by and differs 2003) magnitude. Planning (Suddle Britain Use and 1988), of risk Land (Ministry example, Netherlands Housing, the For Denmark, country. in to tolerance country from differs nu o xsigstain n 10 and situations existing for annum or slopes existing 10 on and risk developments at most individuals for year ehrad,teacpal iklmti 10 is limit risk acceptable the Netherlands, iiso et f10 of death docu- Risk’ of a of lities in ‘Tolerability risk titled acceptable ment defined (1988) slopes Executive natural interim on Administrative landslides an for (Leroi on limits Special same adopted, the Kong basis, has Government Hong Regional The ments. ofodn,eoin adsi raaace.I the If avalanche’. or slip subject land be erosion, to the expected flooding, be considers to reasonably officer or approving subject, the land approve Land ‘if to The refusing subdivision for a Charter. provisions Govern- Community contains Local Act the Title the and Act, Act, Title ment Land the by governed as deaths of number 7. the Figure and in between deaths relation of the of frequency from the quantified District is the groups to by risk basis (Porter interim Vancouver an North on adopted was xsigdvlpetad10 and development existing eetaftllnsiei ot acue set Vancouver North in landslide fatal a recent A h utainGoehnc oit a speci- has Society Geomechanics Australian The eieta eeomn nBiihClmi is Columbia British in development Residential tal et 05.BiansHat n Safety and Health Britain’s 2005). . 4 5 e nu o e develop- new for annum per n nuyo 10 of injury and tal et 07.Scea ikor risk Societal 2007). . 5 o e development new for Á SLRD RegularMeeting Agenda,April28,2008 nulprobabi- annual 6 5 o new for nthe In . 5 4 4 .Friele P. Page 51 of204 per per for tal. et h otx fteLloe ie valley: River Lillooet the in of on apropos context 231) particularly the seems p. failure (2002, edifice Siebert volcanic of comment following The Conclusions to standards those risk. jurisdic- used landslide or successfully manage acceptance have countries risk that those tions with in risk developed on standards existing based ‘safe’ of define perform comparisons and can analyses practitioners risk texts, quantitative reluctant legal their are tolerance replace amend makers risk to law quantitative to if of set Alternatively, changed a standards. by be ‘safe’ word legislation the We that interpretation. personal encourage to open is documents and legal defined not most interpretation. is to and ‘safe’ open Third, therefore word assessment. the such importantly, be a may for training expe- their thus inadequate claim though even can engineer’, expertise, geoscientists or rience or ‘geotechnical engineers official of a no variety is of there by Second, report designation needed. a is that professional recognise to a skilled needs sufficiently officer be approving to the First, provisions. these of safely’. occur indicates may professional of development qualified assessment that suitably an a by where is land and the there available, where land guidelines], other those no [of 3.3 Section alluvial granted, in for be fan established may as requirements develop although prone standard to areas with ‘consent that, in flows, debris discouraged states to be Bylaw should Exemptions) Local Floodplain development or The 910, the 56). (Section Variances Local and (Section Act 920) the Charter Government and land. Community in 919.1 the BC (Section appear of Act statements Government use vague intended’. restricting more Similarly use or that one covenants the stipulate for certify also registered safely may to office used approving be The required may geo- land is in profes- ‘the experienced a engineering by geoscientist report technical or a engineer doubt, in sional is officer approving oiia n cnmcpolm,ee o shorter for severe efforts. produce even mitigation can problems, hazard term eruption) economic an and (or of eruption political absence given a the during in occur whether will anticipating failure of precludes edifice difficulty The potentially areas. effectively of occupancy affected restricts at often that avalanches zoning hazard of volcanoes risk. rate within avalanches recurrence individual population low debris dense the of volcanic However, areas of large mobility places high The h alr odfn sfl’lae l h quoted the all leaves ‘safely’ define to failure The efficacy the on doubt cast that arise issues Three Downloaded By: [Friele, Pierre] At: 20:18 22 February 2008 loo concern. are of failure, although catastrophic also of which precursor a 1996), necessarily deep-seated Evans not of and slopes signs (Bovis show steep movement floor some valley the addition, that caused bordering and In floods levees, Lillooet of damage. and history in significant banks long river hazards a overtopped several has have of valley The one flows, valley. only debris on are only is focuses which it valley because analysis, risk Lillooet in flows groups debris unacceptable. and individuals volcanic esti- to we risk from existing analyses, the the and that in mate reason- included developed with uncertainties and internationally standards, able acceptance Using risk applied people. thousands possibly or the of hundreds of by kill preceded much would not destroy if warnings, and, would valley Lillooet that in gen- flow development has ex- would debris that probably means a largest Holocene erate the no the as by during large rock occurred as is of landslide landslides A supply hausted. large of the for history and available well-documented volcanism, and a instability has Meager Mount ffodli osrcinlvl n ye,t a to types, and system. warning levels flow construction debris specification of that floodplain and valley, spectrum covenants of the a in restrictive development include from regulate stake- could ranging all risk to policy measures, meaningful acceptable The a is holders. increase, that develop to policy should continues management As valley agencies reserve). the (re- these native of Affairs Currie population Mount Northern the the the and and for Indian Pemberton, sponsible Regional of of Squamish-Lillooet Municipality Department the the with in rests District, risk public makers and hazards and policy enhance natural Pemberton, of Currie to Meadows, Mount informing Pemberton used for of responsibility residents base it Nevertheless, because tax development services. may the promoting they in increases stake Further, a properly strategies. have implement to to mitigation and resources risk, effective and and hazards existing lack expertise evaluate commonly technical agencies the to These district hazard regional municipalities. responsibility acceptable to and responsibility of the this public levels transferring provincial by of enforce the BC and itself the determine consult 2004, freed In may hazard. government the and by in issues affected assessments legal and social, their political, into regulators consider input and also society, one will Owners, only process. decision is the assessment risk quantitative Fell comprehensive a be to intended not is paper Our tal et 20)hv one u hta that out pointed have (2005) . SLRD RegularMeeting Agenda,April28,2008 Page 52 of204 Georisk taeyadlandfo h itito North of District the from experience. similar learned Vancouver’s a adopted and governments desirable strategy and be districts tolerance would North It other risk Council. if of recommend District the to District mem- to created criteria community the been of at has force bers task way a under where Vancouver, is process Such policy. a management a risk implement flow scientists this and debris establish reasonable For between no to hazard. dialogue bodies took government identified a and they an encourage of we because face reason, arise, the that held in action be losses In could for function’. authorities liable regulatory government the words, reasonable of other exercise performance to arises between in care the care of proximity then duty plaintiff, a sufficient complai- the say courts is and nature authority there the government the and of is of, harm those it ned cause of legislation, might performance by negligent powers the mandated that or foreseeable power firm the discretionary of their exercise is law of the exercise whether the the powers, in regulatory Quoting ‘If (2007): Urquhart duties. per- Singleton for negligently regulatory framework for a formed Supreme liability established The government has valley. evaluating Canada Lillooet of in Court risks now-quantified the and ignore hazards they if liability significant RainierPilot/Pilot_highlight.html). (http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/About/ Highlights/ Rainer A detected. Mount operational is is at flows flow debris detecting debris for automatic system significant similar an a trigger when and notice data incoming the would the software to Special analyse adjacent hall. fire possibly staffed Pemberton, continuously manage- in emergency centre an ment at stations base- located duplicate all computers to radio station from by transmitted Data be then computer. vibrations would base-station radioed When are a data to the vibrations. and thresholds, frequency, programmed ground exceed amplitude, of the duration data records a and that geophone a logger of consist the Each would River. station below Lillooet AFM and floodplain Creek (AFM) River Meager of monitor Lillooet confluence the at flow on could acoustic landslides stations and large system Meager record warning severe Mount to A seismographs rainfall, hazards, avalanches. include natural heavy and other tsunami, British winds, of in include variety used including a widely for are manage- Columbia risk systems and Warning hazard ment. requirement long-term minimum responsible the be for may system mitigation. warning active to A itself lend not does valley Lillooet prvn uhrte a xoetesle to themselves expose may authorities Approving in flow debris possible largest the Unfortunately, 61 Downloaded By: [Friele, Pierre] At: 20:18 22 February 2008 62 vn,SG,18.Arc vlnh rmtepa of peak the from avalanche rock A 1987. S.G., Evans, elgs ..adGlet . 94 eietsuc and source Sediment 1994. 1977. R., Gilbert, M., and J.R. Ronayne, Desloges, and M., Fougberg, F., Decker, 1983. S.A.S., Croft, Woods- and V.N., Rampton, S.G., Evans, J.J., Clague, devel- for thresholds acceptability Hazard 1993. P., Cave, of comparison a acceptable: or Tolerable 2005. B.J.M., Ale, References reviewer. Christophe anonymous by an review and careful Bonnard from McNeely benefited Laboratory). Roger has Radiocarbon paper by Canada The of provided of Sonic Survey were Many by (Geological Ltd. ages out Services radiocarbon carried Drilling was the Geotech Drilling clearing and for rigs. Ltd. and drill Drilling properties the their Beks for on John drill snow Vanloon, and to Menzel, us Niel allowing Bob Vanloon, for Ronayne, John Jack Miller, Black, Bruce Stephen thank We Acknowledgements atr .. 92 xlrto nteLloe River Lillooet the in Exploration 1932. N.M., Carter, debris 1998 30, July The 2000. M., Jakob, and M. Bovis, deformations Extensive 1996. S.G., Evans, and M.J. Bovis, manage- risk landslide Berkley 2006. for Engineering, reasons BGC Planner: Mr. and law The 1973. T., Berger, Canada Columbia. British Meager, Mount h otlca eietr eodo ilotLake, Lillooet of Columbia. record British sediments: sedimentary lake postglacial glacial the from inferences hydroclimatic settlement Ltd. a Printing of Hemlock history the Pemberton: Columbia. British of sity Columbia British Valley, Creek Ca- western the tephras, 1179. for River estimates Bridge nada. age and Improved River White 1995. G.J., worth, Branch, 1992-15. Co- Survey File British Geological Open Columbia government, British local lumbia. by approvals opment the and Kingdom United the in Netherlands. regulation risk Watershed. Sciences Earth Mount of Columbia. Creek, Journal British dian Capricorn Complex, at Volcanic dam Meager landslide and flow 163 Canada. Columbia, southwest Mountains, North British Coast southern in of slopes rock of District the by for prepared Canada. BC, Inc. Report Vancouver, assessment. Engineering risk BGC 1 phase ment: 1973. August 23 Action X4042, Columbia, No. British of Court Supreme judgment. Á 182. aainJunlo at Sciences Earth of Journal Canadian ae 71,929 87-1A, Paper , aainApn Journal Alpine Canadian ikAnalysis Risk tblt seseto h Capricorn the of assessment Stability ora fHydrology of Journal Á 5() 231 (2), 25 , 934. niern Geology Engineering 7 1321 37, , hss(S) Univer- (BSc). Thesis . elgclSre of Survey Geological SLRD RegularMeeting Agenda,April28,2008 1 8 21, , unb,BC: Burnaby, . Á 5,375 159, , Á 241. 1334. Á 2 1172 32, , 18. Cana- Á .Friele P. 44, , 393. Page 53 of204 Á tal. et vn,SG,19.Ftllnsie n adld ikin risk landslide and landslides Fatal 1997. S.G., Evans, vn,SG,20.Landslides. 2001. S.G., Evans, ree ..adCau,JJ,20.LreHlcn land- Holocene Large 2004. J.J., Clague, and P.A. Friele, 2001. M., Deszcz-Pan, and T.W., Sisson, C.A., Finn, A 2005. E., Leroi, and S., Lacasse, K.K.S., Ho, R., Fell, uhi,RH n vn,SG,20.Aayi flandslide of Analysis 2004. S.G., Evans, and R.H. Guthrie, M., Stasiuk, and K., Simpson, J.J., Clague, P.A., Friele, landslide Volcanic 2006. J.J., Clague, and P.A. Friele, vn,SG n eGaf .. 05 Preface. 2005. J.V., Graff, De and S.G. Evans, change climate Recent 1994. J.J., Clague, and S.G. Evans, iko,CJ,19.Caatro ocns,volcanic volcanism, of Character 1994. C.J., Hickson, om . oi,MJ,adJkb . 04 h landslide The 2004. M., Jakob, and M.J., Bovis, K., Holm, 1989. Executive, Safety and Health 1988. Executive, Safety and Health persistence, Work, 2007. S.G., Evans, and R.H. Guthrie, assessment Canada. uvyo aaa ultn58 43 548, Bulletin Canada Canada, in of hazards Survey geological of synthesis ldsfo yo ek otwsenBiihColum- British southwestern bia. Peak, Pylon from slides volcano. Rainier Nature Mount at zones hy- altered collapse-prone drothermally of measurements Aerogeophysical Management Risk Landslide manage- and assessment ment. risk landslide for framework vii America, rqece n hrceitc nantrlsystem, natural Landforms a Columbia. in British coastal characteristics and frequencies Holocene Colum- on British valley, bia. volcano River quaternary Lillooet in a sedimentation of Impact 2005. Con- Geotechnical Canadian Annual 59th ference the of Columbia. ings British Meager, Mount at hazards aatohclnsie:efcs curne n me- and occurrence, chanics effects, landslides: Catastrophic n aatohcgoopi rcse nmountain in processes environments. geomorphic catastrophic and 231 British Southwestern region, Cascade Columbia Vancouver Washington the the and of hazards of Columbia end British State. northern arc, risk, magmatic and hazards hazards, industrial major of Office. Stationery vicinity HM London: the in planning hnigadrteti otwsenBiihColumbia. British Geomorphology glacial southwestern Age in Ice retreat post-Little and thinning to basins alpine of response Office. stations power nuclear from land- of impact geomorphic slides. the events: formative and Á aainJunlo at Sciences Earth of Journal Canadian eietr Geology Sedimentary 250. In rceig fteItrainlCneec on Conference International the of Proceedings Geomorphology 0,600 409, , acue,B,997 BC, Vancouver, , ole,C:TeGooia oit of Society Geological The CO: Boulder, . ...Mne,ed. Monger, J.W.H. : In elgclSre fCnd,Blei 481, Bulletin Canada, of Survey Geological . otra:Blea 185 Balkema, Rotterdam: . 9 1321 29, , .Cue n el eds. Fell, and Cruden R. : Á viii. Geomorphology 7 201 57, , Á 602. Á 1339. 8 266 88, , Á 216. 7,305 176, , at ufc rcse and Processes Surface Earth odn MStationery HM London: . acue,B,3 BC, Vancouver, , In Á 1004. 0 107 10, , ikciei o land-use for criteria Risk ..Bok,ed. Brooks, G.R. : Á elg n geological and Geology 275. h oeaiiyo risk of tolerability The Á Á 322. 80. Á Á 196. 1 165 41, , 128. adld risk Landslide Geological . Proceed- Á Á 25. 182. In A : . Downloaded By: [Friele, Pierre] At: 20:18 22 February 2008 ois . tr,CP,adAln .. 97 Sediment 1997. P.A., Allen, and C.P., Stark, N., Hovius, ao,M,1996. M., Jakob, 1998. J.W., Vallance, and S.P., Schilling, R.M., Iverson, ao,J,Pesn .. n ct,K,20.Dbi flows Debris 2005. K., Scott, and T.C., Pierson, J., Major, flows. debris for classification size A 2005. M., Jakob, ae,MA,18.Rsdnetmso hne stored channel of times Residence 1987. M.A., Madej, 2005. R., McInnes, and R., Fell, Bonnard,Ch., E., Leroi, study Engineering 2001. Ltd., Associates Leidal Wood Kerr Bryan, and G.C., Minor, R.B., Hubbard, H.W., Kendall, sediment and evolution Hillslope 1982. H.M., Kelsey, sediment Holocene 1991. O., Slaymaker, and P. Jordan, 1994. P., Jordan, change climate of Effects 2007. S., Lambert, and M. Jakob, u rmamuti etdrvdb adld map- landslide by derived belt ping. mountain a from flux betv eieto flhriudto hazard lahar-inundation 972 of zones. delineation Objective phenomena eds. Hungr, O. USA. and Washington, Helens, St. Mount at 438. 429 Publication, Sciences Hydrological of Association Univer- State Oregon sity at held Symposium International Geology Engineering coast Columbia. British southern of magnitude, Columbia and British mountains, frequency flow debris eieti ewo re,nrhetr California. northwestern In Creek, Redwood in sediment Manage- Risk Landslide ment on Conference International management. and assessment Risk Vancou- North Band, BC. Indian ver, Currie Mount Diking District, Valley geomorphic, Pemberton investigations. hydrologic, hydraulic Corridor: and River Lillooet for reactor NRC Scientists. the cerned of review study a safety reactors: power nuclear 1977. W.M., Tech- 86 General PNW-141, Station Report, nical Experiment Range Northwest and Pacific Forest Service, Forest Basins Agriculture, of Drainage ment Forested in Routing Duzen California. and Van coastal basin, north headwater River, forested a in movement approach. Quaternaire budget a Columbia: sediment British basin, River Lillooet in production and behavior Columbia. dynamic properties Columbia: physical British mountains, review. Columbia. southwestern coastal in British landslides of occurrence the on ..Beschta R.L. : ovli,Oeo,3 Oregon, Corvallis, , Á 984. acue,B,159 BC, Vancouver, , Geology elgclSre fAeiaBulletin America of Survey Geological edleg rxsSrne,685 Praxis-Springer, Heidelberg: . 5 45 45, , abig,M:Teuinfrcon- for union The MA: Cambridge, . opoercadgoehia otoson controls geotechnical and Morphometric no fcnendsinit,terssof risks the scientists, concerned of Union 5 231 25, , ersflw ntesuhr coast southern the in flows Debris hss(h) nvriyo British of University (PhD). Thesis . Á 57. 9 151 79, , tal et ae eore Research Resources Water ersflwpoessadrelated and processes flow Debris Á 234. Á ,eds. ., uut18,International 1987, August 7 Á Á 198. hss(h) University (PhD). Thesis . 96. Á 161. eorpi hsqeet physique Ge´ographie nSdmn Budgets Sediment In rceig fthe of Proceedings SLRD RegularMeeting Agenda,April28,2008 rceig fthe of Proceedings SDepart- US . In .Jakob M. : Á 731. 110, , .In Page 54 of204 Georisk Á atn . od . cwb .. n hrh M., Church, and J.W., Schwab, K., Rood, Y., Martin, oivk-uo,O,17.Gaircue ld near slide caused Glacier 1977. O., Mokievsky-Zubok, of survey Geological 1991. S., McCuaig, and R. McNeely, on .. isn .. n lnj,PN,2005. P.N., Flentje, and R.A., Wilson, A.T., Moon, iro,TC n ct,KM,18.Dwsra dilution Downstream 1985. K.M., Scott, and T.C. Pierson, protec- flood Valley Pemberton 1985. H.H., Nesbitt-Porter, ibr,L,20.Lnsie eutn rmtestructural the from resulting Landslides 2002. L., Siebert, Belt, Garibaldi complex, Meager Mount 1990. P.B., Read, ipo,KA,Saik . hmmr,K,Cau,J.J., Clague, K., Shimamura, M., Stasiuk, K.A., Simpson, 1978. P.B., Read, and S., Fougere, K.W., Savigny, M., Jakob, M., Porter, ude .. 03 oaihi prahfrindividual for approach logarithmic A 2003. S.I., Suddle, 2002. M. Stewart, 1996. C.J., Hickson, and J.K., Russell, M.V., Stasiuk, for Responsibility alert. Client 2007. Singleton-Urquhart, ora fErhSciences Earth of Columbia. the Journal British in Islands, landsliding Charlotte shallow Queen by transfer Sediment 2002. yo ek rts Columbia. Sciences Earth British Peak, Pylon 89-9. Paper Canada, Survey of Geological XXIX. Dates Radiocarbon Canada rceig fteItrainlCneec nLand- on models. Management Conference Risk frequency International slide the landslide of using Proceedings and Developing fadbi o:tasto rmdbi o to flow debris from transition search flow: flow. stream debris hyperconcentrated a of Water Environment, BC. Victoria, of of Branch, Province Management Ministry for Columbia, report Unpublished British study. 1985 tion niern Geology Engineering eds. volcanoes. of failure 167 17, Columbia. British southwestern 603. File Columbia. British ocncdbi osi ebro aly British Valley, catastrophic 679 Pemberton for in Evidence flows Columbia. 2006. debris P.A., volcanic Friele, and Conference ON. Geotechnical Canadian Canada. 60th the Vancouver, urban of North for in management slides Risk flow 2007. N., Morgenstern, ik h aeyindex. safety the risk: Mount of Columbia. eruption British BP Columbia yr British Meager, 2360 terrain: mountainous 486. Bulletin Canada, eruption BP of and Survey 2400 chemistry Geological Colum- behaviour. magma the British between Meager, linkages of Mount bia; of origins products and eruption nature, Distribution, BC. Singleton Vancouver, LLP. client: Law to a from Firm Communication lands. unstable naturally Á 689. 1 1511 21, , Á elgclSceyo mrc,Rvesin Reviews America, of Society Geological 170. aainJunlo at Sciences Earth of Journal Canadian aiebokadahaaacehzrsin hazards avalanche ash and block Dacite elg,Mae re etemlarea, geothermal Creek Meager Geology, 5 1039 15, , Á 1524. elgclSre fCnd,Open Canada, of Survey Geological 209 , In In ..EasadJV DeGraff, J.V. and Evans S.G. : acue,B,681 BC, Vancouver, , Á .BdodadP.H.J.A.M. and Bedford T. : Á 9 189 29, , 1052. hss(S) nvriyof University (MSc). Thesis . 235. Á ruatlglCouncil legal Urquhart ae eore Re- Resources Water aainJunlof Journal Canadian Á esineCanada Geoscience 205. Proceedings Á Canadian Ottawa, , 690. 43, , 63 , Downloaded By: [Friele, Pierre] At: 20:18 22 February 2008 64 alne ..adSot .. 97 h sel mud- Osceola The 1997. K.M., Scott, and J.W. Vallance, a e oi,M n abr,A,20.Rslsof Results 2002. A., Lambert, and M. Kooij, der van eilne,1527 Zeuitlinger, eds. Gelder, van oit fAeiaBulletin America flow. of debris Society clay-rich hazard huge and a sedimentology of implications Rainier: Mount from flow nA aao acue n on egr B.C. Remote and Meager, Geoscience Mount International the and of Vancouver Proceedings of repeat-pass data of volumes InSAR large of analysis and processing Á aeyadreliability and Safety 1534. 0,143 109, , SLRD RegularMeeting Agenda,April28,2008 Á 163. is:Ses& Swets Lisse: . Geological .Friele P. Page 55 of204 tal. et hted .. enls .. n ann .. 2002. A.J., Cannon, and C.J., Reynolds, P.H., Whitfield, hted .. ag .. n ann .. 2003. A.J., Cannon, and J.Y., Wang, P.H., Whitfield, lcrcladEetoisEgnes 1228 Engineers, Electronics and Electrical Symposium Sensing xmlsfo h eri ai,BiihColumbia. Journal British Resources Basin, Water climates: Georgia Canadian future the and from present examples in streamflow Modeling oeigftr temo extremes streamflow future Modeling o osi eri ai,BiihColumbia. Journal British Resources Basin, Water dian Georgia in flows low o.2 e ok nttt of Institute York: New 2. Vol. , 8 633 28, , 7 427 27, , Á 656. Á Á od and floods 1230. Á 456. Cana- To: Regional Board
From: Kimberly Needham, Strategy Planner
Date: April 18, 2008 REPORT Re: Application for a Temporary Use Permit; Canadian Snowmobile Adventures Ltd.; Callaghan Valley; Electoral Area D
Recommendation:
THAT Temporary Use Permit No. 11 be approved and issued to Canadian Snowmobile Adventures Ltd. for a period of one year.
Administrator’s Recommendations:
Voting Rules Who Votes: All; Count: Directors; Decision: Majority
Purpose: To provide the Board with an update and staff recommendations on a Temporary Use Permit (TUP) application for dogsled tour staging and kenneling facilities in the Callaghan Valley.
Background:
On December 19, 2007 Canadian Snowmobile submitted a Temporary Use Permit (TUP) application to allow for dog kenneling and check-in facilities on 0.65 hectares of unsurveyed Crown land in the Callaghan Valley. The subject property is located at kilometer six on the Callaghan Forest Service Road, approximately 1.5 km north of the RMOW boundary. Canadian Snowmobile currently has a snowmobile tour staging area in the Callaghan Valley within the RMOW. They are required to relocate this staging area following the 2007/2008 winter season. The proposed staging area is consistent with the terms of their commercial recreation tenure.
Comments on the proposed TUP (#11) have been received from a variety of Provincial agencies, as well as the RMOW. No significant concerns were raised by the Provincial agencies. RMOW staff indicated that they do not foresee any significant negative impacts resulting from TUP #11. RMOW staff did recommend keeping the dogs and dog operations at least 30 meters away from watercourses and that conditions be put in place to ensure humane dog-handling practices are carried out.
On Feb 25, 2008 the Board directed staff to hold an open house for public review of TUP #11, and also that notice be given that the TUP would be considered at the March Board meeting. A letter outlining Canadian Snowmobile’s green house gas reduction plan was requested, as well as a letter committing to uphold the Callaghan Valley motorised recreation closure.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 56 of 204 - 2 -
On March 13, 2008 an open house was held in Whistler to provide the public with the opportunity to comment on TUP #11. Approximately twenty members of the public attended the open house. A number of concerns were raised by the public, including the lack of a plan for the Callaghan Valley, the unfair playing field that is created by permitting the operation in a prominent location, the noise and smell of the operation, the look of the development, the perception of few development constraints and less public consultation for a TUP as opposed to a rezoning, and adequate care for the dogs.
Canadian Snowmobile responded by saying that their tenure has been in place for roughly fifteen years and are they now required to move their staging area. They would prefer a rezoning that would permit permanent buildings, but under the circumstance plan to construct the best temporary buildings they can while working within the conditions of the TUP.
TUP #11 was brought before the Board on March 31, 2008 for consideration. The Board carried the following motion:
‘THAT the Canadian Snowmobile Adventures Temporary Use Permit No. 11 application be referred to Staff to address community watershed concerns to the extent that they fall within SLRD jurisdiction.’
To address the above motion, and other issues raised by members of the Board and the public, a letter from Canadian Snowmobile is attached, which outlines the following:
1. commitments to reducing green house gas emissions; 2. what Canadian Snowmobile proposes to do to protect the RMOW watershed; 3. a discussion of the company's history of responsible operations; and, 4. how Canadian Snowmobile will address the dog management concerns that have been raised.
Staff Comments:
Staff are satisfied that the conditions of TUP #11 will ensure the proposed development will not affect visual quality as seen from the Callaghan Valley Road and will have minimal impact on the environment. Also, staff feel that the letter submitted by Canadian Snowmobile does demonstrate a commitment to addressing the issues raised at the March Board meeting.
TUPs can be issued for up to two years; however, staff recommend that TUP #11 be issued for a period of one year. This will permit Canadian Snowmobile to continue operating over the 2008/2009 winter season, but give the SLRD opportunity to review the terms of the TUP prior to the 2010 Olympics.
There has been significant concern over the lack of a plan for the Callaghan Valley. Staff recommend that a planning exercise be completed for the Callaghan Valley addressing public access, visual quality, recreation facilities, and other development prior to the 2010 Olympics.
TUP #11 does not create any entitlement or permission for more permanent uses such as a lodge or accommodation.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 57 of 204 - 3 -
Respectfully submitted,
Kim Needham Strategy Planner
Attachments: 1. TUP #11 2. Letter from Canadian Snowmobile Adventures Ltd.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 58 of 204 - 4 -
TEMPORARY USE PERMIT TP NO. 11
ISSUED TO: Canadian Snowmobile Adventures Ltd. 701-4282 Mountain Square Whistler, BC V0N 1B4
1. This Temporary Use Permit is issued subject to compliance with all of the Bylaws of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District applicable thereto, except those specifically varied or supplemented by this Permit.
2. This Temporary Use Permit applies to those lands within the Squamish Lillooet Regional District described below and any and all buildings, structures, and other development thereon: A 0.65 hectare parcel of unsurveyed Crown land 6 kilometers up the Callaghan Forest Service Road, as shown on Schedule A (the ‘Property’).
3. In addition to the existing provisions of Squamish Lillooet Regional District Zoning Bylaw No. 20, 1970 (or any bylaw replacing Bylaw No. 20, 1970) the following uses are permitted:
a) dog sledding; b) temporary buildings (ATCO trailers, a 5th wheel, or other mobile buildings) for a dog kennel facility having up to 45 individual dog kennels; c) supplies storage and a check-in facility; d) portable toilet facility (or similar structure); e) individual sled-dog kennels; and f) unpaved parking areas.
4. Uses permitted under section 3 of this permit shall be subject to the following conditions:
a) no significant cut and fills may be created; b) disturbed sites shall be replanted with naturally occurring vegetation where possible; c) parking areas may not be paved and must be minimized in size to the least amount required for guest and employee parking; d) garbage and other waste shall be managed with bear proof bins; e) fuel storage on the property shall meet the standards specified in the Hazardous Waste Regulation (Environmental Protection Act) to provide protection from spills, vandalism, and fire hazard;
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 59 of 204 - 5 - f) buildings shall be modified to blend into the natural environment to the greatest extent feasible through exterior modifications, including removing the steel/corrugated siding and replacing it with natural wood siding and trim, and screening ancillary structures with vegetation; g) signage shall only be posted on buildings on the Property; h) a minimum ten meter vegetated buffer must be maintained at the top of the road bank to screen all development from view of the Callaghan Forest Service Road; i) on the date of expiry of the temporary use permit the temporary use area shall be free of fuel contamination and restored as nearly as may reasonably be possible to the same condition as it was on the commencement date of the permit; j) all animals are to be secured with a tangle-free chain at least 5 feet in length or kept in an enclosure of a minimum of 75 square feet; k) enclosures must be such that animals have the ability to sit on the top of their enclosure; l) each animal must be kept in a separate enclosure; m) bedding in enclosures shall be changed daily and facilities should be cleaned daily; n) kennel compounds shall have a minimum 6 feet high fence to secure the animals; o) separate pens shall be provided for female dogs in heat and female dogs with litters; p) all dog enclosures shall be maintained such that snow is cleared and the entryways are easily accessible for the animals; q) the dog kennel area and enclosures shall be designed and maintained in consultation with the SPCA.
5. As a condition of the issuance of this Temporary Use Permit, the Regional District is holding security set out below to ensure that development is carried out in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Permit. Should any interest be earned upon the security, it shall accrue to the Permittee and be paid to the Permittee if the security is returned. The condition of posting of the security is that should the Permittee fail to carry out development hereby authorized according to the terms and conditions of this Temporary Use Permit, the Regional District may use the security to carry out the development permitted by this Temporary Use Permit. There is filed accordingly: a) An Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $7,000.00.
6. The land described herein shall be developed in strict accordance with the terms and conditions and provisions of this Temporary Use Permit.
7. This Temporary Use Permit expires on ______.
8. Any application to amend this Temporary Use Permit shall be considered a new application.
9. This Temporary Use Permit is not a building permit.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 60 of 204 - 6 -
AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION PASSED BY THE BOARD
THIS DAY OF 2008.
ISSUED THIS DAY OF 2008.
VALID UNTIL ______.
Paul R. Edgington Chief Administrative Officer
Schedule A to TUP # 11
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 61 of 204 - 7 - Schedule A to TUP 11– Location Maps
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 62 of 204 - 8 -
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 63 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 64 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 65 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 66 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 67 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 68 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 69 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 70 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 71 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 72 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 73 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 74 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 75 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 76 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 77 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 78 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 79 of 204 To: Regional Board
From: Allison Macdonald
REPORT Date: April 22, 2008
Re: BC Transit Annual Operating Agreement Pemberton Transit
Recommendation: THAT the Chair and Chief Administrative Officer be authorized to sign the 2007/08 Pemberton Annual Operating Agreement Amendment #1, 6-month extension, Amended Schedule B and Amended Schedule C, effective October 1, 2007, in order to prevent a disruption of service;
AND THAT the amendment be referred to the other beneficiaries of the service (Village of Pemberton and Mt. Currie) to advise them of the increase.
Administrator’s Comments: concur with recommendation
Implications: General: The agreement has been reviewed by the Policy Research Assistant, who notes that fuel costs have increased by 7% and recommends endorsement.
Financial/Legal: An increase of 3% may require an amendment of the financial plan. Funding for this service is provided by Select funds, the Village of Pemberton and Mt. Currie Band. If funds from Mt. Currie, Village of Pemberton and Select funds cannot cover the increase, the Board would be liable for the shortfall.
Board Policy: None.
Strategic Plan: Public transit is strongly endorsed in the draft Regional Growth Strategy, as well as the Village of Pemberton/Mt. Currie Winds of Change document.
Background: Supporting Documents: Cover letter and one copy of the agreement amendment.
Allison Macdonald Manager of Administrative Services
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 1 Page 80 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 81 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 82 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 83 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 84 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 85 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 86 of 204 To: Regional Board
From: Planning Department
April 15, 2008 REPORT Date:
Re: Planning Department Activity Report March-April 2008
Electoral Area C OCP Review
The Director of Planning and Development attended the April 17th meeting of the Lil’wat Land and Resources Committee. Referral comments have been received by numerous agencies including VoP, Pemberton Valley Dyking District, Ministry of Forests, ALC, MoT, Sunshine Coast RD, ILMB. Staff are waiting for RMOW and hopefully Lil’wat comments.
Electoral Area B OCP Review
Work continues on the first draft of the Electoral Area B OCP bylaw. A meeting was held with a realtor in Lillooet to discuss residential and commercial land supply and development proposals within Lillooet and the Electoral Area. Staff time required to manage rezoning and temporary use permit applications currently underway has resulted in an extended timeline for the Electoral Area B OCP project.
Green River Estates rezoning
The Green River Estates zoning amendment bylaw and phased development agreement have been referred to the Village of Pemberton and Resort Municipality of Whistler, as requested by the Board at their April 14 special meeting. Revised bylaws may come before the Board again in May 2008.
Other Rezoning Applications (to be brought forward shortly)
Work continues on the rezoning application for the industrial site at Rutherford Creek. Lil’wat Nation staff are working with a landscape architect to prepare landscaping and screening drawings. Comments from the Ministry of Transportation on approved access to the site are still pending.
Staff are working with the Ts’kw’aylaxw Nation to move the Sky Blue Water Resort rezoning application forward. On April 9, 2008 staff went on a site visit to the Sky Blue Water Resort and met with the administrator of the Ts’kw’aylaxw Nation and the caretakers of the resort.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 1 Page 87 of 204 Consultants have been hired to address sewage treatment and water quality concerns, archaeological studies, issues regarding density of the development, and contaminated sites legislation.
Staff have been working with an applicant to assess the Molnar property’s subdivision potential near Birkenhead Provincial Park (at Blackwater Creek). A site visit and review of an initial rezoning proposal were carried out. Revisions to the proposal are pending.
Three applications have been received at Britannia Beach – one from the Mining Museum and two from Britannia Bay Properties (upper residential subdivision and commercial proposal for the lower townsite).
Ryan River IPP Environmental Assessment
The first EA meeting is scheduled for April 30th in Vancouver..
Garibaldi at Squamish
The Director of Planning and Development and Director of Utilities and Environmental Services attended a meeting of the GAS water working group on March 26th.
The Director of Planning and Development provided comments to the EAO on the “table of Commitments” being developed in conjunction with the environmental assessment.
The Director of Planning and Development attended a meeting at the RMOW on April 16th with representatives of MTSA, RMOW, Whistler business community representatives and Ford Fricke, a ski industry consultant retained by RMOW to review economic impacts and issues relating to GAS and its implications for Whistler.
The Director of Planning and Development met with DoS staff on April 17th to discuss approaches to concurrent OCP/Zoning review by Squamish and SLRD.
The Planning Department is expecting to receive the EAO “recommendation report” for ministers on April 16th and we will prepare a report for the Board’s consideration at the April meeting.
Sea to Sky LRMP Visual Landscape Management Strategy
On March 27, 2008 the Planner attended the last session of the Sea to Sky LRMP Visual Landscape Management Strategy. At the previous meeting it was noted that lands adjacent to Squamish and the RMOW were designated as areas requiring a higher standard of preservation compared to the lands around Pemberton and Mount Currie. Recommendations resulting from the process are expected to be released in early May 2008.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 2 Page 88 of 204 Air Quality Management Plan
On February 26, 2008, staff met with the Air Quality Coordinating Committee (AQCC) and staff of the Ministry of Environment in Squamish. At the meeting the woodstove exchange program was discussed as well as a number of other environmental initiatives. The budget for the next year was reviewed, with members providing direction as to the most effective use of resources. The AQCC will be hiring an Emissions Reduction Coordinator for the summer to work in the Sea-to-Sky corridor.
Regional Growth Strategy
The draft RGS was referred to all member municipalities for review and comments. Staff are arranging to present the RGS to all member municipalities in order to work out the final details. On March 4th, the first meeting was held with the Village of Pemberton. On March 25th staff met with the District of Squamish and on April 15th a meeting was held at the District of Lillooet. A meeting with the Resort Municipality of Whistler is scheduled for May 5th.
AAC
On April 14, 2008 an AAC meeting was held to discuss a proposed subdivision of the Sabre property near the Pemberton Plateau. The recommendations from this meeting are addressed under separate cover.
Work has begun on a farm bylaw. As part of this project, staff are assessing the feasibility of a ‘farm home plate’ amendment to the zoning bylaw, and looking into a bylaw to regulate the deposit of fill on agricultural land.
Facilitation Seminar
On April 4, 2008 the Planner attended a seminar on facilitation held by the Justice Institute of BC in New Westminster.
Bylaw Enforcement
A complaint was received about a property near Anderson Lake (Area C) that has become unsightly. The Planning Technician conducted a site visit mid-March to determine any bylaw infractions. Pictures of the discarded materials found on the Anderson Lake foreshore were forwarded to the Integrated Land Management Bureau for review. A Crown Land Enforcement Officer will be conducting a site visit shortly.
Follow up was undertaken at the beginning of April for some properties in Area D that have been subject to numerous complaints. The properties have been sent letters in early 2008 and the follow up will see if any clean up has been completed. The majority of the property owners have cleaned up their property and complied with the bylaws. Further consultation with the non- complying residents will be needed. Ongoing education of about the bylaws
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 3 Page 89 of 204 The Planning Technician went up to Pavilion Lake to look at potential zoning bylaw infractions. Letters will be sent to all property owners that are not complying with the bylaws. They will be given time to bring their properties into conformance with the bylaws or face further action from the Planning Department.
The Planning Technician attended the Advanced Bylaw Enforcement & Investigative Skills Level 2 course at the Justice Institute of BC April 7-11th, 2008. The course covered development of policy and procedures, risk management, bylaw drafting, investigative skills and the applicable bylaw enforcement legislation.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 4 Page 90 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 91 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 92 of 204 To: RegionalBoard From: LindaBrown REPORT Date: April3,2008 Re: DepartmentActivityReport Recommendation ThattheRecreationDepartmentactivityreportforApril2008bereceived. Administrator’sComments SpringLeisureGuide PreparationoftheguidearecompleteandcustomermailoutwaspreparedforMarch31st.The guideismailedouttoalladdressesintheVillageofPemberton,Mt.CurrieandAreaC(1550 boxes.RegistrationforprogramscommencinginmidͲAprilhasbegun. FieldBookingsfor2008 The user groups of the fields in Pemberton were called together to determine their requirementsfortheseason,togooverpolicyandprocedureforbooking,useofthefieldand thepossibilityofuserfeesbeingimplemented.Themeetingwasattendedbyalltherequired usergroupsandascheduleforusewascreatedandforwardedtotheSchoolBoardfortheir information. NewCommunityCentreProject Workhasbeendonetosecurepricingforfitnessequipment,kitchenequipmentandbanquet equipment.RecommendationshavebeenpreparedandsubmittedtothePVUSforapproval. FitnessequipmenthasbeenchosenandaPOwillbeissuedfordeliveryofitemsatendofMay. Kitchenequipmentpurchaseshavebeenputonholdwhilefundraisingisdonetosecurethe necessary budget to outfit the kitchen with stainless steel shelving and workstations and commercialappliances.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 1 Page 93 of 204 AlternateElinorWarnerhasheadedupthefundraisingcampaign.TodatethePembertonand DistrictHealthCareFoundationhassetaside$5000towardsthepurchaseofthisequipment. Targetamountisapproximately$22,000. All Audio Visual / Data Tel & Cable equipment and information has been identified and coordinated with the AV Reps, Kinetic Electric and RMT Construction.Conduit lines are completeandinstallationofpreͲwirewillcommenceonApril21,2008.InstallationandsetͲup ofequipmentwillbedoneoncethefacilityisalmostcomplete,toensurethattheequipmentis notsubjecttoheavydustloadsordamagesduringfinalconstruction. Quoteshavebeenreceivedforbanquetfurnitureandarecommendationwillbeforwardedto thePVUSforapprovalforpurchase.50%fundingfortheseitemshasbeenprovidedforinthe OPLSgrantfunding. GrantFundingUpdate AnextensiontotheOPLSgrantfundingtocreatetheYouthCentre,Amphitheatreandpurchase A/VequipmentwasgrantedtoMarch31,2009.Thisextensionwillensurethatourprojectis completeandnofundingtotheprojectislost. Firstandsecondsubmissionshavebeenfiledforreimbursement.Thesereportsindicatethe OPLSprojectisapproximately59%completeasatMarch31,2008.Oneoftherequirements foranextensionontheprojectwasprojectcompletionofaminimumof50%. ______ Author’ssignature
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 2 Page 94 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 95 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 96 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 97 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 98 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 99 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 100 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 101 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 102 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 103 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 104 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 105 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 106 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 107 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 108 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 109 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 110 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 111 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 112 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 113 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 114 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 115 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 116 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 117 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 118 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 119 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 120 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 121 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 122 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 123 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 124 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 125 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 126 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 127 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 128 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 129 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 130 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 131 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 132 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 133 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 134 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 135 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 136 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 137 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 138 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 139 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 140 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 141 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 142 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 143 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 144 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 145 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 146 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 147 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 148 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 149 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 150 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 151 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 152 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 153 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 154 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 155 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 156 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 157 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 158 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 159 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Minutes March 31, 2008; 10:30 AM SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC
In Attendance:
Board: R. Oakley (Chair); J. Turner (Area D); K. Melamed (Whistler); M. Macri (Area B); J. Sturdy (Pemberton); R. Kahlon (Squamish); I. Sutherland (Squamish); C. Roshard (Lillooet); S. Gimse (Area C)
Staff: P. Edgington, CAO; S. Olmstead, Director of Planning and Development; A. Antonelli, Planner; S. Cheng, Recording Secretary
Others: 6 members of the Public, and 1 member of the Press
1 Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 10:30 AM.
2 Approval of Agenda
The following were added to the Agenda;
12.2 PLTAC issue – Inviting Chief Negotiators for meeting
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the agenda be approved as amended.
CARRIED
3 Committee Reports and Recommendations
Out of Sequence
It was moved and seconded:
THAT item 10.2, the Yalakom Community Group delegation, be considered out of order.
CARRIED
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 160 of 204 This is page 2 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 31, 2008 in the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton, BC
10.2 Yalakom Community Group Delegation re: Max Pacific Power Inc.
Mr. Bill Spencer gave a presentation to the Board.
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Max Pacific Power Inc. be requested to withdraw their Yalakom River IPP application. CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Staff be directed to report with more information from Max Pacific Power regarding the Yalakom IPP project. DEFEATED
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the resolution to send letter to Max Power Inc. regarding their Yalakom IPP application be reconsidered. CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
THAT item 10.2 be deferred to the next Board meeting.
CARRIED
3.1 Electoral Area Directors Committee Recommendations of March 10, 2007:
1. Referral: Max Pacific Power Inc. IPP cluster; Electoral Areas A & B
It was moved and seconded:
THAT a letter be submitted to the Integrated Land Management Bureau requesting that a decision on the Downton, Carpenter, and Yalakom IPP clusters proposed by Max Pacific Power Inc. be deferred until more information is provided on social, environmental, and economic impacts, a public consultation process has been carried out, and assurance is provided that the impacts of the project will be effectively mitigated.
OPPOSED: Melamed CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 161 of 204 This is page 3 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 31, 2008 in the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton, BC
THAT a letter be submitted to the Integrated Land Management Bureau requesting that a regional energy plan be developed for the SLRD that will address the cumulative impacts of IPPs and community benefits.
CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the applicants be informed that temporary use permits for industrial sites associated with IPPs are required.
CARRIED
2. Terzaghi Dam Road to Seton Portage
It was moved and seconded:
THAT a letter be sent to the Ministry of Transportation requesting that the Terzaghi Dam Road be included in the DriveBC website.
CARRIED
3. Maintenance Schedule for Highway 99 (Duffey Lake Road portion)
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Ministry of Transportation be requested for a confirmation of their maintenance and replacement schedule for the Duffey Lake road and its bridges.
CARRIED
4. Electoral Area C Road Conditions
It was moved and seconded:
THAT a letter, under Director Gimse’s signature and co-signed by the Chair, be sent to Minister Kevin Falcon advising that there are concerns over the potholes and fading centre lines of Pemberton Meadows and Pemberton Portage roads.
CARRIED
3.2 Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee Recommendations of March
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 162 of 204 This is page 4 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 31, 2008 in the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton, BC
19, 2008
It was moved and seconded:
THAT items 3.2.1 to 3.2.5 recommendations be moved. CARRIED
1. Pemberton Recreation Trails Service Budget THAT the Pemberton Recreation Trails Service Budget be approved.
2. THAT Staff be directed to commence dialogue with the Naylors regarding their proposed right of way.
3. Revised Pemberton/Area C Rescue Service Budget THAT the Pemberton/Area C Rescue Service budget be approved.
4. Signage for New Community Centre THAT Staff prepare a list of funding levels for room naming privileges for use in donation campaign for the new Community Centre..
5. Lot 12 Parking Issues THAT Staff be directed to investigate alternatives to concrete barriers for the Lot 12 parking lot at the new Pemberton Community Centre.
3.3 Committee of the Whole Recommendations of February 21, 2008:
Director Sutherland left the meeting at 11:52 AM and rejoined the meeting at 11:58 AM.
1. Parks and Open Spaces Coordinator Position
It was moved and seconded:
1. That the position of Open Spaces Coordinator be established as a 0.8 FTE position.
2. That funding for this position be provided for in the open space services currently established by the board.
CARRIED
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 163 of 204 This is page 5 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 31, 2008 in the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton, BC
Meeting was recessed at 12:00 PM and reconvened at 12:36 PM.
2. 2008 -2012 Financial Plan:
It was moved and seconded:
THAT all the recommendations from item 3.3.2 be moved.
CARRIED
Sea to Sky Trails THAT the Sea to Sky Corridor Trails budget be approved.
Pemberton Valley Recreation Trail Service THAT the Pemberton Valley Recreation Trail service budget be referred to the Pemberton Valley Utilities and Services Committee.
Furry Creek Open Spaces THAT the Furry Creek Open Spaces budget be approved in principle.
Britannia Beach Parks and Trails THAT the Britannia Beach Parks and Trails service budget be referred to Director Turner and Staff.
Electoral Areas Community Parks Service THAT the Electoral Areas Community Parks Service budget be approved.
4 Bylaws
4.1 Unweighted Corporate Vote
4.1.1 Bylaw 1067 - “Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1067, 2007” - Application for rezoning: Lot 8, DL 1545, Lillooet District Plan KAP 48955; Electoral Area C – 8902 Pemberton Portage Road.
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Bylaw No. 1067, cited as “Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1067, 2007” be read a third time. CARRIED
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 164 of 204 This is page 6 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 31, 2008 in the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton, BC
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Bylaw1067, cited as “Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1067, 2007” be adopted.
CARRIED
4.1.2 Bylaw 1069 – Transit Planning and Capital Infrastructure Service Establishment
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Bylaw No. 1069, cited as Squamish-Lillooet Regional Transit Planning and Capital Infrastructure Service Establishment Bylaw No. 1069 – 2007 be adopted. CARRIED
4.1.3 Bylaw 1072 – A bylaw to authorize the entering into of an Agreement respecting financing between the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District and the Municipal Finance Authority of BC
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Bylaw 1072, 2008, cited as, "Howe Sound East Fire Protection Service Security Issuing Bylaw No. 1072 - 2008" be introduced and read a first, second and third time. CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Bylaw 1072, 2008, cited as, "Howe Sound East Fire Protection Service Security Issuing Bylaw No. 1072 - 2008" be adopted.
CARRIED
4.1.4 Bylaw 1078, 2008 - A Bylaw to Amend Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Records Retention and Scheduling Bylaw No. 616, 1997
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Bylaw 1078, 2008, cited as, “Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Records
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 165 of 204 This is page 7 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 31, 2008 in the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton, BC
Retention and Scheduling By-law No. 616, 1997, Amendment Bylaw No. 1078- 2008” be introduced, and read a first, second and third time.
CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Bylaw 1078, 2008, cited as, “Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Records Retention and Scheduling By-law No. 616, 1997, Amendment Bylaw No. 1078- 2008” be adopted.
CARRIED
4.1.5 Bylaw 1080 - A bylaw to facilitate temporary commercial and industrial uses; Bylaw 20; Electoral Area D
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Bylaw No. 1080, cited as ‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Zoning Bylaw No. 20, 1970, Amendment Bylaw No. 1080, 2008’ be read a third time.
CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Bylaw No. 1080, cited as ‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Zoning Bylaw No. 20, 1970, Amendment Bylaw No. 1080, 2008’ be adopted.
CARRIED
4.1.6 Bylaw 1082 - Pemberton Meadows Fire Protection Service Establishment Bylaw No. 1082-2008
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Bylaw 1082, 2008, cited as, “Pemberton Meadows Fire Protection Service Establishment Bylaw No. 1082-2008” be introduced and read a first, second, and third time as amended, with the “whichever is greater” under Maximum Requisition amount deleted. CARRIED
4.1.7 Bylaw 1083 - The Heights Fire Protection Service Establishment Bylaw No. 1083-2008
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 166 of 204 This is page 8 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 31, 2008 in the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton, BC
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Bylaw 1083, 2008, cited as, “The Heights Fire Protection Service Establishment Bylaw No. 1083-2008” be introduced and read a first, second, and third time as amended with the “whichever is greater” under Maximum Requisition deleted. CARRIED
4.1.8 Bylaw 1084, 2008 – A Bylaw to adopt the 2008 – 2012 Financial Plan
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Bylaw 1084, cited as “Squamish-Lillooet Regional District 2008 – 2012 Financial Plan, By-law No. 1084-2008 be introduced, read a first, second, and third time. CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Bylaw 1084, cited as “Squamish-Lillooet Regional District 2008 – 2012 Financial Plan, By-law No. 1084-2008 be adopted.
CARRIED
4.1.9 Referendum Report for Bylaw 1082 and 1083
It was moved and seconded:
THAT participating area consent for Bylaws 1082 and 1083 be obtained through assent of the electors (referendum), pursuant to s. 797.5(1) of the Local Government Act, to be held in August, 2008.
CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Allison Macdonald be appointed Chief Election Officer and Susan Cheng be appointed Deputy Chief Election Officer for Other Voting related to Bylaws 1082 and 1083.
CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 167 of 204 This is page 9 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 31, 2008 in the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton, BC
THAT the following question be submitted to the electors of Pemberton Meadows of Electoral Area C, as defined in Schedule A of Bylaw 1082, of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District:
“Are you in favour of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District adopting Pemberton Meadows Fire Protection Service Establishment Bylaw No. 1082- 2008 which provides for the maximum requisitioning annually of $0.664/$1,000 of the net taxable value of land and improvements, for the purpose of operating a fire protection service within the service area established by Bylaw 1082-2008?” YES ____ NO ____ CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the following question be submitted to the electors of Pemberton Heights of Electoral Area C, as defined in Schedule A of Bylaw 1083, of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District:
“Are you in favour of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District adopting Pemberton Heights Fire Protection Service Establishment Bylaw No. 1083- 2008 which provides for the maximum requisitioning annually of $0.633/$1,000 of the net taxable value of land and improvements, for the purpose of operating a fire protection service within the service area established by Bylaw 1083-2008?” YES ____ NO ____ CARRIED
4.2 Weighted Corporate Vote
5 Staff Reports and Other Business
5.1 Unweighted Corporate Vote
5.1.1 Planner - Application for a Temporary Use Permit; Blackcomb Snowmobile; Callaghan Valley; Electoral Area D
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Temporary Use Permit No. 10 be approved and issued to Blackcomb Snowmobile Ltd. for a period of two years.
OPPOSED: Melamed; Macri CARRIED
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 168 of 204 This is page 10 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 31, 2008 in the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton, BC
5.1.2 Strategy Planner - Application for a Temporary Use Permit; Canadian Snowmobile Adventures Ltd.; Callaghan Valley; Electoral Area D
It was moved and seconded: THAT Temporary Use Permit No. 11 be approved and issued to Canadian Snowmobile Adventures Ltd. for a period of two years.
It was moved and seconded: THAT item 5.1.2 – Canadian Snowmobile Adventures Ltd.’s Temporary Use Permit Application be deferred. DEFEATED It was moved and seconded: THAT the Canadian Snowmobiles Adventures Ltd.’s Temporary Use Permit No. 11 application be referred to Staff for report on means to address community watershed concerns to the extent they fall within SLRD jurisdiction. CARRIED It was moved and seconded: THAT Staff use best efforts to conclude Callaghan Valley planning work by September 2009. CARRIED
5.1.3 Director of Planning – Terms of Reference for Environmental Assessment of the Upper Pitt River IPP projects
Not for Agenda - did not consider
5.1.4 Planning Technician – Application for subdivision in the ALR - Part SW ¼ of District Lot 211 Except Plan 7488 PID 010-309-349 (1759 Sea to Sky Highway) – Drew Meredith and Lori Mitchell – Electoral Area C
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the subdivision in the ALR application for Part SW ¼ of District Lot 211 Except Plan 7488 PID 010-309-349 (1759 Sea to Sky Highway) be supported and forwarded to the Agricultural Land Commission
CARRIED
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 169 of 204 This is page 11 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 31, 2008 in the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton, BC
5.1.5 April, 2008 Committee of the Whole Meeting Date
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the SLRD Board convene on April 14, 2008 for a Committee of the Whole meeting. CARRIED
5.1.6 2008 Committee Appointment List
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the 2008 Committee Appointment list be approved as presented.
CARRIED
5.1.7 Planning Department Monthly Report
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the March Planning Department Monthly Report be received.
CARRIED
5.1.8 Utilities Department Monthly Report
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the March Utilities Department Monthly report be received.
CARRIED
5.1.9 Recreation Department Monthly Report
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the March Recreation Department Monthly report be received.
CARRIED
5.2 Weighted Corporate Vote – All Directors
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 170 of 204 This is page 12 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 31, 2008 in the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton, BC
6 Correspondence Requesting Action
6.1 Lillooet and Area Library Budget Revision
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the correspondence from the Lillooet and Area Library be received.
CARRIED
6.2 Pemberton & District Chamber of Commerce – UBCM Community Tourism Phase 2 Application
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Pemberton & District Chamber of Commerce’s 2008 Community Tourism Phase 2 funding application be endorsed. CARRIED
6.3 BC Hydro Correspondence re: Bridge River Valley Power Outage
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Legal advice be obtained regarding submitting a single complaint to the BC Utilities Commission from the SLRD, and on behalf of Bridge River Valley residents regarding the November 2007 Bridge River Valley power outage.
CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
THAT a Media Release concerning the complaint to the BC Utilities Commission be prepared;
AND THAT the complaint be submitted to the Ombudsman.
CARRIED
7 Confirmation and Receipt of Minutes
7.1 Regular Board Meeting Minutes – February 25, 2008
It was moved and seconded:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 171 of 204 This is page 13 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 31, 2008 in the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton, BC
THAT the February 25, 2008 Regular Board meeting minutes be approved as corrected, with the following corrections:
x Item 5.1.7: Add “THAT letters be sent to other Regional Districts advising of SLRD day – September 23, 2007 and requesting that they consider proclaiming their own Regional District days”.
x 5.1.10: Add “AND THAT a complaint be filed with the Ombudsman on the power outage issue.”
CARRIED
7.2 Committee of the Whole Meeting Minutes – February 21, 2008
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the February 21, 2008 Committee of the Whole minutes be confirmed as circulated.
CARRIED
7.3 Electoral Area Directors Committee Meeting – March 10, 2008 Receipt for information.
It was moved and seconded:
THAT items 7.3 to 7.8 be received for information. CARRIED
7.4 Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee Meeting - March 19, 2008
7.5 Pemberton/Area C Economic Development Commission Meeting Minutes – March 3, 2008
7.6 Pemberton/Lillooet Treaty Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes – February 25, 2008
7.7 Public Hearing Minutes for Bylaw 1067 – February 25, 2008
7.8 Public Hearing Minutes for Bylaw 1080 - March 13, 2008
8 Business Arising from the Minutes
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 172 of 204 This is page 14 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 31, 2008 in the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton, BC
9 Consent Items – Correspondence for Information
9.1 MFA Correspondence
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the MFA correspondence be received for information.
CARRIED
10 Delegations and Petitions
10.1 Malcolm Leong – Blackcomb Snowmobiles
Did not attend
10.2 Yalakom Community Group – Bridge River IPP’s
Considered earlier in the meeting.
11 Decision on Late Business (only if required)
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the late items be considered at this meeting.
CARRIED
12 Late Business
12.1 Director of Planning – Referral: Pinecone Burke Provincial Park boundary adjustment application/Upper Pitt River Power IPP; Electoral Area D
It was moved and seconded:
1. THAT a letter be submitted to Ministry of Environment, Environmental Stewardship, Lower Mainland Region requesting that:
(a) a regional energy strategy be developed to identify and prioritize which watersheds are suitable for energy development and which corridors are suitable for power transmission within the SLRD, FVRD, and GVRD;
(b) the Upper Pitt River IPP be evaluated in the context of the regional energy strategy.
2. THAT the recommendation to the Ministry of Environment be circulated to
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 173 of 204 This is page 15 of the minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on March 31, 2008 in the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton, BC
neighbouring local governments for consideration and support.
CARRIED
12.2 PLTAC/Chief Negotiators meeting
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Staff organize dinner with Chief Negotiators; PLTAC members; Board members, and FVTAC for April 9, 2008.
CARRIED
13 Directors’ Reports (matters of information, not requiring action)
13.1 Director Roshard
Director Roshard reported on the following:
x Rural Summit at 100 Mile House x Southern Pine Beetle Committee Update x IPP Open house in Lillooet on April 17, 2008 x St'at'imc Community -to-Community Forum
14 Termination
The meeting was adjourned at 2:30 PM.
Russ Oakley Paul R. Edgington Chair Chief Administrative Officer
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 174 of 204 Special Meeting Minutes April 14, 2008; immediately following the CoW meeting SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC
In Attendance:
Committee: R. Oakley (Chair); J. Turner (Area D); K. Melamed (Whistler); M. Macri (Area B); J. Sturdy (Pemberton); S. Gimse (Area C)
Staff: P. Edgington, CAO; S. Cheng, Recording Secretary
Others:
1 Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 4:03 PM.
2. Adoption of April 14, 2008 Committee of the Whole Recommendations
Sea to Sky Trail Project Update
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Staff prepare the Terms of Reference; mandate; and membership for proposed new Sea to Sky Trail Standing Committee.
CARRIED
Green River Estates Zoning Amendment Bylaw No. 1036; Electoral Area C
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Green River Estates Zoning Amendment Bylaw 1036 be referred to Staff for:
(a) Consultation with RMOW Staff on the Phased Development Agreement with respect to the conditions at the time of transfer to RMOW and assumption of risk by RMOW; and
(b) Consultation with the Village of Pemberton on amenity provisions in Bylaw 1036. CARRIED
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 175 of 204 This is page 2 of a Special Meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held on April 14, 2008, in the SLRD Boardroom.
It was moved and seconded:
THAT a formal legal opinion be obtained on the First Nations considerations raised in Chief Andrew’s August 3, 2007 letter.
CARRIED
Greyhound Application for Service Reduction
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Staff be directed to send a letter to the Passenger Transportation Board (“PTB”) outlining concerns about:
(a) the elimination of “flag/drop” service at the specified points, other than Darrell Bay (b) the change of service levels at Brackendale & Dentwille from “time/stop” to “flag/drop” service.
AND asking that the Applicant be required to:
1) consult with the Ministry of Transportation and Peter Kiewit & Sons to seek resolution of Greyhound’s safety concerns at the present “flag/drop” locations; 2) report back to the PTB regarding the substance of those consultations prior to the PTB making a decision; and 3) advertise any changes granted by the PTB in 2 consecutive editions of the Squamish Chief newspaper.
CARRIED
3 Termination
The meeting was adjourned at 4:05 PM.
Russ Oakley Paul R. Edgington Chair Chief Administrative Officer
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 176 of 204 Committee of the Whole Meeting Minutes April 14, 2008; 1:30 PM SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC
In Attendance:
Committee: R. Oakley (Chair); J. Turner (Area D); K. Melamed (Whistler); M. Macri (Area B); R. Kahlon (Squamish); I. Sutherland (Squamish); J. Sturdy (Pemberton)
Staff: P. Edgington, CAO; A. Macdonald, Manager of Administrative Services; S. Olmstead, Director of Planning and Development; J. Cheshuk, Director of Utilities and Environmental Services; S. Cheng, Recording Secretary
Others: G. McKeever; D. Ehrhardt; L. Cavello; B. MacPherson; 4 members of the Public
1 Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 1:32 PM.
2 Approval of Agenda
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the agenda be approved as circulated.
CARRIED
3 New Business
3.1 A. Macdonald, and G. McKeever - Sea to Sky Trail Project Update
Mr. McKeever gave an overview of the Sea to Sky Trail Project report.
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Sea to Sky Trail Project report be received for information.
CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT Staff prepare the Terms of Reference; mandate; and membership for
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 177 of 204 This is page 2 of a meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Committee of the Whole, held on April 14, 2008, in the SLRD Boardroom.
proposed new Sea to Sky Trail Standing Committee.
CARRIED
3.2 Legal Advice on Green River Estates – In-Camera
It was moved and seconded:
THAT pursuant to Section 90 of the Community Charter, that this meeting of the Board be closed to the public, other than SLRD and RMOW Staff and L. Cavello, as the matter to be considered relate to personnel matters, litigation or potential litigation affecting the Regional District.
CARRIED
The meeting was closed to the Public, other than SLRD and RMOW Staff, and L. Cavello, SLRD Legal Counsel, at 2:00 PM
The meeting was re- opened to the public at 3:47 PM. The meeting was recessed at 3:47 PM and reconvened at 3:52 PM.
3.3 Green River Estates Zoning Amendment Bylaw No. 1036; Electoral Area C
It was moved and seconded: See Paul’s wording.
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT the Green River Estates Zoning Amendment Bylaw 1036 be referred to Staff for:
(a) Consultation with RMOW Staff on the Phased Development Agreement with respect to the conditions at the time of transfer to RMOW and assumption of risk by RMOW; and
(b) Consultation with the Village of Pemberton on amenity provisions in Bylaw 1036. CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT a formal legal opinion be obtained on the First Nations considerations raised by Chief Andrew’s August 3, 2007 letter.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 178 of 204 This is page 3 of a meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Committee of the Whole, held on April 14, 2008, in the SLRD Boardroom.
CARRIED
4 Decision on Late Items
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Late Items be considered.
CARRIED
5 Late Items
5.1 Greyhound Application for Service Reduction
It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT Staff be directed to send a letter to the Passenger Transportation Board (“PTB”) outlining concerns about:
(a) the elimination of “flag/drop” service at the specified points, other than Darrell Bay (b) the change of service levels at Brackendale & Dentwille from “time/stop” to “flag/drop” service.
AND asking that the Applicant be required to:
1) consult with the Ministry of Transportation and Peter Kiewit & Sons to seek resolution of Greyhound’s safety concerns at the present “flag/drop” locations; 2) report back to the PTB regarding the substance of those consultations prior to the PTB making a decision; and 3) advertise any changes granted by the PTB in 2 consecutive editions of the Squamish Chief newspaper.
CARRIED
6 Termination
The meeting was adjourned at 4: 03 PM.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 179 of 204 This is page 4 of a meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Committee of the Whole, held on April 14, 2008, in the SLRD Boardroom.
Russ Oakley Paul R. Edgington Chair Chief Administrative Officer
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 180 of 204 Committee of the Whole Minutes March 31, 2008; 9:30 AM SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC
In Attendance:
Committee: R. Oakley (Chair); J. Turner (Area D); K. Melamed (Whistler); M. Macri (Area B); J. Sturdy (Pemberton); R. Kahlon (Squamish); I. Sutherland (Squamish); C. Roshard (Lillooet); S. Gimse (Area C)
Staff: P. Edgington, CAO; S. Cheng, Recording Secretary
Others:
1 Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 9:35 AM.
2 Approval of Agenda
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the agenda be approved as circulated.
CARRIED
3 New Business
3.1 Hydro Grant in Lieu Allocations
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the following policy for Allocation of Dams and Reservoir grants be recommended to the board for approval: x The allocation of Dams and Reservoir grants be on a percentage of overall grant formula basis; x The following percentage allocations be made: o 40% - General Government o 30% - Land Use Planning o 5% - Feasibility Study Reserve (to maximum fund level of $150,000, with any resulting excess being allocated to General Government) o 1% to General Select Funds o 5% to the following standing commitments:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 181 of 204 This is page 2 of a meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Committee of the Whole, held on March 31, 2008, in the SLRD Boardroom.
Lillooet Recreation Centre - $8,500 Seton Portage Fire Service - $5,000 Pemberton Area Transit - $14,500 Squamish Public Library - $10,000 o 19% to Electoral Area Select Funds (to be divided equally among the 4 Electoral Area) x Unused Electoral Area Select Fund allocations will be transferred to General Select Funds at each fiscal year end; x Prior years’ (2007 and earlier) accumulations of Electoral Area Select Funds will be retained to the extent that they have been allocated for specific identifiable projects; x Where allocations of prior and future years Electoral Area Select Funds have been made for specific identifiable projects which relate to an established service, the allocation will be transferred to an appropriate reserve fund for that service; x Electoral Area Select Fund Allocations for specific identifiable projects (other than those which have been transferred to a specific service reserve fund) which remain unexpended as at December 31, 2012 will be transferred to General Select Funds; x Electoral Area Directors will identify their allocations of prior years (2007 and earlier) accumulations of Electoral Area Select Funds for specific identifiable projects no later than the June 2008 Regular Board meeting; x Electoral Area Grants By-law No. 774-2003 will be amended to remove the provision which delegates the authority to Electoral Area Directors to provide grants not exceeding $1,000.00 [This to become a function of the Electoral Area Directors Committee]; x A monthly “Grant Approvals Report” setting out Electoral Area Select Fund usage will be placed on the agenda of each regular board meeting.
OPPOSED: Melamed, Roshard CARRIED
3.2 2008 – 2012 Financial Plan
4 Decision on Late Items
5 Late Items
6 Termination
The meeting was adjourned at 10:04 AM.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 182 of 204 This is page 3 of a meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Committee of the Whole, held on March 31, 2008, in the SLRD Boardroom.
Russ Oakley Paul R. Edgington Chair Chief Administrative Officer
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 183 of 204 Electoral Area Directors Committee Meeting Minutes April 14, 2008; 10:30 AM in the SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster St., Pemberton BC
In Attendance:
Committee: J. Turner (Chair); R. Oakley (Area A); M. Macri (Area B)
Staff: P. Edgington, CAO; S. Olmstead, Director of Planning and Development; A. Antonelli, Planner; S. Cheng, Recording Secretary
Others: Tracey Saxby, Delegation
1 Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 10:30 AM.
2 Approval of Agenda
The following were added to the agenda:
6.1 Meeting Date re: Douglas Trail – Highline Road 10.1 Contribution to the Sea to Sky Air Quality Management Plan
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the agenda be approved as amended. CARRIED
3 Staff Reports and Other Business
3.1 Planner - Application for rezoning: Non-ALR portion of DL 969 at Blackwater Creek; Electoral Area C
It was moved and seconded:
THAT item 3.1 – Application for rezoning on Non-ALR portion of DL 969, LLD be deferred to the May 2008 EAD committee meeting. CARRIED
3.2 Planner - Village of Pemberton referral re: Menzel - Perry Proposal for Subdivision in the ALR (KAP73119, DL 202, LLD)
It was moved and seconded:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 184 of 204 This is page 2 of a meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area Directors Committee, held on April 14, 2008, in the SLRD Boardroom.
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board;
THAT AAC comments and the SLRD staff report regarding the nine-lot subdivision proposal for KAP73119, DL 202, LLD submitted to the Village of Pemberton by Mr. Bob Menzel on November 19, 2007 be forwarded to the Village of Pemberton. CARRIED
Ms. Antonelli left the meeting at 10:45 AM.
3.3 Director of Planning and Development - Bylaw 820: Lillooet Lake Estates Land Use Contract Site Plan Amendment – Revision and Scheduling of a Second Public Hearing
It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
1. THAT second and third readings of Bylaw No. 820, cited as Squamish- Lillooet Regional District Bylaw No. 88-1976, Land Use Contract Amendment Bylaw No. 820-2003 be rescinded.
2. THAT Bylaw No. 820 be amended to apply only to lands managed by the Lillooet Lake Estates Committee.
3. THAT Bylaw No. 820, cited as Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Bylaw No. 88-1976, Land Use Contract Amendment Bylaw No. 820-2003 be read a second time as amended.
4. THAT the Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District delegate the holding of a public hearing for the consideration of Bylaw 820 to Area “C” Director Susan Gimse, with Pemberton Director Jordan Sturdy as alternate delegate pursuant to section 891 of the Local Government Act;
5. THAT the public hearing for the consideration of Bylaw 820 be held at 7:00 p.m. on --- in the Board Room at the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Office, Pemberton, BC.
6. THAT the map attached to BL 820 be amended to include approximate location of Catalina Creek setbacks;
AND THAT the Public hearing date and time for Bylaw 820 be determined at the April Board meeting.
CARRIED
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 185 of 204 This is page 3 of a meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area Directors Committee, held on April 14, 2008, in the SLRD Boardroom.
3.4 Environmental/Utilities Technician - Application for Permit Amendment under the Provisions of the Environmental Management Act
It was moved and seconded:
THAT item 3.4 be tabled.
CARRIED It was moved and seconded:
THAT item 3.4 be lifted from the table. CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT the SLRD support Lizzie Bay Logging’s burn permit amendment for a term of 3 years.
Opposed: Macri CARRIED
3.5 Policy Analyst - Community Tourism Programme - Phase II
It was move and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
1. THAT Area D’s Community Tourism Phase II funds be directed to Britannia Beach Mining Museum’s Copper and Fire Festival;
2. THAT Staff forward Community Tourism Phase II application information to the Bridge River Valley Economic Development Society; Seton Chamber of Commerce; Ts’kW’aylaxw and Seton Lake bands;
3. AND THAT the District of Lillooet be asked to confirm intention to partner with the SLRD on Phase I funds.
CARRIED
4 Correspondence Requesting Action
4.1 Pemberton Visitor Information Centre – Request for Funding
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 186 of 204 This is page 4 of a meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area Directors Committee, held on April 14, 2008, in the SLRD Boardroom.
It was moved and seconded:
THAT item 4.1 – Pemberton Visitor Information Centre’s funding request be deferred to the April 2008 Board meeting.
CARRIED
4.2 Lillooet and Area Library, Books for Babies – Request for funding
It was moved and seconded:
THAT $1500 from Area B Select Funds be authorized to the Lillooet and Area Library for their Books for Babies programme.
CARRIED
4.3 Girl Guides Funding Request
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Girl Guides’ funding request be deferred to the April 2008 Board meeting.
CARRIED
4.4 Letter of Support for the Seton Lake Band re: Economic Development Proposal
It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT a letter of support to be sent to Cliff Casper regarding the Seton Lake Band’s feasibility study proposal to Western Economic Development.
CARRIED
5 Confirmation and Receipt of Minutes
5.1 Minutes of March 10, 2008 EAD Committee meeting
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the March 10, 2008 Electoral Area Directors Committee meeting minutes be received.
CARRIED
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 187 of 204 This is page 5 of a meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area Directors Committee, held on April 14, 2008, in the SLRD Boardroom.
6 Business Arising from the Minutes
6.1 Meeting Date with Douglas Nation Re: Highline Road
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Staff consult with Chair, Area B and C Directors on meeting date with the Douglas Nation regarding the Highline Road.
CARRIED
Mr. Olmstead left the meeting at 11:25 AM. Mr. Cheshuk joined the meeting at 11:27 AM.
7 Consent Items and Correspondence for Information - None
8 Delegations and Petitions
8.1 Tracey Saxby from Greener Footprints
Ms. Saxby gave a presentation on reducing plastic bag use in the Sea to Sky corridor.
It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT Staff investigate and report on plastic bag reduction options for the SLRD.
CARRIED
9 Decision on Late Business
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Late Business be considered at this meeting.
CARRIED
10 Late Business
10.1 Sea to Sky Air Quality Management Plan Funding Contribution
It was moved and seconded:
THAT $444.00 from Electoral Area D Select funds be authorized to the Sea to Sky Air Quality Management plan.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 188 of 204 This is page 6 of a meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area Directors Committee, held on April 14, 2008, in the SLRD Boardroom.
CARRIED
11 Directors’ Reports
12 Termination
The meeting was adjourned at 12:16 PM.
John Turner Paul R. Edgington Chair Chief Administrative Officer
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 189 of 204 Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee Meeting Minutes April 7, 2008; 11:30 AM, or immediately following the Economic Development Commission meeting SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC In Attendance:
Committee: S. Gimse (Presiding Chair); S. Sturdy (VoP); E. Warner (Area C); M. Blundell (VoP)
Staff: L. Brown; P. Edgington, CAO; S. Cheng, Recording Secretary
Others: B. Trinder and G. Stratton, RMT
1 Call to Order
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the meeting be convened at 10:53 AM. CARRIED
The meeting was called to order at 10:53 AM.
2 Approval of Agenda
The following were added to the Agenda:
4.1 Pemberton Visitors Centre Funding Request 4.2 RMT – Project Management, Change to Contract
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the agenda be approved as amended.
CARRIED
3 New Business
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 190 of 204 This is page 2 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Pemberton Valley Utilities and Services Committee meeting, held on April 7, 2008 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
3.1 General Landscaping Contract
Intersection/Paving/Sidewalk/Street Lights /Lot 12
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the landscaping for the New Pemberton Community centre be deferred until the meeting with VoP to discuss development permit issues;
AND THAT RMT will rework the numbers on intersection and paving.
CARRIED
3.2 DYS Architecture Invoices
It was moved and seconded:
THAT item 3.2 be deferred until RMT meets with DYS.
CARRIED
J. Sturdy left the meeting at 12:15 PM and rejoined the meeting at 12:50 PM. B. Trinder left the meeting at 12:30 PM.
Meeting was recessed for lunch at 12: 30 PM and reconvened at 12:50 PM
3.3 Grants in Aid/Recreation Commission
3.4 Overall Project Update
3.5 Fitness Equipment
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the fitness and strengthening equipment for the New Pemberton Community Centre be purchased from Lifestyle Fitness.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 191 of 204 This is page 3 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Pemberton Valley Utilities and Services Committee meeting, held on April 7, 2008 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
CARRIED
3.6 Kitchen Equipment
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the New Pemberton Community Centre kitchen be called a Community Kitchen. CARRIED
3.7 Overall Landscape Plans Discussed earlier
3.8 Solicitation Programme OK with letter as circulated.
3.9 Delegation – Christine Buttkus, Communities That Care Did not attend.
4 Late Items
4.1 Pemberton Visitors Centre Funding Request
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Pemberton Visitors Centre’s funding request be received and be deferred to the April 2008 EAD meeting. CARRIED
4.2 RMT – Project Management, Change to Contract Meeting was closed to the Public – G. Stratton left the meeting at 1:00 PM. Meeting was re- opened to the public at 1:09 PM.
4.3 Lot 12/Drainage/Intersection/ Development Permit Discussion L. Pilon; S. Fraser and R. Diamond (all VoP) joined the meeting at 1:10 PM.
5 Correspondence
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 192 of 204 This is page 4 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Pemberton Valley Utilities and Services Committee meeting, held on April 7, 2008 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
6 Minutes
6.1 Minutes of March 19, 2008
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the March 19, 2008 Pemberton Valley Utilities and Services minutes be approved as circulated. CARRIED
7 Termination
The meeting was adjourned at 1:58 PM.
Susan Gimse P. Edgington Presiding Chair Chief Administrative Officer
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 193 of 204 Pemberton/Area C Economic Development Commission Meeting Minutes Monday April 7, 2008; 9:00 AM SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC
In Attendance:
Commission: P. Vandenberg (Chair); J. Sturdy (Pemberton); S. Gimse (Area C); S. Ryan; A. Helmer
Staff: S. Cheng, Recording Secretary
Others: A. Ross, Pemberton/Area C Economic Development Consultant
1 Call To Order
The meeting was called to order at 9:15 AM.
2 Approval Of Agenda
The following was added to the Agenda:
3.2 Development of a Website 3.3 Freedom of Information and Privacy Issues
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Agenda be approved as amended.
CARRIED
3 New Business
3.1 Alexandra Ross - March 2008 Report
A. Ross gave an overview of her March activities.
It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT Staff draft a letter for A. Ross confirming that she is working for a government body so that she is qualified for government rates at hotels.
CARRIED
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 194 of 204 This is page 2 of a meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Economic Development Commission held on April 7, 2008, in the SLRD Boardroom.
It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT Village of Pemberton and SLRD Staff be requested to draft a Bylaw to allow for temporary structures for the 2010 Olympics and other events leading up to the 2010 Olympics. CARRIED
3.2 Development of an Economic Development Website
It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT a Pemberton / Area C Economic Development website be developed, subject to funding. CARRIED
3.3 Freedom of Information and Privacy Issues
It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT A. Ross and P. Edgington, with legal advice, work together to draft policy around confidentiality issues regarding economic development role.
CARRIED
M. Blundell joined the meeting at 10:46 AM.
4 Minutes
4.1 Minutes of March 3, 2008
5 Termination
New date and time for May meeting: 1:30 PM on May 12, 2008.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:47 AM.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 195 of 204 This is page 3 of a meeting of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Economic Development Commission held on April 7, 2008, in the SLRD Boardroom.
Peter Vandenberg Chair
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 196 of 204 Pemberton-Lillooet Treaty Advisory Committee Minutes March 31, 2008; 3:00 PM Or immediately following the SSRHD Meeting SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster St., Pemberton BC
In Attendance:
Committee: M. Macri (Chair); M. Lampman (Lillooet); S. Gimse (Area C); C. Roshard (Lillooet)
Staff: P. Edgington, CAO: S. Cheng, Recording Secretary
Others:
1 Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 3:41 PM.
2 Approval of Agenda
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the agenda be approved as circulated.
CARRIED
3 New Business
3.1 Negotiation Update on In-Shuck-ch Treaty
Paul Edgington gave an overview of the meeting he attended in Deroche in March.
3.2 Negotiation Schedule
The negotiation schedule was discussed.
4 Correspondence
5 Minutes
5.1 Minutes of February 25, 2008
It was moved and seconded:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 197 of 204 This is page 2 of the minutes of a Pemberton/Lillooet Treaty Advisory Committee, held on March 31, 2008 in the Squamish- Lillooet Regional District Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton, BC
THAT the February 25, 2008 Pemberton/Lillooet Treaty Advisory Committee be approved as corrected, with one “n” in Marge Lampman’s name.
CARRIED .
6 Members’ Reports
Ms. Lampman gave an update of her activities.
7 Late Items
8 Termination
The meeting was adjourned at 4:05 PM.
Mickey Macri Paul R. Edgington Chair Chief Administrative Officer
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 198 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 199 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 200 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 201 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 202 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 203 of 204 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda, April 28, 2008 Page 204 of 204