arXiv:cond-mat/9409043v1 12 Sep 1994 sa xaso offiin and coefficient expansion an is where rudsaecnb rte 3 as [3] singlet written Kondo be zeroth-order can the state Fermi ground which the of is in strength point problem the starting liquid My of interactions. regardless electron valid the is without derive the predicted Further, I be analyses. expression can group and renormalization origin to simple obtained recourse liquid a Luttinger has a FN in by temperature Kondo the of aiysont egvnby given is be coefficient to expansion shown The easily impurity. magnetic local the ln as pling iudi hc h on ige tt om nywhen only Fermi forms a state singlet in < bound J problem the fundamentally which Kondo is in standard that liquid liquid the be Luttinger to from a seem distinct in does effect concensus Kondo the the in However, be will [1]. procedure error this from obtained exponents model, yF.F one u htbcuebsnzto does bosonization because predicted that form the out preserve simple not pointed the FN to FN. reduce by not weak-coupling does the in it valid liq- regime, is Luttinger exponent this the Although for constants uid. coupling charge and spin admdladotie sa exponent an as obtained and model bard h pndniywv xoet[2]. exponent spin-density-wave the svldsrcl ntelmto ekCuobinteractions, Coulomb weak of limit the in result strictly This valid is scattering. electron forward for constant pling e eut fF sta h od eprtr scales temperature Kondo the the of that One as is liquid. algebraically FN Luttinger of a prob- results in the effect key addressed Kondo the previously) of [2] lem (LT) Toner and Lee 72.15.Nj numbers:72.10.Fk,71.45.-d, PACS b triplet) (or singlet from the simply of state. existence understood the be for can condition liquid the Luttinger a in perature coupling, 2 πv g htIwn oso eei htteagbacscaling algebraic the that is here show to want I What narcn etrFrsk n aas F)[](and [1] (FN) Nagaosa and Furusaki letter recent a In 2 hwhr o h leri cln fteKnotem- Kondo the of scaling algebraic the how here show I F and 0 << | F T i η k | stefl em sea Fermi full the is Ψ .ErirL ooie h xeddHub- extended the bosonized LT Earlier 1. T = ∝ k i leri cln fteKnoTmeauei utne Li Luttinger a in Temperature Kondo the of Scaling Algebraic = e easepnnilywt h od cou- Kondo the with exponentially decays πv g 2 F k>k n T SU X ( , k ǫ − F v 1 F ∝ ) 2 ymtyihrn nteKondo the in inherent symmetry (2) F J α
h em eoiyand velocity Fermi the J k . ( 2 a η k † ihJteKnoexchange Kondo the J with , ↑ α χ k | ↓ F χ = − s i h stesi iesaeof eigenstate spin the is a = F k † | ↓ Q χ χ K ↓ † kliquids system effectively Luttinger electron origin 1-d the correlated at power Kondo the located and a the spin impurity Below as electron the scales the between level. it coupling Fermi strong the Rather, of temperature, at density vanishes constant. particle and a single law the not however, is case, states this In psuedo-particles non-interacting [4]. of pro- set bosonization a the generates cedure because followed be can derivation n the and htteitga a nagbacsnuaiyta scales that singularity algebraic as immediately an find has we integral, integral (2) an the Eq. to that in sum [6] the states convert of density and the for form this substitute hc mle that implies which with F k ntecrepnigLtigrpolm similar a problem, Luttinger corresponding the In ( n | E b 2 ymti aei which in case symmetric (2) t ( = ) k b − ǫ J | ) ( Ψ o H g 1 | ∝ i = e − ǫ h ieeouinof evolution time The . stesadr od aitna.I ewrite we If Hamiltonian. Kondo standard the is k − 1 N ) iEt J r h nriso h recnuto states. conduction free the of energies the are g ǫ h tblt odto o h ige state singlet the for condition stability The . | 2 h u ssrcl bv h em surface Fermi the above strictly is sum The . g 1 α − > k 1 = 1 ( J E = 1 t n consequently, and 0 o ntevcnt fteFrilvl[5]. level Fermi the of vicinity the in b ) efidta h vlto equa- evolution the that find we 0), = olw immediately. follows ∝ const.J − J J g o o g g 1 stedmninlconductance dimensional the is 1 − X = 1 k ′ o E = p E b − k 1+ ( − B α 1 1 g 1 K k T − πv ǫ g k k σ a eotie from obtained be can 1 2 F i . ) α quid ,teappropri- the 1, = o eusv in- repulsive For . ˙ < g k = h .I enow we If 1. F | [ b k H , ] | Ψ (4) (3) (2) i , Let us now analyze this expression in the weak-coupling regime. In this regime g can be expanded in a power series in g2 << 1. We find that the leading power law πvF 2πvF g2
dependence, Tk ∝ Jo , is precisely the result of FN. πvF p g2 In the strong-coupling regime, Tk ∝ Jo [7]. The pro- cedure of FN is not easily amenable to a strong-coupling analysis. We find then that this simple procedure based on the analysis of the stability condition for the Kondo bound state predicts algebraic scaling of the Kondo tem- perature that recovers the weak coupling result. It is the power law dependence of the pseudo-particle density of states for a semi-infinite Luttinger liquid that leads to this behaviour. The physical picture that this derivation suggests is that the pseudo-particles in the Luttinger liq- uid form the screening cloud at the magnetic impurity in direct analogy to the quasi-particles in the Fermi liquid problem. Of course this picture changes dramatically if back-scattering is included [8]. As FN pointed out, in the presence of backscattering, the two semi-infinite pieces of the Luttinger liquid become connected and the scal- ing behaviour presented here breaks down. Away from half-filling, however, back scattering as well as umklapp processes are not relevant along the Luttinger fixed line. Hence, away from half-filling, the analysis presented here should hold true.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work is supported in part by the NSF and the ACS Petroleum Research Fund. I thank Yi Wan, Nancy Sandler, and A.-H. Castro Neto for insightful remarks.

[1] A. Furusaki and N. Nagaosa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 892 (1994). [2] D. H. Lee and J. Toner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3378 (1992). [3] K. Yosida, Phys. Rev. 147, 223 (1966). [4] F. D. M. Haldane, J. Phys. C 14, 2585 (1981). [5] C. L. Kane and M. P. A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1220 (1992). [6] This derivation is in the spirit of the interlayer tunneling argument used by S. Chakravarty and P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 3859 (1994). [7] The results presented here can be trivially extended to the triplet ground state, which also exhibits a Kondo effect in a Luttinger liquid. In Eq. 1, a plus sign should be used and J →−J. [8] A. Luther and V. J. Emery, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 589 (1974).

2