Arxiv:1708.05733V2

Home , Luttinger liquid

arXiv:1708.05733v2 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 18 Dec 2017 nov oesae ertebto ftebn,adtheir small, and band, exponentially the is of rate bottom processes the near backscattering states The vicinity hole involve the point. Fermi in nearest remains the of quasiparticle of each backscattering involve i.e., not fermions, of decay do the excitations to rise elementary giving processes scattering the tantly, nti aetegso lmnayecttosi nther- in is velocity excitations with elementary move can of but gas equilibrium, mal the case this In ω ecie ycasclhdoyais ewl epri- be will regime the We in interested hydrodynamics. marily classical by described energy osre uniis h oa ubro particles of number total the quantities: conserved D n-iesoa emosi h bec fdsre at disorder of absence temperatures the low in fermions one-dimensional h hsclprilsfrigteLtigrlqi.For liquid. Luttinger spin- the interacting between weakly forming interaction the particles of physical details the the on depending [15], utne iud eoefrin 1]wt nt decay finite with [11] rate fermions spinless in become exci- excitations liquids the bosonic Luttinger account, the into na- between taken are interactions the sys- tations these the as in When such excitations elementary tems. picture, of liquid lifetimes cap- and Luttinger not ture the properties by the on tured focused systems dimensional [7–10]. 6], experiments the [5, subsequent states of in of observed renormalizations density tunneling law and power scattering the impurity as electron such one-dimensional systems, of properties under- basic for the the foundation between standing the interaction provided of theory This strength any fermions. properties at low-energy system approach the the this describes of of adequately excita- advantage it that bosons The elementary is noninteracting the as dispersion. treated that linear are with is system feature the of main tions Its theory liquid Tomonaga-Luttinger [1–4]. the of in framework described the usually are fermions interacting dimensional nti ae ecnie h yaiso ytmof system a of dynamics the consider we paper this In uho h eetwr nteter fone- of theory the on work recent the of Much one- of systems of properties low-energy The ≪ steeeg cl fteodro em energy. Fermi of order the of scale energy the is τ τ ex − − E 1 1 n momentum and , ∝ h ytmi ls oeulbimadcnbe can and equilibrium to close is system the T ilysala o eprtrs tlwrfeunistes the frequencies diffusive. lower is At heat compared of temperatures. large the propagation low is in the at frequency to the heat small provided addition tially of weak, in is propagation which mode ballistic in sound frequencies to of corresponding range sound broad a find we γ esuysudi aienivratsseso one-dimensi of systems invariant Galilean in sound study We ihteexponent the with , 1 aeil cec iiin ron ainlLaboratory, National Argonne Division, Science Materials T 2 eateto hsc,Uiest fWsigo,Seattle, Washington, of University Physics, of Department τ ≪ − eodsudi ytm foedmninlfermions one-dimensional of systems in sound Second 1 D 2 1 ≪ uhasse osse three possesses system a Such . fermions ω τ P − ≪ tvr o frequencies low very At . 1 τ ∝ ex − e 1 τ . − ex − γ D/T 1 .A Matveev A. K. 1–4 r6 or [12–14] 7 = ∝ T 1–1,where [17–21], u 1] Impor- [16]. ex Dtd eebr1,2017) 18, December (Dated: o equal not (1) N 1 , n .V Andreev V. A. and h rudsaeo h ytmhsannaihn mo- nonvanishing a has system the mentum of state ground the rmters ftefli sawl-nw etr fsuper- of feature well-known a is fluid fluid the of rest the from eosrt h xsec ftescn on nthis in sound second to the and of system. (1) existence range the one- frequency of demonstrate the system in the develop fermions of to dimensional hydrodynamics is two-fluid goal that entropy Our similar of velocity. a wave different a den- a particle is at of sound propagates wave second usual the the whereas is two-fluid sound sity, sound two of first terms of The in existence modes. is the system predicts this that of hydrodynamics motion the of tion emi q 2 consfrtefc htat that fact the first for The accounts respectively. (2) channels, Eq. momentum spin in with term and charge excitations the bosonic in the of numbers evdqatt:tedffrnebtentenmesof fermions numbers left-moving con- the and fourth between right- a difference the the possesses system quantity: the served frequencies such At velocity the to ti elgbeat negligible is it lnkcntn,while constant, Planck as eaainof relaxation cause size where suesi oainsmer n aieninvariance. in Galilean order leading and To symmetry rotation spin assume otecag n pnscoso h aitna,and Hamiltonian, the of velocities, sectors different spin at propagating and sup- charge system corresponding the excitations, Our to bosonic of [24]. branches two spectrum theory ports liquid excitation Luttinger linear conventional with the by described is etmo h ytmi [3] is system the of mentum 1 2 h eaheto h a feeetr excitations elementary of gas the of detachment The ewl ou ntesse foedmninlspin- one-dimensional of system the on focus will We emoso mass of fermions L 4 e[2 3.Teaporaetertcldescrip- theoretical appropriate The 23]. [22, He N ihproi onaycniin,and conditions, boundary periodic with cn on oei apd n the and damped, is mode sound econd p ytm h apn ftesecond the of damping The system. stettlnme ffrin nasse of system a in fermions of number total the is F nlfrin.A o temperatures, low At fermions. onal oarlxto aeta sexponen- is that rate relaxation a to J ron,Ilni 03,USA 60439, Illinois Argonne, ae fdniyteei second a is there density of waves P hr h em momentum Fermi the where , ahntn915 USA 98195, Washington = u 2 ω 4 ftecne fms ftefli [20]. fluid the of mass of center the of h L J T/D ≫ NJ m novsbcsatrn ffermions, of backscattering involves τ − N ihrplieitrcin and interactions repulsive with ≪ + 1 k ρ . X ,tednmc ftesystem the of dynamics the 1, k and k ( N N k k ρ σ v J + ρ r h occupation the are = and N k σ N ) p , R v F σ − h mo- The . N = N R h hN/ L 6= sthe is Be- . N 4 (2) L L k . 2

Similarly, the energy of the system is given by values, n − n0 and s − s0. We start by evaluating ε and p in the leading order in these small parameters. 2 2 2 mvρ 2 h NJ ρ σ At finite temperature, the dominant contribution to the E = (N − N0) + 2 + [ǫρ(k)Nk + ǫσ(k)Nk ], 2N0 32mL energy density ε is due to the quasiparticle excitations. k X (3) Substituting the occupation numbers (6) into the last c.f. [3]. In the first term N0 is some reference value of the term in Eq. (3), we obtain particle number and we have used the usual relation be- − πT 2 3~ 1 1 1 tween the ground state compressibility and vρ. Bosonic ε = = vs˜ 2, v˜ = + . (8) 6~v˜ 2π v v excitations in the Luttinger liquid are superpositions ρ σ of small momentum particle-hole pairs near each Fermi Here we applied the relation ∂ε/∂s = T to find the en- point. At N R = N L the energies are ǫ (k) = v |k|. ρ,σ ρ,σ tropy density s = πT/3~v˜ and expressed ε in terms of s. At N R 6= N L the quasiparticle ground state is moving Combining Eqs. (4)–(6) with (2), we find the momentum with velocity density hJ − − 1/2 u0 = . (4) 1 1 4mL 2ε vρ + vσ p = mnu0 + (uex − u0), v2 = − − . v2 v 3 + v 3 The dependence of the quasiparticle energies on u , 2 ρ σ ! 0 (9) Then, using Galilean invariance we immediately obtain ǫρ,σ(k)= vρ,σ|k| + u0k, (5) the particle current j = p/m in the form is obtained by performing Galilean transformation to the 2ε stationary frame. j = nu0 + 2 (uex − u0). (10a) −1 mv2 At frequencies below τex , collisions between the bosonic excitations occur very quickly compared with the The remaining three currents can be obtained using the −1 typical time scale ω , and to first approximation one kinetic equation for elementary excitations and account- can assume that the gas of excitations is in an equilib- ing for the fact that collisions do not change the number rium state described by the Bose distribution of particles, momentum, energy and J. The method was − developed in the theory of superfluidity [23]. When ap- ǫ (k) − u k 1 N ρ,σ = exp ρ,σ ex − 1 . (6) plied to the Luttinger liquid, the results take the form k T dk ∂ǫ (k) j = N λ j∂ ǫ (k)+ ǫ (k) λ , Since the collisions between excitations conserve their to- ε h k n λ λ ∂k λ=ρ,σ tal momentum, the equilibrium is characterized by the X Z dk ∂ǫλ(k) velocity uex, which is not necessarily equal to the veloc- j = j(0) + N λ n∂ ǫ (k)+ k , p p h k n λ ∂k ity u0 associated with the Fermi surface. λ=ρ,σ Z As discussed above, in the absence of backscattering X there are four conserved macroscopic characteristics of 1 dk j = µ(0) + N λ∂ ǫ (k) . the fluid: the number of particles, energy, momentum u0 m  h k n λ  λ=ρ,σ and J. The hydrodynamic description of the fluid is ob- X Z   tained by writing these conservation laws in the form of (0) (0) Here jp and µ are the pressure and chemical poten- continuity equations on the respective densities: tial, respectively, of the Luttinger liquid at T = 0. Using Eqs. (5) and (6), to leading order in u0 and uex we find ∂tn + ∂xj =0, (7a) ∂ v˜ ∂tε + ∂xjε =0, (7b) j = ε n j +2εu , (10b) ε v˜ ex ∂tp + ∂xjp =0, (7c) (0) ∂n(nv˜) ∂ u + ∂ j 0 =0. (7d) j = j + ε , (10c) t 0 x u p p v˜ Here n, ε, and p are densities of particles, energy, and µ(0) ∂ v˜ j = + ε n . (10d) momentum of the system, respectively. Instead of den- u0 m mv˜ sity J/L we use the velocity u0 defined by Eq. (4). The We are now in a position to transform Eq. (7) into a corresponding currents j, jε, jp, and ju0 are yet to be set of four differential equations on four hydrodynamic determined. parameters of the fluid: n, s, u0 and uex. Substituting Below we only consider the regime of small deviation Eq. (10a) into (7a), we find of the system from thermal equilibrium, which will be described by two velocities u0 and uex and the deviations 2ε ∂tn + n ∂xu0 + 2 (∂xuex − ∂xu0)=0. (11a) of densities n and s of particles and entropy from mean mv2 3

When substituting Eq. (8) into (7b), one should use the Our discussion so far assumed that the frequencies of expression in terms of the entropy density s and keep interest are in the range (1). In other words, we set in mind thatv ˜ is a function of density n that in turn τex = 0 and τ = ∞. We shall now relax the latter con- depends on time. Expressing the resulting ∂tn with the dition, i.e., assume a large but finite τ and extend our < −1 aid of Eq. (7a) and using the expression (10b) for jε, we treatment to frequencies ω ∼ τ . In this regime one obtain must account for the backscattering processes studied in Refs. [18–21]. Due to the slow rate of these processes, ∂ts + s ∂xuex =0. (11b) they do not affect the equilibrium form of the distribution function (6). As a result the state of the system is This result has the form of the continuity equation ex- still described by parameters n, T , u0, and uex, but be- pressing the conservation of entropy, which holds to linear cause of the backscattering processes the two velocities order in a deviation from equilibrium. Since the entropy relax toward each other as is transported only by the gas of excitations, one expects d uex − u0 the entropy current in the form js = suex, in agreement (uex − u0)= − . (12) with Eq. (11b). dt τ When substituting Eqs. (10c) and (10d) into (7c) and It is important to point out that this relaxation does not (7d) one must evaluate the derivatives of the ground state affect the expressions (10) for the currents and does not (0) (0) chemical potential µ and pressure jp with respect to violate the conservation laws for the number of particles, the density. The chemical potential is easily obtained energy, and momentum of the system. (0) from the first term in Eq. (3), resulting in ∂nµ = In our hydrodynamic description of the one- 2 mvρ/n. The derivative of the pressure is found using dimensional system, the first three of the four equations (0) (0) 2 (7), and, respectively, (11), express these three conserva- the thermodynamic relation ∂ jp = n∂ µ = mv . n n ρ tion laws and thus remain unchanged. The right-hand Then Eq. (7c) takes the form side of Eq. (7d), becomes du0/dt, which is found by ap- 2ε plying conservation of momentum condition dp/dt =0to ∂tu0 + 2 (∂tuex − ∂tu0) mnv2 Eq. (9) and using (12). After that we recover Eq. (11d) −1 2 with a simple modification ∂t → ∂t + τ . 2 ∂n(nv˜) ∂xn 2ε ∂n(nv˜) ∂xs +vρ 1+ ε 2 + =0. (11c) This modification of the hydrodynamic equations (11) mvρv˜ n mn v˜ s < −1 strongly affects the second sound mode at ω ∼ τ . To 2 To leading order at T → 0, substitution of Eq. (10d) first approximation we take ε/nmv2 → 0 and obtain the into (7d) gives the same result, because in this limit frequency of the second sound in the form p = mnu . Taking the difference of these two equations, − − 0 ω = (v q)2 − (2τ) 2 − i(2τ) 1. (13) which accounts for the time dependence of the momen- 2 −1 tum of the gas of excitations, we arrive at At v2|q| > (2τ) pthe frequency is reduced, and more im- portantly, the second sound decays with the rate (2τ)−1. 2 n∂nv˜ ∂xn 2 ∂xs No wavelike solution exists at v |q| < (2τ)−1. Heat prop- ∂tuex − ∂tu0 + v2 + v2 =0. (11d) 2 v˜ n s 2 2 agation over long distances is diffusive: ω = −i(v2τ)q at q → 0. As a result, the system has a large, but fi- To study the propagation of collective modes in one- nite thermal conductivity κ obtained by multiplying the 2 dimensional liquids, we now solve the system of equa- diffusion coefficient v2 τ by the specific heat ∂ε/∂T , tions (11). In the low-temperature limit one can set πT v2τ ε = 0 in Eqs. (11a) and (11c). One easily finds two κ = 2 . (14) − ~ propagating-wave solutions proportional to e iωt+iqx. 3 v˜ First, Eqs. (11a) and (11c) give rise to a phonon-like Alternatively, the thermal conductivity can be obtained mode with the spectrum ω = vρ|q|. This mode is de- directly from the modified Eq. (11d). Replacing ∂t → −1 termined by the dynamics of the variables n and u0, de- ∂t + τ and considering long time scales gives Eq. (11d) −1 2 scribing the waves of particle density. Due to the presence with ∂t → τ . At ε/nmv2 → 0 the gas of excitations of mixing terms in Eq. (11d), the phonon is accompanied does not affect particle density n and velocity u0, see by the oscillation of entropy density s and velocity of the Eqs. (11a) and (11c). Assuming n = const and u0 = 0 2 gas of excitations uex. in Eq. (11d), one finds uex = −v2τ(∂xs)/s. Substituting Second, there is a solution with the spectrum ω = v2|q| this result into the expression jQ = Tsuex for the heat 2 that describes waves of s and uex, whereas n = n0 and current, we obtain jQ = −T v2τ∂xs. Using our earlier u0 = const. This wave of entropy is fully analogous to the result for the entropy density s = πT/3~v˜, we obtain 4 second sound in superfluid He. The existence of the sec- jQ = −κ∂xT with κ given by Eq. (14). ond sound in a system of one-dimensional fermions with To find the effect of a finite backscattering rate on the repulsive interactions is the main result of this paper. first sound, one should solve the set of equations (11) in 4

2 1 first order in the small parameter ε/nmv2. At small q we that of spin- 2 fermions with attractive interactions. In find this case the energy spectrum of the spin excitations has a finite gap ∆ at T = 0 [4]. Our two-mode description πT 2∂2(n2v˜) κT ∂ (nv˜) 2 ω = v + n q − i n q2. still applies at ∆ ≪ T . In the opposite limit, ∆ ≫ T , the ρ 12~mnv v˜2 2mnv2 v˜ spin excitations are frozen out, and the adaptation of the ρ ρ (15) theory to the spinless case, as described above, should be This result demonstrates that at ωτ → 0 the first sound made. mode becomes the ordinary thermodynamic sound. In The existence of the second sound mode means that particular, the first term in Eq. (15) contains a correc- the heat propagation in the one-dimensional system is tion to the sound velocity, which simply accounts for the ballistic at sufficiently high frequencies ω ≫ τ −1, whereas temperature dependence of the adiabatic compressibil- the usual diffusive heat transport is restored at ω ≪ τ −1. ity of the one-dimensional quantum liquid. The second Experimentally, such a frequency dependence of ther- term is imaginary and thus describes attenuation of the mal transport may be observed in long ballistic quan- sound mode. Indeed, in any medium thermal conductiv- tum wires, such as those obtained by the cleaved-edge ity gives rise to the absorption of sound. We have verified overgrowth technique [29, 30]. A time-dependent tem- that the resulting absorption rate [25] is consistent with perature difference across the wire can be achieved by the second term in Eq. (15). driving ac current through one of the leads, cf. Ref. [31]. To summarize, we have studied collective excitations A direct observation of both first and second sound 1 6 of a system of one-dimensional spin- 2 fermions at a low was recently reported in a system of Li atoms in elon- temperature based on a two-fluid hydrodynamic descrip- gated trap [32]. In this experiment the system was three- tion of the system. In contrast to liquid 4He, there is dimensional, and superfluidity was achieved by tuning no superfluid condensate in our case. The two-fluid na- interactions to resonance by a magnetic field. In order ture of the system can be understood as follows. We to observe the second sound discussed in this paper, one apply the Luttinger liquid theory to small sections of the can replace the trap in Ref. [32] with an array of narrow one-dimensional system. The state of each section is de- traps that are in the one-dimensional regime [33, 34]. scribed by two sets of variables: the occupation numbers The authors are grateful to Subhadeep Gupta for help- of the elementary excitations, and the zero modes N and ful discussions. Work at Argonne National Laboratory J. In addition, we keep in mind that the excitations was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office equilibrate with each other at the rather short time scale of Science, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division. τex, whereas their equilibration with the zero modes hap- Work at the University of Washington was supported by pens at the much longer scale τ. Thus in the frequency the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science, Basic range (1) the system consists of two components. The Energy Sciences under Award No. DE-FG02-07ER46452. excitations form a gas, analogous to the normal component of superfluid 4He, whereas the position- and time- dependent values of densities of N and J describe a second liquid, similar to the superfluid component of 4He. Our main result is that in addition to the well- [1] S Tomonaga, “Remarks on Bloch’s Method of understood acoustic charge and spin excitation modes Sound Waves applied to Many-Fermion Problems,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 5, 544–569 (1950). propagating at velocities v and v , there is a second ρ σ [2] J. M. Luttinger, “An Exactly Soluble Model of a Many- sound mode propagating at velocity v2 given by Eq. (9). Fermion System,” J. Math. Phys. 4, 1154–1162 (1963). This mode describes the waves of entropy; its decay is [3] F. D. M. Haldane, “’Luttinger liquid theory’ of small for frequencies in the range (1). In contrast to su- one-dimensional quantum fluids. I. Properties perfluid 4He, at ω ≪ τ −1 the second sound disappears, of the Luttinger model and their extension to and the heat transport becomes diffusive. Another sys- the general 1D interacting spinless Fermi gas,” 14 tem where the second sound exists in a finite frequency J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. , 2585–2609 (1981). [4] Thierry Giamarchi, Quantum physics in one dimension range is dielectric crystal [26, 27]. (Clarendon, Oxford, 2004). Our treatment can be applied to other one-dimensional [5] C. L. Kane and Matthew P. A. Fisher, “Trans- systems at low temperatures, such as a system of bosons mission through barriers and resonant tunneling or spin-polarized fermions. The absence of spin excita- in an interacting one-dimensional electron gas,” tions in these systems can be accounted for by taking the Phys. Rev. B 46, 15233–15262 (1992). [6] Akira Furusaki and Naoto Nagaosa, “Single- limit vσ → ∞ in our formulas. In this case the velocities of the first and second sound modes are both equal barrier problem and Anderson localization in a one-dimensional interacting electron system,” to vρ in the limit T → 0. It is worth mentioning that Phys. Rev. B 47, 4631–4643 (1993). at vσ → ∞ our expression (14) for thermal conductivity [7] Seigo Tarucha, Takashi Honda, and Tadashi Saku, recovers the result for the spinless one-dimensional sys- “Reduction of quantized conductance at low temper- tem obtained in Ref. [28]. Another important example is atures observed in 2 to 10 µm-long quantum wires,” 5

Solid State Commun. 94, 413–418 (1995). Phys. Rev. B 85, 041102 (2012). [8] O. M. Auslaender, A. Yacoby, R. de Picciotto, K. W. [21] K. A. Matveev, A. V. Andreev, and A. D. Baldwin, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, “Experimental Klironomos, “Scattering of charge and spin excitations Evidence for Resonant Tunneling in a Luttinger Liquid,” and equilibration of a one-dimensional Wigner crystal,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1764–1767 (2000). Phys. Rev. B 90, 035148 (2014). [9] Marc Bockrath, David H. Cobden, Jia Lu, Andrew G. [22] L. D. Landau, “The Theory of Superfluidity of Helium Rinzler, Richard E. Smalley, Leon Balents, and Paul L. II,” J. Phys. USSR 5, 71 (1941). McEuen, “Luttinger-liquid behaviour in carbon nano- [23] I. M. Khalatnikov, An introduction to the theory of su- tubes,” Nature 397, 598–601 (1999). perfluidity (Perseus, New York, 2000). [10] Zhen Yao, Henk W. Ch. Postma, Leon Balents, and [24] A more detailed microscopic theory is required for the Cees Dekker, “Carbon nanotube intramolecular junc- evaluation of the relaxation times τ and τex, which is not tions,” Nature 402, 273–276 (1999). part of this work. [11] A. V. Rozhkov, “Fermionic quasiparticle repre- [25] L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics (Else- sentation of Tomonaga-Luttinger Hamiltonian,” vier, Oxford, 2013). Eur. Phys. J. B 47, 193–206 (2005). [26] Charles P. Enz, “Two-fluid hydrodynamic description of [12] Adilet Imambekov, Thomas L. Schmidt, and ordered systems,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 46, 705–753 (1974). Leonid I. Glazman, “One-dimensional quantum [27] V. L. Gurevich, Transport in phonon systems (North- liquids: Beyond the Luttinger liquid paradigm,” Holland, Amsterdam, 1986). Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1253–1306 (2012). [28] Wade DeGottardi and K. A. Matveev, “Electrical and [13] M. Arzamasovs, F. Bovo, and D. M. Gangardt, “Ki- Thermal Transport in Inhomogeneous Luttinger Liq- netics of Mobile Impurities and Correlation Functions uids,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 236405 (2015). in One-Dimensional Superfluids at Finite Temperature,” [29] A. Yacoby, H. L. Stormer, Ned S. Wingreen, L. N. Pfeif- Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 170602 (2014). fer, K. W. Baldwin, and K. W. West, “Nonuniversal [14] I. V. Protopopov, D. B. Gutman, and A. D. Mirlin, Conductance Quantization in Quantum Wires,” Phys. “Relaxation in Luttinger liquids: Bose-Fermi duality,” Rev. Lett. 77, 4612–4615 (1996). Phys. Rev. B 90, 125113 (2014). [30] C. P. Scheller, T.-M. Liu, G. Barak, A. Yacoby, L. N. [15] Zoran Ristivojevic and K. A. Matveev, “Relaxation Pfeiffer, K. W. West, and D. M. Zumbühl, “Possible Ev- of weakly interacting electrons in one dimension,” idence for Helical Nuclear Spin Order in GaAs Quantum Phys. Rev. B 87, 165108 (2013). Wires,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 066801 (2014). [16] Torsten Karzig, Leonid I. Glazman, and Fe- [31] A. A. M. Staring, L. W. Molenkamp, B. W. Alphenaar, lix von Oppen, “Energy Relaxation and Ther- H. van Houten, O. J. A. Buyk, M. A. A. Mabesoone, malization of Hot Electrons in Quantum Wires,” C. W. J. Beenakker, and C. T. Foxon, “Coulomb- Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 226407 (2010). Blockade Oscillations in the Thermopower of a Quantum [17] Anders Mathias Lunde, Karsten Flensberg, and Dot,” Europhys. Lett. 22, 57–62 (1993). Leonid I. Glazman, “Three-particle collisions in quantum [32] Leonid A. Sidorenkov, Meng Khoon Tey, Rudolf Grimm, wires: Corrections to thermopower and conductance,” Yan-Hua Hou, Lev Pitaevskii, and Sandro Stringari, Phys. Rev. B 75, 245418 (2007). “Second sound and the superfluid fraction in a Fermi gas [18] Tobias Micklitz, Jérôme Rech, and K. A. Matveev, with resonant interactions,” Nature 498, 78–81 (2013). “Transport properties of partially equilibrated quantum [33] Toshiya Kinoshita, Trevor Wenger, and David S. Weiss, wires,” Phys. Rev. B 81, 115313 (2010). “Observation of a One-Dimensional Tonks-Girardeau [19] K. A. Matveev, A. V. Andreev, and M. Pustilnik, “Equi- Gas,” Science 305, 1125–1128 (2004). libration of a One-Dimensional Wigner Crystal,” Phys. [34] Henning Moritz, Thilo Stöferle, Kenneth Günter, Rev. Lett. 105, 046401 (2010). Michael Köhl, and Tilman Esslinger, “Confine- [20] K. A. Matveev and A. V. Andreev, “Equi- ment Induced Molecules in a 1D Fermi Gas,” libration of a spinless Luttinger liquid,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 210401 (2005).