Kazakhstan Tier 2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kazakhstan Tier 2 KAZAKHSTAN TIER 2 KEY FINDINGS Amid a general crackdown on dissent and nonconformity, activity” and “religious teaching” to penalize a broader range during which even secular civil society activists have faced of expression; as of December 2017, additional amendments charges of terrorism, the Kazakh government continued to under consideration would further restrict religious freedom, commit serious violations of religious freedom in 2017. During including education for children, worshipping in private homes, the year, 20 individuals were sentenced to prison terms for and discussing religious beliefs. Throughout the year, dozens the peaceful expression of religious beliefs, including a Jeho- of Muslims and Christians were fined or detained for religious vah’s Witness and members of the Tabligh Jamaat Islamic observance or for the possession of religious literature. In an missionary movement. Government suspicion is aroused par- ominous echo of practices in the neighboring countries of ticularly by proselytism, connections to religious movements Russia and Uzbekistan, Kazakh authorities temporarily banned or institutions abroad, and criticism of or dissent from official Jehovah’s Witnesses and charged a religious prisoner due for religious policy. The country’s restrictive 2011 religion law bans release with new infractions. Based on these concerns, in 2018 unregistered religious activity and is enforced through police USCIRF again places Kazakhstan on its Tier 2 for engaging in raids, detentions, fines, and the closing of religious institu- or tolerating religious freedom violations that meet at least tions. In December 2016, amendments to this law increased one of the elements of the “systematic, ongoing, egregious” penalties and state controls of religious literature and foreign standard for designation as a “country of particular concern,” religious travel, and expanded the definitions of “missionary or CPC, under the International Religious Freedom Act (IRFA). RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE U.S. GOVERNMENT • Ensure that the U.S.-Kazakh Strategic observance and expression, in line • Apply the Global Magnitsky Human Partnership Dialogue and other bilat- with the recommendations of the Rights Accountability Act, Executive eral interactions prioritize discussion of United Nations (UN) Human Rights Order 13818, or other relevant tar- issues relating to freedom of religion Committee; geted tools, to deny U.S. visas to and or belief, including pressing the Kazakh • Provide an alternative to military ser- block the U.S. assets of specific officials government to: vice for conscientious objectors; and and agencies identified as responsible for violations of the right to freedom of • Refrain from imposing repressive • Agree to visits by the three Organi- religion or belief; practices similar to other neighbor- zation for Security and Cooperation ing countries that are recommended in Europe (OSCE) Personal Repre- • Ensure the U.S. Embassy, including by USCIRF for CPC designation; sentatives on Tolerance, set specific at the ambassadorial level, maintains • Desist from further restrictive dates, and provide the full and active contacts with religious freedom amendments to its laws that infringe necessary conditions for such visits. activists; and on religious freedom and instead • Press for at the highest levels and work • Ensure continued U.S. funding for bring those laws in line with Kazakh- to secure the unconditional release of Radio Azattyq, the Kazakh service of stan’s commitments to international prisoners of conscience, and press the Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/ human rights standards; Kazakh government to treat prisoners RL), so that uncensored information • Ensure that anti-extremism and humanely and allow them access to about events inside Kazakhstan, includ- counterterrorism campaigns do not family, human rights monitors, ade- ing those related to religious freedom, serve as a pretext for infringement quate medical care, and lawyers, and continues to be disseminated. on the right to peaceful religious the ability to practice their faith; USCIRF | ANNUAL REPORT 2018 TIER 2 TIER KAZAKHSTAN COUNTRY FACTS FULL NAME RELIGIOUS DEMOGRAPHY* Republic of Kazakhstan 70% Muslim (Sunni Hanafi) 26% Christian (including Orthodox, Protestants, Catholics, GOVERNMENT Jehovah’s Witnesses) Presidential Republic 3% Other (including Jews, Buddhists, Baha’is, Hare Krishnas) POPULATION 1% Non-Hanafi Muslim (including Shi’a and Sufi Muslims) 18,500,000 GOVERNMENT-RECOGNIZED RELIGIONS/FAITHS Sunni Hanafi Islam and Russian Orthodoxy *U.S. Department of State BACKGROUND and Orthodox Christianity.” Unfortunately, govern- Before its 2011 religion law was enacted, Kazakhstan ment practice suggests that other religions do not enjoy was one of the least repressive post-Soviet Central the same status. The government also funds “anti-sect Asian states with regard to freedom of religion or belief. centers” that function as quasi-nongovernmental The religion law, however, sets stringent registration organizations, publicly promoting intolerance against requirements with high membership thresholds, certain religious minorities. and bans or restricts unregistered religious activities, In 2016, Kazakhstan was marked by widespread including those relating to education, literature dis- popular unrest over land reforms, as well as by tribution, and training clergy. Other vague criminal two attacks on security forces that the government and administrative statutes enable the state to pun- attributed to Islamist fundamentalists, possibly as a ish most unauthorized religious or political activity. pretext for cracking down on civil society. In Septem- Religious groups are subject to police and secret ber 2016, a new government ministry, Religion and police surveillance. As a result of the law’s registration Civil Society, was formed; the Religious Affairs Com- requirements, the total number of registered religious mittee, which oversees official policies on religion, groups fell sharply after 2011, especially the number falls under its jurisdiction. Reflecting the official of “nontraditional” religious groups, which declined assumption that religion is above all a security issue, from 48 to 16. By 2013, only Muslim groups affiliated the chair of the Kazakh National Security Council was with the state-backed Muslim Board were registered. appointed to head the new ministry. In December Shi’a and Ahmadi Muslims were denied legal status, 2016, Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev signed a as were mosques attended primarily by particular package of amendments into law increasing penalties ethnic groups. As it was during Soviet times, the 11,000 and state controls of religious literature and foreign members of the Union of Evangelical Christian Baptists religious travel. The definitions of “missionary activ- refuse—as a matter of conscience—to register. Catho- ity” and “religious teaching” were widened to penalize lic communities are exempt from registration due to a a broader range of individuals and activities involving government agreement with the Holy See. Although all religious expression. religions are officially equal under the religion law, its The articles of the Criminal Code most commonly preamble “recognizes the historical role of Hanafi Islam used to imprison religious believers are article 174, USCIRF | ANNUAL REPORT 2018 TIER 2 TIER KAZAKHSTAN which penalizes “incitation of social, national, clan, However, Christians in Kazakhstan also are subject to racial, class, or religious conflict,” and article 405, imprisonment for their beliefs. In 2017, the number of which punishes involvement in “extremist” move- Christian prisoners of conscience in Kazakhstan briefly ments banned by the court system. In July 2016, the UN increased to two; in May 2017, Jehovah’s Witness Teymur Human Rights Committee criticized the government Akhmedov, who suffers from cancer, started serving a of Kazakhstan for its use of article 174 and other overly five-year prison term under article 174 for sharing his broad laws to punish the peaceful exercise of freedom of beliefs with secret police informers posing as students. In religion or belief. In August 2016, the UN Human Rights October 2017, Seventh-day Adventist Yklas Kabduakasov Committee expressed concern that the “broad formula- was released from prison after completing a two-year tion” of the concept of extremism in Kazakh law “unduly sentence for discussing his faith. Two more Christians restrict[s]” religious freedom. were convicted on criminal charges in 2017 but received only “restricted freedom” sentences, which limit their RELIGIOUS FREEDOM CONDITIONS 2017 freedom of movement inside the country. Asaf Guliyev, Changes to the Laws another Jehovah’s Witness charged alongside Akhmedov, As of December 2017, additional amendments that would received five years of restricted freedom, while Baptist further restrict religious freedom were under final consider- Yuri Bekker was sentenced to one year of restricted free- ation by the Kazakh government. Particularly troubling are dom for refusing to pay a fine levied in September 2015 for amendments that would affect education for children, wor- distributing religious literature. In August 2017, the UN shipping in private homes, and discussing religious beliefs. Working Group on Arbitrary Detention called for Akhme- Among other things, the proposed amendments would fur- dov’s immediate release. ther restrict who may legally proselytize—already broadly Much more common were administrative
Recommended publications
  • Conflict Between Freedom of Expression and Religion in India—A Case Study
    Article Conflict between Freedom of Expression and Religion in India—A Case Study Amit Singh Centre for Social Studies, University of Coimbra, Colégio de S. Jerónimo Apartado 3087, 3000-995 Coimbra, Portugal; [email protected] Received: 24 March 2018; Accepted: 27 June 2018; Published: 29 June 2018 Abstract: The tussle between freedom of expression and religious intolerance is intensely manifested in Indian society where the State, through censoring of books, movies and other forms of critical expression, victimizes writers, film directors, and academics in order to appease Hindu religious-nationalist and Muslim fundamentalist groups. Against this background, this study explores some of the perceptions of Hindu and Muslim graduate students on the conflict between freedom of expression and religious intolerance in India. Conceptually, the author approaches the tussle between freedom of expression and religion by applying a contextual approach of secular- multiculturalism. This study applies qualitative research methods; specifically in-depth interviews, desk research, and narrative analysis. The findings of this study help demonstrate how to manage conflict between freedom of expression and religion in Indian society, while exploring concepts of Western secularism and the need to contextualize the right to freedom of expression. Keywords: freedom of expression; Hindu-Muslim; religious-intolerance; secularism; India 1. Background Ancient India is known for its skepticism towards religion and its toleration to opposing views (Sen 2005; Upadhyaya 2009), However, the alarming rise of Hindu religious nationalism and Islamic fundamentalism, and consequently, increasing conflict between freedom of expression and religion, have been well noted by both academic (Thapar 2015) and public intellectuals (Sorabjee 2018; Dhavan 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • ISSN 2320-5407 International Journal of Advanced Research (2015), Volume 3, Issue 8, 837- 845
    ISSN 2320-5407 International Journal of Advanced Research (2015), Volume 3, Issue 8, 837- 845 Journal homepage: http://www.journalijar.com INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH RESEARCH ARTICLE ROLE OF ATTORNEY IN THE DEFAMATION OF RELIGION CRIME PROSECUTION AND RELATED TO OBJECTIVE OF SENTENCING Agung Dhedy Dwi Handes1 & Zulkifli Aspan2 1.Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia 2. Department of Law, Hasanuddin University. Manuscript Info Abstract Manuscript History: This study aims to determine the role and constraints of the Prosecutor in the prosecution of the crime of defamation of religion is connected with the Received: 15 June 2015 Final Accepted: 18 July 2015 purpose of punishment. This study uses normative research and socio- Published Online: August 2015 juridical. The results showed how the relationship prosecution procedure and substance of the prosecution so that the role of the prosecution of the crime Key words: of defamation of religions can work well within the framework of law enforcement and the attainment of the objectives of punishment for the The prosecutor, Prosecution, perpetrators of the crime of blasphemy. Religion, Punishment *Corresponding Author Agung Dhedy Dwi Copy Right, IJAR, 2015,. All rights reserved Handes INTRODUCTION Freedom of religion is one of the human rights of the most fundamental (basic) and fundamental to every human being. The right to freedom of religion has been agreed by the world community as an inherent individual rights directly, which must be respected, upheld and protected by the state, the government, and everyone for the respect and protection of human dignity. This can be seen in the Constitutional Court Decision No.
    [Show full text]
  • “Hate Spin”: the Limits of Law in Managing Religious Incitement and Offense
    International Journal of Communication 10(2016), 2955–2972 1932–8036/20160005 Regulating “Hate Spin”: The Limits of Law in Managing Religious Incitement and Offense CHERIAN GEORGE1 Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong As democracies try to manage the risks arising from religious vilification, questions are being raised about free speech and its limits. This article clarifies key issues in that debate. It centers on the phenomenon of “hate spin”—the giving or taking of offense as a political strategy. Any policy response must try to distinguish between incitement to actual harms and expression that becomes the object of manufactured indignation. An analysis of the use of hate spin by right-wing groups in India and the United States demonstrates that laws against incitement, while necessary, are insufficient for dealing with highly organized hate campaigns. As for laws against offense, these are counterproductive, because they tend to empower the most intolerant sections of society. Keywords: hate speech, incitement, offense, freedom of expression, censorship, India, United States, First Amendment How to regulate religious offense has become one of the most contentious questions concerning freedom of expression. The 2015 murder of Charlie Hebdo cartoonists in revenge for their satirical depictions of the Prophet Mohammed was just one of several traumatic incidents that have prompted democracies to ponder once again the tension between free speech and respect for religion. If only to protect people from violent retribution, some commentators wonder whether the time has come to set stricter limits on the right to offend. For example, the European Council on Tolerance and Reconciliation (2015), chaired by former British prime minister Tony Blair, has proposed laws for combating intolerance that would temper liberal democracies’ position on free speech.
    [Show full text]
  • Blasphemy As Violence: Trying to Understand the Kind of Injury That Can Be Inflicted by Acts and Artefacts That Are Construed As Blasphemy
    Journal of Religion in Europe Journal of Religion in Europe 6 (2013) 35–63 brill.com/jre Blasphemy As Violence: Trying to Understand the Kind of Injury That Can Be Inflicted by Acts and Artefacts That Are Construed As Blasphemy Christoph Baumgartner Faculty of Humanities, Utrecht University [email protected] Abstract This article suggests an understanding of blasphemy as violence that enables us to identify various kinds of injury that can be inflicted by blasphemous acts and artefacts. Understanding blasphemy as violence can take three forms: physical violence, indirect intersubjective violence, and psychological violence. The condi- tions that allow for an understanding of blasphemy as physical violence depend on very specific religious assumptions. This is different in the case of indirect intersubjective violence that can take effect in social circumstances where certain forms of blasphemy reinforce existing negative stereotypes of believers. The analy- sis of blasphemy as psychological violence reveals that interpretations according to which believers who take offense to blasphemy are ‘backward’ and ‘unenlight- ened’ do not suffice to explain the conditions of the insult that is felt by some believers. The article shows that these conditions can be explained by means of Harry Frankfurt’s philosophical theory of caring. Keywords anti-religious racism; blasphemy; caring; offense; violence 1. Introduction In recent years, acts and artefacts that were perceived as blasphemous by numerous believers received much attention in public debate as well as in scholarly literature. This concerns the various aspects and interests which motivated public statements and demonstrations for or against such acts © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2013 DOI 10.1163/18748929-00601007 36 C.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Immersed in the Snares of Apostasy:' Martyrdom and Dissent in Early Al
    ‘Immersed in the Snares of Apostasy:’ Martyrdom and Dissent in Early al-Andalus _________________________________ A Thesis Presented to The Honors Tutorial College Ohio University _________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for Graduation From the Honors Tutorial College With a degree of Bachelor of Arts in History _________________________________ Written by Francisco Cintron April 2018 This thesis has been approved by The Honors Tutorial College and the Department of History _________________________ Dr. Kevin Uhalde Associate Professor, History Thesis Adviser ___________________________ Dr. Miriam Shadis Associate Professor, History Director of Studies ___________________________ Cary Roberts Frith Interim Dean Honors Tutorial College Table of Contents Introduction....................................................................................................1 Chapter One....................................................................................................8 Constructing a Sociopolitical Order Chapter Two.................................................................................................32 Eulogius’ Martyrs & Córdoba’s Response Chapter Three...............................................................................................60 Christian Martyrs of the Umayyad Regime Conclusion....................................................................................................86 Bibliography.................................................................................................92
    [Show full text]
  • Why the First Amendment Must Protect Provocative Portrayals of the Prophet Muhammad Daniel Ortner
    Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy Volume 12 | Issue 1 Article 1 Winter 2016 The eT rrorist's Veto: Why the First Amendment Must Protect Provocative Portrayals of the Prophet Muhammad Daniel Ortner Recommended Citation Daniel Ortner, The Terrorist's Veto: Why the First Amendment Must Protect Provocative Portrayals of the Prophet Muhammad, 12 Nw. J. L. & Soc. Pol'y. 1 (2016). http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njlsp/vol12/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Copyright 2016 by Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law Vol. 12, Issue 1 (2016) Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy The Terrorist’s Veto: Why the First Amendment Must Protect Provocative Portrayals of the Prophet Muhammad Daniel Ortner1 I. INTRODUCTION On Wednesday, January 7, 2015, armed gunmen entered the offices of French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo and killed employees and editors of the magazine in probable retaliation for the publication of satirical cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad.2 The attack on Charlie Hebdo has contributed to the debate over whether publication of speech that is likely to provoke violent reactions from religious extremists should be permissible.3 Some have argued that such speech should be prohibited in order to prevent responsive violence and terrorism.4 Recently, a school of journalism dean argued in USA Today that the publication of cartoons that insult the Prophet Muhammad 1 Daniel Ortner, J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Urgency of Religious-Blasphemy Case Arrangement in the Frame of Diversity Towards National Criminal Law Reform
    The Urgency of Religious-Blasphemy Case Arrangement in the Frame of Diversity towards National Criminal Law Reform Somawijaya*, Ajie Ramdan** DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v5n3.a4 Submitted: October 14, 2018 | Accepted: December 27, 2018 Abstract Indonesia is an independent state with One Godly Belief based on just civilized humanity. Amid the diversity, and to guarantee togetherness within the framework of state life, the state desperately needs the formulation of common goals or ideals commonly referred to as state philosophy or state ideals, which function as grodslag philosophies and common platform for citizens in the context of state life. This diversity is recognized on the Indonesian emblem of Garuda Pancasila ‘Bhinneka Tunggal Ika’. The notion of the importance of regulation regarding the criminal offense of blasphemy is the realization of the first principle in the Pancasila, namely the Belief in the One and Only God. This study analyzed the new Draft of the Criminal Code submitted by the Government to the Indonesian Parliament in mid-2015 to replace the Criminal Code that is inherited from the era of the Dutch Colonial. The new Draft of the Criminal Code contains important changes, namely the existence of reconciliation efforts and revitalization of blasphemy acts. This change becomes interesting to be examined, especially from the urgency of the existence of regulation on blasphemy in the frame of diversity and aspects of penal reform. It also explains that the issue of blasphemy is very sensitive in Indonesian society. Constitutional Court Decree Number 140/PUU-VII/2009 is the foundation of the re-conception and revitalization of blasphemy in Penal Reform.
    [Show full text]
  • CQR Religious Repression
    Published by CQ Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc. www.cqresearcher.com Religious Repression Should U.S. support of religious freedom be stronger? early 75 percent of the world’s inhabitants — 5.1 billion people — live in countries that restrict religious freedom, a fundamental human right N under international law. Draconian antiblasphemy laws, threats of imprisonment, physical attacks and the desecration of holy sites are among the tools used to stifle religious expression . Many foreign policy experts see religious oppression as a serious threat to global stability. Advocates in the United States are pushing Refugees from Sudan attend church services in a policymakers to make religious freedom a higher priority, arguing refugee camp in newly independent South Sudan in July 2012. After the south voted for independence in that promoting it abroad will help defuse tensions and foster 2011, following a 22-year civil war, thousands of Sudanese Christians in the largely Muslim north fled south, where the new constitution protects peace and democracy. But others say that making religion a focus religious freedom. Sudan’s imposition of draconian Islamic law, or Sharia, sparked the war. of foreign policy is a mistake because it is too complex and volatile an issue. Meanwhile, some countries, such as newly inde - I pendent South Sudan, have taken noteworthy steps to broaden THIS REPORT N THE ISSUES ....................935 religious rights. S BACKGROUND ................941 I CHRONOLOGY ................943 D AT ISSUE ........................949 E CQ Researcher • Nov. 1, 2013 • www.cqresearcher.com CURRENT SITUATION ........950 Volume 23, Number 39 • Pages 933-956 OUTLOOK ......................951 RECIPIENT OF SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS AWARD FOR BIBLIOGRAPHY ................954 EXCELLENCE N AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SILVER GAVEL AWARD THE NEXT STEP ..............955 RELIGIOUS REPRESSION Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Question" Doctrine? Judicial Authority to Examine Religious Practices and Beliefs
    Catholic University Law Review Volume 54 Issue 2 Winter 2005 Article 4 2005 Is There a "Religious Question" Doctrine? Judicial Authority to Examine Religious Practices and Beliefs Jared A. Goldstein Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview Recommended Citation Jared A. Goldstein, Is There a "Religious Question" Doctrine? Judicial Authority to Examine Religious Practices and Beliefs, 54 Cath. U. L. Rev. 497 (2005). Available at: https://scholarship.law.edu/lawreview/vol54/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Catholic University Law Review by an authorized editor of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IS THERE A "RELIGIOUS QUESTION" DOCTRINE? JUDICIAL AUTHORITY TO EXAMINE RELIGIOUS PRACTICES AND BELIEFS JaredA. Goldstein' In the familiar 1947 movie Miracle on 34th Street, faith and law come into comical conflict. As anyone who has seen the movie remembers, the plot concerns the identity of a jolly, portly, white-bearded old man who calls himself Kris Kringle and claims to be the one and only Santa Claus. When the old man's apparent delusion lands him in a state mental institution, the film's romantic lead, a lawyer, sets out to free him. An involuntary commitment hearing is called to determine the purported Santa's sanity, and the old man's lawyer sets out to prove that his client is the true Santa. The district attorney argues that the existence of Santa Claus is not a proper subject for judicial inquiry.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Offence As a Political Tool
    Institut Européen des Hautes Etudes Internationales Master in Advanced European and International Studies Anglophone Branch Religious Offence as a Political Tool. The Role of Religion in the Limitation of Freedom of Expression. Master thesis by: Marzena Romanowska Adviser: dr. Nizar Ben Ayed 2007/2008 “If liberty means anything, it means the right to tell people what they don’t want to hear.” George Orwell 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………………………..4 Section I – Defining religious offence 1. Religion in politics – an introduction and historical background………………...7 1.1. The meaning of religion in world politics – example of Islamic states. Fundamentalism……………………………………………………………...7 1.2. Theory of secularism………………………………………………………..17 2. Definition of religious offence…………………………………………………..19 2.1. What is sacred nowadays?..............................................................................20 2.2. Religious offence and its role in history. Blasphemy……………………….22 Section II – Religious offence in the context of freedom of expression. 3. Freedom of expression as a human right………………………………………..30 3.1. What is the freedom of expression? Freedom of expression vs. freedom of speech………………………………………………………………...……..30 3.2. Religious hate speech and its censorship………………………………….. 36 4. Limitations of freedom of expression based on religious issues - case studies……………………………………………………………………….…..38 4.1. “The Satanic Verses” affair……………………………………………...….39 4.2. The Danish cartoons affair……………………………………………….....49 4.3. Freedom of expression in the Netherlands. “Submission” and “Fitna”........55 Section III – Blasphemy laws in theory and in practice. 5. The debate on blasphemy laws in Europe………………………………….……62 6. Blasphemy laws in non-secular states – case of Pakistan……………………....68 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………..73 3 Introduction As new particular cases constantly occur, the relation between religion and politics is present in contemporary international relations in many different ways.
    [Show full text]
  • The Causes of Religious Wars: Holy Nations, Sacred Spaces, and Religious Revolutions
    The Causes of Religious Wars: Holy Nations, Sacred Spaces, and Religious Revolutions By Heather Selma Gregg Master’s of Theological Studies (1998) Harvard Divinity School B.A., Cultural Anthropology (1993) University of California at Santa Cruz Submitted to the Department of Political Science In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology February 2004 Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All Rights Reserved 1 2 The Causes of Religious Wars: Holy Nations, Sacred Spaces, and Religious Revolutions by Heather Selma Gregg Submitted to the Department of Political Science on October 27, 2003 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science Abstract In the wake of September 11th, policy analysts, journalists, and academics have tried to make sense of the rise of militant Islam, particularly its role as a motivating and legitimating force for violence against the US. The unwritten assumption is that there is something about Islam that makes it bloodier and more violence-prone than other religions. This dissertation seeks to investigate this assertion by considering incidents of Islamically motivated terrorism, violence, and war, and comparing them to examples of Christian, Jewish, Buddhist and Hindu bellicosity. In doing so, it aims to evaluate if religious violence is primarily the product of beliefs, doctrine and scripture, or if religious violence is the result of other factors
    [Show full text]
  • Aryas Unbound: Print Hinduism and the Cultural Regulation of Religious Offense
    TSPACE RESEARCH REPOSITORY tspace.library.utoronto.ca Version: Postprint (Accepted Manuscript) 2015 Aryas Unbound: Print Hinduism and the Cultural Regulation of Religious Offense J. Barton Scott The Accepted Manuscript (AM), the final draft of this author manuscript, is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). To view the details of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Permanent link of this paper: http://hdl.handle.net/1807/95440 Important Notes Always cite the Version of Record (VoR: final publisher’s version)so that the author(s) will receive recognition through services that track citation counts, e.g., Scopus. When you are unable to access the VoR, the citation needs to include the word, Postprint (Accepted Manuscript). Visit Publisher’s Site for the VoR: https://doi.org/10.1215/1089201x-3139072 This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Duke University Press in Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa, and the Middle East in August 2015, available online: https://doi.org/10.1215/1089201x-3139072 Aryas Unbound: Print Hinduism and the Cultural Regulation of Religious Offense J. Barton Scott1 1 Department of Historical Studies and Department for the Study of Religion, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada ABSTRACT This article analyzes a controversial book ban from the 1940s to trace the mutual determinations of print media, the legal regulation of communal sentiment, and the discourse of religious tolerance in late colonial India. Claimed as the Bible of the Arya Samaj, the Satyarth Prakash (The Light of Truth) was banned in the Muslim-majority province of Sindh due to its defamatory remarks about the Prophet Muhammad.
    [Show full text]