DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Statement – Chapters 11-16

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Statement – Chapters 11-16 DOCUMENT 5.2 (Part 2 of 2) Environmental Statement – Chapters 11-16 National Grid (Richborough Connection Project) Order Regulation (5)(2)(a) Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 and TEN-E Regulation EU347/2013 Application Ref: EN020017 January 2016 Page intentionally blank Richborough Connection Project Volume 5 5.2 Environmental Statement National Grid National Grid House Warwick Technology Park Gallows Hill Warwick CV34 6DA Final January 2016 Page intentionally blank Richborough Connection Project – Volume 5, Document 5.2 Document Control Document Properties Organisation Amec Foster Wheeler Author Richborough EIA Project Team Approved by Karen Wilson and Chris Chadwick, Amec Foster Wheeler Title Environmental Statement Document Reference 5.2 Version History Date Version Status Description/Changes 04/01/16 1 Final 1st Issue Richborough Connection Project – Volume 5, Document 5.2 Page intentionally blank Richborough Connection Project – Volume 5, Document 5.2 Table of Contents – Part 2 of 2 (Chapters 11 to 16) 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 General introduction 1 1.2 The applicant 1 1.3 The national transmission system 2 1.4 The need for new infrastructure and the Richborough Connection project 3 1.5 Overview of the proposed development 4 1.6 Planning Act 2008 and TEN-E Regulation EU 347/2013 5 1.7 The need for an Environmental Impact Assessment 5 1.8 Purpose of the Environmental Statement 6 1.9 Consultation and engagement 12 1.10 Structure of the Environmental Statement 14 1.11 Other DCO documents 14 2. NEED FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 15 2.1 The need for the proposed development 15 2.2 National Grid’s duties 18 2.3 National Grid’s project development process 18 2.4 Consideration of alternatives for the Richborough Connection project 20 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 55 3.1 Summary description 55 3.2 Construction programme 59 3.3 Proposed development site and surroundings 62 3.4 400kV overhead line construction 64 3.5 132kV overhead line diversion works 89 3.6 132kV overhead line dismantling 91 3.7 Project design evolution and mitigation 95 3.8 Construction Environmental Management Plan 96 4. PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT 101 4.1 Introduction 101 4.2 National Policy Statements 102 4.3 National planning policy and guidance 107 4.4 Development plans 108 4.5 Other Local Planning Authorities 109 4.6 Other legislative requirements 110 5. THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROCESS 113 5.2 Environmental Impact Assessment terminology 114 5.3 Environmental Impact Assessment scoping and scheme evolution 115 Final i January 2016 Richborough Connection Project – Volume 5, Document 5.2 5.4 Project design and EIA scope evolution 127 5.5 Identification of baseline conditions 127 5.6 Assessment years 128 5.7 Overview of assessment methodology 129 5.8 Approach to cumulative effects 130 6. LANDSCAPE 145 6.1 Introduction 145 6.2 Policy and legislative context 146 6.3 Data gathering methodology 157 6.4 Environmental Impact Assessment consultation 159 6.5 Overall landscape baseline 165 6.6 Embedded environmental measures incorporated into the proposed development 197 6.7 Scope of the assessment 201 6.8 Assessment methodology 210 6.9 Assessment of effects: Landscape elements 216 6.10 Assessment of effects: Landscape character 227 6.11 Assessment of effects: Landscape designations 235 6.12 Assessment of effects: Wider study area – National designations 240 6.13 Conclusions of significance evaluation 242 7. VISUAL 247 7.1 Introduction 247 7.2 Policy and legislative context 248 7.3 Data gathering methodology 250 7.4 Environmental Impact Assessment consultation 252 7.5 Overall visual baseline 257 7.6 Embedded environmental measures incorporated into the proposed development 266 7.7 Scope of the assessment 269 7.8 Assessment methodology 276 7.9 Assessment of effects: Views within 1km 282 7.10 Assessment of effects: Views between 1 - 3km 322 7.11 Assessment of effects: Views beyond 3km 331 7.12 Conclusions of significance evaluation 335 8. HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT 355 8.1 Introduction 355 8.2 Policy and legislative context 355 8.3 Data gathering methodology 364 8.4 Environmental Impact Assessment consultation 365 8.5 Overall historic environment baseline 370 8.6 Embedded environmental measures incorporated into the proposed development 377 8.7 Scope of the assessment 379 Final ii January 2016 Richborough Connection Project – Volume 5, Document 5.2 8.8 Assessment Methodology 386 8.9 Assessment of effects: Direct effects on Heritage Assets 391 8.10 Assessment of Effects: Change to setting of heritage assets 414 8.11 Assessment of Effects: Historic Landscape Character 449 8.12 Conclusions of Significance Evaluation 454 9. BIODIVERSITY 461 9.1 Introduction 461 9.2 Policy and legislative context 462 9.3 Data gathering methodology 469 9.4 Environmental Impact Assessment consultation 478 9.5 Overall biodiversity baseline 492 9.6 Embedded environmental measures incorporated into the proposed development 495 9.7 Scope of the assessment 505 9.8 Assessment methodology 517 9.9 Assessment of effects: Thanet Coast & Sandwich Bay SPA/Ramsar 521 9.10 Assessment of effects: Stodmarsh SPA/Ramsar 530 9.11 Assessment of effects: Stodmarsh SAC 537 9.12 Assessment of effects: Statutory sites West Blean and Thornden Woods SSSI 540 9.13 Assessment of effects: River Great Stour, Ashford to Fordwich Local Wildlife Site 544 9.14 Assessment of effects: Little Hall and Kemberland Woods and Pastures Local Wildlife Site 548 9.15 Assessment of effects: Chislet Marshes, Sarre Penn and Preston Marshes Local Wildlife Site 552 9.16 Assessment of effects: Ash Level and South Richborough Pasture Local Wildlife Site 558 9.17 Assessment of effects: Ancient woodland, veteran trees and lowland mixed deciduous woodland. 563 9.18 Assessment of effects: Hedgerows 569 9.19 Assessment of effects: Rivers 573 9.20 Assessment of effects: Ponds 577 9.21 Assessment of effects: Curlew (Non-breeding) 580 9.22 Assessment of effects: Lapwing (Non-breeding) 585 9.23 Assessment of effects: Dunlin (Non-breeding) 591 9.24 Assessment of effects: Marsh harrier (Breeding and Non-breeding) 597 9.25 Assessment of effects: Hobby (breeding) 601 9.26 Assessment of effects: Peregrine (Breeding and non-breeding) 604 9.27 Assessment of effects: Barn owl (Non-breeding and Breeding) 608 9.28 Assessment of effects: Cetti’s warbler (breeding) 611 9.29 Assessment of effects: Kingfisher (breeding) 613 9.30 Assessment of effects: Great crested newts 615 9.31 Assessment of effects: Reptiles 620 9.32 Assessment of effects: Badgers 624 9.33 Assessment of effects: Bat Assemblage 627 9.34 Assessment of effects: Dormouse 634 Final iii January 2016 Richborough Connection Project – Volume 5, Document 5.2 9.35 Assessment of effects: Water vole and Otter 639 9.36 Assessment of effects: Terrestrial invertebrates 646 9.37 Assessment of effects: Invasive Plant Species 650 9.38 Conclusions of significance evaluation 652 10. TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT 667 10.1 Introduction 667 10.2 Policy and legislative context 667 10.3 Data gathering methodology 672 10.4 Environmental Impact Assessment consultation 672 10.5 Overall traffic baseline 678 10.6 Embedded environmental measures incorporated into the proposed development 690 10.7 Scope of the assessment 695 10.8 Assessment methodology 698 10.9 Assessment of effects: Construction traffic (all vehicles) 706 10.10 Assessment of effects: Construction traffic (HGV flows) 713 10.11 Assessment of effects: Pedestrian delay (users of PRoW) 725 10.12 Conclusions of significance of evaluation 737 11. NOISE AND VIBRATION 743 11.1 Introduction 743 11.2 Policy and legislative context 743 11.3 Data gathering methodology 751 11.4 Environmental Impact Assessment consultation 753 11.5 Overall noise and vibration baseline 762 11.6 Embedded environmental measures incorporated into the proposed development 765 11.7 Part A Construction noise - Scope of the assessment 767 11.8 Assessment methodology - construction noise and vibration 771 11.9 Assessment of effects – construction noise 775 11.10 Assessment of effects - construction traffic noise 788 11.11 Assessment of effects – construction vibration 789 11.12 Conclusions of significance evaluation for construction noise 790 11.13 Part B Scope of the assessment – operational noise 792 11.14 Assessment methodology - operational noise 796 11.15 Assessment of effects – operational noise 801 11.16 Conclusions of significance evaluation for operational noise 807 12. AIR QUALITY 809 12.1 Introduction 809 12.2 Policy and legislative context 809 12.3 Data gathering methodology 815 12.4 Environmental Impact Assessment consultation 816 12.5 Overall air quality baseline 820 Final iv January 2016 Richborough Connection Project – Volume 5, Document 5.2 12.6 Embedded environmental measures incorporated into the proposed development 822 12.7 Scope of the assessment 823 13. WATER ENVIRONMENT 827 13.1 Introduction 827 13.2 Policy and legislative context 827 13.3 Data gathering methodology 841 13.4 Environmental Impact Assessment consultation 844 13.5 Overall water environment baseline 850 13.6 Embedded environmental measures incorporated into the proposed development 866 13.7 Scope of the assessment 876 13.8 Assessment methodology 883 13.9 Assessment of effects on aquatic environment receptors 888 13.10 Assessment of effects on water resources receptors 896 13.11 Assessment of effects on flood risk receptors 899 13.12 Conclusions of significance evaluation 904 14. GEOLOGY, SOILS AND AGRICULTURE 911 14.1 Introduction
Load more

Recommended publications
  • G Sites of Special Scientific Interest Screening Assessment
    WRMP19 SEA Environmental Report G Sites of Special Scientific Interest screening assessment SSSIs considered Water dependent sites Sites within 2 km of option located downstream of Option types that require new Option name Sites within 200 m of new reservoir abstraction or Screening narrative Screening decision reference built infrastructure (i.e., pipeline or repair/amendments discharge points, or groundwater, reservoir to existing pipelines supported by target aquifer and water treatment works for groundwater options) abstractions Catchment management CGW-2 Catchment Management N/A None N/A No adverse impacts from water quality improvement No significant impacts likely. Interventions at actions Woodgarston CGW-3 Targeted catchment N/A Pembury Cutting and Pit [all N/A No adverse impacts from water quality improvement No significant impacts likely. management units at favourable condition] actions interventions in the Pembury area Water reuse EFF-35 Effluent reuse to River Brighton to Newhaven Cliffs Brighton to Newhaven Cliffs Brighton to Newhaven Cliffs Proposed pipeline route runs adjacent to Lewes Brooks Measures to avoid significant effects on Lewes (plan Ouse: source – [100% of units at favourable or [100% of units at favourable [100% of units at favourable (no intersection with site) and in close proximity to Brooks and Brighton to Newhaven Cliffs SSSIs alternative Peacehaven (25Ml/d unfavourable – recovering or unfavourable – recovering or unfavourable – recovering Lewes Downs (minimum distance of approximately identified though SEA and recorded in option option) Option) condition] condition] condition] 200m), however no direct impacts and no drainage dossiers. For Lewes Downs this would include impacts anticipated. No significant effects likely either rerouting pipeline east of existing route via Lewes Brooks [93.6% of units at Lewes Brooks [93.6% of following implementation of standard mitigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Assessment of Kent 2004
    CHILHAM: STOUR VALLEY Location map: CHILHAMCHARACTER AREA DESCRIPTION North of Bilting, the Stour Valley becomes increasingly enclosed. The rolling sides of the valley support large arable fields in the east, while sweeps of parkland belonging to Godmersham Park and Chilham Castle cover most of the western slopes. On either side of the valley, dense woodland dominate the skyline and a number of substantial shaws and plantations on the lower slopes reflect the importance of game cover in this area. On the valley bottom, the river is picked out in places by waterside alders and occasional willows. The railway line is obscured for much of its length by trees. STOUR VALLEY Chilham lies within the larger character area of the Stour Valley within the Kent Downs AONB. The Great Stour is the most easterly of the three rivers cutting through the Downs. Like the Darent and the Medway, it too provided an early access route into the heart of Kent and formed an ancient focus for settlement. Today the Stour Valley is highly valued for the quality of its landscape, especially by the considerable numbers of walkers who follow the Stour Valley Walk or the North Downs Way National Trail. Despite its proximity to both Canterbury and Ashford, the Stour Valley retains a strong rural identity. Enclosed by steep scarps on both sides, with dense woodlands on the upper slopes, the valley is dominated by intensively farmed arable fields interspersed by broad sweeps of mature parkland. Unusually, there are no electricity pylons cluttering the views across the valley. North of Bilting, the river flows through a narrow, pastoral floodplain, dotted with trees such as willow and alder and drained by small ditches.
    [Show full text]
  • English Nature Research Report
    Vatural Area: 33. East Anglian Plain Geological Sigaificance: Outstanding (provisional) General geological character: The solid geology of the East Anglian Natural Area is mainly underlain by Jpper Cretaceous chalk. This very pure limestone was laid down on the floor of a tropical sea between 97 md 74 Ma. Locally the chalk is rich in fossils including sea-urchins and bivalves. Overlying much of the ;halk is a complex sequence of Quaternary deposits (deposited over the last 2 Ma) showing changes in Aimate and environment from both cold (glacial) and temperate (interglacial) periods. These sediments hostcompletely obscure the underlying chalk and it is their composition which gives the Natural Area its :haacter. The base of the Quaternary sequence is the early Pleistocene Crag deposits which are marine jcdiments of*shelly muds and sands, often containing temperate marinc molluscan faunas. However, the nost extensive and thickest Quaternary sediments consist of glacial sands, gravels and clays deposited by the 4nglian ice sheet as it advanced across the area around 300,000 to 250,000 years BP. These deposits are ;ollectivcly known as 'boulder clay' and their calcareous nature reflects glacial erosion and transportation of he chalk bedrock beneath. The Anglian glaciation interrupted a well-developed fluvial network of eastward flowing rivers, and patches of these preglacial river gravels are still found within the area. Many localitites show river gravels related to the early development of the River Thames, which crossed this area prior to jiversion by the Anglian ice sheet. These sites are important for Quaternary stratigraphy (including records Jf climate change) because they can be correlated with sedirnents in other parts of Britain and abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Planning Applications Committee
    PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE Thursday, 2nd September, 2021 10.00 am Council Chamber, Sessions House, County Hall, Maidstone AGENDA PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE Thursday, 2nd September, 2021, at 10.00 Ask for: Andrew Tait am Council Chamber, Sessions House, County Telephone: 03000 416749 Hall, Maidstone Membership (13) Conservative (10): Mr R A Marsh (Chairman), Mr A Booth (Vice-Chairman), Mr C Beart, Mrs R Binks, Mr P Cole, Mr D Crow-Brown, Mr M Dendor, Mr O Richardson, Mr C Simkins and Mr J Wright Labour (1): Ms J Meade Liberal Democrat (1) Mr I S Chittenden Independents (1) Mr P M Harman Webcasting Notice Please note: this meeting may be filmed for live or subsequent broadcast via the Council’s internet site or by any member of the public or press present. The Chairman will confirm if all or part of the meeting is to be filmed by the Council. By entering the meeting room you are consenting to being filmed. If you do not wish to have your image captured please let the Clerk know immediately. UNRESTRICTED ITEMS (During these items the meeting is likely to be open to the public A. COMMITTEE BUSINESS 1. Substitutes 2. Declarations of Interests by Members in items on the Agenda for this meeting. B. GENERAL MATTERS 1. General Matters D. DEVELOPMENTS TO BE CARRIED OUT BY THE COUNTY COUNCIL 1. Application CA/21/01854 (KCC/CA/0136/2021) - Construction of part of a new road (A28 Link Road) including viaduct between A28 Sturry Road and A291 Sturry Hill and associated on-line improvements at A28 Sturry Link Road, Sturry; KCC Major Capital Programme Team (Pages 1 - 176) E.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmentally Sensitive Site Map SSSI Kent Ashford
    Thanet Coast U P Medway Estuary and Marshes G Thanet Coast THN Medway Estuary & Marshes Tankerton Slopes and Swalecliffe Medway Estuary & Marshes Cobham Woods Peter`s Pit Medway Estuary & Marshes TLL Cobham Woods Elmley The Swale Halling to Trottiscliffe The Swale The Swale HTG Escarpment The Swale The Swale H D Asset Information - Analysis & Reporting S R J F [email protected] C Margate North Downs Woodlands YD Birchington-on-Sea LEGEND Swale Westgate-on-Sea Meopham Rochester 2 Longfield J Herne Bay Thanet Coast & Sandwich Bay Tree Preservation Orders E Broadstairs Chatham S Sandwich & Pegwell Bay Sole Street VIR Rainham (Kent) Whitstable Conservation Areas Kemsley Thanet Coast and Sandwich Bay Ramsgate Halling Newington Stodmarsh Contaminated Land S WM Sittingbourne Stodmarsh Stodmarsh Teynham Stodmarsh Minster DU Stations Stodmarsh Queendown Warren Faversham Rail Lines Holborough to Burham Marshes Ramsar* Holborough to Burham Marshes Aylesford Stodmarsh Special Protected Areas* Selling Sturry Pit Sandwich Bay Allington Quarry Barming Bearsted Chartham Bekesbourne Special Areas of Conservation* Maidstone West Blean Woods F Allington Quarry Hollingbourne DM R Blean Complex National Nature Reserves* East Farleigh ive Adisham r Le Wateringbury n Harrietsham West Blean & Thornden Woods SSSI within 500m of railway* Lenham Sandwich Bay to Hacklinge Marshes Sandwich Bay to Hacklinge Marshes SSSI with Site Manager Statement* Yalding Down Bank r Lydden and Temple Ewell Downs Hothfield Common u 1 Shepherds Well DU
    [Show full text]
  • List of Unpublished Fieldwork Reports Held by Kent County Council
    LIST OF UNPUBLISHED FIELDWORK REPORTS HELD BY KENT COUNTY COUNCIL The following reports (so-called ©grey literature©) may be viewed by appointment only with the Kent Historic Environment Record Team at: Invicta House County Hall Maidstone ME14 1XX telephone: 01622 221541 email : [email protected] Report Publication Title Author Easting Northing number Date 1978/1 54 ROCHESTER ROAD KENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY 574272 168637 1979/1 1979 THE MINTYARD, CHRIST CHURCH CATHEDRAL Canterbury Archaeological Trust 615118 158098 1980/1 1980 ST PETERS STREET - GAS WORKS REDEVELOPMENT, MAIDSTONE WIMPEYS 575650 155742 1982/1 1982 RIPPLE RD, RIPPLE Dover Archaeological Group 636290 149333 1982/2 1982 CHATHAM HISTORIC DOCKYARD (INITIAL STUDY) R ELLIS, H WILSON AND L 575874 169347 WOMERSLEY 1984/1 1984 BORE PLACE- BUILDING/LANDSCAPE SURVEY Institute of Archaeology Field 550866 149209 Archaeology Unit 1985/1 1985 ROCHESTER, KENT - ANALYSIS OF COIN PELLET MOULDS English Heritage 574270 168640 1985/2 1985 MAIDSTONE SPINE ROAD - BOREHOLE REPORTS KENT COUNTY COUNCIL 575600 156205 1985/3 1985 BORE PLACE (THE MOUNT AND WARREN)- EXCAVATION Institute of Archaeology Field 550806 149276 Archaeology Unit 1987/1 1987 HAM FARM, FAVERSHAM KENT RURAL PLANNING SERVICES PLC 602081 162641 1987/2 1987 RIVERVIEW PARK, GRAVESEND A G WEEKS AND PARTNERS 566358 171095 1988/1 1988 ABBEY STREET, FAVERSHAM BRIAN MOOREHEAD AND 601857 161857 PARTNERS 1988/2 1988 SNOWDOWN COLLIERY - POLICY GUIHoneyDELINES DOVER DISTRICT COUNCIL 624772 151081 1988/3 1988 NETHERCOURT ESTATE
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Defence
    Ministry of Defence SSSI unit condition (ha) UNFAVOURABLE UNFAVOURABLE NO UNFAVOURABLE Percent SSSI held by SSSI name Whole SSSI area (ha) FAVOURABLE PART DESTROYED DESTROYED MoD area RECOVERING CHANGE DECLINING MoD ALKHAM, LYDDEN AND SWINGFIELD WOODS 228.33 99.1 7.5 106.6 46.69% APPLEBY FELLS 10,693.02 453.7 4,532.2 4,985.8 46.63% ASH TO BROOKWOOD HEATHS 1,576.12 482.4 830.8 94.4 1,407.6 89.31% ASHDOWN FOREST 3,209.28 92.0 201.1 293.1 9.13% BARNHAMCROSS COMMON 69.08 0.1 0.1 0.16% BARROW BURN MEADOWS 5.18 2.9 2.3 5.2 100.00% BARROW MEADOW 5.67 5.6 5.6 99.29% BASINGSTOKE CANAL 101.15 5.3 8.6 19.1 0.2 33.1 32.76% BENFLEET AND SOUTHEND MARSHES 2,373.69 98.6 98.6 4.15% BILLSMOOR PARK AND GRASSLEES WOOD 112.58 4.3 0.3 4.6 4.09% BIRKLANDS AND BILHAUGH 505.73 206.1 1.5 207.6 41.05% BIRKLANDS WEST AND OLLERTON CORNER 414.64 61.7 6.6 68.2 16.46% BLANDFORD CAMP 28.69 3.6 25.1 28.7 99.97% BOURLEY AND LONG VALLEY 823.90 7.1 783.1 32.1 822.3 99.80% BOWES MOOR 4,489.89 0.3 0.3 0.01% BOWNESS COMMON 803.29 26.5 26.5 3.30% BOX MINE 58.74 0.2 0.2 0.39% BRADENHAM WOODS, PARK WOOD & THE COPPICE 134.93 0.0 0.0 0.01% BRAMSHOTT AND LUDSHOTT COMMONS 371.14 0.3 102.2 102.5 27.61% BRATTON DOWNS 400.08 119.1 44.7 0.2 0.0 164.1 41.01% BRAUNTON BURROWS 1,339.74 1.2 589.8 9.0 600.0 44.78% BRECKLAND FARMLAND 13,392.58 1,552.4 1,552.4 11.59% BRECKLAND FOREST 18,126.08 462.5 462.5 2.55% BRIDGHAM & BRETTENHAM HEATHS 441.70 200.9 200.9 45.48% BROADMOOR TO BAGSHOT WOODS AND HEATHS 1,696.33 81.2 495.7 576.9 34.01% BROWNDOWN 66.47 61.4 61.4 92.36% BROXHEAD AND KINGSLEY COMMONS
    [Show full text]
  • Kent Rare Plant Register Draft Species Accounts P (Second Part: Polygo to Pyr)
    1 Kent Rare Plant Register Draft species accounts P (second part: Polygo to Pyr) Compiled by Geoffrey Kitchener and the Kent Botanical Recording Group Issue date: February 2020 2 Kent rare plant register This section of the register covers: In Part Pa – Polyga In Part Polygo – Pyr Parapholis incurva Polygonum oxyspermum subsp. raii Parentucellia viscosa Polygonum rurivagum Pedicularis sylvatica Polypodium cambricum Persicaria minor Polypogon monspeliensis Peucedanum officinale Potamogeton acutifolius Phelipanche purpurea Potamogeton coloratus Phleum arenarium Potamogeton friesii Pilosella peleteriana Potamogeton obtusifolius Plantago media Potamogeton pusillus Platanthera bifolia Potentilla anglica Platanthera chlorantha Potentilla argentea Poa bulbosa Potentilla erecta Poa infirma Prunus cerasus Polycarpon tetraphyllum Puccinellia fasciculata Polygala amarella Puccinellia rupestris Polygala serpyllifolia Pyrola rotundifolia Pyrus pyraster It is issued in draft, pending further development. Records, photographs and information regarding the occurrences of these plants in Kent will be welcome. The register accounts give priority to data from 2010 onwards, but some historic data are also included (however, generally not specific sites with no post-1970 records) so as to indicate trends and where the plant may yet be discovered or rediscovered. Distribution maps for records from 2010 onwards show vice counties 15 and 16 in white (the boundary between is a black line) and local authority boundaries by red lines. See the Kent webpage of the
    [Show full text]
  • A28 Link Road
    SECTION D DEVELOPMENT TO BE CARRIED OUT BY THE COUNTY COUNCIL Background Documents: the deposited documents; views and representations received as referred to in the reports and included in the development proposals dossier for each case; and other documents as might be additionally indicated. Item D1 Construction of part of a new road (A28 Link Road) including viaduct between A28 Sturry Road and A291 Sturry Hill and associated on-line improvements at A28 Sturry Link Road, Sturry, Canterbury, Kent CT20 – 19/00904 (KCC/CA/0091/2019) A report by Head of Planning Applications Group to Planning Applications Committee on 9th March 2021. Application by Kent County Council for Construction of part of a new road (A28 Link Road) including viaduct between A28 Sturry Road and A291 Sturry Hill and associated on-line improvements at A28 Sturry Link Road, Sturry, Canterbury, Kent CT20 – CA/19/00904 (KCC/CA/0091/2019) Recommendation: Subject to the issuing of planning consents for applications CA/20/02826 and CA/18/008681 planning permission be granted subject to the imposition of conditions. Local Members: Robert Thomas, Alan Marsh & Classification: Unrestricted Graham Gibbens Site 1. The land through which the scheme passes is essentially open countryside which lies approximately 3km to the north-east of Canterbury. It is bounded to the south by the A28, to the west by industrial premises and retail units on the Canterbury Retail Park, to the north by agricultural land and woodland, and to the east by the A291 Sturry Hill. Cutting across the middle of the site, slightly elevated on an embankment, is the Canterbury to Ramsgate railway line, which runs in an east-west direction.
    [Show full text]