DOCSLIB.ORG

Work Programme Supply Chains

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Work Programme Supply Chains Work Programme Supply Chains The information contained in the table below reflects updates and changes to the Work Programme supply chains and is correct as at 12 August 2011. It is published in the interests of transparency. It is limited to those in supply chains delivering to prime providers as part of their tier 1 and 2 chains. Definitions of what these tiers incorporate vary from prime provider to prime provider. There are additional suppliers beyond these tiers who are largely to be called on to deliver one off, unique interventions in response to a particular participants needs and circumstances. The Department for Work and Pensions fully anticipate that supply chains will be dynamic, with scope to flex and evolve to reflect change within the labour market and participant needs. The Department intends to update this information at regular intervals dependant on time and resources available. In addition to the Merlin standard, a robust process is in place for the Department to approve any supply chain changes and to ensure that the service on offer is not compromised or reduced. Summary of Contract Package Areas CPA 1 - East of England CPA 2 - East Midlands CPA 3 - West London CPA 4 - East London CPA 5 - North East CPA 6 - North West - Merseyside, Halton, Cumbria and Lancashire CPA 7 - North West - Greater Manchester, Cheshire & Warrington CPA 8 - Scotland CPA 9 - South East - Thames Valley and Hampshire and Isle of Wight CPA 10 - South East - Surrey, Sussex and Kent CPA 11 - South West - Devon and Cornwall, Somerset and Dorset CPA 12 - South West - Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and West of England CPA 13 - Wales CPA 14 - West Midlands - Birmingham, Solihull and Black Country CPA 15 - West Midlands - Coventry and Warwickshire, Staffordshire and the Marches CPA 16 - West Yorkshire CPA 17 - South Yorkshire CPA 18 - North East Yorkshire and the Humber Provider/CPA Supply Chain Structure Organisational Sector CPA 1 East of England Ingeus All Trades Training Ltd Private Sector T1 ATS Community Employment Private Sector T1 ESG T/A Sencia Limited Private Sector T1 Exemplas Holdings Ltd Private Sector T1 F1 Training Computer Services and Training Ltd Private Sector T1 HIT Training Ltd Private Sector T1 Intraining Private Sector T1 Ixion Holdings Ltd Private Sector T1 MPower Training Solutions Ltd Private Sector T1 Papworth Trust Voluntary Sector T1 TBG Learning Ltd Voluntary Sector T1 Trade Skills Academy Private Sector T1 Action for Blind People Voluntary Sector T2 Citizens Advice Bureau Voluntary Sector T2 Clarion Work Focus Voluntary Sector T2 Phoenix Futures Voluntary Sector T2 Richmond Fellowship Voluntary Sector T2 Royal Mencap Society Voluntary Sector T2 Suffolk County Council Public Sector T2 The Grow Organisation Voluntary Sector T2 UFI Ltd (Learn Direct) Private Sector T2 Seetec Kennedy Scott Private Sector T1 Norfolk Training Services Private Sector T1 NWES Private Sector T1 Zinc Voluntary Sector T1 Armstrong Learning Private Sector T2 Association of Colleges Public Sector T2 Citizens Advice Bureau Voluntary Sector T2 Essex Adult Community Learning Private Sector T2 Gingerbread Voluntary Sector T2 HIT Training Private Sector T2 Ixion Private Sector T2 John Laing Training Private Sector T2 Kickstart Voluntary Sector T2 Learn Assist Private Sector T2 Luton Foyer Voluntary Sector T2 NACRO Voluntary Sector T2 Rehabworks Private Sector T2 Right Direction Private Sector T2 Train4Work Private Sector T2 UFI learndirect Private Sector T2 UK Training and Development Private Sector T2 CPA2 East Midlands A4E Acorn Training Ltd Private Sector T1 Avanta Enterprises Ltd ( TNG ) Private Sector T1 Business2Business Private Sector T1 Community Enterprise Derby CIC Voluntary Sector T1 Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire Chamber of Commerce (DNCC) Private Sector T1 Disability Works Voluntary Sector T1 Enable Voluntary Sector T1 First College Private Sector T1 Framework Housing Association Voluntary Sector T1 Nacro Voluntary Sector T1 Seetec Private Sector T1 Turning Point Voluntary Sector T1 JHP Group Limited Private Sector T1 Princes Trust Voluntary Sector T1 Relate Voluntary Sector T2 AAT College ( All About Training ) Public Sector T2 Advanced Personnel Management ( APM ) Private Sector T2 Age UK Voluntary Sector T2 Barker Ross Private Sector T2 CG Partnership Voluntary Sector T2 Clarion Interpreting Private Sector T2 Clearaims Private Sector T2 Community Access Group Voluntary Sector T2 Corby Community Partnership Voluntary Sector T2 Dedicated Company Training t/a DC Training Private Sector T2 Disability Alliance Voluntary Sector T2 Gingerbread Voluntary Sector T2 Giving World Online Voluntary Sector T2 Groundwork Greater Nottingham Voluntary Sector T2 Inplace Personnel Services Ltd Private Sector T2 Instant Selection Process Private Sector T2 Kettering Accommodation Concern Voluntary Sector T2 LCDP Voluntary Sector T2 Leicester Fit for Work Service Private Sector T2 LHA Support Services Ltd Voluntary Sector T2 Lincoln Pelican Trust Voluntary Sector T2 Lincolnshire Action Trust Voluntary Sector T2 n-ergy group ltd Private Sector T2 Network for Black Professionals Voluntary Sector T2 Northamptonshire CDA Voluntary Sector T2 Novas Scarman Voluntary Sector T2 P3 Voluntary Sector T2 QA Associates Ltd Private Sector T2 Renovo Private Sector T2 Safety Problem Solutions UK Ltd Private Sector T2 Skills UK Ltd Private Sector T2 Support into Work Private Sector T2 The Football League Trust Voluntary Sector T2 The PRIME Initiative ( PRIME ) Voluntary Sector T2 Think3e Voluntary Sector T2 Training Solutions Ltd Private Sector T2 Victim Support Voluntary Sector T2 Wing Production House Private Sector T2 WSG Associates Private Sector T2 Ingeus BTCV Voluntary Sector T1 Business in the Community (BITC) Voluntary Sector T1 Chesterfield College Public Sector T1 Community Enterprise Derby CIC Voluntary Sector T1 Concept Care Solutions Private Sector T1 Enable Voluntary Sector T1 Framework Housing Association Voluntary Sector T1 Groundwork Derby and Derbyshire Voluntary Sector T1 Inbiz Private Sector T1 Ingeus Private Sector T1 Learn Today Private Sector T1 North Nottinghamshire College Public Sector T1 Papworth Trust Voluntary Sector T1 Pitman Training Private Sector T1 TBG Learning Voluntary Sector T1 The Big Training Company Private Sector T1 Action for Blind People Voluntary Sector T2 Citizens Advice Bureau Voluntary Sector T2 Clarion Work Focus Private Sector T2 Leicestershire and Rutland Probation Trust Public Sector T2 Phoenix Futures Voluntary Sector T2 Royal Mencap Society Voluntary Sector T2 Ufi Ltd (Learn Direct) Private Sector T2 CPA3 West London Ingeus 5 E Ltd Voluntary Sector T1 Action Training Centre Ltd Private Sector T1 Adult Training Network Voluntary Sector T1 ESG T/A Sencia Limited Private Sector T1 Excelsis Training Solutions Private Sector T1 Groundwork London Voluntary Sector T1 InBIz Private Sector T1 Ixion Holdings Ltd Private Sector T1 MEL Productions Ltd Private Sector T1 Renaisi Ltd Voluntary Sector T1 The Citizens Trust Voluntary Sector T1 The Training Consortium - TTC Private Sector T1 Urban Futures London Ltd Private Sector T1 Volunteer Centre for Kensington & Chelsea Voluntary Sector T1 Acton for Blind People Voluntary Sector T2 Broadway Homelessness and Support Voluntary Sector T2 Clarion Work Focus Voluntary Sector T2 Hammersmith & Fulham MIND Voluntary Sector T2 Phoenix Futures Voluntary Sector T2 The Camden Society Voluntary Sector T2 The Zacchaeus 2000 Trust Voluntary Sector T2 UFI Ltd (Learn Direct) Private Sector T2 Maximus 5 E Ltd Voluntary Sector T1 Action Training Centre Ltd Private Sector T1 Avanta Enterprise Limited (TNG) Private Sector T1 Careers Development Group ( CDG ) Voluntary Sector T1 Kennedy Scott Private Sector T1 Renaisi Ltd Voluntary Sector T1 The Citizens Trust Voluntary Sector T1 Urban Futures London Ltd Private Sector T1 Westminster Works Consortium Voluntary Sector T1 Addaction Voluntary Sector T2 Blue Sky Development & Regeneration Voluntary Sector T2 Capitalise Debt Advice Partnership Voluntary Sector T2 Cricklewood Homeless Concern Voluntary Sector T2 Enterprise for Change Private Sector T2 Expert Patients Programme Community Interest Co Voluntary Sector T2 Gingerbread Voluntary Sector T2 Martinex Limited t/a Burleigh College Private Sector T2 MENCAP Voluntary Sector T2 Praxis Community Projects Public Sector T2 St Mungos Voluntary Sector T2 The Princes Trust for Mature Enterprise Voluntary Sector T2 West London Vocational Training Private Sector T2 Reed Action Acton Voluntary Sector T1 ProDiverse Private Sector T1 Twin Training Private Sector T1 Urban Futures London Ltd Private Sector T1 Uxbridge College Public Sector T1 Vital Regeneration Voluntary Sector T1 Addaction Voluntary Sector T2 Adult Training Network Private Sector T2 BeSmart Private Sector T2 Blue Sky Development Voluntary Sector T2 Broadway Voluntary Sector T2 Business in the Community Voluntary Sector T2 CITE Voluntary Sector T2 Clarion Private Sector T2 Disability Works UK Voluntary Sector T2 Ecoactif Voluntary Sector T2 Hillside Clubhouse Voluntary Sector T2 Intech Private Sector T2 JGA Group Private Sector T2 KIS Training Private Sector T2 Lifecare Private Sector T2 Mapalm Private Sector T2 Nacro Voluntary Sector T2 Nove New Opportunities Voluntary Sector T2 Oracle Training Voluntary Sector T2 Red Kite Learning Voluntary Sector T2 St Mungos Voluntary Sector T2 The Camden Society Voluntary Sector T2 The Princes Trust Voluntary Sector T2 TLE Training Private Sector T2 TRC Voluntary Sector T2 Triangle Fusion Private Sector T2
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Making It Fit For
    Making it fit: a guide to preparing for the social sector size criteria A publication by the Making Best Use of Stock Team Chartered Institute of Housing Supported by Learn with us. Improve with us. Influence with us | www.cih.org 2 The Chartered Institute of Housing The Chartered Institute of Housing (CIH) is the professional body for people involved in housing and communities. We are a registered charity and not-for-profit organisation. We have a diverse and growing membership of over 22,000 people – both in the public and private sectors – living and working in over 20 countries on five continents across the world. We exist to maximise the contribution that housing professionals make to the wellbeing of communities. Our vision is to be the first point of contact for – and the credible voice of – anyone involved or interested in housing. Chartered Institute of Housing Octavia House, Westwood Way, Coventry, CV4 8JP Tel: 024 7685 1700 Email: [email protected] Website: www.cih.org The Making Best Use of Stock Team provides free advice and guidance to local authorities and housing providers to support them in making the best use of existing stock. The team focuses on four core areas – using existing stock more effectively to meet housing need, tackling social housing fraud, making use of potential new freedoms and flexibilities and assisting providers in responding to tenancy and welfare reform. The team offers practical advice and guidance and shares good practice to help you make the best use of existing resources and ultimately to help secure improvements in services delivered to tenants.
    [Show full text]
  • Promises and Pitfalls in the Work Programme's Private Power Market
    Making Markets in Employment Support: Promises and Pitfalls in the Work Programme’s Private Power Market Eleanor Carter Department of Geography June 2018 Submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Acknowledgements The heartiest of thanks go firstly to Adam Whitworth. The time, thought and effort that Adam has dedicated to both me and this PhD project have been immense and I am hugely grateful for his support. From my first inklings of interest in undertaking doctoral research Adam has been a tremendous source of encouragement and advice. I owe Adam a deep intellectual debt: his insights have been crucial in helping me work through ideas and approaches. Beyond this, Adam’s persistent backing and reassurance has been a crucial underpinning to a new-found confidence in my own ideas and abilities. My second supervisor Dan Vickers also played a formative role in sharpening my analytical skills. I am grateful for the support of other friends and colleagues across the Geography Department at the University of Sheffield and DWP teams based at Rockingham House. I would also like to thank the Economic and Social Research Council who funded the project through an advanced quantitative methods studentship. I owe much to my friends and family. My parents in particular are key culprits in nurturing my inquisitiveness and determination. Thank you for your generosity, support, and care. Thanks also to my sister Rosie, who has reminded me throughout that it is important to have fun and who has provided plenty of entertaining distractions. Finally, to Mark McCombs whose quiet and sturdy support I have cherished through it all.
    [Show full text]
  • Inflicting the Structural Violence of the Market: Workfare and Underemployment to Discipline the Reserve Army of Labor
    Fast Capitalism ISSN 1930-014X Volume 12 • Issue 1 • 2015 doi:10.32855/fcapital.201501.011 Inflicting the Structural Violence of the Market: Workfare and Underemployment to Discipline the Reserve Army of Labor Christian Garland “Taking them as a whole, the general movements of wages are exclusively regulated by the expansion and contraction of the industrial reserve army, and these again correspond to the periodic changes of the industrial cycle. They are, therefore, not determined by the variations of the absolute number of the working population, but by the varying proportions in which the working-class is divided into active and reserve army, by the increase or diminution in the relative amount of the surplus-population, by the extent to which it is now absorbed, now set free.”[2] — Marx, K. (1867) Inflicting the Structural Violence of the Market As the ongoing crisis of capitalism continues beyond its sixth year, the effects have been felt with different degrees of severity in different countries. In the UK it has manifested in chronic levels of underemployment which veil the already very high unemployment total that is currently hovering not far off the early 1980s levels of around three million. This data takes into consideration the official unemployment total and combines it with the number of Job Seekers Allowance (JSA) claimants now ‘self-employed’ who work in various odd jobs such as catalogue selling or holding an eBay account now claim Tax Credits to supplement their meager earnings. As such, “record falls in unemployment” and “record numbers in employment” are really not what they seem.
    [Show full text]
  • Work Programme Evaluation: Findings from the First Phase of Qualitative
    Research report Work Programme evaluation: Findings from the first phase of qualitative research on programme delivery by Becci Newton, Nigel Meager, Christine Bertram, Anne Corden, Anitha George, Mumtaz Lalani, Hilary Metcalf, Heather Rolfe, Roy Sainsbury and Katharine Weston Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No 821 Work Programme evaluation: Findings from the first phase of qualitative research on programme delivery Becci Newton, Nigel Meager, Christine Bertram, Anne Corden, Anitha George, Mumtaz Lalani, Hilary Metcalf, Heather Rolfe, Roy Sainsbury and Katharine Weston A report of research carried out by the Institute for Employment Studies, the Social Policy Research Unit at the University of York and the National Institute of Economic and Social Research on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions © Crown copyright 2012. You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. This document/publication is also available on our website at: http://research.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd5/rrs-index.asp Any enquiries regarding this document/publication should be sent to us at: Central Analysis Division, Department for Work and Pensions, Upper Ground Floor, Steel City House, West Street, Sheffield, S1 2GQ First published 2012. ISBN 978 1 909532 01 4 Views expressed in this report are not necessarily those of the Department for Work and Pensions or any other Government Department.
    [Show full text]
  • National Audit Office Report (HC 832 2012-2013): a Commentary for the Committee of Public Accounts on the Work Programme Outcome
    REPORT BY THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL HC 832 SESSION 2012-13 13 DECEMBER 2012 A commentary for the Committee of Public Accounts on the Work Programme outcome statistics Our vision is to help the nation spend wisely. We apply the unique perspective of public audit to help Parliament and government drive lasting improvement in public services. The National Audit Office scrutinises public spending for Parliament and is independent of government. The Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG), Amyas Morse, is an Officer of the House of Commons and leads the NAO, which employs some 860 staff. The C&AG certifies the accounts of all government departments and many other public sector bodies. He has statutory authority to examine and report to Parliament on whether departments and the bodies they fund have used their resources efficiently, effectively, and with economy. Our studies evaluate the value for money of public spending, nationally and locally. Our recommendations and reports on good practice help government improve public services, and our work led to audited savings of more than £1 billion in 2011. A commentary for the Committee of Public Accounts on the Work Programme outcome statistics Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 13 December 2012 This report has been prepared under Section 6 of the National Audit Act 1983 for presentation to the House of Commons in accordance with Section 9 of the Act Amyas Morse Comptroller and Auditor General National Audit Office 12 December 2012 HC 832 London: The Stationery Office £8.75 This note provides the Committee with a commentary on the Department’s statistics for Work Programme outcomes and makes reference where appropriate to other published material.
    [Show full text]
  • Coalition Government Extends “Slave Labour” Welfare Policy
    Analysis Discipline and discontent: coalition government extends “slave labour” welfare policy Chris Jones Under the government’s Work Programme, unemployed people must work for free for private companies such as Tesco and Primark or face losing their benefit payments. These companies manage the programme “without prescription from government” and are given access to sensitive personal data. The government is determined to bolster the number of people involved in the scheme. Disabled people have been increasingly targeted for enrolment and the government’s Universal Credit welfare plan will see thousands of individuals become eligible for referral. Since the late 1990s, successive governments in the UK have introduced “work-for-your-benefit” policies through which the receipt of unemployment benefits is conditional upon the undertaking of certain activities – for example, filling in a minimum number of job applications every week. Following its formation in May 2010, the coalition government introduced the Work Programme which raised the number and intensity of activities required of those claiming benefits. It also increased the severity of sanctions that can be imposed should people not comply. The activities – which in many cases include unwaged work – are prescribed by private firms with government contracts. These firms exercise considerable power over the individuals involved. Upon referral to the Work Programme by a member of staff at a Jobcentre Plus, a letter is sent to the claimant. It states that the provider or one of their partners: “Will support you whilst on the Work Programme. They will discuss what help you need to find work, and draw up an action plan of things you’ll do to improve your chances of getting and keeping a job.
    [Show full text]
  • The Work Programme
    1 The Work Programme The Work Programme 2 The Work Programme Introduction The Work Programme is a major new payment-for-results welfare-to-work programme that launched throughout Great Britain in June 2011. Along with the Universal Credit benefit reforms, it is central to the Coalition Government’s ambitious programme of welfare reform. The Work Programme is being delivered by a range of private, public and voluntary sector organisations which are supporting people who are at risk of becoming long-term unemployed to find work. It replaces previous programmes such as the New Deals, Employment Zones and Flexible New Deal and represents a long-term investment by government and its partners in seeking to help more people into lasting work. The programme design combines strong long-term incentives with freedom for service providers to innovate. It is at the leading edge of wider government commissioning of payment-for-results public services. Flexibility and dynamism are central to how the UK labour market works: relatively low levels of labour market regulation and taxation mean that firms have incentives to create new jobs alongside new business opportunities, and can offer flexible working arrangements. Above average employment rates, in OECD and EU terms, are coupled with lower than average unemployment. Yet challenges remain. There are still around 5 million people of working age receiving out-of-work benefits, around half of whom receive incapacity benefits. At around 2.5 million, unemployment is still much too high. Youth unemployment is a particular concern, and the proportion of individuals living in workless households is one of the highest in the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social and Political Significance of Workfare in the United Kingdom a Normative Human Rights Critique
    SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY - UNIVERSITY OF LONDON The Social and Political Significance of Workfare in the United Kingdom A Normative Human Rights Critique Eleanor Hinton LLB This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the following degree: MA Understanding and Securing Human Rights at the Institute of Commonwealth Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London. Date of Submission: 03.09.2012 Abstract This paper provides a critical analysis of the workfare schemes introduced by the coalition government. Workfare is presented as the product of neoliberal ideologies that have introduced notions of conditions and reciprocity to the realisation of traditionally entitlement-based rights. The history of the welfare state is assessed from a political- economic perspective. It is suggested that the rationale behind the schemes is fuelled by political and corporate motivations, which effectively subordinate the importance of human rights. This new social contract is explored from different philosophical perspectives of economic and social rights. Evidence of corporate and political reactions to social pressure suggest that civil society can be effective in discouraging decisions that pose a threat to human rights standards. The compatibility of workfare schemes with a normative understanding of specific rights is assessed. The study concludes that workfare constitutes a serious threat to human rights, signifying the erosion of the British welfare state, and hence basic welfare entitlements. There is a strong
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Delivering Adult Skills Provision to the Unemployed
    A Guide to Delivering Adult Skills Provision to the Unemployed A partnership between: Contents Page 02 Foreword Page 03 Section 1 Executive Summary Page 04 Section 2 The Policy Context Page 07 Section 3 Integrating Adult Skills with Other Programmes of Support for the Unemployed Page 13 Section 4 Building the Learner Package to Meet the Needs of Unemployed Learners Page 17 Section 5 Working with DWP Advisers and the Work Programme Page 21 Section 6 Working with DWP Customers Page 24 Section 7 Destination Tracking and Reporting Page 26 Section 8 Case Studies Page 29 Section 9 Reference Material 1 Foreword AELP is pleased to have produced this guide in association with the Education and Training Foundation for all How to use this guide providers that are active in the employment, learning Section 1 Executive Summary. and skills markets. The flexibilities within the Adult Skills Budget mean that many more providers have Section 2 sets out all the main policy around Skills developed high quality provision addressing the needs Conditionality, the Adult Skills Budget and the Job of the unemployed and are working with employers to Outcome Payments. deliver jobs for the unemployed. Providers now have Section 3 provides information on the range the opportunity to develop real synergy between the of provision and other support available for more traditional Welfare to Work employability support unemployed people and how that support interfaces and skills provision for the unemployed, and offer good with the delivery of Adult Skills. quality, integrated support to help learners get the skills they need to move into work.
    [Show full text]
  • Trust for London.Indd
    What can we do to support people to move out of low-paid work? An Open Space Event at Lambeth Town Hall on Tuesday 16th September 2014 What can we do to support people to move out of low-paid work? An Open Space Event 1 Open Space Using the Open Space process participants created an agenda of discussion /questions and topics prompted by the question: What can we do to support people to move out of low-paid work? Groups formed and the following recommendations emerged from discussion. The numbers in brackets reflect the votes assigned to different ideas at the end of the meeting. What can we do to support people to move out of low-paid work? An Open Space Event 2 Key themes within the recommendations 1. A more streamlined approach required so that the divisions between unemployed and employed are not so stark • Integrate ‘back to work’ and ‘progression’ support into a seamless service that would address the underlying issues – that of poverty. Services should be configured so that they are regarded as ‘employment pathways’. The target should be ‘above poverty’ wages (not just any job). • JCP (Job Centre Plus) need to change their objectives as currently only focused on getting any job, they should be more focused on good employment/progression. 2. Targeted advice needed • Investment in workforce development (for employment support providers) which would include developing their skills in the additional advice needed for those in low paid work such as negotiating with employers (for more wages/promotion); knowledge of in-work and other forms of training opportunities; marketing the support to low paid workers and offering this in a flexible way (evenings/weekends).
    [Show full text]
  • Community Work Placements (Cwp)
    Community Work Placements Information Pack for Delivery Partners Community Work Placements Information Pack for Delivery Partners Publication date: 04 November 2013 to 04 December 2013 V2.0 November 2013 - 0 - Community Work Placements Information Pack for Delivery Partners Contents: 1. Introduction .............................................................. 1 2. Overview of Community Work Placements ............. 2 3. Commercial Approach, Employment Related Supported Services (ERSS) Framework, Suppliers and Timeline. ...................................................................... 3 4. Code of Conduct and Merlin Standard................. 10 5. Further information ............................................... 10 6. Annex A. ERSS Framework Suppliers ................. 11 V2.0 November 2013 - 0 - Community Work Placements Information Pack for Delivery Partners 1. Introduction 1.1 On Monday 30 September 2013 the Chancellor of the Exchequer the Rt Hon George Osborne MP announced ‘Help to Work’. This package of new measures will be available to all claimants completing their time on the Work Programme without a job, many of whom will be unemployed for a number of years. One of these new measures is Community Work Placements. 1.2 The Community Work Placements Commercial Competition was launched on 24 October 2013, with Employment Related Support Services (ERSS) Framework providers able to tender for the contracts. 1.3 The Minister of State for Employment, Esther McVey MP, is keen that as many organisations as possible have the opportunity to play a part in delivery of Community Work Placements, whether as a delivery partner to a successful provider or otherwise. 1.4 To help facilitate this, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) have prepared this ‘Community Work Placements Information Pack for Delivery Partners’. This pack provides an overview of Community Work Placements to help organisations determine whether they would be interested in being a delivery partner or otherwise participating in Community Work Placements.
    [Show full text]
  • Workfare Schemes in Historical and Class Context
    Aufheben 1 Editorial: The ‘new’ workfare schemes in historical and class context The storm of public outrage expressed against the one hand, given that our involvement in workfare schemes in February and March this struggles against workfare had in the past been year was quite unprecedented. People being criticised by some for parochialism5 or for the forced to work for their benefits featured heavily supposed narrowness of our concerns, there was in the news for weeks. This was perhaps a sense of vindication. There was also the surprising. The illegitimacy of attacks on benefits excitement, of course, of seeing the government has usually been a marginal issue even in the defensive and vulnerable, and beating a rapid ‘political’/campaigning scenes1 and the labour retreat in the face of the opposition to the movement,2 let alone the mainstream press. schemes. On the other hand, we noted that many In the face of this hostile ‘public opinion’, the of the howls of outrage at the workfare schemes government made concessions over sanctions for reflected a complete lack of historical perspective. some of the workfare schemes.3 Around the same Workfare schemes specifically, and the disgusting time, a succession of the big companies involved - treatment of the unemployed more generally, have TK Maxx, Sainsbury’s, Waterstones, Shelter, a very long history of course. Forms of workfare – Marie Curie, 99p Stores, Maplin, Oxfam, Mind, required work for unemployment benefits – have BHS, Burger King, HMV, and Boots - publicly been used (or attempted) on many previous announced they were pulling out of some of the occasions in the last century, though they have a schemes.4 Afraid for their reputations, they didn’t much longer history of use in the USA than in the want to be seen to be ‘exploiting the vulnerable’ UK.6 In the UK, we can trace early versions and by using compulsory (or near compulsory) work indeed the basis of today’s schemes to the Job experience ‘placements’ that did not lead to jobs Seeker’s Allowance (JSA), which was introduced or constitute real training.
    [Show full text]