Relative Importance of Gas Uptake on Aerosol and Ground Surfaces Characterized by Equivalent Uptake Coefficients

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Relative Importance of Gas Uptake on Aerosol and Ground Surfaces Characterized by Equivalent Uptake Coefficients Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 10981–11011, 2019 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10981-2019 © Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Relative importance of gas uptake on aerosol and ground surfaces characterized by equivalent uptake coefficients Meng Li1,a, Hang Su1, Guo Li1, Nan Ma2, Ulrich Pöschl1, and Yafang Cheng1 1Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, 55118, Germany 2Center for Air Pollution and Climate Change Research (APCC), Institute for Environmental and Climate Research (ECI), Jinan University, Guangzhou, 511443, China anow at: Chemical Science Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Boulder, Colorado 80305, USA Correspondence: Hang Su ([email protected]) and Yafang Cheng ([email protected]) Received: 19 March 2019 – Discussion started: 2 April 2019 Revised: 9 July 2019 – Accepted: 19 July 2019 – Published: 29 August 2019 Abstract. Quantifying the relative importance of gas up- Given the fact that most models have considered the up- take on the ground and aerosol surfaces helps to determine takes of these species on the ground surface, we suggest also which processes should be included in atmospheric chem- considering the following processes in atmospheric models: istry models. Gas uptake by aerosols is often characterized N2O5 uptake by all types of aerosols, HNO3 and SO2 uptake by an effective uptake coefficient (γeff), whereas gas uptake by mineral dust and sea salt aerosols, H2O2 uptake by min- on the ground is usually described by a deposition velocity eral dust, NO2 uptakes by sea salt aerosols and O3 uptake by (Vd). For efficient comparison, we introduce an equivalent liquid organic aerosols. uptake coefficient (γeqv) at which the uptake flux of aerosols would equal that on the ground surface. If γeff is similar to or larger than γeqv, aerosol uptake is important and should be included in atmospheric models. In this study, we com- 1 Introduction pare uptake fluxes in the planetary boundary layer (PBL) for different reactive trace gases (O3, NO2, SO2,N2O5, HNO3 Multiphase processes play an essential role in atmospheric and H2O2), aerosol types (mineral dust, soot, organic aerosol chemistry and atmosphere–biosphere exchange (Ravis- and sea salt aerosol), environments (urban areas, agricultural hankara, 1997; Ammann et al., 1998, 2013; Gard et al., 1998; land, the Amazon forest and water bodies), seasons and mix- Usher et al., 2003; Bauer et al., 2004; Fowler et al., 2009; ing heights. Kolb et al., 2010; Su et al., 2011, 2013; Herrmann, 2003; For all investigated gases, γeqv ranges from magnitudes Herrmann et al., 2015; Pöhlker et al., 2012; Oswald et al., of 10−6–10−4 in polluted urban environments to 10−4–10−1 2013; Andreae et al., 2015; George et al., 2015; McNeill, under pristine forest conditions. In urban areas, aerosol up- 2015; Pöschl and Shiraiwa, 2015; Quinn et al., 2015; We- take is relevant for all species (γeff ≥ γeqv) and should be con- ber et al., 2015; Cheng et al., 2016; Fröhlich-Nowoisky et sidered in models. On the contrary, contributions of aerosol al., 2016; Lappalainen et al., 2016; Tang et al., 2016; Meusel uptakes in the Amazon forest are minor compared with the et al., 2018). They not only affect the atmospheric trace gas dry deposition. The phase state of aerosols could be one of concentrations but also modify the properties of condensed the crucial factors influencing the uptake rates. Current mod- phases, commonly known as the aging process (Song and els tend to underestimate the O3 uptake on liquid organic Carmichael, 1999; Cheng et al., 2006, 2012; Rudich et al., aerosols which can be important, especially over regions with 2007; Andreae 2009; Jimenez et al., 2009; Gunthe et al., γeff ≥ γeqv.H2O2 uptakes on a variety of aerosols are yet to 2011; Ditas et al., 2018). In the planetary boundary layer be measured under laboratory conditions and evaluated. (PBL), aerosols and the ground provide two kinds of sur- faces for multiphase reactions. In previous gas uptake stud- Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 10982 M. Li et al.: Relative importance of gas uptake on aerosol and ground surfaces ies, different formulations have been used to describe and and photochemical data for the multiphase reactions were parameterize the gas uptake processes (Wesely, 1989, 2007; conducted afterwards (Crowley et al., 2010, 2013; Ammann Ravishankara, 1997; Jacob, 2000; Wesely and Hicks, 2000; et al., 2013; Burkholder et al., 2015). Pöschl et al. (2007), and Zhang et al., 2003; Ammann and Pöschl, 2007; Pöschl et al., the follow-up studies (e.g., Shiraiwa et al., 2010, 2011) de- 2007). veloped a comprehensive kinetic model framework, enabling A variety of ground surfaces, including vegetation, water, consistent and unambiguous descriptions of mass transfer rock, roads and so on, can take up gaseous species via dry and chemical reactions in aerosol systems. deposition, and, thus, have significant impacts on the bud- However, the question still remains as to which surface get of these reactive gases and on the physicochemical prop- types are more important for gas uptake in the PBL. The an- erties of the ground surface itself (Lelieveld and Dentener, swer is not straightforward due to the following reasons: 2000; Ashmore, 2005). Dry deposition is one of the major removal pathways for most gaseous species and has been ex- 1. First, although the surface of the Earth seems to be tensively parameterized in atmospheric models (Wesely and much larger than that of tiny aerosols, its contribution Hicks, 2000; Zhang et al., 2002, 2003). A resistance model, is diluted by the large volume of the PBL, resulting in which consists of the aerodynamic resistance, quasi-laminar a surface to volume ratio close to that of aerosol; for resistance and surface resistance, has been widely applied to example, for a PBL height of 1000 m, the correspond- 2 −3 calculate the dry deposition flux in global and regional atmo- ing surface to volume ratio is 1000 µm cm , which is comparable to aerosol surface area concentrations of spheric models (see Fig. 1, Wesely and Hicks, 2000; Wesely, − −1 200–2000 µm2 cm 3 for urban areas (Woo et al., 2001; 2007). The dry deposition velocity, Vd (in units of cm s ) calculated as the reciprocal of the total resistance, is the key Stanier et al., 2004; Wu et al., 2008, 2017; Ma and Bir- 2 −3 parameter to describe the uptake fluxes on the ground. mili, 2015) and 200–1000 µm cm for rural environ- Since the late 1990s, the importance of reactive uptake ments (Ma et al., 2014; Ma and Birmili, 2015; Wu et al., of gases by aerosols has been commonly accepted (Ravis- 2017; Held et al., 2008). hankara, 1997; Gard et al., 1998; Jacob, 2000). Gas uptake 2. Second, different formulations also hinder the compar- by aerosols not only influences the fate of reactive gases, but ison. As illustrated above, different schemes, formula- also changes the physiochemical properties of atmospheric tions and terminologies are applied to calculate the up- aerosols (Kolb et al., 2010). Taking the multiphase chem- take fluxes on ground and aerosols. The dry deposition istry into account has proven to be a key factor to explain the velocity (V ) is the fundamental parameter to describe observations and improve the model performances (Zhang d the deposition process on the ground, whereas the ef- and Carmichael, 1999; Song and Carmichael, 2001; Liao fective uptake coefficient (γ ) is used to describe the and Seinfeld, 2005; Wang et al., 2006; McNaughton et al., eff uptake fluxes on aerosols. 2009; X. Wang, et al., 2012; B. Zheng et al., 2015; Tang et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2018; Mu et al., 2018). Compared In this study, we conducted a comparative assessment of with dry deposition, the parameterization of gas uptake on the gas uptake on both ground and aerosol surfaces. Our goal aerosols is more challenging (Jacob, 2000; Pöschl and Shi- is to identify the prevailing multiphase process in the PBL, raiwa, 2015). The mass transfer between gases and aerosols especially those processes that have not yet been sufficiently can be described by the resistance model in analogy with an considered in atmospheric models. Section 2 describes the electrical circuit that decoupled the physiochemical limita- methods of calculation and comparison. We present and dis- tions in the gas phase, gas–surface interface and the bulk cuss the main results in Sect. 3, which is followed by a sum- phase under (quasi-) steady-state conditions (Schwartz and mary of our major findings in Sect. 4. Freiberg, 1981; Schwartz, 1986; Kolb et al., 1995). A sim- plified scheme, which relies on the formulation of an effec- tive uptake coefficient (γeff) has been widely used in cur- 2 Methods rent atmospheric models (Jacob, 2000; Liao and Seinfeld, 2005; K. Wang et al., 2012). Growing numbers of labora- In this work, we compared the relative importance of gas up- tory studies have reported γeff for various trace gases and take by the ground and by aerosols based on their uptake aerosol particles that are potentially important for atmo- fluxes. In this comparison, resistance models were applied spheric chemistry, such as O3, NO2, SO2,N2O5, HNO3 on to calculate uptake fluxes on both ground and aerosol sur- mineral dust (Ullerstam et al., 2002; Mogili et al., 2006; faces (see Fig. 1) as detailed below. The uptake fluxes of Vlasenko et al., 2006; Wagner et al., 2008; Ndour et al., six reactive gases (O3, NO2, SO2,N2O5, HNO3 and H2O2) 2009), soot (Rogaski et al., 1997; Longfellow et al., 2000; were calculated and compared for four typical land use cate- Al-Abadleh and Grassian, 2000; Saathoff et al., 2001) and gories (urban areas, agricultural land, the Amazon forest and sea salt aerosols (Mochida et al., 2000; Gebel and Finlayson- water) and five aerosol types (mineral dust, soot, solid or- Pitts, 2000; Hoffman et al., 2003; Thornton and Abbatt, ganic aerosol, liquid organic aerosol and sea salt aerosol).
Recommended publications
  • Nitrogen Trace Gas Emissions from a Riparian Ecosystem in Sot&Em
    CHEMOSPHERE PERGAMON Chemosphere 49 (2002) 1389-l 398 www.elsevier.com/locate/chemosphere Nitrogen trace gas emissions from a riparian ecosystem in sot&em Appalachia John T. Walker aP*, Christopher D. Geron a, James M. Vose b, Wayne T. Swank b ’ US Enviromental Protection Agency, Natkmal R&k Managmt Research Laboratory, iUD-63, Research Triangk Park, NC 27711, USA b US Department of Agricdture, Forest Service, Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory, Otto, NC 28763, USA Received 11 July 2001; received in revised form 21 May 2002; accepted 19 June 2002 Abstract In this paper, we present two years of seasonal nitric oxide (NO), ammonia (NH3), and nitrous oxide (NrO) trace gas fluxes measured in a recovering riparian zone with cattle excluded and adjacent riparian zone grazed by cattle. In the recovering riparian zone, average NO, NH3, and NrO fluxes were 5.8,2.0, and 76.7 ngNm-* s-i (1.83,0.63, and 24.19 kg N ha-’ y-t), respectively. Fluxes in the grazed riparian zone were larger, especially for NO and NHr, measuring 9.1, 4.3, and 77.6 ng Nm-* s-* (2.87, 1.35, and 24.50 kg N ha-’ y-l) for NO, NHr, and N20, respectively. On average, NzO accounted for greater than 85% of total trace gas flux in both the recovering and grazed riparian zones, though NrO fluxes were highly variable temporally. In the recovering riparian zone, variability in seasonal average fluxes was ex- plained by variability in soil nitrogen (N) concentrations. Nitric oxide flux was positively correlated with soil ammo- nium (NH:) concentration, while N20 flux was positively correlated with soil nitrate (NO;) concentration.
    [Show full text]
  • Inelastic Scattering in Ocean Water and Its Impact on Trace Gas Retrievals from Satellite Data
    Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1365–1375, 2003 www.atmos-chem-phys.org/acp/3/1365/ Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Inelastic scattering in ocean water and its impact on trace gas retrievals from satellite data M. Vountas, A. Richter, F. Wittrock, and J. P. Burrows Institute for Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany Received: 4 April 2003 – Published in Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.: 2 June 2003 Revised: 29 August 2003 – Accepted: 4 September 2003 – Published: 15 September 2003 Abstract. Over clear ocean waters, photons scattered within 1 Introduction the water body contribute significantly to the upwelling flux. In addition to elastic scattering, inelastic Vibrational Raman Backscattered light from waters with low concentrations of Scattering (VRS) by liquid water is also playing a role and chlorophyll and gelbstoff – which are commonly referred can have a strong impact on the spectral distribution of the to as oligotrophic waters – is significantly influenced by outgoing radiance. Under clear-sky conditions, VRS has an Vibrational Raman Scattering (VRS) within the water (e.g. influence on trace gas retrievals from space-borne measure- Stavn and Weidemann, 1988; Marshall and Smith, 1990; ments of the backscattered radiance such as from e.g. GOME Haltrin and Kattawar, 1993; Sathyendranath and Platt, 1998; (Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment). The effect is par- Vasilkov et al., 2002b). ticularly important for geo-locations with small solar zenith As inelastic scattering redistributes photons over wave- angles and over waters with low chlorophyll concentration. length, VRS fills-in solar Fraunhofer lines, as well as trace gas absorption lines and therefore changes the spectral dis- In this study, a simple ocean reflectance model (Sathyen- tribution of scattered light in the atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Cris Trace Gas Data Users Workshop
    NOAA Unique CrIS/ATMS Processing System (NUCAPS) Trace Gas Data Products and Access A.K. Sharma (OSPO) CrIS Trace Gas Data Users Workshop September 18, 2014 The NOAA Unique CrIS/ATMS Processing System Products Retrieval Products gas Range Precisio d.o.f. Interfering Gases Science Cloud Cleared Radiances 660-750 cm-1 (cm-1) n Code 2200-2400 cm-1 T 650-800 1K/km 6-10 H2O,O3,N2O 100 levels Cloud fracon and Top 660-750 cm-1 2375-2395 emissivity Pressure Surface temperature window H2O 1200-1600 15% 4-6 CH4, HNO3 100 layers O 1025-1050 10% 1+ H2O,emissivity 100 layers Temperature 660-750 cm-1 3 2200-2400 cm-1 CO 2080-2200 15% ≈ 1 H2O,N2O 100 layers Water Vapor 780 – 1090 cm-1 1200-1750 cm-1 CH4 1250-1370 1.5% ≈ 1 H2O,HNO3,N2O 100 layers O3 990 – 1070 cm-1 CO2 680-795 0.5% ≈ 1 H2O,O3 100 layers CO 2155 – 2220 cm-1 2375-2395 T(p) CH4 1220-1350 cm-1 Volcanic 1340-1380 50% ?? < 1 H2O,HNO3 flag SO2 N2O 1290-1300cm-1 2190-2240cm-1 HNO3 860-920 50% ?? < 1 emissivity 100 layers 1320-1330 H2O,CH4,N2O HNO3 760-1320cm-1 N2O 1250-1315 5% ?? < 1 H2O 100 layers SO2 1343-1383cm-1 2180-2250 H2O,CO NH3 860-875 50% <1 emissivity BT diff CFCs 790-940 20-50% <1 emissivity Constant NUCAPS EDR Trace Gas Products The EDR product contains the following trace gas profiles calculated on each CrIS FOR: O3 layer column density (at 100 levels) O3 mixing ratio (at 100 levels) First Guess O3 layer column density (at 100 levels) First Guess O3 mixing ratio (at 100 levels) CH4 layer column density (at 100 levels) CH4 mixing ratio (at 100 levels) CO2 mixing ratio (at 100 levels) HNO3 layer column density (at 100 levels) HNO3 mixing ratio (at 100 levels) N2O layer column density (at 100 levels) N2O mixing ratio (at 100 levels) SO2 layer column density (at 100 levels) SO2 mixing ratio (at 100 levels) 3 AWIPS NUCAPS Products The retrieval product for AWIPS contains the following variaBles.
    [Show full text]
  • Concentrations and Fluxes of Aerosol Particles During the LAPBIAT
    Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 7, 709–751, 2007 Atmospheric www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/7/709/2007/ Chemistry © Author(s) 2007. This work is licensed and Physics under a Creative Commons License. Discussions Concentrations and fluxes of aerosol particles during the LAPBIAT measurement campaign in Varri¨ o¨ field station T. M. Ruuskanen1, M. Kaasik2, P. P. Aalto1, U. Horrak˜ 2, M. Vana1,2, M. Martensson˚ 3, Y. J. Yoon4, P. Keronen1, G. Mordas1, D. Ceburnis4, E. D. Nilsson3, C. O’Dowd4, M. Noppel2, T. Alliksaar5, J. Ivask5, M. Sofiev6, M. Prank2, and M. Kulmala1 1University of Helsinki, Dept. of Physical Sciences, P.O. Box 64, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland 2Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia 3Department of Applied Environmental Science, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden 4Department of Experimental Physics, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland 5Institute of Geology, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia 6Air Quality Research, Finnish Meteorological Institute, Finland Received: 21 November 2006 – Accepted: 8 January 2006 – Published: 17 January 2007 Correspondence to: T. M. Ruuskanen (taina.ruuskanen@helsinki.fi) 709 Abstract The LAPBIAT measurement campaign took place in the SMEAR I measurement station located in Eastern Lapland in the spring of 2003 between 26 April and 11 May. In this paper we describe the measurement campaign, concentrations and fluxes of aerosol 5 particles, air ions and trace gases, paying special attention to an aerosol particle for- mation event broken by a polluted air mass approaching from industrial areas of Kola Peninsula, Russia. Aerosol particle number flux measurements show strong downward fluxes during that time.
    [Show full text]
  • Dual Laser Trace Gas Monitor Sensitive, Rapid, Highly Specific and Continuous Measurements of Multiple Atmospheric Trace Gases in Ambient Air
    Dual Laser Trace Gas Monitor Sensitive, rapid, highly specific and continuous measurements of multiple atmospheric trace gases in ambient air. APPLICATIONS ADVANTAGES • Extremely sensitive detection of a wide variety of • Absolute trace gas concentrations with atmospheric trace gases, such as: methane, out calibration gases. nitrous oxide, nitric oxide, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, formaldehyde, • Fast time response. formic acid, ethylene, acetylene, carbonyl sulfide, acrolein, ammonia and others. • Free from interferences by other atmospheric gases or water vapor. • Combustion monitoring and characterization. • Turnkey and unattended operation. • Isotopic monitoring of CH4 and N2O for source/ sink characterization. • Ready to be deployed in field measurements and on moving platforms. • Eddy Covariance measurements. • Two lasers allow simultaneous • Fast response plume studies. measurement of more species. • Air quality monitoring. • Optical pathlength of either 76 meters or 210 meters. • Mobile measurements from ship, truck, and Aircraft platforms. AERODYNE RESEARCH, Inc. 45 MANNING ROAD, BILLERICA, MA 01821 (978) 663 9500 www.aerodyne.com CAEC_TILDAS_DUAL POPULAR INSTRUMENTS HIGHER PRECISION AND ACCURACY IS OBTAINABLE WITH MID-INFRARED LASERS Clumped CO2 Isotopes* CH4 Isotopes CO2, Water Isotopes N2O Isotopes NO, NO2 CH4, N2O, CO,CO2, H2O, C2H6 MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR DUAL LASER TRACE GAS MONITOR: Dimensions: 560 mm x 770 mm x 640 mm (W x D x H) Weight: 75 kg Electrical Power: 250-500 W, 120/240 V, 55/60 Hz (without pump) MULTIPASS CELL: Choice of 76 meter standard cell (V=0.5 liters) or 210 meter “Super Cell” (V=2liters) *Image attribution by Psammophile [GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html) or CC-BY-SA-3.0-2.5-2.0-1.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons REFERENCES: Nelson, D.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportable Aerosol Characterization Trailer with Trace Gas Chemistry: Design, Instruments and Verification
    Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 13: 421–435, 2013 Copyright © Taiwan Association for Aerosol Research ISSN: 1680-8584 print / 2071-1409 online doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2012.08.0207 Transportable Aerosol Characterization Trailer with Trace Gas Chemistry: Design, Instruments and Verification T. Petäjä1*, V. Vakkari1, T. Pohja2, T. Nieminen1, H. Laakso2, P.P. Aalto1, P. Keronen1, E. Siivola1, V.-M. Kerminen1,3, M. Kulmala1, L. Laakso3,4 1 Division of Atmospheric Sciences, Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland 2 Hyytiälä Forestry Field Station, Hyytiäläntie 124, FI-35500 Korkeakoski, Finland 3 School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa 4 Finnish Meteorological Institute, Research and Development, P.O. Box 503, FI-00101, Finland ABSTRACT The characterization of atmospheric aerosol properties and trace gas concentrations in various environments provides a basis for scientific research on the assessment of their roles in the climate system, as well as regional air quality issues. However, measurements of these face many problems in the developing world. In this study we present the design of a transportable aerosol dynamic and atmospheric research trailer, which relies minimally on the existing infrastructure by making use of wireless data transfer. The instrumentation used in this trailer was originally used in various aerosol formation studies, and has been expanded so that it can also monitor air quality. The instruments include a Differential Mobility Particle Sizer (DMPS) for aerosol number size distribution in the range 10–840 nm, a Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance (TEOM) for aerosol mass concentration, and Air Ion Spectrometer (AIS) for atmospheric ion measurements in the size range 0.5–40 nm.
    [Show full text]
  • Is a Trace Gas in Earth's Atmosphere, with a Mixing Ratio in 2005 Of
    Nitrous Oxide Nitrous oxide (chemical formula N 2O), is a trace gas in Earth’s atmosphere, with a mixing ratio in 2005 of 319±0.12 ppb (parts per billion, by volume). Atmospheric nitrous oxide is steadily increasing due to human activities. Nitrous oxide absorbs terrestrial radiation (i.e. radiation emitted by the Earth), and consequently it is an important anthropogenic greenhouse gas; it is one of the gases targeted for control within the Kyoto Protocol. Nitrous oxide also absorbs solar radiation, which can split the molecule, releasing reactive species that contribute towards stratospheric ozone depletion. Various natural and anthropogenic sources add nitrous oxide to the atmosphere. The main natural sources are related to biological activity in soils and the upper ocean. The largest anthropogenic source is from the use of nitrogenous fertilizer in the agricultural sector; others include combustion of fossil fuel, biomass and biofuel, and industrial processes. Nitrous oxide emissions related to biofuel production are an example of reducing emissions of one greenhouse gas (CO 2) at the expense of increasing emissions of another. Nitrous oxide is relatively inert in the troposphere (the atmosphere’s lowest 10-15 km). Higher up, in the stratosphere, energetic ultra-violet radiation starts to break the molecule apart. This photochemical destruction in the upper atmosphere removes about 0.9% of all nitrous oxide every year, determining the average atmospheric residence time of an N 2O molecule, which is currently around 114 years. This is long compared to timescales of most atmospheric transport and mixing processes, which typically range from hours to a few years.
    [Show full text]
  • An Implementation of the Dry Removal Processes DRY Deposition and Sedimentation in the Modular Earth Submodel System (Messy) A
    Technical Note: an implementation of the dry removal processes DRY DEPosition and SEDImentation in the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) A. Kerkweg, J. Buchholz, L. Ganzeveld, A. Pozzer, H. Tost, P. Jöckel To cite this version: A. Kerkweg, J. Buchholz, L. Ganzeveld, A. Pozzer, H. Tost, et al.. Technical Note: an implementation of the dry removal processes DRY DEPosition and SEDImentation in the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy). Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, European Geosciences Union, 2006, 6 (4), pp.6853-6901. hal-00302014 HAL Id: hal-00302014 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00302014 Submitted on 24 Jul 2006 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 6, 6853–6901, 2006 Atmospheric www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/6/6853/2006/ Chemistry ACPD © Author(s) 2006. This work is licensed and Physics 6, 6853–6901, 2006 under a Creative Commons License. Discussions Dry removal processes in MESSy A. Kerkweg et al. Technical Note: an implementation of the Title Page dry removal processes DRY DEPosition Abstract Introduction and SEDImentation in the Modular Earth Conclusions References Submodel System (MESSy) Tables Figures A.
    [Show full text]
  • Interaction of the Oceans with Greenhouse Gases and Atmospheric Aerosols
    Interaction of the oceans with greenhouse gases and atmospheric aerosols UNEP Regional Seas Reports and Studies No.94 Prepared in co-operation with BIIR IT UNESCO UNEP 1988 I Note; This docianent is an extract from the report entitled Pollutant Modification of Atmospheric and Oceanic Processes and Climate' prepared for the Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of F4arine Pollution (GESAIiP) sponsored by the United 1ations, United Nations €nviromnt Progrinne (UNEP). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FM)). United Nations Educational. Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) 1 World Health Organization (I1O), World Meteorological Organization (0), International Maritime Organization (1110) and International Atcmic Energy Agency (IAEA). The report was prepard by the $lO-1ed GESAI4P Working Group No. 14 on the Interchange of Pollutants between the Atisphere and the Oceans 1 which is also supported by UNEP and UNESCO. The eighteenth session of GESRIIP (Paris 11-15 April 1988) approved the report of the Working Group and decided that it should be published by 1140 as GESAMP Reports and Studies Mo. 36. The designations en1oyed and the presentation of the material in this document do not iui1ly the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the organizations co-sponsoring GESAMP concerning the legal status of any State 1 Territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The docianent contains the views expressed by experts acting in their individual capacities 1 and may not necessarily correspond with the views of the sponsoring organizations. For bibliographic purposes, this docwnent may be cited as: J4O/UNEP/UNESCO: Interaction of the oceans with greenhouse gases and atmospheric aerosols: UNEP Regional Seas Reports and Studies No.
    [Show full text]
  • Ammonia: Measurement Issues
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska 2005 Ammonia: Measurement Issues Lowry A. Harper USDA-ARS Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub Harper, Lowry A., "Ammonia: Measurement Issues" (2005). Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty. 1339. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/1339 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 15 Ammonia: Measurement Issues LOWRY A. HARPER Southern Piedmont Conservation Research Unit J. Phil Campbell, Sr., Natural Resources Conservation Center USDA-ARS Watkinsville, Georgia Ammonia (NH3) is a colorless gas under standard conditions, whose pungent odor is easily discernible at concentrations above about 10 ppm, and to some per- sons, down to almost 1 ppm. It is the major basic neutralizing gas in the atmos- phere so it has an important role in the neutralization of atmospheric acids generated by the oxidation of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx). As + a result, the reaction product of NH3, ammonium (NH4 ), forms an aerosol that is a major component of atmospheric aerosols and in precipitation (Asman et al., 1998). Other organic forms also exist, such as amines and organic N compounds (not currently studied), but the concentrations of these components are generally negligible by comparison (Van der Eerden, 1982).
    [Show full text]
  • Ozone Depletion Due to Increasing Anthropogenic Trace Gas Emissions: Role of Stratospheric Chemistry and Implications for Future Climate
    Vol. 1: 85-95, 1991 CLIMATE RESEARCH Published April 14 Clim. Res. Ozone depletion due to increasing anthropogenic trace gas emissions: role of stratospheric chemistry and implications for future climate M. Lal*,T. Holt Climatic Research Unit, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ,United Kingdom ABSTRACT: The response of the atmosphere to increasing emissions of radatively active trace gases (COz,CH,, N20, o3and CFCs) is calculated by means of a l-dimensional coupled chemical-radiative- transport model. We identify the sign and magnitude of the feedback between the chemistry and thermal structure of the atmosphere by examining steady state changes in stratospheric ozone and surface temperature in response to perturbations in trace gases of anthropogenic origin. Next, we assess the possible decline in stratospheric ozone and its effect on troposphere-stratosphere temperature trends for the period covering the pre-industrial era to the present. Future trends are also considered using projected 'business-as-usual' trace gas scenario (scenario BAU) and that expected as a result of global phase-out of production of CFCs by the year 2000 (scenario MP). The numerical experiments take account of the effect of stratospheric aerosol loading due to volcanic eruptions and the influence of the thermal inertia of the ocean. Results indicate that the trace gas increase from the period 1850 to 1986 could already have contributed to a 3 to 10 % decline in stratospheric ozone and that this decline is expected to become more pronounced by the year 2050, amounting to a 43 % ozone loss at 40 km for the scenario BAU. The total column ozone Increase of 1.5% obtained in our model calculations for the present-day atmosphere is likely to change sign with time leading to a net decrease of 12.7 % by the middle of next century.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement of Proton Transfer Reaction Rates in a Microwave Cavity Discharge Flowing Afterglow George M
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Physics Theses & Dissertations Physics Spring 2003 Measurement of Proton Transfer Reaction Rates in a Microwave Cavity Discharge Flowing Afterglow George M. Brooke IV Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/physics_etds Part of the Atmospheric Sciences Commons, Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics Commons, and the Physical Chemistry Commons Recommended Citation Brooke, George M.. "Measurement of Proton Transfer Reaction Rates in a Microwave Cavity Discharge Flowing Afterglow" (2003). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), dissertation, Physics, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/6vm5-5117 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/physics_etds/38 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Physics at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Physics Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MEASUREMENT OF PROTON TRANSFER REACTION RATES IN A MICROWAVE CAVITY DISCHARGE FLOWING AFTERGLOW By George M. Brooke IV B.S. May 1994, Virginia Military Institute M.S. December 1997, Old Dominion University A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PHYSICS OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY May 2003 Approved by: Leposava Vuskovic (Director) Anatoly V. Radyushkin (Member) Charles I. Sukenik (Member) Paul E. Ulmer (Member) Karl H. Schoenbach (Member) Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT MEASUREMENT OF PROTON TRANSFER REACTION RATES IN A MICROWAVE CAVITY DISCHARGE FLOWING AFTERGLOW George M. Brooke IV Old Dominion University, 2003 Director: Dr.
    [Show full text]