DOCSLIB.ORG

"66 Baby Point Road Proposed" Development

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
"66 Baby Point Road Proposed" Development Submission by Anne and Robert Galway 62 Baby Point Road April 24, 2009 To Committee of Adjustment Etobicoke York Panel 2 Civic Centre Court Toronto, ON, M9C 5A3 Carla Schreiber, Assistant to the Committee of Adjustment [email protected] Good Afternoon; At the outset, I would like to introduce myself. I am Dr. Robert Galway. My wife, Anne, and I live at 62 Baby Point Road. We are the second owners of that property built in 1922, and have lived there continuously for 36 years, commencing in 1973. As such we have an in depth knowledge of the history and culture of the neighbourhood. The Baby Point Enclave is one of the oldest if not the oldest residential neighbourhood in Toronto. The entry to the enclave is through a set of historic stone gates that can lay claim to demarcating the first gated community in the Borough of York and the City of Toronto. The land was originally a Six Nations Village “ Taiaiacon” inhabited by members of the Seneca tribe. A memorial to the Village stands at the fork in the street leading to Baby Point Road on the North and Baby Point Crescent on the south. 66 Baby Point Road is the backdrop to this Memorial Cairn. The Village guarded the fordable rapids at the site of the Old Mill known as "The Toronto Carrying Place", or, le portage de Toronto. Etienne Brule passed through these lands (1615)on his epic exploratory journey that led to Louisiana and beyond. This tract was settled in 1816 by a son of the French Canadian fur trading family of “Francois Bâby”. You may be interested to know that the Bâby Family Farm near Windsor Ontario was captured by American Forces in the War of 1812 and served as the American Military Headquarters during that continental struggle.1 In addition to establishing a Fur Trading Post in York, the family also dispatched brothers to establish similar outposts in Detroit and in Northern Michigan at Michelimackinac near Sault Ste. Marie. 1 Peter Newman As a consequence of the uprisings in Upper and Lower Canada in the early years of the 19th Century, the British Crown dispatched Lord Durham to Canada to investigate the causes and recommend solutions ...... in what was probably the nations first Royal Commission. Lord Durham was hosted by James Baby (who had anglicized his persona and name by that time) during his stay in Canada. It was the Lord Durham Report of 1837 that led to the establishment of the Provinces of Ontario and Quebec, and an elected Legislature in each province. The Crown obtained Title to this tract of land in the early part of the 1900`s after which they sold the property to Robert Home Smith, a lawyer and graduate of U of T, as well as a Commissioner of the Toronto Harbour Commission. Home Smith developed this property with great foresight that was equally applied to other regions in the Humber River Valley including the Kingsway, St. Georges Golf Club and The Old Mill. He brought a sense of Urban Planning to these developments that was far ahead of his time and his concepts of residential development and design still withstand intense scrutiny by urban planners as well as well intentioned developers and residential architects. His principles of property layout are deserving of respect and should not gave way to architectural largesse as is the case associated with this application. This preamble serves to establish the historical background of this very special residential area. I would like to take the remaining time to outline and display certain features of the immediate neighbourhood to 66 Baby Point Road that illustrate the pleasing aesthetics that grace the street. There are seven properties aligned along the curve of Baby Point Road that merit review. These include the target property number 66, and the 3 properties adjacent to this property lying to the east and west respectively. The properties are established on their individual lots with a setback ratio that gives rise to a harmonious sight line as one moves along the road regardless of the direction of approach, be it from the east or the west. This aesthetic sight line did not happen by chance. It was achieved by creating an èn Echelon position of each home on its lot. The footprint of each home and the integration of the setbacks from the street into a harmonious curving sightline is an instructive example of residential design unity. ( read above from right to left - 62 Baby Point Road to 70 Baby Point Road) This montage includes the two properties immediately to the east and to the west of the target property (62 Baby Point Rd to 70 Baby Point Rd.) 66 Baby Point Rd is in the middle three (3) frames. This collage not only illustrates the en echelon placement of the properties on their lots but the proportionality that integrates the street scape into a unified entity. This is best appreciated from an aerial or a "birdseye" view of the homes adjacent to 66 Baby Point Road. Although each home displays different architectural features, there is a pleasing harmony of size and shape that serves to integrate them into the communal surroundings such that no one home dominates the other. The spaciousness of the properties was enhanced by placing the garages behind the homes leaving significant space (residential elbow room) between each house. It should not be overlooked that the homes on display above are built on ravine lots situated along the ancient south bank of the Humber River. A site map demonstrates that over one-third or more of each lot consists of a steeply inclined slope of over 60 metres in height subject to erosion and other hazards that can permanently damage the ecology, topography and local geography. There are significant species of wildlife inhabiting the ravine on a year around basis. The flora and fauna of this natural habitat is deserving of protection. The area is also noteworthy from the archaeological perspective. Taking the foregoing into consideration, it is this homeowners opinion that the demolition of 66 Baby Point Road to make way for a home of over 6500 sq. ft. is not acceptable. The footprint of the ground floor alone is almost 90 percent greater than the present one. The increase of the square footage of the floor space is essentially double that of the existing building (all for a family of four). The application for a variance clearly is not a minor one. The demolition of 66 Baby Point Road and the construction of a "Monster Home " with its encroachment on the street sight lines and adjacent residential space is a major transgression on this historic neighbourhood. In my considered view it represents a form of Architectural `Octomummy` Syndrome. It calls for rejection. In Summary: We strongly oppose the proposed development and ask that the Committee refuse the requested variance. The Baby Point Enclave is an historic residential community in the City of Toronto that has a rich cultural and architectural heritage deserving of respect and preservation. Potential concerns: The proposal is excessively large and out of keeping with the existing physical character of the area. Moving this oversized house forward on the lot would dominate the streetscape and overwhelm the more modest homes, which comprise the prevailing building type of this neighbourhood. The site is constrained by the ravine to the rear and a number of prominent and significant trees. The better approach to building on this lot would be to design a more modest house that preserves the existing trees and respects the pattern of front lot setbacks. It would irrevocably alter and intrude upon the existing “en echelon” pattern of the present setbacks and the associated aesthetics of the street sight lines. The justification for the variance is to enable rear yard landscaping. However, the rear yard could be landscaped without the requested variance if the applicant chose to build a more modest house, in keeping with the other homes in the neighbourhood. The applicant has done a poor job of consulting with area residents. The design was done first and presented to area residents as an afterthought. Clearly, there is no effort to design a house that fits with the neighbourhood. To Conclude: We strongly oppose the proposed development and ask that the Committee refuse the requested variance. Signed: Robert Galway Anne Galway References & Links Humber Valley Surveys - The Toronto Land Corporation; Home Smith & Company www.torontoneighbourhoods.net/regions/york/146_overview.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambton_Neighbourhood,_Toronto http://www.fredamurdock.com/4a_custpage_15403.html www.torontolife.com/guide/real-estate/west/lambton-baby-point/ http://www.torontohistory.org/Pages_ABC/Baby_Point.html http://www.babypointclub.on.ca/ http://www.stgeorges.org/index.cfm?ID=70 http://www.housesforsaletoronto.com/4a_custpage_15401.html http://www.heritagetoronto.org/news/blog/ron-williamson http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Baby Notes: www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090320.reFlippersMain0320/CommentStory/RealEstate/home.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average Price by Percentage Increase: January to June 2016
    City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average price by percentage increase: January to June 2016 C06 – $1,282,135 C14 – $2,018,060 1,624,017 C15 698,807 $1,649,510 972,204 869,656 754,043 630,542 672,659 1,968,769 1,821,777 781,811 816,344 3,412,579 763,874 $691,205 668,229 1,758,205 $1,698,897 812,608 *C02 $2,122,558 1,229,047 $890,879 1,149,451 1,408,198 *C01 1,085,243 1,262,133 1,116,339 $1,423,843 E06 788,941 803,251 Less than 10% 10% - 19.9% 20% & Above * 1,716,792 * 2,869,584 * 1,775,091 *W01 13.0% *C01 17.9% E01 12.9% W02 13.1% *C02 15.2% E02 20.0% W03 18.7% C03 13.6% E03 15.2% W04 19.9% C04 13.8% E04 13.5% W05 18.3% C06 26.9% E05 18.7% W06 11.1% C07 29.2% E06 8.9% W07 18.0% *C08 29.2% E07 10.4% W08 10.9% *C09 11.4% E08 7.7% W09 6.1% *C10 25.9% E09 16.2% W10 18.2% *C11 7.9% E10 20.1% C12 18.2% E11 12.4% C13 36.4% C14 26.4% C15 31.8% Compared to January to June 2015 Source: RE/MAX Hallmark, Toronto Real Estate Board Market Watch *Districts that recorded less than 100 sales were discounted to prevent the reporting of statistical anomalies R City of Toronto — Neighbourhoods by TREB District WEST W01 High Park, South Parkdale, Swansea, Roncesvalles Village W02 Bloor West Village, Baby Point, The Junction, High Park North W05 W03 Keelesdale, Eglinton West, Rockcliffe-Smythe, Weston-Pellam Park, Corso Italia W10 W04 York, Glen Park, Amesbury (Brookhaven), Pelmo Park – Humberlea, Weston, Fairbank (Briar Hill-Belgravia), Maple Leaf, Mount Dennis W05 Downsview, Humber Summit, Humbermede (Emery), Jane and Finch W09 W04 (Black Creek/Glenfield-Jane
    [Show full text]
  • Trailside Esterbrooke Kingslake Harringay
    MILLIKEN COMMUNITY TRAIL CONTINUES TRAIL CONTINUES CENTRE INTO VAUGHAN INTO MARKHAM Roxanne Enchanted Hills Codlin Anthia Scoville P Codlin Minglehaze THACKERAY PARK Cabana English Song Meadoway Glencoyne Frank Rivers Captains Way Goldhawk Wilderness MILLIKEN PARK - CEDARBRAE Murray Ross Festival Tanjoe Ashcott Cascaden Cathy Jean Flax Gardenway Gossamer Grove Kelvin Covewood Flatwoods Holmbush Redlea Duxbury Nipigon Holmbush Provence Nipigon Forest New GOLF & COUNTRY Anthia Huntsmill New Forest Shockley Carnival Greenwin Village Ivyway Inniscross Raynes Enchanted Hills CONCESSION Goodmark Alabast Beulah Alness Inniscross Hullmar Townsend Goldenwood Saddletree Franca Rockland Janus Hollyberry Manilow Port Royal Green Bush Aspenwood Chapel Park Founders Magnetic Sandyhook Irondale Klondike Roxanne Harrington Edgar Woods Fisherville Abitibi Goldwood Mintwood Hollyberry Canongate CLUB Cabernet Turbine 400 Crispin MILLIKENMILLIKEN Breanna Eagleview Pennmarric BLACK CREEK Carpenter Grove River BLACK CREEK West North Albany Tarbert Select Lillian Signal Hill Hill Signal Highbridge Arran Markbrook Barmac Wheelwright Cherrystone Birchway Yellow Strawberry Hills Strawberry Select Steinway Rossdean Bestview Freshmeadow Belinda Eagledance BordeauxBrunello Primula Garyray G. ROSS Fontainbleau Cherrystone Ockwell Manor Chianti Cabernet Laureleaf Shenstone Torresdale Athabaska Limestone Regis Robinter Lambeth Wintermute WOODLANDS PIONEER Russfax Creekside Michigan . Husband EAST Reesor Plowshare Ian MacDonald Nevada Grenbeck ROWNTREE MILLS PARK Blacksmith
    [Show full text]
  • THE SHARED PATH Foxwell St Terry Dr Symes Rd
    GETTING THERE AND BACK Follow the path of an ancient You can reach the suggested start and end point Aboriginal portage route. Discover 7 MARSHES AND OAK SAVANNAH on public transit by taking the BLOOR / DANFORTH panoramic views, river marshes, and The marsh at the mouth of the Humber River, dating subway to Old Mill station. Other TTC access is back 5,000 years, housed a wide range of plants, provided by a Dundas Street West Bus Route and the former sits of water-powered mills sh, waterfowl, and mammals which made it a vital The Queensway Streetcar. hunting, shing, and gathering site for Aboriginal THE ROUTES peoples. Further up the path, a black savannah tree is a rare remnant of an ecosystem that once ourished FOR MORE INFO SHARED PATH DISCOVERY WALK in the dry, sandy soils at the bottom of former Lake Discovery Walks is a program of self-guided walks Although you can begin this Discovery Walk Iroquois (now known as Lake Ontario). that links city ravines, parks, gardens, beaches and at any point along the route, a good starting neighbourhoods. For more information on Discovery point is at the base of the footbridge over the Walks, including brochures, please call customer Humber River where it enters Lake Ontario. You’ll visit The Shared 9 THE KING’S MILL service at 311, or 416-392-CITY (2489) from outside the beginning of an ancient portage route up the City limits. Information can also be found at toronto. Humber River Valley, sites of early fur trading posts, In 1793, the King’s Mills, the area’s rst water-powered ca/parks/trails/discover.htm.
    [Show full text]
  • TO360 City-Wide District Naming Web Consultation Report
    Toronto 360 Wayfinding Strategy TO360 Citywide District Naming Web Consultation Final Report March 2019 1. Background About TO360 The Toronto 360 (TO360) Wayfinding Strategy is an effort to help people find their way by making streets, neighbourhoods, and the city more legible. Following the successful completion of a pilot project in the Financial District in 2015, the City of Toronto began a five-year rollout in select parts of Toronto. This rollout is focused on developing a mapping database that will support the future production of wayfinding maps. The project is led by the City of Toronto’s Transportation Services Division working with consultants Steer, T-Kartor, and Swerhun Inc. In Year One of the project (Fall 2017 – Spring 2018), the TO360 team developed a map database for the area bounded roughly by Lake Ontario, Royal York Rd, St. Clair Ave, and Warden Ave. Now in Year Two (Fall 2018 – Spring 2019), the team is further developing the database for additional areas, including: Yonge St from Steeles Ave to Merton St, between Avenue Rd and just east of Bayview Ave; Eglinton Ave from Dufferin St to Cleveland St, between Glencairn Ave and Merton St; and the areas around Scarborough Civic Centre, bounded by Sheppard Ave E, Midland Ave, St. Andrews Ave, and Markham Rd. The TO360 team delivered the first of two rounds of consultation for Year Two in November 2018. Round One consisted of four Local Stakeholder Mapping Workshops within the Year Two mapping area. At these workshops, the team sought feedback from representatives of local Residents’ Associations, Business Improvement Areas, “Friends of” parks groups, and local pedestrian advocacy groups on District Names, walking routes and barriers, active areas, places of interest, and landmarks.
    [Show full text]
  • THE HERITAGE YORK REPORTER Winter 2015 Heritage York at Lambton House, 4066 Old Dundas Street, York, on M6S 2R6
    THE HERITAGE YORK REPORTER Winter 2015 Heritage York at Lambton House, 4066 Old Dundas Street, York, ON M6S 2R6 T: 416-767-5472 www.lambtonhouse.org Brent Chamberlain to speak on Pan Am Path at the Annual Fundraising Dinner Dance A passionate supporter of inclusive city-building, Brent Chamberlain serves as the Chair of the Friends of the Pan Am Path, a role he has held since the organization’s founding in 2013. He has held a number of progressive leadership positions in both the non-profit and private sectors and has been appointed to the Toronto region grant review team for the Ontario Trillium Foundation, the largest granting foundation in Canada. Brent is a graduate of McGill University and the London School of Economics. He is the Associate Director, Diversity & Inclusion for Bell Canada, where he leads the enterprise-wide corporate strategy focused on creating competitive business advantage through workplace inclusion and diverse marketplace growth. The Pan Am Path The Pan Am Path is a collaborative legacy project between Friends of the Pan Am Path and the City of Toronto. The Pan Am Path will connect Toronto’s extensive trail system and bring the Path to life by creating opportunities for arts, culture, sports, enriched public spaces and local tourism. The Path will connect over 84km of trails across Toronto starting at the Claireville Reservoir in the west end of the city. The Pan Am Path follows the Humber River down to the waterfront, traversing the Martin Goodman Trail to the Don River where it continues North before transferring to the Hydro Corridor in the East end of the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Health Assessment Report Identifying Assets, Needs and Service Priorities for Accesspoint on Jane
    Community Health Assessment Report Identifying Assets, Needs and Service Priorities for AccessPoint on Jane October 2013 Jane Community Health Assessment Report 2 Published by Access Alliance Multicultural Health and Community Services, 2013 To be cited as: Access Alliance (2013). Jane Community Health Assessment Report. Toronto: Access Alliance Multicultural Health and Community Services. Requests for permission and copies of this report should be addressed to: Access Alliance Multicultural Health and Community Services 500-340 College Street Toronto, ON M5S 3G3 Telephone: (416) 324-8677 Fax: (416) 324-9074 www.accessalliance.ca © 2013 Access Alliance Multicultural Health and Community Services Jane Community Health Assessment Report 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive summary ................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 2. Environmental Scan Findings ......................................................................................................................... 11 3. Community Survey Results ............................................................................................................................. 14 4. Community and Service Provider Focus Groups ............................................................................................ 19 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Business Improvement Area 2021 Operating Budget Approvals
    EC19.2 Appendix B Appendix B - Status of Business Improvement Area 2021 Operating Budget Approvals Approved by Board of Approved by General Approved by Business Improvement Area Management Membership City Council Albion Islington Square BIA Baby Point Gates BIA Bayview Leaside BIA October 10, 2020 November 30, 2020 Bloor Annex BIA Bloor by the Park BIA November 4, 2020 November 4, 2020 December 16- 17, 2020 Bloor Street BIA September 30, 2020 October 30, 2020 December 16- 17, 2020 Bloor West Village BIA Bloorcourt Village BIA Bloordale Village BIA Bloor-Yorkville BIA August 30, 2020 October 30, 2020 December 16- 17, 2020 Broadview Danforth BIA September 14, 2020 November 16, 2020 Cabbagetown BIA October 21, 2020 November 18, 2020 Chinatown BIA October 28, 2020 October 28, 2020 December 16- 17, 2020 Church-Wellesley Village BIA October 9, 2020 November 3, 2020 December 16- 17, 2020 CityPlace and Fort York BIA College Promenade BIA College West BIA Corso Italia BIA Crossroads of the Danforth BIA October 28, 2020 November 30, 2020 Danforth Mosaic BIA Danforth Village BIA Dovercourt Village BIA Downtown Yonge BIA September 24, 2020 November 19, 2020 Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) - 2021 Operating Budgets: Report 2 Appendix B Page 1 of 4 Approved by Board of Approved by General Approved by Business Improvement Area Management Membership City Council DuKe Heights BIA November 10, 2020 November 26, 2020 Dupont by the Castle BIA September 24, 2020 October 29, 2020 December 16- 17, 2020 Eglinton Hill BIA Emery Village BIA Fairbank Village BIA
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 Site and Area Specific Policies
    CHAPTER 7 SITE AND AREA SPECIFIC POLICIES Throughout the City are sites and areas that require policies that vary from one or more of the provisions of this Plan. These policies generally reflect unique historic conditions for approval that must be recognized for specific development sites, or provide a further layer of local policy direction for an area. In most cases, the site and area specific policies provide direction on land use. The Plan policies apply to these lands except where the site and area specific policies vary from the Plan. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. South of Steeles Avenue, West of Alcide Street .......................................................................................... 13 2. West Side of The West Mall, East of Etobicoke Creek ................................................................................. 13 3. 124 Belfield Road ........................................................................................................................................ 14 4. Monogram Place.......................................................................................................................................... 14 5. 20 Thompson Avenue .................................................................................................................................. 14 6. South Side of The Queensway, Between Zorra Street and St. Lawrence Avenue, North of the Gardiner Expressway ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • East West Central
    Central Bayview/Post Road/Bridlepath $1,900,000 (26) TorontoRealEstateCentral.com Wilson Ave. York Mills Rd. Average Freehold Teddington Park/ Ledbury Bedford Park Hoggs Hollow/ The Valley House Prices $1,237,000 $1,102,000 (select Toronto neighbourhoods) (27) (47) $3,756,000 (10) Golfdale Wanless Park January 1, 2011 to $936,000 (11) Lawrence Ave. W. Lawrence Ave. E. March 31, 2011 John Ross Glencairn Road / Avenue Hwy 11a Robertson Lawrence Park $2,099,000 $1,815,000 $2,644,000 (12) (14) Legend (16) Blythwood Craighurst $ = Average House Price Briar Hill () = Volume of Houses Sold Allenby North Sherwood Park = Change from previous quarter $1,118,000 Toronto $1,162,000 (16) $853,000 = Insufficient Sales (8) Eglinton Ave. W. (16) Eglinton Ave. E. (Average not necessarily accurate. Chaplin Estates South Eglinton Please contact us for details.) $1,066,000 =Central Toronto Branch (12) $873,000 (44) Leaside 1Km $939,000 Forest Hill (43) $2,460,000 Moore Park (20) West $1,771,000 St. Clair Ave. W. (21) St. Clair Ave. W. Forest Hill South Bloor West Village / West $1,544,000 (18) Baby Point St. High Park $836,000 (14) $737,000 Yonge Keele Rosedale (22) (25) The Annex $2,170,000 $1.050,000 (22) Bloor St. W. / Hwy 5 1,412,000 St. (25) $ Yorkville/ Yorkville/ The Danforth/ Swansea / Riverside Danforth Ave/Hwy 5 Dufferin Riverdale $510,000 Bloor St. W. / Hwy 5 $686,000 (33) (33) Cabbagetown St. / Hwy 11 Parkside Lake $755,000 (36) $703,000 Gerrard St. E. Yonge (5) Expressway / Lake Ontario Queen St.
    [Show full text]
  • Child & Family Inequities Score
    CHILD & FAMILY INEQUITIES SCORE Technical Report The Child & Family Inequities Score provides a neighbourhood-level measure of the socio-economic challenges that children and families experience. The Child & Family Inequities Score is a tool to help explain the variation in socio-economic status across the City of Toronto neighbourhoods. It will help service providers to understand the context of the neighbourhoods and communities that they serve. It will also help policy makers and researchers understand spatial inequities in child and family outcomes. While other composite measures of socio-economic status in the City exist, the Child & Family Inequities Score is unique because it uses indicators that are specific to families with children under the age of 12. The Child & Family Inequities Score is a summary measure derived from indicators which describe inequities experienced by the child and family population in each of Toronto’s 140 neighbourhoods. The Child & Family Inequities Score is comprised of 5 indicators: • Low Income Measure: Percent of families with an after-tax family income that falls below the Low Income Measure. • Parental Unemployment: Percent of families with at least one unemployed parent / caregiver. • Low Parental Education: Percent of families with at least one parent / caregiver that does not have a high school diploma. • No Knowledge of Official Language: Percent of families with no parents who have knowledge of either official language (English or French). 1 • Core Housing Need: Percent of families in core housing need . This report provides technical details on how the Child & Family Inequities Score was created and describes how the resulting score should be interpreted.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Toronto Map with 73 Bias
    73 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREAS STEELES AVE E LESLIE ST LESLIE ALBION RD TAPSCOTT RD 24 DREWRY AVE CUMMER AVE 39 MCNICOLL AVE 08 BRIMLEY RD 01 FINCH AVE W WILLOWDALEAVE 26 404 HIGHWAY FINCH AVE E WESTON RD WESTON 42 JANE ST JANE 41 HIGHWAY 400 HIGHWAY 23 WILLIAM R ALLEN RD ALLEN R WILLIAM MARTINGROVE RD HUNTINGWOOD DR 01 10 MIDLAND AVE 33 MCCOWANRD REXDALE BLVD WILSONHEIGHTS BLVD SHEPPARD AVE W HIGHWAY 427 07 ST BATHURST 59 SHEPPARD AVE E KEELE ST KEELE BAYVIEW AVE BAYVIEW 40 09 HIGHWAY27 HIGHWAY 401 02 HIGHWAY 401 PROGRESS AVE YORK MILLS RD WILSON AVE 36 HIGHWAY 409 HIGHWAY 401 ELLESMERE RD MILITARY TRL BRIDGELAND AVE PORTUNION RD CALEDONIA RD CALEDONIA 25 MARKHAMRD ORTONPARK RD AVENUE RD SCARBOROUGHGOLF CLUBRD WILLIAMR ALLEN RD 44 DIXON RD 72 34 LAWRENCE AVE W 37 38 69 ST KEELE MOUNTPLEASANT RD LAWRENCE AVE E SCARLETT RD 151515 43 DON MILLS RD MILLS DON 12 ST DUFFERIN 70 BIRCHMOUNTRD BLACK CREEKDR MORNINGSIDEAVE THE WESTWAY BELLAMYRD N 65 KINGSTON RD EGLINTON AVE W 11 EGLINTON AVE E ISLINGTONAVE 48 24 27 73 64 25 HIGHWAY427 GUILDWOOD PKWY ORIOLE PKWYORIOLE DANFORTH RD KIPLINGAVE LAIRDDR RENFORTHDR 04 ROYALYORK RD SPADINA RD 49 VICTORIAPARK AVE KENNEDYRD DAVISVILLE AVE WARDEN AVE 50 ST YONGE OVERLEA BLVD 03 29 MOORE AVE ST CLAIR AVE W RATHBURN RD ST CLAIR AVE E 60 15 55 33 71 DON VALLEY PARKWAY DUNDAS ST W SYMINGTONAVE GREENWOODAVE O CONNOR DR DAVENPORT RD DONLANDSAVE WOODBINEAVE PHARMACY AVE BURNHAMTHORPE RD COXWELL AVE Lake Ontario 35 58 36 ANNETTE ST DUPONT ST PAPEAVE DAWES RD KEELE KEELE ST 51 02 23 58 66 BLOOR ST W LANSDOWNE AVE 20
    [Show full text]
  • Baby Point Heritage Conservation District (HCD) Study
    Baby Point Heritage Conservation District (HCD) Study Engagement Summary Report Prepared by Lura Consulting for the City of Toronto June 2018 Baby Point Heritage District Conservation (HCD) Study Community Engagement Summary Report Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ i 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Overview of Community Consultation Process .................................................................................... 2 2.1. Community Consultation Meetings .............................................................................................. 3 2.2. Community Advisory Group Meetings .......................................................................................... 4 3. Summary of Participant Feedback ‘What We Heard’ ........................................................................... 5 3.1. Community Consultation Meeting #1 ........................................................................................... 5 3.2. Community Consultation Meeting #2 ........................................................................................... 7 3.3. Old Millside Community Advisory Group #1 ................................................................................. 7 3.4. Old Millside Community Advisory Group #2 ................................................................................
    [Show full text]