Little Rock Afb 1962 Guide

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Little Rock Afb 1962 Guide History of Little Rock Air Force Base Little Rock Air Force Base of- assigned to Second Ail,;.Force on The 384th Bombardment Group's ficially came into being on Febru- 1 August 1955. Colonel Joseph J. target was Halberstadt, Germany. ary 1, 1955. Preston was assigned as the first Though under 25 minutes of su~- Actually its beginning started in Commander of the 825th Air Divi- tained flack fire and an enemy air- October 1951, when an unofficial sion. craft trailing a bomb on a steel spokesman of the United States The 825th Air Division has the cable through their formation, the Air Force made an extemporaneous responsibility of monitoring and Group lost no aircraft. The 384th comment that, Air Force wise, coordinating the manning, train- Bombardment Group destroyed Arkansas looked like the "hole in ing, equipping and operational six enemy aircraft with two the doughnut." That comment was readiness of its assigned units for 'probables' and either destroyed or actually the conception of Little the primary purpose of conducting dealt heavy damage to targets. Rock Air Force Base. At the time strategic air warfare on a global The group received the first of its the comment was made, every scale. On 1 August 1955, the 825th two unit citations for participating state bordering Arkansas had at Air Division had two wings, the in the raid. The second citation least one Air Force station while 384th Bombardment Wing (Medi- came in April 1944 when the 384th Arkansas did not have a single um) and the 70th Strategic Recon- Bomb Group led a task force of active base. naissance Wing, the 4225th United 113 planes through enemy aircraft In January of 1952, the citizens States Air Force Infirmary and and flak to destroy a German air- of Little Rock and Pulaski County the 825th Air Base Group assigned craft componc'1t plant. The Group officially opened the drive to have under their command. All of these participated in 316 combat mis- an Air Force base located in the assigned units units were physical- sions. county. By the end of September ly located at Little Rock AFB, The "384th" appeared again al- 1952 the committee had raised al- Arkansas, except the 70th Strategic most nine years later at Little Rock most one million dollars. On De- Reconnaissance Wing which was Air Force Base as the 384th Bom- cember 12, 1953, the Army Corps located at Lockbourne Air Force bardment Wing (Medium). The of Engineers was instructed to al- Base, Ohio. Today the division has 384th Bombardment Wing is pres- lot $9.6 million for initial construc- two bombardment wings, the 384th ently composed of a Headquarters tion and to take possession of ap- BW and the 70th Bombardment Squadron, 544th, 545th and 546th proximately 7,500 acres just north Wing, the 825th Combat Support Bombardment Squadrons, 384th of the town of Jacksonville, Arkan- Group and the 825th Medical Group Armament & Electronics Squad- sas. located at Little Rock AFB. In ad- ron, 384th Organizational Mainten- By August 1, 1955, all units as- dition the division has the 68th ance Squadron, 384th Field Main- signed to the base were activated Bombardment Wing, the 68th Com- tenance Squadron, and its newest with the exception of the 70th bat Support Group and the 806th addition, the 70th Air Refueling Strategic Reconnaissance Win g Medical Group located at Chen- Squadron. which had been activated January nault AFB, Louisiana under their 24, 1955, at Lockbourne AFB, Ohio. command. The 70th started its move to Little 70th Bombardment Wing Rock AFB in September 1955 and 384th Bombardment Group The 70th Bombardment Wing had completed the move and was On 1 December 1942, the 384th was originally activated on Sep- in full operation by October of that Bombardment Group (Heavy) was tember 13, 1941, at Gray Field, year. activated at Gowan Field, Idaho. Fort Lewis, Washington, as the With the move of the 70th com- It was first commanded by Cap- 70th R e con n a i s san c e Group, pleted, the 825th Air Division was tain Ralph E. Switzer, whose pri- equipped with thirteen obsolete 0-47 in full operation with its four as- mary duty was that of flight sur- type aircraft. signed units. In September 1958, geon. Originally the Group had With the coming of Pearl Har- the 825th Air Base Group and the only 27 officers and 225 enlisted bor, the 70th Reconnaissance 4225th USAF Dispensary were personnel. The group remained at Group assumed a mission of coast- changed to the 825th Combat Sup- Gowan Field only a month before al scouting and anti-submarine port Group and 825th Medical being transferred to Sioux City patrol along the Pacific coast. Al- Group respectively. Army Air Base, Iowa, for training though this mission was not spec- The growth of the base con- in B-17s under the command of tacular, the personnel of the 70th tinued and in 1961 the missile age Colonel Bud J. Peaslee. After com- served with great pride and honor. came to Little Rock Air Force Base pleting this training, in early 1943, The reconnaissance group was with the construction of Titan II the group stopped briefly at Camp inactivated June 27, 1949, and re- missile sites in the northern part Kearney, Nebraska to equip with activated January 14, 1955, as the of the state. Little Rock Air Force new B-17s prior to overseas trans- 70th Strategic Reconnais san c e Base will be the headquarters for fer. Equipped with new aircraft Wing, assigned to the 801st Air Di- the 308th Missile Wing and its as- the Group arrived in the European vision, Second Air Force, SAC. signed units who will control, main- Theater of Operation in May 1943. On August 1, 1955, the 70th Wing tain, and use, if necessary, the June 22, 1943, was the day of the was moved to Little Rock Air Titan II ICBM which will be housed 384th Group's first combat mission. Force Base, and on June 2, 1958, in the giant silos in Arkansas. The first mission was unsuccessful. it went out of the reconnaissance Two airmen were killed, three business and assumed the mission wounded, two aircraft were lost of a combat crew training wing. 82Sth Air Division and 11 damaged. On January 11, It remained in this status until The 825th Air Division was acti- 1944, the 384thBombardment Group October 25, 1961, when it was re- vated at Little Rock Air Force participated in the first large scale organized and designated the 70th Base, Jacksonville, Arkansas, and air raid. Bombardment Wing. -2- 3 SATAF SATAF Little Rock is a detachment of the Bal- The top 28 feet of the silo wall is eight feet thick; listic Systems Division of the Air Force Systems the remaining sections are four feet thick. The silo Command, Los Angeles, California. It has the job contains the launch duct, a· flame deflector, two of seeing that the Titan II missile launch com- exhaust ducts, a 100,000-gallonwater tank, and nine plexes around Little Rock Air Force Base are built levels of equipment-mounting access space. to specifications and turned over to SAC in an oper- The control center prOVIdes a hardened and ational condition. Military and civilian personnel of separated area, with space for electrical and me- the Air Force and the Army Corps of Engineers chanical equipment rooms, and messing and sleep- make up the task force. ing quarters for operating personnel. It is a 37-foot ins.ide diameter, dome-shaped concrete sub-surface Titan II is a two-staged, liquid fueled, inertially structure connected to the silo by a 209-foot tunnel guided ballistic rocket, over 90 feet long and 10 feet and the blast lock and access portal structures. The in diameter. It is launched directly from its under- floor levels inside the control center are suspended ground silo, and is directed to its target by a self- from the dome, to minimize blast shock. contained, all inertial guidance system which can- The blast lock is a hardened, single-level struc- not be jammed by any known method, and which ture containing three rooms, one of which is for provides the capability of launching the entire Titan decontaminating purposes. The structure is 38'8"x II force in 'salvo'. Titan II uses storable liquid fuel, 34'8"x20' in height, with roof, walls, and foundation rather than the highly volatile cryogenic fuels used slabs from three to five feet thick. The blast lock on the Atlas and earlier Titan missiles. contains two pairs of blast doors, one to prevent The launch silo is a reinforced concrete cylinder nuclear blast reaching the control center from the with a concentric steel and concrete inner launch access portal, and one to prevent the resulting blast duct. The silo provides nine separate levels, is from an explosion of the missile in the silo from approximately 147 feet deep and 55 feet inside reaching the control center. diameter. The foundation is a seven-foot circular A cut-away drawing of a typical launch com- plate with no extension beyond the exterior face. plex as it will appear in operational status is shown. -8- WELCOME 308th Strategic Missile Wing ,:a~~" monstrous metal hopper and a tall concrete building- all resting below the earth's surface. Inside will be the latest Titan missile, which will be ready for launch in " moment's notice. Colorful History In assuming identity as the 308th Strategic Missile Wing, the new unit brought a colorful history to Little Rock AFB. Originally designated as a bombardment group, the unit compiled an outstanding combat record during World War II.
Recommended publications
  • Biography U N I T E D S T a T E S a I R F O R C E
    BIOGRAPHY U N I T E D S T A T E S A I R F O R C E LIEUTENANT GENERAL TIMOTHY D. HAUGH Lt. Gen. Timothy D. Haugh is the Commander, Sixteenth Air Force; Commander, Air Forces Cyber, and Commander, Joint Force Headquarters-Cyber, Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, Texas. General Haugh is responsible for more than 44,000 personnel conducting worldwide operations. Sixteenth Air Force Airmen deliver multisource intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance products, applications, capabilities and resources. In addition, they build, extend, operate, secure and defend the Air Force portion of the Department of Defense global network. Furthermore, Joint Forces Headquarters-Cyber personnel perform operational planning as part of coordinated efforts to support Air Force component and combatant commanders and, upon approval of the President and/or Secretary of Defense, the execution of offensive cyberspace operations. In his position as Sixteenth Air Force Commander, General Haugh also serves as the Commander of the Service Cryptologic Component. In this capacity, he is responsible to the Director, National Security Agency, and Chief, Central Security Service, as the Air Force’s sole authority for matters involving the conduct of cryptologic activities, including the spectrum of missions related to tactical warfighting and national-level operations. The general leads the global information warfare activities spanning cyberspace operations, intelligence, targeting, and weather for nine wings, one technical center, and an operations center. General Haugh received his commission in 1991, as a distinguished graduate of the ROTC program at Lehigh University. He has served in a variety of intelligence and cyber command and staff assignments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Smithsonian and the Enola Gay: the Crew
    AFA’s Enola Gay Controversy Archive Collection www.airforcemag.com The Smithsonian and the Enola Gay From the Air Force Association’s Enola Gay Controversy archive collection Online at www.airforcemag.com The Crew The Commander Paul Warfield Tibbets was born in Quincy, Ill., Feb. 23, 1915. He joined the Army in 1937, became an aviation cadet, and earned his wings and commission in 1938. In the early years of World War II, Tibbets was an outstanding B-17 pilot and squadron commander in Europe. He was chosen to be a test pilot for the B-29, then in development. In September 1944, Lt. Col. Tibbets was picked to organize and train a unit to deliver the atomic bomb. He was promoted to colonel in January 1945. In May 1945, Tibbets took his unit, the 509th Composite Group, to Tinian, from where it flew the atomic bomb missions against Japan in August. After the war, Tibbets stayed in the Air Force. One of his assignments was heading the bomber requirements branch at the Pentagon during the development of the B-47 jet bomber. He retired as a brigadier general in 1966. In civilian life, he rose to chairman of the board of Executive Jet Aviation in Columbus, Ohio, retiring from that post in 1986. At the dedication of the National Air and Space Museum’s Udvar- Hazy Center in December 2003, the 88-year-old Tibbets stood in front of the restored Enola Gay, shaking hands and receiving the high regard of visitors. (Col. Paul Tibbets in front of the Enola Gay—US Air Force photo) The Enola Gay Crew Airplane Crew Col.
    [Show full text]
  • Page Key to Index
    PAGE KEY TO INDEX AIRCRAFT — B-17 "Flying Fortresses" 1 AIRCRAFT — Other 2 AWARDS — Military 2 AWARDS —Other 3 CITIES 3 ESCAPES and EVASIONS 10 GENERAL 10 INTERNEES 19 KILLED IN ACTION 19 MEMORIALS and CEMETERIES 20 MILITARY ORGANIZATIONS — 303rd BG 20 MILITARY ORGANIZATIONS — Other 21 MISSIONS — Target and Date 25 PERSONS 26 PRISONERS OF WAR 51 REUNIONS 51 WRITERS 52 1 El Screamo (Feb. 2004, pg. 18) Miss Lace (Feb. 2004, pg. 18), (May 2004, Fast Worker II (May 2005, pg. 12) pg. 15) + (May 2005, pg. 12), (Nov. 2005, I N D E X FDR (May 2004, pg. 17) pg. 8) + (Nov. 2006, pg. 13) + (May 2007, FDR's Potato Peeler Kids (Feb. 2002, pg. pg. 16-photo) 15) + (May 2004, pg. 17) Miss Liberty (Aug. 2006, pg. 17) Flak Wolf (Aug. 2005, pg. 5), (Nov. 2005, Miss Umbriago (Aug 2003, pg. 15) AIRCRAFT pg. 18) Mugger, The (Feb. 2004, pg. 18) Flak Wolf II (May 2004, pg. 7) My Darling (Feb. 2004, pg. 18) B-17 "Flying Fortress" Floose (May 2004, pg. 4, 6-photo) Myasis Dragon (Feb. 2004, pg. 18) Flying Bison (Nov. 2006, pg. 19-photo) Nero (Feb. 2004, pg. 18) Flying Bitch (Aug. 2002, pg. 17) + (Feb. Neva, The Silver Lady (May 2005, pg. 15), “451" (Feb. 2002, pg. 17) 2004, pg. 18) (Aug. 2005, pg. 19) “546" (Feb. 2002, pg. 17) Fox for the F (Nov. 2004, pg. 7) Nine-O-Nine (May 2005, pg. 20) + (May 41-24577 (May 2002, pg. 12) Full House (Feb. 2004, pg. 18) 2007, pg. 20-photo) 41-24603 (Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Brig Gen Evan Dertien Commander, 96Th Test Wing Eglin AFB, Florida Evolution of Cyber 96 TW
    96 TW Brig Gen Evan Dertien Commander, 96th Test Wing Eglin AFB, Florida Evolution of Cyber 96 TW • Evolution of electronic communication • Cyber is becoming integrated in every aspect of our mission • In 2016, Air Force cyber operators blocked more than 1.3 billion malicious connections Cyber is Pervasive 96 TW Find Assess Fix Kill Chain Engage Track Target Command & Control Enterprise Why A Cyberspace Test Group? 96 TW • History • Large Growth in Cyber/C4ISR Workload AOC Black Dart JSTARS BCS/NCR-IADS JSpOC Space Fence NC3 FAB-T/AEHF • Appropriate leadership level for scope of responsibility: 420+ Test Programs Over 560 personnel 38 on DDT&E/DOT&E Oversight $145M a year “income” 22 ACAT I/II Cyberspace Test Group 96 TW 96th CYBERSPACE TEST GROUP (Eglin, FL) Det 1 – TESTREP & OL (Hanscom, MA) 45th Test Squadron 46th Test Squadron 47th Cyber Test Squadron Business/Logistics Div (Eglin, FL) (Eglin, FL) (San Antonio, TX) (Eglin, FL) Enterprise Systems Test Kill Chain Test Squadron Cyber Test Squadron Integration Division Squadron 45th Test Squadron Enterprise System Test 96 TW Command & Control Mission Planning Business Enterprise 46th Test Squadron Kill Chain Testing 96 TW Find…Fix…Track…Target…Engage…Assess Sensors & Defensive Sys Black Dart Link-16 JSTARS 47th Test Squadron Cyber & Security 96 TW Offensive & Defensive Capabilities Cybersecurity Aircraft & Avionics Cybersecurity Full Battlespace Test 96 TW Command & Control, Datalinks, Weapons, and Interactions Link 16 SADL S N N N N 3 2 N 82 83 84 Rm 149 1 N Rm 148 S S S S S S Rm 150
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Technology Innovation and the Future of Air Force Intelligence Analysis
    C O R P O R A T I O N LANCE MENTHE, DAHLIA ANNE GOLDFELD, ABBIE TINGSTAD, SHERRILL LINGEL, EDWARD GEIST, DONALD BRUNK, AMANDA WICKER, SARAH SOLIMAN, BALYS GINTAUTAS, ANNE STICKELLS, AMADO CORDOVA Technology Innovation and the Future of Air Force Intelligence Analysis Volume 2, Technical Analysis and Supporting Material RR-A341-2_cover.indd All Pages 2/8/21 12:20 PM For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RRA341-2 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0633-0 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2021 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. William Chockey; faraktinov, Adobe Stock. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.
    [Show full text]
  • Premises, Sites Etc Within 30 Miles of Harrington Museum Used for Military Purposes in the 20Th Century
    Premises, Sites etc within 30 miles of Harrington Museum used for Military Purposes in the 20th Century The following listing attempts to identify those premises and sites that were used for military purposes during the 20th Century. The listing is very much a works in progress document so if you are aware of any other sites or premises within 30 miles of Harrington, Northamptonshire, then we would very much appreciate receiving details of them. Similarly if you spot any errors, or have further information on those premises/sites that are listed then we would be pleased to hear from you. Please use the reporting sheets at the end of this document and send or email to the Carpetbagger Aviation Museum, Sunnyvale Farm, Harrington, Northampton, NN6 9PF, [email protected] We hope that you find this document of interest. Village/ Town Name of Location / Address Distance to Period used Use Premises Museum Abthorpe SP 646 464 34.8 km World War 2 ANTI AIRCRAFT SEARCHLIGHT BATTERY Northamptonshire The site of a World War II searchlight battery. The site is known to have had a generator and Nissen huts. It was probably constructed between 1939 and 1945 but the site had been destroyed by the time of the Defence of Britain survey. Ailsworth Manor House Cambridgeshire World War 2 HOME GUARD STORE A Company of the 2nd (Peterborough) Battalion Northamptonshire Home Guard used two rooms and a cellar for a company store at the Manor House at Ailsworth Alconbury RAF Alconbury TL 211 767 44.3 km 1938 - 1995 AIRFIELD Huntingdonshire It was previously named 'RAF Abbots Ripton' from 1938 to 9 September 1942 while under RAF Bomber Command control.
    [Show full text]
  • 4407.Pdf (6740 Кбайт)
    Deliberate Force A Case Study in Effective Air Campaigning Final Report of the Air University Balkans Air Campaign Study Edited by Col Robert C. Owen, USAF Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama January 2000 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Deliberate force a case study in effective air campaigning : final report of the Air University Balkans air campaign study / edited by Robert C. Owen. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-58566-076-0 1. Yugoslav War, 1991–1995—Aerial operations. 2. Yugoslav War, 1991– 1995—Campaigns—Bosnia and Hercegovina. 3. Yugoslav War, 1991–1995—Foreign participation. 4. Peacekeeping forces—Bosnia and Hercegovina. 5. North Atlantic Treaty Organization—Armed Forces—Aviation. 6. Bosnia and Hercegovina— History, Military. I. Owen, Robert C., 1951– DR1313.7.A47 D45 2000 949.703—dc21 99-087096 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. ii Contents Chapter Page DISCLAIMER . ii FOREWORD . xi ABOUT THE EDITOR . xv PREFACE . xvii 1 The Demise of Yugoslavia and the Destruction of Bosnia: Strategic Causes, Effects, and Responses . 1 Dr. Karl Mueller 2 The Planning Background . 37 Lt Col Bradley S. Davis 3 US and NATO Doctrine for Campaign Planning . 65 Col Maris McCrabb 4 The Deliberate Force Air Campaign Plan . 87 Col Christopher M. Campbell 5 Executing Deliberate Force, 30 August–14 September 1995 . 131 Lt Col Mark J.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Commands and Air National Guard
    2019 USAF ALMANAC MAJOR COMMANDS AND AIR NATIONAL GUARD Pilots from the 388th Fighter Wing’s, 4th Fighter Squadron prepare to lead Red Flag 19-1, the Air Force’s premier combat exercise, at Nellis AFB, Nev. Photo: R. Nial Bradshaw/USAF R.Photo: Nial The Air Force has 10 major commands and two Air Reserve Components. (Air Force Reserve Command is both a majcom and an ARC.) ACRONYMS AA active associate: CFACC combined force air evasion, resistance, and NOSS network operations security ANG/AFRC owned aircraft component commander escape specialists) squadron AATTC Advanced Airlift Tactics CRF centralized repair facility GEODSS Ground-based Electro- PARCS Perimeter Acquisition Training Center CRG contingency response group Optical Deep Space Radar Attack AEHF Advanced Extremely High CRTC Combat Readiness Training Surveillance system Characterization System Frequency Center GPS Global Positioning System RAOC regional Air Operations Center AFS Air Force Station CSO combat systems officer GSSAP Geosynchronous Space ROTC Reserve Officer Training Corps ALCF airlift control flight CW combat weather Situational Awareness SBIRS Space Based Infrared System AOC/G/S air and space operations DCGS Distributed Common Program SCMS supply chain management center/group/squadron Ground Station ISR intelligence, surveillance, squadron ARB Air Reserve Base DMSP Defense Meteorological and reconnaissance SBSS Space Based Surveillance ATCS air traffic control squadron Satellite Program JB Joint Base System BM battle management DSCS Defense Satellite JBSA Joint Base
    [Show full text]
  • Cold War Scrapbook Compiled by Frances Mckenney, Assistant Managing Editor
    Cold War Scrapbook Compiled by Frances McKenney, Assistant Managing Editor The peace following World War II was short- lived. Soviet forces never went home, kept occupied areas under domination, and threatened free nations worldwide. By 1946, Winston Churchill had declared, “An iron curtain has descended across the conti- nent.” Thus began a 45-year struggle between the diametrically opposed worldviews of the US and the Soviet Union. In 1948, the USSR cut off land access to free West Berlin, launch- ing the first major “battle” of the Cold War: the Berlin Airlift. Through decades of changes in strategy, tactics, locations, and technology, the Air Force was at the forefront. The Soviet Union was contained, and eventually, freedom won out. Bentwaters. Bitburg. Clark. Loring. Soes- terberg. Suwon. Wurtsmith—That so many Cold War bases are no longer USAF instal- lations is a tribute to how the airmen there did their jobs. While with the 333rd Tactical Fighter Training Squadron at Davis-Monthan AFB, Ariz., in 1975, Capt. Thomas McKee asked a friend to take this “hero shot” of him with an A-7. McKee flew the Corsair II as part of Tactical Air Command, at Myrtle Beach AFB, S.C. He was AFA National President and Chairman of the Board (1998-2002). Assigned to the 1st Strategic Reconnaissance Squadron, Beale AFB, Calif., RSO Maj. Thomas Veltri (right) and Maj. Duane Noll prepare for an SR-71 mission from RAF Mildenhall, UK, in the mid- 1980s. Veltri’s most memora- ble Blackbird sortie: “We lost an engine in the Baltic, north of Gotland Island, and ended up at 25,000 feet, with a dozen MiGs chasing us.” Retired Lt.
    [Show full text]
  • The 341St Missile Wing History
    341st Missile Wing History HISTORY OF THE 341 MISSILE WING World War II Bomb Group The 341st Missile Wing began as the 341st Bombardment Group (Medium) in the China-Burma- India (CBI) Theater of World War II. The Group was activated at Camp Malir in Karachi, India on 15 September 1942. The unit was one of the first bomber units in the CBI; being equipped with B-25 Mitchell medium bombers, which were shipped from the United States to Karachi. The aircraft were readied for flight operations by Air Technical Service Command at Karachi Air Depot and dispatched to Chakulia Airfield, now in Bangladesh in December. The group was formed with two bomb squadrons (11th, 22d) which had been attached to the 7th Bombardment Group since May 1942, and two newly activated squadrons (490th and 491st). The 11th Bomb Squadron was already in China, having flown combat missions with China Air Task Force since 1 July 1942. Planes and crews of the 22nd had been flying recon and tactical missions over north and central Burma, also since July. The group entered combat early in 1943 and operated chiefly against enemy transportation in central Burma until 1944. It bombed bridges, locomotives, railroad yards, and other targets to delay movement of supplies to the Japanese troops fighting in northern Burma. 341st Missile Wing History The 341st Bomb Group usually functioned as if it were two groups and for a time as three. Soon after its activation in September 1942, 341st Bomb Group Headquarters and three of its squadrons, the 22nd, 490th and 491st, were stationed and operating in India under direction of the Tenth Air Force, while the 11th squadron was stationed and operating in China under direction of the "China Air Task Force", which was later reorganized and reinforced to become the Fourteenth Air Force.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of F-16 Accident Which Occurred on 01/26/95
    4+49 6565 617416 05 JUN ?5 09:14 T F :CA 452-7416 "~1 DOCKETED USNRC PEl? 2003 JAN 17 PH' 1: 49 OFFICE fIF (ýe SGECFIVARY RULEIIAKiNGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT F-16CG, SN 89-2036 AVIANO AIR BASE, ITALY WILLIAM F. RAKE. Lieutenant Colonel. USAF Accident Investigation Officer JAMES D. STEVENS, Lieutenant Colonel, USAF Legal Advisor RICHARD (NMI) PEEPLES, Senior Master Sergeant, USAF Technical Advisor NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Docket No -- Official Exh. No In the matter of S"Iff IDENTIFIED A.21:i a nt _ RECEIVED Iv. ýnr REJECTED "Off'r____ ____ F-& C rl•:tor _DATE _ ___ F 1-76 58070 I _ _ -__. Witness Reporter U_________________ 7_ecobp/a7e 5C c Y-O .5e6-rj- en) +49 6565 617416 05 JUJ '935 09:14 T:' F 'CA -52-7416 P.3/17 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Statement of Authonty 5 Statement of Purpose 5 Summary of Facts 6 History of Flight 6 Mission 6 Briefing and Preflight 7 Flight Activity 8 Impact 9 Egress System 9 Personal and Survivai Equipment 9 Rescue and Crash Recovery 9 Maintenance Documentation 10 Maintenance Personnel and Supervision 14 Engine, Fuei, Hydraulic, and Oil Inspection Analysis 11 Airframe and Aircraft Systems 11 Operatons Personnei and Supervision 12 Pilot Qualifications 12 Medical 13 NAVAIDS. Facilities. and NOTAMs 13 Weather , 13 Governing Directives and Publications 13 Statement of Opinion 15 Certification 2 58071 +49 6565 617416 05 JUN '95? 09:14 5C F :CA 452-7416 P.4/17 Legal Sufficiency Review 17 Glossary of Terms 18 SAFETY INVESTIGATION BOARD, PART I Tab AF Form 711, USAF Mishap Report A AF Form 71, 1 b, Aircraft Flight Mishap Report C AF Form 71 1c, Aircraft Maintenance and Materiel Report D Flight and Personnel Records G AFTO Forms 781.
    [Show full text]