Gar Tsenyen Gungton

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gar Tsenyen Gungton Gar Tsenyen Gungton Gar Tsenyen Gungton (Tibetan: མགར་བཙན་ཉེན་གུང་སྟོན, Wylie: mgar btsan nyan gung rton, ? â“ 695) was a general of the Tibetan Empire. He was the fifth son of minister Gar Tongtsen Yulsung. In Chinese records, his name was given as Bólùn Zà nrèn (simplified Chinese: 勃论赞刃; traditional Chinese: 勃論贊刃) or Lùn Zà nrèn (simplified Chinese: 论赞刃; traditional Chinese: 論贊刃), both attempted to transliterate the short form of his title and name Gar Tsenyen Gungton. Jump to: navigation, search. Gar Tsenyen Gungton (Tibetan: མགར་བཙན་ཉེན་གུང་སྟོན, Wylie: mgar btsan nyan gung rton, ? â“ 695) was a general of the Tibetan Empire. The young king Tridu Songtsen had realised that members of the Gar family had become independent warlords and posed a threat to the central authority of the king for a long time. Tridu Songtsen was very angry about this defeat and tried to weaken their influence, and Gungton realised it soon. Add. Gar Tsenyen Gungton. + . Read more. Full Wikipedia Article. Gar Tsenyen Gungton. Gar Tongtsen Yulsung. 100% (1/1). + . Read more. Gar Tongtsen Yulsung. Gar Tsenyen Gungton Tibetan Empire. Wang Xiaojie. 100% (1/1). Gar Tsenye Dompu Gar Trinring Tsendro Gar Tsenba Gar Tagu Risum. Father: Gar Tongtsen Yulsung. The details. Biography. According to Old Tibetan Annals, Gungton launched a rebellion against the young king in the next year. The young king led troops personally, quickly put down the rebellion. Gungton was captured and executed. The contents of this page are sourced from a Wikipedia article. The contents are available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license. Gar Tongtsen Yülsung (Wylie: mgar stong btsan yul srung, 590-667) was a general of the Tibetan Empire who served as Great Minister (Tibetan: བློན་ཆེན་, THL: lönchen) during the reign of Songtsän Gampo. In many Chinese records, his name was given as Lù DÅngzà n (Chinese: 祿æ±è´Š) or Lùn DÅngzà n (Chinese: è«–æ±è´Š); both are attempts to transliterate the short form of his title and name, Lön Tongtsen..
Recommended publications
  • (Sinoloji) Anabilim Dali
    TÜRKİYE CUMHURİYETİ ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ DOĞU DİLLERİ VE EDEBİYATLARI (SİNOLOJİ) ANABİLİM DALI ÇİN KAYNAKLARINDA TANG HANEDANLIĞI DÖNEMİ ANXİ (KUÇA) GENEL VALİLİĞİ VE ANTİK İPEK YOLU’NA ETKİLERİ Doktora Tezi Sema GÖKENÇ GÜLEZ Ankara – 2019 TÜRKİYE CUMHURİYETİ ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ DOĞU DİLLERİ VE EDEBİYATLARI (SİNOLOJİ) ANABİLİM DALI ÇİN KAYNAKLARINDA TANG HANEDANLIĞI DÖNEMİ ANXİ (KUÇA) GENEL VALİLİĞİ VE ANTİK İPEK YOLU’NA ETKİLERİ Doktora Tezi Sema GÖKENÇ GÜLEZ Tez Danışmanı Doç. Dr. İnci ERDOĞDU Ankara – 2019 ÖNSÖZ Tang Hanedanlığı Çin’in altın çağını yaşadığı ve aynı zamanda doğu ve batı arasında etkileşimlerin yaşandığı bir dönem olmuştur. Söz konusu dönemde hanedanlık stratejik konuma sahip olan Batı Bölgesi politikasında önemli stratejiler izleyerek bazı tedbirler almıştır. Nitekim Tang Hanedanlığı’nın Batı Bölgesi’nde izlediği en önemli strateji Qiuci (Kuça) merkez olmak üzere kurduğu Anxi Genel Valilik birimi olmuştur. Bu çalışmada, Tang Hanedanlığı döneminde Batı Bölgesi’nde kurulan Anxi Genel Valilik birimi ve altında kurulan Anxi Dört Garnizon yapısının kapsamı, kuruluş amaçları ve Batı Bölgesi’ndeki faaliyetleri ile sonuçları ele alınacaktır. Aynı zamanda Tang Hanedanlığı’nın bölgede Anxi Genel Valilik birimini kurması doğrultusunda aldığı önlemlerin antik İpek Yolu’na etkileri incelenecektir. Tez çalışmam süresince yardımını esirgemeyerek destek olan danışman hocam sayın Doç. Dr. İnci Erdoğdu’ya teşekkürlerimi sunar, lisansüstü çalışmalarım süresince her türlü konuda destek olan ve deneyimlerini paylaşan sayın hocam Prof. Dr. Bülent Okay’a teşekkür ederim. Ayrıca doktora tez araştırması yapmak üzere bir yıllık süre ile bulunduğum Shanghai Fudan Üniversitesi’nde tez çalışma ve araştırmalarım ile kaynak tedariki konusunda yardımcı olan sayın Prof. Dr. Han Sheng hocama ve tez araştırmalarım konusunda değerli fikirlerini benimle paylaşan sayın Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Norman Harry Rothschild
    NORMAN HARRY ROTHSCHILD Emerging from the Cocoon: Ethnic Revival, Lunar Radiance, and the Cult of Liu Sahe in the Jihu Uprising of 682-683∗ Closer examination of a Buddhist movement in Shaanxi 陕西 in the early 680s can help reveal the mechanics of the interplay between wealth, merit, faith and power in popular Buddhism during the early Tang. Bai Tieyu 白鐵余 evolved from a faith healer who amassed a huge fortune from Buddhist be- lievers wishing to gaze upon a planted bronze Buddha he had ‘discovered’ to a messianic deliverer, who, claiming that the mandate had been severed, set up a government and assumed an imperial title. By the spring of 683, Bai Tieyu’s local uprising in Suizhou 綏州 had grown to such proportions that the Tang court ordered general Cheng Wuting 程務挺 and commander-in-chief of con- tiguous Xiazhou 夏州 prefecture Wang Fangyi 王方翼 to suppress it. The uprising must be understood on three interrelated levels. First, it was a peasant rebellion, a response to abysmal socio-economic conditions. Second, it was a religious movement centred both upon local traditions of revivalist Buddhism and apocalyptic beliefs of popular Buddhism, particularly those surrounding Yueguang Wang 月光王 («Prince Lunar Radiance»), a lesser- known Buddhist deity. Third, it can be understood in terms of historical ethnic tensions between the Jihu 稽胡, a sedentary non-Chinese group that had long settled in Shaanbei 陝北 and Shanxi 山西, and the political centre. The analy- sis of the movement from the last two perspectives will require the introduc- tion of another figure, Liu Sahe 劉薩訶, a Jihu monk and folk hero.
    [Show full text]
  • Fazang (643-712): the Holy Man
    FAZANG (643-712): THE HOLY MAN JINHUA CHEN, UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA By and large, the importance of the Tang Buddhist monk Fazang (643-712) has still been so far appraised and appreciated in terms of his contributions to Buddhist philosophy, and especially his status as the de facto founder of the East Asian Avataµsaka tradition, which has been well known for its sophisticated and often difficult philosophical system. The choice of modern scholars to focus on Fazang’s philosophical contributions is certainly justifiable. Most of his extant writings are indeed philosophical texts. This “Avataµsaka- only” vision of Fazang might well give the impression that he was an armchair philosopher, who was almost exclusively preoccupied with metaphysical speculations, with little or no interest in other forms of religion. Fazang’s historical and hagio/biographical sources present to us three different types of images, all quite contrary to the sober, if not stern, impression that his reputation as a great philosopher might have cast upon us: first as a politician who deliberately and shrewdly added his significant weight to the balance of power when it reached a critical point of exploding into major and fundamental sociopolitical changes (“revolutions” is perhaps not too strong a word); second, as a warrior who fought the enemy of the empire, not by sword, but by charms; and eventually, as a mediator between humanity and the heavens when dishar- mony started to develop between them and threatened the very structure of the human world. It is probably in terms of such a status as a go- between of humanity and heaven, or — more in line with Chinese tra- ditional ideas — an adjustor if not manipulator of yin and yang, that we ought to discuss Fazang’s function and image as a holy man in medieval China.
    [Show full text]
  • T the Semantic Shift of “Western Regions” and the Westward Extension of the “Border” in the Tang Dynasty
    The Semantic Shift of “Western Regions” and the Westward Extension of the “Border” in the Tang Dynasty Rong Xinjiang and Wen Xin Traditionally, the term “Western Regions” could refer to two connected geographical regions. In its broader sense, it denotes the entire area west of Yumen Pass in Dunhuang; in its narrower sense, it includes only Southern and Eastern Xinjiang. Since the Han dynasty, the relations with the region covered by the narrower sense of the term have been of grave concern for regimes in China Proper. The Tang dynasty was the most daring in its dealings with the “Western Regions”, ruling over this area for an extended period of time and exerting considerable influence over local societies. Additionally, we also possess for the period of Tang rule some of the richest historical data regarding this area and, with the help of excavated texts, many details of the Tang rule have been clarified. Based on such empirical research, scholars such as Zhang Guangda also asked broader questions of the nature of Tang rule. He suggested that “the Tang began [its westward expansion] with the conquest of Xi Prefecture (Turfan), and after a century, by the mid-8th century, a type of Han/Non-Han dual governance has developed in areas beyond Xi Prefecture (meaning mostly the Four Garrisons)”.[1] Wang Xiaofu further explained the nature of this dual governance: “In the Four Garrisons of the Tang, there existed a form of governance between the prefecture-county system and the vassal kingdoms. Only in the Four Garrisons do we see the real manifestation of dual Eurasian Studies ( Volume III ) governance”.[2] Clearly, scholars have noticed the exceptional status of the Four Garrisons region in the Tang government: under the Han/Non-Han dual governance, the Four Garrisons region exhibited different features from regular “loose-rein” regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned Using Book Scancenter 5033
    Chapter 7 Competition Between Tang and Tibet Before the An Lushan Rebellion While the presence of nomadic powers on the northern frontier was a perennial problem for China from Han until Ming, the rise of a powerful kingdom in Tibet was a one-time phenomenon. During its period of strength from early in the seventh century to about 840 Tibet posed a very serious problem to China, as a direct threat to the security of its frontier as well as to its ideological claims of superiority over its neighbors. Before the An Lushan rebellion, Tang relations with the Tibetan kingdom focused first of all on competition for control of the Tuyuhun kingdom, then on the Western Regions and the southwest. The Tibetan Challenge Tibet, called Tufan in the Chinese sources, rose as a unified and powerful kingdom rmder the Yarlung dynasty around the end of the sixth century and the beginning of the seventh. The Yarlung dynasty had existed previously for a number of generations as chiefs of a smaller tribal state. During that period the main power lying between China and what became Tibet was the Tuyuhim kingdom. In his study of the establishment of the Tufan kingdom, Yamaguchi Zuiho describes how the hostile policy of the Chinese towards the Tuyuhun during the Sui and Tang periods not only provided the Yarlung dynasty with the opportunity of expanding and evolving into the Tufan kingdom, but also planted in the minds of its rul­ ers the desire to replace the Tuyuhun as an international power. As a re­ sult, Tufan, by learning from the Tuyuhun, was able to absorb the latter and eventually surpass it.^ No dates can be assigned securely to the history of Tibet before the sixth century of our era.^ Some scholars have attempted to reconstruct an earlier history,^ but it is clear that until the formation of the Tufan king- ' Yamaguchi 1983.
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned Using Book Scancenter 5033
    Chapter 4 Tang’s Internal Evolution and its Foreign Policy Before discussing in detail the relations between China and its principal foreign rivals during Tang, we need to take an overview of the internal evolution of China during these centuries. We must understand the changes that took place in the internal power structure to understand the ways in which these changes influenced the formation of policy and the making of particular decisions dealing with external problems as they arose. Gaozu: Dynastic Consolidation Even more than Emperor Wen of Sui, Gaozu, the dynastic founder of Tang, displayed a cautious, pragmatic realism in his conduct of foreign affairs. Unlike Yang Jian, who was already at the center of power when he took the ambitious step of usurping the throne, Li Yuan was merely a provincial governor who, despite his aristocratic background, would probably have never conceived the ambition to supplant the Sui dynasty if it had not been for the anarchic breakdown that resulted from Emperor Yang ’s obsession with conquering Koguryo. While the standard account pictures him as having to be reluctantly pushed into taking up arms by his brilliant son, Li Shimin, the role of the future Taizong may have been exaggerated by historians endeavoring to glorify the latter’s achievements. Nevertheless, the standard accoimt seems in general consistent with Gaozu ’s character as reflected in the decisions he took in dealing with foreign powers. As we shall see, while he was in command of affairs, Gaozu showed little compunction in adopting a sub­ missive attitude towards the Turks and in giving up pretensions to suze­ rainty over Korea.
    [Show full text]
  • Eighteen Lectures on Dunhuang Brill’S Humanities in China Library
    Eighteen Lectures on Dunhuang Brill’s Humanities in China Library Edited by Zhang Longxi, City University of Hong Kong Axel Schneider, Universität Göttingen VOLUME 5 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/bhcl Eighteen Lectures on Dunhuang By Rong Xinjiang Translated by Imre Galambos LEIDEN • BOSTON 2013 This book is the result of a co-publication agreement between Peking University Press and Konin- klijke Brill NV. The book was translated into English from the original《敦煌学十八讲》(Dun- huangxue shiba jiang) with financial support from China Book International of the Information Office of the State Council of China and China Classics International of the General Administration of Press and Publication of China. Rong, Xinjiang. [Dunhuang xue shi ba jiang. English] Eighteen lectures on Dunhuang / by Rong Xinjiang ; translated by Imre Galambos. p. cm. — (Brill’s humanities in China library ; volume 5) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-90-04-25042-0 (hardback : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-90-04-25233-2 (e-book) 1. Dunhuang (China)—History. 2. Dunhuang manuscripts. I. Galambos, Imre. II. Title. III. Title: 18 lectures on Dunhuang. DS797.28.D864R6513 2013 951’.45—dc23 2013009564 This publication has been typeset in the multilingual “Brill” typeface. With over 5,100 characters covering Latin, IPA, Greek, and Cyrillic, this typeface is especially suitable for use in the humanities. For more information, please see www.brill.com/brill-typeface. ISSN 1874-8023 ISBN 978-90-04-25042-0 (hardback) ISBN 978-90-04-25233-2 (e-book) Copyright 2013 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands.
    [Show full text]