Review Apparent Water Permeability As a Physiological Parameter in Crustaceans
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Environmental DNA (Edna)
fenvs-08-612253 December 1, 2020 Time: 20:27 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 07 December 2020 doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2020.612253 Environmental DNA (eDNA) Monitoring of Noble Crayfish Astacus astacus in Lentic Environments Offers Reliable Presence-Absence Surveillance – But Fails to Predict Population Density Stein I. Johnsen1†, David A. Strand2*†, Johannes C. Rusch2,3 and Trude Vrålstad2 1 Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Lillehammer, Norway, 2 Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway, 3 Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Noble crayfish is the most widespread native freshwater crayfish species in Europe. It is threatened in its entire distribution range and listed on the International Union for Edited by: Concervation Nature- and national red lists. Reliable monitoring data is a prerequisite for Ivana Maguire, University of Zagreb, Croatia implementing conservation measures, and population trends are traditionally obtained Reviewed by: from catch per unit effort (CPUE) data. Recently developed environmental DNA Michael Sweet, (eDNA) tools can potentially improve the effort. In the past decade, eDNA monitoring University of Derby, United Kingdom Chloe Victoria Robinson, has emerged as a promising tool for species surveillance, and some studies have University of Guelph, Canada established that eDNA methods yield adequate presence-absence data for crayfish. *Correspondence: There are also high expectations that eDNA concentrations in the water can predict David A. Strand biomass or relative density. However, eDNA studies for crayfish have not yet been [email protected] able to establish a convincing relationship between eDNA concentrations and crayfish †These authors have contributed equally to this work density. This study compared eDNA and CPUE data obtained the same day and with high sampling effort, and evaluated whether eDNA concentrations can predict Specialty section: relative density of crayfish. -
How the Red Swamp Crayfish Took Over the World Running Title Invasion
1 Title 2 One century away from home: how the red swamp crayfish took over the world 3 Running Title 4 Invasion history of Procambarus clarkii 5 Authors 6 Francisco J. Oficialdegui1*, Marta I. Sánchez1,2,3, Miguel Clavero1 7 8 Affiliations 9 1. Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC). Avenida Américo Vespucio 26, 10 Isla de la Cartuja. 41092. Seville, Spain 11 2. Instituto Universitario de Investigación Marina (INMAR) Campus de Excelencia 12 Internacional/Global del Mar (CEI·MAR) Universidad de Cádiz. Puerto Real, 13 Cadiz (Spain). 14 3. Present address: Departamento de Biología Vegetal y Ecología, Facultad de 15 Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Apartado 1095, 41080, Seville, Spain 16 17 Contact: [email protected] Francisco J. Oficialdegui. Department of Wetland 18 Ecology. Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC). C/Américo Vespucio 26. Isla de 19 la Cartuja. 41092. Seville (Spain). Phone: 954466700. ORCID: 0000-0001-6223-736X 20 21 Marta I. Sánchez. [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0002-8349-5410 22 Miguel Clavero. [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0002-5186-0153 23 24 Keywords: Alien species; GBIF; Global translocations; Historical distributions; 25 iNaturalist; Invasive species; Pathways of introduction; Procambarus clarkii; 26 1 27 ABSTRACT 28 The red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) (hereafter RSC), native to the southern 29 United States and north-eastern Mexico, is currently the most widely distributed 30 crayfish globally as well as one of the invasive species with most devastating impacts 31 on freshwater ecosystems. Reconstructing the introduction routes of invasive species 32 and identifying the motivations that have led to those movements, is necessary to 33 accurately reduce the likelihood of further introductions. -
Chinese Mitten Crab (Eriocheir Sinensis) in San Francisco Bay
Distribution, Ecology and Potential Impacts of the Chinese Mitten Crab (Eriocheir sinensis) in San Francisco Bay Deborah A Rudnick Kathleen M. Halat Vincent H. Resh Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management University of California, Berkeley TECHNICAL COMPLETION REPORT Project Number: UCAL-WRC-W-881 University of California Water Resources Center Contribution #206 ISBN 1-887192-12-3 June 2000 The University of California prohibits discrimination against or harassment of any person employed by or seeking employment with the University on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, physical or mental disability, medical condition (cancer- related), ancestry, marital status, age, sexual orientation, citizenship or status as a Vietnam-era veteran or special disabled veteran. The University of California is an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer. The University undertakes affirmative action to assure equal employment opportunity for underutilized minorities and women, for persons with disabilities, and for Vietnam-era veterans and special disabled veterans. University policy is intended to be consistent with the provisions of applicable State and Federal law. Inquiries regarding this policy may be addressed to the Affirmative Action Director, University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, 300 Lakeside Drive, 6th Floor, Oakland, CA 94612-3560, (510) 987-0097. This publication is a continuation in the Water Resources Center Contribution series. It is published and distributed by the UNIVERSITY -
THE DISTRIBUTION of NATIVE and INTRODUCED SPECIES of CRAYFISH in AUSTRIA MANFRED POCKL (Dr M. Pockl, Department of Limnology, In
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Aquatic Commons 4 MANFRED POCKL THE DISTRIBUTION OF NATIVE AND INTRODUCED SPECIES OF CRAYFISH IN AUSTRIA MANFRED POCKL (Dr M. Pockl, Department of Limnology, Institute of Zoology, University of Vienna, and State Government of Lower Austria, Experts for the Conservation of Nature, Landhausplatz 1, A-3109 St Pölten, Austria.) Introduction Crayfish are the largest invertebrates found in European freshwaters north of the Mediterannean region, where river-crabs (Potamon) also occur. Some crayfish attain body lengths greater than 25 cm and exceed 350 g in weight. These decapod crustaceans are omnivores, feeding on a wide variety of small invertebrates, fish, algae and higher aquatic plants, including some riparian vegetation. They also scavenge on dead and dying plants and animals. However, their quantitative role in the trophic economy of streams and lakes is not well understood, especially in relation to population biomass and potential competition with fish. Like the latter, however, crayfish have long been prized by man as a source of food, and in parts of Europe some species have been exploited commercially for many centuries. The most notable of these is the fishery based on the red-clawed or noble crayfish Astacus astacus, which was decimated by the lethal plague fungus Aphanomyces astaci in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Importations of relatively large species from North America, which are resistant to the fungus but can act as carriers, has led to concerns for the continued existence and conservation of native European species, several of which are now listed as endangered species. -
Top 10 Species Groups in Global Aquaculture 2018
Top 10 species groups in global aquaculture 2018 FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department reduce to 10,5pt so until note in p.2 his factsheet presents the top 10 species groups in global aquaculture 2018 (Table 1) and Tfeatures one of the fastest growing species groups: crayfishes (Table 2). The ranking of all 63 species groups in global aquaculture 2018 is illustrated on the back cover. More information about the top 10 species groups at regional and national level can be found in a more comprehensive factsheet as Supplementary Materials.1 The comprehensive factsheet also elaborates on the species grouping methodology used in the ranking exercise. Top 10 species groups in world aquaculture 2018 In 2018, 438 ASFIS – Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Information System – species items2 were farmed in 196 countries/territories with 115 million tonnes of world production, an increase of 2.3 million tonnes (2.04 percent) from the 2017 level (Table 1). There has been no significant change on the top 10 list between 2017 and 2018 (Table 1).3 The top four items remained unchanged, while marine shrimps and prawns moved up from #6 to #5 switching positions with oysters. Scallops (#10 in 2017) dropped down to #11 in 2018 because of the 2.3 percent decline in its production quantity. WAPI FACTSHEET WAPI Half of the top 10 species groups grew faster than the average 2.04 percent growth for all species between 2017 and 2018: freshwater fishes nei (#10; 16.58 percent), marine shrimps and prawns (#5; 5.04 percent), oysters (#6; 4.64 percent), carps, barbels and other cyprinids (#1; 3.87 percent) and brown seaweeds (#3; 3.4 percent). -
The Crayfish Plague Pathogen Can Infect Freshwater- Inhabiting Crabs
Freshwater Biology (2014) 59, 918–929 doi:10.1111/fwb.12315 The crayfish plague pathogen can infect freshwater- inhabiting crabs ,1 †,‡,1 †,‡ § JIRISVOBODA* , DAVID A. STRAND ,TRUDEVRALSTAD ,FREDERIC GRANDJEAN ,LENNART ¶ † †† EDSMAN , PAVEL KOZAK**, ANTONIN KOUBA**, ROSA F. FRISTAD , SEVAL BAHADIR KOCA AND ADAM PETRUSEK* *Faculty of Science, Department of Ecology, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic †Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway ‡Department of Biosciences, Microbial Evolution Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway §Laboratoire Ecologie et Biologie des interactions, equipe Ecologie, Evolution, Universite de Poitiers, Symbiose UMR-CNRS 6556, Poitiers Cedex, France ¶Department of Aquatic Resources, Institute of Freshwater Research, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Drottningholm, Sweden **Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Vodnany, Czech Republic ††Egirdir Fisheries Faculty, Suleyman€ Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey SUMMARY 1. The oomycete Aphanomyces astaci is generally considered a parasite specific to freshwater crayfish, and it has become known as the crayfish plague pathogen. Old experimental work that reported transmission of crayfish plague to the Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis, and the ability of A. astaci to grow in non-decapod crustaceans, has never been tested properly. 2. We re-evaluated the host range of A. astaci by screening for the presence of A. astaci in two crab species cohabiting with infected crayfish in fresh waters, as well as in other higher crustaceans from such localities. The animals were tested with species-specific quantitative PCR, and the pathogen determination was confirmed by sequencing of an amplified fragment of the nuclear internal tran- scribed spacer. -
Guidelines for the Capture and Management of Digital Zoological Names Information Francisco W
Guidelines for the Capture and Management of Digital Zoological Names Information Francisco W. Welter-Schultes Version 1.1 March 2013 Suggested citation: Welter-Schultes, F.W. (2012). Guidelines for the capture and management of digital zoological names information. Version 1.1 released on March 2013. Copenhagen: Global Biodiversity Information Facility, 126 pp, ISBN: 87-92020-44-5, accessible online at http://www.gbif.org/orc/?doc_id=2784. ISBN: 87-92020-44-5 (10 digits), 978-87-92020-44-4 (13 digits). Persistent URI: http://www.gbif.org/orc/?doc_id=2784. Language: English. Copyright © F. W. Welter-Schultes & Global Biodiversity Information Facility, 2012. Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and opinions presented in this publication are those of the author and do not represent those of GBIF. License: This document is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0. Document Control: Version Description Date of release Author(s) 0.1 First complete draft. January 2012 F. W. Welter- Schultes 0.2 Document re-structured to improve February 2012 F. W. Welter- usability. Available for public Schultes & A. review. González-Talaván 1.0 First public version of the June 2012 F. W. Welter- document. Schultes 1.1 Minor editions March 2013 F. W. Welter- Schultes Cover Credit: GBIF Secretariat, 2012. Image by Levi Szekeres (Romania), obtained by stock.xchng (http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1389360). March 2013 ii Guidelines for the management of digital zoological names information Version 1.1 Table of Contents How to use this book ......................................................................... 1 SECTION I 1. Introduction ................................................................................ 2 1.1. Identifiers and the role of Linnean names ......................................... 2 1.1.1 Identifiers .................................................................................. -
Zoologische Mededelingen Uitgegeven Door Het
MINISTERIE VAN ONDERWIJS, KUNSTEN EN WETENSCHAPPEN ZOOLOGISCHE MEDEDELINGEN UITGEGEVEN DOOR HET RIJKSMUSEUM VAN NATUURLIJKE HISTORIE TE LEIDEN DEEL XXX, No. 12 6 APRIL 1949 THE ISOPODA AND TANAIDACEA OF THE NETHERLANDS, INCLUDING THE DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES OF LIMNORIA by L. B. HOLTHUIS (With four textfigures) The Isopod and Tanaidaoean Crustacea of the Netherlands have not been treated as a whole since 1889, when Hoek published the second part of his Crustacea Neerlandica dealing with the Isopoda and Amphipoda. Hoek in this paper mentioned 25 species of Isopoda, 9 of which are marine forms, 1 a freshwater form and 15 terrestrial, no Dutch Tanaidacea were known to Hoek. At present we know 49 species of Dutch Isopoda, of which 20 are marine, 2 are freshwater forms and 27 are terrestrial, furthermore three species of Tanaidacea are known from this country. The present paper is an enumeration of all Dutch species of the two above mentioned groups, with their distribution within our country and, if necessary, with remarks on their synonymy and ecology. A volume on the Isopoda and Tanaidacea for the series "Fauna van Nederland", written in the Dutch language is now ready for the press and will be published in the course of time; in this volume a complete bibliography of the Dutch Isopoda is given, so that in the present paper only the most necessary references are made. The Isopoda found in Dutch greenhouses and those belonging to the family Armadillidiidae are treated here only summarily, as they have been dealt with more extensively in previous papers (Holthuis, 1946a, b). -
Koura, Paranephrops Planifrons) in the Lower North Island, New Zealand
Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Habitat determinants and predatory interactions of the endemic freshwater crayfish (Koura, Paranephrops planifrons) in the Lower North Island, New Zealand. A thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Ecology at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. Logan Arthur Brown 2009 Acknowledgements My gratitude goes to all those who helped me throughout my thesis. The completion of this has taken many years and is thanks to the efforts of many who have helped me with fieldwork, made suggestions on ways to carry out experiments and been there for general support. A special thanks must go to my partner Emma who has put up with me for three years trying to complete this, also to my family and friends for their support. Thanks to my supervisor Associate Professor Russell Death for helping come up with the original topic and the comments provided on drafts. Thanks also to Fiona Death for proof reading final drafts of my thesis. The following people gave up their time to come and help me in the field. Matt Denton-Giles, Emma Round, Charlotte Minson, Jono Tonkin, Nikki Atkinson, Travis Brown, Jan Brown, Ray Brown, Peter Bills, Hannah Bills, Caitlin Bills, Brayden Bills, Hannah Rainforth, Shaun Nielson, Jess Costall, Emily Atkinson, Nikki McArthur, Carol Nicholson, Abby Deuel, Amy McDonald, Kiryn Weaver, Cleland Wallace, and Lorraine Cook. -
Freshwater Crayfish Astacus Astacus - a Vector for Infectious Pancreatic Necrosis Virus (IPNV)
DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Vol. 4: 205-209.1988 Published July 27 Dis. aquat. Org. I Freshwater crayfish Astacus astacus - a vector for infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV) M. Halder, W. Ahne Institute of Zoology and Hydrobiology, University of Munich. Kaulbachstr. 37. D-8000Miinchen, Federal Republic of Germany ABSTRACT: Freshwater crayfish Astacus astacus were experimentally infected with infectious pan- creatric necrosis virus (IPNV) strain Sp by injection, by waterbath immersion, by administration of virus in feed, and by exposure to IPNV-infected fry of rainbow trout Salmo gairdnen. IPNV was found in crayfish organs and haemolymph up to l yr after infection. Crayfish excreted IPNV into the water continuously. Fry and eggs of rainbow trout immersed into that water became infected with IPNV. IPNV particles were demonstrable by electron microscopy in the granules of crayfish haemocytes. Results indicate that the freshwater crayfish could play a role In the epizootiology of IPN. INTRODUCTION astacus take up IPNV? Does the virus persist in the crayfish? Is IPNV excreted by the infected crayfish? Infectious pancreatic necrosis (IPN),a viral disease of Can rainbow trout Salnlo gairdneri fry and eggs young salmonid fishes, causes severe losses in cultured become infected with IPNV excreted by infected cray- salmonids. The disease agent, infectious pancreatic fish? The answers to these questions are important to necrosis virus (IPNV), has been found in cyclostomata an understanding of the epizootiology of IPN. (1 species) and in many teleost fishes (37 species) as well as in molluscs (6 species) and crustaceans (Ahne 198513).Crustaceans known to carry IPNV are Carcinus MATERIALS AND METHODS maenas (Hill 1982), Daphnia magna (Ahne 1984), and Penaeus japonicus (Bovo et al. -
Risk Assessment of American Lobster (Homarus Americanus)
Risk assessment of American lobster (Homarus americanus) Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management Report 2016:4 Risk assessment of the American lobster (Homarus americanus) Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management Date: 2016-07-29 (updated version) Publisher: Björn Sjöberg Cover page photo: Vidar Öresland ISBN 978-91-87967–09-2 Havs- och vattenmyndigheten Box 11930, 404 39 Göteborg www.havochvatten.se Risk assessment of the American lobster (Homarus americanus) Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management Risk assessment of American lobster (Homarus americanus) Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management Report 2016:4 Risk assessment of the American lobster (Homarus americanus) Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management Preamble American lobster (Homarus americanus) Pest Risk Assessment has been produced following the scheme: GB non-native organism risk assessment scheme, version 5 which was prepared by CABI Bioscience (CABI), Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS), Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (CEH), Central Science Laboratory (CSL), Imperial College London (IC) and the University of Greenwich (UoG). The pest risk assessment scheme constructed by the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organisation (EPPO, 1997 and in prep.) provided the basis for the Great Britain NonNative Organism Risk Assessment scheme. The EPPO scheme closely follows the international standard for phytosanitary measures (ISPM 11) on pest risk analysis produced by the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) (FAO, 2003). IPPC standards are recognised by the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement of the World Trade Organization (WTO, 1994). More information on the scheme is provided at www.nonnativespecies.org/downloadDocument.cfm?id=158. -
LOVE THEM Or HATE THEM?
INVASIVEINVASIVE DECAPODSDECAPODS LOVELOVE THEMTHEM oror HATEHATE THEM?THEM? DavidDavid HoldichHoldich TheThe intentionalintentional oror accidentalaccidental introductionintroduction ofof invasiveinvasive speciesspecies isis secondsecond onlyonly toto habitathabitat destructiondestruction inin causingcausing thethe globalglobal lossloss ofof biodiversity.biodiversity. AquaticAquatic systemssystems presentpresent fewfew barriersbarriers toto thethe spreadspread ofof invasiveinvasive speciesspecies onceonce theythey becomebecome establishedestablished (Cook(Cook && Clark,Clark, 2004).2004). However,However, littlelittle emphasisemphasis hashas beenbeen putput onon thethe considerableconsiderable impactimpact thatthat decapoddecapod crustaceanscrustaceans cancan havehave onon inlandinland waters.waters. Global Strategy on Invasive e.g.e.g. Global Strategy on Invasive AlienAlien Species.Species. McNeelyMcNeely etet alal.. (2001).(2001). IUCNIUCN Gland,Gland, Switzerland,Switzerland, andand Cambridge,Cambridge, UK,UK, inin collaborationcollaboration withwith thethe GlobalGlobal InvasiveInvasive SpeciesSpecies Programme.Programme. OneOne briefbrief mentionmention ofof invasiveinvasive decapods,decapods, i.e.i.e. crayfishcrayfish escapingescaping fromfrom aa LondonLondon fishfish market!market! ApproximatelyApproximately 10,00010,000 speciesspecies ofof decapoddecapod crustaceans,crustaceans, whichwhich includeinclude thethe prawns,prawns, shrimps,shrimps, lobsters,lobsters, crabscrabs andand crayfish.crayfish. ManyMany havehave aquaculturalaquacultural