Wyoming Valley As Westmoreland County, Connecticut, Even Though It Was Separated from the Rest of the Colony of Connecticut by Over Two Hundred Miles

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wyoming Valley As Westmoreland County, Connecticut, Even Though It Was Separated from the Rest of the Colony of Connecticut by Over Two Hundred Miles Wyoming Valley as Westmoreland County, Connecticut, even though it was separated from the rest of the Colony of Connecticut by over two hundred miles. On July 3, 1778, during the American Revolutionary War, the Connecticut settlers in the Wyoming Valley were attacked by a contingent of British Loyalist forces, Pennamites and Iroquois commanded by Major John Butler. The Susquehanna settlers were led by Colonel Zebulon Butler, a Continental Army officer, who just happened to be on furlough in the Wyoming Valley at the time of the confrontation. Major John Butler (1728-1796) – not related to Colonel Zebulon Butler – was born in Connecticut, but moved to New York before the Revolutionary War. He fought in the French and Indian War and later served as an officer in the British Army during the Revolution. Colonel Zebulon Butler (1731-1795) was born in Ipswich, Massachusetts, and later moved with his family to Connecticut. After serving in the French and Indian War, he became one of the directors of the Susquehanna Company. He commanded the 3rd and 1st Connecticut Regiments during the Revolutionary War, and later represented the Wyoming Valley settlers in the Connecticut General Assembly (1774-1776). Another important leader of the Wyoming Valley settlers was Colonel John Durkee (1728-1782), although he was not present at the massacre on July 3, 1778. Colonel Durkee was from Norwich, Connecticut, and led two hundred settlers into the Wyoming Valley in May 1769. Fort Durkee on the Susquehanna, near the present city of Wilkes-Barre, was named in his honor. rd th He commanded the 3 and 4 Connecticut Regiments in the Revolutionary War. It is interesting to note that Sergeant James Grant served under Colonel John Durkee in the 3rd and 4th Connecticut Regiments (1775-1781) and in the 1st Regiment commanded by Colonel Zebulon Butler in 1783. This may or may not have been a coincidence. It is quite possible that Colonels Durkee and Butler knew John Grant of Ashford, said to be the father of James and Hamilton Grant. In the early stages of the massacre on July 3, 1778, the Connecticut settlers successfully held the Loyalists at bay, but a large contingent of Iroquois launched a surprise attack on the settlers’ flank in support of the British. Accounts vary with respect to how many settlers were killed, but estimates range between two and four hundred, many of whom were scalped in the massacre that ensued. It has been said that Major Butler was unable to control the Iroquois in the latter stages of the battle and the atrocities escalated without his consent. The following summer, in retaliation for the massacre, a large contingent of Continental forces under the command of General John Sullivan reentered the valley and destroyed forty Iroquois villages and torched their farmlands. This “scorched earth” campaign essentially marked the end of the Native American occupation of the upper Susquehanna. General John Sullivan (1740-1795) served as a Major General in the Continental Army during the Revolutionary War. After the war, he was a delegate to the Continental Congress, served as Governor of New Hampshire, and in 1789, President Washington nominated him to be the first federal judge in the U.S. District of New Hampshire. On December 30, 1782, a court of arbitration of the Continental Congress decided in the Decree of Trenton to grant the Wyoming Valley lands to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Armed with this mandate, Pennsylvania then proclaimed that the Yankees were not citizens, could not vote, and were to relinquish their claims to property in the Commonwealth. The Connecticut settlers refused to leave and the second Yankee-Pennamite war erupted in May 1784. Recognizing that a compromise was required to resolve the protracted dispute, the Pennsylvania legislature rescinded the Decree of Trenton. They eventually secured a settlement with the Connecticut claimants by agreeing to honor their claims to land in the Wyoming Valley. 31 .
Recommended publications
  • Edward Wall, a Loyalist in Conflict by Peter C
    Edward Wall, a loyalist in Conflict by Peter C. Betz 178 Noonan Road, Fort Johnson, N.Y. 12070 . Tne author WQufd like to acknowledge. tlze res~~tth fLSSistan~e Of . Mt. Gavin K. Watt, PresUient of the Museum of Applied Milit4ry Mr. Peter C. Betz, a History alU/Lt. Col. William Smy, no,ted Butler's :Rtmgers authority, · native of ...bf>tlz of whom provided information not locally available, as well as Amsterdam . e_<!itorial and very patient cmnputer assistance provided by.Mr. Micha.el NY, grew Johnson. · . .. .. · .. .. up in the Mohawk Th~ - author aL<.Jo wishes to ack~owledge the influence of the late Col Valley, · Charles B, Briggs, past Superintendent ofJohnson Hall State Historic received his Site) who iii the J960's and early 70's was the first area historimi to · BA in acknowledge; research and lecture on the livf!"s, hard~hips and English and History sacrifices of the Loyalist.<;. from the University tic assertions dating back no further than tcr-as-tyrant, a characterization, no doubt of Vermont the writings of factually-liberal nine­ sometimes correct in Simms' own era. in 1965 and his Masters teenth century Ameri c<in historians such But on what primary documentation ol Library as Jcptha R. Simms, w ho in his 1882 Simms claims any authority for applying and Information Science at SUNY, Albany in opus, Frontiersmen of New York de­ this later stereotype to Edw<1rd Wall he 1966. Always interested in New York State scribes Wall as the first man to "use the does not say, si mply because there i s history, he wrote a weekly local history birch", and tells us that, "Wall was a se­ none.
    [Show full text]
  • Orders of George Washington to General John Sullivan, at Head-Quarters May 31, 1779
    Orders of George Washington to General John Sullivan, at Head-Quarters May 31, 1779 The Expedition you are appointed to command is to be directed against the hostile tribes of the Six Nations of Indians, with their associates and adherents. The immediate objects are the total destruction and devastation of their settlements, and the capture of as many prisoners of every age and sex as possible. It will be essential to ruin their crops now in the ground and prevent their planting more. I would recommend, that some post in the center of the Indian Country, should be occupied with all expedition, with a sufficient quantity of provisions whence parties should be detached to lay waste all the settlements around, with instructions to do it in the most effectual manner, that the country may not be merely overrun, but destroyed. But you will not by any means listen to any overture of peace before the total ruinment of their settlements is effected. Our future security will be in their inability to injure us and in the terror with which the severity of the chastisement they receive will inspire them.[4] The 1779 Sullivan Campaign A Little-Known Offensive Strategic To The War Breaks The Indian Nations' Power by Stanley J. Adamiak The 1779 Sullivan Campaign emerged as one of the larger of the Continental Army's offensives during the American Revolution, yet remains relatively unknown.1 It was an act of reprisal to break the Iroquois Confederation, a Native American political and military alliance that included the Seneca, Cayuga, Mohawk, Onondaga, 0neida, and Tuscarora tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wyoming Massacre in the American Imagination
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2021 "Savage and Bloody Footsteps Through the Valley" : The Wyoming Massacre in the American Imagination William R. Tharp Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd Part of the Cultural History Commons, and the United States History Commons © The Author Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/6707 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “Savage and Bloody Footsteps Through the Valley” The Wyoming Massacre in the American Imagination A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at Virginia Commonwealth University By. William R. Tharp Dr. Carolyn Eastman, Advisor Associate Professor, Department of History Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia 14 May 2021 Tharp 1 © William R. Tharp 2021 All Rights Reserved Tharp 2 Abstract Along the banks of the Susquehanna River in early July 1778, a force of about 600 Loyalist and Native American raiders won a lopsided victory against 400 overwhelmed Patriot militiamen and regulars in the Wyoming Valley of Pennsylvania. While not well-known today, this battle—the Battle of Wyoming—had profound effects on the Revolutionary War and American culture and politics. Quite familiar to early Americans, this battle’s remembrance influenced the formation of national identity and informed Americans’ perceptions of their past and present over the course of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • David Fanning and Retaliatory Violence Between Tories and Whigs in the Revolutionary Carolinas
    “Blood for blood”: David Fanning and Retaliatory Violence between Tories and Whigs in the Revolutionary Carolinas By: Gregory Mayr History 586: Advanced Seminar in History Kansas State University Spring 2014 Professor Louise Breen Abstract This paper, relying primarily on Loyalist Colonel David Fanning’s personal narrative of the American Revolution, will argue that Fanning applied, in some of his actions, a form of retributive reasoning similar to that described by Historians Wayne E. Lee and Jeffrey J. Crow as typical for the revolutionary Carolinas. In Fanning’s case, the code by which he decided what to do in given situations was more complex than a one-dimensional law of retaliation; Fanning made an effort to incorporate conventional forms of honor into his actions, but harbored a great deal of distrust for his adversaries that came out of the experiences he had during the Revolution with his Whig opponents. His targets were purposive, aimed at Whig leadership, supplies and government officials. Fanning’s level of violence escalated toward the end of the revolution due to his genuine disdain for the rebels and his resentment at fighting what he eventually acknowledged to be a losing war. Keywords: Fanning; Retaliation; Retribution; lex talionis; Burke 2 On 28 February 1782, the infamous loyalist partisan David Fanning wrote a cold and threatening letter of protest to Governor Thomas Burke of North Carolina. The Whig government had hanged “three of my men, one Captain and two privates,” and was detaining an additional “Captain and six men under the sentence of death.”1 Fanning knew that the British cause had entered its death throes with the definitive American victory at Yorktown, Virginia, in October, 1781, but fighting units remained mobilized until the signing of the peace treaty in 1783, and in the meantime governments throughout the former colonies had to make decisions about how to deal with the militia men who continued the civil war in the southern frontier.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Perspectives on Its Purpose from Published Accounts Preston E
    SOME PERSPECTIVES ON ITS PURPOSE FROM PUBLISHED ACCOUNTS PRESTON E. PIERCE ONTARIO COUNTY HISTORIAN DEPARTMENT OF RECORDS, ARCHIVES AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT ERVICES CANANDAIGUA, NEW YORK 2019 (REPRINTED, UPDATED, AND REVISED 2005, 1985) 1 Front cover image: Sullivan monument erected at the entrance to City Pier on Lake Shore Drive, Canandaigua. Sullivan-Clinton Sesquicentennial Commission, 1929. Bronze tablet was a common feature of all monuments erected by the Commission. Image from original postcard negative, circa 1929, in possession of the author. Above: Sullivan-Clinton Sesquicentennial Commission tablet erected at Kashong (Yates County), Rt. 14, south of Geneva near the Ontario County boundary. 1929. Image by the author. 2004 2 Gen. John Sullivan. Image from Benson J. Lossing, Pictorial Field Book of the Revolution. v. I. 1860. p. 272. 3 Sullivan-Clinton Campaign monument (front and back) erected in 1929 in Honeoye. Moved several times, it commemorates the location of Ft. Cummings, a temporary base established by Sullivan as he began the final leg of his march to the Genesee River. Images by the author. Forward 4 1979 marked the 200th anniversary of the Sullivan-Clinton expedition against those Iroquois nations that allied themselves with Britain and the Loyalists during the American Revolution. It is a little-understood (more often misunderstood) military incursion with diplomatic, economic, and decided geo-political consequences. Unfortunately, most people, including most municipal historians, know little about the expedition beyond what is recorded on roadside markers. In 1929, during the sesquicentennial celebrations of the American Revolution, the states of New York and Pennsylvania established a special commission that produced a booklet, sponsored local pageants, and erected many commemorative tablets in both states.
    [Show full text]
  • Valentine Morgan S1567
    Southern Campaigns American Revolution Pension Statements & Rosters Pension application of Valentine Morgan S1567 f12NC Transcribed by Will Graves 5/15/09: rev'd 6/3/17 [Methodology: Spelling, punctuation and/or grammar have been corrected in some instances for ease of reading and to facilitate searches of the database. Where the meaning is not compromised by adhering to the spelling, punctuation or grammar, no change has been made. Corrections or additional notes have been inserted within brackets or footnotes. Blanks appearing in the transcripts reflect blanks in the original. A bracketed question mark indicates that the word or words preceding it represent(s) a guess by me. The word 'illegible' or 'indecipherable' appearing in brackets indicates that at the time I made the transcription, I was unable to decipher the word or phrase in question. Only materials pertinent to the military service of the veteran and to contemporary events have been transcribed. Affidavits that provide additional information on these events are included and genealogical information is abstracted, while standard, 'boilerplate' affidavits and attestations related solely to the application, and later nineteenth and twentieth century research requests for information have been omitted. I use speech recognition software to make all my transcriptions. Such software misinterprets my southern accent with unfortunate regularity and my poor proofreading skills fail to catch all misinterpretations. Also, dates or numbers which the software treats as numerals rather
    [Show full text]
  • Oriskany:Aplace of Great Sadness Amohawk Valley Battelfield Ethnography
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Ethnography Program Northeast Region ORISKANY:APLACE OF GREAT SADNESS AMOHAWK VALLEY BATTELFIELD ETHNOGRAPHY FORT STANWIX NATIONAL MONUMENT SPECIAL ETHNOGRAPHIC REPORT ORISKANY: A PLACE OF GREAT SADNESS A Mohawk Valley Battlefield Ethnography by Joy Bilharz, Ph.D. With assistance from Trish Rae Fort Stanwix National Monument Special Ethnographic Report Northeast Region Ethnography Program National Park Service Boston, MA February 2009 The title of this report was provided by a Mohawk elder during an interview conducted for this project. It is used because it so eloquently summarizes the feelings of all the Indians consulted. Cover Photo: View of Oriskany Battlefield with the 1884 monument to the rebels and their allies. 1996. Photograph by Joy Bilharz. ExEcuTivE SuMMARy The Mohawk Valley Battlefield Ethnography Project was designed to document the relationships between contemporary Indian peoples and the events that occurred in central New York during the mid to late eighteenth century. The particular focus was Fort Stanwix, located near the Oneida Carry, which linked the Mohawk and St. Lawrence Rivers via Wood Creek, and the Oriskany Battlefield. Because of its strategic location, Fort Stanwix was the site of several critical treaties between the British and the Iroquois and, following the American Revolution, between the latter and the United States. This region was the homeland of the Six Nations of the Iroquois Confederacy whose neutrality or military support was desired by both the British and the rebels during the Revolution. The Battle of Oriskany, 6 August 1777, occurred as the Tryon County militia, aided by Oneida warriors, was marching to relieve the British siege of Ft.
    [Show full text]
  • S31104 Andrew Harwell A/K/A Harvey
    Southern Campaign American Revolution Pension Statements & Rosters Pension application of Andrew Harwell a/k/a Harvey S31104 f15VA Transcribed by Will Graves rev'd 2/27/14 & 5/27/15 [Methodology: Spelling, punctuation and/or grammar have been corrected in some instances for ease of reading and to facilitate searches of the database. Where the meaning is not compromised by adhering to the spelling, punctuation or grammar, no change has been made. Corrections or additional notes have been inserted within brackets or footnotes. Blanks appearing in the transcripts reflect blanks in the original. A bracketed question mark indicates that the word or words preceding it represent(s) a guess by me. The word 'illegible' or 'indecipherable' appearing in brackets indicates that at the time I made the transcription, I was unable to decipher the word or phrase in question. Only materials pertinent to the military service of the veteran and to contemporary events have been transcribed. Affidavits that provide additional information on these events are included and genealogical information is abstracted, while standard, 'boilerplate' affidavits and attestations related solely to the application, and later nineteenth and twentieth century research requests for information have been omitted. I use speech recognition software to make all my transcriptions. Such software misinterprets my southern accent with unfortunate regularity and my poor proofreading skills fail to catch all misinterpretations. Also, dates or numbers which the software treats as numerals rather than words are not corrected: for example, the software transcribes "the eighth of June one thousand eighty six" as "the 8th of June 1786." Please call material errors or omissions to my attention.] [State of Kentucky, Perry County] Revolutionary Claim For the purpose of obtaining the benefit of an act entitled, "An Act supplementary to an act for the relief of certain Officers and Soldiers of the Army of the Revolution," approved on the 7th of June 1832.
    [Show full text]
  • House in the Horseshoe Virtual Field Trip the Skirmish High School
    House in the Horseshoe Virtual Field Trip The Skirmish High School Standards AH1.H.1.1 Use Chronological thinking to: 1. Identify the structure of a historical narrative or story: (its beginning, middle and end). 2. Interpret data presented in time lines and create time lines. AH1.H.1.2 Use Historical Comprehension to: 1. Reconstruct the literal meaning of a historical passage. 2. Differentiate between historical facts and historical interpretations. 3. Analyze data in historical maps. 4. Analyze visual, literary and musical sources. AH1.H.1.3 Use Historical Analysis and Interpretation to: 1. Identify issues and problems in the past. 2. Consider multiple perspectives of various peoples in the past. 3. Analyze cause-and-effect relationships and multiple causation. 4. Evaluate competing historical narratives and debates among historians. 5. Evaluate the influence of the past on contemporary issues. AH1.H.1.4 Use Historical Research to: 1. Formulate historical questions. 2. Obtain historical data from a variety of sources. 3. Support interpretations with historical evidence. 4. Construct analytical essays using historical evidence to support arguments. Vocabulary Primary source - an immediate firsthand account written by someone who was directly involved Secondary source - a secondhand account written by someone who was not directly involved In 1781, a skirmish took place at a lone house in the lush countryside of what is now Moore County, North Carolina. That house was known as the House in the Horseshoe, and it still stands today. Philip Alston, a colonel in the American militia who owned the house, and David Fanning, a British Loyalist who commanded his own militia, clashed in a violent, hours-long conflict that proved to be important for local North Carolina citizens, both Pariot and Loyalist.
    [Show full text]
  • The Massacre of Wyoming. the Acts of Congress for the Defense of The
    34- THE MASSACRE OF WYOMING. THE ACTS OF CONGRESS FOR THE DEFENSE OF THE WYOMING VALLEY, PENNSYLVANIA, 1776-1778 : WITH THE PETITIONS OF THE SUFFERERS BY THE MASSACRE OF JULY 3, 1778, FOR CONGRESSIONAL AID. WITH AN INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER BY REV. HORACE EDWIN HAYDEN, M. A. CORK BS PONDING SECRETARY WYOMING HISTORICAL AND GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY. PRINTED FOR THE SOCIETY. WlLKES-BARRE, PA. I895 . SEE PAGE XVIII. THE MASSACRE OF WYOMING. THE ACTS OF CONGRESS FOR THE DEFENSE OF THE WYOMING VALLEY, PENNSYLVANIA, 1776-1778 : WITH THE PETITIONS OF THE SUFFERERS BY THE MASSACRE OF JULY 3, 1778, FOR CONGRESSIONAL AID. WITH AN INTRODUCTORY CHAPTER BY REV. HORACE EDWIN HAYDEN, M. A. CORRESPONDING SECRETARY WYOMING HISTORICAL AND GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY. PRINTED FOR THE SOCIETY. WILKES-BARRE, PA. 1895- 3,34 COPYRIGHT, 1895, BY WYOMING HIST.-GEOL. SOCIETY. PRINTED BY R. BAUR & SON, WILKES-BARRE, PA. CONTENTS. PACK Preface v Introductory Chapter Massacre of Wyoming vii-xxiv Acts of Congress I Petition of the Sufferers of Wyoming, 1837 7 Resolutions of Pennsylvania Assembly, 1837 21 Petition of Samuel Tubbs, and others 23 Act of Congress, 1838, Adverse to the Petition 24 Petition of the Sufferers of Wyoming, 1839 27 Affidavits of the Survivors of the Massacre, 1839. Mrs. Sarah Bidlack 44 Huldah Carey 44 Bertha Jenkins 46 Sarah Myers 48 Catherine Courtright 49 Phebe Cooper 60 Colonel Edward Innian 45 Colonel George P. Ransom 50 General William Ross 61 Major Eleazar Blackmail ... 54 Rev. Benjamin Bidlack 55 Stephen Abbott 46 Ishrnael Bennett 52 Ebeuezer Marcy 53 Jose Rogers 53 Joseph Slocum -57 Cornelius Courtright 59 Anderson Dana .
    [Show full text]
  • Pg. 1 Historical Register of Units of the Militia, Associators, and Minutemen
    Historical Register of Units of the Militia, Associators, and Minutemen from 1607 to 1861 Compiler and editor – Walter G. Green III, Ph.D. Copyright 2015 by the Society of Descendants of Militia Officers. All rights reserved. 2016-06-03 Note: This register is currently in an editing process to convert all entries to a standard style. Red type indicates entries which have been edited to the style. We expect the conversion process to be completed by 1 April. In that process information that may require further validation is marked by an asterisk (*). Note to Users: This register is based on the best available information that the Society has been able to access, and is provided as a guide to further research. Users should consult the original sources cited, and make a determination as to whether those sources meet the user’s, or other organization’s or publication’s, requirements. Although every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information in this register, errors in transcription are possible, even probable, and some sources may be of uncertain reliability. Our intent is to gather as much information as possible from all available sources and refine that information over time. Please call any errors or omissions noted to our attention, providing details and the sources for that information. UNITS – MASSACHUSETTS 1629-1680 Colony/State Date Unit Strength Reference Massachusetts 1641-06-01 Massachusetts Bay Wright “Massachusetts (Bay Colony) Colony Militia: Militia Roots”. Sergeant Major General John Humphrey Massachusetts (a) 1636/7-03- (a) South Regiment: (a) Wright “Massachusetts (Bay Colony): 09 Colonel John 1 Colonel Militia Roots”.
    [Show full text]
  • Butlers of the Mohawk Valley: Family Traditions and the Establishment of British Empire in Colonial New York
    Syracuse University SURFACE Dissertations - ALL SURFACE December 2015 Butlers of the Mohawk Valley: Family Traditions and the Establishment of British Empire in Colonial New York Judd David Olshan Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/etd Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Olshan, Judd David, "Butlers of the Mohawk Valley: Family Traditions and the Establishment of British Empire in Colonial New York" (2015). Dissertations - ALL. 399. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/399 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the SURFACE at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations - ALL by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract: Butlers of the Mohawk Valley: Family Traditions and the Establishment of British Empire in Colonial New York Historians follow those tributaries of early American history and trace their converging currents as best they may in an immeasurable river of human experience. The Butlers were part of those British imperial currents that washed over mid Atlantic America for the better part of the eighteenth century. In particular their experience reinforces those studies that recognize the impact that the Anglo-Irish experience had on the British Imperial ethos in America. Understanding this ethos is as crucial to understanding early America as is the Calvinist ethos of the Massachusetts Puritan or the Republican ethos of English Wiggery. We don't merely suppose the Butlers are part of this tradition because their story begins with Walter Butler, a British soldier of the Imperial Wars in America.
    [Show full text]