DOCSLIB.ORG

Environment: Status and Strategies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PRA AR D T ES T H U Chapter 14 Environment: Status and Strategies 14.1 Introduction • To enhance the individual and community well- being within and between generations, often The principles of ecologically sustainable referred to as ‘intergenerational equity’. development (ESD) are increasingly being accepted locally, nationally and internationally. Legislative • To conserve and protect biological diversity and initiatives, strategies, action plans, policies and essential ecological processes and life-support programmes that incorporate ESD principles have been systems. initiated at all institutional levels from the United The chapter considers major environmental themes Nations, national governments, business organisations, viz., Air, Water, Biological and Noise and their current corporations, and network of community groups. ESD status using available data to highlight responses or terminology has become interchangeable with the more actions under way to address them. commonly used term ‘sustainable development’ or ‘sustainability’. The wider acceptance of ESD principles Accordingly the chapter is organised as follows: has shifted the goals for management of environment Section 14.2 discusses the air environment in terms of towards long-term sustenance. At the same time, the the sources of air pollution, status and assessment of inherent risks of irreparably depleting or degrading the air quality, areas of critical air quality and the impacts natural resources over the short to medium term are on human healh. Section 14.3 deals with the water increasingly being recognised. environment in terms of the sources of water pollution, status and assessment of water quality, both surface Population growth places additional pressure on the and groundwater quality in the different regions. natural environment through the consumption of Section 14.4 discusses the biological environment of natural resources and the generation of wastes and Uttar Pradesh. Noise pollution is discussed in Section other inputs capable of degrading the quality of soil, 14.5. The last section 14.6 brings out the summary and water and air. This causes loss of native flora and fauna recommendations. and, as more recently noted, influences global climate change. The study region of Uttar Pradesh is divided into two parts on the basis of the resource base and eco- The natural resource base on which all human system dynamics: activities rely is often described as renewable or non- renewable. Limits may be more apparent in terms of • The upper Indo-Gangetic plain and the central non-renewable resource consumption, but there is Indo-Gangetic plain. increasing recognition of the limits or thresholds for • The Bundelkhand region. renewable resources as. Six districts have been selected considering the The main objectives of this chapter are to delineate above classification viz. Varanasi, Jhansi, Agra, framework for environmentally sustainable development Lucknow, Kanpur and Ghaziabad. The other factors of Uttar Pradesh so as: responsible for short-listing these districts are eco- • To ensure a path of economic well-being that resources, geology, geographical location, political and safeguards the welfare of future generations, often industrial zones and also the availability of data for referred to as ‘intergenerational equity’. environmental parameters. These six districts of Uttar 414 UTTAR PRADESH DEVELOPMENT REPORT—VOL. 2 Pradesh are representative of the general environmental 14.2.3 Emission Inventory status of the state. Secondary data on source emission (point, area and The Indo-Gangetic Plain represents Varanasi, Kanpur line), collected from various sources is analysed for the and Ghaziabad. The two districts, Agra and Lucknow identification of critical parameters and hot spots. List have been selected based on environmental of type of industries contributing to air pollution is considerations. Jhansi belongs to Bundelkhand region. shown in Table 14.1 for some districts. The data for environmental parameters was not available except for Jhansi, hence, only one district has been TABLE 14.1 chosen for Bundelkhand region. Type of Industries in Uttar Pradesh 14.2 Air Environment District Type of Industries Air pollution encompasses a diverse array of natural Lucknow Distillery, Brewery, Iron & Steel including and anthropogenic emissions, including gaseous foundries, Rolling & Pickling, Casting, Pesticides, Chemicals, Asbestos, Cement, Electronics, Silicates, constituents, volatile chemicals, aerosols (particulate) Timber and their atmospheric reaction products. Ambient air Varanasi Food Products, Tobacco and Tobacco Products, Silk, acts as an atmospheric sink where all emissions are Textile Products, Wood Products, Leather Products, Rubber, Petrochemical Products, Non metallic released. Many such emissions are in such small & Mineral, Basic metal & Alloy Industries, Metal Products & Parts, Machinery & Machine Tools quantities that they get immediately dissipated and Kanpur Cotton Textiles, Leather Industry, Jute Mills, absorbed but continuous release of these pollutants Woollen Mills, Edible Oil Industries, Chemicals and build up in the air and pose hazard to human health. Chemical Products, Basic Ferrous Industries, Manufacture of Non-Electrical Machinery Assimilative capacity of air environment is the Ghaziabad Heavy & Medium Industries, Small Scale Industries, Handicraft, Rural Industries maximum amount of pollution load that can be Agra Foundry, Glass Industries, Lime Kiln, Silicates, discharged without violating the best designated use of Refractory, Eriquette, Rubber Industries, Leather the air resource in the planning region. The phenomena industries governing the assimilative capacity of air environment Jhansi Thermal Power Plant, Heavy Electricals, Fertilisers, mostly stone based industries, Handicraft include dilution, dispersion, phase transformation and absorption. Source: District Industrial Development Centres, various. 14.2.1 Climate of Uttar Pradesh 14.2.4 Status and Assessment of Air Quality The climate in the state is both hot and cold. The The aerometric secondary data pertaining to Uttar climate is cool or cold from November to early March Pradesh is collected from all possible sources like although the days are pleasant and often warm. After UPPCB, CPCB, etc. the middle of March, it gets to be hot and in May, it The ambient air quality status in the studied region could rise to 45°C or even more. June is both hot and is assessed, based on secondary data collected. The humid until the south-west monsoon breaks in all its parameters selected for AAQM include SPM, SO2 and fury. Thus, the temperature varies from 3°C to 46°C. NOx as these are the major criteria pollutants The humidity varies from 45 per cent-50 per cent. The representing emission from fuel usage in all wind speed varies from 3.7-9.6 km/hr. commercial/industrial and domestic activities. The quality is assessed in cities—Kanpur, Lucknow, Agra, 14.2.2 Sources of Air Pollution Jhansi, Varanasi, and Ghaziabad. The values of SPM, (i) Point Sources: Chemical plants, refineries, SO2 and NOx have been compared with standards of power plants, paper mills, cement plants, etc. CPCB, which is given in Appendix A-14.1. (ii) Area Sources: Dry cleaners, petrol stations, 14.2.4.1 Lucknow electroplaters, etc. The data for ambient quality were collected from (iii) Line Sources: Automobiles, railways, airways, secondary sources and studied. Table 14.2 represents Vehicles, etc. the ambient air quality data of different areas from year (iv) Natural Sources: Dust storms, volcanoes, 1996 to 2001. The parameters selected for AAQM include SPM, SO and NOx as these are the major forest, fires, etc. 2 Chapter 14 • ENVIRONMENT: STATUS AND STRATEGIES 415 TABLE 14.2 Ambient Air Quality Data (Lucknow) Location Category 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 SPM SO2 NOx SPM SO2 NOx SPM SO2 NOx SPM SO2 NOx SPM SO2 NOx SPM SO2 NOx Hazratganj Commercial 530 33 36 547 34 39 470 31 31 370 24 29 321 28 30 322 28 30 Mahanagar Residential 399 29 32 368 28 31 386 28 29 328 25 27 354 29 30 358 28 30 Talkatora Industrial 556 33 35 575 30 33 503 29 33 529 31 34 500 31 33 478 32 34 Source:Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board. 3 Notes: All values in mg/m ; SPM-Suspended Particulate Matter; SO2-Sulphur Dioxide Gas; NOx-Nitrogen’s Oxide Gas. criteria pollutants representing emission from fuel 14.2.4.3 Agra usage in all commercial/industrial and domestic The ambient air quality is extremely poor with activities. reference to SPM in Agra. Prescribed locations are in The SPM levels in the commercial areas (from 1996– sensitive category, for which standard limit of SPM is 3 2001) exceeded 200 μg/m (the CPCB limit for 100 μg/m3 but in these cases values are very much residential/commercial area). But the levels of SO and 3 3 2 higher i.e. vary from 312 μg/m to 969 μg/m shown in NOx are within the prescribed limit (i.e. for SO and 2 Table 14.4. Although the level of SO and NOx are NOx 80 μg/m3) by CPCB. 2 within prescribed limits. In the residential areas, levels of SPM in all the 14.2.4.4 Ghaziabad years exceeded the prescribed limit. However, for SO2 and NOx the values are within prescribed norms. In The industrial area of Ghaziabad has been considered case of industrial areas, the SPM levels are near the for the purpose. At different sites as shown in Table limit by CPCB (i.e. 500μg/m3) and levels of SO and 2 14.5, SPM concentration in Sahibabad in year 1996, NOx are within the prescribed limit. 1997 and 2001 is exceeding the limit is 500 μg/m3. In 14.2.4.2 Kanpur 1998–2000, it is within limit. At Bulandshahr road, the SPM values are exceeding the limit to some extent. The In Kanpur also, values of SPM at all the locations values of SO and NOx are again within limit. are exceeding the prescribed norms. For commercial 2 3 3 areas it varies from 422 μg/m to 597 μg/m , for 14.2.4.5 Varanasi residential areas from 466 μg/m3 to 568 μg/m3 and for industrial areas 504 μg/m3 to 663 μg/m3 (Table 14.3), In Varanasi, the data available are from Jawahar Nagar (residential area).
Recommended publications
  • Census of India, 2001A, 2001B) the Population of India on 1St Mar 2001 Stood at 1027.02 Million (Male-531.28, Female-495.74)

    Census of India, 2001A, 2001B) the Population of India on 1St Mar 2001 Stood at 1027.02 Million (Male-531.28, Female-495.74)

    THE STATUS OF RIVER GANGES IN THE MIDDLE STRETCH ______________________________________________________ 1 1. DEMOGRAPHIC FEATURES According to Census of India (Census of India, 2001a, 2001b) the population of India on 1st Mar 2001 stood at 1027.02 million (Male-531.28, Female-495.74). The population growth in India is fairly in tune with classical theory of demographic transition. During most of the nineteenth century, India witnessed a fluctuating but ultimately more or less a stagnant growth of population, which drifted into the twentieth century until 1921. Thereafter, the country passed through successively all the phases of demographic transition and is now widely believed to have entered the fifth phase, usually characterized by rapidly declining fertility. As per 2001 census the population density stood at 324 people per km2. The overall literacy rate was 65.38% (Male-75.85%, Female-54.16%). The share of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar in total population was 16.17 and 8.07%, thus forming about 1/4th of the country’s population. The population of districts along the river Ganga (Kanpur-Bhagalpur stretch) in U.P. and Bihar formed 20.43 and 32.36% of the respective state’s population. The decadal population growth, sex ration and population density for the districts is depicted in Table 1. From the table it is obvious that population pressure is much more in the districts of Bihar as compared to U.P. The literacy status in different districts is presented in Table 2. The literacy states was poor in Bihar as compared to Uttar Pradesh. Table
  • List of State-Wise National Parks & Wildlife Sanctuaries in India

    List of State-Wise National Parks & Wildlife Sanctuaries in India

    List of State-wise National Parks & Wildlife Sanctuaries in India Andaman and Nicobar Islands Sr. No Name Category 1 Barren Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 2 Battimalve Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 3 Bluff Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 4 Bondoville Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 5 Buchaan Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 6 Campbell Bay National Park National Park 7 Cinque Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 8 Defense Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 9 East Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 10 East Tingling Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 11 Flat Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 12 Galathea National Park National Park 13 Interview Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 14 James Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 15 Kyd Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 16 Landfall Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 17 Lohabarrack Salt Water Crocodile Sanctuary Crocodile Sanctuary 18 Mahatma Gandhi Marine National Park National Park 19 Middle Button Island National Park National Park 20 Mount Harriet National Park National Park 21 Narcondum Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 22 North Button Island National Park National Park 23 North Reef Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 24 Paget Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 25 Pitman Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 26 Point Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary 27 Ranger Island Wildlife Sanctuary Wildlife Sanctuary

  • Effect of Some Heavy Metals On

    Rec. zool. Surv. India: 107(Part-2) : 1-19, 2007 EFFECT OF SOME HEAVY METALS ON LAMPITO MAURITII KINBERG (ANNELIDA: OLIGO CHAETA) IN MUNICIPAL WASTES DISPOSAL SITE AND A RESERVE FOREST FLOOR SITE OF WEST BENGAL, INDIA A. CHOWDHURY AND A. K. HAZRA Zoological Survey of India, M-Block, New Alipore, Kolkata-700 053, India INTRODUCTION As a result of the increasing interest paid to the recycling of wastewater, municipal wastes and sewage sludge in agricultural practice, it becomes necessary to study the uptake of heavy metals in invertebrates in general and earthworm in particular. It is evident that earthworm can accumulate heavy metals from surrounding polluted soils and other media in their body (Gish and Christensen, 1973; van Hook, 1974; van Rhee, 1975; Ireland, 1979, 1983; Ash and Lee, 1980; Beyer, 1981; Beyer et 01. 1982; Kruse and Barrett, 1985). But no such work has been carried out in India. To fill up this lacuna the present study has been conducted with the following objectives: To determine whether this dominant species of L. mauritii could be use to absorb the heavy metals in contaminated soil and to compare them with a less polluted controlled reserve forest floor. MATERIALS AND METHODS Earthworm samples were collected month wise at random by digging and hand sorting method. Collected samples were repeatedly washed in water and then kept in double distilled water for 72 hours to evacuate soil from its gut. After that period earthworm samples were preserved in 10% formalin. Preserved samples were washed in double distilled water and then oven dried at 65°C for 48 hours Dried samples were crushed, weighed on a microbalance and acid (Nitric and Perchloric) digested on a hot plate.
  • District Saharanpur 82

    District Saharanpur 82

    BASE LINE SURVEY IN THE MINORITY CONCENTRATED DISTRICTS OF UTTAR PRADESH (A Report of Saharanpur District) Sponsored by: Ministry of Minority Affairs Government of India New Delhi Study conducted by: Dr. R. C. TYAGI GIRI INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES SECTOR-O, ALIGANJ HOUSING SCHEME LUCKNOW-226 024 CONTENTS Title Page No DISTRICT MAP – SAHARANPUR vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY vii-xii CHAPTER I: OUTLINE OF THE STUDY 1-3 1.1 About the study 1 1.2 Objective of the study 2 1.3 Methodology and Sample design 2 1.4 Tools 3 CHAPTER II: DEVELOPMENT STATUS IN SAHARANPUR DISTRICT 4-19 2.1 Introduction 4 2.2 Demographic Status 5 2.3 Demographic Status by Religion 6 2.4 Structure and Growth in Employment 7 2.5 Unemployment 8 2.6 Land Use Pattern 9 2.7 Coverage of Irrigation and Sources 10 2.8 Productivity of Major Crops 10 2.9 Livestock 11 2.10 Industrial Development 11 2.11 Development of Economic Infrastructure 12 2.12 Rural Infrastructure 13 2.13 Educational Infrastructure 14 2.14 Health Infrastructure 15 2.15 Housing Amenities in Saharanpur District 16 2.16 Sources of Drinking Water 17 2.17 Sources of Cooking Fuel 18 2.18 Income and Poverty Level 19 CHAPTER III: DEVELOPMENT STATUS AT THE VILLAGE LEVEL 20-31 3.1 Population 20 3.2 Occupational Pattern 20 3.3 Land use Pattern 21 3.4 Sources of Irrigation 21 3.5 Roads and Electricity 22 3.6 Drinking Water 22 3.7 Toilet Facility 23 3.8 Educational Facility 23 3.9 Students Enrollments 24 3.10 Physical Structure of Schools 24 3.11 Private Schools and Preferences of the People for Schools 25 3.12 Health Facility
  • Important Facts for Prelims (31St December 2018)

    Important Facts for Prelims (31St December 2018)

    Important Facts for Prelims (31st December 2018) drishtiias.com/printpdf/important-facts-for-prelims-31st-december-2018 M-STrIPES There has been an increase in the number of poachers arrested by forest officials in past one year. The mobile app, M-STrIPES, used for surveillance and patrolling of tiger-populated areas has played a major role in this. M-STrIPES (Monitoring System For Tigers-Intensive Protection and Ecological Status) This app was developed by the National Tiger Conservation Authority and the Wildlife Institute of India in 2010. M-STrIPES allows patrol teams to keep a better tab on suspicious activity while also mapping the patrolling, location, routes and timings of forest officials. The App was also used in the All India-Tiger Estimation. Dudhwa Tiger Reserve The Dudhwa Tiger Reserve is a protected area in Uttar Pradesh that stretches mainly across the Lakhimpur Kheri and Bahraich districts. It comprises of the Dudhwa National Park, Kishanpur Wildlife Sanctuary and Katerniaghat Wildlife Sanctuary. Dudhwa is home to a number of wildlife species, including the Bengal Tiger, Gangetic dolphin, rhinoceros, leopard, hispid hare, sambhar, swamp deer, hog deer, cheetah, sloth bear, elephant and over 450 species of birds. One District One Product (ODOP) Prime Minister of India recently attended a regional summit of ODOP scheme in Varanasi. ODOP Scheme was launched by the Uttar Pradesh Government to give a boost to traditional industries, synonymous with the respective state's districts. 1/2 Through this scheme, the state government wants to help local handicraft industries and products to gain national and international recognition through branding, marketing support, and easy credit.
  • UP State Biodiversity Board BBIIOODDIIVV Nneewwss Volume : 6 N Issue : 22 N Jan - Mar 2015 a Quarterly E‐Newsletter

    UP State Biodiversity Board BBIIOODDIIVV Nneewwss Volume : 6 N Issue : 22 N Jan - Mar 2015 a Quarterly E‐Newsletter

    UP State Biodiversity Board BBIIOODDIIVV NNeewwss Volume : 6 n Issue : 22 n Jan - Mar 2015 A Quarterly e‐Newsletter Editorial Esteemed Readers, Environmentalists, biologists and others concerned about the health of the planet and its inhabitants recognize the key role wetlands play in life on Earth. Besides containing a disproportionately high number of plant and animal species compared to other land forms, wetlands serve a variety of ecological services including feeding downstream waters, trapping floodwaters, recharging groundwater supplies, removing pollution and providing fish and wildlife habitat. Wetlands are critical for human development and wellbeing, especially in India where a large number of people are dependent on them for drinking water, food and livelihood. Despite their immense importance, wetlands are one of the most degraded ecosystems globally. Research suggests that over-exploitation of fish resources, discharge of industrial effluents, fertilizers and pesticides and uncontrolled siltation Painted storks and weed infestation, among other reasons, have wiped out or severely damaged over Photo Credit : (Mycteria leucocephala) Neeraj Mishra 1/3rd of India's wetlands. Wetlands are on the “front-line” as development pressures increase everywhere. When they are viewed as unproductive or marginal lands, wetlands are targeted for drainage and conversion. The rate of loss and deterioration of wetlands is accelerating in all regions of the world. The pressure on wetlands is likely to intensify in the coming decades due to increased global demand for land and water, as well as climate change. The Wetlands (Conservation and Management) Rules, 2010 is a positive step towards conservation of wetlands in India. Under the Rules, wetlands have been classified for better management and easier identification.
  • Drishti IAS Coaching in Delhi, Online IAS Test Series & Study Material

    Drishti IAS Coaching in Delhi, Online IAS Test Series & Study Material

    Drishti IAS Coaching in Delhi, Online IAS Test Series & Study Material drishtiias.com/printpdf/uttar-pradesh-gk-state-pcs-english Uttar Pradesh GK UTTAR PRADESH GK State Uttar Pradesh Capital Lucknow Formation 1 November, 1956 Area 2,40,928 sq. kms. District 75 Administrative Division 18 Population 19,98,12,341 1/20 State Symbol State State Emblem: Bird: A pall Sarus wavy, in Crane chief a (Grus bow–and– Antigone) arrow and in base two fishes 2/20 State State Animal: Tree: Barasingha Ashoka (Rucervus Duvaucelii) State State Flower: Sport: Palash Hockey Uttar Pradesh : General Introduction Reorganisation of State – 1 November, 1956 Name of State – North-West Province (From 1836) – North-West Agra and Oudh Province (From 1877) – United Provinces Agra and Oudh (From 1902) – United Provinces (From 1937) – Uttar Pradesh (From 24 January, 1950) State Capital – Agra (From 1836) – Prayagraj (From 1858) – Lucknow (partial) (From 1921) – Lucknow (completely) (From 1935) Partition of State – 9 November, 2000 [Uttaranchal (currently Uttarakhand) was formed by craving out 13 districts of Uttar Pradesh. Districts of Uttar Pradesh in the National Capital Region (NCR) – 8 (Meerut, Ghaziabad, Gautam Budh Nagar, Bulandshahr, Hapur, Baghpat, Muzaffarnagar, Shamli) Such Chief Ministers of Uttar Pradesh, who got the distinction of being the Prime Minister of India – Chaudhary Charan Singh and Vishwanath Pratap Singh Such Speaker of Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly, who also became Chief Minister – Shri Banarsidas and Shripati Mishra Speaker of the 17th Legislative
  • 2020-08-15 149.Pdf

    2020-08-15 149.Pdf

    CLIMATE AND SOIL OF UTTAR PRADESH Dr SHALU DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY Ch CHARAN SINGH UNIVERSITY, MEERUT The climate of Uttar Pradesh is tropical monsoon type where winter season is very cold and summer season is very hot. The state of Uttar Pradesh has very fertile land which is mostly covered by alluvial soil. Apart from this, the state has a variety of soil groups which are different from each other, e.g. Bangar, Khadar, red soil, black soil, parwa, month soil, etc. Climate of Uttar Pradesh The climate of Uttar Pradesh is tropical monsoon climate. The state also experiences climate variations to large scale due to presence of hills in the Northern part, different elevation and distance from the sea. Thus variation can be seen from Saharanpur to Deoria. The climate is humid, the plains experience extreme climatic conditions i.e. winters are cold and summers are hot and the Southern part experiences severe cols in winter and severe hot in summer season. Uttar Pradesh is mainly divided into two climatic regions on the basis of rainfall. These are discussed below: (i) Humid and Tropical Region It is divided into two sub-groups which are: Terai Region:- This region includes Bijnor, Northern Moradabad, Bareilly, Rampur, Pilibhit, Deoria, Lakhimpur, Bahraich, Gonda, Basti, Gorakhpur, Siddharthnagar, Maharajganj, Sant Kabir Nagar, Padrona, etc. This area is a marshy land as it is situated at the foot hills of Himalayas. The average annual rainfall in Terai Region is 120-150 cm and average temperature is 18℃ to 30℃ in January and July, respectively. Eastern Uttar Pradesh:- This region includes Northern Shahjahanpur, Sitapur, Barabanki, Faizabad, Azamgarh, Ballia, Ghazipur, Jaunpur, Varanasi, Bhadki, Chandoli, Southern Allahabad, Kaushambi, Chitrakoot and Mirzapur districts.
  • PROTECTED AREA UPDATE News and Information from Protected Areas in India and South Asia

    PROTECTED AREA UPDATE News and Information from Protected Areas in India and South Asia

    PROTECTED AREA UPDATE News and Information from protected areas in India and South Asia Vol. XIX No. 3 June 2013 (No. 103) LIST OF CONTENTS Odisha 10 CAG points to serious deficiencies in tiger reserve EDITORIAL 3 management in Odisha Exciting times for the PA Update Rice for Olive Ridley Conservation scheme in four coastal districts NEWS FROM INDIAN STATES Tamil Nadu 11 Andhra Pradesh 4 Blackbuck population rises in Vallanadu Remains of a rare spider sighted in the Sanctuary Seshachalam BR Uttarakhand 12 Ban on heavy vehicular traffic through Kawal Uttarakhand seeks tiger reserve status for Rajaji Tiger Reserve National Park Gujarat 5 West Bengal 12 No lion poaching in Gir in two years Sunderban tigers to be radio-collared Jammu & Kashmir 5 Trikuta WLS de-notified NATIONAL NEWS FROM INDIA 12 Jharkhand 5 NPV of forest land for CAMPA to be reviewed Palamau TR takes up repair of its core roads Any citizen can move National Green Tribunal to Karnataka 6 report violations Water level in Kabini reservoir drops to lowest in ten years SOUTH ASIA 13 19 tiger deaths in Karnataka in one year ending Nepal March 2013 Barasingha population rises in Shuklaphanta Kerala 6 Kerala to prepare Marine Biodiversity Register IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS UPDATE 14 Decline in Rock bee colonies in Idukki WLS Andhra Pradesh Madhya Pradesh 7 Dispute over Kolleru land remains unresolved NBWL refuses permission for highway Gujarat upgradation project through Ratapani WLS Increase in vulture populations in lion country in Maharashtra 8 Gujarat Three tonnes of plastic removed
  • 105 Chapter-5 L U C K N 0 W a Study in Resort Personality Physical

    105 Chapter-5 L U C K N 0 W a Study in Resort Personality Physical

    105 Chapter-5 L U C K N 0 W A Study in Resort Personality Physical Setting : The cultural city of Lucknow - on - Gomati is a paramount urban agglomeration in the otherwise economically depressed rural Awadh. Lucknow »was founded on the mound, strategically located on the southern banks of the river Gomati. River frontages are not mere localizable attractions for city facades but they also have a secret hand in determining the morphological aspects of townships particularly in their early stages of development. It is situated at 26*^52' N Latitude and 80^ 56'E longitude. Presently, Lucknow dominates as the capital of Uttar Pradesh. This city, of about over one and half million people ranks among the ten big metropolis of India. Lie of the Land : Considering the notoriety of the Gomati for frequent rising in spates, the high mound-popularly known as the Lakshman Tila- was an ideal location for a human settlement, insuring safety and security against flood hazards. The rest of the land undulates very gradually, almost imperceptibly, towards the south and south east. Now known as Lakshman Tila. 106 TAMING OF THE GOMATI I MILE LUCKNOW: FLOODS SUBMERGED AREA BUND LINE The. Gomati ka^ bzen notoxiou^ {jox h.z>i ' {,ioujn-;>'. Shz tkizatzmd the <sett£ement in 1915 and 1923, bat tkz city e-icaped hex Miath. In 1960 6m Mueiizd in angzi vohzn thz piannzx^ qioomzd toivn^hip to i/te north.. Both thz bank'}, oVzi^towzd : the. watzx in Haziat Canj :uai kme.-dezp, i^akanagax oiaA maioomd and the {,(.ood struck the.
  • CP Vol VIII EIA

    CP Vol VIII EIA

    GOVERNMENT OF UTTAR PRADESH Public Works Department Uttar Pradesh Core Road Network Development Program Part – A: Project Preparation DETAILED PROJECT REPORT Volume - VIII: Environmental Impact Assessment Report and Environmental Management Plan Gola – Shahjahanpur Road (SH-93) July 2015 India Consulting engineers pvt. ltd. Uttar Pradesh Core Road Network Development Program DETAILED PROJECT REPORT Volume-VIII: EIA and EMP Report Gola – Shahjahanpur Road (SH-93) Volume-VIII : Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIA) and Document Name Environmental Management Plan (EMP) (Detailed Project Report) Document Number EIRH1UP020/DPR/SH-93/GS/004/VIII Uttar Pradesh Core Road Network Development Program Project Name Part – A: Project Preparation including Detailed Engineering Design and Contract Documentation Project Number EIRH1UP020 Document Authentication Name Designation Prepared by Dr. S.S. Deepak Environmental Specialist Reviewed by Sudhendra Kumar Karanam Sr. General Manager (Roads & Highways) Rajeev Kumar Gupta Deputy Team Leader Avadesh Singh Technical Head Approved by Rick Camise Team Leader History of Revisions Version Date Description of Change(s) Rev. 0 19/12/2014 First Submission Rev. 1 29/12/2014 Second Submission after incorporating World Bank’s Comments and Suggestions Rev. 2 13/01/2015 Incorporating World Bank’s Comments and Suggestions Rev. 3 16/07/2015 Revision after discussion with Independent Consultant Page i| Rev: R3 , Uttar Pradesh Core Road Network Development Program DETAILED PROJECT REPORT Volume-VIII: EIA and EMP
  • Wastewater: Environment, Livelihood & Health Impacts in Kanpur

    Wastewater: Environment, Livelihood & Health Impacts in Kanpur

    AN NGO FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION, PROTECTION AND SECURITY Contact at: 0512-2402986/2405229 Mob: 9415129482 Website: www.ecofriends.org e-mail : [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Wastewater: Environment, Livelihood & Health Impacts in Kanpur About Kanpur • Kanpur is the 8th largest metropolis in India and largest and most important industrial town of Uttar Pradesh. • Kanpur is sandwiched between River Ganga in the North and River Pandu in the South. • The total area of Kanpur Nagar district is 1040 sq km • The urban area had a population of 2.721 m persons in 2001. • Estimated water production from all sources in 2002 was 502 mld, giving a per capita production of 140 lpcd • Total wastewater generation is 395 mld River Ganga (above) and River Pandu (below) are the recipients of roughly 300 mld of total wastewater generated in Kanpur Wastewater irrigated areas in Kanpur The present study area is in the northeast of Kanpur where wastewater farming is in existence since early nineteen fifties. The sewage-irrigated areas are in the east direction of Jajmau that hosts 380 highly polluting leather factories. Surprisingly the exact area under wastewater irrigation is not known. Different government departments provide different data regarding the land area irrigated with wastewater. There are 2770 farmers involved in wastewater agriculture. These farmers are doing agriculture on 2500 ha of land. Out of total number of farmers, 333 farmers (112 lessees + 211 encroachers) are practicing agriculture on 414.6 ha of land owned by KNN. KNN owns 511.58 ha of land in wastewater irrigated areas.