DOCSLIB.ORG

Women and Brexit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Women and Brexit EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Women and Brexit Assessing the Impact of Brexit on Women and Gender Equality in the UK Mary Honeyball MEP and Hannah Manzur September 2019 1 Women and Brexit Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................3 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................4 1. Women’s Rights and Equality Law Post-Brexit............................................. 8 The Protection Floor .................................................................................................................... 12 a. Evaluating the Government’s approach ............................................................................13 The Government’s Reaction to Equality Law and Women’s Rights Concerns and Proposals .... 15 Concerns arising from the UK’s Record on Equality Law: EU and Domestic ............................ 20 b. The Loss of Legal Protections and Safeguards for Equality Law Post-Brexit....................21 Loss of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights ........................................................................... 21 The European Court of Justice and EU Case Law....................................................................... 23 Women’s Employment Rights and Protections: EU Directives at Risk........................................ 24 c. Missing Out on Future Rights and Protections ..................................................................31 The Work-Life Balance Directive................................................................................................. 32 The Women on Boards Directive.................................................................................................. 33 2. The Socio-Economic Impact of Brexit on Women....................................... 34 a. Austerity, Trade and the Gender Pay Gap........................................................................36 Austerity Measures, Public Spending Cuts and Female & Family Poverty................................. 37 Post-Brexit Trade Policies and Agreements................................................................................. 40 Widening the Gender Pay and Pension Gap................................................................................ 41 b. The Socio-economic Impact of Brexit on Women as Workers, Consumers, Public Service Users and Carers ............................................................................................................................43 The Socio-economic Impact of Brexit on Women as Workers...................................................... 44 The Socio-economic Impact of Brexit on Women as Consumers ................................................. 46 The Socio-economic Impact of Brexit on Women as Public Service Users.................................. 48 The Socio-economic Impact of Brexit on Women as Carers ........................................................ 51 3. Where are the Women? – The Representation of Women’s Voices and Gendered Perspectives within Brexit ............................................................................... 54 a. Representing Women within the Brexit Campaign............................................................55 The Representation of Women in the Media................................................................................. 55 The Gender Gap in Voting patterns and Opinion Polls ............................................................... 56 Brexit Campaigns and Activism before and after the Referendum............................................... 58 b. Representation of Women within the Brexit Process .........................................................62 2 Women and Brexit Representation of Women within Parliamentary Debates on Brexit............................................ 63 Representation of Women within Decision-making Positions in the Brexit Process ................... 63 4. The Impact of Brexit on Women’s Organizations and Vulnerable Groups... 67 a. Women’s Rights Organizations and Support Services.......................................................68 The Impact of Brexit on Women’s Organizations: Policy Influence and Collaboration.............. 68 Defunding Women’s Organization and Support Services ............................................................ 70 b. Intersectional Brexit: Examining the Impact on Marginal and Vulnerable Groups of Women ..............................................................................................................................................72 Female Victims of Sexual and Domestic Violence ....................................................................... 73 Migrant Women: Settled Status and ‘Productive Man’................................................................ 75 Minority Religious and Ethnic Women......................................................................................... 79 Minority and Vulnerable Groups ................................................................................................. 82 Regional Effects on Women.......................................................................................................... 85 Conclusion.............................................................................................................................89 3 Women and Brexit Introduction This report challenges the notion of a ‘gender-neutral Brexit’ by illustrating the gendered impacts of both mainstream and marginalised aspects of the Brexit process and its consequences for women in the UK. It will analyse the legal, economic, and social impact of Brexit on women, paying particular attention to areas where women are specifically and/or disproportionately affected. These areas have been largely excluded from media coverage and public debate on Brexit, and have received little to no responsive action by the Government. Brexit constitutes a ‘critical juncture’ in the UK1. Decisions made and actions taken throughout the Brexit process “will establish political structures that will have a long lasting impact on gender equality policies and politics”2. Discourses, policies and processes currently being undertaken by political figures and institutions will determine the post-Brexit structural landscape of British politics, law, and society. The issue of ‘Brexit’ functions as a filter for contemporary political, social and economic issues, assigning value and contextual meaning to narratives and policies on immigration, trade, employment, public services, the economy and democracy. This filtering process also serves to exclude issues which do not conform to mainstream notions of what ‘Brexit’ means for the UK, taking oxygen from discussions on social and structural problems and inequalities, including the issue of women’s interests and gender equality. At present, the gender-blind approach of the Government towards Brexit and the exclusion of women’s voices and interests in media and political debates and discussions of Brexit is contributing towards the increasing disadvantage of women within this process. Similarly to Government austerity policies in response to the 2008 financial crisis, the persistently gender-blind approach towards the Brexit crisis will result in the systematic disadvantage of women’s rights and interests. This threat is largely the result of the lack of visibility concerning women’s labour, the expectation that they will shoulder the burden for families and the most vulnerable, and the silencing of their voices and interests. The depth and breadth of these issues, as evidenced in this report, and the absence of media and political attention towards them is jarring. Based on the findings of this report, it is unsurprising that experts have argued that “Brexit poses the greatest modern day threat to women’s rights and gender equality policies in the UK”3. If we are to improve, or even maintain, the current levels of equality, protections and prosperity that EU membership directly or indirectly grants women in the UK, we must take decisive, proactive steps to address the very real threats to the future of women and gender equality in the UK. A multitude of voices from academia, NGO and charity sectors, politics and governance have raised these issues and suggested necessary actions needed to address them. These include key reports by the House of Commons Women and Equalities Committee (Women’s Committee)4, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) 5, 1 Guerrina, R. Murphy, H. 2016. ‘Strategic Silences in the Brexit Debate: Gender, Marginality and Governance’. Journal of Contemporary European Research. 12:2. See also: Hozic, A. and True, J. 2017. ‘Brexit as Scandal: Gender and Global Trumpism’. Review of International Political Economy. 24:2. 2 https://www.equallyours.org.uk/edf-gendering-brexit-blog-series-dont-worry-womens-rights-and-equality-are- already-embedded-within-our-legal-framework/#more-50448 See also: Hozic and True, ‘Brexit as Scandal’ 3 Statement made by Professor Roberta Guerrina, Head of Politics at the University of Surrey and leading expert on gender and Brexit. Available at: https://www.surrey.ac.uk/mediacentre/press/2018/brexit-one-greatest-threats- women%E2%80%99s-rights 4 House of Commons Women and Equalities Committee. February 2017. Ensuring Strong Equalities Legislation after the EU Exit. Available at: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmwomeq/799/799.pdf.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 17 July 2018 - - Page 1 of 38 - (I) Causing Or Permitting a Derogatory Article to Be Written in Brexit Central; And
    IN THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL CASE NUMBER: [TBC] B E T W E E N: SHAHMIR SANNI (Claimant) -and- THE TAX PAYERS ALLIANCE LIMITED (Respondent) PARTICULARS OF CLAIM Parties (1) The Claimant was employed by the Respondent from 13 March 2017 to 13 April 2018. He was employed as a Digital Campaign Manager. His responsibilities included running the Respondent’s social media accounts, YouTube channel, and producing website content and video content. (2) The Respondent is a self-declared “grassroots campaigning group dedicated to reforming taxes, cutting spending and protecting taxpayers”. It is a lobbying group pursuing a right-wing political ideology. It operates from 55 Tufton Street, Westminster, an office block where seven other similar right-wing political organisations are based. (3) The Claimant was summarily dismissed by the Respondent on 13 April 2018. Legal Claims (4) The Claimant advances claims of: (a) Automatically Unfair Dismissal by reason of having made a protected disclosure (s.103A Employment Rights Act 1996 (“ERA”)); (b) Directly discriminatory dismissal (s.13 and s.39(2)(c) Equality Act 2010 (“EqA 2010”) because of his belief that protecting the integrity and sanctity of British democracy from taint and corruption was paramount, which is a philosophical belief protected by s.10 EqA 2010 and in accordance with the characteristics set out in Grainger v Nicholson [2010] ICR 360; (c) Protected Disclosure detriment (s.47B ERA), namely:- _________________________ - Particulars of Claim - - 17 July 2018 - - Page 1 of 38 - (i) Causing or permitting a derogatory article to be written in Brexit Central; and (ii) Instructing Wilsons LLP to write the letter wrongly threatening defamation proceedings; and (iii) Permitting or causing the making of derogatory statements in public and the media on 4 July 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H2019
    May 15, 2020 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H2019 The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Burchett Hollingsworth Rice (SC) b 1246 question is on the resolution. Burgess Hudson Riggleman Byrne Huizenga Roby AFTER RECESS The question was taken; and the Calvert Hurd (TX) Rodgers (WA) Speaker pro tempore announced that Carter (GA) Jayapal Roe, David P. The recess having expired, the House the ayes appeared to have it. Chabot Johnson (LA) Rogers (AL) was called to order by the Speaker pro Cheney Johnson (OH) Mr. WOODALL. Madam Speaker, on Rogers (KY) tempore (Mr. CUELLAR) at 12 o’clock Cline Johnson (SD) Rose, John W. and 46 minutes p.m. that I demand the yeas and nays. Cloud Jordan Rouzer The yeas and nays were ordered. Cole Joyce (OH) Roy f Collins (GA) Joyce (PA) Rutherford The vote was taken by electronic de- Comer Katko AUTHORIZING REMOTE VOTING BY Scalise vice, and there were—yeas 207, nays Conaway Keller Schweikert PROXY AND PROVIDING FOR OF- Cook Kelly (MS) 199, not voting 24, as follows: Scott, Austin Crawford Kelly (PA) FICIAL REMOTE COMMITTEE [Roll No. 106] Crenshaw Khanna Sensenbrenner PROCEEDINGS DURING A PUBLIC YEAS—207 Curtis King (IA) Simpson HEALTH EMERGENCY DUE TO A Davidson (OH) King (NY) Smith (MO) Adams Gabbard Norcross NOVEL CORONAVIRUS Davis, Rodney Kinzinger Smith (NE) Aguilar Gallego O’Halleran Diaz-Balart Kustoff (TN) Smith (NJ) Allred Garamendi Mr. MCGOVERN. Mr. Speaker, pursu- Pallone Duncan LaHood Smucker Barraga´ n Garcia (TX) ant to House Resolution 967, I call up Panetta Dunn LaMalfa Spanberger Bass Golden Pappas Emmer Lamb Spano the resolution (H.
    [Show full text]
  • E-Petition Session: TV Licensing, HC 1233
    Petitions Committee Oral evidence: E-petition session: TV Licensing, HC 1233 Monday 1 March 2021 Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 1 March 2021. Watch the meeting Members present: Catherine McKinnell (Chair); Tonia Antoniazzi; Jonathan Gullis. Other Members present: Rosie Cooper; Damian Collins; Gill Furniss; Gareth Bacon; Jamie Stone; Ben Bradley; Tahir Ali; Brendan Clarke-Smith; Allan Dorans; Virginia Crosbie; Mr Gregory Campbell; Simon Jupp; Jeff Smith; Huw Merriman; Chris Bryant; Mark Eastwood; Ian Paisley; John Nicolson; Chris Matheson; Rt Hon Mr John Whittingdale OBE, Minister for Media and Data. Questions 1-21 Chair: Thank you all for joining us today. Today’s e-petition session has been scheduled to give Members from across the House an opportunity to discuss TV licensing. Sessions like this would normally take place in Westminster Hall, but due to the suspension of sittings, we have started holding these sessions as an alternative way to consider the issues raised by petitions and present these to Government. We have received more requests to take part than could be accommodated in the 90 minutes that we are able to schedule today. Even with a short speech limit for Back- Bench contributions, it shows just how important this issue is to Members right across the House. I am pleased to be holding this session virtually, and it means that Members who are shielding or self-isolating, and who are unable to take part in Westminster Hall debates, are able to participate. I am also pleased that we have Front-Bench speakers and that we have the Minister attending to respond to the debate today.
    [Show full text]
  • The Meritocrat's Manifesto
    THE MERITOCRAT’S MANIFESTO Dominic Raab MP THE MERITOCRAT’S MANIFESTO Dominic Raab MP FIRST PUBLISHED BY The Social Market Foundation, June 2014 ISBN: 978-1-904899-91-4 11 Tufton Street, London SW1P 3QB Copyright © The Social Market Foundation, 2014 The moral right of the authors has been asserted. All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the publisher of this book. THE SOCIAL MARKET FOUNDATION The Foundation’s main activity is to commission and publish original papers by independent academic and other experts on key topics in the economic and social fields, with a view to stimulating public discussion on the performance of markets and the social framework within which they operate. The Foundation is a registered charity and a company limited by guarantee. It is independent of any political party or group and is funded predominantly through sponsorship of research and public policy debates. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author, and these do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors or the Social Market Foundation. CHAIRMAN DESIGN AND PRODUCTION Mary Ann Sieghart Pistachio Design www.pistachiodesign.com MEMBERS OF THE BOARD Daniel Franklin PRINTED BY Graham Mather Diversified Global Graphics Group
    [Show full text]
  • Far-Right Anthology
    COUNTERINGDEFENDING EUROPE: “GLOBAL BRITAIN” ANDTHE THEFAR FUTURE RIGHT: OFAN EUROPEAN ANTHOLOGY GEOPOLITICSEDITED BY DR RAKIB EHSAN AND DR PAUL STOTT BY JAMES ROGERS DEMOCRACY | FREEDOM | HUMAN RIGHTS ReportApril No 2020. 2018/1 Published in 2020 by The Henry Jackson Society The Henry Jackson Society Millbank Tower 21-24 Millbank London SW1P 4QP Registered charity no. 1140489 Tel: +44 (0)20 7340 4520 www.henryjacksonsociety.org © The Henry Jackson Society, 2020. All rights reserved. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and are not necessarily indicative of those of The Henry Jackson Society or its Trustees. Title: “COUNTERING THE FAR RIGHT: AN ANTHOLOGY” Edited by Dr Rakib Ehsan and Dr Paul Stott Front Cover: Edinburgh, Scotland, 23rd March 2019. Demonstration by the Scottish Defence League (SDL), with supporters of National Front and white pride, and a counter demonstration by Unite Against Facism demonstrators, outside the Scottish Parliament, in Edinburgh. The Scottish Defence League claim their protest was against the sexual abuse of minors, but the opposition claim the rally masks the SDL’s racist beliefs. Credit: Jeremy Sutton-Hibbert/Alamy Live News. COUNTERINGDEFENDING EUROPE: “GLOBAL BRITAIN” ANDTHE THEFAR FUTURE RIGHT: OFAN EUROPEAN ANTHOLOGY GEOPOLITICSEDITED BY DR RAKIB EHSAN AND DR PAUL STOTT BY JAMES ROGERS DEMOCRACY | FREEDOM | HUMAN RIGHTS ReportApril No 2020. 2018/1 Countering the Far Right: An Anthology About the Editors Dr Paul Stott joined the Henry Jackson Society’s Centre on Radicalisation and Terrorism as a Research Fellow in January 2019. An experienced academic, he received an MSc in Terrorism Studies (Distinction) from the University of East London in 2007, and his PhD in 2015 from the University of East Anglia for the research “British Jihadism: The Detail and the Denial”.
    [Show full text]
  • Publishing Government Legal Advice Table of Contents 1
    Library Briefing Publishing Government Legal Advice Table of Contents 1. Law Officers’ Legal Summary Advice to the Government In the UK, law officers of the crown are responsible for providing legal advice 2. Iraq War and the to the government. Successive governments have observed a long-standing Publication of Legal convention that the advice they receive from law officers is not disclosed Advice outside government. This House of Lords Library Briefing provides a brief 3. Legal Advice on overview of the role of the law officers and the convention on the publication Military Action Post-Iraq of their advice. It also gives examples of how the Government has referred to Conflict the convention in response to calls for it to make public the full advice that it 4. Brexit had received from law officers. The final section discusses demands for the Government to publish the legal advice that it has been given regarding Brexit. Over recent weeks, there have been repeated calls—including from Labour, the Liberal Democrats, the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) and a former Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union—for the Government to publish in full the legal advice it has received about its proposed Brexit deal. On 13 November 2018, a binding motion for a return was agreed without division in the House of Commons, calling for “any legal advice in full, including that provided by the Attorney General, on the proposed withdrawal agreement on the terms of the UK’s departure from the European Union including the Northern Ireland backstop and framework for a future relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union” to be laid before Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Speaker Brochure 2020
    Institute of Economic Affairs SPEAKERS 2020 [email protected] iea.org.uk Adam Bartha Adam is the Director of EPICENTER, with the responsibility to enable the cooperation of the network and organise the private and public events programme in Brussels. He was previously European Outreach Manager at EPICENTER and a Koch Summer Fellow in the Publications Department of the Independent Institute in California. He also has experience in domestic party politics in Germany and Hungary. Adam has a BA (Hons) in Politics and International Relations from the University of Shefeld and an MSc in Political Theory from the London School of Economics. Adam is uent in English, German and Hungarian. Possible topics include EU integration, Populism, Rule of Law, Central-and Eastern European Political and Economic Affairs Professor Philip Booth Philip Booth is Senior Academic Fellow at the Institute of Economic Affairs and Professor of Finance, Public Policy and Ethics at St. Mary’s University, Twickenham. He also holds the position of (interim) Director of Catholic Mission at St. Mary’s having previously been Director of Research and Public Engagement. Philip previously worked for the Bank of England as an adviser on nancial stability. He has written widely, including a number of books, on investment, nance, social insurance and pensions as well as on the relationship between Catholic social teaching and economics. Possible topics include Banking and Financial Services, Market Failure, Financial Regulation, Government Debt, the Financial Crisis, Tax and Economic Growth, Globalisation and Inequality and International Development. Emily Carver Emily Carver is the Institute of Economic Affairs’ Media Manager, responsible for managing and growing the IEA’s media output.
    [Show full text]
  • Making a Hasty Brexit? Ministerial Turnover and Its Implications
    Making a Hasty Brexit? Ministerial Turnover and Its Implications Jessica R. Adolino, Ph. D. Professor of Political Science James Madison University Draft prepared for presentation at the European Studies Association Annual Meeting May 9-12, 2019, Denver, Colorado Please do not cite or distribute without author’s permission. By almost any measure, since the immediate aftermath of the June 16, 2016 Brexit referendum, the British government has been in a state of chaos. The turmoil began with then- Prime Minister David Cameron’s resignation on June 17 and succession by Theresa May within days of the vote. Subsequently, May’s decision to call a snap election in 2017 and the resulting loss of the Conservatives’ parliamentary majority cast doubt on her leadership and further stirred up dissension in her party’s ranks. Perhaps more telling, and the subject of this paper, is the unprecedented number of ministers1—from both senior and junior ranks—that quit the May government over Brexit-related policy disagreements2. Between June 12, 2017 and April 3, 2019, the government witnessed 45 resignations, with high-profile secretaries of state and departmental ministers stepping down to return to the backbenches. Of these, 34 members of her government, including 9 serving in the Cabinet, departed over issues with some aspect of Brexit, ranging from dissatisfaction with the Prime Minister’s Withdrawal Agreement, to disagreements about the proper role of Parliament, to questions about the legitimacy of the entire Brexit process. All told, Theresa May lost more ministers, and at a more rapid pace, than any other prime minister in modern times.
    [Show full text]
  • Bordering Two Unions: Northern Ireland and Brexit
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics de Mars, Sylvia; Murray, Colin; O'Donoghue, Aiofe; Warwick, Ben Book — Published Version Bordering two unions: Northern Ireland and Brexit Policy Press Shorts: Policy & Practice Provided in Cooperation with: Bristol University Press Suggested Citation: de Mars, Sylvia; Murray, Colin; O'Donoghue, Aiofe; Warwick, Ben (2018) : Bordering two unions: Northern Ireland and Brexit, Policy Press Shorts: Policy & Practice, ISBN 978-1-4473-4622-7, Policy Press, Bristol, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv56fh0b This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/190846 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • SATURDAY 20TH JANUARY All Programme Timings UK 06:00 Sooty
    SATURDAY 20TH JANUARY All programme timings UK All programme timings UK All programme timings UK 06:00 Breakfast 06:00 Sooty 09:50 Black-ish 06:00 Forces News 10:00 Saturday Kitchen Live 06:10 Bottom Knocker Street 10:10 Toddlers Make You Laugh Out Loud 06:30 The Forces Sports Show 11:30 Mary Berry Everyday 06:20 Bottom Knocker Street 11:00 It's Not Rocket Science 07:00 British Motoring Legends 12:00 Football Focus 06:35 Dino Dana 11:55 Brooklyn Nine-Nine 08:00 The Aviators 13:00 BBC News 06:50 Super 4 12:20 Star Trek: Voyager 08:30 Sea Power 13:15 Masters Snooker 07:00 Signed Stories: Share a Story 13:05 Shortlist 09:00 Sea Power 16:30 Final Score 07:05 Ultimate Spider-Man 13:10 Malcolm in the Middle 09:30 Sea Power 17:30 BBC News 07:30 Scrambled! 13:35 Malcolm in the Middle 10:00 The Forces Sports Show 17:40 BBC London News 07:35 The Tom and Jerry Show 13:55 Young & Hungry 10:30 Hogan's Heroes 17:50 And They're Off... for Sport Relief 07:55 Fangbone 14:20 Young & Hungry 11:00 Hogan's Heroes 18:30 Pointless Celebrities 08:10 The Powerpuff Girls 14:40 There's Something About Megan 11:30 Hogan's Heroes 19:20 Wedding Day Winners 08:30 Be Cool, Scooby-Doo! 15:35 Don't Tell the Bride 12:00 Hogan's Heroes Lorraine Kelly and Rob Beckett present a series 09:05 Wishfart 16:20 The Middle 12:30 Hogan's Heroes which sees two pairs of nearlyweds and their 09:25 ITV News 16:45 Modern Family 13:00 R Lee Ermey's Mail Call friends and family compete to win the honeymoon 09:30 James Martin's Saturday Morning 17:05 Shortlist 13:30 R Lee Ermey's Mail Call of a lifetime.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Opinion and Discourse on the Intersection of LGBT Issues and Race the Opportunity Agenda
    Opinion Research & Media Content Analysis Public Opinion and Discourse on the Intersection of LGBT Issues and Race The Opportunity Agenda Acknowledgments This research was conducted by Loren Siegel (Executive Summary, What Americans Think about LGBT People, Rights and Issues: A Meta-Analysis of Recent Public Opinion, and Coverage of LGBT Issues in African American Print and Online News Media: An Analysis of Media Content); Elena Shore, Editor/Latino Media Monitor of New America Media (Coverage of LGBT Issues in Latino Print and Online News Media: An Analysis of Media Content); and Cheryl Contee, Austen Levihn- Coon, Kelly Rand, Adriana Dakin, and Catherine Saddlemire of Fission Strategy (Online Discourse about LGBT Issues in African American and Latino Communities: An Analysis of Web 2.0 Content). Loren Siegel acted as Editor-at-Large of the report, with assistance from staff of The Opportunity Agenda. Christopher Moore designed the report. The Opportunity Agenda’s research on the intersection of LGBT rights and racial justice is funded by the Arcus Foundation. The statements made and views expressed are those of The Opportunity Agenda. Special thanks to those who contributed to this project, including Sharda Sekaran, Shareeza Bhola, Rashad Robinson, Kenyon Farrow, Juan Battle, Sharon Lettman, Donna Payne, and Urvashi Vaid. About The Opportunity Agenda The Opportunity Agenda was founded in 2004 with the mission of building the national will to expand opportunity in America. Focused on moving hearts, minds, and policy over time, the organization works with social justice groups, leaders, and movements to advance solutions that expand opportunity for everyone. Through active partnerships, The Opportunity Agenda synthesizes and translates research on barriers to opportunity and corresponding solutions; uses communications and media to understand and influence public opinion; and identifies and advocates for policies that improve people’s lives.
    [Show full text]