Drug Repurposing Opportunities in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Drug Repurposing Opportunities in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma pharmaceuticals Review Drug Repurposing Opportunities in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Rita Rebelo 1,2,† ,Bárbara Polónia 1,2,†,Lúcio Lara Santos 3,4, M. Helena Vasconcelos 1,2,5,* and Cristina P. R. Xavier 1,2,5,* 1 Cancer Drug Resistance Group, IPATIMUP—Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; [email protected] (R.R.); [email protected] (B.P.) 2 i3S—Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal 3 Experimental Pathology and Therapeutics Group, IPO—Instituto Português de Oncologia, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal; [email protected] 4 ICBAS—Biomedical Sciences Institute Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal 5 Department of Biological Sciences, FFUP—Faculty of Pharmacy of the University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal * Correspondence: [email protected] (M.H.V.); [email protected] (C.P.R.X.) † These authors equally contributed to this work. Abstract: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is considered one of the deadliest tumors worldwide. The diagnosis is often possible only in the latter stages of the disease, with patients already presenting an advanced or metastatic tumor. It is also one of the cancers with poorest prognosis, presenting a five-year survival rate of around 5%. Treatment of PDAC is still a major challenge, with cytotoxic chemotherapy remaining the basis of systemic therapy. However, no major advances have been made recently, and therapeutic options are limited and highly toxic. Thus, novel therapeutic options are urgently needed. Drug repurposing is a strategy for the development of novel treatments using approved or investigational drugs outside the scope of the original clinical indication. Citation: Rebelo, R.; Polónia, B.; Santos, L.L.; Vasconcelos, M.H.; Since repurposed drugs have already completed several stages of the drug development process, a Xavier, C.P.R. Drug Repurposing broad range of data is already available. Thus, when compared with de novo drug development, drug Opportunities in Pancreatic Ductal repurposing is time-efficient, inexpensive and has less risk of failure in future clinical trials. Several Adenocarcinoma. Pharmaceuticals repurposing candidates have been investigated in the past years for the treatment of PDAC, as single 2021, 14, 280. https://doi.org/ agents or in combination with conventional chemotherapy. This review gives an overview of the 10.3390/ph14030280 main drugs that have been investigated as repurposing candidates, for the potential treatment of PDAC, in preclinical studies and clinical trials. Academic Editor: Mary Meegan Keywords: drug repurposing; pharmacology; pancreatic cancer; therapeutic strategies Received: 24 February 2021 Accepted: 17 March 2021 Published: 20 March 2021 1. Drug Repurposing: An Attractive and Challenging Approach Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in Drug repurposing has been emerging as an interesting alternative to the conventional published maps and institutional affil- drug discovery process. Additionally referred to as “drug repositioning”, “drug reprofil- iations. ing”, “drug redirecting”, “drug rediscovery” or “drug re-tasking”, this is a strategy for the development of novel treatments using approved or investigational drugs outside the scope of the original clinical indication [1–3]. Interestingly, the recent development and increasing interest observed in genomic and proteomic technologies for the assessment of cancer specific biological pathways has led to the discovery of several new drug targets, Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. providing excellent opportunities for drug repurposing, since almost every drug used This article is an open access article in human therapy has the potential to address more than one target [3]. The increasing distributed under the terms and interest in this approach relies on the fact that, by finding new applications for clinically conditions of the Creative Commons approved drugs, drug repurposing is able to overcome the major issues associated with Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// conventional drug discovery, which include substantial costs, slow pace and high risk of creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ failure [3,4]. According to Nosengo (2016), the estimated cost for a repurposed drug to 4.0/). reach the market is US$300 million, whereas, for a new drug, it is estimated to be ~$2 to $3 Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14030280 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/pharmaceuticals Pharmaceuticals 14 Pharmaceuticals 20212021,, 14,, 280 280 2 of2 of36 35 ~$2billion to $3 [5 billion]. Interestingly, [5]. Interestingly, the Food the and Food Drug and Administration Drug Administration (FDA) approval (FDA) forapproval new drugs for newhas decreaseddrugs has decreased in the past in years, the past especially years, es whenpecially compared when compared to the 1990s to [the6]. 1990s [6]. InIn fact, fact, clinically approvedapproved drugsdrugs have have previously previously completed completed several several stages stages of the of drugthe drugdevelopment development process; process; hence, hence, data regardingdata rega dosing,rding dosing, safety, safety, toxicity, toxicity, drug interactions, drug interac- side tions,effects, side pharmacodynamics effects, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetics is often available is often [1– 3available]. Therefore, [1–3]. the Therefore,need for large the need investments for large and investments the time frame and the for time drug frame development for drug candevelopment be significantly can bereduced significantly [1,3]. As reduced depicted [1,3]. in As Figure depicted1, while in newFigure drug 1, while discovery new drug and development discovery and might de- velopmenttake up to 10might to 17 take years up forto 10 a drugto 17 toyears reach for the a drug market, to reach the timeline the market, for drug the timeline repurposing for drugis only repurposing about 3 to is 12 only years about [4]. Additionally,3 to 12 years [4]. the Additionally, previous evidence the previous on the effectevidence of these on thedrugs effect in preclinicalof these drugs models in preclinical and in humans models reduces and in thehumans riskof reduces failure the in upcomingrisk of failure clinical in upcomingtrials [1]. Nevertheless,clinical trials [1]. despite Nevertheless, its great despite advantages, its great drug advantages, repurposing drug can repurposing face several canobstacles, face several particularly obstacles, in drug particularly licensing, in clinicaldrug licensing, adoption clinical or even adoption during theor even development during theof clinicaldevelopment trials [1of,2 clinical]. These trials problems [1,2]. Th mightese problems be explained might by be the explained existence by of regulatorythe exist- enceexclusivities, of regulatory which exclusivities, increase drug which market increa protectionse drug market beyond protection the patent beyond term, the or bypatent drug term,withdrawal or by drug from withdrawal the market, from which the hampers market, drug which supply hampers for clinical drug supply trials, asfor well clinical as by trials,complications as well as in by the complications label extension in the in label medicines extension that in are medicines authorized that through are authorized national throughprocedures national [1,2]. procedures [1,2]. FigureFigure 1. 1. SchematicSchematic comparison comparison between between the the processes processes and and timeline timeline of ofde denovo novo drugdrug development development andand drug drug repurposing. repurposing. Nonetheless,Nonetheless, drug drug repurposing repurposing represents represents a relatively a relatively unexplored unexplored source source of new of ther- new apies,therapies, being being a very a veryattractive attractive option, option, especially especially in neglected in neglected areas areasof medicine, of medicine, where where the lackthe lackof commercial of commercial interest interest delays delays drug de drugvelopment. development. Moreover, Moreover, drug repurposing drug repurposing candi- datescandidates that are that off-patent are off-patent offer an offer additional an additional advantage. advantage. The competitive The competitive environment environment in the pharmaceuticalin the pharmaceutical industry industry leads to leads a severe to a mark severedown markdown in their inprices, their which prices, facilitates which facilitates access toaccess medicines to medicines for the general for the population general population and reduces and the reduces public the health public burden health [2]. burden [2]. Initially,Initially, drug drug repurposing repurposing was largelylargely aa serendipitousserendipitous processprocess or or was was based based on on clinical clin- icalside side effects effects and and off-label off-label use use [1, 3[1,3].]. One One of theof the first first cases cases of of drug drug repurposing repurposing was was thalido- tha- lidomide,mide, a sedative a sedative and and antiemetic antiemetic drug drug that that was was found found to to be be effective effective in in the the treatment treatment of oferythema erythema nodosum nodosum leprosum leprosum and, and, later, later, in multiplein multiple myeloma. myeloma. This This led led to theto the development develop- mentof analogs, of analogs, such such as lenalidomide as lenalidomide and an pomalidomide,d
Recommended publications
  • Study Protocol
    Clovis Oncology, Inc. Clinical Protocol Oral rucaparib (CO-338) CO-338-014 7 July 2016 CONFIDENTIAL A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study of Rucaparib as Switch Maintenance Following Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Patients with Platinum-Sensitive, High-Grade Serous or Endometrioid Epithelial Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal or Fallopian Tube Cancer Protocol Number: CO-338-014 Investigational Product: Rucaparib (CO-338) Eudra CT Number: IND Number: Development Phase: Phase 3 Indications Studied: Platinum-sensitive, high-grade serous and endometrioid epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, and fallopian tube cancer Sponsor Name and Address: Clovis Oncology, Inc. 5500 Flatiron Parkway Suite 100 Boulder, CO 80301 USA Phone Number: 303-625-5000 Facsimile Number: 303-245-0360 Responsible Medical Officer: Compliance Statement: This study will be conducted in accordance with the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki, clinical research guidelines established by the Code of Federal Regulations (Title 21, CFR Parts 50, 56, and 312), and ICH GCP Guidelines. Essential study documents will be archived in accordance with applicable regulations. CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT The information in this document contains commercial information and trade secrets that are privileged or confidential and may not be disclosed unless such disclosure is required by applicable laws and regulations. In any event, persons to whom the information is disclosed must be informed that the information is privileged or confidential and may not be further disclosed by them. These restrictions on disclosure will apply equally to all future information supplied to you which is indicated as privileged or confidential. 1 Clovis Oncology, Inc. Clinical Protocol Oral rucaparib (CO-338) CO-338-014 Coordinating Investigators for the Study Coordinating Investigator for North America: Coordinating Investigator for Europe, Middle East, and Asia Pacific: 2 Clovis Oncology, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Discipline Review/Summary, Clinical, Non-Clinical
    CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 209115Orig1s000 MULTI-DISCIPLINE REVIEW Summary / Clinical / Non-Clinical NDA/BLA Multi-disciplinary Review and Evaluation NDA 209115 Rubraca (rucaparib) 1 NDA/BLA Multi-disciplinary Review and Evaluation Application Type NDA Application Number(s) 209115 Priority or Standard Priority Submit Date(s) June 23, 2016 Received Date(s) June 23, 2016 PDUFA Goal Date February 23, 2017 Division/Office DOP1/OHOP Review Completion Date November 22, 2016 Established Name Rucaparib (Proposed) Trade Name RUBRACA Pharmacologic Class Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase 1 inhibitor Code name AG-014669, PF-01367338, Applicant Clovis Oncology, Inc. Formulation(s) Oral tablet Dosing Regimen 600 mg PO BID Applicant Proposed Rubraca is indicated as monotherapy treatment of advanced ovarian Indication(s)/Population(s) cancer in patients with deleterious BRCA-mutated tumors, inclusive of both germline BRCA and somatic BRCA mutations (as detected by an FDA approved test), and who have been treated with two or more chemotherapies. Recommendation on Accelerated approval Regulatory Action Recommended Rubraca™ is indicated as monotherapy for the treatment of patients Indication(s)/Population(s) with deleterious BRCA mutation (germline and/or somatic) associated (if applicable) advanced ovarian cancer who have been treated with two or more chemotherapies. Select patients for therapy based on an FDA-approved companion diagnostic for Rubraca. 1-1 Version date: February 1, 2016 for initial rollout (NME/original BLA reviews) Reference ID: 40178304028244 NDA/BLA Multi-disciplinary Review and Evaluation NDA 209115 Rubraca (rucaparib) Contents 1 NDA/BLA Multi-disciplinary Review and Evaluation .......................................................................... 1-1 Reviewers of Multi-Disciplinary Review and Evaluation ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AMANTADIP\Dle: on Nemolebtic-II[WDUCED CATALEPSY UV the RAT
    J. Fac. Plmnz. Istanbul lstanbul Ecz. Fak. Mec. 29, 1 (1993) 29, 1 (1993) THE EFFECT OF CYPROHEPT~~AWEb AMANTADIP\dlE: ON NEmOLEBTIC-II[WDUCED CATALEPSY UV THE RAT SUMMARY Catalepsy is not a unitary phenomenon. With respect to biochemical mechanisms and neurotransmitter sytems, the origin of this behavioural response varies according to different substances which cause catalepsy. For example, the catdeptogenic effect of ne- uroleptics has been related to the blockage of striatal doparnine receptors. Neurophysio- logical and biochemical data have shown that a mechanism caused by gama-aminobuty- ric acid and serotonin have been effective in the proper functioning of the dopaminergic nigrosbriatal tract. We have studied the effects of cyproheptadine, a serotonin antagonist, and of amantadin which is used in the treatment of Parkinson syndrome on the catalepsy indu- ced by trifluoperazine, a phenothiazin compound, and pimozid, a drug used as a neuro- leptic. It was observed that when rats were pretreated with cyproheptadine as well as amantadiie, the catalepsy induced by the above neuroleptic drugs was attenuated. The results of our study show that substances which have an effect on the seroto- nergic and dopaminergic systems also play a role on cases of catalepsy induced by the neuroleptic drugs mentioned above. (*) Faculty of Pharmacy, Depament of Pharmacology, University of Istanbul, 31152, Istanbul, Turkey Katalepsi bir tek nedene bagh OWortaya qllian bit durum degildir. Biyokimya- sal ve norotransmitter sistemler agsmdan bu davran~glnsebebi, katalepsi olughYan qe- gitli maddeler iqin fad&&. Omegin noroleptiklerin kataleptojenik etkisi striatal dopa- min reseptorlerinin blokaj~nabajjlanmqtx. Niirofizyolojik ve biyokimyasal veriler do- pamine jik nigro-striatal sistemin duzenli $&$masmda gma-aminobutirik asid ve sero- tonin'e bagh olan bir mekanizmmn etkili oldugunu gostermigtir.
    [Show full text]
  • Withdrawal Assessment Report - Orphan Maintenance
    17 January 2019 EMA/22653/2019 Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products Withdrawal Assessment Report - Orphan Maintenance Rubraca (rucaparib) Treatment of ovarian cancer EU/3/12/1049 (EMA/OD/085/12) Sponsor: Clovis Oncology UK Limited Note Assessment report as adopted by the COMP with all information of a commercially confidential nature deleted. 30 Churchill Place ● Canary Wharf ● London E14 5EU ● United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0)20 3660 6000 Facsimile +44 (0)20 3660 5555 Send a question via our website www.ema.europa.eu/contact An agency of the European Union © European Medicines Agency, 2019. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged Table of contents 1. Product and administrative information .................................................. 3 2. Grounds for the COMP opinion at the designation stage .......................... 5 3. Review of criteria for orphan designation at the time of type II variation .................................................................................................................... 5 Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 .............................................................. 5 Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 .............................................................. 6 4. COMP list of issues .................................................................................. 8 Withdrawal Assessment Report - Orphan Maintenance EMA/22653/2019 Page 2/8 1. Product and administrative information Product Active substance Rucaparib International Non-Proprietary
    [Show full text]
  • Delusional Parasitosis Mimicking Cutaneous Infestation in Elderly Patients
    LESSONS FROM PRACTICE LESSONS FROM PRACTICE Delusional parasitosis mimicking cutaneous infestation in elderly patients Clinical records Patient 1 Patient 3 An 88-year-old man gave a 12-month history of seeing insects attacking An 81-year-old woman was referred with a persistent belief that his legs and crawling along the floor of his house. He described these she had scabies and lice infestation of her eyes, nose, arms and insects as 4 cm long, black and white bugs with beaks, which pecked anus. This resulted in her persistently washing her clothes and at hisThe legs, Medical causing Journal wounds. of He Australia often felt ISSN:a sharp 0025-729X stinging sensation 18 herself and reporting the retirement village where she lived to the heraldingAugust their 2003 presence. 179 4 209-210 He also had burning pain in both legs below Health Department. She had received anti-scabies treatment the knees. He had had his house fumigated twice in the previous year empirically. ©The Medical Journal of Australia 2003 www.mja.com.au andLessons put various from chemicals practice across his doorways and bed to ward off the She had a long history of severe depression after the death of her bugs. He described no other hallucinations or delusions. husband, for which she took doxepin. She had paranoid ideation He was not using any regular medications and had never been a about her neighbours and saw things crawling down the walls, consumer of alcohol. He lived alone and managed all activities of and had moved residences several times to avoid these problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Schizophrenia Care Guide
    August 2015 CCHCS/DHCS Care Guide: Schizophrenia SUMMARY DECISION SUPPORT PATIENT EDUCATION/SELF MANAGEMENT GOALS ALERTS Minimize frequency and severity of psychotic episodes Suicidal ideation or gestures Encourage medication adherence Abnormal movements Manage medication side effects Delusions Monitor as clinically appropriate Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome Danger to self or others DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA/EVALUATION (PER DSM V) 1. Rule out delirium or other medical illnesses mimicking schizophrenia (see page 5), medications or drugs of abuse causing psychosis (see page 6), other mental illness causes of psychosis, e.g., Bipolar Mania or Depression, Major Depression, PTSD, borderline personality disorder (see page 4). Ideas in patients (even odd ideas) that we disagree with can be learned and are therefore not necessarily signs of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia is a world-wide phenomenon that can occur in cultures with widely differing ideas. 2. Diagnosis is made based on the following: (Criteria A and B must be met) A. Two of the following symptoms/signs must be present over much of at least one month (unless treated), with a significant impact on social or occupational functioning, over at least a 6-month period of time: Delusions, Hallucinations, Disorganized Speech, Negative symptoms (social withdrawal, poverty of thought, etc.), severely disorganized or catatonic behavior. B. At least one of the symptoms/signs should be Delusions, Hallucinations, or Disorganized Speech. TREATMENT OPTIONS MEDICATIONS Informed consent for psychotropic
    [Show full text]
  • ARIEL4: an International, Randomised Phase 3 Study Of
    ARIEL4: An International, Randomised Phase 3 Study of Rucaparib vs Chemotherapy in BRCA1- or BRCA2-Mutated, Abstract ESGO7-0665 Relapsed Ovarian Cancer (OC) Rebecca S. Kristeleit,1 Domenica Lorusso,2 Ana Oaknin,3 Tamar Safra,4 Elizabeth M. Swisher,5 Igor M. Bondarenko,6 Tomasz Huzarski,7 Jaroslav Klat,8 Vladimir Moiseyenko,9 Róbert Póka,10 Luciana S. Viola,11 Chris Tankersley,12 Lara Maloney,12 Sandra Goble,12 Caro Unger,12 Adam Dowson,12 Heidi Giordano,12 Amit M. Oza13 1University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; 2MITO and Unità di Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; 3Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; 4Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University and Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; 5University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; 6Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy, City Multiple-Discipline Clinical Hospital, Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine; 7Private Health Care Innovative Medicine, Grzepnica, Poland; 8University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic; 9NN. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology Cancer Center, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; 10Debrecen University Clinical Center, Debrecen, Hungary; 11Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil; 12Clovis Oncology, Inc., Boulder, CO, USA; 13Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada INTRODUCTION • In high-grade OC, including fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer, ≈18% and ≈7% of
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Consumption in 2017 - 2020
    Page 1 Drug consumption in 2017 - 2020 2020 2019 2018 2017 DDD/ DDD/ DDD/ DDD/ 1000 inhab./ Hospital 1000 inhab./ Hospital 1000 inhab./ Hospital 1000 inhab./ Hospital ATC code Subgroup or chemical substance day % day % day % day % A ALIMENTARY TRACT AND METABOLISM 322,79 3 312,53 4 303,08 4 298,95 4 A01 STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 14,28 4 12,82 4 10,77 6 10,46 7 A01A STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 14,28 4 12,82 4 10,77 6 10,46 7 A01AA Caries prophylactic agents 11,90 3 10,48 4 8,42 5 8,45 7 A01AA01 sodium fluoride 11,90 3 10,48 4 8,42 5 8,45 7 A01AA03 olaflur 0,00 - 0,00 - 0,00 - 0,00 - A01AB Antiinfectives for local oral treatment 2,36 8 2,31 7 2,31 7 2,02 7 A01AB03 chlorhexidine 2,02 6 2,10 7 2,09 7 1,78 7 A01AB11 various 0,33 21 0,21 0 0,22 0 0,24 0 A01AD Other agents for local oral treatment 0,02 0 0,03 0 0,04 0 - - A01AD02 benzydamine 0,02 0 0,03 0 0,04 0 - - A02 DRUGS FOR ACID RELATED DISORDERS 73,05 3 71,13 3 69,32 3 68,35 3 A02A ANTACIDS 2,23 1 2,22 1 2,20 1 2,30 1 A02AA Magnesium compounds 0,07 22 0,07 22 0,08 22 0,10 19 A02AA04 magnesium hydroxide 0,07 22 0,07 22 0,08 22 0,10 19 A02AD Combinations and complexes of aluminium, 2,17 0 2,15 0 2,12 0 2,20 0 calcium and magnesium compounds A02AD01 ordinary salt combinations 2,17 0 2,15 0 2,12 0 2,20 0 A02B DRUGS FOR PEPTIC ULCER AND 70,82 3 68,91 3 67,12 3 66,05 4 GASTRO-OESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE (GORD) A02BA H2-receptor antagonists 0,17 7 0,74 4 1,10 4 1,11 5 A02BA02 ranitidine 0,00 1 0,63 3 0,99 3 0,99 4 A02BA03 famotidine 0,16 7 0,11 8 0,11 10 0,12 9 A02BB Prostaglandins 0,04 62
    [Show full text]
  • Rucaparib Maintenance Treatment for Recurrent Ovarian Carcinoma: The
    Original research Rucaparib maintenance treatment for Int J Gynecol Cancer: first published as 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002240 on 8 June 2021. Downloaded from INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER Original research Editorials Joint statement Society statement recurrent ovarian carcinoma: the effects of Meeting summary Review articles Consensus statement Clinical trial Case study Video articles Educational video lecture progression- free interval and prior therapies Images Pathology archives Corners of the world Commentary Letters ijgc.bmj.com on efficacy and safety in the randomized phase III trial ARIEL3 Andrew R Clamp,1 Domenica Lorusso ,2 Amit M Oza,3 Carol Aghajanian,4 Ana Oaknin,5 Andrew Dean,6 Nicoletta Colombo,7 Johanne I Weberpals,8 Giovanni Scambia,9 Alexandra Leary,10 Robert W Holloway,11 Margarita Amenedo Gancedo,12 Peter C Fong,13 Jeffrey C Goh,14,15 David M O’Malley,16 Deborah K Armstrong,17 Susana Banerjee,18 Jesus García- Donas,19 Elizabeth M Swisher,20 Terri Cameron,21 Sandra Goble,22 Robert L Coleman,23 Jonathan A Ledermann 24 ► Additional supplemental HIGHLIGHTS material is published online • Rucaparib extended progression- free survival versus placebo regardless of penultimate progression- free interval. only. To view, please visit the • Rucaparib extended progression- free survival versus placebo regardless of prior chemotherapies or bevacizumab use. journal online (http:// dx. doi. org/ • The safety profile of rucaparib was consistent across all subgroups. 10. 1136/ ijgc- 2020- 002240). For numbered affiliations see ABSTRACT subgroups, median progression- free survival was also end of article. Introduction In ARIEL3 (NCT01968213), the significantly longer with rucaparib versus placebo in the poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor BRCA-mutant and homologous recombination deficient Correspondence to rucaparib significantly improved progression-free survival cohorts.
    [Show full text]
  • L-Citrulline
    L‐Citrulline Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee Meeting November 20, 2017 Susan Johnson, PharmD, PhD Associate Director Office of Drug Evaluation IV Office of New Drugs L‐Citrulline Review Team Ben Zhang, PhD, ORISE Fellow, OPQ Ruby Mehta, MD, Medical Officer, DGIEP, OND Kathleen Donohue, MD, Medical Officer, DGIEP, OND Tamal Chakraborti, PhD, Pharmacologist, DGIEP, OND Sushanta Chakder, PhD, Supervisory Pharmacologist, DGIEP, OND Jonathan Jarow, MD, Advisor, Office of the Center Director, CDER Susan Johnson, PharmD, PhD, Associate Director, ODE IV, OND Elizabeth Hankla, PharmD, Consumer Safety Officer, OUDLC, OC www.fda.gov 2 Nomination • L‐citrulline has been nominated for inclusion on the list of bulk drug substances for use in compounding under section 503A of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) • It is proposed for oral use in the treatment of urea cycle disorders (UCDs) www.fda.gov 3 Physical and Chemical Characterization • Non‐essential amino acid, used in the human body in the L‐form • Well characterized substance • Soluble in water • Likely to be stable under ordinary storage conditions as solid or liquid oral dosage forms www.fda.gov 4 Physical and Chemical Characterization (2) • Possible synthetic routes – L‐citrulline is mainly produced by fermentation of L‐arginine as the substrate with special microorganisms such as the L‐arginine auxotrophs arthrobacterpa rafneus and Bacillus subtilis. – L‐citrulline can also be obtained through chemical synthesis. The synthetic route is shown in the scheme below. This
    [Show full text]
  • Carbaglu; INN-Carglumic Acid
    London, 19 August 2016 EMA/532759/2016 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) Assessment report for paediatric studies submitted according to Article 46 of the Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006 Carbaglu carglumic acid Procedure no: EMEA/H/C/000461/P46/033 Note Assessment report as adopted by the CHMP with all information of a commercially confidential nature deleted. 7 Westferry Circus ● Canary Wharf ● London E14 4HB ● United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0)20 7418 8400 Facsimile +44 (0)20 7418 8613 E -mail [email protected] Website www.ema.europa.eu An agency of the European Union © European Medicines Agency, 2016. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Table of contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................ 3 2. Scientific discussion ................................................................................ 3 2.1. Information on the development program ............................................................... 3 2.2. Information on the pharmaceutical formulation used in the study ............................... 3 2.3. Clinical aspects .................................................................................................... 3 2.3.1. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 3 2.3.2. Clinical study .................................................................................................... 4 2.3.3. Discussion on clinical aspects ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Orphan Drugs Used for Treatment in Pediatric Patients in the Slovak Republic
    DOI 10.2478/v10219-012-0001-0 ACTA FACULTATIS PHARMACEUTICAE UNIVERSITATIS COMENIANAE Supplementum VI 2012 ORPHAN DRUGS USED FOR TREATMENT IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS IN THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC 1Foltánová, T. – 2Konečný, M. – 3Hlavatá, A. –.4Štepánková, K. 5Cisárik, F. 1Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology 2Department of Clinical Genetics, St. Elizabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava 32nd Department of Pediatrics, UniversityChildren'sHospital, Bratislava 4Slovak Cystic Fibrosis Association, Košice 5Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty Hospital, Žilina Due to the enormous success of scientific research in the field of paediatric medicine many once fatal children’s diseases can now be cured. Great progress has also been achieved in the rehabilitation of disabilities. However, there is still a big group of diseases defined as rare, treatment of which has been traditionally neglected by the drug companies mainly due to unprofitability. Since 2000 the treatment of rare diseases has been supported at the European level and in 2007 paediatric legislation was introduced. Both decisions together support treatment of rare diseases in children. In this paper, we shortly characterise the possibilities of rare diseases treatment in children in the Slovak republic and bring the list of orphan medicine products (OMPs) with defined dosing in paediatrics, which were launched in the Slovak market. We also bring a list of OMPs with defined dosing in children, which are not available in the national market. This incentive may help in further formation of the national plan for treating rare diseases as well as improvement in treatment options and availability of rare disease treatment in children in Slovakia.
    [Show full text]