DOCSLIB.ORG

Article Scientific Polarforschung, 89, 25–30, 2021 Polarforschung © Author(S) 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Article Scientific Polarforschung, 89, 25–30, 2021 Polarforschung © Author(S) 2021 Scientific article Polarforschung, 89, 25–30, 2021 https://doi.org/10.5194/polf-89-25-2021 Polarforschung © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Open Access Wilhelm Filchner – hierarchy and insufficient leadership on the Second German Antarctic Expedition Ursula Rack Gateway Antarctica, Te Kura Aronukurangi/School of Earth and Environment, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand Correspondence: Ursula Rack ([email protected]) Published: 20 May 2021 Abstract. The Second German Antarctic Expedition (1911– schuldigungen zu einem Ende zu bringen. Diese Abhand- 1912) did not have a good start, because Wilhelm Filch- lung zeigt einzelne Missstände auf, die diese Expedition zum ner (1877–1957) failed to secure his position as expedition Scheitern verurteilte. Dem vorliegenden Artikel liegen einige leader. His problems began long before the expedition set Kapitel meiner Dissertation zugrunde (Rack, 2010). sail: he had the support neither of the scientists and officers on board nor of the scientific community in Germany. The enforced choice of the captain, who suffered from syphilis, brought the expedition to the brink of collapsing. In addi- 1 Introduction tion, the rivalry between the groups on board the Deutsch- land, and the usual challenging circumstances any expedition Wilhelm Filchner wanted to establish Germany in the ranks confronts in these regions, led to mutiny at the end of their of the great foreign Antarctic explorations with a German time in Grytviken, South Georgia. Upon the expedition’s re- Antarctic expedition. When he announced his proposal at the turn to Germany, “courts of honour” took place to adjudicate Berlin Geographical Society in Berlin (Gesellschaft für Erd- on the mutual accusations. This article reviews some of the kunde Berlin), 5 March 1910, some in the scientific commu- reasons why this expedition was disaster-prone. The article nity in Germany were not confident about his chances of suc- is based on research from my PhD thesis (Rack, 2010). cess and did not fully support this event. Erich von Drygal- ski (1865–1949), expedition leader of the German National Kurzfassung. Die zweite Deutsche Antarktis-Expedition Antarctic Expedition (1901–1903), also known as the Gauss (1911–1912) stand unter keinem guten Stern. Wilhelm Filch- expedition, was one of his harshest critics. However, some ner (1877–1957) konnte seine Position als Expeditionsleiter influential members in the science community and military von Anfang an nicht behaupten. Manche Probleme began- ranks advocated his plans. Albrecht Penck (1858–1945) was nen schon lange bevor die Expedition auslaufen konnte. one of them. Filchner partially developed his expedition pro- Er hatte nicht den Rückhalt der Wissenschaftler die mit gramme based on Penck’s theories about glaciation during ihm am Schiff waren und auch nicht derer, die in der the ice ages. The Association of the German Antarctic Ex- Polarforschung der Zeit involviert waren. Die auferzwun- pedition (Verein Deutsche Antarktische Expedition) was in- gene Wahl seines Kapitäns, der sich im Endstatium von fluential in the recruitment of the expedition members and Syphilis befand, machte die Expedition zu einer Gradwan- controlled the expedition’s finances. Most of the scientists derung. Die rivalisierienden Gruppierungen innerhalb der and officers were under the impression that the expedition Expeditionsteilnehmer und die Probleme, die fast jedes Un- was a marine endeavour to display the greatness of the Ger- ternehmen in diesen Gegenden zu bestehen hatten, führte man Navy, but Filchner and a handful of scientists had only letztendlich zu einer meutereiähnlichen Auseindersetzung a science expedition in mind. This was a fundamental point in Grytviken, Südgeorgien. Zurück in der Heimat wur- of conflict from the start. The enforced choice of the captain den Ehrengerichte angestrengt, um die gegenseitigen An- was another critical issue because he was not only a driving force in the group opposed to Filchner that formed on the Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Polarforschung e.V. 26 U. Rack: Wilhelm Filchner – hierarchy and insufficient leadership journey south, but he was also critically ill and his decisions earlier. He also stated that some of the scientists, as well as were heavily influenced by his medical conditions. Filch- Vahsel, had asked him for advice because they trusted him ner, who had problems working with peers, hindering his at- more than Filchner. In this entire correspondence, Drygalski tempts at leadership, exacerbated the situation. This became expressed his contempt for and lack of confidence in Filch- evident before the expedition started and was aggravated dur- ner. This strengthened Vahsel’s position before the ship had ing the expedition, exposing the underlying flaws and per- even set sail. Nevertheless, who was Richard Vahsel? sonal sensitivities of those involved. This article, based on Richard Vahsel was a navy officer with Antarctic expe- the research in my PhD thesis (Rack, 2010), demonstrates rience. He was well educated, could move in German so- how weak leadership compromised a potentially successful ciety, and knew “the rules of the game”. Besides, Vahsel, expedition, and the subsequent series of conflicts resulted in being from the navy, had the advantage that the expedition an expedition marred by a collapse in structural and interper- was considered a marine endeavour. Most of the selected sonal relations. officers and scientists supported this view. Filchner was an army officer and, for some time, the rivalry between army and navy had been a striking aspect of the German Empire 2 Filchner’s authority is weakened long before the and its social fabric. Establishing the German Navy was a expedition leaves Bremerhaven crucial move in the colonial and imperial rivalry with Eng- land. Alfred von Tirpitz’s (1849–1930) long-lasting plans for Filchner presented his expedition plans to scientists and the building a strong navy (he was a driving force behind the wider public, showing that his ambition was to establish the rise of the German Navy) were widely circulated through the German Empire in the ranks of Antarctic exploration. The newspapers and other propaganda efforts undertaken to get expedition promised great scientific findings, and Filchner the wider public behind the project. Also important was that himself had a talent for getting many influential people on the navy, especially in the upper ranks, was seen as a “safe board when it came to funding, especially the support of haven” for the aristocracy and the wealthy upper class. The the Bavarian King Luitpold, who introduced a lottery that army, especially the lower ranks, was considered vulnerable encouraged other donations from different sources. The As- to socialism. Back in 1903, on the return of the German Na- sociation of the German Antarctic Expedition was founded tional Antarctic Expedition, led by Drygalski, who was a ge- to oversee the finances and other formal decisions. Filchner ographer, there was much discussion in newspapers on who welcomed this arrangement at first, but he allowed the asso- should be the leader of an expedition to the south polar re- ciation to take control of crucial decision-making such as the gions. Newspapers argued strongly against a non-navy leader recruitment of the expedition members. He, effectively, lost stating that an expedition to the south polar regions was too control in the preparation period and, in particular, the choice important to let a “geographer, zoologist or geologist” be the of the captain – a position that is crucial for the success of any leader. The argument was that it was disturbing to put a naval expedition. captain under the command of a scientific leader and, in fact, Filchner had planned to recruit a Norwegian captain when this might even be responsible for the unsuccessful attempt he purchased the ship Deutschland in Norway (Krause, to go further south. A scientist should only be a “passenger”. 2012). However, the ship sailed under the flag of the German But because discovery successes are today particu- Empire and the decision was made by the committee of the larly in the interest of the research in the South Po- Association of the German Antarctic Expedition to recruit lar Regions, therefore, first and foremost, the expe- a German captain; Richard Vahsel was their choice. He had rience, initiative and daring of the navy personnel Antarctic experience as fourth officer on the first German Na- is to be placed in its service, whereas the pundits tional Antarctic Expedition. Drygalski expressed his favour can form part of the staff within, where they have for Vahsel in a letter to Hofrat Hermann Wagner (1840– plenty of opportunity to achieve something useful. 1929): “I hope and expect that Vahsel holds on to the mat- (Argus-Nachrichten-Bureau, 1903) ter” and further in the conversation he stated the following: “Big sledging trips are not to expect but scientifically lots Vahsel understood that there are more facets in his favour. can happen if Vahsel keeps the upper hand.” (von Drygalski, Years before, Filchner had become popular with his expedi- 1911) Filchner had influential supporters such as Albrecht tions to Asia, but on his Tibet expedition (1903–1905) he had Penck, a leading scientist of palaeoglaciation, and his theo- an associate, Albert Tafel (1876–1935), who accused Filch- ries built a significant element of the expedition plans. How- ner of cowardice. Tafel based his assertion on the fact that ever, Penck and Drygalski were rivals in academic terms. The when a local tribe attacked the expedition, Filchner destroyed strong support Filchner had in Penck might have influenced parts of the equipment, so they did not fall into the enemies’ Drygalski’s mistrust in this endeavour as well. Drygalski also hands. Tafel disagreed with Filchner’s research methods and revealed in this correspondence that he did not trust Filchner claimed that he always had to work harder to get his part and that his plans were not original, and some of the pro- done.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Navigation on Shackleton's Voyage to Antarctica
    Records of the Canterbury Museum, 2019 Vol. 33: 5–22 © Canterbury Museum 2019 5 Navigation on Shackleton’s voyage to Antarctica Lars Bergman1 and Robin G Stuart2 1Saltsjöbaden, Sweden 2Valhalla, New York, USA Email: [email protected] On 19 January 1915, the Imperial Trans-Antarctic Expedition, under the leadership of Sir Ernest Shackleton, became trapped in their vessel Endurance in the ice pack of the Weddell Sea. The subsequent ordeal and efforts that lead to the successful rescue of all expedition members are the stuff of legend and have been extensively discussed elsewhere. Prior to that time, however, the voyage had proceeded relatively uneventfully and was dutifully recorded in Captain Frank Worsley’s log and work book. This provides a window into the navigational methods used in the day-to- day running of the ship by a master mariner under normal circumstances in the early twentieth century. The conclusions that can be gleaned from a careful inspection of the log book over this period are described here. Keywords: celestial navigation, dead reckoning, double altitudes, Ernest Shackleton, Frank Worsley, Imperial Trans-Antarctic Expedition, Mercator sailing, time sight Introduction On 8 August 1914, the Imperial Trans-Antarctic passage in the 22½ foot (6.9 m) James Caird to Expedition under the leadership of Sir Ernest seek rescue from South Georgia. It is ultimately Shackleton set sail aboard their vessel the steam a tribute to Shackleton’s leadership and Worsley’s yacht (S.Y.) Endurance from Plymouth, England, navigational skills that all survived their ordeal. with the goal of traversing the Antarctic Captain Frank Worsley’s original log books continent from the Weddell to Ross Seas.
    [Show full text]
  • Antarctic Primer
    Antarctic Primer By Nigel Sitwell, Tom Ritchie & Gary Miller By Nigel Sitwell, Tom Ritchie & Gary Miller Designed by: Olivia Young, Aurora Expeditions October 2018 Cover image © I.Tortosa Morgan Suite 12, Level 2 35 Buckingham Street Surry Hills, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia To anyone who goes to the Antarctic, there is a tremendous appeal, an unparalleled combination of grandeur, beauty, vastness, loneliness, and malevolence —all of which sound terribly melodramatic — but which truly convey the actual feeling of Antarctica. Where else in the world are all of these descriptions really true? —Captain T.L.M. Sunter, ‘The Antarctic Century Newsletter ANTARCTIC PRIMER 2018 | 3 CONTENTS I. CONSERVING ANTARCTICA Guidance for Visitors to the Antarctic Antarctica’s Historic Heritage South Georgia Biosecurity II. THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT Antarctica The Southern Ocean The Continent Climate Atmospheric Phenomena The Ozone Hole Climate Change Sea Ice The Antarctic Ice Cap Icebergs A Short Glossary of Ice Terms III. THE BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT Life in Antarctica Adapting to the Cold The Kingdom of Krill IV. THE WILDLIFE Antarctic Squids Antarctic Fishes Antarctic Birds Antarctic Seals Antarctic Whales 4 AURORA EXPEDITIONS | Pioneering expedition travel to the heart of nature. CONTENTS V. EXPLORERS AND SCIENTISTS The Exploration of Antarctica The Antarctic Treaty VI. PLACES YOU MAY VISIT South Shetland Islands Antarctic Peninsula Weddell Sea South Orkney Islands South Georgia The Falkland Islands South Sandwich Islands The Historic Ross Sea Sector Commonwealth Bay VII. FURTHER READING VIII. WILDLIFE CHECKLISTS ANTARCTIC PRIMER 2018 | 5 Adélie penguins in the Antarctic Peninsula I. CONSERVING ANTARCTICA Antarctica is the largest wilderness area on earth, a place that must be preserved in its present, virtually pristine state.
    [Show full text]
  • Representations of Antarctic Exploration by Lesser Known Heroic Era Photographers
    Filtering ‘ways of seeing’ through their lenses: representations of Antarctic exploration by lesser known Heroic Era photographers. Patricia Margaret Millar B.A. (1972), B.Ed. (Hons) (1999), Ph.D. (Ed.) (2005), B.Ant.Stud. (Hons) (2009) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science – Social Sciences. University of Tasmania 2013 This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis. ………………………………….. ………………….. Patricia Margaret Millar Date This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. ………………………………….. ………………….. Patricia Margaret Millar Date ii Abstract Photographers made a major contribution to the recording of the Heroic Era of Antarctic exploration. By far the best known photographers were the professionals, Herbert Ponting and Frank Hurley, hired to photograph British and Australasian expeditions. But a great number of photographs were also taken on Belgian, German, Swedish, French, Norwegian and Japanese expeditions. These were taken by amateurs, sometimes designated official photographers, often scientists recording their research. Apart from a few Pole-reaching images from the Norwegian expedition, these lesser known expedition photographers and their work seldom feature in the scholarly literature on the Heroic Era, but they, too, have their importance. They played a vital role in the growing understanding and advancement of Antarctic science; they provided visual evidence of their nation’s determination to penetrate the polar unknown; and they played a formative role in public perceptions of Antarctic geopolitics.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Number: 2897 a History of Early Antarctic Fossil Discoveries in Support of the Supercontinent Gondwana Clary, R.M.1, and Sharpe, T.2
    Paper Number: 2897 A History of Early Antarctic Fossil Discoveries in Support of the Supercontinent Gondwana Clary, R.M.1, and Sharpe, T.2 1Mississippi State University, Box 5448, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA; [email protected] 2Centre for Lifelong Learning, Cardiff University, UK ___________________________________________________________________________ First proposed by Eduard Suess (1831-1914), the supercontinent Gondwana included the present-day continents of South America, Africa, Australia, India, and Antarctica. Alexander Du Toit (1878-1948) expanded Suess’ work in his 1937 book, Our Wandering Continents; An Hypothesis of Continental Drifting. Correlating evidence to support the inclusion of Antarctica in the Gondwana supercontinent would result from the stratigraphic and paleontological data collected within early polar expeditions. Early rock and fossil specimens of Antarctica were recovered by the 1829-1831 Antarctic Expedition sponsored by the United States of America. The expedition included a scientific program, supported by the Lyceum for Natural History of the City of New York. James Eights (1798-1882) produced quality scientific work, including a geological description of the Shetland Islands, and the first fossil of the Antarctic—carbonized wood [1, 2]. The Norwegian expedition of 1893-1894, under Carl Anton Larsen (1860-1924), also found petrified wood fossils on Seymour Island. The wood hinted of a warmer climate in Antarctica’s past, and sparked scientific interest [3]. Within the Heroic Age of Antarctic Exploration (1897-1922), additional fossils were uncovered. Cretaceous ammonites, molluscs, echinoderms and leaves were collected on Seymour Island, and additional plant fossils at Hope Bay, by geologist Nils Otto Gustaf Nordenskjöld (1869-1928) during the Swedish South Polar Expedition of 1901-1904.
    [Show full text]
  • German Exploration of the Polar World: a History, 1870–1940, by David T. Murphy
    394 • REVIEWS the derived surnames are Scandinavian. Following each VARJOLA, P. 1990. The Etholén Collection: The ethnographic of these three divisions is a long list of names. In Madsen’s Alaskan collection of Adolf Etholén and his contemporaries in home, the women spoke English and Russian, and the men the National Museum of Finland. Helsinki: National Board of spoke English, various European languages, and some- Antiquities. times multiple Native languages, raising questions (espe- cially when combined with essays by Jeff Leer and Lydia Karen Wood Workman Black) about multilingualism in the past. In what situa- 3310 East 41st Avenue tions were which language(s) used, and by whom? Multi- Anchorage, Alaska, U.S.A. ple language use is a foreign concept to many Americans, 99508 and perhaps we pay too little attention to its possibilities. So many people are involved in this volume that no one person using it could know all of them. One deficit is that GERMAN EXPLORATION OF THE POLAR WORLD: the essays have only self-identification of the authors. A HISTORY, 1870–1940. By DAVID T. MURPHY. Lin- This is also and more expectably the case of the nine coln, Nebraska, and London: University of Nebraska Alutiiq Elders in the final chapter, although there is a Press, 2002. ISBN 0-8032-3205-5. xii + 273 p., maps, listing of Alutiiq Elders, their places of birth and present b&w illus., notes, bib., index. Hardbound. US$49.95; residences (xi–xii), and the three editors are given very UK£37.95. brief biographical sketches (p. 265). A list of contributors would have been helpful.
    [Show full text]
  • The Centenary of the Scott Expedition to Antarctica and of the United Kingdom’S Enduring Scientific Legacy and Ongoing Presence There”
    Debate on 18 October: Scott Expedition to Antarctica and Scientific Legacy This Library Note provides background reading for the debate to be held on Thursday, 18 October: “the centenary of the Scott Expedition to Antarctica and of the United Kingdom’s enduring scientific legacy and ongoing presence there” The Note provides information on Antarctica’s geography and environment; provides a history of its exploration; outlines the international agreements that govern the territory; and summarises international scientific cooperation and the UK’s continuing role and presence. Ian Cruse 15 October 2012 LLN 2012/034 House of Lords Library Notes are compiled for the benefit of Members of the House of Lords and their personal staff, to provide impartial, politically balanced briefing on subjects likely to be of interest to Members of the Lords. Authors are available to discuss the contents of the Notes with the Members and their staff but cannot advise members of the general public. Any comments on Library Notes should be sent to the Head of Research Services, House of Lords Library, London SW1A 0PW or emailed to [email protected]. Table of Contents 1.1 Geophysics of Antarctica ....................................................................................... 1 1.2 Environmental Concerns about the Antarctic ......................................................... 2 2.1 Britain’s Early Interest in the Antarctic .................................................................... 4 2.2 Heroic Age of Antarctic Exploration .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reconnaissance of the Filchner Ice Shelf and Berkner Island, Weddell Sea, Antarctica
    Indian Expedition to Weddell Sea Antarctica, Scientific Report, 1995 Department of Ocean Development, Technical Publication No. 7, pp.1-14 Reconnaissance of the Filchner Ice Shelf and Berkner Island, Weddell Sea, Antarctica V.K. RAINA, S.MUKERJI, A.S. GILL AND F. DOTIWALA* Geological Survey of India; Oil & Natural Gas Commission Introduction Antarctic continent is surrounded, all around by a permanent ice shelf, at places almost 100 km wide. Besides this circum-continental shelf, there also exist three major ice shelves, Fig.1. The area along south Weddell Sea reconnoitred by the Expedition. 2 V.K. Rainaetal. namely: Ross ice shelf; Amery ice shelf and the Filchner-Ronne ice shelf, which cover the embayments (inlets) within the physiographic domain of this continent. The Filchner and Ronne ice shelves exist along the southern and the south-western limits of the Weddell Sea within the longitudes 34° W and 63° W and latitudes 78° S to 82° S and cover an area of about 5,00,000 km including some large ice rises. This shelf, as the name suggests, comprises the Filchner shelf, in the east, and larger of the two, Ronne shelf in the west, separated, along the northern extremity i.e. north of 81° S latitude, by the largest ice rise in Antarctica - the Berkner island. Southward, the two shelves merge into one. Filchner Shelf is named after Wilhelm Filchner, the Leader of the German Expedition that landed and established a field station on it, for the first time, way back in 1912. This shelf differs from the circum-continental shelf in being more rugged, crevassed and rumpled with large escarpments, and is primarily the extension of the Polar ice.
    [Show full text]
  • Jég És Föld Között Az Antarktisz (Újra)Felfedezése Antarktisz.Qxd 21.4.2005 14:15 Page 3
    Antarktisz.qxd 21.4.2005 14:15 Page 1 František Kele – Fekete László Jég és föld között Az Antarktisz (újra)felfedezése Antarktisz.qxd 21.4.2005 14:15 Page 3 František Kele – Fekete László Jég és föld között Az Antarktisz (újra)felfedezése NAP Kiadó Dunaszerdahely, 2003 Antarktisz.qxd 21.4.2005 14:15 Page 4 A kötet megjelenését a Szlovák Köztársaság Kulturális Minisztériuma támogatta. Kniha vyšla s finančnou podporou Ministerstva kultúry SR. A fordítás F. Kele – L. Fekete: (Znovu)objavovanie Antarktídy című kiadványa alapján készült. Fordította Tóth Mihály © František Kele, Fekete László, 2003 © Fényképek: František Kele, Fekete László Hungarian translation © Tóth Mihály, 2003 ISBN Antarktisz.qxd 21.4.2005 14:15 Page 5 „Nem láttam még ennél szebb és vadregényesebb tájat...” Roald Amundsen Antarktiszi utunk Martin Kukučín* és Milan Rastislav Štefánik** emléke előtt tisztelegve valósult meg. E könyvet azoknak ajánljuk, akik a múltban bármikor az Antarktiszon dolgoztak. Köszönet mindazoknak, akik segítettek az „UNION – AntArktis 2000” expedíció megvalósításában. * Martin Kukučín (1860, Jaszenova, Árva vármegye – 1928, Lipik, Horvátország) – a szlovák realista széppróza egyik legkiemelkedőbb képviselője, tanár, orvos, eredeti nevén Matej Bencúr. Fő művén, a Dom v stráni (A Pretur ház, Farkas I. ford., 1935; Ház a hegyoldalban, Hubik I. ford., 1956) című regényen kívül több kötete is megjelent magyarul. 1908-ban horvát feleségével együtt kivándorolt Dél-Amerikába, s ott Buenos Airesben, Santiagóban és Punta Arenasban a vele együtt hontalanná vált horvátok orvosa volt. ** Milan Rastislav Štefánik (1880, Kosaras, Nyitra vármegye – 1919, Pozsonyszőlős) – szlovák csillagász, francia, csehszlovák tábornok, diplomata, az olasz- és oroszországi, valamint a franciaországi és amerikai csehszlovák légiók szervezője. Az ideiglenes csehszlovák kormány, majd az első csehszlovák kormány hadügyminisztere.
    [Show full text]
  • Biting Adventures of Polar Exploration Captivating Reads from the World's Leading Polar Bookstore the World's
    The World’s Coolest Stories Biting Adventures of polar exploration Captivating reads from THe World’s leading polar bookstore ‘He was lucky.’ Roald Amundsen: The Northwest Passage ‘They found the easy route to the Pole.’ His personal diaries from the Gjøa expedition, 1900–1905 in two volumes ‘Amundsen’s claim might be fraudulent.’ t the turn of a new century Roald Amundsen diaries Roald Amundsen’s n presenting with great pleasure Roald Amundsen’s personal THE FRAM MUSEUM PRESENTS Idiaries from the Gjøa Expedition this is not just a big moment Geir O. Kløver: beganfor histhe Fram preparationsMuseum, but also an important contribution for to thethe conquest of the A dissemination of Norwegian and Canadian polar history. Roald Amundsen’s Roald Amundsen writes with great enthusiasm about the enormous Lessons from the Arctic Northwest effortsPassage, he and his crew are making which in dealing with scientifichad research eluded sailors for and Amundsen’s own studies of the Inuit and their way of life around diaries Gjoa Haven, Nunavut. After reading the diaries we know so much about the expedition, about life aboard Gjøa and among the Inuit centuries. Name: Roald Amundsen that it feels as if we have partaken in the expedition ourselves. Age: 34 Position: Captain, Amundsen is generous in his descriptions of his comrades and treats How Roald Amundsen won the race Expedition Leader all contact with, and all the information from, the Inuit with great respect. In addition, he emerges as an unprecedented planner of When: 1903 – 1905 an expedition through the Northwest Passage. After four hundred Where: The Northwest The Northwest Passage 190 to the South Pole through meticulous These unabridgedyears of attempts to solve thediaries puzzle of the Passage, are his expedition the Passage thoughts of the took place exactly as he presented his plan to the Norwegian planning and preparations over world’s mostGeographical successful Society in 1901, more than 18polar months before theexplorer departure with Gjøa.
    [Show full text]
  • El Mejor Amigo Del Hombre En La Antartida
    EL MEJOR AMIGO DEL HOMBRE EN LA ANTARTIDA 1898 - 1922 1 Dedicatoria Hubo una perra de la raza Siberian Husky que se llamo: ERIKA YELDYIAK. Fue un regalo que me hicieron mis hijos Oscar y Ayelén. Como integrante de la familia se encargo de cuidar desde muy pequeños a mis nietos Brenda y Maximiliano, los que la usaron de juguete viviente. Fue la fundadora del criadero que se llamo “Tak Tuk” y lleno nuestra casa de alegría cada vez que nacían sus crías. En su rol de madre y luego abuela se entregaba a sus obligaciones con esmero, estaba en todos los detalles. Sociable en grado sumo, a la hora del almuerzo o de la cena se instalaba a mi derecha esperando que le diera algo de comer y cuando venían visitas quería participar de la reunión. Hoy en la distancia del tiempo la recuerdo levantando en las noches su hocico al cielo y aullando como lo hicieron sus ancestros. 2 Erika Yeldyiak a la derecha y su hijo Cris de Tak Tuk 3 INDICE EL MEJOR AMIGO DEL HOMBRE EN LA ANTARTIDA Prólogo. 5 Introducción 6 1. Carsten Egeberg Borchgrevink y la British Antartic Expedition de 1898 a 1900. 7 2. Erich Dagobert von Drygalski y La Primera Expedición Alemana al Polo Sur de 1901 a 1903. 8 3. Nils Otto Gustaf Nordenskjöld y la Expedición Sueca al Polo Sur de 1901 a 1904. 9 4. Robert Falcon Scott y la Expedición Nacional Británica a la Antártida de 1901 a 1904. 12 5. William Speirs Bruce y la Expedición Antártica Nacional Escocesa de 1902 a 1904.
    [Show full text]
  • A NTARCTIC Southpole-Sium
    N ORWAY A N D THE A N TARCTIC SouthPole-sium v.3 Oslo, Norway • 12-14 May 2017 Compiled and produced by Robert B. Stephenson. E & TP-32 2 Norway and the Antarctic 3 This edition of 100 copies was issued by The Erebus & Terror Press, Jaffrey, New Hampshire, for those attending the SouthPole-sium v.3 Oslo, Norway 12-14 May 2017. Printed at Savron Graphics Jaffrey, New Hampshire May 2017 ❦ 4 Norway and the Antarctic A Timeline to 2006 • Late 18th Vessels from several nations explore around the unknown century continent in the south, and seal hunting began on the islands around the Antarctic. • 1820 Probably the first sighting of land in Antarctica. The British Williams exploration party led by Captain William Smith discovered the northwest coast of the Antarctic Peninsula. The Russian Vostok and Mirnyy expedition led by Thaddeus Thadevich Bellingshausen sighted parts of the continental coast (Dronning Maud Land) without recognizing what they had seen. They discovered Peter I Island in January of 1821. • 1841 James Clark Ross sailed with the Erebus and the Terror through the ice in the Ross Sea, and mapped 900 kilometres of the coast. He discovered Ross Island and Mount Erebus. • 1892-93 Financed by Chr. Christensen from Sandefjord, C. A. Larsen sailed the Jason in search of new whaling grounds. The first fossils in Antarctica were discovered on Seymour Island, and the eastern part of the Antarctic Peninsula was explored to 68° 10’ S. Large stocks of whale were reported in the Antarctic and near South Georgia, and this discovery paved the way for the large-scale whaling industry and activity in the south.
    [Show full text]
  • Parallel Precedents for the Antarctic Treaty Cornelia Lüdecke
    Parallel Precedents for the Antarctic Treaty Cornelia Lüdecke INTRODUCTION Uninhabited and remote regions were claimed by a nation when their eco- nomic, political, or military values were realized. Examples from the North- ern and Southern hemispheres show various approaches on how to treat claims among rivaling states. The archipelago of Svalbard in the High Arctic and Ant- arctica are very good examples for managing uninhabited spaces. Whereas the exploration of Svalbard comprises about 300 years of development, Antarctica was not entered before the end of the nineteenth century. Obviously, it took much more time to settle the ownership of the archipelago in the so-called Sval- bard Treaty of 1920 than to find a solution for Antarctica and the existence of overlapping territorial claims by adopting the Antarctic Treaty of 1959. Why was the development at the southern continent so much faster? What is the es- sential difference between the situations obtaining in the two hemispheres? Was there a transposition of experiences from north to south? And did the Svalbard Treaty help to construct the Antarctic Treaty? Answers to these questions will be given by the analysis of single periods in the history of polar research, scientific networks, and special intergovernmental and nongovernmental organizations with concomitant scientific or economic interests that merged in the twentieth century to arrange exploration and exploitation of polar regions on an interna- tional basis. EXPLORATION AND SCIENCE BEFORE WORLD WAR I SVALBARD After the era of whaling around the archipelago of Svalbard, the Norwe- gians were the only ones to exploit the area economically, including fishing, Cornelia Lüdecke, SCAR History Action since the 1850s, whereas Swedish expeditions starting in the same decade were Group, Fernpaßstraße 3, D- 81373 Munich, the first to explore the interior of the islands (Liljequist, 1993; Holland, 1994; Germany.
    [Show full text]