DOCSLIB.ORG

Exchanges with the Soviet Union Hearing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

V 4 • F W > UNITED STA TES SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL ^ l 2 -2 - EXCHANGES WITH THE SOVIET UNION n government . Storage H E A R I N G BEFO RE TH E SU BC OM MITTE ES ON IN TERN A TIO N A L SE CURIT Y AND SC IE N TIF IC A FFA IR S AND IN TERN A TIO N A L OPE RATI ONS OF TH E COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NINE TY -SI XT H CONGRESS SECOND SESSION H.J. Res. 534 i J H MAY 20, 1980 m rn oc <■ Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Affairs oc r □CO :i 3 1 ' □ itCO = - IT H H □ C U M E N T S < JUL 2 1 1 9 8 0 - a R R E L L L IB R A R Y ‘ KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITX U.S. GO VE RN MEN T PR IN TIN G OFFIC E 63-521 O WAS HI NG TO N : 19 80 COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS CL EM EN T J. ZA BL OC KI, W isc onsin , Ch airm an L. H. FO UN TA IN , N or th Car ol in a W IL LI AM S. BR OO MFIEL D, Michiga n DA NT E B. FA SC EL L, Flo ri da ED WAR D J. DER W IN SK I, Il lino is CH ARL ES C. D IGGS, J r., M ichiga n PA UL F IN DL EY , Il linoi s BE NJA M IN S. RO SE NT HA L, New York JO HN H. BUCHANAN, J r., A laba ma LEE H. HA MILT ON , In dia na LA RRY WI NN , JR., K an sa s LESTER L. W OLF F, New Y ork BEN JA M IN A. GIL MA N, New York JO NA TH AN B. BING HA M, New Y ork TE NN YS ON G UYER, Ohio GUS YATRON, Pen ns yl va ni a RO BE RT J. LAGOMA RSINO , Cal ifor ni a CA RD ISS CO LL INS, Il lino is WILLIAM F. GOODLIN G, Pen ns yl va ni a STEPH EN J. SOL ARZ, New Y ork JO EL PRI TC HA RD , W as hi ng to n DON B ON KE R, W as hi ng to n M IL LI CE NT FE NW IC K, New Je rs ey GE RR Y E. STUD DS, M as sa ch use tts DAN QUAYL E, In dia na ANDY IREL AN D, Flo rida DONALD J . PE ASE , Ohio DAN M ICA , Flo rida MICHAE L D. BA RN ES , M arylan d W IL LIAM H. GRAY III, Pen nsy lv an ia TONY P. HA LL , Ohio HO WA RD WOL PE , Michig an DA VID R. BO WE N, Missis sip pi FLOY D J. FIT H IA N , In dia na J oh n J. B rady, J r. , Ch ief of S ta ff J o seph in e Web er , Sta ff A ss is ta nt Susan McCartan, S ta ff A ss is ta nt Subcommittee on I nternational Security and Scien tific Affairs CL EM EN T J. ZA BL OC KI, W isc onsin , Ch airm an L. H. FO UN TA IN , N orth Car ol in a WILLIAM S. BR OO MFIEL D, Mi chiga n LEE H. HA MILT ON , In dia na LARRY WI NN , J r., K an sa s LES TE R L. WOL FF , New Y ork DAN QUAYLE, In dia na JO NA TH AN B. BING HA M, New Y ork Iv o J. Spa la tin, Su bc om m itte e Sta ff D irec tor Wil liam H. F it e, M in ori ty S ta ff C on su ltan t T on i J . Grant, Su bc om m itte e Sta ff A ssoc ia te Subcommittee on I nternational Operations DA NT E B. FA SC EL L, Flo rida , Ch airm an ANDY IR EL AN D, Flo rida JO HN H. BUCHANAN, J r., Al ab am a DAN MICA, Flo ri da ED WAR D J. DERW IN SK I, Illino is WILLIAM H. GRAY III , Pen nsy lv ania JO EL PR IT CHARD , W as hi ng to n DAVJD R. BO WE N, M issis sip pi R. Mic hael F in ley , Subc om m itte e Sta ff D irec tor J anean Man n, M in ori ty Sta ff C on su lta nt Virg inia Sch lu nd t, Su bc om m itte e Sta ff A ssoc ia te K aren B re nn an , Su bco m m itte e Sta ff Assoc ia te CONTENTS WITNE SSES Hon. Thomas R. Pickering, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Oceans and Intern ational Environmen tal and Scientific Affairs, Department of P a &e State ______________________ ___________________________________ 2 William D. Carey, executive officer, American Association for the Ad­ vancement of Science___________________________________________ 4 Max Gottesman, Ph. D., cochairman, Committee of Concerned S cientists. 6 AP PEND IXES 1. Text of House Joint Resolution 534______________________________ 23 2. Statem ent submitted for the record by Hon. Donald J. Pease________ 29 3. Letter from Philip Handler, president, National Academy of Sciences, with attach ed statem ent for the record_________________________ 31 4. Letter to Hon. George E. Brown from Hon. J. Brian Atwood, Assistant Secretary of State for Congressional Relations with State Depart­ ment comments on the legislation______________________________ 46 5. Letter from Max Gottesman and Mark Kac, cochairmen, Comm ittee of Concerned Scientists, with comments on the legislation_________ 48 6. Article from Technology Review, December/Janua ry 1980, entitled “Science and Hum an Rights,” by Earl Callen, Bernard R. Cooper, and John Parmentola________________________________________ 49 (in ) UNITE D STA TES SCIEN TIFIC AND TECH NICAL EXCHANGES WIT H THE SOVIET UNION TUESD AY, M AY 20 , 19 80 H ouse or R ep re se nt at iv es , C om mit te e on F or eig n A ff air s , S ub co mmitte es on I nt er na tion al S ec ur it y an d S cie n tif ic A ff ai rs an d I nt er nati onal O pe ra tion s , ashington^ D.G. The subcommittees met at 1 0:30 a.m. in room 2200, Ra yb urn House Office B uilding , Hon. Clem ent J. Zablocki (ch airm an) pre siding . Ch air ma n Zab lo ck i . The subcom mittees will please come to order. We meet today to conside r House Jo in t Resolutio n 534 which deals with U.S . policies affecting scientific and technical exch anges with the Soviet Un ion . 1 House Jo in t Resolution 534 was introd uced by Re pre sen tative George Brown, a mem ber of the Com mittee on Science and Technology. Represe nta tiv e Brow n ha d hop ed to join us tod ay, bu t due to a death in his fam ily , he will not be able to attend toda y’s hearing. Repre sen tative Don Pease was to rep res ent the Com mittee on Sci­ ence and Techno logy, however, since he too is unable to be here , I have been asked to enter int o the record the rem ark s of our fellow colleague, Don Pease, who reflects Con gressman Br ow n’s thinking on this subject. W ith ou t objection, the sta tem ent of Hon. Donal d J. Pease will be ins ert ed in the record. If there is no objectio n, it is so ord ere d. 2 Before we he ar from our dis tin gu ish ed witnesses, I would like to briefly sum marize the resolu tion as repo rte d from the Com mittee on Science and Technology on Apr il 22. Th e resolution does the follo wing: (1) Dec lare s a ha lt to official tra ve l rel ate d to scientific and tec h­ nological coo peratio n wi th the Soviet Un ion fo r a minim um of 6 months unless the tra ve l is of direct an d very substan tial benefit to the Un ite d States; (2) Recomm ends th at nonofficial tra veler s—that is, agencies of State and local gov ernment, private agencies and org aniza tions, pr o­ fessional societies, as well as scientists, scholars, and technolo gists— defer tra ve l relate d to scientific and technical coo peratio n to the Soviet Un ion fo r a minim um of 6 mo nth s unless otherw ise dictated by ex trao rdinary circum stan ces or indiv idual conscience; 1 See text of H.J. Res. 534, app. 1 on p. 23. 2 See statement of R epresentative Pease in app. 2 on p. 29. (1) (3) Direc ts the Presiden t to repo rt to Congress on domestic and foreign policies which should be insti tuted to fu rthe r the purposes of the reso lutio n; and (4) Urges the impleme ntation of non gov ernmental as well as Government sta nd ards and policies fo r the cond uct of intern ational cooperativ e rese arch and fo r the pro tec tion of human righ ts and fundam ental freedom s of all scientists, scho lars, and technologists.
Recommended publications
  • Washington Committee for Soviet Jewry,1968

    Washington Committee for Soviet Jewry,1968

    Ambassador Richard Schifter December, 2013 As you know, I have not lived a life in which I have blown my horn. However, before I depart the scene, let me make a record of my contribution to the emigration campaign, for historical purposes and for my descendants. Some of this is covered in my book, Human Rights, Perestroika, and the End of the Cold War. Significant numbers of Soviet Jews became interested in emigrating from the Soviet Union after the 1967 War. At the beginning of the War, Soviet media had gotten the message out that Israel was about to be defeated and destroyed. When it turned out that Israel had succeeded in the War, Russian Jews had once again become aware of the existence of Israel. Zionism in that part of the world was reborn. Jews also increasingly felt discrimination, both in the job market and in higher education. So the emigration campaign started and the Soviet government soon clamped down on it, allowing only a few exit permits. In 1966 the number of exit permits for Jews was about 2000. In 1970 it was about 1000. But the Soviet Jewry movement had gotten started, calling for free emigration from the Soviet Union. Even though Kissinger, and thus the Nixon and Ford Administrations, did not have emigration on its détente agenda, the movement had gotten many members of Congress interested and the Soviet Union began to hear from members of the movement. By 1972 the number of exit permits for Jews was past 13,000. In 1974 came the Jackson-Vanik amendment, encouraging the Soviet Jewry movement to keep going.
  • Israeli Reactions in a Soviet Moment: Reflections on the 1970 Leningrad Affair

    Israeli Reactions in a Soviet Moment: Reflections on the 1970 Leningrad Affair

    No. 58 l September 2020 KENNAN CABLE Mark Dymshits, Sylva Zalmanson, Edward Kuznetsov & 250,000 of their supporters in New York Ciry, 1979. (Photo:Courtesy of Ilya Levkov; CC-BY-SA) Israeli Reactions in a Soviet Moment: Reflections on the 1970 Leningrad Affair By Jonathan Dekel-Chen The Kennan Institute convened a virtual meeting and public demonstrators pushed the Kremlin to retry in June 2020 marking the 50th anniversary of the the conspirators, commute death sentences for their attempted hijacking of a Soviet commercial flight from leaders, and reduce the prison terms for the rest. Leningrad.1 The 16 Jewish hijackers hoped to draw international attention to their struggle for emigration to A showing of the 2016 documentary filmOperation Israel, although many of them did not believe that they Wedding (the code name for the hijacking) produced by would arrive at their destination. Some were veterans Anat Zalmanson-Kuznetsov, daughter of two conspirators, of the Zionist movement who had already endured preceded the Kennan panel and served as a backdrop punishment for so-called “nationalist, anti-Soviet for its conversations. The film describes the events from crimes,” whereas others were newcomers to activism.2 the vantage point of her parents. As it shows, the plight Their arrest on the Leningrad airport tarmac in June of the hijackers—in particular Edward Kuznetsov and 1970, followed by a show trial later that year, brought Sylva Zalmanson—became a rallying point for Jewish the hijackers the international attention they sought. and human rights activists in the West. Both eventually Predictably, the trial resulted in harsh prison terms.
  • Helsinki Watch Committees in the Soviet Republics: Implications For

    Helsinki Watch Committees in the Soviet Republics: Implications For

    FINAL REPORT T O NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITLE : HELSINKI WATCH COMMITTEES IN THE SOVIET REPUBLICS : IMPLICATIONS FOR THE SOVIET NATIONALITY QUESTIO N AUTHORS : Yaroslav Bilinsky Tönu Parming CONTRACTOR : University of Delawar e PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS : Yaroslav Bilinsky, Project Director an d Co-Principal Investigato r Tönu Parming, Co-Principal Investigato r COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 621- 9 The work leading to this report was supported in whole or in part fro m funds provided by the National Council for Soviet and East European Research . NOTICE OF INTENTION TO APPLY FOR COPYRIGH T This work has been requested for manuscrip t review for publication . It is not to be quote d without express written permission by the authors , who hereby reserve all the rights herein . Th e contractual exception to this is as follows : The [US] Government will have th e right to publish or release Fina l Reports, but only in same forma t in which such Final Reports ar e delivered to it by the Council . Th e Government will not have the righ t to authorize others to publish suc h Final Reports without the consent o f the authors, and the individua l researchers will have the right t o apply for and obtain copyright o n any work products which may b e derived from work funded by th e Council under this Contract . ii EXEC 1 Overall Executive Summary HELSINKI WATCH COMMITTEES IN THE SOVIET REPUBLICS : IMPLICATIONS FOR THE SOVIET NATIONALITY QUESTION by Yaroslav Bilinsky, University of Delawar e d Tönu Parming, University of Marylan August 1, 1975, after more than two years of intensive negotiations, 35 Head s of Governments--President Ford of the United States, Prime Minister Trudeau of Canada , Secretary-General Brezhnev of the USSR, and the Chief Executives of 32 othe r European States--signed the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperatio n in Europe (CSCE) .
  • Human Rights and History a Challenge for Education

    Human Rights and History a Challenge for Education

    edited by Rainer Huhle HUMAN RIGHTS AND HISTORY A CHALLENGE FOR EDUCATION edited by Rainer Huhle H UMAN The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Genocide Convention of 1948 were promulgated as an unequivocal R response to the crimes committed under National Socialism. Human rights thus served as a universal response to concrete IGHTS historical experiences of injustice, which remains valid to the present day. As such, the Universal Declaration and the Genocide Convention serve as a key link between human rights education and historical learning. AND This volume elucidates the debates surrounding the historical development of human rights after 1945. The authors exam- H ine a number of specific human rights, including the prohibition of discrimination, freedom of opinion, the right to asylum ISTORY and the prohibition of slavery and forced labor, to consider how different historical experiences and legal traditions shaped their formulation. Through the examples of Latin America and the former Soviet Union, they explore the connections · A CHALLENGE FOR EDUCATION between human rights movements and human rights education. Finally, they address current challenges in human rights education to elucidate the role of historical experience in education. ISBN-13: 978-3-9810631-9-6 © Foundation “Remembrance, Responsibility and Future” Stiftung “Erinnerung, Verantwortung und Zukunft” Lindenstraße 20–25 10969 Berlin Germany Tel +49 (0) 30 25 92 97- 0 Fax +49 (0) 30 25 92 -11 [email protected] www.stiftung-evz.de Editor: Rainer Huhle Translation and Revision: Patricia Szobar Coordination: Christa Meyer Proofreading: Julia Brooks and Steffi Arendsee Typesetting and Design: dakato…design. David Sernau Printing: FATA Morgana Verlag ISBN-13: 978-3-9810631-9-6 Berlin, February 2010 Photo Credits: Cover page, left: Stèphane Hessel at the conference “Rights, that make us Human Beings” in Nuremberg, November 2008.
  • Historical Dictionary of Russian and Soviet Intelligence

    Historical Dictionary of Russian and Soviet Intelligence

    Russia • Military / Security Historical Dictionaries of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, No. 5 PRINGLE At its peak, the KGB (Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti) was the largest HISTORICAL secret police and espionage organization in the world. It became so influential DICTIONARY OF in Soviet politics that several of its directors moved on to become premiers of the Soviet Union. In fact, Russian president Vladimir V. Putin is a former head of the KGB. The GRU (Glavnoe Razvedvitelnoe Upravleniye) is the principal intelligence unit of the Russian armed forces, having been established in 1920 by Leon Trotsky during the Russian civil war. It was the first subordinate to the KGB, and although the KGB broke up with the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, the GRU remains intact, cohesive, highly efficient, and with far greater resources than its civilian counterparts. & The KGB and GRU are just two of the many Russian and Soviet intelli- gence agencies covered in Historical Dictionary of Russian and Soviet Intelligence. Through a list of acronyms and abbreviations, a chronology, an introductory HISTORICAL DICTIONARY OF essay, a bibliography, and hundreds of cross-referenced dictionary entries, a clear picture of this subject is presented. Entries also cover Russian and Soviet leaders, leading intelligence and security officers, the Lenin and Stalin purges, the gulag, and noted espionage cases. INTELLIGENCE Robert W. Pringle is a former foreign service officer and intelligence analyst RUSSIAN with a lifelong interest in Russian security. He has served as a diplomat and intelligence professional in Africa, the former Soviet Union, and Eastern Europe. For orders and information please contact the publisher && SOVIET Scarecrow Press, Inc.
  • E Helsinki Forum and East-West Scientific Exchange

    E Helsinki Forum and East-West Scientific Exchange

    [E HELSINKI FORUM AND EAST-WEST SCIENTIFIC EXCHANGE JOINT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY OF THE COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AND THE Sul COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL SECURITY AND SCIENTIFIC AFFAIRS OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE NINETY-SIXTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JANUARY 31, 1980 [No. 89] (Committee on Science and Technology) ted for the use of the Committee on Science and Technology and the Committee on Foreign Affairs U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 421 0 WASHINGTON: 1980 COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DON FUQUA, Florida, Chairman ROBERT A. ROE, New Jersey JOHN W. WYDLER, New York MIKE McCORMACK, Washington LARRY WINN. JR., Kansas GEORGE E. BROWN, JR., California BARRY M. GOLDWATER, JR., California JAMES H. SCHEUER, New York HAMILTON FISH, JS., New York RICHARD L. OTTINGER, New York MANUEL LUJAN, JR., New Mexico TOM HARKIN, Iowa HAROLD C. HOLLENBECK, New Jersey JIM LLOYD, California ROBERT K. DORNAN, California JEROME A. AMBRO, New York ROBERT S. WALKER, Pennsylvania MARILYN LLOYD BOUQUARD, Tennessee EDWIN B. FORSYTHE, NeW Jersey JAMES J. BLANCHARD, Michigan KEN KRAMER, Colorado DOUG WALGREN, Pennsylvania WILLIAM CARNEY, New York RONNIE G. FLIPPO, Alabama ROBERT W. DAVIS, Michigan DAN GLICKMAN, Kansas TOBY ROTH, Wisconsin ALBERT GORE, JR., Tennessee DONALD LAWRENCE RITTER, WES WATKINS, Oklahoma Pennsylvania ROBERT A. YOUNG, Missouri BILL ROYER, California RICHARD C. WHITE, Texas HAROLD L. VOLKMER, Missouri DONALD J. PEASE, Ohio HOWARD WOLPE, Michigan NICHOLAS MAVROULES, Massachusetts BILL NELSON, Florida BERYL ANTHONY, JR., Arkansas STANLEY N. LUNDINE, New York ALLEN E.
  • September 20, 1968 Yu. Andropov to the CPSU CC

    September 20, 1968 Yu. Andropov to the CPSU CC

    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified September 20, 1968 Yu. Andropov to the CPSU CC Citation: “Yu. Andropov to the CPSU CC,” September 20, 1968, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, RGANI, F. 80, Op. 1, D. 513, Ll. 58-60. Obtained and translated by Mark Kramer. https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/188129 Summary: This memorandum from KGB Chairman Andropov to the CPSU Politburo follows up on the initial report from Andropov, Shchelokov, and Malyarov. The document highlights the “malevolent views” of the group that held an unauthorized demonstration in Red Square on 25 August 1968, singling out Pavel Litvinov, Larisa Bogoraz, Viktor Fainberg, and Vadim Delaunay for particular opprobrium. Andropov stresses that the KGB will intensify its crackdown on opposition figures who try to “spread defamatory information about Soviet reality.” Credits: This document was made possible with support from the Blavatnik Family Foundation. Original Language: Russian Contents: English Translation Scan of Original Document Secret Copy No. 1 USSR ___ Committee of State Security of the USSR under the USSR Council of Ministers ______ 20 September 1968 No. 2205-A Moscow To the CPSU CC By way of addendum to our No. 2102 from 5 September 1968, I am reporting that the Moscow procurator, in contact with the Committee of State Security, has completed the investigation and is remanding to the court the criminal case charging L. I. BOGORAZ-BRUKHMAN (the wife of the imprisoned writer [Yulii] Daniel), P. M. LITVINOV, K. I. BABITSKII, V. I. FAINBERG, V. A. DREMLYUGA, and V. N. DELAUNAY. The guilt of these people in staging disturbances on Red Square on 25 August 1968 was confirmed by the testimony of multiple witnesses and by material evidence that was confiscated.
  • Reliving the Vigil by Norman Goldstein

    Reliving the Vigil by Norman Goldstein

    Norman Goldstein was chair of the Jewish Historical Society of Greater Washington’s Community Advisory Committee for the Voices of the Vigil exhibition. He is a past president of the Jewish Community Council and was a chair of the Freedom Sunday Rally for Soviet Jewry in 1987. His insight on the vigil follows. Reliving the Vigil by Norman Goldstein The Jewish Historical Society of Greater Washington’s Voices of the Vigil exhibit in JCCGW’s Goldman Art Gallery tells the story of one of the most memorable periods in all of our lives, when we truly transformed the world. Together, we brought down the Soviet Union and made it possible for more than a million of our fellow Jews to emigrate to Israel, and for countless others to live in countries of their choosing. Free to make aliyah as a result of our protests, the great numbers of new and highly skilled olim (immigrants) changed the face of Israel and guaranteed its long-term survival as a sovereign state. We supported and nurtured the rebirth of Jewish life and culture in the former Soviet Union. We did all this as a united Jewish people, supported by many other people of good will. We had a common purpose of ensuring the dignity and human rights of our fellow Jews and other persecuted people, whose religious freedoms and other rights had been suppressed for so long. Started by a group of college students, the Soviet Jewry movement took hold across the United States in the late 1960s. Thereafter, from 1970 to 1991, the Washington community protested, marched, wrote letters and petitioned.
  • Protest and Dissent in the Soviet Union: the Unofficial Moscow •� Journal, a Chronicle of Current Events, (American Heritage Press, 1972), 18

    Protest and Dissent in the Soviet Union: the Unofficial Moscow • Journal, a Chronicle of Current Events, (American Heritage Press, 1972), 18

    •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••r• Glasnost as Speaking TruthisPower: In partialfulfillmentoftherequirements Submitted toProfessorLindaGerstein In LateSovietRussia For theBachelorsinArtsHistory, By ElizabethHeld Haverford College a WeaponofDissent April 20,2012 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ••••••••••••••••►•••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS flour, andeggs. To ProfessorLindaGerstein,whotaughtmethattobakeacakeyouneedbutter,sugar, ii •• iii •• ABSTRACT ••• In 1968, a group of Soviet dissidents began to print their own newspaper, the •• Chronicle of Current Events, and to work with western reporters to spread their message about the illegality of the ruling regime. By using their own media forms, the dissidents •• were able to break the government's monopoly on information. More importantly, they •• used the media technologies to advocate for their two key, interconnected goals of •• glasnost, or openness, and the rule of law. The dissidents made two main arguments. •• First, that glasnost was integral to creating an equitable and fair justice system. Second, that speaking truth was legal and not something the government could prosecute. •• • Glasnost served as both a rallying cry and as a weapon. The dissidents called for openness, but also used their media outlets to expose events the government wished to ••• keep quiet. • In choosing the two mantras of legality and glasnost, the dissidents consciously put themselves in the shadow of previous groups of Russian reformers who had the same ••• demands. They placed themselves in a historical debate. The dissidents also sought to •• differentiate their version of glasnost, complete openness, from various government •• leaders' definitions of the term. •• This thesis seeks to explore the way dissident media outlets forced the dual goals •• of glasnost and respect for the rule of law. It will examine the causes and forms of dissident media, and their relationship to the idea of legality.
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 1992

    The Ukrainian Weekly 1992

    lished by the Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal non-profit association! rainian WeeklV Vol. LX mNo. 5 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 1992 50 cents Ukraine's Supreme Council reconvenes; Canada formalizes diplomatic ties approves blue-and-yellow state flag with Ukraine, upgrades consulate by Marta Kolomayets flag. (Thirty-one deputies abstained and by Marta Kolomayets near Kiev, to greet a Canadian Armed Kiev Press Bureau 29 did not take part in the vote.) Kiev Press Bureau Forces plane carrying more than 15 tons The first day's session continued with of humanitarian aid for the citizens of KIEV - The Supreme Council a number of deputies offering their KIEV — "Canada is committed to Ukraine. adopted the blue-and-yellow flag as the comments and criticisms regarding Mr. helping Ukraine with its dramatic state flag of Ukraine on Tuesday, Kravchuk's morning speech. political and economic reforms," said This first shipment, arranged by the January 28, the first day of the fifth The second day of this session began Canadian Minister for External Affairs Canadian Red Cross through funding session of the 12th convocation of Par­ with formalities as the Supreme Council Barbara McDougall during a whirlwind `by the Canadian government, is the first liament. voted Vasyl V. Durdynets to succeed visit to Ukraine on January 26-27. of five to arrive in Ukraine. It is being During the morning session, Presi­ Ivan Pliushch as first deputy chairman After a meeting with Ukrainian distributed to targeted hospitals by dent Leonid Kravchuk expressed his of the Supreme Council. Mr. Pliushch President Leonid Kravchuk on Mon­ branches of the Ukrainian Red Cross.
  • The Paradigm of Scientists for Sakharov, Orlov and Sharansky (Sos)

    The Paradigm of Scientists for Sakharov, Orlov and Sharansky (Sos)

    GUERRILLA TACTICS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: THE PARADIGM OF SCIENTISTS FOR SAKHAROV, ORLOV AND SHARANSKY (SOS) (Invited speech on the occasion of the Sakharov Prize Award at the 2010 “April” meeting of the American Physical Society) February 15, 2010 Morris (Moishe ) Pripstein Physics Division, National Science Foundation I would like to thank the American Physical Society for honoring me as a co-recipient of the Sakharov Prize along with such illustrious human-rights activists as my colleagues Joe Birman and Herman Winick. I would also like to thank my wife, Flo, for her major contributions to the activities described below which led to this award and to our children, David, Jeremy and Laura, for their unstinting support throughout that hectic period. In addition, I want to express my deep appreciation to Elena Bonner for her very generous comments presented earlier in this session by her daughter, Tatiana Yankelevich, and to Tatiana and her brother Alexey Semyonov and his wife, Liza, for joining us in this occasion. This award is especially meaningful to me as it pays homage to the great scientist and human- rights champion Andrei Sakharov, a role model to many of us, and because of the outstanding previous awardees, Yuri Orlov and Xu Liangying. While many scientists have valiantly engaged in the struggle for human rights, it is this group, along with Natan Sharansky, Elena Bonner, Fang Li Zhi and the long list of other dissident and refusenik scientists who put their own lives at risk on behalf of human rights, who are the heroes of the movement and a special inspiration to the rest of us.
  • The Observance of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights by the Soviet Union

    The Observance of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights by the Soviet Union

    AO-A093 577 DEPARTM4ENT OF STATE WASHINGTON DC OFFICE OF EXTERNAL--ETC F/S 5/14 POLITICAL RIGHTS BY--ETCfUI 17A-A 1- 7 THE OBSERVANCE OF THE COVENANT ON CIVIL AND IUNCLASSIFIED FAR-3013 NL UflMENEMffllf INSTITUTE ON SOC& T LAW V VALERY CHALIDZE N JHE OBSERVANCE OF THE COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS BY THE SOVIET UNION. Chief Consultant- Leon Lipson Consultants: Alexander Volpin I Konstantin Simis co George Ginsburgs Translation of the basic text: George Ginsburgs Collection of examples: Ludmilla Alexeyeva Pavel Litvinov This paper is written to order of the U.S. State Department I 'Lij New York, 1980 I 6'v Was p si fr~D epar~ter! of S~ i DIMUU'RIBTI NST ENT A f4rnea nerem ccu: nc, be .!-erpre!,-j 3z rev ,nt~ Approved for pu-Uc relea ;.;CY :" > "er e <- 9, i,•"-" THE OBSERVANCE OF THE COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS BY THE SOVIET UNION Table of Contents Page Introduction 1 Article 1. The Right of Self-Determination 9 Article 2. The Duty of States Party to the Covenant to 25 Respect and Ensure Human Rights Article 3. The Right of Men and Women to Equal Enjoyment 39 of all Civil and Political Rights Set Forth in the Covenant Article 4. The Right of States Party to the Present 41 Covenant to Take Measures Derogating from their obligations under the Present Covenant Article 5. Protection from Curtailment of any of the Rights 43 and Freedoms Recognized in the Present Covenant Article 6. Protection of the Right to Life 44 Article 7.