Scotch Creek and Sinlahekin Wildlife Areas Management Plan Acknowledgements Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Scotch Creek and Sinlahekin Wildlife Areas Management Plan Acknowledgements Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff April 2017 Scotch Creek and Sinlahekin Wildlife Areas Management Plan Acknowledgements Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Planning Team Members Plan Leadership and Content Development Justin Haug Sara Hanson Jim Olson, Scotch Creek Wildlife Area Manager Jim Olson Jeff Heinlen Justin Haug, Sinlahekin Wildlife Area Manager Daniel Christensen Connie Iten Jeanne Demorest, Lands Planner Michael Dehart Jamie Bass Lauri Vigue, Lands Planner Bryan Dupont Dale Swedberg Melinda Posner, Wildlife Area Planning Section Manager Scott Fitkin Mark Teske Clay Sprague, Lands Division Manager Ryan Fortier Nathan Wehmeyer Document Production Mapping Support Michelle Dunlop, Public Affairs John Talmadge, GIS Peggy Ushakoff, Public Affairs Shelly Snyder, GIS Matthew Trenda, Wildlife Program Scotch Creek and Sinlahekin Wildlife Areas Advisory Committee Roster, March 2017 Name Organization City Tim Vugteveen Department of Natural Resources Oroville Carolyn Davis Okanogan Economic Alliance Omak Julie Alley Tonasket Chamber of Commerce Tonasket Greg Bennett Okanogan Fly Club Omak Anna Lyon Okanogan County Noxious Weed Office Okanogan Char Schumacher Okanogan County Planning Okanogan Jerry Barnes Okanogan County Cattleman’s Association Loomis Dick Finch Okanogan Wildlife Council Omak Joe Berney Neighbor Okanogan Kelly McDonald Neighbor / Agriculture Lessee Tonasket Dave Sunde Backcountry Horseman of Washington Tonasket Heather Findlay North Central Washington Audubon Society Okanogan Jerry DeBacker Okanogan Land Trust Okanogan Craig Nelson Okanogan Conservation District Okanogan Will Keller Natural Resources Conservation Service Okanogan Matt Marsh U.S. Forest Service Tonasket Mark Williams Bureau of Land Management Wenatchee Rick Lind Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation Tonasket Tom Windsor North Central ATV Club of Washington Omak Jeff Hardesty Oroville Superindendent Oroville Cover Photos: Similkameen-Chopaka Unit of Scotch Creek WLA, monarch butterfly and white-tailed deer by Justin Haug 2 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Scotch Creek & Sinlahekin Wildlife Areas Jim Unsworth, Director, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Scotch Creek and Sinlahekin Wildlife Areas Management Plan April 2017 Scotch Creek and Sinlahekin Wildlife Areas Management Plan 3 Table of Contents List of Acronyms & Abbreviations 7 Wildlife Area Management Planning Overview 9 Introduction 9 Wildlife Area Management Planning Framework 9 Purpose 9 Public Outreach and Stakeholder Involvement Process 9 Vision 9 Statewide Planning Goals 9 Success Stories 11 Wildlife Areas Overview 17 Property Location and Size 17 Scotch Creek Wildlife Area 19 Sinlahekin Wildlife Area 41 Geology and Soils 64 Hydrology and Watersheds 65 Resource Management 66 Species Management 71 Fish Species 82 Habitat Management 86 Ecological Systems and Ecological Integrity 87 Habitat Connectivity 89 Forest Management 90 Fire History and Management 92 Rare Plants 94 Weed Management 94 Restoration 95 Cultural Resources 95 Climate 96 Current Climate 96 Climate Change 96 Research and Other Studies 99 Recreation and Public Use 99 Road Management 103 4 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Land Ownership and Management 104 Acquisition History, Funding and Purpose 104 Encumbrances and Deed Restrictions 105 Easements 105 Water Rights 105 Managing Lands on Behalf of Other Entities 105 Other Entities Operating on WDFW Lands 105 Local Land Use Plans 106 Administration and Staffing 107 Enforcement 107 Facilities and Maintenance 107 Management Direction and Approach 108 Management Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures 108 Adaptive Management/Monitoring 108 References 109 Appendices 111 A Goals, Objectives & Performance Measures 112 B Research and Other Studies 123 C Rare Plants on the Sinlahekin WLA 124 D Weed Management Plan 125 E Species and Habitat Information 129 F Fire Management 131 G Cultural Resources Summary 136 H Water Access Sites 146 I Summary of Public Process 153 Scotch Creek and Sinlahekin Wildlife Areas Management Plan 5 Figures 1. Okanogan River Stramflow Data 2016 (USGS) 2. Scotch Creek and Chesaw Sharp-tailed Grouse Populations Tables 1. State and Federal Conservation Status, WDFW Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) and SGCN Criteria and Priority Areas that may occur on the wildlife area units 2. Summary of non-salmonid presence on the WLAs 3. Ecological Systems of Concern Summary for Scotch Creek and Sinlahekin Wildlife AreasEcological System of Concern 4. Wildfires with Significant Impact on Scotch Creek and Sinlahekin Wildlife Areas 5. Key impacts of climate change, potential management actions and information gaps for forest habitats 6. Key impacts of climate change, potential management actions and information gaps for grassland and shrubland habitats 7. Vulnerability Assessment Information for Key Species 8. Potential Climate Impacts, Effect on Habitat and Management Actions 9. Recreational Opportunities on Scotch Creek and Sinlahekin Wildlife Areas 10. Grazing and Agricultural Leases Summary for each unit 11. Scotch Creek and Sinlahekin Wildlife Area Units and Regulatory Designations 12. Appendix A Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures 13. Appendix B Research and other studies 14. Appendix C Rare Plants on the Sinlahekin Wildlife Area 15. Appendix D Weed Class and Unit Location 16. Appendix E Species of Greatest Conservation Need Relationship with Ecological Systems of Concern 17. Appendix H Water Access Sites in Eastern Okanogan County 18. Appendix I WDFW response to public comments received during SEPA process 6 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife List of Acronyms & Abbreviations BLM Bureau of Land Management BPA Bonneville Power Administration DAHP Washington State Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation DNR Washington State Department of Natural Resources EIA Ecological Integrity Assessment EIM Ecological Integrity Monitoring ESA Endangered Species Act IPM Integrated Pest Management NEWICC Northeast Washington Interagency Communications Center PHS Priority Habitats and Species RCW Revised Code of Washington RCO Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office SEPA State Environmental Policy Act SERP Sinlahekin Ecosystem Restoration Project SGCN Species of Greatest Conservation Need SRFB Salmon Recovery Funding Board SWAP State Wildlife Action Plan TNC The Nature Conservancy USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service USFS United States Forest Service WAC Washington Administrative Code WA AC Wildlife Area Advisory Committee WDFW Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife WLA Wildlife Area WHCWG Washington Wildlife Habitat Connectivity Working Group WWRP Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program Scotch Creek and Sinlahekin Wildlife Areas Management Plan 7 Fleabane and Silky Lupine on Carter Mountain Unit Photo by Justin Haug 8 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Wildlife Area Management Planning Overview Introduction Purpose Under state law, the Washington Department of Fish and The purpose of this management plan is to guide management Wildlife (WDFW) is charged with “preserving, protecting activities occurring on the Scotch Creek and Sinlahekin and perpetuating” the state’s fish and wildlife species, wildlife areas for the next 10 years. Management goals, while also providing sustainable recreational opportunities objectives and performance measures are defined in Appendix that are compatible with fish and wildlife stewardship. A. These were developed to be consistent with WDFW’s As of 2017, WDFW owns or manages nearly one million mission, strategic plan and requirements associated with the acres in 33 wildlife areas across the state, whose diversity funds used to purchase the wildlife areas. The plan is intended includes nearly all species and habitats present in the state. to provide a clear vision of how these lands are managed for a With the loss of natural habitat posing the single greatest variety of audiences, including WDFW staff and the public. threat to native fish and wildlife, these areas play a critical conservation role. The wildlife area management plan Public Outreach and Stakeholder addresses all aspects of resource management, and aligns Involvement Process with statewide conservation goals. The agency is committed to a transparent and inclusive public The Scotch Creek and Sinlahekin Wildlife Areas outreach process for all wildlife area management plans. Under Management Plan was developed by an interdisciplinary the umbrella of the statewide goals listed below, a customized team of WDFW staff and with significant public outreach strategy was developed for these areas, tailored to involvement. This included input from the local local and regional stakeholders, as well as local and out of stakeholder-based Scotch Creek and Sinlahekin Wildlife town visitors and user groups. For this plan, the public process Area Advisory Committee (WAAC), input from included three elements: 1) public and advisory committee Okanogan County and other public agencies, and input meetings; 2) development and distribution of fact sheets, from other interested citizens gathered from two public meeting announcements and news releases; and, 3) solicitation meetings. of public comments through phone, email and the WDFW website. A complete summary of the public outreach activities Wildlife Area Management Planning is included in Appendix I. Framework Management of these areas is guided by WDFW’s Vision mission and strategic plan, as well as by state and federal Instead of one overall vision, WDFW has a vision for each of laws.
Recommended publications
  • The Washington Climate Change Impacts Assessment
    The Washington Climate Change Impacts Assessment Evaluating Washington’s Future in a Changing Climate ........................................................................................................ A report by The Climate Impacts Group University of Washington Climate Science June 2009 in the Public Interest Recommended citation: Climate Impacts Group, 2009. The Washington Climate Change Impacts Assessment, M. McGuire Elsner, J. Littell, and L Whitely Binder (eds). Center for Science in the Earth System, Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Oceans, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Available at: http://www.cses.washington.edu/db/pdf/wacciareport681.pdf Front cover satellite image credit: http://visibleearth.nasa.gov/view_rec.php?vev1id=4786 NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration Visible Earth: A catalog of NASA images and animations of our home planet Provided by the SeaWiFS Project, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, and ORBIMAGE The Pacific Northwest is cloud-free in this SeaWiFS image. Multihued phytoplankton blooms are visible off of Washington's Olympic coast. Also visible in this image are: Fraser River outflow, snowcapped peaks of Mt. Olympus, Mt. Rainier, Mt. Adams, Mt. Hood, Mt. Jefferson, the Three Sisters, the North Cascades, and the Columbia and Snake River watersheds. Metadata * Sensor OrbView-2/SeaWiFS * Visualization Date 2000-09-26 * The Visible Earth is part of the EOS Project Science Office located at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. Small images credits: Wheat: © 2009 www.photos.com Coast; Seattle skyline: © J. Martin Grassley McNary Dam: courtesy Bonneville Power Administration Salmon: courtesy University of Washington News and Information Forest: courtesy Climate Impacts Group, University of Washington Report design: Beth Tully, Edit-Design Center, University of Washington The Washington Climate Change Impacts Assessment Evaluating Washington’s Future in a Changing Climate ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Colville and Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forests Revised Forest Plans Frequently Asked Questions
    Colville and Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forests Revised Forest Plans Frequently Asked Questions Plans and Planning Rule and Process Q. What is a Forest Plan? A. A forest plan, or land and resource management plan (LRMP), is a tool that provides a framework and broad guidance for making management decisions for a Forest unit, while providing technical boundaries for protecting the environment. They are strategic and programmatic, and identify desired conditions for national forest lands. Similar to county land- use zoning plans, they identify areas where various types of activities may occur, such as harvesting trees or certain types of recreational uses. Q. When were the existing Forest Plans approved? A. The Colville forest plan was completed in 1988, the Okanogan in 1989, and the Wenatchee in 1990. Q. Why revise current land management plans (LMPs)? A. Revision is required by law (NFMA, National Forest Management Act of 1976). The existing Forest Plans have reached their intended 15-year life. Both public comment and new science show some need for change to the existing Plans. Much has changed since the existing set of forest plans were approved in the late 80’s, including changes in public values and expectations from public lands, recreation demands and types of recreation uses, demographics and development patterns, and natural resource policy. Other changes have occurred on the landscape itself; and there have been advances in our knowledge about landscape processes, science and technology. Even though amendments have been made over time to the existing plans to adapt to some of those changes, they still do not fully reflect the current needs of the forest and neighboring communities.
    [Show full text]
  • PARKS and RECREATION COMMISSION 2021 Prices for Cabins, Yurts and Vacation Houses (Prices Shown Without Tax)
    WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 2021 Prices for Cabins, Yurts and Vacation Houses (Prices shown without tax) Peak Season Shoulder Season Winter Apr 1 - May 14 May 15 - September 15 November 1 - March 31 & Sept 16 - Oct 31 Weekends & Weekends Weekends & Park & Facility Weeknights Holidays Weeknights & Holidays Weeknights Holidays BATTLE GROUND LAKE STATE PARK Cabins 79 79 69 69 55 55 BAY VIEW STATE PARK Cabins 1-4 79 79 69 69 55 55 Cabins 5-6 89 89 79 79 65 65 BELFAIR STATE PARK Cabins 79 79 59 69 55 55 BROOKS MEMORIAL STATE PARK Wall Tents 45 45 40 40 40 40 CAMA BEACH STATE PARK See end of table. CAMANO ISLAND STATE PARK See end of table. CAPE DISAPPOINTMENT STATE PARK Cabins 79 79 64 74 64 74 Yurts 79 79 64 74 64 74 Lighthouse Keeper 339 447 229 303 229 303 Ass't Lighthouse Kpr 241 318 164 217 164 217 COLUMBIA HILLS STATE PARK Rustic Cabins 50 50 50 50 50 50 CONCONULLY STATE PARK Cabin C1 79 79 64 69 60 60 Cabin C2-C5 69 69 54 59 54 54 DASH POINT STATE PARK Cabins 80 80 70 70 65 65 DECEPTION PASS STATE PARK C1 Ben Ure Island 99 99 79 79 69 69 WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 2020 Prices for Cabins, Yurts and Vacation Houses (Prices shown without tax) Peak Season Shoulder Season Winter Apr 1 - May 14 May 15 - September 15 November 1 - March 31 & Sept 16 - Oct 31 Weekends & Weekends Weekends & Park & Facility Weeknights Holidays Weeknights & Holidays Weeknights Holidays C2-C6 Campground 79 84 69 79 55 55 C7 Cornet Bay 100 100 100 100 100 100 C8 Cornet Bay 120 120 120 120 120 120 DOSEWALLIPS STATE PARK Cabins
    [Show full text]
  • Owl Mountain Wilderness Evaluation
    May-June 2009 Owl Mountain Wilderness Evaluation WILDERNESS EVALUATION Owl Mountain – 621016 11,083 acres OVERVIEW History The 2006 inventory identified this area as meeting the criteria for a potential wilderness area (PWA) as described in Forest Service Handbook (FSH) 1909.12, Chapter 70. The area had not been identified in any previous inventory. The following chart depicts the current 1988 Colville National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan direction for the 2006 inventoried area. Table 1--Management area percentages (rounded) Colville National Forest MA1 MA10 MA5 MA6 MA7 MA8 Old Growth Semi- Scenic Scenic/ Wood/ Winter Dependant primitive, Timber Winter Forage Range Species Motorized range Habitat Recreation 32% 37% 9% 12% 6% 3% Location and Access The Owl Mountain Proposed Wilderness Area (PWA) is contained wholly within Ferry County in T. 40 N., R. 35 E., Sec. 1, 12 13, 23, 24, and 25; and T. 40 N, R. 36 E., Sec. 3 – 10, 15 – 22, 27 – 31, and 34. The area is accessed on the east side through the Little Boulder/Independent Creek road systems, ultimately Forest Road 9576-370, which ends at a road closure on Huckleberry Ridge. There is no access from the north because of the Canadian border. The northeast side of the area is extremely rugged and steep and provides no access. Access from the southeast side is along U.S. Highway 395. However, very few people actually access the area from this side. The terrain on the lower slope is such that few hike up from the highway. Most of the access to this area is derived from driving into the heart of the Kerry Creek watershed on Forest Road 9576-150, which leads to the east end of Forest Trail 102 (Owl Mountain Motorized Trail).
    [Show full text]
  • Snowmobiles in the Wilderness
    Snowmobiles in the Wilderness: You can help W a s h i n g t o n S t a t e P a r k s A necessary prohibition Join us in safeguarding winter recreation: Each year, more and more people are riding snowmobiles • When riding in a new area, obtain a map. into designated Wilderness areas, which is a concern for • Familiarize yourself with Wilderness land managers, the public and many snowmobile groups. boundaries, and don’t cross them. This may be happening for a variety of reasons: many • Carry the message to clubs, groups and friends. snowmobilers may not know where the Wilderness boundaries are or may not realize the area is closed. For more information about snowmobiling opportunities or Wilderness areas, please contact: Wilderness…a special place Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission (360) 902-8500 Established by Congress through the Wilderness Washington State Snowmobile Association (800) 784-9772 Act of 1964, “Wilderness” is a special land designation North Cascades National Park (360) 854-7245 within national forests and certain other federal lands. Colville National Forest (509) 684-7000 These areas were designated so that an untouched Gifford Pinchot National Forest (360) 891-5000 area of our wild lands could be maintained in a natural Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest (425) 783-6000 state. Also, they were set aside as places where people Mt. Rainier National Park (877) 270-7155 could get away from the sights and sounds of modern Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest (509) 664-9200 civilization and where elements of our cultural history Olympic National Forest (360) 956-2402 could be preserved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Spring Cattle Grazing on the Nutritional Ecology of Mule Deer
    THE EFFECTS OF SPRING CATTLE GRAZING ON THE NUTRITIONAL ECOLOGY OF MULE DEER (ODOCOILEUS HEMIONUS) IN EASTERN WASHINGTON By SARA JANE WAGONER A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCES IN NATURAL RESOURCE SCIENCES WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Department of Natural Resource Sciences MAY 2011 To the Faculty of Washington State University The members of the Committee appointed to examine the thesis of SARA JANE WAGONER find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted ________________________________ Lisa A. Shipley, Ph.D., Chair ________________________________ Linda H. Hardesty, Ph.D. ________________________________ Kristen A. Johnson, Ph.D. ________________________________ Karen L. Launchbaugh, Ph.D. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project was fully funded and supported by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), and partnered by the Washington Cattlemen’s Association. My advisor, Dr. Lisa A. Shipley, whom was the brain-child and brawn-child behind this enormous endeavor, tirelessly offered perspective and assistance when I needed it, and I am forever indebted. A sincere thank you to my committee members: Linda Hardesty, Kristen Johnson, and Karen Launchbaugh for contributing their range science expertise and logistical input to our experimental design. I extend my appreciation to Rachel and John Cook, for giving me the opportunity to work along side them at Starkey; it gave me a real grasp on what I was getting into; especially to Rachel, for her professional guidance, friendship, and assistance towards this project. Thank you Laura Applegate, Taryn Clark, Becky Greenwood, Ben Maletzke, Tamara Johnstone-Yellin. and Sarah McCusker for selflessly pitching in, you are truly great friends.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Basalts and Glacier Floods—Roadside Geology
    u 0 by Robert J. Carson and Kevin R. Pogue WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Information Circular 90 January 1996 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENTOF Natural Resources Jennifer M. Belcher - Commissioner of Public Lands Kaleen Cottingham - Supervisor FLOOD BASALTS AND GLACIER FLOODS: Roadside Geology of Parts of Walla Walla, Franklin, and Columbia Counties, Washington by Robert J. Carson and Kevin R. Pogue WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Information Circular 90 January 1996 Kaleen Cottingham - Supervisor Division of Geology and Earth Resources WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Jennifer M. Belcher-Commissio11er of Public Lands Kaleeo Cottingham-Supervisor DMSION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Raymond Lasmanis-State Geologist J. Eric Schuster-Assistant State Geologist William S. Lingley, Jr.-Assistant State Geologist This report is available from: Publications Washington Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resources P.O. Box 47007 Olympia, WA 98504-7007 Price $ 3.24 Tax (WA residents only) ~ Total $ 3.50 Mail orders must be prepaid: please add $1.00 to each order for postage and handling. Make checks payable to the Department of Natural Resources. Front Cover: Palouse Falls (56 m high) in the canyon of the Palouse River. Printed oo recycled paper Printed io the United States of America Contents 1 General geology of southeastern Washington 1 Magnetic polarity 2 Geologic time 2 Columbia River Basalt Group 2 Tectonic features 5 Quaternary sedimentation 6 Road log 7 Further reading 7 Acknowledgments 8 Part 1 - Walla Walla to Palouse Falls (69.0 miles) 21 Part 2 - Palouse Falls to Lower Monumental Dam (27.0 miles) 26 Part 3 - Lower Monumental Dam to Ice Harbor Dam (38.7 miles) 33 Part 4 - Ice Harbor Dam to Wallula Gap (26.7 mi les) 38 Part 5 - Wallula Gap to Walla Walla (42.0 miles) 44 References cited ILLUSTRATIONS I Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • (Asos) Implementation Plan
    AUTOMATED SURFACE OBSERVING SYSTEM (ASOS) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN VAISALA CEILOMETER - CL31 November 14, 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service / Office of Operational Systems/Observing Systems Branch National Weather Service / Office of Science and Technology/Development Branch Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary............................................................................ iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose................................................................................. 2 1.3 Scope.................................................................................... 2 1.4 Applicable Documents......................................................... 2 1.5 Points of Contact.................................................................. 4 2.0 Pre-Operational Implementation Activities ............................ 6 3.0 Operational Implementation Planning Activities ................... 6 3.1 Planning/Decision Activities ............................................... 7 3.2 Logistic Support Activities .................................................. 11 3.3 Configuration Management (CM) Activities....................... 12 3.4 Operational Support Activities ............................................ 12 4.0 Operational Implementation (OI) Activities .........................
    [Show full text]
  • The Wild Cascades
    THE WILD CASCADES October-November 1969 2 THE WILD CASCADES FARTHEST EAST: CHOPAKA MOUNTAIN Field Notes of an N3C Reconnaissance State of Washington, school lands managed by May 1969 the Department of Natural Resources. The absolute easternmost peak of the North Cascades is Chopaka Mountain, 7882 feet. An This probably is the most spectacular chunk abrupt and impressive 6700-foot scarp drops of alpine terrain owned by the state. Certain­ from the flowery summit to blue waters of ly its fame will soon spread far beyond the Palmer Lake and meanders of the Similka- Okanogan. Certainly the state should take a mean River, surrounded by green pastures new, close look at Chopaka and develop a re­ and orchards. Beyond, across this wide vised management plan that takes into account trough of a Pleistocene glacier, roll brown the scenic and recreational resources. hills of the Okanogan Highlands. Northward are distant, snowy beginnings of Canadian ranges. Far south, Tiffany Mountain stands above forested branches of Toats Coulee Our gang became aware of Chopaka on the Creek. Close to the west is the Pasayten Fourth of July weekend of 1968 while explor­ Wilderness Area, dominated here by Windy ing Horseshoe Basin -- now protected (except Peak, Horseshoe Mountain, Arnold Peak — from Emmet Smith's cattle) within the Pasay­ the Horseshoe Basin country. Farther west, ten Wilderness Area. We looked east to the hazy-dreamy on the horizon, rise summits of wide-open ridges of Chopaka Mountain and the Chelan Crest and Washington Pass. were intrigued. To get there, drive the Okanogan Valley to On our way to Horseshoe Basin we met Wil­ Tonasket and turn west to Loomis in the Sin- lis Erwin, one of the Okanoganites chiefly lahekin Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal to Purchase Land Along the Methow River Would Protect Fish
    Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Fact Sheet BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION Fact Sheet Fact Sheet Habitat ConseRvation – PubliC NotiCe february 2011 Conservancy will own and manage the land. A conservation Proposal to purchase land easement will be placed on the property to permanently along the Methow River protect the land for conservation values. BPA would have Fact Sheet rights of enforcement to the easement. would protect fish habitat Land management: The Methow Conservancy in Okanogan County will lead the development of a baseline assessment and management plan to guide the protection of the land and Location: Winthrop, Okanogan County, Wash. enhancement of the riparian habitat for fish. The management plan will be updated periodically to account 1 Acres: for changes on the property and consider the best Fact Sheet available science. Partners: The Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation and the Methow Conservancy For more information Purpose: The Bonneville Power Administration is Bonneville Power AdministrAtion: proposing to fund the purchase of land in the Methow Jay Marcotte, project manager, 800-622-4519 or River watershed in north-central Washington to protect 503-230-3943, [email protected] fish habitat. This property was chosen to ensure the ongoingFact success of existing riparianSheet protection projects in ConfederAted triBes And BAnds of the Cedarosa area. The Methow Conservancy already has the YAkAmA Nation: conservation easements on 20 nearby properties. The Brandon Rogers, tribal biologist, 509-949-4109, Methow River watershed is important for fish conservation [email protected] because it supports populations of Upper Columbia spring the methow ConservAncy: chinook salmon, Upper Columbia steelhead, and Jeanne White, conservation project manager, Columbia River bull trout, which are all listed as threatened 1-509-996-2870, [email protected] or endangeredFact under the Endangered Sheet Species Act.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013-15 Capital Budget Omnibus Capital Only
    2013-15 Capital Budget Omnibus Capital Only TABLE OF CONTENTS Subject Page Capital Budget pages begin with C - Budget Highlights .............................................................................. 1 Bar Chart: Total Appropriations in the Capital Budget (10 Year History) ................................ 6 Pie Chart: Capital Budget by Functional Area Comparison of 2011-13 and 2013-15 Enacted ................ 7 New Appropriations Project List .................................................................. 8 Alternatively Financed Projects .................................................................. 20 Project Lists Housing Trust Fund Project List – LEAP Capital Document 2013-1A ............................... 21 Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account – LEAP Capital Document 2013-2B .......................... 24 Trust Land Transfer Program – LEAP Capital Document 2013-3A ................................. 25 Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program – LEAP Capital Document 2013-6A .................... 26 Projects for Jobs and Economic Development ................................................... 32 Projects that Strengthen Communities and Quality of Life ......................................... 33 Projects that Strengthen Youth and Families .................................................... 35 Building for the Arts ....................................................................... 36 Youth Recreational Facilities ................................................................ 37 Building Communities Fund ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Study Areas
    I ___- .-ll..l .“..l..““l.--..- I. _.^.___” _^.__.._._ - ._____.-.-.. ------ FEDERAL LAND M.ANAGEMENT Status and Uses of Wilderness Study Areas I 150156 RESTRICTED--Not to be released outside the General Accounting Wice unless specifically approved by the Office of Congressional Relations. ssBO4’8 RELEASED ---- ---. - (;Ao/li:( ‘I:I)-!L~-l~~lL - United States General Accounting OfTice GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division B-262989 September 23,1993 The Honorable Bruce F. Vento Chairman, Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands Committee on Natural Resources House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: Concerned about alleged degradation of areas being considered for possible inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System (wilderness study areas), you requested that we provide you with information on the types and effects of activities in these study areas. As agreed with your office, we gathered information on areas managed by two agencies: the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (BLN) and the Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service. Specifically, this report provides information on (1) legislative guidance and the agency policies governing wilderness study area management, (2) the various activities and uses occurring in the agencies’ study areas, (3) the ways these activities and uses affect the areas, and (4) agency actions to monitor and restrict these uses and to repair damage resulting from them. Appendixes I and II provide data on the number, acreage, and locations of wilderness study areas managed by BLM and the Forest Service, as well as data on the types of uses occurring in the areas.
    [Show full text]