DOCSLIB.ORG

Levi Teitz Thesis Final Version

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Levi Teitz Thesis Final Version The effects of natural selection on human Y chromosome amplicons by Levi S. Teitz Bachelor of Science, Biological Sciences University of Maryland, College Park, 2013 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN BIOLOGY AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JUNE 2018 ©2018 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Signature of Author: _______________________________________________________ Department of Biology May 29, 2018 Certified by: _____________________________________________________________ David C. Page Professor of Biology Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: _____________________________________________________________ Amy E. Keating Professor of Biology Co-Chair, Biology Graduate Committee The effects of natural selection on human Y chromosome amplicons by Levi S. Teitz Submitted to the Department of Biology on May 29, 2018 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology ABSTRACT The Y chromosome is unique among the mammalian chromosomes: it determines sex, and is therefore normally present in a single copy, unlike all other chromosomes that can recombine with an identical homolog. These two facts have had profound effects on the fate of the Y chromosome, subjecting it to unique evolutionary pressures that caused the loss of most of its genes. Because of this lack of functional genes, speculation abounded that natural selection is ineffective on a chromosome that lacks a homolog with which to recombine, and that the Y chromosome is doomed to eventually fade away. In recent years, evidence has been building that the Y chromosome is indeed shaped by evolutionary forces acting to maintain its functional genes. However, these studies bypassed the amplicons—large, highly identical segmental duplications—which are a prominent feature of mammalian Y chromosomes and contain many genes crucial for spermatogenesis. In this thesis, we present evidence that natural selection acts on the ampliconic regions of the human Y chromosome. We first develop computational tools to detect amplicon copy number changes from whole genome sequencing data of 1216 men, and find that many men have such changes. By projecting those changes onto a phylogenetic tree of the analyzed Y chromosomes, we find that the reference copy number of each amplicon is ancestral to all modern human Y chromosomes. We then use simulations and novel analytical methods to demonstrate that the ancestral copy number of each amplicon is maintained by selection within diverse human lineages, even in the face of extremely high rates of mutation. Finally, we find that deleted amplicons are preferentially restored to their previous copy number by subsequent duplications. These results are another step forward in the ongoing reframing the history of the mammalian Y chromosome: the Y chromosome is not the victim of random neutral processes, but is the carefully calibrated result of complex interplay between various selective forces. Thesis Supervisor: David C. Page Title: Professor of Biology 3 4 To Grandma, Grandpa, Sabba, and Savta 5 6 בס״ד ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, thank you to my advisor, David Page, for your endless encouragement and faith in me. You are a true mentor, always looking to guide me and help me grow as a scientist. Your meticulous approach to research and the conscientious philosophy with which you run your lab are models that I can only hope to emulate in the future, wherever it takes me. I joined the Page lab not just because of the science but also because of the people, who have created an amazingly warm, collaborative, and intellectually challenging atmosphere. Special thanks to Helen Skaletsky, for constantly sharing your incredible expertise and helping my science reach new heights; Tatyana Pyntikova, for helping me break my streak of doing no non-computational experiments, and for the tremendous amount of work you put in to assist me with my research; Laura Brown, for your kindness and care that shine through while sitting next to you every day; and Katherine Romer, for your friendship in sharing board game nights, puzzle hunts, and much more with me. And thank you to Winston Bellott. From the time I was your rotation student until today, you have happily acted as my sounding board and proofreader, taught me a tremendous amount through our countless conversations on every topic, kept me up to date on various rocket launches (from both Earth and Kerbin), and answered literally thousands of my questions. Your unending enthusiasm for and knowledge of both science and everything else is inspiring. Thank you as well to the members of my thesis committee: Dave Bartel, Jing-Ke Weng, and Andy Clark, for your generous and valuable advice. To my friends, in Cambridge, Somerville, and elsewhere: the meals, movies, cooking sessions, songs, games, shows, visits, phone calls, and more that we’ve shared have kept me going over the past five years. Without you, none of this work would have been possible. And finally, to my family. I love you, and thank you for everything. 7 8 CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 11 PART I: THE Y CHROMOSOME IN THE PRE-GENOMIC ERA .................................................13 PART II: COMPLETE SEQUENCE OF Y CHROMOSOMES ......................................................22 PART III: Y CHROMOSOME VARIATION ............................................................................35 PART IV: CURRENT OPINIONS ON Y CHROMOSOME AMPLICONS ......................................48 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................50 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................50 CHAPTER 2: SELECTION HAS COUNTERED HIGH MUTABILITY TO PRESERVE THE ANCESTRAL COPY NUMBER OF Y CHROMOSOME AMPLICONS IN DIVERSE HUMAN LINEAGES ....................................................................................... 61 SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................63 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................64 RESULTS ..........................................................................................................................70 DISCUSSION .....................................................................................................................99 MATERIAL AND METHODS .............................................................................................105 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................116 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................116 SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL AND METHODS ....................................................................123 SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES AND TABLES ...........................................................................129 CHAPTER 3: CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK .............................................141 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................143 FUTURE WORK ...............................................................................................................145 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................150 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................150 9 10 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ______________________________________ 11 12 PART I: THE Y CHROMOSOME IN THE PRE-GENOMIC ERA THE DISCOVERY OF THE Y CHROMOSOME The first Y chromosome was discovered in 1905. Two studies observed via light microscopy that several insect species have a male-specific chromosome: each species has the same number of chromosomes in male and female, but in males one chromosome is significantly smaller than the rest (Stevens, 1905; Wilson, 1905). Until that point, scientists had only been aware of the X chromosome, of which one copy is absent in males (Henking, 1891; Sutton, 1902). Due to its male-specific nature, the Y chromosome was hypothesized to play a role in sex determination (Stevens, 1905; Wilson, 1905). This hypothesis ended up being partially true: exceptions include fruit flies, whose sex is determined by the ratio of X chromosomes to autosomes, but which require the Y chromosome for male fertility (Bridges, 1916). While most early sex chromosome research was done in insects, studies identifying human and other mammalian Y chromosomes followed (Painter, 1921). However, the mammalian Y chromosome’s role in sex determination remained unclear until 1959, when studies of men with Klinefelter syndrome, who have two X chromosomes and one Y chromosome, and women with Turner syndrome, who have just a single X chromosome, demonstrated that maleness in humans depends on the presence or absence of the Y chromosome (Ford et al., 1959; Jacobs and Strong, 1959). Y CHROMOSOME EVOLUTIONARY THEORY In his studies of fly genetics, Hermann Muller noted that many traits exhibited the pattern of X-chromosome linkage, but none had been linked to the Y chromosome 13 (Muller,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sequence Analysis in Bos Taurus Reveals Pervasiveness of X–Y Arms Races in Mammalian Lineages
    Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on September 25, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Research Sequence analysis in Bos taurus reveals pervasiveness of X–Y arms races in mammalian lineages Jennifer F. Hughes,1 Helen Skaletsky,1,2 Tatyana Pyntikova,1 Natalia Koutseva,1 Terje Raudsepp,3 Laura G. Brown,1,2 Daniel W. Bellott,1 Ting-Jan Cho,1 Shannon Dugan-Rocha,4 Ziad Khan,4 Colin Kremitzki,5 Catrina Fronick,5 Tina A. Graves-Lindsay,5 Lucinda Fulton,5 Wesley C. Warren,5,7 Richard K. Wilson,5,8 Elaine Owens,3 James E. Womack,3 William J. Murphy,3 Donna M. Muzny,4 Kim C. Worley,4 Bhanu P. Chowdhary,3,9 Richard A. Gibbs,4 and David C. Page1,2,6 1Whitehead Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA; 2Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Whitehead Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA; 3College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA; 4Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA; 5The McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63108, USA; 6Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA Studies of Y Chromosome evolution have focused primarily on gene decay, a consequence of suppression of crossing-over with the X Chromosome. Here, we provide evidence that suppression of X–Y crossing-over unleashed a second dynamic: selfish X–Y arms races that reshaped the sex chromosomes in mammals as different as cattle, mice, and men. Using su- per-resolution sequencing, we explore the Y Chromosome of Bos taurus (bull) and find it to be dominated by massive, lin- eage-specific amplification of testis-expressed gene families, making it the most gene-dense Y Chromosome sequenced to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Evolution of a Y Chromosome to Autosome Gene Duplication in Drosophila Research Article
    Molecular Evolution of a Y Chromosome to Autosome Gene Duplication in Drosophila Kelly A. Dyer,*,1 Brooke E. White,1 Michael J. Bray,1 Daniel G. Pique´,1 and Andrea J. Betancourt* ,2 1Department of Genetics, University of Georgia 2Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Ashworth Labs, Edinburgh, United Kingdom Present address: Institute for Population Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna 1210, Austria *Corresponding author: [email protected], [email protected]. Associate editor: Jody Hey Abstract In contrast to the rest of the genome, the Y chromosome is restricted to males and lacks recombination. As a result, Research article Y chromosomes are unable to respond efficiently to selection, and newly formed Y chromosomes degenerate until few genes remain. The rapid loss of genes from newly formed Y chromosomes has been well studied, but gene loss from highly degenerate Y chromosomes has only recently received attention. Here, we identify and characterize a Y to autosome duplication of the male fertility gene kl-5 that occurred during the evolution of the testacea group species of Drosophila. The duplication was likely DNA based, as other Y-linked genes remain on the Y chromosome, the locations of introns are conserved, and expression analyses suggest that regulatory elements remain linked. Genetic mapping reveals that the autosomal copy of kl-5 resides on the dot chromosome, a tiny autosome with strongly suppressed recombination. Molecular evolutionary analyses show that autosomal copies of kl-5 have reduced polymorphism and little recombination. Importantly, the rate of protein evolution of kl-5 has increased significantly in lineages where it is on the dot versus Y linked.
    [Show full text]
  • ©Copyright 2008 Joseph A. Ross the Evolution of Sex-Chromosome Systems in Stickleback Fishes
    ©Copyright 2008 Joseph A. Ross The Evolution of Sex-Chromosome Systems in Stickleback Fishes Joseph A. Ross A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2008 Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Molecular and Cellular Biology University of Washington Graduate School This is to certify that I have examined this copy of a doctoral dissertation by Joseph A. Ross and have found that it is complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the final examining committee have been made. Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Catherine L. Peichel Reading Committee: Catherine L. Peichel Steven Henikoff Barbara J. Trask Date: In presenting this dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the doctoral degree at the University of Washington, I agree that the Library shall make its copies freely available for inspection. I further agree that extensive copying of the dissertation is allowable only for scholarly purposes, consistent with “fair use” as prescribed in the U.S. Copyright Law. Requests for copying or reproduction of this dissertation may be referred to ProQuest Information and Learning, 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346, 1-800-521-0600, to whom the author has granted “the right to reproduce and sell (a) copies of the manuscript in microform and/or (b) printed copies of the manuscript made from microform.” Signature Date University of Washington Abstract The Evolution of Sex-Chromosome Systems in Stickleback Fishes Joseph A. Ross Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Affiliate Assistant Professor Catherine L.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Y Chromosome Ampliconic Genes in Great Apes
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School EVOLUTION OF Y CHROMOSOME AMPLICONIC GENES IN GREAT APES A Dissertation in Bioinformatics and Genomics by Rahulsimham Vegesna © 2020 Rahulsimham Vegesna Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2020 The dissertation of Rahulsimham Vegesna was reviewed and approved by the following: Paul Medvedev Associate Professor of Computer Science & Engineering Associate Professor of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology Dissertation Co-Adviser Co-Chair of Committee Kateryna D. Makova Pentz Professor of Biology Dissertation Co-Adviser Co-Chair of Committee Michael DeGiorgio Associate Professor of Biology and Statistics Wansheng Liu Professor of Animal Genomics George H. Perry Chair, Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Bioinformatics and Genomics Associate Professor of Anthropology and Biology ii ABSTRACT In addition to the sex-determining gene SRY and several other single-copy genes, the human Y chromosome harbors nine multi-copy gene families which are expressed exclusively in testis. In humans, these gene families are important for spermatogenesis and their loss is observed in patients suffering from infertility. However, only five of the nine ampliconic gene families are found across great apes, while others are missing or pseudogenized in some species. My research goal is to understand the evolution of the Y ampliconic gene families in humans and in non-human great ape species. The specific objectives I addressed in this dissertation are 1. To test whether Y ampliconic gene expression levels depend on their copy number and whether there is a gene dosage compensation to counteract the ampliconic gene copy number variation observed in humans.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetics, a Mating Experiment Called a Reciprocal Cross Is Performed to Test If an Animal's Trait Is Sex-Linked
    Sex Determination Sex determination, is a system which decides the sexual characteristics of an organism or offspring. It helps to determine whether the organism will be male or a female, which are the two most common sexes. The widely used technique is chromosomal sex determination, in which sex chromosome of male i.e. X or Y chromosome, decides the sex or gender of the offspring. Female carries XX chromosome and male carries XY chromosome. It is also possible to perform genetic tests to eliminate any chromosomal or genetic disorders. Sex determination is the genetic process of determining the sex of the organism. Let us study in more detail about this. Before we understand how sex determination is done, we need to understand the genetic makeup of a human being. As we all know, humans have 23 pairs or 46 chromosomes. Of these 23 pairs, 22 pairs are known as autosomes whereas 1 pair is known as the sex chromosome. It is this one pair that helps in determining the sex of an individual. Sex Determination in Humans Females in humans have 2X chromosomes- 1 each is inherited from either parent and denoted as XX. Males in humans have 1X and 1 Y chromosome, where the X is inherited from the mother and the Y from the father. In a way, we can say that it is the father who determines the sex of the unborn child. This can put to shame a lot of history in which people believed it is the woman who was responsible for not giving birth to a male heir.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Pseudoautosomal Regions: a Review for Genetic Epidemiologists
    European Journal of Human Genetics (2008) 16, 771–779 & 2008 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 1018-4813/08 $30.00 www.nature.com/ejhg REVIEW The human pseudoautosomal regions: a review for genetic epidemiologists Antonia Flaquer1, Gudrun A Rappold2, Thomas F Wienker1 and Christine Fischer*,2 1Institute for Medical Biometry, Informatics, and Epidemiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; 2Institute of Human Genetics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany Two intervals of sequence identity at the tips of X and Y chromosomes, the human pseudoautosomal regions PAR1 and PAR2, have drawn interest from researchers in human genetics, cytogenetics, and evolutionary biology. However, they have been widely ignored in linkage and association studies. The pseudoautosomal regions (PARs) pair and recombine during meiosis like autosomes, but the recombination activity in PAR1 is extremely different between sexes. In men, it exhibits the highest recombination frequencies of the genome. Conflicting genetic maps of this region have been estimated by using three-generation pedigrees, sperm typing, and by using haplotypes from single nucleotide polymorphisms. Male genetic map lengths in the literature vary, and linkage disequilibrium has not been analyzed in detail. We review existing tools like genetic and physical maps, linkage disequilibrium methods, linkage and association analysis, implemented statistical methods, and their suitability for PARs. For multipoint linkage analysis, sex specificity must be indicated twice, first using sex-specific maps, and second by considering the sex-specific pseudoautosomal inheritance pattern. Currently, microsatellite panels and single nucleotide polymorphism chips do not contain sufficient numbers of markers in PAR1 and PAR2. The number of markers in PAR1, needed in indirect association studies, should be much larger than for autosomal regions alike in size, since linkage disequilibrium is very low.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Y Chromosome, in the Light of Evolution
    REVIEWS THE HUMAN Y CHROMOSOME, IN THE LIGHT OF EVOLUTION Bruce T. Lahn*, Nathaniel M. Pearson*‡ and Karin Jegalian§ Most eukaryotic chromosomes, akin to messy toolboxes, store jumbles of genes with diverse biological uses. The linkage of a gene to a particular chromosome therefore rarely hints strongly at that gene’s function. One striking exception to this pattern of gene distribution is the human Y chromosome. Far from being random and diverse, known human Y-chromosome genes show just a few distinct expression profiles. Their relative functional conformity reflects evolutionary factors inherent to sex-specific chromosomes. DIOECIOUS In many DIOECIOUS taxa, karyotype determines sex. To somes. It is curious, then, that one of the shortest Having separate male mediate this developmental decision, sex-chromosome human chromosomes — the Y — might contain the and female organisms. pairs have arisen independently among such lineages longest human genomic region, in which genes show from separate pairs of ordinary autosomes1. The sex only a few distinct expression profiles. To the extent chromosomes of one taxon can, therefore, differ phylo- that tissue specificity reflects functionality, the human genetically and structurally from those of another. The Y thus harbours remarkably low gene-functional mammalian sex chromosomes, for example, are not diversity. In fact, if classified jointly by location and specifically related to those of birds, insects or plants. apparent function, known human Y genes boil down Despite their many origins, the sex chromosomes of to pseudoautosomal loci and three basic classes of diverse life forms are strikingly alike. Ever-hemizygous non-recombining, male-specific loci. chromosomes (that is, the Y chromosome (hereafter the The pseudoautosomal regions (PARs) at the ends of Y) in XY or the W chromosome in ZW systems) tend to the human Y comprise ~5% of its sequence (this frac- be small, gene-poor and rich in repetitive sequence.
    [Show full text]
  • Embryonic Growth and the Evolution of the Selfish V-Linked Growth Factors
    Heredity 73 (1994) 233—243 Received 25 November 1994 Genetical Society of Great Britain Embryonic growth and the evolution of the mammalian V chromosome. II. Suppression of selfish V-linked growth factors may explain escape from X-inactivation and rapid evolution of Sry LAURENCE D. HURST Department of Genetics, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EH, U.K. The mammalian Y chromosome may be an attractor for selfish growth factors. A suppressor of the selfish growth effects would be expected to spread were it to have an appropriate parent-specific expression rule. A suppressor could act by boosting the resource demands of competing female embryos. This possibility may explain incidences of the escape from X-inactivation and provides a rationale for why these genes typically have Y-linked homologues. Alternatively, a suppressor could act to decrease the resource demands of males with the selfish Y. This possibility is supported by the finding that the size of male, but not female, human infants is negatively correlated to the number of X chromosomes. A protracted arms race between a selfish gene and its suppressor may ensue. Both the variation in copy number of Zfyandthe unusually fast sequence evolution of Siy maybe explained by such an arms race. As required by the model, human S#yisknown to have an X-linked suppressor. Preliminary evidence suggests that, as predicted, rapid sequence evolution of Srymaybe correlated with female promiscuity. The case for fast sequence evolution as the product of maternal/foetal conflict is strengthened by consideration of the rapid evolution of placental lactogens in both ruminants and rodents.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudo-Autosomal Region Polymorphism, P. 1 Testing for the Footprint of Sexually Antagonistic Polymorphisms in the Pseudo
    Genetics: Early Online, published on June 3, 2013 as 10.1534/genetics.113.152397 Pseudo-autosomal region polymorphism, p. 1 Testing for the footprint of sexually antagonistic polymorphisms in the pseudo- autosomal region of a plant sex chromosome pair Authors: Qiu S 1, Bergero R, Charlesworth D Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, The King’s Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK All authors contributed equally 1 Current address: State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Plant Resources, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China Copyright 2013. Pseudo-autosomal region polymorphism, p. 2 Running title: Pseudo-autosomal region polymorphism Key words: Silene latifolia, sex chromosomes, pseudo-autosomal region, nucleotide diversity, sexual antagonism Corresponding author: D. Charlesworth ([email protected], +44-131-650-5751) The sequences have been submitted to NCBI with the accession numbers KF019374- KF019629. Pseudo-autosomal region polymorphism, p. 3 ABSTRACT The existence of sexually antagonistic polymorphism is widely considered the most likely explanation for the evolution of suppressed recombination of sex chromosome pairs. This explanation is largely untested empirically, and no such polymorphisms have been identified, other than in fish, where no evidence directly implicates these genes in events causing loss of recombination. We tested for the presence of loci with sexually antagonistic (SA) polymorphism in the plant Silene latifolia, which is dioecious (with separate male and female individuals) and has a pair of highly heteromorphic sex chromosomes, with XY males. Suppressed recombination between much of the Y and X sex chromosomes evolved in several steps, and the results in Bergero et al.
    [Show full text]
  • MEDICAL BIOLOGY PRACTICALS. GENETICS. Practical 5. Sex Determination and Sex Linkage
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327666985 MEDICAL BIOLOGY PRACTICALS. GENETICS. Practical 5. Sex determination and sex linkage. Chapter · September 2018 CITATIONS READS 0 1,797 3 authors: Boris M. Sharga Diana B. Pylypiv Uzhhorod National University 15 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS 60 PUBLICATIONS 85 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Volodymir Feketa Uzhhorod National University 58 PUBLICATIONS 4 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Bacteriorhodopsin production View project Bacillus as antagonists and biocontrol agents of plant pathogenic bacteria and fungi View project All content following this page was uploaded by Boris M. Sharga on 15 September 2018. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. 32 Uzhhorod National University Medical Faculty N2 Department of Fundamental Medical Disciplines MEDICAL BIOLOGY PRACTICALS. GENETICS. Practical 5. Sex determination and sex linkage. By Boris M.Sharga, Diana B. Pylypiv, Volodymir P.Feketa The temperature was regarded as factor of human sex determination (SD) since ancient times. Particularly, Aristotle (335 B.C.E.) naively proposed that the heat of the male partner during intercourse determines the gender of child [13]. Temperature sex determination (TSD) was found in reptiles (crocodiles and turtles) and in fishes [14, 30]. The nest temperature (not male temperature) has effect on SD. For example, nearly all eggs of Alligator mississippiensis incubated at 33°C, produce males. The development at 30°C resulted in nearly all hatching as females [10]. TSD occurs in species with undifferentiated chromosome (ch) Y. The developing gonads in vertebrate have the bipotential genital ridges: the cortex and the medulla.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing for the Footprint of Sexually Antagonistic Polymorphisms in the Pseudoautosomal Region of a Plant Sex Chromosome Pair
    INVESTIGATION Testing for the Footprint of Sexually Antagonistic Polymorphisms in the Pseudoautosomal Region of a Plant Sex Chromosome Pair Suo Qiu,2 Roberta Bergero,2 and Deborah Charlesworth1,2 Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, United Kingdom ABSTRACT The existence of sexually antagonistic (SA) polymorphism is widely considered the most likely explanation for the evolution of suppressed recombination of sex chromosome pairs. This explanation is largely untested empirically, and no such polymorphisms have been identified, other than in fish, where no evidence directly implicates these genes in events causing loss of recombination. We tested for the presence of loci with SA polymorphism in the plant Silene latifolia, which is dioecious (with separate male and female individuals) and has a pair of highly heteromorphic sex chromosomes, with XY males. Suppressed recombination between much of the Y and X sex chromosomes evolved in several steps, and the results in Bergero et al. (2013) show that it is still ongoing in the recombining or pseudoautosomal, regions (PARs) of these chromosomes. We used molecular evolutionary approaches to test for the footprints of SA polymorphisms, based on sequence diversity levels in S. latifolia PAR genes identified by genetic mapping. Nucleotide diversity is high for at least four of six PAR genes identified, and our data suggest the existence of polymorphisms maintained by balancing selection in this genome region, since molecular evolutionary (HKA) tests exclude an elevated mutation rate, and other tests also suggest balancing selection. The presence of sexually antagonistic alleles at a locus or loci in the PAR is suggested by the very different X and Y chromosome allele frequencies for at least one PAR gene.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Information Appendix
    Supporting Information Appendix Radical remodeling of the Y chromosome in a recent radiation of malaria mosquitoes Andrew B. Hall, Philippos-Aris Papathanos, Atashi Sharma, Changde Cheng, Omar S. Akbari, Lauren Assour, Nicholas H. Bergman, Alessia Cagnetti, Andrea Crisanti, Tania Dottorini, Elisa Fiorentini, Roberto Galizi, Jonathan Hnath, Xiaofang Jiang, Sergey Koren, Tony Nolan, Diana Radune, Maria V. Sharakhova, Aaron Steele, Vladimir A. Timoshevskiy, Nikolai Windbichler, Simo Zhang, Matthew W. Hahn, Adam M. Phillippy, Scott J. Emrich, Igor V. Sharakhov*, Zhijian Tu*, Nora J. Besansky* *correspondence to: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] 1 Supporting Information Appendix Table of Contents S1. Genomic and transcriptomic datasets (figs. S1-S4, tables S1-S3) S1.1. PacBio WGS sequencing S1.2. PacBio WGS error-correction and assembly S1.3. Identification and PacBio sequencing of Y chromosome derived BACs S1.4. Male and female Illumina WGS of species in the An. gambiae complex S1.5. Illumina WGS of field-collected individuals of An. gambiae S1.6. mRNA-Sequencing (RNA-Seq) datasets S2. Identification of Y sequences from PacBio WGS (tables S4-S8) S2.1. CQ methods and benchmarking S2.2. Ydb: an extensive catalog of Y chromosome sequences derived from PacBio sequencing S2.3. Comparison of the CQ method to the Y chromosome Genome Scan (YGS) method S2.4. Spatial mapping S3. The An. gambiae Y chromosome contains massively amplified satellites and retrotransposons (figs. S5-S9, table S9) S3.1. The satellite amplified region (SAR) S3.2. The zanzibar amplified region (ZAR) S3.3. changuu S4. Fluorescence in situ hybridization and estimating size of the Y chromosome (fig.
    [Show full text]