DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessing the Impacts of Revising the Tobacco Products Directive Study to Support a DG SANCO Impact Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessing the Impacts of Revising the Tobacco Products Directive Study to Support a DG SANCO Impact Assessment CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and EDUCATION AND THE ARTS decisionmaking through research and analysis. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from www.rand.org as a public INFRASTRUCTURE AND service of the RAND Corporation. TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND TERRORISM AND Browse Reports & Bookstore HOMELAND SECURITY Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Europe View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation technical report series. Reports may include research findings on a specific topic that is limited in scope; present discussions of the methodology employed in research; provide literature reviews, survey instru- ments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; or deliver preliminary findings. All RAND reports un- dergo rigorous peer review to ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity. Assessing the impacts of Revising the Tobacco Products Directive Study to support a DG SANCO Impact Assessment Jan Tiessen, Priscillia Hunt, Claire Celia, Mihaly Fazekas, Han de Vries, Laura Staetsky, Stephanie Diepeveen, Lila Rabinovich, Helen Ridsdale, Tom Ling Prepared for the European Commission Directorate-General for Health and Consumers EUROPE The research described in this report was prepared for the European Commission Directorate-General for Health and Consumers. RAND Europe is an independent, not-for-profit research organisation whose mission is to improve policy and decision making for the public good. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. R® is a registered trademark. © Copyright 2011 European Commission All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the European Commission. Published 2011 by the RAND Corporation 1776 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 4570 Fifth Avenue, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2665 Westbrook Centre, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 1YG, United Kingdom RAND URL: http://www.rand.org RAND Europe URL: http://www.rand.org/randeurope To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Email: [email protected] Preface The European Commission Health and Consumer Directorate-General (DG SANCO) commissioned RAND Europe to provide support in assessing the impacts of revising the Tobacco Products Directive 2001/37/EC. The research conducted by RAND Europe examines the evidence available for the key health, social and economic impacts that could be expected from the implementation of five policy options currently considered by DG SANCO for the revision of the Tobacco Products Directive 2001/37/EC. This research used a variety of qualitative and quantitative methods to assess the economic and health effects of future regulation, including rapid evidence reviews and econometric and health-economic modelling techniques. This report will serve as an input to DG SANCO’s own regulatory impact assessment exercise, which is a mandatory part of the legislative process in the European Union (EU), but the report also provides an up-to-date overview of the evidence and basis for current tobacco product regulation that may be of interest to a wider audience interested in tobacco control policies. RAND Europe’s work is objective, multidisciplinary and based upon the core value of quality. All our products are peer reviewed before final dissemination as part of our quality assurance procedures. For more information about RAND’s quality standards please see http://www.rand.org/standards. For more information about this document or RAND Europe, please contact: Tom Ling RAND Europe Westbrook Centre Milton Road Cambridge CB4 1YG United Kingdom Tel. +44 (1223) 353 329 [email protected] i Assessing the Impacts of Revising the Tobacco Products Directive RAND Europe Contents Preface .......................................................................................................................... i Contents ...................................................................................................................... ii List of figures .............................................................................................................. ix List of tables .............................................................................................................. xiii List of acronyms and abbreviations ........................................................................... xvii Summary ................................................................................................................... xxi CHAPTER 1 Introduction .................................................................................... 1 1.1 The challenge of tobacco ................................................................................... 1 1.2 Tobacco control in the EU ................................................................................ 2 1.3 Tobacco Products Directive 2001/37/EC .......................................................... 3 1.4 RAND Europe’s assignment .............................................................................. 4 1.5 This report ........................................................................................................ 6 CHAPTER 2 Approach and methodology ............................................................. 7 2.1 Approach: supporting an impact assessment ...................................................... 7 2.2 Evidence and literature review ........................................................................... 8 2.2.1 Sources of evidence .............................................................................. 8 2.2.2 Key terms ............................................................................................. 9 2.2.3 Inclusion criteria ................................................................................ 10 2.2.4 Capturing relevant information from the sources identified ................ 10 Qualitative information ................................................................................... 10 Quantitative information ................................................................................. 11 2.3 Modelling of health impacts and healthcare costs ............................................. 11 2.3.1 Data ................................................................................................... 12 2.3.2 Key assumptions of the approach ....................................................... 13 2.3.3 Steps of the approach ......................................................................... 15 2.3.4 Limitations ......................................................................................... 20 2.4 Forecasting future prevalence and modelling macroeconomic impacts ............. 21 2.5 Assessing administrative burden ....................................................................... 23 2.6 Comparing measures and options .................................................................... 26 2.7 Types of impacts assessed ................................................................................. 27 ii RAND Europe Content CHAPTER 3 Background for tobacco use and its health effects........................... 28 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 28 3.2 Tobacco use in the EU .................................................................................... 29 3.2.1 Smoking prevalence is declining in the EU ........................................ 29 3.2.2 Differences among Member States ..................................................... 31 3.2.3 Smoking prevalence among men and women ..................................... 37 3.2.4 Young smokers .................................................................................. 39 3.2.5 Socioeconomic differences ................................................................. 41 3.2.6 Use of different tobacco products ....................................................... 42 3.3 The health effects of tobacco use ..................................................................... 45 3.3.1 Toxicology of tobacco use .................................................................. 45 3.3.2 The link between tobacco use and morbidity and mortality
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Take a Stand Against Illegal Tobacco
    Take a stand against Illegal Tobacco The current state of play Illegal tobacco sales in the UK continue to undermine legitimate business whilst providing criminals with huge profits. The continued availability of cheap illegal tobacco in communities across the country undermines attempts to prevent underage people accessing tobacco as illegal tobacco sellers do not care who they sell to. The smuggling of tobacco is a multibillion pound industry for criminals. The high level of tax in the UK, the large difference in the tax rates between the UK and other countries, and the openness of international borders creates the perfect environment for criminals to operate. Criminal organisations and opportunist smugglers are targeting the lucrative UK tobacco market. HM Revenue & Customs' 2012/13 estimates show that revenue theft could be as much as £2.9 billion.1 For a criminal, tobacco smuggling is relatively easy. Tobacco products come in small packages, are highly valuable and easy to transport; whilst the risks of detection, prosecution and conviction, though improving, are low relative to the huge profits. For example, a single container of illegal cigarettes can provide criminals with a profit of up to £2 million.2 It's clear more needs to be done! Did you know? HM Revenue & Customs estimates show that revenue A single container of illegal theft could be as cigarettes can provide criminals much as £2.9 billion1 with a profit of up to £2 million Illegal Tobacco Explained What is NUKDP? Non-UK duty paid (NUKDP) is a catch-all phrase used to describe cigarettes and roll your own tobacco (RYO) found in the UK that has not incurred UK taxes.
    [Show full text]
  • Tobacco Control Survey, England 2019-2020
    www.tradingstandards.uk TOBACCO CONTROL SURVEY ENGLAND 2019/20 Jane MacGregor, MacGregor Consulting Limited for the Chartered Trading Standards Institute 18 1 Tobacco Control Survey, England 2019/2020: A Report of Trading Standards Service Activity CONTENTS Summary 4 Premises where products were Figure 7: Percentage of test purchase Introduction 4 non-compliant with SPoT 26 operations resulting in illegal sales Context 5 Actions taken 27 between 2008/09 and 2019/20 12 Methodology 5 Actions taken UAS tobacco 28 Figure 8: Underage sales: tobacco - Actions taken UAS NIPs 28 proportion of test purchase operations Tobacco control activities 6 by type of premises 13 Actions taken illicit tobacco 29 Priority given to tobacco control activities 6 Figure 9: Underage sales: nicotine Tobacco control activities 8 Actions taken TRPRs tobacco 29 inhaling products - total number of test Underage sales 9 Actions taken TRPRs NIPs 30 purchase operations and sales made 15 Tobacco products 10 Actions taken SPoT 31 Figure 10: Underage sales: nicotine Complaints and enquiries received 10 Conclusion 31 inhaling products - percentage visits Complaints and enquiries received by Underage sales: tobacco products 31 resulting in illegal sale 15 premises type 10 Underage sales: NIPs 32 Figure 11: Underage sales: nicotine Test purchase operations for tobacco 11 Illicit tobacco products 32 inhaling products - proportion of test purchase operations by type of premises 16 Number of test purchase operations Tobacco and Related Products resulting in illegal sale 11 Regulations
    [Show full text]
  • Qualitative Research Into Ryo Habits and Attitudes
    Colgithomi Associates Market Research Consultants QUALITATIVE RESEARCH INTO RYO HABITS AND ATTITUDES THE DEBRIEF PRESENTATION DOCUMENT Prepared by : Colquhoun Associates Prepared for: Patrick Roozeman, Gallaher Ltd Project Tri,/9834/ GC March 1998 82 Surhiton Hill Park, Surbiton, Surrey KT5 SER Tcl: 0181 399 2741 Fax: 0181 399 7159 Mobile : 0830 256137 Page Number I BACKGROUND 1 II RESEARCH OBJECTIVES III METHOD AND SAMPLE 3 IV MAIN FINDINGS 4 I . Tar and Nicotine 1 .1 Current Perceptions 1 .2 Expectations 5 1 .3 Overall 6 1 .4 Reactions to Levels 7 2 . Tar/Nicotine Matrix 8 2.1 Expectations 2.2 TN Matrix 9 2._'.1 Initial Responses 2.2.2 Subsequent Understanding 10 2.2.3 Summary of Understanding 3 . New Low Tar Proposition 11 4. Tobacco Characteristics 12 4.1 Overview 4.2 Arrival at Preferred Brand 13 4.3 Preferred Brands 4 .3.1 Old Holbom 4.3.2 Golden Virginia 14 4 .3.3 Drum 4.3.4 Samson continental 4.4 Birds Eye Stem 15 4.4.1 Old Holbom Loyalists 4.4.2 Drurn/Samson continental 16 4.5 Moisture Levels 17 4.6 Drum/Samson continental -Potential 19 4.6.1 BES 4.6.2 Moisture Level 5 . Packaging 20 5 .1 Old Holborn 5.1 .1 Pack Shape ". 1 .2 Pack Feel 5.1 .3 Seal 21 I ." Extemal Seal 5.1 .6 Cellophane Proposition _' Golden Virginia 2 3 5.2.1 Pack Shape 2. 2 Pack Feel Wrap Cellophane .3 2 . 5 5 .2 .4 Double Wrap Seal External 5 .3 Drum/ Samson continental 5.3 .1 Pack Shape 5.3 ? Pack Feel 5.3 .3 External Seal 5 .3 .4 Wrap 6.
    [Show full text]
  • 1160-1165/1/1/10 Imperial Tobacco Group
    This Transcript has not been proof read or corrected. It is a working tool for the Tribunal for use in preparing its judgment. It will be placed on the Tribunal Website for readers to see how matters were conducted at the public hearing of these proceedings and is not to be relied on or cited in the context of any other proceedings. The Tribunal’s judgment in this matter will be the final and definitive record. IN THE COMPETITION APPEAL TRIBUNAL Case No. 1160-65/1/1/10 Victoria House, Bloomsbury Place, London WC1A 2EB 10 October 2011 Before: VIVIEN ROSE (Chairman) DR ADAM SCOTT OBE TD DAVID SUMMERS OBE Sitting as a Tribunal in England and Wales BETWEEN: (1) IMPERIAL TOBACCO GROUP PLC (2) IMPERIAL TOBACCO LIMITED Appellants – v – OFFICE OF FAIR TRADING Respondent CO-OPERATIVE GROUP LIMITED Appellant – v – OFFICE OF FAIR TRADING Respondent WM MORRISON SUPERMARKET PLC Appellant – v – OFFICE OF FAIR TRADING Respondent (1) SAFEWAY STORES LIMITED (2) SAFEWAY LIMITED Appellants – v – OFFICE OF FAIR TRADING Respondent (1) ASDA STORES LIMITED (2) ASDA GROUP LIMITED (3) WAL-MART STORES (UK) LIMITED (4) BROADSTREET GREAT WILSON EUROPE LIMITED Appellants – v – OFFICE OF FAIR TRADING Respondent (1) SHELL UK LIMITED (2) SHELL UK OIL PRODUCTS LIMITED (3) SHELL HOLDINGS (UK) LIMITED Appellants – v – OFFICE OF FAIR TRADING Respondent _________ Transcribed using LiveNote by Opus 2 International 1 Bell Yard, London, WC2A 2JR Tel: +44 (0)20 3008 5900 [email protected] _________ HEARING (DAY 11) Note: Excisions in this transcript marked “[…][C]” relate to passages excluded. APPEARANCES Mr Mark Howard QC, Mr Mark Brealey QC and Mr Tony Singla (instructed by Ashurst LLP) appeared on behalf of the Appellants Imperial Tobacco Group Plc and Imperial Tobacco Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Selling Tobacco, Electronic Cigarettes and E-Liquids the Consequences
    Selling Tobacco, Electronic Cigarettes and E-Liquids • You must be registered with the Scottish Government to sell tobacco products, electronic cigarettes or e-liquids by retail. Register online at: www.tobaccoregisterscotland.org/ • It is an offence to supply a tobacco product, cigarette papers, electronic cigarettes or e-liquids to anyone under 18 (even if they claim it is for an adult) • It is an offence for any person under 18 to buy a tobacco product or cigarette papers. • It is an offence for any person over 18 to knowingly buy or attempt to buy a tobacco product or cigarette papers on behalf of someone under 18. • Cigarettes must only be sold in packs of 20 or more. It is illegal to sell single cigarettes. • The sale of cigarettes via a vending machine for use by customers is prohibited. The Consequences of Not Complying with the Law: There are serious consequences for those who do not comply with tobacco sales legislation. Trading Standards Officers have powers to issue Fixed Penalty Notices for offences such as selling to someone aged under 18, not being a registered seller, and not displaying the required notice (see below). The fixed penalty has been set at £200. This will increase by £200 for every offence committed within a two year period. It should be noted that a fixed penalty can be issued to either a sales assistant, the owner of the premises, or both. If a retailer is found to be in breach of tobacco sales legislation three times within a two year period, the local authority can apply to the courts to have the retailer banned from selling tobacco.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Supply of Cigarettes and Tobacco and of Cigarette and Tobacco Machinery
    Report on the Supply of Cigarettes and Tobacco and of Cigarette and Tobacco Machinery Presented to Parliament in pursuance of Section 9 of the Monopolies and Restrictive Practices {Inquiry and Control) Act, 1948 Ordered by The House of Commons to be Printed 4th July, 1961 LONDON HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE PRICE IOJ. 6d. NET 218 MEMBERS OF THE MONOPOLIES COMMISSION R. F. Levy, Esq., Q.C. {Chairman) Professor G. C. Allen, C.B.E. Andrew Black, Esq., C.B.E. Brian Davidson, Esq. Dr. L. T. M. Gray* I. C. Hill, Esq., C.B.E. W. E. Jones, Esq., C.B.E. Ashton W. Roskill, Esq., Q.C* Sir Frank Shires A. S. Gilbert, C.B.E. (Secretary) * Dr. Gray, because of his connections with the machiii^i^ri^idustrv and Mr ROQUIT ^use he was appointed a member during the closing staged have n^l Seen part kifte inquiry. ii CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 PART I. CIGARETTES AND TOBACCO CHAPTER 1. General Background 2 CHAPTER 2. History of the Tobacco Industry 14 CHAPTER 3. The Imperial Tobacco Company (of Great Britain and Ireland) Limited 33 CHAPTER 4. Other Manufacturers 55 CHAPTER 5. Distribution 67 CHAPTER 6. Bonus 82 CHAPTER 7. Conclusions as to the Conditions defined in the Act .. 90 PART II. MACHINERY CHAPTER 8. General Background 92 CHAPTER 9. History and Organisation of the Machinery Industry .. 97 CHAPTER 10. Molins Machine Company Limited: Financial Arrange• ments and Organisation 102 CHAPTER 11. Molins Machine Company Limited: The Supply of Machinery 107 CHAPTER 12. Conclusions as to the Conditions defined in the Act .
    [Show full text]
  • Điểm Khó Khăn Đối Với Chúng Tôi, Vì Nhu Cầu Về Thuốc Lá Đã Giảm Do Một Số Đợt Tăng Thuế Tiêu Thụ Đặc Biệt
    ĐĐIIỂỂMM TTHHUUỐỐCC LLÁÁ TTHHẾẾ GGIIỚỚII TTIINN 0033 NNÔÔNNGG DDÂÂNN && NNGGUUYYÊÊNN LLIIỆỆUU Thái Lan: Cơ quan độc quyền thuốc lá sẽ giúp nông dân chuyển sang trồng cây cần sa 24/02 - Với doanh số bán thuốc lá dự kiến sẽ giảm do thuế tăng mạnh, Cơ quan Thuốc lá Thái Lan có kế hoạch giúp nông dân thuốc lá chuyển sang trồng cây cần sa. Giám đốc cơ quan này, Daonoi Suttiniphapunt, cho biết mức tăng thuế tiêu thụ đặc biệt sẽ được áp dụng vào tháng 10 tới sẽ khiến giá một bao thuốc lá tăng từ 30 - 40% lên ít nhất là 93 Baht. Điều đó sẽ dẫn đến sự sụt giảm trong tiêu dùng, bà này dự đoán. Chính quyền sẽ chống thuốc lá tự quấn, có mức thuế thấp hơn. Dự kiến 19 tỷ điếu thuốc lá sẽ được sản xuất trong năm nay, khối lượng như năm ngoái, nhưng lợi nhuận có thể sẽ thu hẹp còn 400 triệu hoặc 500 triệu Baht so với 900 triệu Baht năm ngoái. Daonoi cho biết chính quyền sẽ hỗ trợ nông dân thuốc lá nếu họ muốn chuyển sang cây cần sa. Việc trồng loại cây này đã được hợp pháp hóa cho các mục đích y tế. (The Nation) Philippines: Lời đề nghị trợ giúp cho nông dân 11/02 - Nếu việc tăng thuế “tội lỗi” tiếp theo được thúc đẩy, chính phủ nên giúp nông dân thuốc lá và các nhà bán lẻ nhỏ đối phó với việc doanh thu có khả năng sụt giảm mà họ sẽ phải chịu, theo một câu chuyện trong tờ báo The Philippines Star trích lời thống đốc tỉnh Ilocos Norte, Imee Marcos.
    [Show full text]
  • The Difference Between Recommended Retail Price And
    Running head: RRP and standardised packaging 1 Title: The difference between Recommended Retail Price and Sales Price for tobacco products 2 in independent and convenience (small) retailers before and after the introduction of 3 standardised tobacco packaging in the United Kingdom. 4 5 Authors 6 Nathan Critchlow1 7 Martine Stead1 8 Crawford Moodie1,2 9 Kathryn Angus1 10 Douglas Eadie1 11 Anne Marie MacKintosh1,2 12 13 Affiliations: 14 1 Institute for Social Marketing, UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Faculty of Health 15 Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland. 16 17 2 Centre for Tobacco Control Research, Institute for Social Marketing, Faculty of Health 18 Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland. 19 20 Corresponding author: Nathan Critchlow, Institute for Social Marketing, Faculty of Health 21 Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland. E-mail: 22 [email protected]. Tel: +44(0)1786 467382. 23 24 Word count: 3,603 25 Table count: 5 26 Supplementary tables: 1 27 28 This article has been accepted for publication in Tobacco Control following peer review, 29 and the Version of Record can be accessed online at 30 https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054409 31 32 1 Running head: RRP and standardised packaging 1 The difference between Recommended Retail Price and Sales Price in independent and 2 convenience (small) retailers before and after the introduction of standardised tobacco 3 packaging in the United Kingdom. 4 5 ABSTRACT 6 Aim: Recommended Retail Price (RRP) is a marketing strategy used by tobacco companies to 7 maintain competitiveness, communicate product positioning, and drive sales.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Tobacco Tax Increases and Industry Pricing on Smoking Behaviours and Inequalities: a Mixed-Methods Study
    King’s Research Portal DOI: 10.3310/phr08060 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Partos, T. R., Hiscock, R., Gilmore, A. B., Branston, J. R., Hitchman, S., & Mcneill, A. (2020). Impact of tobacco tax increases and industry pricing on smoking behaviours and inequalities: a mixed-methods study. Public Health Research , 8(6), 1-174. https://doi.org/10.3310/phr08060 Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan Tobacco International (JTI) 2017 Third Quarter Results
    Tokyo, November 1, 2017 Japan Tobacco Inc. Japan Tobacco International (JTI) 2017 Third Quarter Results Earnings growth remains on track for full year (billions of units, millions of US$) Jul-Sep Change Jan-Sep Change vs. prior vs. prior 2017 2016 year 2017 2016 year 1 Total shipment volume 104.8 104.5 0.3% 298.0 304.2 -2.0% 1 GFB shipment volume 76.0 75.5 0.5% 216.8 216.3 0.2% 2 Core revenue 2,754 2,823 -2.4% 7,895 8,062 -2.1% Core revenue at constant FX 2,717 2,823 -3.7% 7,941 8,062 -1.5% Adjusted operating profit 1,009 897 12.4% 2,747 2,626 4.6% Adjusted operating profit at constant FX 982 897 9.4% 2,868 2,626 9.2% Highlights 2017 third quarter results (July-September) • Adjusted operating profit at constant FX grew 9.4%, driven by cost optimization. On a reported basis, adjusted operating profit increased 12.4% supported by positive currency impacts. • Core revenue decreased 3.7% at constant FX due to negative volume and price/mix variance. Favorable currency movements resulted in reported core revenue decreasing 2.4%. • Total shipment volume grew 0.3% driven by the acquisition in the Philippines. Excluding this acquisition, total shipment volume declined 1.2% mainly due to industry volume contraction. • GFB shipment volume increased 0.5% driven by strong performance of Winston and Camel. • Investment continued in emerging products. Logic, our e-cigarette brand, was launched in Russia. Our tobacco vapor product3 Ploom TECH was introduced in Switzerland in July and was expanded to four US states in September under the brand name Vapeleaf by Logic4.
    [Show full text]
  • TACKLING the SUPPLY of ILLICIT TOBACCO PRODUCTS in ENGLAND 2014 Commissioned by the Department of Health Tobacco Policy Team
    OPERATION HENRY: TACKLING THE SUPPLY OF ILLICIT TOBACCO PRODUCTS IN ENGLAND 2014 Commissioned by the Department of Health Tobacco Policy Team Jane MacGregor, MacGregor Consulting Ltd for the TSI [email protected] Summary and Key Findings Operation Henry is the first large scale coordinated action by Trading Standards to tackle the local supply of illicit tobacco products across England The Operation was developed and managed by the Trading Standards Institute on behalf of the Department of Health. Tobacco detection dog search teams were provided by Wagtail UK Ltd Illicit tobacco products were available in every English region 81 local authority Trading Standards Services took part in Operation Henry; seizures occurred in 67 of those authorities The majority of seizures were made at small retailers, independent newsagents and off license premises The highest seizure rate was in the North East of England with 94% of premises searched revealing illicit tobacco products The lowest seizure rate was in London with 28% of premises searched revealing illicit tobacco products There were 1,855,976 genuine non UK duty paid cigarettes seized o The largest single seizure was 1.4 million sticks detected at a self- store facility in London There were 615, 540 illicit white cigarettes seized with Jin Ling , Pect / Fest, NZ Gold and Gold Mount brands reported most often o The largest single seizure of illicit whites was 87,770 sticks detected at a business storage unit in the East of England The total value of the seized tobacco products was £753,499 o £439,513.68 from the seizure of genuine non UK duty paid cigarettes o £145,766.03 from seizure of illicit white cigarettes o £92,395.52 from non UK duty paid hand rolling tobacco 1 MacGregor Consulting Ltd for the Trading Standards Institute Contents Summary and Key Findings ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Review of Research Exploring the Response of Consumers, Retailers and Tobacco Companies to Standardised Packaging in the United Kingdom
    A systematic review of research exploring the response of consumers, retailers and tobacco companies to standardised packaging in the United Kingdom Crawford Moodie Kathryn Angus Martine Stead Institute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling October 2019 Acknowledgements We would like to thank Dr. Alison O’Mara-Eves and Dr. Dylan Kneale from the EPPI-Centre, at the Institute of Education (University College London), for acting as independent external assessors to conduct critical appraisal of each of the studies included within this review. We would also like to thank authors of the included studies for sharing additional information about their studies with us and our colleagues in the field of tobacco control for alerting us to relevant ongoing studies. The work was undertaken by the authors as part of the Public Health Research Consortium. The Public Health Research Consortium is funded by the Department of Health Policy Research Programme. The views expressed in the publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department of Health. Information about the wider programme of the PHRC is available from http://phrc.lshtm.ac.uk/ Table of Contents What this study adds: .................................................................................................................. 5 Abstract ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]